Equivalence between Mass and Acceleration. Einstein’s Concept of Mass as a Frequency of Information
In the graph, the evolution of the concept of mass in relativity, from the initial image of an abstract substance in the center of an accelerated vortex of space-time, proper of the abstract, pre–world war age, when Einstein first published his work on gravitation, to the first pictures obtained in bubble chambers in the postwar age, to the realization that each mass is a fractal space-time made of smaller cyclic motions proper of twenty-first century.
In the graph, for the pedantic observer, which rejects Newton as too simple, over seeded by Einstein, a final note on the multiple perspectives we can have of any event of space-time according to the ∆±1 or Sp, Tƒ, ST perspective we adopt, we classify the 4 standing models of gravitation as relative truths, belonging to the 4 perspectives of reality: Sp< =>Tƒ.
In the graph the 4 obvious descriptions of mathematical physics regarding gravitation: Tiƒ (relativity, dominant in form)≈ Ft (Newton – dominant in dynamic motion) <-> Ps (Poisson, dominant in past spatial field/gradient-form)≈ Se (Lagrange, dominant in the analysis of the balances of entropic motion-energy):
Ft: Newton is a moving CLOCK LIKE vortex of the same mass-motion regions)
Ps: Poisson is a potential static field of energy gradients..
Se: Hamiltonian-Lagrangian is a dynamic description of the conservative energy of the system.
Tiƒ: Einstein’s simultaneous measures in relativity are a still, formal description in ‘present’ of the gravitational space-time.
And so all of them are equivalent. In fact Einstein derived his work via Poisson from Newton. Today Relativity’ informative mappings of the galaxy space-time are transformed in AMD theory into a Lagrangian-Hamiltonian ‘bidimensional model’, for computer calculations, proving once more the bidimensional structure of space-time.
All are in fact derived one from each other, as Einstein took its beginnings from Poisson, who elaborated on Newton; and the more important of them all the Hamiltonian).
Fractal relativity means on the other hand, that the larger wholes emerge from the smaller ones. So the larger masses emerge from the smaller motions of strong quarks. Its synchronic collective, bigger motions are quark stars, pulsars, and black holes. Today we can model any type of vortex of space-time with fractal mathematics, as each small vortex transfers the momentum to the bigger vortex, which emerges as a macroscopic entity.
Thus, we conclude that a black hole is a fractal concentration of the densest matter of the Universe, quarks, since quarks represent on average more than 99.9% of the matter of our bodies. Those improvements on the details of mass theory, based on the advancement of its mathematical tools (discovery of fractals, chaos theory, and the five postulates of non-Euclidean geometry) is the natural way in which the evolution of science happens, departing from sound logic principles.
In the text quoted from the New Scientist that opened chapter 2, we came to the conclusion that the Universe has a fractal structure because it is made of fractal space and fractal time. But what is space and time? In simple terms, here are the two essential morphologies of the Universe: Space is the lineal, expansive energy of the vacuum in eternal motion (seeing as still distance or space, according to the paradox of Galileo). And fractal times are cyclical clocks of information, whose frequency or rhythm encodes the information of the Universe.
So space and lineal energy on one side and time and cyclical clocks of information on the other are synonymous. The static, continuous concepts of space and time become then sums of discontinuous, moving pieces of energy and infinite clocks of information that our senses put together into an abstract continuous single space-time.
One we have “exploded” and given movement to the abstraction of space and time, it is easy to recognize the minimal bytes of energy and bits of information of the real, physical Universe. Physical information, masses and charges, and physical energy, forces, which are not substances but motions, events in time of cyclical, informative nature (masses and charges) or energetic, spatial, expanding shape (energy), that constantly transform into each other ad eternal, creating the essential rhythm of the physical Universe:
E (forces) < => Tƒ- Particles (masses and charges)
The key to grasp the concept of mass as a vortex of acceleration are two physical laws: one of classic relativity, the principle of equivalence between accelerated motions and masses, and one of fractal relativity, the paradox of Galileo, the fact that we perceive reality either as a moving energy (in the case of a mass, as a vortex) or as fixed space (in the case of mass as a particle). All moves and doesn’t move depending on the way we look at it. Thus, all spaces have inner motion, even if our senses don’t see that motion or fix that motion into forms of in/form/ation.
Mass is the great problem unresolved by quantum physicists in their model of the Universe since it is not an energetic but an informative form. Einstein, who had a visual, geometrical image of mass, defined it as a vortex that absorbed space-time, attracting in its flow everything else traveling on that space-time as a bathtub attracts all what is in the water it absorbs.
How did Einstein come to that idea? As many textbooks and visualizations explain, he realized that when we accelerate, as it happens in a Formula 1 car or a lift, we feel more weight. Thus, he made a bold statement: mass and acceleration are the same. If we feel mass when we accelerate, it is because mass is acceleration. But what type of acceleration?
The answer is actually quite simple, because it turns out that Newton had long ago discovered a beautiful formula to describe all the forces of the Universe: F=m × a.
Where a means a lineal acceleration and so m must be a cyclical acceleration. Indeed, there are no more types of accelerations and so Einstein (using, of course, more complex mathematics than Newton to refine his calculus, as mathematics had evolved a lot since Newton’s time) postulated that masses would be vortices of space-times since only a vortex is a cyclical, accelerated movement.
That principle of equivalence is the fundamental principle in which general relativity is based. It states merely that mass and cyclical acceleration are the same. It means in layman terms that a mass is not a material form but a movement. And of course, because that movement is an inward, cyclical movement, it deploys a resistance to be pushed outward in a lineal manner, which from our macroscopic view seems to give mass a solid position.
Again this is intuitive. If you are a very small being turning at full speed, it will be very difficult to push you away. When you see a skater in a ring, he speeds up and closes his arms to move faster and become more stable in his position. Thus, the homology between acceleration and mass defines for a curved space the meaning of a mass, and the paradoxical fact that the smaller the vortex is, the faster it turns and the bigger the mass is. It is the same that happens in any tornado or hurricane: the closest you are to the center, the faster you turn and the more attractive the tornado is.
In that sense, what you experience as weight is the inertial resistance to any displacement of a vortex anchored in a point of space-time. The same happens in our macro universe when a skater turns around and bends his arms to spin faster. If he opens his arms spreading his vortex, he decelerates and moves easier in a lineal direction.
A mass is thus the inertial force that we need to push away, the accelerated vortex. Those vortex like spirals accelerating in a curved path, inward, are like the pictures we observe in accelerators, or the most recent pictures of masses we have obtained, in which indeed we see a fluctuating vacuum with the form of a vortex. Further on, we know that the frequency or rotational speed of those vortices, called spins, is related to the mass of each particle. So we have both, logic and experimental proofs. Of course, I have used here and will continue using the simple mathematics of Newton and the visual thought experiments of Einstein, to describe those concepts because this is a book for non-specialists.
Already Descartes said that the Universe was made of vortices and “res extensa,” that is, lineal space. What Einstein did was to apply the most modern non-Euclidean mathematics of his day to those well-known principles. So he improved greatly the detail of those vortices, as non-Euclidean geometry allowed much more refined calculations than those we could do with the mathematics of Newton, but in essence the principles stayed. So we can explain very easily in an intuitive manner, thanks to the principle of equivalence, a mass with a simple equation:
Equivalence principle: mass = curved acceleration= cyclical vortex that resists displacement
If we use the simpler mathematics of Newton to define Einstein’s mass, we can see in more detail the properties of such vortices, which can be described as fluid vortices of the bits of information, the particles that create any of the multiple fractal space-time membranes of the Universe. Consider the simplest bidimensional equation of a vortex:
Vortex Speed × Radius-size of vortex = Vo × Ro = Constant Value
Since the product of the speed and the radius is constant, the shorter the radius, the faster the speed. What this means is that any vortex paradoxically accelerates faster when it is smaller. So the product of a growing speed and diminishing radius remains constant. Hence we find that smaller particles that rotate faster have more mass. So the electron, which is bigger and rotates slower than the quark has less mass. In fact, the electron’s mass is 0.1% of the mass of an atom, which is all stored in the inner faster-rotating smaller quarks and gluons.
While in the cosmological scale, the black hole, which rotates at light speed and occupies the minimal space of all the cosmic bodies, is the most massive form of the Universe. Then it becomes a quark star called a pulsar, which has a center of strange quarks and a surface of dense neutrons. It rotates also very fast, near the speed of light, and it has an enormous mass.
We do not know what the substance of black holes is, but Einstein called them frozen stars and he said that if we were to obey the laws of the scientific method, they had to have a cut-off substance. Then when he died, we found quarks and so it is obvious that black holes, the densest rotating stars of the Universe, should be made of top quarks, the densest top quarks of the quantum world. Since black holes have very similar properties to those of a quark star or pulsar, ultra dense stars with enormous rotational speed, this fact reinforces the thesis that black holes are top stars.
But this fact, which anyone can understand, is ignored by quantum cosmologists because they don’t believe in Einstein; and of course, those who believe in Einstein are merely interested in the use of the more complex mathematical model of gravitation and mass, in which the principle of equivalence of Newton and Einstein is not so clear. The details of the trees prevent them from seeing the big picture of the forest. But here we are concerned with the picture that tells us that quarks are the atoms of the densest black holes and quark stars because only among the known particles, quarks are that heavy, and only among the known celestial bodies, black holes and quark stars are that heavy.
Further on, because dark matter represents 75% of the universe’s mass, very likely, dark matter is made of black holes, pulsars, and other types of quark stars.
Now when you get into details, the word vortex is substituted by spin, the word curved cycle by non-Euclidean geometry, and you use also two different names for the type of forces displayed by quark vortices (strong forces) and by black holes and pulsars (gravitational forces) because we are talking of two fractal scales of reality, the quantum microscopic world and the cosmological world. But those details that we will explain later in depth, unifying both scales, gravitation, and the quantum world with fractal equations (a long goal of Mr. Einstein, which I found thanks to the expansion of the postulates of non-Euclidean geometry that Mr. Einstein lacked) are of no importance to understand in simple mathematics, the meaning of mass:
Max. rotational speed × min. radius= quarks and black holes= the densest masses of the cosmos
Med. rotational speed × med. radius = electrons and stars
0 rotational speed × max. radius = light = 0 mass
It is in those terms how it becomes easy to understand the different masses of different particles and cosmic bodies, related to their angular momentum or spin: the electron which turns slower in a wider circumference is far lighter than the proton that turns faster in a smaller space, which is lighter than the black hole which turns to the limit of speed of our world.
While the mass of light is zero because the electromagnetic wave never closes in to itself, but once it has made half a circumference downward, it switches upward and so it moves as a transversal, lineal wave without mass and maximal, infinite radius: 0 mass × infinite radius = K.
In detail, light has an insignificant bit of mass because due to the rotation of galaxies (Mach principle), it has some curvature and it acquires more mass/frequency when it rotates around a quark or black hole vortex, finally evolving into a more complex form, absorbed by an electron, quark, or black hole.
Now it is easy to understand how mass (rotational motion) becomes energy (lineal movement) and vice versa (E=mc2 and M=E/c2). E=mc2 means just that when energy approaches the c-limit of speed of our space-time, as it cannot go faster, it deflects its energy that curls into cyclical motion into mass. This, of course, is another thing CERN pretends to research with the quark cannon. Because using quantum equations and Higgs particles, there is no way to understand how energy becomes mass and vice versa.
The Universe is simple. So a simpler explanation of reality is more truth, even if it is experimentally less refined in its initial conception. For example, Copernicus was simpler than Ptolemy. Further on, for many years, till Kepler and Newton refined its elliptical orbits into ellipses, Copernicus’s cyclical orbits were less accurate than Ptolemaic calculus, but the principles were sounder: The sun was put in the center and that simplified enormously the model.
So it satisfied better Occam’s principle. That is what the principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravity of Newton and Einstein does with masses: by considering that particles are cyclical, accelerated motions, not substances, this sounder principle simplifies all calculus, explains logically how mass attracts like a hurricane of space-time, and so it must be truer than the complicated quantum theories of mass, as the Higgs Mechanism, which does not even explain how mass attracts in a coherent manner.
Connecting knots: De Broglie, mass, frequency and time and energy dilation
But this is NOT the internal property of mass, which is a vortex of accelerated gravitational time, E=mc2+E=hƒ->M=ƒ(K).
We shall latter a more detailed analysis on the first concepts of quantum physics and its relationship with 5D, physics around those 2 Einstein equations and De Broglie’ interpretations of it, as he found that all physical ‘quanta’ had a body-wave and a head-particle as they move over an energy field:
Sp (lineal field) < ST – wave < Spherical Particle of information.
And so he wrote: λ x P (mv) = H (Planckton)
Written in 5D as Vs. (Sp-field) > l (ST-wave) > m (Tƒ) = H
But while this is now standard 1st course of physics, what is of interest in De Broglie original paper is its disquisitions about the difference between the wave internal clock and the particle clock, as he focused on the ‘time element’ of E=Hv, and how time changed its clock slowing down as the wave-particle increased its speed-length in the 5th dimension, by a proportion, which we should now remark is equal to Einstein’s increase of energy of the system in Special relativity, such as, if we consider that an increase in the speed of the wave is in fact a growth of the wave space-distance: ∆ L = -∆Tƒ x ∆ Es =K,
Scales are similar NOT equal.
It is important to notice though that the Universe of 5D planes is fractal, ruled by the 3rd postulate of ¬Æ, of similarity not equality, as fractals are not equal in scales, but similar with internal parts that might differ even if the outside form of the point seems equal to an external observer.
Thus self-similarity is not equality, an atom is self-similar to a galaxy but NOT likely a galaxy – reason why for example quantum cosmology, which models galaxies as atoms (albeit without the conceptual 5D understanding) does not give us exact results.
Quantum cosmologists consider by using exactly the same equations (in their ad hoc method with no conceptual reasoning) ‘identical’ the scales of the cosmos and the quantum world, so they use quantum equations for all. This is a hyperbolic error. We have equations for each scale and what we can show, as we did here, is the self-similarities of scales.
All in all, it is evident that what we call a black hole or pulsar is made of quark quanta; it is a fractal of quarks. Thus we can apply to its vortices the laws of Newtonian fluids or the more complex equations of a Non-Euclidean vortices of space-time, as we do with any other ‘medium’ called a ‘phase space’ in physics. They can be considered akin to a hurricane, which is a ‘medium’ of air molecules, or to a tornado, which is a medium of water molecules. All those mediums have limits of speed, which are the same for their lineal forces and cyclical vortices:
Light space-time has a c-speed limit, which is also the limit of speed of a rotational electron vortex and a 0 K limit.
Dark energy and quark matter belonging to the gravitational membrane seems to have a c<10 c lineal and rotational speeds.
Because each space-time membrane has vortices of information and energetic, lineal forces, we need equations of self-similarity, relating informative vortices of charges and masses on one side and gravitational and electromagnetic waves on the other. This is done with gravito-magnetism, which relates cosmic gravitational, lineal waves and electro-magnetic fields. So, the gravito-magnetic formalism just needs to be properly fit within the wider concept of 2 self-similar fractal space-times, to define in self-similar terms, light waves and dark-energy waves of gravitation; as the elementary, actions-units of the 2 fractal scales.
Needless to say if a proton is a black hole of the inferior scale, a black hole is a quark condensate. And measures give us black holes as ‘top quark condensates’.
Needless to say, the philosophical conundrum of the self-similarity of forces and forms on both scales cannot be solved experimentally. If the Universe is self-similar between those 2 scales, but those are the limits of scales of reality, there is nothing below the atom or over the galaxy. If the Universe is infinite in its scales we are nothing to the whole. And yet while the first answer pleases our ‘anthropocentric world view’, the second answer is far more logical and in accordance with the evolution of science and thought.
It would then mean that the Universe is absolutely relative. That is, reality is not only as General Relativity proved, relative in all its motions, which depending on the observer might be seen as motion or as stillness (so Galileo found the Earth moves but we see it still), but it would be also absolutely relative in scales.
Which form together the 5th dimension of the Universe. This fifth dimension in which science has worked since the first telescopes and microscopes opened it to our eyes, however has not been understood in logic terms at all beyond the beginning represented by Einstein, on my view by a lack of philosophical and logical depth in the work of physicists.
We deal here, when talking of the fifth dimension with a concept that should have been obvious: if physics study in general relativity time as space, in a present slice, the total time includes a flow from past to future, and from the microcosms to the future evolution of more complex structures, from smaller to bigger scales – and those dimensions, the past, already evolved flows of time that created scales from the micro-quantum world to the macro-gravitational world, are the 5th and 6th dimension which physics does not study but must be understood to evolve science.
General relativity studies the ‘present, continuum space-time’ (hence spatializes time to gain precision in the measure by creating a simultaneous frame of reference). And Absolute relativity is the next step expanding the study of time with both, logic and geometric, topological, mathematical non-Euclidean tools.
I recall the only time I could give a conference on that unification at Sonoma’s 50 anniversary of Systems Sciences, in which many top physicists were present.
They were first in awe that such simple equations as a 3 dimensional vortex could unify and extract the never found theoretical result of G and Q (we have only empirical measures), solve the hierarchy problem and further on as I develop a bit more the gravitational ‘jargon’ of charges, prove that the Proton radius was equal to the black hole radius so an atom was self-similar to a galaxy and the scales of the Universe were infinite through the 5th dimension.
Then someone raised his hand and told me what Hilbert told to Einstein when we published special relativity: the mathematics is too simple (Hilbert quipped that they were at the level of an undergraduate), and the enthusiasm waned. Within months NY Times published in its Sunday magazine a cover with my suit to the Nuclear Industry and that killed my career with ad hominem so I loss all my scholar positions and never gave more master conferences…
But that is another story of the limits of ethics in science. What matters here is to realize of the multiplicity aroused by the 4 pillars of all descriptions of reality. And the Occam’s razor: simpler is better.
The strong principle of equivalence: mass as a vortex of gravitational time.
Mass is the attractive, in/forming force of the Universe; and it is merely the last, accelerated, curved motion of the gravitational force. Einstein explained this with his principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass/gravitation. Initially, due to the ‘mirage’ of materialism, physicists thought the principle only applied to the external, curving vortex of gravitational forces that sunk into the mass. But the mass as a solid substance was never found and all pictures have seen merely vortices of curved motions.
Now we can explain all this and take further, conceptually and mathematically the discoveries of Einstein, thanks to the advances of complexity. In this post we shall deal at the simplest possible level with empirical, theoretical and mathematical demonstrations of those concepts, considering some of the new advances on theory of information and astro-physics, we are making departing from Einstein’s insight.
Einstein’s mass theory
In Physics, according to Einstein the information of a particle is its mass. This can be easily proved theoretically, mathematically and empirically.
In the previous pictures there is an obvious empirical proof. All pictures of masses and charges appear as vortices with an accelerated inward motion. Let us now deal with the other proofs (and let us remember that truth in epistemology of science is based in 3 pillars – empirical, logical and mathematical proofs.
Einstein’s Conceptual proof.
Now this simple equation is in accordance with Einstein’s Principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitational force. Both are the same in General Relativity. And so why we should stop this ‘comparison’ at a certain point of the accelerating vortex? Since in the Universe we have never seen ‘substance’ but only motions, it is logic to think that what we call a mass is exactly that: the final region of acceleration into a vortex of gravitational forces. Such vortex obviously offers a resistance to motion (inertial mass), which is dependent of the speed/acceleration of such motion.
Einstein’s Mathematical proof
The mathematical proof is simple, given by the 2 main equations of Einstein, which relate the frequency of information (a time parameter), the mass and the energy of physical systems:
ExT=K, E=Mc2, hence M=K/T=Kv; where v is the frequency of rotation of the vortex of mass.
Thus a mass is a vortex of space-time that carries the information of the Universe in its frequency.
This also has empirical proofs: All vortices attract inwards with a force equivalent to the strength of the rotating vortex. So a hurricane attracts more when it turns faster. And so a mass, which is a hurricane of space-time attracts more the faster it turns. Moreover vortices of all kind are ‘accelerating’ inwards: Vo x Ro = K, which means that the shorter the radius is, Ro, the faster its speed, Vo, so the closer you come to the vortex, the faster it turns, the more it attracts, the stronger its gravitational force is, and the more mass it has.
But what type of accelerated motion? Well it turns out that there are only two accelerated motions, lineal and cyclical accelerations. Further on, accelerated motions can produce forces that ‘work’. And Newton gave us a simple equation to describe ‘all’ the forces of the Universe: F = M (cyclical acceleration) x A (lineal acceleration). This is fascinating because it means that the Universe is made of 2 accelerated motions: F = M x A, where A is lineal acceleration or ‘energy’ and Mass is a vortex with more dimensional form, or cyclical acceleration, whose form and frequency carry the in-form-ation of the Universe.
Of course when we enter into deeper analysis of the mathematical details, a mass vortex is more complex. Einstein described it with a set of equations that go beyond the scope of this introduction. But there is a different version of those equations much simpler – the gravito-magnetic version, recently proved experimentally by a Probe, which are mimetic from the equations of electromagnetism.
And so since charges are obvious accelerated vortices of electromagnetic forces, it is self-evident that if masses produce a self-similar field system, they will be accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.
As Einstein put it ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’. And so there you have, the 3 simplest, more important equations of Physics, F=m a, E=Mc2, E=hv and then the more complex, equally essential Maxwell and Einstein’s equations come all together to accept mass as an ‘internal’ property that define mass and hence need no further fields and esoteric particles to be explained.
Some extra-ordinary solutions obtained with Mr. Einstein’s Principle of Strong Equivalence.
So we return to objective science and bring different perspectives to explain basic physical phenomena, and the simpler answers unlike the Germanic view are considered the more harmonic and larger truth: such as why certain particles like a black hole have more mass, while others like a photon have no mass?
It is really because particles are ‘prescient’ and foresee the arrival of a celebrity (they are also conscious) coming to it, distinguishing them? Or something more objective, physical and normal; as the Higgs interpretation for common consume would believe? Not, obvious. The Answer is because its vortex of time is faster.
Of course something more normal when we describe a mass as an accelerated vortex, whose frequency of rotation gives us like in a hurricane its speed and strength and attractive power. Then all the questions still unknown about mass and energy become solved:
– First, why and how energy becomes mass in that equation, E=Mc2. This is simple Energy is lineal acceleration, mass is cyclical acceleration, thus a mere topological change of the form of motion transforms one into the other. The Universe is eternal, made of motions. And so one becomes the other in the c-limit speed of our space-time membrane.
– Then why antiparticles have inverse time coordinates? Self-evident: they are time vortex that turns clock wards.
– Then, why black holes attract so much being so small? Obvious. The event horizon is the c-limit of speed that curves light into mass. So they turn at c-speed, and they are very small. Thus the frequency of its mass-cycle that is proportional to its speed and inverse to its length is the maximal possible in the Universe.
– So why light has no mass? A tautology: Light does not close a cycle, but it is a wave that deflects the cycle into an open wave. Hence it never has mass. But if we were to calculate its mass in terms of energy the higher the frequency of the web (analogous to the mass frequency) the more mass-energy it has.
– Then there is the scalar, fractal structure derived of the homology of the equations of charges and masses, which however exist in two different scales. This is a key discovery for the fractal structure of the Universe and proves one of my fundamental mathematical findings: the unification equation of the G and Ke Universal constants of charges and masses as two vortices of two fractal discontinuous scales of space-time, the quantum, smaller world and cosmic upper scale.
And we will return to that at the end of this article, when considering in depth the consequences of upholding and evolving Einstein’s theory of mass, instead of seeking and absurd scalar particle that explains so little…
– Finally, why the Universe accelerates between galaxies? It is accelerating and will end into pure entropy? No. Self-evident. Physicists ignore the meaning of information and mass and they have a continuous theory of space. None of that works anymore. As each time cycle ‘breaks’ space into an inner and outer region. So do the time cycles of the Universe of which the biggest clock is a galaxy that ‘warps space into time-mass’. So the acceleration of space between galaxies is balanced by its warping within them.
And both balance each other: gravitation informs light-space into mass vortices, galaxies. And then light-space the substance of which our space is made, once it abandons the galaxy, stretches his frequency (Doppler effect as ‘real’) till its ‘generational time cycle’ of around 10 up to 10 years dissolves it back into non-perceivable, lineal, gravitation with no form. But this and so many other fascinating results of a proper theory of time cycles require more knowledge of physics that I expect a non-physicists to have, so we shall end here the simpler version of Einstein’s mass theory.
5D Unification from the perspective of electromagnetism: Heaviside equations.
Following with the concept of an atom-galaxy, albeit slightly different, as all fractal scales have slightly different laws, we come to the opposite view: to describe gravitation with the equations of electromagnetism.
