The authors of technological genocides are often normal, professional people, which work in their ‘ivory tower’, ad dismiss ‘collateral damages’ obsessed by the goals of their research
How do genocides happen? 5 elements converge in genocides:
1. The evolution of military technologies.
We must recognize the danger the LHC poses. The evolution of ‘atomic cannons’ and nuclear bombs has reached a point that has now made it possible to blow up the Earth. Quark-gluon liquids that the LHC is posed to create are the most lethal substances in the universe. They are the detonator of mass-bombs (M=e/c2) that blow up entire stars. Improvements in technology have now increased the level of lethal power:
Without the technological advances that R.H., praised by the SS-Authorities for being ‘a true pioneer in this area, because of his new ideas and educational methods’ achieved with his research on crystal poison, the +3 million victims of his factory would have never been possible.
Without the technological advances that R.H., praised by the SS-authorities achieved with his research in crystallized poison, the +3 billion victims of his factory prepared to be a true pioneer in this area, would have never been possible.
2. The ethics of a technological civilization.
To apply these lethal technologies people must worship machines rather than life. They follow the ethics of a technological civilization, as industrial cultures do: ‘Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even if they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are Dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics. ‘ Erich Fromm
This ethical statement explains what LHC is designed to do. To make a bigger, more powerful atomic cannon, because we now have the capacity. CERN will undertake this mission regardless of its harmful collateral effects to mankind. This project also means big contracts for technological companies and jobs for Nuclear Physicists, many unemployed since the end of the Cold War. As CERN said: ‘Whatever the discoveries ahead for physicists working at LHC, the experiments will’, according to CERN’s Chief Scientific Officer, Jos Engelen, “keep physicists off street corners for a long time to come’.
The costs and risks of this experiment are so high that Public funding should be used in wiser ways. Research within other areas of science, such as cosmology done with telescopes, and social and biological sciences provide jobs and harmless results. In the XXI century a series of technologies of extinction have appeared that now require immediate judicial and political action to effectively avoid the end of our species.
3. Sheeple behavior. The psychology of death.
The holocaust of mankind could not be achieved without the passivity and sheeple behavior of those victims, who are murdered while respecting authority. Enter the phenomena of ‘wishful thinking’, trying to avoid the reality of death till the end. Psychologists show this occurs by:
1) denying it, 2) blaming those who tell them the truth, and 3)bargaining for a positive solution, which means to believe what the perpetrators say…
In Auschwitz, despite all the warnings, many people wanted to believe till the end that they were safe. Many ran towards the showers, since the SS-authorities ‘endeavored to fool the victims into thinking that they were to go through a delousing process.’ R.H.
Indeed, people will deny till the end any risk. The media and the sheeple have played step-by-step into this psychology of death, dismissing the messengers with bad news, instead of solving the issue.
4. Denial and censorship.
Denial is the longest step of sheeple behavior and the psychology of death. Human beings will not consciously set about to commit a mass massacre and suicide. So Denial and censorship is a needed element in all cultures that commit holocausts, achieved through:
‘Group thinking’ and respect for ‘authority’: physicists follow a law of silence that denies their responsibility in the nuclear terror, since the age of Hiroshima. Europeans and especially the French and Germans, the biggest contributors to this machine, have rejected all suits placed against the nuclear company. Both countries have followed ‘group thinking’, respect to authority, and a sense of arrogant ‘grandeur’, which overcome individual ethics, and their own traditional societal morals in this megalomaniac project.
Ideological indoctrination: Since Galileo invented ‘Ballistics’, physicists, due to their worldly profession as makers of weapons, tend to accept only energy/entropy theories that justify weapons and big-bangs as the end meaning. They overlook and censor the time arrow of creative information and life evolution in the Universe. For example, the Nobel Prize cannot be given to an evolutionist. The work of Einstein on black holes as informative vortices of mass is substituted by Hawking’s never proved idea that they ‘evaporate information’. The fractal, informative theory of the Universe is sided despite its many proofs for the explosive big-bang; the arrow of information and life is called ‘nengantropy’, the negation of entropy as if life were negative. This Shivaite cult to energy and weapons justifies among physicists the search for the energy of death as the meaning of it all, and the highest goal.
The LOL method: Don’t worry be happy. Society has perfected the LOL method and applied it to our problems, thereby avoiding confrontation. CERN’s members even made a little dance to calm their fears of genocide: physicists made a party of the end of the world at the mass-annihilation factory.
As a journalist put it: ‘CERN’s black holes have had excellent press… Never has nuclear physics looked so sexy since Oppenheimer invented the atomic bomb’. Indeed, the press called sexy bathsuits bikinis, like the name of the islands nuclear physicists blew up with the H-Bomb.
