Mass Theory. The Higgs Hoax
in the two videos, to be seen consecutively we dismount the false ‘media propaganda’ created around the Higgs as an essential particle that gives mass to all the other particles of the Universe. This is blatantly false as Mr. Leonard Susskind explains in his lectures at Standford University. The higgs is a minor particle related to electroweak reactions, one more of the zoo of over 1000 particles known in the Universe. Mass is defined as Nobel Prize Wilczeck explains according to the equivalence principle of Einstein (E=Mc2), as the frequency of vibration of a vortex of space-time. Thus the faster a space time vortex vibrates the more mass it has (such is the case of a black hole turning in its event horizon at the maximal speed of the universe, c-speed). In the same manner a hurricane attracts more the faster it rotates. The videos use the stringent laws of the scientific method and its proofs of veracity (falsification, evidence, correspondence, simplicity, etc.) to compare both theories, Einstein’s principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitational forces that defines mass as the final accelerating gravitational vortex of space-time with Mr. Higgs theory of mass which has never been able to define the different masses of the particles of the Universe and gives a different explanation to the mass-media hysteria about the Higgs: a propaganda campaign needed to sell the industry of accelerators, as Mr. Lederman, the lobbyist of the industry which defined the Higgs as God’s particle says on video: ‘i was a propagandist for the industry’. Thus the industry needed an alibi to keep its huge projects and budgets going and the Higgs was pumped up to divine status for that purpose…
update. November, 2013 Nobel prize
Mass is the attractive, in/forming force of the Universe; and it is merely the last, accelerated, curved motion of the gravitational force. This was explained by Einstein with his principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass/gravitation. Initially, due to the ‘mirage’ of materialism, physicists thought the principle only applied to the external, curving vortex of gravitational forces that sunk into the mass. But the mass as a solid substance was never found and all pictures have seen merely vortices of curved motions.
Now we can explain all this and take further, conceptually and mathematically the discoveries of Einstein, thanks to the advances of complexity.
Till here all seems clear. You will have probably understood what Mr. Einstein meant by a mass as a gravitational vortex, because after all as he put it ‘the Universe is simple but not malicious’.
But there are also ‘malicious physicists, which are not simple’ and try to convert the Universe to its cause. Let us then see what the Higgs is supossed to do to give mass to particles. Explaining in detail as Mr. hauer has done in its conference of the Higgs, the ‘quantum alternative’ that tries to take the place of Einstein: alas! the celebrity particle.
The behaviour of physicists in a crowded social event at a conference is equivalent to the Higgs mechanism, as proposed by David Miller (University College London).
In the graph, the hypothesis that the Higgs also gives mass to particles was an idea that came out later during the marketing of this particle as the meaning of it all, but Higgs was never able to explain how it did it. So since Mr. Higgs did not know what his particle did, a student invented the esoteric Higgs mechanism, which converts particles in humanlike sentient beings. Those particles, represented in the drawings by blue physicists, cluster around Einstein, who enters the room, slowing the scientist’s progress. In this manner they give the scientist mass. But they treat each particle differently. They like some (the celebrities of the party, which have more mass) while other particles are liked less, so they move faster and have less mass.
Of course, this is called… bull$hit. A 13 billion dollar excuse.
Let us now return to serious science and Mr. Einstein’s explanation trying to answer with his model the key question of all this puzzle. Why certain particles like a black hole have more mass, while others like a photon have no mass? It is really because particles are ‘prescient’ and foresee the arrival of a celebrity (they are also conscious) coming to it, distinguishing them? Or something more objective, physical and normal?
Of course something more normal when we describe a mass as an accelerated vortex, whose frequency of rotation gives us like in a hurricane its speed and strength and attractive power. Then all the questions still unknown about mass and energy become solved:
– First, why and how energy becomes mass in that equation, E=Mc2. This is simple Energy is lineal acceleration, mass is cyclical acceleration, thus a mere topological change of the form of motion transforms one into the other. The Universe is eternal, made of motions. And so one becomes the other in the c-limit speed of our space-time membrane.
– Then why antiparticles have inverse time coordinates? Self-evident: they are time vortex that turn clockwards.
– Then, why black holes attract so much being so small? Obvious. The event horizon is the c-limit of speed that curves light into mass. So they turn at c-speed, and they are very small. Thus the frequency of its mass-cycle which is proportional to its speed and inverse to its length is the maximal possible in the Universe.
– And so why black holes DO NOT EVAPORATE?…
There are so many proofs that I wrote an entire book about it… Not only because Mr. Hawking breaks the two principles of Entropy but because ‘clocks of time’, masses do NOT evaporate, they are not ‘temperature beings’ an electromagnetic magnitude, they are NOT quantum particles, also an electromagnetic species. Mr. Hawking believes that there is only a single time in the Universe and black holes can work as time machines. Wrong.
As Einstein put it ‘There are infinite time clocks moving at different speeds’. So you cannot go back into a single past time and kill your grand’father – his time is independent of yours, as all those clock-cycles of the Universe are independent of each other.
Absolute time does not exist. As Leibniz put it, there are infinite time clocks related to each other by their relative simultaneity in a present space in which we measure them equalizing all the times of the Universe with our mechanical clcoks. But physicists understanding of time cycles is so primitive that they have yet still to figure out properly Leibniz and einstein. In any case nothing of all those fancy musings about black holes moving towards the past and evaporating information make any sense. Hawking is so Wrong that the amazing surrealist thing about him is how this kind of hoax can pass as science ‘ the power of the media and military to convert in heroes those who serve their purposes.
Black holes dominate the Universe precisely because they create mass by bending gravitational space into mass-information. They create, don’t erase information. As Einstein put it ‘time bends space into mass’. And mass carries the information of the Universe in its frequency.
But of all this Mr. Hawking understands little if anything at all; it is theory of information, XXI c. Complexity science of which he rightly said would be the science of the XXI c. if we are still here…
The problem is politicians know even less and humans at large are too shy and too entitled to realize they can dissapear in a whisp of time and nobody in the infinite Universe will care.
Ultimately Higgs overblown particle that does NOT give mass to anyone and Hawking’s NON evaporation are the same kind of error: a quantum theorist trying to invade relativity with quantum, false effects.
Why this occur has a simple cause and a deeper cause:
-The deep cause is the misunderstanding of the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, made of ‘planes of space-time’ existence, built as russian dolls are, one over the other. And made of two fundamental elements, from where all others are deduced, lineal motion or space or speed or energy ‘ different perceptions of the same phenomena – on one side and cyclical motion or time clocks or dimensional form or information – on the other side, mutating into each other ad eternal in each of those scales and each entity of the Universe made of complementary systems of energy and information (fields-bodies of energy guided by particles-heads that gauge information)
So the Gravitational space-time membrane with its own space-energy force (gravitation) and its own informative particle-vortex (masses) is DIFFERENT from the quantum scale of electromagnetic particles, made of light-space and charges. They are similar but their laws are NOT exactly the same.
Once this is accepted, (2), there is no NEED to invent fanciful theories. What matters and we are observing constantly in the Universe are the transformations of electromagnetic energy and gravitational energy into cyclical charges and masses, two self-similar phenomena, which can be unified with fractal equations, as they are two membranes of space-time of different size, belonging to the ‘5th dimension’ of fractal scales of space-time (Se x Ti = K), this writer studies in his work.
