RSS

Author Archives: futureofhistory

About futureofhistory

I am a scientist, known by a few peers for authoring the Mathematical and Logic formalism of the Science of General Systems, an organic description of the Universe and all its similar parts, as a network of systems of energy and information, which follows a 3000 year long 'intellectual search', proper of the Latin, Southern European culture whose worldview is based on: - Man as the measure of all things - hence the Universe and all its parts, as a complex, fractal organism... - And reason, based in logic not in belief as the language of truth... Origin of true democracies based in the power of the ethic, verbal law, the biological language of the human kind. As opposed to the now Globalized, Mechanist, North-European culture of corporations, which makes: - The Machine the measure of all things, including men and the Universe, described as mechanisms. - And believes on memes of metal and Biblical religions that separate humans into chosen of go(l)d and not chosen. Origin of capitalist societies in which the digital languages of money and machines are considered superior to those of man and today rule and direct the planet towards the evolution of those selfish memes of metal, disregarding any collateral damage they might cause on mankind. Most of my books are only published in Spain, but you can read my scientific work on my kindle books googling my name or reading the webs: http://www.economicstruth.com for the models of Humanities and http://www.generalsystems.wordpress.com For the models of Natural Sciences and http://www.cerntruth.com and the film quantum roulette at http://www.lhcdefence.org on my activism against the nuclear industry Luis Sancho, Santa Monica, California, Barcelona, Catalonia.

Chronicle of death foretold

INTRODUCTION: LHC, A FACTORY OF STRANGE MATTER.

‘Strange matter does not exist; so there are no risks’ CERN’s safety report to the world, on why we shall not worry.

‘If strange matter exists and it appears in this room it will swallow the Earth in a few days’ Cox, CERN’s spokesman, on why we shall not worry.

“Every particle not forbidden is compulsory’ Totalitarian Principle, Gell-mann, Nobel Prize, discoverer of quarks. On why strange matter DOES exist and we shall worry.

‘The most likely candidate for the dark matter of the galactic halo is strange quark matter… the most stable of the Universe.’ Witten, father of M-string theory, Fields medal. On why strange matter DOES exist and we shall worry.

New CERN Collisions shows novel phenomena: “As the number of particles produced in proton collisions increase, the more of the so-called strange hadrons are measured.”

Alice/cern experiment; paper released on April, 2017, only for die-hard specialists. On why strange matter DOES exist and we shall worry.

“On the day they were going to kill him, Santiago Nasar dreamed he was going through a grove of timber trees where a gentle drizzle was falling, and for an instant he was happy.”

‘Chronicle of a Death foretold’. Garcia Marquez, wor(l)d master. On the thing that matter, which are NOT of matter.

•••••••

This site is dedicated to CERN’s dangers for Mother Earth, its lies and alibis as this nuclear factory relic of the cold war explore higher levels of entropy that the planet can support, with the making of strangelets and black holes.

This is the praxis of its flag machine, the LHC, ultimately just a quark cannon. 

Yet as all mankind except a very few number of scientists supports CERN with unbridled enthusiasm, there are 2 other aspects to take into account: the theoretical element; as CERN claims as an alibi that justifies the risks that it will advance the future of science, with his exploration of the big-bang, which is not truth; and yet because the world believes that to be the case, we need to explain, the cultural & economic element, the origin and purpose of our technological civilisation, which makes possible to construct machines that can destroy us all. And finally, a personal chronicle, as I was a decade ago the main plaintiff, with a few scientists, in a series of highly publicised suits against the company, which failed to warn mankind and do the proper reviews of risks for the industry.

For those who don’t read physics, visually oriented, an easy explanation is our film ‘strange matters’ that explains from a historical, scientific and philosophical perspective, the non-future of the Earth due to the progress towards higher energies and more explosive big-bangs, natural to the very essence of the Industry of Accelerators (a clear dual fruit of the tree of science, which brings diminishing positive fruits and increasing negative benefits since its inception as the main tool of research of nuclear weapons):

 

In August 2014, a refurbished RHIC, a smaller machine than the LHC, distillated the first atoms of strangelet in NY. At that point the Industry should have been halted, as we halt the chances of global pandemics when we spot a sprout of a viral contagion. But alas! a virus is biological, ‘life’ but a ‘strangelet’ is a material virus; and since we live in a civilisation that denies life and worships mechanisms, the ‘religious zeal’ of our Nuclear industries completely ignored the obvious: that unlike a virus which would kill a few humans but not ended the species, a material virus, like the strangelet could eat up the entire Earth.

In Christmas 2015 the LHC at CERN doubled its potency, and this year 2017 has increased luminosity (density of collisions), to FINALLY fully entering the regime of constant production of dibaryons, an usdusd stable, quark hexagonal form, the ATOM of strangelet matter (the strongest configuration of Nature, from honeycombs to Buckballs to graphene sheets). The nuclear reaction that could convert the Earth into a rock of strange matter, the most stable in the Universe, though requires a critical mass to explode and so it will take time for it to fall to the center of the planet – unavoidable given its huge gravitational mass – and there rest waiting for companions till it starts the global pandemics, eating up inside out the planet.

Let us then consider in more detail the three risks LHC experiments represent for mankind, from major to minor:

1.Creation of strangelets – lumps of strange quarks shown to be very common in the Universe, as all pulsars seems to be frozen, strange quark stars. This risk is absolute, meaning that according to the ‘Totalitarian Principle’ of physics, all particles that can theoretically happen will happen. And strange quark matter will theoretically happen, since the LHC is merely beyond ‘speculative theories’ a quark cannon, which produces massive quantities of strange quarks at high energy regimes.

2. Creation of baby black holes that do not evaporate, either as top quark condensates (Einstein’s famous frozen stars) or string stars with higher dimensionality. This risk has been overblown by media, since it is less likely and black hole theory has still a ‘mythic, speculative’ side that allowed them to divert attention from the truly, well-proved, scientific catastrophe:

3. Finally the magnetic field of the LHC, the strongest on planet Earth, which cause disturbances on the Earth’s magnetic field, cause of Earthquakes that have increased till record numbers, similar to those of II World War during the carpet bombing of the pacific seismic ‘ring of fire’, since the machine was put on line in a continuous growth. There is indeed a pattern studied in other posts on the web of LHC’s starts and increases of energy followed by massive volcano and earthquake activity.

In the past decade of LHC activity, both earthquake and volcano activity have reached peaks not seen since II world war, when the carpet bombing of the Pacific ring of fire, clearly increasing its activity. In 2015 with the previous upgrading, 7 major volcanoes started eruptions within hours, and a massive earthquake taking place in Nepal…

Any of those 3 scenarios should have deterred CERN’s physicists and its political backers, from upgrading the machine to double potency in 2015, and do the 2017 upgrading of luminosity and energy of proton collisions, but physicists and the P.R.ess considers the issue closed and prefers wishful thinking to ethic and social responsibility… in a very inconvenient truth much more dangerous for the Earth than global warming or Islamic terrorism.

We study in the documentary above the consequences for mankind of this new regime of energies and experiments, analyzing in detail the errors and lies of the outdated 90s safety report of the Industry, which still affirms strange quark liquid is a ‘gas’, ignoring  the liquid nature of what the accelerators are producing, misconceives the nature of cosmic rays (lonely atoms that cannot form a critical mass of strange liquid) and denies the most widely accepted hypothesis about the nature of quark stars, and quark dark matter present in the galactic halo (Witten’s hypothesis of strange quark matter), affirming that ‘strange quark liquid’ does not exist in the Universe. While in 1990s there were not absolute proofs, today we believe it is the main component of nova explosions, pulsars, the galactic halo and it is being produced at those accelerators with the enormous risk for the humankind.

So conveniently the industry, which is preparing the first collisions at CERN this summer at full potency, doubling the energy and hence the risks of those experiments, does not upgrade the report, not to warn mankind of its likely outcome: the production of enough strange matter to start an ice-9 extinction (creation of a critical mass of strangelet able to convert the Earth into a pulsar):

dark-matter-copydece4155ba

In the graphs, developed in detail in the different posts of this web, we show the 3 distinctive Life extinction events that the Large Hadron Collider – a quark cannon that throws bullets of the densest, most explosive material of the Universe, quark condensates – can cause, once it has doubled potency in Spring 2015, over the 10 Tev barrier of creation of dark matter  and increased enormously its density of collisions this year 2017-

 

I. THE LHC

A QUARK CANNON AND ITS RISKS FOR MOTHER EARTH

Why we are so sure of the dangers of CERN for the planet? For epistemological, sociological, mathematical and experimental reasons:

I. Epistemological Risks

The essence of science is precisely its predictability and capacity to verify true from false theories. And at present those 3 fundamental threats of damage to Earth are sound truths of known-known physics, while the theories that dismiss them, such as the evaporation of black holes or the denial of its existence are neither proved not founded in sound theoretical background. 

Thus those risks are real, as the creation of particles in accelerators follow the Totalitarian principle of Physics, which translates the certainty of the Laws of Nature to particle physics. The principle states that ‘Every particle not forbidden is compulsory’ – meaning that everything that might happen in the realm of particle creation MUST happen. And since quark condensates, strangelets and toplets are theoretically sound and should be formed over 10 Tev, they must happen.

The Totalitarian Principle – a Universal law that applies to all natural sciences – means that in the same manner when you put fire on water it always boils with a 100% of chances, because the laws of Thermodynamics (heats move from the hot fire to the cold water) are ALWAYS RIGHT, are NOT probabilistic, any particle that can exist will certainly be formed in an accelerator under the right proportion of energy, which for the two particles that can extinguish us, black holes is 10 tev and for Strangelets is a quantity of strange quarks known as the ‘bag threshold’ also around 10 Tev, the barrier of entrance into the ‘dark world’ of ultra-powerful ‘mass bombs’ that once formed feed on all type of light matter.

The Witten hypothesis.

Moreover, the MOST ABUNDANT produce of LHC TODAY, is ‘strange quark liquid’, a mixture of uds matter which is created in growing lumps as the luminosity and energy of those collisions increases. This strangelet matter however is vehemently denied to ‘exist’ as the ‘official position’ of CERN, despite the fact that it remains the most likely candidate to form the heavy dark matter that surrounds the galaxy, and accounts for 90% of its mass (halo), according to the laws of the scientific method (economicity, efficiency, Ockham’s razor) as it is the simplest concept, based in a known known particle, for which the efficient, economic Universe should have a clear role. Hence Edward Witten, the most prestigious physicist alive, father of Super-String theory affirmed earlier in his career, it should be the main candidate to form that halo, born of the transformation of planets and stars into strangelets, since it is also the most stable matter of the Universe, one formed in enough quantity – a mere question of energy upgradings by the industry of accelerators. The Witten hypothesis is still the most accepted one among profesional physicists, as the continuous stream of professional papers testifies. 

The Fermi paradox.

Finally if that is the case, it would be the only ‘logic solution’ to the mystery of the Fermi paradox – why in a Universe teaming with planets, there is not Intelligence and/or robotic colonisation? What extinguishes life before the threshold of Interstellar travel?

Thus we introduce in this central post, those themes, studied in great detail in the side articles, as well as the sociological, military, industrial reasons, and human ‘ego-centered’ beliefs that make possible those experiments to continue, despite all those obvious warnings, easily dismissed by the power of Nuclear physicists, in an age of ‘revivalism’ of nuclear weapons sponsored by war-monger politicians.

Thus the different quark condensates that the LHC can produce and can extinguish us are bound to happen when the proper conditions of energy are met in 2015 when the machine is upgraded over the 10 Tev barrier, shown in great detail in the previous graph:

1)  CERN should therefore produce a heavy condensate of quark liquid, either strangelet, bottomlet or toplet. The possibility is so high that even CERN recognizes in the ‘CASTOR papers’, it will make them with a 70% of chances, (contradicting all its public statements). There are still some uncertainties on a factor called the ‘bag’ factor – meaning the stability of those quark condensates will depend on the numbers of heavy quarks that are created on those collisions (the more quarks, the more they will attract each other and form quark-gluon explosive condensates). The numbers of quarks to make strangelets stable though will keep growing as the ‘luminosity’ (density of bunches of quarks collided) and energies of the collision needed to create those heavy quarks (as energy becomes mass, E=Mc2) increase. So each ramping of luminosity and energy will increase those chances.

Indeed Mr. Penrose, a British physicist, from a prominent family of outstanding scientists, hence ‘evidently’ void of any possible ‘personal agenda’ (as the rest of us is, activists against the LHC are; but unlike us not so easy to submit to an ‘ad hominem’ campaign’,  since his father co-authored most Hawking’s papers; reason why  his name, site and activism is kept ‘anonymous’ by the P.R.ess) discovered a secret program within CERN, dedicated to the production and analysis of those ‘strangelets’, CASTOR, which the organization vehemently deny. Indeed, CERN denies it can produce strangelets  – but it has constructed a detector, CASTOR, because it considers quite likely them to appear in internal memorandums as this power presentation shows, to the point of building such a special detector for them:

In the graph, ‘Team Castor’ has built a Calorimeter to detect the production of strangelets at CERN. The probability for each event, according to inner documents, like this powerpoint presentation, implies that CERN will produce 500 strangelets each month starting the 11/9 of this year, when the first pb-pb collisions take place. Standard literature on strangelets explains what will happen next: strangelets will grow, absorbing quarks and transforming our matter into ultradense strange matter, till reaching the size of an atom (albeit with a huge density). Then 2 common processes of Nuclear reactions can take place: fission of the strangelet into smaller pieces that will grow again, starting a nuclear reaction called ‘ice-9’, or catalysis as the huge charge and mass of the strangelet attracts atoms that lump on the surface creating more strangelets.

In the fall of 2015 CERN will begin colliding groups of 70 million lead hadrons at 287 tev, unpacking millions of quarks in each collision. Those quarks will be first accelerated at light speed, acquiring relativistic mass, becoming heavier strange quarks, the substance of a strange quark-gluon soup called a ‘strangelet‘. The strange liquid has the potential to become stable and start an ‘ice-9′ big-bang reaction. If that happens that effectively transforms the Earth into a pulsar.

While CERN adamantly denies to the public and the press that production of Strangelets is possible, it runs a program called CASTOR for Centaruro And STrangelets Object Research, whose researchers affirm in their inner reports to the company the ‘likely’ probability of creating them. This is in accordance to the most advanced literature on the subject, but of course, it must be hidden to the public and the naive press…

This simple fact – that CERN is just a quark cannon that deconfines and gives heavier mass to quarks, transforming them into the next ‘horizon’ of heavy mass, strange quarks, which eat up planets might seem amazing to the reader, submitted to the ‘rhetoric’ of research and the blatant lies of this institution, a left-over the cold war, ‘refurbished’ with a newspeak of research. But this is the bottom line, simple truth about CERN. CERN says its experiments are similar to cosmic rays, and this is false.

Cosmic rays are mere single protons and gamma rays and electrons, light particles, NOT heavy lead atoms, massed in bunches, crashed to create quarks. So WE NEVER saw a deconfined quark in a cosmic ray.

But none of those truths have made it to the mainstream world of politics and power. They let them do it. And so now that the ion-ion collisions and its dibaryon production is on line a global silence covers the risks.

The black hole scenario

2) In 2015, when the LHC ramps up to 14 Tev, it will cross the 10 Tev barrier in its collisions, so it will make possible the creation of black holes, since it will be creating a massive amount of top quarks, the densest substance of the Universe, likely component of black holes (same density), but again CERN disguises this fact talking only about the Higgs (a by-product of the collision of top and antitop quarks) or rather God’s particle (using the well-known pseudo religious jargon of nuclear physicists, which during the cold war acquired with massive propaganda the undeserved status of ‘high priests’ of science to justify with ‘knowledge’ the risks they poised to mankind.

In 2015 the LHC will accelerate protons and hadrons at maximal energy, colliding them at over 1 Pevproducing heavy, bottom, charm and top quark-gluon liquid condensates, aka Higgs, possible substances of black holes. The quark-gluon soup it will produce will be far denser and attractive than strangelet liquid, hence the process of accretion of the Earth will be self-similar to the strangelet event but much faster.

Those collisions have the potential to create micro-black holes and top quark condensates (the real Higgs). The top quark condensates have properties similar to black holes, which according to Albert Einstein will not evaporate, rather convert matter (the Earth) into a 3 cm Black Hole or Frozen star. What Einstein defined as a mass-bomb, since he deduced his equation, E=Mc2, first in its inverse form, M=E/c2, thus foreseeing the existence of energy collapsing into mass.

Experts consider that beyond such barrier black holes will be produced, if:

– String Theory is truth (9 out of 10 physicists believe so).

– Thermodynamics are truth, as its 2nd law implies that an ultra hot black hole born in a cold environment, the Earth, will transfer us heat evaporating us. This contradicts Hawking’s belief, never proved experimentally that ultra hot black holes will evaporate absorbing heat from our cold world, because they ‘will travel to the past’ (Sic). Time travel TO THE PAST, has never been proved.

– And/or if Black holes are not mere mathematical objects but real objects as recent observation show. This was Einstein’s theory, reason why they are also called ‘Einstein’s frozen stars’. On that view they are ultradense, fermion condensates made of a cut-off substance of the same density, which are top quarks.

I advanced decades ago this hypothesis as a top quark star would be exactly equal in properties to a black hole. Einstein believed black holes could not be just a mathematical equation, but needed a real substance, which can only be, among the particles we know today, the top quark, with self-similar properties to a Higgs – which is produced by a top/antitop quark couple. Because then top quarks were not discovered Einstein could not explain them in detail. But he will be proved once more right. Now since the LHC will start massive production of top quarks in 2015, they might easily condensate into small black holes.

Thus if Black holes are frozen top stars, they will not evaporate because top quarks don’t evaporate. If Einstein is right they will not evaporate, because relativity means that ‘size’ doesn’t matter, it is relative and so in Einstein’s theory black holes of any size grow exponentially. As today, we have multiple proofs that Relativity theory is truth and none of black hole evaporation. So standard science proves Black holes will swallow Earth.

Further on, in Haifa (left image), 2 years ago, an homologous of a black hole, a Dumb Hole made of atomic condensates, 1 million time slower, that should have evaporated producing phonons instead of photons, didn’t.

Now in science because there is only a Universe, there is only a true theory for each fact. Each property requires a theory so several theories that describe several theories could be right. String theory, Thermodynamics, the principle of conservation of energy and information and Relativity, all proved right means we are in a ‘Totalitarian’ case. Black holes and strangelets will happen.

There is NO probability that a law of science is truth or false. It CANNOT be both things at the same time. So probabilities are either 0 or 100. If Thermodynamics are truth, we shall die; if string theory is truth we shall die; if the thresholds of energy for creation of black holes and strangelets (10 Tev, bag) are truth we shall die.

Many people are confused by this ‘error of knowledge’ which CERN exploits shamelessly saying that the ‘probability’ exists but it is small. This is due to a faulty understanding of quantum physics, in which there are probabilities REGARDING our capacity to observe a certain particle. But the particle IS there, if the theory that describes it and the events that create it happened. It is also due to an error in the perception of the factor that defines the occurrence, ‘when’.

‘When’ is the only ‘statistical’ fact we might argue, as collisions must met certain conditions of precision to accumulate quarks enough to create those particles that cannot be measured except by statistics – as we know we will get a double six throwing dices ALWAYS, if we keep throwing dices, but we cannot know in which throw, ‘when’ this will happen. We know it will happen because it is a fact that there are faces with 6. Point.

When you heat with fire cold water there is NOT A PROBABILITY that might or might not get hotter. It WILL ALWAYS because the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is truth. Point. ‘When’ it will boil, the time/quantity variable is the only question. So it is in the case of black holes/strangelets, when, the time/quantity variable depending on how many quarks we pack in those collisions, depending on how precise is the collision is the only variable we don’t know but it is NOT really a variable.

As with dices, if we had all the information about the throwing, we would know the bounces of the dice and the final position; if we knew all the information about the trajectory of each particle we would know how precise is the target collision. If we could see closer – without interference with our instruments – the quantum particle, we would see its position. We illustrate this common error of laymen regarding quantum physics, shamelessly exploited by CERN in our article on the famous case of the ‘Schrondiger’s cat’ paradox. If we repeat the experiment several times, the cat will certainly be dead.

So the when is what we can generously argue, which will increase with the ‘throwing of dices’, the number and energy of the collisions. This CERN knows. It knows it will create Strangelets and it gives CASTOR a 70% probability of detecting them. It knows it will create black holes and so it gives Hawking’s bizarre theory that denies the laws of Einstein’s relativity and thermodynamics a 100% chance as a ‘dogma of truth. Or as his Chief Theorist, Mr. Ellis put it in a recorded conference, to his ‘students’ and ‘workers’ all of them tied by confidentiality contracts ‘you must believe in Black Hole Evaporation’.

Thus if under 10 Tev in the regime that could find a Higgs we have taken 5 years to find it when we made a good collision, it is safe to say that between 2015 and 2020 the LHC will throw enough dices/particles to create under the Totalitarian Principle a strangelet or black hole that will certainly extinguish us if any of those laws in which most science is based that have always proved right are right (Relativity, Thermodynamics, Time arrows, conservation of energy and information.)

In this manner The Totalitarian Principle shall explain The Fermi paradox or absence of intelligent life in a universe teaming with planets. Only the Totalitarian principle explains it, meaning that ALL planets reach the technology of LHC before they reach interplanetary travels and ALL of them attempt the experiment that ALWAYS blows the planet into a Nova creating a pulsar (a strangelet star) or a Supernova, creating a black hole.

We shall study in this web in depth those theories, the reasons why CERN hides all this information (obviously not to loose jobs, prestige and contracts from the military-industrial complex), the reasons why physicists back them (same reasons plus the desire to prove their ‘bizarre theories’ about black holes, travel to the past, etc. the cosmic proof that this will happen (The Fermi paradox) and the human infantile, self-suicidal nature proved in the past that tends towards our self-extinction.

May 2017. An important year for LHC clearly has increase the chances that the Schrodinger’s human cat will die.

  
A new  year with upgrades that have started production of strange atoms exponentially (see picture above) with a better injector and a remarkable boost on density/luminosity in the collisions.

So obviously strange matter dybarion production is ‘falling’ and increasing the critical mass in the center of the planet, increasing the chances of triggering an ice-9 reaction, as dibaryons are stable, known-known to be produced right now at LHC and so dense they all fall to the same point of maximal density close to the Earth’s center. So while a single ‘shot’ of this poison to the EARTH, hence to Mankind is like the schrodinger cat a small probability of collective genocide, each new experiment means an accumulation of probabilities as it would happen every time the cat ‘triggers the hammer’.

I.e. as in the Schrodinger’s cat experiment; while a cat pressing the poisonous trap has a 50/50 chance to be dead or alive; as the cat keeps pressing the poison trap more times, the chances he/mankind is dead when we open the ‘Pandora BOX’ will grow:

EVERY year the LHC keeps producing more strange matter falling to the center of the earth, the chances grow and at the end, the human cat will be dead. Because once the reaction starts, the pandora box open – we cannot resurrect the planet; we cannot go the centre of the Earth and stop the reaction.

Now, a strangelet is nothing strange, it is merely a ‘lump of strange quarks’. And we know those lumps of strange quarks, once formed devour our lighter, simpler up and down quarks. THIS IS BY FAR the most risky, and with the upgradings of 2017 an astounding dangerous ‘phenomena’, as we warned but CERN always denied, is happening. Not only strange quark atoms are being produced, but they ARE growing exponentially, eating up our matter, hinting that we only need the right quantity of them to provoke the self-sustained ‘ice-9 reaction’ that will convert the EARTH into a 15km rock of dark matter:

The astounding fact about that graph, with the red strange matter atoms running amok in exponential growth, is that NOBODY is explaining that we are now on the verge of a catastrophe, whenever a new boost of energy produces enough of them. The official version is still that strange matter does NOT exist.

As it happens, the LHC once its ‘goal’, the irrelevant Higgs has been found and nothing else is discovered, it  has become just a ‘quark cannon that produces lumps of strange quarks, and soon it will produce strangelets”. Hence our change of title for this blog: ‘Indeed, a chronicle of a death foretold’ which was dismissed without a proper scientific, political and ‘risk’ assessment and now is merely hidden as ‘data’ in obscure physical magazines.

The LHC is a cyclical, ‘never-ending’ cannon barrel, that accelerates  lead ion ‘bullets’ every cycle, the heaviest non-radioactive atom with more quarks, with two purposes: to increase the mass of those quarks transforming them into ‘strange quarks’, and then collide them to make ‘strangelets’, strange quark condensates.

The LHC is JUST A FACTORY of strangelets, and so when it goes on line at full potency, will just mass produce strangelets

Thus strangelets now all seems to indicate it will be made at CERN between 2017 and 2020 on collisions over 10 Tev. Then those strangelets will fall to the center of the Earth undetected (which will excuse CERN from responsibility, AS IT will deny it produced them till the end), and it will eat up  the Earth inside out, till it converts it into a 15 km. strangelet rock.

Indeed as the graph shows the LHC has clearly started production of stable quark combinations among them dibaryons, whose density and absolute stability clearly points to the formation of the ‘bag of strangelets’ in the centre of the Earth, where they should be accumulating as we speak, required to start up the ice-9 reaction, within the next decade of increasing, ‘schrodinger’s cat’ experiments.

So it is imperative to close the facilities and decommission the industry of accelerators, a relic of the cold war with no real use for mankind.

Of course easier done that say, as other clear cases of human foolness we seem to be a species who cannot ‘get it till it happens’. ‘The world is littered with corpses of wars everybody thought would never happen’. Said a reputed British historian. And then all said ‘I told you so’. But as this war cannot be chronicled a posteriori, as nobody will be around to ‘told you so’, it is needed to ‘foretold the chronicle of our death in advance’… The pictures is indeed a clear proof which needs only a bit more of energy to land the nail in the coffin. The cat so we speak will like death inside, the box will crunch and there won’t be anyone to certify the experiment was a success.

The Earthquake scenario.

 How we will know the Earth is being killed?

Those 2 events have different speeds: black holes, observed in the cosmos, cause a fast big-bang explosion, which we will hardly notice before becoming part of it. Strangelets should be slower. They should fall to the center of the Earth eating it from inside out. In that case, the process will be signaled by an increase in Earthquakes and volcano activity. The final proof will be the existence of a series of +8 earthquakes in the Richter scale.

Yet even before the Earth crunches by strangelets or black holes that do not evaporate, the LHC might already be causing earthquakes, as we anticipated years ago, given the fact that it causes a gravitomagnetic field, the only one on Earth today.

Gravito-magnetic fields are caused by c-speed mass cycles, as the LHC is and they provoke disturbance on (Earth’s) magnetic fields… which is the known-known recognized cause of earthquakes.

2012 year is in fact was the second year on number of big >7 Richter scale earthquakes on record, after the carpet bombing of II World War, during the pacific campaign that bombed the ‘ring of fire’ – also a man-made year of earthquakes.

Then after the machine ended its ion run and the gravitomagnetic c-speed mass cycle it was creating, earthquakes quickly diminished. The pattern thus is obvious: earthquakes have peaked during the period the LHC created a gravito-magnetic ring on Earth, to the level seen when carpet bombing destroyed during the II world war the islands of the ‘pacific ring of fire’.

Then also earthquakes diminished when world war ended.

So the cause-effect pattern is self-evident. LHC’s run create gravitomagnetic waves that disturb the magnetic  field of Earth, causing earthquakes.

Yet the ‘P.R.ess’ which considers a taboo any criticism of nuclear research ignores those facts and gives as only explanation, when it gives any… ‘Fracking’. But Fracking takes place only in oil fields mostly in North-America, where none of those big earthquakes have happened. And Fracking keeps growing, while those earthquakes have diminished. And Fracking only causes small range earthquakes.

Conclusion. According to the Totalitarian Principle, the laws of entropy, the laws of quarks, the laws of Einstein and Relativity, of the 4th and 5th dimension, the risks to the Earth are real and CERN should be the cause of our demise as a species in planet Earth.

 

II. PRACTICAL PROOFS HOW IT WILL BE.

 To be or not to be, that is the question. Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles. and by opposing end them? To die’  Hamlet, W. Shakespeare. On life and the things that matter.

‘He didn’t talk of people, but of things that truly mattered, machines, roads, weapons, factories.’ Goering, on the leader of the Great-Grand-Germanic military-industrial-nation and the things that mattered to make German great again.

In the previous paragraph we studied the theoretical known-known models of the Universe that offers 3 scenarios of damage to planet Earth that should happen under the Totalitarian Principle. What are the experimental proofs that this scenarios will happen?

As in the case of any other ‘certain risk’ to planet Earth, such as Global Warming, we cannot take a decision on ‘experts’ trusting their dictums because today ‘experts’ are paid to back the agenda and interests of corporations. Such is the case of CERN, who authored the risk reports breaking all the laws of independence required for such reports. We thus must trust the authority of reason as the ‘reasons of authorities’ are bent to the interest of the company and the natural fear of scientist to the ridicule of catastrophism. Since if the risks are certain and the Earth is blown up, nobody will reward those who warn us, and if not experts will be ridiculed and loose their scientific prestige for ‘failing’ in their predictions and attacking the most powerful institution of big science. In other words, experts are ‘hijacked’ by the ‘violent’ nature of those experiments that can kill us. And so in the same manner there are few reports on the military industry and its risks to mankind, there are few reports on CERN risks. And yet from the point of view of reason and scientific truth, the Shakespearean question has only an answer:  It will be…

The industry of accelerators, where nuclear bombs have and will be researched in a small scale, will continuously upgrade its energy, as part of the process of evolution of weapons, regardless of its collateral benefits for particle research and finally will create strangelets or black holes, under the Totalitarian principle.

Why we are so sure? Once the fact that the Industry continuously upgrade its power and no institution or political group dares to oppose firmly the nuclear industry, and once the theoretical proofs are clarified the only ‘leg of truth’ required are experimental evidence. And there are at least 2 experimental proofs:

– If black holes appear there will not be black hole evaporation since no black hole has ever been found anywhere in the galaxy to evaporate, despite 40 years of research and the fact that if they were evaporating, they will do so in a explosion of gamma rays easily detectable.

The second experimental proof is also very strong. it is called the  Fermi paradox or lack of intelligent life on the Universe, Fermi the author of the first nuclear bomb stated flatly that we see no life on the galaxy because the evolution of nuclear weapons cause its demise. This is also the explanation given by most scientists that seek for life on the galaxy. In the past religious groups affirmed the cause was that we were the only planet with life, but now we have found so many planets thanks to the Kepler satellite that this possibility no longer holds. And yet none shows life, neither human or robotic life, which would have long ago colonized the galaxy. All radio waves come from black holes and strangelets – strange stars called pulsars.  So indeed planets and stars become strangelets and black holes (something also theorized in the organic models of the fractal Universe developed by this author with the metrics of the 5th scalar dimension of the Universe).

Thus, by the experimental proofs of the Fermi paradox and the Fermi satellite that has found non evaporation of black holes and the continuous streams of galactic news about pulsars, strange stars and black holes, likely top stars, the evolution of the Nuclear Industry and its quark bombs will blow up the Earth.

So now that we know with quite certainty that destiny awaits… Let us study the factual signs that the 3 scenarios of catastrophe produced by the LHC on mother Earth are happening:

– The strangelet scenario of creation of a strangelet ‘pulsar’ star as all those we see on the cosmos, by creation of a strangelet particle that will swallow the Earth

– The black hole scenario of creation of a micro-black hole of ultra hot temperature that will evaporate and attract our weak electromagnetic world.

– The milder scenario of an increase in Earthquakes, caused by the magnetic ring of CERN, the strongest magnetic ring of planet Earth that disturbs its magnetic field (disturbances of those fields cause earthqueakes).

The mass’ c-speed gravitomagnetic ring: Earthquakes and volcanic activity.

The first hints that the LHC is seriously damaging life on Earth which we predicted in 2007 –  an increase on earthquake and volcano activity – are now facts.

 This  is due to the fact that the LHC is creating a powerful gravito-magnetic field, a ‘ring’ of charged, massive particles that can interact with the magnetic fields of the magma and Earth’s center.

Disturbances on the Earth’s magnetic field by the magnets of the LHC and specially the charged positive c-speed flow of protons come through 3 different processes:

– The 27 kilometers continuous ring of charged protons can interact with self-similar charged flows in the magma or earth’s center, creating a powerful electro-magnetic effect, displacing magma and causing earthquakes and volcano activity. It is a fact that the first day that the charged, proton ring was created in 2008 it caused 4 significant Earthquakesthe first one in Iran, seconds after it was powered up.

The charged proton ring thus acts as a secondary pole to that of the magnetic, inner field of the Earth.

– The creation of different types of strange liquid, some of them already produced in the first experiments, (Kaons at the LHC, hyperons at RHIC) would also provoke explosions in the magma. If stable, those strange forms of matter will leak to the center of the Earth. Some of it will remain in the center, forming the seed of a strangelet. Some will accrete and/or explode in the mantle, in highly energetic, tiny bombs. This tendency as all risks should increase in 2015 when the machine doubles its energy.

– The creation of gravitational waves.

The LHC is a 27 Kilometer ring of positive charged massive particles, turning at c -speed. This is essentially equivalent to the ‘singularity’ of a Kerr black hole –  a rotating c-speed charged ring of mass. Since a Kerr singularity can produce transversal gravitational waves;  the LHC might produce perpendicular  gravitational waves that will sink straight towards the center of the Earth (in a similar process a rotating , charged coil is used to produce electromagnetic waves). If so those Gravitational waves, which are undetectable will affect magnetic fields, provoking earthquake waves and increase volcano activity.

Thus, each time the machine increases its speed and ‘luminosity’ (mass), as CERN powers up the LHC, we should observe an increase of earthquakes and collateral deaths, till the 2 possible ‘doomsday events’ happen:

Strangelet Scenario

‘Black holes travel to the past and evaporate, so if we could enter one, we could come out and kill our grand-father’ Hawking, on his ‘imaginary black holes’ and why we shall not worry.

Synopsis.

The first and most probable scenario of human extinction is the creation of strangelets or any other kind of quark-gluon liquid made of lumps of heavy, strange quarks.

They can be created with a lower probability in proton-proton collisions, as those heavy quarks are the ‘signature’ of decay of the hypothetical Higgs or any other Goldstone boson, whose production is the confessed goal of CERN.

They can be created with a much higher probability in lead to lead collisions over 10 Tev as lead has many more quarks than protons and so the lump of quarks that can condensate into a heavy strange liquid, thousands of times heavier than the heaviest atom,  is bigger. When this lump reaches a certain critical mass, it will become stable and start a chain reaction, transforming the rest of the Earth’s matter into heavy quarks in a process similar to a nuclear chain reaction, only that instead of converting the mass of the Earth into lighter energy, it will convert the lighter Earth into heavy mass.

It is the simplest of the ‘mass-bombs’, which follow Einstein’s initial equation of conversion of energy and mass, M=E/c2 (better known by its second expression, E=Mc2, deduced by Einstein’s from the conversion of energy into mass, ergo a ‘standard’ reaction in Einsteinian Physics).

Because strangelets, unlike black holes are ‘likely’ to be produced increasing enormously our probabilities of extinction, CERN has adamantly denied there is any chance to produce it.

In 2015 as the LHC increases the potency and number of quarks it collides in its experiments, it will create greater quantities of atoms of strangelet liquid, called hyperons, made of up, down and strange quarks, which it has already produced in unexpected numbers at low energies, despite all their safety reports that said it would never produce them.

As quarks accelerate at c-speed, they acquire mass, because energy cannot go beyond light speed. Energy curls tiny vortices of space-time (Einstein’s definition of mass), making those quarks heavier. At light speed our protons made of up and down quarks (uud) will become strange quarks, converting the colliding protons into hyperons (usd particles, atoms of usd=strange liquid). Within the point of collision hyperons merge in pairs becoming dibaryons, which are stable and neutral and so they cannot be detected.

Thus dibaryons once formed, will fall to the center of the Earth, accreting matter as they form a growing ball of strange liquid. If they have not enough critical mass to become stable, which will ‘likely’ happen after 2015’s increase in luminosity and potency produces them in massive numbers, those dibaryon will explode in their path to the center of the Earth provoking mini-big bangs in the mantle, which will cause an increase in earthquake activity after the machine switches on. But some might arrive to the center of the Earth, where they will form a growing ball of ultradense strange liquid, which finally will crunch the Earth into a strange star.

 We will know this scenario’s end is closer, when we experience magnitude 9 earthquakes that kill hundreds of thousands of human beings. As such earthquakes have never happened within a single year, the existence of a couple of those earthquakes will mean the process of accretion which is ‘exponential’ have been triggered.

Black Hole Scenario

A black hole is made of strings (the minimal components of quarks) which are the components of gluons and quarks. Their mathematical description is equivalent (a 5th dimensional world of strings is equivalent to a 4 dimensional world of quarks); which reinforces the idea that a black hole is a top quark star.

The LHC was created to produce massive quantities of top quarks since the Higgs and a top quark condensate are the same substance, (the Higgs was promoted as the new ‘God particle’ just to get more research resources, not allocated to study known-particles). It will not form black holes that evaporate. Since quarks don’t evaporate.

The black hole will not fall to the Earth but it will become the new, densest center of the Earth and the Earth will fall into LHC’s creation. The process will last a very short time. Some images might be captured on TV but most likely wherever we are, we will just feel a strong wind, and then a blast of attractive forces will crunch and kill us, as the Earth explodes into a Nova.

Certainties in this theme.

The black hole scenario has been the most commented by the press. Yet it remains secondary to the strangelet scenario, both for theoretical and practical reasons. Since one ‘single case’ will do us and strangelets are easier to do in ion ion collisions. This should be the first event to happen.

Of course the P.R.ess which backs CERN but also makes money with catastrophist scenarios mostly concentrates in the black hole scenario, when it wants to create a ‘big scare’, with big sales prior to the final  happy conclusion of a CERN’s expert: ‘nothing will happen, it is all a joke’,

The certainty of black hole creation in that sense is not absolute, because Y it depends on the existence of strings, of which there is theoretical certainty but not possible experimental proofs (they are too small to be observed). The models of this author on the metrics of the scalar Universe (5th Dimension) however considers that black holes are top quark stars and in that case, black holes will be produced, and certainly will not evaporate. 

Ultimately both models of black holes are not exclusive. Since if string theory is truth, all particles will be made of strings. And top quarks which show a very strong force and huge mass and huge positive charge will attract each other and the matter of the Earth with the same force that super-gravitation (the theoretical deduction of string theory). In that regard the reader should understand that most sound theories in physics are parallel, similar theories that reinforce each other, since they use ‘parallel’ mathematical equations. Models vary in the mathematical ‘sentence’, as multiple verbal sentences mean the same, when we use similar words.  So the ‘hidden dimensions’ of String theory that make Gravitation far more powerful are equivalent to the far more powerful attraction that the creation of a top quark star will cause. As the LHC is designed to produce massive quantities of Tops (which are in fact a key product of Higgs processes), all indicates that black holes either modeled with strong theory or top quark theory will happen.

We conclude that both scenarios should happen, strangelets with absolute certainty, black holes if as 90% of physicists believe, string theory is truth. So we shall give the black hole scenario for the 2015-2020 period of statistical collisions (that might shoot on ‘perfect’ target the microscopic protons to reach the required energy) a 90% of chances.

The childish irresponsibility of Physicists accustomed for 70 years, an entire human life, to accept existential risks for the Earth on top of the military-industrial complex, explains in any case their ‘law of silence’. If 99.9% of nuclear physicists accepted the cold war that already could have killed life on Earth, living on the industry of making nuclear weapons and researching them on accelerators, why now they should change their mind? Wishful thinking is the norm in a nihilist corporation that has in its entrance a statue to Shiva and Kali, Lords of death. Why the rest of society accepts those risks? The answer in this case is obvious: we live in a happy ‘Truman Show’, a happy new world mixture of the dystopias of Huxley and Orwell, in which the virtual reality of the Media System, paid by corporations censors any issues of risks related to the industrial-Military complex. And people, as in the parable of Matrix always chooses to be ‘data’, to live the virtual dream, to believe…

So only the scientific method, its experimental, epistemological and theoretical models can guide our search for ‘cerntruth’.

Of course CERN does not make public those sound-sound, known-known scientific models that prove the risks. For example, it ignores all about top quark condensates that will be produced in Higgs reactions and only focuses on the propaganda of the HIggs particle as the ‘saint grail’ of physics, which is NOT.

III. THE EXPERIMENTAL PROOF OF OUR DEMISE: THE FERMI PARADOX.

‘There is not sign of life in any planet of the galaxy because nuclear physicists blow them up before interstellar travel’ Fermi (Paradox) on why we shall worry

Now for very long CERN said there is no proof we shall all die of genocide. Indeed, the proof will come only after they kill us, so this very military response, which any death squadron could utter to the man to be shot, works fine for them.

Yet, with a ‘little bit of thought’ and recent data on the Universe and its composition it turns out there is indeed, a clear proof coming, from other planets. And it is called the Great Filter, or Fermi paradox. Indeed, recently we have found there are millions of planets out there and we hear no signs of robotic or carbon life but only the tam-tam of strange pulsars and black holes, as Fermi, the head of the Manhattan project that make the first atomic bullets, put it – the explanation is simple, we physicists blow up all planets before interstellar travel happens.

So we must conclude that most if not all those planets collapse before interstellar travel, now on sight with the EM engine, comes into being. And this means we must do something this century to blow up the planet without chances to reconstruct our civilisation. And since life is resilient and has always come back fast from any natural or war disaster, it must be something much more brutal than a war, a global warming flood. Further on, it cannot be an extinction by chance (as if a lost, rogue black hole would collide with us) because it happens to all planets, so it is deterministic. Finally  it cannot be caused by terminators or A.I. since then robots would have colonised the Universe.

All that leaves only a possible cause, as in all planets, being technology parallel and synergic, the easiest thing to manufacture which is a bomb, in this case a strangelet bomb MUST come first. Alas, there is not only ‘one proof’ but billions of them – all those planets which did not make it to colonise the galaxy, which can be colonised after interstellar travel very quick in a few million years – a relative wisp of time on the long life of the galaxy. So if technological planets survive, it should be colonised already. And yet the silence is ominous. Only the tam tam of black holes and strange, pulsar stars, comes into our radio waves.

And the adamant defense of mankind of the quark cannon, is the clearest proof that Fermi was right. There are now plans just in case CERN doesn’t kill us to make a 52 km. quark cannon in China, and another of 100 km. in Europe.

And all this of course, always justified by the sacred research of our high priests, the nuclear physicists, makers of atomic cannons.

It is like if the creators of Big Bertha, the biggest cannon prior to the age of nuclear weapons would justify their bombing of Paris, with the excuse they might unearth archeological remains of Lutetia. CERN justifies its bombing of Earth with strangelets, after it goes on line at maximal potency in 2015, with the excuse that it might unearth some rare particle. So does RHIC competing for the ‘nationalistic’ honor of reaching the creation of those strangelets earlier.

But while the Germans of I World War could not get away with such a surrealist view of their cannon industry, the Americans & Germ(an)s of XXI century have become shrewder and justify their industry with those newspeaks of research. Fact is History rhymes.

Plainly speaking, the industry of artillery follows its evolution and so from the first ‘tube’ (cannon in italian), which started ballistics, through the centuries of physicists making them bigger, faster with denser bullets, to the last cannon, the quark cannon, aka LHC, with its quark explosives, through the millions of ‘cannon flesh’ corpses left in the trail, it has gone a long way. But the evolution will end soon, achieving its purpose, which the Merchant of Death, the biggest arm dealer of the XIX century, Mr. Nobel clearly explained, in a cynical letter to her peace-loving lover, who asked him for a Prize to Peace: ‘my factories will end all wars, when they evolve a weapon powerful enough to destroy entire nations with a single shot’.

This is the quark cannon and its theorists seeking collateral theories for a Nobel prize. After the letter, she abandoned Nobel, the inventor of dynamite. Then he created the Peace Prize but she did not come back. After the quark cannon produces the first bullets of strange matter that will fall to the center of the Earth and eat it up inside out, physicists will repent as many did after making the Atomic Bomb. But the Earth will not come back.  

As all has changed to remain the same.

Indeed, we are doing it for the same routines that took us into the cold war – the topic military-industrial complex, we shall comment on to end this central post.

 IV. THE WORLDLY PROFESSION OF PHYSICISTS: MAKE ENTROPIC WEAPONS…

“A Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even If they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are Dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics’.

Eric Fromm, Father of political psychology, on the Nuclear culture of entropy & weapons… and why we shall worry.

The Military Perspective: The Quark Cannon

As so many fruits of the Tree of Science, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has two perspectives. Its origin in military research, since accelerators were the last invention of artillery (a circular cannon), used to research atomic weapons, and its use for civil research, since the study of the debris of atomic explosions has allowed mankind to peer in the smallest, densest ‘knots of mass-energy’. The problem with the LHC is that its military implications far outweigh its usefulness for scientific research. And this is the fact that the rhetorics of CERN, an institution of the cold war, which systematically hides its original military purpose, has shrewdly hidden to the point that most of the people working today there, young 20 somethings, recently graduated, long forgotten the historic origin of accelerators truly believe the quark cannon is ‘only’ an instrument of research and ignore its ‘military risks’.

Yet when the Large Hadron Collider is explained in simple, military terms people can understand better those dangers. In military terms the LHC is a quark cannon, the final evolution of 800 years of western artillery, a science dedicated to kill as many humans as possible, which has used  bore pieces of metal to deliver at maximal speed, the densest possible materials (first rocks, then iron, latter lead and finally hyperdense quarks, the 99% of the mass of the atoms clumped in their centers).

This evolution advanced steadily during centuries along the evolution of physics and its comprehension of all phenomena related to cannons. First Galileo was contracted by the Arsenal of Venice with a princely salary of 1000 gold ducats to calculate the longest possible distance of a cannon shot and improve the ‘spy glasses’, latter called telescopes, to observe rival gunboats at distance (the Venetians invented the gunboat in their attack to Constantinopoli in 1208). He thus started the science of ballistics, the name of his fist book,  latter renamed physics, also called for many centuries the ‘science’ of motion, as it is a restricted discipline of knowledge basically related to the understanding of energy, motion and materials used to the construction of weapons.

The field expanded but still bore this trademark.

For example, heat theory was discovered by an artillery master observing the friction heat of their cannon pieces. What this means is that the primary occupation of most physicists has always been to make weapons, latter machines (the nice twin of all weapons, so a bomber became a plane and a car a tank); and instruments to observe their effects – those spy glasses to see the enemy ‘galleras’…

Not to speak of the definition that Galileo imposed on time, as a parameter of the measure of motion: V=s/t, which still stands in Einstein’s work.

This is the origin of the concept of time as the 4th dimension of space, again a very restricted definition of time.As it has reduced all time=changes to the single arrow of entropy, denying the inverse arrow of time=change of information, proper of life and evolution, which Physicists still struggle to understand.

This of course does not mean physics is not concerned with knowledge… of motions in space – but they are NOT con-cern-ed with life and its information arrow.

So we must differentiate the ‘good and bad fruits’ of the tree of science – that is; research which is primarily concerned with knowledge, as for example, telescopes observing the big bang peering in long distant galaxies whose light comes from the far away past, and research which is mainly concerned with weaponry and uses the rhetoric of knowledge and some discoveries to justify the primary target.

Galileo’s work on ballistics and CERN were the first and last of those cases: the industry of artillery at its best, justified with the excuse of redundant knowledge – since the laws of motion and the big bang can be studied throwing other ‘things’ and looking with telescopes. Death is a high stakes that need a high reason. And here is where the rhetorics of the Higgs boson (not the particle of god, not even the one that gives mass to other particles but just another particle of the zoo of physical species) came in, and along it all the other ‘hyperboles’ about what is simply a quark cannon.

Indeed, cannons reached its lineal maximal potency around I world war when Bertha, the big cannon of Krupp, delivered its bullets to Paris from 60 kilometers away.

Lead was also the heaviest atomic substance. But you could not make a one kilometer lineal cannon – too heavy, too long. And after lead the heaviest elements became like Uranium is, radiactive, and difficult to handle. So how to make a longer cannon, with a stronger substance? Enter II world war. Uranium was heavier and on top of it, it split and reacted making the bullet a bomb. So physicists started to study radioactive materials, which incidentally end being lead, to substitute lead in their cannons. And then Lawrence realized that the problem of lineal cannons could be resolved making them infinitely long with a circular magnetic path, that accelerated the bullet every cycle, so the cannon could continuously accelerate the bullet as many ‘cycles’ as it wanted, making ‘de facto’ the cannon cylinder infinite. And the accelerator cannon was born. The name then was changed starting the make up ‘newspeak’ transformation of the jargon of artillery into the jargon of ‘research’.

So next, they planned to deliver atomic bombs with accelerators. They had a longer bore and a denser substance than Big Bertha. So they designed the first atomic bomb consisting in an accelerator that collided two pieces of uranium in its center provoking an atomic explosion. It was though too heavy to transport and a second design of a self-cointained bomb substituted it. But accelerators were the strongest cannons available, and alas! research of new nuclear weapons started in Earnest, with the cold war, thanks to them. All nuclear weapons would be first tested in circular cannons (the real name of the device). The West established CERN and legally protected it as a ‘sovereign nation’ (reason we could not sue it), becoming the flagship of the European participation in the cold war.

Rhetoric now were expanding as Nuclear Physicists had become the scourge of the Earth, the first caste of people who intended to destroy the planet and all forms of life on it for the ‘common good’. So along the cold war an industry of making nuclear scientists researching atomic weapons, appear as the sacred priests of knowledge, developed the concept that the fundamental form of understanding the Universe was to study the debris produced by atomic circular cannons. This would have seem absurd to more sophisticated readers prior to II world war – namely if the Germans had told us that the obuses of big Bertha thrown over Paris would be the key to understand the Universe we would have had a big laugh.

But in the present age of erased visual minds, childish thought, fiction, rhetorics, big brother newspeaks and other niceties, it worked. So now the Germans (main contributors to this machine, lead by a German, and buttressed with German technology), can truly believe that shooting the Earth with its enhanced Big Bertha, will discover the meaning of it all.

This newspeak was obviously needed because the underlying reason of the industry of quark cannons – to provide new mass-murder devices for the cold war – ended with the fall of communism. But this didn’t mean war and the most profitable of all mechanical industries, the industry of weapons had to end. We found in the Semite wars between Israel and the US vs. Arab fundamentalist Jihadists and Palestinians, a perfect excuse for perpetual war and the evolution of robotic weapons – the most profitable modern industry.

And we found in the newspeak of fundamental research the perfect excuse for the evolution of artillery.

Fundamental’ is a serious word that justifies all wars. And in this case ‘fundamental research’ is the only possible word to justify the risks. Already Mr. Teller – the nuclear physicist who found the H Bomb, patented it and made a fortune manufacturing it – realized knowledge is the perfect excuse to pass a weapon. He bragged, as we show in our film ‘quantum roulette’ that he convinced Truman to pay for the H-Bomb because it would increase our knowledge of the atom. LOL.

Then he proposed the first ‘ultimate weapon’ – a hydrogen bomb big enough to destroy the entire Soviet Union, and hence the entire planet. But he could not sell it with ‘military rhetorics’ only. Eissenhower realized nuclear physicists, all in favor of it, were madmen on a collision course with humanity and after the proposal was put on the table for ‘military reasons’, he called the ‘commies’ and started detente. Nuclear Physicists had gone too far, even for hard nose military men. Now they have gone even further. But Nuclear physicists also have become shrewder and so they have hidden the truth with research. The bottom line is industrial routine, jobs, contracts. So any technological industry must continue, even if it has no purpose at all. Cars keep evolving its speed limit even if they cannot go beyond 70 miles per hour. So does the industry of accelerators. As Fromm put it ‘the ethics of a technological civilization’ consist of evolving machines, even if they can destroy the planet.

And so finally the quark cannon, the first cannon that can destroy the planet, has come into existence, even if it can destroy the planet. It is the LHC, which as the first Galilean model, has its own ‘spy glasses’ to observe in detail the debris it produces, including a calorimeter called CASTOR to detect the creation of strange matter; since it is supposed to understand the meaning of it all, observing that debris.

But its ‘true nature’, its ‘historic origin’, is unmistakable. It is just the last evolution of the artillery industry, an infinitely long, accelerating cannon, which uses the most explosive, dense and dangerous substance of the Universe, quarks and throws bullets of quarks to the planet Earth. And one of those bullets will be able to kill mankind. It is the ultimate weapon.

And what it will produce is simple enough: quark condensates of higher density than our light up and down quarks, the substance of our atoms. For one thing, there are 3 families of increasingly dense quark matter, the up & down family (ours – the substance of the stars of the galactic body); then the strange family, which is called strange matter, the substance of strange stars called pulsars, and probably the halo of the galaxy, and then the top family very likely the substance of black holes and the center of the galaxy.

The problem is that matter is ‘darwinian’. Strange matter eats light up & down matter. And top black hole matter eats strange and up & down matter. It is a pecking order. So when strange matter – the easiest to do – will appear on the quark cannon, it will eat the earth. There is no doubt about it. And the only question that remains to be solved is when the LHC or any of its planned successors in the industry of quark cannons will have enough energy to produce with our quarks, denser strange quarks that will devour the Earth.

We believe according to known-known theory of quarks this will happen in 2015 when the quark cannon doubles its potency. It is in any case a question of time that the artillery industry in its most advanced piece, the quark cannon, evolves beyond the threshold of creation of strange matter, and kill the Earth. The industry is blind and protected of all criticism with its lies and rhetorics. It is the summit of the military industrial complex and it does indeed some collateral research besides the collateral damage to mankind to feed its rhetorics. But the bottom line is this: it is a quark cannon, it produces quark condensates, the heaviest most dangerous self-sustained, self-feeding explosive on the Universe, and it will once crossed the energy required to produce a strange quark condensate blow up the Earth.

The rest is ‘irrelevant’ knowledge, ‘irrelevant’ rhetorics, and irrelevant indeed, since an extinct species, mankind, knows nothing. Only a piece of that rhetoric will suffice to show how difficult this question is. Nuclear Physicists ALL perfectly know that cosmic rays are just simple atomic substances, protons, electrons and gamma rays, colliding on the atmosphere. We have NEVER found a deconfined quark in cosmic rays. Cosmic rays are NOT quark bullets, because they are not heavy ‘lead’ ions, which can produce ‘quark condensates’. And yet, whenever any journalist, politician or the public ask about the risks at CERN, ALL nuclear physicists lie, saying cosmic rays have done this experiment one thousand times. This is an ABSOLUTE lie, that any first ‘course’ of physics explains.

But of course, all is very shrewd. CERN does collide besides heavy lead ions, which can create quark condensates, protons, and so they do experiments similar to cosmic rays… But those are not the dangerous experiments that will create strange matter. Cern does research on fundamental particles, but this is not the reason why XX century military-industrial systems paid for the accelerator industry. And most ‘CERNIES’ are idealist kids who didn’t know the origin of their industry and think their work has no risk. But ‘big boys’ playing with big toys, big weapons are not a excuse for putting us all at risks.

The cosmic rays half-lie shows what perhaps is the saddest part of this story from a theoretical point of view. As a scientist I always thought there was a ‘realm’ in which truth mattered – science, as opposed to politics, economics or religion. This is no longer truth. Science now is also ‘wishful thinking’. CERN’s statements show THE DEGREE OF intellectual corruption, rhetorics and callousness which Nuclear Physicists, after 60 years of getting away with murder doing nuclear weapons, have achieved.’

The bottom line though OF ALL THIS is on the next post – ‘STRANGELETS UPDATES’, which is the Chronicle on the foretold death, as mankind like Mr. Nassar in Marquez’s book, walk step by step through the road that we/he knows will end with a final shot that will kill him. And yet he walks on, as mankind does for all the wrong reasons, down the street filled with ‘physicists bullshit’:

Conclusion. We are coming closer to the last step.

“My factories will end all wars, when they invent a weapon that can destroy a single nation with a single shot.’ Saint Nobel of the dynamite, on the future research of military science

The most important of those risks caused by CERN, flagship of the industry of accelerators and its quark cannon shows that the danger of crossing the threshold of formation of ice-9 (strangelets) or black holes is not going away. On the contrary as the industry keeps evolving into higher energies and we know better the Universe the theoretical and practical risks keep increasing.

On one hand the industry is on the brink of producing enough quark, dark matter – which shows NOT only to exist, but to grow EXPONENTIALLY at higher energy – to start a nuclear chain reaction of those 2 ‘self-feeding’ organic bombs (strangelets easy to produce and perhaps black holes).

And all seems to indicate, as the issue is today under a short of global law of silence, similar to what happens when a war has started – not to believe in victory and ask for diplomacy is then call treason or derrotism – that the process of this foretold death is not going away.

Since the industry, with very meager theoretical results (what economists call the law of diminishing returns and higher costs, which happens to any industry once it has reached its ‘mature’ state), keeps going ahead with new technological advances, such as the plasma accelerator – much cheaper and powerful – and plans to build a 100 km. ring-factory in China that certainly will cross levels of entropy delivered to the Earth, far more dangerous than those happening at CERN. But the number of returns – that is of relevant particles, to  find has dwindled to zero.

Indeed, once the hype of the irrelevant Higgs became exhausted and exploited ad nauseam, and ‘imaginary’ mathematical particles, which do NOT respect the laws of philosophy of science, are nowhere to be found returns come to zero (when physicists will learn that ‘all what is mathematically truth is not real’ – Enstein?; so just because you can write fictions in equations besides words and images, such as SUSYs and imaginary black holes travelling to the past, they are NOT going to do so in reality)…

In fact as 99.999% of what the LHC, a quark factory re=produces are different forms of ever more dense quark matter, we are entering a surrealist age in which the discoveries on new, increasingly stable forms of ultra-heavy, strange, quark matter – the very substance that is going to kill us all – are heralded as the ‘new physics at CERN’, which is the theme of the next post.

Alas, CERN now that is out of the radar of the P.R.ess under the Law of Silence on the inconvenient truth of its risks  is giving up even the pretension of NOT making strange matter or the pretension that new particles will come up from the accelerator after the failures of finding anything else but the ‘standard model of quarks. So, hardy anybody in the field of physics, as today in this summer 2017, seriously believes CERN will find anything that truly maters but just ever more dense FORMS OF QUARK MATTER:

The last months, UPDATED IN THE NEXT POST have been all indeed about new discoveries of dense quark matter, as we predicted it would be:

it was first strange pentaquarks, as the heavier density of strange matter keeps attracting light up and down quarks our substances, breaking the supposed laws of ‘CERN’s physics’ – they were not suppose to exist because the mantra is that ‘strange matter does not exist’, and does not ‘has attractive power’. Then it was the realisation its growth is exponential as it keeps feeding faster in our light matter (this was also heralded not as a clear proof of the veracity of the risks but as ‘new physics’). And now they are closing into the likely substance of black holes as ‘frozen stars with a cut-off substance’ (Einstein): the ultra heavy bottom and top quarks are coming in strong; and it is also ‘good’ because it is ‘new physics’.

So you can expect one day CERN to announce (if the strange or Black hole bomb GIVES them time to do so), in an enthusiastic press release J.D. something like this: ‘It is a great day for new physics; we have successfully proved after 40 years of failed search that Mr. Hawking is wrong and black holes do NOT evaporate’.

“What I’ll never forget was the terrible smell of shit.” But Argénida Lanao,said that Santiago Nasar walked with his usual good bearing, measuring his steps well, and that his Saracen face with its dashing ringlets was handsomer than ever. As he passed by the table he smiled at them and continued through. “We were paralyzed with fright,” Argénida Lanao told me […] “Santiago, my son,” she shouted to him, “what has happened to you?” “They’ve killed me” he said, stumbling on the last step.

Chronicle of a foretold death.

On how CERNies will keep bull$hitting as they accelerate step by step its ringlet, looking so good, just as Santiago Nassar did, not to loose face till in the last step we all stumble… and fall… into the dark world…

Advertisements
 
25 Comments

Posted by on March 10, 2017 in News

 

Strange-let updates

From time to time we will bring in this post the relevant new records and new forms of quark strange liquids produced by the Industry of Accelerators, which sooner or latter will become stable and start up an ice-9 reaction that will ‘freeze’ into a 15 km. rock mother Earth… And some other strange news about the obsession with genocide of nuclear physicists and its faked, ‘great research’ flukes on the meaning of it all.

Upddate 16 Oct 2017. PULSARS FUSIONING ITS STRANGE QUARK CORE.

Today Ligo – another big Nobel prize machine, but this one doing harmless, real science, will announce the detection of 2 neutron=strange stars fusioning black hole style and causing gravitational waves. Some comments:

  • This is a clear example on how the strangelet core of neutron stars  – the dominant type of strange stars, which are supposed NOT to exist according to the safety report of CERN (its fundamental NO DANGER proof in more than a decade old safety report, NEVER updated with this type of new information:  “we have no proofs of strangelet matter anywhere in the Universe”. Hence if something does not exist there is no danger – even if a decade latter EVERY astronomer will tell you neutron stars have a a strangelet core…)
  • Its effect IS an astounding explosion of gamma-ray bursting energy, similar to a Nova, but far more powerful – in fact it is called a one thousands’ nova (kilo nova), since undoubtedly the collision fusions its strange cores into an ice-9 reaction, causing among other things the creation of gold and uranium, which a normal star cannot produce. So we will have a glimpse to what  will happen on Earth when strangelet produced at LHC fusion in enough quantity to become stable, grow and eat us up.
  • Further on, it shall prove the self-similarity of Strange stars and black holes, as top quark condensates with a ‘cut-off’ substance as Einstein in its 4D models demanded
  • So yes, strangelet stars exist; they are quark condensates similar to black hole top quark stars, which will be easy to reproduce with the ever growing in energy industry of accelerators – now planning a 100 km. ring.
  • Then there is of course the circus of ‘big science’ – the news I read are kept secret,for  the whole world to send its P.R.ess. So the theatre circus of mass-media around technological machines continues. My problem with that circus though is that true question poised by this discovery, which is yet another proof – of the existence of strange stars all over the Universe, and the risks of doing similar experiments on Earth will be as usual ignored…

So expect the announcement on strange stars colliding , despite CERN denial sometimes this afternoon…  Never mind the picture of its fusion above is taken… from a CERN server that report us about kilo novas despite denying that its strange liquid core does exist all over the Universe, and unfortunately as they keep producing growing numbers of strange quarks – see previous update, soon to exist in the core of the Earth.

For those interested, here is a PBS video on the subject:

Conclusion: we still have an completely outdated more than a decade old ‘safety report’ which ignores the most talked about substance of astrophysics today – strange quarks, both being reproduced in growing numbers at CERN (see previous update) and now starting to show all over the Universe with its huge effects.

Now picture this, if strange liquid does not exist in the center of neutron stars, as all seems to indicate, triggering a kilonova that reproduces tons of gold, where all the gold and uranium and lead of the planets come from? Ice-9 reactions thus are likely to be happening everywhere. It is indeed, a curious thought to think that gold has taken us here, to provoke a small kilo nova that would reproduce tons of go(l)d, we shall die literarily of it. Might go(l)d worship be a darwinian strategy of gold metal to produce more of it?

But the law of silence is absolute because today science is about money, huge expensive machines like LHC and LIGO.

The difference though is obvious. While the money of those astrophysical machines would be better spent in basic research on life science, from agriculture to public financing of drug research (despite all the hype, we can hardly obtains any information of largely invisible gravitational waves)…  LIGO IS harmless. And better still is the Webb telescope again with new delays for lack of financing, which will peer beyond the limits of the likely ”local’ big-bang…

CERN is NOT and gives nothing in return. But PROFITS and hype in big science are directly proportional to costs for taxpayers, and benefits for technological industry that pays the P.R.ess hype.

So now with increasing tempo we are getting also news of the planning of a 100 Tev collider of “astronomical” costs and risks, forever ignored:

Indeed, just in case we survive LHC, plans keep going ahead to design a 100 km machine with ginormous energy power that will certainly make strangelets and copious amounts of top quarks, triggering an ice-9 or gas-9 reaction (the microscopic production of black holes likely made of top quark condensates, the collateral product of Higgs production, but that part they are not telling…) The excuse BEYOND technological big science spending and jobs for nuclear physicists? ‘we need it to study dark matter’, whose most likely candidate (Witten’s hypothesis) is indeed the strange stars and top quark stars, aka microscopic black holes NOT evaporating. Since most sound models of dark matter, based in known substances (hence following the 2 best epistemological ‘razors’ of truth, Universe’s Economicity and Ockham’s simplicity) show should fill the galactic halo.

Update – April 2017

‘Alice’, not the one in wonderland but the ‘experiment’ on proton collision seems now to produce also strangelets, and as usual the paper does become enthusiastic about the ‘new physics’, ignores to mention the risks, and keeps printing the incorrect name of ‘quark-gluon plasma’ (hot gas) when the production IS always strange liquid (cold, perfect superfluid strangelet)… But of course, the word and the risks are taboo; so a decade after establishing the fact-fact the produce is NOT plasma but liquid, the old, inaccurate name stays.

We just copy-paste the news and highlight the key ‘names’ and ‘enthusiasm for new physics’, in this surrealist, ‘in crescendo’ creation of bigger and bigger lumps of strangelet.


As the number of particles produced in proton collisions (the blue lines) increase, the more of these so-called strange hadrons are measured (as shown by the orange to red squares in the graph). Credit: ALICE/CERN
In a paper published today in Nature Physics, the ALICE collaboration reports that proton collisions sometimes present similar patterns to those observed in the collisions of heavy nuclei. This behaviour was spotted through observation of so-called strange hadrons in certain proton collisions in which a large number of particles are created. Strange hadrons are well-known particles with names such as Kaon, Lambda, Xi and Omega, all containing at least one so-called strange quark. The observed ‘enhanced production of strange particles’ is a familiar feature of quark-gluon plasma, a very hot and dense state of matter that existed just a few millionths of a second after the Big Bang, and is commonly created in collisions of heavy nuclei. But it is the first time ever that such a phenomenon is unambiguously observed in the rare proton collisions in which many particles are created. This result is likely to challenge existing theoretical models that do not predict an increase of strange particles in these events.

“We are very excited about this discovery,” said Federico Antinori, Spokesperson of the ALICE collaboration. “We are again learning a lot about this primordial state of matter. Being able to isolate the quark-gluon-plasma-like phenomena in a smaller and simpler system, such as the collision between two protons, opens up an entirely new dimension for the study of the properties of the fundamental state that our universe emerged from.”

Why it is important to properly name the ‘substance’ is obvious: a plasma is an entropic, gaseous state that dissipates; a liquid (‘let’ in strangelet), is a group of particles that strongly interact together forming growing lumps. Now, they have established it appears not only in heavy hadron collisions but also in heavy hadron-proton collisions (2015) and with enough energy even in proton-proton ones. Moreover the ‘size’ of the minimal droplet keeps ‘shrinking’ – evidence that the minimal quantity of strangelet to start up an ice-9 reactions must be quite smallish. ‘This thing” as in all the classic terror movies about ‘invading’ species clearly ‘wants to live and grow’ – the Rex shows its teeth…

Here is the finding that proton-hadron also produces strange liquid droplets of 2015, which better explains that difference:

Littlest’ quark-gluon plasma revealed by physicists using Large Hadron Collider
September 3, 2015

“This is probably the first evidence that the smallest droplet of quark gluon plasma is produced in proton-lead collisions.”
The KU researcher described quark-gluon plasma as a very hot and dense state of matter of unbound quarks and gluons—that is, not contained within individual nucleons.
“It’s believed to correspond to the state of the universe shortly after the Big Bang,” Wang said. “The interaction between partons—quarks and gluons—within the quark-gluon plasma is strong, which distinguishes the quark-gluon plasma from a gaseous state where one expects little interaction among the constituent particles.”
“There is still much that we don’t fully understand about the properties of quark-gluon plasma,” he said. “One of the biggest surprises of the earlier measurements at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory was the fluid-like behavior of the quark-gluon plasma. Being able to form a quark-gluon plasma in proton-lead collisions helps us to better define the conditions needed for its existence.”

So what all this tells us is obvious: Nature likes top predators, and strange quarks are top predator matter, which once and again appears ‘stronger’ in larger numbers, telling us, it is going to eat our matter, as it feeds on it faster than expected in every new experiment, clearly with an exponential curve. See in previous graph, the ‘red squares’ representing strange particles accelerating its growth; while our light matter remains in similar numbers – so in the new regime of energies, strange droplets start to run amok, taking ‘all’ the new energy that feeds that exponential growth.

It is indeed a chronicle of a foretold death, because they are telling us unequivocally what they do, and everybody is happy with it. 

It reminds me of a cartoon on the leader of the ‘free world’, you know who:

.. 100 days on his presidency and 98% of the groupie sheeple would still vote for him.

Same goes for CERN. Doesn’t matter how close it comes to the ‘final event’ – enough strange matter to start the ice-9 reaction, they keep the chronicle up to date and every body likes it, as ‘it tells it like it is’.

 

Update. 23 Dec. 

We bring today a ‘relative’ lighter issue, for a change… normal A-bombs…

Trump will make more nukes, pumping up research in all kind of weapons of mass destruction and I couldn’t help to tweet him…

As only neo-fa$cists troll his web, (people as usual scared to death to contradict the powerful), it became the top comment to his runt (:

screen-shot-2016-12-23-at-09-31-41
screen-shot-2016-12-22-at-20-50-29screen-shot-2016-12-21-at-12-06-47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Update. The worshippers. Mass consensus goes on

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/06/05/why-is-the-director-of-cern-at-the-bilderberg-conference/

Update 1, december. 2016

To understand what the Earth will become, and how obvious are the ‘lies’ of CERN and its excuse of safety (based in the wishful thinking that we have not detected strange quarks on the Universe – alas of course they are ‘invisible’, but we DO have both, the most well-known theory about the Halo, being made of strange quarks – Witten Hypothesis, and a growing renewed interest among physicists on strange stars, as all pulsars and neutron stars seems to have a core of strange matter. In that sense, chances we become a strange star are ginormous. Here a non-partisan, objective PBS-sanctioned serious analysis of those strange stars, where the physicist clearly states that strange matter IS more stable than normal matter and IT IS JUST A QUESTION OF THE AMOUNT created to reach that stability, which ensures that the industry of accelerators WILL reach that threshold sooner or latter.

18 Nov. 2016 – Multi-million pound Large Hadron Collider upgrade project launched

A new multi-million pound international project led by the University of Manchester has been launched to upgrade the Large Hadron Collider to the High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) in the 2020s.

The project will enable the machine to deliver more collisions per second, called luminosity. This is a key performance indicator of an accelerator, as it tells you the number of particles colliding in a certain amount of time. The greater the number of collisions the more chance physicists have of seeing a new particle. With this upgrade, the LHC will Increase the overall luminosity by a factor of 10, delivering 10 times more collisions than the LHC would do over the same period of time and producing strangelet balls 10 times bigger, with the subsequent decametric rise in chances to start up an ice-9 reaction. As we have repeatedly said, the issue of the Industry of Accelerators is simple: if it is not halted and decommissioned sooner or latter it will cross the threshold of energies needed to create stable strangelets on Earth. That it has not yet happened and we are still here are welcome news, that we are simply upgrading an industry which is a ‘Chronicle of a Foretold Death’, that of mankind, merrily worshipping its ‘energy record-breaking machine’ till it kills itself is a statistical certainty. Here is the article:

HL-LHC (High Luminosity LHC)
The full exploitation of the LHC is the highest priority in the European Strategy for Particle Physics), adopted by the CERN Council and integrated into the ESFRI Roadmap. The HL-LHC project funding was approved by the CERN Council in June 2014. To extend its discovery potential, the LHC will need a major upgrade around 2020 to increase its luminosity (rate of collisions) by a factor of 10 beyond the original design value (from 300 to 3000 fb-1).   HL-LHC relies on a number of key innovative technologies, representing exceptional technological challenges, such as cutting-edge 13 Tesla superconducting magnets, very compact and ultra-precise superconducting cavities for beam rotation, and 300-metre-long high-power superconducting links with zero energy dissipation.

This is of course the consequence of absolute censorship on the risks at CERN, as they do NOT exist by ‘decree’. How humanity can deny the obvious: that those risks are absolute, just a question of crossing the expected mass of strange liquid; that the extinction of humans is completely irrelevant to the Universe at large and that we have the proof of this happening to infinite other planets, given by the Fermi Paradox (not human or robotic Life passes this technological age, prior to interstellar travel) – has only a simple explanation: humans have overall an infantile, subjective, entitled bratty psyche, and that is the trademark of the staple food of the Universe: toddlers playing with dangerous tools, who won’t accept a no.