Murder at distance. Denial of responsibility is easier among physicists because they murder at distance through interposed machines. So they can pass the blame to the military that throw the weapons physicists create. Their irresponsiblity is granted by the military-industrial complex that imported all the weapon-makers of Germany and acquitted the scientist that manufactured Zyklon-B. He affirmed ‘he didn’t know’ what his product was used for. We are told Mr. Oppenheimer who said ‘I am become death’ is not a mass-murderer. Despite Oppenheimer’s hand in ±250.000 Japanese civilian victims, mainly children and women. Again Oppenheimers role was an act of murder at distance.
CERN will murder mankind at distance if it is not stopped or its LHC broken. It will be producing invisible strange liquid or invisible black holes that will fall to the center of the Earth, first provoking an increase on Earthquake activity, and finally collapsing the planet, 6000 kilometers away from the dark matter factory. Nobel Prize Wilczek , who defended the company in its lawsuits, said laughing in a public conference ‘it was easy to sign the safety statement, since if something goes wrong…’
The European technocrats that paid for CERN and its SS- authorities, (strange science self-appointed experts) will continue to deny the facts until the end’, as they receive all kinds of homages. French and German reconverted military industries will praise this new mass-annihilation factory that now researches under the LOL method, planetary bombs to ‘find God’s particle’ and ‘the meaning of it all’. They may, indeed fulfill the dream of Mr. Nobel, called by the less censored, politically incorrect press of the XIX century, Dr. Death: Nobel prophesied that his weapon factories would achieve peace ‘before Congresses does, annihilating entire armies with a single shot’.
On the other hand, all the letters and articles of those opposed to this genocide are NOT being published. The biggest mass-media agency in the world, William Morris Endeavor, had agents initially backing the film ‘Quantum Roulette’, and praised it in personal emails after watching its final cut. They retired the offer to distribute this ’Inconvenient truth’ to avoid problems with the powerful Nuclear Industry, which has a big ‘war chest’ and pays for the very convenient truth of a much less dangerous environmental catastrophe, called Global warming thereby promoting its nuclear plants as ‘clean energy’… Never mind that its residues poison into the Earth and its mass- bombs can blow us all up. Which brings us to the 4th cause of this genocide:
5. Go(l)d Corruption.
Genocides and global wars have occurred in technological cultures during certain ‘fascist’ ages, when a military-industrial system comes to control a corrupted political system. Mass-media companies establish complex structures that repress important information, allowing the creation of lethal machines, the ‘eviL=anti-live=deadly fruits’ of the tree of science to continue unchecked. Censorship of life ethics and violent indoctrination is also promoted during ‘fascist’ ages by Mass-media, for example hate-radio in the age of Hitler, hate-TV and the LOL method in our ‘neo-fascist’ age of ‘just wars’ and violent films. The informative ‘castes’ of the society, journalists, politicians, judges, the industrial-military complex and fundamentalist scientists and religions come together to permit, provoke and implement a genocide mostly unknowing, uncaring, or unaware.
CERN, a $10 billion USD company, finds no opposition. It has even achieved Diplomatic Immunity to avoid appearing at Courts, where it will never could defend its actions, its theories, and its potential genocide. CERN is a powerhouse that collaborates with half of the world population of nuclear physicists. Money has bought theoretical ‘experts’, who initially opposed CERN, and now defend it in court.
6. Selfish, individual agendas.
We live in a world in which the Law of the survival of the species is denied. Social love, solidarity, eusocial behavior, love religions are overlooked as unimportant. Only the individual agenda matters. The ego is king.
This aberration of the laws of nature, which evolves socially from atoms to molecules to cells to social, historic organisms, planets and galaxies, favoring the survival of species over individuals, expressed in the wor(l)d language through religions of love, is the main reason we are tending to our extinction. Arguably it is produced precisely by the obsolescence and substitution of humans by machines, which we generally consume individually, becoming alienated from other human beings.
People rarely engage with other people to fight for the rights of life and mankind. The sheeple always look to the other said. Millions of Germans knew about the massacres of concentration camps. Millions today know about the black hole risks but they will never talk about it and will do nothing.
The perpetrators, our physicists and technocrats, will keep to their daily agendas, which might seem ridiculous from the perspective of mankind but essential to their individual p.o.v. Strange Scientists at CERN, who perform the ‘rat race’ of scholar publications will keep publishing ‘SS-papers’ about Z-particles. Never mind those Particles they study are irrelevant to society and kill our matter. If they were mutating ebola virus they would also publish their articles. So those scientific terrorists will keep publishing a detailed account on how we will be extinct with the same methodical zeal used by R.H. in their counting of Z-Crystal units spent at his facilities.