None of this matters to CERN OF COURSE, neither to the Nobel Committee. We are talking of the industry of technology, not of pure science. Theories are worth a dime, what matters in a technological civilization are the machines you can build. CERN is a concern built over decades. So it is based in ideas that are even older, and if there is ‘bad luck’ as it tends to happen with mammooth old ideas they must be kept for all the wrong reasons – namely they justify the machine that can kill us all. The mind though goes faster than the engineer and so now CERN is obsolete for XXI c. physics but not for jobs and prizes and genocide.
If CERN and its theorists respected Einstein and truth in physics more than technology, they would NOT try to deny his best proved laws of gravitation with fancy musings. And physicists would use more their brains than their hands to understand the Universe. But technology commands theory and because quantum physics and electromagnetism are the industrial sustain of our world cosmological gravitational species are beyond our control, by sheer mass, 99 to 1, quantum physicists which are the bulk of the profession NOT relativists now invade all other fields and study species that do not belong to their ‘ecosystem of particles’, trying to make them ‘believe in quantum’.
In that regard, what we face at CERN is not only an existential problem but an intellectual problem: quantum physicists work with a single arrow of entropy=energy, ignoring all about the sciences of information and the meaning of masses as information, forms, dimensional form; and are halting the development of true science, using the methods of religions and the military to impose their false ideologies of the Universe – censorship, bullying, money and political power. But they cannot censor, paraphrasing Einstein, ‘the thoughts of God’, the laws of the Universe, and the consequences of creating the most powerful, attractive vortices of mass of the Universe on planet Earth´, will be on his words ´the laugh of the Gods. For imposing truth with power´.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE 2012 -on the discovery of the higgs
‘It will be born extremelly small. It shall arise and grow exceedingly fast. It shall have no respect for any created being, but its power shall be such as to enable it to transform everything, from its natural condition into itself’
Abstract. The Higgs and the membrane of dark matter.
The discovery of the Higgs or any other Goldstone boson opens the door to the membrane of ultra-heavy quarks of dark matter, only serious candidate remaining to explain the nature of the Dark World that controls and feeds on ordinary matter in the galactic scale, once SUSY theories have been discharged.
It couldn’t be otherwise. Since the ‘Universe is simple but not malicious’ (Einstein). And so all particles that exist must have a role in that efficient Universe. According to such Occam’s Principle, heavy quarks must have a key role, which cannot be any other but being the components of that all pervading dark, heavy mass world.
In such a Universe teaming with quark condensates, strange and top quark stars, black holes and dark energy, a key factor are the doors that transform the matter of our light Universe into the dominating, 96% of dark matter. Those doors are heavy bosons called generically Goldstone bosons.
Thus, the Higgs is just one of those bosons that transforms our membrane of light matter into the dark matter membrane of heavy quark particles, top quarks, strange quarks and bottom quarks in which it decays.
And if produced in enough numbers it might condensate into an explosive, quark liquid, either a strangelet or toplet that starts the chain reaction we fear can annihilate the world (ice-9 reaction that will convert us into a strange star and gas-9 reaction that will make us into a black hole or toplet star…
In that regard, the Higgs is not the essential particle which explains the mass of all other particles of the Universe (this job is well done by Einstein’s General Relativity and its modern extensions) but just one that ‘transforms us’ into heavy quark masses. And this is the essential lie, today masterminded by CERN, in the past by the lobbyists of the Nuclear Industry, (Mr. Lederman) who have exaggerated the role of the Higgs to obtain fundings for this machine. Now, of course, when the funding is obtained, CERN starts to recognize this fact, as it does in its last ATLAS report, in which it says:
‘ Introduction. The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics [1–4] has been tested by many experiments over the last four decades and has been shown to successfully describe high energy particle interactions. However, the mecha- nism that breaks electroweak symmetry in the SM has not been verified experimentally. This mechanism [5– 10], which gives mass to massive elementary particles, implies the existence of a scalar particle, the SM Higgs boson.’
Thus for the first time in a decade, when all is sold and sanctified CERN recognizes what we have been explaining for a decade: that the Higgs just kills our matter (breaks its symmetry) converting us in massive elementary particles (hence giving them mass), as a transformative state. But it does NOT give mass to particles, as mass is NOT given by an external agent, but a natural condition of any Einsteinian vortex of space-time that attract other particles as hurricanes do, dragging them as part of the space-time flow they absorb. So in this post we shall explain also Einstein’s mass theory and reveal what truly the Higgs implies for mankind – the opening of the dark world of heavy masses which feed on our universe.
Of course, that research entices nuclear physicists so much, that they disregard the surrealist, obvious danger of mass-producing them in our ‘light’ environment – short of creating a Jurassic Park for dark matter particles, here on Earth, to study the ways these lethal virus-like ‘particles’ can kill us, ‘breaking our symmetry’. This again should not surprise the reader if he is aware that Nuclear Physicists have been living with the Fermi Paradox – their responsibility in the future holocaust of the human species – quite comfortably during the entire cold war. So our collective dismissal for them is ‘business as usual’. Another matter though is the attitude of politicians, judges and the P.R.ess who as usual prefer to look to other side and let genocides happen, as long as they are not they are not their direct responsibility and some ‘expert’ is handy to justify it.
So we shall study in this post:
1. The experiment and the chances it really found the Higgs.
2. The nature of a Goldstone boson and how it destroys and feed on our world.
3. The different theories of mass of Mr. Einstein and Mr. Higgs and why the Higgs was blown out in its importance.
4. The obvious conclusion, when we objectively judge the importance of the Higgs and the risks of those experiments: while the finding of a goldstone boson is a landmark of physics, its importance is far inferior to many other experiments in biological social sciences, far cheaper and important for our life in this planet.
Further on, the hunt for the Higgs has two collateral effects that damage both science and life:
– The Higgsteria which for profit reasons has blown up Higgs importance, has also imposed the wrong theory about mass (quantum physics instead of Einstein’s relativity) and stopped all funding and interest in the work of Einstein and its expansion (Absolute relativity, fractal structure of the Universe, mass theory, etc.)
– The experiment can still kill us, and the mere fact nuclear physicists are allowed to keep putting our species at risk is a crime of which all elements of our ‘technological society’ with their blind slavery to the ‘memes of metal’, money, weapons and machines that rule us, are guilty.
Luis Sancho Santa Monica, California
After the discovery of a Goldstone boson that might be a Higgs, we have opened the door to the dark world, whose strongest candidates today, as SUSY has been discharged, are the known known, extra-heavy quarks, which if produced in great numbers will condensate into strangelets and maybe black holes (likely to be top quark stars).
We are now going to mass-produce Goldstone bosons of high energy/mass that decay into strange, top and bottom quarks, called in liquid, explosive form, strangelets, toplets and bottomlets quark-explosives.
Those substances described in the graph, can become mass-bombs able to feed and transform the entire planet into a quark star. We are thus closer to a negative scenario when the production of Higgs resumes in 2015 at an industrial scale. Then, the chances that the particles in which Goldstone bosons transform our electromagnetic, ‘weak symmetry’ world, Top, Bottom, and Strange quarks are produced in enough quantities to condensate into a dark matter liquid explosive will be according to the Totalitarian Law of physics (all compounds that are not ruled out by the laws of physics ‘will happen’) almost ‘certain’.