We notice in the graphs of a hydrogen atom and the galaxy, which in Einstein-Walker model of the Universe was in fact modeled as a hydrogen atom, one of the most fascinating proofs of the fractal structure of the Universe in infinite self-similar scales of lineal forces of ‘spatial energy’ and cyclical particles of ‘informative time’ are the recently found ”excited S-orbitals’ of the galaxy: two bubbles of electromagnetic energy, with exactly the same form that the S orbitals of an atom have in its excited states. This fascinating image, beyond a discussion about galaxies as atoms in an infinite eternal fractal Universe, responds to two of the new ‘invariances’ of absolute relativity.
If Einstein showed that all systems are invariant to motions and rotations in space, Absolute relativity adds the invariance of scale (so gravitational and quantum scales are self-similar in properties) and the invariance of form (so its topologies are also the same).
So what the previous image shows is the self-similarity of the quantum, electro-magnetic and cosmological, gravitational membranes of space-time. They are the 2 main fractal scales of space-time of the Universe. In this post on the future of science we introduce the mathematical equation that unifies the constants of both forces, G and Q, complementary to the Gravito-magnetic equations recently proved by Probe A, which express Einstein’s field equations in a format self-similar to that of electromagnetic forces.
According to general relativity, the gravitational field produced by a rotating object (or any rotating mass–energy) can, in a particular limiting case, be described by equations that have the same form as in classical electromagnetism. Starting from the basic equation of general relativity, the Einstein field equation, and assuming a weak gravitational field or reasonably flat space-time, the gravitational analogs to Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetism, called the “GEM equations”, can be derived. GEM equations compared to Maxwell’s equations in SI units are:
In the graph Gravito electromagnetism, abbreviated GEM, refers to a set of formal analogies between the equations for electromagnetism and relativistic gravitation; specifically: between Maxwell’s field equations and an approximation, valid under certain conditions, to the Einstein field equations for general relativity. The most common version of GEM is valid only far from isolated sources, and for slowly moving test particles.
The analogy and equations were first published in 1893, before general relativity, by Oliver Heaviside as a separate theory expanding Newton’s law, differing essentially only by some small factors.
For a test particle whose mass m is “small”, in a stationary system, the net (Lorentz) force acting on it due to a GEM field is described by the GEM analog to the Lorentz force equation. Where:
- m is the mass of the test particle;
- q is the electric charge of the test particle;
- v is the velocity of the test particle.
The acceleration of any inertial test particle is simply the same (above graph), changing the ‘names’ of the lineal and cyclical motions.
The discrepancy in the factors arises because the source of the gravitational field is the second order stress–energy tensor, as opposed to the source of the electromagnetic field being the first order four-current tensor. This difference becomes clearer when one compares non-invariance of relativistic mass to electric charge invariance. This can be traced back to the spin-2 character of the gravitational field, in contrast to the electromagnetism being a spin-1 field.
We shall see along these articles specially on the 4th line the enormous importance that the concept of spin has for the structure of the Universe; as it is the minimal unit of information and perception of reality. And the first step in the construction of all forms of information, perception and reproduction of reality, and the emergence of new forms of ‘social organization’ that ultimately emerge as new planes of existence of physical systems.
In Planck units
From comparison of GEM equations and Maxwell’s equations it is obvious that −1/(4π G) is the gravitational analog of vacuum permittivity, ε0. Adopting Planck units normalizes G, c and 1/(4π ε0) to 1, thereby eliminating these constants from both sets of equations. The two sets of equations then become identical but for the minus sign preceding 4π in the GEM equations.
These minus signs stem from an essential difference between gravity and electromagnetism: electrostatic charges of identical sign repel each other, while masses attract each other.
Hence the GEM equations are simply Maxwell’s equations with mass (or mass density) substituting for charge (or charge density), and −G replacing the Coulomb force constant 1/(4π ε0).
The following table summarizes the results thus far:
4π appears in both the GEM and Maxwell equations, because Planck units normalize G and 1/(4πε0) to 1, and not 4πG and 1/ε0.
In the graph, we can see the main difference between the gravito-magnetic field and the electromagnetic-field, which in terms of ‘spin orientation’, could be resumed in the concept that gravito-magnetism is the ‘anti-particle’ of electromagnetism as both are inverted in the direction of the angular momentum and the magnetic field.
Now it is important to observe a fundamental law of 5 D Physics: between planes of the 5th dimension
Yet since spin and magnetism are also inverted (left handed/right handed), the series of ‘growing cyclical vortices’ which ‘feed into each other’ as they emerge into larger configurations, as in the case of lineal momentum, in which each new ‘flow of lineal motion’ has the inverse direction of the previous ones (so the couple of neutrinos that give birth to photons in the neutrino theory of light, have longitudinal polarization, and the photon, transversal polarization, going in opposite directions, and then the electron, which feeds on electromagnetic fields have inverse direction and the electric current that is born of the electron displacement is also inverse in direction).
All in all physical systems in their directions of emergence as social wholes sustained by the energy and form of the lower scale follow a FUNDAMENTAL law of 5D metric:
|∆-1 ∧ O∆ ∧ | ∆+1
Which means that as we grow in scale the functions and forms of the points become inverted.
This approximate reformulation of gravitation as described by general relativity in the weak field limit makes an apparent field appear in a frame of reference different from that of a freely moving inertial body. This apparent field may be described by two components that act respectively like the electric and magnetic fields of electromagnetism, and by analogy these are called the gravito-electric and Gravitomagnetic fields, since these arise in the same way around a mass that a moving electric charge is the source of electric and magnetic fields.
The main consequence of the Gravitomagnetic field, or velocity-dependent acceleration, is that a moving object near a rotating massive object will experience acceleration not predicted by a purely Newtonian (gravitoelectric) gravity field. More subtle predictions, such as induced rotation of a falling object and precession of a spinning object are among the last basic predictions of general relativity to be directly tested.
Indirect validations of gravitomagnetic effects have been derived from analyses of relativistic jets.
Roger Penrose had proposed a frame dragging mechanism for extracting energy and momentum from rotating black holes. Relativistic jets can serve as the largest and brightest form of validations for gravitomagnetism.
Some higher-order gravitomagnetic effects can reproduce effects reminiscent of the interactions of more conventional polarized charges. For instance, if two wheels are spun on a common axis, the mutual gravitational attraction between the two wheels will be greater if they spin in opposite directions than in the same direction. This can be expressed as an attractive or repulsive gravitomagnetic component.
When asked at CERN on those themes, Mr. Hawking merely replied: ‘i don’t understand’. And yet since ‘the Universe is simple but not malicious’, anyone with high school knowledge of physics will be able to grasp it.
The parallelism between the equations of electromagnetism and Gravitation were discovered by that forgotten Genius, Heaviside, even before Einstein discovered his. Then it was found that Heaviside and Einstein’s equation were self-similar in a gravitational field on flat space-time, which is more or less all the space-time of the Universe except the ‘peaks’ of height that black holes form.
Recently Probe B proved that gravito-magnetism (the equivalent to magnetism in the gravitational cosmological scale) exists. So the equations were right. And yet, this ‘new generation’ of mechanical physicists keep ignoring the implications of this and many self-similar discoveries that back Heaviside vision and the fractal nature of the Universe.
Let us then take further their work using that self-similarity to its ultimate consequences, considering the Q-constant just self-similar to the gravitational constant and finding what are the parallel particles of both scales.
Physical Reality is made of dual energetic/informative states (complementarity principle particle-wave): Cyclic vortices/ particles develop lineal actions-waves in 2 scales, the microscopic quantum world of Electromagnetism and the macroscopic, gravitational world. Once the duality of scales and forms is understood, we unify the constants of dimensional proportionality of both types of vortices and forces, studying transversal waves of ‘lineal speed’ in both scales of the fractal universe: the c-speed of small electromagnetic waves, and we contend, the superluminal ‘action at distance’ of gravitational waves.
Back to the ego paradox – the parallels between religious zealots and physicists.
The only difference between religious people and creationist physicists is in the language of those 2 supposed infinitesimal ‘wholes’, God, the name, and V≈Hod, the equation religious and big-bang zealots think explains it all:
-1/2 humanity thinks God talks only with words, in the exact language of the believer, which only the priest understands. Another 1/2 believes God talks only with numbers, in the exact language of the believer, which only the mathematical physicist understands.
So the trick is to make the language complex enough to disguise the simplicity of the argument. Thus christian priests talked in Latin for peasants to feel awe, the Koran could not be translated, and Vhod has gotten a lot of ad ons and machines to make it complex enough for the human mass, worshipers of machines to feel there is a better priesthood upholding the supreme intelligence of the human ape, which when we look at his ‘real mind’, is an homunculus with a very small mental consciousness, a huge big mouth to utter nonsense and an even bigger hands to assembly machines and pump his ego with weapons. The graph shows man at face value. Notice how small is the ‘reasoning part’ for the ego. It is all about big mouths and machines assembling things. So the person with the biggest, most arrogant big mouth and more dexterous hands to make machines and weapons carries he day among the worshipping audiences.
Things get more surrealist when we look objectively to the ego-theories of both rivals of truth.
So when the homunculus talks in both cases, God and Vhod, and his ‘mediums’, the priest and the physicist are supposed to have the capacity to create reality ‘speaking the language’. Now, it is the priest and the scientist who creates reality, as vehicle of God.
So in Islam, god creates reality exactly talking ‘names’ in arab, which then become reality, reason why you cannot translate the Koran. In the catholic church God spoke in Latin. And only the priest could understand it. In the Hindi religion Shiva, the god of death, spoke with burning flames as in Judaism, because fire was the substance used by the military caudillos of Israeli zealots and Hindi castes to make their weapons.
In both religions the priest becomes through the ceremony and the mantras it speaks, God himself, which is also ‘eaten by the catholic’ believer in ‘the creationist power of the language’. So ‘God, the word became man and inhabited among us’.
And this is the case of physicists today akin to the religion of Hindi Shivaites: the fire of his bombs created the Universe and a statue of Shiva presides CERN’s facilities – it only has changed according to the growing arrow of information, which as time goes by increases the complexity of those rituals, the ‘cover up’ of the amazing arrogance of the homunculus.
And of course it has changed the language. So now Vhod has ‘unified’ the words of Babel and talks only in platonic mathematics – the epistemological theory of physicists.
Do you think I am exaggerating? Or no. If anything I am downplaying the capacity of the physicist priesthood to ‘create’ reality just uttering numbers.
Let us explain this, because i am NOT joking. Physicists actually believe since quantum theorists applied the religious theory of linguistic creationism to mathematics that ‘THEY’ invent reality.
Indeed, the reader should not be surprised that mathematics is today NO LONGER defined as an experimental language that merely mirrors reality, as it was always thought of, and proved by Lobachevski and Godel (mathematics as a mirror of reality must be proved experimentally to know what theory is truth, or as Einstein, yes again, this sound guy, everybody reveres but everyone denies, put it: ‘i know when mathematics is truth but not when it is REAL’). NO WONDER his best friend was Godel, who proved mathematics needs experiments. Never mind. Physicists dismissed it all together and affirmed as religious zealots that the Universe is made of mathematical ‘entities’ and moreover, THEY CREATED MATHEMATICS. So they were like the priests of the Gods of the hindoos and hebrews, the ‘creators of reality,
Indeed, as God and the priest ‘invents’ in his mind the language which creates reality, an idealist, arrogant German, a mathematical physicist called Mr. Hilbert told us that ‘he’ invents mathematics in his mind and then mathematics creates reality.
So he started his ‘axiomatic book’, landmark of XX century physics, ‘the foundations of mathematics’ on the nature of reality with an astounding ‘self-confession’: ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’ which ‘are’ the substances of the mind that creates the Universe.
Hilbert was the main influence on the physicists that invented the ‘quantum, Copenhagen interpretation’ of a purely mathematical Universe that ‘becomes real’ only when the physicist observes it, against the sound realist model of the true masters and founders of this science, Planck, De Broglie, Schrodinger and Einstein. THEY had an absolutely sound, experimental, normal explanation, called today the Pilot-wave theory in which waves guide particles, as it happens in the macroscopic homology of pilot waves, proved ad nauseam, recently with the EM engine for interstellar travel.
But reality didn’t make Mr. Bohr and Mr Heisenberg and Mr.Pauli, flinch. As usual they started a nasty ad hominem campaign against Broglie and Einstein, who had found the equations, they now misused and twist to prove their alt-right theory a la Trump (they had the power of the german industry on his side).
So they stated flatly that the Universe was made of ‘mathematical, imaginary functions’, and ‘only did happen’ collapsing into reality only when the mathematical physicist, the observer who ‘imagined points and lines’ looked at it.
So Einstein quipped: ‘the moon doesn’t come out when i look at it’. And he was ostracised from the group. Broglie, brutally assaulted by Pauli, had to retract as the criminals of the Stalinist Moscow trials, where all the original r=evolutionaries were condemned to death after confessing they were wrong; and the ‘impostors’ Bohr, a wealthy heir of the financial industry and Heisenberg, a Nazi connected to the military-industrial complex (sounds familiar?) carried the day, while the solitary geniuses, Broglie, a french aristocrat, and Einstein a socialist, pacifist, lonely genius, retired.
Heisenberg got the Saint Nobel of the Dynamite, the youngest man to get one, which Einstein had been denied for decades, as a pacifist, to the point one year it was declared deserted because all the ‘silent normal physicists’ refused to name another candidate. And everybody has been happy ever since, explaining you that quantum physics proves we humans create reality, there are parallel Universes as we are immortal and every ‘thought we have’ creates another Universe where we exist also so we are not ONY GODS, that is Vhods, but actually far more powerful that God, who did create only one Universe: each of us is in the business of creating ∞ Universes, in which each of our alter egos is the central creator.
Again the imposition of this astoundingly arrogant view, now canonical as the big-bang and the G.Bush is (not the American president, busy-busy creating alt-right Universes of his own but the God Bush of Abrahamic religions 🙂 required the ‘reductionism’ of all sound theories, eliminating all the variables, arguments, equations and elements which the human creator did NOT observe.
So by this way of reducing it all to the observer, they made POSSIBLE to reduce all to the Physicists mind-theory. One of the practitioners of this theory, an Iranian who affirmed it was easier for the LHC to produce dragoons that strangelets and black holes, Mr. Hamed, is really into it, now lobbying the Industry to convince the Chinese to make an even bigger LHC, to see if those dragoons come out for the Chinese new year. Seriously, he claims to have tabulated the number of Universes created and wants to see them through the LHC: 10 up to 500, that is there are 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Universes created by observers (more or less, i run tired of pressing zeros) and he claims to have the equation to know them all.
Indeed, what has essentially happened to physicists after that bizarre ego-trip of mr. Bohr et al is obvious: since mathematics creates the universe, not the other way around (reflects the Universe in a language), and more over it is a ‘proprietary language’ of the Hilbert school of imaginary points, lines and planes, any mathematical equation MUST be real MUST create some effect in reality – never mind there is zero proof of it. So INDEED, we can expect dragoons if you can model them mathematically, black holes evaporating to the past (Hawking) if you can write them mathematically, and so on.
This philosophy of science is now canonical and plainly false.
Of course the simplex nature of the scientific method when it does NOT interpret reality works, whatever philosophy of science you choose.
There is nothing intelligent in doing the praxis of science; you collect data, you put it in equations – now you don’t even need to know much of it, just plug it into computers and you make machines with it. But humans will always take a flight of the ego just because Nature NOT them transmits information perfectly through waves, etc.
We are talking though here of the huge questions, ‘the thoughts of god’, the meaning of it all, NOT the details. And in this field the Copenhagen and big-bang interpretation is pure ego bull$hit, as Einstein fully understood. Because people use in real day machinery based in quantum physics, the practitioners of the Hilbert->Bohr religion of the observer can sell their infinite Universes and entropy only theory and people tend to think all this quantum ‘bull$hit’ is real.
To me the only remarkable thing about it, as in the case of the ridiculous ego-trips of abrahamic religions is what it tells us about ‘humans as an egolatric species’, who will always rejects truth and hence ‘existence’ as it is, if you sell him a good fantasy to make him again the center of the Universe. But the penalty they pay is not only theoretical – the complete misunderstanding of the thoughts of God, but quite real – its future extinction by all those species of ‘organic bombs’ they thoroughly despise as irrelevant. The human microbio must be above heavens and Earth.
The languages he speak – either words or numbers – must be the vehicle to understand, even create the Universe.
And the proof of all this must be not reason and experience but ‘prizes’ , ‘ceremonies’, the seal of ‘authority’ of some other clueless human; the peer solidarity; the routines and dogmas repeated by new generations, since as Gerry Garcia said ‘whores, religions and old buildings get respetable with age’. So has happened with the religion of Copenhagen and the big bang dogma.
So, don’t dare to insinuate that it is all a pseudo-religion of the ego, which it is. A wall silence will rise to anyone who tries to deny dogmatism in physics, as it happened to Hoyle, Einstein for quite sometime till his formula was used to do bigger bombs, Eddington for insinuating that without direct evidence quantum interpretations were just myths of the mind and many others. And of course, Godel and Lobacjevski who showed that mathematics is not consistent in itself bust must be based in the experimental reality of SPACE (GEOMETRY) AND TIME (LOGIC ALGEBRA).
We shall thus in this post along our narrative of CERN’s dangers and activism, and the ego-trips of the homunculus and those who make a religion of their worldly profession of entropic weapons prove you the following Postulate foundation of all mathematical and linguistic statements:
‘Mathematics is an experimental language, whose laws postulates, 3 sub disciplines and real units, numbers & points ARE based as a mirror of reality in the laws of Space (geometry and its points), Time (algebra and its numbers) and the scalar structure of the Universe (analysis)”
BUT to prove THAT first we need to understand how entropy and information together create a space-time cycle.So let us explain you without ego, and with both arrows of time, entropy and information and its infinite, energetic combinations, how the Universe truly works.
Since indeed, when we abandon the entropic, lineal only-time theory of physicists, biased by their worldly profession, we realise all clocks of TIME in the Universe are cyclical and store information:
In the left graph, all time clocks and cycles, which return to its origin, creating a circle that stores the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles.
This self-evident truth is ONLY denied by physicists, biased by their worldly profession, to make lineal weapons, which deliver entropic lineal shots with cannonballs (left, Galileo’s drawings on ballistics, which brought the concept of lineal-only time). As physics and war became the trade mark of western civilisation, physicists dedicated to evolve machines and weapons, changed the two arrows and cycles of time, which became reduced to lineal entropic ‘big-bang’ time.
Even after Darwin brought back the concept of evolutionary time and Vico->Marx, Kondratieff->Schumpeter applied this concept of r=evoution to history and economics and biology expanded as a science of life and information, stored in circadian and genetic cycles, the concept of cycles of time today accepted in life, history and economics – IS STILL DENIED by entropic physicists.
Time, which means change=motion in philosophy, however cannot be reduced to a simple LINEAL formula, v=s/t that equalises all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘time clock’ of measure elongated into an infinite duration AS it is more convenient to study loco-motions, the lineal entropic motions of those cannonballs, which imposed with power the simplification of time cycles that still endures and justifies the big-bang experiments of planet Earth.
So after concluding his first book on Physics, called ‘military instruments’ Mr. Galileo affirmed, his lineal time would be the ‘delight of philosophers and artillery masters’. Funny thing though is that even the entropic lines of its cannonballs were ‘twisted’ downwards into a curved parable by the informative force of gravitation. It would take 400 years for Einstein to explain indeed that ‘gravitational forces of time vortices, masses, curved space, informing the Universe’
But particle, quantum physicists still deny him, from Hawking who affirms black holes travel backwards in time, so they are not vortices of mass-information but entropic explosive things that evaporate, against ALL theoretical and experimental evidence, to the deniers of the Einstein-Broglie-Bohm pilot theory, proved recently ‘again’ by the EM engine able to move in interstellar travel with no combustible thanks to the ‘guidance’ of the wave… All this shows a simple fact: the worldly profession of physicists and the power of machines DOMINATES AND IMPOSES its lineal bias on theory. And truth and reason cannot ‘bend’ that.
THE HARSH, OBJECTIVE CONCLUSION OF TRUE SCIENCE: NOT IF BUT WHEN.
The Totalitarian principle of Gell-mann – any particle that can exist WILL exist; the ethics of a technological civilisation of Fromm (‘if we can make a machine, we will make it, even if it menaces to kill us all’) and the Witten-Sancho hypothesis (the Halo of galaxies is made of strangelets, as it is the only known-known particle that fits into its properties and the ‘ternary, organic structure of the galaxy’- this is my contribution through the formalism of the 5-D scalar Universe – obliges it to have a cut-off substance of the microcosmos, which can only be strangelets) and the Fermi Paradox, (the non-existence of intelligent life or robotic life in the Universe, teaming with planets that extinguish before reaching interstellar travel, today possible thanks to EM-engines) precludes that we WILL be extinguished by the Industry of Accelerators.
NONE of those 4 proofs have been rebutted, merely censored. And as we show in other posts, the process of production of dibaryons and strange liquid is now well-documented. So the pending questions is ‘when’ not ‘if’ or ‘why’, the Earth will become a strangelet and likely migrate to the halo of the galaxy… Witten though in this case won’t get his nobel prize… which seems to be more important for those minions of thought behind CERN that the protection of human life, ‘whatever it takes’.
So the fifth proof is the behaviour of humans in the face of death, which basically is the ‘Ostrich reaction’: dig-it and hide your head and brain beneath, just hoping the lion doesn’t see your bumpy a$$. Sorry, the issue is too surrealist to keep a moderate tone. Indeed, ‘human consensus’ in madness is not a proof of truth.
For example, 4 billion humans seem to believe that some goat-keeper of the bronze age who saw a bush burning found the meaning of it all, and talked directly to the creator the infinite Universe, just because they fear death so much, they can’t even accept the obvious. Mr. Meshu was a delirious peasant in a very ignorant age, and we are ‘ashes of space-time’.
But alas, 3000 years have passed of all the wrong ceremonies to deny this, and even today, paradox of paradoxes, people die as jihadists and zealots to sustain this view that they won’t die. So do entropic physicists, clueless about the information systems of the Universe, who will not renounce to explain it all with entropic disorder=death, the worldly religion of its real profession, to make weapons, which kill humans, something they also don’t acknowledge to be doing. So as in the Abrahamic case, they will die because they can’t even contemplate death. Indeed, ashes to ashes.
In that regard, the only ‘uncertainty’ in a totalitarian, deterministic universe is not ‘if’ but ‘when’. It will be CERN’s constant upgrades of the LHC? Or shall we wait for the creation of the Chinese 100 km. collider? Or for the much cheaper, far more powerful ‘table plasma accelerators’?
Let us repeat this: the universe is a block of deterministic space-time. There is no probability but lack of knowledge or not desire to know the future. We can only in this case talk of the ‘probabilities’ of this happening at a certain time. But if the industry of accelerators IS NOT cancelled ‘soon’, which doesn’t seem to be the case; since the ostrich is moving her tail trying to attract the Black Hole lion, as we speak; this WILL certainly happen. When? Before Interstellar travel is possible at the end of the century.
Yes, I know this is not popular. Most people leave now the blog, and some send me spasm. What nobody does is the logic behaviour in such a case: to complain to CERN, the apocalyptos, not to the messenger, the rational cautious human being.
When? is in that sense THE ONLY PENDING QUESTION.
And the Fermi paradox tell us it will be soon – this century as we could be colonising the Universe with EM engines and robots much earlier than that but not a single civilisation has passed in the galaxy the Great Filter or else they would be here with their ‘robots’ and we see none.
It is for that reason that I call in my models of the super organism of history, and its 3rd age of excessive information and childish behaviour, the zero generation: our sons or grand-sons being born today, which will be ‘certainly’ vaporised, while humans as always have done, put their ostrich head in the nearest ‘black hole’.
In the graph, the Industry of Accelerators keeps evolving, with cheap, smaller plasma versions, upgrades at CERN and Chinese plans to build a super-machine of 100 km. since the ‘issue’ of its dangers for mankind has been buried, censored and so humanity with his astounding capacity TO DENY truths that conflict with their ego and sense of entitlement has passed page on the first clear risk for his survival on Earth, far more important than global warming also caused by the ‘pollution of machines’. Indeed, the ‘human factor’ of reason and survival instincts, which is the ‘only’ factor to ad into the certainty of the Totalitarian principle is solved. We are chosen of go(l)d and it is blasphemous to doubt that we shall not become eternal, dominate black holes, reach the supreme knowledge through the expansion of entropy=big bang death and solve all the mysteries of the Universe making ever bigger quark cannons and learning its mysteries by the pedestrian method of shooting quark balls to mother Earth Fact is the issue is not solved Authority not reason, power not human caring has imposed a Law of Silence that the ‘human sheeple’ accepts merrily with the childish attitude and selfie indifference, zeitgeist of our age.
Thus it is only a question of when the energy of those accelerators will succeed piling up enough strangelet liquid, already produced at the LHC to make the ‘quark ball’ a stable lump of strange matter and start an ice-9 reaction – a factor, which we can calculate theoretically but only the ‘moment’ of collective death will assert with absolute certainty. Till then my advice is ‘carpe diem’, live the day. As you cannot ‘explain death’ to entitled children of thought, bad boys with big toys, which is what most humans are.