The rest of the world, politicians and common people are busy with daily life, often unknowing, uncaring, or simply feeling we are too important to die. In this sense, the risk of human extinction makes CERN a monstrosity; yet from a selfish perspective it seems to lower risks. People think yes, 6.6 billions might die but the share of probability for me and myself must be then much smaller :‘I’/6.6 billion…
Unfortunately the probability is very high, because we are a single species. And death is half of the equation of reality. In the Darwinian Universe species, who dont fight for survival die for other species to survive. Only those species that are brave enough to fight for life and repress death survive. Yet, instead of preserving Gaia, we make the most lethal substances of the Universe in our Courtyard.
Our culture of selfish, clueless scientific nations and physicists who act like ‘big boys with big toys’, is currently not fit to survive…
We are not the center of the Fractal, Infinite Universe. The Universe which is not anthropomorphic, but it is dominated by dark matter. The Fermi paradox, given by Mr. Fermi after realizing of the dangers of Nuclear Weapons is clear: why we do not observe intelligent life in the Universe, when there are so many planets fit for life? Do physicists blow them all up before they can evolve socially into a peaceful world that worships the arrow of information and life NOT only the arrow of entropy and death, as physicists do. We must urge politicians and technocrats to take a humble step backwards and a giant leap for mankind, by closing the big-bang factory.
This is of course, the last but perhaps most important reason why CERN will kill mankind, thinking it is ‘improving her’, by expanding our knowledge of the Universe. The religion of physics though requires due to its complexity a longer post in itself.
Its essence though is easy to understand. Physicists’ ‘worldly religion’ is to make machines and weapons NOT to find the ultimate meaning of reality. This tasks corresponds to Philosophers of Science, like this writer, one of the pioneers of the science of complexity with its models of the 5th dimension. What is the difference between both approaches? Easy. A philosopher of science and ANY other serious scientist today MUST obey the laws of the scientific method. Physicists however no longer obey them, because ‘power’ has corrupted them.
In a technological civilization the finding of pure knowledge has become irrelevant to the ‘Financial-Media (informative)/Military-Industrial (energetic) System’ of Corporations, ‘company-mothers’ of machines which merely want to evolve machines and weapons to make money with them. And this is what Physicists do. This is their ‘true job’.
So Physicists abandoned in the XX century the stringent laws of truth of the scientific method and its logic and epistemological sciences, whenever they collide with their worldly job. Further on, as computers allowed better calculus, the number of theories that could be tested increased.
Information is inflationary in any language, including mathematics – that is, there are many more mathematical theories than real particles; in the same manner that there are many more books of fiction than non-fiction, many more visual films with fantasies than documentaries.
With the advance of computer calculus it is today easy to create complex models of the Universe that fill the natural arrogance of man, who always thought to be the most intelligent entity of the Universe; but unlike creators of audiovisual and verbal languages, which are aware of the difference between fiction and non-fiction and the existence of a linguistic ‘baroque’ style of excessive form, or ‘information’ mathematics, being a recent language of thought, still exists in the first ‘epic’ style of a language – that in which all what the language pronounces seems an absolute truth.
When Egyptians created the written language any words were deemed truth and the Pharaoh would merely state ‘it has been written’ to prove the truth of any statement.
So it happens today in the realm of theories about the Universe: it has been computed, we might say, suffices for a physicist to believe in the existence of certain mathematical particles.
The combination of power, machines, computers, ego-trips and the belief of physicists that their task is sacred, it is the ultimate meaning of science, thus make unavoidable that they will keep evolving computers, robots, creating bigger bombs and CERN like institutions, absorbing all the resources of science, as bankers do with money, on top of the corporative market… Both have enough power to dismiss their negative effects on society, their parasitic control of their ‘ecosystem’, the economy and science.
But to get there, bankers of course had to do away with democracy and the right of governments to control the language of social power, money and a sound-sound theory of economics. And to get there physicists had to do away with control of big science, the right of governments and people to revise their risks… and even worse, the STRINGENT LAWS OF TRUTH OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD that would prove their risks, would prove the absurdity of many of their mathematical fictions and would value their work properly, diminishing their importance as high priests of science.
This is little understood by scientists and it is the fundamental reason of the errors of physics and its capacity to explain the ‘real astrophysical’ universe in which we exist. The result is a hyper-inflation of theories about the Universe, many of them belonging to fiction science, as physicists no longer expect their theories to be validated by the systems the scientific method has developed to differentiate truth from falsity or limit the scope of certain theories and interpretations of reality.
All of them seem however for the ‘sacred Brahmin’ of Shiva, with its ego-trip of geniuses without comparison with the rest of us, mortal scientists of inferior disciplines, absolutely transcendental and worth the risks. Hawking’s dictum that we, philosophers of science, are just people who are envious of physicists and do not understand mathematics, or that he did not study the job of his father (biology) because it seemed to him a lesser, easier science, are a paradigm of this arrogant attitude that from their ivory tower, make physicists to dismiss society.