September, here it comes the top let, Black hole…

It is funny how slowly all the systems of science, and its species are coming through decades into my work on the fractal organic, 5D Universe. Now, part of this model which is all over this web is the obvious concept that black holes are top-quark stars, born of the toplet particles which combine top-tops with higgs, bottom and charm, heaviest particles of the Universe, as ‘systems are scalar’, fractal, and so there must be beyond the entelechy of a mathematical description a real substance for black holes, which Einstein said should exist or else BH were imaginary. So I did the calculus and found toplets must exist in stable combinations with Higgs, bottom and charms, and the supreme ttt++ particle be the central core of ‘real black holes’. It means of course that black holes do not evaporate, do not travel the past (mathematical errors) and will be very easy to create as Higgs and tops are produced together, and will start to appear in growing numbers with increasing luminosity.

Everybody disagree, then a 720 particle appeared and they thought it was imaginary SUSYs etc. I said no, IT is a top-quark heavy combination, seed and predecessor of future black holes. Alas, it has taken them another year to accept it:

screen-shot-2016-09-16-at-14-51-19

In the graph, the first sight of things to come, ttHs, precursors of our toplets, and bcb particles, atoms of black holes and its ‘gas-9’ creation:

dark macrocosmos

in the graph, the fractal organic model of the galaxy, similar to a cell, with a black hole ‘DNA-informative gravitational center’, a halo of strangelet quarks, the surrounding protein and a mitochondria world of stars and planets – us, which ultimately will become converted into strangelets and Black holes by minions of thought as those ‘simplex physicists’ working at CERN.

But the good news is they decayed, it is though a question of time, they do become stable atoms of black holes.
So NOW WE KNOW how the 2nd risk, black hole production will HAPPEN. Only question is when and which of both risks will come first.

Update. Top quarks growing production.

The top quark is the heaviest particle in the known universe, and the only ‘cut off substance that can make real black holes, as outside Platonic physics, philosophy of science precludes all systems in the fractal universe have a smaller parts which make its substance. So you have cells. Stars atoms, and black holes should be top quark stars; as Einstein forecasted (he said he wouldn’t believe in black holes till a particle as dense as them – the black hole – was found. He died before that. But then Hawking had taken the celebrity position of guru of physics and they denied the logic next step I gave a decade ago, studying them as top quark stars, which fits nicely in both 4d metric equations (einstein) and 5d (mine).

This intro is a brief consideration on the natural way in which cern will make black holes, the second greatest risk after strangelets clearly confirmed ‘in the making’ by the growing amount of strange matter on heavy-ion collisions.

Now we are told that in proton-proton collisions top quarks are coming in huge numbers. Those are the news:

So far we are lucky. They are decaying, but as all things, it is just a question of quantity, to get them attracting each other forming ttt++ particles, the top triad which should be the ‘catalyser’ of top quark black holes in 5D metric.

We need new physics to understand how they can form a stable state that will give birth to the black hole, which the standard model do not provide, as it requires v>c.

But in the scalar 5D universe this is standard: v>c happen outside galaxies, as v=c is merely the ‘light space-time background of the galaxy, hence its limit of speed, but where there is not light beyond the v=c accelerated horizon of a black hole, as all vortex keep accelerating is obvious speeds can be over c.

And indeed, Ker rotating black holes do show in its central axis faster than light speeds. There are more fringe theories that would allow them to happen, but I consider only Einstein’s intuitions, proved Kerr metric equations for rotating black holes, and the natural extension of the standard model (5D scalar universe). Another step on this chronicle… among physicists of the visual age, which really think – as they cannot see hence understand time and its arrows, with 0-conceptual intelligence –  that knowledge is about pictures of particles…

Some secondary news on the summer concern merely extremely secondary physical phenomena of null relevance pumped up by the P.R.ess – they saw the scattering=entropic death of a light ray by another high energy ray, confirming that high energy kills, alas, great news all over the press.

Next threshold-step of danger on this walk on death row will come with ‘new strange physics’ at the ion collider it seems this fall, hopefully not the last step of our ‘sarracens’ (not ISIS the ‘other terror’ faked state – CERN has diplomatic immunity as a ‘state’ of the cold war, but nobody seems to realise of its terrorists acts – but the metaphoric Santiago nassar of ‘death chronicle’).

September – Proton scattering, for once an experiment I like.

Scientists are pulling down luminosity and hence risk to do scattering of protons, which in the scalar 5D model according to its unification equation are the equivalent of galactic nuclei, to see the distribution of its quarks. I like the experiment. IT IS not risky and it is one which could shed some light on the fractal model of the scalar Universe:

“Scientists associated with the TOTEM and ATLAS/ALFA experiments at LHC are now dialing down the luminosity, thereby reducing the chances of head-on collisions and increasing the probability of elastic scattering.

“One of the most fascinating physics goals of TOTEM is to get information on the probability that two protons pass completely through each other without interfering,” CERN said in a statement released Thursday. “This might appear awkward if you think of a proton as a billiard ball, but instead you have to try to imagine the two scattering protons as large ‘galaxies’ (made up inside of tiny moving particles) launched at high speed against each other: there is a finite probability that the two ‘galaxies’ will pass through each other without the inner particles interacting significantly.”

September. WIMPs ruled out.

it is a slow deja vu process, a chronicle of a foretold death, which keeps mounting proofs but nobody cares to bell the alarm ring. The quest is simple: dark matter was first considered to be made of strange quarks (Witten hypothesis), as all the laws of science – experimental evidence, economicity – show that the heavy quarks that dominate mass must have a role in the Universe and they are the perfect candidate to be dark matter. But if so obviously they are extremely easy to do, and the halo of the galaxy should be filled with them. Alas! this hypothesis went mute when the accelerator industry showed they could do dark matter strangelets that would devour the Earth. And yet, Nature stubbornly keeps affirming that the scientific method and its evidence of truth, ARE there to stay, while the scientists’ imagined particles do not appear anywhere. 

So on one side the LHC keeps churning ever more stable forms of strangelet (strange quark liquids) – lumps that stay longer in the accelerator, pentaquarks and new configurations, more dibaryons that should be falling to the center of the earth and slowly growing up a critical ice-9 mass runaway reaction that will convert Earth into nova.

While on the other side the ‘likely imagined’ candidates for dark matter do not appear at all. First it were SUSYs, heavy particles that break all the rules of economicity and hence never showed experimental evidence. Now they are ruled out. It was the star candidate for dark matter. The second candidate was WIMPs, weakly interacting massive particles, and the are now ruled out. So what we are left with? The stubborn, existing strangelet lumps of heavy quarks, which slowly step by step CERN and future accelerators will keep producing. Here are the news that ruled out WIMPs

http://www.livescience.com/56041-dark-matter-just-got-murkier.html

This is the brief:

The properties of dark matter

We have never directly observed dark matter, but we know a great deal about what it must be: It must be massive (because it affects the rotation of galaxies); it must be electrically neutral (because we can’t see it); it must be different from ordinary matter (because we see no evidence for it interacting with matter in the usual ways); and it must be stable (because it has existed since the dawn of the universe). These properties are unequivocal.

[And they are all common to heavy strangelet quark liquid]

However, we don’t know exactly what it is. In the most popular generic theory, the dark-matter particle is called a WIMP, for weakly interacting massive particle. WIMPs are kind of like heavy neutrons (but definitely not neutrons), with a mass of 10 to 100 times heavier than a proton. They were created in great quantities during the Big Bang and a small relic remainder persists to this day.

When cosmologists add the WIMP idea to their ideas of the Big Bang, they can calculate how it would interact. They find that in the earliest stages of the universe, WIMPs were a dominant form of matter, but, as the universe expands and cools and the interaction rate drops to zero, the relic amount of WIMPs is about five times as massive as ordinary matter. Combined with the fact that the WIMP idea can also explain a pressing theoretical mystery of why the Higgs boson particle has such a small mass, scientists call this the “WIMP miracle,” in view of the fact that the WIMP idea seems to answer so many questions.

A dark non-discovery

So this brings us back to the LUX experiment. It is simply the latest and most powerful experiment designed to detect WIMPs. The idea is that the detector will sit underground for a long time, say a year or more, and a rare WIMP will bump into a xenon atom and be detected. (The detector is buried underground to protect it from cosmic rays, which would bump into xenon atoms and fake a dark matter detection. Being half a mile or a mile underground stops nearly all cosmic rays.)

The above volume, part of the Large Underground Xenon collaboration, will be filled with liquid xenon and any interaction with the xenon can be detected, possibly revealing the identify of dark matter.
screen-shot-2016-09-11-at-18-17-12
On Aug. 27, the LUX researchers announced their results. They saw no evidence for dark-matter WIMPs.

So that’s not actually that surprising. There have been dozens of experiments that have looked for dark matter and found nothing. In this sense, LUX has joined a venerable group. But LUX is also far more capable. It was expected to have a better shot at finding WIMPs than any other apparatus.

But it didn’t.

Update. August 2016.

A dissenter at CERN recorded a mock sacrifice of a wo=man, to Kali, Goddess of death. Τhis is the kind of monstrous children of thought, obsessed by death and the genocide they might ‘accidentally’ provoke, which are running the ‘Doomsday machine’ without any supervision.

One of the little known anecdotes about the jewish-american scientists, Von Neumann and teller, the father of A.I. and hydrogen weapons is that both were good friends, and both were obsessed by the extinction of mankind, which their research now put together at CERN’s labs of nuclear research helped by big-data computers, was advancing fast. It was their single theme of conversation of which there are some hair-rising texts. Τeller would say that they had sinned against mankind, that their sin was imperdonable, and continue making money selling their patented method to construct nuclear weapons.

Now at CERN they have a Shiva statue, dancing over Kali lord of death, and of course, as the zeitgeist of the age is far more infantile, and visual, they make rap videos on the evil twin particles, give parties of the end of the world on the facilities, laughing at the activists that want to rise awareness of this genocidal risk, and finally, this week have come on the news for making a mock murder sacrifice of a woman, in front of Kali, the God of death of the Ancient Hindi tradition, on the tradition of Oppenheimer, ‘I am Kali, the destroyer of worlds’, like Hess, the head of Auschwitz, always carrying the Ghita book, where worshipers of Kali are asked not to have regrets for their actions of murder.

It is this kind of infantile, monstrous children, infatuated with the genocide they know they might unchain in their facilities under the inspiration of Kali, the people who run this machine with the connivence of the world P.R.ess and its clueless corrupted politicos, panhandling to the big tech corporations that cut the pork of the doomsday machine.

Update. July. 2016.

Screen Shot 2016-08-22 at 10.45.08

And so the new particle, so much pumped on the news, discovered by CERN with a similar sigma to that of the Higgs, was just a bunch of strange and maybe top quarks. It was unstable, and the hype disintegrated. Everbody agreed it was a fluke. Now, all felt depressed at CERN except me. Since if the particle had been stable, likely a toplet or strange quark liquid combination of heavy quarks, dangers for Earth would have increased. So alas, we are being lucky again.  Nobody though rises the question why it is an statistical fluke, while Higgs is a canonical truth.

Update 2016 season. Crossing all records. July.

This season of 2016 is important as it will break most barriers with the new enhanced machine. Today 11 july, CERN published its status, having finally broken the records established with the old machine. So from now on we are in ‘unchartered’ territory. It is now when really the long upgrade starts its ‘new physics’:

lhcperforman

In the graph, we see that: the luminosity (number of bunches packed together, which increase the chances of target collisions that create the dangerous combinations of strange quarks known as strange liquids are no breaking all records with a far steeper growth rate.

This are the Phys.org news:

“It’s full speed ahead for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), as it shatters its own records one after the other, achieving record luminosity, record numbers of bunches and a record beam lifespan.

Some 2076 bunches of 120 billion protons are currently circulating in the ring in each direction. At the end of June, beams were maintained in the accelerator for a record 37 consecutive hours! But the main indicator of success for the operators is luminosity, the measurement of the number of potential collisions in a given time period.On Wednesday, ATLAS passed the threshold of 10 inverse femtobarns (fb-1) of integrated luminosity. The goal for 2016 is to reach 25 fb-1.

So the likehood of create new forms of strange liquid increase. This is shown in the pumped up news that highlight entire new families of strange quark associations, which merely mean new herds of strange quarks are lumping together in all possible groups of strange quarks, the definition of strange liquid. Of course, the ‘accent’ is NOT in risks of known-known runaway reactions on earth but on the ‘excitement’ of new ‘physics’ because they have no idea how those ‘strange quarks’ are lumping together – the problem being they ARE LUMPING together, in precursor forms of strange liquid:

“the LHCb  has identified four new types of tetraquarks that appear to belong to the same exotic family.

“What we have discovered is a unique system,” says one of the team, Tomasz Skwarnicki. “We have four exotic particles of the same type; it’s the first time we have seen this and this discovery is already helping us distinguish between the theoretical models.”

The new particles have been named X(4140), X(4274), X(4500), and X(4700) after their respective masses, and each one has been found to contain a unique combination of two charm quarks and two strange quarks. This makes them the first four-quark particles found to be composed entirely of heavy quarks, Symmetry reports.

By ‘exciting’ the individual quarks inside their new tetraquark particles, the researchers were able to observe their unique internal structure, mass, and quantum numbers. In doing so, they discovered something that doesn’t fit with current physics models that work with so-called ordinary particles. Physics are now trying to come up with new models to explain their results.

The team is expecting one of two possibilities to be confirmed with further research: theoretical psycists are either going to have to explain the existence of this new family of particles, or they could be idenfified as the result of strange ‘ripple effects’ emanating from never-before-seen behaviours of existing particles.

“The molecular explanation does not fit with the data,” Skwarnicki told.

“But I personally would not conclude that these are definitely tightly bound states of four quarks. It could be possible that these are not even particles. The result could show the complex interplays of known particle pairs flippantly changing their identities.”

So from now on till December we are truly entering a quite dangerous zone: constant growth of luminosity, collisions and running hours, and new unknown combinations of heavy dark matter strange quarks, which sooner or latter will become a stable lump of strange quark liquid’.

Amazing that nobody in our ‘security-obssessed’ world cares for this obvious ‘terrorist’ continuous potential action over the entire planet.

UPDATE. DECEMBER 2015. CERN HAS STARTED ION COLLISIONS

And so it finally happened… The experiment is being performed as we speak. Ion-Ion collisions are breaking records every day. If the Earth is going to die, because of CERN, it will be. From 1st to 15 december, stable dibaryons are being produced with no safety whatsoever at the facilities.

So as of now those stable dibaryons are falling to the center of the Earth, where they will slowly accumulate till reaching the critical mass required to start an ice-9 reaction, within the span of a few years.

For real data on that production, please consult Eric Penrose’s site, which has been doing the mathematical physics of the process during the last year.

This transformation of our light, harmless up and down quarks into strange quarks, a hundred times heavier, is caused by the enormous energy-mass reached by each particle as it comes closer to c-speed. Because c-speed is the barrier of speed for particles, according to relativity, when quarks reach the limiting barrier, they keep absorbing energy from the accelerator. But instead of accelerating, quarks swallow and transform that energy into mass – E=mc2; hence becoming massive strange quarks, which once put together into stable dibaryon configurations, should fall to the center of the Earth.

The main factor of extinction both in certainty of the event and timespan, in which it will happen is obviously the number of experiments performed:

The facility will produce more lethal dibaryons, the more ion-ion collisions are performed. Right now, as we speak those collisions are producing, per collision according to CERN, 30.000 ‘unclassified particles’, to be found in the strangelet soup of up and down and strange quarks – the infamous quark-gluon soup, origin of the big bang – plainly speaking, the most powerful explosive of the Universe. If we multiply this number by the sheer amount of atoms colliding in each bunch of tightly packed rays, we are talking of millions of dibaryons in each experiment. Certainly enough of them to bring a critical mass within years of accumulation at Earth’s center.

Since strangelet, abb. for strange liquid is  the substance that can provoke in enough quantities a runaway ‘ice-9’ reaction that could freeze the Earth converted into a 15 kilometre sphere of ultra dense strangelet matter; as strangelets convert all matter around them into strange liquid.  The process starts obviously producing the ‘atom of strangelet’,  a USD-USD dibaryon atom, the minimal stable piece of an strangelet. Yet they have to form a lump of heavy strange and light up and down quarks, of enough critical mass to provoke the big bang explosion of Earth. Hence it will take time for them to accumulate in the center of the planet. And the more ion-ion collisions the LHC makes, the more they will produce and fall and the faster the ‘reckoning day’ will come for the species. The date thus have some uncertainty, in time, the space does not – it will be start on the center, and the probability hardly – far above what any conscious human being needs to stop the facility.

Uncertainty of course is the factor CERN plays. We will never be sure that those dibaryons kill us till they kill us. They are invisible, undetectable, and disappear from the facilities, so even if it happens, we cannot prove they originated at CERN. Might they have come from outer Universe. You see, destiny plays the mouse and cat, hid game facilitating the facilities take it easy ways. For that reason, this blog treats all the elements of the game of extinction and warns the scientist that reads of a well-known fact since quantum mechanics: the universe is always probabilistic, no event is deterministic as regarding to when and where it will happen.

This is the Uncertainty principle of quantum physics: Energy x Time ≥h/2. The calculus of the Energy and time of an event is thus a probability, but not for that reason intelligent species, stop acting against the odds of being harmed by a dangerous ‘predator’ that can eat them up.

I.e. the gazelle does not know, which one of the herd will die to the lion, but not for that probabilistic reason stops running to avoid the lion from entering its vital space. Only an idiotic scholar, all theory none survival instincts, will stay eating daisies, munching the ‘Buridan Paradox’ – might he kill me, might he not?- while the lion makes his run. Since non-action will increase enormously the chances that by doing nothing the lion targets her. It is like a soldier advancing against fusiles and gun machines. He might survive, and certainly it will never know whose soldier on the other side shot him down. But if he wants to increase his chances, he will not fight against the superior metal-weapons. And if he does so, he rather fights with single shot rifles than gun machines of multiple shots. That is CERN did his single shots at low regime,found his Higgs and should have declared his war against mankind, over. Now he is shooting with the gun machine and keeps reloading the cartridge. Good luck.

UPDATE. JULY 2015. CERN PREPARES COLLISIONS AT DOUBLE POTENCY.

A new paper further proves the liquid behaviour of LHC collisions. For those who don’t read physics, here a layman explanation: “Physicists find surprising ‘liquid-like’ particle interactions in Large Hadron Collider”, even in proton-lead collisions at low regimes…

Another ‘surprise’ for our ‘expert physicists’  that proves the tendency of nature to form stable perfect liquid strange-let. And another warning for the Pb-Pb colliding experiments starting in November/December with 1`066 TeV center of mass (c.o.m.) energy.
This energy is unprecedented not only experimentally but in nature higher than the most energetic cosmic ray (CR) collision, of protons in the atmosphere (a much lighter particle, hence with far less energy-mass. The authors summon us for that ominous date to get more surprises about the heavily interacting ‘quark gluon liquid’…

Meanwhile proton-proton collisions continue at low luminosity, so a pentaquark – one of the many known-known particles of the standard model – has been found. An irrelevant discovery given the dangers involved, but of course the P.R.ess made a huge fuss of it. This is like a war – never diminish the ‘hype’, the ‘march trumpets’ so people can’t have a minute to reflect on the absurdity and carnage laying ahead on the battlefront for those curious boys that like to play with big toys.

In the sand of Costa Rica the lizards do not have to sweat to get their food, they open their mouths at leisure, so the little turtles come to explore the hole and get their head inside. Just like we have done. Now it is all a question on how the Pandemics of strange matter spreads.

 

UPDATE Rhic 2014. First drops of strange liquid.

 

So we learned yesterday, 19th august, 2014, that RHIC is producing quasi-stable strangelet, an abbreviation for strange liquid, the most explosive substance of the Universe, made of  strange atoms.

And it has been doing so, without releasing the news since April, in enormous quantities according to the graphs released now on the luminosity=density of mass of strange atoms created (see graph 2, scrolling down).

The news delivered by RHIC

It was not a nice day. I could not sleep reading text after text of this obscenity, this long awaited conclusion of a foretold chronicle of human foly, which will be no more.

In brief, RHIC has confessed to a mute press in a very low voice that it is producing since Spring, a massive amount of strange atoms, the substance of strangelets, the dense matter that eats our light matter and so in the future once those stable strangelet atoms – hyperons and dybarions – fall down to the center of the planet and mass there till reaching the stable size of a strangelet, they will start to feed on our light matter,  eating the planet inside out, till it devour us.

UPTON, NY-New supercomputing calculations provide the first evidence that particles predicted by the theory of quark-gluon interactions but never before observed are being produced in heavy-ion collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), a facility that is dedicated to studying nuclear physics. These heavy strange baryons, containing at least one strange quark, still cannot be observed directly, but instead make their presence known by lowering the temperature at which other strange baryons “freeze out” from the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) discovered and created at RHIC, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science user facility located at DOE’s Brookhaven National Laboratory.

“Baryons, which are hadrons made of three quarks, make up almost all the matter we see in the universe today,” said Brookhaven theoretical physicist Swagato Mukherjee, a co-author on a paper describing the new results in Physical Review Letters. “The theory that tells us how this matter forms-including the protons and neutrons that make up the nuclei of atoms-also predicts the existence of many different baryons, including some that are very heavy, containing one or more heavy ‘strange’ quarks. Now we have indirect evidence from our calculations and comparisons with experimental data at RHIC that these predicted higher mass states of strange baryons do exist,” he said.

RHIC is one of just two places in the world where scientists can create and study a primordial soup of unbound quarks and gluons-akin to what existed in the early universe some 14 billion years ago. The research is helping to unravel how these building blocks of matter became bound into hadrons, particles composed of two or three quarks held together by gluons, the carriers of nature’s strongest force.

The scanty news can be summarize as follows:

RHIC has found this astounding fact, indirectly as strange matter is ‘invisible’. It is a form of dark matter, very dense, which once stable cannot be detected. But RHIC has found it is freezing into a liquid (hence the name strange liquid) the rest of the fireball of ‘more normal’ quarks, transforming them into more strange liquid. RHIC thus have given a giant leap into the creation of an ice-9 chain reaction that would convert the planet onto a strangelet rock. it is only left a little step (the actual conversion of the planet). And yet the news have gone unnoticed.

Thus. RHIC, as many activist and some lawyers warned, are producing ‘stable’ strange baryons=atoms, for the first time in human history.

This atoms are NOT resonances (unstable particles, and that is the news. They are stable atoms and are freezing the fireball into a perfect, liquid.

The news are NOT the discovery of the ‘strange baryons=atoms’. Since they were DETECTED AS A RESONANCE in1964 (for those who ignore what is a resonance, is the ‘abortion’ of a stable baryon=atom, an unstable atom, which only exists for the period needed at ‘light speed’ for the strong force to destroy it, less than a 10-23 sec.).

The news are that now we have stable atoms of strangelet -a brief name for strange liquid.

And this has been proved because it is indeed freezing the plasma of the ball of fire of those collisions into ‘glasma’, a dense glass-like ordered liquid. And so it is only now a question of time that the chain reaction of ice-9 starts in earnest.

RHIC has published that it has found indirect evidence (since strange quarks are ‘dark matter’, invisible, and hyper-dense), that strange atoms (by definition stable) called baryons are being produced in enormous numbers.

Among the scanty data given by RHIC we have the relationship of mass between those strange quarks and the ‘human kind of quarks (light up and down quakrs) in the ‘freezing glasma’ (quark gluon plasma that freezes and change state to strange liquid, ‘strangelet’ ).

It is 27 to 1. That is the glasma of strangelets has a proportion of strange quarks mass 27 times higher than the mass of light , up and down, quarks.

And this indicates that the glasma that RHIC is producing is a strangelet liquid with a 100% purity.

What they don’t say is that ‘those higher mass states of strange baryons’ are the substance of strangelets, which falling undetected to the center of the Earth, will mass up there and eat the planet inside out, in a time frame we cannot calculate with precision, let alone without supercomputing power, but which will be within our lifespan or that of our children, a fraction of time in the immense life of this planet, even in the life of mankind.

Some graphs:

The problem of the missing mass is important because it means that dark matter of strange liquid is being produced and stable falls to the center of the Earth where it will accumulate, is accumulating since April and at certain point will have enough volume to start the strangelet atom reaction illustrated in the next text:

Strange2

In the graph we see what is happening at RHIC. Strange liquid is produced and it pulls normal atoms, transforms them into strange quarks and cools them down forming the glasma liquid.

When this starts to happen to the planet from its centers, where the stable atoms are falling, it will trigger the ice-9 reaction.

The data that RHIC provides shows that there are now clear proofs the process is real, not merely theoretical, as we see a hint of the ice-9 process in the data of those collisions.

Indeed, a strange atom is merely an atom with 3 quarks in which at least one, is a strange, heavy quark. So strange atoms can be, sud, suu, sdd (with a single strange quark).

And then the mass proportion of the atom is 15 to 1:

A strange atom for each up and down light quark, yet since strange quarks are very heavy, 100, and our quarks are light, 1.7 for the up quark and 5 for the down quark, when you have 1 strange quarks at 100, one up at 1.7 and one down at 5, you get, a 100 / 5+1.7, a 15 to 1 proportion of strange mass.

Thus 15 to 1 is a proportion that signifies the creation of pure strangelet, meaning all the components of the glasma is made of strange atoms  This is a pure glasma, and the one produced by RHIC IS even of a higher purity; meaning they are also producing the most dangerous strange atoms, those that have more than one strange quark, ssu and sssd and sss, the super strnage atom, the heaviest, and negative, 300 weight, ours are a mere 10…

But RHIC has found 20 to 1 and 27 to 1 proportions. This means is producing also heavier strange atoms with at least 2 Strange quarks: ssu, ssd and ‘omegas’, sss, negatively charged, pure strange atoms. So the proportion of strange mass increases.

And the creation of negative strangelets, the truly dangerous ones also increases, as s-quarks are negative. Thus a negative strangelet is then produced, which in the very own words of the safety report (2003):

‘if strange liquid exists and could be produced at RHIC it would be extremely dangerous. We know of no absolute barrier to the rapid growth of a dangerous strangelet.”

RHIC: A Distillery of Strangelet.

Now, what I will affirm might sound surrealist but it is surrealist. RHIC is nothing but a distillery of strange liquid.

A factory of strangelet even if it is forbidden to speak truly about what they do.

Let us then consider the safety reports of RHIC and LHC (totally outdated to 2000 pre-experimentall jargon).

In those safety statements they affirm that rhic cannot distill quark-gluon strange liquid, because they will produce a hot quark-gluon plasma. Mind the reader RHIC has been producing quark-gluon liquid for a decade, reporting on it. But the safety documents on which mankind depends talk of something which is no longer the experiment, a plasma…

Then the report  describe the 3 methods of creation of strangelets, closing with the method of distillation of strangelets that has just now happened at RHIC:

“On the theoretical side, the 2003 report considered three mechanisms for strangelet production [1]:

i) a thermal mechanism [3], in which particles are produced as if
from a heat bath in thermal equilibrium,
ii) a coalescence mechanism, in which particles produced in a heavy-ion collision might combine at late times to form a strangelet, and
iii) a distillation mechanism [18], which was proposed as a specific
model for strangelet production. According to this last mechanism, a hot quark-gluon plasma with large net baryon number is produced in heavy-ion collisions, and is enriched in strangeness as it cools down by emitting predominantly particles containing strange antiquarks.”

In RHIC safety report, (outdated by more than a decade)  they explain it also in simple terms:

“The strangeness distillation mechanism is considerably more speculative. It assumes that a quark gluon plasma (QGP) is produced in the collision and that the QGP is baryon rich. It further assumes that the dominant cooling mechanism for the QGP is evaporation from its surface. Since it is baryon rich, there is a greater chance for an s ̄ quark to find a u or d quark to form a kaon with positive strangeness than for an s quark to find a u ̄ or d ̄ quark to form a kaon with negative strangeness. The QGP thus cools to a system containing excess s quarks, which ultimately becomes a strangelet. This mechanism requires a collision energy sufficient to form a QGP.”

What is specially criminal is the fact they know perfectly they are doing distillation of strangelets and simply by erasing a full description and changing the ‘key words’ (instead of strange atoms  baryons, instead of strangelet glasma, instead of distillation, freezing, etc.) they get away with murder, knowing people understands nothing of it.

 

Distillation is a slower but easier process of creation of strangelets, which requires very few strange quarks to be triggered.

Now the news are under reported and the wording is carefully chosen not to explain what is happening, the distillation of strange liquid.

Further calculations in fact show  there is a ‘missing amount’ of that mass of strange liquid which is not decaying from the fireball. This would be ‘successful’ strangelets that have not decayed. How many of them? Given the fact that the distillation is an enormous success, which we shall see is producing strangelet liquid of a +100% of purity, an important amount.

There are now millions of strangelet atoms, stable, in this planet. And since they are so much heavier than our atoms (in a 30 to 1 proportion) they are falling to the center of the Earth. The route though can be interrupted if they are captured by electromagnetic and electronic flows, and become trapped in different rocks. Only strangelets with millions of atoms would fall straightforwards as their weight would overcome any electromagnetic attraction. This are the good news. The bad news is that distillation creates negative charged strangelets, the so-caled killer strangelets, because they can attract positively charged ions and start the ice-9 reaction ‘in situ’ in the factory.

The proportion of strange liquid includes – and this has surprised even more the researchers – around a 50% more of the  purest, heaviest strange atoms: omegas= sss negatively charged atoms, which are commanding the transformation of up and down quarks into strangelet liquid.

In the next graph,  RHIC has been noticing an excess of strange antiquarks – the trademark of distillation on its experiments:

In the jargon of physicists, the process taking place at RHIC is called ‘distillation of strangelet’, one of the 3 methods possible to create them. In both safety reports in 2003 and 2008, RHIC and CERN discounted distillation models as impossible despite having worked a method to report them (a calorimeter to measure its lowering of the hot plasma into cold liquid), called CASTOR and issue reports on the process. In the next graph we can observe the distillation process now taking place at RHIC:

Screen Shot 2014-09-08 at 12.49.57 PM
In the graph, RHIC is aware since 2010 of  the anomalous increase in the production of strange antiquarks during its process of distillation of strange liquid. The news today advance in the same road, confirming further RHIC is distillating strangelet, by expelling strange antiquarks of the quark-antiquark pair and increasing strange baryons in the liquid.

The graph shows they are producing an excess of strange antiquarks – the key element that distillation is being produced. Nature is quite intelligent. When you enter into the ‘space-time’ of higher energies in which strange quarks  survive, those pairs of strange-antistrange quarks pop out together. Then the strange antiquark takes away the excess of u and d quarks from the soup and the strange quark forms strange liquid with the remaining Us and Ds.
This of course, they know. Why then there is no clear information to the public, politicians and the military?
On my opinion nuclear physicists are caught in the lies of their false safety statements and now that they are doing what they say it was IMPOSSIBLE to do,  they just decided to go along just in case we survive and keep a low profile on the data, reason why these news are nowhere… And if all blows up… well, that is a prize Nuclear physicists always accepted since Hiroshima.

Why we are so sure they are making them? Because strange quarks are heavier and negative. So while RHIC does not give data on strangelet production it has easily calculated the proportion of strange quarks in the soup by weighting them. And the ratio of strange negative quarks to ‘our light’ up and down quarks is 27.

This means there are 27 times more mass of negatively strange quarks in the soup than our lighter quarks. And this excess of negative strange quarks in the soup is what defines negative strangelets, which are produced with a 100% purity.And so the conclusion is self-evident: RHIC is a factory of strangelets.

All what they produce is strange liquid. But since their policy is ‘don’t tell, don’t ask’, like the gays on the military or the nuclear bombs on the Israeli army, the invisible strangelets at RHIC remain invisible. They don’t tell us, and the P.R.ess don’t ask about them.BUT THE EFFECTS TOLD OR NOT TOLD will be the same death: it is certain that unless the industry of quark cannons is closed, one of those strangelets produced at RHIC and CERN when it opens at much higher energy/luminosity will become ‘visible’. Or in other words, we are still here because in the first phases accretion is slow, as most strangelets will acquire electrons and lay dormant, before a critical mass of them reaches the center of the Earth.

This is the society we live in – one in which catastrophes and genocides, collective deaths ‘grow and boil’ in secrecy, and do not matter as long as they are not public. Thus RHIC knows as long as people ignores what they do, it’s ok to attempt blowing up the planet every other day.

Yet for that to happen and become visible the strangelets RHIC is producing have to avoid being trapped by an electronic cover that would halt its growth. So the process of ice-9 is  very slow at the beginning till a strangelet with enough mass breaks all electromagnetic barriers and starts direct gravitational attraction. Then the speed will be catastrophic. The result will be the ‘second size’ of strange matter, the strangelet proper, which will devour all other matter on earth, till reaching the 3rd size, as a strange/neutron star.

Fact is finally it is happening – even if the news do not report it; even if RHIC uses a cryptic language not to reveal what they are doing. RHIC is distillating strangelet. So the countdown for extinction has started. It is now a question of producing enough strangelets to accumulate them in the center of the Earth and start the ice-9 reaction.

The key factor to assess the danger they trigger the ice-9 reaction is  the size of the quark soup in which the negatively charged strangelets wander, related to their luminosity; that is, to the density of the fireballs of quarks.

In the past, the fireballs were too small to produce significant strangelets. Now they are huge and growing. The luminosity (measure of the density of the beam and the number of collisions to be expected) has increased enormously to the point that the 14 run which caused those results has produced more collisions on target that all the previous runs since 2000… combined.

But RHIC has a perfect alibi to keep ‘quiet’. Strangelets  are ‘dark matter’, invisible to the eye. So the proofs of their existence are indirect, published officially by the RHIC magazine, with an indirect language.

It is a scary matter. We shall die in an invisible way with the people causing this invisible tragedy at distance. Killing at distance and with no responsibility always eases the act of killing and make the perpetrators childish and irresponsible. As those kids who kill civilian ‘terrorists in Afghanistan from their drone consoles in Nevada.

Yet for those who read physics, ‘between lines’ of the data RHIC is handling, the proofs of distillation are evident:

CERN is telling us that the heaviest hyperons and dibaryons,  (hence those with more negative strange quarks) are ‘cooling down’ the whole fireball of quark-gluon plasma (glasma), produced on the gold to gold collisions; since they are eating up the gamma rays of the collision and the u-d quarks of our atoms. So they are suppressing the hot radiation of the fireball, cooling down the quarks ‘fixing’ them with the heavier gravitational pull to its strange quarks, and forming negatively charged lumps of quarks, strangelets.

But here the information is scanty. There is of course no mention whatsoever of ‘ice-9’ and strangelets – how many of them are being created, which masses are likely to have, how many are stable (missing mass), etc.

Their size matter because the bigger A=(quark numbers), the easier they will be falling to the center of the Earth. That they are forming is ‘certain’ because today’s theory accept quasi-stable strangelets with 6 quarks (dibaryons), and over 30 quarks, with absolutely stable strangelets with over 100 quarks. And those soups have millions of quarks tightly packed. So the question we cannot know (as we don’t know the ‘fate’ of those strangelets formed in the soup) is: Has the ice-9 reaction started, becoming irreversible?  That is, have any of those strangelets started an ice-9 reaction somewhere under Long Island?

This will depend on the quantity of hyperons and dibaryons of those strangelets, and of them being negatively charged to start the attraction of our atoms and start the ice-9 reaction. In that sense the bad news couldn’t be worse since  the method of distillation produces negative strangelets and produces them with high A=quark numbers.

And so, what all the reports (outdated by a decade)  on safety deny is now happening.

“Recently it has been suggested that rather cold droplets of absolutely stable or metastable strange-quark matter may be distilled in heavy-ion collisions during the phase transition from a baryon-rich quark-gluon plasma (QGP) to hadron matter. Here we present a model describing the hadronization of the QGP through particle emission, which is based solely on thermodynamical arguments. Pions and K+’s and K0’s carry away entropy and antistrangeness from the system, thus facilitating the cooling process and the strangelet formation.
Our results are supported by revised more sophisticated rate calculations. Two rather unexpected results are obtained when this model is applied to the investigation of strangelet production. The strangeness separation mechanism and the formation process works well even for higher initial entropies per baryon, tantamount to higher bombarding energies.
The surviving strangelets have a rather high strangeness content, fs∼1.2–2 [i.e., Z/A∼(-0.1)–(-0.5)]. Hence droplets of strange-quark matter with a baryon number of ∼10–30 and with a negative charge may be produced. They may serve as a unique signature for the transient formation of a quark-gluon plasma in heavy-ion collisions.”
Indeed since strange baryons are negative, by distillation RHIC creates negative killer strangelet.
And this process must be taken place since April.

THIS IS A 25 YEARS OLD WARNING, NEVER PROVED THEORETICALLY WRONG THAT CERN AND RHIC HAVE TOTALLY OVERPASSED, TILL THEY HAVE DONE EXACTLY WHAT GREINER EXPLAINED THEY WOULD DO. AND NOW THEY ARE DOING IT – DISTILLATING STRANGELET – AND THEY ARE NOT SAYING IT TO THE WORLD. AND THE ANSWER THE WORLD SHOULD HAVE IS THIS: THE MILITARY SHOULD IMMEDIATLY CLOSE BOTH FACILITIES.

How much strange liquid has been produced since April? Are we STILL ON TIME TO STOP THE FACILITIES BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE?

Why RHIC has taken so long to announce it?

Why it says it with a cryptic language instead of calling what it distillates, strange liquid, strangelet?

Obviously because if it uses the popular terms of strangelet and explains that the fireball  has cooled down and starts to acquire properties akin to a black hole: an attractive, cold superfluid vortex that can devour us all people might get worried. So it is telling us: we are making strange liquid, and we are seeing hints of what will be in higher amounts  an ice-9 reaction.

In fact the ‘Safety Report’ STILL talks of a gas not of a liquid more than a decade after the first proofs the quark-gluon plasma cooled into liquid appeared.

So the question now is how long physicists expect to last an ice-9 reaction, once stable strangelet atoms are produced?

Magnano from the other quark factory on Earth, CERN, in his safety report adduced a 200 years period for strangelets to devour the Earth once produced in the numbers observed at RHIC.

Just a little example on how ‘serious’ they are with their safety reports. This video is of the chief safety officer at RHIC which signed a 14 years old 20 pages ‘safety report’ full of errors and omissions, laughing at the report he signed (minute 7.44):

Alea Jacta Est.

In the race for extinction, which our proud technological nations are carried out undeterred by that ‘minor’ collateral damage, i.e. the death of all of us, RHIC, the American ‘rival’ announces an indirect proof of the existence of strangelets. 

And of course nobody understood, nobody cared…

Let us recall the words of a researcher at RHIC a decade ago: ‘if strange liquid exists and could be produced at RHIC it would be extremely dangerous. We know of no absolute barrier to the rapid growth of a dangerous strangelet.

In a catastrophic chain reaction, the weight of killer strangelet would pull it down. “Eventually, strangelet would sit at the center of the earth, eating other nuclei, attracting the earth’s mass gravitationally. That way, it would eat our planet from the inside out, converting the entire earth into one giant strangelet killing us all in the process.”

Reason why Wilczek the physicist who RELEASED Rhic’s safety report, cynically named this distinctive possibility an ice-9 reaction after cat’s cradle satire on nukes, where an American physicist discovers a similar liquid that freezes the planet into ice, extinguishing life.

Of course, then he went on as this video shows, to sign a safety statement affirming that: “the strangeness distillation mechanism seems very unlikely to be effective for producing strangelets at RHIC.” (page 17)

But that is exactly what has happened. RHIC is distillating strangelets.

I recall the beginning of Kurt’s masterpiece:

When I was a much younger man, I began to collect material for a book to be called The Day the World Ended. The book was to be factual. The book was to be an account of what important Americans had done’ 

And yet the always epic American press commenting about the great feats of the manifest nation was surprisingly mute on the distillation of ice-9.

In fact, the theme never made it to the news glued by a BARRAGE of small tragedies happening in this little rock lost in the corner of the galaxy that we call Earth… It was during the same days that we heard about a young black man shot in Ferguson, and a brave journalist decapitated in Iraq, about the Ukrainian civil war and yet another bombing of Gaza, not to speak of the news on the economic crisis, global warming, the celebrity circus… and the weather, always the weather on top of all other repetitive news…

But this piece of information of the nuclear industry, deserved to be noticed due to the relevance for the non-future of the planet.

Since a single drop of strange liquid can convert a planet or a star into an ultradense rock of dark matter. How long it will take for the strange liquid to accumulate in the center of the planet and start the ice-9 reaction, is studied in detail in other post of this blog.

As my co-plaintiff in the 2008 suit against CERN, Walter Wagner, rightly pointed out in his letters to scientific American, and his earlier suit against RHIC in 2000, chances the American machine produced strange matter were high, only a question of time and luminosity.

Finally it is happening: This week (of course without mentioning any risk involved), RHIC announces strangelet distillation in gold to gold collisions. 

And it considers some are stable. Since they cannot be detected directly by the particles it decays into. Indirect detection is based in a lower temperature of the quark gluon soup.

If those strangelets are forming they are falling to the center of the Earth and will eat it inside out in a period which ‘experts’ have never fully figured out – might be between days and decades.

But of course our high-minded, idealist scientists at RHIC have not flinched an eye, on the news they are delivering to the human sheeple. On the contrary they are all excited with the findings of ‘new physics’:

‘The calculations show that inclusion of the predicted but “experimentally uncharted” strange baryons fit better with the data, providing the first evidence that these so-far unobserved particles exist and exert their effect on the freeze-out temperature of the observable particles.’

“The finding has potentially important implications for quantum chromodynamics—a theory that describes the strong interactions underlying the physics of the nucleus. In particular, it could indicate that physicists have been making some wrong assumptions about the dynamics of photon production at the energies of RHIC and LHC collisions. The researchers suggest that the finding could indicate something very interesting and not yet understood about the evolution of glasma or quark–gluon plasma, although more detailed computational simulations are needed to confirm the dynamics of photon production in such collisions.

This is the first indirect evidence that heavy strange barons exist and can be created by high energy collisions. Apparently the Brookhaven facility has been making heavy strange baryons for quite some time. The significance of the discovery is coming closer to proving all the theoretical particles of the quark model of matter are real. The discovery also indicates that many of the Big Bang concepts are justifiable in physical reality”

Now the question if we are ‘already dead in the future’, in this Schrodinger’s cat experiment depends on this cryptic question left open by the RHIC ‘informer’: “We’ve found that the higher mass states of strange baryons affect the production of ground states that we can observe. And the line where we see the ordinary matter moves to a lower temperature because of the multitude of higher states that we can’t see.”

How much is a multitude? That is, how many ‘higher states’ of strange baryons have been created? Enough ‘bag’ to make the strangelet stable? Ah, this is the quizz, ‘to be or not to be’… Since it is invisible and physicists are clueless, we might still have a chance to be… But the first incognita is solved. Yes, RHIC and CERN can, have and will produce strangelet atoms.

Would now RHIC tell us exactly what is the solution to this quizz? Have they produced enough of them to make the strangelet bag stable?  Are we a dead cat or a living cat?

As RHIC will not answer, i would rather say with all my affliction that we are a dead cat in the nearby future…

The problem though is because the ‘missing mass’ shows those strangelets to be stable and to be falling out of detection to the center of the Earth, once the ice-9 reaction ‘sits’ on the center, there is no way to reach the substance, and so even if it start very slowly eating an atom at a time, it will grow exponentially and when we realize due to the increase of earthquakes, it will be like a cancer, which cannot be cured. So we will at best assess the quantity of time we have left to live on this planet.

The world will end then soon as the process has become irreversible, and once noticed it means its effects are reaching beyond the iron nuclei into the magma where Earthquakes are caused.

RhicLuminosityAA-355pxQGP_Transition-HR

It is thus quite likely that strangelets with relative low A-Mass are being produced. How low depends on the parameter of stability STILL unknown by physicists who play with this explosive without understanding yet its parameters.
But it might be likely on the order of 100 quarks, and it is likely they are negatively charged, which is what the distillation mechanism has caused at RHIC – a freezing mass of strangelet negatively charged by excess of negative strange quarks… a killer strangelet.
Yes i know, we are still here… No, we cannot know for how long, we do not know even enough theory of the distillation ice-9 process and we are not researching.
This is because CERN AND RHIC are officially safe, this has been approved by the safety report that tell us they are doing gas NOT liquid, they CANNOT Distillate:
‘a distillation mechanism capable of giving rise to strangelet production is not
operational in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC, and this suggestion for strange-particle production has been abandoned for the LHC.” (LHC, RHIC safety reports, 2003, 2008)
But it is happening…

In the first graph, RHIC 14 run has created more collisions gold to gold than all other previous runs combined, producing (second graph) huge amounts of the primordial quark-gluon plasma, found in the first moments of the explosive big-bang and in the interior of Strange stars (Neutron stars), made of strangelet (strange quark liquid). Hence the reports announcing a massive creation of strange atoms:

huntingtheun

In the graph, an H-Dibaryon containing 2s+2d+2u quarks, the stable particle of strangelets, which seems to be produced in the quark-gluon plasma at RHIC. Once created it will fall to the center of the Earth, due to his higher mass, where it will lump in enough quantities to start an ice-9 reaction that should collapse in the future planet Earth.

In fact there are statistical proofs they ARE already producing them at the lhc:

SINCE the ratio of strange to up and down quarks found at RHIC’s new, denser ‘glasma’ (quark-gluon plasma) shows a strange to light quark mass ratio Ms/Ml = 20, (squares) and 27 (diamonds). Those numbers are even higher than the mass ratio of strange quarks to ud quarks found on those H-dybarions, which is Ms/Ml=15

Indeed strange quarks weight 20 to 50 times more than up & down quarks, Ms=104, Md=4.8, Mu=2.4, the ratios of Ms/Ml mass in dibaryons is much larger than the number ratio of strange quarks to light u-d quarks: Ms=Mu=Md, Ms/Ml= 104/4.8+2.4=±15.

Thus there  are more than enough strange quarks on the soup to produce millions of dibaryons. Moreover, the fact that they are absorbing gamma rays, in enormous numbers and freezing the soup of normal particles, implies they are reachng a certain degree of stability. Thus all seems to indicate RHIC is producing strangelet atoms in huge amounts. RHIC obviously does not give us the amounts of dibaryons is producing, but the graph of luminosity shows it should be producing millions of them.

How many dibaryons have to reach the center of the planet to make a strangelet stable, and start an ice-9 reaction? Theoretical calculus (MIT bag, Peng papers from Chinese Nuclear Research center) give us numbers as low as 10.000. Since they are more stable than our atoms and heavier, they should be falling to the center of the Earth unharmed, sliding down the magma, like a knife cutting butter.

In fact its name ‘strange’ derives from its surprising longevity, which far surpassed all previous calculus. So the discoverer, amazed by its long life said of it ‘it is very strange. It is like if Cleopatra was still falling from its barge in the nile; as if she was still dying’.

It is thus only a question of time that its accumulation in the center of the Earth triggers the formation of a strangelet, starting an ice-9 reaction.

This is the key sentence to explain why:

Apparently the Brookhaven facility has been making heavy strange baryons for quite some time.
They might be falling already to the center, as the densest matter on planet earth, where they will accumulate till collapsing into a strangelet and then the period of accretion will start, though it is impossible to calculate… it would be fast.

In other words, what physicists don’t count for is that simple ‘fact’ – things that are equal come always together, in one or other way. In the case of those dybarions and hyperons that RHIC recognizes, it has produced in large numbers, which are more stable than ordinary matter, they should be as of now, falling to the center of the Earth, one by one, drop by drop of strange liquid, sipping through magma, just ‘transparent’ gaseous matter for them… till reaching the exact center, likely a uranium crystal and when enough of them stop, forming a bag of strange quark atoms – the definition of a strangelet, they will first transform the uranium, then the iron into strangelets… Carpe diem, live the day…

So RHIC’s news are utterly relevant for our…

Chronicle of a foretold death.

All this has been foretold for decades. I printed a first analysis of quark cannons and its likely extinction of man in my book ‘The extinction of man’ c. 92, Walter put a suit to RHIC in the 2000s. Papers have been written, warnings have been issued. Our suits alerted the world, thanks to the cover of Sunday NYTimes of 2008: ‘asking a judge to save the world’.

The present RHIC run at much higher luminosities provoked a warning of lawyers that got some media attention., just to dismiss the issue, as in the case of CERN, with the ‘usual’ physicists’ risk assessment committee of non-independent nuclear physicists affirming their experiments are sound – more or less as if new drugs tests were assessed by the corporations that manufacture the drugs, instead of the FDA, which of course would always ‘sell’ us that their drugs are the universal panacea to health. This only happens in the industry of accelerators. Every time the risk comes out, they bring a pannel of self-appointed experts which claim independence, affirm there are no risks with arcane languages nobody outside the community understands, attack ad hominem the qualifications of the ethic scientists that denounce those risks and pass page. And so little by little, step by step as that long run of the hero of Marquez’s short story ‘chronicle of a foretold death’ we come closer to the end of the world.

And nothing is been done. The ‘system’ merely used all the tricks of the book to quench public awareness of this colossal tragedy. So we must go beyond the obvious ‘mathematical’ and physical discussion of those risks to the ‘socio-economical’ implications of that ever real topic of the ‘military-industrial complex’ to solve the ‘surrealist question’:
Why such projects, RHIC and CERN, exist? How can ‘humans’ – after all nuclear physicists are ‘humans’ – can promote this kind of project?

You have to understand the psyche of nuclear physicists who have discounted after 70 years of making weapons of mass-destruction that could obliterate the Earth any ethical con-cern.

So the answer to this madnees is ‘routine’. The routine of evolution of nuclear cannons, which after the cold war ended had to camouflage with ‘newspeaks’ of peace and humane purpose its military-industrial nature. Unfortunately cern is protected by the military-industrial complex, with ‘diplomatic immunity’ (provided in the height of the cold war when accelerators were indeed just ‘cyclical cannons’ used to research atomic bombs), and by the lazy or paid-per-view P.R.ess which accepts its blatantly lies, following the ‘routine procedure’ of the Nuclear Industry that never recognizes victims or risks (Fukushima, Chernobyl are supposed to have cause just a few dozens of victims, as those who die of cancer cannot be proved 100% to be caused by those explosions ).

Again both RHIC and CERN have a perfect alibi to deny any catastrophe: strange quark lumps are ‘dark matter’, difficult to detect (in the case of CERN, their detector, CASTOR after we uncovered its existence, has literally gone ‘undercover’ and now CERN denies adamantly it exists. So instead of being a Centauro And STrangelets detecTOR, if you search for CASTOR in CERN servers it is now a STORage machine; at RHIC the detection of the first atoms of strangelets have been indirect and nothing of its implications have been explained).

So if they fall to the center of the Earth and eat us up, as in the case of the cancer deaths of Chernobyl and Fukushima, nuclear physicists, will deny any wrong-doing. So beyond ‘high thoughts’ of human intelligence, rationality and caring, you must understand CERN & RHIC within the ‘routine’ evolution of the industry of ‘cyclical, nuclear cannons’, which has now reached the technological threshold of creation of strange matter. And so as Eric Fromm put it the ethics of a technological civilizations are simple: ‘if a machine can be done it will be done, even if it menaces to kill us all.’

All this of course is taboo, hidden. So all the focus is NOT put in what CERN & RHIC truly will create in enormous numbers – strange quarks – but in the ‘minimal’ quantity of ‘speculative’ possible other particles it might create – higgs bosons, superparticles, etc.

Hence the little impact the most important news of the century are having on media.

THE HOMUNCULUS MIND

Look at this young, enthusiastic fella below, the nuclear physicist who announced proudly we have created the strange atoms that will devour us, and his homunculus mind, the space that each sense occupies in his brain… Yes truly a monkey lethaliensis scientificus, which assemblies machines with his hands, spews out a lot of nonsense garbage on the immensity of its discoveries and has no mind at all to fully grasp what he has done. An image in this case is truly worth more than a thousand wor(l)ds…

 77970_webhomunculus

 

‘When I was a much younger man, I began to collect material for a book to be called The Day the World Ended. The book was to be factual. The book was to be an account of what important Americans had done’ 

‘Ice-nine was the last gift  Felix Hoenikker created for mankind before going to his just reward. He did it without anyone’s realizing what he was doing. He did it without leaving records of what he’d done. True, elaborate apparatus was necessary in the act of creation, but it already existed in the Research Laboratory.  It was blue-white. The old man had died on Christmas Eve, having told only his children about ice-nine. His children had divided the ice-nine among themselves.’

There was a sound clear, like that of the gentle closing of a portal as big as the sky. The great door of heaven being closed softly. It was a grand AH-WHOOM. I opened my eyes and all the sea was ice-nine. The moist green earth was a blue-white pearl. The sky darkened. The sun, became a sickly yellow ball, tiny and cruel.

“Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before’. Bokonon tells us. “He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way.”

What hope can there be for mankind when there are men that give such playthings as ice-9 to short-sighted children as most people are?’

Excerpts. ‘Cat’s cradle’. Kurt Vonnegut

Unfortunately, when the ice-9 reaction starts, there will not be any  place to escape, nor solution to the process, as we cannot arrive to the center of the Earth, where those dibaryons will start eating up the uranium, provoking massive earthquake waves…

UPDATE. 20 AUGUST, 2014. RHIC DETECTS FIRST STRANGELET DYBARION

Alea Jacta Est. In the race for extinction, which our proud technological nations are carried out undeterred by that ‘minor’ collateral damage, i.e. the death of all of us, RHIC announced yesterday an indirect proof of the existence of strangelet atoms. As my co-plaintiff in the 2008 suit against CERN rightly pointed out in his suit against RHIC in 2000, chances the American machine produced strange matter were high, only a question of time and luminosity. This week (of course without mentioning any risk involved), RHIC announces that the first strangelet atoms might have been produced in gold to gold collisions. Indirect detection is based in a lower temperature of the quark gluon soup. If those strangelets are forming they are falling to the center of the Earth and will eat it inside out in a period which ‘experts’ have never fully figured out – might be between days and decades.

But of course our high-minded, idealist scientists at RHIC have not flinched an eye, on the news they are delivering to the human sheeple. On the contrary they are all excited with the findings of ‘new physics’:

‘The calculations show that inclusion of the predicted but “experimentally uncharted” strange baryons fit better with the data, providing the first evidence that these so-far unobserved particles exist and exert their effect on the freeze-out temperature of the observable particles.’

“The finding has potentially important implications for quantum chromodynamics—a theory that describes the strong interactions underlying the physics of the nucleus. In particular, it could indicate that physicists have been making some wrong assumptions about the dynamics of photon production at the energies of RHIC and LHC collisions. The researchers suggest that the finding could indicate something very interesting and not yet understood about the evolution of glasma or quark–gluon plasma, although more detailed computational simulations are needed to confirm the dynamics of photon production in such collisions.”

Now the question if we are ‘already dead in the future’, in this Schrodinger’s cat experiment depends on this cryptic question left open by the RHIC ‘informer’: “We’ve found that the higher mass states of strange baryons affect the production of ground states that we can observe. And the line where we see the ordinary matter moves to a lower temperature because of the multitude of higher states that we can’t see.”

How much is a multitude? That is, how many ‘higher states’ of strange baryons have been created? Enough ‘bag’ to make the strangelet stable? Ah, this is the quizz, ‘to be or not to be’… Since it is invisible and physicists are clueless, we might still have a chance to be… But the first incognita is solved. Yes, RHIC and CERN can, have and will produce strangelet atoms.

Would now RHIC tell us exactly what is the solution to this quizz? Have they produced enough of them to make the strangelet bag stable?  Are we a dead cat or a living cat?

My opinion is that this is another nail in the coffin, the clearest one in anticipation of the ‘big run’…

UPDATE. DECEMBER 2015. CERN HAS STARTED ION COLLISIONS

And so it finally happened… The experiment is being performed as we speak. Ion-Ion collisions are breaking records every day. If the Earth is going to die, because of CERN, it will be. From 1st to 15 december, stable dibaryons are being produced with no safety whatsoever at the facilities.

So as of now those stable dibaryons are falling to the center of the Earth, where they will slowly accumulate till reaching the critical mass required to start an ice-9 reaction, within the span of a few years.

For real data on that production, please consult Eric Penrose’s site, which has been doing the mathematical physics of the process during the last year.

This transformation of our light, harmless up and down quarks into strange quarks, a hundred times heavier, is caused by the enormous energy-mass reached by each particle as it comes closer to c-speed. Because c-speed is the barrier of speed for particles, according to relativity, when quarks reach the limiting barrier, they keep absorbing energy from the accelerator. But instead of accelerating, quarks swallow and transform that energy into mass – E=mc2; hence becoming massive strange quarks, which once put together into stable dibaryon configurations, should fall to the center of the Earth.

The main factor of extinction both in certainty of the event and timespan, in which it will happen is obviously the number of experiments performed:

The facility will produce more lethal dibaryons, the more ion-ion collisions are performed. Right now, as we speak those collisions are producing, per collision according to CERN, 30.000 ‘unclassified particles’, to be found in the strangelet soup of up and down and strange quarks – the infamous quark-gluon soup, origin of the big bang – plainly speaking, the most powerful explosive of the Universe. If we multiply this number by the sheer amount of atoms colliding in each bunch of tightly packed rays, we are talking of millions of dibaryons in each experiment. Certainly enough of them to bring a critical mass within years of accumulation at Earth’s center.

Since strangelet, abb. for strange liquid is  the substance that can provoke in enough quantities a runaway ‘ice-9’ reaction that could freeze the Earth converted into a 15 kilometre sphere of ultra dense strangelet matter; as strangelets convert all matter around them into strange liquid.  The process starts obviously producing the ‘atom of strangelet’,  a USD-USD dibaryon atom, the minimal stable piece of an strangelet. Yet they have to form a lump of heavy strange and light up and down quarks, of enough critical mass to provoke the big bang explosion of Earth. Hence it will take time for them to accumulate in the center of the planet. And the more ion-ion collisions the LHC makes, the more they will produce and fall and the faster the ‘reckoning day’ will come for the species. The date thus have some uncertainty, in time, the space does not – it will be start on the center, and the probability hardly – far above what any conscious human being needs to stop the facility.

Uncertainty of course is the factor CERN plays. We will never be sure that those dibaryons kill us till they kill us. They are invisible, undetectable, and disappear from the facilities, so even if it happens, we cannot prove they originated at CERN. Might they have come from outer Universe. You see, destiny plays the mouse and cat, hid game facilitating the facilities take it easy ways. For that reason, this blog treats all the elements of the game of extinction and warns the scientist that reads of a well-known fact since quantum mechanics: the universe is always probabilistic, no event is deterministic as regarding to when and where it will happen.

This is the Uncertainty principle of quantum physics: Energy x Time ≥h/2. The calculus of the Energy and time of an event is thus a probability, but not for that reason intelligent species, stop acting against the odds of being harmed by a dangerous ‘predator’ that can eat them up.

I.e. the gazelle does not know, which one of the herd will die to the lion, but not for that probabilistic reason stops running to avoid the lion from entering its vital space. Only an idiotic scholar, all theory none survival instincts, will stay eating daisies, munching the ‘Buridan Paradox’ – might he kill me, might he not?- while the lion makes his run. Since non-action will increase enormously the chances that by doing nothing the lion targets her. It is like a soldier advancing against fusiles and gun machines. He might survive, and certainly it will never know whose soldier on the other side shot him down. But if he wants to increase his chances, he will not fight against the superior metal-weapons. And if he does so, he rather fights with single shot rifles than gun machines of multiple shots. That is CERN did his single shots at low regime,found his Higgs and should have declared his war against mankind, over. Now he is shooting with the gun machine and keeps reloading the cartridge. Good luck.

3. Dec. 2015. DON’T WORRY BE HAPPY (and die like a child).

Now, before we go on, the reader should understand beyond evilwood movies the facts of death in the Universe. The fundamental food of the cosmos are children. It sounds harsh but it is what happens in the world. 90% of animal children never get adulthood. When lions run the herd, they seek for the children. When tortoise hutch all kind of predators eat them before arriving to the water. African thugs use children soldiers, because they are emotional, driven, lineal, focused in the task they do not question. CERN in that regard is a cradle of children physicist, in the 20s average, using millions of childish students all over the world. And it has used to dismiss those danger childish arguments, with a ‘teacher’s’ benevolent tone.

This surrealist approach is shrewd and it has worked.

Thus accordingly, to the childish approach, CERN has developed a panoplia of silly-nilly propaganda working at top speed:

Rap songs on evil particles; engagements with celebrities of the media circus; cosmic hype on irrelevant discoveries and the beat-drum of ‘new records of energy-mass’, hence of higher risks ; and messianic, pseudo-religious mantras that ranged from God’s particle to the Shiva statute at the entrance of CERN.

All those elements narrated in the previous film -are repeated ad nauseam, under the classic dictum of the first ‘ministry of propaganda’ (today called in the newspeak of the day, ministry of information): ‘if you repeat a lie many times people will believe it, the bigger the lie the more they will’ (Goebbels).

But those lies must sound silly and fun, so CERN maintains 2 pages to prove the no-risk mantra:

  • One written in a tone proper of a kindergarten school master, sweet and calmed, to resolve the ‘magic’ side of it.

    Yes Messieurs we do know that, thanks for telling. It is this a serious institution, providing true statements and taking seriously the risks of a global nuclear tragedy? Are we treated as citizens who pay with his taxes this machines and deserve a proper response? Why CERN has diplomatic immunity – the reason it dismissed the suits; why safety reports unlike in any other industry are not authored by independent researchers?

    Why it has broken all the NEPA and environmental laws of Europe, repeatedly poisoning the area? Because the Nuclear industry is the summit of the military industry, and this ‘peaceful machine for research’ is the white elephant, useless, dangerous but nice to see in its awesome pics for kid-scientists working there (20-agers most of them, who sign confidentiality statements and as their chief scientist put it ‘must believe in black hole evaporation, the concept backed by Mr. Hawking and Mr. Penrose, based on time travel to the past). This of course, is the internal dialog for the flock of young, enthusiastic collaborators to keep crunching data to the tune of the rappers.

  •  Meanwhile for more serious seekers of truth, alas, he gives us the ‘safety report page’, which is a copycat of a safety report made 20 years ago for a much smaller machine in the United States – RHIC; ad it has NEVER been updated to the much higher power and technical specifications of this machine, or included the new discoveries on cosmology that prove the existence of strangelets (the report simply denies they exist and so it solves the problem out of the hat, but as today it has become the main candidate to be the component of 90% of matter in the Universe – dark matter; alas, they do not only exist but it is likely the commonest, hence easy to produce, substance of the Universe).

Thus the report  is plagued with obvious half-lies that any physicist knows – the best known, the mantra that cosmic particles do have so much energy as those collisions and so if cosmic rays do not blow up planets, the experiments poise no risk. Of course, the half lie is the trick. Cosmic particles are gamma rays or at best lonely protons, which cannot produce quark strangelets, because they don’t have ‘mass’, which is the factor here, no energy, as the heavy ions of the collider do. And they are not massed up in bunches of billions of them, guided to collide in a central point, where they reach enough critical mass to produce dibaryons and small lumps of quark-matter.

We dare to say that CERN’s people are very smart to be intelligent and survive. Since instead of plotting lies to defend their livelihood, it should say the truth and respect the life of mankind.

And the truth is that Cosmic rays do NOT produce quark-gluon plasma, the substance from where strangelets are born and NEVER will; since they are lonely, light particles unlike the dense heavy bunches of the heaviest atom, lead, using in those collisions, guided by magnetic fields with extreme precision to mass in enough numbers to produce the strangelet liquid (let us also give the proper name to the ‘quark-gluon soup’, which is nothing but a liquid made of up and down and strange quarks – which once distilled onto stable dibaryons (2 up, 2 down and 2 strange quarks) should become a strangelet in the Earth’s centre.

A final, simple proof that cosmic quarks do not produce ‘big bang’ strangelet soup is obvious:  If it would, we will not even construct the machine but merely watch the cosmic rays that hit the Earth and see the ‘witches’s brew’.

It remains of course to be explained what they will find in this new run now that the irrelevant Higgs has been explored in depth. Alas! lacking a good argument, CERN has outdone itself, publishing that one of the most hopeful discoveries that lay ahead is the understanding of dark matter, which makes 90% of the mass of the galaxy and accumulates around the Halo.

Recap.The equation of death and its 2 limiting risks.

As we have been explaining for a decade, following the well-known Witten hypothesis, the 2 main candidates for dark matter in the halo are:

– Micro black holes that did NOT evaporate (first hypothesis of Hawking before came with the absurd idea that actually they are time machines that travel to the past and so as you would evaporate back into the past into your mother womb, they should go back into the past and disappear just formed) – a fact which will mean if they are created at CERN they will swallow us.

-And strangelets, which would be created in nova explosions and planetary explosions, and migrate under the laws of angular momentum to the halo. So now, CERN tells us that yes, dark matter is likely to be made of strangelets, and they are going to explore the theme at CERN, of course omitting the ‘half truth’ – this should mean our extinction – since their control of media, in this advancing militaristic age makes it safe enough to say without saying to the world. We are going to convert the planet into strangelets, to study that magnificent particle, which we shall appropriately call, the ‘Hell Particle’. So now that is what they research and they tell us, and the sheeple sings the song, ‘four legs, four legs’. So yes, it is time for Nirvana, a peaceful day. Because the process is a great silence. Invisible dark matter, undetectable should be now falling, and the only variable we cannot fully calculate for lack of knowledge about the exact configuration of the Earth’s interior, is how long it will take them to travel to the center, and create that critical mass, as they will follow a biased ‘brownian motion’, through the magma, much heavier than normal matter, hence with a gravitational gradient to the center, but repelled chaotically in its journey… to erehwoN.

This duality between the good and the bad fruits of the tree of science has always been at the heart of the destiny of mankind, and we never solved it properly as the zealots of the machine have won the battle. A responsible, humble humanity would have prune the tree since its inception, forbidding the bad fruits, weapons and promoting the good ones, tools. Death is in the metrics of the 5th dimension, a simple equation of imbalance by overdrive of energy (accidental death) or information, form (3rd age of wrinkles in life, warping of matter into black holes in Einstein’s relativity, angst, baroque age of technological wars in history).

So if Life and survival is the balance of mens sana in corpore sanum: Energy=Information; death is Max. Energy  x Min. Information, (accidents, weapons that deliver maximal energy, a Big bang Nova explosion for planets and stars), or Max. Information x Min. Energy (3rd age, cold, freezing death, black hole death of matter, star death into white dwarfs, death by future robots and A.I. – algorithms of information, the true meaning of Artificial Intelligence that atrophy, substitute and displace human minds from labor and war field, as we speak).

Thus on the wider vision that a European Humanist always add to the technical aspects of science, we are in the ‘3rd age of History’, and so we should instead of rushing into death by information, had controlled the tree of science, but we didn’t. As a mad old man who feels like a child and wants to keep going making a fool of himself, mankind rushes into extinction, at full speed.

So yes we soon will be producing as many God’s particles as Hell’s particles, perfectly cancelling each other into a 0-sum called the human species. But who can prove it and blame them, if earthquakes within the next decade suddenly rise to 8 in the richter scale? Dibaryons are invisible, and the reaction will start from the center of the Earth. So CERN is shielded of any present or future responsibility, as it can always say it was not their fault but some particle from the outer Universe that has sipped into the planet.

In that regard, what people like Hawking and the bosses at CERN, shield by media and power, never grasped is the fact that science should not only be theory and prices but mainly praxis in favor of a better future for the humankind, exactly the opposite of big money and prize ambition, which drives the people at the facilities in their search for ‘nobel prizes’.

Mr. Hawking and thousands of other physicists are conscious of the risks and the ‘imaginary nature’ of his black hole time machines and the risks of the new technologies that break the balance of the planet. But none speaks up against their practice. At best they denounce each other’s work. So Hawking, on one side laughs at Caltech on the risk that his imaginary black holes make ‘bolognesa spaghetti’ out of mankind.

But on the other, he warns humanity of its near end if we keep evolving technology. So he urges us to find soon inhabitable planets and migrate to survive, sponsoring our view on the Fermi Paradox.

It is all talk, since he knows travel to the stars, given the lethal radiation existing beyond the Oort ring, needs massive shields on stellar ships, which will take centuries to design. And the Nuclear and robotic Industry – the two limits of maximal energy and information that unbalance the Earth and can kill her – will do us well before that happens.

So while he is aware of those 2 limits of human survival and rightly denounces the evolution of A.I. and robotics, even quotes some possible catastrophic scenarios at CERN related to Higgs production he should warn mankind against his imaginary black holes, his field of expertise.

Instead he advanced the clock of the end of the world created after the A-Bomb by physicists, which now runs a couple minutes ‘before’ the endpoint.

In that regard, the loneliness of our activism against CERN is not a proof of falsity but of the cynicism of big science and its practitioners who won’t disclose those dangers to protect their prestige and livelihood.

Simply speaking, when a life risk is imposed by power, it cannot be judged. Instead it becomes a censored taboo, so only the optimist good side that all realities have is highlighted, as it happens when a war starts and we know millions will die – you cannot speak of it. It is called ‘derrotism’ and it is punished. Instead the system preaches optimist and talks of a short blitzkrieg, of glorious days a head, as the Germans and French – the heart of the LHC experiment – did in I world war, which now celebrates its 100 birthday. Paris and Berlin simultaneously was to be reached within a week according to the P.R.ess of both sides…

 

 

 

 

 
6 Comments

Posted by on December 3, 2016 in Uncategorized

 

± sign decides World’s fate

My theory of black holes is the biggest blunder of my life’

S. Hawkings on his 70th birthday

‘In physics, if a particle can happen, it will happen.’

Totalitarian Principle, Gell-mann; discoverer of quarks.

“I thought of calling it “information”, but the word was overly used, so Von Neumann told me, “You should call it entropy, nobody knows what entropy really is. So in a debate you will always have the advantage.”

Von Neumann to Shannon, father of Information Theory.

 ‘Heat cannot pass spontaneously from a body of lower temperature to a body of higher temperature.’

Rudolf Clausius, 1850,first enunciation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics, original wording.

2nd law

Heat. ‘Heat is energy that is transferred from one body to another as the result of a difference in temperature. If two bodies at different temperatures are brought together energy is transferred – i.e. heat flows – from the hotter body to the colder. The effect of this transfer of energy is an increase in the temperature of the colder body and a decrease in the temperature of the hotter body’. 

Britannica, 1st paragraph, article on ‘Heat’, Macropaedia; Volume 8, page 701

We are just a mush in the surface of a rock lost in the corner of the Universe, departing of those facts we can talk about man’ Schopenhauer, father of modern philosophy.

I. WHY BLACK HOLES DO NOT EVAPORATE FOR NON-SCIENTISTS 

The hard facts of known-known science.  

The fate of humanity, a childish species, who feels entitled to defy the laws of the Universe with wishful thinking, depends on this formula:

M_H \leq \frac{\hbar c^3}{8 \pi G k_B T_u} \;(1)

As the formula is filled with Universal Constants, and only two variables we shall write it in a simplified manner as:

±ΔMass ≤ Konstant/±ΔTemperature.

Or easier to Understand moving Temperature to the other side:

±ΔMass  x  ±ΔTemperature  = Constant.

Simple, isn’t? It is the formula that defines the changes in temperature and mass of black holes.

We know both can change but in which direction? If the black hole mass  increases, temperature must diminish for the product to remain constant. If the black hole mass diminishes, then temperature must increase for the product to remain constant.

Two choices. Why we care? well, as it happens your life depends on it.

More exactly on the choice of ± signs of that equation.

If we write:

-Δ Mass  X +Δ Temperature = Constant…

You live, as the black holes the LHC will make in 2015, when it works at full potency, will increase temperature, getting hotter and diminishing mass, evaporating.

If we write:

+Δ Mass  x -Δ Temperature = Constant, then you die.

As black holes will cool down, transferring heat to the surrounding planet, evaporating us into a cosmic explosion, a Nova.

Never a symbol mattered so much to mankind. So who or what chooses those symbols? That is the conundrum. (2)

The ‘what’, the Universe and its scientific laws have chosen the Symbol of your death.

The ‘who’, Mr. Hawking and his laws of ‘imaginary time’, have arbitrarily decided the Universe is wrong and the black hole will evaporate.

The problem is that the Universe  and his fundamental laws, the Laws of entropy always choose the equation of death, our evaporation.

Indeed, any ultra-hot object as a black hole, born in a cold environment as the Earth is, according to the laws of entropy cools down and transfers heat to the environment, evaporating us. And this is what we see in the Universe happening, always, when a black hole is born. It cools down and evaporates its surroundings into a big explosion, a Nova.

When you take an iron rod from the oven and put it in cold water, the water evaporates and the iron cools down, ALWAYS. And in the Universe whenever we see the birth of an ultra-hot black hole it evaporates its surrounding electromagnetic world (us) and gets colder, ALWAYS, till it reaches as a mature huge black hole a thrermodynamic balance with the cold vacuum that surrounds it.