What they truly excel at is on ceremonies that pump up their ego, silly-nilly prizes and axiomatic dogmas of truth by ‘consensus’ censorship and power imposition that time and the Universe reveals once and again to be partial truths or absolute falsehoods.It is in that sense remarkable that 99% of what the LHC PRODUCES is quark liquid (strangelet in the making) but it is THE ONLY THING THEY DO NOT TALK ABOUT. Indeed, you will hear about Higgs, SUSYs, multiple dimensions, antimatter, axions, axinos, neutrinos, all the zoo of imaginary particles but that 99% of potentially genocidal substance, the most powerful explosive of the Universe, in the making IS not a theme of con-cern. It does NOT officially exist anywhere in the Universe. This is the degree of surrealism reached by the industry. Imagine a factory that produces 99% of cars and then some ‘debris’ but only would talk of the scrap proudly as if that was the purpose of the factory.
Conclusion. The paradox of the ego and the entropic worldly profession of physicists.
So 2 are the obvious causes of the bias of physicists towards entropic and creationist, linguistic theories of the Universe, the paradox of the ego, and the cultural, worldly profession of Northern, germanic European physicists, who developed this discipline:
On one hand the ethics of a technological civilisation are based in its main cult(ure) of war and weapons that deliver ‘massive amounts of lineal entropy’ (the germanic culture of Goths, who came in history calling themselves the tribe of the Gods because they could kill anyone who opposed them and have always developed religions and theories based ‘only’ in lineal entropy=death), today globalised. So we ‘believe’ in german physics, without realising its cultural bias. Further on, the so-called military-industrial complex is the basis of the main ‘tribal institution’ they founded to organise humans – the nation, first merely a tribe of aristocratic germans, on top of the European people, the franks, the anglos, the alamani and so on; then with colonisation expanded globally, and substituting the natural unit of mankind as a single ‘homo sapiens species’. So research in weapons and machines, and competition between homo tribalis with them seems essential to all of us. And this ‘ego-centered’ tribal concept expands also through anthropocentric religions to all humans, who feel entitled, immortal and center of the Universe. And needless to say it expands to scientists, specially physicists, who feel to hold the ‘language of god’, mathematics, as its main experts, and hence the highest intelligence of the Universe
On the other hand, against all evidence, we think we are not at risk because of the ego zeitgeist of mankind, which of course the reader will deny, specially if he is a physicist; as he is human after all and believes indeed to be perhaps no longer the center of the Universe, as all humans thought till Galileo, but at least its most perfect species. So our lack of con-cern – how the Universe could eliminate its highest species? is born on THE HUMAN EGO, which cannot tolerate not TO BE IMMORTAL, not TO BE THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE, its only ‘intelligent species’ who knows better – and paradoxically will rather die holding this supreme ego paradox than accept humbly its limits of life and death, evolution and knowledge in an infinite immortal Universe, of which we are just a smallish part. Religious jihadists do die to uphold their beliefs; and so do despite its rational outlook, certain scientific believers in physical theories in which man, not the Universe creates reality.
The paradox of the ego, is thus natural to the essence of being human – we are self-centred beings – but inverse to the nature of TRUE science, which is objective and constantly displaces man from the center of the Universe. So first Copernicus took us from the center of space; then Darwin took us from the center of evolution; then Einstein took us from the center of motion; and his friend showed mathematical languages were not the language of god, but a mirror of reality that needed experimental proofs. And finally the extensions of their work in the XXI century, Absolute relativity took us from the center of size, in a fractal, Universe of infinite scales. But most humans still reject those advances o objective science. So we need too fully upgrade the objective theories of mathematical physics, in the path of Einstein, Godel, Bohm and Hoyle, to show the limits of any scientific inquire, with a hidden anthropomorphic agenda, as the rival theories of the Copenhagen Interpretation, the creationist entropic big bang, and needless to say the ego paradoxes of creationist, abrahamic religions are.
So we shall conclude this paradox of the ego, turning around the heads of those mathematical believers and defining the equation of the ego paradox in mathematical terms to show the believers their infinitesimal nature.
0-Minds: Still mappings with languages of information of the ∞ Universe.
In the graph, Science and any other form of knowledge merely tries to reduce the infinite Universe to a smallish mirror mapping or ‘monad’ or ‘frame of reference’ or ‘language’, to act and react to the flows of entropy and information of that Universe (combined in the 3rd arrow of time, energy).
What both physicists and religious people do is to ‘exclude’ all other mind-views, mirror-mappings and languages of perception from reality, biasing the Universe into a ‘straightjacket’ called ‘theory of everything’ based in its single language.
Let us then return to the origin of their peculiar concept of ‘reality’ created by the language of mathematics and the force we perceive, entropic lineal light, which excludes completely the in-formative force of ‘invisible gravitation’ and the intelligent mirrors of all other species, from feromonal ants to gravitational black holes who externally act as if they were ‘intelligent’ perceptive beings ordering their territorial domain, as we do with words, and scientists and sensorial machines (clocks of time, eyes of metal, telescopes and microscopes) do with maths.
In other words, the Universe needs infinite minds, focuses of information to order it. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.
Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:
– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’, the less important part of the ternary systems of the Universe, the cytoplasm of cells, the inner space-time of light matter in galaxies, where we live, the cells of your body, the light filled space of atoms, etc.
– Closed, cyclical times, the external membranes, which he called ‘vortices’ and separates the system from the outer Universe, the halo membrane of galaxies, the electron of atoms the skin of your body, which jails the inner space.
And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, is the fact that he perceived them from a singularity, central linguistic point of view, the verbal mind that controls the system – the black hole of gravitational information, the nervous system, the DNA code. So he said: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’. Yet this point and language-mirror is an infinitesimal reduction of the whole Universe, even if the mapping is quite accurate reflection of it. So we can now define in a simple equation all the minds of realty:
– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.
0-mind x ∞ Universal cycles = C: constant World mirror of the Universe.
So each mind is an infinitesimal world mirror of the infinite universe. And so there is only one infinite Universe but infinite Linguistic Monads.
What the physicist or religious person does is TO DENY all other mirrors, languages, monads and affirm HE CREATES WITH HIS LANGUAGE the Universe, the infinitesimal creates the infinite talking words in arab or ‘imagining point, lines, planes and particles that collapse when the physicist looks at the moon that before was NOT there’ LOL, try to laugh at them. Then they will show they are right because they can kill you.
The explanation of this paradox though is immediate if you look again at the equation of ‘any mind’ (o x ∞ = Constant, undetermined world):
The mind believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which seems to be quiet, as the mind stops motion to put it all inside and so human minds have always thought the Earth did not move, and it was the center of the Universe.
And while Copernicus taught us not to be the case, Einstein proved it was all relative motion, Darwin explained we are just a step in the ladder of evolution of information, and my models of duality and the fractal Universe shows our scale of size to be also relative, the concept has creeped slowly back into physics, with the anthropic principle, the big-bang theory, the marketing and propaganda and ego-pumping P.R.ess that made of nuclear physicists in the cold era, to back their worldly religion of producing enough atomic bombs to kill us all, to heights of anthropomorphic ego never seen since G. Bush talked to the bronze age peasant.
Alas, now we again confuse the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ WITH THE UNIVERSE, which Hilbert, Bohr and CERN is creating with entropic death. So their minds are just fractal points, but believe to know it all.
Descartes was not a simpleton though as those big-bang physicists are. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.
So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.
In the graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.
Newton though carried the day, and all attempts to put the record straight by Leibniz (relational time), Einstein (infinite time clocks), Bohm (pilot-wave theory of normal quantum physics), Darwin (man as an evolving species), and so many others including this writer, Sancho (Organic dual theory of the Universe) have met with the imposing Wall of the EGO-CENTERED man, a la ‘Trump’ who creates his ‘alternative truths’ that people love as long as it pumps the ego of all of us – never mind they always keep producing enough entropic death and war to kill us all.
HUMAN REASONIG AND BELIEFS.
We have shown something scientists vehemently deny – the human element in all its endeavours, including scientific research.
In that regard the world of science as all what is human CANNOT be isolated from society, the human ego, the technological civilisation we live in, even if ultimately we all scientist seem to look for truth. Thus in this issue we need to consider:
Epistemological reasons are concerned with the objective, predictable nature of Scientific truths, which contrary to belief is not ‘probabilistic’, but deterministic – events will happen if its causes appear, only the capacity of man to ‘calculate’ when and where is probabilistic – so we do know for example, in the most talked about case of probabilities with certainty that a wave-particle will strike a quantum screen but we do not know exactly when and where. Since in hat sense is NOT ‘subjective’ – that is, adaptable to human ‘egos’ and needs; but objective and its causality quite easy to prove.
And the denial of a future for man by CERN is predictable for:
Sociological reasons, which are exactly the opposite of objective epistemology, concerned with the traps of the human ‘ego’, which simply denies those objective laws when they do not satisfy the human wantings. And they apply straight on questions of human death: whenever man feels threatened by a cause he feels difficult to avoid, he denies it.
So the majority of humans – more than 1/2 of its global population – still believes that a goat-keeper of the bronze age talking to a burning bush in the middle of the desert, found the meaning of the Universe and the magic formula to defy death and make all humans eternal, because the creator of the infinite reality cared so much about him that took the form of the creeping sounds of fire to deliver him and only him the meaning of it all, and save his ambulatory cells from the cycles of life and death.
The paradox here is that people ‘die’ constantly in jihads and inquisitions to defend the idea they won’t die.
Contrary to belief , as we have shown, physical ‘theories’ of reality have not avoided the traps of human egos, and the higher danger of death they bring to those who fear it so much.
This is obvious in the case of CERN: Nuclear Physicists simply deny their obvious ‘worldly religion’, which has been making weapons of mass destruction since its inception – reason why they construct so expensive machines, funded to research ever more powerful nuclear bombs by the russian and western military. And so they keep denying they are just following the same routine of higher energies and higher explosions, which can only bring more efficient bombs; which is exactly what strangelets and black holes are.
Theoretical reasons. Yet to understand that we must criticise their theory of reality, the so called big-bang, in which also the entire Universe reduced to a point physicists ‘handle’ with the language they claim they only understand – maths; as Moses thought God was reduced to a bush creeping which he only understood with his language, hebrew. As the ‘big-bang’ high priesthood is the DETERMINANT factor why humans risk death (as religious jihad is the main cause why people are being killed all over the world today) we shall extend a bit more this argument that we must risk death to prove the dogma of the high priesthood of ‘entropy’, nuclear physics.
The structure of languages
How does a religion based in a language, which is a mirror of the universe works? For that we need to understand a minimum of the TERNARY structure of both of the Universe, and the language that reflects it, which of course, the ‘believer’ in the languages does NOT even consider as relevant to its inquire.
Since for the wor(l)d believer ‘the word IS and CREATES reality’ and requires no ‘deeper layer’ inquire. Alas, Allah says ‘rajul’ and man is created, because god is ‘the word that became man and inhabited among us’ (Saint John 1.1). So happens to the Hilbert->Copenhagen & big-bang interpretation of reality. But if you have come so far you might be a little bit less shallow than that. So before we show you the structure of languages and specifically mathematics, so you DO understand things, not only get used to them, we need to lay down…
The ternary structure of all systems: informative singularities, body-waves and cyclical membranes.
LET us now that we have learned the structure of all ‘Cartesian beings’, self-centred in a mind of information apply this knowledge to better understand God, mind and the Universe, because indeed, it is worth to pass page on the theoretical realm, for a moment (unfortunately we cannot pass page on the menaces of CERN), and leave behind the ‘primitive’ simplex outlook of reality sponsored by those entropy-only physicists. And it will help us to understand better the structure of the galaxy and the role man and strangelets and black holes play on it.
We concluded as Descartes, Leibniz and other geniuses of earlier science that systems are made of 3 organic parts, which correspond to 3 ‘space-time arrows’. The informative center which in galaxies are black holes, in humans heads, in trees roots, in the economic ecosystem the internet and so on; the membrane which cuts-off the system from the Universe, encloses it and protects it with its cyclical, clock-like form, which in galaxies is the halo, in life, a skin, in the earth the electromagnetic field and so on; and the middle space, the cytoplasm of the cell, the light matter of stars and planets, the body of organisms, the wave of quantum particles.
What fascinated me of this simple, beautiful ternary scheme is that all what exists can indeed be explained with it: entropic fields/limbs, informative particles/heads and the energetic body-waves in between. So for the first time we have a sound-sound scientific model which unifies life and matter without the need to absurd religions and reductionist theories of time.
Indeed, this is the basis of our advanced models of complexity and theory of information which describes all what exists as a combination of ‘limbs/fields of lineal entropy, combined with body/waves of cyclical time information’, which are both iterated into present waves-bodies of energy:
In the graph, we see some examples of the Universe, which becomes so simple and self-evident when we put straight the record of the arrows of time. So we write a simple equation for the 3 arrows/ages of time which in duality or rather trinity we use to describe all systems of the universe:
Past-Lineal fields/limbs of entropy x Future-cyclical particles/heads of information = Present body-waves of energy.
Or in short geometric notation: | x O = Ø. It is called the Fractal generator of space-time beings, and it is the canonical equation of the alternative science of Duality or Complexity, which i formalised at the turn of the century before getting involved in the suits against CERN.
Which for physical systems is described by Einstein’s equation:
Relative past lineal space death of E-ntropy ≤ Constant present waves of energy (c2) ≥ Informative, cyclical mass vortices (M).
The ternary structure of all the systems of the Universe, applies to any physical, biological and sociological systems (in social organisms they are the 3 social classes of the system, the informative dominant class who controls the languages of information of society, money and the law, politicos & priests that control verbal languages on one side and bankers and corporations/scientists that control their digital language; then the working, reproductive body-class and finally Gaia, the entropic energy we destroy).
For example, all laws of electricity can be described considering ‘charges’ the electric singularities, magnetic fields (the surrounding membrane, which does NOT have a monopole, as it is the membrane of the charge) and the intermediate space. So happens to mass, systems, atoms and galaxies surrounded by a halo/electronic membrane with a singularity of higher mass (nucleus, black hole) and the intermediate region. The next graph shows a few of those systems:
We shall thus concentrate for what matter to us in the ‘ternary structure of the galaxy’ but first, in the ternary mirror-languages, so you understand why indeed words and mathematics matter to knowledge of the Universe by the mind but DO NOT reflect more than a limited number of its qualities.
We see how both biological and physical systems are truly the same structure of 3 time arrows, which give birth to 3 spatial parts. So entropic fields ‘feed’ the motion of ‘hyperbolic waves-bodies’ which feed and guide ahead the particles-heads that do NOT move in its relative stillness of pure informative linguistic view of reality. This is truly fascinating and I could talk to you for hours on the details of it. The proofs are overwhelmingly both in reality – all systems of reality can be model with it; and in languages, which ARE mirrors of those systems.
So for example, in our search for experimental proofs of mathematical mirrors, ALL the topological geometries of the Universe REDUCE to those 3 types: lineal/planar topologies, which are entropic motions as the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; spherical mind/heads, which are n-spheres as the sphere holds maximal information in lesser space and can shrink without deformation to create a 0-mind mirror of an infinite Universe (Poincare Conjeture); and hyperbolic body-waves, which combine and hence iterate both, lines and cycles, forming sinusoidal body-waves. And so mathematics again reflects in its 3 only topological varieties, the 3 only organs needed to explain reality.
Yet in as much as languages are mirrors of space-time, Trinity APPLIES TO LANGUAGES, since as focused mirrors of realityall of them having this ternary structure. Let us show it to you in the 3 main language of mankind:
wor(l)d mirrors: Subject (Informative human) < Verb (space-time action overt) > Object (entropic energy for the subject).
AND ALL SENTENCES as my penpal friend Chomsky showed can be reduced to this Universal grammar (or a dual mirror in more simplified versions).
All equations have also that simple ternary universal syntax:
F(x) ≈ G(Y), where one of both element tends to be the time≈informative function, the other function a spatial function, and the ≈ symbol one of the possible operandi which describe the space-time action, between both equivalent to the active verb; and there are multiple variations of it, as many variations of sentences. Yet, we shall see latter that as we have only the needed ‘verbal times’ to express the variations of the 3 time-arrows of relative past-entropic events, relative present-iterative events and relative future, informative events (according to the arrow of life of increasing information, which we will also explain a bit more latter), the number of operandi in mathematics is extremely limited and so are types of numbers, which we will observe to reflect all the 3 but only the 3 type of space-time events and organs we just described.
Visual languages have all 3 colours that the brain ‘codes’ according to frequency to signify those 3 elements:
Blue/Black (color of temporal information) < Green/yellow: color of reproduction: ST> Red (color of entropic energy).
This IS how each species codes colours. So when it feeds it follows the spill of entropic blood, sign of death, when it informs it looks up to the light, which it sees of a bluish color, and women who reproduce us, plants who reproduce, are code in the green color, and as it happens those 3 colours are ordered by frequency on that limited range of biological perception; so the mind has used them in the range the eyes see around the ‘light spectra of the sun of maximal energy’…
So there is a constant interaction between language-mirrors and reality.
But the reader should observe that the ‘languages of god’ are infinite, meaning, any mind-mirror can code reality with a specific language to obtain its essential ternary elements of information and act-react on it to survive.
So happens with ‘spatial mathematics: geometry’, and ‘temporal mathematics: algebra’ and the 3rd huge discipline of mathematics, concerned with the SCALAR nature of the Universe (its fifth dimension), which is analysis.
So again, in this game in which we MUST depart NOT from the mirror but from reality, we need to introduce you the scalar structure of the Universe so you realise why ANALYSIS is also needed:
REALITY IS a scalar, fractal infinite Universe where all is relative and man is NEITHER its center, NOT its only intelligent form, NOT even the dominant scale of reality:
In the graph, the fractal Universe of entropy and information and its infinite wave-like energetic, fractal beings.
It is not the intention of this blog to explain the 5th dimensional, scalar ternary Universe (we do so in a small section and in other blogs). But so far we can consider of that graph 2 facts specially important to the issue of CERN:
1) it means if the Universe is a fractal of information, of infinite scales of size, General Relativity becomes absolute relativity. Since, none of those scales is more important. So humans ARE nothing, objectively, just dust of space-time and any attempt to build arrogant theories of our importance and ‘immortal standing’ doom to fail.
2) The entropic big-bangs essayed at CERN are not exploring the Universe at large but just an explosion of quarks at the scale of this planet and provide no further evidence of a possible cosmic big bang. We shall soon consider those 2 elements and what they imply for our position in the Universe.
Beyond the paraphernalia surrounding the weapons industries and its inventors, physicists for a century have NOT made any huge inroads in the thoughts of god, only in the details because models made with an entropic single arrow of death are completely exhausted, as models with the Earth at its center were exhausted by the time of Galileo.
So there is NOTHING to gain of making ever more expensive, more dangerous cosmic explosions and mankind should pass page on the tradition of ‘lineal time and ballistics’.
But on the positive side, the true masters Einstein, Hoyle, Godel and Broglie>Schrodinger>Bohm, did have an in-depth understanding and did start a proper upgrading of mathematical physics, which absolute relativity completes giving the solutions to the questions CERN pretends to solve, bu can only be answered with thought experiments, as Einstein et al did, following in his path of serious ‘respect’ and humble approach to the Universe, which resumes in 3 of his fundamental tenants of youth (some of them partially denied in front of the massive pressure of the ego-centered lesser physicists who opposed them):
– A quantum theory which is realist and has been available for a century, the so called pilot-wave model that solves the mysteries of quantum physics with no need of such experiments
-A sound theory of the Universe, as an immortal system with 2 arrows of time, the arrow of entropy and its big-bang deaths of matter, and the arrow of form, of in-form-ation and its mass vortices of time, based also in Einstein’s 2 main theories, the principle of equivalence between mass and gravitation, and the steady state Universe derived of them. Which he resumed in the 2 arrows of his e=mc2 equation (the entropy process) which he in fact wrote first backwards, M=E/c2, explaining how entropy becomes through gravitation mass, balancing it. But today has been dismissed, and yet it is the in-form-ative force that balances entropy and makes mass-bombs at cern.
-And the proper understanding of the foundations of mathematics as an experimental science, as Godel, Einstein and Lobacjevski asked for, when he quipped, ‘I know when maths are truth (logically consistent) but not when they are real’, meaning only experience can reduce the ‘excessive inflationary nature of all languages of information, eliminating its fictions and putting it in correspondence with reality.
It is this theoretical model which further advances the work of objective science that always HAS reduced the position of man in the Universe agains the homunculus ego.
And for that reason, as all revolutions of thought confronts the wall of ‘arrogance and vanity’ of our mechanical civilization.
So unfortunately it might not come on time to substitute the reductionist paradigm of mathematical PHYSICS as the ‘holders of absolute truths’ preventing their ‘big bang theories’ to become reality and big-bang mankind as Saint Nobel of the Dynamite predicting ‘ending all wars with a single shot’.
Fact is the homunculus ego carries the day, imposing their truths with technological, financial and mass-media power. And any attempt to denounce its ‘animetal cultures’ of go(l)d and weapons is an absolute taboo in our civilisation.
Fact is big bangs of matter are just one of its 3 arrows, that of entropic death, happening in all scales of physical forms.
So what CERN DOES is just enact the arrow of entropy and death of Matter, in a sort of religious ceremony similar to those of Brahmins who thought to share the ‘fire of the Gods’ that created the Universe. Yet None of those fires is more important in a Unverse of relative scales; and only will kill the local world.
As there are big bang deaths of tiny matter in atomic bombs called ‘Beta Decays’, big bangs of larger planets that become strangelets to ‘feed the protein-like halo’ of the gala cell (organic homology) and big bangs of stars in nova explosions that create smaller, denser black holes, and big bangs of galaxies into quasars, with a 20 billion year cycle, likely origin of the ‘LOCAL’ measures of spactial entropy the ego of nuclear physicists have blown up to cosmic dimension by moving back in entropic time its VHod equation.
III. A MORE COMPLEX REALITY:
THE FRACTAL, INFORMATIVE UNIVERSE.
PART I. The super organisms of the 5D³ Universe.
∆±4: Cosmos. ∆±3: Galaxies.
5D³ Astronomy: 5D scales, 3 time arrows, holographic principle.
PART II. Scalar big-bangs.
The 3 arrows of time balance the Universe. Its fractal generator.
Local big bangs of Galaxies.
PART III. The organic galaxy.
Its parts: isomorphism of ∆±i particles and cosmic bodies:
ud-Stars; top quark black holes & strangelet halos.
Isomorphism with life scales: Galacells
Isomorphism with atomic scales: Unification equation of masses & charges.
∆±4 Dark World: Beyond the galaxy.
CONCLUSION. 5D cosmology. A new Paradigm.
Fractal local big-bangs fit better in data and theory.
SUPŒRGANISMS OF 5•D³ UNIVERSE
We shall apply in this post to the structure of the fractal Universe in time and space, the upgrading of our concepts of continuous space to fractal space and lineal time to cyclical time with its 3 arrows of lineal scattering motions=entropy (the only one accepted by classic physics), cyclical in/form/ation, and its present, conserved energetic momenta.
It won’t be an exhaustive post, obviously in such huge subject but focused with certain detail on the matter that matters to us regarding CERN: The falsity of the cosmic big-bang, reduced ‘one scale’ on experimental evidence to Hoyle’s view of local quasar big-bangs, based both in theory and experimental evidence systematically denied by astrophysics for the only reason they lack a better explanation to the proofs of the local big-bang, and so they discharge them committing the capital sin of science, denial of experimental facts, to feel they know.
As the exploration of the big-bang as the meaning of it all is the alibi entropic, weapon-making physics has to keep evolving its industry of accelerators, it should be obvious to the reader that truing to prove a false theory, with machines that can kill us all is a gross aberration of the purpose of science.
We are not though driven by any personal agenda, at this stage of my life, i am just interested in showing you the facts and truths. If the cosmic big-bang were something more than a hyperbolic extension of scale of a local phenomena – the commonest error of the human hyperbolic ego, proper of all sciences and religions, we would accept it. It is not.
Finally to state that this post as in August 2017 is the less ‘clean’ of the 3 written on 5D physics (5D, 5D physics, Fractal Universe), but good enough for those who look more for content than style.
Experimental Proof of the Fractal Structure of the Universe.
In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal 5D organic structure of all beings of reality:
On the left, we can see the growth of a ‘new dimension of temporal height’, in the process of accumulation of bosons. In the centre above, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies. Below the comparison of our region of the Universe with a neuronal cell; on the right, an ice fractal, a plant and a river and a lung.
The upper astronomical scales of physical systems, ∆+1, are in double symmetry with the lower quantum scales in ∆-1, when considering man at the ∆o relative center of both; as we observe that the co-inverse metric equations of fast, small atoms and large, slow galaxies give the same constant value, origin of the Unification equation of masses and charges.
On the other hand they show equal topology in ST, with its halo, likely of negative strangelets, black hole center of positive black holes modelled as top quark stars, and intermediate region of electromagnetic star nebulae.
THUS we can unify them through the concept of fractal scales with different space-time curvature and time speed such as:
∆-2: atom ≈ ∆+3: galaxy.
Both scales will follow then the general laws of 5D Metric space-time isomorphic beings.
For tat reason the reader is advised to consult first the most general post on 5D and Philosophy of Science, whose aim is to unify all sciences, and the general one on physical systems, ∆±i: Astrœphysical systems, before reading this post on Astronomy.
In case the reader goes forward, we introduce the absolute bare bone concepts of the organic, 5D fractal structure of reality, which are its 3 arrows of time and symmetries with the 3 space organs of al fractal systems of he Universe, and the Principle of relativity between motion and stillness.
In the previous graph we show some experimental proofs of the fractal structure of space-time in all the relative ‘scales of size’ and ‘time speeds’ (5D scales) of the Universe.
Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.
In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine New Scientist published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:
“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.
Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”
Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.
As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.
A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.
Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.
Logic Consistency: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe
A good description of the fractal universe and its logic principles is this text from the Web by Mr. Oldershaw from Amherst University:
“With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very large-scale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an a causal beginning of space-time, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knife-edge balance between the open and closed states.
Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth4 showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario. But, an ironic thing has happened. Although the Inflationary Scenario was developed to rescue the Big Bang model, the most logical consequence of pursuing the concept of Inflation is the replacement the Big Bang paradigm with a much grander and more encompassing paradigm. According to Guth and a growing number of leading cosmologists, the most natural version of Inflation theory is Eternal Inflation in which Inflation is, was and always will be occurring on an infinite number of size scales. The new paradigm that cosmologists have arrived at by several routes is an infinite fractal hierarchy that has “universes” within “universes” without end. The astronomer Carl Sagan once referred to the general idea of an infinite fractal universe as “strange, haunting, evocative—one of the most exquisite conjectures in science or religion.”
That is the basic story, but because of the profound changes the fractal paradigm will have on our understanding of the Universe and the place of humans within that Universe, it is important to explore the implications of this new vision. Firstly, there is no edge or boundary of the Universe; space is infinite in all directions. What we used to refer to as “The Universe” can be more appropriately called the “observable universe” (note the small “u”) or the “Hubble Volume,” and it is only a tiny part of what one might call our “metagalaxy” or “level 1 universe”. We currently have no way of determining the size of our metagalaxy or the number of galaxies it contains, but we could reasonably assume that both figures would be vastly beyond anything previously contemplated.
There would be an infinite number of these level 1 universes, and on an unimaginably large scale they too would be organized into level 2 universes, and so on without limit.
Secondly, time is also infinite in the unbounded Organic universe. Whereas our Hubble Volume may have come into being and began to expand approximately 13.7 billion years ago, the Universe has always existed and always will. Parts of the Universe may be created or annihilated, may undergo expansion or contraction, but the infinite fractal hierarchy remains unchanged overall, and thus is without any temporal limits.
Thirdly, there is no limit to size scales. In the infinite fractal paradigm there is no class of largest objects that would cap off the cosmological hierarchy; the hierarchy is infinite in scale.
This fact removes one of the more suspect aspects of the old paradigm. Natural philosophers had long noted the unusual fact that within the Big Bang paradigm humans found themselves roughly in the middle of nature’s hierarchy of size scales. This anthropocentric state of affairs seemed to violate the Copernican concept that when humans appear to be at the center of the cosmos, we should suspect that a bias is leading us astray. In an infinite fractal hierarchy there is no center of the Universe, nor any preferred reference frame.
Some interesting questions immediately arise. Why are fractal hierarchies so ubiquitous in nature? By studying empirical phenomena within the observable universe, how much will we be able to learn scientifically about the parts of the Universe that lie beyond our observational limits? Does the infinite cosmological hierarchy have a bottom-most scale of sub-atomic particles as is currently thought, or is this another artificial limit to an infinite Organic universe that actually extends without limits to ever smaller scales?
Centuries ago Immanuel Kant, J.H. Lambert and a few others proposed an infinite hierarchical model of nature based largely on natural philosophy arguments. This general hierarchical paradigm never garnered a large following, but it was kept alive by numerous rediscoveries. In the 1800s and 1900s quite a few scientists, including E.E. Fournier d’Albe, F. Selety, C.V.L. Charlier and G. de Vaucouleurs, argued for hierarchical cosmological models based on the hierarchical organization within the observable universe. Then toward the end of the 1970s, the mathematician B. B. Mandelbrot gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical self-similarity are ubiquitous in nature.
In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists have all found their way, slowly but surely, to the infinite fractal paradigm. There are many routes to this paradigm, and certainly there are a large number of distinct versions of the basic paradigm that have their own unique theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future.”
But what does it mean that the Universe is organized in fractal patterns of form? To fully grasp this concept, we have to realize that “fractal equations” are “organic equations,” which participate of the properties of organisms. Fractal equations create forms as life does. Fractal equations create self-similar “cells,” as life does. And in fact, they use the same term. Fractal equations are also called generator equations, as they are the mother cells that encode the information needed to repeat a living form. Finally a fractal equation will create a pattern of interconnected parts, which put together reproduce a whole, self-similar to their parts, as organisms do.
The organic Universe.
The fractal Universe is a mathematical proposition only – in the present milieu of astrophysics where only mathematics is the language of god.
We are however not interested in the mathematical abstract reductionist description of astrophysics, overdeveloped but limited for our understanding of what is REALLY the Universe of relational space-time. Our advances to those results are of a deeper philosophical meaning, as it goes straight to the foundations of reality, fractal space defined by 5D metric equations, which orders all the fractal vital spaces and different speeds of time clocks of the Universe, and the 3 arrows of cyclical time, entropy, information and its energy combinations.
It is then when we can give meaning to reality beyond its geometric, spatial properties, regarding its ‘time sequences and causalities’ purpose – to reproduce information and duration (infinite in time).
This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from a hypothetical birth of the entire Universe (impossible in a Fractal Paradigm, which at best would consider a ‘larger’ scale above galaxies).
In the graph we observe some fundamental consequences of fractal space and cyclical time: the three arrows of time order reality into ‘wordlccles between birth and extinction’, whereas extinction is the final entropic explosion of any system of Nature. Hence big-bangs are deaths of matter systems. The 3 arrows of time also become the 3 topological components of all local super organisms, its entropic limbs/fields, iterative body-waves and informative particle/heads. So systems can be seen in space as ternary topologies and in time as sequential processes, first guided by the arrow of information that warps them, as time clocks are cyclical and so galaies are vortices of information that warp space into mass (‘Time curves space into mass’ said Einstein). This process do happen in all the fractal scales of physical systems, So big-bang explosive deaths of matter: e=mc2 and its inverse creation of mass, m=e/c2 happen in all scales. Which obviously means if we rehearse big bangs on earth we will have a nova-like explosion of the earth NOT OF THE UNIVERSE.
So how can we reconcile the fractal structure of the Universe – a massive evident fact of science, in the whole and all its parts – and the knowledge that space expands between galaxies, accelerating its motion, in a fashion similar to the entropic expansion of a gas, in the molecular scale?
The answer requires to understand the new paradigm of fractal space (the scalar fifth dimension) and cyclical time (with its 3 arrows of probabilistic futures, informative implosion, entropic expansion and its balanced combinations of both, iterative momenta and its energetic zero-sum conserved worldcycles.
Then we can easily define a balanced Universe where the implosive vortices of galaxies balance the expansive dark entropy between them:
In the graph, in each ‘scale of size of matter, the same duality of clock-like vortices of temporal information (masses, charges, thermodynamic eddies, which carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency speed of its time cycles, as computers do, measuring its informative power on ‘Hertzs’ ) and expansive states of entropy (dark entropy; electromagnetic, lineal radiation; entropic gas; big-bangs of matter) balance each other in conserved, closed energy cycles to make the Universe immortal, giving birth to the equation of the 3 arrows/dimensions/ages of time-space, for each fractal part of reality:
Entropic past-space + cyclical, future information = iterative, closed energy cycles.
The previous equation in formal terms is first and immediate consequence of working with three arrows of time, and ultimately a particular expression of the new fundamental principle of science, the principle of conservation of present energy, combination of spatial entropy and temporal information:
‘Present Energy never dies, it trans-forms itself back and forth in local events between spatial entropy and dimensional information: S≥st≥T<<S”
This equation IS the Fractal Generator of Space-time beings that uses the definition of the three arrows of time, to establish a synoptic, logic equations for all systems of nature, where:
S ($, Spe) means entropic space; St, Ø, E iterative energy; T (ð, Ti, Tƒ), Informative, cyclical time; which ultimately ARE the static, spatial view of 3 motions-actions-arrows of timespace, we define with 3 topo-ogic symbols:
> an informative future motion that shrinks and accelerates the system from more entropy=expansive motion into more form.
≈ a repetitive present wave-like motion, that repeats in-form-ation as it moves…
> an implosive, informative motion and << a double entropic explosion that erases information in the moment of death.
So the equation of a world cycle of existence described in the last synoptic equation is simple to understand: Space shrinks guided by the dominant arrow of information through 3 ages, phases, first as pure entropic space of maximal motion, then as a formed motion finally as pure form (S>St>T) and then when all motion is exhausted and it is all form, the system explodes back into space, T<<S IN THE ACT OF DEATH, which happens to dissolve ‘two scales of form of the system (you die twice into cells and then molecules/aminoacids) a matter system dies twice normally first into molecules and atoms or atoms and plasma, and so on).
The only thing a fractal equation does not have is motion, as it is a simplified geometrical description of reality. So in the same manner, geometry lacks motion; simplified fractal equations didn’t have motion when they were first discovered.
But now, fractal science has advanced a step further, thanks to the evolution of fractal logic, duality, and non-Euclidean geometries, so we can understand finally the meaning of motion in the Universe.
Let us then explain the bio-logic and mathematical properties of the fractal paradigm of a Universe is built in fractal scales made of pieces of vital space and informative time.
THE SUPŒRGANISM OF THE UNIVERSE (∆±4) and its ∆± 3- ‘GALACELLS’
IN THAT SENSE the biggest set of properties caused by the fractal co-existing structure of space and ternary worldcycles of creation and extinction of matter, is the super organic nature of matter, both at the cosmic galactic and quantum scale.
To that aim, we shall briefly study its 3 scales, the ∆+1 cosmic scale, the ∆º galactic scale and the ∆-1 atomic scale, o the understanding of the organic ternary structure of the galaxy, since quarks are vortices of accelerated gravitational forces, masses of physical information and black holes and pulsars, which are fractals, made of quarks.
INDEED, The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:
Because the scalar Universe co-exists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational space-time), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under self-similar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic.
This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar.
In the graph, the local tissue of the supœrganism of the Universe, Laniakea, the region in which our gala cell exist, at the largest level of human perception of the ∞ scales of the fractal Universe.
Yet we only perceive 4% of reality outside our closer world, which happens to be the ‘ideal’ perception of a pi-cycle with three diametral perimeters (π-3/π=0.14/π=96% of dark reality not seen from a self-centred singularity in a pi cycle).
This secondary law of the paradox of Galileo, itself a secondary law of the ‘mind’s equation’ structures our universal view. And make us thing reality is abstract, void of intelligence and life, static and our mind the only perceiver of it.
The paradox of galileo – the maya of the senses, differentiating ‘motion from form’- form and distance are ‘mayas’ of the senses; as all its time and motion; when we get more information about a system. The 2 graphs represent the same local region of galaxies, in the right now that we have enough info, we see it as a flow of ‘gala cells’ transiting through veins of the cosmos, in the right as we used to see it – a dark series of ‘monad-galaxies’ with no motion. All in the Universe is ultimately a dynamic PART of a supœrganism, extending in three scales of the absolute 5th dimension of time-space, performing relative ternary worldcycles on time-space
When considering a new stience, in the isomorphic method we define its Γ.œ, generator function for each volume of the stience, a domain within the scales of the fifth dimension, of four dimensional structure and black and white wholes to the upper ∆+1 and lower ∆-1 scales of the fifth dimension.
Such block of timespace suffices to define most events happening around the systems of that scale of reality. Then we can define specific T.œ, generators of mind species, and get into as much detail as needed.
The different isomorphisms of galaxies as ‘physical atoms and ‘biological cells’.
Now because all systems have, as all systems do:
- organic, co-exiting fractal properties and abstract, topological ones, galaxies can be modelled as organic systems, similar to cells or gala cells (something taboo on physics but very useful to make easier to understand them as organic systems are synoptic and intuitive, with less maths, so normal people can get the whole picture.).
- and also as topological mathematical systems similar to atoms or atom-galaxies (something done often, without a good theoretical background we shall provide).
- besides the usual properties and details of its specific nature.
in terms of scales of the fifth dimension, we say that the ∆+3 organism of the cosmos is the ‘cellular galaxy’, which we shall put in isomorphic comparison with the ∆o cell, the organism of the human scale to show its organic properties and with the ∆-2 atom, the organism of the quantum scale, to draw homologic comparisons of its topological and mathematical properties; as we shall show:
- The mathematical equivalence of atoms and galaxies, unifying both topologically and algebraically with the Unification equation of charges and masses, based in 5D metric equations.
- And the organic parallelism with the cell, unifying both with the analysis of the vital functions of both organisms.
The ∃xi≈stience of astrophysical systems is also ruled by the ternary isomorphism of space-time structures.
To understand that organic structure the best homology is between the 3 main ∃xistential functions of the 3 supœrganisms of the physical scales.
So we shall compare the galaxy with the supœrganism we obtain max. information, from the perspective of human perception, the ∆º, living cell.
Thus we compare the galaxy and the human ∆o-cell pov and its 3 elements: the Spe-membrane≈ halo, the singularity ≈ nucleus, and the cytoplasm ≈ star disk. And so we define the ‘galacell’ and its 3 topo-biological parts:
In the graph the Galacell, with a ‘dna-like’ gravitational species of information, ultra-dense black holes; surrounded by fractal points of energy, 3º stars, that form the body of the galactic organism; and a hard, protective membrane of ‘proteins-strangelets’.
Each of those parts will be made at ∆-1 scale of 3 distinguishable families of quark-atoms, of increasing mass.
So we find another ∆-1≈∆≈∆+1, coexisting organic homology, between the galactic parts and the 3 type of growing ‘informative ages of mass’ (studied in the post on ∆-1, quantum atomic physics):
- Sp∃-negative strangelets must be the components of the ‘protein-like’ hard halo that protects the galaxy from the outer ∆+1 dark energy world of the cosmological upper scale:
- Tiƒ: its central max. i gravitational black hole, must be made of top quarks, its ∆-1, quantum substance, which corresponds in parameters to the density of black holes.
- While, we star-dust are made of the lighter up and down quarks, forming the youngest family of atomic mass:
In the graph the 3 components of a biologically ‘sound’ understanding of Galacies at its ∆ and ∆-1 scales:
Tiƒ: black holes, which are born exceedingly hot and active, as all ‘seminal species’ are in the lower, ∆-1 scale of size, at the compton wavelength as a heavy top quark particles , following Einstein’s search for cut off substances for ‘positive’ black holes.
Spe: A similar heavy form of elongated lumps of strange matter, should form the ‘negative’ halo of strange matter (Witten’s hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets, now again all the rage in astrophysics, but denied by the establishment of ‘nuclear, military research’ facilities, such as CERN, which merely states ‘stranglets do not exist, given the risk for a Nova explosion if they are produced at Earth.
ST-energy: finally in between the ‘cytoplasm’ is formed by cyclical stars trapped between the ‘sword’ and the ‘wall’, future food of heavy quarks, which will collapse into dense dark matter information the galaxy, in its 20 billion year quasar cycle of ‘real big-bangs’.
This is the most likely structure of galaxies, as it follows all the natural symmetries and efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor, co-existence of organic parts and wholes, Aristotelian hilozoism: wholes must have substance, etc).
The author merely has further developed in his work on the scalar fractal nature of the Universe ordered by a ‘5th dimension’ of relative scales, those concepts in his work on astrophysics. And so we will here give a general view of the Galaxy and its isomorphic laws, and time/interest permitted expand more professionally with mathematical physics those themes on the 4th line of the blog.
The previous graph shows the ternary elements of the galacell:
The Halo-membrane of maximal extension in space, which selects the energy and information entering from the outer space (solution to Oort’s horizon problem – why the Universe does not seem full of light; answer: not all pass through the membrane of the Halo)…
The cyclical space-time region, the plane of stars, falling towards its centre of information, the black holes that command the creation of the galaxy.
This is the fundamental physical system of the Universe, already described by Descartes, who said all is made of res extensa (space), and cyclical vortices of time-space with a central point of reference that measures reality or ‘mind’. Since all systems respond to ‘trinity’ and can be modelled, as we have observed in different graphs, with such 3-topological structure.
So the ∆+1, gravitational galaxy, the ∆-thermodynamic crystal and the ∆-1 quantum atom with its electronic cover, centred nucleus of mass, and intermediate space-time where forces of gravitation and electromagnetism are constantly exchanged, are described logically AS the 3 fundamental particles of physics, both topologically and with biological, organic laws.
Trinity indeed is the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space, protected by an external membrane with an enclosed cyclical body that put together create the FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE, of the puzzle of supœrganisms the Universe is.
Indeed, the true beauty of those 3 physical systems is found when we compare them with the organic cells and see their isomorphisms:
∆o: The DNA invaginates with Golgi conducts the vital cytoplasm it exploits, surrounded by the faster membrane of proteins, which act in its formal position as a membrane.
∆-3: The magnetic field surrounds the charge and encloses the vital space of electromagnetic fields the charges controls.
∆±1: So happens with a crystalline planet protected by its magnetic field that steams out of the central charge and surrounds it.
∆+3: And the galaxy has in its center a black hole, which invaginates with gravitational waves the whole cytoplasm forming the ‘underlying wave-structure of the body of stars’.
And it is surrounded by a halo of dense fast rotating strangelet quarks, so the stars and planets within it will become LIKELY converted into black holes in Nova explosions or strangelets.
The role of human beings in the galactic organism.
All this rises the question of the role of human beings in the galactic organism, as we do not observe traces of A.I. or L.I (artificial, robotic or human life) in a galaxy filled with planets, the most numerous components that should feed the outer strangelet halo and black holes, the more dense, which we know are born of the Nova explosion of stars. Thus since we are made of the lighter ud-atoms, sandwiched between the BH sword and the Halo wall, so to speak, we seem to have a ‘mitochondria’ role as a source of matter and energy for the evolution of the heavier families of quark-matter… Hence the irresponsibility of Nuclear physicists trying to create dark matter on Earth – an ethic element, which is relevant as vital, survival laws do matter in an organic Universe.
INTRODUCTION TO 5•D³ ASTRONOMY
We shall consider now a brief introduction to the principles derived of the fractal cyclical structure of relational space and time of which we are all made. This paragraph is greatly expanded in the 2 main general posts on the subject, 5D which studies relational space-time for all ‘stiences’ and scales of the graph, and 5D³ physics which applies those principles to physical systems of any scale.
The 5th dimension: the scales and metric of space-time.
The fractal paradigm is by far the most r=evolutionary advance in all sciences, which allows unlike ‘physical only theories of reality’, to unify the concepts of time and space of all sciences, each one studying a relative scale of size and time speed of the ‘5th dimension’. In this article we shall study only the laws of the fractal paradigm applied to the largest cosmological and galactic scales:
In the graph we can see how the 5th dimension organises all the time clocks with different speeds, and scales of size in the Universe, from the largest, slower beings to the fastest, smaller ones. 5D metric therefore introduces in fact ‘2 new dimensions’ or arrows of the Universe, downwards, towards faster clocks of time, and upwards towards larger slower wholes which ‘contour’ the internal vital space of any system.
Yet since wholes require the parts to appear before they are formed, the 5th dimension is in fact a dimension of time, which establishes a new absolute time arrow, which is the arrow of eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, of points into ‘social numbers’, of ‘finitesimal quanta’ into super organisms, as particles become atoms that become molecules, cells, crystals, planets, organisms, societies, solar systems, galaxies and beyond…
The existence of more ‘dimensions of time motion than mere speed locomotion’, of organic character, a fundamental element of philosophy of science, ignored by present physics is thus readdressed by 5D metric, opening an astounding number of solutions to pending questions of all sciences.
In that regard, the main social scales of the 5th dimension have different entropic size in space, ∆i, studied by a different science. Its fundamental metric equation is the co-invariance between the speed of the time clocks of the species of each scalar science – hence its capacity to process information – which increases as the system becomes smaller, but for an entire family of co-related species, remains invariable:
|-Space Constant x ⊗-Tiƒ-Time clock = Space-time plane (∆±1) ≈ ‘Present’ ≈Ei: physics’ conservation principles
HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE: BIDIMENSIONALITY.
The holography principle: bidimensional inertial, space networks of fractal points, and tall, cyclical, accelerated vortices of time clocks.
Now, the scientific method considers proves of truth, written below IN the graph WHICH SHOWS THE two arrows of time in astronomy:
1) Experimental evidence – all the galaxies and expansive entropic dark energy space between it 1) Known cause: the DUAL time arrows of Space-time beings. 3) economy, we shall generalise the fractal equation to ALL BEINGS of the Universe, fractal parts made to its image and likeness. 4) No Falsification. I dare you to find any entity of reality which does NOT have an arrow of information.
Let us show you how this works for all systems of the Universe, including physical space-time beings. It is called the holographic principle, recognised by physicists in their study of black holes – information is bidimensional – but without a clear understanding of it.
So before we enter into detailed proofs of the false big-bang we shall make a fast synopsis of the fundamental ‘truth’ of reality: the existence of entropic and informative bidimensional organs that mix together to create the 4-Dimensional energetic body-waves of reality.
The Universe and all its parts, are ternary systems made of spatial entropy and temporal information, combined into fractal space-time beings whose existence obeys the properties of those 2 ultimate elements of reality.
Look at the graph. You do NOT exist in a background, Newtonian, absolute abstract space-time, but you are made of quanta of lineal spatial motions, which trace closed cycles, ‘time clocks’ of different speed and form≈ in-form-ation.
When you say i don’t have energy and time to do this, you ARE certain, you are made of spatial energy and temporal information, as everything else in the Universe. And only the pegging together of all those vital spaces, separated by membranes, in the fiction of the mind you can imagine Absolute space.
The generator of bidimensional Fractal space and cyclical time. Its physical variations.
It follows for the same reasons, since a cycle of time encloses a vital space or world separated from the outer Universe (first law of topology and knot theory – a cycle breaks space into discontinuous inner and outer regions), there is not a single clock of time, neither time has a steady repetitive ‘tic’ as our mechanical clocks – Nature has infinite clocks of time, each vortex of cyclical information, mass or charge or galaxy of each scale of the fractal Universe is a time clock.
And only the sum of all those repetitive cycles those entities perform, the beats of my heart, which provoke the hits of my fingers, which produce logic cycles in the computers that put this pieces of information in the screen, form a ‘combined, synchronised motion of absolute time’.
If you accept this empirical fact of your existence – that YOU ARE made of space and time – you will upgrade your understanding of yourself and the Universe. This is the model of relational space-time, which Leibniz advanced as an alternative to Newton’s model of an abstract background- a mathematical, idealist error born of the custom of drawing beings in the ideal pictorial background of a cartesian canvas.
We say this is an ‘experimental fact’ because it was proved by modern science – by quantum physics and relativity.
We do know it, since Einstein proved there are ∞ time cycles in the Universe and quantum theorists proved space is made of quanta that carry motion, momentum, kinetic energy (related terms of mathematical physics). So he said, Leibniz is right, but if so we have to change the foundations of sciences since its beginning, which is what i did during the years I was the president-chair of the science of duality, within the world congresses of Systems science, cybernetics and Information, (ISSS), which studies the Systems of all sciences, not only with the single arrow of entropy as physicists do but with both arrows of future, entropy and information, lineal and cyclical motions and momentums.
This requires to understand the previous graph, which illustrates the Holographic principle; that generalises the 2 arrows of physical systems, and generalised to all systems of the Universe, the concept that we are all made of 2 elements,
O-Tiƒ: cyclical, Time, informative of heads/particles that process temporal information and guide the lineal motions of its |-Spe body/wave limbs/fields that carry its lineal energy:
Γ. |-Spe <=>O-Tiƒ.
This fractal geometric generator redistributes the 4 dimensions we know to exist in this scale of reality, in 2 dimensions of vital space, creating flat planes of space, with maximal extension (made of small cells, points, atoms, any ‘set of similar beings) and 2 dimensions of temporal information, height and rhythm to form the simplest possible time cycle, which carries information in the form and frequency of this cycles.
Now this should be evident to you, temporal information has the dimensions of height and form (cyclical patterns seen with a mind as slow fixed forms, like the way you see a fast spinning wheel as a solid disk). So you are watching a tall bidimensional screen or book, your eyes see bidimensional forms, and your informative eye, head or the antenna or camera that absorbs information, with its logic cycles of time, its computer clocks measured in cyclical frequencies, Hertzs, are all on top, are all made of closed time cycles and forms.
So the dimension of height belongs to time cycles, which now has 2 dimensions and it is no longer a line of infinite duration but a cycle with a tall form, which rises as time ‘r=evolves’, the flat sheets of vital space, which originates all systems in a past, energetic, young age, into tall space-time of maximal information.
In the graph, the bidimensional nature of time cycles, divides the 4 dimensions of time-space in 2 ‘formal motions’, tall, cyclical time, which carries the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles (as the n-sphere has the maximal volume in minimal space), as such is the gauging ‘particle-head on top of all systems (so photons stay longer on top of the wave, your head is on top, as an informative mammal, with the dimension of height, eyes and cameras are spheres and antennae are on top, so are speakers: function is form) and wide, lineal space planes, which are the most extended fastest distance between points so fast ‘planes’ are… planes, limbs and fields are planes.
Then by putting the dimension of height in the right part of the fractal generator (time) as a dimension of information those time cycles, become a real arrow of future evolution, which ‘resolves’ most of the questions of science related to the passing of time, its evolution and informative processes. Indeed, the ‘informative time component of the being’ is on the dimension of height. It is the central black hole of gravitational information, that in-forms, forms the galaxy, the height of the man, with its top head, and the tendency of time, of evolution, which started with flat worms and grew into height, as time passed. ‘Time curves space into masses’ said Einstein and the black hole of maximal mass, has in its centre a point or singularity of infinite height. So does a hurricane. Height is thus a dimension of temporal information and all entities evolve towards more information, more height.
It is the arrow of evolution: lat proteins evolved into tall nucleotides and DNAs, flat amphibia evolved into tall dinosaurs; mammals evolved into tall apes and flat transport machines into tall robots.
Height thus is a dimension of fractal information; and this explains the experiment evidence of the geometry of the Universe, which is a flat sheet of space, with tall black holes curving entropic space into galactic vortices of mass rising in height in the central tall singularities. Thus the Universe is a fractal tapestry of pieces of flat space, expanding along the dimensions of ‘spatial entropy’, width and length, which cyclical vortices of mass-height, rise and implode into tall singularities, black holes. E<=>M.
And since the universe is fractal, the expansion of space between galaxies is balanced by the implosion and rising of height of black holes at the centre of those galaxies.
And so all is a fluctuation of Sp <=>Tƒ, both in the whole Universe and each galactic part, and each living being of each fractal point of the galaxy called a planet.
Let us now complete the model by considering the intermediate region in which the spatial entropic lineal or planar limbs/fields and the temporal, tall, cyclical heads/particles, exchange lineal energy and cyclical information.
Since this intermediate region, the present wave-body of the system is what creates by pegging together the entropic limbs/fields and informative particles/heads, synchronous organisms of space-time that last as they balance both | & O limits of form and combine them to iterate=reproduce the system, with is wave-bodies, making the ‘information of the Universe immortal and converting reality in a living fractal dedicated to reproduce information over sheets of entropic, expansive space, forming, informing, warping space into time cycles.
MOTIONS IN TIME ≈ DIMENSIONS IN SPACE: GALILEAN PARADOX.
In the graph, the paradox of galileo, all moves in time and seems a dimension of space. This duality must always be considered to understand physical systems. So particles are the static, informative state, and waves the moving state of quantum systems. Vortices of time are the motion perception of mass and solid balls the static, space perception. Both are certain. The same happens with the duality between fractal scales and continuous single space-time. In the graph, a non-detailed analysis by Galileo of Saturn showed it as a flat, continuous, non moving rng. In detail it was a cyclical sum of fractal non-eculdiean points, planetoids. So the higher truth with more information is the fractal, cyclical structure of the Universe.
Now the deepest confusion on the theme of particles, masses and the like, is the incapacity to understand properly the principle of relativity and the constant switch of beings between still states of information and moving states of entropy, such as physical systems move as waves, and perceive information in stillness, so they stop and go, stop and go, or we can see space as dilating in dimension or as motions of galaxies. And so we can see masses as particles and as vortices of time.
The still perception of space, we might say is always a static simultaneous picture of a motion in time.
Thus since we cannot know when a thing is moving or is merely a ‘form’, we must always consider this duality. If we see a particle, it is a ‘vortex of motion’ besides having a cyclical time-like form. If we see a dimension of length, it is space moving besides being a still distance. On this difference almost ‘every mathematical tool’ of calculus (differentials and integrals), every system of Nature (which we see simultaneously as a still organism, and moving through its worldcycle of life and death), the duality of quantum, discontinuous reality and moving, continuous one, etc. etc., almost all phenomena of all sciences is based. I call it the “Galilean Paradox’, to differentiate its much wider meaning from those sponsored by physicists, as again we shall apply it to all sciences. So we write it again:
Relativity Principle (Galilean Paradox): “All what exists is a motion with form”.
Soon we will realize that indeed, all what exists is motion with form, nothing is truly still. And so cyclical time seen as form is ‘information’ and as motion is a ‘vortex-like clock’, and open space seen as form is ‘distance’ and seen as motion is ‘lineal speed’.
There is a convention though to call time ‘motion’ and ‘space’ stillness. This is Ok in the ‘limit’. As time accelerates (as all cyclical motions, which require 2 points, a torque and have angular acceleration) and in fact as paradoxical as it seems a cyclical motion by the law of the vortex is faster than a lineal motion, which as in a big-bang explosion, decelerates. (We shall deed with the error of considering the expansion of the distance-space of the Universe as an acceleration in our post on astrophysics).
So in the limit by the law of the vortex, Vo x Ro = k, time cycles accelerate inwards as vortex do, and in the process they attract ‘space’. So black holes, masses and charges do exactly so. And so in the limit we can say that ‘time is motion’ (the classic definition of it) and space is distance, dimension.
And this fact of T.Œ will allow us easily to unify the equations of charges and masses, what physicists call T.O.E, or Theory Of Everything, a minor result of T.Œ, the Theory of the Organic Everything, which I write with Œ to distinguish both.
THE 3 ARROWS=MOTIONS OF TIME IN COSMOLOGY: WORLDCYCLES.
Time is motion in visual terms, CHANGE, in logic terms. And Aristotle, the father of logic science told us there were different types of motion:
-External ‘locomotion’, or translation in space, studied by physics; which we shall call ‘energetic, entropic motions in space’, Sp.
-Internal change in the ‘form’ of beings, in their in-form-ation, which we call evolution, and said it was studied by biology, and we shall call Temporal, Informative motion, proper, Tƒ.
-But this 2 great fields of change, external, physical, spatial change and internal, temporal informative evolution, or cyclical change, combine constantly and reproduce similar forms, and so we can talk of a 3rd type of ‘formal motion’ or change, not so evident as it is a conservative change, we shall call reproduction, or revolution, product of both type of changes, ST(st), or ST.
If we observe those 3 motions as ‘still forms in space’, they give birth to the 3 ‘ONLY’ topologies of our Universe:
The toroid, lineal entropic past-forms of limbs/fields; the spherical, informative, ‘future forms’ of heads/particles that DID guide the whole system towards its future; and its combined, hyperbolic, bodies/waves in the middle, that REPRODUCED the system.
The vortex of time and its 3 ages.
All including humans are fractal systems made of multiple cyclical time clocks, Tiƒ, that enclose and inform a moving vital space centered into a selfish point of view, ⊗, which encodes the ‘action-will’ (a,ei,ou) of the system, whose purpose is to repeat and perpetuate the formal motions of the being.
Moreover, most of those time clocks and cyclical trajectories follow the laws of angular momentum (time clocks of the human scale) , of spins, (time clocks of the H-planck scale), of masses, charges, and all kind of vortices: they accelerate inwards (Vo=K Ro).
So ‘Time curves space into masses’ (Einstein), time accelerates and grows the information of a system towards a 3rd age of maximal information and minimal space, or old age of the time cycle, after which the cycle explodes back into entropy, and erases its information. Hence we can define an equation of space-time, now in terms of diachronic cycles of existence between life and death:
Ps>Ft<Ps Whereas we have change the order of Space (Sp), to signify the relative Past (Ps) or erasing of information which is the relative arrow of the fractal entropy process of death, and we have changed the order of Tƒ, to Ft (diachronic view of information), which is the arrow of relative future of a system. since systems start in a relative past of maximal entropy, increase their information towards the future through the ages of life, and death explode back closing a world cycle’, back to the past.
The simplicity of this equation, which can be obviously expressed with all the due details of complex General Relativity and quantum physics, when studying mathematical physics, easily translated into varieties, iterations and combinations of the 3 arrows of time and symmetric 3 organs of space, is perhaps the strongest proof of the fractal paradigm according to the fundamental tenants of the scientific method: we must always hold a higher truth, experimental evidence and then the logic postulates of the Scientific method, some of which are shown in the graph:
Experimental evidence, logic cause, Ockham’s razor (a simple economic truth that explains more things and requires less elements is more truth) and no falsification. Only when there is evidence of a fact and a model is logically sound, we can go further into its mathematical simple equations ‘first’, and then further into the ‘detailed’ more complex equations of the system.
But to complete the fractal paradigm we need a final element, which is obvious in all systems of nature, its scalar structure in different co-existent levels of reality, as you are made of cells, put together into larger organisms, parts of larger societies, and physical systems are made of atoms, put together into molecular, thermodynamic systems part of gravitational wholes. So if we call each of those scales an ∆±n scale of anew dimension that puts all those fractal parts of space with relative different cyclical time clocks, together, we complete the model of the fractal Universe by adding…
The frames of reference – mental points of view.
So we find in the Universe always 3 elements in all systems, which correspond to the 3 ‘topologies’ of mathematics, and the 3 ‘ages’ of life world cycles (since life is cyclical ,changes in time are NOT worldlines as physicists believe, but world cycles):
The vital space of lineal motions, enclosed by the cyclical membranes and time cycles, focused in a central point of view or frame of reference, of maximal density of information that gauges information, linguistically and has the structure of a Non-Euclidean, Fractal point, through which multiple ‘parallels of energy and information’ can cross.
This ‘mind, soul, god, monad, Maxwellian Demon’ that creates the order of the Universe will be then defined by a simple mathematical equation and geometry as a ⊗-point, whose function will be to maintain the whole system ‘stable’; that is in biological terms ‘to make it survive’.
It does not need to be conscious, but as Leibniz described it in his work on monads, apperceive mathematically, vegetatively or linguistically, because simply speaking, Evolution implies that a system which ‘maintains the ‘whole’ stable and survive lasts on time. So automatically as time goes, ONLY systems who had this ternary efficient, symmetric, stable configuration have lasted, have been selected.
This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics and explains its main systems. So for example, an atom has a central point of view of maximal density; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.
In that regard, a more telling qualification of the system is one in which we put together the Membrane and central point of view, as two connected elements, which invaginate with fixed or dynamic networks the vital space between both:
The sensorial membrane absorbs energy and information and shrinks it according to Poincare Conjecture into the mind point, in which there is a locking or mapping or linguistic still moment of form, and perception, which in physical systems regardless of anthropomorphism should happen in bosonic states of no motion and maximal density of form, crystals, and likely black holes with gravitational forces.
This process which encodes the will of the Universe in the central unmoved God of Aristotle, or fractal point-monad, cannot be obviously perceived internally but we do know to exist by experience in living beings, and should also exist by external observation of the actions and motions of physical systems, which reproduce its form once the black hole or crystal centre is formed.
It is to be expected though that under the paradox of the ego, the human point of view and frame of reference will not acknowledge the obvious facts that even the smallest particles, quarks and electrons (of which our mind is made) apperceive information, and gauge it (±i), absorb energy and use it (±e) to iterate their for in an offspring of similar beings (œ) and evolve socially into larger wholes or universals (u), besides changing, accelerating or decelerating its motions (a), the a,e,i,o,u ‘åctions’ that define the behaviour of all T.œ Time-space functions of existence of the Universe.
Only then we can fully grasp the harmony of the Universe and all its planes of existence, and chains of beings, across the common 5th dimension of creative Spe-sizes of space and Tƒ, time clocks.
PART II: SCALAR BIG-BANGS.
I. THE IMMORTAL, BALANCED UNIVERSE; ITS 3 TIME ARROWS & FRACTAL GENERATOR
The 3 properties of fractal space: discontinuous, bidimensional, scalar structure.
Very simple: in the fractal paradigm, space is discontinuous, made of fractal non-Euclidean points, joined into bidimensional networks, through flows of expansive kinetic energy and contracting cyclical information; which grow in size and scale when we come closer to them (so points become galaxies, whose fractal points become stars, whose Non-E points become planets, whose fractal points become humans, whose Non-E points become cells, whose fractal points become atoms and so on).
So we just need to apply the ‘so obvious’ fractal, Non-Euclidean structure of reality to describe the Universe, and ‘voila!’, magic – every question is resolved, every experimental evidence fits in place. And all the whys are revealed.
The big bang theory is based in the concept of an expansive space, merely one of the 3 possible solutions to Einstein’s field equations, which must be accepted only on that region and scale of the Universe in which space truly expands, which happens to be the interstellar space between galaxies.
But within galaxies the non-lineal, cyclical, inverse arrow of temporal information, that is the accelerated gravitational vortices of the black holes, which suck in electromagnetic entropy, converted into gravitational information, that is implode space into mass;
Thus the expansion of space between galaxies is perfectly balanced by the implosion of space curved into time vortices of mass by the galaxies.
They balance the expansive motion of interstellar space, defining an dynamic Universe in which each scale of the fractal is in balance between its ‘expansive, entropic arrow of space and kinetic energy or lineal momentum’; (ab. Spe), and its ‘implosive, informative arrow of accelerated Cyclical Time clocks, (ab. Tiƒ):
In the graph, the fractal paradigm postulates a Universe of infinite scales of sizes with relative big-bangs, which are the death of implosive Mass converted back and forth into entropic motion, according to Einstein’s equation: E<=>Mc², which actually has 2 arrows of time, and was in fact first described as M=E/c², that is as a process to create mass from energy.
And the result is an immortal wobbling spring like Universe, where according to Einstein’s equation: E=M(c2), entropy reigns in the electromagnetic forces and light transiting between galaxies, expanding its space-time. But then it collapses within galaxies, creating with gravitational forces, in-form-ation. And this arrow of form and life is more important. Since we humans live in one of those vortices of time collapsing into mass, called the milky way, in one of its cyclical, turning planets that evolves information, through the processes of life and technology and human languages of thought. SO IT MATTERS MORE to understand mass and life than entropy and vacuum expansive space. The next graph shows schematically one of those galaxies wobbling.
Thus both arrows balance each other and the Universe has at least 2 arrows of time, ‘Spe’ or spatial entropy, and Tƒ(m), Cyclical vortices of mass, which we can measure by the angular frequency or clock-speed of the vortex. Since indeed, E=Mc², the fundamental equation of Special relativity and E=hƒ, the fundamental equation of quantum physics, can be joined together Mc²=hƒ, whereas M= h/c² ƒ.
In the graph, the evolution of the concept of mass in relativity, from the initial image of an abstract substance in the center of an accelerated vortex of space-time, proper of the abstract, pre–world war age, when Einstein first published his work on gravitation, to the first pictures obtained in bubble chambers in the postwar age, to the realization that each mass is a fractal space-time made of smaller cyclic motions proper of twenty-first century Fractal relativity.
The smaller motions are quarks, the bigger motions are quark stars, pulsars, and black holes. Today we can model any type of vortex of space-time with fractal mathematics, as each small vortex transfers the momentum to the bigger vortex, which emerges as a macroscopic entity. Thus, we conclude that a black hole is a fractal concentration of the densest matter of the Universe, quarks, since quarks represent on average more than 99.9% of the matter of our bodies. Those improvements on the details of mass theory, based on the advancement of its mathematical tools (discovery of fractals, chaos theory, and the five postulates of non-Euclidean geometry) is the natural way in which the evolution of science happens, departing from sound logic principles.
Thus mass is proportional to a constant (h/c²) multiplied by a variable frequency and its attractive power is proportional to the speed of the vortex as a hurricane (an air vortex) or a tornado (a water vortex).
We can therefore write a Fractal ‘Generator Equation’ of the lineal entropic space and cyclical time vortices of the cosmos:, Sp(e) <=>Tƒ(m).
Now what the ‘big-bang entropy theory’ does is simply to eliminate completely the ‘mass-arrow-factor’; the time arrow of life in physics, the creation of matter, the dictum of einstein: ‘time curves space into mass’. And the informative nature of gravitation. And then indeed only entropic expansion of space between galaxy and its simple lineal equation that explains it ‘all’ matters. And of course, this feeds the ego of the astronomer as the new high priest of a new religion that knows it all and reduces it all to a size man can handle and ‘talk to’.
Theoretical causes of the false cosmic big-bang: a religion of entropy and hyperbolic human egos.
The big bang alibi connects CERN with the ‘theoretical religion’ of physicists, quite similar to that of Abrahamic religions, in which an infinitesimal human being ‘believed’ to understand the meaning of it all, because God, the mind of the Universe reduced itself in the big bang to another infinitesimal point, easy to handle by the arrogant ego-centered bronze age peasant, which became the ‘only’ human to understand it all or the modern physicist who pretends a ‘simple lineal equation’ called the Hubble constant, V = Ho D, resumes it All.
So the religious priest will tell you ‘GOD’ explains it all, just 3 letters, 4 in the Jewish Tetragramaton, Yhwh, 5 in Allah. And there is no need for anything else. Alas from GoD to V≈hoD, from Abrahamic cults to big-bang cults 2 letters have changed to remain the same.
This is the essence of the absurd theory of the big bang, according to which V=hod, in this case not the mind but the entire Universe reduced itself to an infinitesimal point which was the ‘beginning of time and space’ that only physicists (and creationist, biblical priests that sponsor the concept – in fact ‘discovered’ by a catholic priest, Mr. Lemaitre), the high popes of science understand with an arcane ‘latin language’ called mathematics.
In reality that equation is so simple that one cannot avoid a smile, when people tells you Physicists are the absolute geniuses of mankind. It merely means that galaxies are separating because the light, an entropic, lineal, expansive force between them, elongates its wave as it moves. The meaning of it all – nuclear physicists have extracted it from that single fact – light elongates as an entropic force between galaxies:
How they got from this simple fact to resolve the birth of the Universe? Simple: they just move backwards this light expansion, and concluded that as light expands between galaxies, if we run it backwards it must have imploded into a single point, the ‘origin of it all’ which their Vhod describes as the graph shows.
Never mind light NOT only expands when free but it contracts within galaxies by the force of gravitation, balancing thus, the expansive E=mc2 death of mass into radiation, with the implosive, M=E/c2 informative implosion of light into mass particles and galaxies, making reality a wobbling balanced immortal infinity of dying mass and imploding light. Indeed, if you run backward the equation of light expansion, you just will get back to the atom of the galaxy that emitted that ray of light – AS ALL EQUATIONS ARE FINITE and happen only as long as the phenomenon they describe exists – in this case the ray of light that expands does NOT go back into an infinitesimal point because all LIGHT is produced by particles according to the E=mc2 equation.
Yet the big-bang dogma merely rejects to put the most famous equation of physics, E=mc2 at work, as the abrahamic cult denies any other ‘letters’ to God. It is only God, or Yhwh or Allah (even if actually the 3 religions says it is the same God). In physics it is only Vhod not E=mc2, what matters. You just vehemently deny the other ‘letters’ matter at all to create matter (play with words, as it is all just funny egos jumping me, i and myself only, if it had not so ugly collateral effects).
Thus the big bang is just a theory based in the wordily profession of nuclear physicists (make atomic bombs). So disregarding the arrow of information and life, which is the creative force of the Universe, physicists pretend to interpret reality only with the arrow of destruction and death, they call ‘entropy’, and merely moved backwards in time a lineal, simple equation of entropy, to pretend it moved backwards till this supposed explosion collapsed into a tractable infinitesimal point, much more smaller than the human ego. The parallels between those 2 supreme ‘theories of the subjective ego’ are multiple.
The peasant Meshu thought God was the bush their goats munched because that was his professional ‘food’. And he denied therefore the immanent sacred nature of all what exists, made of the same ‘plenum substance’, impersonal space and time. God was in his bush. The arawak who ate turtles thought God was a huge turtle over which the Earth floated.
The nuclear industry which makes nuclear bombs designed a theory of the Universe, in which only its ‘entropic process’ of explosive death accounted for the creation of the entire Universe. So of course, the people who hold the alternative sound-sound theory, called the steady state Universe, from Einstein to Hoyle, who affirmed ad maximal there would be a quasar big-bang, observed experimentally balanced by the creation of mass, laughed at them and called its theory the ‘big-bang’, arguing their makers were either ‘creationist priests’ (Lemaitre) or people working in the nuclear industry (Gamow). It was then business as usual: ad hominem attacks on Einstein and Hoyle, the P.r.ess heralding Gamow as a genius, since it backed the nuclear weapons industry and justified experiments and industries that researched them.
Yet for the big bang to work, they needed to DENY all other causes of the process of DUAL informative creation of mass and entropic destruction of mass into radiation. This of course created the paradox that physicists used e=mc2 to explode bombs but deny their equation to uphold ‘Vhod’.
At this point things became a little surrealist: physicists changed the name of the arrow of information and life and called it ‘negantropy’, the negation of death, as if negating death was a ‘sin’ and information and life was irrelevant, something Vhod could dispose of.
They also denied the most important in-formative force of the Universe, gravitation, which ‘forms’ the mass of galaxies, as time goes by. So Einstein, the only sound mind, who merely did ‘thought experiments’ said that ‘time curves space into mass’.
SINCE IN RELIGION PROOFS MATTER NOT.
Let us then study the different scales of physical matter, its dead, big-bang moments, and the unification equations of the charge and mass scales, explaining along the way most of the pending question of astro-physical sciences, from the perspective of the fractal paradigm, and 5D Metric, the Organic structure of the universe, its time clocks and space quanta.
Again this is a very fast Reader Digest of the content of this post and the accessory post on the 5th dimension. So some concepts might need further clarification.
In the next graph we can see some E/c<=>Mc processes of spatial expansion and big-bang destruction of mass, all of which have an inverse temporal, informative, process of much slower creation of temporal information and mass that balances them, in different scales of physical systems, from the beta decay that explodes atoms into electrons and protons (with an inverse slow collapse of electrons into atoms) to the quasar big-bang of galaxies (with an slow process of creation of mass-information from gaseous space):
If we consider the space-time an absolute continuum in a single scale, this more accurate picture of what we perceive is not possible, hence we come to the conclusion of present cosmology – that the Universe will expand and die. If we consider that this expansion is compensated by galaxies, which follow Einstein’s dictum: ‘Time curves space into mass’, Mr. Hogg’s conundrum – how to correct the big-bang is solved.
And so we learn another fundamental truth of Philosophy of Science, which today is often overlooked: we must never deny experimental evidence, even if at first sight it contradicts an established theory.
For that reason we must accept the fractal informative structure of reality, where the big bang is merely the death-rebirth cycle of a quasar-like galaxy or local Universe, a scale of size above galaxies.
So both together create an immortal Universe of expansive ‘bidimensional sheets’ of flat space we observe the ‘canonical structure’ of…
In the graphs, the scales of the Universe and the human being and its space-time symmetries, which the reader will observe are the same we used to describe the Universe.
Since we are all isomorphic organisms of 5D fractal space-time, and therefore the study of the scales of human beings, biology and history is more important than the study of the scales beyond the limits of human perception, as CERN does, since we are the most perfect super organism of the universe, the measure of all things, including the simpler and less perceived organisms of galaxies and atoms and beyond.
First, we must stress that Cosmology has a huge metaphysical component in its Greek sense – it is well beyond the limits of human perception, which we find to be the atom and the galaxy, beyond and within uncertainty and dark gravitational matter makes knowledge to say the ‘least’ incomplete.
Thus contrary to belief big-bang theories of the Universe and Cosmology in the widest sense do not belong to astro-physics, but still we can do science if we are minimally serious with the scientific method.
Then the cosmic big-bang likely falsehood, as a product of the ego-trips of physicists, follows from the available data on it. It does NOT contradict as we shall see 5D physics. On the contrary it would also validate it. So we are NOT against cosmic big-bang because 5D physics does not tolerate it but because plain good old’ science disproves it.
So we shall give an alternative physical theory of the Universe, which follows closer the T.Œ=Sc3‘ laws of truth of the scientific method (Objectivity, Logic-Linguistic reason, Experimental evidence; Minimalism (Occam’s razor), Correspondence (previous ‘true theories’, parts of the new one), Causal, cyclical predictability and Coherence (logic and mathematical reason).
Thus here we shall on one side prove that the big-bang does not follow all the elements of the T.Œ=Sc3‘ 4 legs of truths in science (Objectivity, Logic, Evidence, Minimalism=Simplicity, Correspondence with previous theories, Causality & Ternary Complexity:
- It is a clear creationist theory based in lineal time, two cultural traits of the western Germanic, biblical military cultures that invented it.
- It is completely illogic and makes no sense at all – for god’s sake indeed, a single point from all was created..
- It has not enough experimental evidence.
- But it passes S: simplicity, initially but … when it was merely the drawing back of a lineal equation (H=Dv, Hubble’s red shift equation). Yet at present as we learned more about the Universe, it requires all kind of ‘epicycles added ad hoc’ to fit the new data (dark matter and energy, accelerated expansion, inflationary first state, etc. So it no longer does fit Minimalism.
- It does not correspond to physical and logic ‘consistent’ theories but only to religious ones – lineal Christian time and creationism.
- And finally it lacks Causal cyclical predictability – it does not explain what was before and after; but the element it truly fails is one we normally consider a given for serious science, ‘logic and internal coherence’. It has none. Because indeed it is creationist ‘religious’, as it requires external creators.
The ego paradox.
Why astrophysicists then do not focus on the limits of known-unknowns.
The answer is the human ambition and anthropomorphic point of view, which is common to any of those Œ that feels himself the center of the Universe. It is the paradox of the ego. And we must introduce it because it is at the core of the ambition of cosmologists and its denial of true science when confronting the facts of his big-bang theory of it all.
Now a mind is defined by a simple equation:
O-mind (finitesimal) x ∞ time space cycles = Linguistic mapping of the Universe.
Thus a mind to fit the infinite time cycles in motion, reduces its dimensions and information to a series of bidimensional membranes of fixed form of information in a language used to map reality.
Humans do that with the infinite universe, reducing it to mathematical mappings. And thinking of course they are observing the ‘whole’. This is the recurrent theme of astrophysics – the denial of absolute relativity, as self-centered humans come back with a vengeance, with new ‘absolute frames of reference’. Now this absolute frame of reference is called the background radiation and the point of view is the creationist big bang.
And the proof of its falsity never mind because we do have to understand it all, and of course, when we do, we will be special beings within that whole. Since, the paradox of the ego tell us that:
‘Every finitesimal 0-mind perceives reality from its self-centered point of view, confusing the whole with the limited linguistic mind that perceives it’.
This is today the situation with the big-bang, falsified by innumerable proofs under the laws of the scientific method, but accepted as the ‘religion of physicists’, the new ‘religious gurus’ of our technological, ‘lineal civilizations.
Within the much larger frame of reference of T.Œ, all this resumes in the ego paradox. Humans MUST have an explanation for the whole, which makes it not so big, and rather controllable.
Experimentally is also the most natural conclusion, as its measure is taken locally also, around the Earth, origin could be then within the galaxy or the local group of galaxies, a mere turbulence of the clouds of gas and dark matter that surround the milky way. It is the first and most important of the 3 canonical proofs of the cosmic big bang. The second proof – the abundance of helium is equally explained by quasar big-bangs, as the equations of the big-bang ‘ages ‘are the same for the explosion of a black hole in the center of galaxies (in fact they are the reversed equations of the formation of a black hole, hence its process of entropic death), the 3rd proof, the age of the big-bang is falsified by the quasar cycle of birth and death of galaxies, which has a 10 to 20 billion years cycle.
And since we observe galaxies in a second cycle, the Universal big bang cannot be younger than a part of the Universe.
The 4th proof is the density of matter of the Universe, far lower than the one required for the big-bang which however is exactly the same density of matter of galaxies, once more proving the ‘local theory’ of a background radiation due to the explosion of a quasar galaxy – either ours, or a quasar of our local group; the 5th canonical proof is the red shift of light, which expands between galaxies, but again it is a lineal half-truth, which purposely ignores the warping of radiation into matter in the ecliptic of galaxies and the inverse blue shift flows jets of radiation that collapse and shrink space into matter coming from black holes (hence not arriving to Earth but seen laterally in most of them) and the natural death of light space-time, which has a life-death cycle similar to that of stars of around 10 billion years, explaining perfectly a first phase of red shift accelerated in the second phase o flight life (5 to 10 billion years), tracing the canonical 3 ‘ages of life’ of the 5D model of the Universe.
Yet the metaphysical proof is perhaps the most obvious: the birth of the entire Universe in a single point of space-time, just because we can run a lineal equation of the redshirts temperature of the present universe to the past with no limit till arriving to a ‘point’ of creation, is logically absurd; scientifically sick (as it requires a previous God-like creator) and natural only to the religious military ideologies of western science, dating back to Newton a pious believer in Yvwh and the lineal concept of time of Abrahamic religions and military science, who already considered a mechanist Universe the proof of the existence of the historic tribal God of the Hebrew.
The present revival of primitive idol-ogies of history thus must be studied NOT in astrophysics but in our section of history and the process of life and death of civilization, with its memorial revivalism in times of war and extinction
On my view astrophysicists have become believers, which will not reason, after a century of public awe as the new religious figures of mankind, and will never deny big-bang theory. Our life thought might be at stakes, as they will soon replicate a small quasar big bang at CERN.
Yet to fully grasp what physicists do at the LHC without much understanding of the process involved, we must go beyond present physics, outside the light space-time membrane of the galaxy, where the symmetry breaks between <c and > c speeds and <o K and > o k into…
Let us in introduce the cyclical theory of cosmology starting by the consequences of cyclical time in the perception of the present lineal analysis of the Universe, as a ‘block of infinite lineal time duration’.
First we shall consider the space-time cycle of the Universe, which will allow us also to illustrate the quite different consequences of using with the same equations, the two different concepts of a universe dominated by a single continuum space, and one dominated by time, made of infinite space-time cycles.
In the graph, the lineal time of Cartesian graphs, accepts only a natural motion – lineal inertia, and denies the fundamental property of time cycles, its closed cyclical form that carries the causal, repetitive laws and stores the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of those cycles.
Since every time motion of the Universe is cyclical and lineal time, physical time, a shorter part of a cycle, or the sum of multiple ‘cyclical steps’, as the wave of light, used to define a second according to its ‘frequency of time cycles’.
Mathematically the discontinuity of space-time and hence the existence of infinite fractal space-time motions in the Universe is proved by the fundamental theorem of topology and knot theory: a closed cycle divides the Universe in an inner and outer space, breaking it.
Thus a time clock or time cycle breaks (knot theory, topology) space into an inner and outer region. So we must also talk of infinite broken spaces, fractal parts of space with ‘motion’ or ‘energy’ that a time cycle surrounds and controls: The unit of the Universe is a space-time cycle; and all beings of Nature are made of such ‘fundamental particles’, the cyclical, fractal space-time born of enlarging, each ‘point’ of lineal time into a ‘cycle’.
Thus the existence of cyclical time clocks implies that space is fractal and enclosed by time clocks, which manage those spaces as their vital, inner spaces, the ‘internal substances’ of which relational space-time beings are made.
So it is not possible to extend to infinity a lineal equation as big-bang physicists do. The equation WILL curve and the big-bang if it existed for the whole Universe, would end in a big crunch (we shall see many proofs it might be restarted to a quasar cycle, as our measure is local in this galaxy and we have tabulated a 10 to 20 billion year cycle of quasars for galaxies, so it might be again another anthropomorphic ego-trip of explaining it all).
Now, in this graph, written with the sequential equation of the Worldcycle of life and death we see two clear differences between the interpretation of the same phenomena in absolute space-time and relational space-time.
Above, the big-bang cycle is described as a single line of a single continuum space-time and a single time direction. The same graph, which is the last one of our ‘Still picture’ the beginning and the end is the same. It is a cycle. And this is what Einstein’s 3 solutions to the space-time structure of the Universe tell us:
The big-bang entropic, expansive solution, its inverse big crunch, Gödel, cyclical solution and the intermediate ‘steady state’, balanced longer present solution in which we exist (the preferred by Einstein, then improved by Hoyle).
Why this huge difference? Simply speaking, because the physicist, which believes in ‘space’ as the only and fundamental factor of the Universe Tends to order systems and solutions to their equations as space solutions. So the 3 solutions to EFE are for the physicist ‘parallel space Universes’ – one in which space is always in a perpetual big-bang (his interpretation of our Universe), other which is a cyclical form (Black hole solution) and one immortal in eternal steady state.
So simply speaking, physical systems display the same 3 ages of all other systems of the Universe, from big-bang entropic ages, to steady state ages, to black hole crunching.
In that regard among the laws≈symmetries of 5D Time-space applied to all sciences, the most important is the explanation of the life-death world cycle:
Time no longer traces worldlines as in 4D physics, but worldcycles, as it is cyclical and has a new dimension of informative height that ‘curves’ the vital Energy of any being into a cycle.
And further on existence in time happens as a travel through 3 5D ∆±1 planes of space-time, from the seminal i-1 faster plane of existence, to the human i-ndividual plane, as members of the slower i+1 rhythms of nations and civilizations our super organisms, to the conundrum of genetics.
Thus smaller ‘systems’ paradoxically as fractals do hold more information in its faster cycles of time. So they code the larger plane of human existence. In the graph we illustrate those 3 cases showing its co-invariant Sxt parameters.
Now, the 5th dimension is more complex and revealing than all the others, because it explains the life-death cycle of all systems, born in the seminal ∆-1 scale as faster time cycles which enclose a vital energy with faster motions, which reproduce and become waves, planes and topological networks, emerging finally into the ∆-scale of the organism, which in turn will become part of slower, larger social ecosystems.
In relational space-time though solutions to space-time equations are routinely considered time solutions, which vary along a certain ‘time-space parameter’.
Lineal vs. cyclical vs. social 5D time
In relativity, the momentum and the energy are the space and time parts of a space-time vector, the four-momentum, and the relativistic invariant relation relates them:
E2/c2 – p2= m2 c2
which says that the length of this four-vector is proportional to the rest mass m.
This of course is ‘time duration’, and so we can related the ‘total volume’ of the time duration or worldcycle of the system, to its Energy and each slice to its momentum. Mass thus become the whole of this worldview of the system, the product of its ‘spatial steps-momentums’ and its whole lineal duration. This physicists describe as the ‘block’ of the worldline of the being.
But in the concept of cyclical time which adds complexity to our analysis, we describe another type of time=change – the internal transformations of the being.
The reader in that regard should understand that the largest possible philosophical conception of time as change has at least those 3 perspectives: change as a lineal translation, and then we can obtain properties derived from classic physics; change as an internal transformation, and then the concept of cyclical time applies.
And finally change as evolution, which ultimately ends up being social d=evolution into wholes or dissolution into parts (Devolution) and then the 5D rules apply.
It is clear to me but likely not to physicists that understanding the cyclical and 5d concepts of time is of more philosophical interest than the lineal concepts associated to p and E.
It of course remains as a huge field of inquire, the proper translation of the entire jargon of physics to 5D, which I have from time to time explored with delightful moments for the mind, but have not published in earnest.
The proper interpretation of Three EFE solutions. The 3 ages=horizons of the quasar big-bang.
The ages of the Universe are 3 formal ages of increasing curvature: an energetic youth (big bang), a reproductive, steady state or big-banging; and a 3rd age of warping information or big crunch, which can be used to study the 3 horizons of any scale of physical matter.
The 3 ages of the big bang are the 3 EFE solutions to Einstein’s space-time equations, which if we order them in time represent the expansive, steady state and implosive phases of the big-bang cycle of the quasar galaxy.
So the 3 equations show a perfect time symmetry of a worldcycle of a galaxy.
C) Correspondence with EFE. Now, the proper way to explain cyclical big-bangs, in any scale (obviously due to the finding of unusual things) is to postulate a local background radiation – which can be the local cluster, the galaxy itself, the cloud that surrounds the local group (the diatomic Andromeda+Milky Way), or even a microcosmic effect of gravitational red shift by the halo of the galaxy dark matter, likely to be made of strangelets; and we shall consider all those cases with a conceptual approach).
While the proper way to adapt any of those big bangs of a possible galactic quasar is to prove the 3 ages of quasars’ correspondence with Einstein’s EFE.
In this case the parameter is the well known to physicists Cosmological constant which varies around a ±0 value, defining 3 possible ‘ages’ in time of the Universe:
|-Sp: Young, entropic, energetic big-bang age.
œ-ST: Present steady state in which galaxies warp space-energy into cyclical accelerated vortices of time (not other thing is a galaxy than a vortex of gravitational acceleration) while space between them expands.
⊗-Tƒ: Future implosive warping big crunch, which will end in a new big-bang cycle.
The topological description: |xo=Ø, or more accurately in bidimensional terms, when symbols are available in the keyboard: ◊x⊗=œ, whereas ◊ is a bidimensional plane of minimal form, of Spe, with a given kinetic entropy, ⊗, is a bidimensional Tiƒ, a membrane that shrinks into a point of view, with a given angular momentum, and œ, is a reproductive S≈T body wave, which tries to maximise its function of existence, Exi(s=t), reached when both elements S and T are similar in balance (Max. SxT->S=T).
This simple self-repetitive structure in its sheer repetition and interaction for n-particles across ∆±n scales but always in case of order and existence of a super organism, as a self-centred ⊗, point of view, will be used to describe the natural symmetries of all physical systems, though it will only have such a topology in the pure informative states as ‘seeds’ of information, or ‘minds of perception’.
Now it must be stressed that the equations we consider are the same, but the interpretation varies. An astrophysicist considers only an absolute space-time, continuous and hence with a single time solution AND a single-space solution. Hence he will tell you that the Universe is expanding in an ‘accelerated’ way, and will finally become ‘dead’ in an extension.
But this is NOT science but ideology, in the sense that it comes from the ‘Postulate of lineal time’ (latter we shall see how indeed is an ideology proper of the military, since physicists have a worldly profession – to make weapons – and so Galileo, which was truly a professional weapons maker working for the Arsenal of Venice for the princely salary of 1000 golden ducats, dedicated to calculate the longest trajectory of cannonballs as any undergrad student knows with his exercise of 1st course on physics).
And so, this lineal motion bias of the military and its weapons maker (his first book was called ‘military instruments’, his second ‘ballistics’) sips in almost every philosophical concept of physics we shall debunk. In this case physicists ignore as if they were not there, the warping quality of galaxies that crunch the energy of vacuum lineal space into cyclical closed motions called particles and masses, which are according to Einstein’s principle of equivalence and the pictures we obtain of them, accelerated vortices of forces, which balance the accelerated lineal expansion between galaxies to create a steady state Universe.
Moreover, we see that those space-time solutions DO happen in different scales of the fractal space-time Universe, because in 5D fractal, relational space-time, we order the infinite different cycles and arrows-motions of time, and its Still forms in space with a new dimension (this is obvious, if we multiply the number of space-times, we need a new dimension to order them).
So we can see that the SAME Einstein Field equations do describe perfectly the quasar big-bangs of galaxies, even to smaller particles, which also follow the E=Mc2 dual explosive and implosive arrows of time.
E) Experimental evidence.
And then it comes the big question, since all our observations are ‘local’ (in the surroundings of Earth at best): it is the big-bang equation of Einstein the big bang of our galaxy? Or the big bang of the Universe? It is the map of the local background radiation that of the last cycle of implosion and explosion of our central black hole or the entire Universe exploding?
A detailed mathematical analysis of present cosmology, we will observe surprisingly that the data fits far more properly with a local galactic big-bang quasar cycle NOT with a Universal big bang. And so the last Hoyle’s theory of the big-bang (the sum of quasar big-bangs) is more proper. Some basic proofs are:
– Temporal analysis: French mapping of the cycle of galaxies, whose black holes explode in a 10 to 20 billion period, hence our galaxy should have exploded within that period. Moreover, in as much as there are galaxies, undergoing a second cycle with obvious traces of a previous explosion, 13 billion years for the big bang is too little.
Undoubtedly this is the ‘life time of our galaxy’, not the entire Universe.
– The same goes for the spatial analysis: black holes on the edge of the Universe are too big, for so little time to form, obviously the final remnant of an absorption of the matter of an entire galaxy.
– Shadows of the afterglow. There are no shadows in galaxies, which should be left by remnant explosion coming from the edges of the Universe.
We will bring many more proofs as we update in the future this post.
Thus the big-bang is a metaphysical theory, in which the number of false assumptions, is remarkable (for it to be the ‘mantra’ only-theory of physicists, something I ascribe as most errors of science to the ‘ego paradox – it makes them the high popes of science, the new religious authority on the meaning of it all)
Now I see here a pattern, so often disguised in human scholarship: a power trip or ego trip makes a discipline corrupted from the larger humanist point of view (all sciences must in their praxis serve mankind, the 99%); in this case physicists originated in the mostly white, Germanic culture of weapons and imitated the long swords, agglutinative long words and dogmatic brain of unbreakable false truths, based in visual, lineal, motion oriented, energetic time, of the dolichocephalic, Neanderthal decoupling of mental races of mankind (see cultural and central post). In brief, physics as it is taught today is the worldly religion of mechanical objects, biased to lineal, energetic visions, with some religious dogmas, similar to those of Shiva and Thor, the Indo-European Brahmins and druids of their earlier cult to motion and weapons.
Fair enough. And in brief terms: I have always fought physicists’ lineal, entropy theories and their weapons both in my theoretical and activist life, for those who know about it. They won those battles with the usual suspect methods (censorship, silence on cyclical time analysis and ad hominem campaigns against anti-nuclear activism). so cyclical time does not matter today, and the nuclear industry keeps working at CERN to produce black holes and strangelets on earth and blow us all.
The problem though is not as Smolin put it of ‘physics’ so much as of Physicists, like Durrenmatt well expressed on his theatre work. This said because physics is part of the Universe and a huge, large quantity of it, but NOT the most interesting in terms of information, due to its uncertainties of distance to man – which can learn more about the game of existence by studying its closer organisms, cells, individuals and historic societies; we do have to study physics.
But we are always under the boot of the worldly profession, the power of physicists, the lineal bias of entropy theories, and the uncertainty of remote scales to man (dark energy-matter in cosmology, uncertain measure in small beings bombed and hence interfered by the observer), which ALLOWS physicists to invent biased spooky theories, bending their information and disrespecting the E=Mc³ 5 postulates of truth of the scientific method (Experimental evidence, Minimalist simplicity, Coherence, Correspondence and Cyclical predictability).
In the cosmological world, we observe an order of time similar to that of life and the quantum world, both experimentally in the process of evolution of stars and galaxies and mathematically in Einstein’s metric equations of Universal space-time.
There are 2 space-time membranes, and since both are made of Entropy and form, both follow the 3 ages of time in its evolution. In gravitational physics, the 3 ages of gravitational space-time are defined by relativity. Those 3 ages are mathematically equivalent to the 3 solutions of Einstein’s space-time equations.
All systems are a sum of quantic cycles that absorb, emit and transform spatial energy into temporal information: SP ≈Tƒ
General relativity a fast over view. The symmetry of relativity in time, the 3 ages of EFE.
The 3 ages of time in cosmology applies to EFE’s (Einstein’s field equations) 3 main solutions 3 hypothetical different Universes, they represent the structure of any space-time, including our galaxy, an island Universe through its 3 ages.
It is also possible to make a complex mathematical treatment of the 3 ages of galactic systems: the 1st age of the system will be the Entropy age, the 3rd age the information age, and the middle age is one of balance, Sp=Tƒ, when the reproduction of most particles took place. We are in that period.
– Max. Sp (Youth): The Entropy age is Lemaitre’s big bang solution that expands space. This solution in the fractal model of space-time applies only to the vacuum space between galaxies.
-Sp=Tƒ; The steady state Universe is Einstein’s solution. It applies to the entire Universe.
– Max. Tƒ: Kerr’s solution of a rotary black hole, which is the third age of an implosive Universe that reverses time coordinates as matter falls back into the central Worm Hole of any space-time.
However because time space fractal and dual, while those solutions in a wider outlook will be applied successively to each age of the Universe, they are also applied in space to the fractal parts of the whole. Thus the big-bang solution applies to the intergalactic space, which astrophysicists study and erroneously apply to the entire Universe (given their dogma of a single continuous space-time).
The informative solution applies to our galaxy. But it does not mean a travel backward in time but an informative vortex, a cyclical clock of time – the galaxy in which we exist with an arrow of information different from the expansive arrow of the intergalactic space of dark Entropy and tired light.
And so we get adding all the expansive motions of intergalactic space and the implosive vortices of galactic mass, a relative balance that is the present steady state applied to the whole; since in each phase of reality all yangs have some yin and all yings seed of yang.
Its Universal ratios/constants of Entropy and form.
In the space-time of the Universe, in the same manner that any other three ages can be related by the different ratios of Entropy and information or vital constants of a being, those three ages are defined mathematically by the constant of action that relates the Entropy and information of the Universal space-time, Lambda & G.
Indeed, the constants of any system are ratios of transformation of the Entropy and form of any system, I/E=K or proportions of Entropy and form, Exi=K. Thus constants evolve and change as the Entropy and information of a system changes with time. In biology, is known that vital constants, change as an organism gets old and becomes wrinkled and warped, increasing its information and diminishing its capacity to process Entropy, changing its metabolic constants and speed of information/thought.
Dirac, Brans-Dicke, and others understood this in cosmology. Indeed, G is a ratio of the mass=information and Entropy= distance of a system. And we already saw how a change on those ratios allowed us to unify and measure the Entropy and form of the 3 membranes of the Universe (strong, gravitational and light forces).
A kind of cosmic repulsive force was first hypothesized by Albert Einstein in 1917 and was represented by a term, the “cosmological constant,” that Einstein reluctantly introduced into his theory of general relativity in order to counteract the attractive force of gravity and account for a universe that was assumed to be static (neither expanding nor contracting). As usual first intuitions are the best and indeed THE COSMOLOGICAL constant, in a fractal Universe, where space expands entropically and cyclical time vortices implode, DO represent exactly what Einstein meant – the expansive force of space that balances the contraction of the galactic vortices of the galaxies-atoms to maintain the entire 5D plane of cosmology in a dynamic balance.
In the equations of Einstein that define the three ages of a galactic space-time and perhaps an entire Universe, that relationship is given by the cosmological constant that measures the Entropy of the gravitational vacuum, l, which Nottale used to measure the minimal fractal quanta of gravitational Entropy. The constant changes with the 3 ages of any fractal space-time or island Universe. In a young, expanding space, l is positive, but so close to zero that it easily becomes negative, causing a warping or big crunch. And so l will also change through the 3 ages or solutions of Einstein’s equation, till reaching the informative age of the galaxy in which we exist.
Recap. The 3 ages of the Universe correspond to the 3 solutions of Einstein’s equations: The young big-bang; the reproductive, steady state or big-banging and the cyclical, informative age, occurring in BLACK holes – Kerr’s solution. They apply in space to the expanding space, imploding, galactic vortex and both together create the present balanced steady state.
So the core of astrophysics is the understanding of the world cycles of physical systems in time and its organic structure in space.
Let us then introduce that organic structure in space, symmetric to its ages in time.
The 5D model of the cosmos in space – the organic structure of galaxies.
A 5D model of the fractal, organic Universe, does not deny Einstein, it merely expands its views, and adds fractal organic properties to the galaxy explaining better the function of those black holes, its atomic substance and working according to the known-known facts of astrophysics, in which black holes have come to dominate most of the creative processes of the galaxy. In that regard, you can compare the galaxy to a cell in a much larger scale, with mitochondria stars, of light yd-matter which end up being devoured and becoming the energy for the creation of black holes, the informative vortices, equivalent to the DNA, that swarm in huge numbers in the centerl nuclei and control its shape and provoke the reproduction of stars, with its in-formative gravitational waves.
Einstein had asked for a cut-off substance, or ‘atom of black holes’, which he could not guess at the time as quarks had not been found, but now we hint that black holes are as he thought ‘frozen stars’ of the heaviest quark families (bct quarks), and that should be the ‘realist modeling’ of black holes. As those quarks will appear in increasing numbers in accelerators, which are crossing the dark matter barrier is very likely they will be produced on those accelerators, in any of its possible varieties of dark matter that range from strangelets (s-quarks) to toplets (TTT-quarks), through Higgs decay (H->Top and anti top).
Now, all this in mathematical physics implies a constant growth of the mass of the black hole along the equation that relates the temperature and mass of a black hole: M=k/T, that is as the black hole cools down, it converts via the weak force, lighter matter into heavier quarks that increase its volume and hence its area.
The last great advances in classic black hole theory were done by Kerr, a new Zealander which defined rotary black holes with or without charge. Those would be the top quark frozen stars with positive charge and the same density at macro-scale than a black hole acting as a relative ‘proton’ acts in an atom in the center of the galaxy. While the halo should be made of strangelet quarks (negative charged), acting in this symmetry between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy, as a relative negative ‘electron’ cover, with the ud-stars and planets in the middle, as seen in the next graph:
THE AGES OF EXISTENCE.
The duality particle-future, past-antiparticle duality IS essentially the ‘life-arrow, death-arrow ‘duality of time events and as such is a huge field of new interpretations of all kind of events and particles, which often means to re-interpret a spatial very fast ‘resonance’ particle, into a time event of particle-antiparticle, life-death transition (mesons for example are death events, in which a particle-antiparticle in time dies; annihilations of particles – antiparticles can on the other hand be interpreted as spatial dualities or temporal events).
And this brings us to a fundamental new insight on all fields of sciences, but specially those fields of the lower ∆-1 scales where clocks of time according to 5 D metric are much faster, and so often we see as we see fast turning wheels as solid space, fast time events as spatial events. Among them, the most important re:
-Particle-antiparticle death events, seen as mesons or spatial collisions.
– Ternary ages of systems, color forces and weak forces seen a spatial gauging interactions.
– And generally any phenomenon that happens in small ranges in space and slow time, which is a transformative event not a gauging spatial force. And any space-formal, fixed system with no relative motion, which tends to adopt a spherical, gauging-informative state.
There is though besides the straighten up of the errors of physics regarding its space-time symmetries a more general analysis of great beauty, which consists in the translation of the ‘Ages of the Big-bang’, which latter we will study in detail, and ascribe to the most likely scale of Galactic matter, which explains how from the most energetic Higgs-top quark-black hole fields, through the ‘breaking of symmetry’, all other forces and particles are born.
But what means the breaking of symmetry in terms of the Generator equation? It is quite simple, when we understand that ‘Energy field’ as the synonymous of the Sp, entropic simpler past motions of all systems of reality which start a process of social evolution that implies an increasing of order and a diminishing quantity of energy-information available as we grow in scales. The breaking of symmetry means merely the growth of those scales and its eusocial evolution into different new social systems that are efficient and respond to the metric of the 5th dimension, as they slow down the clocks of time and enlarge the surface of space of the Universe, in new planes of existence, which obey the metric of the 5th dimension L=Sp x Tƒ.
Yet since the big-bang is the death NOT the birth of the most perfect form of the Universe a hyper-black hole (as its equations are the inverse equations to the metric of a black hole), we do NOT increase the speed of Tƒ-clocks (as it will happen in the bi crunch), reducing the Sp size of the system, as in an arrow of information, and life Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp = L, but in an inverse fashion each of the epochs of he big-bang and the subsequent differentiation of physical species into forms of larger space and slower time clocks represents precisely the entropic death of the Universe from the form of max. energy, the hyper black hole, likely made of top quarks and Higgs fields.
So first the Higgs field (spatial element), and top-bottom quarks (particle element), decreased its speed of motion, likely to be an inflaton, superluminal c-motion and rotary T-motion (given the enormous mass of the top quark, its clocks of time must be between 10 and 100 times faster than those of our matter), which as it expanded and cool down (temperature is not a proper measure of frequency and order, only for thermodynamic systems, but physicists use it to describe high frequency=high temperature, lineal time clocks), freezing into a series of new planes of the 5th dimension, creating in each plane a new Sp<ST>Tƒ, type of field quanta, wave-form and dominant particle.
So after the top quark black hole and Higgs field of super-luminal dark energy and information, expanded at superluminal speeds in a fraction of time (Min. Tƒ x Max. Sp) during the Inflaton epoch, the quark gluon soup started the production of slower=lighter Tƒ-articles (t-> b-> c-> s-> d ->u quark decays through the strong force), and slower=more informative bosons:
-> Higgs (o spin) ->Neutrino (1/2 spin) -> Photon (1 spin); in a series of growing entropy ages which ended in the recombination era, in which the entropy growing ‘death’ finally finished, when the system had created enough up and down and electron quarks in a dual sea of neutrinos and photons, which started now the opposite arrow of evolution of matter, giving birth to atoms, stars and in its furnaces new elements of higher mass, while the galaxy acquired its structure, with a central black hole of remnant top quarks, a halo of strange quarks survivors of the quark gluon soup, in stable forms (dibaryons, strangelets), and an intermediate region of ud matter, first in plasma state and then as the galaxy reached its present form in stars and planets.
Thus the evolution of the galaxy and perhaps the Universe, depending on which scale we observe the big-bang (a quasar big-bang or a cosmic big-bang, which we shall soon discuss), is just part of the eternal cycles of creation and destruction of mass and energy, the worldcycle of physical systems, between the arrow of life and death, perfectly resumed in those ‘Universal constants of action’ for each scale, which in the cosmic scale amounts to E<c=>M back and forth worldcycles of big-bangs and big crunches of energy into mass, and to similar detailed events in every other scales, in the quantum scale to E<v> H and in the thermodynamic scale to E < ST > PV, in the particle scale, Beta Decay –<-> Electron capture, in the star scale Nova<-> Star formation, in the galactic scale, quasar big bang < -> Galactic evolution.
It is worth to notice though that the process of formation of the Tƒ element are slow life processes of aggregation, so for example galactic evolution goes through the first nebulae age, the spiral galaxy and the globular galaxy till all matter is swallowed by the black hole, which then dies in a quasar big-bang of a few moment, and Mass aggregation goes lumping molecular matter in slow gas->liquid->solid crystal growth cycles of life to become destroyed in a brief moment by fire or nuclear explosion. So it also follows that all physical systems obey the inversion of the zero sum between life and death such as life arrow:
Max. Tƒ x Min. S (lasting long in time in reduced space) Vs. Death arrow= Max. S x Min. Tƒ (lasting short in time in a long spread of space).
Of which the clearest example is the big-bang big life cycle of the Universe, as the big-bang, if certain, lasted a quanta of Planck time in which the inflaton Universe expanded enormously in space (min. Tƒ = Max. Sp= death), while the process of evolution and formation of matter, stars and galaxies has lasted 14 billion years.
Big bang as entropic deaths in the isomorphic fractal spaces.
When physical systems, masses or charges on the atomic or cosmological level, die, their Sp x Tƒ elements split, as in all processes of death (separation of ‘head and body’ in life organisms): their temporal, gravitational or electromagnetic central knot of information jets out in the dimension of height and their intermediate space expands into a membrane of spatial radiation. In the big bang a hyper-black hole exploded and its Entropy gave birth to our Universe.
Stars produce big-bangs that show clearly the breaking apart of its informative/energetic regions: a flat toroid expands most of the mass of its toroid, reproductive inner region and a perpendicular, magnetic jet (right side) expels its central superfluid, informative zone. While in atomic, smaller worlds, charges transform its information into a bidimensional plane of light-space, c2, in a process defined by Einstein’s equation: E=Mc2.
The gravitational faster than light big bang resolves the mystery of the inflationary age, now canonical in cosmology. Moreover it follows the general isomorphisms of ‘death processes’ of multiple spaces and times theory. Since death is the most expansive, spatial process of erasing of information, Max. Sp=Min.Tƒ, it happens in a relative zero time – the minimal time of the system, when information dies and expands into a relative bidimensional sheet of space.
So we die in a second, our time clock that is the minimal unit of time of the human being (thought, blink of the eye, heart beat) and suddenly we become a ‘relative flat’ surface of Entropy (corpse, extended into a flat space). So it does the gravitational Universe, whose death happens in the tick of Planck’s time, the minimal action/vibrational time of its string units.
Indeed, death is anti-symmetric to life, an arrow that has no intermediate states and lasts minimal time: a transformation of information into Entropy happens in the relative zero time of each scale: from novae to atomic bombs, to universes, to human death.
Further on, since a vortex of physical, gravitational time is paradoxically faster, more massive, informative, the smaller it is, the faster gravitational big bang started in the smallish vortex of mass-time, the Planck mass/density/time-tick, he aptly called the ‘numbers of God’; since it was the hyper-black hole ‘brain’ of the previous organic Universe, whose reproductive radiation gave birth to our huge Universe. Only the inverted properties of time and space, information and Entropy, explain it.
T.Œ, theoretically has no limit on the fastest possible time clocks of information and smallest space-times of the universe. So there might be big-bangs in all sizes and scales, yet all of them will be likely the equivalent of , the dual death of a black hole or neutron mass, splitting into a positive and negative ‘solution’ to the square function of energy of a system.
In the graph the real big-bang is dual. It is the explosion of a black hole, which is a top quark star that breaks the symmetry of its Sp and Tƒ functions, emitting its Tƒ-mass through its axis and its entropic field of radiation through its planar equator.
In this first age, the Universe or Galaxy’s black hole died in an explosion of gravitational waves (the equivalent to neutrino waves in the beta decay and nova explosion, latter considered in more detail), whose enormous energy moved forward the top quarks of the galaxy, decaying fast into strange quarks, which are the only stable heavy quarks at vacuum pressure, forming the atoms of dark matter called dibaryons (Usd-usd hexaquarks).
We are dealing here with the strongest most stable combination of quarks, as the hexagon is a perfect bidimensional pi-closed form of space, where a 3=6 radius diameter, can close completely a ‘geodesic’ elliptical halo, protecting as proteins protect the cell, the galaxy from external influences.
This is the cover of dark mater of the galaxy in perfect symmetry between its 3 families of mass and its 3 organic parts, latter studied in more detail.
For the cosmic atom it would be a much faster process, hypothesized to arise from cosmic inflation, a faster-than-light expansion just after the big Bang – only that we do NOT have the particles that could do that, because the top quark has enough job to expand a black hole with its neutrino, high energy wave and its front of fast decaying top-bottom-charm-Stable strangelet dibaryons, to the size of the galaxy.
The numbers do NOT work for further, faster, expansion. And 5D physics DO NOT speculate. It is a simple, efficient, minimalist theory of reality constructed only with available particles.
Now, we have recently discovered a ttt particle of 700 plus GB, which physicists are clueless about, ignoring what it is, but it has all the aspect of being a triplet top quark, which I prophesized 20 years ago would be the central ‘boson’ substance of the black hole, ‘gas-9’.
In this phase, the quark gluon liquid didn’t cool as physicists think (they still call it plasma 🙂 but exactly the opposite since the little-bang is the DEATH of a black hole of perfect order into entropy, so all is exactly the other way around as the experiments at CERN are constantly proving.
And so it is now when the first ± c-speed symmetry creation NOT symmetry breaking takes place, separating the interior of the galaxy-atom at < c speed, from the interior of the remaining ‘proton’-black hole, smaller than the original neutron-hyper black hole, with the strange quark halo, rotating at relative c-speed in each small strangelet vortex, acting as the protein that isolates the galaxy, and causes the ‘solidity’ of the whole galaxy which – physicists still observe with awe – does NOT work as an unconnected spiral, but thanks to that 96% of dark matter, ahs the exact rigidity of any organic solid system, from a cell to your liquid organism surrounded b a hard solid membrane-skin:
in the graph, all systems follow the same developmental ages. The explosion of the big-bang which will feed a new galaxy according to the cycle of ‘barred galaxies’ as ours, implies an inflationary age of expansion of the ‘membrane’, which through gravitational waves with a halo of strange quarks and a background of ‘neutrinos’ would fast expand the dark matter heavy membrane to the limits of the galaxy, while the slower front of electromagnetic radiation, which does not penetrate so fast, would go behind, leaving as it progresses and cools down a process of confinement of lighter quarks into hadrons and nucleons.
Ahead, the Higgs, faster than light boson (or rather ‘above’) as the explosion would split perpendicular ‘faster than like, asymmetric jets’, and planar waves of matter in different fashion, given the different polarization of neutrino waves and electromagnetic ones, would push away the remnant energy.
However cosmologists invent a…
So next, without understanding the past-future duality of quarks-antiquarks, cosmologists thought the universe, which consisted mostly of energy in the form of neutrinos and photons given the enormous energy density of the big bang of the black hole, the cosmos-galaxy would exist as a collection of quarks and antiquarks along with their exchange particles, a state which has been described as a “superhot plasma of anti-quarks and quarks, annihilating”. This time period is estimated at 10‾³² seconds to 10‾5 seconds, which would provoke through that annihilation another big bang (cosmology is full of big explosions).
Now 20 years ago, when I first copyrighted 5D physics I affirmed it would be a quark-gluon cold superfluid soup, a perfect time vortex of under zero temperature, since:
– Temperature is a measure of entropic disorder applied only to this side of the universe and to thermodynamic, molecular world.
– Inside the black hole there is a top quark star in solid or superfluid states of boson perfect form.
– The anti-quark is the death moment of the quark that last only a second and so it is not the state of the anti-atom entropic big-bang which would produce a massive wave of quarks, decaying from top into dibaryon strangelets that would form the halo.
And here is where 5d physics proved itself in 2008 when they made a perfect liquid at RHIC.
But then I sued the entre global community of physicists, because next they could provoke a strangelet ice-9 reaction and blow up the Earth. So I never was accepted in any forum of physicists again.
What happens then? A basic cycle of creation of all organic, complementary systems:
Singularity-> Big bang (death) ->Entropy Sheet->
Informative Reproduction (Big-banging of particles) ->
Social evolution (Creation of stars and galactic networks)
They are the phases of creation of the Universe. In complex models of morphogenesis, informative evolutionary phases in time alternate with reproductive radiations in space, creating a fractal rhythm of biological radiations and punctuated evolution proper of physical, biological and cultural systems:
Max. TƑ (Evolution)->Max. ST (Reproduction)->Max.Tƒ(evolution).
That rhythm applied to any system and fractal scale means that we observe the alternation of those 2 phases in any organic process of physical/biological creation, a big bang & a big banging:
-Big bangs: The singularity/seminal egg explode their energetic membrane in a micro-time period (big bang, creation of a cellular egg, etc.). Then it continues its expansion at a slower rate as it grows in complexity inwards, invaginating and creating its energetic and informative networks (invagination of dark Entropy in the Universe and electromagnetic membranes controlled by them, of the nervous system and the blood system it controls in the fetus).
-Big bangings: In the big banging phases, news informative particles/cells are evolved around those 2 forces/networks and then they start a massive age of reproduction or ‘biological radiation’.
The alternation of those two processes slowly builds a living being and a Universe masterminded by two networks around which new particles/cells and social groups of those particles/cells of increasing complexity are born.
Thus, in the inflationary Universe, explained in organic terms, a minimal, cyclical black hole vortex of the size of a string with the density of Planck and its constants of God created a first gravitational big bang, reproducing=multiplying into 1011 fractal regions of dark Entropy and quark matter in 10-43 sec.
Each gravitational bubble gave birth to a 2nd big bang of fractal beta-decays, in which nucleons expanded, dying into protons and electrons (cyclical, informative big-bang), while light-membranes of electromagnetic radiation warped the gravitational dark Entropy giving birth to an age of light.
This dual process expanded the regions of cyclical time/mass (as neutrons exploded into beta-decays) and imploded the regions of dark Entropy (as light warped the minimal information of gravitational strings), creating protons, electrons and light in 1010-11 parallel future galactic regions.
Then the process reversed as the fractal regions of mass imploded into galaxies and the dark Entropy between them tired light and expanded, but both processes remain in balance, so the present universe is in a steady, mature state without expanding or imploding when we add the implosive galactic vortices and the explosive regions between them.
The Webb telescope, by solving the relative size of the big bang and the type of hierarchical scales the organic universe displays, will determine the experimental details of those processes. If the Webb telescope observes in its 13 billion years limit a landscape of galaxies similar to the ones of our cosmic region, it means the fractal universe extends to a relative infinity; as each galaxy is self-similar to an atom of the Universal scale, whose size is astonishingly huge. Some theories hint to that concept:
– Relativists model the Universe with Einstein-Walker equations in which each galaxy is treated as a hydrogen atom. This theoretical trick that facilitates the calculus of relativity shows the self-similarity between a hydrogen atom and a Galaxy of the upper scale. Each point of the electron nebulae is a star of the upper scale. If so, each proton is a positive, central Kerr black hole. And alternatively each +Kerr black hole is a hadron made of positive top quarks. And the gravitational waves of dark Entropy expelled by black holes are equivalent to the magnetic fields of protons.
An alternative model considers that each star is self-similar to a photon, While the electron nebulae that surrounds the atom is equivalent to a nebulae of strange, quark stars, the halo of the galaxy; since strangelets are negative (strangeness is negative).
So protons are self-similar black holes (top quark stars). The halo is made of strangelet stars as the Earth will be soon (and we are indeed close to the Halo). And stars are neutral, light photons.
Cosmologists use models of electronic nebulae to describe the behavior of stars around the central black hole; and some have tried models with high-density photons.
Yet self-similarity is not identity. So what we call quantum cosmology requires a fractal formulation to make sense; NOT the use of quantum equations as if they were identical, but the logic of fractals to observe the self-similarities of those scales.
What else can we know, we human beings, dust of space-time about the infinite Universe? Not much more, because if there is a higher fractal scale and galaxies are self-similar to atoms, the extension of that scale will be so vast that we shall never find its limits. Indeed, in our Universe there are trillions of atoms and so if there are trillions of self-similar galaxies, the maximal perception we can have is that of a local structure within that Universe.
This philosophical view will be far more appealing than a mere big bang of a cellular Universe for metaphysical reasons:
– A Universe in which the two self-similar scales of quantum and cosmological vortex of space-time (charges and masses) are truly self-similar is truly infinite in space and infinite in scales of temporal information and complexity. Then we, humans are really nothing but a mush over a corner of the Universe. But in second thoughts, such structure means that we humans are also all, as each of us has infinite Universes within his self.
– While size is absolutely relative and so our position on those scales doesn’t matter, we are an incredibly complex fractal structure of Entropy and information, which in the fractal models of biology needs 10 membranes of space-time to be described. Hence, even if our size is minimal our informative complexity is astonishing; and we are from the perspective of the arrow of information, one of the supreme beings of creation.
This is not the case in a single big-bang theory where only Entropy and size matters; so we are nothing but dust of space-time.
Recap: The big bang in any scale of reality is the death of a previous physical informative knot of matter, which expands in space and then starts a creative and reproductive process or big banging.
The unknowns in the cosmological scale.
Now the reader will observe that we put an interrogation in all the symmetries of the cosmological scale, since contrary to belief the big-bang theory is NOT proved, likely to be only a false hypothesis, based in lineal physics, the religious power ego-trip of physicists who think they ‘know better’ and the study of their planes of the 5D are more important than those of zoologists, doctors or historians.
The contrary is truth, as the Universe is isomorphic, the scales of 5D a relative infinite and so it does not matter which scale we study, what matters is the sale we get more information from, which is the human scale – so it will give us a more complete vision of the Existential game, and the scale that a praxis makes more useful to mankind which is again the human scale.
In brief medicine not astrophysics should be the central science in a properly evolved scientific culture, base din the thorough unit of the Universe and the philosophy of science that studies it.
If there is a higher cosmological observable, the big bang in any case would be not the birth but the death of the previous Universe.
Its present description would need to be corrected to fit it nicely on a higher scale of the Universe, which will then have a non-local simultaneous ‘cellular structure’ in space, to allow for simultaneous communication of its parts with a 10c hyper gravitational force, and transversal gravitational waves, within the model of the galaxy atom.
And it will have a temporal evolution described by the epochs of the big-bang, which only will represent its entropic youth, coupled with the other 2 solutions of EFE (steady state and final big-crunch), but within a much larger time-span and size.
∆±3: THE GALACTIC UNIVERSE AND ITS LIGHT SPACE-TIME MEMBRANE
So what do ‘astrophysics truly be studying’? Obviously the next duality of scales of matter in which the degree of knowledge is high by experimental evidence; the Galaxy and the atom. And the correspondence between both which in 5d metric show the same equations, as a gravitational vortex, a galaxy and an electromagnetic vortex an atom have the same 5D structure albeit with a 10 up to 40 difference of curvature-attractive power, size and speed of its time clocks.
As we will study the atom on the scales of matter, beyond the deduction of the Unification equation of charges and masses we shall study the ∆+3 galactic scale and its upper and lower elements, its ‘Universal ecosystem’ and solar cells:
- ∆+2: Solar Systems
- ∆+3: Galaxies
- ∆+4: Universes.
Thus astrophysics studies for each of those ascending planes, its 5D Scalar Asymmetry, its Spatial symmetry an its Time Ages, written in the first lines of this post; where the Galaxy is the Œ-system we study, the cosmos, the unknown larger scale we hardly perceive due to the uncertainty of being inside the galaxy with minimal perception of dark energy and dark matter, whose nature we shall tackle first, and finally its ∆+2 units, stars, which, are the Human world we know better.
5D PHYSICS thus studies those scales with the linguistic isomorphic method, starting with the study of the 5D co-existing organic structure of the specific Œ, the galaxy, thus comparing it in its functions and forms to a cellular system – the most researched organic whole in human sciences.
Then once this co-existing structures are lay down with DNA black holes on the center, mitochondrial stars reproducing the substances of galaxies and halos of dark matter likely to be strangelet matter by symmetry with the 3 families of mass on the protein membrane, we can study each of the ages of evolution of the galaxy, which will be parallel to those of the cosmic big-bang now reduced to a quasar process of reversal birth and extinction of central black holes.
And then we shall study through all those ages the evolution of its smaller parts to focus finally in the ∆-1 scale of stars of which the planet we live in is a relative membrane. Finally all this can be and will be mathematized in the 3rd and 4th lines when we expand the model to its quantitative isomorphisms (universal constants, class relationships, actions of space-time, variations and subspecies, etc.)
The scales of big-bangs
So let us now introduce 5D physics, with its alternative analysis of the big bang and the structure of the galaxy according to the Generator equation of the galaxy, mimetic to all other generators and its symmetries in space, time ages and scales.
The scales of big-bangs. The quasar big-bang.
In the graph, the scalar ‘big-bang’ at 4 levels: an electron, which in a Beta Decay explodes into an electron, radiation and a proton, and the similar inverse, nova that leaves behind a neutron star.
So when they had almost convinced NASA to send a probe to measure it, they found it was local, as most other if not ALL the features of that radiation.
Multiple space-times imply the existence of multiple big-bangs with different explosive size and speeds, all of them deaths of an informative mass or charge that uncoils its accelerated vortex into radiation following Einstein’s equation, E=M(c)2, where a bidimensional or tridimensional vortex (M or e) becomes extended into a plane of radiation (hence the square of lineal c-speed).
Yet for each different scale the parameters of speed (c), mass (M) and Entropy will change. And so we obtain a series of self-similar big-bangs described in the graph.
The single cosmic big-bang based in a single space-time continuum, was devised even before we knew the existence of a faster than light, gravitational membrane of dark Entropy and dark, quark matter. So we first must define it within that scale of big-bangs as the big-bang of a membrane of electromagnetic radiation; hence a quasar big-bang, not a cosmic big-bang, which will correspond to the much faster explosion of a gravitational membrane, starting at the Planck scale of the gravitational minimal units, the lambda-strings.
This is in a way the conclusion of astrophysicists, which now study the big bang as a dual process, with an inflationary age (the gravitational membrane) and a slower age (the big-bang of electromagnetic space, created over the gravitational membrane).
So instead of a fantastic big-bang particle that in the absolute past of time created all the absolute space of the Universe, we consider to exist in a fractal universe of infinite scales, where big-bangs are also scalar processes of creation and extinction of vortices of mass in several scales:
– There are big-bangs of atoms (beta decays) in quantum scales.
– There are star big-bangs (Novae or super-novae that create strange stars (pulsars) and black holes, (top quark stars)).
– There are galactic big-bangs, quasars, whose periodicity and background radiation coincides with the cosmic big-bang in its simplest formulation.
– And there are cosmic big-bangs (inflationary period of the big-bang), in which the gravitational membrane at non-local faster than light speed expanded before giving birth to electromagnetic membranes, forms warped around this primordial membrane.
Recap. The invariance of topological form at scale means that big-bang processes of death are common to all the scales of the Universe. What physicists call the big-bang seems to be a galactic big-bang.
And that is what we shall do in this post. Because a careful analysis of the information about the big bang seems to reduce the scale of what they are studying to the ‘galactic cycle of big-bangs and big crunches’ known as the quasar cycle. And though this I know is disliked (Only Fred Hoyle hold it), T.Œ has no problems with human dissent. Its test of truth is purely objective, scientific methodology. on those grounds the big bang fails at cosmic level.
Why? For many reasons. The most obvious is that the picture that portraits the galaxy in the center is exactly the same that the right picture of the background radiation, which on top ‘OBVIOUSLY’ is radiation measured within the galaxy. And that the period for the big bang on the right is exactly the same period for the quasar cycle of a galaxy (observed through the measure of quasar cycles all over the Universe). So all seems to indicate we are observing a quasar cycle NOT a cosmic cycle.
Let us see it comparing those periods with the periods of a neutron star and a neutron (the two big-bangs on the left).
A small neutron has a 15-minute decay cycle, a Neutron star forms and explodes within at least a few million years, normally a few billion.
this is what 5D metric tell us: Max. Sp = Min. Tƒ, so the Neutron has a much slower life cycle because it is bigger.
Hence the Universe must have a much slower cycle than a galaxy, which is bigger.
Now a quasar cycle of a galaxy is 15 billion, which is exactly the big-bang age of the cosmic model
But the Universe should have a 15 ‘zillion’ cycle NOT also 15 billion, as a galaxy, as it is much larger.
The whole ALWAYS lasts much more than its ‘finitesimals’. Thus we conclude the right picture belongs to our galaxy, NOT to the Universe: it has the same form, the same time length, and it is obtained in the same space place (our galaxy) at the same 5D scale.
So it is the picture of the background radiate on left by local quasar cycle, perhaps of the central black hole of this galaxy or perhaps of a super galaxy in the local group. Now this is in essence the ‘forest’ picture of it, with 5D metric and known known space-time parameters. We will now go into a few important details and proofs all of which reinforce that perfect picture.
There is another recent test also which cast doubts on the cosmic big bangs. Astronomers wanted in the ‘time picture observe shadows’ provoked by huge galaxies that interfere with the background radiation coming from the wall of fire. The artistic rendering helps to understand why there should be ‘shadows’, as this is the ‘spatial perspective’ of the time big-bang – which is allowed by the symmetry between all space and time states on 5 D (merely accepted without any deep understanding in present physics): when we put in time the earth at the center, huge galaxies should screen the radiation of the wall of fire or external membrane, but they don’t. So it seems the radiation is local.
And so on and so on. So it is on known-known astrophysical data not on 5D physics where the cosmic big-bang finds its problems, and it says a lot on the human desire to know it all and accept myths and religious beliefs that astrophysicists shun off so often contradictions of the cosmic big-bang.
Now it must be clear that for 5D physics both make sense, as the Universe IS just a scale above the galaxy. So all those big-bang prove 5 D physics, and its ternary symmetries and ∆±1 scales, the ages in time (Es>ST>Tƒ) and organic, spatial simultaneous Sp<ST<It parts hat define the system of a galaxy, easy with the same generator equation it defines all other system of the Universe.
And all in all, we hold a final ‘decision’ on future further analysis by the Webb telescope which finally! Will be launched, to get more information of far remote in time and space events. But again the trick of this duality is as follows:
If light dies as 5D physics considers (all space-time entities do have a finite duration in time), at around 1011 light years it is impossible to distinguish the effects of a dying light – the spatial asymmetric view (red shift to infinity and final black out beyond 1011 distance, hyper abundance of very young quasars at that distance because of its higher brilliance and the mission of ‘young light of maximal energy-life span) from a cosmic big-bang effect, the temporal antisymmetric view: red shift to the original explosion, birth at + 1011 years and black out before birth)!!!
This if a fascinating fat of many space-time dualities in 5D Physics: the explanation in time and its symmetry in still space are extremely difficult to differentiate when we do NOT have enough information about them. So in atomic 5D physics we shall see how a phenomena which ‘smells’ all the way as a time antisymmetry – the color forces of quarks – CANNOT really be qualified either as time or space; so the conclusion in those cases is that the explanation is a complementary ‘wave’ ST-analysis.
On the other hand there are phenomena that the ‘spatial-mental’ bias of all forms of knowledge clearly mistakes as a spatial force, when it is a time trans-form-ation (the weak force, which transforms quarks into other ones). In the case of the big bang it is in the details where reason tilts towards a local big bang. Because ultimately what we are trying to figure out is a ‘symmetry’ on 5D scale.
What scale is the scale of the big bang? The ∆-3 galactic scale or the ∆-4, cosmic scale?
But and this is the question poised here – a quasar cycle of a galactic or super-galactic black hole exploded back 14 billion years ago, in the local Virgo Cluster would produce exactly the same undistinguishable phenomena, whereas the inflation state would be the explosion of gravitational waves, carrying a massive neutrino background ahead of the wave, laying down the first ‘structural’ space, while a massive quark-gluon soup of strangelet matter during the quark epoch would reach the limits of the galaxy to create the halo, and then after the Planck epoch, the decay of the intermediate matter from top to bottom to charm to strange to up and down quark would establish our galactic ‘body’.
In brief, the epochs of the big-bang are mimetic to those of a quasar big-bang, and really the only way to decide which one happened is in the details – the facts that we are making local observations that the BG Radiation looks like the galaxy that the time of the cosmic big-bang is the same of a galactic quasar cycle, that the density of the big-bang is the same that the density of matter of a galaxy (Not of the whole cosmos), that the radiation of the big-bang does NOT leave shadows crossing outer galaxies etc.
There are so many details of parameters that fit better the galaxy, and we shall explain with some detail that as much as we would like to back with 5D physics the cosmic big bang to get maybe finally some recognition in our old age, before exit mundi of all this awesome work, a bit of a selfie here (-; ts, ts, we are not selling us cheap at this time, sorry guys. The cosmic big bang is a fake.
So let us now consider all the big-bangs together, infinite deaths small and biggies of the physical systems of the universe.
A conceptual analysis of mass and charges, its scales and 5D metric.
That is the Universe of infinite 5D scales, is the integration of all its parts, smaller ∆±in islands universes that co-exist across 3 scales of the 5th dimension:
-The ±1 quantum-cellular/organic-thermodynamic/social-gravitational scales, both in its sequential time order, as they ‘increase its information and diminish in space, >and its spatial polar order, as they exchange simultaneously energy motion, <, and information, perception, >, between its 2 poles, SP<ST>TƑ.
Then using the metric of the 5th dimension, if we accelerate and diminish a galaxy, in its two parameters:
Sp (size) x Tƒ (angular momentum) =K
Alas, it resolves the Saint Grail of Physics, the unification of charges and masses. As its equations matches those of the atom.
So the atom and the galaxy are two vortices of electromagnetic and gravitational forces, which in the metric of the 5th dimension are easily unified changing the jargon of electromagnetism to that of Gravitation.
Indeed in those metric each atom is similar to a galaxy. The proton has the Schwarzschild radius, as if it were a black hole of a galaxy atom… the electron seems a halo of negative strangelets. But the mass relationship is inverse, so actually the scales of the 5th dimension change sign – the galaxy is similar to a ginormous antiparticle; dark energy can be modeled as repulsive gravitomagnetic waves – the equivalent of transversal electromagnetism… Not surprisingly the Walker-Einstein equations of Relativity model Galaxies like Hydrogen atoms.
How this can be possible requires some conceptual and mathematical analysis. So we shall explain the concepts behind and then prove mathematically the equation or T.O.E. which physicists have so long looking for – the unification of forces, charges and masses.
Now what seems surprising here is the fact that mass appears quantized, and the question of what is the quanta of mass remains to be clarified. Usually people hint that it might be a Planck Mass:
Mp=√hc/G ≈ 10 -9 kg
About the mass of a flea egg.
This as well as the large speed-distance of a second of light motion has always been a puzzle to scientists which study the lower scales of the thermodynamic and quanta world, but actually is one of the clearest proofs of the scalar nature of the 5th dimension as gravitational scales are well above our human scale corresponding to the galactic scale.
But if such is the minimal quanta of mass, what happens below that scale? Well, the standard model of particles does not give them rest mass.
So we must conclude something which should be obvious if physicists had the idea of fractal space-time clear enough: below a scale of the Planck mass there is NOT rest mass, particles at rest. All of them are moving.
In the same manner that there is a minimal H-planckton below which there is no possibility to ‘exist’ and so we do have the uncertainty principle of h, as the minimal quantity in which there are ‘quantum systems fully formed’, and this is the reason why the electron does have a minimal orbit, as it ‘disintegrates’ below that orbit, that is, becomes ‘something else’ absorbed by the nucleus (to form normally a neutron), below the level of the flea egg all contributions to the mass we observe are in the form of ‘energy’, of open motions.
This of course does NOT mean below that scale systems are NOT affected by gravitational fields. It simply means they are NOT at rest in a gravitational field, they are like the electron in its orbit, not at rest as a center of mass, as a point of view, as a fixed form. They are NOT forming ‘mass organisms’, but are under the thermodynamic and quantum effects of different energies. They CAN be enclosed into a mass organism, but they are then ‘energy’ of it. And if their inner thermodynamic or quantum-electromagnetic energy is strong enough they will ‘break the enclosure’ and set themselves free…
Or stated in a different manner, which I assume will be denied by the non-philosopher of science (and the modern one, which long ago submissive to physicists forgot what the ‘masters’, Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz told us about unmoved minds-gods, the units of ‘thought’):
a mass-center is a fixed frame of reference, a fractal world in itself, which does NOT move, as it can convert into an informative, gravitational mirror-mind the energies around it. It is a territorial top predator. And in the world of masses, this is a top quark on the low scale and a black hole on the large scale.
As it happens the Planck mass is nature’s maximum allowed mass for point-masses (quanta) – in other words, a mass capable of holding a single elementary charge.
If two quanta of the Planck mass or greater met, they could spontaneously form a black hole whose Schwarzschild radius equals their Compton wavelength.
Once such a hole formed, other particles would fall in, and the black hole would experience runaway, explosive growth (it WILL NOT evaporate via Hawking radiation). And as it does so it will diminish its temperature, M=K/T, the active magnitude of its lower ∆-thermodynamic scale, as it is ‘digested’ and converted into this other plane, as ‘mass’ quanta, as top quarks.
In the graph, Nature’s stable point-mass particles, electrons and quarks, are many, many orders of magnitude lighter than the Planck mass and cannot form black holes in this manner. To notice an essential feature of ∆±i russian doll structure of the universe: as we grow in scales up and down, we increase in the downside the density of information of each particle, which will mange in the up side a larger scale of higher spatial entropy.
Hence the world of dark black holes thus have ‘expansive new rods of distance-speed or dark entropy’, and denser systems of quark matter (heavy bc-atoms and top quark boson states aka black holes)
As systems emerge upwards into new wholeness which are however more ‘ghostly constructed’ with less ‘density’ seemingly evanescent to the smaller denser cores of the russian doll universe, the whole looses its ‘density-mass’ and becomes just that logic encasing of it all, with diminishing ratios of ‘stuff’.
In that regard, the obvious conclusion is that gravitation is ABOUT the larger scale of cosmological galaxies, about TOP QUARK BLACK HOLES and strangelets, and NO, there is no unification in a single space-time continuum as both scales ARE different scale of the fifth dimension, and the galaxy-atom of positive top quark black holes and negative strangelet halos merely repeats the quantum game on the highest of all scales of the Universe known to man, whereas dark energy is the equivalent to electromagnetic entropic forces, and all the game repeats itself in this larger scale, of a Universe which is ‘simple but not that simple’ (einstein commenting on those theories that reduce it all to a VHod kind of formula.
It also follows that all what we ud-light beings do in this planet will be a local planetary big-bang, as all what we observe out there in the local galaxy is a local quasar like-big bang. WE ARE NOT experiencing the religious birth of it all. Gosh, it is soo obvious for anyone not full of himself.
In the graph, the most likely nature of the big-bang is local – very likely the quasar big bang of a 20 billion years cycle of life and death of the Milky Way, a barred galaxy, which is today exactly in its form on the 14 billion years mark of that tabulated 20 billion years cycle of Barred galaxies.
All the problems of the cosmological big-bang both theoretical, metaphysical and experimental, quantitative can then be resolved. Theoretically the equations of the big-bang are just the entropic, reversed, death equations of a black hole. Such explosion would account for the amount of Helium near the center of the galaxy, and the density of matter-radiation, which coincides with that of the galaxy. The asymmetries and form of the background radiation obtained in local measures will coincide with that of the galaxy too. Its origin on the local big bang from the remote past, or most likely on the activity of ‘Moon MACHOs’, the smallest black hole particles of the ‘triad’ of 5D scales of mass in the Universe, which if having the mass of a moon planetoid (the most common cosmic object of the Universe) will produce exactly the same redshift temperature radiation. And so on and so on…
The fractal structure of the Universe on the other hand will account for the expansion of the intergalactic space, the cosmological entropic vacuum scale, where ‘Gravitational transversal waves’ will act as repulsive gravitation, in the same manner their microcosmic equivalent in the charge scale act between particles. While the vortices of contraction of vacuum energy into mass – galaxies will balance that expansion, on the flat plane of the spiral.
In the graph, we see then the characteristics of those multiple little quasar bangs, in which dark matter made of the heaviest 2 families of mass (top/bottom/charm quark combinations that form the atoms of black holes and strange quarks that form the core of neutron, pulsar stars and strangelets in the halo). Thus they would account for most of the mass of the Universe. In terms of mass energy, as we consider on the present formalism a 4-vector momentum with 3 dimensions for space and one for time-mass, ultimately we observe a 3 to 1 proportion between ‘Lineal Space’ (G-waves of repulsive transversal gravitation) and the dimension of mass.
The galaxy on the other hand, does NOT contain repulsive gravitation as it is the interior region of the galaxy atom, which is purely attractive. Its configuration is equivalent to the theoretical configuration of the ‘cosmological big-bang’ now reduced to the barred galaxy big-bang cycle. And so we find again the ternary symmetry of the III families of mass, which form the 3 components of the galaxy atom, its ‘strangelet’, negatively charged Halo, its positively charged central top quark black hole, its 3 invaginated networks of information and energy (neutrino and photon background) and the plasmatic ud-mass of light mitochondrial stars. What is the role of the planetoids made of atoms in which humans exist. They represent only o.1% of the total mass of the galaxy, as almost all ud matter is in the form of star plasma.
So we might conclude, humans are NOT that important; an planetoids and planets on the 1 to 106 relative mass scale we find between moons and the heaviest Jovian planets which can be considered small not-ignited stars are the scalar range to feed strangelet matter that will end up in the Halo. This simple harmonic scale has only a problem: anthropomorphism. It makes us irrelevant, it puts the high popes of astrophysics back to Earth on their delusion of understanding the whole with a human self-centered perspective, and certainly makes sheer madness the experiments now carried out on Earth in search of self-feeding self-reproductive dark matter (strangelet quark-gluon soups, now starting to be produced at industrial scale at CERN and future accelerators at China).
In the graph, the quasar Little-bang, is the same process that the cosmic Little-bang but limited to the inversion of a central black hole, which dies and goes through the same phases the inflation period, is the period of black hole explosion with its gravitational waves that create the underlying structure over which the following epochs will produce as energy cools down the different particles of the galaxy. This is what it is recreated today at CERN, and might provoke the strangelet formation on its ‘initial ages’, which are stable usd lumps that could swallow the Earth.
We can now consider if briefly the ages of the Little-bangs that happen all over the Universe every time a Galaxy lives and dies, returning to the Dark World. Even if we were describing the Little Bang of the Cosmos, it is a necessary perspective for the ego-centered human to reduce its cosmic, galactic, universal epithets to the lowest of all perspectives, that of a microbial species, ‘Cantor dust of space-time’, ‘rational zero interval of the irrational infinite’, humble 0-mind who matters not more than mater. And this I advice to the reader, because it is the best way to survive and go around the Universe.
In any case, even if the cosmos had a big bang of 14 billion years, from ∆+5 it would be an infinitesimal point dying away on the truly absolute Relative Universe. So we will call all big-bangs, little bangs. As that is the meaning of it.
Now this is the most likely reality – a Universe in the ∆+4 plane, beyond the ∆œ human perspective of a relative infinite number of galactic anti-atoms (as the symmetries of 5D are inverse and so we need to jump two scales to find a similar being, 2 scales of life to find robots-like insects, to scales of cells, to find nations-like cells, DNA-like humans, and so on.)
So those anti-atom galaxies might be part of a larger bang, the cosmic little-bang, which however would be of a dimensions that we, infinitesimal inhabitants of a galaxy anti-atom cannot even imagine and it is not worth to explore.
So we shall reduce ourselves to the description of the Little Bangs, we do know about, with the laws of 5D physics.
The death of micro-light waves.
Now in 5d physics, tiredness=death of light is not provoked by the smearing of light paths by dust and other ‘chance’ collisions of light, which would rightly as Zwicky pointed out smear the image of far away galaxies, but exactly as in the cosmic big-bang and general relativity by the expansion of the underlying space-time ‘scale’ of the Universe, ∆-1. The difference though is that in 5D physics:
- The c-limit of speed only applies to ‘galactic space-time’, where the underlying gravitational space is ‘contracted’ by the -c2t2 factor of special relativity (simplest formalism), due to the frequency creation of time-information by light over the underlying gravitational space-time.
- When this gravitational space-time is liberated from galaxies, it ‘stretches out’, dissolving its information into entropy, and its speed becomes ‘NON-LOCAL’, from the point of view of a light space-time observer. The formula is immediate. As V=S/T, and Time stores information, as information disappears (invisible gravitation), then C=S/o-information = ∞. Thus the Universe becomes infinite non-local and this allows that the cosmological Un+4 scales IS connected into a present ‘spatial view’ (the previous artistic graph).
Now this fact is essential to the scales of 5D systems, as it ALLOWS the fundamental symmetry between time ages and present still space-organisms. All SCALES of the 5th dimension MUST have a force able to create a relative simultaneity in a single time quanta that communicates its parts to create balances and metabolic equilibriums. Thus there MUST be a relative non-local faster than light speed, with less T-information, and this is ‘dark energy’; which we consider to be the ‘repulsive electromagnetism’, of the galactic atom.
It is then easy to see that the speed of such G-waves would be infinite in terms of human perception, and the quantity of information they carry minimal. Indeed, if we consider a ‘Hertzian’ wave at this scale, it would carry a bit of information for several parsecs. But it would allow a spatial view of the Universe.
All this of course belongs to metaphysics, which as we said is the true nature of cosmology, as there is no way to perceive experimental evidence ‘outside’ the halo meaningful.
Yet the linguistic isomorphic method make us to consider a reasonable assumption that scales beyond our perception will follow the same isomorphisms of scales within our perception. So we can use the same formulae and deduce the non-local invisible nature of G-repulsive Giant Transversal gravitational waves between galactic-atoms and within each internal atom, to control the stars and halo of the galaxy.
Now from the perspective of a light space-time observer the space-time between galaxies, being invisible won’t be observed as a tachyon, faster energy wave, but as a dilating distance. And so it will be seen as a cosmological expansion of space (balanced by the implosion of each fractal galaxy atom, to maintain the whole Universe in immortal balance).
Thus the effect on micro-light waves will be the observed red shift.
Indeed it follows that what we call light does travel through the expanded intergalactic gravitational space-time, and red shifts.
A second phenomena also must be observed, namely the ‘internal’ death of light, as all forms of the Universe do have a world cycle. The light world cycle is likely to be of a mean 10 billion years similar to the life cycle of its ‘photonic quanta’, the stars of galaxies, which are basically dense configurations of light and plasma; the equivalent to the particle state of light. And this 10 billion years light world cycle is what we observe with an expansive age of light as it goes through the world cycle, further accelerated in the 2nd part of the world cycle (5 to 10 billion years).
It follows also that the furthest stars will emit ‘younger’, longer living light, so the further we look onto the galaxy, we shall see arriving to our galaxy, only younger stars, till a point where we do not see more light coming.
Further on, as all forms are relative ‘pi-cycles’, whose membranes do NOT let see the external universe except by its ‘holes’, the halo of the galaxy must limit as all membranes what we perceive from outside. This again happens in any entity inside a super organism. Our cells do NOT see the external world, and only the sensorial eyes do see it. So the next question is how much is ‘dark energy-space-matter-form’, from an inner observer of a relative fractal knot of space-time.
The calculus of an ideal pi cycle is immediate. As a pi cycle is made of 3 diameters, with outer holes between them, in our curvature electronic space-time minds, where pi is 3.14, we ONLY see through o.14 holes of a 3.14 diameter. so there is a 3/3.14 darkness, of regions we do NOT see from the interior of a pi cycle.
As it happens, 3/3.14 = 96% which would be the dark world for any inner relative mind point of view. As it happens dark matter and energy accounts for 95%, which is there and we do not see. It is then the halo the membrane that ‘darkens’ the Universe?
We do have for the sun the membrane called the Oort and Kuiper belts… But they are internal to the super organism of the galaxy, so we shall discuss it on its scales. but still they do darken part of the galaxy despite being internal ‘open’ cells. The galaxy though IS the true fractal point (the equivalent of the atom, darkened by the electron and the Nuclear force cover).
So the reader should understand how much uncertainty exists in cosmology.
Back to our theme of the cosmological redshirts and its now ‘3 causes’ (as always in the ternary Universe) we can write them within a Generator equation, this time expressing the 2nd Non-Euclidean postulate of lines≈waves of communication:
Tƒ (emitter: Original red shift by expansion) < ST (red shift by wave dying) > Tƒ (Halo, likely ‘blue shift’ back to create background radiation and reduce to c-speed the wave).
Those 3 components are just a case of the Fundamental equation of particle physics:
Tƒ(Fermion)< ST (Boson wave) >Tƒ (Fermion)
applied to the upper cosmological scale.
The study of that equation in 5D physics is an entire field of cosmological research for future 5D cosmologists, if we survive the age of ‘lineal macho-man Neanderthal physics’. So here we shall make some comments on the death of light (ST cause).
As light dies away it is canonical in 5D astrophysics that entropy will elongate as all death processes the space-time, which in terms of the duality motion=form (Galilean paradox) means an increase of distance. Moreover, because light does have a 10 billion mean age (same for stars made of light, here the part does live as the neurons and the head, the same than the whole but NOT longer; so light dies before the stars mean life). This moreover explains why after 5 billion years, its maturity at the height of its world cycle, life accelerates its death-elongation into red color, till fading away. Which also explains why we do NOT see more radius to the Universe:
Light cannot come from beyond that radius because that is the limit of its life NOT the limit of the whole, but of its waves of information, its minimal part.
Indeed, it seems that light beams and light-evolved entities (stars) have a mean cycle of 10 billion years, after which they suffer an energetic big-bang expansion – stars explode into Novae and light gets tired and expands in a redshirts process, returning to its gravitational, non-local lower scale of dark Entropy.
This of course explains why far away light red shifts and seems to expand space: it is dying and beyond those mean 10 billion years an increasing ‘darkness’ is observed in the Universe, which a simple Gauss curve of probabilities show to be almost absolute beyond the x+1/3rd 13.3 billion years range.
Again physicists don’t see both, the dual space and time views of the Universe but only the temporal big-bang, which considers a cosmos in time failing to analyze it in space as a simultaneous system connected by non-local gravitation. So they think darkness is not caused by the spatial death of light, which they merely use as a clock of cosmic time, thinking therefore that beyond those ages we enter into a temporal darkness – and the Universe didn’t exist.
In the graph, we illustrate how complex physics, using the same data that Simplex physics of a single space-time continuum can resolve the puzzles of the Universe. Cosmologists have found that light coming from far away galaxies seems to decelerate and accelerate its red shift till dissolving around 1010-11 years after its emission. And they affirm this is a proof of an expanding Universe, as they apply a local phenomenon, the life/death curve of light self-similar to the life-death curve of any entity, which increases its frequency till its ½ life and then decreases, becoming tired till death, to the entire space-time of the Universe (a global symmetry).
The tiredness and world cycle life-curve of light however only applies to a local phenomenon: light tires and red shifts at the end of its journey, dissolving back into gravitational dark-Entropy, which is perceived as an expansion of the light-membrane, but that effect is compensated by the contraction of space into mass in the galactic vortices giving us a zero-sum.
Let us then study in descending scales those 3 little bangs.
5D Lorentz Invariance: A 4D cosmic electron membrane of the canonical big-bang.
We do NOT fully deny the cosmic scale of the big-bang, which 5D somehow makes logic (it would just be another scale of big-bang of an atom-Universe. There are certain basic numbers that back that opinion. The number of galaxies, 1011 is the constant of social order between planes of the 5th dimension.
The relationship between the Force of Gravitation and Charge (temporal curvature), is according to some estimates (already noticed by Feynman and I believe Eddington), the same that between the radius of the proton and the Cosmos (spatial length). So it fits in 5D Metric: Sp x Tƒ = K, better than a possible ‘local cluster’ big-bang with lesser radius. But those numbers have been varying a few potencies of 10 here and there. In any case it is a proof of the force of 5D metric that even if we ultimately reject the cosmic big-bang for lack of experimental data, we can for the first time explaining rationally without creationist ideas.
The spatial symmetry on 5D big-bang; all galaxies are in the expanding membrane of the ‘electronic cover’ of the cosmic neutron explains Lorentz Invariance nicely.
Now in the parlance of physics, this mind point of view is called ‘relativity’, which implies we cannot distinguish frames of reference when we choose one at its center.
Now in the present format, the ‘subjective use of the human frame of reference’ at the center of the big bang, could seem a misinterpretation of the meaning of the Lorentz Invariance to suit ‘us’ – ultimately another ‘anthropomorphic’, man in the center, reality only what man can see, subjective theory of religious ‘nature’.
But this would be an easy critic. An not an accurate one. Since In the case of the previous picture for that to be real – not frame of reference – the solution of physicists is obvious and quite smart and realistic: the entire picture is actually NOT a ‘volume’ but a membrane, like the expanding surface of a globe. If all the galaxies were pegged in the expanding surface of an SP-Membrane any POINT would see the rest of the cosmos which being so ‘large’ would appear as a flat surface, in the same way we see the Earth as a flat surface and any point on the Earth could in principle if light would curve a bit through th