Finally, we do not see Higgs bosons but its decaying particles, heavy top and bottom quarks and antiquarks that in huge numbers as they will be produced after 2015, will attract each other and condensate into explosive strangelet, toplet or bottomlet liquids, the known-candidates, responsible for the explosions of Novas, Supernovas and quasars.
In that regard, it must be said that this expensive and dangerous tune up is unneeded to explore the Higgs candidate, as we have found it at low energies/masses. So with the present regime of low risk energies, all its properties could be researched. But that won’t change the policy of CERN, since it would mean to accept the existence of those risks, which the company adamantly rejects against the known-known laws of science. Ultimately CERN, as all ‘modern corporations’, never accepts a wrong-doing, always uses a corporative, P.R. Walt Disney type of ‘newspeak'; and so its routine and the need for jobs and future budgets for new accelerators makes unavoidable the upgrade and on the long term perhaps our dismissal by the paradigmatic mad scientist – the nuclear ‘researcher’…
We would wish and have fought for a different future, but the determinism of humanity to ‘go to the end’, on this issue of finding a quite irrelevant particle ‘whatever it takes’, seems to make Mr. Fromm’s statement the destiny of our civilization:
‘Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even if they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics.’
Yet of course ethics deals with survival, the preservation of life. So technological ethics deal with the survival of machines and weapons whatever they do to mankind. And certainly CERN’s LHC seems determined to survive till it accomplish the Fermi Paradox, whatever its collateral damage to mankind is.
Its money-hungry industries and Nobel-hungry physicists will also validate the Merchant of Death’s proposal to end all wars with the peace… of Nirvana: ‘My factories will put an end to war sooner than your congresses: on the day [my weapons] can annihilate armies in a second…”
Mr. Nobel’s justification of its factories of weapons was latter picked up by physicists during the Nuclear race, and renamed the M.A.D. strategy (Mutual Assured Destruction). It was then when accelerators were discovered to research the Atomic and Hydrogen bomb. In fact the first Atomic bomb was an accelerator design, but the unpractical construction of one accelerator, too heavy to fly over Japan scrapped those plans and the machine became the fundamental tool of research of new weapons, in a race between Russia and the US, disguised with a new jargon of ‘Nuclear Physics’ and the ‘search for new particles’ as the ‘Saint Grail’ of knowledge.
This secondary role became the best propaganda for them after the end of the cold war when funding dragged for the Super-Collider, once the ‘red scare’ diminished. It was then when the bright idea of pumping up the Higgs – just the 3rd boson that kills our matter as the Z and W boson do, but NOT the particle that creates mass – into transcendental meaning became the alibi for further funding of this prop of the Nuclear Industry.
Since if the stakes were so high (our annihilation and 13 billion $ of tax payer money) the purpose must be even higher – the finding of the meaning of God, Man and the Universe. And it worked.
So M.A.D. has become now a reality with this new icon of our civilization, the ultimate weapon, but of course in the age of Orwellian Newspeaks, where we don’t go to war but send ‘peace missions’, we are also researching the 3rd horizon of Nuclear weapons, Mass-bombs for peaceful research. Newspeaks change adapting themselves to the Zeitgeist of each age. What does not seem to change is the purpose of our ‘technological civilization’…
If so the resolution of the long standing Fermi Paradox – why despite the abundance of planets there are no signs of intelligent radio-signals or robotic civilizations in the Universe, only the rhythmic tam-tams of pulsars (strangelet stars) and black holes (quite possible toplet stars) – will give reason to the cynical Mr. Fermi, who affirmed nuclear physicists blow up all those planets before they reach interstellar travel or A.I. substitute us – making us into yet another tam-tam strangelet or toplet star. It will also confirm, Mr. Smolin’s theory of a Universe that evolves black holes NOT human beings, though quite in a different way.
(Of course if you are a ‘believer’ on G. Bush, a God Bush of the bronze age, you can always think on the anthropic principle so many ‘serious’ physicists sponsor: namely that we are the ‘chosen’ unique intelligent species of the Universe, designed to host us (-; and so we shall not only find God’s particle but she will rapture us into heavens )-: 0-: To each one its Karma.
I. THE EXPERIMENT AND THE FINDING OF A GOLDSTONE BOSON
On the graph, from CERN’s site, the existence of a statistical bump in the production of photon couples around 125 Gv, means there might be a particle with that mass desintegrating on that zone. Because Higgs equations do not specify the mass of the Higgs boson. Ergo any new particle could be a Higgs boson as we don’t know its mass. But what we know is that the esoteric Higgs mechanism to give masses to other particles, whose equations predict that as the Higgs interacts with those other particles, the boson’s mass fluctuates wildly, have NOT been met. If that particle exists is not fluctuating, ergo it is a proof OF THE NON-EXISTENCE of the Higgs Mechanism and reinforces the view of this researcher and others working on the extension of Einstein’s Principle of equivalence to explain mass that mass MUST BE described with the tools of gravity and Einstein’s work NOT with the quantum alternative presented by Higgs.
So the Higgs is still missing. All what really was found is a bump in the production of pairs of photons, the commonest reaction of the Universe. Thus to ascribe those photons to the desintegration of a specific particle, the Higgs is a wrong logical conclusion, as a pair of photons is NOT an EXCLUSIVE signature of the Higgs. Further more, the specific signatures of the Higgs, the decay of our matter into heavy quarks of the ‘dark world’, top-antitop and bottom-antibottom particles was negative, meaning in fact LESS reactions than expected took place. So what was found? Maybe, the existence of a much more generic type of particles called aproppiately ‘goldstone bosons’, since their ‘magic transformation into Higgs’ will report a pot of gold to CERN (-;
Indeed, once more money wins over science and we falsify the laws of the scientific method and the stringent measures of truth that used to make science different from religion, politics and economics.
Today the need for the Higgs obviates that loop of scientific logic between the premise – there is a bump of photons – and the conclusion – the Higgs among many other particles produced it, despite its specific signatures were not there. Interpretation once more is bend to the needs of the researcher, with the oldest trick of ‘relaxed scientific evidence’, bumpy logic.
But this ambiguous ‘discovery’ paves the way for the money needed to upgrade the machine by 2015 for lead to lead collisions over 10 Tev. Then if strangelets exist their proof will not be a small bump but a big bang…
Indeed, what it has probably been found, a ‘goldstone boson is extremely dangerous. It is the door to the dark world of quark gluon explosives that can erase the smiley, which crossed my face when I read the ‘physics’ of this ‘discovery of the century’ )-:
Im sure all the bosses at CERN have now in their faces a big LOL for having cheated so easily the P.R. Press of not-so ‘expert’ scientific journalists, which once more have swallowed the pill – not to speak of the governments and public that will foot the bill of new waves of Goldstones, threatening to start in this planet a chain reaction of dark matter… )=;
Indeed, the most astounding fact of this conference is not the finding of a goldstone boson, door to the dark world of dark matter, black holes and big-bangs in the making but the 4th clear proof that CERN is NOT an idealist, serious scientific institution but a company of physics of the industrial-military complex, of the nuclear industry, with the same kind of cynicism about truth and wreckless behavior about risks that those industries show – witness the recent independent report at Fukushima.
Indeed, CERN has first denied the fact that if Einstein is right and black holes are formed they will eat the Earth (first denial of truth); it affirmed the machine was safe and known, and within days of switching it, it blew up (second mishap); then it said, too early that Einstein was wrong and neutrinos were faster than light in its bid proper of all quantum physicists to ridicule the master of all themes about mass and gravitation from a quantum perspective, 3rd mishap; and now makes a mockery of the epistemological method and parameters of truth in physics to announce before enough data and signatures are found the particle that justifies the investment. 4 mishaps however have not casted the slightest doubt on this company which risks the life of all of us, or an independent analysis of the risks involved in the ‘adventure’ of entering the dark world of super-energies and super-masses, big-bangs and symmetry breaking (which merely means death of our matter).
That is the collective responsibility of mass-media, which long became mere infotainment, in this affair.
10th july, update.
We were the first to uncover at cerntruth, the day of the conference that the data shown at CERN merely implied the possible existence of a goldstone boson, not the Higgs and his rather absurd theory of mass, but probably the sounder nambu-goldstone bosons of technicolor theory that produce the ‘death of our matter’ into dark matter (technically known as ‘breaking of symmetry’) in the process of predation of our light matter by heavy quarks, forming quark-gluon explosives, strangelets and black holes.
This week a paper has appeared at Arxiv.org explaining the same fact, further proving that CERN behaves as a ‘corporation with P.R. strategies that care nothing for truth and risks. Now, I don’t pretend to be a better nuclear physicist than CERN is, (just a better ‘time theorist’ :) so if I know, the bosses at CERN who gave that conference know they have not yet found the Higgs.
The only difference I believe between those who oppose CERN, who know-know and those who work there, the ‘expert Chenneys’ of the Military-Industrial Complex with their known-unknowns is a question of self-interest, their ‘known’ who fogs their reason.
What they know and care, a budget, the nuclear industry, the need for prizes, makes truth to bend and become unknown or as Nietzsche put it: ‘ The commonest lie is that which one lies to himself’.
Yet the more dangerous of all, and in this Dick was right, are the unknowns-unknowns of the dark world, which the gold stone, the philosophical chimera of ‘knowledge’ will bring here to transform us onto its go(l)d particle. Since all these ‘golden stones’, mind the reader, are specific particles of a process called breaking the symmetry, which is basically a process of death of our matter ‘fed’ into the high density dark quarks through ‘weak currents’ mediated by those bosons.
Update. 4th August.
Atlas now claims a 5.9 sigma in his finding of the Higgs. 2 precisions:
– CERN continues NOT to average to obtain their sigmas, all the channels of the Higgs boson, as it should, merely jacking up the ‘price’ of the channels that show more evidence (diphoton). This cheating trick is also common among economic ministers of certain countries that to hide inflation change the ‘weight’ of each product price in the total average, in favor of those products with lower inflation, as CERN changes the weight of each channel it averages in favor of those channels with higher production. But this is not how serious science is done. Present data still means merely there is likely a goldstone boson but NOT with the peculiar characteristics of the Higgs – a faulty theory that inflates what a Higgs does. So what we are likely to have is the first bosons of the ‘fractal scale’ of dark matter, likely to be made of quark-gluon explosive condensates.
– And this precision is important to understand what we, Relativists have been telling for decades, all along – that the predicted goldstone boson that opens the door to the dark matter membrane does not give mass to all particles, only to heavy quarks, transforming our light particles into them. This in fact is recognized for the first time in the Atlas experiment: ‘This (Higgs) mechanism [5– 10], which gives mass to massive elementary particles’…
We conclude that the importance of the Higgs for knowledge has been upgraded in the same proportion that its dangers have been degraded, according to the Corporative directives of this company and its Media Department, truly ‘expert’ in Orwellian Newspeaks:
Thus, guided by Higgsteria masterminded by the P.R.ess Office of CERN and the expected profits of the military-industrial complex that Nuclear Physics, even in its research arm, represents, mankind will ignore those risks, spend astronomical sums firing up the LHC at higher energies, and building new accelerators to mass-produce Higgs sub-products, H->T+S+B (toplet, strangelet, bottomlet liquids)… And so in a bizarre paradox we shall all risk our lives for the pleasures of studying an invisible entity which never manifests itself, but only shows in a cascade of explosions that will ‘in crescendo’ excite physicists and quantum fluctuations till the dark world transforms us into itself.
And so instead of bizarre theories about the nature of all the matter of the Universe (the Higgs Mechanism in the P.R.ess version), the Occam’s principle has been imposed: the Higgs is a particle that kills and transforms our mass into dark matter, but it does not create mass, an intrinsic property of space-time, as Einstein wanted.
Since ‘ the Universe is simple but not malicious’. A. Einstein. And so we don’t need more particles than the ones we have (3 families of quarks of increasing mass and the different bosons of those membranes), extended in a series of fractal scales of space-time (the quark, inner atom scale; the external, quantum, electro-magnetic, light scale, we inhabit and the bigger cosmic, gravitational scale of dark matter). In that increasingly proved fractal, dual scale Universe, certain doors, describe mathematically how matter and energy travels between scales. These doors are often vortices=particles of a certain membrane of space-time that act as bridges to the other membrane. Such is the case of black holes in the bigger scale and goldstone bosons in the lower scale, which transform our light matter into dark, heavy quarks…
Since indeed, the Higgs is just that virtual state of transformation of mass into heavy quarks, the ‘real’ entities, the goal of the process. And so dark matter will with all probability be made of the known-known heavy quarks of the II and III family; of strangelets and toplet substances, of which strange stars, Novas and probably black holes are made of. Yet the problem of exploring those quark-gluon substances born out of the decay of weak force bosons (W, Z, H triad) in this planet, is that dark matter feeds and controls our matter ‘breaking its symetry’, and transforming electromagnetic energy into heavy quark masses, in a process described by Einstein, M=E/c2, and called a mass bomb. So the research and understanding on how our light, electromagnetic membrane ‘dies’ and evolves into dark matter is as absurd as a researcher enthusiastic about committing suicide, cutting his wrists, to explore the speed of the bleeding flow… Since a extinct physicist knows nothing, mankind would do better stopping the obsession of CERN physicists for the study of the weak currents of energy that those bosons transfer to the dark world, when they break=kill the symmetry of ours.
II. A FAMILY OF GOLDSTONES: WHAT IS REALLY THE HIGGS
Further on, as per Hauer’s conference CERN has neither proved this unknown particle is a boson.
And Photons (we have only seen the decaying photons NOT the Higgs), can decay from many other particles. They are, conceded, often a signature of bosons, any of them, yet even so, it does not take us further than where we were: A) background B) Higgs C) Goldstone.
Conclusion the Higgs is not still found, by any of the minimal methods of veracity and truth, defined in serious scientific announcements, but the world has been convinced it is found. Because the world of media is infotainment. It is no longer serious, not even in an issue of this transcendental importance (not the Higgs but CERN and its machine). And so finally the ‘sheeple’, which believes the press has joined in.
And this is the most fascinating of all facts. How a pointless, ignorant mass of journalists, merely transcribing news have accepted with no criticism the discovery of the century (-;
Fact is Goldstones break the symmetry = kill our matter and this is what CERN studies and this is dangerous and this should be explained in a layman jargon to politicians and the public, who find fascinating that ‘metaphysical symmetry’ talk but understand nothing of what really means.
This is truly the ultimate alibi of CERN or Wall Street, of Nuclear Physicists and Economists: people are more afraid of making fools of themselves, of suffering in their ego, than of death and poverty. So they take this kind of abuse from nuclear physicists as they take it from bankers, just because they use imposing jargons, ‘breaking the symmetry’, ‘collateral debt obligation’, instead of ‘killing matter’ and ‘toxic asset’.
And so with that seemingly powerless trick, c.d.o.s were sold and the need to risk the planet’s existence to study the death of our matter (how nuts this is), were hidden by the beautiful task of studying how ‘the symmetry of the electromagnetic world we live in’ is broken.
But of course the possible goldstone is for CERN, the horn of plenty, the perfect alibi for future funding. So we shall have Higgsterya for long.
The scientific method and its 3 tenants of truth: logic, mathematical and experimental consistency.
So how can we resolve what they have found? If we were to use NOT the ‘corporation’s method’, in this case CERN’s P.R.s doing their campaign to increase their ‘trademark’ and ‘sell’ to politicians the budget for its upgrade, but the experimental, scientific method and its 3 ‘tenants’ of truth, experimental evidence, mathematical consistency, and logic causality, we would come to a self-evident truth:
We have not found God’s particle, the Higgs, but a Goldstone, and no, this is not a silly game of words, but truly another type of particle called aproppiately the Goldstone boson by his discoverer, Jeffery Goldstone.
Let us explain ourselves as always in fractal scales of complexity. In brief. We have a sign, the Gamma ray photons that peaks up at 126 gigas. This means a particle might lurk there, any particle. We have negative signature for the Higgs specific decay reactions – meaning in layman jargon that many particles can become gamma ray photons, any bosons and some others, but certain reactions which were not found, are specific of the Higgs. Higgs decays into->Top plus antitop or Bottom plus antibottom or tau+antitau. And of those reactions in fact at 126 gigas less than expected (negative sigma probability) were found.
So now if I were a serious scientist I wouldnt call a conference for the entire world to affirm that I have discovered a Higgs. This is totally specific and could have only be claimed if the specific Higgs reactions of massive top quarks plus top antiquarks in which the Higgs alone explodes were found.
A serious scientist would have only said that a particle might have been found at 126 and it could be a boson because it had decay in a mode proper of bosons without charge. And this means it could be a family of bosons known for 50 years, called Goldstone bosons, among which the Higgs is one but not the only one and certainly not the likely one by lack of its specific top-antitop decay signature.
Alas the conference should have merely declared that there was a probability of finding a particle, maybe a Goldstone boson, if we were not living in an age of pure corruption that now extends also to hard science, where a corporation which has stacked 10 billion $ budgets in finding a certain particle MUST – not may but MUST – find it.
I’m not sure if I am explaining myself well because obviously I cannot use equations in a blog for scientists and ethical people, but not for physicists, so I will repeat like a mandala those basic ideas, as CERN repeats ad infinitum its dangerous experiments till instead of hitting a gold pot of the stone variety hit a black hole… So let us do a recap.
Recap. CERN might have found a particle, which has not the specific signature of the Higgs, as it did not increase the number of massive quarks created which is what the Higgs only does. It is therefore a possible particle. Because the photonic peak of desintegration tends to be caused by a boson, it might be a boson. This type of bosons are called Goldstone bosons. This is so far what CERN has found, a goldstone boson which due to the lack of signature specific of the Higgs, will likely not be the Higgs but other variety.
The G Particle right on the spot (-: I thereby nominate Mr. Goldstone for a Nobel prize.
The logic and mathematical method. Higgs doesn’t give mass to all particles; it just helps to kill our mass transformed into heavy quarks.
Now, the first leg of truth we need of the 3 ‘sustains’ of any event, THE EXPERIMENTAL METHOD, tells us that the particle found experimentally is probably a boson and likely not the Higgs – no specific signature.
The experimental method has failed and this means that without one of the 3 legs the ‘chair’ of truth will fall. But normally the experimental method fails in serious science, because the logic and mathematical method have failed somewhat. And given the astounding development of computers and hence of mathematical systems, it is normally the logic consistency of the system, which the researcher not the computer must provide ‘a priori’, before ‘doing mathematical physics’, what has failed here. So now we have to explore a bit why indeed the Higgs is not likely the goldstone we found as the specific ‘treat’ of the Higgs is to give masses to other particles. And this is absolute non sense when we apply seriously the logic and mathematical method to Mr. Higgs theory of a weak-force boson that exists only in the ‘border membrane’ between the light world and the dark world, giving mass to all the particles of our Universe.
If we strip the Higgs of that falsity however it becomes a more regular goldstone-type boson. And this is likely what we got. So let us imagine, when things calm down and more experiments are carried to the risk of our lives (if a B.Hole appears and Einstein is right this circus is over) that many more goldstones of whatever specific type are found, tabulated and proofs of their bosonic nature appear. This means a new particle related to the W and Z and electroweak forces is found, which should be called a goldstone boson, G.
This is what we have, the G particle not the Higgs.
And this is the likely answer by the scientific method because logically the Higgs does not give mass to all the other particles of the Universe; it is not the key element to explain the meaning of mass.
Then Mr. Goldstone as Mr. Nambu, the co-writer of his work, prior to the Higgs (merely a specific variety of the Goldstone boson that does very weird things according to Higgs that no other boson does, like giving mass to electrons, something which has never been even described properly in mathematical terms), would be Nobel candidate, and as Nambu, receive the Nobel prize for his work on the electroweak force and its breaking of the space-time of our Universe (the so called symmetry breaking which merely means our universe is broken and fed into the universe of dense masses, which of course we fear it will happen not only in a single goldstone boson but in enough quarks to blow up us all).
Of course, this would be science as it used to be done before the age of audiovisual celebrities, ‘big science budgets’, ‘damned lies and statistics’.
Penrose writes me in a private email that goldstone is ambiguous in his papers about the existence of the Higgs mechanism, latter explained in more detail,… no wonder why.
Indeed, even if the results are proved the goldstone boson we shall found it does not have the Higgs mechanism. It will not give mass to light particles that form our world, electrons and light-space, and light quarks, nor there is a single explanation on how it could do that, which is the fundamental ‘theoretical lie’ of CERN: to have blown up the importance of the Higgs, a particle related to the weak force as other heavy bosons, the Z and the W, but NOT the meaning or explanation of mass, provided by Einstein’s work on gravitation. In that sense, the H, properly called G will complete the triad, W, Z, G, of intermediate states that break the symmetry of our space-time membrane absorbing our energy and transforming it into heavier mass, to give birth by its final decay to the densest quarks of the Universe (b, T). A mass which enters the accelerator accumulates energy, and then E=Mc2, as that energy coils into a vortex of gravitational mass, through those transitional W, Z, G states ends up becoming a massive quark.
This is really what there is to the Higgs. And yet, because it was needed so much money and the idea of finding yet another particle of the zoo of nuclear physics, was not relevant enough (more or less it was like asking 10 billion $ to fund a project to find a new, wonderful ant that could explain the meaning of the Universe). It took a lot of chuptzah and ambition to take the bold step of rejecting the much more promising advances made by relativists on the steps of Einstein’s work and accepting the weird Higgs Mechanism to explain mass. And because you cannot force-feed science it simply doesn’t work.
This absurd affirmation- that the Higgs gives mass to all particles of the Universe – vehemently denied by those who follow Mr. Einstein’s work on the strong principle of equivalence is just another attempt as those Mr. Hawking with its evaporating black holes, to invade the territory of Relativity, Cosmology and gravitation, described by Einstein, with Quantum theories that are not fit to explain gravity. It is like explaining physics with biology or history with the Newtonian laws. It simply doesn’t work.
But power has expanded quantum theories into all those realms as power has expanded ‘monetary values’ to invade all ethic values. So now the ‘values’ and laws of quantum theory MUST explain also mass, regardless…
Again, of this, few are aware, as quantum physics represents 30% of the world GDP and Relativity 0%. So in terms of money, Relativistic research is not exactly in the same league. But that doesn’t mean Mr. Einstein’s cosmological discoveries are invalidated by money and the number of theorists of each discipline, which obviously will defend their point of view. Am I inventing a confabulation theory? Not, of course, apart from the one century old standing arguments of Einstein vs. Bohr, which has made Einstein’s work ‘fair game’ for quantum physicists, this bias must be explained with the simple facts of economics. There are two main branches of physics, relativity and quantum theory. Relativity deals with all things related to mass, gravitation and the cosmological, macroscopic scale of the fractal Universe. Quantum theory with all things related to electromagnetism, particles and other forces of the microscopic Universe. Both theories therefore relate to two different scales of space-time and in the fractal discontinuous space-time models which are slowly but steadily displacing the continuous, standard model expanding our concepts as nothing has done since Galileo, those scales are ‘self-similar’ (a fractal, systemic concept) not equal. So there is no quantum gravity, and so we give ‘to the Caesar what belongs to the Caesar': gravity and mass belongs to Einstein.
No Higgs is required when we understand Einstein – a Goldstone maybe, for the limited work of converting us into dark matter.
In quantum physics the point of view is that forces are mediated by particles exchanged between fermions. But this applies to electromagnetic forces. Gravitation is an in/formative, one way only force. And so it is a vortex of space-time that attracts as hurricanes do, the faster it turns till the limit of rotational c-speed in black holes, the most attractive. In brief, mass is, an intrinsic property of a vortex of space-time.
The Higgs deals with the weak force at quantum scale if it exists, with roles similar to the Z and W bosons and so not the panacea of anything. Just another particle. The jump needed to complete the standard model is the understanding of fractal scale time, not the attempts by quantum physicists of invading Einstein, following the one century old quarrels between Einstein and quantum physicists and specially the fact that 30% of the world GDP comes from quantum physics, as we are closer to that sclae than from relativity which deals with the Universe. So the overwhelming number of jobs and experts in the physics world are quantum theorists and they need to theorize and expand their field, taking over other fields.
So the conclusion is: Yes, a particle, the last boson of the triad of heavy bosons that transform ‘light’ matter into dense quarks has been found. No, it is not the God’s particle, and probably it will not end up being the Higgs but any of its predecessor theories (Nambu-Goldstone bosons) which completed the role of the W and Z particles in the ‘destruction of our mass’, reconverted in dark matter at the LHC. In that regard, its discovery merely is a new step in that steady and ultra-dangerous entrance into the dark world of ultra-heavy, maybe hyperluminal particles of dark energy and dark matter responsible for the death (symmetry breaking) of light matter.
Recap. Of all the different mathematical, self-similar theories that describe this ‘Goldstone boson’ (which was the real name, given also the ironic concept of a ‘gold stone’, that indeed converts stones in this case particles into pure gold for the researchers), the most interesting are Nambu’s work, since they describe most clearly the process of death of our matter and its transformation into heavier particles. So the particle will probably be, according to the laws of the scientific method a Goldstone-Nambu particle, G.
And that is extremely dangerous for us, one more step into the dark world of top predator matter that kill ours, breaking the symmetry (synonimous of death and transformation of our world of light space into dark mass.)
Since Goldstones of any variety, indeed transform all what they touch into dark matter, top-antitops, bottom-antibottoms, heavy quarks, the explosive substance of Novas and supernovas, black holes and strange stars, the most likely candidates to the 96% of dark mass, which dominates the Universe. Now we know there is one particle that can transform us into ‘them’, now we have the puzzled almost complete, now we have the boson of the dark world calling at our doors, and the purpose of cern will be from here onwards to produce enough Gs to populate the accelerator of tops and bottoms and strange quarks and charm quarks, the quark-gluon explosives that can destroy the Earth.
In Nambu’s and self-similar formulations (technicolor, Top color, Higgless theories, etc.) you don’t need an invisible field that nobody observes, which breaks the main laws of epistemology (Occam’s razor, the Universe is simple and so the simplest explanation is truth), but merely the top quark, the top predator mass of the Universe, feeds on our mass breaking our symmetry and the process implies 3 intermediate states of that mass, as W, Z and G particles that live so little that cannot really be considered real but just virtual states of transition; as when water freezes and there is in between a state of water/ice. So when light matter becomes top quark dark matter it freezes into mass through those states.
In essence, you exist in a light-space Universe, made of electromagnetic and light particles (u-d quarks). This is the first family of mass. As always in the fractal Universe there are 3 families of ‘evolution’ of any system, which implies an increase of its information parameter. Those are the 3 ‘states’ of any ‘field of space-time’. And their reason of existence is simple. You live in a Universe of two parameters energy and in/form/ation, form, and so energy transforms into information and then when all is information, it explodes and dies.
For example, molecular matter is first energetic gas, then becomes balanced, exi, liquid and finally solid, informative, formal mass. And then the big-bang explosion of mass devolves it back into pure energy.
You live a young, energetic age, reproduce in your maturity your energy and information and then warp, become formed, informative in your 3rd age and then die in an explosion.
Well matter also has 3 families of increasing information till arriving to the top quark, which probably condensates stars into top quark stars, aka black holes of self-similar mass-density through a big-bang explosion of death of a star. And the transformations of states require to ‘break the symmetry’ of our matter and make it into W->Z->H which ‘decays’ into Top-antitop, or Bottom-antibottom quarks.
But the idea that those particles of a ‘different space-time membrane’ of higher density and energy and mass (the dark world of black holes and strange stars), also give mass to all the other particles of the Universe, including electrons, which are all over the Universe in the thin membrane of light-space, even without materializing (as nowhere in our light universe there are those energies), constantly is so aberrant than only the complete despise of one of the 3 foundations of the scientific method, experimental, logic and mathematical evidence, by modern physics can explain why people ‘believe’ this.
Indeed, mathematical consistency in this case exists in several theories. The Higgs is the less consistent, Nambu’s the more. So there is a possible 3rd heavy boson. Experimental evidence now is important, but CERN has falsified it to make it look like a HIggs. Indeed, of the 5 channels that desintegrate a Higgs, the 3 specific of the Higgs (transformation into top-antitop, bottom-antibottom or tau-antitau particles of heavy mass), have not occured, in fact they gave negative sigma values meaning that they found less reactions that expected on the specific signatures of the Higgs: – 2.5 for tau, – 2.3 for bottom and so those negative sigmas cancelled most of the positive sigmas and make the discovery NOT specially relevant to identify the particle precisely as the Higgs.
In that regard the corruption of truth by CERN, the lack of ethics of this company that endangers our life for nothing, the entire mindset of this company is much closer to that of the ‘experts’ in finances of Goldman than the idealistic myth those researchers have built around themselves. It is a new low in the nuclear industry’s trade mark mixture of arrogance, ignorance and cult to death. Those particles are about the death of our matter not the meaning of the Universe. And yet mankind needs a religion to die for, a goatkeeper’s god of the bronze age, a tribal nation that denies the unicity of the homo sapiens, or now a meaningless particle that only can bring the kindgom of Kali to the Earth…
III. EINSTEIN VS. HIGGS: EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE: MASS AS A VORTEX OF SPACE-TIME.
The conclusion is obvious: if the Higgs boson really exist, at its real value face is a rather secondary particle, not the particle of god or the giver of mass). Since neither the Higgs or any other quantum theory explain the mass of particles… Let us then end, resuming at the simplest possible level why Mr. Higgs particle is a hoax that does not give mass to other particles and the correct theory of mass is that of Mr. Einstein.
(For those audiovisually inclined we have resumed those themes in a ‘humorous video’ with plenty of information on the difference between Mr. Einstein’s work on mass, and that of Mr. Higgs and Mr. Hawking. )
Einstein’s mass theory
In Physics, according to Einstein the information of a particle is its mass. This can be easily proved theoretically, mathematically and empirically.
In the previous pictures of masses as vortices obtained in bubble chambers (beg. article) tthere is an obvious empirical proof. All pictures of masses and charges appear as vortices with an accelerated inward motion. Let us now deal with the other proofs (and let us remember that truth in epistemology of science is based in 3 pillars – empirical, logical and mathematical proofs.
Einstein’s Mathematical proof
The mathematical proof is simple, given by the 2 main equations of Einstein, which relate the frequency of information (a time parameter), the mass and the energy of physical systems:
ExT=K, E=Mc2, hence M=K/T=Kv; where v is the frequency of rotation of the vortex of mass.
Thus a mass is a vortex of space-time that carries the information of the Universe in its frequency.
This also has empirical proofs: All vortices attract inwards with a force equivalent to the strength of the rotating vortex. So a hurricane attract more when it turns faster. And so a mass, which is a hurricane of space-time attracts more the faster it turns. Moreover vortices of all kind are ‘accelerating’ inwards: Vo x Ro = K, which means that the shorter the radius is, Ro, the faster its speed, Vo, so the closer you come to the vortex, the faster it turns, the more it attracts, the stronger its gravitational force is, and the more mass it has.
Einstein’s Conceptual proof.
Now this simple equation is in accordance with Einstein’s Principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitational force. Both are the same in General Relativity. And so why we should stop this ‘comparison’ at a certain point of the accelerating vortex? Since in the Universe we have never seen ‘substance’ but only motions, it is logic to think that what we call a mass is exactly that: the final region of acceleration into a vortex of gravitational forces. Such vortex obviously offers a resistance to motion (inertial mass), which is dependent of the speed/acceleration of such motion.
But what type of accelerated motion? Well it turns out that there are only two accelerated motions, lineal and cyclical accelerations. Further on, accelerated motions can produce forces that ‘work’. And Newton gave us a simple equation to describe ‘all’ the forces of the Universe: F = M (cyclical acceleration) x A (lineal acceleration). This is fascinating because it means that the Universe is made of 2 accelerated motions: F = M x A, where A is lineal acceleration or ‘energy’ and Mass is a vortex with more dimensional form, or cyclical acceleration, whose form and frequency carry the in-form-ation of the Universe.
Of course when we enter into deeper analysis of the mathematical details, a mass vortex is more complex. Einstein described it with a set of equations that go beyond the scope of this introduction. But there is a different version of those equations much simpler – the gravito-magnetic version found by Heaviside, recently proved experimentally by a Probe, which are mimetic from the equations of electromagnetism.
And so since charges are obvious accelerated vortices of electromagnetic forces, it is self-evident that if masses produce a self-similar field system, they will be accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.
As Einstein put it ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’. And so there you have, the 3 simplest, more important equations of Physics, F=m a, E=Mc2, E=hv and then the more complex, equally essential Maxwell and Einstein’s equations come all together to accept mass as an ‘internal’ property that define mass and hence need no further fields and esoteric particles to be explained.
And indeed, the fact that Einstein’s equations can be written as electromagnetic equations is also the key to the unification equation of the G and Q Universal constants of charges and masses as two vortices of two self-similar forces of two different fractal scales of the Universe – one of the most striking advances of marrying the extended Principle of Equivalence and the recently proved fractal nature of the Universe – the true paths of modern research in mass theory, which the thunder of CERN cannot silence…
Because of course, and this is the beauty of science – you cannot corrupt a scientific truth, you need to prove it with the tenants of truth of epistemology and the scientific method…
And so it is left to proof the ‘Einstein Mechanism’ just the empirical proof… Look around you, every single vortex in the Universe attracts and every particle is a vortex; look around you, because it is an intrinsic property of every particle we do not need to find any new field, any new boson, anything… just what you see is what it is.
Theoretical. In essence Mr. Hawking as Mr. Higgs never understood Einstein, despite of making a living on denying him. Mr. Hawking believes that there is only a single time in the Universe and black holes can work as time machines. Wrong. There are infinite time cycles and you cannot go back in time, as those cycles are independent of each other and so you can only at best move backwards a time cycle. Second he thinks black holes evaporate information. Wrong. Black holes precisely create mass by bending electromagnetic space into mass as we have explained. They create, don’t erase information.
Mathematical. What did Hawking gets wrong in his equations? The two principles of Entropy he denies, when he affirms information evaporates. But also when he thinks that an ultra-hot ‘born’ black hole, in an ultra-cold Earth’s environment is going to break the first law of thermodynamics and become a perfect machine, as it becomes even hotter evaporating. Instead the hot item cools down and evaporates the external world – our world. This any high school student knows it. Or else your coffee will evaporate and the cup freeze. Now if you interpret his equation without this conceptual error, the result is obvious: the black hole will be born exceedingly hot and so the smaller it is the faster it will evaporate the surrounding environment.
Indeed, in simplified terminology Hawking says: Mass = Konstant/Temperature.
And when we reject his entropic error enclosed in the way he dynamizes that equation all is clear: The black hole is born at maximal temperature, with minimal mass, but as temperature diminishes, its inverse parameter, mass grows, POINT. This self-evident truth is what I could not deny for theoretical and ethical reasons and got me into this nightmare (1). Why then physicists defend this absurdity? It has to do a lot with non-theoretical reasons (celebrity, mass-media, industrial profits, CERN’s policy, etc.) but also with the way ‘complicated’ arguments have always impressed people, who without fully understanding them accept it. The jargons and complicated mathematical arguments used by Hawking and other quantum theorists do that work. It is like the banker’s speech on toxic assets. That is the name we have now ‘after’ they convinced us of their enormous value. The ‘black hole factory’ is the proper name of the LHC but that won’t be accepted ‘after’ as a matter of fact, it evaporate us.
Experimental. We never saw one evaporating. All feed on mass – the faster the smaller the born black hole is. And this is proved by Novas, which grow so fast after the birth of a micro-black hole seed in his interior. And it is proved by recent observations of small black holes which are far more active than big ones. So one it is born it will grow at c-speed swallowing the Earth within seconds.
– So why light has no mass? A tautology: Light does not close a cycle, but it is a wave that deflects the cycle into an open wave. Hence it never has mass. But if we were to calculate its mass in terms of energy the higher the frequency of the web (analogous to the mass frequency) the more mass-energy it has.
– Then there is the scalar, fractal structure derived of the homology of the equations of charges and masses which however exist in two different scales. This is a key discovery for the fractal structure of the Universe and proves one of my fundamental mathematical findings: the unification equation of the G and Q Universal constants of charges and masses as two vortices of two fractal discontinuous scales of space-time, the quantum, smaller world and cosmic upper scale.
And we will return to that at the end of this article, when considering in depth the consequences of upholding and evolving Einstein’s theory of mass, instead of seeking and absurd scalar particle that explains so little…
– Finally, why the Universe accelerates between galaxies? It is accelerating and will end into pure entropy? No. Self-evident. Physicists ignore the meaning of information and mass and they have a continuous theory of space. None of that works anymore. As each time cycle ‘breaks’ space into an inner and outer region. So do the time cycles of the Universe of which the biggest clock is a galaxy that ‘warps space into time-mass’. So the acceleration of space between galaxies is balanced by its warping within them. And both balance each other: gravitation informs light-space into mass vortices, galaxies. And then light-space the substance of which our space is made, once it abandons the galaxy, stretches his frequency (doppler effect as ‘real’) till its ‘generational time cycle’ of around 10 up to 10 years dissolves it back into non-perceivable, lineal, gravitation with no form. But this and so many other fascinating results of a proper theory of time cycles require more knowledge of physics that I expect a non-physicists to have, so we shall end here the simpler version of Einstein’s mass theory.
We don’t need the Higgs. The Higgs is just a mathematically poorly constructed theory that Nuclear Physicists have sold out to an audience – the establishment of the military-industrial complex… What people should understand is this: even if the Higgs was found it is only a particle related to certain reactions of the ‘temporal, informative force ‘par excellence’ of the Universe – the weak force that trans-forms particles; but it is NOT the particle that gives mass to all other vortices of space-time (aka particles), neither explains as we have done the obvious relationship between mass and size of the particle (Max. Mass = Min. size by virtue of the inward accelerated motion of any vortex) which is the rule that differentiates the different weights of each particle.
So why we need Hawking’s evaporation?
In that regard, what we face at CERN is not only an existential problem but an intellectual problem: quantum physicists work with a single arrow of entropy=energy, ignoring all about the sciences of information and the meaning of masses as information, forms, dimensional form; and are halting the development of true science, using the methods of religions and the military to impose their false ideologies of the Universe – censorship, bullying, money and political power. But they cannot censor, paraphrasing Einstein, ‘the thoughts of God’, the laws of the Universe, and the consequences of creating the most powerful, attractive vortices of mass of the Universe on planet Earth.
We really need it to survive. Since, now with the new propaganda machine greased and funds coming, we might have them coming in 2015 at 14 tev. The problem is the Universe doesn’t need it. And the Universe takes primacy over man, and this neither prophets and scientists of lately it seems, seem to understand.
Nobody really believed in Hawking when he published. Then as he became famous and an industry of popular physics, it became tolerated. Only when CERN needed it to prove itself ‘safe’, it became dogma not to discuss his work and simplistic negation of basic laws of physics.
But all this is not only to be blamed on physicists. They are defending their way of life at CERN. It is the people who blindly believe them as experts. Like the bankers who ab=used mankind in this crisis printing money for free because people do not understand how money is printed, physicists are abusing us because people don’t understand their maths. That is why I have made them so simple to you. In the future updates of this post, we shall develop the entire model in the themes concerned with mass and Einstein’s upgrade with more mathematical rigor. But what matters is to depart from sound conceptual analysis, which is where people and Higgs fail. Then once you have a wrong concept, maths can take you to any conclusion, as in both cases.
The funny part of it…
is that now the wrong concept is a fact – not the existence of a Higgs which might be truth after all, but we need seriously much more data for that, but the idea that the Higgs gives mass to all particles, which merely pumped up its importance to get funding going. And so an entire planet has a new religion – the Higgs.
This is funny of course only for non believers, like ‘the Life of Brian’ is funny, but physicists take this kind of truths very seriously like the Brianists do :) So the Higgists will fight to convey new methods to prove such a blatant lie and that is funny. You see an entire new type of twisted scholastic logic is needed for the task.
And so now the entire information industry, corrupted long ago by the military industrial complex and the celebrity circus and the ignorance of its practictioners etc.etc. will have the task to spread the belief and teach in their text books the ‘good news’ that the celebrity particle and the Higgs Mechanism have completed our understanding of the Universe – now we know it all! (the Einstein’s Mechanism of course does NOT exist officially, but I’m sure he would be amused as a pantheist with this new pan-psychism of those socially conscious electrons and approve :)
Good luck. I can imagine the teacher sweating and the students practicing the celebrity ‘move’ dispatching his text books right to his head at c-speed…
Im sorry but i can’t help it, LOL…Right now thousands of ‘research journalists’ who research by the chimpanzee method, wiki, copy and make some happy sounds, gee, gee… They must be now all chatting about the astounding advancement for the human species of having found the celebrity particle that prescient, socially conscious electrons love to chat with too…
What started as a joke between Master Magician, Leo Lederman, and a few colleagues on how to sell an accelerator, when the Nuclear Industry was in its lower moments has become now a dogma. In this ‘fantaphysical world’ constructed with evaporating black holes, invisible fields that however are everywhere giving mass to the tiniest electrons with a mammooth particle that only comes out of 5 trillion collisions examined, 1 in a trillionth, mind the reader. You and everything else has mass because the celebrity particle that only appears once in a trillionth is busy-busy giving mass to trillions of particles… Uhm, at 1 event for each trillionth of particle collisions, the time it will need to give mass to all the particles of my ‘trou noir’ is longer than the life of the Universe! I Lol… The eschatological sense of mankind, the search for the absurd, the disgusting, the tragic, death and the absolute all conveyed by that word reaches now new heights in this endeavor. What Weinberg called the ‘Toilet particle’ before it was needed to accelerate fundings and Lederman, the biggest lobbyist of the nuclear industry, in search for hundreds of millions of $ sold the toilet… of God to Reagan (-:
“The God Particle’ (p. 23): “The Higgs-Boson is the primary reason for the building of the super collider”
‘Those who impose truth with the tools of power, will be the laugh of the Gods‘ Albert Einstein, true discoverer of the meaning of mass.
2. Unfortunately, we live in an age of ego trips, based in human authority not in objective laws of science, as if humans have forgotten that ‘who matters nothing in science’, it is all what, how and why.