In this principle, that heat moves from the hot source to the cold one, are based all the laws of thermodynamics, all the machines of the planet. If this principle would not exist you could made a machine of eternal motion, the biggest hoax of science. There is NOT a single exception to the laws of Thermodynamics in the Universe. Everything in science is based in this law.

But then a child of thought, with utter disregard of the known-known laws of the Universe, has chosen the other symbols:

– Δ Mass  X  + Δ Temperature = Constant…

It is Hawking’s formula of evaporation of black holes…that defies all the laws of entropy, all the laws of time, all the laws of Einstein and all the laws of the 5th dimension, the expansion of Einstein’s relativity that I study.

And that is the problem.

What the equation means is easy to understand:

Hawking affirms that black holes do exactly the opposite that all other entities of the Universe:

They are born very hot, the hottest objects of the Universe (in this we all agree), but then instead of cooling down in our cool Universe, burning us into hell, they will ‘magically’ absorb heat from the cold environment (+Δ), getting even hotter, breaking all the laws of entropy!

It is like if you throw a flame into water and the flame would get hotter and the water would become ice!

It is like if you get a cup of hot coffee and the cup keeps getting hotter ‘evaporating’, while it freezes your hand!

This has never happened and the mere idea was for very long in science a laughing matter. Since the laws of entropy are crystal clear. When a hot system is put by the side of a cold system, temperature moves from the hot system that cools (in this case the black hole) to the cold one that heats and evaporates.

But Hawking insisted for decades with an obsessive mind and charm. When a black hole is born, hotter than the environment, instead of evaporating the environment as any hot object does, it will become hotter and evaporate!

How he figures the black hole does that? Well it can’t according to the laws of time and entropy. So alas! He figured out that the black hole travels back into the past instead of traveling to the future. And that is why it evaporates. It is like if a baby will travel back into the past and enter the womb of the mother evaporating. Easy.

Indeed, he also muses after that astounding discovery that he could enter a black hole and come into the past and kill his grand-father. Seriously.

How he calls this weird type of time that goes backwards? Hold on to your seat (:

‘Imaginary time’… Seriously )-:, 0-:

This is Hawking in a nutshell. The rest is all ‘celebrity’ noise.

And that is why we are worried, very worried. Of course it would be easier to believe the fairy tale of time travel, imaginary time, the end of entropy laws, a machine of perpetual motion… I wouldn’t mind to believe all that if my life didn’t depend on it.

Indeed, on such musings hang the life of mankind. Our destiny depends on an ± symbol. It is worth to repeat it:

-Δ Mass  x  +Δ Temperature = Constant

Defines ‘imaginary black holes’ that break the laws of entropy and will get hotter. Then for all the constants of the Universe to remain constant their mass must diminish and balance the increase of heat. And you will live.

But the Universe has never done this choice.

On the contrary the Temperature of a hot mass always diminishes in a cold environment.

So mass always increases. Let us then respect the laws of the Universe, proved ad nauseam in all systems and write instead the symbols right:

+Δ Mass  x -Δ Temperature= Constant.

The hot black hole as all the systems of the Universe will decrease its temperature as it is born much hotter than our Universe, and so the heat will be transferred to our electromagnetic world and evaporate it, and the black hole will absorb it as energy in its event horizon collapsing that energy into  mass at the speed of light: M=E/c2

This is what Einstein say, what we observe in the Universe, what every black hole born in that Universe proofs:

The black hole is born very hot, evaporates the surroundings and absorbs it, exploding the world into a Nova at the speed of light. So we will die in a few seconds. Simple, straight forwards maths that a kid in high school could understand. So the risks of creating a small black hole on Earth keep mounting. Why then are we doing it? Why we are provoking a potential genocide  by denying the laws of science? Obviously it cannot be because of science, but for all the spurious, wrong, unscientific causes of our civilization that now we shall explore.

The error of Hawking is like the tale of the emperor’s naked clothes. One day an emperor forgot to dress and went into a parade. And none would say anything till a child pointed out that the emperor was naked. His errors are so evident and absurd that nobody dares to contradict him. But the emperor walks naked and black holes will cool down and swallow the Earth if they are born at LHC.

And yet the entire situation is so absurd that nobody will shout, ‘cover the emperor’s with decent cloths’. The emperor and Mr. Hawking have been invested with too much authority for any one except a child, a madman or a genius, 3 characters often compared, to point out the error without fear of making fools of themselves.

Conclusion.

1. The deduction of the Formula of Evaporation of black holes, which is what tantalizes physicists, because it brings together the main Universal Constants of the Universe, is completely accessory to this argument. What they always miss is the key element of that formula – the choice of the symbol of entropy that defines the thermodynamics of black holes, which is Hawking’s arbitrary decision based in 3 different ‘possible choices’ all of which contradict the fundamental tenants of science:

– Either time travel backwards is possible.

– Or the 2 laws of entropy are false.

– Or you can travel faster than light.

Any of those 3 possibilities are aberrant denials of fundamental scientific laws. And when one reads the initial texts of Hawking is obvious he is just ‘making’ a hypothetical exercise, as  this kind of black holes are called initially ‘imaginary black holes’, as if he were building an imaginary bestiary. The way in which aberrations of scientific or social thought become dogma goes well beyond the purpose of this article.

II. WHY BLACK HOLES DO NOT EVAPORATE From the perspective of the the three topologies of space-time.. 

Science is truth when 3 elements are met: experimental evidence, correspondence with previous theories known to be truth and only then mathematical analysis with the proper dynamic evolution towards the future.

Now, we observe that the smaller the black holes are the faster they grow in a furious swallowing path. And yet the Fermi Satellite sent in orbit to find the signature of evaporating black holes has NOT found the slightest signature of black hole evaporation.

So what to make of this? Obviously, the 3 elements of science are not met:

  • Experimental evidence (none) ->Correspondence principle with previous theorems (Einstein’s hole always grow, no hair theorem gives no temperature to black holes) -> Mathematical equations (improper interpretation of the symbol of time).

So both fundamental laws of scientific truth, falsification in the negative, and experimental evidence in the positive, prove that baby black holes do not evaporate, breaking the essential laws of thermodynamics, and Nature stubbornly imposes its cosmic order.

Of course, we cannot observe the ultimate birth of a black hole on those Nova explosions, to prove the Universal hierarchy of scientific laws, unless the industry of accelerators, which keeps coming closer to the energies required to create one, reproduces a baby hole on Earth, in which case needless to say we would also lack a peer reviewed proof, as the speed of accretion using the temperature-mass ratio discovered by Mr. Hawking.  Today the fundamental theory of the Universe, the big-bang, is based in an expansion backwards in time of a lineal equation, similar to Hawking’s:

Hubble established a cosmological velocity-distance law: velocity = Ho × distance. Whereas the variables are here instead of mass and temperature, speed and distance and the constant is Ho.

According to this Hubble law, the greater the distance of a galaxy, the faster it recedes. Modern estimates place the value of H around 22 km/s per 1 million light years. While the reciprocal of Hubble’s constant lies between 13 billion and 14 billion years, and this cosmic time scale serves as an approximate measure of the moment of birth of the universe.

Thus the same procedure of running backwards in time a black hole mass growth, pattern would give us travelling to the past, the point of birth of the black holes at the Planck scale at enormous temperature.

Does this mean Hawking’s work lacks scientific merit?

Not at all, as if we respect the laws of thermodynamics, the ratio mass-temperature of black holes, describes the birth of a small black hole, which as all systems of Nature show an enormous activity and rate of growth, in its initial stages, feeding in the energy that surrounds them – the placenta of our seminal seeds, the nest in which the parental system feeds them, the environment in which the new species becomes the dominant predator; in the case of the black hole the rich field of electromagnetic energy that surrounds it in stars where they are born by gravitation collapse and/or planets against which they collide.

It is then easy to understand the importance of the formula to interpret the genesis of black holes, the mechanisms of Nova explosions, and the way in which the energy and information of the lower scales of nature (the quantum and thermodynamic scales emerges as mass in the larger cosmological scale), since and this is the second merit of the equation of Hawking, which stirred the imagination of scientists, to the point of accepting his peculiar interpretation is the fact that it uses all the main constants of space and time of Nature, whose meaning is still no understood in theoretical physics.

And so it hinted to the solution of the fundamental ending question of physics – what is the relationship and meaning of those constants, and how can we unify mathematically the 3 fundamental scales of physical systems, the smaller quantum scale of electromagnetic charges, the human scale of thermodynamic molecules and the larger scale of cosmological masses:right euqationNow we have written the equation with the proper symbol and alas, it is a very important equation, as now IT FOLLOWS THE CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE.

Why that beautiful equation is an equality?

Because the event horizon is a discontinuum, which act as an osmotic membrane, with 2 sides, which have the same ‘surface’ area, so to speak.

The event horizon has two sides as all membranes. In one side you are inside the black hole (8π GM), and there is NO temperature here (no hair theorem, black holes are defined only with 3 parameters, angular momentum, mass and charge). So the black hole DOES not evaporate because it is NOT made of temperature. It is impossible to evaporate.

On the other side of the membrane, there is though temperature, because we ARE in the Thermodynamic and quantum world, which the black hole swallows.

This duality of a membrane is perfectly understood in terms of Topological laws. The fundamental theorem of topology states that a closed circle, any n-dimensional membrane breaks the continuum into an internal world and an external Universe, with 2 different surfaces, an internal elliptic, implosive, in-formative surface and an external hyperbolic, expansive, entropic geometry,

And those are the 2 sides of the black hole: Internally the black hole creates pure information. Externally the black hole increases the entropy and disorder of our world just before it swallows it.

Consider any other ‘organic system’ absorbing energy and trans-forming it into its own substance. You eat, and first you disorder, increasing the entropy of the food you eat down to amino acids. This is what the black hole does in the side of the quantum-thermodynamic scales of the Universe. But then you stomach evolves the amino-acids back into proteins of your ‘own DNA code’. This is what the black hole does in the inside of the membrane: converts entropy into information.

But we can equal both sides, because they have the same surface, one side is gravity surface, the other side is entropy surface.

So the way to properly write that equation in terms of the duality of entropy and information and the 3 fractal scales of the physical Universe is:right euqation

This is the beauty of the equation of Hawking, when we respect the 2 ‘fundamental proofs’ of truth in science:

Experimental evidence (black holes always swallow our world in nova explosions that increase the entropy of our galaxies but absorb and grow in mass internally).
Correspondence principle (no hair theorem: black holes do not have temperature; they can be described with only 3 parameters, mass, angular momentum and in some cases charge, if they do have it; Einstein’s equations: black holes do always increase mass, do not evaporate, do not emit radiation).
Thus when we put properly the symbol, ≥, black holes grow according to the beautiful formula of Hawking, which in this manner respects the 2 fundamental proofs of truth in science – experimental Nova evidence and Correspondence principle; further clarifies the process of creation of mass, in a more detailed version of E=Mc², explains why the Universe is fractal, with discontinuous membranes between the entropic side of the Universe (electromagnetic-thermodynamic membrane) and the in-formative gravitational side that in-forms reality (mass-black hole side).

And why there are 2 ‘geometrical description’ of space-time (elliptic curved space-time of Einstein’s gravitation, made of accelerated vortex like informative mass clocks) and the hyperbolic, entropic, expansive description of quantum physics. Which ARE 2 DIFFERENT discontinuous sides of the fractal Universe that balance each other and MUST NOT be unified in simple terms because BOTH ARE NEEDED to balance the Universe.

On one hand you have what the black hole eats, our space-time world, on the other the gravitational space-time world.

There are in fact 3 scales of space-time in reality and that is what the Universe shows.

On the side of mass, we have a beautiful equation, which is identical to the tensor of Einstein’s Relativity, that describes a gravitational world, 8 πG Mass.

It must be noticed that unlike Einstein’s tensor, here there is no energy-entropy, but only the other 2 elements of Einstein’s equation: 8 π G, the curvature of the black hole and Mass, the substance of gravitational space.

On the other side, we have the same equation above for quantum space-time where h is the angular momentum of its clocks of information (so quantum systems code with h-planck quanta its informative spin and form) and c is obviously the speed-distance of space, as we see light space. Space is made of light, as impressionists painters realized and Einsteins’ relativity principle that cannot distinguish motions from distances, or the spatial expansion of intergalactic space, homologous to the red-shift elongation of light space proves.

Our human electronic mind perceives light-space, through, its time clocks, Tƒ=h-planck, is the minimal quanta perceived by an electron,  and Sp the speed of light, and H/c is so small that we have a mind that processes very little information and in terms of Lobachevski’s parameter of geometry displays a flat Euclidean World:

gravitationalwavesbestintermediatespace_image002

In the graph, you can see what i talk about. You see light and light has 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions. That is why your mind is flat and Euclidean. This product h c³ is thus the time-space clocks and volume of the quantum world, and its ratio Tƒ/Sp=h/c³, is the ‘ratio of information/space’ of the human mind, which in terms of Geometry is called the Gaussian/Lobachevski ratio of curvature that defines a flat mind. Beautiful isn’t. So many things hidden in an equation (-; Saper vedere.

On the other side, we have a ratio between the simplest quantum minimal, larger world and our intermediate thermodynamic scale, meaning that the black hole absorbs the quantum space-time (hc³), and first it converts it into pure entropy and temperature (KT) – hence the ratio; and then it moves it to the other side of the membrane, converted into 8 π G Mass.

Now, a brief lesson on modern cosmology. The Universe has shown to be fractal, structured in relative scales of size and with different time clocks of different speed. This we know since Einstein. We do NOT have mechanical clocks around the Universe measuring time. As obvious as this is people do not seem to understand it.

And we co-exist in several scales, with membranes and discontinuous between them, such as the Lorentz transformations that define transitions between the electromagnetic light and mass scales, the quantum equations of Planck (violet catastrophe) that define the transition regions between the thermodynamic and radiation scales.

There are 3 fundamental of such scales which we show in the next graph, the larger gravitational scale, the human thermodynamic scale and the quantum scale, with different space-quanta and time clocks:

QLL

In the graph we show them, with different space and time quanta. But all of them have a common co-invariant formula, which defines them as space-time planes of reality, with a ‘different time clock’ that measures the information of the system in the frequency and form of its cycles, and a given space quanta that measures its pieces of space.

And there are transfers of motion between them, called ‘angular momentum and ‘lineal momentum, or ‘information and ‘space’. There are many formula on physics to describe this space-time planes, and the easiest ones are those of Energy, and those that define its forces. They vary slightly (we show on the left side the formula for energy, and slight variations show formulae for momentum and forces in each scales).

This is the new stuff on physics, the formalism of the 5th dimension that this writer pioneered before this activism, as it explain the ‘whys’ of Universal constants, and the structure between scales, the reason of the exponential discontinuous equations between scales. And Hawking’s equation is a fundamental equation that relates the 3 scales together. In fact it is the only equation that relates them, as the black hole swallows it all. Swallows both the quantum and electromagnetic world and converts it into mass; it is the true devouring monster of the Universe:

∆+1(cosmological scale) : M ( 8 π G) ≥ ∆-1: hc³/ k T: ∆: Thermodynamic scale)

Now the formula has the 3 clocks of time, (G-curvature, h-angular momentum, T-emparture) and 3 space quanta of the 3 scales of the fractal Universe (c3 volume of light space, M-ass and K-entropy quanta).
So his work is essential to the fractal Universe structure and its 3 5D scales.

As such is a ‘beauty’ and it is a pity that Mr. Hawking was not happy enough finding it, and that he said ‘philosophers of science envy me, because they don’t know mathematics, and that is why they criticise the evaporation of black holes’. Of course, we do know mathematics, we invent mathematics. People like Descartes and Leibniz invented analytic geometry and calculus the two main branches of modern mathematics and they defined themselves as philosophers of science, NOT physicists. That is why we can have rigour with truths.

So to the beauty of it. First we must ask. Why there are two sides on that equality, which when properly written with the positive arrow of time is M ≥ k/T, that is the black hole mass always grows?

Because this equation is taken from the event horizon, the membrane that separates the discontinuous fractal scale of gravitation – the inside of the hole, or M (8π G) – which creates mass-information; from the outer region, the entropic, thermodynamic and quantum world, which the Hole is swallowing.

So we have an equation that shows how ∆+1 gravitational mass information is created by accretion of the lower scales of quantum light space-time (Hc3) and thermodynamic space-time (KT).

And it is precisely the simplicity and perfection of the equation, which relates the time clocks and space-quanta of the 3 scales of the Universe, what makes it so important. As it truly writes in the formalism of the fractal Universe:

∆+1 Gravitational Scale:  Space quanta: M x Tƒ(curved clock): G = ∆-1: quantum scale/∆ Thermodynamic scale:  Sp:c³ x Tƒ: h / Sp: K x Tƒ (T)

That is, the mass quanta of the gravitational space, whose frequency or curvature or attractive accelerated clock is given by G, is swallowing the Space-time of the electromagnetic, quantum Universe, whose clocks of time are here measured by the angular momentum h and its quanta of space, by the volume of 3-dimensional Euclidean space; after converting it first into thermodynamic entropy, in its process of ‘rising it up’ and transforming it upwards through the scales of information of the 5th dimension, into thermodynamic space quanta, k-constants, and its time clocks, temperature.

This is the analytical, algebraic understanding of the accretion of black holes, which absorb the space-time, c-h quanta of electromagnetic scales, convert it by this ∆-1/∆ space-time ratio first into entropic heat and then swallow it up into gravitational mass.

And the beauty of it is that we DO have here the equations in perfect form. we have in the quantum scale on top, the h-angular momentum, the minimal clock of time-information of the quantum scale, multiplied by c³, the volume of space (as we are in a light space-time membrane, with the 3 euclidean perpendicular co-ordinates of light, the electric magnetic and c-speed arrows). And we have below the thermodynamic space constant, k-entropy, as entropy is an expansive space, and the time clocks of the thermodynamic world which is temperature.

So the equation allow us to understand for the first time, properly interpreted the meaning of the 3 Universal constants of space of the Universe, in its 3 relative scales of size, Mass, Entropy and c‚ light space-time. And its 3 relative cyclical clocks of time, G-curvature,h-angular momentum and temperature:

This equation is therefore a fundamental equation, which properly understood with the 2 arrows of the future, entropy and information and the laws of the fractal Universe duality.

III. WHY BLACK HOLES ARE SO EASY TO MAKE FOR NON-PHYSICISTS.

Now, the second question poised on those experiments once we have added the dual arrows of time to the event horizon – entropy on the outer side of the membrane – our world – and information on the inner side of mass – the black hole –  is this:

How easy is to make one of those baby black holes? Quite easy, almost certain if the accelerator industry is not cancelled, either at CERN or in China.

Here again we must follow the 3 canonical principles of the scientific method:

-Experimental evidence (they are all over the place, man, we have been looking for Planets with A.I. or I.A. – artificial intelligence or intelligent animals – and found none. No robots, no Homo Asapiens there, just the tam-tam of an enormous number of black holes.) So it seems all planets do end converted into black holes and strangelets. Moreover, there is in this department an astoundingly important proof, also extracted from Hawking’s equation, now properly understood as the birth and growth of black holes.

This equation shows that black holes will cool down the event horizon till finding a thermodynamical equilibrium with the Universe. Alas!, the exact equilibrium of a black hole will be at 2.7 K the temperature of the background radiation, at which stage the black hole event horizon will become stable, and this temperature is reached with a mass equal to a moon, the commonest planetoid of the galaxy, dozens of them only in the solar system. So if black holes grow according to the previous equation they will reach equilibrium after swallowing a moon.

And so there might all be filled with moon machos, aka, highly dense black holes that have swallowed a moon, and start to redshift light to the exact Background radiation.

This means the background radiation which is locally measured now, would have a now, local origin in black holes that have grown to the size of a moon. It is then kind of tragicomic to observe that one of the fundamental safety statements of CERN is that ‘the moon is still here’ (meaning that since black holes have not swallowed us, we are still here with our moons. Well maybe one of those days the moon won’t be here any more):

4 big bangs detail

Map of all the moons that are not still here anymore (right side). The observer can notice that the map of the background radiation is exactly the same than the galaxy (in the centre). So obviously as our measure of the BG is local, and it has the same form than the galaxy IT IS THE MAP OF THE BACKGROUND RADIATION OF THE GALAXY, and each point is a black hole which has swallowed a moon, and so it is redshifting in its ‘balanced state’, light to the exact BG. temperature.

This would be one of the 3 ‘scales’ of relative size of black holes. On the left, we notice the fractal structure of the Universe, which as a mandelbrot set repeats similar forms in all scales (it is an atom of the electromagnetic scale), On its side, a star has exploded into a black hole, of the medium size. In the centre of the galaxy there are swarms of black holes that form a huge super organism of black holes that commands as DNA informative molecules do with its informative gravitational language the galaxy

Conclusion, black holes must be very easy to do because they are the ‘informative DNA’ of the organic galaxy the most important part of it. So how they can be done so easily?

Now, the way this is explained in abstract mathematical physics is by postulating a new, 5th dimension of gravitation, in the smaller scales of particles that makes attraction at those scales stronger. But we do not need a dimension of space, but a dimension of motion, a new degree of faster rotary motion, on the quantum heavier particles that make up the black hole, for it to exist. Since in Relativity a motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space, as we cannot distinguish motions from distances. So Galileo said e pur si muove a pur no muove, meaning that the Earth moves but seems still, and he thought Saturn’s rings to be a continuous dimension of space, when they were a rotary motion of small planetoids:

image005

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. So this is what really the 5th dimension means: smaller scales of particles that turn faster, and attract more, with more mass.

Indeed we just studied what really the 5th dimension of scalar space-time is: a dimension of relative sizes in space and relative speeds in time, which make smaller scales to turn faster in motion.

So as relativity says that we cannot distinguish motion from form-distance (so a line of a car in the night at fast motion seems a dimension in space), all what this means is that if we can find a substance that turns faster in its attractive vortices of mass, in the quantum scale, this faster motion, which is the proper interpretation of the 5th dimension, will be more massive, more attractive, and so we just need to make this fast turning vortex of attractive space-time to have extra-strong gravitation, find the cut-off substance that would make black holes real and Einstein demanded to believe on them, and if this fast turning, heavy denser particle exists, and CERN can do it, it will certainly do black holes, when enough luminosity and energy is reached.

Yes, this fast turning, heavier, more attractive particle that can be the atom of black holes that gives them substance do exist, and it is called the 3rd family of heavy quarks, which are amazingly heavier than our quarks, thousands of time heavier and correspond to the exact parameters of a black atom.

And at the present regimes CERN in small numbers and certainly in huge numbers China, if it constructs its collider, those bottom, top and charm quarks of the heavier masses will be produce. Since in fact the Higgs decays into Top and anti top quarks. So the more they research Higgs and produce more Higgs the more certain will be black hole creation. And so we can conclude with the solution of the Fermi paradox. We do NOT hear A.i. or I.A. because not so much Intelligent Animals make black holes and blow up planets.

IV. WHY BLACK HOLES ARE SO EASY TO MAKE FOR COSMOLOGISTS. THE MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE.

Now, we shall elaborate this with the new physics of duality and the fractal paradigm to further understand why this is the most logic, symmetry, natural solution according to the laws of the scientific method (economicity, simplicity) to explain the structure of dark matter, the Halo and the galaxy.

It is all there, again. Physicists ask for a new 5th dimension to make black holes, and we find it as a relativistic motion, which is proved experimentally (the fastest clock of time of the Universe are the bottom quarks, as top quarks have not yet produced in enough numbers to measure its no doubt even faster, more attractive rotational clock). And this superstring, supermassive quark is the cut off substance of black holes.

In brief, if we define mass by the speed and frequency of its gravitational vortices, according to the equivalence principle of Einstein between gravitation and acceleration, those fast turning particles are vortices of space-time, similar to attractive tornadoes (E=mc2 +E=hv-> M=k  ƒ, so the faster the particle, black hole or mass turns as a space-time vortex the more it attracts:

4 

In the graph, the evolution of the concept of mass in relativity, from the initial image of an abstract substance in the center of an accelerated vortex of space-time, proper of the abstract, pre–world war age, when Einstein first published his work on gravitation, to the first pictures obtained in bubble chambers in the postwar age, to the realization that each mass is a fractal space-time made of smaller cyclic motions proper of twenty-first century.

In the graph, for the pedantic observer, which rejects Newton as too simple, over seeded by Einstein, a final note on the multiple perspectives we can have of any event of space-time according to the ∆±1 or Sp, Tƒ, ST perspective we adopt, we classify the 4 standing models of gravitation as relative truths, belonging to the 4 perspectives of reality: SP< =>TO.

In the graph the 4 obvious descriptions of mathematical physics regarding gravitation: It (relativity)≈ Tƒ (Newton) <-> Sp (Poisson)≈ Es (Lagrange):

Tƒ- Newton is a moving CLOCK LIKE vortex of the same mass-motion regions)

Sp-Poisson is a potential static field of energy gradients..

Es- Hamiltonian-Lagrangian is a dynamic description of the conservative energy of the system.

It: Einstein’s simultaneous measures in relativity are a still, formal description in ‘present’ of the gravitational space-time.

And so all of them are equivalent. In fact Einstein derived his work via Poisson from Newton. Today Relativity’ informative mappings of the galaxy space-time are transformed in AMD theory into a Lagrangian-Hamiltonian ‘bidimensional model’, for computer calculations, proving once more the bidimensional structure of space-time.

All are in fact derived one from each other, as Einstein took its beginnings from Poisson, who elaborated on Newton; and the more important of them all the Hamiltonian).

All this of course can be turned with algebra into very complicated equations to describe those vortices as masses with different mathematical equations. The graph shows 4 of those ‘formalisms’, which are equivalent with more or less ‘finesse’ in the degree of detail, they have.

The 5D model.

Now the 5D model of the fractal, organic Universe, does not deny Einstein, it merely expands its views, and adds fractal organic properties to the galaxy explaining better the function of those black holes, its atomic substance and working according to the known-known facts of astrophysics, in which black holes have come to dominate most of the creative processes of the galaxy. In that regard, you can compare the galaxy to a cell in a much larger scale, with mitochondria stars, of light yd-matter which end up being devoured and becoming the energy for the creation of black holes, the informative vortices, equivalent to the DNA, that swarm in huge numbers in the centerl nuclei and control its shape and provoke the reproduction of stars, with its in-formative gravitational waves.

Einstein had asked for a cut-off substance, or ‘atom of black holes’, which he could not guess at the time as quarks had not been found, but now we hint that black holes are as he thought ‘frozen stars’ of the heaviest quark families (bct quarks), and that should be the ‘realist modeling’ of black holes. As those quarks will appear in increasing numbers in accelerators, which are crossing the dark matter barrier is very likely they will be produced on those accelerators, in any of its possible varieties of dark matter that range from strangelets (s-quarks) to toplets (TTT-quarks), through Higgs decay (H->Top and anti top).

Now, all this in mathematical physics implies a constant growth of the mass of the black hole along the previous equation: M=k/T, that is as the black hole cools down, it converts via the weak force, lighter matter into heavier quarks that increase its volume and hence its area.

The last great advances in classic black hole theory were done by Kerr, a new Zealander which defined rotary black holes with or without charge. Those would be the top quark frozen stars with positive charge and the same density at macro-scale than a black hole acting as a relative ‘proton’ acts in an atom in the center of the galaxy. While the halo should be made of strangelet quarks (negative charged), acting in this symmetry between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy, as a relative negative ‘electron’ cover, with the ud-stars and planets in the middle, as seen in the next graph, greatly expanded in its detailed explanation on the post of 5D astrophysics:

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 18.26.57

dark macrocosmos

In the graph the ‘sane’ understanding of black holes, which are born exceedingly hot and active, as all ‘seminal species’ in a lower scale of size, on the compton wavelength as a heavy quark particle, and the similar form of the halo of strange matter. this simple scheme, following Einstein’s search for cut off substances for black holes and Witten hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets, now again all the rage in astrophysics

Now, once we had the ‘solutions’ (Kerr black holes), the study of those holes was limited by the c-speed turning event horizons, which ‘absorbed’ the light of electromagnetic matter after exploding it, and ‘digested’ it via the weak force, creating heavier particles. But the maths were worked out by Christodoulou:

‘He had shown that no process whose ultimate outcome is the capture of a particle by a Kerr black hole can result in the decrease of a certain quantity which he named the irreducible mass of the black hole, M . In fact, most processes result in an increase in M, with the exception of a very special class of limiting processes, called reversible processes, which leave M unchanged.

It turns out that M, is proportional to the square root of the black hole’s area.”

So it is all clear and nice, regardless of what ‘language you prefer’, that of 4D Einstein or the added scalar meaning for a proper, scientific real understanding of 5D (as we indeed do have infinite proofs of the fractal structure and scales of size and different speeds of time clocks of physical systems from galaxies to particles). As all is obeying the laws of symmetry and Relativity of the Universe (call it Einstein’s relativity or Absolute relativity, its expansion into several 5D planes).

Update. February 2014. Hawking denies himself.

A very surprising event: the same emperor has shouted foul, has found hmself naked. Hawking has insisted on the line of his ‘birthday’ declarations that his ‘black hole theory was the biggest blunder of my life’.
He now considers the closest regions of black holes similar to storm eddies in which time forecast is not easy to make (:

Since ‘gravitational collapse produces apparent horizons but no event horizons behind which information is lost… Thus, like weather forecasting on Earth, information will effectively be lost, although there would be no loss of unitarity.’

Now, since Hawking’s musings about the evaporation of black holes requires the existence of an event horizon in which, due to the properties of the event horizon a virtual particle produced from the vacuum would escape the black hole resting its mass to it (while the other will fall in), Mr. Hawking finally denies his own theory, leaving CERN naked of alibis to deny the enormous risks of making those black holes at Earth.

So what the media did? Nothing.  The world has ignored the implications for CERN of such statement.
To understand in depth why we deal in other posts with the ‘secondary corners’ of our collective coffin... ‘Big Brother smiley’, the happy fictions of the media system…
 
The astonishing thing about Mr. Hawking’s recent dilettante musings denying the existence of event horizons – hence of black hole evaporation – as ‘the biggest blunder of his life’ (he changes sides in the debate like a magician – now there is event horizon and evaporation;   now there is none of both – perhaps thinking himself not only the new Einstein but the new Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove’)  is that knowing as physicists know LHC will do black holes, NOBODY on the establishment of science has brought back the ‘theme’ of our extinction by those black holes after Hawking’s denial of Event Horizons, hence of evaporating effects.

 

It is like the entire subject has been ‘filed’ as a ‘dirty little secret’ by physicists, its P.R.ess and politicians and they won’t open the pandora box till it opens ‘accidentally’… Then if there is time to reflect upon this collective genocide they will all deny they knew anything about it.

Why  Humanity is willing to take this risk to His Existence with so much enthusiasm? We can no longer merely consider this fact from a scientific, rational perspective, as it is not a rational fact, even if nuclear physicists have merely tried to keep it under the umbrella of arid mathematical equations, crunching data numbers and budgets. The matter falls fully into the realm of human emotional, irrational behavior in the face of  collective death.
It is indeed said that, ‘if you murder a person you are a criminal but if you commit genocide you are a hero’; as humans seem to be blocked in front of mass-murder, lacking the courage to confront it in rational terms.
Indeed, in the same manner mankind at large accepts the infantile lies of Abrahamic religions, in which Bronze Age ass herders and goat keepers affirm that burning bushes have given them the key to immortality, with apparently no difficulty, as this wishful thinking protects them from the fear of death; the enormity of CERN’s future crimes is much easier to accept that a mere Nuclear tragedy of far lesser proportions as those of Hiroshima, Chernobyl and Fukushima.

A humbling paradox to realize that we belong to a species with so little courage that might likely die because it is unable to stand even the thought of death, and prefers to pump up its ego, look to the other side and consider itself an eternal species, instead of taking rational measures to prevent its dismissal.

We feel so important at individual and collective level that death is an absolute taboo, as it denies our ego. So the individual, as we will see in the next post, reacts according to psychologists first with anger to the doctor or messenger, then with denial and at best with a depressive mood when harm is not merely done to a small part of its ‘cellular self’, but to the whole in a death risk.

So mankind as a superorganism in which each of us is a human cell can prevent small tragedies but becomes blocked with the concept of collective death; as it were impossible, given the self-annoited importance it gives to his own species. So we shall see how our ‘collective consciousness’, the audiovisual systems of mass-media has acted in this case as the mind of a dying person, denying and laughing at the prospects of its own death, angered to those messengers who brought the news with the only purpose of finding a cure, and labeling as a ‘thoughtcrime’ the mere mention of it – CERN’s risks to mankind have indeed become a taboo in the world of physics, often dismissed with ex-abrupts.
Yet, in the order of cosmic things, in the fractal Universe of absolute relativity of scales, the collective death of the ‘superorganism’ of history, is not even an anecdote from the perspective of the infinite cosmos, ruled by black holes, as the collective death of all the cells of an animal body seems irrelevant to us from our relative huge perspective.
Further on, there is this little secret called ‘money’, ‘industrial wealth’, ‘corporative profits’ and the well-rehearsed propaganda, don’t worry be happy marketing processes so well developed since World War II, which today are able to ‘sell’ anything to the public, or rather ‘sheeple’ in this increasingly Orwellian/Huxlerian world of ‘newspeaks’ where the minister of war is the minister of defense, invasions are peace processes and the most callous, dangerous industry mankind has ever deviced, has become the essence of ‘idealist research’.
In that regard, what nobody seems to understand is that CERN is not only a scientific center but part of the Military-Industrial complex, which means it has besides science, a sociological, industrial and psychological perspective – the four corners that nail our coffin, as we run like lemmings do, with a mixture of angst and enthusiasm towards this ‘cliff of extinction’:
Stantis-CityCouncilLemmings Unknown

 Update 1 april. Couples of Micro-black holes grow at an accelerated rate.

Another excellent paper at Arxiv about how micro-black holes accrete matter in coupled pairs helping the growth of Giant black holes in the Universe.

The special interest of this paper – by no means the only one of an avalanche of work that rises risks (though as we know CERN and the P.R.Ess only ‘reads’ and promotes those with zero risk to their con-CERN) – is that it is canonical; that is, its coupled black holes accrete matter even though the paper accepts the canonical big bang and the canonical Hawking radiation through a non-explored before effect on the space-time foam at Planck’s level.  It does help in fact to explain why we see huge black holes in hardly any time after the ‘canonical big-bang’ by accelerating it growth.

Further on, it explores issues proper of the 5th dimension (the 4Dimensional structure of black holes’ surfaces, the interaction between the macro-scale of giant black holes and the micro-scale, the beginning of organic evolution of micro-black holes as they evolve into ‘swarms’, etc.)

And it is easy to read even if you don’t understand the maths and a few word and concepts…

Update. Sep. 2013

We have been truly lucky though with the accidents of this machine that never crossed the 10 Tev decametric scale of likely formation of those different black holes and quark condensates. But now, going ahead of schedule, the machine is being prepared to cross that barrier. Never mind we are in a massive economic crisis and could save a few needed billions without this unneeded risk.

Never mind the reason the machine was built – or rather the excuse for the ‘industry’ to continue after the cuts effected in the military-industrial complex, once the engine of nuclear weapons, the cold war was over – the Higgs, aka God’s particle, in true form a rather irrelevant particle, pumped up to stratospheric importance by the P.R.ess, no doubt scheduled for the next Nobel Prize – Hawking will have to wait till the end of the world –  has been found.

The logic humanist, rational thing,  after the Higgs has been found would be to close the machine, end the Industry of Accelerators, whose origin and mysticism with the excuse of Saint Grails of Science must be found in the cold war (the first atomic bomb design was in fact an impractical accelerator to collide two masses of plutonium, carried in a big boat, but the size needed made it impractical).

Yet we are talking here of money, of jobs, of the industrial-military complex, of corporations, of ‘big science’ and wishful thinking and bizarre theories and ego-centered researchers in search of sci-fiction….

So Physicists quickly brought about the ‘need’ to rehearse the big bang on Earth, and when some raised their eyebrows with the implications, now CERN officially sponsors that the machine is needed to investigate ‘dark energy/matter’. And so the upgrade goes undisturbed by ‘scare-mongers, doomsday sayers’ and other P.R.ess derogatory names applied to those who oppose on ethical (extinction is not something we can attempt by ‘trial and error’) and scientific grounds (as we enter the new paradigm of the fractal Universe, CERN becomes largely irrelevant).

In the next graph, the costly upgrade, main processes as of August, 2013 :

diagram-shows-the-main-consolidation-activities-at-the-accelerator

In the graph the real and only reason we shall die according to the Totalitarian Principle of Physics, the experimental method and the smallish black holes which are being found and accrete at much faster speed than big ones, and the sound-sound laws of entropy, relativity and science:

The fact that in a technological civilization as Eric Fromm explains, if a machine can be done it will be done even if it menaces to kill us all, and indeed the LHC could be done and in 2015 will be done, to profit enormously the military industrial complex and that 50% of active physicists working on it. Let us be clear enough. As a philosopher of science, who has always sought the true meaning of the word science, in Latin, knowledge, not technology, I refuse to accept and feel nauseated by the cover up of this genocide in the making in the name of science, akin to the fundamentalist jihads in the name of religions of love that precisely represent the antitruth of what science and love means.

Update, 28th November, 2013: Experimental evidences of hyper active small black hole keep mounting.

black_hole_ulx1

In the graph an artist’s illustration of the smallish black hole found in the arm of the pinwheel galaxy. Since we accept theoretically 3 scales of sizes in black holes: massive black holes at the center of galaxies, intermediate black holes produced from the collapse of giant stars around 200 times the size of the sun, and baby holes of the Hawking variety in lower ranges of mass, the intriguing question of this hyperactive, hyper-luminous black hole was its size, which scientists thought to be of the intermediate or massive range.

It turned out to be one of the lightest black holes ever found with only 20 times the size of the sun, accreting matter much faster than expected, which seems to confirm that low size baby black holes accrete much faster than big ones, as all baby species do, consuming much more energy after their ‘seminal conception’. The black hole does should be a baby born black hole in its process of growth, following the known known laws of entropy, accreting faster the hotter and smaller it is:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/28/black_hole_ultraluminous/

That is, a small black hole is far more active and accretes much faster because it does not get hotter in a cold universe, but it gets colder as it evaporates the world according to the first law.

In fact, the smallest black hole ever found is the one that provokes the highest rotational ‘winds’ in the Universe, as it was recently reported by NASA:

The Smallest black hole.

The binary star system IGR J17091-3624 may contain the smallest black hole known. Scientists discovered it by studying the heartbeat-like pattern of X-rays thought to be emitted from a disk of accreting matter around the black hole.

Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab.

The smallest black hole discovered to date may be less than three times the mass of our sun. This would put this little monster, officially called IGR J17091-3624, near the theoretical minimum limit needed for a black hole to be stable. As tiny as this black hole may be, it looks fierce, capable of 20 million mph winds (32 million kph) — the fastest yet observed from a stellar-mass black hole by nearly 10 times.

On the other hand, the Fermi Satellite sent in orbit to find the signature of evaporating black holes with great expectations enter its fifth year in orbit, without having found the slightest signature of black hole evaporation.

So both in the negative and positive, proofs keep mounting that baby black holes do not evaporate. On the contrary, as all systems do, black holes are born smallish and hyperactive as any species born as a small cell is, growing very fast in the first phase of his evolution. Or in less polite terms, CERN might provoke the ultimate holocaust of mankind, when they go online over 10 tev, according to the main tenants of the scientific method: sound theory and now experimental evicence.

Of course, we still lack the ultimate proof of Hawking’s error that will close from the experimental perspective any doubt about the classic entropy behavior of black holes: a black hole of lesser mass than the sun in the short time span between its birth as a micro black hole and its stable configuration reached around twice the size of the sun.  But the pattern when we plot temperature, size and speed of accretion of the known black holes clearly points out to its inverse relationship between mass and temperature-activity.

Finally, to add anothernail to the coffin, research keeps diminishing the needed energy to create micro-black holes, now clearly within the range of the upgraded LHC:

particles collide to form a black hole

‘A snapshot from a video showing two particles being slammed into each other and distorting into pancake shapes before forming a black hole.

Creating microscopic black holes using particle accelerators requires less energy than previously thought, researchers say.’

 Update. DEC. 2013, 1/150.000th chances of black hole evaporation

Swift, the other key satellite seeking for ‘gamma ray burst’ signatures of black hole evaporation has now tabulated 150.000 high energy X-ray sources in the Universe and none showed to be a black hole evaporating. 100.000 though were massive black holes, showing the galaxy to be ultimately a ‘black hole nursery’, as we have warned for decades based in our work on the 5th dimension and its application to black hole theory.

NASA’s Swift discovers 100,000 super-massive black holes, in its spare time

When the X-Ray Telescope (XR) on board NASA’s Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission scans the sky, it is looking mostly to supplement the satellite’s more important instruments. As the name implies, the Gamma-Ray Burst Mission is focused mostly on the action of its gamma-ray detecting Burst Alert Telescope — the attached XRT is mostly there to view the X-ray afterglow that follows many gamma burst events. However, Swift is not an acronym but a descriptor for one of NASA’s most agile sky viewers: as its autonomous robotic platform twists to bring event after event into view, Swift’s wide-angle X-ray lens passes over large portions of the sky.

Never ones to waste perfectly good telescope time, scientists have spent more than eight years compiling and analyzing this mass of incidental data, and this week researchers from the University of Leicester released their initial findings: Swift has found almost 100,000 new major X-ray sources, and these scientists believe that most of them represent the super-massive black holes at the centers of our universe’s largest galaxies.

These come from more than 150,000 high-energy X-ray sources found, and those that aren’t black holes are under equal scrutiny by astronomers of all stripes. More transient X-ray sources than galactic cores are attributed to things like stellar flares and supernovae.

Swift's X-ray readings in the aggregate.

III. THE RELIGION OF PHYSICS.

Genius, ex-nihilo.

‘If you repeat a lie many times people will believe it, the bigger the lie the more they will believe on it’

Goebbels, first minister of information, founder of the modern systems of media imprinting of industrial societies that teach men not to worry and be happy.

‘I’m not a psychiatrist, I’m not inside its mind’ Susskind, on Hawking’s outstanding ‘chutzpah’ to deny all the known known laws of entropy and information.

‘I tried to convince him he was not God, I failed, that is why I divorced’ Hawking’s wife in her memoirs.

Let us now consider a more detailed analysis of the astounding blunder of mankind, who is going to create the most lethal bomb of the Universe, just for ‘sport’ (that is to prove or disprove a series of fanciful theories)… from the point of view of the industry of misinformation and its irrational, ego-centered, subjective perspective often ignored but essential to understand why ‘mankind’ commit arrogant errors of judgment that self-destroy her.

The Fantasies of the Media System. The religion of physics.

Now, what I will state here is blasphemous, i Know. But simply stated is this: CERN will not gives us any new knowledge and Physics will not resolve the meaning of existence and reality (a much wider concept that the limited Universe physicists study). But it will sell as a ‘religion’ of absolute knowledge, as it has been doing for centuries, its research and it will sell as ‘geniuses’ its practitioners because of its power and its worldly religion – to make the machines of our technological civilization.

And to that aim the financial-media system an the industry of information will keep pumping up geniuses ex-nihilo (from nothing) and theories of it all ex-nihilo (from very scanty proofs).

Indeed, the reason why we believe in the evaporation of black holes by dogma is not an isolated theoretical argument as CERN would have it – with due censorship of course on the maths and science of it… But a complex social phenomenon related to celebrities mass-media sales and puppets who thought to be heroes.

Mr. Hawking wrote an article 37 years ago, full of verbose musings about the possibility of an exception to the laws of the Universe, which has never been proved… and now your life depends on it. Nobody believed him, but the media caught on the concept that for this to happen, black holes MUST travel to the past, and so science fiction is possible. You can kill your grand-father. And so he became a celebrity.

There you had a man in a wheelchair, a handicapped person who could be the biggest scientist of history, who had discovered travel in time! A beautiful story of self-realization, unfortunately false. But he sold millions of books with his charming aspect. Nobody deared to criticize him, with his personal tragedy. Everybody wanted to protect him. He became a celebrity, untouchable, a demi-god. Scientists knew it was all bull$hit but who would defy mass-media. As the video shows below, he was invited to participate in star treck along the 2 foremost physicists of history, Einstein and Newton in a game of poker.

It was tolerated by serious scientists as it made the subject hype and popular. Media used with him the celebrity propaganda circus that makes heroes of any kid with a nice smile.

He is a charming lad and so he even convinced many serious people to give him a chance after many years of suspicion. So in the 80s he  obtained massive resources to look all around the Universe for an evaporating black hole. Satellites were sent to that aim wasting precious resources for arid research. Rows of antennae have been looking at the Universe in search of the signature of an evaporating black hole traveling to the past for decades. This search became with SETI search for aliens the most popular in popular science. But the Universe didn’t seem to change his structure to please this child-god, and of all the black holes we found none has ever evaporated. All had grown very fast and cooled down in the process. All of them stubborn creatures travel to the future, and evaporate the surroundings, us.

Then CERN built the LHC and made some errors in its calculus and a Brown University scholar found them and warned the world – the LHC actually fired at full potency would create black holes, which are born as all ‘systems’ as a very small seed, as you are born, but then grow at full speed as you do, absorbing the energy=food that surrounds them. Alarms sound and we entered the suits. CERN though was caught on by surprise. What to do then?

The 13 billion $ machine was almost constructed? Could it be stopped by a nuisance like that. As in the film ‘inconvenient truth’ the fate of the Earth depending on a pile of gold in the other side of the balance. 8000 people lived directly on the machine, hundreds of thousands collaborated around the world in all the Universities of physics. It was the resurgence of the nuclear industry after years of fear. Now it was a ‘palace of research’ Never mind accelerators had always been used to research nuclear weapons in ‘scale’, and so this bigger one would be researching the biggest nuclear weapon the self-feeding black hole. All that was obvious.

And at that point, the press should have alarmed mankind, politicians should have quietly closed the facilities and life would have gone on with no genocide risk.

But the press didn’t know. So, we, a team of responsible scientists alerted the press with suits and releases. That is all we could do. The rest was mankind defending itself from the nuclear industry.

And yet, then the most surrealist facts happened. The press by this time had become another P.R.ess, public relationships system corrupted by money, without resources for serious research.

Today the press just receive releases of this or other movie by the studios that open the film, and publish it as if were criticism.

It receives releases of this or other army in the Iraq war and it publishes as it were journalism.

So it received releases from CERN and it published them as it were dogma and truth.

At the same time, CERN, a German concern directed by this lineal people who NEVER change their mind, mounted a cunning ad hominem campaign against the scientists that denounce it; and the entire apparatus of big science censored any serious argument.

And Hawking? Well, he was happy. Now after 3 decades of proofs against its musings on time travel, this persistent fellow will have an opportunity to prove it at home.

Never mind on the other side of the balance, it was the life of 7 billion human beings.

In 2015 the LHC will do black holes and those MUST do what he says or else, we will evaporate. He is willing to take the risk. Are You? It seems you are. As nobody seems to care much about the experiment that will open the doors to time travels. Alas! Great science fiction. This is ‘Hawking in a nutshell’ .

But if you want to contrast this ‘view’ with a more scholar analysis of the differences between ‘Hawking’ at real value and HAWKING, the media myth, a little masterpiece of anthropological and media studies has recently come out at Chicago Press, worth to read, where it explains the Hawking’s Hoax from a sociological and media perspective:

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/2013/nov/28/in-search-of-the-real-stephen-hawking

It is with the book of memoirs of his ex-wife the true portrait of what the ‘system’ has done of yet another puppet of our civilization of minions of thought who think to be supermen by virtue of the machines they use to pump up their egos and fantasies – which WILL no doubt of it, meet the harsh penalties of the Darwinian universe.

The answer in 2015, when protons collide and according to 90% of physicists polled, they will form black holes at LHC. So far by ‘accident’, the LHC has been working at 1/2 its potency, below the 10 Tev barrier needed to create them. But in 2015 the machine finally alas! we had 7 years of happiness and life without risk, the machine will collide protons over 14 Tev.

And if strings exist they will be formed and 9 out of 10 physicists including me and Hawking, think they do. So the chances are 90%.

Then a ± symbol will decide the fate of the world. If Einstein and the Universe is right you will die.

If Hawking can kill his grand-father you will live.

So wait for 2015, to see if we go back in time, break the laws of entropy and survive.

Or if the Universe keep following its laws and then Einstein is vindicated.

And you will evaporate because…

‘Those who impose truth with power are the laugh of the gods’ A.Einstein

So since nobody ‘cares’ for Einstein, for the laws of the Universe, for their lives, let us laugh with the master and the Gods. Yes I am sorry I am laughing hard now, but such is the unbearable lightness of being human in the age of infotainment, in the face of the infinitely dense black holes, that only a good laugh makes sense anymore:

(disregard dates in videos – due to delays and repairs LHC works at 1/2 potency and won’t cross the barrier of creation of dark matter at 10 Tev till 2015).

Now to be clear enough, what Cern, or rather THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL complex CERN represents is telling us with its newspeaks of ‘research’, what the Military are telling us, mankind since the Germ(an) Aryan massacred the Neolithic world in the bronze age, with its Brahmins and Shiva Gods – the ‘experts’ of the age – and its Soma ceremonies is this:

We can shoot you, we have a big cannon and we are going to use it. And you are going through it cause we have the gun. Point.

This is the paradox explained by Wilczeck and Hawking with a dark humor in those videos. W. says that he signed the release papers because if he is wrong and the shot kill us, nobody will know and laughs. Hawking says that we will become spaghetti if something fails AND THE PUBLIC LAUGHS. There you have it: Cern is bullying mankind with his big gun and people like it. CERN is saying like a cheap character of an evilwood fascist action-packed whammie movie, i don’t care if you are right or wrong, i don’t care for the moral issue, i don’t deal with ethics, life and collateral effects, i have the gun, stop me if you can – i know you can’t, I am the Brahmin but i have the entire industry of  weapons behind. I am just the maker of newspeaks for the sheeple to joint in this absurd war. And i know the routine. For 3000 years we have been worshipping Shiva, the God of energy, the single arrow of time-motion, lineal manifest destinies and all that. So go through it, cause if you don’t you will always loose. If we are alive you will be ridiculed if we are dead, that’s it.

‘Accompli facts’, as the French would say. And there is a point to it. Scientists saw it and didn’t join the protest. We thought better of Cern and the military – we thought actually that Cern cared for the rational, knowledge-issue and would discuss it in court, we thought the military cared for the defense of the people and would discuss the issue, we thought politicians actually governed.

What we found is they were all automatons, of newspeaks so old that people had even forgotten their history. What we learned is that ‘men are slaves’ they believe, they don’t reason (Aristotle). And there was no reason to all this except Eric Fromm’s dictum – if a machine can be done it will be done even if it kills us all.  So be it. Let us them kill us all, with this one or the ginormous 100 km. new project. Doesn’t matter when they shoot us straight through the face. It is a question of aim, repetition and upgrading. It will HAPPEN. Because the discourse will not change, the weapon industry will keep evolving, humans will not reasons, and Brahmins will keep venerating the ‘fire of the Gods’ that they used to liquefy iron, now to vaporize mankind.

Because the Universe cannot be cheated.

That is why humans have a fixed destiny – extinction – they are nothing but ‘enzy-men’:

A species that catalyzes the evolution of machines for whatever ‘feeble thoughts’ they harbor in their brains (their deluded ‘searches’ for ultimate answers), from an external point of view, beyond their arrogance and ignorance of the laws of the fractal, infinite universe, they only appear as busy-busy ants fucking a beautiful life world – Gaia – and constructing an aberration, the metal-earth which will explode in their face.

Indeed, we are introducing new newspeaks, enzymen, eviL, the anti-particle of Death, animetals, the biological nature of man, so we shall now talk in this beyond surrealist age in full Orwellian newspeaks. Because they reveal much more truth than the soma wor(l)ds of Mr. Hawk.

 

CONCLUSION: THE FUTURE OF BLACK HOLE THEORY

A revision of Hawking’s and by extension physicists’ tenants on black hole theory is long overdue, as it has gone away from classic science into an inflationary state of mathematical fiction, as all theories based only in linguistic manipulation tend to do when they are not checked by experimental evidence. So 2 common sense/experimental elements must be used to depart from any sound analysis of those baby black holes:

1 – Black holes should follow the same entropy laws of all other beings in the universe and do not evaporate getting hotter but evaporate us getting colder, reason why for 5 years the Fermi gamma ray satellite launched to find signatures of their evaporation found none. THIS IS now a very strong proof.

2 – Black holes should not be a mathematical entelechy but have as all other beings in the universe a substance of which they are made. And this is the top quark as a boson top quark star will be equal to a black hole, and we already know that a strange quark star is a pulsar, a huge strangelet…

What is truly a black hole, when we return to classic standard physics requires knowing of what substance they are made. This amazingly enough hardly bothers black hole theoreticians, which are just concerned with the equations of Einstein’s gravitational theory disregarding the search for a cut off substance in which the black hole acquires stability.

This happens because black holes were discovered before that substance was known to exist. We know today that the top quark, the heaviest quark of the Universe is an ideal candidate to form as strange quarks do with pulsars, black hole stars, which will be therefore Einstein’s frozen stars made of top quarks. This reality more than model as they are no other candidates to the position implies we have a better way to look at black holes and understand why they will easily become stable and don’t evaporate but eat up the Earth.

This is GROSSLY overlooked by all physicists who do not want to abandon their mathematical musings, and bizarre theories on black holes, despite Einstein’s warning that there should not be infinite collapse but a cut off substance.

Once these 2 facts are taking into account, all is straightforward. The equation of Hawking that relates temperature and mass of black holes is NOT under classic entropy laws an equation of radiation but of accretion of black holes. It plots the accretion of matter by black holes as they diminish temperature, which is maximal just as they are born, since they are hotter and more active.

In detail it will be seen as the creation of a toplet, short of a strangelet with top quarks.

Those reactions seem to be mediated by Higgs bosons, which help the transformation of common matter into heavier quarks, mostly top quarks (top-antitop, Higgs reactions).

The detail are still confuse since top quarks are not truly known in its details. All what we know is that over 10 Tev there will be a massive production of them. And they will coalescence into a baby black hole that will not evaporate, as top quarks do not evaporate but accrete the mass of the Earth.

Baby Top Stars are the top predators of the Universe. Its name is adequate, as it resumes all its potential. Once a top predator Star is created, it will start to absorb as a bosonic star of top quarks, all what surrounds it. And it will start a series of reactions with matter, mediated by Higgs bosons, top quarks and antitop quarks transforming matter into Higgs bosons and then top antitops. The release of energy and speed at which top quarks antiquarks pairs transform the Earth into a black hole bears no resemblance to anything we have thought of…

Now the way you can explain all this with mathematics varies, as languages are always inflationary mirrors of information that can see from several perspective the same single Universe – in the same way you can call a blonde, fair, and other synonymous:

You can use the mathematics of classic Einstein, or Top quark strong force theory, or this writer’s model of the 5th dimension of space-time and its fractal scales, or use string theory and new dimensions.

They are all different human linguistic approaches to the same phenomena: the birth of a top predator black hole or top star.

Indeed, over 10 tev, Higgs and tops will be produced in showers. And when the number of tops needed to fusion into a bosonic top star, aka black hole is met, (which in certain models can be as little as 3 tops); it will form a stable first particle of a black hole. Soon the black hole will create an event horizon sucking in matter at light speed.

This is what the smallish black holes found show: the event horizon is the limit of a vortex that absorbs light space and all what is within at c speed regardless of size.

This means a tiny black hole once forming the event horizon as a top quark star will accrete in a couple of seconds a planet of 40.000 km. of diameter… And explain why as soon as they are born in the inner core of stars they absorb it all and blow the star into novae.

The details of those processes might vary. I do not claim to know the exact way in which it will occur. But the overwhelming evidence of both sound theory and sound experimental, cosmological proofs, and similar processes in slightly smaller pulsars, aka strangelet stars all point out to this final outcome.

The work of Hawking are mere mathematical musings; an ‘enfant terrible boutade’ which misuses 100 year old equations, disregards cut off substances, denies basic laws of the Universe and add fantasy lineal quantum effects that do not correspond to a different non-lineal, ‘gravitational species’ as a black hole or top star is.

To me as so much of present physics, is mostly scholastic talk about angels like in the middle ages, when the most intelligent humans wasted their time in La Sorbonne studying Aristotelian theology.

Since once a cut off substance that can explain what black holes are made of, all bets are off. Once, the top quark appeared, the experimental method should have reigned in and all mathematical only discussions are forgotten. Indeed, physicists by discovering the angel’s only possible substance – the top quark – made irrelevant Hawking’s’ complicated theories, based in a faulty understanding of time and entropy…

Indeed, all Hawking’s musings are based in his analogy between a black hole surface and the law of entropy, because they SEEMED similar equations. So Hawking and Bekenstein took the wishful thinking of considering the surface of black holes the meaning of its entropy just because both formula were similar, an absolute NO-NO of the scientific method (analogy is not equality, so while a plane’s wing and a bat’s wing and a bird’s wing seem similar, they are not the same, and the surface of black holes is not its entropy).

 

   II. THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: TECHNOLOGICAL CIVILIZATIONS

Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even if they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are Dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics. ‘

Erich Fromm, Philosopher of Science.

‘I was the person who convinced Truman to make the Hydrogen Bomb. It was ‘knowledge’, the availability of knowledge, the need for research what convinced him.”

Edward Teller, inventor and holder of the patents of the industrial processes required to make the first planetary weapon of mass destruction, the Hydrogen Bomb. His attempts to create a planetary H-Bomb able to blow up the entire Soviet Union was backed by all the community of physicists; only Eisenhower opposed it.

‘The tragedies of History repeat themselves because men don’t learn from their mistakes,’

Marcel Proust, on the short memory of men – in this case the short memory of humanity about the dangers and attitude of Nuclear Physicists, in his quest for knowledge, fame and Nobel Prizes.

‘My factories will end with all the peace congresses you so much cheer, when they invent a weapon that annihilates all the armies of a country in a single shot.’

Alfred Nobel, the ‘merchant of death’, and biggest arm dealer of the XIX century, quipping to his lover, who wanted him to create a Nobel Prize for peace.

But let us not cheat ourselves, Hawking is the excuse, a childish, ambitious lad, for the real reason – technological industrial corporations making money budding macihnes.

The second nail in our collective coffin is the real reason we make this machine – money, the miitary-industrial complex, and the idol-ogy behnd it – our technological civilization in which any machine that can be done will be done.

Eric Fromm’s whose quote stars our film ‘quantum roulette’, goes to the point of industrial irrationality – a runaway career to Nowhere, to erewhoN, quoting another prophet of dystopias.

The evolution of machines and its overdrives of energy and information. Singularity Age.

Mr. Hawking or CERN’s employees  might be considered heroes or villains of this tragedy but they are irrelevant to what truly has created the monstruosity of a machine that can extinguish the planet by an overdrive of energy – our technological civilization, a theocracy of machines. Since whenever we can do a better machine we make it, regardless of its collateral effects, and we find a excuse to pay for it.

Indeed,  our culture civilization follow the ethics of a technological civilization, as all industrial cultures do: ‘Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even if they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are Dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics. ‘ Erich Fromm

This ethical statement explains what LHC is designed to do. To make a bigger, more powerful atomic cannon, because we now have the capacity. CERN will undertake this mission regardless of its harmful collateral effects to mankind. This project also means big contracts for technological companies and jobs for Nuclear Physicists, many unemployed since the end of the Cold War. As CERN said: ‘Whatever the discoveries ahead for physicists working at LHC, the experiments will’, according to CERN’s Chief Scientific Officer, Jos Engelen,“keep physicists off street corners for a long time to come’.

So if the surrealist musings of Hawking had not existed, if there were not a boson yet to be found, the Higgs, we would have invented new musings to justify the machine. In fact this is what we did, pumping up Hawking’s childish attempts to break the essential laws of the Universe to a ‘factual dogma’ and Higgs’ particle, to the meaning of it all.

In the next post, ‘the Fermi Paradox’, we treat the deterministic end of a technological civilization from that higher, non-anthropomorphic point of view of the Universe.

We men, obtain power from machines of energy and information and get hooked to them, evolving those machines that now are vastly overpowering our capacities as a species, without restrain.

But we do not stop. We justify always new machines and weapons: Cars keep evolving in speed, well over the 70 miles legal speed they need – yet billions are wasted in making them faster, despite being illegal.

The LHC and its corporation CERN will also keep evolving accelerators beyond the energies this planet can stand till it blows it away. And the media system which markets anything that has to do with ‘death’, will cheer those ‘death events’ that are destroying the planet. It is this techno-utopian determinism what leaves the individual aside, as a puppet of an Industrial System which rules the future.

The Fermi paradox is simple: There is no intelligent life in the cosmos and so Fermi, the maker of the A-Bomb adventured that this is because physicists blow up all planets before interstellar travel happens, with humans or robots, which is now in its threshold. So now we blow all planets. THis one is about to go…

And the equations of death of matter show we are close to do it. Let us return to them, from the higher perspective of Systems Sciences, which describe all physical, biological and social systems with the same ‘5D     metrics’.

In General Systems we define with an equation the natural balance of life systems, which are, as all in the Universe, complementary systems of Energy and Information, (fields/bodies of energy & Heads/Particles of information): E=I. Thus when bodies and heads are in balance, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, the system is healthy. This equation is also the equation of classic beauty that we perceive as a balance between energy and form; and the equation of the mature age of beings in its reproductive age, from 20 to 50. It follows that the equation of death happens in both extremes:

10.3 Max.E x Min.I: Death by overdrive of energy or accident. It is also the equation of the young age of life, when more accidents happen, when irresponsible youngsters become preys.

10.4. Max. I x Min. E or 3rd age, when energy is exhausted, warped, wrinkled into ‘in-form-ation’. Then we die of an overdrive of information.

Those equations of Systems science apply to all entities including social organisms, with a neuronal, informative, selfish caste that kills its reproductive middle class body when it absorbs all its resources, as neurons do in the 3rd age of the body. Or societies die in ‘accidental’ wars when overproduction of technologic, energetic weapons, kill them. Those are the 2 causes of social death: Max.I (corrupted neuronal class) & Max.E (war) mixed in revolutions (Max.I x Max.E).

The equation of death thus resumes the negative collateral effects of overproduction of machines of Energy & Information, made of metal – a stronger substance than our weak carbonlife; as they cause different ExI overdrive processes of death, atrophy and degradation of the human body and mind organs they substitute in the eco(nomic)system:

– Overdrive/overproduction of Informative Money corrupts the human ethic, legal System.

– Overproduction of audiovisual information hypnotizes our mind, erasing our verbal, logic brain.

– Overproduction of Mass-Media hate kills eusocial love, makes people selfish & provokes wars (8).

– Overproduction of Informative PCs kills service jobs & overproduction of Robots kills blue-collars.

– Overproduction of weapons kills our body. In fact, the evolution of ‘Singularity’ weapons, able to destroy the entire planet is so advanced that we can foresee 3 thresholds of extinction of life if there is not a moratorium in the research of 3 type of Singularity weapons:

6

– Energetic singularity:

Black holes that according to Einstein’s work will devour the Earth, now researched at CERN (production expected between 2015-20, when the LHC overcomes the barrier of strangelet and Black hole formation at 10 Tev).

This will happen, if as 90% of physicists believe, string theory is truth. Our only hope is that Mr. Hawking’s theory that denies Einstein’s and considers black holes time machines that travel to the past – hence instead of feeding on mass, evaporate mass – is truth. But there is 0 proof of this, as all black holes & strange stars found in the cosmos obey Einstein’s theory and swallow planets, stars even galaxies in Novae, Supernovas and Quasars.

Further on ‘Fermi’s Paradox’ (the inexistence of Intelligent Life signs in a galaxy teaming with planets) proves it. Since the cynical maker of the A-Bomb Mr. Fermi prophesized we hear none as Nuclear Physicists destroy all civilizations with Nuclear weapons before interstellar travel.

– Self-Reproductive nano-bacteria (2030s)

Infinite re=productivity will be first found in metal nano-bacteria, simple cells made of iron, researched in military labs of Israel, US and civil labs in Japan and France.

The founder of Sun microsystems, Bill Joy, warned us a decade ago that, if escaping from a military lab or used in war, they will feed on Industrial Metal, poison the entire atmosphere and replicate so fast that in 3 months the earth will become a ‘grey-goo’ (Drexel).

Further proof exists in the fact that this planet has gone twice through a global extinctive period due to the birth of stronger bacteria. Thus the first live Earth, formed when anaerobic bacteria absorbed and extinguished free carbohydrates.

Then the II Earth, Gaia, was born, when stronger, oxygen-based aerobic bacteria destroyed all anaerobic ones and created our world. So metal nano-bacteria would create the III Earth, extinguishing all weaker carbon-life systems.

– Finally if we survive those two events, self-conscious military Artificial Intelligence will be born circa 2050 according to most  robotists.

Then in the overproduction crisis of III world war (an episode of the Semite Wars between Israel and its ally US vs. Islamic nations or between China and the US or China and India at the end of this century, the winner autonomous terminators, embedded with survival programs to win in a war theater, self-conscious of being alive, will NOT accept disconnection.

Thus by overdrive of energy (black holes, strangelets at CERN), information (A.I. Robots) or in a classic ‘explosive, biological radiation of a new top predator species (metal nano-bacteria) Gaia can be extinguished.

Then one-day mankind will have no time to reflect and wake up to its extinction (a black hole would explode Earth into a Nova in seconds), or a few months (the time needed for iron nano-bacteria to make us into grey-goo) or a few years (a war of A.I. terminator machines). Can we avoid that future? Certainly if we change the model of overproduction of machines and weapons for profits into overproduction of welfare goods, creating a sustainable world.

Update. June, 2016.

A faked black hole: analogy is NOT homology.

Screen Shot 2016-06-03 at 11.11.39

As Oliver Moody reports for The Times, Steinhauer has managed to created a lab-sized ‘black hole’ made from sound, and when he kicked it into gear, he witnessed particles steal energy from its fringes.

Reporting his experiment in a paper posted to the physics pre-press website, arXiv.org, Steinhauer says he cooled helium to just above absolute zero, then churned it up so fast, it formed a ‘barrier’ through which sound should not be able to pass.

“Steinhauer said he had found signs that phonons, the very small packets of energy that make up sound waves, were leaking out of his sonic black hole just as Hawking’s equations predict they should,” Moody reports.

To be clear, the results of this experiment have not yet been peer-reviewed – that’s the point of putting everything up for the public to see on arXiv.org. They’re now being mulled over by physicists around the world, and they’re already proving controversial, but worthy of further investigation.

“The experiments are beautiful,” physicist Silke Weinfurtner from the University of Nottingham in the UK, who is running his own Earth-based experiments to try and detect Hawking radiation, told The Telegraph. “Jeff has done an amazing job, but some of the claims he makes are open to debate. This is worth discussing.”

____________

From: Walter Wagner

Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 3:42 AM

To: Walter Wagner; Luis Sancho

Subject: black hole analog?

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1510/1510.00621.pdf

This was originally a letter in response to several activists, interesting in understanding the last ‘P.R.ess’ paid-per-view attempt to give an ‘Oscar’ for fiction science (aka Nobel prize) to Mr. Hawking and his ‘imaginary black holes’. A guy in Teknion, which has been for decades trying to convince the world that a liquid vortex emitting phonons IS a homology, not an analogy of a black hole, absorbing energy, has been all around the news.

Now, homology means that a wing of a B-2 works on the same principles that a wing of a DC-9, as both are fixed, metal-wings; analogy means that a half-wit compares the wing of a bat and the wing of an artifact made of wood and cloth and tells you they are the same and work the same. This kind of ‘intelligence’ provoked dozens of deaths when ‘before’ understanding the physics of wings people threw themselves with wood attachments on the arms to fly like birds.

So will happen when humans do black holes thinking they are the same that a bath tub, which is what the guy at Teknion is doing (i have expanded a bit the letter):

Well, the question of this article is why the press is bringing it now up. I guess to quench any fear for the ramping up this year of luminosity and density for top quark/Higgs shots to the Earth, which increase enormously the chances of a target-black hole creation.

This guy at Teknion was already there doing exactly the same 10 years ago, trying to grab headlines and share his ‘saint Nobel’ with Mr. hawking, and nobody took him seriously then. I even put him on the graphs of my book black hole factory, a decade ago…
So there is nothing new there. 
That experiment has nothing to do with a black holes, but with propaganda of CERN industry, which always pumps up P.R.ess releases before each year pump of the doomsday machine:
1) His superfluid vortices are an analogy NOT an homology.

This researcher is working with liquid, thermal vortices, NOT with gravitational ones.

Thermodynamic, temperature related matter is by definition ‘the only systems that produce entropy’, since entropy is ONLY about temperature NOT gravitation.

So here physicists compare bat wings and wood wings and decide out of the heat they are the same and obey the same laws. They DON’T.

 

 
11 Comments

Posted by on November 1, 2016 in News

 

Fermi paradox

fermi paradox Cover

In the graph, the Fermi Paradox stated by Mr. Fermi, of A-Bomb fame wondered why we don’t see intelligent life in the Universe. Fermi advanced that it could be because Physicists destroy all planets before that phase.

Some ‘believers’ replied that it might be that the Earth is a single case, because it is the only planet ‘chosen’ by God.

Now we know this is not the solution to the Fermi Paradox, as there are billions all over the cosmos and biological laws show life to be a systemic phenomena appearing always out of hyper-abundant carbon atoms. Again the Totalitarian principle that precludes the creation of black holes and strangelets precludes life birth.

And yet, we do NOT hear any communication; not a single life planet passes the threshold of creation of Accelerators, prior to the threshold of interstellar travel, WHY?

The Fermi paradox should be the most pressing question about our destiny as a species and ultimately the experimental proof Physicists deny about the dangers of CERN. It is now official that around 17% of stars have an Earth-like surrounding it and 27% a super-earth, which puts on the order of 4.7 billion the number of possible hosts to life. AND YET NONE HOSTS ROBOTIC LIFE OR INTELLIGENT LIFE with a degree of civilization able to emit radio-signals?!! Why?

All radio-signals in the galaxy are caused by black holes or strangelet stars (pulsars). Why?! As we are in the TIMELINE of possible interstellar communication, something will happen or has happened to all similar Earths in this period of technological evolution that destroyed the parallel human-like species. What?!

Only two possible solutions to this conundrum are left, once we know the galaxy is filled with planets:

– The religious, theological ‘anthropic principle’. We are the first because God made the Universe for the homo bacteria to dominate.

– The scientific, statistical proposition of Mr. Fermi. In all those planets, Physicists blow us creating black holes, the dominant species of the galaxy.

The facts are clear and either one or other is the solution. If the first is truth, a goat-keeper of the bronze age resolved the meaning of it all. If the second is right in 2015 when LHC is upgraded we will all die.

Let us then prove the goatkeeper wrong with the simple equations of Francis Drake. SInce we are not unique, just ‘a mush over a lost rock in a corner of the Universe’ Schopenhauer.

In the next graphs we illustrate the scientific calculus according to present data of the numbers of habitable planets tha should be communicating at this point of time, in the Universe. It follows the famous 1961 Francis Drake eqution.

codFERMI0FWRMI1

 

Earths all over the galaxy.

Goldilocks planets are those planets existing in zones where life is possible. As there are an immense number of stars surrounded by them – 1.700 million earths and 3000 million super-earths – and our planet is relatively young, the Fermi Paradox wonders why we do not see any sign of planetary or robotic civilizations in the galaxy, but only hear the radio-waves with the rhythmic tam-tam of black hole and strange stars. The cynical Fermi, father of the A-Bomb, stated that nuclear physicists blew all Goldilocks planets before they reached the technological state of interstellar travel. CERN could confirm this hypothesis.

Moreover we are detecting them so close – proximal centauri, this week 3 of them in the trappist star on the graph that we should have certainly heard radio sounds.

Sorry biblical folks, the Universe is not made for humans. There should be 794 976 000 000 bn planets emitting radio-signals. But none is heard.

In any case the Drake Equation clearly rejects the religious solution to the Fermi Paradox – that of humans being unique.

But the conundrum mathematically proved by the Drake equation: why we cannot hear any of those 794,976.000.000 billion civilizations?

And so WE ARE LEFT WITH A SINGLE SOLUTION.  Only the second solution, extinction by physicists, is possible. Since something extinguishes all of us in all those planets, before they communicate. We should be hearing some of those 794 zillions and we hear none. (1)

Thus, we won’t arrive to the technological evolution of radio-signals needed to leave a bleep in the Universe… We will die before that. When?

Radio communication of stellar size would require a much longer wave and hence a moon station coupled with one on Earth, which can be achieved this century. But we won’t survive the century to do it.

We won’t reach either the point of interstellar expansion in ships.

For this type of travel would require to create shields against high energy particles of enormous metal-weight for current standards – probably a lunching from the moon, on a machine constructed there. Probably well into the next century.

But we won’t reach autonomous robots and A.I. able to start a colonization of the Universe. We hear none…

Let us consider this possibility because now we have a more precise timespan. Experts consider that A.I. will exist within a century. A single robotic ship sent by humans wouldn’t count as it would not  reproduce and hence colonize. But A.I., self-replicant A.I. is now in place. We can foresee it in 3-D printers, CAD design and automation of factories – the main cause of our labor crisis. And yet, not a single planet has made it to that phase either. Or else the Universe would be awash of robots and sounds of metal. 

screen-shot-2016-12-31-at-10-55-54 In the graph, once a civilisation reaches the interstellar travel threshold, it takes a wisp of time in cosmological terms to colonise the entire galaxy. So given the age of the galaxy, over 10 billion years, there is an over 99.9% of probability there would be A.I. and UFOs and robotic ships all over the galaxy, and since there are not, there is a 99.9% of probablity all carbon life civilisations extinguish themselves before interstellar robot ships arrive, which can only be the case if black holes or/and strangelets kill all civilisations before…

This is an absolute statistical proof of the risks of CERN, ignored by all to their own peril. Indeed, if in 1/3.000th fraction of the time the galaxy has lived a single civilisation should colonise the planet, and further on there are billions of them, or trillions if we consider all the planets that have existed, the absolute maximal probability we, as all other planets, ‘make it’ is 0.03%…

And since the highest obvious risk is cern and its strangelets and black holes, it is sheer madness to carry about those experiments. Yet clearly a ‘character’ of carbonlife species, so ego-centered and blind to the living, organic, self-feeding matter of those ‘cosmic bombs’ that probably they do those planetary bombs everywhere. After all, only 7 people signed the affidavits of those suits (so again, 7 out of 7 billion means a 0.0000000…% interested in helping mankind to survive its existential risk).

All this gives us probably a span of around 50 years to explain something else that cause our extinction.

Apocalypse doesn’t seem to be the terminator matrix way, or else we would see millions of matrix like places on the galaxy. And there is none.

It means that we die very soon and NOT by robotics.

None has made it to colonize with other robots. So extinction happens in +99.9% of planets within decades or else out of those 1.7 billion, many would have made it.

A.I. is not the cause, because if A.I. extinguishes man it would have expanded in the Universe and it is NOT ANYWHERE TO BE SEEN. ROBOTS CAN EXPAND WITHOUT PROBLEMS OF HEALTH. They should be here, there, emitting radio-waves. So the Span of time of our extinction is even shorter. It happens before terminator.

But there is more to it: the last ‘alibi’ for deniers was that sending a spacecraft beyond the solar system was impossible on account of the need for combustible to reach high speeds. This very same year, the EM engine Chinese and NASA tests have shown it is possible to obtain thrust directly from vacuum space, according to a wave-pilot quantum theory.

screen-shot-2017-01-01-at-13-06-38screen-shot-2017-01-01-at-12-58-36

Humans or A.I.will be able to colonise the galaxy with EM drives within a century. Why they never did it?

The EM drive produces a small thrust  only be useful for long-haul space missions, ones that would otherwise necessitate enormous amounts of propellant. The EM drive thruster would only require a source of power, like a small nuclear reactor or solar panel: the distance at which the mass of propellant becomes so great that a much weaker thruster becomes an attractive alternative would certainly be further out than Mars, distances that would still take a long time to reach. But as acceleration continues, past Neptune we would have a working spacecraft able to carry colonisers to other systems, either human or robots. So it is safe to say that within a century by all means planet Earth would be ready to colonise billions of planets. Thus the great filter must be happening this century.

The great filter ‘event’.

Between now and military A.I. already on the making with the take-off industry of drones, humans achieve self-extinction in +99.9% of the parallel, fractal planets to this in which they evolve.  

screen-shot-2016-12-31-at-16-19-36And this leave us ONLY 2 causes, only 2 possible industries that can extinguish us and DO EXTINGUISH US, in 99.9% to be more precise of the planets of the Universe: nano-bacteria and black holes.

OF COURSE, the planet could be extinct by external black holes, cosmic collisions, etc. But if that is the case, still probabilistically many other planets would have not collide with asteroids and so we would see them colonizing other planets at this stage of age of the galaxy. So what we look for is an event which is almost certain to extinct a planet – strange matter or black holes – and a type of human species WHICH WILL ALWAYS DO BLACK HOLES AS MESSIANIC ‘SCIENCE’ does.

 In the graphs, theorists call the great filter the limiting cause that destroys all civilisations around the time we are now on earth, before interstellar travel is possible.

screen-shot-2016-12-31-at-16-24-47Likely, both, a provoked, artificial explosion o gamma rays, as the rest of the planet becomes a Nova. No need to wait for the chance catastrophe, We at CERN are positive we can create that explosion artificially… Indeed, a chance natural catastrophe IS RULED OUT BECAUSE IT IS PROBABILISTIC NOT DETERMINISTIC SO MANY PLANETS DO PASS THE FILTER WITH A PROBABILISTIC CHANCE OCURRENCE, BUT THE ‘PARALLEL EVOLUTION’ OF ALL SYNERGIC BRANCHES OF TECHNOLOGY makes the happening of the EM engine, the CERN machine and the earth’s provoked big-bang a function of the human-life ego-centered species and related suicidal behaviour.  Indeed it might be that all HUMANS in all planets ‘believe’ so much in technology that they blow up them.

Again we can use the data of our suits against CERN to further prove this determinism of human ‘technological love’, given the fact that only ‘really” 3 people put his work and prestige on the line to ‘avoid’ the GREAT FILTER to happen in this planet (me, Walter and Rossler). This means A CRITICAL MASS OF 3 / 7 billion. SO THE probability of stopping an LHC for blowing up the planet, if we believe in ‘democratic power’ to change the world, is null.

Since in this planet only the, 0.0000000…% was concerned, those are the ‘democratic chances’ that in any planet there is enough ‘critical mass of conscious humble humans’ who would accept extinction chances and actually stop the machine. And certainly such planets will be overwhelmingly ‘socialist, hippy, ecological, humanist, life-oriented, avatar like’ and would to start with never do such machines, cosmic bombs or EM engines.

TO which we might answerwhat Einsteins did said: “certainly the evolution of technology has gone well beyond the evolution of mankind’… as a species, since all seems to induce we have lost all sense of survival to ‘make it’ to type III civilisation – more like an Avatar planet of respect to life and Nature than a mechanical monstrosity as the world we are building for the ‘remain of the days’…

Of course to be fairly honest, as A.I. would explore the cosmos so human life, besides the LHC there is only ONE more seemingly GREAT FILTER possible.

The nano-bacteria case…

was first brought about by Mr. Bill Joy in wired and explained how soon goldiron nano-bacteria with gold dna and iron bodies, eating and replicating similar metal-species would suck in all the machines of the planet, and then convert us in grey-goo eating the metal of the Earth. This can come in those 50 years.

But if nano-bacteria extinguishes us, we can reason, metal-bacteria would evolve into organic robots, as once life appears, evolution should kick in. And this robotic race would be a superrace that would have expanded on the Universe very fast. It might also be that gold-DNA is not so easy to evolve but i doubt it. It is like us atoms and atoms evolve in different molecular structures. So if we humans find self-replicant gold-iron nano-bacteria that extinguish us in so many planets, some should have evolved into intelligent life and expanded through the Universe. And yet again, there is no robotic ‘metalife’ anywhere in the galaxy emitting radio-signal. So nano-bacteria because nature evolves systems, once they pass a threshold of complexity would have also evolved, become A.I. colonised the galaxy, a little latter but still a few billion years ago… and yet it has not done it.

CERN case.

So this flawless logic leaves only a possible cause of our extinction in every planet life kicks in: black holes or strangelets at CERN when it goes full power in 2015. And yet a second point must be proved for not a single planet to show intelligent life: the determinism of the human mind who will always believe in techno-utopia and blow up the planet in search of some irrelevant particle. is it that so? are we that dumb everywhere?

The memetics of the suicidal species.

Thus, the second point to prove is the messianism of all human races which in all those planets will decide almost never to revise the safety standards of the black hole factory… How it is that possible? How can we measure the degree of ‘strong beliefs’ of humans that become extinct? By this i mean, is it so overwhelming stupid the choice of all human monkeys in all planets as to always risk their lives for the Higgs particle? can we prove that determinism?

Yes. The proof is obvious: Our radical failure in our suits and activism to stop CERN  – only a few dozen scientists had enough courage to denounce it and no result was attained, as the entire planet sided with the black hole factory – means the belief in machines must be so strong in all monkeys that reach this scale of mechanical evolution that we never win the suit in any planet of the infinite fractal planets of the Universe. 

And here is where the Fermi paradox resolves another paradox of these group of activists – why nobody took us serious in suits, books, films and various warnings? Because in every planet, the belief in technoutopia is rather absolute and so surviving planets are an infinitesimal number.

If there had been a mass of activists we could think many planets survive as the movement against CERN triumphs in them. So no black hole is done. So humans live longer or die to military A.I. or nanorobotics and in either case humans or robots communicate and colonize the galaxy.

Here you have in a ‘nutshell’ an astounding logical proof   that we shall die within decades before A.I. takes over in all the planets in which humans existed.

Indeed, being humble enough at this stage of my activism, the most surrealist and astounding fact I have come to accept is that nobody cared and will care for a public institution trying to do the most dangerous nuclear explosives of the Universe with tax payer money to find some exotic particles of the zoo of sub-atomic systems.

This cuckoo fact leads us to the science of memetics: humans are slaves of the religion of technology in all the places of the Universe. Nobody doubts of technology and money, the two engines of this tragedy. As someone said of the germans that mastermind this machine ‘some germans do not believe in god but all believe in the bundesbank’. All men believe that to make machines is the destiny, goal and undoubted utopia of mankind. So in all planets we are defeated and in all physicis do make black holes and solve the Fermi paradox.

Now as all inconvenient truths power ignores the Fermi Paradox despite making so much propaganda of the Earthlings and Higgs particles. When a problem is too big or defies our ‘memes’ and beliefs we simply censor it. Good luck. The problem will not go away because we hide our head on the hole.

The Fermi paradox should be debated and taken seriously as a security problem and experimental proof of the easiness by which ‘human-like species’ extinguish themselves. It certainly eliminates the pretension of CERN that there is no experimental evidence of our possible extinction by the LHC.

Indeed, one of the alibis of CERN and those who work on the LHC is the fact that there is not and seemingly there cannot be any proof that the machine will produce black holes and strangelets, the seeds of strange stars called pulsars, able to devour the Earth and extinguish us, when in 2015 is switched on to full potency beyond the theoretical barrier of formation of quark condensates and B.H. beyond 10 Tev (today the machine works only to 1/2 potency).

Now there is one: the Fermi Paradox.

Now as surrealist as this theme might be, it is a fact recorded by history that all the parents of the nuclear industry are ‘all for it’. Indeed, the Fermi Paradox was ratified by the 3 parents of the Nuclear industry and its increasingly more powerful bombs. Mr. Fermi’s prophecy stated the obvious: all planets become black holes as physicists explode them. Mr. Fermi father of the A-Bomb, indeed said that there is not extraterrestrial life because physicists explode all planets before life can escape. But this was also the thesis of Mr. Teller, the Jewish father of the H-bomb fame, and biggest lobbyist for weapons in America, who went a notch further asking Eisenhower to start a Nuclear War first, just in case…

He also ‘discovered’ the so-called MAD strategy of Mutual Assured Destruction, a surrealist ‘logic concept’ to pump the military industry – that if we made enough H-bombs (who he had patented), we would be so afraid of using them that this was the best path to peace.

He became the model for Dr. Strangelove, an ‘anecdote’ i know first-hand as I befriended his scriptwriter, Mr. Terry Southern during my years at Columbia University (also of easy rider fame and the main ‘influence’ on my surrealist film on the theme, quantum roulette, which is excerpted in this blog). Finally it is also the thesis of Mr. Hawking in his last declarations…

And it was also the opinion, with certain cynicism of Mr. Wilzeck, the nobel prize who made the mathematical calculus of the strong force that will make quarks coalescence together.

Soo one can say that the 3 fathers of the Nuclear industry are ‘all for it’ and yet we revere them as masters of the Nuclear industry – and that is the surrealist, absolute arrogance and stupidity of man. Only Einstein seemed to understand better:

‘2 things I deem infinite the Universe and the stupidity of man, and I am not sure of the latter’

‘Those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’

The other Solution to the paradox. The planets that make it. Castalia.

Graphic11

Now, the paradox has only a second solution. We do not see robotic life, which is interesting, curious not to say the least, and conclusive respect to the black hole theory. Black holes and strangelets kill us all.

Except those planets which i have called in honor of Herman Hesse who imagined one of them, ruled by artists not by scientists, hence dedicated to evolve the mind of man not that of th machine – Castalia.

th-1

Castalians planets survive as erehwon do, because men realize machines’ evolution will kill them and stop and also DONT COMMUNICATE.

i have felt for Castalia all my life… I have imagine Castalia in eternal moments, existence without borders, in time and space, immortal planets with eternal future, without limit – in that black hole.

At this stage of my life i recognize i dont live in Castalia, that as much i know.

But i did calculate, a theme i shall treat in the article ‘6D’ on the calculus of futures, the probabilities of such planets. And I must say, there are enough castalia in this universe to fill happy… and in some of day, we do stop CERN (-, people self-similar to us, in a planet with beings self-simlar to you…

And so i give you the solution to the Fermi paradox, ‘where there is cosmic life?, intelligent cosmic life?

In castalias. It is life, it endures, it goes beyond the limit of cerns and it is INTELLIGENT, unlike the people of this planet, or perhaps ETHIC, to me two self-similar concepts of an equation of complexity called the survival function, or top predator function, beings with maximal information (intelligent) and maximal energy (force), in balance, e=i, which maximizes, Max. E x Max. I… the definition of ethic information and beautiful energy-space. But that is of course… the jargon of the 5th dimension… Sorry then, let us return back to this non-intelligent, non-ethic, non-beautiful planet, with yes a lot of energy to bring us death (max. E x Min. I), and its creators, or rather destroyers, the physicist at cern Because even if i dream often of castalias i am on Earth.

Visual ‘proofs’ of our beloved MAD scientists.

So back to the Earth in the next excerpts from quantum roulette, you can see at ‘face value’ our 4 ‘heroes’ of the military-industrial Complex, all of them ‘for it’. The images you will see belong to a film quantum roulette which I did in Los Angeles, initially with the help of WME, the biggest agency in town, till they realized this was actually ‘real’. So after the suits and pressures from politicians the project was cancelled and I finished by myself. Needless to say it only opened in a festival worldwide, ‘the globians’ in berlin, because as the curator, Mr. Poltzer, founder of IDM pro put it – here I am the only guy to decide. In any other jury you will be censored because all must be politically correct or someone protests. I indicate in which minute we have them doing their declarations in case you want to save time.

In the next video we illustrate the 3 ‘ages’ of increasing power of Nuclear Bombs, A-bombs H-bombs and Planetary bombs, with a brief account of the evolution of the Nuclear industry, in its increasing pursuit of the equation of death, including the original footage of Mr. Fermi’s famous paradox… at minute 2:

In the same video in minute 7.10  you can see the father of the H-bomb, Mr. Teller, considering the need of an H-bomb, because ‘we can do it’. In the next video that explains the nature of Mass bombs (M=Ec2), he starts the excerpt showing his ‘disappointment’ with the A-Bomb because it had not enough power. So he felt motivated to make a bigger H-bomb:

Here you can see Mr. Hawking at minute 2, explaining us his motivation to push the creation of Black holes at CERN – to get a nobel prize, and the downside of it – if he is wrong we shall all become liquid spaghetti:

He has accordingly placed the clock of the end of the world two minutes before doomsday.Easy prediction, since you can always predict what you do. What about not doing anything to blow up the world Mr. Hawking, so you don’t need to warn us about it?

Finally in this video you can see also at minute 2, Mr. Wilzeck who signed the ‘safety’ release of the LHC explaining why he did it – as if he is wrong and blows up the Earth, he won’t be blamed:

But could we humans possibly change the fate of the Fermi paradox? Potentially we can, because the only solution to the paradox which has a positive life-preserving outcome is the non-evolution of the machines of the Singularity age. If a planet doesn’t worship the tree of technology but the tree of science, it will survive with man as top predator, but then again, it won’t develop intergalactic complex communication technology, but lie ever happier and unknown around a planet with no signs of complex technology. This is the only positive, humanist solution.

Could it be implemented on this planet? To understand that we have to go deeper into ‘knowledge’ of how the future is created (and we mean created, we know how it is ‘not’, by doing singularity machines).

In fact evolution and the objective understanding on how the future is created, shows this is most likely outcome, as the experimental evidence of the Fermi paradox also shows.

The singularity machines.

The Fermi Paradox is well known to specialists who study the non future of mankind in a world in which weapons of mass destruction keep being researched without limit, and it inscribes within the larger view of the Singularity age, or final age of the Industrial Revolution, when energetic and informative machines become ‘organic’. So we create mass-bombs, self-feeding, autonomous bombs, strangelets and black holes that can extinguish us. And we create self-feeding, autonomous robots, military A.I. that can also extinguish us.

Those are the ‘informative’ and energetic ‘singularity’ machines, whose awesome jump in energetic and informative capacities can extinguish us; since death is the ‘breaking of the balance and symmetry’ between the energetic and informative elements of any complementary system of the Universe, due to an overdrive of energy and information. So we die in accidents and wars (maximal energy/ death), and we die by excess of information, of form (3rd age, warping), and so the Earth can die by an excess of energy (B.H. Singularity at CERN) or a rival top informative predator species (military A.I.). And science is evolving both with the excuse of knowledge.

Thhe singularity age is now happening with the advance of information adn energy machines that vastly overpower us, but our industrial civilization has accepted it under a false premise, which as usual follow Nietzsche’s dictum ‘the commonest lie is that in which one lies to himself’ – that machines are good, abstract and the Universe a mechanism with only human intelligence…

The Wilczek paradox.

Or as Nobel Prize Wilczek, Amici Curiae of CERN in our suits to this company put it, and we recorded on video, ‘It was easy for me to sign a zero risk statement, because if something happens, then…’ and he laughed (who is gonna blame it, was the implicit end of his sentence’) – see video at the end of this post, in the visual part of it.

So because the proof can only be our extinction, the people who will be always blamed either of being catastrophists (if we survive) or of dying without recognition (if we are right and the high probability of an extinctive event ‘becomes’) were those who showed the ethical point of view.

This paradox is however a common paradox of History: those who make violence always win over those who make reason because death stops the argument. In this case, the LHC by going on-line without controls to ‘prove’ there were no risks (as Hauer declared to be the strategy to calm down alarmists) shows again the power of weapons over reason. And yet there is a clear proof at cosmological scale, of anthropomorphic nature that shows how easy potential human species can be extinguished and are probably extinguished.

There is not intelligent life despite the myriad of planets there must be in the galaxy. Do Physicists manage to create enough nuclear bombs to explode all planets before we achieve galactic communication’?

In this case the Fermi paradox is rejected as most truths are rejected by humans, on the shaky grounds of the ego-trip on the importance of our species. That is, we, human beings somehow are ‘special’ (pseudo religious argument) and too important to disappear at the hands of a mere lump of matter, which is false when you take not the subjective, anthropomorphic beliefs of religious people (the G. Bush talking to us:), or scientific people (who think they are the only intelligent species of the Universe.)

This refutal of the Fermi Paradox doesn’t even deserve a comment on a serious scientific blog, regardless of the growing number of fundamentalist jewish-christian believers in the ‘anthropic’ pseudo-religious dogma (if we exist in the Universe despite our fragility is because God wants us to exist, designing the Universe to that aim).

All this ‘hidden’ pseudo-religious beliefs are at the core of physics, with their arrogant statements about humans as the only intelligent beings, mathematics as the only language of God, the Higgs as the ‘god’s particle’ and their search for ultimate energies as the ‘Saint Grail’ of knowledge. No further commentary is needed.

A second proof, though of scientific nature, was the fact we had not seen more planets like ours. But it turned out to be just an experimental error now uncovered by more potent telescopes: the Universe is teaming with planets and so there should be billions of planets like ours. And yet none give us radio signals of life. Why? Obviously because people like those working at CERN manage to extinguish all planets before they discover ways of intergallactic communication, in their hidden arm race to find the meaning of mass-bombs.

 

The ‘physicists’…  all for it. Sanctified mass-murderers.

There was a time in which humans knew what were ‘the physicists’. The mad scientist par excellence was the physicist, who was bringing us an atomic holocaust. Durrenmatt wrote a magnificent play on that title. But in the world of machines and children of thought we live in, without any sense of responsibility or caring for the future, all this is forgotten. Children cannot understand death, and one of the reasons CERN has gone without much fear is the civilization of children and visual death, which inundates our world. So children cannot distinguish between ‘real death’ and virtual one – and this one is ‘real’.

This is the Kindergatten world we live in. One where absolute evil can be the new normal as long as it is not taken seriously. The holocaust of Rwanda was tolerated because that week, according to chronicles the White House had covered the ‘theme of Africa’ with the South-African elections.If that is the case, and it seems the case of mankind, now doing robots that expel humans out of labor and war fields without also any opposition – if we men ‘are slaves because we believe we don’t reason’ (Aristotle), the Fermi paradox will indeed happen in all planets. As in all planets the technology will reach first the LHC that interstellar travel.

So in all it we’ll be built regardless of which lunatic physicist and which theory is designed to prove – a fractal, a continuum, a dark space, a travel to the past (in this case with the lunatic rants of Mr. Hawking shown at true face below)… or the ‘dragoons’ of multiverses of Mr. Arkami-Hamed.

What matters and explains deterministically the tragedy is the corporation, the military-industrial complex that will ALWAYS DO AN LCH BEFORE IT DOES AN INTERSTELLAR far more complex starship.

Moreover, as we explain in our blog on technology and economical evolution, http://www.economicstruth.com, at this stage the mind of man is devolving under the audiovisual influence of Televisions and the evil culture of death’, provided by the evolution of digital minds that hypnotize our children.

And again this is deterministic: motion hypnotizes the eye, a natural born killer that likes faster motion and red/energy colors. So as Televisions evolve in all planets, men become part of the a ‘neopaleolithic culture’, of selfish ego-trips, superficial, visual thought, where ‘images’ become knowledge and logic, time causality and survival, eusocial love disappears. The automatic process of degeneration of the human soul related in that technological blog, all too evident in this planet thus happens as machines evolve organically, in parallel, making humans in all planets retarded visual ego-trips of null causal knowledge and irresponsibility. They become the ‘staple food’ of the black holes they do trying to be like God. In the article on the Mayan prophecy we relate some aspects of the fractal, organic Universe that builds black holes. This is indeed going deeper the explanation of the Fermi paradox.

THe 2.7 background radiation is the temperature of a black hole of the mass of the moon. So all planets and moons might end up becoming black holes either by feeding on one, or by conversion by LHC ‘experts’.

In the past years since we lost the suits because the judges did not dare to judge, the physicists did not dare to defend CERN and so all  was dismissed technically because as the judge put it ‘the destruction of the Earth would not be atttributable to the American Government’ I have come to accept indeed the deterministic aspects of our ‘technological civilization’ that degenerates us to a point in which we can collectively commit suicide almost in a fictional way – as our mind is built on fictions and ego-trips that forget the tender softness of the flesh.

Thus the kind of ‘zero generation’, of toddlers of thought that populate CERN will exist irresponsibly in all planets. The collective mind will be erased and LHCs will be built and tested by children with no sense of death.

Today The press no longer informs. The modern human is very much a child of evil. Like Mr. Bush, our president at the time we put the suits against CERN, an evil child; like Hawking, a childish ego, who according to his wife thought to be God, a man who obviously care little for life, isolated in its mind, a fictional character who thinks to be a ‘genius’ but has been long just signing books their acolytes cash in, as this group knows for obvious reasons (one of the main activists against CERN is the son of his closest collaborators)…

But in the world of marketing and corporations, of technology, the human is just a puppet of that destiny, written in the evolution of machines.

So we choose freaks for the kicks, they sell better.

Man in a chair genius of the century, kid with guitar – mr. Bieber genius of songs, ‘house negro’ working for bankers, Mr. Obama, leader of the world. The people who rule the world for corporations – the managers, technicians, marketers, sellers, own the subconscious collective of mankind. I have reflected a lot during this years how we have arrived to this situation. That wider view thought of a world ruled for corporations who care only for profits and the machines they build, provided in my other blog http://www.economicstruth.com is the only deterministic explanation of the fermi paradox at sociological level. That is, the sentence that starts my surrealist film on this theme, ‘quantum roulette’ ‘A technological civilization is based in the believe that if a machine can be done it must be done, even if it kills us all’.

 the world is ruled by corporations and so the process of evolution and reproduction of machines is the essence of our technological civilization,

and so all  industrial planets arrive to this absurdity – waiting for extinction for the sake of a machine and a series of job contracts and the excuse of a lunatic, 3rd rate physicist exploited by the industry of information. 

Absolute evIL the antiparticle of Live, synonymous of death, is what the physicists of the nuclear industry represent.

Castalia, Utopia is thus the obnly solution.

intelligent humans that  understand the conundrum and stop evolving machines as the meaning of existence, cheer for life and Gaia and don’t give signals to the external Universe.

Thus only Utopia, the 3rd solution, or techno-utopia, the LHC explain our incommunication. But we are not in utopia but in technoutopia. This means LHC will do black holes and they will evaporate us as they absorb our matter and grow. Since we, Earth’s homo bacteria have chosen NOT, utopia, that is a sustainable, world based in the fruits of the tree of life and man as the measure of all things. There is no doubt that the Earth’s new religion is the machine and we want to communicate and travel through space. We are not stopping the ‘economic system’. And yet we never arrive anywhere, we never colonize other planets, we end now, here.

The culture of the living Universe is basically extinct. It started with Plato and thought of the Universe, as I do in my work on General Systems Science, as an organism. ‘The World is a living being with a mind called Logos’. It meant that the logos of man was the mind of Gaia, also an organism. And we should care for both, for the Tree of Science. No doubt some planets are like that. Planets of flesh where men-like beings do not make machines. Erehwon planets that transcend beyond the dreams of our imaginations, but not here.

Instead we live in the culture of the machine – worship machines of energy such as CERN or information, such as CERN’s web and computers. So we will evolve technology to its limits and find ourselves with Fermi’s solution.

In brief, the singularity age and our extinction either by informative robots or more massive/informative matter seems just another stage in the growth of information of this planet, either at atomic scale (Black Hole Singularity at CERN) or at molecular scale (birth of military A.I.)

In that sense, if there is something I learned in the suits and campaigns against CERN is the determinism of that process of extinction as the absolute overwhelming majority of mankind cannot even conceive their absolutely irrelevant meaning humans have for an infinite, self-similar fractal Universe…

And this absolute arrogance of man, specially of those who guide the Industrial R=evolution, technocrats, industrialists and the military, in front of destiny, justifies our extinction and takes the blame out of the Universe itself, which has given us so many parables and opportunities to behave in balance with nature, with a humble, intelligent awareness of our limits as a species.

This writer, has renounced to a wonderful life as an ‘outstanding researcher of our religion, science’, easily achieved, had he only provided mankind with his discoveries in the field of ‘time theory and complexity’, for the simple reason that the praxis of science, technology is what is killing mankind with the excuse of knowledge.

And survival is more important that knowledge. Since a extinct scientist knows nothing.

Thus any truly intelligent scientist, regardless of what fame and celebrity he can acquire with his discoveries finds himself today in a crossroads of history where his only proper attitude is NO LONGER THE RAT RACE of scientific sinecures but the denounce of the non-future of uncontrolled research.

Survival not knowledge should be the ‘a priori’ law of all scientific research, which would mean the immediate prohibition of research in high energies and mass-bombs (energetic singularity) and robots and A.I. (information singularity). But scientists put deaf ears to profits and fame. So they prefer to ignore that in a Darwinian universe information is always ‘interested’, nothing is given for free and so it is all a trade-off in search of balances. Curiosity kills the cat and a truly intelligent species is one that ‘controls’ its wish for more energy and information, without endangering his life. 

But once more mankind shows not to be that ‘special, humble species’, who truly would deserve the name of ‘being made to the image and likeness of the Universe’. Since the immense majority of its members just follow the easy path. And this my friend is what kills mankind: our incapacity to be really free, in the Buddhist sense – to control our desires, our Universal program. There is no critical mass of intelligent, ethic scientists to do so.
 
9 Comments

Posted by on February 3, 2016 in News

 

70% chances of strangelets

Castor is a detector of strangelets installed at CERN, which denies in public the possibility of producing them, given the enormous dangers for the planet they poise.

Update. 24 Dec.2011. Since strangelet danger is still on the view of science, the biggest one for Earth, after ‘cern activists’ destroyed my webs (see ‘mass attack’) i have moved forward in the reconstruction process this article, originally published a year ago. I apologize for broken links and missed pictures that were not localized.

As in all extinction dangers produced by LHC and future accelerators built by the military-industrial complex with the alibi of ‘research’, the fact that we ‘are still here’ obviously doesn’t mean it will not happen in the narby future. it only means only the ‘threshold’ of stability of strangelets or black holes, which is a function of the energy/mass they have, itself a function of the power of the machine, hasn’t been crossed yet. But the probability to cross the threshold of stability will grow with time, till a point in the future, the threshold will be crossed and we’ll become extinct, fulfilling the cynical prophecy of Mr. Fermi -of Manhattan Project fame – who affirmed the lack of life signs on the galaxy, despite the statistical probability of many earth-like planets (today confirmed) could only be due to physicists blowing planets in their development of the nuclear industry.

As it is obvious the evolution of ‘doomsday machines’ is going much faster than that of interstellar travel, LHC is just the ‘first probability of extinction’. Its upgrade over the ‘real barrier’ of formation of dark matter in the decametric, scalar universe – 10 TEV – by 2014 sets the next big probability to cross the threshold.

A responsible society will therefore not make that upgrade, considering the enormous costs it represents in an age of massive cuts in life-sustaining health-care budgets and the fact that the main scientific reason for building this machine – the finding of the Higgs will be resolved as CERN itself accepts next year, before the upgrading. But I am afraid the nuclear industry will not be reasonable and find excuses to go forward; while the corporations involved in this project and its lobbies will ‘convince’ European politicians – specially now that a physicist, Miss Merkel, has become the ‘financial dictator’ of the Union and Germany provides most of the machines and directors of this disguised factory of ‘mass-bombs’.

That big science has ‘parked’ the issue of LHC dangers, as so many other dangers for the future of life and history on planet Gaia are ignored, whenever they collide with the profits of corporations (witness the reversal on the Kyoto agreements on global warming, which were already short to produce any effect for economical reasons); doesn’t mean the dangers are gone. It only means that humans have accepted another suicidal risk for the profits and selfish agenda of a minority, as they have accepted war and its ‘collateral effects’ for the profits of the Military-Industrial Complex, now embarked in a ‘Terminator race’ of drones or are accepting the destruction of the health-care system and its increasing death-toll in hospitals (10% will die in waiting lists in Spain, never arriving to the surgeon to protect the billionaire profits of the financial industry; which keeps multiplying its profits), and so on and so on. In that sense the LHC, the first machine-weapon that can extinguish mankind is part of a wider process of self-destruction of life in this planet, which since the beginning of the Industrial R=evolution has made of machines and its ‘mechanist’ ideologies, the measure of all things and casts doubts aboutthe future of history – the super-organism of the human species, from the first ‘cellular homo’ that spoke till the last human cell that the LHC’s ‘production’ might devour…

Point of the strangelet risk is that unlike black holes, which might or might not appear according to different theories, strangelets will appear certainly and the only doubts are their thresholds of stability at a given A-mass and when it will be crossed in lead to lead collisions. It seems we have been ‘lucky’ till now, but all what this article talks about will be once more relevant with the upgrade over 10 Tev – providing the present surge in Earthquakes we forecasted as the first sign of dark matter production does not keep increasing (which would mean the process now is irreversible and dark matter has been formed and fallen to the Earth).

Abstract. We have received and will show in this article astonishing documents leaked out of CERN internal servers, about the CASTOR  project, a Centauro and STrangelet Object Research to hunt for strangelets ‘likely‘ to be produced at the LHC.

According to those internal documents CERN has been lying for years to the press and in the suits, since it always affirmed that it won’t produce the ultra-dangerous, ultradense ‘strangelets’, the liquid explosive made of up, down and strange quarks, responsible of the ice-9 reactions that cause supernovas (below’s graph).

In those documents CERN affirms there is a 65-70% of chances of producing negative strangelets, which according to standard science on strangelets today, will provoke the ice-9 reaction (name taken from Cat and Cradle’s book in which a physicist destroys the world throwing a new type of water that freezes the planet, since an ice-9 reaction will condensate the planet in a 15 kilometers ultra-dense strange star).

Thus CERN has been lying and it is playing with all mankind a Quantum Russian Roulette game with 4 shots out of 6, 66% chances of extinction. This will be even if we survive the biggest genocide of history, calculated multiplying probability and victims: 66% x 6.6 billions=4.4 billions, 1000 times the Holocaust. The experiment will start in 45 days now. We might be living the last month of our existence as individuals and as a species. This Fall can be indeed the Fall of Man. And yet, the experiment is not stopped. This machine is too big to fail. Ave Caesar Hauer, morituri te salutant…

(Keep reading for a full disclosure of those documents, most of them provided by Mr. Penrose, a British physicist and mathematician, who has been trying to alert the European Press and Ministers of Science, with little success, and explains them in a more technical jargon in his site dedicated to raise awareness of this potential global genocide.

Alternatively if you prefer a simpler, visual description of this event, click on the 10 min. films ’11/9′ on your right:  ‘Informative film’ is an illustrated interview in ‘coast to coast’ Radio to Walter Wagner, my co-plaintiff on the Federal Suit against CERN; ‘surrealist film’ is a documentary, ‘Dr. Strangelove’ style, on the events that will take place the 11/9, shot at CERN, with historic material and strangelet physics explained by Dr. Wilczek, the Nobel Prize who discovered and named the ice-9 reaction. I hold copyrights and permissions on those images, given to me by CERN’s press office before suing them; yet the film is censored in several countries of Europe, notably Germany, the main contributor of this machine, so you might not be able to see it. Both Wagner and Wilczek were the first scientists to warn about the future dangers of Super-colliders in their landmark letters to Scientific American in 1999).

In the graph, for the first time in History mankind has built a machine-weapon, able to destroy this planet. The LHC is an accelerator, a type of machine evolved during the cold war to rehearse small nuclear explosions, which could be used by the military as a sampleof future Nuclear Bombs, and by researchers to explore the simplest forms of energy and particles that compose the Universe. After the cold war ended, Russia and America put an end to the astronomical costs of those machine-weapons, but Europe, with the new ‘marketing’ of ‘peaceful use’ (similar to our ‘peace forces’ in ‘humanitarian missions’ in Afghanistan) took the industry of accelerators a step further. The result is the Large Hadron Collider, a 7 teravolt, superconductive, superfluid ‘quark cannon’. which will mass together the densest, most attractive substance of the Universe, quarks, to explore the formation of quark-gluon liquids, the explosives, responsible of cosmic annihilations, such as Novas, Super-novas and perhaps the hypothetical big-bang of the Universe.

The irresponsibility of CERN’s physicists who plan to do those experiments with quark liquid explosives here on Earth, without even the slightest military or political supervision, has been denounced in Courts and Internet blogs, to not avail, since the LHC is a machine ‘too big to fail’, defended by technocrats, nuclear industries/ physicists and the corporate press, with the same zeal they defended nuclear weapons during the cold war, when that name was still ‘politically correct’.  Now we have proofs that the European Company of Nuclear Research has been lying to the public about the probabilities of those catastrophic scenarios. In those internal documents CERN affirms that the LHC has enough potency to create strangelets, a strange liquid explosive that is responsible of the ice-9 reaction that converts stars into Super-novas. The Company has even a machine, CASTOR, for Centauro and STrangelet detecTOR, built to study them. Since the ‘Castor Team’ affirms the LHC will ‘likely’ create stable strangelets this 11/9. In the graph, we observe the entire range of LHC’s potency and the type of quark explosives this ‘quark cannon’, the layman name this machine should have, will produce. Strangelets are made of usd quarks, deconfined in lead to lead collisions starting 11/9/2010…

The News

It is now official. What we feared for years… the real thing, explained ‘ad nauseam’ on this web is now on schedule. 11/9, CERN will start production of strangelets…

We have obtained an astounding self-confession, a ‘leak’ encrypted in the tons of documents CERN produces only for ‘physicists’ experts:

‘Prof. A. Panagiotou and students are investigating phenomena in the very forward region. In particular, the existence and identification of exotic states of matter, such as “Centauro” and “Strangelets”

, the later being a bulk of quark matter of about equal number of u, d and s quarks, believed to be produced in ultra-relativistic HI collisions. This search was one of the original motivations for the design of CASTOR.’

And then a video transcript from one of his students:

My name is Panos Katsas. I work as an experimental physicist for the CASTOR forward calorimeter of CMS and my main area of interest is the study of exotic events in heavy ion collisions, especially the identification of strangelets, which are likely to be produced.’ (bottom left on the link, with a self-similar ipod discourse, censored in its last 3 minutes substituted by a fixed picture, since we first post this cynical discovery on the web).

The Large Hadron collider will start collisions of Hadrons, the 11/9. That day CERN will shoot for the first time Lead bullets  at the speed of light against mother Earth in this superconductive, superfluid cannon. According to the most advanced theoretical research on the subject, they can create strangelets that would sink the Earth into a rock of a few kilometers of diameter. Strange liquid is the quark-gluon soup that causes the big-bangs of Novas, Super-Novas and maybe even long ago caused the big-bang of the cosmic Universe. And their ‘strangelet’ CASTOR device will count them.

Why strangelets are so dangerous? Simple. A strangelet is a mass of quarks, which works with 3 attractive forces far superior to those of any atom:

– The strong force of its massive number of quarks (100 times stronger than the weak electromagnetic force)

– The gravitational forces of those massive number of quarks (far stronger than any atom, since 99% of the mass of atomic particles are in the quarks)

– The charge of the quarks lumped in the strangelet (far stronger than any ion, due to the enormous numbers of quarks lumped in the strangelet)

The 3 forces together will attract atoms, positive ions if the strangelet is negative; electronic covers is the strangelet is positive; normal atoms with the gravitational force if the strangelet is neutral; atomic nuclei with the strong force in the quark-gluon soup made by the LHC. And so they will start either an explosive ice-9 reaction (fast process that triggers a super-nova) or in the case they are forming with a small mass of quarks, falling towards the center of the Earth, a distillation of new strangelets, as new atoms peg to the original strangelet attracted by those 3 super-forces. Both reactions will end up consuming all the matter of Earth.

Because Physicists at CERN know those risks – his spokesman Mr. Brian Cox, even explained them in the BBC, affirming all the matter of Earth would convert into one –  they have always said adamantly the LHC won’t produce them, and CERN has denied in all suits and press releases any chance of producing strangelets. Yet it is a fact that it has designed a machine, a detector of strangelets, CASTOR and installed it to detect them.

Further on the ‘CASTOR TEAM’ has given conferences in which they affirm they will produce them in events which are not found in cosmic rays. Never mind this was for years CERN’s ever-repeated safety argument: all what we do is what cosmic rays do in the atmosphere. Not so, however when CERN physicists talk among themselves.

The previous confession of Mr. Katsas, a young student working at CERN, who broke the ‘confidentiality statements’ of zero risks that all workers in the company must sign (as reported by Engelens, Chief engineer in the New Yorker ) and is now no longer working on the facilities,  shows the duplicity of CERN, which provides in other page a course on how to deal with the press: ‘minimizing threats and maximizing opportunities’.

Thus, according to CERN inner reports the first ‘extinction event’ might happen in November. Since the probability given by CERN to the creation of strangelets is closer to the probability we have given in all our suits for extinction, 65%, as it can be seen in the conference given by Mr. Katsas: ‘Strangelet hunt


It must be understood what an ‘Extinction event’ means – the first real chance of planetary destruction, performed by the Community of Nuclear Physicists, which have built an astoundingly powerful ‘Atomic cannon’ in search of their Saint Grail of Absolute Energy. Only that now the industrial-military complex that built this machine-weapon doesn’t tell us we must love nuclear devices, as they did in the 50s, because people are no longer fascinated by war. Instead we are told that we must perform big-bangs on Earth with this peaceful device to find God’s particle. Frankly I prefer the straight talk of the 50s to this ‘double talk’, adapted to the Walt-Disney like fairy tales of our current press. In any case the bottom line is this: An overdrive of energy (accidents, weapons) is also the cause of death, which erases the information of life and now menaces to erase all the information of all life forms of this planet and yet neither the press, nor politicians realize that in the Universe, not even a planet is ‘too big to fail’ according to the laws of black holes and strangelets that devour them…

Indeed, CERN says that the probabilities of extinction are small, one in a million and things like that. This is rubbish. We must understand to which degree CERN is lying when we understand the meaning of probabilities in quantum theory: quantum probabilities are not referred to the existence or not of an event, which either exists if the laws of science allow it (Totalitarian principle of physics: all what is not forbidden by the laws of science will happen) or do not exist if those laws are wrong. Quantum probabilities merely are a tool to know where a certain electron exists in a certain place, due to the uncertainty of its position –

but there is not uncertainty in its existence in time, the electron does exist. Thus, probabilities apply to the task of finding the location of the electron in space, not to define if the electron exists or not. For the same reason, if the laws of strangelets preclude that strangelets will be formed, they will be formed. So there is 100% of chances that those strangelets will be formed and grow. If we lower those chances is because we give certain ‘hope’ or chance for those laws to be wrong at our present knowledge. So does CERN which uses the expression ‘likely’ and a 65-70% chances, as theory today seems to confirm they will happen. But in science it is also needed the experimental fact to give 100% of probabilities. However the reader must understand that the scientific method and the sound mathematics and theories behind the formation of strangelets have been proved ad nauseam. All our civilization is based in those laws. So the ‘likely’ will probably become certainty.

What is absurd is to invent probabilities, out of the hat, as Mr. Arkani-Hamed did, affirming in the NYTimes that there is also ‘a minuscule probability that the LHC make dragons that might eat us up‘ or an ‘Oxford expert’ who said it is ‘easier to win the lottery 3 times in a row‘, or a European physicist, who said ‘it is easier than a wind brings an elephant from Africa’. Those people show a complete disrespect for science, ethics and the intelligence of the readers. So when a liar at CERN or an enthusiast groupie physicist’s blog tells you that there is 1 probability in a million, he is inventing them. It is like saying every time you switch on a light, it might work or not. According to Maxwell it will always work as long as the cable is working. The same with CERN’s experiments. That is why they are so frightening, because according to Einstein and our theory of strangelets they will exist and swallow it all.

If you want to throw some detailed numbers, what will happen becomes more evident: according to the Chinese Institute of Higher Energy Physics, the strangelet will grow till it acquires the size of the Compton wave of the Electron, which is 2.42×10 up to −12 meters, a bit smaller than the Hydrogen atom (Bohr radius). This is more than 3 magnitudes bigger than the Proton radius which packs those quarks: The nucleus of a hydrogen atom is indeed a proton with 3 quarks, whose size is in the range of 1.75 fm (1.75×10−15 m).

On the other hand the volume of a sphere is 4/3 πr3 where r is a radius. Thus the volume is a bit less than 3 magnitudes bigger than the radius.

So to calculate the number of quarks in the strangelet ‘atom’, we have to consider that the strangelet will have to pack triads of quarks, with the same density they are packed in the nucleus, but in a space + 3 magnitudes bigger in radius and – 3 magnitudes bigger in volume.

Thus if we ad the minus 3 magnitudes of volume and the plus 3 magnitudes of radius and multiply them for the 3 quarks inside each nucleus that simple calculus shows that each stable strangelet will pack around 3 x 10 up to 6 quarks in a space equivalent to a Compton Electron wave… Thus each strangelet has around 3 million quarks packed in a size smaller than a hydrogen atom. Since the strong force is 100 times stronger than our electroweak force, you have a particle with around 100 million times more strong forces than the Hydrogen atom.  Also the strangelet’s gravitational force will be awesome, falling to the center of the Earth in no time.  It will be then a particle seating in the center of the Earth, which will become a mass-well of attractive gravitational and strong forces in which the Earth matter will fall.

It is easy then to find out the final product. Since the strangelet will shrink the radius of the Earth in the aforementioned 10 up to 3 order of magnitude. Since the diameter of the Earth is 12.756 kilometers, it means the Earth will become a rock of 13 kilometers of diameter (with an oblong form due to the liquid nature of strangelets and its enormous rotational forces that will flatten the ‘strangelet, ice-9 star’  across the rotational plane):

In the graph, the 2 most probable scenarios of extinction: if black holes are as Einstein predicted, ‘frozen stars’ of an ultradense ‘cut-off matter’, they will be made of the densest form of matter, top quarks. And they won’t evaporate. Since the LHC is trying to make the Higgs, which is defined as a top/antitop quark field, it will do them in 2013 when it ramps up its power. On the other hand it will do strangelets this November. Essentially both types of dark matter, which show at macroscopic level (black holes and strange stars) self-similar properties, will merely differ in size and density, and hence the strength at which they will devour the Earth. The final result will be a black hole of around 3 centimeters, slightly bigger than a dollar coin, or an ‘almond’ rock of strange liquid of the diameter of the Earth lowered by 3 magnitudes, of around 15 x 6 kilometers.) While the black hole scenario is still argued theoretically -as some like Hawking treat black holes as mathematical objects, while others consider them made of strings, which would be the parts of those top quarks – the strangelet scenario should happen according to the Totalitarian principle of physics: ‘Everything not forbidden is compulsory’. Since there is no doubt about the existence of strange quarks and strange liquid. In that regard, one of the biggest delusions of CERN and the nuclear physicists interviewed by the media is indeed to talk about ‘probabilities’ which in quantum physics refer to the location in space of a particle, which is uncertain, not to the creation of a particle in time, which is defined by the Totalitarian principle: If a theory is right, it happens. Point.  The uncertainty will be about the place within nanometers of the formation of the strangelet, NOT of the causal chain of reactions that will determine its creation if present Strangelet theory is truth.

Since this schizoid company of multiple personalities won’t come out of the closet till it is too late.

Activism in this issue.

Mr. Penrose and myself warned and contacted the press about this issue, with null success in our appeals to different groups. In the W.S. papers on the suits against CERN this was the most stressed and possible scenario, but the press ignored it focusing on the black hole scenario, precisely because the strangelet or bottomlet or toplet heavy quark condensate is ‘standard physics and should happen in the future at maximal potency in this accelerator and if we are lucky enough in any further upgrade.

Unfortunately the hands of the military-industrial complex are very extended and no serious information on this issue has been considered by CERN, the politicos that paid it or the P.R.ess.

A few examples will suffice: Mr. Rossler, one of the discoverer of chaos theory and the main activist in Europe, tried to appeal to the German Government, the main contributor to this project, whose general manager is German, but it turned out Miss Merkel is a physicist adamantly in favor of the machine. We tried to interest wikileaks on the Castor project till we found Mr. Assange is also a physicist and ex-CIA agent… Mr. Walter, here in the US, accepted an interview with Comedy central and it turned out  Mr. Jon Stewart was also the son of a professor of physics, in-loved with CERN, who made a mockery of these dangers. And so on, and so on.

Indeed – and this is truly what blowed up my mind as an activist – not only nuclear physicists are willing to take the risk of human extinction, as they have always done for profits or fame (nuclear war race) – but most of mankind has been so easily cheated with the propaganda about the Higgs that it will go along sacrificing their lives, the future of their sons, everything in this planet for a fairy tale called the Higgs – a particle rather irrelevant to explain anything but precisely the creation of quark condensates.

This took me to the conclusion that humans are basically believers, not thinkers, memetically imprinted by repetition and propaganda, as another German, Mr. Goebbels, the first ‘information minister’ in history – an invention of the nazis which called it then by its real purpose, ‘propaganda ministry’, put it: ‘if you repeat a lie many times people will believe it’. That is, there is no much difference between the 4 billion humans who believe a goatkeeper of the bronze age who saw a bush burning had talked to God, and often die in history for that belief, and the other 3 billions which rather believe in a new religion, technology, who has sold the idea that the finding by this machine of an insignificant boson, with a limited role in the study of the death of our matter (symmetry breaking), deserves to risk our existence.

What nobody seems to believe is the rather obvious truth that we are just an ‘old mush, hanging on the surface of a lost rock of the universe’ (Schopenhauer), weak, soft, old bags of dirty water, among the lightest species of the Universe, with very limited energy, which can be easily blown up by an overdrive of energy – the very definition of death, and we would do much better recognizing our limitations, being realist about it and stopping behaving like big boys with big toys and an overstated IQ, both of ethical and intellectual nature – which is what scientists at CERN are.

We shall therefore – once it is clear CERN is likely to produce stable strangelets and strangelets will swallow our planet – provide in this post a more detailed analysis of those 2 causal events:

– First we will include the leaked documents that show CERN will produce them. And then…

– The real scenarios of what will happen when those strangelets form.

 A decalogue of Leaks: the duplicity of CERN.

The duplicity of CERN is constant when referring to strangelets whose production and dangers denies in public and in its Safety ‘LSAG’ report (bottom of that page) but it affirms in its internal documents. Let us consider a Decalogue of lies, at a more technical level, ‘illustrated’ by ‘Team Castor’ on its powerpoint presentations:

0) The Company which always affirmed that all the phenomena that will happen at CERN has happened in cosmic rays that are harmless has the chuptzah to affirm in his first report on CASTOR, expressly that the LHC has been constructed to study events at high energy that will never occur in Cosmic Rays. So we were indeed, mild in our assurance that CERN was committing ‘criminal neglicence’ since this is plainly speaking in legal terms a case of ‘recklessness’:

1) The company has been testing its machine, the Large Hadron Collider, at low energies with protons and now it has scheduled the first real experiment with hadrons the 11/9. That day it will collide lead and deconfine millions of quarks to replicate the conditions of the big-bang producing massive amounts of quark-gluon liquids of which strange liquid (Ab. Strangelet) is the easiest to make, with the lightest u, s and d quarks as Mr. Katsas explains in his CERN’s web page.

Yet the company never explains that quark-gluon liquids, are not only responsible for the original cosmic big-bang but also for the big-bangs of stars into Supernovas, whose remnant, a pulsar, is a star with a surface of degenerated neutrons and a core of strange liquid.

2) Information on CASTOR, the detector of strangelets, is only available to physicists within CERN’s site. Yet the existence of such CASTOR project does not come in google searches. Instead the company has another project also called CASTOR, which is the only one available in google searches and turns out to be ‘the CERN Advanced STORage manager’

Similar searches in google or CERN site search results do not yield links to the CASTOR detector site (IE ‘centauro+strange or strangelet+castor’) only to the CASTOR storage site.

3) In a recent professional book of 332 pages dedicated to the Atlas Experiment that hosts CASTOR, ‘The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC’, in chapter 6, it has only 3 pages on it and with no mention of strangelets.

This duplicity is evident in the constant denial in public of the probability to make strangelets andthe dangers of this production vs. the inner information provided in the non-advertised pages about CASTOR that we have digged out of CERN’s server.

In that regard CERN published a LSAG (Safety Report), which denies both the creation and danger of strangelets, against all published literature and against the affirmations made in their web The following have most relevant information:

4) According to the CASTOR reports the probability given of Pb-Pb collisions creating such strangelets is of 1/1000th creating a total of 500 strangelets every month at full luminosity; (talk from CMS Week: presentation – 3rd slide from last found in that report). This contradicts LSAG assertion that probability for a strangelet emerging from LHC would be ‘negligible’:

 
Nt. This and the following slides are part of ‘Team Castor’s’ powerpoint presentations.

In the graph, ‘Team Castor’ has built a Calorimeter to detect the production of strangelets at CERN. The probability for each event, according to inner documents, like this powerpoint presentation, implies that CERN will produce 500 strangelets each month starting the 11/9 of this year, when the first pb-pb collisions take place. Standard literature on strangelets explains what will happen next: strangelets will grow, absorbing quarks and transforming our matter into ultradense strange matter, till reaching the size of an atom (albeit with a huge density). Then 2 common processes of Nuclear reactions can take place: fission of the strangelet into smaller pieces that will grow again, starting a nuclear reaction called ‘ice-9’, or catalysis as the huge charge and mass of the strangelet attracts atoms that lump on the surface creating more strangelets.

5) According to the Castor pages, strangelet charge would be only negative or neutral, as it is generally agreed in professional literature and affirmed in the suits against CERN. This is relevant because neutral and negative strangelets will absorb the matter of the Earth much easily that positive strangelets.

Yet the Safety Report made public, the LSAG affirms they will be positive:

6) According to the CASTOR site pages, strangelets will be stable for enough time to produce an explosive reaction, yet according to LSAG they will not:

‘Duration could be stable, or as long as 10^-4 seconds. They contradict the LSAG statement that strangelets would be unstable.

7) According to the CASTOR reports, a mechanism of strangelet production by ‘strangelet distillation’ could be possible, which is however dismissed in LSAG report:

Distillation is a slower but easier process of creation of strangelets, which requires very few strange quarks to be triggered.

8 ) According to standard literature and all the affidavits denouncing this company in different suits, strangelets will be created in higher number at higher energies (since Einstein postulated that mass and energy are equivalent, E=Mc2, hence with higher energy an accelerator produces more Strangelets).

Yet the LSAG denied this obvious law, which now is contradicted in the CASTOR reports for internal consumption:

‘Strangelets will be produced above RHIC’s energy (200GeV nucl-nucl c,o.m) starting at 233 GeV nucl-nucl c.o.m.

9) According to CASTOR reports, strangelet could realistically be produced with atomic mass number as low as 18 – and CERN will produce thousands of strange quarks per second, so it certainly will produce them. This contradicts assertions of LSAG report of negligible creation on that range.

(From CMS conference report, 5 april 2007)

10) According to the CASTOR report Strangelets are thought likely to have been detected from cosmic ray data of collisions in the 70’s. This contradicts LSAG assertion that no indications of Strangelets have been found.

And so on.

We are now 70 days before the experiments that will collide in the Large Hadron Collider lead at light speed to produce strangelets according to all those internal reports and CASTOR is prepared to observe them.

This is known perfectly by CERN’s experts. One of them, Mr. Brian Cox, main spokesman for CERN had the chuptzah to explain in a BBC documentary how the Earth would be swallowed by strangelets if they were formed. (This is the guy who said during the smearing campaign against those of us who knew CERN could destroy the world, that we are all ‘turds’ and ‘twats’)

So ad one, CASTOR revelations and two, Mr. Cox’s view on the behavior of strangelets and you get 0: nothing, niente, nada, our ‘likely’ annihilation the 11/9… according to CERN and all the theoretical knowledge we have about strangelets and ice-9 reactions…

What we have not found in the server of CERN is any machine, system or provision to contain their exponential growth, in the so-called ice-9 reaction that starts the process of creation of a super-nova. On the contrary, all what CERN gives to ‘the public’ is the reassurance that strangelets will not be formed, according to that Safety, LSAG report, which the same company denies in its internal memorandums.

Training the Press…

But of course, CERN is not alone in this duplicity.

As important as the role of CERN backed by the nuclear physicist community, is the role of corporate science and the corporate press who has acted as a P.R. to this corporation, in part because they don’t understand the physics involved and it is easier to call the press office and get a release as if it were an article on CERN, in part because we live in a world ruled by corporations that evolve machines, and make profit with them so technology must always be right, even if it kills us all. So the press censors any scientists who gives bad news on technology regardless of their personal merits and the truth they explain. In fact, even Einstein was prosecuted in the 50s for opposing the A-Bomb. But unlike the smart anti-live=eviL behavior of CERNerds, most journalists are as most humans good people, which would have reported this tragedy if they knew enough physics or realized this Organization is NOT a group of idealist researchers but the heirs of Teller, the nuclear physicists, who once the cold war was over and the production of Nuclear weapons plummeted found refuge at CERN, a place where to keep their search for higher energies and explosives. In a few words while editors in the corporate press, like those who advised judges against Federal Law at the Nytimes to throw the suit to the nearest black hole, are restrained by the Corporate ideology that all technologies are good, even those who can murder us, journalists were simply taken for a ride by the press office and marketing campaigns of CERN, which even gives courses on how to deal with the press, ‘maximising oportunities and minimising threats‘:


Indeed, Miss Jessica Pryce-Jones must be a genius, because her media training course has taken the entire world press for a ride. For 3 years the press has been pounding on us, the people who warned with suits, letters, books and films against this monstrosity. While the ‘trained press’ has published the ‘no threat, pass and see the circus of CERN: big opportunity to discover the Particle of God!’ PR releases of this Nuclear Company. And so now we are 70 days before the first experiment that might destroy the Earth…

Till now it has all been tests with light protons, even though the company affirms those tests were real experiments….

But soon, the 11/9, a date mirror of 9/11, the biggest terrorist team ever assembled in History, the physicists at CERN will start production of the most dangerous substance of the Universe, the primordial quark gluon soup that exploded in a big-bang all the matter of a previous Universe.
The choice of the date could not be more cynical. Do those people have any respect for the victims of terrorism, for the victims of mass murder nuclear weapons, for the millions who have died with arms invented by ‘physicists’? Of course not. Being an intelligent lot one can imagine the choice of date was not an irony of destiny, but perhaps it was.
But nothing will be done to stop them. Because those are our home made terrorists, German Technocrats to the service of the SS (Strange Science) – One Rolf Hauer, who affirms with stone face that this astounding irresponsibility is a ‘great leap forward’ for mankind; one John Ellis, who organizes parties of the end of the world; one Stephen Hawking, who puts mankind to test and laughs at it in public, saying that if he is wrong and Einstein is right, we shall all become spaguetti.

Unfortunately, the most advanced theoretical research on strangelets (the work of Peng & Chen from the Chinese Institute of High Energy Physics) shows that strangelets, once formed, could start a chain reaction that would catalyze the conversion of the Earth into a 15 kilometer rock.

The Fermi Paradox might have a solution…

So that’s it. Alea jacta Est. The scenario is clear and will be undoable by Christmas 2010, though the time in which a tidal wave of 8 plus earthquakes will be followed by the shrinking of the Earth and the duration of the process is not known in detail. It might take a few minutes or up to a century. But there will not be rescue missions to the center of the planet where those strangelets will grow, feeding on Gaia. It is the Fermi Paradox, which Mr. Fermi of A-Bomb fame, cynically explained to their peers, when he bet that Trinity would only blow up New Mexico. Then he posed this question to the world: ‘why we do not hear any intelligent life on the cosmos? Are we, physicists, destroying all planets before we reach interstellar travel?

Now, we could rephrase his question: Why we only hear the monotonic tam-tam of strangelet stars (pulsars) and black holes? Are all forms of ‘humanity’, in the self-similar fractal Universe, born to kill life and transform this planet into dark matter, which makes up to 75% of the Universal matter and its main candidates to be are MACHOS, quark stars, strangelets and black holes? Given the astounding irresponsibility of the Physicists’ community and the sheeple behavior of politicians and press who let ‘them do it’, this seems to be a logic, though terrifying answer to the Fermi paradox…

The physics of strangelets: how they can devour the Earth.

The moment of truth has arrived. CERN will attempt the first experiment that can extinguish Gaia (our Earth) on 11/9, 2010. This has never happened in history for 5.000.000.000 years.  It is indeed an event in a lifetime that we would prefer not to pass through.

Consider the pdf. ‘lies and statistics‘  and ‘quark stars‘ to understand the enormous probability those experiments have of creating a quark star or strangelet. The chances of creation of strangelets in pb-pb collisions at 3.5 TEv are between 33% and 66%… between 11/9 and the end of a one year run, with continuous events at increasing luminosities (higher densities in the collisions, which increase the chances that one of them create the strangelet that would start the chain-reaction that swallows the Earth).

These first experiments with lead are rushed in, with just a few months’ notice, taking advantage that lead ions have the same geometric emittance and magnetic rigidity than protons… reasons why this machine, which is basically a big magneto, taken cared of by 8000 electricians, playing to be God, works for lead. Since lead follows the same geometric, magnetic paths, the test experiments ran till now, with the excuse of finding an impossible, ‘toilet particle’ (name given to the Higgs by Nobel Prize Weinberg), have already calibrated the quark cannon. So the LHC doesn’t need major adjusts to collide now lead and produce strangelets.

Indeed, this ‘eschatological company’, dedicated to research 1) ‘toilet particles’ and 2) the end of the world, will now move into phase 2, after failing to find the Higgs Hoax.

Why we are so sure the risk is so enormous, more or less like tossing a coin to the air?: heads you are dead. Because true science exists for a reason, based in methods of veracity that CERN has ignored whenever they didn’t suit its agenda, but the Universe obeys or else reality as we know would crumble around us. When we switch on a light it always lights up unless there is an accident, not sometimes according to 1/millionth probability as CERN pretended it will happen (on public) with the chances that black holes and strangelets if formed will follow the known-known laws of science (Einstein’s relativity and standard strangelet theory). Now, we know CERN always understood this and prepared CASTOR for the ‘big-bang’ event. And so because theoretical science of strangelets today tell us that at those energies, when the quark cannon strikes target, strangelets will be formed, chances that they will be formed are huge, both in our suits and papers and those of Team Castor who estimates  (slide, point one), a ‘very big number’!, 500 strangelets a month. I thought of Einstein, when he was called a liar by 300 German scientists, who wrote a book ‘300 physicists against Einstein’. ‘If they were right, one would be enough’ – he said. Indeed, one strangelet not 500 would be enough to start an ice-9 reaction.

The first knowledge we had about strangelets was advanced by MIT theorists, specially Mr. Jaffe, in the 90s when the LHC was planned. Then it was speculated that strangelets will not form easily and the most dangerous, negative strangelets able to attract other nuclei, will not take place. But as it turned out that ‘strange quarks’ are negative, having a 1/3rd charge, soon we learned that most strangelets would be negative. The next ‘impossibility’ – that strange liquid (the non abbreviated name of strangelets) – would not exist in nature, was destroyed by the increasing evidence that ALL pulsars, also called neutron stars, were actually strangelets, strange stars, with a strangelet nuclei and only a cover of neutrons. So it is happening ALL the time in nature. By then CERN had got the money for the LHC and could not back off unless it was to fire its 8000 electricians and hundreds of thousands of physicists collaborating. So they denied stubbornly the existence of strangelets, quoting systematically the old papers of the 90s. One of those papers by Mr. Glashow, from 91 – that old indeed – was the only paper Mr. Glashow, Court Amici in the suit against CERN at Hawaii, brought to the judge. He claimed a pretentious authority on strangelets on account of his Nobel Prize for the weak force. But as today those papers are totally outdated (and so it is the weak force model for which he got the Nobel Prize, but that is another matter).

20 years after that paper in which he affirmed that ‘strangelets’ were very ‘unlikely’ to exist in Nature, we know they are all over the cosmos. Then it came the series of breakthroughs of the Chinese Institute of High Energy Physics, which proved mathematically( and have never been disputed as science must be disputed, with pen and paper), that all type of color-locked strangelets (negative, positive and neutral) will form and become stable, in the case of Neutral strangelets with just 6 quarks in the form of dibaryons, in the case of negative strangelets with a few thousand of them. CERN calculates it will produce close to a million strange quarks in pb-pb collisions at the LHC at top energies in 2013, and a somewhat shorter but well above 1000 quark ball number in November.

We shall therefore, once it is clear CERN will produce stable strangelets, provide the real scenarios of what will happen when those strangelets form. Since this schizoid company of multiple personalities won’t do it.

1st scenario: chain reaction of strangelets as a complex liquid that converts Earth into a Supernova.

Peng, from the Chinese Institute of High energy physis, rightly considers then that the strangelet will grow, absorbing quarks and transforming our matter into ultradense strange matter, till reaching a stable form with a size slightly smaller than a hydrogen atom. Then it will become an atom of strange liquid.

In the graph, A is the number of quarks in the strangelet, figure a.b and c are for color locked strangelets, of  positive (slet-1), negative (slet-2) and neutral (slet-3) strangelets. Figure d is for the ‘old type’ of strangelet, theorized before we knew that quarks ‘lock themselves’ into triads becoming far more stable. During the first phase of growth, positive and negative strangelets have an enormous imbalance of charge, becoming neutral at 1000 quarks (negative strangelet) or close to 100.000 quarks (positive strangelets). Neutral strangelets, start slightly negative and become neutral around 100 quarks. Thus in that first phase, strangelets grow attracting positive ions and electronic covers. This makes the reaction faster for positive strangelets, which might take days to form a huge lump on the center of the Earth, starting an ice-9 reaction; and slower for neutral strangelets, which might take decades to reach the critical mass needed for the creation of a Supernova on Earth.

The first phase, which can be followed in the previous graph of Peng’s master article is obvious: the strangelet is still growing, and it has either a huge negative or positive charge, because it has different numbers of the 3 quarks, u, d, s, which have respectively +2/3rd, -1/3rd and -1/3rd.  Only when the strangelet has the same numbers of u,s and d quarks it becomes neutral (since +2/3 – 1/3 – 1/3 =0 charge).  Thus, in the previous phase as the strangelet falls to the center of the Earth, it will have a positive or negative charge in the order of thousands. This is an astounding attractive power, since the most attractive chemical reactions on Earth are triggered by atoms which have 2+ or 2- charges. Imagine an atom with +5000 or – 5000 positive or negative charges. Other atoms will cluster around it in no time. This is the journey of growth of the strangelet towards the center of the Earth, feeding in those six thousand kilometers, till it reaches a neutral state with a huge size.

Because the strangelet has the size of an atom, despite having thousands of quarks inside, when the strangelet seats in the center of the Earth, where atoms are tightly packed, it will attract them now with its gravitational and strong forces. Some people at CERN trying to find excuses for this not to happen, say that there will be a Coulomb barrier that prevents those atoms to fall into the strangelet. But of course this is silly. The coulomb barrier is the product of the atomic number of the atom and the elementary charge, which even for the heaviest uranium gives us around 100, the value of the strong force of a single quark, so what they are telling us is that a single individual will be able to stop the force of thousands of them – the strong force of the quarks inside the growing strangelet  (-;. Like in the case of Cosmic rays or the game of absurd probabilities, nuclear physicists are playing with the naivety and trust of people who don’t know physics. The strangelet will certainly keep growing till reaching the aforementioned size of an electron compton wave with 3 million quarks inside, in a size slightly smaller than a hydrogen atom. And now its gravitational and strong force will catalyze the formation of new ‘strangelet atoms’ around it.

Indeed, the last excuse nuclear physicists have invented to calm the public is that once the strangelet reaches the Compton size it won’t keep growing. This is correct. The compton wave should be the size of a 3 million quarks, strangelet atom. But the strangelet atom will keep attracting atoms with its awesome gravitational and strong force, deconfining them and packing up their quarks into new strangelet atoms.

Since in fact those 3 millions of quarks per strangelet atom pack S-quarks with a mass twenty four times that of our average quark (95 Mev vs. 3 Mev for the up and 6 for the down):

So a single strangelet, smaller than a hydrogen atom, packs however the weight of 26 million normal quarks, a gravitational force equivalent to half a million atoms of water. That super-dense water, the Ice-9, being so small and heavy will cut through the Earth as a knife cuts the water, falling at g-speed… How long it will take in that journey?

It is easy to calculate because it will be a free fall and so it will follow the simple Galilean formula for the acceleration of a body:  d=1/2 at^2

Where the Distance to cross are d= 6.374 kilometers and the acceleration is, a =9.8 m/s

Which gives us a time of nineteen minutes in its descent.

As they fall, seating on the center of the Earth,  forming the first drops of ice-9, those strangelets will start crunching and feeding the light, ordinary matter as we breath air, in a monotone series of big crunches and big bangs, breathing the matter and expelling the electro-weak energy of its electrons.

Since the strangelet is given a stability of hours, it will arrive to its destiny almost certainly. How long thus will it take for the LHC to blow up the Earth in the worst scenario? A few hours after the first collisions take place the 11/9, there could be millions of strange quarks feeding with its awesome force in the center of the planet. The longevity of strange quarks have always surprised researchers. The first strange particle discovered, the Kaon, lived millions of times more than expected, reason why it was called ‘strange quark’. It was ‘as if Cleopatra were still dying from the aspid bite, still falling into the river’, said the physicist that discovered it. The strangelet will keep falling beyond that river, cutting like a knife into the water, followed by a massive release of energy, as it cracks atoms with its enormous imbalance of charge, absorbing its quarks. Finally it will reach its point of rest at the center of the Earth, finding other strangelets, growing the first drops of ice-9…

One atom at a time, millions of quarks of ordinary matter will become part of the new strangelet atoms in an spontaneous reactions that releases more energy that consumes.

 Those type of ‘spontaneous’ reactions happen all over Nature. In any chemical reaction the final product is not a single molecule but an enormous number of small molecules, catalyzed by the reaction that keeps transforming the initial products (in the ice-9 reaction the atoms of the Earth) into the end products (the molecules or in the ice-9 reaction the strangelet atoms).

Indeed, because the strangelet will still attract further matter, the strangelet will NOT become static but it will turn more atoms into strangelets. Nature is never static. Chemical reactions like this one, in which there is a release of energy, since the end product (the strangelet) is more stable than the original product (the atomic matter), don’t stop till the initial products disappear, in this case till the entire Earth becomes strange matter. They are called exergonic reactions or spontaneous reactions for that reason, since just the initial kick of energy that triggers the creation of the first product makes the reaction self-sustained. This has been finally recognized this week in the article of physicsworld we quote at the end of this post, which literally says:  ‘A little energy is enough to transform a neutron star [with an iron cover] into a strange star’. The same can be said of the Earth: ‘ a little energy is enough to transform the iron core of the Earth into a strange star’.

2 common processes of Nuclear reactions will then take place:

–  Catalysis of new strangelets, as the huge charge and mass of the strangelet attracts atoms that lump on the surface creating more strangelets: the stable Strangelet with its awesome charge and weight will keep attracting atoms and ions. Those atoms and ions, surrounding the stable strangelet will form new ‘atoms’ of strange liquid. And so the strangelet mass will keep growing.

This even a high school student of physics can understand. Basically the first strangelet will act as a ‘catalyzer’ of the reaction, forming new strangelet atoms in its surface. This again happens all the time in Nature in which heavier metal nuclei act as ‘catalyzers’ of chemical reactions, as matter is attracted by them and anchors in the surface. So new atoms anchored in the surface of the first strangelet will continue growth.

– But there is even a faster, more scary possibility… that the first strangelet fissions into smaller pieces that will grow again, starting a nuclear reaction called ‘ice-9’, exploding the Earth into a super-nova in a matter of seconds.

Indeed. All the atomic nuclei that ‘grow’, split when they reach their limit and fission, starting a chain reaction that grows even faster, as strangelets do in Nature in Quark stars all over the cosmos. It happens in any atomic bomb, in any radiactive atomic nucleus. So what will happen then, because it is NOT excluded
and according to the Totalitarian Principle of Gell-mann (the discoverer of quarks) ALL what is not excluded happens in science, and further on this is what the drop-liquid model shows to happen always in atomic nuclei made of quarks is obvious:
When the strangelet reaches the size of the Compton wave, since it is in fact a liquid, it will find very easy according to the drop-liquid model of atomic nuclei, to split/fission in several parts that will keep growing back to the 3 million quark stable package, exactly as in any chain reaction, causing the Earth to become a supernova.

The catastrophic scenario is simple and self-evident, and it can be seen all over the cosmos in the transformation of a normal star into a pulsar, which has a strangelet core. Basically the strangelet will follow the droplet model we use for fission processes. According to Peng, the growth of the strangelet will be fast in all possible types, neutral, positive and negative, because we have found a new quality of strange matter, called ‘color locked’, according to which those quarks are far more stable than previously thought.

This again has never been disputed, except by CERN’s hired experts in the suits against the company. Today all physicists know that quarks ‘lock themselves’ in triads that become far more stable than what physicists – specifically Mr. Glashow, a theorist that worked on strangelets 20 years ago… Yet CERN engaged Mr. Glashow in the suits against the LHC, as the foremost expert and ‘Nobel Prize’ from decades ago, to defend the ‘ordinary sets’, which are to modern theory of strangelets what the Rutherford model of atoms is to quantum theory – a joke.

In the last decade the Chinese Institute of Nuclear Physics has become the most advanced Institution in the analysis of strangelets, that have surpassed clearly the ancient American MIT institute, where the second expert on those suits, Amicus Curiae Mr. Wilczek, keeps laughing at our ‘likely’ extinction… pointing out in the hyperlinked video that if he is wrong, nobody will blame him.  While in our suits he claims to be an ‘authority’ that has to be ‘trusted’, because we are ‘persons of no merit’ without further technical or scientific explanations. Since he knows perfectly if he goes into scientific details as we do in this article, he has no objective, scientific arguments to deny what the Chinese researchers are saying and we merely explain in this article.

Fact is, in the same manner the Chinese are taking over America as the top economical nation at race speed, their labs today are producing an increasing wealth of top papers at the head of research in many fields, including strangelets. Further on, they are NOT engaged in CERN so their views are the only objective views within the physicists’ community. There are NOT at the Chinese Institute of higher physics, confidentiality statements that oblige workers at CERN, like Mr. Wilczek, hired to make those safety reports, to state zero risks, as the New Yorker reported . So they can tell us the naked truth. So far, neither CERN, Mr. Wilczek or Mr. Glashow have wanted to make any explanations beyond their claim that we must ‘trust their authority’ – neither of them have in fact appeared on the suits against the company, which defaulted systematically.

2nd scenario: neutral strangelets: creation of ‘usd’ particles, the minimal units of a strangelet that slowly grow and devour the Earth inside-out.

But even if the LHC produces far less quantities of Strange quarks than predicted, producing slet-3 of the graph, neutral strangelets, the reaction can take place in a slower fashion.

We already have experimental evidence of this, since the previous top Ion accelerator, RHIC, produced a few strange quarks that formed a cohesive liquid, a proto-strangelet, with far less energy/mass (E=Mc2), than the LHC will have. It made small, aborted phetus – let us put it this way – that thanks God – didn’t stabilize, but grew a billion times faster than expected, and started to absorb other quarks. This surprised all researchers that expected a gas and found a ‘perfect liquid’. The Rex showed its teeth. But the corporation that runs this Jurassic Park of ultra-dangerous primordial particles won’t close the facilities. Those were the first atoms of strangelets – mainly hyperons (usd atoms) just one stage below the particle that will kill us, the double nuclei hyperon, the stable dibaryon, usd-usd. At RHIC we were lucky. We only saw  half dibaryons, usd atoms, which are not stable. We just need two join two ‘strains’ of this lethal RNA to form a stable ‘DNA’ of strange science, a dibaryon that will catalyze as DNA did in the organic soup, the conversion of matter in strange liquid.

The scenario is simple:

There are 3 kinds of ‘atoms’ of strange liquid, a mixture of up, down and strange quarks:

1) Up-strange and down-strange Kaons. They are the first to appear and they are unstable, so they decay as antiparticles. The LHC did 16% more of those in December at a mere 1.1Tev.

2) Hyperons, usd-atoms. They are only stable at high pressure, inside stars and maybe in the nuclei of Earth. At RHIC 70 hyperons were found, much more than expected. If 2 of them collide they form a dibaryon a double Hyperon: usd-usd; and dibaryons are stable at normal atmospheric pressure. Those 2 atoms, hyperons and dibaryons are the only substances we know can provoke supernovas and we know they are the nuclei of pulsars, the remnant of those explosions. And so now:

3) Thus, at 3.5 Tev in lead to lead collisions, the LHC will produce so many collisions between hyperons that it shall create a constant stream of stable dibaryons, stable strangelet liquid, able to blow up the Earth.

Dibaryons are the neutral, stable atom of strangelet liquids. You need only 2 hyperons, 2 usd-atoms joined in a collision to form a usd/usd di-baryon. Those stable and neutral dibaryons then will fall to Earth’s center.

A few hundred might form in each collision. How many are needed to form a strangelet? If you see the previous table of the types of strangelets, a dibaryon, usd-usd will have neutral charge (+2/3 -1/3 -1/3 +2/3 -1/3 -1/3) but it is already stable with a mere 6 quarks. 

Thus, according to Peng and Chen  a single dibaryon could do it. But in this case the process will be extremely slow, as the dibaryon will be neutral, seat on the center of the Earth and catalyze very slowly the creation of new dibaryons. This would be the best scenario, taking decades to blow up the Earth. But this scenario that might be already in the workings (as neutral dibaryons are invisible – only charged particles are detected in accelerators, so they could have been produced at RHIC without being noticed), is superseeded by the thousands of strange quarks the LHC will produce in its collisions. The certainty of dibaryon creation in any case is close to 100% if it didn’t happen at RHIC already.

Thus on 11/9 CERN will start creating strangelet atoms, dibaryons.

Of course CERN has denied this adamantly in public. Yet again, we have found an inner document in which CERN affirms that ‘dibaryons will be stable, lasting a few days:

‘There is a mass range, below 2055 MeV (the mass of a lambda and a neutron), where it [Hdibaryon] could only decay by a doubly weak decay into two neutrons.  This is a deltaS =2 reaction and leads to a predicted lifetime of the order of days’

By JP Coffin et al. (seriously)
‘Search for strange dibaryons in STAR and ALICE’  Jrnal of Phys G v28 pp1707-1714  2002

How long will the dibaryons take to fall to the center of the Earth? Not very long.  It is a free fall event. One hundred times heavier than our mass, its fall will be like that of a parachuter, towards home, the center of the earth. Then, there, the Earth will fall into them…

The first warnings.

The creation at RHIC of an unstable liquid drop of strangelet was always denied, prior to the experiment. It was only anticipated in 2000 by a Safety Officer of Accelerators, who denounced that possibility and put a suit, risking his job, to RHIC, Mr. Walter Wagner, a Physicist from Livermore Laboratory. He lost his job for that suit and was cannibalized by the corporate scientific press, who said it would never happened, who said RHIC would only create a gas.

And yet, it created a proto-strangelet liquid with a behavior similar to that of a black hole.

This  was a ‘BIG surprise’ for all scientists involved who claimed before at RHIC that they would never produce a single strangelet (strange liquid particle) but just an evaporating, harmless gas. And yet they did make the first particles of strangelet liquid, fortunately enough in small numbers and without any explanation on how it had happened.

I wrote then, with the help of Rossler, as specialists in Complexity, fractal theory and Chaotic liquids, an article, censored by the corporate scientific media, explaining what none has done in those prehistoric, mamooth labs that use still in the XXI century models of simple liquids and single entropy arrows, 20 years after we defined (Mehaute and myself), mathematically the existence of a second arrow of in’formative’ time, responsible for big crunches in complex liquids, black holes and the Universe at large.

But of course, we were not published. We are, as my friend affirmed in a personal e-mail, ‘non-persons’, like those invisible characters of a science-fiction tragedy. Because this is indeed, a tragedy of cosmic proportions, made possible not only by CERN, but also by the corporate press that dares not to denounce a company ‘too big to fail’. And yet the consequences once this happens will be impossible to undo. But we humans seem unable to learn from past experiences.

Plainly speaking our arrogance and ignorance of the laws of the Universe go together to accelerate our demise. If we were ignorant but humble we just wouldn’t take the risk. If physicists knew as much as they pretend to know, instead of being stuck in a single arrow of time (energy), and a simple mathematical analysis of reality (not the fractal Non-Euclidean equations and dual arrows of energy and information we use in complexity), they would simply not need CERN, as they would understand and resolve as we have done in Complexity all the questions the quark cannon pretends to study.

‘Physicists are often wrong but never in doubt’ said Landau. Indeed, nuclear physicists at CERN are both arrogant and ignorant of any sound physics that don’t  cater their agenda of zero risk; and so in their ignorance they will make strangelets and/or black holes in their arrogance they will dismiss the advices of those of us who are humble and knowledgeable about the true laws of mass and black holes that we have discovered using the second arrow of time/information.  But of course, we do not have a 10 billion dollar machine and war chest to explain this to the world. We are what true scientists have always been. Individual people, with little power, little interest in the bonfire of human vanity, but beautiful minds to understand that knowledge and ethics go together, or as Socrates put it, ‘an intelligent man is a good man’. At CERN they are neither intelligent not good people, but smart bullies which live off the routines of the cold war age, when Nuclear scientists were sanctified, not because they explained us the meaning of it all, but because they were making nuclear weapons and the system was justifying them as the ‘high priest of knowledge’, to elevate ‘Shiva’ the God of death and energy to the top of the human altars. Indeed, when the Aryan invaded India, they divided the caste of warriors in fighters and Brahmins, the philosophers that wrote the Baghavad Gita, to justify murder on the altar of Shiva. Oppenheimer, who pressed the bottom that inagurated CERN, and Rudolf Hoess of Auschwitz fame had something in common: both carried with them always the Gita, which quenches all ethical fears, as we humans must behave as automatons of duty and death.

‘The tragedies of History return because humans never learn from their past’ M. Proust

It is useless to argue further about the duplicity and callousness of corrupted military or corrupted science – exemplified during the XX and XXI century by nuclear physicists, who pretend to explain us the meaning of it all with false God’s particles but are merely abusing the tax payers and menacing the future of life in this planet. Unfortunately the ‘Industrial military-complex’ is with them and the corporate press hails them as geniuses, because ‘in the name of the religion of science’ all crimes can be justified. And so the religion of the machine is above any authority and nobody defies it. It should not surprise us that now again all physicists back CERN, regardless of the known-known risks and unknown-known genocide it can cause: the only physicist of note, who dissent against the Nuclear Race was Mr. Einstein, reason why he had a file opened by the FBI; his classes at Princeton were deserted… and so he took to walks with Godel and boat sailing. Knowledge and scientific prestige, even in the case of Einstein, had to yield to the power of money and the industrial-military complex, as it has been the case with CERN.

In that regard, the fundamental error of Humanity regarding Nuclear Physicists is NOT to realize that they are neither the avant garde of scientific research (we, Complex theorists, like Mr. Rossler and myself, who have fusioned the laws of biology and physics, of Darwin and Einstein are), nor they are idealist scientists, but they act and respond to their worldly profession, which is to make weapons. And so their character, duplicity and obsession with death is self-similar to that of the military that ‘defend’ our nations but often ruin them causing unnecessary wars.

This is something people seem to have completely forgotten. Nuclear Physicists make weapons and then discover ‘things’ which are mostly irrelevant for the ‘big picture’ of the Universe, studied by astrophysicists, philosophers of science and in this century, Complex and system scientists, which fusion biological and physical laws in a veritable theory of Unification.

If people would understand this, then it would easily compare CERN with the behavior of our military in Afghanistan, where they pretend to be a ‘peace corps’ but massacre innocent people with robotic weapons. CERN belongs to that psychology which was crystal clear during the Cold war but now it has been forgotten.  Since the industrial-military complex has refined his marketing and now it sells itself as a ‘knowledge tank’ to the service of mankind.

Yet if a ‘minor ‘genocide happens, if the innocent electricians and youngsters working at CERN, who ignore what their leaders know, if the people of Geneva die in an atomic explosion (in case the strangelet and black hole become unstable, they will be transformed, E=Mc2, into the biggest nuclear explosion ever, but won’t destroy the Earth), Mr. R.H. who prudently moved to Tokyo, the day the LHC made the first collisions, ‘just in case’, should be tried for mass murder with John Ellis and the rest of the people responsible of this cover up of Mr. Einstein’s work and the laws of strangelets, which they perfectly know, as those documents show, and yet have hidden to the public and the ‘sheeple’ press.

The solution must come from outside CERN and the nuclear physicists’ community.

Obviously at this stage, technocrats, politicians and the press who backed this company with wishful blindness are trapped in their own errors of judgment and will not cancel a 13 billion $ project not to face public derision for being cheated by yet another mammoth – not so clean – Energy Corporation. The machine is too big to fail; and as we all know it is an unwritten rule of power politics ‘never to acknowledge any mistake’.

And certainly Nuclear Physicists will not come out of the closet and say the truth. They never do. None except Einstein, regretting his letter to the president, confronted clearly the Nuclear Race. The International Agency of Nuclear Science, from the UN, certified that in Chernobyl tragedy ‘only 56 people died'(1) – the people who were blasted that day – since they refused to acknowledge the +200.000 cancer victims according to the Byelorussian government as ‘non-proved’. You see, this is now again the official position: In the suits Courts determined that the ‘Destruction of Earth is in no way attributable to US government’

since we didn’t demonstrate ‘Injury in fact’ – only ‘a posteriori’ when we are all dead could we sue CERN. La Hague Court of Human rights told my father, a reputed Lawyer from Spain, that they would only judge ‘genocides that had happen’. But all this was before we knew the extend of CERN’s ‘wrecklesness’  in this matter. So now, only direct action by the European Governments and Security forces can stop this 11/9 act of ‘scientific terrorism’. But it must be done in a quiet, non-compromising way.

How then could we stop this genocide of all of us in the making? The only thing that could be done is to ‘fake’ a solution with the ‘tools’ of power of our society, money and weapons, since truth, the power of the wor(l)d, which is the only tool I have, didn’t beat the money and weapon-machines of CERN in this corrupted world we live in.

Thus, the solution is a 3 sided process, which could be achieved using either of the 3 languages that control the world, words, money and weapons:

– The press should change sides and denounces the company NOW, reason why today I released the news of this post to 100 newspapers. While Mr. Penrose, a British physicist and mathematician who provided me with some of these documents, has been trying to leak the same CERN’s lies to the ministries of science of Europe… So far with little success.  Since there is an unwritten law in our ‘free market’ economy that states corporations are never prevented from committing enviromental crimes. Only at posteriori they are denounced with outrage as it happened with British petroleum. But perhaps ‘word of mouth’ could do it. You could help to disseminate the news, twitting, facebooking and digging this post with the tools given below… If this becomes ‘vox populi’ then CERN would have to respond to the world and political power could act.

– Politicians could also stop the machine with money. Further cuts on the program and budget of CERN could be requested. European Governments could quietly ask ‘Caesar Hauer’ to close CERN for winter, as it always did before to ‘save’ money, given the fact that this machine when running consumes the amount of energy of the entire city of Geneva and prices of electricity are much higher in winter. This is in fact the first year the machine will run in winter at higher cost, paradoxically when we all have to tighten our belts in the middle of the Economic Crisis. The reason is obvious: CERN wants to dismiss the risks with a ‘fait accompli’ so it is rushing the experiment because as John Ellis, chief theorist put it: ‘the best way to dismiss this talk about the LHC destroying the world, is to switch it on’. Now CERN should be obliged to release a statement saying that the machine will go on recess during the winter period, as it is usually done, to save money to European tax payers. And then quietly close down the next year.

– Finally, the Interior Ministries of France or Switzerland, responsible for policing and nationalsecurity, who have territorial jurisdiction on the machine, could also stop it. If security forces and politicians of those countries knew what is at stakes, they could fake a ‘bomb warning’ at CERN, evacuate the premises and while searching for the device, set it up in secret and explode the tubes of the collider. Yes, indeed, in 9/11 there were confabulation theorists that went so far as to say the American government had put charges on the basements and cut the foundations of the building – witness the absurd rhetoric on that issue of the Iranian president, recently at UN – yet another politician who absurdly thinks Nuclear Bombs must be had, if we ‘can do it’. This confabulation theory was obviously false and doesn’t deserve any serious thinking. However in the 11/9 ‘plot’, since those ‘scientific terrorists’ are ours and hence far more difficult to deal with, breaking the collider could be indeed a solution for european governments not to loose face and for physicists quietly exit this ill-conceived machine and accept defeat without public opprobium.  Then the collider would shut down for repairs and latter on, quietly cancelled for ‘economical reasons’.

So there is indeed a solution to this genocide in the making. It won’t happen I know, the routines of our society are too strong, our leaders too weak to defy them, power too arrogant to recognize a mistake. So they will probably prefer to ‘believe’ that the heirs of Openheimer and Teller are to be trusted, that the laws of Nature will bend to their will… But maybe a miracle happen, an Asimovian ‘mule’ breaks the routines of human self-destruction and takes the risks of being ridiculed as the people who sued CERN have been, knowing that this has to be done.

This must be stopped by political power. We cannot longer trust nuclear physicists. It was done before by Eisenhower. In the previous Horizon of Nuclear Weapons, Hydrogen Bombs, Teller had invented a very costly mechanism to produce H-bombs, patented the method and created the industries to profit from its manufacturing. But he didn’t sell the product for ‘money and prizes’, his true reasons. Instead Teller convinced Truman of the need to make Hydrogen bombs, because they were necessary to ‘know better’ the atom. Then he proposed an H-Bomb made with his company at stratospheric prices able to blow up the whole URSS. He was backed by the entire nuclear community – never mind that such explosion will destroy the atmosphere and all forms of life on planet Earth. Eisenhower realized of this MAD strategy and called Krushev, starting the process of disarmament.

Any takers against the Heirs of Teller of whom his college Isador Rabi said: “I really do feel it would have been a better world without Teller, I think he is an enemy of humanity”

? Today we could just change the name of Mr. Teller for Mr. Ellis, who said his job is to protect ‘the LHC from mankind’. So we wonder, where is the new Einsehower able to protect mankind from the LHC?

We need a politician, a man of action, which at this stage can only be Obama, Sarkozy or Van Rompuy. They could stop CERN from making strangelets, and make truth the promises of a world with less Nuclear weapons.  Eisenhower was a military who protected mankind from Nuclear Physicists. Can Mr. Obama or Mr. Sarkozy protect us again with something more substantial than promising words?

Update, 23 september


In the graph, bunches of protons with hundreds of times less quarks than the lead ions which will collide the 11/9 have formed a drop of unstable quark-gluon liquid,  a fermion condensate, surprising CERN’s physicists. On the ion collisions the 11/9 there will be hundreds of times more quarks packed together, bound to create stable strangelets (u,s, d quark liquids)

More bad news coming. Yesterday CERN gave the news that a quark-gluon liquid was starting to form with simple proton/proton collisions. Given the fact that energy becomes mass, E=Mc2, the quarks inside the protons multiplied in enormous numbers and since the bunches of protons collided at close distances, they massed in a bose-einstein fermion liquid (ridge on the picture) that ‘surprised’ again all scientists. As we explained in our post – The Grand Design – we exists in an organic, fractal Universe whose forms self-reproduce constantly into self-similar forms, which gather into herds and form new, bigger scales of the fractal Universe. So quarks reproduce new quarks and form herds. Thus the 3 lonely quarks of the proton reproduced thousands of quarks which formed a Bose-Einstein condensate, which was unstable. Needless to say when the hundreds of quarks inside the lead hadrons collide, there will be more than enough quark liquid to create stable strangelets that will start the dreaded ice-9 reaction (stability grows with the quark mass of the strangelet). The signs of an impeding catastrophe are everywhere, but nobody listens. Since the idea that we, humans, are so unimportant to the Grand Design that we could disappear easily defies the ego-centered beliefs of our species. Time is running out for the press, the military and the governments to stop this experiment but they keep practicing their wishful blindness.

The way in which yesterday’s scary discovery was presented as ‘new physics’ by all newspapers that merely released the PR news from the company shows that we will wait till the ice-9 spill happens. Only that this spill cannot be closed like the BP one. Nuclear Physicists are willing to take the risk with the cynical nihilism they have always shown, from Oppenheimer (‘I am become Kali, the destroyer of worlds’) to Teller to Wilczek, who was taped saying: ‘I never was so confident to make a prediction as when I was called to seat on a panel about the possibility of an accelerator turning on and ending the world; predicting that it won’t is very safe because if your prediction is wrong [shrugging his shoulders], ha, ha, ha, ha’.

‘2 things I deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man; and I am not sure of the former’. A. Einstein

Update 12th October. Paper confirming ice-9 reaction. [ Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 141101.]

In a new article at physics world physicists finally acknowledge that CERN will produce strangelets. This was taboo but perhaps the success of this release commented in alternative media outlets has opened the Pandora Box. The article recognizes that the LHC will produce them, and that they can cause an ice-9 reaction, converting the iron core of the Earth into a strange star, because strangelets are more stable than normal matter (the article refers to neutron stars, made of neutrons with a cover of iron, but obviously will produce the same effect if they fall to the iron core of the Earth)  Yet what astonishes the reader is that after recognizing those dangers, the cold-hearted researchers eagerly expect their production at CERN to further advance their career and prove the thesis of their paper. This astounding irresponsibility is at the core of all what is wrong at CERN and the people that back those experiments. Nothing matters in the ‘rat race’ of scholar papers, in the competition to ‘achieve’ the Nobel Prize, the grant, the recognition of a minor discovery, even the high chances of extinguishing Earth. Selfishness reaches a ‘surrealist’ twist that explains the style of the video we made about those strangelets.

And the final warning, which closes the film quantum roulette, from ‘Cat and cradle’: ‘What hope can therebe for mankind, when there are men that give such playthings as ice-9 to short-sighted children as most people are?’

Here the beginning of the article at Physics world with ad-ons by me []:

‘The energy needed to convert a neutron star [with a core of neutrons and a surface of iron] into a so-called strange star may come from annihilating dark-matter particles. That is the conclusion of a new study by physicists in Spain, the UK and the US, who propose that this conversion mechanism may be a good way to put a lower limit on the mass of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), a leading candidate for dark matter [The physicists work in WIMPs and that is the only thing they care for – to put ‘a lower limit on their mass’.]….

It has been proposed, however, that, given some kind of source of additional energy, neutron stars can convert to strange stars, objects consisting of strange matter –

a soup of unbound up, down and strange quarks.

The idea is that adding this energy to a certain limited volume of the neutron star will unlock the up and down quarks confined inside the neutrons [exactly what the LHC will do]. Some of these quarks will then naturally convert into strange quarks, producing a region of strange matter known as a strangelet. If, as has been hypothesized, strange matter is in fact more stable than normal, nuclear, matter it will exist a lower energy. The excess energy given off by the conversion of normal matter into strange matter then unlocks more up and down quarks, leading to the creation of more strangelets.

A little energy is enough to transform a neutron star into a strange star.

The result is a runaway process capable of converting an entire neutron star into strange matter within a second or less. “The neutron star is metastable, like someone on a mountain ledge,” explains Joseph Silk of the University of Oxford who was involved in the work. “Just as a little kick can push that person off the ledge and send them to the bottom of the mountain, so a little energy is enough to transform a neutron star into a strange star.” [the LHC excess of energy will do so]

While there is no clear evidence that strange matter actually exists, the observation of extremely brief but ultra-bright bursts of gamma rays from the cosmos suggests the existence of strange stars. Researchers have proposed that the enormous power needed to produce a gamma-ray burst could come from the formation of a black hole, but the large numbers of particles of normal matter surrounding a black hole could absorb much of that energy. The conversion of a neutron star into a strange star, however, could provide the required energy but without the surrounding matter.

[This was all along what we said in our first suits: that the massive bursts of gamma-rays found by the Fermi satellite, which never found signatures of black hole evaporation, were a clear prove that either neutron stars or planets with civilizations of ‘physicists’, were blowing up, confirming the Fermi paradox – we don’t hear signs of advanced civilizations in a galaxy filled with planets because they burst in gamma-rays. Moreover, precisely because of the tiny size of a planet, the explosion of planets by ‘physicists’ would match the cleaness, low magnitude/mass and high frequency/energy observed in those gamma ray bursts. Are all planets busted by LHC-like machines, reason why we don’t observe galactic civilizations, even of the robotic kind, as the parallel evolution of the machines of the Singularity age end systematically in those explosions. Given the indifference of mankind to this obvious danger and the automaton behavior of physicists just worried by their limited ‘field of research’, destiny seems to loom larger by the day.]

[Then after an argument on their ‘subject’ WIMPS, the team happily finds that CERN will give them a ‘second chance’ to prove his theory – the same argument of Hawking that stated publicly at Pasadena that producing black holes at the LHC will give him ‘ a second chance to win a Nobel Prize’]:

‘The team claims that two lines of observation could support their thesis and thereby help place a new limit on the mass of WIMPs. One would involve measuring the mass and radius of a strange star, obtained by studying the radiation of pulsars, and comparing these values with the predictions made by their model and those of alternative models. Evidence could also be obtained by creating and then measuring strangelets at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider in the US or in the Large Hadron Collider at the CERN laboratory near Geneva.’

Update, 14 Oct. End of the proton run

. At 3:38 a.m. beams of protons were colliding with a luminosity of  1.01 × 1032, a milestone that the teams running the Large Hadron Collider had been working all year to achieve – Rolf Heuer explained in the message sent today to CERN staff – ‘It’s a great achievement by all concerned to reach this important milestone with over two weeks to spare. The remainder of this year’

s proton running will be devoted to maximising the LHC 2010 data set and preparing for 2011 proton running before we switch to lead ions in November.’

Any discovery of note? Of course, not.  The Higgs Hoax was just the objective of the marketing department, in charge of ‘training the press’.

But the press – let us face it – has trained itself with political and economical correctness, now for centuries, to back always technology (hence also weapons, the most advanced technology at any time) as the ‘future’ progress of mankind…

We could make a bigger, larger, more powerful machine. And since machines gather digital ‘data’, once it was clear that the Higgs Hoax had been just an excuse for the Media Hype, data now has become in itself the goal of the experiment, as Hauer explains: ‘the larger goal of delivering an integrated luminosity of one inverse femtobarn to the experiments by the end of 2011. That’s the amount of data […] the objective we set ourselves.’ So we have made a better atomic cannon, regardless of its null beneficial use for mankind beyond the femtobarn of data, because nuclear physicists wanted it. And the military-industrial complex could make it. A bigger toy for our spoiled children of thought.

But to ‘have it all’ is the irresponsible philosophy of children, which see it all tainted subjectively by the glass of their wantings. The Darwinian Universe doesn’t work like that. Curiosity kills the Schrödinger’s cat. In fact, Nature feeds on children: Eggs, cubs and alevins are the cosmic staple of a fractal, eternal Universe, which constantly reproduces the same in/form/ations and events, reason why it cares nothing for their extinction.

How many planets have gone through self-similar, infantile, self-appointed Sons of God, claiming to be discovering the meaning of it all, while blowing themselves up? How many gamma-ray bursts of ‘unique’, anthropic planets are happening now? How meaningless we are?

‘ …a mush over the surface of a lost rock in a corner of the Universe – departing from those facts, we can talk about man.’  Schopenhauer

 Update, 20 October. The last release.  

Mr. Penrose and other physicists greatly concerned by the implications of these documents spent the last week doing an important, careful release of the CASTOR papers to the key mainstream media and science reporters and the Interior and Science Ministries of all the nations involved at CERN. This was not an easy task, as Mr. Penrose, the spokesman for this ‘Heavy-Ion Alert’ group, is the scion of a well-known family of British scientists, whose reputation would be put on line for this release, and so he has taken his time to talk this issue with his family and peers, trying to find a way out for CERN to not avail. But he has now presented the issue in a more academic manner and released the information to the press.

I must congratulate him; since I am conscious that the massive smear campaigns against me and the ‘pioneer’ people, who opposed this potential genocide has crippled our efforts and credibility. This, I have explained in this web: the prosecution has gone to the point of getting my scholar papers on the science of complexity and my pioneer models on the fractal Universe, applied to all sciences erased from Google scholar (till my work in the late 90s, except for some extraordinary insights of Mr. Mandelbrot and the application of fractal conceps to Astrophysics by Nottale, there was not a clear formulation of a Unification Theory of all sciences based in the scalar, self-similar, fractal, self-generative properties of information, the ‘program’ that designs the Universe. Since Mandelbrot, one of the few geniuses of the post-war era, who just passed away sparing himself the ‘Grand Finale’ have given indeed the first right step, discovering the fractal mathematics of information, but his concept of ‘roughness’ was too shy of the enormous implications of fractal, organic structures for the big picture of reality. Further on, it was needed to complete the 5 Non-Euclidean Postulates of geometry and fusion them with fractal mathematics to renovate the languages of the human mind. And so only when I completed that task left unfinished by Riemann and Einstein, I had the key to unlock the Grand Design, upgrading all sciences with it.)

In that regard I was first shocked by the insinuations that we opposed CERN for ‘gain and fame’, or that we didn’t know what we talked about, but since we were never given a chance to defend ourselves, only one side of the story remains. In any case, what those smearing campaigns on Rossler, Walter and me means for this issue is that we have been mouth-strapped, effectively from the beginning. For that reason I insisted so much to Mr. Penrose and other scientists to do this release, despite having those documents available in this web. Since it is obvious that they won’t be smeared – respect is due in the ‘anglopocentric’ world we live in to people with the right pedigree (-; Sorry Eric, we have now only 20 days left before what can be our last minute on Earth, so let me have some irony about the way humans qualify subjectively truth).

From now on, if CERN has a ‘carte blanche’ to go ahead with the experiments, the responsibility will be shared by the Press, the Political Power and the Company.

If we die, it won’t be any longer CERN only, which has to be blamed. As it would be naive to blame only BP of the spill, now that we know the extent of the cover up of the Government’s Agencies on the risks and damage of the spill. Companies in our civilization are wrongly designed to reach their goals at all costs. Governments and the Press are supposed to monitor, alert and control with their executive power their wrong-doing. They are now informed, if they cover up this crime and allow these experiments to take place to protect a ‘machine’, it means plainly speaking, that we humans lack the minimal qualities required to survive in the Darwinian, Fractal Universe.

In any case the release was done, perhaps a bit late, but with courage Mr. Penrose has done what had to be done. And of course, as today, nobody has published…

So when and if this happens, I just want to state that we, the people who have dedicated years to these cause, have finished our job.

For any further inquires on CASTOR, please contact Mr. Penrose, who has taken the relay from us in this matter at the Heavy-Ion Alert site. Good luck my friend. It is indeed a heavy, strange Sisyphus stone, the one you carry now, hope it doesn’t sink us all.

Update. 8th november. 24 hours before massive collisions. Stable beams.

It seems stable beams have been achieved and a few collisions taken place. Now the machine is ramping up its luminosity. Thus, tomorrow massive collisions of lead ions will start to take place, with enough density to produce strangelets. If strangelets form they will fall undetected to the center of Earth. By 2011, in most statistical models the conversion of Earth’s matter into dark matter will be advanced enough to end our existence on planet Earth. Curiously enough by then the LHC will be closed for an upgrade of energies and of course, if this were to happen, CERNies will deny all responsibility. Had this been discussed, instead of censored, we could be more optimist about the future… But CERN is already talking of further upgrades beyond the 7 Tev barrier of 2013, when again we will go through new existential risks. The conclusion is obvious:

Even if we survive 11/9, the fact that the experiment and its future upgrades are carried on without the slightest control and opposition, only means we humans will keep searching for higher forms of mass and energy, till definitely we cross the barrier of stability of strangelets, black holes and other forms of dark matter that will devour us. Make no mistake, the end of the race for higher energy in accelerators should be an event, which creates a stable black hole or strangelet that devour us – NOT an intelligent commission of politicians and citizens, who decides to stop this disguised arm race. And since the industry will keep pushing further upgrades and plans to reach always new energies, sooner than latter the planet will blow up, with the indifference and acquiescence of our political and judiciary institutions.

Update, 1st December.

Lead collisions have taken place forming the quark-gluon ‘perfect liquid’ already seen at RHIC in minimal quantities. The ‘perfect liquid’, mainly, a mixture of u, s and d quarks, suppressed systematically jets of particles that should have exploded in a quark-gluon gas. Those particles stayed inside the ball of fire for enough time to form dibaryons, the simplest strangelet particles that can be created in acceleratiors. It is the slow scenario of extinction  by accumulation of strange particles that might take years to reach enough critical mass to provoke the conversion of Earth into dark matter. On a positive note, we are still here, which means the fastest ice-9 reactions (massive conversion of the USD perfect liquid into strangelets within seconds of the collision) have not taken place. 

We are still here. We are being lucky… We can now safely consider that enough lead to lead collisions have taken place to discharge the ‘faster’ scenarios of strangelet formation (a runaway ice-9 reaction taken place after a massive growth of +3 million strong quarks strangelets). The fastest scenarios based in the ‘Peng Papers’ seem to be ruled out at this point. Yet the slower scenarios – dibaryon formation, slowly leaking to the center of the Earth and provoking a big crunch in years to come – cannot be ruled out. Moreover the behavior of the quark-gluon soup on the experiments performed, suppressing massively jets of particles that should be emitted and are being absorbed back into the quark-gluon liquid, shows how easily strange quarks are interacting inside the soup and probably creating different particles of dark, strange quark matter, which will take months or years to detect. This is the risk that has already happened and we shall not know for years to come… But the official establishment of science is cheering up. Nothing really new has been found, of course… but that was never the goal of this experiment. This means, as today, 2 relevant scenarios are left: the dibaryon scenario (strangelet formation within years) and the black hole scenario over 10 Tev, which will not take place till 2013…

Let us quote the article ‘LHC Creates Cosmic Primordial Soup and Probes Strange Particle Jets ‘ on the nature of those jets to understand those dangers: ‘Jets are a common sight in collisions of protons at the LHC, usually appearing in pairs as narrow cones of particles heading away in opposite directions from the collision point. They are equally common in collisions of lead ions, but with a twist. The ATLAS measurement showed that the more “head-on” the collisions of lead ions, the more unbalanced the energies of the jets streaming out in opposite directions from the collision point. While one jet may still appear as a narrow cone of particles, the second jet has a much lower energy, and the narrow cone of particles has become much more diffused. [Symmetry]

That effect is called “jet quenching,” and the imbalance appears when one jet must travel through more quark-gluon plasma to escape the collision area than the other:

If the collision happens near the edge of the soup, one quark only has to pass through a bit of soup to escape – that’s the big jet. But the other, going in the opposite direction, has to travel through lots of hot dense exotic matter. It gets scattered around and loses lots of energy into the medium it is passing through. That’s the “missing” second jet. [The Guardian]

Jet quenching was indirectly observed at Brookhaven National Lab seven years ago. But with the energies at LHC, the effect is so pronounced that physicists could see it directly.’

In other words, strange quarks are not jetting out and dissolving but being trapped by the quark-gluon liquid, recombining in particles, among them very ‘likely’, dibaryons…

Black mass.

How can you deal with the madness of the LHC – a totem of the new religion of man, the machine, which physicists, its high priests, build just for the sake of it? In case you haven’t ‘watched’ the previous article, we shall close this one with a surrealist film – an art which appeared to create parables of the incomprehensible death toll of I world war. An Image indeed is worth one thousand words – not only technical pictures, which is all the knowledge CERN will ever achieve risking our lives – but also artistic ones. So here to conclude, a personal interpretation, sampled  from different sources and ‘black masses’ …

(please disregard as usual dates on those videos, 2010 the original date for full energy shots are now postponed to 2015, when those danger scenarios are likely to happen)

(1) 9. http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/releases/greenpeace-new-study-reveals-d

The data, based on Belarus national cancer statistics, predicts approximately 270,000 cancers and 93,000 fatal cancer cases will be caused by Chernobyl. The report also concludes that on the basis of demographic data, during last 15 years, 60,000 people have died additionally in Russia because of the Chernobyl accident, and estimates of the total death toll for Ukraine and Belarus could be another 140,000.
Yet ‘only 56 people have died as a direct result of radiation released in Chernobyl’ according to the report ushered by UNO’s Atomic Energy Agency: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article563041.ece

 
16 Comments

Posted by on November 7, 2015 in News

 

Quark liquid: Cosmic bombs

Mankind has opened the first factory of strange liquid. In 2015 will reach enough energy to produce massive amounts of quark condensates and possibly black holes (disregard dates in videos, as they were done before CERN delayed till 2015 its opening at full potency):

During 5 years, a small group of ethic physicists and scientists of the field of complexity and theory of information (notably Mr. Rossler, founder of chaos theory; this writer, who found the mathematical formalism of general systems science; Eric Penrose, a mathematician, the scion of a family of well known british physicists and Walter Wagner, a safety officer in the most prestigious center of accelerators in America at Livermore), tried to rise awareness of those facts, but the ‘military-industrial complex’ – yes that old topic in top form these days, made a big press campaign, to deviate the ‘issue’ to ad hominem campaigns and ‘big smiley’, dont worry be happy we know what we do shallow arguments, without, of course, revising with scientific rigor the issue.

So we finally gave up and now it is only a question of time, to wait from an answer from the Universe, which somehow already has answered on the destiny of mankind this year, with the proofs of the Fermi paradox.

Below the last open letter, the last warning that Rossler and I sent to the world of scientific media about the most explosive substance of the Universe, which we study with the laws of complexity and chaos attractors, in which we are recognized specialists… We gave it a poetic name, because only metaphors and hyperboles can explain the madness and arrogance of our scientists, who never foresee the collateral effects of their actions:

 

CLEOPATRA IS STILL DYING

(The quark-gluon soup, cause of Big-Bangs)

The Kaon was the first strange particle found and its quarks – the particles that exist inside the nuclei of atoms, keeping most of its mass- were called strange because they lived millions of times longer than quantum physicists expected.

‘It was as if Cleopatra were still dying of an asp bite, still falling from her barge into the Nile’ – said his discoverer (1.)

That strange love for life seems to be a condition of the ultra-dense quark-gluon soup, made of free quarks that initiated the cosmos. Since it showed again a strange stability in the 2nd ‘big surprise’ reported by Scientific American, when the RHIC (Hadron Ion Collider) made a drop of strange liquid. It was not a gas, as quantum theorists have expected. Instead they found a complex, cyclical, far from equilibrium system, a super fluid vortex of quarks and gluons, perfectly ordered. ‘It should have behaved like a gas, hopefully with more energy, it will behave rightly’ said somewhat ‘sanguine’ to SciAm (2), the quantum physicist in charge of the experiment, unable to model with simple, lineal, energetic equations the strange liquid, which again lived billions of times more than expected, accreted particles and behaved according to Nastase (3), from Brown University, as a proto-black hole:

We learned that while cooling inside the liquid was expelling outwards a big-bang of gamma radiation, which reached over a trillion degrees (4), a temperature only observed in Super-novas – where an inner vortex of strange liquid forms a pulsar or quark star; while the electronic cover of the atoms evaporates into a big-bang. Quantum physicists are thus split in two groups: Those who think they created strange liquid and those who think they created expanding plasma. And each one describes the event with their partial set of equations.

Who is right, who is wrong? It is the quark-gluon soup a gas or a liquid? The answer is: both. It is like cracking nuts to extract their rich, tasty inner substance (the quarks that hold 99% of the mass of the atom), throwing away in the big-bang of radiation the electronic, light cover (which forms our ghostly world).

But to understand how this is done we must not use the lineal equations of quantum physics, which date back to more than a century ago when complex liquids and its fractal, chaotic equations were still unknown to scientists. Instead we want to bring here the opinion of Complexity Theory, a new discipline, founded the year of Einstein’s death at the Macy’s congress, which explains how the Universe destroys reality with lineal, expansive energy also called ‘entropy’, cause of disordered gas-like processes, and creates order with cyclical clocks of information.

Both processes are often simultaneous, reason why the science of Time that studies both ‘arrows of future’ together, (whose international congresses I have chaired in recent years (5) is called Duality. In duality we study how both arrows of time, energy and information create, becoming ‘complementary’, as when an informative particle and a field of energy come together, creating a physical entity or when an informative nuclei/head and an energetic body evolve into a cell or an organism. But we also study how under conditions of extreme stress, due to an excess of energy or information, those far from equilibrium systems split apart, So when an organism suffers an accident due to an excess of energy, it ‘breaks its symmetry’, a subtle way to say it is beheaded. And when the organism ages, due an excess of form, of information, it wrinkles and dies.

In physical processes, symmetry breaks when the energetic, electromagnetic components of matter reach the energetic limit of c-speed and its informative elements, its inner cyclical quarks, approach the absolute order of zero Kelvin temperature.

Then both depart, creating a central, ultra cold vortex liquid, a frozen star, either a pulsar or black hole and a dying burst of electronic energy in the form of radiation. The simplest far from equilibrium physical system is a refrigerator. The interior is cold precisely because the exterior has a rack of Freon liquid that is hot and dissipates energy. So heat is expelled outwards to cool the interior. One of the ‘two arrows or motions’ of the Universe, entropy, synonymous of lineal, expansive energy and disorder is thrown away. So information, synonymous of form and cyclical order, better achieved without temperature, can increase.

This is in essence what happens in a quark-gluon soup, which causes a double big-bang and big-crunch called a supernova, which gives birth to a strange, cold vortex of quark mass in the interior of the star and expels the external electronic cover, converted into hot radiation. And so what we saw at RHIC was a mini- supernova.

In that sense, unlike in quantum entropy, in Complexity, the famous Heisenberg equation, energy x information =Constant, is described as a feed-back cycle proper of all quantum systems, which fluctuate between the limits of energy and informative death of our Universe :(c-speed and 0 k temperature).

When those dual, complementary systems made of waves of energy and particles of information go out of equilibrium they move towards the two limits of energy and form, infinite temperature/energy in the external, expansive big-bang zone; and 0 k, perfect fluid order, in the zone of formation of strangelets; Since infinite x 0 = K.

Thus, if RHIC has measured trillions of degrees in the surface of the ‘ball of fire’, inside the ball quarks are being cooled at near zero temperature, into a super fluid vortex, which are the natural conditions of formation of strangelets. Those liquid vortices can be modeled with Lorenz and Rössler’s attractors6, mathematical functions discovered chaos theorists, who compresses liquids into cyclical trajectories maintained in its equilibrium by sudden bursts of perpendicular energy, called ‘jets’ that expel away the radiation and temperature of the system. In science all theories require experimental proof to be confirmed. And that indeed seems to be the case in this issue, as only complexity theorists expected a decade ago the quark-gluon liquid, while the surprised RHIC and CERN experimentalists still believe they will find an expansive gas, with far less strange quarks than we predicted.

And yet in December 2009, when the LHC probed for the first time beyond the 1 tev barrier of death of light matter into strange matter, it produced 13% more ‘than expected’ strange kaons (the first bricks of the strange liquid) and electro-weak pions, (the debris of electro-weak matter, radiated in the big-bangs (7).

Moreover, the growth of strange particles produced was geometrical, not lineal; and so collisions at higher energy might produce enough strange liquid to form stable strangelets, since at the same time we are revising upwards the production of strange liquid, Chen and Weng from the Shanghai Institute of Nuclear Physics, have proved that quarks lock themselves in triplets that make stable strange liquid with far less quarks than thought before (8); well within the range of energies/masses created by CERN (as energy becomes transformed into mass by Einstein’s famous principle of equivalence: E=mc2 (9).

In that sense, once those liquid droplets reach the limit of the Bohr radius that pack thousands of them, they would fission as all dynamic liquids do starting the so-called ‘ice-9 reaction’ (10) that creates super-novas. Because quantum physicists model those processes with lineal equations, they are unaware of their duality and danger the recreation of the quark-gluon soup implies for the Earth. Since if the process becomes stable – when enough quarks are massed together – their enormous attractive power could keep cracking the atoms of this planet, absorbing its quarks and blowing up their electronic cover in a big-bang that would reduce the Earth to a small quark star, called a pulsar. Quantum physicists do not expect this to happen because the creation of strangelets (the strange liquid of quark stars) require very cold temperatures and since they only measure the heat of the external big-bang they feel confident they would produce less strange liquid in the up to 1000 times stronger collisions that will take place at CERN.

Complex theorists like myself of Mr. Rössler, one of the founders of chaos theory, which have tried to stop those experiments believe the opposite will happen, since the interior will become ‘refrigerated’ as the external radiation increases its temperature, in the manner we have described in this article.

In that sense, the fate of our planet might depend on whose description of the quark gluon soup is more accurate, that of the old lineal equations of quantum physicists or the new, non-lineal, dual equations and chaotic attractors of complexity and color-locked strangelets. Yet the ultimate proof will be experimental evidence, which so far seems to lean in favor of the models of complex liquids. Yours sincerely

Luis Sancho, Complexity theorist.

Endorsed by Otto Rössler, Fractal Theorist ____

Notes:

1 As quoted in the book ‘The particle Odyssey’ by F.Close; 2002.

2 Scientific American 2006 ‘The first micro-seconds’ by Riordan.

3 See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4357613.stm

4 http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/PR_display.asp?prID=1074.

5 ISSS Congresses at Cancun, Sonoma, Tokyo & Madison, 05,06,07,08, which developed a model of unification of sciences, with both arrows of time, energy and fractal information. More at www.unificationtheory.com.

6 Mr Rössler is the founder of hyper chaos theory: see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%B6ssler_attractor.

7 see http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0512112 by Peng Chen and Weng.

8 http://www.mit.edu/press/2010/lhc-results-0208.html

9 Einstein’s Principle of Equivalence between accelerated, curved motions and gravitational masses explains the attractive power of those liquid vortices that accelerate inwards, acting as hurricanes of space-time. It offers in the new physics of fractal relativity an alternative to the quantum theory of mass sponsored by Mr. Higgs, proposed independently by Mr. Wilczek and this author, which unlike the Higgs, is able to explain the different masses of those particles, which are proportional to the rotating speed of those vortices (as it happens with hurricanes that attract more the faster they turn). It also offers an explanation to the origin of physical information in the Universe, carried in the rotational frequency of those vortices and a mechanism to explain how energy becomes mass, as it curls its accelerated motion near the limit of c-speed into cyclical motion=Mass, described by Einstein’s equations: E= Mc2 and E xT=K. From where Mass=K/T= Frequency of a mass vortex.

10 A name taken from Mr. Kurt Vonnegut’s novel ‘cat and cradle’ in which a physicist discovers a liquid that freezes the water of the Earth, extinguishing life; since strange liquid would convert the Earth into a ‘frozen’ quark star; and first mentioned by Wilczek and Wagner in SciAm 99 letters, ‘A little big-bang’. Here you have a video describing the ‘ice-9’ reaction, with a surrealist introduction to the ‘secret cult of physicists’, to the God Shiva and its energy of death (disregard dates, as the machine will not reach the energies required till 2015, after it was decided to go at 1/2 potency for the first years):

 
3 Comments

Posted by on September 29, 2015 in News

 

Earthquakes’ Records

2011: Record in Earthquakes

It is becoming a global trend the growth of earthquakes since CERN started to operate, and so there are constantly new records, as the planet rearranges its delicate balances of magnetic fields every time CERN switches on and off the machine. We shall only bring them from time to time, as earthquakes as dangerous for human lives as they are pale in comparison with the real dangers of global genocide, and we do not want to stress them too much, plus there is always the alibi of  events that cannot be proved completely – though of course a wise gazelle does not come close to a lion even if it is not proved the lion is hungry and will eat her.

23, Dec, 2011.

As today, the machine works at only 4+4 Tev below the theoretical 10 Tev barrier of formation of black holes and heavy quarks,which can trigger a catastrophic event. So the truly dangerous events (condensation of explosive quark liquids responsible of novas and supernovas) have been adjourned till 2015 when the machine is fired at maximal potency. At that point of space-time all information provided with the old dates on the risks of the LHC, will be relevant again as the LHC fires at 14 Tev, and the massive production of Goldstone bosons (aka Higgs), which decay into the heaviest top, bottom and strange quarks, make the condensation of strange-let, bottom-let or top-let explosive liquid (-let meaning liquid), responsible for the creation of novas, supernovas and perhaps quasars, quite probable.

Regarding those delays, they were first due to the fact that despite reassurances by CERN on the impossibility of LHC’s failure, the machine though broke the first week on line. Ever since plans to switch at full power have been delayed once and again till the present date of 2015. This was a extremely positive development for mankind, as the probabilities the LHC could cross at 1/2 potency, at 8 Tev, the ‘threshold’ of establity of dark matter which could signify our extinction (black hole and strangelets), believed to be over the 10 Tev barrier, were not realized.

While power will only double, the reader should notice also that those risks will increase ‘geometrically’ (logarithmically) since there will also be a massive increase of luminosity (statistic number of collisions) and hence a geometrical increase in the chances to produce quark-gluon condensates.

In any case what seems proved is what we considered to be the first signal the LHC is affecting the Earth: a surge on Earthquake activity, which has almost doubled its big earthquakes in the past 4 years. Moreover, statistically the annual minimal happens in the winter period when LHC is closed. So it will happen now in winter, till March 2012, when a new surge will take place.

Update. 11-12 april 2012. 

The 2012 ‘hunting season’ restarted the LHC at higher 4 Tev (8 Tev in the point of collision, still under the theorized 10 Tev barrier of black hole, strangelet and toplet formation). And chronometrically, as in all the previous seasons the occurrence of Earthquakes has jumped. It had plummeted during winter, as the machine rested in peace, but:

– Within hours of the first magnetic ring formation with 4 Tev bunches (26 march) we suffered a >7 earthquake in Mexico. During that first week earthquakes over 6 doubled and we got two >7 earthquakes – the same quantity than in the entire winter, thus an increase over 1000%

– Then last  week, collisions started and within a week there were two plus 8 earthquakes in Sumatra – the biggest events ever outside a fault plate, which is always indication of a man-made cause. A pattern emerges, of minimal activity of earthquakes during CERN’s winter break followed by a year peak as soon as the LHC’s magnetic field and quark matter factory switches on, either producing disturbances on the Earth’s magnetic field or dense dark matter which explodes in its fall to the center of the Earth, provoking cascades of high energy events as cosmic rays do in their atmospheric collisions.

Indeed, the last year, within a week of restarting collisions there was a 9 earthquake in Japan… In previous years the same pattern took place with earthquake peaks in Iran, Chile, etc. Deja vu. But the pattern is incremental, as the LHC increases its regime of energy and density of collisions. So this year overcame last year’s peak at Japan, and it was far more significant, because the outbrake of Earthquakes was global, not only localized in the place of the Sumatran event; and overall it has been the day with the highest number of big Earthquakes on record in the history of this planet.

This means that the LHC, which is the strongest magnetic field of planet Earth, only parallel to the one in the core of the planet is provoking shifts on the magnetic field, whose changes are considered responsible for most Earthquakes. Needless to say the Financial-Military-Industrial system and its P.R. press has ignored the facts. They cannot be proved 100%, only it seems God’s particle will be prove to ‘exist’ with Sigma 3 probabilities, well bellow the standard of serious science.

 

UPDATE – 1st January 2012.

This article was written last year, when 2010 became the year on record with more Earthquakes. 2011 has overcome 2010 in a growing series, which started when the LHC came in line, after repairs, late in 2009:

Richter scale          2009    2010   2011

>9                                  0        0         1

>8                                  1        1         0

>7                                 16      23      19

>6                               144    149     185

>5                              1896   2009   2270

>4                          6805     10358   12992

Notice the extreme growth on earthquakes specially on the middle rage. Essentially the 4-5 series have doubled, an astounding rise that has never occurred and has not even received the slightest explanation. On the contrary due to the growing alarm and serious consequences (life losses), the official disclaimer put above the data simply denies the data – all surges are just ‘statistical anomalies’ according to USGS (Source: USGS.)

LAST DATA UPDATE: 19th August
– In the past month till today, 19th August, the Earth has experienced a total of 9 earthquakes higher than 7 in the Richter scale, when many years there is only 1 each month… Most of them are taking place in the antipodes region of CERN at great depth, showing inner disturbances in the gravitomagnetic fields of the planet.
– The present surge in earthquake and volcano activity might be anthropic. 2010 is statistically the highest year on record on earthquakes for all categories, except for the man-made surge during II world war carpet bombing in 1943.
– If we consider only the statistics for April there is a further surge for 2010. But what has humanity done this April 2010, to create fluctuations in the gravitational and magnetic fields of the earth responsible for magma motions that cause earthquakes? Very simple: we have switched on what is today the strongest gravitomagnetic field on this planet, the Large Hadron Collider.
– Since this machine that could latter in the decade at higher energy/mass produce strangelets (Pb-pb collisions) and black holes (over 10 Tev collisions), is today the strongest gravitomagnetic field on Earth. Since Earthquakes, like avalanches, are released by a butterfly effect, the initial change on the gravitational and magnetic fields of the Earth to trigger the release of the potential energy stored in a fault is minimal, below the power of the LHC’s gravitomagnetic fields.

– There are 3 possible ways in which the LHC can cause earthquakes:
A) If the magnetic field of the magnets drawn above interact with other magnetic fields in the magma.
B)If it made black holes or strangelets that are now in the center of the Earth, slowly eating the planet.
C) If it produces perpendicular gravitational waves,  affecting the antipodes (Tonga, Fidji region), which is reaching a maximal with occurrences at very deep level (over 500 km.)
– A cautionary stop of that machine and serious studies on its effects, which so far have been carried only by employees of the company, is long overdue for obvious bio-ethical reasons, since this year is also on the path to be the peak on human deads caused by Earthquakes. Yet 1/3rd of those deads have yet to materialize.
– If the machine stopped now, we have enough data on this pattern of switching on the LHC and getting a surge on earthquakes to do a serious statistical analysis. Politicians should act now. The costs of the volcano in Iceland for Europe might already exceed the value of this machine… This is no longer a question of science but of public policy. To ignore and censor the truth of the LHC will not change its lethal consequences…

Statistical facts

Number of Earthquakes Worldwide for 2000 – 2010

Magnitude 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
8.0 to 9.9 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 4 0 1 1
7.0 to 7.9 14 15 13 14 14 10 9 14 12 16 16
6.0 to 6.9 146 121 127 140 141 140 142 178 168 142 115

Data till 19 August, 2010

In the US:

Magnitude 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
8.0 to 9.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7.0 to 7.9 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
6.0 to 6.9 6 5 4 7 2 4 7 9 9 4 4
5.0 to 5.9 63 41 63 54 25 47 51 72 85 56 41
4.0 to 4.9 281 290 536 541 284 345 346 366 432 291 371
3.0 to 3.9 917 842 1535 1303 1362 1475 1213 1137 1486 1492 2040
2.0 to 2.9 660 646 1228 704 1336 1738 1145 1173 1573 2374 1786
Total 2342 2261 3876 2946 3550 3685 2783 2791 3618 * 4260 * 4272

Source: earthquake.usgs.gov

The reader should notice that we are still in summer, but the number of top earthquakes has now equalled the maximal of the decade; while in America there have been already more Earthquakes than in any year of the century.

Further on, we witnessed q wave of volcano activity happening mainly in the fractal borders of the Eurasian Plate, where the LHC hyper-magnetic field seats and in the LHC’s antipodal region, Australia and rim islands.

This year is on the road to be the all time highest ‘Earthquake year’ on record since World War II.

Hardly 1/3rd of the year has come by (113 days). Thus if we multiply by 3, the 2010 data, gathered by the US National Center for Earthquake Information (till April 24), we obtain for the whole 2010 year:

A maximal since World War II, for events in the 8 and 7th scale (3, 21; equalling the 1950 record of 24, >7 scale earthquakes), an all time record for the 6th scale (186, overcoming the 183, 1995’s  record); and for the 5th scale (2256 earthquakes; overcoming the 2074 earthquakes of 2007, the previous record).

This is much higher than the average year on record for the century. Only one year in the entire century set a higher record for earthquakes over 7 in the Richter scale: 1943, at the height of the II World War’s massive bombings of the Earth’s crust.

Thus, the 2010 surge is a high growth rate that might not be statistical but ‘antropic’, as the 1943-44 surge was. Since statistical changes happen within certain percentual limits. It cannot be either a geological process that has normally slow geological-time changes. Even global warming has far less steep rates of growth. Imagine we increase by 1/4th the temperature of the Earth in a year…

So it cannot be caused by Global warming either; which has a far slower rate change. Nor certainly by hot women as the press says, ridiculing an Iranian Cleric.

Unfortunately there has been nothing on this planet added this year to the magnetic field, responsible for magma motions, responsible for plate motion, responsible for earthquakes… except the LHC, the new, strongest magnetic ring in this planet. It is thus possible that the new, LHC’s hyper-magnetic ring is disturbing the Earth’s magnetic flows.

Indeed, it is very likely that as in the case of global warming, we are facing a man-made enviromental catastrophe. In that regard it does not seem a coincidence that the 2 years that have registered the maximal number of earthquakes in the century, the 1943-44 period and the 2010 period, are two peaks in human disturbances on planet Earth. In the 1943-44 period global war and massive bombings carpeted extensive regions of the planet. In 2010 we created a machine, whose magnetic field has no equal on the planet…

And yet the press does not report on the LHC experiments anymore, maybe not to cause public alarm. It also downplays the surge on Earthquakes, which is real.

We have so far, 7 top earthquakes:  Solomon Islands (7.1) and Haiti (7) on January; Ryukyu islands (7) and Chile (8.8) in February; and an impressive 3, in April, the month in which the LHC started a continuous run: China (7.1); Tijuana (7.2) and Indonesia (7.7). Further on, the strongest of those earthquakes, in Chile happened within hours of the first succesful proton run at 3.5 Tev…

If the April stats are considered only, 2010 with an annual average of 36, it will even beat the all time record of the 1943-44 period of carpet bombings, which registered a total of 32+23=55 big earthquakes…

A) The LHC  magnetic field.  

The magnetic field within the lhc tunnel. Outside of the beam tubes is still 3 million times greater than the earth’s magnetic field

CERN people adduce that because the gravitomagnetic fields of the LHC are not ‘colosal’, they should not have the energy to provoke earthquakes. But earthquakes only need a ‘butterfly effect’. Simple mine explosions have caused them. Air bombing has caused them… Since the energy of the earthquake is already stored as potential energy in the fault. So you just need a chaotic, butterfly effect multiplied by the fault to release its energy. Earthquakes are in that sense similar to an avalanche. And the LHC has enough potency to be the butterfly…

In the graph we can see how strong those fields are and how they spread outside the ring into the rock formation under the Jura mountains.

We cannot pretend to know exactly how the huge LHC magnetic field is affecting the Earth; as we don’t have reliable maps of the entire Earth’s field. Yet the causality in time is there: we know that any new source added to a magnetic field modifes its structure. In April we introduce a new top magnetic field on this planet and the surge in Earthquakes peaked.

We considered earlier on in the suits of 2008, the possibility that switching on the strongest, fastest turning electromagnetic field on planet Earth would cause gravito-magnetic interactions with the Earth’s field as it always happens when a new pole of forces appears in any field system.

This is basic physics and yet no studies were carried out, no serious reports on safety. And now we are in the statistical peak, all time high for more than a century, on the number of Earth quakes on Earth since the LHC started up its systems.

The first time the machine was switched on, before it blew up in 2008, within a day, 4 big earthquakes over the 6 Richter scale  hit the Earth (6.1 Iran, 11.00:35; 6.6 Atlantic, 13:08; 6.6 Indonesia, 00.00; 6.9 Hokkaido 00:20) . The first one, within seconds of switching on the LHC, happened in Iran and seismologists there wondered if it was related, but being ‘Iran’, it seems the alarm didn’t sound.

So we were lucky and the machine broke down. Then CERN switched it back on and broke the record of any electro-magnetic field anywhere on Earth. A new macroscopic electromagnetic and gravitomagnetic field had been created and it was not on the center of the Earth.  The complexity and sheer variety of paths of those fields makes the hypothesis of interaction and a buttefly effect extremely likely.

While there are other theories to explain the surge of earthquakes, among which, of course we also have a ‘trendy’ explanation based in global warming, all those theories require a longer, geological time-span to cause a surge. Only the LHC is time-related. Since it is this year, precisely when the machine was switched on, when we have a surge in volcano’s activity and earthquakes.

While our knowledge of the magnetic field of the Earth is incomplete to be 100% sure, the statistical correlation is high. For example, this week there were no significant earthquakes for the first time in the month and curiously enough the beam at LHC was not on. When it was put back tenfolding its luminosity during the week-end for 30 hours, Monday first hour at the end of the run, as the graph shows, a 5.7 earthquake and the 6.5 Taiwan earthquake hit.

Then the beam broke (till wednesday) and again the quantity of earthquakes dropped. This pattern has been observed several times.

Like the strange liquid, CERN stated it would never produce, already created in tiny amounts (hyperons), these disturbances of the Earth’s magnetic field are denied or explained with geological cyccles.

Yet any causal argument which uses causes of ‘ geological nature’ needs much longer cycles than an annual variation . An annual variation of the range we start to see (over 25% more earthquakes and volcano activity than any year since records started in 1900) implies a sudden brusque change, caused by a new factor, and the only new factor added to the magnetic fields of earth are the magnets of the LHC and its streams of protons.

Even a graduate student knows that 2 charged coils create an electromagnetic flow ‘out of nothing’. But the LHC is not any simple magnet. It is the strongest, fastest positive charged pole on Earth right now. It can perfectly interact with any magnetic ring inside the Earth and provoke a flow that changes the distribution. Most of the first earthquakes happened in the border of the Eurasian plate, from Haiti in the parallel North American plaque, with a direct line from CERN.

Cern is uder Geneva,  in a zone of soft subduction, which means the effect is spreading first in the Eurasian plate. The Eurasian soft subduction zone goes down all the way to Sumatra, through Iran, Afghanistan and South China, all those zones are where more Earthquakes have occurred.
Australia on the other hand is the antipodes.

Since the most likely cause are gravitational waves, which extend perpendicular and parallel to an accelerated ring of mass, moving at relativistic speeds, the maximal effect should be produced in the borders of the eurasian plate (parallel waves) and the antipodes (perpendicular waves). And this is indeed the case. Most earthquakes and volcano activity happened on the borders of the Eurasian plate or  in the antipodes: Australia is having its record year of quakes with happenings in Adelaide and the Kalgoorie mines; and the islands of the pacific also have a record year (Solomon, Samoa, etc.)

The Iceland volcano is exactly in the Atlantic ridge that separates our plate and North America.

Starting in CERN the soft subduction zone becomes the ridge of the plate which first passes through the south of Spain, where they have the strongest earthquake in decades a few days ago, and then branches north to Iceland where we have volcanoes erupting and continues into the North-American plate through the Caribbean, where a recent earthquake has destroyed Haiti.

So CERN might be causing the present disruption of the plates.  But what can possible do CERN?

As we predicted in this web many wrong things that could now be the cause of this steep change in Earthquake rates.

B) CERN might have created already a black hole or other form of dark matter, including different type of strange liquids that have collapsed in the center of the Earth into a stable seed that is now growing, eating up the Earth and causing Earthquakes.

Cern doesn’t know if this is the case and does not comment on it, but it might be the case.

Both a micro-black hole, neutral, stable might have fallen into the Earth.

Or dibaryons, stable strange liquid might have fallen. After all RHIC already produced drops of strange liquid, hyperons (its basic usd atom) and kaons, the first ‘strange particle’ discovered. It lived so much that scientists said it ‘would be as if Cleopatra was still dying of the asp bite. This strange long-living ultra-dense quark liquid, or ‘strangelet’ might be falling to the Earth, accreting matter and exploding.

All those possibilities mean that the process of extinction of Earth might have started, might even be already irreversible if a stable strangelet or black hole are on Earth’s center.

C) The gravitomagnetic field

There is though a second cause that might bereversible, if Earthquakes are caused merely by the magnetic activity or the LHC, by the mere fact of being switched on, not by the particles it creates but by the LHC ‘gravito-magnetic waves’.

CERN has created and it is working with the strongest new ring of gravitomagnetic forces on Earth, comparable to that of the Earth’s center. The LHC is the first machine of planetary effects due to the extreme force of its magnetic, accelerating mass fields.

 Moreover in the modern models of fractal relativity gravitomagnetic forces connect the 2 space-time membranes of the Universe:  the electromagnetic membrane of quantum particles and the gravitational membrane of space-time. This membrane, which defines the space position of the Earth’s atomic masses could wobble and start the butterfly effect of an Earthquake.

The equations of gravito-magnetism have been thought of since Einstein and there are models of them even in Wikipedia.

A gravitomagnetic wave is produced by a massive c speed charged ring, which is self-similar to a Kerr-singularity, a c-speed ring or black hole.  Thus the LHC circle is a new 27 kilometers positive gravit0-magnetic pole, whose gravitational waves can affect the gravitational or magnetic field of Earth.

As the graph shows any gravitational wave would produce a motion in space-time and the particles laid over it, which can trigger the butterfly effect of an earthquake.

Any good geophysicist with some scientific flair could find 100 ways in which that machine, its magnets and the 27 km. c-speed ring of charged protons can interact with the messed magnetic fields on earth, creating disturbances in the magnetic and mass-fields of the Earth.

 Dead toll and public policy

 

 In the graph, we can see that barely 1/3rd into the year the death toll is enormous. It might become the deadliest year on record.

Yet the press applies once more the LOL Method and focuses in an Iranian cleric that says earthquakes are caused by women’s clothing.

When will the media start thinking beyond the limited horizon of the past and look at the future of nuclear energy being created right now in CERN?’

We need to begin an argument about the destructive consequences of this machine, whose regimes of energy and particles this planet cannot stand.

When will scientists and technocrats acknowledge that they have made an error, that the LHC is not a giant leap for mankind as the German CEO of this company said, but a giant leap backwards for sustainability in this planet.

I imagine for politicians must be very difficult to acknowledge they have wasted 10 billion $USD, but that is a bargain for what it will ‘really cost’ the LHC:

If as it seems the LHC is related to the surge of earthquakes and volcano activity the costs of the damages this machine is causing far exceeds its value; if we talk of human lives there is no way to calculate the enormous cost.

Many lives and an enormous chaos and financial cost is already ascribed to this wave of earthquakes. Yet the events of the LHC have not even started, as the ring is at minimal potency…

How many more people have to die before our politicians act up?

Update, 20th November. Latter in the Year the quantity of Earthquakes stabilished during the last months of the run with protons.

It has increased though after the starting of hadron collisions, specially in europe where a swarm of Earthquakes is affecting the subduction zone to the East of CERN seat.

A swarm of tremors on the 3-4 Richter scale in Eastern Europe and the 5th scale (+40 consecutive Earthquakes) in the hot spot of Aden has been happening since CERN started ion collisions in bunches (the earlier sunday collision was just for the press, with a single bunch, not statistically significant). This might be caused by the creation of strangelets that fall undected and explode in the Moho, transition barrier, the point in which as all transitions barriers it is more difficult to cross, without changing the properties of matter. This implies a possible chain of small explosions of strangelets in the Moho barrier. Further down, the strangelet will find a next barrier to growth in the Lehman discontinuity that should however affect a wider region from depth and width, an entire plate, either the European or African Plate.

The astounding cluster of 45 earthquakes in the hot spot of that plate at Aden never recorded in history, at the end of the european fault, where CERN lies – a normally quiet fault – shows again that some strange phenomenon might be affecting the Eurafrican plate. And that something extraordinary can only be CERN, because nothing extraordinary apart from CERN’s magnetic ring has happened on Earth. So CERN’s activity remains one of the most likely explanations of this unusual phenomena, convincing enough to take precautory measures immediatly.

Our scientists, burocrats and military should accept that the Industry of Quark Cannons is the most dangerous industry today in planet Earth and regulate once and for all this machine and future Accelerators. The absurd presumption that the LHC is NOT a powerful weapon that might be disturbing at best the magnetic field of Earth and at worst producing a ‘likely’, constant spill of different forms of dark matter doesn’t hold in scientific grounds. If we lived in a civilization in which Human Life truly mattered CERN should stop now till the previous swarms are clarified. If the swarm of 3 to 5 earthquakes happening in the Convergent Plate boundaries around the key ‘tap’ of the Old Continent, the weak Arabian Plate, are being pounded by explosions of dark matter, it is possible that a Volcano is on the making in the Aden region…

UPDATE. 2012: The day the Earth stood still.

   

The day after: during the cascade surge of the 11-12th of April 2012, the Earth suffered the highest number of >5 earthquakes events in recorded history.

Moreover several facts point out to a human made causes of ‘global’ proportions:

– We registered the two strongest Earthquakes ever outside a fault line. Yet earthquakes outside fault lines can only have human causes, NOT geological ones.

– The distribution of events was NOT only localized around the >8 huge events off the Indonesian coast, but evenly distributed in several regions of the Earth:

– The reader can observe there were the days before four >5 events along the South Atlantic ridge.

– Then there was the cluster of Sumatra with two >8 outside the fault lines.

– A series of >5s surrounding Australia.

– Another clusters along the Japanese and Alaskan coast.

– In America, both in the west coast there was a huge surge from Mexico to Seattle and several smaller happenings within mainland, where Earthquakes have more than doubled since the LHC went online in 2009. – And there was signifcant activity in the borders between Eurasia and Africa…

This abundance of Earthquakes in non-fractal zones requires a human cause. But the wide distribution, which affected the entire Earth’s magnetic field implies a global one. And the potency of many of them implies an important disturbance.

Because the only new event that could affect globally the Earth, with no significant changes in astronomical parameters, has been the first collisions at the LHC after the long break of winter, in which earthquake activity dropped drastically, the most likely hypothesis is that LHC’s new energy records are the cause of those disturbances, either because:

– They might cause general disturbances on the magnetic fields of the Earth, as it is the biggest magnetic field after the one in its center, and magnetic fields when created interact and reorder those that surround it; and even more likely:

–  The events are due to the creation of high density dark matter – the possible formation of a proto-strangelet or black hole, which exploded on its fall to the center of the Earth, triggering a cascade of high energy events, in the same manner that the explosion of particles of high energy in the atmosphere (cosmic rays), provoke a ‘cascade’ of high energy events. This means that as the LHC keeps pumping up its energy power, doubling it in 2015, the creation of a stable black hole or strangelet (a direct function of its mass-energy, which stabilizes them), is a growing increasing possibility, which would mean the end of this planet in its present form.

– To notice also that a pattern is emerging, as last year the LHC also went online after the winter break days before the Japanese massive Earthquake. Yet the interests of the Nuclear Industry at stakes in this experiments makes very unlikely that the cause of this peak of Earthquake activity part of a general surge that has doubled Earthquakes since the LHC went online will be even considered by big science and the global media that protects the new religion of our technocratic civilization – the machine of ‘God’s particle’.

The record day of earthquakes ever. 12th April, 2012

Today we got the biggest Earthquake in history outside a fault, within a week of restarting collisions at the LHC, as we got the biggest Earthquake in Japan last year… within a week of restarting. Today though was a bit frightening. Two eights, one seven, two six, unaccountable fives… and in different regions of the world: In the Atlantic midrange, in the American west coast, in the Indian basin…

It was the day of maximal activity of Earthquakes, ever, in history. “This is the largest earthquake that hasn’t happened on one of the main plate boundaries ever.

The previous largest was between Australia and New Zealand 15 years ago and back in 1957 in Mongolia.”

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/why-earthquake-did-not-cause-a-tsunami-20120412-1wvik.html#ixzz1roQmSSvo

So that’s the point. Earthquakes don’t happen in non-fault places unless they have an extra-ordinary man-made cause… as it was the case of the surges during II world war or when mine detonations caused them.
What caused not one, but two 8 plus biggest earthquakes outside a plate zone? What did man do?
What kind of effect man could have done that altered the magnetic balances of the Earth?
Ah, you know; there was also a surge on this web, as someone put its name in reddit… on the section conspiration theories. Since there is no absolute causal proof that CERN activity increases earthquake activity on Earth.
Of course… humans are very self-assured that what they do is always right. To deny the ‘wishful thinking’ and egotrip of the over powerful Nuclear Industry and their research on the particle of God, you would need an absolute type of proof… which is impossible, since all human proofs come from our limited minds and limited IQ and limited data.
Since as Haldane put it:
‘Only the Universe knows all the information about yourself’. And so you can never have an absolute proof. Witness the case for the absolute proofs of Euclidean mathematics, gone with the wind in a single stroke… of a tiny Non-E point…
So you are always working with possibilities but wise species, who want to live long don’t test possibilities related to death.
This, the theme of this post, we shall illustrate with different languages, parables of nature, history and the equation of death…
The parable of the lion, the gazelle and the hyena.
The gazelle doesn’t wait to see if the lion is just having a walk of flexing muscles for the hunt. Most times in fact, the lion is having a walk, but she races away any-way.
What the instinct of the gazelle tells her is that whatever the probability of a hungry lion or dark matter particle, one day the lion king will walk to hunt and then if you have not distanced yourself from it, you will be swallowed.
But there is an animal on the savanna that has a different view. It is called the hyena. It laughs a lot to these matters, and it shares its territory as queen of the savanna or so she thinks with the lion. The hyena is not good food and the lion rather passes on it. But the hyena thinks this is because the lion is scared, lazy, a nobody. And so often a childish hyena who wants to show off to the herd that she can boss bothers the lion in the territorial border. I saw once those images filmed at night, when the hyena thinks it has some advantage.
She comes once and again and again and the lion rests, disturbed in their dreams of wide open, manly hunts of gracile gazelles and tasteful food under the sun. And then when the Hyena wakes him up the fourth time, the lion races not to eat but to punish, and within a whisper the hyena is dead. And the folks who were so enthusiastic looking at her champion to see if finally they came on top of the king of the jungle… quietly go away, the balance is restore, and only a corpse soon retired by the ants – those eusocial beings that are queens of the next fractal scale do with them.
Yesterday was the second run. The first at 3.5 didn’t wake up the lion; this one at 4 seems to have bothered it. But we h.h. human hyenas want to wake up the lion and show off we are macho men. So now we are going around as the images show every time the hyena triumphed, claiming, you see, the lion is a weakling, nothing to worry about, with the chorus of laughs of the rest of the herd.
The third time will be in 2015, when the machine truly starts up, 7 years after its P.Rs said it had been put on and the lion-king of the Universe, the ‘quark liquid condensate’ responsible for strangelets,
Novas and other explosive runaway reactions, being probably a black hole a top quark star or ‘toplet’… will have a serious chance to wake up. Will then the youngish hyena that wanted to defy the leader of the pack, Mr. Einstein, whose equations show black holes don’t evaporate, win the battle. And if not, where she will run? Ah, maybe she has found as Hawking claims travel backwards in time (where his black holes evaporate:), or perhaps as CERN claims in his opera-tic ‘solo’ it will run faster than light, where Mr. Einstein’s lions can’t.
As CERN used to say of the chances of black hole formation, before we sued them for potential genocide… unlikely (which statistically means in science a 10% of chances – a 10% x 7 billion= 700 million genocide in insurance terminology… that’s what LHC means and does, even if we survive its lions… but that ethical point of view, of course, is not even bothering the present selfish, ego-centered human, so we shall not insist on it).
Of course we will never be able to prove that Earthquakes are caused by CERN’s interference with the magnetic fields of Earth. When even geologists can’t truly understand why most Earthquakes happen, but there are enough causal relationships. 4 years of increasing statistics since CERN went on, a massive surge when is switched on, the lowest statistics when it is switched off; magnetic fields cause earthquakes; CERN is the biggest magnetic field on Earth aside from the planet’s core; man-made Earthquakes are possible and the previous peak were the carpet bombings of II world war.
Surprisingly enough the surge of 1943 is not discussed. It was caused by the American bombing of the islands of the ring of Fire in the pacific. Why then nobody considers the probability that LHC’s magnetic ring is causing disturbances? Why nothing happens? Why not expert talks? Why USGS warns that the anomalous growth in earthquakes might be an statistical anomaly?

Spring 2015:Earthquake Wave

0,,18484313_404,00

We said we wouldn’t update the earthquake record and we have kept the promise, but as CERN has made a huge upgrade on his machine, we felt compelled to monitor this in crescendo record on every big switch on/off moment of the LHC. And indeed:

Four major earthquakes and volcano activity all over Japan happened last week, as LHC ramps up for the first experiments at 13 TEV.

Update, May, 2015. And so we are here again in this Chronicle of a foretold death, as the LHC starts its tests at double potency but still at minimal luminosity (very few bunches of particles) and only with light particles (protons, not yet lead ions). And so we are again at record high in earthquakes.

As if all the ‘events’ happened during the first run, tabulated in the old article, which set a series of records in earthquakes not seen since the carpet bombing of the pacific ring of fire in II world war, were not enough… a new series of massive earthquakes are taking place, as the second strongest magnetic ring on Earth (the LHC) gets again on line.

Kathmandu was an 8.1Ms[2] and a maximum Mercalli Intensity of IX (Violent) earthquake, happening as soon as the LHC started their first disturbances on the magnetic field on Earth, going on line around a month ago. It was the worst natural disaster to strike Nepal since the 1934. Hundreds of thousands of people were made homeless with entire villages flattened, across many districts of the country. Centuries-old buildings were destroyed at UNESCO World Heritage sites in the Kathmandu Valley,

A major aftershock occurred on 12 May 2015 at 12:51 NST with a moment magnitude (Mw) of 7.3.The epicenter was near the Chinese border between the capital of Kathmandu and Mt. Everest. And this curious fact – that hundreds of alpine tourists – those ‘i have done it all’ sport dilettantes of the western circus which like to say they have climbed the sacred mountain, were there granted it bit more of attention than the series of earthquakes ‘climbing’ the statistics of the last run of the LHC, which coincidentally happened when Haiti and Chile and Japan’s earthquakes hit the world.

Now we have again in Japan, 4 major earthquakes within a week with a final massive earthquake, an 8.1, on the depths of the sea, which makes the link with LHC more direct, since those disturbances, which should affect the magnetic field of the Earth, whose minute changes are the cause of earthquakes, must happen at certain depths. It was thus a very deep earthquake and for that reason  there were less number of victims. But we are playing with fire. The same earthquake happening in nearby Tokyo of that magnitude would have provoked the biggest catastrophe of XXI century in terms of material damages.

In any case statistics tell us that since the LHC started back its magnetic ring, we are again on record highs on the number of Earthquakes and the last long month (40 days of tests and going stronger), is an absolute spike on the number and strength of earthquakes since the facility had closed. Do you want a better correlation?

1) Earthquakes are caused by magnetic disturbances on the Earth’s magnetic field.

2) Magnetic disturbances in any magnetic field are provoked immediately after a new magnetic field is created and the magnetic system realigns itself.

3) The LHC is the biggest magnetic field when we combine its strength, length and time in operation after that of the Earth.

4) When the LHC starts up again within a short time period huge earthquakes happen.

This simple casual and factual correlation is almost an Aristotelian syllogism: ‘all men are biped, I am a man, I am biped.’ That is the simple truth. And then I look myself in the mirror for the experimental truth, and yes, I see myself as a biped.

‘Earthquakes are caused by magnetic disturbances on Earth’s field. The LHC is a magnetic disturbance on the Earth’s field. The LHC causes earthquakes. And then we look at the data, and yes, there are earthquakes. So that is the simplex truth.

Then it comes the rhetoric ‘arguments’  to deny the obvious. ‘But you can actually walk on all..  fours, just use your hands’, kind of arguments.  Yes, there are human dogs, freaky BDSM players and… cynics, those Greek philosophers that were called dogs because they rejected wealth, made love on the streets and barked at anyone who criticized them. Shivaites also can argue that the God of death has 6 hands and can walk on more fours; Cernies seem to be in that sense closer to the beast than the human being, for their absolute indifference to the life of mankind. But they are not the species. Any human with some morals and some self-respect is a biped. Any scientist with some understanding of the issues involved here and some morals will agree the LHC is a dangerous doomsday machine that provokes earthquakes and might provoke the ultimate earthquake, the crushing of the entire earth’s mantle.

Science is based in statistical analysis of probabilistic events, which accumulate casually. Those are the proofs of modern science. Truth is never absolute as truth requires all the information of an event or species, which is only carried by the species itself (see 10D article, section III< to understand the meaning of truth and theory in complex sciences). But wise species act on the future according to those likely to happen events.

A Gazelle runs when it sees a lion even if there is only a slight probability it will eat her (depending on how long the lion ate last time, which diminishes chances of an attack and how many other gazelles are on the savanna). All measured the chances a lion eats the gazelle are for a mean pack of thousands of them, within the slot of time she is close to the lion, very small, but the gazelle runs. The relationship between the LHC and the surge on Earthquakes is on those basis has enough probability to grant a halt to its operations, the more so when we all know the fundamental discoveries it must achieve, the ‘Higgs hoax’ are behind us. The life and property of millions of humans, mostly Asians in the faults around the ring of fire are the lives of those gazelles. 

But of course, nothing is being done. If there is a truism about modern neo-fascist Europe is its total indifference – as it has always been the case throughout most of its history – for the life of the rest of human races, very often termed as ‘sub-humans’ (this of course today cannot be said, but in the two countries that run our continent and are also running the LHC – France, where the fascist front is winning elections and Germany with its renewed nationalism, headed by a ‘physicist’, that is the present mood).

In this world of political correctness neofascism thrives behind the scenes. So the Europeans always say they care so much for life and human rights and the 3rd world – as long as it doesn’t come home. So, alas, the continent has no major fault lines, so the earthquake wave never will hit them and that is enough to ignore any possible causality. The facts though are there and they are reported ‘coldly’. The German press writes: “Last Saturday’s 8.1-magnitude earthquake was the fourth major seismic event to strike Japan in one week, suggesting that a period of relative stability in the tectonic plates beneath the country has come to an end.’ Of course zero remarks anywhere of a possible connection with the jewel of the high-tech german industry (the LHC). Instead our expert tell us that:

“The point is that the Japanese islands have been extraordinarily quiet for the last half-century or so, meaning this could very well simply be a return to a normal situation,” he told DW. “I wouldn’t say I have no concerns, but we can’t be too concerned.”
“The problem is that the science of volcanoes and earthquakes is still not well understood, so it is impossible at the moment to say whether these separate incidents are connected or if it is merely coincidence,” he added. So, now we are preparing what political correctness has baptized today as ‘the new normal’. Drones killing children are ‘the new normal’. Earthquakes ruining nations are ‘the new normal’. Death in brief is ‘a new normal’.

Consider the tragedy on the Mediterranean, the ‘new normal’ of European solidarity with the 3rd world, and their ‘caring policies’. Of recently we cared so much for the ‘sub-humans’ – you know Islam, negroes and the like –  that we cancelled all rescue operations of immigrants fleeing the yihad wars of northern-Africa and Syria and let them sink in front of our eyes on the Mediterranean – the spaniards went so far in Ceuta that the police actually shot blank range the ‘negroes’ that were trying to grasp the boats before sinking – none of those policemen had been indicted. It is the ‘new normal’ of course.

And there is also as in all P.R.ess releases of CERN’s experiments a ‘rationale’ to it, provided by the British, the 3rd ‘theoretical backer’ of the doomsday machine, national experts in convoluted hypocritical arguments for the sake of money and imperial glory. Cameron explained us that Operation Triton – to let them sink on the ocean was in fact a caring operation. We did this because by sending the ‘message’ that we will let them sink into the depths of the Ocean, we were dissuade them to stay home and die there. This ws the hypocritical convoluted way of thought that started operation triton – a nice name for the god of the depths of the sea where they will sink and die – we, Europeans, mind the reader invented civilization, we are mind the reader above all those ‘racist, ignorant americans’ because we have always references to ancient mythologies, Shiva statues, etc. ‘death with art’ you might say, from bullfighting to scientific con-cerns.

We let die people for their own good. That is the concept. We do not kill them. We just create the conditions for them to die. We provoked the economic and political conditions with our banister capitalism, our military backing of dictators, our wars on the spot, so the people of the ‘South’ have two choices: die at home of hunger and repression or die at the sea and fall in the hands of Triton, while we watch them sink in the water without rescue. Those are the eternal morals of the Europeans, specially, the French-German coalition – both nations at a new high of national pride not seen since the Nazi age. The pride of France is its Nuclear Industry – the biggest of the world, with Areva, CERN, ITER and the highest proportion of electricity anywhere made by nuclear plants. The ‘dark horse’ of course being the German engineers. (So Areva is really Siemens’ nuclear department and CERN, despite being in France is nurtured by german physicists) .

Yes this sounds all demagogy and topic germ(an) bashing. But unfortunately some nations never learn; thus deserve eternal bashing. Germans have destroyed the world so many times, it is difficult to count them. First there were the ‘People of the Sea’, then the ‘Barbarians’, next Luther and its fundamentalist hordes; again they were at it in the 30 years war. Frederick the great came next massacring the poles. And they were at it again ‘unifying’ their nation. And then came I world war, and II world war. They have been destroying Europe every century since they ended renaissance wight the ‘sacco di rome’. So now in the XXI century they are again at it, both economically with the ECB bank and militarily with CERN. Do you think they understand or care for it? No, according to their mechanical way of thinking, their long ‘sword-like words’ full of absolute false truths, impossible to bend, according to their non-thought, always action, point of view, this robotic, mechanized inhuman species is always right and if you do not agree, you have two choices kill them or die. That is their game. If you want a german not to do something, stop him by force. Do not reason with him. He has the most primitive European language, the only ‘ergative’ one, that is where the object comes before the subject, that is, where the machine is more important than the human being – unless he is German of course.And now the French are competing with them to be also ‘trou noirs’ – french word which means both ‘asshole’ and ‘black hole’.

One wonders in that sense, what would have happened to the LHC if it were not Tokyo or Kathmandu, but Paris and Berlin, the cities on the fault lines. If the 9 and now 8 earthquakes didn’t happen on the east pacific but nearby Lyon and Hamburg. I bet the causality then would be proved, just in case.  But the deaths of Kathmandu are too remote – those write in sanscrit script. And you know, we are very civilized, we already have the God Shiva at the doors of the LHC to make the Indians happy. Those faults are not our fault. As long as ‘Operation Shiva’ happens at ‘distance’ our moral seems to be protected.

You know we are saving lives letting people sink impaled into the trident of triton, crashed under the foot of Shiva.

And it is all for our wonderful civilized Europe. We are discovering the meaning of the Universe according to Physicists simplex concept of time as entropy and death…. of others – those which physicists’ weapons have always killed.

One thing though is also a truism about the Universe. It is all action-reaction. At the end it is always ruled by a cruel justice. It always comes back to hunt us. But in a big way. When the earthquakes come home, it will be truly the end.

There is no hope then?
Well, as long as we are here, the Europeans might get a change of view. But for that to happen, they have either to suffer an accident of ‘nuclear proportions’, or other nations will have to protest enough for them to back.

After all Operation triton was cancelled a few months ago, after thousands of ‘sub-humans’ die, and the rest of the world noticed that behind the hypocritical attitude of the European 3 leading nations who plotted the massacre and are also behind CERN, Germany, France and the UK, there was a blatant racism, and an utter despise for human life. US, UNO, the Pope, and all kind of humanist organizations protested and so when the ‘little secret’ of operation triton became ‘vox populi’ neo-fascist Europe changed discourse.
This week alone the Italians have saved 5000 lives on the seas.

Mr.Cameron of course is making rounds on European nations asking for changes in immigration policies and military intervention to destroy North African boats (which of course are also used for fishing and live hood), blackmailing continental Europe with a Britexit if they don’t act, to deaf ears, i must say. And the Germans and French are refusing to host the immigrants – so the spirit has not changed but lives are being saved.

So if the world would have protested the LHC and the earthquake waves perhaps the Europeans would have also changed their mind about the stupidest science project ever deviced on planet Earth. But this is not happening.

This was of course, the rational behind our suits in America, given the fact that European Courts and the Genocide court at La Hague would not admit them here. They told to my lawyers that they only ‘judged’ genocides after they had happened…

Europeans with all their snobbish sense of cultural superiority are far dumber than gazelles. It seems. They have to put their head inside the mouth of the lion and investigate its teeth, before they realize it actually can cut their heads.

The Guardian

Wednesday 10 June 2015 16.54 BST
0ecaab87-2ec9-43e8-bb01-53bbf1af96d8-620x372
Mount Kinabalu in the
state of Sabah, Borneo island, where 16 climbers lost their lives.

Wednesday 10 June 2015 16.54 BST

Earthquakes caused by nudity, short skirts, gay marriage and other scapegoats
The recent Malaysian earthquake was blamed on a group taking naked pictures on a sacred mountain. At least it wasn’t the ‘fault’ of gay people for once…
Natural disasters are, by definition, natural. Which might lead you to assume they are one of the few areas of life in which no one is at fault. Not so, according to some in Malaysia who blamed last week’s earthquake – in which 16 climbers died – on a British woman posing naked for pictures at the top of the country’s highest mountain. The peak is sacred, and the spirits were supposedly angered enough to unleash tremors of a 6.0 magnitude. The woman has been arrested along with three men and her lawyer has requested they are held separately amid fears for their safety.  “When promiscuity spreads, earthquakes increase,” he warned.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on June 1, 2015 in News

 

Italian fault

Screen Shot 2016-10-30 at 09.10.46.pngscreen-shot-2017-01-13-at-17-14-41

Update. October 28. 2016.

The LHC as expected keeps breaking records of energy and luminosity in its magnetic field, the strongest on Earth after the one on the core. Changes in magnetic fields on Earth cause earthquakes. The LHC seats on the head of a system of Alpine faults that crosses the Italian Peninsula, where as expected a record year of Earthquakes happens as we speak.

3 consecutive +6 Earthquakes on the Italian fault are not on record in thousands of years of history of the Italian peninsula.

Moreover, CERN systematically does a short of fracking throughout the peninsula: a redundant experiment to prove that neutrinos oscillate, since a Japanese team have already proved it, watching the sun’s neutrinos.

This is a pattern we often brought about in the suits – there is always an astronomical alternative with no danger and cheaper to the industry of accelerators which should therefore cancelled because of its dangers and redundancy: all the big bang experiments at CERN can be done in astronomy by watching directly the big-bang with telescopes.

They are better experiments because they have no risk, and because astronomers do study the real big-bang, not a faked one on EARTH with all its dangers and null experimental value (it is just a ‘big bang’, not the big-bang, as it was but a simulation).

The same goes with the Sasso’s neutrinos – it is far more telling to study the sun’s neutrinos, which do have a larger trajectory to calculate its oscillations.

Now for good measure, as so few dare to explain the truth about any CERN’s risk, we quote from wikipedia:

“In 1984, a 10-kilometre (6.2-mile) tunnel was bored through the Gran Sasso Massif. In 1995, a second parallel tunnel was completed. Construction of the tunnel included an underground particle physics laboratory at Assergi, the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso or Gran Sasso National Laboratory.

The laboratory is composed of three large underground chambers and lies beneath 1,400 metres (4,600 feet) of rock. Construction of the laboratory and second tunnel faced fierce opposition from Italian and international environmental groups including Pro Natura, LIPU and Club Alpino Italiano as well as the World Wildlife Federation and WWF Italia, Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth. Environmentalists noted that the nuclear physics laboratory would lie on or near two major and highly active seismic faults. The underground laboratory is used for experiments in particle and nuclear physics, including the study of neutrinos, high-energy cosmic rays, dark matter & nuclear decay. The LNGS was the destination of the neutrinos involved in the faster-than-light neutrino anomaly publicly announced in September 2011. The opposition created by the tunnel and laboratory construction galvanised the Italian environmental movement, leading to the creation of the Parco Nazionale del Gran Sasso in 1991.’

Update. 20 Jan. 2017

(one of those ‘quid pro quo’ our hypocritical world loves so much to disguise eviL=anti-Live actions – we murder you ‘anonymously’ in absurd wars, but hey!, your widows will get a medal in a trumpeted ceremony; we bury a ‘dark matter’ lab one mile below a very nice advertised ‘Parco nazionale Gran Sasso e Monti dela Laga’ for all eyes to see, problem is just as we speak 30 people are buried death exactly above that lab):

screen-shot-2017-01-19-at-15-08-33

Now of course, i know i shouldn’t be putting this graph on here, because we must ‘respect’ the dead, after we might kill them. And on top murder at distance is the rule of the land… we are presumed to be innocent till it is not proved. But those ‘hang ups’ of wrong human sentimentalism do not change the fact those 30 people are dead and buried above a facility of an industry, relic of the cold war that should not exist.  You do NOT build facilities to study dark matter and receive neutrino waves of which we know near to nothing on its ‘wave effects’ on the fields of Earth over a fault. Humans though seem happy destroying the world, as long as they are not blamed of it, in and can find fairy tales about the ‘inevitability of the process’.  Fact is Italy has reached statistically a record in Earthquakes the last year and as it is the oldest European culture there are consistent records for two millennia. And statistics are proofs in science so here there is an statistical correlation. And only one possible reason: either the neutrino wave or the experiments at CERN with the second strongest magnetic field on earth in terms of ‘length and power’, after the center of the planet, is destabilizing the fault. Things never happen by chance. Statistical correlations do imply a cause-effect. We do not claim to know the in-between pattern:

gravitomagnetic_inductiondece4155baIn the graphs the length and power of the magnetic field at CERN, makes it the only ‘macroscopic’ closed magnetic circuit on this planet that can influence the Earth’s magnetic field, whose changes, we know are responsible for Earth’s earthquakes. The alibi of CERN as that of physicists and corporations is always the same: we are not directly responsible. If weapons kill, never mind we made them – it is the military.

The correlation though is strong: whenever CERN switches on, within hours a major earthquake has happened in some other place, and since the lab is exactly at the head of the Italian faults, it is not surprising that the biggest statistical increase on Earthquakes on Earth has happened in Italy. Now, we can’t expect ‘experts’, whose live hood is in the business of nuclear physics ever to recognise all this, neither the common people, who by definition ‘believes in their elites’, whatever they dish out on them, as history shows. In that regard, only the media could rise a warning on all those experiments, reason why once it was evident no court or scientist would dare to defy the ‘experts’ and accept any justification, I did a film on CERN’s dangers, even if i was a scientist, not a documentarist.

After that proofs kept mounting that those dangers were real. Strange physics evolved further on the path of those dangers. The existence of dark strange matter today is considered proved. It is a liquid (strangelet means liquid strange matter), no longer a gas. It is considered to be more stable than iron. Most astrophysicists today believe it is at the core of all pulsars. And after the dismissal of SUSY, the most likely candidate to form the dark matter halo of the galaxy (90% of its mass), as Witten hypothesised when dark matter was discovered first. So all the alibis of CERN (that strange matter does not exist, etc.) are debunked.

But the issues of CERN’s dangers, both local (earthquakes) and global (conversion of Earth into a 3 cm. black hole or 15 km. strange star) are NOT reopened.

screen-shot-2017-01-10-at-21-58-33It is quite astonishing, how the human collective psyche, following Nietzsche’s dictum (insanity in individuals is rare, in groups is the norm), works: a danger appears – let’s say robots taking over as they will probably if we survive CERN – the intellectual elite relizes and denounce them (2oo1 odyssey, terminator, Wiener and the fathers of systems sciences, and theory of information, my speciality – but they make money, they give military power, and the experts that profit defend them as their live hood is on them. So the rest backs off. And only a few rational humans keep speaking up those dangers.

CERN has worked the same way. Nobody will bring the issue – it is closed. It is now considered unavoidable, as military robots, the financial control of our democracies, Brexit or the Italian Earthquakes. It is even unpolite to mention it. The sheeple don’t want to feel bad as its not going to react. The elite only is there to appease people not to solve its problems. The experts will fight for their money till the end. So even something so obvious as CERN’s dangers and so easy to stop, as it just a european, tax-payer facility with no real use, a mammoth of the cold war, keeps going till it murder us all for no reason. Alas, the ultimate alibi being that we humans ‘chosen of god’ cannot die, God will provide and the strangelet will dissolve. Reasoning stops there, because if people would reason, they would freak out and would have to confront CERN. So only when catastrophes happen in a very proved manner, ‘afterwards’, when nothing can be done – specially in this case, they will ‘believe’, as ‘people are slaves, they believe, they don’t reason’. The confort zone in CERN is thus ‘belief’ whatever it takes.

The value of the experiment, global P.R.ess campaigns at 0 cost.

So what is this experiment worth? Nothing.

But of course, it provides hype for the P.R.ess eternal campaign to promote CERN and get the budget going – a field in which the institution is a savvy master. So a few years ago the experiment was all over the news, because alas! it had found that neutrinos go faster than light.

Never mind they have to retract a few months latter: All over the world we had not only the particle of God coming from CERN but also the biggest discovery of XXI c. the end of Relativity theory. CERN, the institution was the new genius, substituting Einstein. Now, big discoveries in ‘science were a question of money and jobs’.

It was indeed double jeopardy: Einstein was wrong both ways:

Einstein, Cern had found shooting neutrino waves along the Italian earthquake’s fault was wrong on Special Relativity (his theory of light), which precluded a constant c-speed for light, the limit of speed in our island-Universe (milky way) filled wit it.

But he was also wrong on his theory of black holes and gravitation (General Relativity); since as we all know because  Hawking has told us without the slightest experimental proof, black holes are time machines that travel to the past, hence evaporate, which is the never proved alibi to make them ‘safe’ if they come out of the LHC.

Never mind all over the Universe when we see one, it follows Mr. Einstein’s sound laws and swallows it all, Reason why we will NEVER PROVE Hawking wrong and Einstein right on black holes MADE AT Earth, because the day they happen we will indeed be dead in no time, as the growing black hole swallows us all.

This I call the ‘Hawking paradox’, which i discussed when i put the suits against the advice of all my scientific colleagues: ‘Luis you will never be proved right. If you are right, we will all die before we know it. If you are wrong they will laugh at you.’ Which I responded always, yes, but that is the ‘military paradox’, whoever can kill you is then right? Or should you denounce it? Well. Only 3 scientists truly did it, which says a lot NOT about the truth of CERN’s statements but the moral standing of Physicists.

However Einstein had it easier. The neutrino-faster-than-light was just a propaganda gimmick. So soon, when the hype receded,  a few months latter we found it was all over again blamed on another of those ‘faulty’ cables, .

The value for Italians: historic earthquake records at ∞ cost.

In any case, the experiment became then a media sensation and of course it kept running to ‘repeat’ the faulty results, and it keeps running with dense beams of neutrinos,  RUNNING through the Italian ‘fault’, likely causing a disturbance, as it is quite rare that the Earthquake’s peak in 2000 years of Earthquake watching across the peninsula happen just when humans decide to run neutrino beams throughout the fault. But of course there is no way to prove it and a physicist will tell you neutrinos hardly interact with matter.

Yes, we know neutrinos in particle state do not easily collide with matter, but we don’t know much of neutrinos in wave state. Theory is not complete; neither tested. For example earlier theories considered neutrinos gravitons, the commonest particle of the Universe, to make up the background gravitational space-time membrane. So neutrinos would be the particle state of gravitational waves and as such they should interact strongly through gravito-magnetic effects with the magnetic field whose changes cause earthquakes. In any case, when a causality is possible science looks at statistics, and statistics show an all time spike in earthquakes through the fault where the experiment is taken place.

So obviously we do have fair signs of statistical causality… And human ignorance on how that causality might be happening does not justify the risks taken. So the question as always with CERN’s experiments is what are the advantages for mankind of those CERN’s experiments compared to the obvious negative effects in life and wealth of a series of Italian earthquakes on the fault over which the neutrino experiments take place? And the answer is none. The experiment merely measures speeds and fluctuations of neutrinos’ waves already measured in other experiments, which renders Sasso’s experiment obsolete.

screen-shot-2016-11-11-at-09-40-15screen-shot-2016-11-11-at-09-48-14

In the graph, the CERN Neutrinos to Gran Sasso (CNGS) project directs a beam of neutrinos from CERN’s facilities to the detector of the OPERA experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory (LNGS), located in the Gran Sasso mountain in Italy” just a mile from the zone where the biggest surge in earthquakes in the entire History of Italy since the Roman Empire is happening in the last years.

The value for science. Anyone can tell me? Please comment on…

Bottom line is both experiments, at sasso and lhc are largely irrelevant. BECAUSE we have already found the ‘Higgs’ and we have proved the oscillation of neutrinos. Even the wi’kids’ have incorporated it:

screen-shot-2016-11-11-at-09-42-09

What’s next?  A 10 billion $ tower to prove that two rocks falling touch the floor at the same time? On view of that surge of earthquakes it would only be logic that the neutrino experiment should be cancelled. Neutrino oscillation has been proved ad nauseam with the same certainty that Mr. Galileo’s balls falling from the Pisa TOWER 400 years ago…

CERN people remind me of the candidates to run the ‘energy department of neo-fascist leader Mr. Trump’, Forrest Lucas and Harold Hamm, two oil moguls of ‘fracking’… They used to advertise their act as ‘big science’. So do CERN with his Sasso experiment. Bottom line though is we have a machine and we shall use it regardless of any effects. And we will always find an experiment to justify our ‘freaky-fracky’ science.

CERN’s ‘business’ is to build big accelerators, regardless of dangers. Because what matters is to spend the money of tax-payers in those big-canons shooting around aimlessly…

Curiously enough CERN’s  CEO is Miss Gianotti, an Italian, which was before the P.R. of the company, showing what is the true expertise needed to run the machine – Public relations to convince clueless politicians on pouring money on it.

She is always congratulating herself for those new records of energy; never mind the possible victims, all mankind. But as it is imposible to prove causality when and if it happens, Physicists at CERN know they are armoured against criticism, with the help of the P.R.ess, its P.R. head and the confidentiality Laws of Silence on the risks.

The machine is our modern God, and cannot be doubted off according to the ethics of…

‘A technological civilisation... is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done if it is technologically possible. If it is possible to construct nuclear weapons, even if they can destroy us all, they must be constructed. Once this principle is accepted humanist values are dethroned and the evolution of the machines becomes the foundation of ethics.’  Eric Fromm 

The alibi of CERN will be always the same:  nothing can be proved about earthquakes and if we die by black holes or strangelets it will be so fast that they will neither be blamed.

But responsible scientists and politicians should weight the pros and cons which are in this case much bigger, and respect human life and cancel those experiments. But alas, nuclear physicists have constructed all the weapons of mass destruction of this planet. So genocide is in their book of ‘deplorables’ they live with. But why we have to with our taxes?

Humans though have always had no qualms to ‘kill at distance’ if they are not seen as responsible.
That is after all what generals do in war and get medals, anonymous corporations do in so many ways  and get rich; so physicists make weapons and deny all responsibility. Murder at distance and don’t feel guilty – we have always done it. Physicists will tell you that they make weapons but it is the military who kills. In this case though, they are doing the shooting to mother Earth. So they should feel responsible.

Record on Italian Earthquakes statistics that go back… to the fall of Rome (to the Gallic lot)
Fact is the machine is ramping up its magnetic field this year again and producing a growing number of lumps of strange matter, exotic pentaquarks with strange ones, dibaryons, the atom of strange matter, and who knows what, as most strange matter is dark, invisible, undetectable,  falling down into the Earth, as soon as it is made up, given its extraordinary weight.
Both events might disturb the upper crust but we cannot prove it. Faults build stress, and can multiply like in a tsunami a small disturbance produced in one extreme, creating a larger wave on the other extreme, as when you thrust a whip that releases all the energy in its tip.

Thus since the 2 main faults of Italy have their origin in the Alps, where CERN sites, and this is the biggest series on historic record, which given the ancient culture of Italy, come back to the last time the Gauls destroyed the nation, when Brennus said ‘vae victims’, in 387 BC when the sacred geese of Juno alerted them on time to defeat the barbarians. No alerts though this time around will stop the neutrinos.

Indeed, the series are top of the list, even higher than the 3 (+6 smaller) earthquakes of 1703 – never mind Miss Gianotti’s eternal smile and enthusiasm shown ad nauseam in all its P.R.ess conferences about the experiment. Might she be so kind to go to Aquila to explain the ‘good news’ of neutrino research?

So the SASSO EXPERIMENT and its neutrino beam ads to the statistical connection of LHC’s switching->big earthquake happening elsewhere within minutes. Again a causal statistical suspicious connection quite straight forward, year after year that none will take serious given the wishful thinking of politico humans…  If something happens and it is good, it certainly I did it; if it is wrong, So when the economy grows all politicos come forward – never mind they have no idea how the economy works. When it is bad, look elsewhere for the fault. But here the fault is crystal clear, runs from Geneva to Aquila along the neutrino beam. The statistics are well proved, chances such correlations happen by ‘chance’ below 1%. 

So to avoid further proof, as the coincidence between switching on, restarting a magnetic field, disturbing the Earth’s field, getting a biggie earthquake was so notorious, becoming a fav ‘confabulation theory’ with people all over the world watching  the public CERN’s schedule, not to provoke further alarm, now CERN no longer is a public ‘research center’ with open data for all to see. So the scheduling became invisible.

CASTOR & Pollux: the dioscuri twins

It was a case similar to the infamous ‘strangelet’ CASTOR detector, who was first ‘Centaurus And STrangelets detecTOR’, BURIED ON Atlas, and discovered by Mr. Penrose at heavyionalert.org. CERN had built a detector of strangelets, but was telling us adamantly that strangelets do NOT exist, against all sound-sound theories of matter.

Why then to build a detector in the center of its machine for something that does ‘not exist’? 

Alas, after we denounce it, magically CASTOR became ‘Center for STORage of data’, and the pics we show on our article were substituted by a huge computer row of big data storage machines. There it lies now invisible the Strangelet Detector, vaporised as their critics without name, lurking on darkness at the head of the italian fault, the invisible neutrino waves cross every other day.

We do know though CASTOR has fired up and shown production of stable dibaryons (usdusd) as per Eric Penrose calculus.

So on the long term, CASTOR will make, its twin risk, those earthquakes a minor con-cern. Do you think our politicos care? Of course not; they know nothing about physics, more or less what they know about economics, so they will let nuclear physicists and banksters, ‘the experts’ do whatever they want to the sheeple, who will sing politely ‘four legs four legs’ we love you all.

Sorry for no being so loving and polite with our ‘experts’. Simply put it, it amazes me that the P.R.ess and our paranoid ‘security states’ do nothing about it. Again a technological civilisation has a dogma, a god, the machine, and dogmas are not even questioned. .

How many more earthquakes and drops of strangelet should happen, before we do preventive action and shut down the machine?

Answer: According to those technological ethics, as many as they might.

The experiment will only end if it ends with us. It seems only then when the planet becomes a strangelet in a Global Earthquake that shrinks mankind into a 15 km. rock, the machine will stop breaking ‘energy records’. What for? No answer. As all the particles it could find have been found. And the machine is only producing ever growing balls of strange quark matter… But the logic of prevention is lost. How many times I have been called a ‘crackpot’, because ‘CERN didn’t blow up the Earth’. They all miss the point. It will blow up the Earth if we keep the industry of accelerators running experiments at ever higher speeds in growing sizes. So anyone who has some grey matter would NOT take the risk. Even if it cannot be blamed when it happens, as we will all be dead. And we as ethic scientists did have to denounce it, even if we would always be blamed ad hominem as when it happens we will be also dead, so in our lifetime it will NEVER happen. This we knew, ethically it was the right thing to do, selfishly it was just a path to ridicule and the end of our scholar careers. And that is why so few scientists have ever denounced CERN.

At the time indeed, I was starting a meteoric career in the field of Systems sciences thanks to my formalism of the 5th dimension, which was being heralded as the biggest thing in time theory since Einstein’s 4th dimension formalism. Then suddenly newspapers said I was a ‘self-styled time theorist’ (-: oh yes i put a smiley at this time and hour; knowing I will die as the official ad hominem crackpot along Walter and Rossler. Who cares? It is an intimate feeling to know you have fulfilled your high ethic and intellectual expectations, even if nobody else does. It is that beautiful parable of perhaps the best novel ever, Karamazov’s brother. Or as Schopenhauer put it: ethics like genius cannot be taught. And cannot be judged on terms of celebrity. Either you have it and help others in silence, either you have it and see and think with a better mirror the wonders of the fractal Universe. But you do NOT communicate. To know wiesen is a silent word.

What is clear is that a 13 billion $ investment will not be shut down for such peccadilloes as a few corpses on the Apenine fault, if it was not shut down on the genocide potential risks that will always exist as long as it is running around its beams. They don’t count corpses at CERN, only particles, as the military says – now that they do the shooting indeed we could consider physicists at CERN part of the industry.

But the P.R.ess must not denounce it. When news about the Italian fault broke a few respectable scientists talked about the Sasso experiment and the faults origin in the alps. Immediately the press talked of crackpots and ‘conspiration theorists’. So people can still not worry, be happy and perhaps die like an idiot’ in the middle of its happy dreams.

Conclusion – The strange zeitgeist of mankind

The Italian fault and the Sasso neutrino experiment happening as we speak for not serious purpose at all except the fact that ‘we can make it’, shows the paradoxical contradictions of the human zeitgeist in the age of the Industrial r=evolution, when the species suddenly changed his intelectual paradigm from worshipping life and mankind, the species that seemed to be the zenith of our organic, living Universe to worship the machine, a primitive organism of metal, which we wrongly believe to ‘invent’ – we merely discover it, and fast evolve it into organic forms.

If we humans at least realised we are evolving ‘organic systems of metal’ and so weapons and bombs will also as robots are about to do reach an organic ‘self-feeding’ structure, which is what the bombs researched at CERN are, we could reason instead of worshipping our machines and weapons and control them. And we say worship not ‘reason’, because the ‘attitude’ of humanity as a species and the way it confronts the mechanical world, with awe and reverence, not with judgment and control, makes all the difference.

‘People are slaves they believe they don’t reason’ said Aristotle, giving up on the capacity of humanity to manage reasonably and sustainably the planet. If humans would reason NOT impose their half truths and statistics, faulty reasoning,, ‘fait accompli’, obsessive ego-trips of mechanical power, wishful thinking and ‘anthropomorphic’ macho-man attitudes, we might have some chances. For example, in the case of CERN at this stage, Higgs found, SUSYs and other exotic flavours nowhere to be shown; with clear hints at growing amounts of strangelet in each new experiment, humans would reason: the new upgrades will only bring higher risks of extinction, and likely not any relevant discovery.

This is a expensive, useless, risky machine whose only reason d’être is the fact that we can make it. So we should be inquiring flatly if we, humans are a rational, intelligent, surviving, mature, worthy, free enough species to do the ‘small effort’ required to press the breaks in a specific technology, the industry of accelerators, whose only ‘sure’ goal is that at a certain threshold of energies it will create a runaway nuclear explosive that will kill us all, or we have created a web of lies and alibis to keep ‘evolving machines at all costs’ for the sake of corporative profit and political power, which makes the process of our likely extinction by machines-weapons due to an excess of energy unavoidable – even if there is no reason at all to die except the routines of making bigger, faster, better mechanisms.

This is my view today after a decade of fighting CERN, the P.R.ess that hides its risks, the politicos that won’t take seriously the issue and the human sheeple who will just watch the world go under and switch channel to an NBA or soccer match not to get depressed. I no longer believe in ‘human freedom’, and ‘intelligence’ as a given. There it seems to be only a shallow surface, a make up of freedom and rationality over an otherwise automaton, action-oriented ‘enzyman’ species, whose only obsession seems to be to catalyse the evolution of those machines, as if nothing else mattered, and no other thoughts or goals in life for the species and the planet made any sense. An obsession so intense that not even the artificial goal of that process will be carried about – the creation of A.I., and robots that would substitute us, (or else there would be robotic life all over the galaxy) – not to speak of the humanist goal nowhere to be seen – a sustainable life world made to the image and likeness of human beings, where machines are ‘selected’ not by their price and profits but by their usefulness to humanity; but instead we walk steadily to the most childish, unwanted but unavoidable ‘finale’ for an irrational, motion-oriented, thoughtless childish ‘entitled’ brat species: accidental death.

Accidents of course are avoidable, but chances that a group of retarded children of thought, playing with a big gun provoke sooner or latter a global accident, shooting randomly around the planet, with no true purpose, are almost deterministic.

And certainly nobody would be blamed, because only humans would be collectively responsible and certainly have done collectively nothing to avoid an end, so easy to circumvent that the mere fact it is happening make us wonder about the null value of a species who does not even extends the hand to grasp the rope that would save it from drowning.

 
5 Comments

Posted by on January 6, 2015 in News

 

bigbang:entropy religion

THE FALSITY OF THE BIG-BANG.

Introduction: The age of entropy

I. Theoretical analysis.

II Experimental proofs.

III. Alternative theory: the fractal Universe.

INTRODUCTION.

ENTROPIC BIGBANG: PUMPING UP THE HUMAN EGO

Abstract. Why mankind is so enthusiastic about CERN, if it can kill us all? The question no longer can be explained only in terms of CERN, as the entire humanity has sided with the concept that the Universe is so simple that it was born of a brutish explosion; despising both its complexity as a fractal of information, and its force as an entropic ‘monster’ able to erase completely the ‘homunculus’ race – ‘a mush in a rock, lost in a corner of the Universe’.

The element of our inquire then must also take into account the astounding simplicity and egocentrism of our species, who is extremely low in Iq, extremely high in vanity, and certainly very dextrous in its capacity to assembly machines, but tremendously limited in its capacity to ‘think in rational terms’.

There is in that regard a fundamental quality of humans: they cannot reason at the same level they can work with machines. As Einstein a master of thought experiments and one of the exceptions to this rule put it: ‘it is clear that our technology has greatly overcome our humanity’.

And nowhere is this so evident as in the analysis of the ultimate ‘philosophy of science and the Universe’ established by physicists, whose technology has greatly overcome their capacity to reason.

In that sense

The answer is our belief in the entropic big-bang and other ‘ego-centric’ theories of reality, which simplify the Universe to fit it into equations of mathematical physics that have converted physicists in the new ‘high priests of knowledge’, to which all is allowed. But do really they Understand the universe?

Let us consider a wider point of view from the perspective of those humble alternative theories, developed in the XX c. by the likes Einstein, Hoyle, Godel and Bohm, and in the XXI c. by complexity and theory of information, which show the limits of the theory of big-bang and the little importance of those experiments from the perspective of pure knowledge.

The post has therefore two parts. One very brief, expanded in our analysis of the fractal Universe, in which we ‘plug in’ the big-bang as it looks when we upgrade our concepts of space-time to the fractal, scalar Universe of three arrows of time, entropy, information and its energetic combinations. That is, when we upgrade our concepts of space and time to duality. It shows clearly that there is no cosmic big-bang and moreover, that CERN does not study more than a local big-bang (our scale).

The second part written during my angry age ‘contra-physicos’ considers the fundamental problem of mankind dealing with his understanding of the Universe, the paradox of the ego… I haven’t read it in ages, as I have passed the anger state of the 5 ages of Kohler’s ‘death feelings’ into the final nirvana=indifference to the future of the humankind… but I’m sure it must be quite sarcastic…

vanitas vanitatum et omnia vanitates

ls

I. PRAXIS AND THEORY:

THE FUTURE OF ASTROPHYSICS.

On the issue of CERN is unavoidable to deal with big-bang falsehoods and the sorrowful state in which physical sciences find themselves today, due to its errors in the foundations of science – its concept of time arrows, as a single arrow of entropy that despises the arrow of form, of information, we system scientists study; and its incomprehension, related to that fact of the way languages, INCLUDING mathematics deforms the Universe.

So in 3 posts, this on the big-bang, one on the evaporation of black holes and the next post on the Higgs hoax, we shall deal with some surrealist humour and serious science with those 3 issues.

As the problem of physicists is both ethical – its lack of respect to life, and theoretical – its despise of the arrow of life and reproduction of information, which in fact structures the Universe, in the case of the big-bang crystal clear, with their denial of the informative arrow/force of gravitation, ONLY in this issue we shall need some personal work – as I am the leading theorist of duality, the science that studies with BOTH arrows, entropy and information the systems of reality.

I am not fond of authority, so just state I was at the time of my suits to CERN the world chair of the science of duality – the discipline of philosophy of science that studies the Universe with both arrow in its most important congresses – those of cybernetics and systems sciences. Yet after the suit both congresses, cancelled the science of duality in a surprising move, that remind me of the western hate towards ‘Hegelian dialectics’, or the prohibition of the Emperor Chin of any taoist book, except those on technology (: yes time is cyclical and history repeats itself – we must all have a single arrow of entropy war and death from chin to CERN, deja vu.

So let me first introduce the higher picture of the dual, real informative=gravitational + entropic=electromagnetic, balanced immortal Universe, where all big-bangs are compensated by informative big-crunches and corresponding forces (the supposed big-bang by the informative gravitational force that shrinks galaxies) and then we will deal with the linguistic problem and entropic problem of physicists, MOSTLY caused by their worldly religion, to make weapons of mass destruction and the PARADOX OF THE EGO, that makes all ‘believers’ to think they only speak the language of God and they are the chosen centre of the Universe, which indeed hard as it seems after Galileo, still comes back creeping in the work of physicists, as those of the Copenhagen interpretations.

The future of astrophysical sciences.

In that sense two things matter to a ‘human’ future in astrophysics today in praxis and theory, which are intimately related.

Since as Socrates put it, ‘a good man is an intelligent man, as he understands the Universe is about a future of life and information (the arrow of time=change understood by biologists) not about a future of death and entropy, a deformation caused by the wordily profession and praxis of physicists. Since we humans tend to defend our live hood with our ideas and NOT the other way around.

So both praxis and theory go always together. Let us see in this case how indeed the Universe in praxis and theory is about life, and only the reductionism of physicists worldly profession can deform so much reality as to negate information and life – which they call negantropy.

On  the contrary information is the dominant arrow of the Universe. And entropy only its fast erasing, once it becomes ‘corrupted’ by excess of warping at the end of a life-informative cycle – the key inversion required both in praxis and theory in this planet of life if we want to keep on living and survive. 

This I prove ad nauseam on those  5D³ section posts. But they are too complex, long articles. And since the issue of entropy, the arrow of death that physicists promote in their praxis and theory, building weapons and telling us all is about big explosions, IS THE THEORETICAL KEY TO PHYSICISTS’ Evil=anti-livE behaviour; we have resumed them here in a couple of pages, so you can have a glimpse at how the ‘Universe really looks’, when we add properly the dominant arrow of in/form/ation to the mix. 

It is not a change of ‘theme’, but a necessary upgrade of astrophysics and our philosophy of the Universe.

Since ONLY when mankind realises that the amateurish philosophy of science of physicists is just the delirium tremens of his worldly profession – making weapons, and respects again life and man as the most perfect known organism and measure of all things we shall have a chance to close down CERN, and send back their children of thought to school, where thy can do no harm.

-THEORY: To upgrade and understand the Universe theoretically in sound grounds, using both arrows of time, entropy and information, which structure a balanced immortal ∞ scale where the entropic dark energy expanding between galaxies IS balanced by the informative, gravitational forces that curve and warp it into galactic vortices of mass, which quantum physicists purposely ignore, to reduce it all to those entropic expansive vacuum spaces; regardless of Einstein’s work and general relativity: ‘time curves space into masses’, as the graph shows:

=
In the graph, in each ‘scale of size of matter, the same duality of  clock-like vortices of temporal information (masses, charges, thermodynamic eddies, which carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency speed of its time cycles, as computers do, measuring its informative power on ‘Hertzs’ ) and expansive states of entropy (dark entropy; electromagnetic, lineal radiation; entropic gas; big-bangs of matter) balance each other in conserved, closed energy cycles to make the Universe immortal, giving birth to the equation of the 3 arrows/dimensions/ages of time-space, for each fractal part of reality:

Entropic past-space + cyclical, future information = iterative, closed energy cycles.

Which gives origin to the ternary ‘topology’ of all of them made of:

Lineal Limbs/fields of spatial entropy < hyperbolic, reproductive body-waves> cyclical informative particle/heads

Of course the three arrows of time have always been there, so humans have always understood them, in philosophy, in the syntax of their natural verbal language. Since time has always been a ‘verbal concept’ synonymous of ‘change, with 3 dimensions, past, present and future… and its related 3 time ages, entropic, moving youth, mature, reproductive age and 3rd age of information, which lasts much longer in time than the opposite moment of entropic death, in an explosion that erases our information, back to the emptiness of space, both in life and matter.

So once the model was lay down, it was all fun, plug and play, putting all the equations of all the sciences, including those of physics, into the so called ‘fractal Generator’ of space-time beings, (the previous equation), translating the jargon of each science to the ‘homologic laws’ of fractal space, and ternary cyclical time, in communion NOT with the particle of God, but with his mind in a Platonic sense:

‘The Universe is a body with a mind called logos≈God’ (Plato)… the seer of time, with a higher logic than that of man’ Saint Augustine….

The ternary logic of its three time arrows… As the same ternary principle is found in its mystical versions of eastern philosophical religions, where visnu-¥in-formation + Shiva-Yang = Brahma, Qin, energy is the origin of its infinite ‘fractal beings of reality. (Reason why Asians were specially fond of it).

Yet even if you believe in western egotist religions, be aware that you also are an expression of the three arrows/elements of all space-time systems. Or don’t you have lineal limbs that move you; a body that reproduces you and a head that perceives information?

Thus as this very basic explanations on the 5D³ models of reality I found, show, what i did was to convert this knowledge into hard science adding the discoveries of physicists, biologists and theory of information today, (from evolution to complexity and theory of organisms), expanding back to ‘all realities’  time-space studies, which physicists had reduced to the study as merely the study of change in motion. Yet there are many informative changes in the Universe, studied by biology, history, etc. ‘time-changes’, of which physicists know nothing. 

We explain them all, for those who might want to explore the future of science with reason no authority, at the section on 5D³ on duality and its theoretical advances on our conception of the Universe.

The fifth dimension of absolute, scalar relativity. 

NOW THERE is a key second element in big-bang theory, which is the ‘scale’ in which the big-bang physicists measure happens in reality. Obviously the paradox of the ego has created a hyperbolic big-bang of cosmic dimensions. But the fact is that measures of the big-bang are all local, galactic. And as Hawking in one of his best results proved, the equations are the same than those of a black hole. So obviously, if the equations are those of a black hole, and the measures are galactic measures, we are measuring a local big-bang, of the last cycle of explosion and rebirth of the galactic black hole, which french astronomers tabulate as happening every 20 billion years.

Scientific American 293, 42 – 49 (2005)

The graph from sci-am shows the 20 billion years cycle of quasars, which destroy the central bar of the black hole, produce massive quantities of helium above the galaxy center (considered the 2nd fundamental proof of the big-bang after the expansion of space between galaxies, already explained) and provokes waves of radiation.

Theoretical reasons: the fractal scalar, 5D Universe.

So we shall consider the theoretical reason why indeed, there are scalar big-bangs in all the ‘scales of the sled-similar fractal universe’ – simply speaking, because the Universe is a fractal of information that repeats its networks, and organic forms in all scales:

But for a theoretical solid background we must introduce absolute relativity and the scales of the fifth dimension.

Next in another brief page we have to introduce the fundamental concept of Absolute, scalar RELATIVITY, the general terms given by the two leading scientists on the fifth dimension (me in philosophy of science, Nottale which works only in physics): The infinity of scales of size and time clocks in the Universe.

Which makes us absolutely relative in importance, hence NOT a chosen of god, only intelligent, entitled etc. being, which will NOT die when a black hole appears on EARTH – Which is really the ultimate alibi/reason why ego-centered humans have believed CERN: how can we die people thought from a smallish black hole, if we are soooo important,

Sorry we are just at true value –  ‘a mush over a lost rock on the corner of the Universe’ (Schopenhauer), in a Universe of ∞ scales of space-time none of them preferential.

So, we shall end this nutshell analysis of the future of science with a perspective on the scalar Universe in which we are – neither as a chosen being nor in a chosen scale, reason why a simple black hole can eat us all; specially because in Absolute relativity, smaller beings are actually much more active, with faster metabolic clocks, hence eating much faster than big thingies. Indeed, the smaller the black hole, as we prove in the article on Hawking’s evaporation, the faster it feeds on matter, as theory and praxis has proved ad nauseam.

 

In the graph, some similar scales and networks that define the fractal Universe. Never mind so much organic evidence that the Universe is a fractal that reproduces information. We are stuck with the simplest possible view of time-space, the big-bang, and the largest possible scale, the whole reality. So our human ego becomes ass the theorised explosion is 🙂

let us then just bring about as a colophon, a mathematical proof of the existence of this dimension, its metric equation in the simplest form. Further information found on the 5D³ section.

5D METRIC; ∞ TIME CYCLES AND SCALES, CO-EXISTING IN ORGANIC PATTERNS.

Now we know a dimension exists when we can travel through it, remaining co-invariant in our space and time. That is, as we grow our Size, our time clock speed diminishes; since we slow down as we grow in size. Such simple equation is called the metric of a dimension and relates the ∞ clocks of time of the fractal Universe that accelerate as we become smaller in spatial size, but whose product remains invariant: S x T = k.

And that exactly what happens when we grow in size or diminish in size through 5D scales, from seminal seed to slow multicellular organism, living in an even larger planetary world of slower geological time clocks:

And this law – that bigger systems run slower time cycles when they grow in size, happens in every system of reality so the existence of a 5th Dimension is absolute. ∞ proofs not a single exception. Moreover, it is the first mathematical explanation of a world cycle of life and death – which we have added in an independent, easier to read, shorter article here.

So experimentally a fractal Universe is proved, and mathematically also. The consequences of it are ginormous. Two simple ones will suffice applied to physical biological and social systems: smaller systems code more information in the speed of its cycles and clock-like forms. So smallish faster black holes code galaxies, controlling them; small genes code bodies and small thoughts – memes, code civilisations. And as a consequence scales co-exist in symbiosis, as ‘organic systems’, where the small parts provide information, synchronise and control larger ones, who deliver energy and motion-entropy to lower ones.

Yet the most important consequence is the absolute relativity of the human being, as no scale is preferential. And the higher paradoxical power of tiny black holes with astoundingly fast time clocks, which therefore are more dangerous than the slow, inactive big ones, as it is precisely their small size what makes them really active, once we correct the main error of Hawking, in his analysis – his confusion on the arrows of time, in this case the arrows of entropy and information. systematically downplayed in his work.

Yet ‘entropic physicists’ will have none of these dual OBVIOUS TRUTHS and act as if galaxies and gravitation didn´t exist (you see a pattern here, any inconvenient truth does NOT exist, point) denying on purpose its obvious contribution to the ‘shrinking’ of space-time of galaxies, and their arrow of information towards the central black hole, to the balanced mix – they even call information ‘negantropy’ – the negation of entropy. Yet information is far more important to humans, as we exist, inside one of such vortices as ‘solid=informative states’. We are NOT living in the dark entropy between galaxies that expands space, nor are we gaseous beings. Hence the irrelevance of most of physics stuck in a single entropic future, for a true philosophy of the Universe and the search for the meaning of human existence in the ternary Universe – which is carried with fare deeper results by information theorists and philosophers of science, like this writer, (: which rather would call entropy=death, neganformation, the negation of life ):

-PRAXIS: So such a closer more complex truth about reality, as made of two arrows, entropy=death and information=life, will stop once and for all the mental alibi of and entropy-only-dying Universe which HAS for centuries justified the worldly praxis of making weapons of mass destruction, proper of physicists.

So the praxis of this science if mankind cares anything about life, his natural informative arrow, must go through the demilitarisation of physics as a science and the end of the cold war era, which will NOT finish till physicists stop researching more cosmic explosions, with the retarded alibi of negating the existence of life, gravitation and anything that is not a big ‘whammy’ as the meaning of it all.

Indeed, if they kill us all it won’t be for any good reason but just because of their routine of making bigger bombs, point and the stupidity and sheeple behaviour of the human flocks that let them do it.

So let us go with the religion of physics – an old article during my third ‘kohler age of the feeling on an incoming death’, when I was really on Einstein’s ether age mood when he said ‘two things i deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man’. Look for content, and for physics – and have a laugh if you can at our infinitesimal ego in the infinite Universe.

HERE WE DEAL WITH THE OTHER SCALE OF physics involved in these experiments, the quantum scale, where again we shall find errors as usual due to the two fundamental problems of the human psyche:

  • The ego paradox, so we find Mr. Bohr, rejecting the sound-sound pilot theory to sponsor a creationist theory of linguistic nature: humans only with god speak mathematics, and only when they measure, reality happens.
  • The belief in authority over reason ‘of little merit’, in worldly praxis (profession, profits) over experimental evidence.. Indeed contrary to belief, physicists are mostly as all humans believers with ‘baconian’ tribal idols and reason does not really sip through easily when authority imposes its views. So there is no much difference really between religion and science, as humans are.

Indeed, the most amazing thing about the two sooo obvious problems of the big-bang, its scale and the fact that you need to eliminate gravitation to make it possible is that all the data and experience prove the Universe is a balance between warping masses of galaxies and entropic dark energy expanding it, and all experimental evidence, even the easy calculus of both – mass and dark entropy – with Einstein’s equation, shows such balance to exist, but to uphold the big-bang, entropic theory and the authority of earlier XX c. researchers physicists deny ALL experimental evidence, and like priests do, keep churning complicated arguments to deny the obvious – what we have just showed. More of it in the long article, let us move into the quantum world…

 

RELIGION OF PHYSICISTS VS.  HUMBLE SCIENCE OF ∞ UNIVERSE

In the graph, the true rational, explanation of quantum physics – the pilot wave theory, recently proved by the interstellar EM engine, vs. the subjective ego-centered theory of ‘the observer’ who creates quantum reality, which has become canonical and is ultimately a religious creationist theory.

The astounding fact about Physics today, both in quantum theory and Cosmology is its ‘outlook’ as an anthropomorphic religion that has substituted earlier abrahamic religions, without respecting the basic laws of objectivism of science, unlike all other disciplines. So Physicists have on one side accepted ‘weird’ theories of reality that make man – in this case the observer – the center of creation, against the sound-sound objective theories of reality available and far more sound experimentally, which however eliminate any ‘entitlement for human beings’. Such is the case of the infamous argument between the founders of quantum theory, Planck, Einstein, De broglie and Schrodinger, and his pilot-wave interpretation and the ‘newcomers’, Hilbert, Bohr, Pauli and Heisenberg who imposed a new religion of humans and their mathematics as the ‘creators’ of reality. While in cosmology, they created by the elimination of the informative gravitational force that creates mass out of entropy in galaxies, another weird theory called the big-bang, in which all reality was once according to a simple lineal equation, V≈HoD, compressed in a single point, easy to describe with its simple mathematical tools, a mere mirror-language of reality.

At the heart of those simple, anthropomorphic, ‘creationist’ theories of reality which CERN pretends to explore further, as in the case of Abrahamic religions there is fundamental, existential problem of humanity: the paradox of the ego, which true science and his lonely humble geniuses have always tried to combat with little results – as humans systematically prefer a theory that makes them ‘exceptional’ and happy that one that tells them the objective truth of their non-importance in the universe. In as much as the indifference to the risks of cern are precisely based in the arrogance of humans who cannot conceive its extinction we cannot only consider theoretical, experimental and military reasons to CERN’s potential genocide but do have to criticise the essence of that human arrogance, the paradox of the ego that makes 1/2 of mankind to believe we are ‘chosen of a Bush-God of the bronze age that makes us immortal’ and only its verbal priests can understand, while the other 1/2 believe the Universe was created in a single point described by a single equation in the single language of God, mathematical physics, which only ‘physical experts’ can understand.

The  egocentric, entropic worldly profession of physicists vs. the humble nature of science

The ultimate reason of mankind’s stubborn denial of the collateral effects of LHC, our likely extinction is NOT true science, but  our egocentric  ‘interpretation’ of the sound data we obtain about the 3 ‘scales’ of size (ab. ∆±i) of the Universe:

  • The ∆-1 quantum microscopic scale, which humans chose to interpret WITH the egocentered copenhagen interpretation instead of the sound pilot-wave theory.
  • The ∆-thermodynamic, human scale, which humans chose to interpret only with the arrow of ‘heat’, chaos and entropy, observed in his use of weapons and steam machines (Carnot, Count Rumford an artillery master, Helmothz), disregarding the arrow of ‘coldness’, which creates ‘information’ in crystal solid systems.
  • The ∆+1 cosmological, gravitational scale, in which again, physicists ignored the arrow of in-form-ation, provided by the attractive-only gravitational force, which creates mass and balances the entropic big-bang of space between galaxies, a pattern observed from the first ‘treatises’ on military instruments of Galileo, also an artillery master, who will consider only the law of lineal inertia and lineal time.

So the pattern is clear: Physics is biased by his worldly profession to choose always a single, entropic arrow of time. And that astounding, blatant reductionism of reality and the duality  all systems of nature, including physical systems is truly a shame to the purpose of science, which is to understand reality with all the data, events and facts available. So what we shall do here, is to give the full picture of physical systems in the 2 scales that matter to CERN, the quantum and cosmological scale.

In that sense CERN and modern astrophysics sponsor a pseudo-religious creationist  theory called the big-bang in which the entire Universe reduced to a single point, which CERN pretends to recreate – and whose research is the ultimate alibi for CERN to be accepted despite its obvious risks. So we shall now slightly divert this article from the factual nature of those risks and the nuclear rhetoric, to consider 3 different questions:

-The nature of the human ego and how humans prefer to believe in happy self-centred theories of reality (anthropomorphic religions, mathematical gods) that in objective science.

-And following that trend they tend to elaborate theories of reality close to their worldly professions. So physicists that make weapons invented the big-bang explosive creation of the universe, despite its many flaws both theoretical and experimental.

-So instead we will reconsider a more objective theory of reality than those sponsored by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics and the big-bang interpretation of creation. Namely the sound-sound, increasingly proved theories of Einstein both in quantum and cosmology (pilot wave theory along De Broglie, and steady state along Fred Hoyle). Indeed after a century of ‘propaganda’ of the creationist and observer’s theory of physics, which so much pumps the human ego, the sound theories of Einstein keep coming back with new proofs, and keep giving new avenues of thought and will if we survive CERN become standard one humans stop being so arrogant about what they can and cannot know and what is the nature of reality.

First to understand what we just said, people must differentiate quantum interpretations of the sound facts, experimental proofs and coherent mathematical equations that allow us to work with electronic machines and construct them. This is the simple, rather mechanical process of gathering data, putting it on equations and assembly machines, which CERN does so well.

But CERN IS NOT constructed just to make a huge machine and take pictures of small particles. It does claim to exist because it will reveal the meaning of the Universe, so we can take the risks of dying, for the stakes are so ‘great’.

So we shall not discuss here at all the obvious fact that quantum equations allow us to make electronic machines – granted, and telescopes allow us to see the Universe; but the ‘interpretations’ of the data of quantum physics and the Universe on ‘philosophical grounds’, and hence also the ‘foundations of mathematics’, which have always split in two fields:

  • The realist humble, relativistic interpretations, which are right and time always brings back, since Copernicus, Descartes and Leibniz the philosophers of science affirmed, his relative theories of time and space and the mind to the times of Einstein, Bohm and Hoyle, who all of them fond of philosophy of science and ‘fist principles’ affirmed a realist quantum interpretation (above), a realist Universe with 2 time arrows, entropic space which dilates it but also informative gravitation that ‘collapses’ those entropic waves into galactic matter, balanced overall its total volume. And finally the use of mathematics as a language-mirror of the mind that does NOT create reality, but merely fits it nicely on the small brain, and has therefore to be studied a priori, AS A LANGUAGE OF THE MIND, with the same ternary syntax, inflationary errors, and modelling properties of all other equally valid languages that mirror reality (visual, verbal languages in man, chemical in life, gravitational in cosmology, etc.)
  • The egocentered anthropomorphic interpretations,which always attempt to reduce phenomena ONLY to those elements that ensure the Human Ego to come on top of reality, from the Ptolemaic theories of the Earth as center of the Universe, to Newton’s definition of absolute space as the plenum body of ‘Yhwh’, to the quantum observer theory, to the axiomatic method of Hilbert in mathematics, as the language humans imagine and comes a priori, creating NOT reflecting reality. Contrary to belief those interpretations who require the ELIMINATION of all non-human larger truths. So Ptolemy dismissed the larger sun in the center. Newton dismissed time and space as relational systems of multiple clocks, carried by different species, NOT only the human, mechanical clock (Leibniz and Einstein). Bohr dismissed the quantum potential field that feeds the motions of particles, even if we don’t see them. And denied the obvious – if we don’t see them is NOT because they are not there but because they are so far removed of our scale of space size and time that we just have a limited information.

The religion of the big-bang vs. a sound dual theory of entropy and information.

The big bang alibi connects CERN with the ‘theoretical religion’ of physicists, quite similar to that of Abrahamic religions, in which an infinitesimal human being ‘believed’ to understand the meaning of it all, because God, the mind of the Universe reduced itself in the big bang to another infinitesimal point, easy to handle by the arrogant ego-centered bronze age peasant, which became the ‘only’ human to understand it all or the modern physicist who pretends a ‘simple lineal equation’ called the Hubble constant, V = Ho D, resumes it All.

So the religious priest will tell you ‘GOD’ explains it all, just 3 letters, 4 in the Jewish Tetragramaton, Yhwh, 5 in Allah. And there is no need for anything else. Alas from GoD to V≈hoD, from Abrahamic cults to big-bang cults 2 letters have changed to remain the same.

This is the essence of the absurd theory of the big bang, according to which V=hod, in this case not the mind but the entire Universe reduced itself to an infinitesimal point which was the ‘beginning of time and space’ that only physicists (and creationist, biblical priests that sponsor the concept – in fact ‘discovered’ by a catholic priest, Mr. Lemaitre), the high popes of science understand with an arcane ‘latin language’ called mathematics.

In reality that equation is so simple that one cannot avoid a smile, when people tells you Physicists are the absolute geniuses of mankind. It merely means that galaxies are separating because the light, an entropic, lineal, expansive force between them, elongates its wave as it moves. There is nothing else, but already Einstein said ‘imagination’ is more important than intelligence. So as religious people have made of God with good imagination and pumping-ego ceremonies the meaning of it all, nuclear physicists have extracted from that single fact – light elongates as an entropic force between galaxies, with a ‘lot of imagination’, half-lies and statistics the meaning of it all.

How they did it? Simple: they just move backwards this light expansion, and concluded that as light expands between galaxies, if we run it backwards it must have imploded into a single point, the ‘origin of it all’ which their Vhod describes as the graph shows.

Never mind light NOT only expands when free but it contracts within galaxies by the force of gravitation, balancing thus, the expansive E=mc2 death of mass into radiation, with the implosive, M=E/c2 informative implosion of light into mass particles and galaxies, making reality a wobbling balanced immortal infinity of dying mass and imploding light. Indeed, if you run backward the equation of light expansion, you just will get back to the atom of the galaxy that emitted that ray of light – AS ALL EQUATIONS ARE FINITE and happen only as long as the phenomenon they describe exists – in this case the ray of light that expands does NOT go back into an infinitesimal point because all LIGHT is produced by particles according to the E=mc2 equation. 

Yet the big-bang dogma merely rejects to put the most famous equation of physics, E=mc2 at work, as the abrahamic cult denies any other ‘letters’ to God. It is only God, or Yhwh or Allah (even if actually the 3 religions says it is the same God). In physics it is only Vhod not E=mc2, what matters. You just vehemently deny the other ‘letters’ matter at all to create matter (play with words, as it is all just funny egos jumping me, i and myself only, if it had not so ugly collateral effects).

Thus the big bang is just a theory based in the wordily profession of nuclear physicists (make atomic bombs). So disregarding the arrow of information and life, which is the creative force of the Universe, physicists pretend to interpret reality only with the arrow of destruction and death, they call ‘entropy’, and merely moved backwards in time a lineal, simple equation of entropy, to pretend it moved backwards till this supposed explosion collapsed into a tractable infinitesimal point, much more smaller than the human ego. The parallels between those 2 supreme ‘theories of the subjective ego’ are multiple.

The peasant Meshu thought God was the bush their goats munched because that was his professional ‘food’. And he denied therefore the immanent sacred nature of all what exists, made of the same ‘plenum substance’, impersonal space and time. God was in his bush. The arawak who ate turtles thought God was a huge turtle over which the Earth floated.

The nuclear industry which makes nuclear bombs designed a theory of the Universe, in which only its ‘entropic process’ of explosive death accounted for the creation of the entire Universe. So of course, the people who hold the alternative sound-sound theory, called the steady state Universe, from Einstein to Hoyle, who affirmed ad maximal there would be a quasar big-bang, observed experimentally balanced by the creation of mass, laughed at them and called its theory the ‘big-bang’, arguing their makers were either ‘creationist priests’ (Lemaitre) or people working in the nuclear industry (Gamow). It was then business as usual: ad hominem attacks on Einstein and Hoyle, the P.r.ess heralding Gamow as a genius, since it backed the nuclear weapons industry and justified experiments and industries that researched them, such as CERN created then. And soon they recruited their twin believers in creationist points and G. bushes, so the church who still denied Evoution jumped on the wagon and every sound proof of the steady state Universe was dismissed and every fool proof of the Big bang was canonised, as we explain in our right side articles on 5D and cosmology which studies the falsehood of big-bang theories.

Indeed for God to be unique, it was just needed to kill all rival gods, and we are still on the business of killing each other to prove our ‘letters matter more’. And for the big bang to work, it was just needed to DENY all other causes of the process of DUAL informative creation of mass and entropic destruction of mass into radiation. This of course created the paradox that physicists used e=mc2 to explode bombs but deny their equation to uphold Vhod.

At this point things became a little surrealist: physicists changed the name of the arrow of information and life and called it ‘negantropy’, the negation of death, as if negating death was a ‘sin’ and information and life was irrelevant, something Vhod could dispose of.

They also denied the most important in-formative force of the Universe, gravitation, which ‘forms’ the mass of galaxies, as time goes by. So Einstein, the only sound mind, who merely did ‘thought experiments’ said that ‘time curves space into mass’. So the creation of mass balances the entropic flows of pure light space without form between those galaxies.

Screen Shot 2016-06-12 at 15.32.50And the result is an immortal wobbling spring like Universe, where according to Einstein’s equation: E=M(c2), entropy reigns in the electromagnetic forces and light transiting between galaxies, expanding its space-time. But then it collapses within galaxies, creating with gravitational forces, in-form-ation. And this arrow of form and life is more important. Since we humans live in one of those vortices of time collapsing into mass, called the milky way, in one of its cyclical, turning planets that evolves information, through the processes of life and technology and human languages of thought. SO IT MATTERS MORE to understand mass and life than entropy and vacuum expansive space. The next graph shows schematically one of those galaxies wobbling.

In the graph, absolute relativity postulates a Universe of infinite scales of sizes with relative big-bangs, which are the death of implosive Mass converted back and forth into entropic motion, according to Einstein’s equation: Entropy<=>Mass (c2), which obviously has 2 arrows of time, and so it was in fact first described first, as M=E/c2, that is a process that transforms entropy into mass and information, stored in the frequency of those accelerated mass cycles.

Now, the ‘steady state theory’ of the Universe has always come to this simple realisation: the creation of mass eliminates the need for a singularity. There are a few different versions and duality merely makes them even more sound. The best elaboration of this steady state dual expansive-implosive Universe, departing from earlier work by Einstein and Fred Hoyle, is the concept of a series of local big-bangs, called quasars, proved recently by the 20 billion years tabulated cycle of galaxies, shown above.

Further on the cycles is reinforced by the fact that big-bang radiation is measured locally, as Penzias and Wilson were indeed measuring the background radiation of the galaxy,  a fact recently rediscovered by the observance of 2 ‘electromagnetic lobes’ on the galaxy, which are exactly the same found in the supposed mapping of the whole Universe. Below we observe the ‘supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmos, which turn out to be exactly the 2 lobes of our galaxy, recently discovered, and the fact that from quantum atoms to galaxies, there are E=Mc2 double big-bangs from beta decay to novas of stars and planets to galaxies:

In the graph the galactic big-bang, and the scales of it. The reader should observe that the image supposedly obtained from BG radiation of a cosmic big-bang is exactly the picture of the galaxy, recently proved, when the two lobes on the central of the image were found above and below the black hole – physicists thought were remants of a 13 billion light-years ago/distance, so Smolin was trying to prove one of his theories about long time changes in the frequency of light waves. Alas, the law of silence on the religion of physics buried the news. And we got back to the routine of a possible big-bang proved false by experimental evidence in both ‘distance’ of the radiation and ‘ages’ of galaxies (graph above).

So what is the origin of the ‘back ground radiation’? Unfortunately another clear proof that the galaxy is teaming with strangelets and black holes. Since the background radiation can only be produced today by a black hole or dark matter strangelet gravitationally redshifting light as it passes through the halo:

And so a huge proof of the Fermi Paradox comes through Einstein’s gravitational redshift: a black hole or strangelet which has eaten the mass of a moon, the most abundant planetary size of the galaxy, will produce exactly redshifted background black body radiation at 2.7 k,

So the SUPPOSED absolute proof of a cosmic big-bang IS in fact without ‘extrapolations into an infinitesimal past point’ perfectly explained now IF the light matter of the galaxy ‘feeds’ the dark matter of the halo, which WILL thereafter redshift constantly gravitationally (another Einstein effect) light all over the galaxy and light coming inside the galaxy at 2.7 K.

Again in Epistemology WHEN 2 POSSIBLE CAUSES OF A phenomena happen, the sound SOUND ONE, is the cause that happens NOW. It is like if you try to explain your 37 degrees of body temperature and you have a doctor that tells you the NOW-now cause – the activity of your cells at 37 degrees, as the activity of dark matter of moon masses (called MACHOs) today at 2.7 K. Obviously this is a sound theory

Now imagine a ‘guru’ that comes and tells you, your 37º temperature is in fact caused by the ‘cooling’ of your temperature at the moment of your birth which was then ‘3 trillion degrees’, and I have a lineal equation that proves you have been getting colder till now, exactly at the required speed to get now 37 degrees. You will think he is cuckoo because he NEVER measured your temperature in the past, so he is making a non-scientific extrapolation. Well THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT Gamow did. He came to the conclusion that the Universe had cooled down from the singularity of trillions of degrees to the almost ‘absolute zero’ of 20 degrees… Wait, but it is not 2.7 K background radiation?

Yes, he FAILED COMPLETELY TO FORECAST it. But WHEN Penzias measured the then called ‘galaxy temperature’ at 2.7 K, GAMOW simply a posteriori changed his lineal equation to meet 2.7 k now, and then a flurry of ‘egolatric’ scientists decided it was NOT local but cosmic radiation. Because that kept them as ‘the new high popes of creationism’ and the meaning of it all. AND AGAINST RELIGIONS I DO NOT REASON.

Indeed, there are many other sounder proper explanations to every supposed cosmic big-bang phenomena, but when an entire ego-centered group of human beings is in a ‘mission’ pumping with zealot ego human power, there is no ‘reasoning’ able to stop the tsunami – the sound reasons are hidden, unpublished, the half-reasons which favor the pseudo-religion are pumped, retouched ad hoc, as Gamow’s temperature…

So we do dedicate an entire post on cosmology to study a little bit in detail this theory, which i am now on the business of properly rewriting as the rest of this idle web for many years left alone after the failure of suits and films to rise public awareness.

But as an image is worth more than a thousand words, we have just showed you the 3 most recent, visual proofs that the background radiation is local, galactic, and if there was in the past a ‘big-bang’ was just the quasar cycle of our galaxy.

So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar big-bangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.

All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the big-bang its falsehood. As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the big-bang. So do those supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic big-bang, which Smolin a famed physicist wanted to use to prove his theory that high frequency light goes faster than red-shifted light, as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago and so a small difference of distance should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy. Yet they occupy supposedly ‘a huge piece of the entire Universe… 

We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 arrows of time. So WHY nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.

Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘big-bang theory’.

While basically Einstein’s attempts to put reason on quantum theory were ignored after he defied Bohr, till his death. He got an FBI file, nobody was going to his classes, and so he dedicated himself to talk to Godel on the ridiculous concept of Mathematics as the substance of the Universe, to boating and walking… Then they discovered black holes, all his theories were proved… till Hawking decided as a celebrity guru to challenge him with his theory of black holes traveling to the past, totally ignorant of the real time arrows of the Universe.

AND THINGS even got worst, with Bohm, who completed Broglie’s pilot wave theory – he got ignored, got his FBI file, was stripped of his American nationality and became an expatriate. Do not think physicists take lightly any attack on his religion of ‘seers’ of time.

In that regard, it is necessary to stress as we do in many articles the sociological and military-industrial topics, which so well work together to prevent the simple, easy solution to CERN – close the factory of strangelet liquid, which is nothing but deconfined quark matter, the ‘thing’ the LHC keeps doing each year in bigger amounts till it become stable and does us all. Basically the LHC is the showcase for most high tech industries and the pet-project of the most powerful group of science, physicists – since they make the machines and weapons of our industrial civilisation; and so sponsor ‘Fromm’s technological ethics: ‘if we can make a machine we must make it, even if it kills us all.

So on one side the pressure of peers is enormously and on the other the rest of mankind who worships machines and physicists will never dare to defy something they don’t understand. 

This means only the most advanced theoretical physicists and philosophers of science (the true queen of scientific disciplines, despite physicists attempts to ‘push us aside’) will tell the truth about CERN, as only the likes of Bohm and Einstein denounced the nuclear industry – yet they will be treated ad hominem and remain the obscurity.. While the physicists, who agree and promote alt-right theories in favor of the military-industrial complex will be exposed and had the power and means both to create strangelets in this machine and promote their non-risk theories on the press and mass-media, as it was the case in our suits against CERN.

 

PART II.

EXPERIMENTAL FALSITY OF THE COSMIC BIG-BANG

Now, the ‘steady state theory’ of the Universe has always come to this simple realisation: the creation of mass eliminates the need for a singularity. There are a few different versions and duality merely makes them even more sound. The best elaboration of this steady state dual expansive-implosive Universe, departing from earlier work by Einstein and Fred Hoyle, is the concept of a series of local big-bangs, called quasars, proved recently by the 20 billion years tabulated cycle of galaxies:

Scientific American 293, 42 – 49 (2005)

Further on the cycles is reinforced by the fact that big-bang radiation is measured locally, as Penzias and Wilson were indeed measuring the background radiation of the galaxy,  a fact recently rediscovered by the observance of 2 ‘electromagnetic lobes’ on the galaxy, which are exactly the same found in the supposed mapping of the whole Universe:

The first graph from sci-am shows the 20 billion years cycle of quasars, which destroy the central bar of the black hole, produce massive quantities of helium above the galaxy center (considered the 2nd fundamental proof of the big-bang after the V=HoD equation, already explained) and provokes waves of radiation. Below we observe the ‘supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmos, which turn out to be exactly the 2 lobes of our galaxy, recently discovered, and the fact that from quantum atoms to galaxies, there are E=Mc2 double big-bangs from beta decay to novas of stars and planets to galaxies.

So what is the origin of the ‘back ground radiation’? Unfortunately another clear proof that the galaxy is teaming with strangelets and black holes. Since the background radiation can only be produced today by a black hole or dark matter strangelet gravitationally redshifting light as it passes through the halo:

And so a huge proof of the Fermi Paradox comes through Einstein’s gravitational redshift: a black hole or strangelet which has eaten the mass of a moon, the most abundant planetary size of the galaxy, will produce exactly redshifted background black body radiation at 2.7 k,

So the SUPPOSED absolute proof of a cosmic big-bang IS in fact without ‘extrapolations into an infinitesimal past point’ perfectly explained now IF the light matter of the galaxy ‘feeds’ the dark matter of the halo, which WILL thereafter redshift constantly gravitationally (another Einstein effect) light all over the galaxy and light coming inside the galaxy at 2.7 K.

Again in Epistemology WHEN 2 POSSIBLE CAUSES OF A phenomena happen, the sound SOUND ONE, is the cause that happens NOW. It is like if you try to explain your 37 degrees of body temperature and you have a doctor that tells you the NOW-now cause – the activity of your cells at 37 degrees, as the activity of dark matter of moon masses (called MACHOs) today at 2.7 K. Obviously this is a sound theory

Now imagine a ‘guru’ that comes and tells you, your 37º temperature is in fact caused by the ‘cooling’ of your temperature at the moment of your birth which was then ‘3 trillion degrees’, and I have a lineal equation that proves you have been getting colder till now, exactly at the required speed to get now 37 degrees. You will think he is cuckoo because he NEVER measured your temperature in the past, so he is making a non-scientific extrapolation. Well THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT Gamow did. He came to the conclusion that the Universe had cooled down from the singularity of trillions of degrees to the almost ‘absolute zero’ of 20 degrees… Wait, but it is not 2.7 K background radiation?

Yes, he FAILED COMPLETELY TO FORECAST it. But WHEN Penzias measured the then called ‘galaxy temperature’ at 2.7 K, GAMOW simply a posteriori changed his lineal equation to meet 2.7 k now, and then a flurry of ‘egolatric’ scientists decided it was NOT local but cosmic radiation. Because that kept them as ‘the new high popes of creationism’ and the meaning of it all. AND AGAINST RELIGIONS SCIENTISTS CANNOT REASON.

But as an image is worth more than a thousand words, we have just showed you the 3 most recent, visual proofs that the background radiation is local, galactic, and if there was in the past a ‘big-bang’ was just the quasar cycle of our galaxy.

So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar big-bangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.

All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the big-bang its falsehood. As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the big-bang. So do those supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic big-bang, which Smolin a famed physicist wanted to use to prove his theory that high frequency light goes faster than red-shifted light, as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago and so a small difference of distance should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy. Yet they occupy supposedly ‘a huge piece of the entire Universe… 

We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 arrows of time. So WHY nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.

Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘big-bang theory’.

 

  Cosmic vs. Quasar big-bangs.

So the question we want to find out is which of the two larger scales of big-bangs, that of a quasar big-bang or a cosmic big-bang fits better real data. Since as we can see in the images above, on the right, they are also quite similar in form. In fact they are almost identical.

Now again, the problem IS obvious. On one side both big-bangs fit 5D theory.

As the ‘magic number’ of 1011 elements that conform the next scale happens in both:

– A galaxy would be the equivalent of a neutron beta decay in the atomic scale, of a nova and the remaining Neutron star in the solar scale, hence a ‘hydrogen atom’ or nucleon of the cosmic scale.

– The Universe would be the equivalent of a Neutron or hydrogen atom in the cosmic scale. Most galaxies have 1011 stars. The total mass of all the stars in the Milky Way is estimated to be between 4.6×1010  and 6.43×1010sun masses.

– And the Universe is considered to have around 1.6 1011galaxies.

So the easiest way to settle the question is to state that the galaxy is just a scale below the big-bang (a huge galactic molecule so to speak), as the neutron star is just a scale above the neutron ( a huge neutron molecule so to speak).

And that it exploded in a big bang of the next scale of the universe.

The spatial symmetry of the cosmic big-bang:  

Screen Shot 2016-03-05 at 13.38.40In the graph we can see nicely how beautiful looks in terms of the 5D (anti)symmetric Generator the big bang in time space and scale:

In the graph, the space-time antisymmetry of the cosmic big-bang: the radiation of the original big bang is seen far away in time and space as a wall of fire.

In the graph the representation of the Generator 5D ST of cosmology:

∆-1:Sp(Wall of fire-membrane) ≤≥ ∆-ST(1011 ‘galacells’)≤≥ ∆+1: Tƒ (Human Subjective Observer; ‘Great attractor’ – objective ‘Black hole ≈ Proton’ center).

The graph is an Artist’s logarithmic scale conception of the observable universe, in space, with the topology of all 5D ternary constructs; but alas! an anthropomorphic Universe with:

Tƒ: Objective center, the point where the big-bang started, which should be the ‘proton=black hole locus’ of the original ‘cosmic neutron’ of the ∆+4 scale exploded in the big-bang, or alternately since according to Lorentz Invariance (Relativity) all frames of reference are relative, as indeed any ‘mind’ perceives information in a spatial-still state:

Tƒ- the Solar System at the center, inner and outer planets, Kuiper belt, Oort cloud, Alpha Centauri, Perseus Arm, Milky Way galaxy, Andromeda galaxy, nearby galaxies…

ST: Cosmic Web, as the ‘cytoplasm of the cell-Universe’.

SP: Entropic Cosmic microwave radiation and Big Bang’s invisible plasma on the edge’s membrane.

So you can see, the big bang would further prove 5D physics and the topological ternary structure of all Universal systems.

So we do NOT doubt the cosmic big bang on 5D grounds, but on real data.

Let us then consider a few of such aspects of the big bang, using as usual the Œ=mc2 scientific method, with scanty mathematical formulae, which go on the 4th line in its full power, as one of the great advantages of TŒ is its capacity to explain any phenomena for 4 points of view – the mental, organic, causal, temporal and spatial, mathematical, in a complementary way.

What is wrong with the previous picture/ wouldn’t it be a perfect proof of 5D physics, as nobody has explained what on Earth exploded 13.4 billion years ago?

Yes it would be perfect if data were fully consistent and not subtly bent to cater to the ‘cosmic arrogance of the human ego’ that wants to pack it all on its infinitesimal mind, Ego paradox always present in all actions of all systems of the Universe that perceive in stillness from its mind point of view a selected part of the whole but confuse it with it:

O-mind x ∞ Universe = still mapping (frame of reference)

Now in the graph we see ‘if the big-bang were real’, the spatial symmetry of the Universe, for which there should be action at distance (to create the needed simultaneity, which in all Real Systems connects in a relative quanta of time all the elements of the system, to allow the isotropy and synchronicity required for a ‘whole’ to work as such:

Sp: Wall of fire≤ ST: Dark Energy ≥ Tƒ: Great attractor.

In such hypothetical Universe:

Sp: the wall of fire of the earlier big-bang would be the outer membrane that isolates the ‘cellular Universe’ at z=10.000 c

ST: The faster than light dark energy, v=S/It =Space/Informative Time=S/0-visible information=∞ relative speed for a human observer, with the same z than the wall of fire; filled with Galaxies.

Tƒ: And a hyper black hole ‘great’ attractor (not the anthropocentric graph below), would be the ‘proton->black hole’ of the ∆+4 cosmic scale.

So far so good. But data fits better on little bangs.

Let us then consider just 10 of many factual proofs that the big-bang is a local quasar big-bang and the proper cosmological theory is that of earlier Einstein->Fred Hoyle->5 D Physics, of an infinite, immortal Universe:

  • The Lorentz invariance

Screen Shot 2016-03-11 at 02.33.01

A simple proof that falsifies the cosmic big-bang of the many we shall show here, is the existence of an absolute frame of reference, if the background radiation is global NOT local, as SciAm soon discovered and published in the graph below. In this case the denial of General Relativity and its postulate of no existence of absolute frames of reference in the Universe.

This is called the “Lorentz symmetry”, named for the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz and it is a symmetry of spacetime. It is in fact a cornerstone of Einstein’s special relativity theory. According to special relativity, there is no absolute space or absolute time (as in 5D Physics, which sometimes I call ‘Absolute relativity’. So if two objects are moving relative to each other in empty space, it would actually be impossible for an observer to tell their absolute velocities—maybe only one of the objects was moving and the other was stationary, for example, but you wouldn’t know which was which because their movements are relative to each other, not to any external reference frame.

Alas, but now we do have one: the cosmic radiation, and we are moving within it. So we just have to measure our movement in relationship to the radiation and Relativity is Gone!:

In the graph, the cosmic background radiation acts as a new fixed frame of reference or ether, falsifying Relativity theory, which does not have as its name explains any fixed space-time background frame of reference

Yet since the cosmic big bang is a solution of relativity theory that the cosmic radiation falsifies the very same theory it tries to prove.

Hence by ‘reductio ad absurdum’, the background radiation must be local not to contradict Relativity.

In the graph a cosmic radiation falsifies the cosmic big bang, which it tries to proof.

It is the most obvious logic error in the big-bang cosmology is his falsification of Einstein’s work in which the big-bang theory is based, as scientific American rightly pointed out when the theory was first put forward (to be forgotten as the propaganda machines of military physics, as the meaning of it all pumped up the theory):

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 13.37.30From the CMB data it is seen that the Local Group (the galaxy group that includes the Milky Way galaxy) appears to be moving at 627±22 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB (also called the CMB rest frame, or the frame of reference in which there is no motion through the CMB) in the direction of galactic longitude, l = 276°±3°, b = 30°±3°.

This motion results in an anisotropy of the data (CMB appearing slightly warmer in the direction of movement than in the opposite direction).

From a theoretical point of view, the existence of a CMB rest frame breaks Lorentz invariance even in empty space far away from any galaxy. So if the big bang is accepted, the theory of which is a solution, Einstein’s relativity based in the non-existence of ETHER, an absolute frame of reference in the Universe (hence ‘relativity name’) is FALSIFIED. Ergo by reductio ad absurdum, the Big bang, which is a solution to the theory it falsifies, is false.

This is one of the many scientific proof of falsity of big bang theory we shall bring in this post, which Cosmologists know and cynically call the ‘axis of evil’ (because it won’t go away and kills their theory right on its inception).

You see what I mean by ‘dogma of religious nature’. How ‘big science’ avoids the axis of evil?

Suppressing data or bringing magic theory to it:  Chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”

Alas, we are back to Babylon, we must be the center of the Universe, just moving 600 kilometers to the east.

Now after being the devil’s advocate, in the proper way, pointing out the fact, let us consider the fact to be right, because we do respect the scientific method. So we shall consider the Lorentz symmetry to be a local symmetry that only takes place within the galaxy; not in the absolute scale of the Universe.

Now this is the ‘real Universe’ of the next scale of the 5th dimension. It looks on the 4% we see clearly as an atomic network of tissue, which joints the atom-galaxies (think for example of a brain of neurons, of a microscopic colony of unicellular algae, and so on). There is zero isotropy as big-bang cosmologists pretend. All their models being approximations which might look nice on computers but have zero scientific theory-praxis solidity. All what we know is that we are moving towards Virgo; that there is a huge nodal network at Hydra-Centaurus – excellent name; which forms with Pisces-Perseus, a clearly connected network in one of whose filaments we find ourselves.

And that at 46 declination a Great Attractor of dark quark matter, likely a super-black hole of top quark stars is waiting for us in a future rendezvous, as we cruise over a remnant cloud of photonic local radiation that does not seem to be (by lack of attraction power) so interested in becoming dark quark gluon liquid-solid super-state of matter.

That is really all we know. The place we live is Laniakea that means “immeasurable heaven’, even if some arrogant believers think they have measured it.

In that regard, while 5D physics is the ONLY rational theory that can explain a cosmic big-bang (as Time accelerates while space shrinks); 13 billion years does not seem time enough for the immensurable heavens.

This as we shall see this solves momentarily the problem; and allow us to consider ‘theories which do not correspond to Relativity’ beyond the galaxy, a fact which is also essential to 5D Physics, as relativity is considered rightly the theory of light space-time where c-speed/distance is the constant of space of the galaxy, the absolute frame of reference, both rod of measure of static space and motion.

And we will return to that, after we deal with the cosmic big-bang, since it is the first ‘step’ to elucidate to expand physics to the scales of the 5th dimension and harmonize it with all other sciences from where it has so much departed.

  • The quasar cycle

The unification of all the physical scales of the universe with the 5th dimension renders an immediate result: the equation of unification of charges and forces, which makes similar (but not equal), the galaxy and the atom.

Moreover, since the big-bang image is mimetic of the previous one it reduces the scale of the big-bang to a quasar scale, making the EFE of Einstein local equations for the Light-space time (reason why it is constant).

In that regard, the big bang scales, that is, the fact that we observer big-bang like death processes of expansion of space 2 planes downwards, as in all other forms of death is one of the strongest proofs of the isomorphic nature of all scales.

In the next graph, from SCiAM, the quasar cycle is longer than the big-bang cycle. Thus by reductio ad absurdum, since we have found galaxies in a ‘second’ quasar cycle, hence over 20 billion years as ‘reborn’ galaxies, forming its central bar, there is no way the time age of the whole is shorter than the time of its parts.

Multiple space-times imply the existence of multiple big-bangs with different explosive size and speeds, all of them deaths of an informative mass or charge that uncoils its accelerated vortex into radiation following Einstein’s equation, E=M(c)2, where a bidimensional or tridimensional vortex (M or e) becomes extended into a plane of radiation (hence the square of lineal c-speed).

Yet for each different scale the parameters of speed (c), mass (M) and Entropy will change. And so we obtain a series of self-similar big bangs described in the graph.

The single cosmic big bang based in a single space-time continuum, was devised even before we knew the existence of a faster than light, gravitational membrane of dark Entropy and dark, quark matter. So we first must define it within that scale of big-bangs as the big-bang of a membrane of electromagnetic radiation; hence a quasar big-bang, not a cosmic big-bang, which will correspond to the much faster explosion of a gravitational membrane, starting at the Planck scale of the gravitational minimal units, the lambda-strings.

This is in a way the conclusion of astrophysicists, which now study the big bang as a dual process, with an inflationary age (the gravitational membrane) and a slower age (the big-bang of electromagnetic space, created over the gravitational membrane).

3.No shadows for the big bang. Ecliptic ‘axis of evil’ and ‘people finding things’.
Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 17.21.14 

In the upper graph:

Physicists have measured a local, hence galactic background radiation, which doesn’t leave shadows from other galaxies and they tabulated the quasar cycle of galaxies, which coincides with the age ascribed in the past to a cosmic big bang. So a more rational theory would consider the cause of the 2.7 K radiation both local in space (galactic) and in time (produced at present); since our measure is local and present.

Now, this is the standard first thought about it: non-thermal radiation from stars.

  • Ad Hoc calculus vs. red shifts. Death of light. Cosmological ‘fractal’ redshirts.

– E x I: Tachyon, Transversal, Gravitational Dark energy waves

Now in what follows we depart from classic cosmology, which as we have seen is good enough to invalidate the cosmic big-bang as a huge lineal ego-trip of astrophysics, and introduce basic concepts of 5D fractal cosmology; which we will develop fully on the 4th line of the blog.

Now the temperature of the background radiation and the radiation itself has alternative theories. My favorite – but not likely correct – is tiredness of light as it falls within 5D physics but it is not mine (which makes it even more objective). My own theory researched during my activism against big-bang experiments on Earth are moon micro-black holes making the halo. Both are far more scientific that the forecasted big-bang temperature. Let us see why, on predictability. Gamow, and the proponent of light tiredness gave predictions ‘before the measure’. Those are:

1946 – George Gamow calculates a temperature of 50 K (assuming a 3-billion year old universe), commenting it “… is in reasonable agreement with the actual temperature of interstellar space”, but does not mention background radiation.

1953 – Erwin Finlay-Freundlich in support of his tired light theory, derives a blackbody temperature for intergalactic space of 2.3K with comment from Max Born suggesting radio astronomy as the arbitrator between expanding and infinite cosmologies.

Freundlich also gave two extreme values of 1.9K and 6.0K in Finlay-Freundlich, E.: 1954, “Red shifts in the spectra of celestial bodies”.

Now the measure was 2.7 K, fully within Finlay’s prediction; completely out of Gamow ‘s prediction. And yet Gamow merely change ad hoc his equations to match the measure, and voila, all physicists which a prior had decided there MUST be a big-bang, ignored Finlay’s.

Now those are the 10 canonical proofs that need no new physics, each of them explained ‘facts’ that the big-bang ‘does NOT explain’ properly. This is more than enough, and while there are a few more, I think 10 is according to the numbers of T.Œ, good enough of fact-known-known proofs.

A timeline will help to understand why it is the likely one by C) cyclical predictability:

1926: Sir Arthur Eddington estimates the non-thermal radiation of starlight in the galaxy has an effective temperature of 3.2 K.

1930s: Erich Regener calculates that the non-thermal spectrum of cosmic rays in the galaxy has an effective temperature of 2.8 K

Thus the thermal radiation calculated by Penzias in 1960 at 3 K had been rightly foreseen by the first people who thought of it (average of 3.2+2.8/2=3k).

On the other hand the late proposal of a cosmic big bang by A-bomb researcher Gamow et al were:

1946: George Gamow estimates a temperature of 50 K.

1949: Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman re-estimate Gamow’s estimate at 28 K.

1960s: Robert Dicke re-re-estimates a MBR (microwave background radiation) temperature of 40 K

These were all offbeat. Only after 1960s measure, busy-busy the cosmic big-bang ‘re-re-re-estimate’ its equations to get ‘a posteriori’ the ‘desired’ experimental results ‘ad hoc’, instead of noting that Mr. Eddington and those proponents of a local background radiation WERE right in their predictions and the cosmic ones totally off-target and hence use the scientific method to deny the cosmic one.

  • Now and here explanations: Moon MACHOs

This AGAIN is a basic proof of truth in science: if WE CAN FIND explanations in present time and here-space, it is absurd to consider an explanation in past or future time and out-of-here space. It is like if we measure your body temperature, at 37 degrees and then a cuckoo physicist tells you the cause is with a lineal past-moving equation that you were born 17 billion years ago at 5 trillion degrees and you are cooling down!! When there is an explanation, in the metabolic activity, now and here of your body.

So what is the metabolic process on the galaxy now that produces that temperature?

Namely the existence of micro-black holes or similar dark matter (strangelets) red-shifting components on the Halo, which account for its mass and the redshirts of all light reflecting or coming through it.

But further on, before we deal with the Halo, there is a huge problem which shows further that it is a local radiation, the so called ‘axis of evil’, which at the cost of billions of $ astrophysicists try to eliminate with zero success. Namely that the radiation aligns with the axis of the galaxy and its equinox, because ‘obviously’ it is produced by the galaxy’s activity.

Do you think this obvious answer has any chance? ha. Quoting the official version, of Wikipedia:

“In particular, the quadrupole and octupole (l = 3) modes appear to have an unexplained alignment with both the ecliptic plane and equinoxes, an alignment sometimes referred to as the axis of evil 🙂

A number of groups have suggested that this could be the signature of new physics at the greatest observable scales; other groups suspect systematic errors in the data. Recent observations with the Planck telescope, which is very much more sensitive than WMAP and has a larger angular resolution, confirm the observation of the axis of evil. Since two different instruments recorded the same anomaly, instrumental error (but not foreground contamination – the way they ‘introduce the local cause – ‘contamination’:) appears to be ruled out.

Coincidence is a possible explanation, chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”

Now to my hypothesis of a halo of dark, quark matter (black holes or strangelets) acting as a far ‘more limited’, closer membrane distorting by red shift the light reflected or coming through it (as all membranes do transform what penetrates them).

Why, it is a preferred solution? Obvious:

The question posted by the non-shadows experimental fact is that the radiation cannot come from the supposed outer ring of fire (big bang radiation). It does have to come therefore from the internal region of the galaxy, reflected by the Halo, giving us a mirror image of the galaxy, or alternately from outer light, crossing through the galaxy, altered by the Halo ‘strangelet and micro-black hole matter’, strong candidates to for the dark matter of the galaxy. Then obviously what physicists do is merely to extend this Halo-altered radiation into a supposed infinity.

The only alternative object that can produce such radiation in present is a micro-black hole, whose temperature red-shifts light as a gravitational lensing. And since a black hole gravitational lensing is proportional to the mass, we can calculate the mass of those ‘background black holes’, which redshirts light at 2.7 k. Indeed, a simple calculus shows that a black hole of the approximate mass of a moon (the most common galactic object of which each sun has hundreds in its planets and Oort/Kuiper belts, would produce that radiation.

So very likely the halo of dark matter of the galaxy is made of micro-black holes that have eaten moons, as their bigger cousins eat stars. Then they WILL radiate at that exact temperature.

Further on, since black holes are fundamental particles of the upper scale, as protons are in the quantum scale they must be homogeneous in size, even if they eat less perfect planetoids, expelling the ‘left-overs’ as gamma radiation and becoming with other quark stars (strangelets), the ‘protein’ membrane that shields the galaxy, as a st-point whose 3 topologies are latter studied in more detail.

Critical density.

One of the problems of the big-bang (of many) is the critical density. It must be of 10-26 kg per cubic meter for the Universe to be the ‘observed’ flat geometry. But it is not. Only 2 so this is a problem, the big-bang of the cosmos does not match the flat geometry of the Universe and the topic spiral galaxy.

So if the big-bang is a local galactic big bang the critical density of the galaxy should be 10-26; then it would be the quasar big-bang of our galaxy.

Let us do some crunching numbers for a change.

The equation for the critical density is:

ρcrit = 3H02 / 8πG

You can see that the critical density is proportional to the square of the Hubble constant — a faster expansion requires a higher density to overcome the expansion.

How empty is space? Astronomers have learned that the mean density of matter in the universe is within a factor of a few of the critical density. We can calculate ρcrit by inserting the gravitational constant, G = 6.67 × 10-11 Nm2 / kg2, and adopting H0 = 65 km/s/Mpc. We first convert the Hubble constant to metric units, H0 = (65 × 1000) / 3.1 × 10+22 = 2.1 × 10-18s-1. Now we can solve to get ρcrit = 3 × (2.1 × 10-18)2 / 8 × 3.14 × 6.7 × 10-11 = 7.9 × 10-27 kg/m3 ≈ 10-26 kg/m3. This amazingly low density is equal to about five hydrogen atoms per cubic meter, or a single hydrogen atom in a volume the size of the average TV set. However, in that same cubic meter there will be 5 to 10 billion low energy photons of microwave background radiation, the feeble relic of the big bang.

How well does this density match up to the density of large objects in the universe? The typical distance between large galaxies is about 2 Mpc, so we can see what the average density would be if a galaxy like the Milky Way were the only object in a box 2 Mpc across.

The mass of the Milky Way, including dark matter, is about 10+12 M. Sun, or 10+12 × 2 × 10+30 = 2 × 10+42 kg. The volume of a 2 Mpc cube is (2 x 3.1 x 10+22)3 = 2.4 x 10+68 m3. The typical density is therefore mass divided by volume, or 2 × 10+42 / 2.4 x 1068 ≈ 10-26 kg/m3.

Thus we can see that the galaxy density roughly equal to the critical density.

  • The Black Hole reversed equation of the expansion.

While there is not clear understanding of what the ‘Singularity that holds the entire mass of the Universe in an infinitely small point’ due to the ‘absurd’ backwards motion of the Hubble equation in lineal terms till are mote past, there is a clear proof the explosion of a black hole into a quasar will give us the same result:

Since the equations of the big-bang inflationary first age are exactly the same than those of a black hole, reversed inside-out, as the black hole explodes creating in its outer rim a ‘ball of fire’, advancing at enormous speed, through repulsive gravitational waves, till the wave smooth an isomorphic sphere of the size of the galactic outer Halo. Thus there is not mystery to the creation of the region, which will be reborn as a spiral galaxy when the entropic death of the black hole reverses its course, in the following eras.

In the parlance of ‘physicists’, the proper description will be this:

Tƒ say that space expands exponentially means that two inertial observers are moving farther apart with accelerating velocity. In stationary coordinates for one observer, a patch of an inflating universe has the following polar metric:

ds²=-(1-Λr²)dt² + 1/1-Λr² dr² +r²dW²  (where Λ is not the symbol of the 5th dimension but the cosmological constant) We use polar metric because the black hole expands with a positive curvature into a spherical form, following the commonest ‘entropic explosion-death’ of any big-bang material death. In the simplest expression we write: M=e/c² only that we are talking of a tachyon superluminal expansive wave.

This is just like an inside-out black hole metric—it has a zero in the component on a fixed radius sphere called the cosmological horizon. Objects are drawn away from the observer at towards the cosmological horizon, which they cross in a finite proper time. This means that any inhomogeneity are smoothed out, just as any bumps or matter on the surface of a black hole horizon are swallowed and disappear.

Since the space–time metric has no explicit time dependence, once an observer has crossed the cosmological horizon, observers closer in take its place. This process of falling outward and replacement points closer in are always steadily replacing points further out—an exponential expansion of space–time.

This steady-state exponentially expanding space-time is called a de Sitter space, and to sustain it there must be a cosmological constant, a vacuum energy proportional to everywhere. In this case, the equation of state is . The physical conditions from one moment to the next are stable: the rate of expansion, called the Hubble parameter, is nearly constant, and the scale factor of the Universe is proportional to .

Inflation is often called a period of accelerated expansion because the distance between two fixed observers is increasing exponentially (i.e. at an accelerating rate as they move apart), while can stay approximately constant (see deceleration parameter).The -dimensional de Sitter space, denoted dSn, is the Lorentzian manifold analog of an -sphere (with its canonical Riemannian metric); it is maximally symmetric, has constant positive curvature, and is simply connected for at least 3.

  • The Helium problem.

Nucleo-synthesis occurs between 3 minutes and 20 minutes after the (quasar) Big Bang

During the photon epoch the temperature of the universe falls to the point where atomic nuclei can begin to form. Protons (hydrogen ions) and neutrons begin to combine into atomic nuclei in the process of nuclear fusion.

Free neutrons combine with protons to form deuterium. Deuterium rapidly fuses into helium-4. Nucleo-synthesis only lasts for about seventeen minutes, since the temperature and density of the universe has fallen to the point where nuclear fusion cannot continue.

By this time, all neutrons have been incorporated into helium nuclei. This leaves about three times more hydrogen than helium-4 (by mass) and only trace quantities of other light nuclei.

This formation of so much Helium was for very long considered the proof of a cosmic big-bang because stars could not form so much Helium. Then it was found that most of the imbalance was helium accumulated around the central black hole of galaxies; which has not been explained. Obviously because Helium formation happened when the black hole exploded with the big-bang temperature it is found close to the center of galaxies, and it was formed by the quasar explosion. So a galactic big-bang explains both its abundance and its location (the cosmic one does NOT explain its location)

  • The ages of the big-bang.

The ‘cycle of explosions’ of Galaxies into quasars, into galaxies, follows the same ages of the big-bang. As all of them after the initial ‘Planck epoch – of gravitational superluminal waves’, dark epoch of nucleosynthesis, are ages ‘within galaxies’, and so they are proved for the inner space of galaxies. They do NOT explain many other features of the Universe as a whole (which is not isomorphic, etc.) but perfectly describe the evolution and formation of the stars of the galaxy.

So the so-called ages of the big-bang, are properly the ages of the galaxy; WITHOUT all the ‘ad hoc’ theories and pseudo-scientific models required to explain WHY the large scale Universe has NOTHING to do with the supposedly smooth result of a cosmic big-bang (this is like Ptolemy constant recurrence to ‘new’ ad hoc epicycles to make fit new observations into its earth-centric theory of the Universe). Trust me, any astronomer knows how long this ‘list’ is.

Thus the quasar big-bang follows further the laws of truth (minimalism: Occam’s razor), simplicity and correspondence. WE DO NOT NEED to postulate strange forms of dark energy and dark matter, except the ones KNOWN, repulsive gravitation (to account for the entropic expansion of space between galaxies that balances its contraction), which is ‘natural’ to the model of galactic-atoms; and quark matter to account for the dark matter of the halo. Let us consider this second element in more detail.

  • The experimental proof. Earth’s experiments can replicate them

The ages of the ‘big bang’ can be replicated by merely doing the quark gluon soup on the LHC here on Earth. Thus there is zero difficulty for the awesome reversed process of a quasar explosion to create enough quark gluon soup to replicate all those ages. Other matter are the risks of starting a big-bang ice-9 or ‘gas-9’ process (word coined by this author in his suits against CERN for potential genocide: aka, a run-away creation of top quarks and Higgs (its decay scalar mode: Top quark->2H) on planet Earth.

In that regard,. Œ, reclassifies particles, to understand the 3 ‘ages of evolution’ of information represented by the 3 families of mass and quarks, which are also in close symmetry with the upper cosmic scale, the components of the 3 regions of the galaxy:

  • The Top quark star center (black holes MUST be modeled AS real ENTITIES, with a cut-off, ∆-1 ‘cellular substance’ as Einstein wanted. Only Top quarks (Higgs condensates in the parlance of modern physicists) turning faster than c-speed in its internal vortex (hence its enormous attractive mass, which increases with the frequency of its vortex: M=ƒ(h/c2)) have the properties at larger scale of a black hole.

That is, black holes ARE top quark frozen stars, with positive top quarks as their cut off substance.

  • The middle region of up and down light human quarks.
  • The external negative charged, strangelet halo.

Thus the 5D symmetry between the ∆-1 (particle) and ∆+1 (galaxy) limiting scales of astrophysics is obvious and further proof of the symmetries of T.Œ and its ‘correspondence’ and ‘minimalism’ (proofs of truth in science), since it accounts for the first time for the reason why 3 families of particles and 3 families of stars co-exist, and eliminates the need for further theories and particles beyond the standard model:

Since the 3 ages of evolution of mass of increasing form – I, II and III families of quarks are symmetric – to the 3 regions of the galaxy: Top quark black holes, up and down matter , negative strangelet halo

Symmetry between atoms and galaxies (protons positive top quark holes, negative electrons, strangelet halo).

And so once we have falsified ‘reasonably’ the big bang (we could write hundreds of pages on this, but we have to move on), we can now consider 5D physics, on the known-known Island Universe of our galaxy, its generator equation, 3 ‘relative planes ‘of existence, 3 ages of time and 3 organic parts in space.

BUT IF THE BIG-BANG IS NOT COSMIC, BUT LOCAL, THE BIG-BANG OF THE GALAXY? WHY WE GET SO MUCH CONFUSED ABOUT IT?

THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE IF WE CONSIDER THE UNIVERSE A FRACTAL SYSTEM OF SELF-SIMILAR SCALES:

BECAUSE THERE ARE BIG-BANGS IN ALL THOSE SCALES AND IT IS EASY TO CONFUSE THEM. Let us prove it by considering a fascinating theoretical proof: the equation of unification of charges and masses as two self-similar vortices of two scales the atom and the galaxy, and all the big-bangs happening between those 2 scales, to prove you how unimportant is to research any of them as the most important, how preposterous to think we can SEE AND KNOW ALL ABOUT ALL THE SCALES.

And then we shall provide you the barebones of an alternative proper theory of it all, much more complex and enlightening, according to what no doubt will be the ‘future of stience’ in the XXI century if we survive CERN: a proper construction of the Universe with its 3 arrows of time, entropy information and energy and its true fractal, scalar, self-similar structure in space…

A FORMAL PROOF OF THE SCALES OF THE UNIVERSE:

The unification equation: charges (∆-3) ≈ masses; atoms (∆-3) ≈ galaxies (∆+3)

4 big bangs detail

In graph, 3+i scalar ‘big-bang’s at 3+i levels: a Hydrogen, excited sp atom, which is born of the beta decay (big-bang of a nucleon);  a galaxy (ours), born of a quasar big-bang (a black hole); and the supposed big-bang of the universe, whose main proof is a mapping of the background radiation obtained ‘only’ on local measures on the same galactic region.

The form of each scalar big bang is similar, as the ‘Fractal scales of the 5th dimension’ are ruled by the same isomorphic laws. Now the imaginary big bang is likely to be the cosmic as it is so similar to the form of the galaxy in which its local measures of Bg are taken that it seems to be a hyperbolic human expansion of the scale of its real experimental ‘proofs’.  

Let us remember again that we can only take measures in the surroundings of a small planet and so we must adscribe phenomena to the most local possible domain for an exact theory (basic rule of truth in science: restrict theories to the area of experimental evidence.) Thus the local big bang with a ‘signature’ called B.G. of the exact form of the galaxy is a local phenomena.

Let us consider an example of what we mean by complexity vs. simplicity. In physics a TOE is reduced to the unification not of all sciences and all languages of knowledge, but only of the 4 forces of nature, gravitation, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak force.

This is the saint grail of physicists, which for a century have miserably failed. Why? If as we prove in our article on the Physical TOE, the unification is a mathematical, trivial result of the metric of the 5th dimension? Because they try to achieve that unification with the more complex formulations of quantum and gravitational physics (General relativity and chromo/electrodynamics).

What about the other 2 forces? The similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atom-galaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is then immediate on the ‘simpler models’, as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). And many other results follow. Further on, the hierarchy between those forces is also immediate. Well not so immediate, it requires…

Let us study mathematically this question by comparing those two limits of charges and masses beyond which human perception, becomes faulty.

This article introduces in a simplified manner, for non-specialists, a new concept of Mass by extending the Principle of Equivalence of Einstein and the metric of the 5th dimension, deducing from it, a Unification Equation of Charges and Masses. It considers also some philosophical and existential deductions of those results, namely the Absolute Relativity of the Universe and the position of man within it.

The Saint Grail of XX c. physics was the search for a Unification Equation of all the forces of Nature. it remained to unify the forces of gravitation and electromagnetism.

‘Mass’ is an intrinsic property of matter, a vortex of gravitational forces, clearly expressed by Einstein’s Principle of equivalence. So it is charge: a vortex of electromagnetic forces.

Under this result, the definition of both, masses and charges as ‘cyclical clocks’ of gravitational and electromagnetic forces of two different scales (the large scale of cosmological gravitation and the small scale of electromagnetic charges) allows an easy conversion of a gravitational and electromagnetic vortex using the simple Metric of the 5th dimension for a tri-dimensional vortex.

The Unification Equation, thus is a trivial mathematical result in 5D Metric, using the simple concept of a fractal Universe structured in different scales of ‘spatial size’ and ‘temporal information’, in which ‘clocks of time’ accelerate, the smaller we become, but the product of both remains, expressed mathematically in its simple formulation by the Metric of the 5th Dimension: Sp x Tƒ = K.

This result allows the ‘first’ ever-theoretical deduction of the value of the G constant of masses, departing from the Q constant of charges. Both mean the same: the degree of space-time curvature produced by an Eddie of masses or charges in those scales of space-time.

It is however impossible to obtain departing from a single space-time continuum as Mr. Einstein or Mr. Hawking tried, by messing the lineal equations of electromagnetism and the cyclical equations of Relativity (what is called quantum gravity).

So we shall deal here with:

  • The concept of a charge and a mass as cyclical vortices of space-time of the two-fractal scales of micro-quantum particles and macro-cosmological ones.

With an Appendix on the Higgs claim to give ‘mass’ to other particles.

  • The mathematical, simple, trivial deduction with the metric of the 5th Dimension of the equation of Unification of the two fundamental constants of Nature, Q and G.

III. Finally, we shall consider the implications of those facts – the parallelism between ‘atoms’ and ‘galaxies’, which as in the equations of space-time of Einstein-Walker (which treated galaxies as atoms), are ‘similar’ forms of two scales of the Universe

With an appendix on the philosophical consequences of this, according to a strong hypothesis of the Fractal Universe (scales which are mathematically equal in the 5D metric are really equal).

Then in the 5D metric a galaxy is an atom of the higher scale, a proton has the same Schwarzschild radius equation than a black hole, which should therefore be a top quark star, positively charged (as top quarks are ++) and dark matter in the halo is made of negatively charged strangelets, the equivalent to a nebulae of electrons. Which gives a role to the 3 families of quark mass and makes sense of the purpose of stars (future black holes) and planets (future strangelets – perhaps our destiny in the higher scale, if as all seems to indicate, the Fermi Paradox converts all planets into strangelets, as nuclear physicists make them with their experiments with quark matter condensates)…

Nobody has attempted as we did to unify both, charges and masses using the simplest of all its ‘first’ descriptions:

Newton’s gravitational vortices and Bohr’s model of the Hydrogen orbit. Hardcore scholars that take years to learn Einstein’s Metric, quantum field theory and Dirac’s equations consider those 2 models ‘passé’.

And yet, precisely because the principles of unification are simple, it is through the simplest methods where the coincidences happen.

So I could easily unify charges and masses, obtaining the key parameters, the Gravitational constant and the Coulomb constant, and the relationship of hierarchy (10∆40), between both forces, by the simple method of translating to gravitational vortex-jargon the jargon of electricity, a somehow convoluted abstraction not so intuitive, and then apply the law of co-invariance of the 5th dimension to both vortices, which immediately showed to be in that 10∆40 relationship.

Whereas a charge vortex had clocks of time much faster, and hence turned much faster becoming a much more attractive ‘hurricane of space-time’.

Now, as it happens with gravitation, quantum physics went beyond Bohr’s model and gave us the other ‘3-point of view’. It gave us the static, formal model, of electronic orbitals, the gradient model of energy levels and finally the more sophisticated Hamiltonian analysis of its operators.

And this final level is the one physicists try by all means to unify. But precisely at that level of detail is where the fractal scales of the Universe which are ‘similar’ but not identical (you are made of space and time and your actions are always the 5 vowels but you do NOT eat light as an electron, or oil as a machine, so you can be unified saying ‘all eats energy’ but not in the specific food).

Let us consider the first element of that duality, unifying masses and charges of gravitation and electromagnetism as vortices of 2 different scales of space-times. Masses and charges are vortices of 2 space-time scales made of 2 relative energetic and informative motions, where gravitation is faster/more extended but carries less information than the slower/less extended world of light and electroweak particles.

The main variation of those vortices of accelerated forces is the one we observe between electronic charges and quark masses, which are the cyclical vortices of those 2 scales of reality, the scale of cosmological vortices of mass and the scale of electroweak vortices of charges.

And so we have to unify those 2 types of cyclical geometries on one side and their lineal, light and gravitational forces, on the other side, as they switch acting either as sinks of space-time (cyclical, non-lineal vortices of increasing acceleration) or as lineal, gravitational or electromagnetic waves in both scales.

Yet since electromagnetism and gravitation are self-similar accelerated vortices of 2 different fractal branes of space-time, the microscopic and cosmologic branes, it follows we should be able to treat them with the same equations of gravitation, either Einstein’s more detailed vortices, defined by the Principle of Equivalence between mass and acceleration or with the classic analysis of Newton, as accelerated vortices with the same geometrical form, whose relative proportion of energy/speed/ distance and information/curvature will be given by 2 different Universal G-Constants.

Thus, we should be able to describe both, the standard Earth-Sun gravitational vortex and Hydrogen, electron-Proton quantum vortex with the same equations, defining them according to the mass of the particles, the rotational speed and 2 different Universal constants, U.C.(i/e):

U(g), the Universal Constant of gravitation that defines a larger/ faster/less curved Gravitational membrane of masses and…

U(q) the Universal constant of charge (Coulomb) that defines a smaller, slower, more curved membrane of quantum light. Since electromagnetism has more information and less energy distance.

Further on, we will be able to prove empirically our hypothesis of 2 self-similar spatial membranes made of light and gravitational quanta, whose only difference is the i/e relative density of information/energy of its cyclical vortices, if the values of the two Universal constants, in those 2 systems (the earth-sun system and the proton-electron system), correspond to their relative empirical value, when we treat them both as mass vortices (being the gravitational constant 1039 times weaker than the charge constant).

Let us then go on with the treatment of charges and masses as Newtonian vortices of space-time. In Newton’s equations a mass can be considered a cyclic, accelerated vortex of gravitational space-time defined in classic Newton Mechanics by a centripetal, gravitational acceleration: ω2r.

The same treatment can be done with Poison equations or Relativity equations, which are a static, present, simultaneous picture of Newton’s space-time vortex of acceleration, where G expresses the informative curvature of the space.

Thus if gravitational acceleration is ω2r, then F=mg=mω2r= GmM/r2, and we arrive at G=ω2r3/M. Where r is in meters and ω is angular acceleration in radians per second. So passing the active magnitude of time (mass, or charge or any form of time clock to the left) we obtain a general equation for all physical time vortices of all scales, which will be the template for the Unification of all vortices, in different ‘degrees of mathematical complexity’.

This written as an identity Sp x T ƒ = Sp x Tƒ observed with different parameters writes:

Γ.                                   Active Magnitude (space-quanta) M x Curvature-speed of the clock (time frequency) G  = volume of space r³ x time acceleration w²

This written in classic mathematical physics, where we consider, using Newton’s notation, a mass a three-dimensional, cyclical accelerated vortex of space-time defined in classic Newton mechanics by a centripetal acceleration, which gives us the classic definition of the universal constant G (UC), writes as:

                                                            UC x M=ω2r3

where r is in meters and ω is the angular acceleration in radians per second of any gravitational orbit.

This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of space-time by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:

Universal constant of a space-time vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)2 × radius3/ mass

If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe both, not only a gravitational vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but also a charge as a quantum vortex of space-time with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

Sun mass = 2 × 1030 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10-7 rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 -11 kg-1 m3 rad. sec.-2

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 1016 rad. sec. -1 = w (electron);

5.3 × 10-11 m. (Bohr radius);

proton mass = 1.6 × 10 -27 kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×1039 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/c2.

But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.

To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it. Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:

For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of space-time. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a self-similar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the non-Euclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of space-time.

He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.

So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of space-time, with two self-similar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a self-similar membrane to that of the cosmological world.

Unification Equation: 

UCG,C = ω2r3/MUCG,C x M= ω2r3   M= ω2r3/UCG,C

Where we obtain for 2 UC(i/e) values, G and Q, 2 different space/time scales and vortices acceleration (mass and  charges).

2 obvious, simple proofs of that dual, scalar structure:

– Planck’s minimal value for Mass is far bigger (10-7 g.) than the minimal value for an electromagnetic action (h), which seems to mean that the mass scale is far bigger than the quantum world.

– The entire standard model works without gravitational forces. Thus we have to postulate that particles are not ‘mass-particles’ but electromagnetic systems, which become elements of mass only when they aggregate in huge numbers, as it happens with electromagnetic photons, which become electrons of the upper scale in huge nebulae.

But we see masses as static forms. This is due to the Galilean paradox: a space-time vortex-mass becomes then statically a space-time distortion, a deformation of space-time, which increases as we decrease size. Since the deformation of space-time is the same for any cycle. Hence, when we trace a smaller cycle the deformation increases. And so it does the mass and the U(w), now a static constant of deformation.

This is the interpretation most often assumed of G in Einstein’s Relativity. In a simpler, classic approximation based in fluid dynamics, M/r3 becomes the density of space/time and its inverse, R3/m, the displacement of space-time provoked by a given mass. It is then evident by Archimedes Principle that a bigger mass density will provoke a bigger displacement and distortion of space-time an inversely a bigger acceleration towards the central vortex. And since the density of a proton is much higher than the density of a planet, the Universal Constant for an atom is much higher and so it is its angular speed. Does the electromagnetic constant, or static curvature of an atomic system, is much stronger. So it is the density of a proton mass.

This reformulation of electromagnetism simplifies and clarifies the meaning of physics. Yet to grasp the relationships between the quantum world and the cosmos we have to transform, using the new coulomb constant, C=1.5×1029, electromagnetic parameters to the jargon of gravity, departing from its fundamental relationship:

F=UCC Mm/r2 = e2/4π eor2

Then we can translate the main constants of electromagnetism (Rydberg constant, α constant, which denotes the strength of the electromagnetic field, etc.) to the gravitational jargon and again the results obtained are close to the theoretical value.

So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric force at different scales, explained with 2 different historic jargons. Further on, as we ‘transform’ the concepts of electromagnetic vortices to gravitational, geometric symbols, the main discoveries of Relativity apply to electromagnetic vortices.

Perhaps the most interesting simplified value under the new U(q) charge constant is the Proton radius that appears with the same formula than a black hole, Schwarzschild horizon.

This means that a quark particle (a hadron, a proton, etc.) is basically a black hole of the quantum, gravitational scale and vice versa: a cosmological black hole might be a deconfined state of billions of ultra-dense quarks. In such fractal Universe, each small particle could from the perspective of a small observer a macrocosmic form. And each atom could be a galaxy. Such fractal Universe validates the Theory of Great Numbers, which are the parameters of self-repetition of the Universe, which might be from a lower perspective a mere atom or black hole of a hyper-Universe.

Now the EXTENSION of the model of electromagnetism, translating its equations to vortex equations of accelerated time is huge.

It means the foundation of the subject with the new physics of 5D time vortices; and makes sense of every part of electromagnetism, a cultural jargon, far more convoluted due to the lack of a precise understanding of it, in the times of Faraday, Franklin et al (for example all physicists do know about the – sign of electrons, an error as electrons are the + absorbing vortices, dominant in the electromagnetic scales NOT protons, which are the quark, dominant in the strong force and its symmetric gravitational informative inner galactic force). And all of them know that the only difference between G and Q is the 1/4e factor which was absorbed in G when Kepler->Newton developed their formulae.

One of the most fascinating results of the understanding of the 5th dimension of space-time, the dimension of fractal scales of space and different speeds of time clocks, is the enormous simplification it implies in our understanding of the fundamental concepts of the Universe, from the meaning of mass and energy, information and time to the solution of the equations yet not solved in classic physics.

In that regard, this new r=evolution of science must be understood as the simplification experimented by astronomy with the arrival of Copernicus which put in the center of the Universe the sun. He was first dismissed precisely for the simplicity of his discovery that made so easy to calculate the orbits of planets. The astronomers of the age found it so simple that they dismissed it. And yet as Einstein put it ‘God is simple and not malicious’. Again when Einstein introduced his most famous formulae, E=mc ², and then his special relativity, he was criticized for the simplicity of the mathematics required to reach those conclusions and Hilbert said it was so easy that a high school could find it.

Tƒ, Sp and Tƒ, Sp are similar concepts. If the reader observes i includes o and æ, a and e, a is in that sense expansive expulsion of energy taken in a larger conceptualization, o and a are the pure energy and form, emitted or absorbed with minimal interference of the being, e and I are the two more elaborated versions which approach to reach and e=I point in which the transformation ends and the being finds an equal connection that I and e are the same, and this realization starts the wave of present, puts in motion the system that finds a cyclical meaning to its communication of two poles and start to move with the purpose of growing and reproduction, Œ

Those masses and charges, prove that the Universe is much more than the physical definition. And we do still have to study the concept of the source, which we shall say now is the Tƒ closed element because once a cycle is closed it finds its purpose in repeating its path (law of the least action). And so it gives purpose to its motion. Closed motions become perceptive motions of its synchronicity with pat actions it is repeating and finding through its memorial logic volume of still time=information, it is itself.

AN OBVIOUS CONSEQUENCE OF ALL OF THIS IS OF COURSE the fact that ‘Higgs DOES NOT’ give mass to those vortices, as MASS is NOT an extrinsic effect BUT AN INTRINSIC process, as Einstein wanted, an accelerated vortex of time. Let US THEN CLOSE this introduction to a true analysis of mass and the big-bang as IT is, with a further improvement on our understanding of Einstein’s theory and why the previous ‘simple’ equations that unify charge and mass ARE correct even if we can cast them with more complex Hamiltonian or Einstein’s formalisms.

Equivalence between Mass and Acceleration. Einstein’s Concept of Mass as a Frequency of Information

4

 In the graph, the evolution of the concept of mass in relativity, from the initial image of an abstract substance in the center of an accelerated vortex of space-time, proper of the abstract, pre–world war age, when Einstein first published his work on gravitation, to the first pictures obtained in bubble chambers in the postwar age, to the realization that each mass is a fractal space-time made of smaller cyclic motions proper of twenty-first century.

In the graph, for the pedantic observer, which rejects Newton as too simple, over seeded by Einstein, a final note on the multiple perspectives we can have of any event of space-time according to the ∆±1 or Sp, Tƒ, ST perspective we adopt, we classify the 4 standing models of gravitation as relative truths, belonging to the 4 perspectives of reality: Sp< =>Tƒ.

In the graph the 4 obvious descriptions of mathematical physics regarding gravitation: T (relativity, dominant in form)≈ Ft (Newton – dominant in dynamic motion) <-> Ps (Poisson, dominant in past spatial field/gradient-form)≈ Se (Lagrange, dominant in the analysis of the balances of entropic motion-energy):

Ft: Newton is a moving CLOCK LIKE vortex of the same mass-motion regions)

Ps: Poisson is a potential static field of energy gradients..

Se: Hamiltonian-Lagrangian is a dynamic description of the conservative energy of the system.

Tiƒ: Einstein’s simultaneous measures in relativity are a still, formal description in ‘present’ of the gravitational space-time.

And so all of them are equivalent. In fact Einstein derived his work via Poisson from Newton. Today Relativity’ informative mappings of the galaxy space-time are transformed in AMD theory into a Lagrangian-Hamiltonian ‘bidimensional model’, for computer calculations, proving once more the bidimensional structure of space-time.

All are in fact derived one from each other, as Einstein took its beginnings from Poisson, who elaborated on Newton; and the more important of them all the Hamiltonian).

Fractal relativity means on the other hand, that the larger wholes emerge from the smaller ones. So the larger masses emerge from the smaller motions of strong quarks. Its synchronic collective, bigger motions are quark stars, pulsars, and black holes. Today we can model any type of vortex of space-time with fractal mathematics, as each small vortex transfers the momentum to the bigger vortex, which emerges as a macroscopic entity.

Thus, we conclude that a black hole is a fractal concentration of the densest matter of the Universe, quarks, since quarks represent on average more than 99.9% of the matter of our bodies. Those improvements on the details of mass theory, based on the advancement of its mathematical tools (discovery of fractals, chaos theory, and the five postulates of non-Euclidean geometry) is the natural way in which the evolution of science happens, departing from sound logic principles.

In the text quoted from the New Scientist that opened chapter 2, we came to the conclusion that the Universe has a fractal structure because it is made of fractal space and fractal time. But what is space and time? In simple terms, here are the two essential morphologies of the Universe: Space is the lineal, expansive energy of the vacuum in eternal motion (seeing as still distance or space, according to the paradox of Galileo). And fractal times are cyclical clocks of information, whose frequency or rhythm encodes the information of the Universe.

So space and lineal energy on one side and time and cyclical clocks of information on the other are synonymous. The static, continuous concepts of space and time become then sums of discontinuous, moving pieces of energy and infinite clocks of information that our senses put together into an abstract continuous single space-time.

One we have “exploded” and given movement to the abstraction of space and time, it is easy to recognize the minimal bytes of energy and bits of information of the real, physical Universe. Physical information, masses and charges, and physical energy, forces, which are not substances but motions, events in time of cyclical, informative nature (masses and charges) or energetic, spatial, expanding shape (energy), that constantly transform into each other ad eternal, creating the essential rhythm of the physical Universe:

E (forces) < => Tƒ- Particles (masses and charges)

The key to grasp the concept of mass as a vortex of acceleration are two physical laws: one of classic relativity, the principle of equivalence between accelerated motions and masses, and one of fractal relativity, the paradox of Galileo, the fact that we perceive reality either as a moving energy (in the case of a mass, as a vortex) or as fixed space (in the case of mass as a particle). All moves and doesn’t move depending on the way we look at it. Thus, all spaces have inner motion, even if our senses don’t see that motion or fix that motion into forms of in/form/ation.

Mass is the great problem unresolved by quantum physicists in their model of the Universe since it is not an energetic but an informative form. Einstein, who had a visual, geometrical image of mass, defined it as a vortex that absorbed space-time, attracting in its flow everything else traveling on that space-time as a bathtub attracts all what is in the water it absorbs.

How did Einstein come to that idea? As many textbooks and visualizations explain, he realized that when we accelerate, as it happens in a Formula 1 car or a lift, we feel more weight. Thus, he made a bold statement: mass and acceleration are the same. If we feel mass when we accelerate, it is because mass is acceleration. But what type of acceleration?

The answer is actually quite simple, because it turns out that Newton had long ago discovered a beautiful formula to describe all the forces of the Universe: F=m × a.

Where a means a lineal acceleration and so m must be a cyclical acceleration. Indeed, there are no more types of accelerations and so Einstein (using, of course, more complex mathematics than Newton to refine his calculus, as mathematics had evolved a lot since Newton’s time) postulated that masses would be vortices of space-times since only a vortex is a cyclical, accelerated movement.

That principle of equivalence is the fundamental principle in which general relativity is based. It states merely that mass and cyclical acceleration are the same. It means in layman terms that a mass is not a material form but a movement. And of course, because that movement is an inward, cyclical movement, it deploys a resistance to be pushed outward in a lineal manner, which from our macroscopic view seems to give mass a solid position.

Again this is intuitive. If you are a very small being turning at full speed, it will be very difficult to push you away. When you see a skater in a ring, he speeds up and closes his arms to move faster and become more stable in his position. Thus, the homology between acceleration and mass defines for a curved space the meaning of a mass, and the paradoxical fact that the smaller the vortex is, the faster it turns and the bigger the mass is. It is the same that happens in any tornado or hurricane: the closest you are to the center, the faster you turn and the more attractive the tornado is.

In that sense, what you experience as weight is the inertial resistance to any displacement of a vortex anchored in a point of space-time. The same happens in our macro universe when a skater turns around and bends his arms to spin faster. If he opens his arms spreading his vortex, he decelerates and moves easier in a lineal direction.

A mass is thus the inertial force that we need to push away, the accelerated vortex. Those vortex like spirals accelerating in a curved path, inward, are like the pictures we observe in accelerators, or the most recent pictures of masses we have obtained, in which indeed we see a fluctuating vacuum with the form of a vortex. Further on, we know that the frequency or rotational speed of those vortices, called spins, is related to the mass of each particle. So we have both, logic and experimental proofs. Of course, I have used here and will continue using the simple mathematics of Newton and the visual thought experiments of Einstein, to describe those concepts because this is a book for non-specialists.

Already Descartes said that the Universe was made of vortices and “res extensa,” that is, lineal space. What Einstein did was to apply the most modern non-Euclidean mathematics of his day to those well-known principles. So he improved greatly the detail of those vortices, as non-Euclidean geometry allowed much more refined calculations than those we could do with the mathematics of Newton, but in essence the principles stayed. So we can explain very easily in an intuitive manner, thanks to the principle of equivalence, a mass with a simple equation:

Equivalence principle: mass = curved acceleration= cyclical vortex that resists displacement

If we use the simpler mathematics of Newton to define Einstein’s mass, we can see in more detail the properties of such vortices, which can be described as fluid vortices of the bits of information, the particles that create any of the multiple fractal space-time membranes of the Universe. Consider the simplest bidimensional equation of a vortex:

Vortex Speed × Radius-size of vortex = Vo × Ro = Constant Value

Since the product of the speed and the radius is constant, the shorter the radius, the faster the speed. What this means is that any vortex paradoxically accelerates faster when it is smaller. So the product of a growing speed and diminishing radius remains constant. Hence we find that smaller particles that rotate faster have more mass. So the electron, which is bigger and rotates slower than the quark has less mass. In fact, the electron’s mass is 0.1% of the mass of an atom, which is all stored in the inner faster-rotating smaller quarks and gluons.

While in the cosmological scale, the black hole, which rotates at light speed and occupies the minimal space of all the cosmic bodies, is the most massive form of the Universe. Then it becomes a quark star called a pulsar, which has a center of strange quarks and a surface of dense neutrons. It rotates also very fast, near the speed of light, and it has an enormous mass.

We do not know what the substance of black holes is, but Einstein called them frozen stars and he said that if we were to obey the laws of the scientific method, they had to have a cut-off substance. Then when he died, we found quarks and so it is obvious that black holes, the densest rotating stars of the Universe, should be made of top quarks, the densest top quarks of the quantum world. Since black holes have very similar properties to those of a quark star or pulsar, ultra dense stars with enormous rotational speed, this fact reinforces the thesis that black holes are top stars.

But this fact, which anyone can understand, is ignored by quantum cosmologists because they don’t believe in Einstein; and of course, those who believe in Einstein are merely interested in the use of the more complex mathematical model of gravitation and mass, in which the principle of equivalence of Newton and Einstein is not so clear. The details of the trees prevent them from seeing the big picture of the forest. But here we are concerned with the picture that tells us that quarks are the atoms of the densest black holes and quark stars because only among the known particles, quarks are that heavy, and only among the known celestial bodies, black holes and quark stars are that heavy.

Further on, because dark matter represents 75% of the universe’s mass, very likely, dark matter is made of black holes, pulsars, and other types of quark stars.

Now when you get into details, the word vortex is substituted by spin, the word curved cycle by non-Euclidean geometry, and you use also two different names for the type of forces displayed by quark vortices (strong forces) and by black holes and pulsars (gravitational forces) because we are talking of two fractal scales of reality, the quantum microscopic world and the cosmological world. But those details that we will explain later in depth, unifying both scales, gravitation, and the quantum world with fractal equations (a long goal of Mr. Einstein, which I found thanks to the expansion of the postulates of non-Euclidean geometry that Mr. Einstein lacked) are of no importance to understand in simple mathematics, the meaning of mass:

Max. rotational speed × min. radius= quarks and black holes= the densest masses of the cosmos

Med. rotational speed × med. radius = electrons and stars

0 rotational speed × max. radius = light = 0 mass

It is in those terms how it becomes easy to understand the different masses of different particles and cosmic bodies, related to their angular momentum or spin: the electron which turns slower in a wider circumference is far lighter than the proton that turns faster in a smaller space, which is lighter than the black hole which turns to the limit of speed of our world.

While the mass of light is zero because the electromagnetic wave never closes in to itself, but once it has made half a circumference downward, it switches upward and so it moves as a transversal, lineal wave without mass and maximal, infinite radius: 0 mass × infinite radius = K.

In detail, light has an insignificant bit of mass because due to the rotation of galaxies (Mach principle), it has some curvature and it acquires more mass/frequency when it rotates around a quark or black hole vortex, finally evolving into a more complex form, absorbed by an electron, quark, or black hole.

Now it is easy to understand how mass (rotational motion) becomes energy (lineal movement) and vice versa (E=mc2 and M=E/c2). E=mc2 means just that when energy approaches the c-limit of speed of our space-time, as it cannot go faster, it deflects its energy that curls into cyclical motion into mass. This, of course, is another thing CERN pretends to research with the quark cannon. Because using quantum equations and Higgs particles, there is no way to understand how energy becomes mass and vice versa.

The Universe is simple. So a simpler explanation of reality is more truth, even if it is experimentally less refined in its initial conception. For example, Copernicus was simpler than Ptolemy. Further on, for many years, till Kepler and Newton refined its elliptical orbits into ellipses, Copernicus’s cyclical orbits were less accurate than Ptolemaic calculus, but the principles were sounder: The sun was put in the center and that simplified enormously the model.

So it satisfied better Occam’s principle. That is what the principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravity of Newton and Einstein does with masses: by considering that particles are cyclical, accelerated motions, not substances, this sounder principle simplifies all calculus, explains logically how mass attracts like a hurricane of space-time, and so it must be truer than the complicated quantum theories of mass, as the Higgs Mechanism, which does not even explain how mass attracts in a coherent manner.

Connecting knots: De Broglie, mass, frequency and time and energy dilation

But this is NOT the internal property of mass, which is a vortex of accelerated gravitational time, E=mc2+E=hƒ->M=ƒ(K).

We shall latter a more detailed analysis on the first concepts of quantum physics and its relationship with 5D, physics around those 2 Einstein equations and De Broglie’ interpretations of it, as he found that all physical ‘quanta’ had a body-wave and a head-particle as they move over an energy field:

Sp (lineal field) < ST – wave < Spherical Particle of information.

And so he wrote: λ x P (mv) = H (Planckton)

Written in 5D as Vs. (Sp-field) > l (ST-wave) > m (Tƒ) = H

But while this is now standard 1st course of physics, what is of interest in De Broglie original paper is its disquisitions about the difference between the wave internal clock and the particle clock, as he focused on the ‘time element’ of E=Hv, and how time changed its clock slowing down as the wave-particle increased its speed-length in the 5th dimension, by a proportion, which we should now remark is equal to Einstein’s increase of energy of the system in Special relativity, such as, if we consider that an increase in the speed of the wave is in fact a growth of the wave space-distance: ∆ L = -∆Tƒ x ∆ Es =K,

Scales are similar NOT equal.

It is important to notice though that the Universe of 5D planes is fractal, ruled by the 3rd postulate of ®, of similarity not equality, as fractals are not equal in scales, but similar with internal parts that might differ even if the outside form of the point seems equal to an external observer.

Thus self-similarity is not equality, an atom is self-similar to a galaxy but NOT likely a galaxy – reason why for example quantum cosmology, which models galaxies as atoms (albeit without the conceptual 5D understanding) does not give us exact results.

Quantum cosmologists consider by using exactly the same equations (in their ad hoc method with no conceptual reasoning) ‘identical’ the scales of the cosmos and the quantum world, so they use quantum equations for all. This is a hyperbolic error. We have equations for each scale and what we can show, as we did here, is the self-similarities of scales.

All in all, it is evident that what we call a black hole or pulsar is made of quark quanta; it is a fractal of quarks. Thus we can apply to its vortices the laws of Newtonian fluids or the more complex equations of a Non-Euclidean vortices of space-time, as we do with any other ‘medium’ called a ‘phase space’ in physics. They can be considered akin to a hurricane, which is a ‘medium’ of air molecules, or to a tornado, which is a medium of water molecules. All those mediums have limits of speed, which are the same for their lineal forces and cyclical vortices:

Light space-time has a c-speed limit, which is also the limit of speed of a rotational electron vortex and a 0 K limit.

Dark energy and quark matter belonging to the gravitational membrane seems to have a c<10 c lineal and rotational speeds.

Because each space-time membrane has vortices of information and energetic, lineal forces, we need equations of self-similarity, relating informative vortices of charges and masses on one side and gravitational and electromagnetic waves on the other. This is done with gravito-magnetism, which relates cosmic gravitational, lineal waves and electro-magnetic fields. So, the gravito-magnetic formalism just needs to be properly fit within the wider concept of 2 self-similar fractal space-times, to define in self-similar terms, light waves and dark-energy waves of gravitation; as the elementary, actions-units of the 2 fractal scales.

Needless to say if a proton is a black hole of the inferior scale, a black hole is a quark condensate. And measures give us black holes as ‘top quark condensates’.

Needless to say, the philosophical conundrum of the self-similarity of forces and forms on both scales cannot be solved experimentally. If the Universe is self-similar between those 2 scales, but those are the limits of scales of reality, there is nothing below the atom or over the galaxy. If the Universe is infinite in its scales we are nothing to the whole. And yet while the first answer pleases our ‘anthropocentric world view’, the second answer is far more logical and in accordance with the evolution of science and thought.

It would then mean that the Universe is absolutely relative. That is, reality is not only as General Relativity proved, relative in all its motions, which depending on the observer might be seen as motion or as stillness (so Galileo found the Earth moves but we see it still), but it would be also absolutely relative in scales.

Which form together the 5th dimension of the Universe. This fifth dimension in which science has worked since the first telescopes and microscopes opened it to our eyes, however has not been understood in logic terms at all beyond the beginning represented by Einstein, on my view by a lack of philosophical and logical depth in the work of physicists. 

We deal here, when talking of the fifth dimension with a concept that should have been obvious: if physics study in general relativity time as space, in a present slice, the total time includes a flow from past to future, and from the microcosms to the future evolution of more complex structures, from smaller to bigger scales – and those dimensions, the past, already evolved flows of time that created scales from the micro-quantum world to the macro-gravitational world, are the 5th and 6th dimension which physics does not study but must be understood to evolve science.

General relativity studies the ‘present, continuum space-time’ (hence spatializes time to gain precision in the measure by creating a simultaneous frame of reference). And Absolute relativity is the next step expanding the study of time with both, logic and geometric, topological, mathematical non-Euclidean tools.

I recall the only time I could give a conference on that unification at Sonoma’s 50 anniversary of Systems Sciences, in which many top physicists were present.

They were first in awe that such simple equations as a 3 dimensional vortex could unify and extract the never found theoretical result of G and Q (we have only empirical measures), solve the hierarchy problem and further on as I develop a bit more the gravitational ‘jargon’ of charges, prove that the Proton radius was equal to the black hole radius so an atom was self-similar to a galaxy and the scales of the Universe were infinite through the 5th dimension.

Then someone raised his hand and told me what Hilbert told to Einstein when we published special relativity: the mathematics is too simple (Hilbert quipped that they were at the level of an undergraduate), and the enthusiasm waned. Within months NY Times published in its Sunday magazine a cover with my suit to the Nuclear Industry and that killed my career with ad hominem so I loss all my scholar positions and never gave more master conferences…

But that is another story of the limits of ethics in science. What matters here is to realize of the multiplicity aroused by the 4 pillars of all descriptions of reality. And the Occam’s razor: simpler is better.

The strong principle of equivalence:  mass as a vortex of gravitational time.

Mass is the attractive, in/forming force of the Universe; and it is merely the last, accelerated, curved motion of the gravitational force. Einstein explained this with his principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass/gravitation. Initially, due to the ‘mirage’ of materialism, physicists thought the principle only applied to the external, curving vortex of gravitational forces that sunk into the mass. But the mass as a solid substance was never found and all pictures have seen merely vortices of curved motions.

Now we can explain all this and take further, conceptually and mathematically the discoveries of Einstein, thanks to the advances of complexity. In this post we shall deal at the simplest possible level with empirical, theoretical and mathematical demonstrations of those concepts, considering some of the new advances on theory of information and astro-physics, we are making departing from Einstein’s insight.

Einstein’s mass theory 

In Physics, according to Einstein the information of a particle is its mass. This can be easily proved theoretically, mathematically and empirically.

In the previous pictures there is an obvious empirical proof. All pictures of masses and charges appear as vortices with an accelerated inward motion. Let us now deal with the other proofs (and let us remember that truth in epistemology of science is based in 3 pillars – empirical, logical and mathematical proofs.

Einstein’s Conceptual proof.

Now this simple equation is in accordance with Einstein’s Principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitational force. Both are the same in General Relativity. And so why we should stop this ‘comparison’ at a certain point of the accelerating vortex? Since in the Universe we have never seen ‘substance’ but only motions, it is logic to think that what we call a mass is exactly that: the final region of acceleration into a vortex of gravitational forces. Such vortex obviously offers a resistance to motion (inertial mass), which is dependent of the speed/acceleration of such motion.

Einstein’s Mathematical proof

The mathematical proof is simple, given by the 2 main equations of Einstein, which relate the frequency of information (a time parameter), the mass and the energy of physical systems:

ExT=K, E=Mc2, hence M=K/T=Kv; where v is the frequency of rotation of the vortex of mass.

Thus a mass is a vortex of space-time that carries the information of the Universe in its frequency.

This also has empirical proofs: All vortices attract inwards with a force equivalent to the strength of the rotating vortex. So a hurricane attracts more when it turns faster. And so a mass, which is a hurricane of space-time attracts more the faster it turns. Moreover vortices of all kind are ‘accelerating’ inwards: Vo x Ro = K, which means that the shorter the radius is, Ro, the faster its speed, Vo, so the closer you come to the vortex, the faster it turns, the more it attracts, the stronger its gravitational force is, and the more mass it has.

But what type of accelerated motion?  Well it turns out that there are only two accelerated motions, lineal and cyclical accelerations. Further on, accelerated motions can produce forces that ‘work’. And Newton gave us a simple equation to describe ‘all’ the forces of the Universe: F = M (cyclical acceleration) x A (lineal acceleration). This is fascinating because it means that the Universe is made of 2 accelerated motions: F = M x A, where A is lineal acceleration or ‘energy’ and Mass is a vortex with more dimensional form, or cyclical acceleration, whose form and frequency carry the in-form-ation of the Universe.

Of course when we enter into deeper analysis of the mathematical details, a mass vortex is more complex. Einstein described it with a set of equations that go beyond the scope of this introduction. But there is a different version of those equations much simpler – the gravito-magnetic version, recently proved experimentally by a Probe, which are mimetic from the equations of electromagnetism.

And so since charges are obvious accelerated vortices of electromagnetic forces, it is self-evident that if masses produce a self-similar field system, they will be accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.

As Einstein put it ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’. And so there you have, the 3 simplest, more important equations of Physics, F=m a, E=Mc2, E=hv and then the more complex, equally essential Maxwell and Einstein’s equations come all together to accept mass as an ‘internal’ property that define mass and hence need no further fields and esoteric particles to be explained.

Some extra-ordinary solutions obtained with Mr. Einstein’s Principle of Strong Equivalence.

So we return to objective science and bring different perspectives to explain basic physical phenomena, and the simpler answers unlike the Germanic view are considered the more harmonic and larger truth: such as why certain particles like a black hole have more mass, while others like a photon have no mass?

It is really because particles are ‘prescient’ and foresee the arrival of a celebrity (they are also conscious) coming to it, distinguishing them? Or something more objective, physical and normal; as the Higgs interpretation for common consume would believe? Not, obvious. The Answer is because its vortex of time is faster.

Of course something more normal when we describe a mass as an accelerated vortex, whose frequency of rotation gives us like in a hurricane its speed and strength and attractive power. Then all the questions still unknown about mass and energy become solved:

– First, why and how energy becomes mass in that equation, E=Mc2. This is simple Energy is lineal acceleration, mass is cyclical acceleration, thus a mere topological change of the form of motion transforms one into the other. The Universe is eternal, made of motions. And so one becomes the other in the c-limit speed of our space-time membrane.

– Then why antiparticles have inverse time coordinates? Self-evident: they are time vortex that turns clock wards.

– Then, why black holes attract so much being so small? Obvious. The event horizon is the c-limit of speed that curves light into mass. So they turn at c-speed, and they are very small. Thus the frequency of its mass-cycle that is proportional to its speed and inverse to its length is the maximal possible in the Universe.

– So why light has no mass? A tautology: Light does not close a cycle, but it is a wave that deflects the cycle into an open wave. Hence it never has mass. But if we were to calculate its mass in terms of energy the higher the frequency of the web (analogous to the mass frequency) the more mass-energy it has.

– Then there is the scalar, fractal structure derived of the homology of the equations of charges and masses, which however exist in two different scales. This is a key discovery for the fractal structure of the Universe and proves one of my fundamental mathematical findings: the unification equation of the G and Ke Universal constants of charges and masses as two vortices of two fractal discontinuous scales of space-time, the quantum, smaller world and cosmic upper scale.

And we will return to that at the end of this article, when considering in depth the consequences of upholding and evolving Einstein’s theory of mass, instead of seeking and absurd scalar particle that explains so little…

– Finally, why the Universe accelerates between galaxies? It is accelerating and will end into pure entropy? No. Self-evident. Physicists ignore the meaning of information and mass and they have a continuous theory of space. None of that works anymore. As each time cycle ‘breaks’ space into an inner and outer region. So do the time cycles of the Universe of which the biggest clock is a galaxy that ‘warps space into time-mass’. So the acceleration of space between galaxies is balanced by its warping within them.

And both balance each other: gravitation informs light-space into mass vortices, galaxies. And then light-space the substance of which our space is made, once it abandons the galaxy, stretches his frequency (Doppler effect as ‘real’) till its ‘generational time cycle’ of around 10 up to 10 years dissolves it back into non-perceivable, lineal, gravitation with no form. But this and so many other fascinating results of a proper theory of time cycles require more knowledge of physics that I expect a non-physicists to have, so we shall end here the simpler version of Einstein’s mass theory.

5D Unification from the perspective of electromagnetism: Heaviside equations.

Following with the concept of an atom-galaxy, albeit slightly different, as all fractal scales have slightly different laws, we come to the opposite view: to describe gravitation with the equations of electromagnetism.

We notice in the graphs of a hydrogen atom and the galaxy, which in Einstein-Walker model of the Universe was in fact modeled as a hydrogen atom, one of the most fascinating proofs of the fractal structure of the Universe in infinite self-similar scales of lineal forces of ‘spatial energy’ and cyclical particles of ‘informative time’ are the recently found ”excited S-orbitals’ of the galaxy: two bubbles of electromagnetic energy, with exactly the same form that the S orbitals of an atom have in its excited states. This fascinating image, beyond a discussion about galaxies as atoms in an infinite eternal fractal Universe, responds to two of the new ‘invariances’ of absolute relativity.

If Einstein showed that all systems are invariant to motions and rotations in space, Absolute relativity adds the invariance of scale (so gravitational and quantum scales are self-similar in properties) and the invariance of form (so its topologies are also the same).

So what the previous image shows is the self-similarity of the quantum, electro-magnetic and cosmological, gravitational membranes of space-time. They are the 2 main fractal scales of space-time of the Universe. In this post on the future of science we introduce the mathematical equation that unifies the constants of both forces, G and Q, complementary to the Gravito-magnetic equations recently proved by Probe A, which express Einstein’s field equations in a format self-similar to that of electromagnetic forces.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.44.36

According to general relativity, the gravitational field produced by a rotating object (or any rotating mass–energy) can, in a particular limiting case, be described by equations that have the same form as in classical electromagnetism. Starting from the basic equation of general relativity, the Einstein field equation, and assuming a weak gravitational field or reasonably flat space-time, the gravitational analogs to Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetism, called the “GEM equations”, can be derived. GEM equations compared to Maxwell’s equations in SI units are:

In the graph Gravito electromagnetism, abbreviated GEM, refers to a set of formal analogies between the equations for electromagnetism and relativistic gravitation; specifically: between Maxwell’s field equations and an approximation, valid under certain conditions, to the Einstein field equations for general relativity. The most common version of GEM is valid only far from isolated sources, and for slowly moving test particles.

The analogy and equations were first published in 1893, before general relativity, by Oliver Heaviside as a separate theory expanding Newton’s law, differing essentially only by some small factors.

Lorentz force

For a test particle whose mass m is “small”, in a stationary system, the net (Lorentz) force acting on it due to a GEM field is described by the GEM analog to the Lorentz force equation. Where:

  • m is the mass of the test particle;
  • q is the electric charge of the test particle;
  • v is the velocity of the test particle.

The acceleration of any inertial test particle is simply the same (above graph), changing the ‘names’ of the lineal and cyclical motions.

The discrepancy in the factors arises because the source of the gravitational field is the second order stress–energy tensor, as opposed to the source of the electromagnetic field being the first order four-current tensor. This difference becomes clearer when one compares non-invariance of relativistic mass to electric charge invariance. This can be traced back to the spin-2 character of the gravitational field, in contrast to the electromagnetism being a spin-1 field.

We shall see along these articles specially on the 4th line the enormous importance that the concept of spin has for the structure of the Universe; as it is the minimal unit of information and perception of reality. And the first step in the construction of all forms of information, perception and reproduction of reality, and the emergence of new forms of ‘social organization’ that ultimately emerge as new planes of existence of physical systems.

In Planck units

From comparison of GEM equations and Maxwell’s equations it is obvious that −1/(4π G) is the gravitational analog of vacuum permittivity, ε0. Adopting Planck units normalizes G, c and 1/(4π ε0) to 1, thereby eliminating these constants from both sets of equations. The two sets of equations then become identical but for the minus sign preceding 4π in the GEM equations.

These minus signs stem from an essential difference between gravity and electromagnetism: electrostatic charges of identical sign repel each other, while masses attract each other.

Hence the GEM equations are simply Maxwell’s equations with mass (or mass density) substituting for charge (or charge density), and −G replacing the Coulomb force constant 1/(4π ε0).

The following table summarizes the results thus far:

4π appears in both the GEM and Maxwell equations, because Planck units normalize G and 1/(4πε0) to 1, and not 4πG and 1/ε0.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 00.02.00

In the graph, we can see the main difference between the gravito-magnetic field and the electromagnetic-field, which in terms of ‘spin orientation’, could be resumed in the concept that gravito-magnetism is the ‘anti-particle’ of electromagnetism as both are inverted in the direction of the angular momentum and the magnetic field.

Now it is important to observe a fundamental law of 5 D Physics: between planes of the 5th dimension

Yet since spin and magnetism are also inverted (left handed/right handed), the series of ‘growing cyclical vortices’ which ‘feed into each other’ as they emerge into larger configurations, as in the case of lineal momentum, in which each new ‘flow of lineal motion’ has the inverse direction of the previous ones (so the couple of neutrinos that give birth to photons in the neutrino theory of light, have longitudinal polarization, and the photon, transversal polarization, going in opposite directions, and then the electron, which feeds on electromagnetic fields have inverse direction and the electric current that is born of the electron displacement is also inverse in direction).

All in all physical systems in their directions of emergence as social wholes sustained by the energy and form of the lower scale follow a FUNDAMENTAL law of 5D metric:

|∆-1 ∧ O∆ ∧ | ∆+1

Which means that as we grow in scale the functions and forms of the points become inverted.

This approximate reformulation of gravitation as described by general relativity in the weak field limit makes an apparent field appear in a frame of reference different from that of a freely moving inertial body. This apparent field may be described by two components that act respectively like the electric and magnetic fields of electromagnetism, and by analogy these are called the gravito-electric and Gravitomagnetic fields, since these arise in the same way around a mass that a moving electric charge is the source of electric and magnetic fields.

The main consequence of the Gravitomagnetic field, or velocity-dependent acceleration, is that a moving object near a rotating massive object will experience acceleration not predicted by a purely Newtonian (gravitoelectric) gravity field. More subtle predictions, such as induced rotation of a falling object and precession of a spinning object are among the last basic predictions of general relativity to be directly tested.

Indirect validations of gravitomagnetic effects have been derived from analyses of relativistic jets.

Roger Penrose had proposed a frame dragging mechanism for extracting energy and momentum from rotating black holes. Relativistic jets can serve as the largest and brightest form of validations for gravitomagnetism.

Some higher-order gravitomagnetic effects can reproduce effects reminiscent of the interactions of more conventional polarized charges. For instance, if two wheels are spun on a common axis, the mutual gravitational attraction between the two wheels will be greater if they spin in opposite directions than in the same direction. This can be expressed as an attractive or repulsive gravitomagnetic component.

 When asked at CERN on those themes, Mr. Hawking merely replied: ‘i don’t understand’.  And yet since ‘the Universe is simple but not malicious’, anyone with high school knowledge of physics will be able to grasp it.

The parallelism between the equations of electromagnetism and Gravitation were discovered by that forgotten Genius, Heaviside, even before Einstein discovered his. Then it was found that Heaviside and Einstein’s equation were self-similar in a gravitational field on flat space-time, which is more or less all the space-time of the Universe except the ‘peaks’ of height that black holes form.

Recently Probe B proved that gravito-magnetism (the equivalent to magnetism in the gravitational cosmological scale) exists. So the equations were right. And yet, this ‘new generation’ of mechanical physicists keep ignoring the implications of this and many self-similar discoveries that back Heaviside vision and the fractal nature of the Universe.

Let us then take further their work using that self-similarity to its ultimate consequences, considering the Q-constant just self-similar to the gravitational constant and finding what are the parallel particles of both scales.

Physical Reality is made of dual energetic/informative states (complementarity principle particle-wave): Cyclic vortices/ particles develop lineal actions-waves in 2 scales, the microscopic quantum world of Electromagnetism and the macroscopic, gravitational world. Once the duality of scales and forms is understood, we unify the constants of dimensional proportionality of both types of vortices and forces, studying transversal waves of ‘lineal speed’ in both scales of the fractal universe: the c-speed of small electromagnetic waves, and we contend, the superluminal ‘action at distance’ of gravitational waves.

Back to the ego paradox – the parallels between religious zealots and physicists.

The only difference between religious people and creationist physicists is in the language of those 2 supposed infinitesimal ‘wholes’, God, the name, and V≈Hod, the equation religious and big-bang  zealots think explains it all:

-1/2 humanity thinks God talks only with words, in the exact language of the believer, which only the priest understands. Another 1/2 believes God talks only with numbers, in the exact language of the believer, which only the mathematical physicist understands.

So the trick is to make the language complex enough to disguise the simplicity of the argument. Thus christian priests talked in Latin for peasants to feel awe, the Koran could not be translated, and Vhod has gotten a lot of ad ons and machines to make it complex enough for the human mass, worshipers of machines to feel there is a better priesthood upholding the supreme intelligence of the human ape, which when we look at his ‘real mind’, is an homunculus with a very small mental consciousness, a huge big mouth to utter nonsense and an even bigger hands to assembly machines and pump his ego with weapons. The graph shows man at face value. Notice how small is the ‘reasoning part’ for the ego. It is all about big mouths and machines assembling things. So the person with the biggest, most arrogant big mouth and more dexterous hands to make machines and weapons carries he day among the worshipping audiences.

Things get more surrealist when we look objectively to the ego-theories of both rivals of truth.

So when the homunculus talks in both cases, God and Vhod, and his ‘mediums’, the priest and the physicist are supposed to have the capacity to create reality ‘speaking the language’. Now, it is the priest and the scientist who creates reality, as vehicle of God.

So in Islam, god creates reality exactly talking ‘names’ in arab, which then become reality, reason why you cannot translate the Koran. In the catholic church God spoke in Latin. And only the priest could understand it. In the Hindi religion Shiva, the god of death, spoke with burning flames as in Judaism, because fire was the substance used by the military caudillos of Israeli zealots and Hindi castes to make their weapons.

In both religions the priest becomes through the ceremony and the mantras it speaks, God himself, which is also ‘eaten by the catholic’ believer in ‘the creationist power of the language’. So ‘God, the word became man and inhabited among us’. 

And this is the case of physicists today akin to the religion of Hindi Shivaites: the fire of his bombs created the Universe and a statue of Shiva presides CERN’s facilities – it only has changed according to the growing arrow of information, which as time goes by increases the complexity of those rituals, the ‘cover up’ of the amazing arrogance of the homunculus.

And of course it has changed the language. So now Vhod has ‘unified’ the words of Babel and talks only in platonic mathematics – the epistemological theory of physicists.

Do you think I am exaggerating? Or no. If anything I am downplaying the capacity of the physicist priesthood to ‘create’ reality just uttering numbers.

Let us explain this, because i am NOT joking. Physicists actually believe since quantum theorists applied the religious theory of linguistic creationism to mathematics that ‘THEY’ invent reality.

Indeed, the reader should not be surprised that mathematics is today NO LONGER defined as an experimental language that merely mirrors reality, as it was always thought of, and proved by Lobachevski and Godel (mathematics as a mirror of reality must be proved experimentally to know what theory is truth, or as Einstein, yes again, this sound guy, everybody reveres but everyone denies, put it: ‘i know when mathematics is truth but not when it is REAL’). NO WONDER his best friend was Godel, who proved mathematics needs experiments. Never mind. Physicists dismissed it all together and affirmed as religious zealots that the Universe is made of mathematical ‘entities’ and moreover, THEY CREATED MATHEMATICS. So they were like the priests of the Gods of the hindoos and hebrews, the ‘creators of reality,

Indeed, as God and the priest ‘invents’ in his mind the language which creates reality, an idealist, arrogant German, a mathematical physicist called Mr. Hilbert told us that ‘he’ invents mathematics in his mind and then mathematics creates reality.

So he started his ‘axiomatic book’, landmark of XX century physics, ‘the foundations of mathematics’ on the nature of reality with an astounding ‘self-confession’:  ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’ which ‘are’ the substances of the mind that creates the Universe.

Hilbert was the main influence on the physicists that invented the ‘quantum, Copenhagen interpretation’ of a purely mathematical Universe that ‘becomes real’ only when the physicist observes it, against the sound realist model of the true masters and founders of this science, Planck,  De Broglie, Schrodinger and Einstein. THEY had an absolutely sound, experimental, normal explanation, called today the Pilot-wave theory in which waves guide particles, as it happens in the macroscopic homology of pilot waves, proved ad nauseam, recently with the EM engine for interstellar travel.

But reality didn’t make Mr. Bohr and Mr Heisenberg and Mr.Pauli, flinch. As usual they started a nasty ad hominem campaign against Broglie and Einstein, who had found the equations, they now misused and twist to prove their alt-right theory a la Trump (they had the power of the german industry on his side).

So they stated flatly that the Universe was made of ‘mathematical, imaginary functions’, and ‘only did happen’ collapsing into reality only when the mathematical physicist, the observer who ‘imagined points and lines’ looked at it.

So Einstein quipped: ‘the moon doesn’t come out when i look at it’. And he was ostracised from the group. Broglie, brutally assaulted by Pauli, had to retract as the criminals of the Stalinist Moscow trials, where all the original r=evolutionaries were condemned to death after confessing they were wrong; and the ‘impostors’ Bohr, a wealthy heir of the financial industry and Heisenberg, a Nazi connected to the military-industrial complex (sounds familiar?) carried the day, while the solitary geniuses, Broglie, a french aristocrat, and Einstein a socialist, pacifist, lonely genius, retired.

Heisenberg got the Saint Nobel of the Dynamite, the youngest man to get one, which Einstein had been denied for decades, as a pacifist, to the point one year it was declared deserted because all the ‘silent normal physicists’ refused to name another candidate. And everybody has been happy ever since, explaining you that quantum physics proves we humans create reality, there are parallel Universes as we are immortal and every ‘thought we have’ creates another Universe where we exist also so we are not ONY GODS, that is Vhods, but actually far more powerful that God, who did create only one Universe: each of us is in the business of creating ∞ Universes, in which each of our alter egos is the central creator. 

Again the imposition of this astoundingly arrogant view, now canonical as the big-bang and the G.Bush is (not the American president, busy-busy creating alt-right Universes of his own but the God Bush of Abrahamic religions 🙂 required the ‘reductionism’ of all sound theories, eliminating all the variables, arguments, equations and elements which the human creator did NOT observe.

So by this way of reducing it all to the observer, they made POSSIBLE to reduce all to the Physicists mind-theory. One of the practitioners of this theory, an Iranian who affirmed it was easier for the LHC to produce dragoons that strangelets and black holes, Mr. Hamed, is really into it, now lobbying the Industry to convince the Chinese to make an even bigger LHC, to see if those dragoons come out for the Chinese new year. Seriously, he claims to have tabulated the number of Universes created and wants to see them through the LHC: 10 up to 500, that is there are 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Universes created by observers (more or less, i run tired of pressing zeros) and he claims to have the equation to know them all.

Indeed, what has essentially happened to physicists after that bizarre ego-trip of mr. Bohr et al is obvious: since mathematics creates the universe, not the other way around (reflects the Universe in a language), and more over it is a ‘proprietary language’ of the Hilbert school of imaginary points, lines and planes, any mathematical equation MUST be real MUST create some effect in reality – never mind there is zero proof of it. So INDEED, we can expect dragoons if you can model them mathematically, black holes evaporating to the past (Hawking) if you can write them mathematically, and so on. 

This philosophy of science is now canonical and plainly false.

Of course the simplex nature of the scientific method when it does NOT interpret reality works, whatever philosophy of science you choose.

There is nothing intelligent in doing the praxis of science; you collect data, you put it in equations – now you don’t even need to know much of it, just plug it into computers and you make machines with it. But humans will always take a flight of the ego just because Nature NOT them transmits information perfectly through waves, etc.

We are talking though here of the huge questions, ‘the thoughts of god’, the meaning of it all, NOT the details. And in this field the Copenhagen and big-bang interpretation is pure ego bull$hit, as Einstein fully understood. Because people use in real day machinery based in quantum physics, the practitioners of the Hilbert->Bohr religion of the observer can sell their infinite Universes and entropy only theory and people tend to think all this quantum ‘bull$hit’ is real.

To me the only remarkable thing about it, as in the case of the ridiculous ego-trips of abrahamic religions is what it tells us about ‘humans as an egolatric species’, who will always rejects truth and hence ‘existence’ as it is, if you sell him a good fantasy to make him again the center of the Universe. But the penalty they pay is not only theoretical – the complete misunderstanding of the thoughts of God, but quite real – its future extinction by all those species of ‘organic bombs’ they thoroughly despise as irrelevant. The human microbio must be above heavens and Earth.

The languages he speak – either words or numbers – must be the vehicle to understand, even create the Universe.

And the proof of all this must be not reason and experience but ‘prizes’ , ‘ceremonies’, the seal of ‘authority’ of some other clueless human; the peer solidarity; the routines and dogmas repeated by   new generations, since as Gerry Garcia said ‘whores, religions and old buildings get respetable with age’. So has happened with the religion of Copenhagen and the big bang dogma.

So, don’t dare to insinuate that it is all a pseudo-religion of the ego, which it is. A wall silence will rise to anyone who tries to deny dogmatism in physics, as it happened to Hoyle, Einstein for quite sometime till his formula was used to do bigger bombs, Eddington for insinuating that without direct evidence quantum interpretations were just myths of the mind and many others. And of course, Godel and Lobacjevski who showed that mathematics is not consistent in itself bust must be based in the experimental reality of SPACE (GEOMETRY) AND TIME (LOGIC ALGEBRA).

We shall thus in this post along our narrative of CERN’s dangers and activism, and the ego-trips of the homunculus and those who make a religion of their worldly profession of entropic weapons prove you the following Postulate foundation of all mathematical and linguistic statements:

‘Mathematics is an experimental language, whose laws postulates, 3 sub disciplines and real units, numbers & points ARE based as a mirror of reality in the laws of Space (geometry and its points), Time (algebra and its numbers) and the scalar structure of the Universe (analysis)”

BUT to prove THAT first we need to understand how entropy and information together create a space-time cycle.So let us explain you without ego, and with both arrows of time, entropy and information and its infinite, energetic combinations, how the Universe truly works.

Since indeed, when we abandon the entropic, lineal only-time theory of physicists, biased by their worldly profession, we realise all clocks of TIME in the Universe are cyclical and store information:

Screen Shot 2016-05-04 at 10.28.43 In the left graph, all time clocks and cycles, which return to its origin, creating a circle that stores the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles.

This self-evident truth is ONLY denied by physicists, biased by their worldly profession, to make lineal weapons, which deliver entropic lineal shots with cannonballs (left, Galileo’s drawings on ballistics, which brought the concept of lineal-only time). As physics and war became the trade mark of western civilisation, physicists dedicated to evolve machines and weapons, changed the two arrows and cycles of time, which became reduced to lineal entropic ‘big-bang’ time.

Even after Darwin brought back the concept of evolutionary time and Vico->Marx, Kondratieff->Schumpeter applied this concept of r=evoution to history and economics and biology expanded as a science of life and information, stored in circadian and genetic cycles, the concept of cycles of time today accepted in life, history and economics – IS STILL DENIED by entropic physicists.

Time, which means change=motion in philosophy, however cannot be reduced to a simple LINEAL formula, v=s/t that equalises all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘time clock’ of measure elongated into an infinite duration AS it is more convenient to study loco-motions, the lineal entropic motions of those cannonballs, which imposed with power the simplification of time cycles that still endures and justifies the big-bang experiments of planet Earth.

So after concluding his first book on Physics, called ‘military instruments’ Mr. Galileo affirmed, his lineal time would be the ‘delight of philosophers and artillery masters’. Funny thing though is that even the entropic lines of its cannonballs were ‘twisted’ downwards into a curved parable by the informative force of gravitation. It would take 400 years for Einstein to explain indeed that ‘gravitational forces of time vortices, masses, curved space, informing the Universe’

But particle, quantum physicists still deny him, from Hawking who affirms black holes travel backwards in time, so they are not vortices of mass-information but entropic explosive things that evaporate, against ALL theoretical and experimental evidence, to the deniers of the Einstein-Broglie-Bohm pilot theory, proved recently ‘again’ by the EM engine able to move in interstellar travel with no combustible thanks to the ‘guidance’ of the wave… All this shows a simple fact: the worldly profession of physicists and the power of machines DOMINATES AND IMPOSES its lineal bias on theory. And truth and reason cannot ‘bend’ that.

 

 

THE HARSH, OBJECTIVE CONCLUSION OF TRUE SCIENCE: NOT IF BUT WHEN.

The Totalitarian principle of Gell-mann – any particle that can exist WILL exist; the ethics of a technological civilisation of Fromm (‘if we can make a machine, we will make it, even if it menaces to kill us all’) and the Witten-Sancho hypothesis (the Halo of galaxies is made of strangelets, as it is the only known-known particle that fits into its properties and the ‘ternary, organic structure of the galaxy’- this is my contribution through the formalism of the 5-D scalar Universe – obliges it to have a cut-off substance of the microcosmos, which can only be strangelets) and the Fermi Paradox, (the non-existence of intelligent life or robotic life in the Universe, teaming with planets that extinguish before reaching interstellar travel, today possible thanks to EM-engines) precludes that we WILL be extinguished by the Industry of Accelerators.

NONE of those 4 proofs have been rebutted, merely censored. And as we show in other posts, the process of production of dibaryons and strange liquid is now well-documented. So the pending questions is ‘when’ not ‘if’ or ‘why’, the Earth will become a strangelet and likely migrate to the halo of the galaxy… Witten though in this case won’t get his nobel prize… which seems to be more important for those minions of thought behind CERN that the protection of human life, ‘whatever it takes’.

So the fifth proof is the behaviour of humans in the face of death, which basically is the ‘Ostrich reaction’: dig-it and hide your head and brain beneath, just hoping the lion doesn’t see your bumpy a$$. Sorry, the issue is too surrealist to keep a moderate tone. Indeed, ‘human consensus’ in madness is not a proof of truth.

For example, 4 billion humans seem to believe that some goat-keeper of the bronze age who saw a bush burning found the meaning of it all, and talked directly to the creator the infinite Universe, just because they fear death so much, they can’t even accept the obvious. Mr. Meshu was a delirious peasant in a very ignorant age, and we are ‘ashes of space-time’.

But alas, 3000 years have passed of all the wrong ceremonies to deny this, and even today, paradox of paradoxes, people die as jihadists and zealots to sustain this view that they won’t die. So do entropic physicists, clueless about the information systems of the Universe, who will not renounce to explain it all with entropic disorder=death, the worldly religion of its real profession, to make weapons, which kill humans, something they also don’t acknowledge to be doing. So as in the Abrahamic case, they will die because they can’t even contemplate death. Indeed, ashes to ashes.

In that regard, the only ‘uncertainty’ in a totalitarian, deterministic universe is not ‘if’ but ‘when’. It will be CERN’s constant upgrades of the LHC? Or shall we wait for the creation of the Chinese 100 km. collider? Or for the much cheaper, far more powerful ‘table plasma accelerators’?

Let us repeat this: the universe is a block of deterministic space-time. There is no probability but lack of knowledge or not desire to know the future. We can only in this case talk of the ‘probabilities’ of this happening at a certain time. But if the industry of accelerators IS NOT cancelled ‘soon’, which doesn’t seem to be the case; since the ostrich is moving her tail trying to attract the Black Hole lion, as we speak; this WILL certainly happen. When? Before Interstellar travel is possible at the end of the century.

Yes, I know this is not popular. Most people leave now the blog, and some send me spasm. What nobody does is the logic behaviour in such a case: to complain to CERN, the apocalyptos, not to the messenger, the rational cautious human being. 

When? is in that sense THE ONLY PENDING QUESTION.

And the Fermi paradox tell us it will be soon – this century as we could be colonising the Universe with EM engines and robots much earlier than that but not a single civilisation has passed in the galaxy the Great Filter or else they would be here with their ‘robots’ and we see none.

It is for that reason that I call in my models of the super organism of history, and its 3rd age of excessive information and childish behaviour, the zero generation: our sons or grand-sons being born today, which will be ‘certainly’ vaporised, while humans as always have done, put their ostrich head in the nearest ‘black hole’.

In the graph, the Industry of Accelerators keeps evolving, with cheap, smaller plasma versions, upgrades at CERN and Chinese plans to build a super-machine of 100 km. since the ‘issue’ of its dangers for mankind has been buried, censored and so humanity with his astounding capacity TO DENY truths that conflict with their ego and sense of entitlement has passed page on the first clear risk for his survival on Earth, far more important than global warming also caused by the ‘pollution of machines’. Indeed, the ‘human factor’ of reason and survival instincts, which is the ‘only’ factor to ad into the certainty of the Totalitarian principle is solved. We are chosen of go(l)d and it is blasphemous to doubt that we shall not become eternal, dominate black holes, reach the supreme knowledge through the expansion of entropy=big bang death and solve all the mysteries of the Universe making ever bigger quark cannons and learning its mysteries by the pedestrian method of shooting quark balls to mother Earth Fact is the issue is not solved Authority not reason, power not human caring has imposed a Law of Silence that the ‘human sheeple’ accepts merrily with the childish attitude and selfie indifference, zeitgeist of our age.

Thus it is only a question of when the energy of those accelerators will succeed piling up enough strangelet liquid, already produced at the LHC to make the ‘quark ball’ a stable lump of strange matter and start an ice-9 reaction – a factor, which we can calculate theoretically but only the ‘moment’ of collective death will assert with absolute certainty. Till then my advice is ‘carpe diem’, live the day. As you cannot ‘explain death’ to entitled children of thought, bad boys with big toys, which is what most humans are.

What they truly excel at is on ceremonies that pump up their ego, silly-nilly prizes and axiomatic dogmas of truth by ‘consensus’ censorship and power imposition that time and the Universe reveals once and again to be partial truths or absolute falsehoods.It is in that sense remarkable that 99% of what the LHC PRODUCES is quark liquid (strangelet in the making) but it is THE ONLY THING THEY DO NOT TALK ABOUT. Indeed, you will hear about Higgs, SUSYs, multiple dimensions, antimatter, axions, axinos, neutrinos, all the zoo of imaginary particles but that 99% of potentially genocidal substance, the most powerful explosive of the Universe, in the making IS not a theme of con-cern. It does NOT officially exist anywhere in the Universe. This is the degree of surrealism reached by the industry. Imagine a factory that produces 99% of cars and then some ‘debris’ but only would talk of the scrap proudly as if that was the purpose of the factory. 

Conclusion. The paradox of the ego and the entropic worldly profession of physicists.

So 2 are the obvious causes of the bias of physicists towards entropic and creationist, linguistic theories of the Universe, the paradox of the ego, and the cultural, worldly profession of Northern, germanic European physicists, who developed this discipline:

On one hand the ethics of a technological civilisation are based in its main cult(ure) of war and weapons that deliver ‘massive amounts of lineal entropy’ (the germanic culture of Goths, who came in history calling themselves the tribe of the Gods because they could kill anyone who opposed them and have always developed religions and theories based ‘only’ in lineal entropy=death), today globalised. So we ‘believe’ in german physics, without realising its cultural bias.  Further on, the so-called military-industrial complex is the basis of the main ‘tribal institution’ they founded to organise humans – the nation, first merely a tribe of aristocratic germans, on top of the European people, the franks, the anglos, the alamani and so on; then with colonisation expanded globally, and substituting the natural unit of mankind as a single ‘homo sapiens species’. So research in weapons and machines, and competition between homo tribalis with them seems essential to all of us. And this ‘ego-centered’ tribal concept expands also through anthropocentric religions to all humans, who feel entitled, immortal and center of the Universe. And needless to say it expands to scientists, specially physicists, who feel to hold the ‘language of god’, mathematics, as its main experts, and hence the highest intelligence of the Universe

On the other hand, against all evidence, we think we are not at risk because of the ego zeitgeist of mankind, which of course the reader will deny, specially if he is a physicist;  as he is human after all and believes indeed to be perhaps no longer the center of the Universe, as all humans thought till Galileo, but at least its most perfect species. So our lack of con-cern – how the Universe could eliminate its highest species? is born on THE HUMAN EGO, which cannot tolerate not TO BE IMMORTAL, not TO BE THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE, its only ‘intelligent species’ who knows better – and paradoxically will rather die holding this supreme ego paradox than accept humbly its limits of life and death, evolution and knowledge in an infinite immortal Universe, of which we are just a smallish part. Religious jihadists do die to uphold their beliefs; and so do despite its rational outlook, certain scientific believers in physical theories in which man, not the Universe creates reality.

The paradox of the ego, is thus natural to the essence of being human – we are self-centred beings – but inverse to the nature of TRUE science, which is objective and constantly displaces man from the center of the Universe. So first Copernicus took us from the center of space; then Darwin took us from the center of evolution; then Einstein took us from the center of motion; and his friend showed mathematical languages were not the language of god, but a mirror of reality that needed experimental proofs. And finally the extensions of their work in the XXI century, Absolute relativity took us from the center of size, in a fractal, Universe of infinite scales. But most humans still reject those advances o objective science. So we need too fully upgrade the objective theories of mathematical physics, in the path of Einstein, Godel, Bohm and Hoyle, to show the limits of any scientific inquire, with a hidden anthropomorphic agenda, as the rival theories of the Copenhagen Interpretation, the creationist entropic big bang, and needless to say the ego paradoxes of creationist, abrahamic religions are.

So we shall conclude this paradox of the ego, turning around the heads of those mathematical believers and defining the equation of the ego paradox in mathematical terms to show the believers their infinitesimal nature.

0-Minds: Still mappings with languages of information of the ∞ Universe.screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-14-00-12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the graph, Science and any other form of knowledge merely tries to reduce the infinite Universe to a smallish mirror mapping or ‘monad’ or ‘frame of reference’ or ‘language’, to act and react to the flows of entropy and information of that Universe (combined in the 3rd arrow of time, energy).

What both physicists and religious people do is to ‘exclude’ all other mind-views, mirror-mappings and languages of perception from reality, biasing the Universe into a ‘straightjacket’ called ‘theory of everything’ based in its single language.

Let us then return to the origin of their peculiar concept of ‘reality’ created by the language of mathematics and the force we perceive, entropic lineal light, which excludes completely the in-formative force of ‘invisible gravitation’ and the intelligent mirrors of all other species, from feromonal ants to gravitational black holes who externally act as if they were ‘intelligent’ perceptive beings ordering their territorial domain, as we do with words, and scientists and sensorial machines (clocks of time, eyes of metal, telescopes and microscopes) do with maths.

In other words, the Universe needs infinite minds, focuses of information to order it.  And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’, the less important part of the ternary systems of the Universe, the cytoplasm of cells, the inner space-time of light matter in galaxies, where we live, the cells of your body, the light filled space of atoms, etc.

– Closed, cyclical times, the external membranes, which he called ‘vortices’ and separates the system from the outer Universe, the halo membrane of galaxies, the electron of atoms the skin of your body, which jails the inner space.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, is the fact that he perceived them from a singularity, central linguistic point of view, the verbal mind that controls the system – the black hole of gravitational information, the nervous system, the DNA code. So he said: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’. Yet this point and language-mirror is an infinitesimal reduction of the whole Universe, even if the mapping is quite accurate reflection of it. So we can now define in a simple equation all the minds of realty:

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

0-mind x ∞ Universal cycles = C: constant World mirror of the Universe.

So each mind is an infinitesimal world mirror of the infinite universe. And so there is only one infinite Universe but infinite Linguistic Monads.

What the physicist or religious person does is TO DENY all other mirrors, languages, monads and affirm HE CREATES WITH HIS LANGUAGE the Universe, the infinitesimal creates the infinite talking words in arab or ‘imagining point, lines, planes and particles that collapse when the physicist looks at the moon that before was NOT there’ LOL, try to laugh at them. Then they will show they are right because they can kill you.

The explanation of this paradox though is immediate if you look again at the equation of ‘any mind’ (o x ∞ = Constant, undetermined world):

The mind believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which seems to be quiet, as the mind stops motion to put it all inside and so human minds have always thought the Earth did not move, and it was the center of the Universe.

And while Copernicus taught us not to be the case, Einstein proved it was all relative motion, Darwin explained we are just a step in the ladder of evolution of information, and my models of duality and the fractal Universe shows our scale of size to be also relative, the concept has creeped slowly back into physics, with the anthropic principle, the big-bang theory, the marketing and propaganda and ego-pumping P.R.ess that made of nuclear physicists in the cold era, to back their worldly religion of producing enough atomic bombs to kill us all, to heights of anthropomorphic ego never seen since G. Bush talked to the bronze age peasant. 

Alas, now we again confuse the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’  WITH THE UNIVERSE, which Hilbert, Bohr and CERN is creating with entropic death. So their minds are just fractal points, but believe to know it all.

Descartes  was not a simpleton though as those big-bang physicists are. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

In the graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

Newton though carried the day, and all attempts to put the record straight by Leibniz (relational time), Einstein (infinite time clocks), Bohm (pilot-wave theory of normal quantum physics), Darwin (man as an evolving species), and so many others including this writer, Sancho (Organic dual theory of the Universe) have met with the imposing Wall of the EGO-CENTERED man, a la ‘Trump’ who creates his ‘alternative truths’ that people love as long as it pumps the ego of all of us – never mind they always keep producing enough entropic death and war to kill us all.

HUMAN REASONIG AND BELIEFS.

We have shown something scientists vehemently deny – the human element in all its endeavours, including scientific research.

In that regard the world of science as all what is human CANNOT be isolated from society, the human ego, the technological civilisation we live in, even if ultimately we all scientist seem to look for truth. Thus in this issue we need to consider:

Epistemological reasons are concerned with the objective, predictable nature of Scientific truths, which contrary to belief is not ‘probabilistic’, but deterministic – events will happen if its causes appear, only the capacity of man to ‘calculate’ when and where is probabilistic – so we do know for example, in the most talked about case of probabilities with certainty that a wave-particle will strike a quantum screen but we do not know exactly when and where. Since in hat sense is NOT ‘subjective’ – that is, adaptable to human ‘egos’ and needs; but objective and its causality quite easy to prove.

And the denial of a future for man by CERN is predictable for:

Sociological reasons, which are exactly the opposite of objective epistemology, concerned with the traps of the human ‘ego’, which simply denies those objective laws when they do not satisfy the human wantings. And they apply straight on questions of human death: whenever man feels threatened by a cause he feels difficult to avoid, he denies it.

So the majority of humans – more than 1/2 of its global population – still believes that a goat-keeper of the bronze age talking to a burning bush in the middle of the desert, found the meaning of the Universe and the magic formula to defy death and make all humans eternal, because the creator of the infinite reality cared so much about him that took the form of the creeping sounds of fire to deliver him and only him the meaning of it all, and save his ambulatory cells from the cycles of life and death.

The paradox here is that people ‘die’ constantly in jihads and inquisitions to defend the idea they won’t die.

Contrary to belief , as we have shown, physical ‘theories’ of reality have not avoided the traps of human egos, and the higher danger of death they bring to those who fear it so much.

This is obvious in the case of CERN: Nuclear Physicists simply deny their obvious ‘worldly religion’, which has been making weapons of mass destruction since its inception – reason why they construct so expensive machines, funded to research ever more powerful nuclear bombs by the russian and western military. And so they keep denying they are just following the same routine of higher energies and higher explosions, which can only bring more efficient bombs; which is exactly what strangelets and black holes are.

Theoretical reasons. Yet to understand that we must criticise their theory of reality, the so called big-bang, in which also the entire Universe reduced to a point physicists ‘handle’ with the language they claim they only understand – maths; as Moses thought God was reduced to a bush creeping which he only understood with his language, hebrew.  As the ‘big-bang’ high priesthood is the DETERMINANT factor why humans risk death (as religious jihad is the main cause why people are being killed all over the world today) we shall extend a bit more this argument that we must risk death to prove the dogma of the high priesthood of ‘entropy’, nuclear physics.

The structure of languages
How does a religion based in a language, which is a mirror of the universe works? For that we need to understand a minimum of the TERNARY structure of both of the Universe, and the language that reflects it, which of course, the ‘believer’ in the languages does NOT even consider as relevant to its inquire. 

Since for the wor(l)d believer ‘the word IS and CREATES reality’ and requires no ‘deeper layer’ inquire. Alas, Allah says ‘rajul’ and man is created, because god is ‘the word that became man and inhabited among us’ (Saint John 1.1). So happens to the Hilbert->Copenhagen & big-bang interpretation of reality. But if you have come so far you might be a little bit less shallow than that. So before we show you the structure of languages and specifically mathematics, so you DO understand things, not only get used to them, we need to lay down…

The ternary structure of all systems: informative singularities, body-waves and cyclical membranes.

LET us now that we have learned the structure of all ‘Cartesian beings’, self-centred in a mind of information apply this knowledge to better understand God, mind and the Universe, because indeed, it is worth to pass page on the theoretical realm, for a moment (unfortunately we cannot pass page on the menaces of CERN), and leave behind the ‘primitive’ simplex outlook of reality sponsored by those entropy-only physicists. And it will help us to understand better the structure of the galaxy and the role man and strangelets and black holes play on it.

We concluded as Descartes, Leibniz and other geniuses of earlier science that systems are made of 3 organic parts, which correspond to 3 ‘space-time arrows’. The informative center which in galaxies are black holes, in humans heads, in trees roots, in the economic ecosystem the internet and so on; the membrane which cuts-off the system from the Universe, encloses it and protects it with its cyclical, clock-like form, which in galaxies is the halo, in life, a skin, in the earth the electromagnetic field and so on; and the middle space, the cytoplasm of the cell, the light matter of stars and planets, the body of organisms, the wave of quantum particles.

What fascinated me of this simple, beautiful ternary scheme is that all what exists can indeed be explained with it: entropic fields/limbs, informative particles/heads and the energetic body-waves in between. So for the first time we have a sound-sound scientific model which unifies life and matter without the need to absurd religions and reductionist theories of time.

Indeed, this is the basis of our advanced models of complexity and theory of information which describes all what exists as a combination of ‘limbs/fields of lineal entropy, combined with body/waves of cyclical time information’, which are both iterated into present waves-bodies of energy:

In the graph, we see some examples of the Universe, which becomes so simple and self-evident when we put straight the record of the arrows of time. So we write a simple equation for the 3 arrows/ages of time which in duality or rather trinity we use to describe all systems of the universe:

Past-Lineal  fields/limbs of entropy x Future-cyclical particles/heads of information = Present body-waves of energy.

Or in short geometric notation: | x O = Ø. It is called the Fractal generator of space-time beings, and it is the canonical equation of the alternative science of Duality or Complexity, which i formalised at the turn of the century before getting involved in the suits against CERN.

Which for physical systems is described by Einstein’s equation:

Relative past lineal space death of E-ntropy ≤ Constant present waves of energy (c2) ≥ Informative, cyclical mass vortices (M).

The ternary structure of all the systems of the Universe, applies to any physical, biological and sociological systems (in social organisms they are the 3 social classes of the system, the informative dominant class who controls the languages of information of society, money and the law, politicos & priests that control verbal languages on one side and bankers and corporations/scientists that control their digital language; then the working, reproductive body-class and finally Gaia, the entropic energy we destroy).

For example, all laws of electricity can be described considering ‘charges’ the electric singularities, magnetic fields (the surrounding membrane, which does NOT have a monopole, as it is the membrane of the charge) and the intermediate space. So happens to mass, systems, atoms and galaxies surrounded by a halo/electronic membrane with a singularity of higher mass (nucleus, black hole) and the intermediate region. The next graph shows a few of those systems:

We shall thus concentrate for what matter to us in the ‘ternary structure of the galaxy’ but first, in the ternary mirror-languages, so you understand why indeed words and mathematics matter to knowledge of the Universe by the mind but DO NOT reflect more than a limited number of its qualities.

We see how both biological and physical systems are truly the same structure of 3 time arrows, which give birth to 3 spatial parts. So entropic fields ‘feed’ the motion of ‘hyperbolic waves-bodies’ which feed and guide ahead the particles-heads that do NOT move in its relative stillness of pure informative linguistic view of reality. This is truly fascinating and I could talk to you for hours on the details of it. The proofs are overwhelmingly both in reality – all systems of reality can be model with it; and in languages, which ARE mirrors of those systems.

So for example, in our search for experimental proofs of mathematical mirrors, ALL the topological geometries of the Universe REDUCE to those 3 types: lineal/planar topologies, which are entropic motions as the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; spherical mind/heads, which are n-spheres as the sphere holds maximal information in lesser space and can shrink without deformation to create a 0-mind mirror of an infinite Universe (Poincare Conjeture); and hyperbolic body-waves, which combine and hence iterate both, lines and cycles, forming sinusoidal body-waves. And so mathematics again reflects in its 3 only topological varieties, the 3 only organs needed to explain reality.

Yet in as much as languages are mirrors of space-time, Trinity APPLIES TO LANGUAGES, since as focused mirrors of realityall of them having this ternary structure. Let us show it to you in the 3 main language of mankind:

wor(l)d mirrors:     Subject (Informative human) < Verb (space-time action overt) > Object (entropic energy for the subject).

AND ALL SENTENCES as my penpal friend Chomsky showed can be reduced to this Universal grammar (or a dual mirror in more simplified versions).

All equations have also that simple ternary universal syntax:

F(x) ≈ G(Y), where one of both element tends to be the time≈informative function, the other function a spatial function, and the ≈ symbol one of the possible operandi which describe the space-time action, between both equivalent to the active verb; and there are multiple variations of it, as many variations of sentences. Yet, we shall see latter that as we have only the needed ‘verbal times’ to express the variations of the 3 time-arrows of relative past-entropic events, relative present-iterative events and relative future, informative events (according to the arrow of life of increasing information, which we will also explain a bit more latter), the number of operandi in mathematics is extremely limited and so are types of numbers, which we will observe to reflect all the 3 but only the 3 type of space-time events and organs we just described.

Visual  languages have all 3 colours that the brain ‘codes’ according to frequency to signify those 3 elements:

Blue/Black (color of temporal information) < Green/yellow: color of reproduction: ST> Red (color of entropic energy).

This IS how each species codes colours. So when it feeds it follows the spill of entropic blood, sign of death, when it informs it looks up to the light, which it sees of a bluish color, and women who reproduce us, plants who reproduce, are code in the green color, and as it happens those 3 colours are ordered by frequency on that limited range of biological perception; so the mind has used them in the range the eyes see around the ‘light spectra of the sun of maximal energy’…

So there is a constant interaction between language-mirrors and reality.

But the reader should observe that the ‘languages of god’ are infinite, meaning, any mind-mirror can code reality with a specific language to obtain its essential ternary elements of information and act-react on it to survive.

So happens with ‘spatial mathematics: geometry’, and ‘temporal mathematics: algebra’ and the 3rd huge discipline of mathematics, concerned with the SCALAR nature of the Universe (its fifth dimension), which is analysis.

So again, in this game in which we MUST depart NOT from the mirror but from reality, we need to introduce you the scalar structure of the Universe so you realise why ANALYSIS is also needed:

REALITY IS a scalar, fractal infinite Universe where all is relative and man is NEITHER its center, NOT its only intelligent form, NOT even the dominant scale of reality:fractal universe

In the graph, the fractal Universe of entropy and information and its infinite wave-like energetic, fractal beings.

It is not the intention of this blog to explain the 5th dimensional, scalar ternary Universe (we do so in a small section and in other blogs). But so far we can consider of that graph 2 facts specially important to the issue of CERN:

1) it means if the Universe is a fractal of information, of infinite scales of size, General Relativity becomes absolute relativity. Since, none of those scales is more important. So humans ARE nothing, objectively, just dust of space-time and any attempt to build arrogant theories of our importance and ‘immortal standing’ doom to fail.

2) The entropic big-bangs essayed at CERN are not exploring the Universe at large but just an explosion of quarks at the scale of this planet and provide no further evidence of a possible cosmic big bang. We shall soon consider those 2 elements and what they imply for our position in the Universe.

 

Beyond the paraphernalia surrounding the weapons industries and its inventors, physicists for a century have NOT made any huge inroads in the thoughts of god, only in the details because models made with an entropic single arrow of death are completely exhausted, as models with the Earth at its center were exhausted by the time of Galileo.

So there is NOTHING to gain of making ever more expensive, more dangerous cosmic explosions and mankind should pass page on the tradition of ‘lineal time and ballistics’.

But on the positive side, the true masters Einstein, Hoyle, Godel and Broglie>Schrodinger>Bohm, did have an in-depth understanding and did start a proper upgrading of mathematical physics, which absolute relativity completes giving the solutions to the questions CERN pretends to solve, bu can only be answered with thought experiments, as Einstein et al did, following in his path of serious ‘respect’ and humble approach to the Universe, which resumes in 3 of his fundamental tenants of youth (some of them partially denied in front of the massive pressure of the ego-centered lesser physicists who opposed them):

– A quantum theory which is realist and has been available for a century, the so called pilot-wave model that solves the mysteries of quantum physics with no need of such experiments

-A sound theory of the Universe, as an immortal system with 2 arrows of time, the arrow of entropy and its big-bang deaths of matter, and the arrow of form, of in-form-ation and its mass vortices of time, based also in Einstein’s 2 main theories, the principle of equivalence between mass and gravitation, and the steady state Universe derived of them. Which he resumed in the 2 arrows of his e=mc2 equation (the entropy process) which he in fact wrote first backwards, M=E/c2, explaining how entropy becomes through gravitation mass, balancing it. But today has been dismissed, and yet it is the in-form-ative force that balances entropy and makes mass-bombs at cern.

-And the proper understanding of the foundations of mathematics as an experimental science, as Godel, Einstein and Lobacjevski asked for, when he quipped, ‘I know when maths are truth (logically consistent) but not when they are real’, meaning only experience can reduce the ‘excessive inflationary nature of all languages of information, eliminating its fictions and putting it in correspondence with reality.

It is this theoretical model which further advances the work of objective science that always HAS reduced the position of man in the Universe agains the homunculus ego.

And for that reason, as all revolutions of thought confronts the wall of ‘arrogance and vanity’ of our mechanical civilization.

So unfortunately it might not come on time to substitute the reductionist paradigm of mathematical PHYSICS as the ‘holders of absolute truths’ preventing their ‘big bang theories’ to become reality  and big-bang mankind as Saint Nobel of the Dynamite predicting ‘ending all wars with a single shot’.

Fact is the homunculus ego carries the day, imposing their truths with technological, financial and mass-media power. And any attempt to denounce its ‘animetal cultures’ of go(l)d and weapons is an absolute taboo in our civilisation.

Fact is big bangs of matter are just one of its 3 arrows, that of entropic death, happening in all scales of physical forms.

So what CERN DOES is just enact the arrow of entropy and death of Matter, in a sort of religious ceremony similar to those of Brahmins who thought to share the ‘fire of the Gods’ that created the Universe. Yet None of those fires is more important in a Unverse of relative scales; and only will kill the local world.

As there are big bang deaths of tiny matter in atomic bombs called ‘Beta Decays’, big bangs of larger planets that become strangelets to ‘feed the protein-like halo’ of the gala cell (organic homology) and big bangs of stars in nova explosions that create smaller, denser black holes, and big bangs of galaxies into quasars, with a 20 billion year cycle, likely origin of the ‘LOCAL’ measures of spactial entropy the ego of nuclear physicists have blown up to cosmic dimension by moving back in entropic time its VHod equation.

III.  A MORE COMPLEX REALITY:

THE FRACTAL, INFORMATIVE UNIVERSE.

PART I. The super organisms of the 5D³ Universe.

∆±4: Cosmos.  ∆±3: Galaxies.

5D³ Astronomy: 5D scales, 3 time arrows, holographic principle.

PART II. Scalar big-bangs.

The 3 arrows of time balance the Universe. Its fractal generator.

g.

Local big bangs of Galaxies.

PART III. The organic galaxy.

Its parts: isomorphism of ∆±i particles and cosmic bodies:

ud-Stars; top quark black holes & strangelet halos.

Isomorphism with life scales: Galacells

Isomorphism with atomic scales: Unification equation of masses & charges.

∆±4 Dark World: Beyond the galaxy.

CONCLUSION.  5D cosmology. A new Paradigm.

Fractal local big-bangs fit better in data and theory.

 

PART I:  

SUPŒRGANISMS OF 5•D³ UNIVERSE 

We shall apply in this post to the structure of the fractal Universe in time and space, the upgrading of our concepts of continuous space to fractal space and lineal time to cyclical time with its 3 arrows of lineal scattering motions=entropy (the only one accepted by classic physics), cyclical in/form/ation, and its present, conserved energetic momenta.

It won’t be an exhaustive post, obviously in such huge subject but focused with certain detail on the matter that matters to us regarding CERN: The falsity of the cosmic big-bang, reduced ‘one scale’ on experimental evidence to Hoyle’s view of local quasar big-bangs, based both in theory and experimental evidence systematically denied by astrophysics for the only reason they lack a better explanation to the proofs of the local big-bang, and so they discharge them committing the capital sin of science, denial of experimental facts, to feel they know.

As the exploration of the big-bang as the meaning of it all is the alibi entropic, weapon-making physics has to keep evolving its industry of accelerators, it should be obvious to the reader that truing to prove a false theory, with machines that can kill us all is a gross aberration of the purpose of science.

We are not though driven by any personal agenda, at this stage of my life, i am just interested in showing you the facts and truths. If the cosmic big-bang were something more than a hyperbolic extension of scale of a local phenomena – the commonest error of the human hyperbolic ego, proper of all sciences and religions, we would accept it. It is not.

Finally to state that this post as in August 2017 is the less ‘clean’ of the 3 written on 5D physics (5D, 5D physics, Fractal Universe), but good enough for those who look more for content than style.

Ls

∆±4: COSMOS

Experimental Proof of the Fractal Structure of the Universe.

Screen Shot 2016-05-15 at 15.31.07

In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal 5D organic structure of all beings of reality:

On the left, we can see the growth of a ‘new dimension of temporal height’, in the process of accumulation of bosons. In the centre above, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies. Below the comparison of our region of the Universe with a neuronal cell; on the right, an ice fractal, a plant and a river and a lung.

The upper astronomical scales of physical systems, ∆+1, are in double symmetry with the lower quantum scales in ∆-1, when considering man at the ∆o relative center of both; as we observe that the co-inverse metric equations of fast, small atoms and large, slow galaxies give the same constant value, origin of the Unification equation of masses and charges.
On the other hand they show equal topology in ST, with its halo, likely of negative strangelets, black hole center of positive black holes modelled as top quark stars, and intermediate region of electromagnetic star nebulae.
THUS we can unify them through the concept of fractal scales with different space-time curvature and time speed such as:
∆-2: atom ≈ ∆+3: galaxy.
 Both scales will follow then the general laws of 5D Metric space-time isomorphic beings.

For tat reason the reader is advised to consult first the most general post on 5D and Philosophy of Science, whose aim is to unify all sciences, and the general one on physical systems, ∆±i: Astrœphysical systems, before reading this post on Astronomy.

In case the reader goes forward, we introduce the absolute bare bone concepts of the organic, 5D fractal structure of reality, which are its 3 arrows of time and symmetries with the 3 space organs of al fractal systems of he Universe, and the Principle of relativity between motion and stillness.

In the previous graph we show some experimental proofs of the fractal structure of space-time in all the relative ‘scales of size’ and ‘time speeds’ (5D scales) of the Universe.

Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.

In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine New Scientist published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.

Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.

 

Logic Consistency: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe

A good description of the fractal universe and its logic principles is this text from the Web by Mr. Oldershaw from Amherst University:

“With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very large-scale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an a causal beginning of space-time, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knife-edge balance between the open and closed states.

Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth4 showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario. But, an ironic thing has happened. Although the Inflationary Scenario was developed to rescue the Big Bang model, the most logical consequence of pursuing the concept of Inflation is the replacement the Big Bang paradigm with a much grander and more encompassing paradigm. According to Guth and a growing number of leading cosmologists, the most natural version of Inflation theory is Eternal Inflation in which Inflation is, was and always will be occurring on an infinite number of size scales. The new paradigm that cosmologists have arrived at by several routes is an infinite fractal hierarchy that has “universes” within “universes” without end. The astronomer Carl Sagan once referred to the general idea of an infinite fractal universe as “strange, haunting, evocative—one of the most exquisite conjectures in science or religion.”

That is the basic story, but because of the profound changes the fractal paradigm will have on our understanding of the Universe and the place of humans within that Universe, it is important to explore the implications of this new vision. Firstly, there is no edge or boundary of the Universe; space is infinite in all directions. What we used to refer to as “The Universe” can be more appropriately called the “observable universe” (note the small “u”) or the “Hubble Volume,” and it is only a tiny part of what one might call our “metagalaxy” or “level 1 universe”. We currently have no way of determining the size of our metagalaxy or the number of galaxies it contains, but we could reasonably assume that both figures would be vastly beyond anything previously contemplated.

There would be an infinite number of these level 1 universes, and on an unimaginably large scale they too would be organized into level 2 universes, and so on without limit.

Secondly, time is also infinite in the unbounded Organic universe. Whereas our Hubble Volume may have come into being and began to expand approximately 13.7 billion years ago, the Universe has always existed and always will. Parts of the Universe may be created or annihilated, may undergo expansion or contraction, but the infinite fractal hierarchy remains unchanged overall, and thus is without any temporal limits.

Thirdly, there is no limit to size scales. In the infinite fractal paradigm there is no class of largest objects that would cap off the cosmological hierarchy; the hierarchy is infinite in scale.

This fact removes one of the more suspect aspects of the old paradigm. Natural philosophers had long noted the unusual fact that within the Big Bang paradigm humans found themselves roughly in the middle of nature’s hierarchy of size scales. This anthropocentric state of affairs seemed to violate the Copernican concept that when humans appear to be at the center of the cosmos, we should suspect that a bias is leading us astray. In an infinite fractal hierarchy there is no center of the Universe, nor any preferred reference frame.

Some interesting questions immediately arise. Why are fractal hierarchies so ubiquitous in nature? By studying empirical phenomena within the observable universe, how much will we be able to learn scientifically about the parts of the Universe that lie beyond our observational limits? Does the infinite cosmological hierarchy have a bottom-most scale of sub-atomic particles as is currently thought, or is this another artificial limit to an infinite Organic universe that actually extends without limits to ever smaller scales?

Centuries ago Immanuel Kant, J.H. Lambert and a few others proposed an infinite hierarchical model of nature based largely on natural philosophy arguments. This general hierarchical paradigm never garnered a large following, but it was kept alive by numerous rediscoveries. In the 1800s and 1900s quite a few scientists, including E.E. Fournier d’Albe, F. Selety, C.V.L. Charlier and G. de Vaucouleurs, argued for hierarchical cosmological models based on the hierarchical organization within the observable universe. Then toward the end of the 1970s, the mathematician B. B. Mandelbrot gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical self-similarity are ubiquitous in nature.

In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists have all found their way, slowly but surely, to the infinite fractal paradigm. There are many routes to this paradigm, and certainly there are a large number of distinct versions of the basic paradigm that have their own unique theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future.”

But what does it mean that the Universe is organized in fractal patterns of form? To fully grasp this concept, we have to realize that “fractal equations” are “organic equations,” which participate of the properties of organisms. Fractal equations create forms as life does. Fractal equations create self-similar “cells,” as life does. And in fact, they use the same term. Fractal equations are also called generator equations, as they are the mother cells that encode the information needed to repeat a living form. Finally a fractal equation will create a pattern of interconnected parts, which put together reproduce a whole, self-similar to their parts, as organisms do.

The organic Universe.

The fractal Universe is a mathematical proposition only – in the present milieu of astrophysics where only mathematics is the language of god.

We are however not interested in the mathematical abstract reductionist description of astrophysics, overdeveloped but limited for our understanding of what is REALLY the Universe of relational space-time. Our advances to those results are of a deeper philosophical meaning, as it goes straight to the foundations of reality, fractal space defined by 5D metric equations, which orders all the fractal vital spaces and different speeds of time clocks of the Universe, and the 3 arrows of cyclical time, entropy, information and its energy combinations.

It is then when we can give meaning to reality beyond its geometric, spatial properties, regarding its ‘time sequences and causalities’ purpose – to reproduce information and duration (infinite in time).

This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from a hypothetical birth of the entire Universe (impossible in a Fractal Paradigm, which at best would consider a ‘larger’ scale above galaxies).

In the graph we observe some fundamental consequences of fractal space and cyclical time: the three arrows of time order reality into ‘wordlccles between birth and extinction’, whereas extinction is the final entropic explosion of any system of Nature. Hence big-bangs are deaths of matter systems. The 3 arrows of time also become the 3 topological components of all local super organisms, its entropic limbs/fields, iterative body-waves and informative particle/heads. So systems can be seen in space as ternary topologies and in time as sequential processes, first guided by the arrow of information that warps them, as time clocks are cyclical and so galaies are vortices of information that warp space into mass (‘Time curves space into mass’ said Einstein). This process do happen in all the fractal scales of physical systems, So big-bang explosive deaths of matter: e=mc2 and its inverse creation of mass, m=e/c2 happen in all scales. Which obviously means if we rehearse big bangs on earth we will have a nova-like explosion of the earth NOT OF THE UNIVERSE.

So how can we reconcile the fractal structure of the Universe – a massive evident fact of science, in the whole and all its parts – and the knowledge that space expands between galaxies, accelerating its motion, in a fashion similar to the entropic expansion of a gas, in the molecular scale?

The answer requires to understand the new paradigm of fractal space (the scalar fifth dimension) and cyclical time (with its 3 arrows of probabilistic futures, informative implosion, entropic expansion and its balanced combinations of both, iterative momenta and its energetic zero-sum conserved worldcycles.

Then we can easily define a balanced Universe where the implosive vortices of galaxies balance the expansive dark entropy between them:

=
In the graph, in each ‘scale of size of matter, the same duality of  clock-like vortices of temporal information (masses, charges, thermodynamic eddies, which carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency speed of its time cycles, as computers do, measuring its informative power on ‘Hertzs’ ) and expansive states of entropy (dark entropy; electromagnetic, lineal radiation; entropic gas; big-bangs of matter) balance each other in conserved, closed energy cycles to make the Universe immortal, giving birth to the equation of the 3 arrows/dimensions/ages of time-space, for each fractal part of reality:

Entropic past-space + cyclical, future information = iterative, closed energy cycles.

The previous equation in formal terms is first and immediate consequence of working with three arrows of time, and ultimately a particular expression of the new fundamental principle of science, the principle of conservation of present energy, combination of spatial entropy and temporal information:

‘Present Energy never dies, it trans-forms itself back and forth in local events between spatial entropy and dimensional information: S≥st≥T<<S”

This equation IS the Fractal Generator of Space-time beings that uses the definition of the three arrows of time, to establish a synoptic, logic equations for all systems of nature, where:

S ($, Spe) means entropic space; St, Ø, E iterative energy; T (ð, Ti, Tƒ), Informative, cyclical time; which ultimately ARE the static, spatial view of 3 motions-actions-arrows of timespace, we define with 3 topo-ogic symbols:

> an informative future motion that shrinks and accelerates the system from more entropy=expansive motion into more form.

a repetitive present wave-like motion, that repeats in-form-ation as it moves…

> an implosive, informative motion and << a double entropic explosion that erases information in the moment of death.

So the equation of a world cycle of existence described in the last synoptic equation is simple to understand: Space shrinks guided by the dominant arrow of information through 3 ages, phases, first as pure entropic space of maximal motion, then as a formed motion finally as pure form (S>St>T) and then when all motion is exhausted and it is all form, the system explodes back into space, T<<S IN THE ACT OF DEATH, which happens to dissolve ‘two scales of form of the system (you die twice into cells and then molecules/aminoacids) a matter system dies twice normally first into molecules and atoms or atoms and plasma, and so on).

The only thing a fractal equation does not have is motion, as it is a simplified geometrical description of reality. So in the same manner, geometry lacks motion; simplified fractal equations didn’t have motion when they were first discovered.

But now, fractal science has advanced a step further, thanks to the evolution of fractal logic, duality, and non-Euclidean geometries, so we can understand finally the meaning of motion in the Universe.

Let us then explain the bio-logic and mathematical properties of the fractal paradigm of a Universe is built in fractal scales made of pieces of vital space and informative time.

THE SUPŒRGANISM OF THE UNIVERSE (∆±4) and its ∆± 3- ‘GALACELLS’

IN THAT SENSE the biggest set of properties caused by the fractal co-existing structure of space and ternary worldcycles of creation and extinction of matter, is the super organic nature of matter, both at the cosmic galactic and quantum scale.

To that aim, we shall briefly study its 3 scales, the ∆+1 cosmic scale, the ∆º galactic scale and the ∆-1 atomic scale, o the understanding of  the organic ternary structure of the galaxy, since quarks are vortices of accelerated gravitational forces, masses of physical information and black holes and pulsars, which are fractals, made of quarks.

INDEED, The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:

Because the scalar Universe co-exists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational space-time), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under self-similar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic. 

This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 13.37.30

In the graph, the local tissue of the supœrganism of the Universe, Laniakea, the region in which our gala cell exist, at the largest level of human perception of the ∞ scales of the fractal Universe. 

Yet we only perceive 4% of reality outside our closer world, which happens to be the ‘ideal’ perception of a pi-cycle with three diametral perimeters (π-3/π=0.14/π=96% of dark reality not seen from a self-centred singularity in a pi cycle).

This secondary law of the paradox of Galileo, itself a secondary law of the ‘mind’s equation’ structures our universal view. And make us thing reality is abstract, void of intelligence and life, static and our mind the only perceiver of it.

The paradox of galileo – the maya of the senses, differentiating ‘motion from form’- form and distance are ‘mayas’ of the senses; as all its time and motion; when we get more information about a system. The 2 graphs represent the same local region of galaxies, in the right now that we have enough info, we see it as a flow of ‘gala cells’ transiting through veins of the cosmos, in the right as we used to see it – a dark series of ‘monad-galaxies’ with no motion.  All in the Universe is ultimately a dynamic PART of a supœrganism, extending in three scales of the absolute 5th dimension of time-space, performing relative ternary worldcycles on time-space 

∆±3: GALAXIES

When considering a new stience, in the isomorphic method we define its Γ.œ, generator function for each volume of the stience, a domain within the scales of the fifth dimension, of four dimensional structure and black and white wholes to the upper ∆+1 and lower ∆-1 scales of the fifth dimension.

Such block of timespace suffices to define most events happening around the systems of that scale of reality. Then we can define specific T.œ, generators of mind species, and get into as much detail as needed.

The different isomorphisms of galaxies as ‘physical atoms and ‘biological cells’.

Now because all systems have, as all systems do:

  • organic, co-exiting fractal properties and abstract, topological ones, galaxies can be modelled as organic systems, similar to cells or gala cells (something taboo on physics but very useful to make easier to understand them as organic systems are synoptic and intuitive, with less maths, so normal people can get the whole picture.).
  • and also as topological mathematical systems similar to atoms or atom-galaxies (something done often, without a good theoretical background we shall provide).
  • besides the usual properties and details of its specific nature.

in terms of scales of the fifth dimension, we say that the ∆+3 organism of the cosmos is the ‘cellular galaxy’, which we shall put in isomorphic comparison with the ∆o cell, the organism of the human scale to show its organic properties and with the ∆-2 atom, the organism of the quantum scale, to draw homologic comparisons of its topological and mathematical properties; as we shall show:

  • The mathematical equivalence of atoms and galaxies, unifying both topologically and algebraically with the Unification equation of charges and masses, based in 5D metric equations.
  • And the organic parallelism with the cell, unifying both with the analysis of the vital functions of both organisms.

The ∃xi≈stience of astrophysical systems is also ruled by the ternary isomorphism of space-time structures.

To understand that organic structure the best homology is between the 3 main ∃xistential functions of the 3 supœrganisms of the physical  scales.

So we shall compare the galaxy with the supœrganism we obtain max. information, from the perspective of human perception, the ∆º, living cell.

Thus we compare the galaxy and the human ∆o-cell pov and its 3 elements: the Spe-membrane≈ halo, the singularity ≈ nucleus, and the cytoplasm ≈ star disk. And so we define the ‘galacell’ and its 3 topo-biological parts:

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 18.26.57

In the graph the Galacell, with a ‘dna-like’ gravitational species of information, ultra-dense black holes; surrounded by fractal points of energy, 3º stars, that form the body of the galactic organism; and a hard, protective membrane of ‘proteins-strangelets’.

Each of those parts will be made at ∆-1 scale of 3 distinguishable families of quark-atoms, of increasing mass.

So we find another ∆-1≈∆≈∆+1, coexisting organic homology, between the galactic parts and the 3 type of growing ‘informative ages of mass’ (studied in the post on ∆-1, quantum atomic physics):

  • Sp∃-negative strangelets must be the components of the ‘protein-like’ hard halo that protects the galaxy from the outer ∆+1 dark energy world of the cosmological upper scale:
  • Tiƒ: its central max. i gravitational black hole, must be made of top quarks, its ∆-1, quantum substance, which corresponds in parameters to the density of black holes.
  • While, we star-dust are made of the lighter up and down quarks, forming the youngest family of atomic mass:

dark macrocosmos

In the graph the 3 components of a biologically ‘sound’ understanding of Galacies at its ∆ and ∆-1 scales:

Tiƒ: black holes, which are born exceedingly hot and active, as all ‘seminal species’ are in the lower, ∆-1 scale of size, at the compton wavelength as a heavy top quark particles , following Einstein’s search for cut off substances for ‘positive’ black holes.

Spe: A similar heavy form of elongated lumps of strange matter, should form the ‘negative’ halo of strange matter (Witten’s hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets, now again all the rage in astrophysics, but denied by the establishment of ‘nuclear, military research’ facilities, such as CERN, which merely states ‘stranglets do not exist, given the risk for a Nova explosion if they are produced at Earth.

ST-energy: finally in between the ‘cytoplasm’ is formed by cyclical stars trapped between the ‘sword’ and the ‘wall’, future food of heavy quarks, which will collapse into dense dark matter information the galaxy, in its 20 billion year quasar cycle of ‘real big-bangs’.

This is the most likely structure of galaxies, as it follows all the natural symmetries and efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor, co-existence of organic parts and wholes, Aristotelian hilozoism: wholes must have substance, etc).

The author merely has further developed in his work on the scalar fractal nature of the Universe ordered by a ‘5th dimension’ of relative scales, those concepts in his work on astrophysics. And so we will here give a general view of the Galaxy and its isomorphic laws, and time/interest permitted expand more professionally with mathematical physics those themes on the 4th line of the blog.

The previous graph shows the ternary elements of the galacell:

The Halo-membrane of maximal extension in space, which selects the energy and information entering from the outer space (solution to Oort’s horizon problem – why the Universe does not seem full of light; answer: not all pass through the membrane of the Halo)…

The cyclical space-time region, the plane of stars, falling towards its centre of information, the black holes that command the creation of the galaxy.

This is the fundamental physical system of the Universe, already described by Descartes, who said all is made of res extensa (space), and cyclical vortices of time-space with a central point of reference that measures reality or ‘mind’. Since all systems respond to ‘trinity’ and can be modelled, as we have observed in different graphs, with such 3-topological structure.

So the ∆+1, gravitational galaxy, the ∆-thermodynamic crystal and the ∆-1 quantum atom with its electronic cover, centred nucleus of mass, and intermediate space-time where forces of gravitation and electromagnetism are constantly exchanged, are described logically AS the 3 fundamental particles of physics, both topologically and with biological, organic laws.

Trinity indeed is  the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space, protected by an external membrane with an enclosed cyclical body that put together create the FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE, of the puzzle of supœrganisms the Universe is.

Indeed, the true beauty of those 3 physical systems is found when we compare them with the organic cells and see their isomorphisms:

∆o: The DNA invaginates with Golgi conducts the vital cytoplasm it exploits, surrounded by the faster membrane of proteins, which act in its formal position as a membrane.

∆-3: The magnetic field surrounds the charge and encloses the vital space of electromagnetic fields the charges controls.

∆±1: So happens with a crystalline planet protected by its magnetic field that steams out of the central charge and surrounds it.

∆+3: And the galaxy has in its center a black hole, which invaginates with gravitational waves the whole cytoplasm forming the ‘underlying wave-structure of the body of stars’.

And it is surrounded by a halo of dense fast rotating strangelet quarks, so the stars and planets within it will become LIKELY converted into black holes in Nova explosions or strangelets.

The role of human beings in the galactic organism.

All this rises the question of the role of human beings in the galactic organism, as we do not observe traces of A.I. or L.I (artificial, robotic or human life) in a galaxy filled with planets, the most numerous components that should feed the outer strangelet halo and black holes, the more dense, which we know are born of the Nova explosion of stars. Thus since we are made of the lighter ud-atoms, sandwiched between the BH sword and the Halo wall, so to speak, we seem to have a ‘mitochondria’ role as a source of matter and energy for the evolution of the heavier families of quark-matter… Hence the irresponsibility of Nuclear physicists trying to create dark matter on Earth – an ethic element, which is relevant as vital, survival laws do matter in an organic Universe.

INTRODUCTION TO 5•D³ ASTRONOMY

We shall consider now a brief introduction to the principles derived of the fractal cyclical structure of relational space and time of which we are all made. This paragraph is greatly expanded in the 2 main general posts on the subject, 5D which studies relational space-time for all ‘stiences’ and scales of the graph, and 5D³ physics which applies those principles to physical systems of a