This job, making machines and weapons has today become the essence of our culture and gives so much respect that as ‘absolute power corrupts absolutely’, physicists have enlarged their work, from the study of the ‘arrow of motion’ in all systems (as they started making canons and studying its motions, as ‘ballistics’ with Galileo) to develop entropy=death theories of the Universe, with ‘big-bang’ explosions, that should reveal the meaning of it all.
This is the bottom line: physicists make weapons, that is how they started, and this has deformed their endeavor at all levels, not only provoking the errors of ‘lineal time’, ignorance of information and its laws, ‘big-bang’ faulty theories, etc. etc. but also making him dismiss the risks and deaths they provoke, something specially truth of nuclear physicists who hold for 50 years the world in the brink of extinction with no doubt their ‘mission’ exploring Nuclear bombs… and particles, was sacred enough. To talk of death and risks is and has always been a no-no taboo subject among people who make the weapons that kill mankind but ‘do not kill themselves’, so can look at distance the process, as bankers who make the money that they deny to mankind condemned to live in abject poverty, for lack of investment in welfare goods, never talk of the rights of people to control themselves the language of social power in a democracy and use it to manufacture the goods they want,
How to deal with monstruosities. Visual Exorcism…
‘Fear and pity may be aroused by spectacular means. Yet those who employ spectacular means to create a sense not of the terrible but only of the monstrous, are strangers to the purpose of Tragedy; for we must not demand of Tragedy, but only that which is proper to it.’ Poetics, Aristotle
Now how do you deal with the existence of a group of people who are able to risk the entire planet for the sake of a few prizes, a salary and a ‘religion’ of machines – physics the science of entropy and motion, who thinks is all about energy, entropy and death?
And are faithfully protected by the entire planetary ego-trip of mass-media, corporations and worship of technology?
In this group of the 4 biggest activists, Mr. Rossler takes it with German angst; Mr. Penrose with some british irony; Mr. Walter with American optimism; but me, being a Catalan, a country known for its art… well I take it with surrealist humor. Now of course, the enormity of this crime – just multiplying the initial probabilities of the company ‘unlikely’, 10% x 7 billion = 700 million holocaust for the fact of doing the experiments, initially made us all live in ‘angst’. I was qualified as the ‘most hysterical’ by some blogger and my depression was so deep for several years that I had to exorcise it with a film.
And certainly it has changed the way i see life and human beings… not only the deep eviL=anti-life actions of ‘physicists’ with their long arrogance, coldness and detachment – as the makers of all the weapons of modern history is chilling, but the idiocy of the human sheeple who ‘trust’ them and find refuge in ‘expert talk’ and the routines of the press and politicians who would die just not to contradict the constant bullying of those minions of thought – the entire nightmare that CERN represents, reminds indeed the astounding, absurd tragedy perfectly avoidable of I world war, another war for the profits of the military-industrial complex who gave birth to surrealism, a very misunderstood form of art, where the absurdity of that tragedy became a parable of the meaningless nature of the human condition. In this we, Spaniards, might be different to the cowardice of the American culture that never accepts death and hence it so easily causes it. We are ‘never hysterical’, but we love life and fight for it. And once we loose it, then we die with a smile, and that is what surrealism means.
Yes, the activists of this fundamental cause of mankind have lost. But not, I won’t be hysterical, just make art of it. Ultimately if we humans could not even stop a public corporation like CERN from so blatantly risk our lives, we are doomed… as other ‘singularity machines’ lurk ahead, far more difficult to stop – metal nanobacteria, military A.I. massive unemployment caused by robotic workers, you name it. If we fought so long against CERN it was because the sheer size of the potential genocide and the relative unimportance of this machine, owned by European states, and merely used to prove an insignificant theory, made us believe it was possible to stop this madness. But we simply found men are powerless, irresponsible, evil children, accidentally constructed to self-destroy…
In that sense, if there is something surrealist today in the world is CERN and its Shiva statues and monuments to the wrong God.So we shall introduce from time to time in this blog, excepts of our film, ‘quantum roulette’, which needless to say will never come to a theater near you. This is the piece about strangelets, strange and surrealist indeed (as usual disregard dates, 2010 was the initial year for full-energy firing of the LHC, now postponed to 2015):
But if you thought that the ‘strangelet’ scenario was ‘strange’, think twice, because our ‘genius’ theory is even more weird. So having befriended Mr. Terry Southern, the writer of Dr. Strangelove during my youth at Columbia University… we shall consider Mr. Hawking’s theory of black holes traveling to the past, or else… with another surrealist touch coming from his past alter ego. Yes, the evilness of Mr. Hawking, and those who surround him and write his books for profit is so utterly absurd, childish and irresponsible as most human ego-trips are that one cannot but draw on that film which put at face value the people responsible for the cold war. So here you have in his own words in a video shot secretly in Pasadena, confiscated at the end of the ‘session’ – after having changed the camera tape for a blanck one (: