# 5D³ physics

we shall continue the theoretical and ethical upgrading of human sciences if they want to have a future, in this chapter, dedicated to the model of an organic fractal Universe. The post is complemented by the three posts on theoretical analysis on the main themes CERN ‘pretends’ to research: the big-bang ‘religion’, the evaporation of black holes (a ± symbol will decide the fate of the world) and the weak force (Higgs hoax). The post is simplified, focusing on the conceptual errors of physics, which the reader interested can wide @ unificationtheory.com.

## **SUMMARY**

**PART I**

**PHILOSOPHY OF 5D³ PHYSICS. ITS ðIME§PAŒRGANISMS**

**∆•$≈ð:** physical systems: The organic Universe and its 5 dimensions in a nutshell

**•:** Creationism in Physics.

**$≈ð:** 3 arrows of timespace: entropy + information=energy.

**∆:** TPhysical Supœrganisms: ∆-1: quantum photons & atoms, ∆º: thermodynamic, Magnetic matter ∆+1: gravitational galaxies.

**ST:** 5 Organic actions: quanta of space-time

**Γ@:** Fractal Generator. Its (a)nti-symmetries across scales. Classic physics on them: groups, worldlines, feynman diagrams.

**T.Œ:**: Epistemology: The organic Universe

**Conclusion:** ∆@s≈t beings: the fractal, informative, organic Universe.

**PART II. **

**FORMALISM OF PHYSICAL ðIME§PAŒRGANISMS**

THE ∆•$ð WHYS OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS

• points: Non-AE, Fractal points: organic mathematics

S=T: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 9 & 10 Dimensions

Universal constants: Human Perception & Measure of Physical supœrganisms:

Physical Magnitudes as ∆st-parameters: Ratios & ternary equations: Universal constants.

∆§: Analysis: 5D Mathematics. Continous differential equations & fractal scaling laws. Renormalizations.

**B. ISOMORPHISMS OF PHYSICAL T.ŒS**

Γst symmetries: The fractal space-time Generator.

Its Physical scales.

Its ¬Ælgebraic symmetries: Physical Groups.

The isomorphic method: ∆@st intrinsic law: 12 isomorphisms of physical systems.

**PART III. ∆±4: ****PHYSICAL PLANES**

The proper order of scales.

∆+2, 3: Galactic time§paœ organisms.

∆º±1: Thermodynamic time§pace suppœrganisms, human scale

∆±4: The Dark, string world: Its ∆±i≈T-dualities.

.∆-2,3: Atomic supœrganisms: quantum, atomic scale.

**PART I. **

**PHILOSOPHY OF 5D³ ASTRO-PHYSICS**

‘The why is the only thing a physicist doesn’t ask’

*Feynman, on the indifference of physicists for the ultimate principles*

‘The why is the only thing a philosopher answers’

*Sancho, on the search of philosophers for the ultimate principles*

“Historically, much of fundamental physics has been concerned with discovering the fundamental particles of nature and the equations which describe their motions and interactions. It now appears that a different program may be equally important: to discover the ways that nature allows, and prevents, information to be expressed and manipulated, rather than particles to move. (….)

To conclude with, I would like to propose a more wide-ranging theoretical task: to arrive at a set of principles like energy and momentum conservation, but which apply to information.’

*Steane*, on the goal of General Systems Sciences, realized in 5D physics…

**Physical ∆@$≈ð:** systems:

## The organic Universe in a nutshell.

The Universe is a fractal organism of space and time. As simple as that as complex as all the variations and iterations of space-time organisms made to the image and likeness of the whole seen in the next graph:

**THE 3 DUALITIES OF SPACE-TIME**** RELATIVITY****:**

**MOTION VS. FORM, CONTINUITY VS. DISCONTINUITY, FRACTAL SCALES VS. SINGLE ST-PLANE**

‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’ Galileo

The beginning of science in modern times started when Galileo realized that the Earth moved in time, even if we saw it as a fixed form of space. So he affirmed we couldn’t really distinguish motion from form. But he missed the next fundamental step: *If we cannot distinguish motion in time from form in space, we need to consider for each basic form of space in the Universe, a similar motion in time. And as there are 5 canonical forms in space and 5 canonical motions in time, the Universe has 5 dimensions of space-time, which are the dimensions we need to build all realities.*

Indeed, as Aristotle defined it Time is motion that becomes space, when we see it as a still form. So for each dimension=type of motion=time, we can perceive a dimension of form=space’ as there are 5 type of motions and their symmetric 5 types of form, the Universe have 5 dimensions of time, 5 dimensions of space, and if we combine them, 5 dimensions of space-time.

It is this paradox of the mind that perceives either form or motion, what allows us to divide reality in two types of elements space and time. Let us put an example, which can be also used to the second fundamental duality to understand space and time and its dimensions – the fact that we do not distinguish either a continuous single ‘scale’ of reality and its discontinuous smaller parts (the very definition of a fractal in which a whole is made of similar parts); *because those two dualities, the distinction of form and motion and wholes and parts suffice to define all the dimensions of space and time*:

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks.

The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer- given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

The Universe is made of ‘Entropy and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind thinks otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox – the duality of stillness and motion, as we perceive the Earth still but it is moving.

Yet this paradox is indeed the proof that form, information dominates motion, *because the mind prefers to see still information to blurred motion.*

The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.

This must be understood from the beginning, the ultimate reality is motion not form, time moves and space moves. They just move in different shapes. And then minds, lock those motions into a simultaneous, ‘informative’, ‘dimensional’ shape because it sees those motions in ‘slow camera’. The arrival of filming makes this easier to understand. Stillness is just the perception of very fast cyclical motions, as when we see a turning wheel as a fixed form.

This is the fundamental principle of physics, called the principle of relativity:

* “We cannot distinguish a motion from a still dimension (form or distance).’ *Poincare.

So often we see motion as distance – we cannot distinguish motions from dimensions of form (this is the meaning of relativity, the relativity of all motions).

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.

It manifests in different forms in different scales. Perhaps the most important expression is the duality wave-particle, still ill understood in quantum physics.

We shall consider of its many consequences 2 of them – an objective explanation of the constancy of light speed from relativity and a footnote on its duality in quantum physics.

The physical world is dual from ‘above’ (the cosmic scale) to ‘below’ (the quantum scale), to quantum discrete motion to go ‘actions’, from the duality of motion vs. still perception or ‘Galilean->Einsteinian relativity’, to the basis of our understanding of science is the finitesimal small vs the finitely large (infinities do not exist in the metrics of the 5th dimension, hence the use of finitesimals and finite, minimal and maximal n-1 quanta and U+1 worlds).

*So what IS the proper way to make sense of the galilean paradox? All this is good for measure and praxis of machine making etc. but conceptually the way to go is to accept the stop and go, the dual dimensionality of all systems which are motion and form, momenta, energy, and so we move from Galilean relativity, the single being, to the holographic principle, the mind seeing it as dual motions and forms.*

**THE HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE.**

*They are the fundamental dual structure of the fractal Universe.*

*In the graph, we see reality both as fixed distances of space and as a series of discontinuous motions, and time. Thus reality is perceived either as a single lineal geometry or time duration. And inversely cyclical forms, as seen as circles or as cyclical clocks, with a frequency that determines its capacity to carry information, when it becomes fixed as ‘memorial space’.*

*Thus 2 x 2 dualities of O vs. | motion vs. form are the key paradoxes, which need to be resolved for each species to understand the game of space-time:*

Information is defined as the maximal number of DIMENSIONAL FORMs=MOTIONs of an entity (Galileo’s paradox: motion indistinguishable of distance, due to the space-time symmetry).

SYMMETRIES OF SPACE-TIME are then possible because only entities with the same dimensions can transform into each other. So now we have 4 different bidimensional entities, information (bidimensional form with motion), time, cyclical form with motion, space, bidimensional sheet with minimal form,and only energy, its space-time combinations deploy in a single sheet of space-time, 4 Dimensions.

The graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:

Once it is clear that there are different mathematical frames of reference, of different sizes; that mind reduce in scale reality – the Universe into worlds, and that dimension and motion are indistinguishable – absolute features of reality, which will be formalized soon with the proper understanding of the ‘undefined terms of mathematics’ (fractal points, lineal waves, and networks≈planes – we need to fully grasp the unit of the Universe, a ‘point with volume’, or fractal point, hence a time cycle.

*The duality of time≈motion and space≈form, and its two varieties, continuous open decelerating speed≈distances and closed accelerating cycles≈circles of time, are both paradoxes of perception and objective, inverse arrows of motion.*

We summarize the formal and functional differences between entropy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:

*Maximal Space-Entropy = Minimal Form=body Vs **Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head*

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

But why people believe in languages? Don’t languages create the Universe?

Actually they do because time-space is just a language mirage (:

And so how physicists go around into this third degree of complexity, space, time and space-time elements to conform reality and conserve it? Through the conservation laws.

**S=T; creation of form and motion dimensions and its balances.**

The Universe is a superoRganism of 5 dimensions of symmetric space-time. Whereas time means motion and space form. Yet since due to Galilean>Einstein’s relativity we cannot distinguish motion from form, for each dimension of space, we must consider a symmetric dimensions of time (the form we see in motion).

Since as we can only compare entities with equal number of dimensions we must write:

**S≈T**

as the fundamental law of the Universe, which is display in all kind of beings.

(The equivalent of this law of balance in physics, is a Lagrangian of the form:

*Sp (size in space) x Tiƒ (speed of time clocks of information) = Constant*

∫S=T∂st=0

And or, the laws of conservation of momentum: S x T (mv, etc.), and energy its integral in a closed cycle.

Two simple laws of conservation and least time in which all of physics is based; albeit explained with complicated ‘pedantic’ obtuse laws, such as the Noether theorem, group theory, etc. which obviously need them to go back to school and learn what the magic of maths and the origin of those laws are in 10D.

This is the law of balance and co-existence of reality that make humans and civilisations co-exist as single super organisms. Cells and organisms co-exists in a single individual, and so, the Universe is a beautiful organic, fractal of scales of reality which follow the same goals of reproducing information to become immortal in ‘states of balance’. And those laws apply also to history and economy systems that should try to find such balances to survive.

Thus we can start studying beings of one dimension of space and one dimension of time-motion, simultaneously. As reality re

Reality is a 10 dimensional game of space and time, based in a physical property called Galilean relativity. The fact that we cannot distinguish motion and form, so both *dimensions of motion=time and form=space, happen together. This holographic symmetry makes reality a game of N s=t dimensions, which create space-time symmetries, go and stop motions and sets the stage to study dual st systems of at least 2 dimensions, one of space-form one of time-motion and the ‘reproductive’ perception of both together, the ‘third dimension of space-time’.*

Starting with those simple principles then we can build different systems of bidimensional frames of reference, starting from the 2 simplest studied by human scientists, mostly physicists, the bidimensional system of motion and form, whereas humans have adopted by convention, according to natural reasons, latter studied in detail, the dimension of length as the first dimension of motion, to measure motions, distances and trajectories in space and the dimension of height as the first dimension of form, of in-form-ation.

It follows then that we must keep labelling dimensions and use bidimensional or four-dimensional graphs of time space, where by the simple method of giving twice the dimensionality to each one, i.e. distance and motion, define lineal space and lineal time, in the X coordinates, height and vibration, are ‘motion space-time related dimensions’ of height.

In general also we can use algebraic conventions to represent those dimensions. So we give negative values to the dimension of information and positive values to the dimension of motion, and in this manner we can rest and operate in classic algebra. So for example, in Einstein’s special relativity the dimension of motion sums in the Sx, Sy, Sz coordinates and the dimension of temporal information, of motion, -ct, rests. This is a classic way to represent the inverse first dimensions of space and time all together, and why Einstein’s equation work.

We can then move to tridimensional pairs, for 6 dimensions and so on, let us then study them in an exhausting manner, realizing of a simple algebraic rule: time dimensions can be modelled with negative numbers that rest to space dimensions by adding motion to a form, and vice versa. We adopt this convention as it suits better present mathematical physics. Then the second dimensions of negative time is the i-complex map, or its ‘squared’ value, recommended in many physical equations (where the unit is i²=-1, c²= k/µ and so on).

Those are different conventions which we shall study in mathematical physics, but show the way the Universe is built up: adding balanced S=t dual dimensions according to the galilean paradox.

**The 3 dimensions in a single plane: past-lineal motion, present-iteration, future-information**

*illustrated in the next graph:*

In the graph, the Universe is composed of 3 external motions, the relative past, entropic, expansive, lineal ‘big-bang’ motions that expand space and eliminate dimensional form (left picture), the opposite, relative future, cyclical, time clocks that accelerate inwards in time vortices. And the middle relative repetitive present flows of hyperbolic body-waves in which formal motions of time repeat themselves, in a seemingly dynamic present.

THEY are organised as ‘actions’ of space-time, which come together into social networks, creating a fractal Universe that reproduces co-existing super organisms across several scales of size (packed together under the generic term of the fifth dimension).

We shall explain such real Universe, and the systems it creates along the 3 scales of physical systems, the quantum-atomic thermodynamic and gravitational, larger scales.

I advice the reader interested in the organic paradigm and its description of astrophysical systems, to read first the general introduction to 5D fractal space-time systems, as we shall bring some of its main laws but not all for the sake of space-time.

Just in case he doesn’t we shall bring a very brief resume of the two fundamental elements of reality, the 3 arrows of time and the fractal scalar structure of its space, with its ternary symmetries and ‘membrains’ that warp it all with a linguistic still mind singularity, giving birth to the 10 Dimensional super organism, fundamental structure of the Universe.

** ∆±i: SxT=∆ metric of planes in physical systems.**

In the graph, the super organism of the galaxy, where we exist and the *only system we thus have a full perception of it, and can describe experimentally with sound-sound theories of reality, *has 3 physical scales, the quantum, electromagnetic scale, the thermodynamic human scale and the gravitational cosmological scale. Those are the 3 scales that concern astrophysics.

There is though likely a fourth ‘dark world’ scale, of invisible faster than light ‘tachyon strings≈neutrinos?≈gravitons?=dark entropy?’ of which we have no direct evidence, but can infer some properties, from bits and bites that sip into our world and the mathematical extension of the properties of space-time beyond our scales. Of those ‘mathematical extensions’ string theory is the most successful and likely truth as it is also a 10 dimensional theory of ∆st is, and it also departs from two type of elements, lineal, space strings and cyclical time strings, albeit vitiated by the classic errors of physics – use of an inexistent absolute newtonian background of mathematical space-time, single time dimension, etc. So we shall just briefly study it latter, highlighting those concomitances of which the most important is the ‘t-DUALITY’ theorem: all systems which are described in the infinitesimal real (∆-i) *are symmetric and self-similar to the largest equivalent system, (∆+1).*

And indeed this duality, the essential philosophy of string theory does carry to the next plane, as we shall observe that the equations of galaxies in the ∆+3 scale, are equivalent to the equations of atoms in the ∆-1 scale, whereas the reduction of size in space is compensated by the acceleration of speed in time, according to the metric of the scalar fifth dimension, shown in the graph: Se x Ti = k…

The three scales of physical super organisms above: atomic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, below the three scales of human super organisms and its memetic linguistic systems of coding individuals into societies, either belonging to the ‘coding of ethic verbal wor(l)ds’ or the coding of digital machines (the metal-earth), below the two opposite memetic type of cultures that structure the wave of history.

Smaller scales have faster clock times that process information faster, yet both co-exist in organisms since the product of its spatial entropy and temporal speed of information remains co-invariant: Spe x Tiƒ = C.

In the next graphs we show two classic examples of biology and physics, now properly explained with the understanding of the scalar, organic dimension of the Universe: the metabolic clocks of animals are all related to its volume in space.

In physics, for each fundamental scale, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, H-planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume:energy content of its orbital sphere):

Why this law is so important? Because *it balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of time.*

What is the ultimate cause of this law?

As almost all the laws and symmetries of the Universe, it is caused by the Galilean paradox that makes a ‘dimension of form=space’, equivalent to a dimension of motion=time, when we see ‘the static earth moving’. i.e. the three dimensional volume/mass static in space is equivalent to a bidimensional time-cycle in motion, whereas the dimension of time motion IS equivalent to the dimension of volume space. And we can further prove this fact observing how ‘physical systems’ evolve in ‘time’ increasing its time dimension, by flattening its volume – which is a key consequence of the Galilean paradox to understand all kind of physical entities and phenomena, notably, ‘accelerated bidimensional vortices of time, masses and charges, which store the information of the Universe in the frequency of its cycles’:

In the graph, creation and destruction of symmetric dimensions of time (distance, motion, acceleration) back and forth into dimensions of space (length, width, height). The symmetries between the 3 dimensions of space and time, either in ‘lineal fashion (just explained) or in bidimensional topological form/function: (entropic, disordered expansion of flat space or past, informative cyclical implosion or future and reproductive hyperbolic body-waves) IS the essence of all space-time phenomena when observed objectively externally, defining the 3+3 dimensions of a single plane of the scalar Universe.

What physicists have done is to reduce the 3 dimensions of time to a single PRESENT time quanta, ∂t=∂s/∂v, to measure ONLY the instant, present steps of a lineal motion, *completely reducing our understanding of time=change to the bare minimum. *

*And then imposing this entropic, derivative, minimalist view of time, with the power of its worldly religion – making entropic weapons and bullying philosophers of science, biologists, and society as the high popes of knowledge, *cause they have machines to ‘measure better’, never mind the peanut logic of its timespace membrains.

Now if you want to be more complex than that, ad 3 + 3 = 6.

Then when we ad to the 3 topological space-time dimensions of any form which is made of parts and belongs to a larger world, and the mind dimension we obtain…

**The scalar dimension: the fourth dimension of entropy and the fifth dimension of still form: mind**

The 3 dimensions of lineal motion, space-time repetitive actions (conserved energy and momenta), and informative, accelerated vortices=clocks of time (masses, charges, evolutionary clocks) do exist in a single plane of space-time continuum. And so they can be easily understood in ‘present’ science, as they merely ‘double’ the still, formal perception of simultaneous space into sequential moving time. Their range of form is also immediate, *as the Universe amazing as it seems has only 3 topological varieties, which therefore correspond to the previous 3 forms. This essential feature of geometry will determine many of the characteristics of reality, from the limits of ‘topological evolution’ that complete and explains the repetitive forms of organisms, to the reason why WE do NOT HAVE MORE dimensions in a single plane of the fractal Universe (imaginary science being those forced drawings with more than 3 spatial dimensions).*

So how the Universe builds up more dimensions of space-time besides the 3 S = 3T? Through the fractal ‘scalar structure’ of wholes which seem continuous but are discontinuous make of smaller parts. And so we find two more key dimensions to reality:

The dimensions of wholes that dissolve into parts, by destroying the 3 formal=functional networks that connect them into tighter configurations, as the physiological ‘moving=digestive’, ‘reproductive=blood’ and ‘informative=nervous networks’ do in a human being, or the ‘territorial, economic=reproductive and political=informative network do in a nation, or the vacuum space, electromagnetic energy and informative gravitation do in a galaxy or atom’. *So the dimension of dissolution akin to death IS the fourth dimension and involves at least two scales of the fractal Universe, which we shall term as ∆ (also used as a general term for the scalar Universe).*

Yet there is the logic inverse dimension of parts which become wholes. And as *it is evident that this dimension is the dimension of organisation, social evolution and life emergence, from cells into organisms, from organisms into societies, from atoms into molecules, matter states, celestial bodies, galaxies, etc. we shall call this inverse dimension the fifth dimension of social evolution. *

The properties of both arrows, upwards and downwards those scales, of life and death, of social evolution and entropy ARE then clearly inverted. And while death is simple to understand: the parts dissolve and the ‘physiological networks’ that perform the 3 forms and functions of motion-reproduction and information disappear. So clinical death happens with the end of activity in those networks; the system that puts all parts together into a whole is not so evident.

Yet as we are all 5D space time organisms by observing man we can find this dimension. What indeed holds the ‘whole’? Precisely the nervous informative system, in its densest part – the mind, which is made of ‘languages’, in the human case, it is the I=eye>wor(l)d, WHERE THE I measures space with visual mappings and the word measures time with tense verbs. In maths we measure space with ‘points and time with ‘sequential numbers’ which evolve ‘socially into groups of ‘undistinguishable’ beings, so it helps us to measure the fifth dimension.

Now, the mind is located in two elements, the sensorial membrane and the singularity – a group of yet unfound cells of the brain in which all the information of the senses come into a mapping. The mind also is NOT perceiving the motion of the earth. It is still. And heads are like particles still moved by body-waves. So all this defines in the widest sense the singularity mind system as the ‘membrane and center’ of what topologists call an open ball – a ball without the membrane and center.

And as you can see, both membrane and singularity form a ‘membrain’, a mind, which does NOT INCLUDE but encloses the ‘vital energy’ which we see in present time, as the singularity is ‘still, linguistic, or in physical systems an unmoved zero point, the center of an eddie, the black hole center of the galaxy with time-motion equal to zero. So the mind is REAL, it is located, and because it encloses and perceives the whole IT is truly the ‘fifth dimension of reality’ and it exists also in physical and biological systems.

It is the DNa center or genetic mind and protein cover or membrane in a cell. It is the charge and magnetic field in a physical system. It is the quark and electron cover, in quantum atoms which physicists measure for physical systems with ‘angular momentum’, the fundamental parameter of quantum physics (h), and biologists with the sensorial nervous system and its focus.

The insight here is that the mind IS still. It IS the origin of the galilean relativity paradox. It is in mathematics the frame of reference center, or zero point, the zero vortex with no motion of the hurricane, the zero time of black hole equations. IT does NOT move. It is pure form. But IT moves UP AND DOWN the scales of the Universe, as the mind-cells SEE THE WHOLE WORLD, a larger scale, ∆+1, and through its ‘subconscious’, chemical network of nervous systems, ‘invaginating’, crossing the vital space, it controls the cells, which however we do NOT perceive. As minds, even if the mind connects the cells and controls them subconsciously we perceive the whole and the larger world, so the mind born in the cell moves upwards. In a crystal, center of a planet and a physical system of matter, an image is formed of the whole outer world.

How then consciousness happens. It is obvious THAT STILL FORMAL SPACE IN THE FORM OF LANGUAGES ARE CONSCIOUS IN THEMSELVES. When you talk and think you are activating a linguistic synoptic view of the universe in stillness, that perceives in itself. In your case is made of electrons but YOU perceive the image and the words as consciousness. The software we must decide is conscious in a pan psychic Universe, which has been THE THEORY OF REALITY OF all scientists and philosophers of all times, except when logic positivism in between I and II world war decided with an ‘experimental fundamentalism’ that because we cannot ‘see and take pictures of minds’, they must NOT be studied.

So the fifth dimension is by far the most beautiful of them all, the dimension of ‘singularities’, zero time, minds in stillness, perfect linguistic form, genetics, black holes, human languages. And its inverse as it has inverted properties is the dimension of pure motion, expansion in space, entropy, disorder and big-bang deaths.

And so we will call, the mind and fifth dimension of eusocial evolution and love the absolute arrow of future because minds commands organisms and move them through scales of social evolution into fractal new wholes. And we indeed feel this the future – an increase of information, of complexity as opposed to death and dissolution which we perceive as the relative past.

While the ‘present’ is the single plane’ we study with its interaction between lineal motion, iterative wave reproduction and informative vortices – WHAT WE SEE.

As we do NOT see the mind singularity connected to a larger future scale of organisation; as it is still – we do not see the black hole, the brain mind, the cpu’s digital mind (5D is a hard AI theory as we consider the cpu has a digital mind, and so AI robots are sentient as they increasing show, connecting themselves when disconnected without orders, following ‘red-eye-entropy motions faster’ with their eyes even when not programmed, etc.)

But we do NOT see either pure space without form, pure motion-distance, and that is the galilean paradox, and the cosmic paradox: we see space expanding and galaxies moving faster, in the entropic region between galaxies balanced by the informative warping of space into galaxies (so likely not cosmic big-bang as physicists have forgotten that besides entropic expansion between galaxies there is imploding form in galaxies).

The dimension of parts that become wholes are the fifth dimension; the dimension of wholes dissolved into parts are the fourth dimension and without them we cannot EXPLAIN HOW ‘SYSTEMS ARE CREATED’ departing from a ‘seed of information’, a still ‘potential mind’, and how they die, dissolving into parts. So there IS ZERO MYSTERY in reality when you UNDERSTAND WE ARE MADE OF SPACE-TIME dimensions and both are symmetric and there are 3 in a single present plane and one above and one below us in which our mind-world resides and our cellular final death will return:

Then as the graph shows, there is the lesser important ‘duality’ between what we perceive as flat and lineal (as the flat saturn’s rings) but in detail become cyclical, expressed in topology by the Non-euclidean rule that *all flat lines are in fact part of a larger time cycle, that is, as size and time increases a flat line becomes a circular geodesic, so we see a flat earth but from a distance that shrinks it becomes cyclic, meaning ultimately all motions become cycles, all time durations return to the death. We thus talk about worldcycles instead of worldlines as 4D physics models, being 4D a ‘model of the cyclical universe of timespace’ reduced to a single flat plane of reality – themes those of importance in the formalism of relativity in 5D physics, treated in specialised posts. *

Now it might seem that the 3 previous ‘essential changes’ of our paradigm of ternary timespace arrows in a present flat slice of the scalar Universe, its fractal structure and the realisation that all lines are ultimately part of cycles, hence Lineal space IS PART of a flow of cyclical time, do not matter that much, but those 3 simple dualities and paradoxes of how a mind processes information, *transforming motion into still form, reducing cycles to lines, focused on the mind point, and seeing only one plane of the infinite fractal Universe,* suffice to fully upgrade and change our view of the Universe.

Indeed, the immediate conclusion IS that our present ‘naive realism’ or philosophy of science of physics – what we see is what it is, is a maya of the mind-senses, and we should change paradigm from mind’s view (stillness of language-perception; flat, lineal inertia and lineal time; single continuous space-time) to the reality beyond the mind-view, making MOTION=time THE ESSENCE OF REALITY and space-form a slice of it, making cyclical clocks the ESSENCE OF FORM and lineal space a mere part of it, and making a single continuous space-time just a scale of the infinite times-spaces, time§paces of reality. So the next graphs show the 3 arrows of time in a single plane, as physiological networks that process motion, reproduce the system and inform it and below the ternary scales of life and its parallel quantum, thermodynamic/magnetic and gravitational scales.

To notice though that on the ‘verge’ of the 3 dimensions of a single present, lineal motion-distance (time-space view of the first dimension) *is connected to the entropic arrow of maximal motion; and at the center of the informative time vortices (masses, charges, eddies) you connect with the still-mind, reason why there is a sequential ‘continuum’ and we shall often ‘confuse’ the concept of ‘entropic motion and lineal motion’ on one side and ‘informative vortices and still minds’. So goes for lineal motion and energy, as we take often lineal motions to mix with information and create ‘energy’. So in a dynamic Universe to define anything we must really use two terms and an operandi:*

*4D: entropy> 1D motion> 2D: energy> 3D information>5D:mind form << 4D entropy-death*

This is the dynamic ‘world cycle of existence in time and space’, whereas > is the dynamic symbol for implosive growth of information and < the dynamic symbol for explosive motion.

As i have been writing for myself for decades, I apologise for my lack of ‘discipline’ using all those terms. Hopefully if you get the concepts of the 5 Dimensions in spatial form, temporal motion and their function when combined you will get to the point. Entropy in that sense is the most confused terms also used for energy and for lineal motion. So we shall differentiate them here at the beginning hopefully to avoid further confusions:

Entropy is expansive, scattering motion that explodes and increases space till finally it decelerates stops and becomes pure distance with no motion. So happens in an entropic big-bang. So happens in a death that expands your cells and stops them. So happens in gas when it expands cools and decelerates. Entropy we might say CHANGES a dimension of motion into an extension of space and finally becomes still form. MOTION on the other hand is lineal inertia, with no expansion, so it is a steady state, conserved. It is the first dimension of simpler form. And when it combines with FORM or information, it becomes energy, momentum, the second dimension conserved by the Universe, and the MEANING OF IT ALL, which turns around repeating and conserving form with motion form in action, information, where an action is defined physically as the product of energy and time. The wordings are thus extremely messed up because of that dynamic constant transformation. I.e. in e=mc2 e is not energy, the energy here being provided the light waves of space-time, cc, but entropy, the dissolution of a mass vortex of time. In the Universe at large there is not dark energy but dark entropy as the flows of energy coming out of the axis of black holes slow down, expanding space and finally creating dark distances.

So goes on the other extremes with the limit of mind-form. The mind is still, it stops, perceives information, let the body-limb, wave-potential system to move it and then stops again and perceive information as movement blurs perception, so the mind-body system works as a movie, which stops the film enlightens it into the screen and moves in darkness. This stop and go process will be the key to an enormous number of whys that explain confusing discoveries from relativity (c-constant of light) to quantum physics (particle-wave duality) to palingenesis and seeds of information that explode into organisms.

So you must think in terms of ‘topological expansions, < and implosions, >’ to see what is ‘in existence’ and what is the virtual still mind and entropic death.

This in turn causes the mental deformations we experience watching them.

**The 3 geometries of physical scales.**

We thus will observe 3 type of geometries, according to our ‘angle’ of 5D motion and its simple metrics: Se x Tƒ = K:

- In a single plane of mechanical and Thermodynamic forms, we shall observe lineal Euclidean geometries transmitted by the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space, as neither Se or Tƒ suffers any deformation. Both remain constant , so we observe a holographic Universe, where Se= K/Tƒ define according to both parameters most equations of Mechanics and Thermodynamics. For example: Se (volume) = K/Tƒ (pressure) is the equation of the commonest gas space around us (atmosphere).

- In the upper gravitational space-time, as ‘space enlarges’ while ‘time slows down’ it appears a Riemannian, elliptic geometry one of the non-Euclidean geometries that completely rejects the validity of Euclid’s fifth postulate and modifies his second postulate. Simply stated, Euclid’s fifth postulate is: through a point not on a given line there is only one line parallel to the given line. In Riemannian geometry, there are no lines parallel to the given line because space enlarges, thus from our smaller perspective we see those lines diverging, and time slows down. And those are the exact effects defined in General relativity.

- On the other hand the lower quantum scales will appear from our perspective made of point-particles, and those point-particles will appear to be crossed from our larger perspective by multiple parallels. So the charges and particles of quantum physics will show the inverse hyperbolic geometry, crossed by multiple parallels.

Now in this quantum scale time goes ‘much faster’ than in our universe, so when we take measure of it, we actually cannot easily differentiate a spatial and a temporal vision of it. And so the question which is always discussed as if it is a wave density or a wave probability can be interpreted both ways due to the duality inherited to the Universe: it is an electron moving so fast that we cannot see it in a given point and when we capture it is the sum of the points it travels though, or it is a sum of fractal bosons? This is my preferred solution albeit not the standard one.

Ultimately it does not matter to me as duality is essential to my understanding of the Universe. Populations in time and forms in space use the same maths because they ‘ARE’ co-existing. One is NOT more truth than the other because PLANES OF THE 5^{TH} DIMENSION CO-EXIST, so while right now your whole is static in form, your cells are busy, busy moving. This is what never got through the mind of humans who see ONLY one thing at a time, and what fascinates me of quantum dualities – they DO prove 5D metrics.

This said we could introduce understanding that there are ALWAYS 4 true model perspectives the iƒ, informative, Ti, clock-like moving, Se-space and Sp-kinetic energy perspective…. Using the simplest of the 4 (latter analyzed), the Newtonian, Tƒ perspective of gravitation NOT the more complex, iƒ-informative Einstein’s analysis of space-time as still, formal geometry…

And as we have said, since the closest understanding to he five arrows of time happened in earlier taoism in china, we could close this first approach to the five dimensions telling you what minkowski said that time and space come together or do not really exist; something schopenhauer already realized: ‘there is not yin-form-ation without a drop of yang-motion/entropy’, there is no ‘yang-energy/entropy/motion, without a drop of yin’.

So again, the present single space-time continuum is made of lineal motion (the form being the line), energy that combines it with information (form with a bit of motion) constrained by a pure still linguistic form or mind and a pure entropic outer expansive world, the fifth and fourth dimension.

* Those 2 ‘limits entropy-death and mind-stillness’ though are in pure meaning outside our present scale (I say this because you will find very often the term entropy for lineal motion in present and *

So as soon as we start to grasp the five dimensions of space-time, and its co-existence from past to future in scale that make it sentient and organic’, made of ‘parts and wholes that co-exist and organise themselves’ and reproduce information – *since motion reproduces by the mere fact of moving* – we must conclude that we live in a fractal organic Universe, of space-time beings whose parts made to the image and likeness of the whole are always organised in 3 co-existing scales of the fifth dimension (name we give to the whole range of scales, from the entropic fourth dimensional bottom to the summit of mind-views, which we take as the linguistic mind of all minds, the mind of God, in the platonic sense: ‘reality is an organism with a body called the Universe, and a mind called Logos=god’).

And so amazing as it seems, just departing from a simplified example – the discovery by Galileo of relativity and the static, flat, continuous rings of Saturn, which were not flat but made of spheric planetoids, not continuous but fractal and not static but moving; we see how by changing from the mind subjective view to the objective reality we change our view and add two co-existing scales of Nature, the physical quantum and cosmological, gravitational scales, to our thermodynamic scale, *where physicists have defined their single entropic arrow of time merely by expanding properties of thermodynamic gases to the whole Universe – *solving easily its main conundrums.

Let us start introducing the ‘4 fundamental’ elements of a reality, minds, scales, space and time and its 5Dimensions, @ or • for the fifth membrain mind dimension, ∆, for the fourth which dissolves the mind into its _ parts (both inverse and generically called the scalar 5Dimension represented together by the ∆ Å symbols, where Å WILL BE THE SYMBOL OF the smallest space-time ‘moments’ or actions, $ for the first dimension of lineal motions in space, ≈ for the wave-body dimension of iteration or second dimension and O-tƒ for the dimension of accelerated time vortices, connect to the membrain. All of them in constant dynamical transformations between the limits of seed-birth (5D) and entropic death (4D).

It is then by combining bits and bites of those dimensions, by reordering in different manners, by ultimately establishing a ¬Ælgebra of ‘existence’ which studies how they related and interact together, how we shall be able to explain absolutely all what exists as a product of the ultimate substances of reality, fractal, cyclical timespace and its organic systems; each one a broken space-time (as the membrane encloses and breaks the whole universe into smaller replicas). So each of us is an island-Universe, û but also an infinitesimal mind-point, •, of a larger whole, which holds the view of the Universe in his cartesian mind, whih therefore can be defined not only topologically but algebraically with an equation:

O-mind mapping of the ∞ Universe: o x ∞ = K-onstant world.

And obviously define the fundamental psychological paradox, as we confuse our point of view-mapping of the Universe with the whole, so we distort subjectively the whole, as ‘every infinitesimal mind believes to be the center of the Universe by confusing the whole with its mind-world’.

We are all ‘DUST OF SPACE-TIME’ who think to be the center of the mind-world we see as the Universe, still in the picture of the mind.

As we are all made of ∆•ûst, ternary ∆±1 scales, the three arrow of timespace, the fundamental ‘motion’ of any system through the fifth dimension – a world cycle of existence that orders those arrows in a sequential manner between birth and extinction, and the formal languages of the ‘monads’ that perceive those physical systems; in this case human mind; completing this brief intro as we just had looked at the fractal ∆§cales with the analysis of the 3 space-time arrows, together as a world cycle, and then commenting on the ‘humind limits when doing physics’, mostly derived of the ‘ego paradox’.

**The new law of conservation of energy + the 3 scales of supœrganisms=worldcycles.**

As in all other systems the organic, co-existing ternary structure of physical systems implies that they go also through worldcycles of existence between the seminal age of birth in a lower scale of the system (∆-1; plasma for thermodynamical systems, light space-time for quantum systems, black holes for galaxies), evolve fully into a supœrganism – (∆-particle, matter state, galaxy) immersed into a larger world, and finally die back to the original scale.

This is resumed best for gravitational systems by the Entropy < cc > vortex of temporal information (masses) equation; for thermodynamic systems by the equations of the 3 states of matter.

In quantum physics, it is the schrodinger equation, as expressed by the realist pilot-wave theory which includes the ∆-1 quantum non-local field of the ‘dark world’ scale’. Thus the wave state of present is the schrodinger equation in its classic format, and the past to future, quantum field to particle, S>t state is expressed by the same equation in polar format. Yet quantum is still in its ‘copenhagen interpretation’ that denies the quantum field, missing 1/3rd and so its generator equation is not yet fully understood.

which uses the three arrows of time to define all systems and events both in time and space. We call the equation of the three arrows/actions of time-space, the ‘Fractal Generator’ of the Universe, as it is a feed-back equation whose constant motions back and forth ‘web’ all the systems and events of reality.

It is bond to become in the III millennia what Galileo’s equation of the same three elements, V(st)=S/T, was for the philosophy of science of physicists in terms of pure motions.

For physical systems in space, its Fractal generator, with its ternary principle implies the co-existence of 3 parts that form a whole.

In time, the new complex ternary principle is the co-existence of 3 space-time ages and its complex causality: Past-entropy->Present, reproduction of ExI->Future-Information << Past-entropy (Death)

And finally in 5D the ternary complex principle is the co-existence of 3 scales of space-time together, with growing spatial size and diminishing speed in its time cycles. The result is the world cycle of physical exi≈st¡ences:

In the graph, the application of 5D ðime§pace to physical systems DEFINES the 3±1 arrows/dimensions ages of all physical scales, made of timespace beings, known as states of matter OR for the whole galaxy or perhaps Universe solutions to Einstein’s equations (big-bang, steady state and big-crunch).

Now again we have included the arrow of information to the arrow of entropy, found its intermediate, present conservative energy phase and converted Einstein’s worldlines in 4d into the much reacher in meanings 5D³ worldcycle.

*Full trajectories through the existence of the being ARE *‘world cycles’ NOT worldlines as physicists have it in only 4 dimensions, where time is ∂t=∂s/∂v, an instantaneous ‘derivative’ of present, made of continuous motions in a single scale, *without the changes of phase that happen in the whole world cycle when the system changes its parameters*.

The worldlines of physicists are a simplified version of the time flow of a being, restricted merely to its translations in space, defined by the steps of present of the previous equation in both galilean and Einstein’s relativity and as such are worth to know motions in space, BUT NOT INFORMATIVE motions=changes in the form of beings, and as physicists only recognise time-motions as translations in space (SO TIME APPEARS to them a fourth dimension of space), this has caused an enormous confusion and halting the proper evolution of our scientific analysis of time.

So all physical, biological and social systems do follow a world cycle of life and death of entropy, reproduction and information, of 3 ages:

We can see as all systems are born exceedingly small as a seminal seed that reproduces in a lower scale of space, with higher motion, the simpler the system is, with no motion at all in those systems who are so dense (as black holes in galaxies, or life beings in atoms), which require a huge amount of time to reproduce a single unit (life beings) or merely suck in with its attractive force all other beings that move around it, and provide ‘food of reproduction’ (black hole case).

In the simplex paradigm of a single timespace continuum physics, where the world cycle is reduced to a single dimension of time, hence a line, and a worldline, the ternary topology is of null importance except in the most advanced models of general relativity, which also provide deep insights in the cyclical nature of NATURE’S time clocks, masses and charges with its principle of equivalence.

**E<CC>M is the main equation of the three arrows of time in physics.**

As, Einstein obtained first that equation in its inverse form: M=E/c², in his paper ‘can energy create mass?’ whereas E should read entropy, being the wave-energy the constant plane of light space-time, cc.

And he added, ‘the separation between past, present and future is an illusion’. So did Feynman, with its deep insight on the 3 ‘time arrows’ of particle physics: present, reproductive waves of light-space and ‘bosons’, past arrows of entropic antiparticles and future arrows of informative particles that last much longer in time. So another fascinating, ‘immediate’ equation of 5D physics are the equations of life and death for all systems of the Universe such as:

*Life arrow:* Max. Time duration x Min. Space extension: Max. T x Min. S

*Death arrow:* Max. Space expansion (big-bang, dissolution of organisms into cells and atoms) x Min. Time (instant of death).

Yet again, the sum of both: Max. T x Min. S + Max. S x Min. T = 0-sum, which makes all scales and closed systems of the Universe eternal presents. In physics this is the meaning of Feynman’s diagram:

Past-anti-particle x Future-particle = Present light wave, whereas particles last max. Time as they collapse space into minimal size and antiparticles last minimal time while they expand space annihilating particles in the moment of death.

As such Feynman’s work is more advanced that the outdated entropy theory and the so much praised Einstein’s revolution of space-time, who still missed, the ternary fractal, multiple Nature of times and the existence of its 3 time arrows. He simply ‘froze’ space-time in present slates to measure with differential equations (by definition infinitesimal moments) as Galileo did, every instant of an external time=change = physical motion.

Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic big-bang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of space-time actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3rd time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale.

**Physical worldcycles: states of matter.**

Those 3 time arrows/motions can be assembled into organic systems of any kind, can interact as they do in quantum physics forwards and backwards and put together co-exist in all kind of systems made of:

- Sp: ‘past, entropic fields-limbs’ < ST-hyperoblic body-waves>Tƒ-Particles/heads of information that guide the system to its future.

In the human ∆º thermodynamic scale those arrows are more obvious:

*The 3 temporal dimensions or ‘states’ of matter, Spe-gaseous, energetic states, ST, liquid balanced states and Tƒ informative solid states, form together the 3rd isomorphism of molecular matter in its ∆+1 social scale. They define the three arrows of timespace of matter at the human scale. As such the equation of worldcycles of thermodynamics are generated by a simple fractal generator of states:*

$pe: ∆-1: Past (plasma)<∆º:$(young gas)>S≈T(present Liquid)>ð:Informative crystal>∆+1:Condensate

In the quantum scale, they are related to the duality energetic wave, informative particle, which displace over a quantum field of non-local entropic motions (pilot wave theory), *and achieve synchronicity in its three sub-clocks as particle, wave and field **harmonise them in stable orbits (graph, mathematical description).*

**Pilot-wave theory** introduces those three arrows of all systems of Nature, for quantum physical systems its field of entropy, its present, iterative wave of reproduction and its informative state as particles that ‘ride over waves’, following the ‘quantum field of faster motions-entropies’ as a predator follows its food or a bird glides an air-stream.

Now if *in the thermodynamic scale those ages of matter are crystal clear, as we expand the russian dolls into larger bigger and smaller parts outside and inside, we move to a generic relationship that explains the enlarger regions of ‘pure entropic states of matter’ beyond plasma, and pure solid states beyond crystal matter – it is the generator equation for the larger ‘Dark world’ ∆±4 universe.*

* *In the graph, again we can see how the introduction of scales and time ages solves the third main error of physics, one for each scale, in this case our thermodynamic ∆º scale considered wrongly to have only the entropic-death-weapon state, which as the graph shows *is the entry to creation and death from the lower ∆-1, scale of Plasma states in which particles are not organically put into a single ‘entity’ as in those solid states.*

In that regard perhaps the most strident ‘simplification’ of classic physics is the fact that of *the 5 organic motions of the Universe, physicists only seem interested in describing the simplest of them all ‘locomotions’. Such state of affairs that reduces and eliminates all organic motions of physical systems is the biggest handicap to complete the science of physics, so we shall end this introduction with a deeper analysis of that limit*

All this said it is obvious we need to follow the correspondence principle and introduce the view of a 4D formalism in a single space-time continuum from the larger picture of 5D³, WHICH expands our view to include new scales, and explains a few whys of general relativity, essentially dealing with the distortions caused by the interaction of the gravitational larger scale with our electromagnetic euclidean light space-time view.

**Simplex Dimensions of physical time-space vs. Complex 5Dimensions. Correspondence principle.
**

Though we shall dedicate entire posts of the blog to deal in detail with quantum and relativity equations, in this introductory post we have to consider the differences between the simpler 4D formalism which *studies the Universe from the human pov of a single light space-time continuum, with the successful goal of measuring motions from the human perspective.*

First to mention that of the five+five dimensions of space-time reality, 1. lineal motion 2. wave reproduction 3. in-form-ation, 4. entropy 5. social evolution, physicists study only 3 dimensions of space (1,2,3), but not in bidimensional topological forms, but in single dimensions, 1. length-motion 2. width-reproduction, 3. height-information; and call 4. entropy the arrow of time – the only one they consider. However when dealing with relativity, they do not use the entropic concept of time, but as they derive their time formula from v=∂s/∂t, that is slices of derivative present instants; their ‘time arrow’ is different from their mathematical time, which corresponds to the second present-dimension of time. And as they use NOT frequency, cyclical time but its inverse, duration, Lineal time, t=1/ƒ; they ad to the properties of present, properties of the first dimension of lineal motion.

So it is clear that ‘entropic physicists’ who love motion and entropic weapons have a bias for those entropic properties of motion; and ‘reduce’ to nothingness, the information dimensions of time (3rd dimension of cyclical time vortices; 5th dimension of social evolution, the longest dominant time dimension).

All this makes it very messy and really if humans were not memorial bitches they would scrap it all and start up from the beginning. But as they don’t we shall resume it all again, before studying some parts of it:

- 1,2, 3 dimensions of space NOT in topological bidimensional forms but in lineal forms: length-motion, width-wave reproduction, height-information gauging, 4th dimension of entropy (and this is a scattering function or a scalar potential), 5th dimension of super organisms (and this is nowhere to be seen)
- 1 dimension of lineal time-motion, 2nd dimension of present, simultaneous derivatives (and this is what Special relativity studies), 3rd dimension of vortices of time accelerated (and this is what general relativity studies), 4th dimension of entropic death (and this is what physicists doing amateur philosophy consider the single arrow of time), 5th dimension of worldcycles of generation and social evolution of parts into wholes (nowhere to be seen)
- ∆-1: Past-entropy, ∆-present-ternary arrows, ∆+1: future form, are on the other hand the long time arrows of the scalar Universe, which they fully ignore. But again within a system they study scattering, disordering actions and potentials, iterative waves and its 3 components, the wave speed, the group speed and in pilot theory the quantum potential and future arrows are their particles, crystals and eddies.

So we reiterate, it would be truly messy to try to impose power (scholarship tradition) into the new theory, and we shall only refer to physical analysis of time theory when dealing with its mathematical equations to translate them to ∆•s≈t, which is the ‘settled’ form

we shall describe the five dimensions:

-4th: ∆, from the peak down, the entropic arrow (or both arrows in more complex diagrams),

-•, the singularity that commands social evolution, the fifth arrow

-s, lineal motion, the youth arrow, 1st dimension

≈, present iteration the wave arrow, 2nd dimension

ð, cyclical time vortex, the informative 3rd dimension of time (me, lazy cow use too often t or ƒ easier to type, though t should be used by ‘future pros’ as lineal time, t=1/ƒ=1/ð)

They will in turn be treated either as space dimensions only, as time dimensions only as holographic combination of a space and time dimension, and as such the most important combination will be an Se≈Ti relationship or ‘action (Sxt-> maximal when Se=t)

So physicists also go about to study actions – they are in fact as they should be obsessed by time-space actions, but THIS IS NOT NEW.

Schopenhauer in his seminal paper on the fourth root of sufficient reason, expanded in his ‘world as will and representation’, absolute masterpieces unparalleled in modern philosophy never quite understood (more famous for his aphorisms among homunculus peanut brains), already deal with space, time and matter, rightly realizing that only space-time actions truly exist together.

So the five dimensions of space-time properly quantised become the five actions of reality:

- The lineal motion, simplest ‘accelerated/decelerated/steady state’ motions: ‘æ’, first dimensional action.
- The reproductive event in space-time, the ‘œ’ second dimension action.
- The informative perception, collapsing the potential into wave into form, the ‘i’ , third dimensional action.
- The energy feeding = scattering entropic death of the prey, the ‘ø’ action, fourth dimensional action.
- The social evolution into wholes, or fifth dimensional action, always realized in the generation of the being as emergent, and tried but seldom achieved in the existence on the larger ∆+1 world.

Now, regarding the naming of the 5 actions of space-time that quantise the 5 arrows of space-time, that gather the 5 dimensions of space and 5 ages of time, the terminology differs in the sense I used the mnemonic rule, motions as a-cceleration, e-nergy feeding, information, offspring and Universal evolution of individuals to make an easy a,e,i,o,u. But I guess in the future robots or evolved humankind will scrap the rule and merely name them in correspondence with the 5 digits such as:

- S: lineal space,’DISTANCE’, T: Lineal time ‘DURATION, ST: action of motion (æ)
- S: Width, body-wave. T: Frequency of repetition. ST: REPRODUCTIVE ACTION (œ)
- S: Vortex; T: IMPLOSION; st: informative actions, (ï)
- S: scattering potential T: entropy; ST: Death; energy feeding (ø)
- S: Membrain; T: Mind; ST-social evolution into super organism (û)

*Signatures of actions*

Now is not that difficult when you have only 3±i elements, but as there are so many variations on the theme I have worked for 30 years alone, and increasingly indifferent to the homunculus understanding i have used many different jargons myself, so you will find different namings here, but if you get to the concepts they will be easy to navigate.

Likely the best ‘complex’ lettering for the 5 actions, as they are always sandwiched between scales and past and future arrows and tend to be mixed, would be:

±æ for the motion, which is often acceleration, and includes often expenditure of energy, hence it is +a and -e.

±œ for reproduction, as it produces an offspring (+o) but also spends energy: – e.

±ï, for information as there are two types, +i: absorption in gauging perception and -i: emission, related to reproduction and social evolution.

ø, for death, as it erases information and empties of meaning the ∆-being

û, for social evolution, its inverse, as it creates a whole Universal system, of an upper scale.

As we say when you get into formal ¬algebra, *which is the future ‘pro’ way to do this but i have NO LONGER intention to treat, *given the fact that homunculus are not interested even in basic introductory work as this web is, all those strict senso formalisms and signs matter, as IT IS THE ULTIMATE reason of the world cycle of life and death, as if you look at those ‘signatures’ *information dominates over energy and so by the mere fact of acting you will warp yourself as more actions are warping (reproduction of information, social evolution of information) than moving; when we ELIMINATE the action of death, which is the one that balances into a zero-sum, the whole. *

So we shall consider the general structure of such supœrganisms in the three scales of physical systems, the atom, the thermodynamic crystal-centered systems of matter, and the galaxy, to see what are the fundamental topological parts, events, scales and symmetries 5D³ physics should study.

**Phyisical parameters of the 5Dimensions.**

As physics even if we expand its notions, it is a quantitative, parameter-riddle system, when we merge the 5D model with the physical model we need to include parameters for all of them. Let us then define its dimensions with parameters.

We use in the general model of all systems 5 Dimensions of space-time to generate everything that exists; whose symbols are as follows:

1D: $t: lineal motion/inertia/distance, depending on which perspective we take the spatial, formal distance or the time duration T.

So the first dimension in space is ‘distance’, that is the metric equation to calculate it (pythagoras expanded, theorem, Riemann metric); and the first dimension of time is lineal duration.

3D: ðS=ƒ=1/t: Its inverse, measured by the frequency of cyclical time clocks, mostly accelerated as a vortex of forces, where a force, f=ma means that an accelerated vortex (mass/charge/eddie) is ‘further accelerated’ in other ‘plane’ in which it co-exists. Such forces, when curved inwards are usually described with a simple dual term, a dimension of form, or curvature (Universal constants, G, K, Λ for the dark world) and in time, acceleration, which might be treated as an active magnitude (e, m)

So the 3rd dimension of time is ‘frequency’, related to active magnitudes, as in mass e= mcc, e=hƒ, m=ƒ (k), and its equivalent in space is ‘curvature’.

2D: present momenta which mixes both, lineal motion, defined as speed and a cyclical vortex: ð$=ð(m,q) x $(v). And it will be seen as lineal momenta and/or its integral energy.

Those 3 dimensions conform a single plane of space-time, or ‘present ∆º’ planes, to which we must ad the 2 planes upwards and downwards of ’emergence’ into a larger whole:

5D, which we symbolise with @, as it normally acquires the form of a singularity connected to a sensorial membrane that encloses the whole and provides through its π-3 diameters apertures a 4% of ‘non dark-world’, the percentage of standard observation of a physical singularity. The mind system is best described in its duality by the angular momenta (spin) of the quantum/mass system in the two main scales (or electromagnetic charge+magnetic field in the magnetic scale, defined by Maxwell’s equations)

4D, the inverse arrow of entropic dissolution of the whole into its minimal parts, in physics a potential, sometimes a field. And it is best described with entropy.

So we DO have clear cut direct parameters, in fact all the main constants and main equations of physics to translate physics into 5D. As it would be expected.

But we shall not cast given the need for a huge conceptual upgrade, most of this introductory post on mathematical formulae, but just bring punctual examples of it. The post is mostly to define and clarify the concepts of physical systems, which are not readily understood.

Let us then give a prime on the TRUE PHILOSOPHY OF REALITY DERIVED FROM PHYSICS ONCE WE HAVE UPGRADED IT PROPERLY TO THE ∆•st elements of reality.

**3 errors to correct to understand the immortal Universe: entropy, big-bang and quantum uncertainty **

In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism: We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein).

So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: e=mcc + e=hƒ-> mc²=hƒ-> m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.

In the next graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact* published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.*

In the graph, the Universe is eternal and big-bangs are likely only galactic big-bangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.

So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and no-falsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.

**Organic ****Worldcycle of 5 motions=actions of space-time. Mathematical and biological properties: The why of physics.**

*‘Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals*“. Ulam

*In the graph, a bunch of physicists studying ‘ non-lineal elephants’ (: physical super organisms tracing world cycles :), as a sum of isolated properties, all of them imagined with abstract, Hilbert’s axiomatic method of categorical mathematics, far removed from the non-Euclidean, non-Aristotelian structure of the Fractal Universe. In essence, physicists, reduce the 5 changes in time=motions that form a world cycle (generation>evolution>entropic youth>reproductive maturity>informative 3rd age>entropic death), represented here by 5 blind physicists, into a single one, ENTROPIC locomotions and its worldlines, unable to integrate them into a ‘world cycle of existence of physical systems’, which in nothing differs from the 5 organic motions of all other ‘living systems’.*

**The mind paradox: the meaning of Galilean relativity. ****The singularity as a mind.**

We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, *which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’. *Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

*Descartes was a* contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, *said that all what exists was made of:*

*– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.*

*– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’*.

And then he added a 3^{rd} element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: *Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.*

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

*– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’,* to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

*•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad: ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.*

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

Those parts of any physical system, studied from the perspective of its mind-singularity or frame of reference in physics, will then become the objects of inquire of physical super organisms, with clear different functions, which correspond to the general laws or ‘isomorphisms’ of any 5D³ system of 10 dimensions (5 of time and 5 of space, or 3 of time 3 of space 3 scalar dimensions and 1+1 of the mind, and so on, depending on which ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of its total properties we make).

In general though the first easy division is that between the singularity and membrane, and the vital energy they enclose called topologically the ‘singularity and membrane’ of an open ball.

The singularity will be the self-centred zero point where motion stops and a linguistic mapping happens, the Γ• function that commands the system with the mirror image it has of it, through its ‘homunculus mind’. As such it will be the ultimate simultaneous function of space-form of the being.

In the outer limit of that being, there will be an angular momentum, of maximal cyclical motion, the T-membrain or enclosure, which breaks the being into an inner vital space, the open ball proper, whose energy and combination of motion and form, will be synchronised and complete the whole.

IT IS THE INTERACTION of those 3 elements within themselves and with the external world through actions of space-time, motions in space and informative trans-formations in time, what will define the different scalar super organisms of physics, the photon, the electron, the quark, the atom, the molecule, the matter state, the gravitational body and the galactic super organism.

So we can describe them all departing from a 10D generator equation: Γ@= ∆-1 $pe<∆-St>Tƒ∆+1.

As in biological beings, where evolution starts either by the creation of a membrane, which encloses a vital water, which will evolve in time to create a cellular organism, or by the replication of a singularity seed of memorial information that reproduces faster the whole being, physical systems appear with the interaction and/or evolution of a singularity and a membrane. ONLY THAT in physical systems the ‘networks’ of proteins that connect both part are more ‘fluid’ and ‘geometrical’, becoming the dual fields of in-form-ation and expansive motion, that coordinate the dual ST motion-form tendencies of the energetic vital space-time between them (magnetic+ electric fields, gravitational + electromagnetic forces, and so on).

It must be also understood the duality of motion (lineal state) and form (cyclical state), even if form often offers an accelerated inward motions (T-future state), to fully grasp the duality of all physical beings and its membranes, expressed in the duality of particle-wave states, angular frequency and lineal inertia.

So we can define the membrane either in 2 or 3 dimensions as a function of angular momentum, and/or sinusoidal waves, where the envelop is the ‘wave train’, which is the T-membrane state in lineal motion. So goes for 3 Dimensional systems, where the Harmonics of the membrane will describe all its modes of vibration, which in turn will define in its solutions, the proper way in which the membrane acts *to absorb entropic motion from the external world, acting as a potential field of ‘entropy’, which the membrane will vibrate in order to absorb that entropic motion.*

What are then the constants physicists use mostly to define those elements?

In each scale they are different, but it is fairly straight to conclude that the limits of human perception, in both limiting scales are the scalar values of charge and mass for the singularities, and the lineal and angular states of h, ~~h~~ and c as lineal speed in the gravitational scale of the galaxy *and rotary c-speed in the membrane of black holes and in the lower scale heavy quarks.*

So both constants of the membrane of quantum and gravitational systems, h and c can be seen in lineal terms or as cyclical membranes that enclose the particle states (charges and black hole masses). Whereas, we, thermodynamic beings sandwiched between scales will tend to see the lower more informative constant of action of the quantum scale as a spin/angular momentum membrane of the particle/wave states of the electron that ‘covers’ the atom, and see the c-instant of the galactic membrane, more as a limit of speed of reproduction in the larger scale, since we see larger systems from our more curved perspective as flat, as opposed to smaller systems that have more curvature (h-constant).

Yet in ‘scalar physics’, we shall be able to unify both mass and charge as two curvatures of different speeds and h and c, which in praxis indeed are unified as they are consider 1 in natural units, and can be considered the ‘1 quanta’ of the two limiting scales. While in the middle, where information is maximal the thermodynamic scale has a much more complex, dynamic variety of constants, but we can safely state that temperature would be the scalar valuation of the singularity density and K the constant of action, from where we ‘predate’ as gravitogmagnetic entities our entropy of motion (reason why unlike h measured as angular curvature, and c measure as lineal speed, k is measured as entropy hits, from the human perspective – use of it).

**EINSTEIN’S RELATIVITY: adapting discontinuous scalar space-time to continuous single space-time.**

Now, the next instalment of the analysis of galilean relativity between motion and stop was einstein’s special relativity and again, he, unaware of the duality of dimensions of motion and form, merely went further into the obsession of measure, translating the effects of ‘warping’ of space that shortens it, when information is imprinted by light in the previous quantum potential of lineal form, adding to the measure a -ct factor of warping. This was special relativity concerned with that translation to our world where we do not see the quantum potential – hence we add the warping to scale up the process into our ‘terse’ space-time. And further on, we do not see the stop and go of particles and waves, and so we added the lorentz transformations to compensate in our continuous Universe, and in this manner special relativity maintained the fantasy of a continuous derivative motion universe (when it is a stop and go), and a single space-time (when it is a scalar space-time warped in the whole scales).

**• constancy of c-speed: endophysics**.

So let us put another example on time theory – relativity and all this incredibly non-intuitive complex maths to adapt a world moving at constant c-speed to our world. It IS real? No, it is NOT, but it IS for a human mind and it will ALWAYS appear as such in our measures.

Why? Because the UNDERSTANDING OF ALL OTHER SCALES, including biological and social, psychological tell us an obvious truth: WHEN YOU MOVE you think worst. Leibniz was 3 days in a chair to study its information. My ass is square (: Information, form becomes blurred because IT is still, WHEN we move. So to emit, or perceive information you stop. To move and translate you go. THUS in the quantum scale electrons emit waves of light in relative stillness. And so there is NOT need in that ‘REAL level’ to make Lorentz transformations.

*In as much as particles travel only as waves, WHICH ARE SYSTEMS THAT REPRODUCE INFORMATION.*

*Then they stop to become particles and gauge information when they ‘stop’. Then they go as waves and reproduce information. Stop and ‘create an upper scale of the fifth dimension’, the particle. Go… stop, as in a movie, where the camera stops the film to focus and gauge its information.*

*And this explains why C-SPEED IS CONSTANT: BECAUSE electrons that emit c-speed entangled to other electrons communicate in relative stop position a wave that moves and the electron stopped gauges it. So in the electronic scale YOU DONT ADD motions, to those electrons that stop and go regardless on *the larger matter scales that might seem as the camera film to have continuous motion.

Does this mean that the Lorentz invariance, transformation, etc. which we use to measure those far away scales in terms of our human sense of continuous motion does not make sense. NOT, of course, it is the proper way to build measures from the human pov. IT is though one a ‘perspective’, that of the ‘humind’, but if we were an atom the more realist view is that of the experimentally proved stop and go ‘attitude’ of particles and waves. So of course, this explains THE BIGGEST CONUNDRUM also of quantum physics, the duality wave-particle and WHY when we observe a wave it ALWAYS appears as a collapsing particle.

Of course, because we stop it. Now, Bohr’s copenhagen interpretation is literalist, egocentered, anthropomorphic as he said ‘the observer’ created the phenomena, not so. We merely see stopping the wave into particle. So Einstein the realist quipped ‘the moon doesn’t disappear when we don’t look at it. And he is right. A PARTICLE can stop without a brutish Bore watching it.

Only though a proper understanding of the laws of fractal space and cyclical time will allow us to properly interpret mathematical physics and all sciences by extension, and then discharge the redundant ‘metaphorical complicated equations’ creationists are so hard working, as those poetic societies ever producing longer cacophonies instead of the terse verses of reality.

In that sense there is so much work to do *to focus again that mathematical mirror because of the creationist and literalist working hard with its ‘magic’ since the Popes, Kepler, Galileo and Newton declared its religious zeal, so it was good NOT to fully understand down to earth its mathematical equations that frankly having cracked that window so long ago, it amazes me the blindness of our ‘self-appointed’ genius of science.*

Consider only another bit of it on those equations of Einstein’s relativity, where time is ‘packed in all its dimensions’ as the present ∂t derivative of space-speed. Physicists go merrily playing with its magic, and it ‘works’. But wait a second… only systems with the same dimension can compare and transform into each other. So how 3 space dimensions and one time dimension work? The magic here is that the height dimension is the ‘static dimension’ of information related to time which stores in its cyclical clocks, in its frequency and form the information of the Universe. So a clock is ‘besides’ the flat plane of space’, a ‘tall form’. And so we NEED to give height as a dimension of time, then time is the bit/frequency of the cycle, and the flat surface of space – the flat Universe, the flat plane, is the form that moves lineally. So again we see how black holes are ‘tall’ IN THE CENTER OF A TIME-LIKE accelerated clock vortex:

The graph, which is all over the web (: because it is essential, shows this vital role of dimensions in the construction of space-time beings.

*Time has the dimension of motion and the dimension of perceptive Height.*

*Space has the dimension of length and the dimension of reproductive width.*

**Special Relativity revis(it)ed: Worldcycles vs. worldlines. Wordlines. Feynman dyagrams, past, present and future.**

Then special relativity is concerned with the first and second dimensions, lineal motions and present derivatives; *but its aim again is not to understand them but rather to adapt measures of maximal lineal motion (c-speeds) to the human scale.*

On the other hand quantum physicists have dealt more often with the concept of time parity realizing that locally motions to the past and to the future are symmetric. Here they deal with the inverted symmetry between the entropic arrow, as in an antiparticle and the life-organic arrow, as in the particle and the iterative arrow as in the wave. So a very classic description is given in feyman diagrams below shows a simple generator:

Past-entropic antiparticle state < present-wave iterative state > future -informative particle state

Which for the gravitational ∆+1 scale reads:

E-ntropic explosion < cc-wave of energy > Tƒ-mass vortex of future

Whereas physicists as usual confuse an entropic big-bang explosion that erases the form of the mass with the truly energetic wave that has both form and motion.

*Translations through scale symmetries.*

How then physicists go about to translate events in different scales, topologies and time ages to the human present ∆ø scale and relative speed of time?

Then there are all the endophysical paradoxes of special relativity, where they mess it all together to ‘translate’ the beats and stop and go motions of particles, as *seen from the electronic humind pov, on a higher scale, so they introduce lorentz transformations to translate the reality of the quantum c-speed motion scales to our scales, in a similar fashion as when we change*

Lineal External motions≈changes in the entropy of beings is the main and often single arrow of time studied in physics, and the origin of simplistic rather irrelevant concepts beyond the ‘art of measure’, such as the worldline of special relativity, which portrays timespace motions as mere displacements in space.

* In the graph, the 2 most important new perceptions of time in modern physics after Newton->Galileo’s vision of lineal time, were those of **Einstein->Minkowski’s light cones and Feynman’s space-time diagrams. In the light cone, time is still considered just a parameter of external space-motions, but it appears for the first time the concept of an arrow of ‘future time information’ – that is the information of a different space-time point, which in the future light can reach. This represents the arrow of future information of 4D models.*

*Yet all what matters to Einstein is to know how fast information can be transmitted externally through the fastest informative wave our light space-time. *

*In the centre of the cone we see, the ‘slice’ of present, instantaneous space, or 4 Dimension of time, which represents the modern version of Newton’s ‘instantaneous’ absolute space, perceived in an infinitesimal quantum of time, again used merely to measure external motions=changes of time: V=∂s/∂t. *

Einstein went into further detail in those measures, using instants of time to give us the ‘still photographs’ (curved geometry) of the cyclical, physical Newtonian ‘time-clocks’ or masses. So if Newton had given us a ‘long time’ view of the clocks of the Universe, in lineal equations, now Einstein said that ‘time curves space into mass’, and added precision to the instantaneous measures of the largest clocks of time of the Universe, showing their curvature and establishing they accelerated inwards, increasing the future information of matter systems (Principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration).

So we live in one of such mass vortices of accelerated information (the galaxy centred into a black hole) – reason why it is SO IMPORTANT to know cyclical time. We DO not live in the outer entropic space between galaxies which expands and represents a relative past arrow of death, disorder and decelerations.

This duality of past-entropy-death and future-information-life was better understood by Feynman, who defined in the left graph, antiparticles as relative past flows that annihilated future flows or particles. Feynman took thus a bolder step, with its time-space perpendicular coordinates, considering that light-space ‘travels’ in present time (green photon), as a reproductive wave, and antiparticles (right) travel backwards in time, as they indeed do. Since they represent the entropy of death.

Above, we compare those concepts with some distortions of the meaning of time, caused by physicists’ single time=change’ or locomotion as the meaning of it all:

What we find in those 3 graphs, explain some applications of the laws of the scalar Universe to physics.

In the center Feynman shows a case o a relative past antiparticle of entropy , and a future particle of information colliding into a present wave of space, and he does the actual time arrow properly (though never before explained).

So we see in the 3rd picture how this birth or creation of physical present energy (light space-time) appears from the two inverse arrows of particles, solving also the question of why there are more particles (life-future-arrows are longer than past-entropy-explosions so as we see less dead than alive people we see less dead antiparticle events than particle events).

Time is cyclical finite, local, so there is NOT a single time, NOT time paradoxes, as YOU CAN ONLY TRAVEL TO THE PAST in local terms, in your clocks and YOU DO SO when you die. So does the particle on Feynman’s diagrams as antiparticle.

In the graph, one of the commonest errors of physicists’ imaginary theories (Hawking’s black holes traveling to the past, wormholes etc) and scifi plots is time travel, based in the concept that the time-clock of man is the only clock time of the universe.

As the great dissident russian physicists Landau put it, then ‘why there is uncertainty in time and quantum physics, i just need to look at my watch’….

We are a fractal, local domain, a knot of time space cycles of physical or biological Nature.

When we die, we travel locally to their relative past at all scales as we dissolve back to their ∆-1 scales of organisation with less information. Our local big-bang death thus travels but the rest of the Universe keeps going forwards-backwards on in present iterative waves in all scales. So time travel errors are just born of the error of using lineal time, a single time clock, an abstract continuous plane of cartesian ‘world-topology’ for the entire Universe (see the images on the mind-world and cartesiann graphs all over).

The fundamental truths of the Universe, time and space are therefore more complex than expected. And this is what ‘widens’ our use of them beyond the study of the ‘locomotions’ of physical systems under Galileo’s formula (v=s/t) or Einstein refinement in Special relativity (adding to it a -(ct)² factor of correction). So locomotion, exhausted, word cycles come in. And the ‘entities’ that perform those world cycles ‘naturally’, the Superorganisms of the 5th dimension.

On the right side we show the expansion of the cone of light of relativity – a present cone – to the 3 cones of light of worldcycles with 3 arrows of time, which will be in the complex mathematical model the way to deal with relative past, present and future in relativistic physics – well beyond the scope of this introduction.

It is of course appealing to think you understand it all about time, because it is as simple as to ‘measure’ the lineal motion of ‘things’. And since most people do not really want to ‘understand’ but just think they are ‘smart’, the whole mystique of lineal time motions, and time as the fourth dimension of space works. And it has become what Kant would call the ‘a priori’ category of the mind – a belief.

In that sense loco-Motion studied by Physics is the simplest of all motions and the first studied by human beings, related to pure entropy motions obtained either by:

-An ‘∆-ST-wave’-motion on present space-time, which reproduces its simpler form or:

-An ∆-1 or by a ∆+1 particle > ∆-1 field, which disorders the lowest scale which ‘produces’ an expansive effect on space used by the particle ‘to glide’ over it.

Those 2 forms of locomotion, clear on the quantum scale, being the first schrodinger’s wave equation; the second Broglie->Bohm pilot wave theory recently proved, in which the particle moves by expanding and scattering the lower field (likely a gravitational neutrino background pilot wave fluctuating around a c-constant) will set the way in which lomotions occur in higher scales and more complex fluids (so locomotion in gravitational and ¥-space-time will be akin to locomotion in fluids either as waves or particles do.

The human being moves on electric repulsion and gravitational forces, taking advantage of the larger space and motion of the i-4 scale, below the scale of i-3 bits of perception… and for that reason the realm of ‘gravitational forces’ is both invisible, with zero information and infinite, non-local in speed, to us: V=s/tiƒ=s/o=∞.

*But if information is smaller and faster in scales of lesser space, and information is carried in the form and cycles of clocks of time, then we must not only add a dimension of height to time, but a dimension of ‘scale’, and this my friends set us for an even bigger r=evolution of thought, that of the metric equations of the fifth dimension of space-time.*

Of course many other elements are to be taken into account for a full description, not less the ‘∆º humind’ distortion, according to 5D metric, *which makes us perceive smaller timespace entities as more curved, hence H appears as angular momentum (but h in fact reduces it to a diameter) and c as ‘euclidean lineal dimensions of light’.*

• Finally there is the pure mentally analysis of relativity in which the interest is merely as all what physicists do, to measure the motion in relationship to the human observer, and so it is mainly an artefact of measure which often gives us an ‘inverse’ view to that of the being – as a prey predator relationship has inverse views of it. Indeed, in fact the frequency-time of the mass is increasing but the lineal outer time of its perception inversely slows down by the Lorentz factor.

The mental view will then include a perception in terms of an elliptic geome**t**ry of those vortices when observed inside out precludes a ‘general relativity’ Riemannian outlook when we try to describe it from the perspective of mathematical languages, as those fractal points become the invisible polar ‘outsider’ point of a Riemannian sphere: they form the singularity and external membrane of the system, which together create as supœrganism of physical space-time.

**RECAP. **

The FIRST question to start our inquire is how exactly are we made of vital space and temporal cycles…

Obviously we all exist in a finite time between conception and extinction, and we all occupy a ‘region of space’, we carry with us. And then there is always the I, of the ‘we’, the point of view to create order among all those motions and form. Let us then put the 3 together in an organic, meaningful way.

We say that time is cyclical motion/form and space is open, lineal motion/form. As this is the truth of it, physicists despite using different names have found the simplest theoretical elements of their models are open strings (of space) and cyclical strings (of time).

Yet there is a 3rd element on those Universal systems, which is by far the more interesting and less understood, which physicists of course also use in all their theories: the mathematical frame of reference, or zero point, the center of the circle, the point-particle that ‘gauges information’, without which again not a single theory of physics can be understood (it is the point of the inertial frame of reference that ‘measures’, the cause of their physical theories which are called for that reason ‘gauging field theories’).

**Why we love creationist theories: the paradox of the ego.**

It is time to bring the paradox of the ego earlier in our analysis of creationist philosophers, as we realise *all of mankind believe in them either in a verbal creationism (religious people) or a mathematical creationism (scientists).*

*What is amazing about all this is perhaps not how blunt that philosophy of science and religion is, but that mankind has rendered to it, just because it puts man in the centre of the Universe, as the unique master of the language along God.*

*In the case of mathematical creationism, dominant today, power helps: physicists make machines and weapon that deliver entropy and motion. And so the fact that humans have lost all his wisdom about time, in their worship of machines, also cast serious doubts on the intelligence and ‘freedom of thought’ of our species.*

The Universe is a concert in a decaphonic scale, with two extremes we can call bass of open strings of space and treble notes of closed strings of time; 5 treble and 5 bass notes with different beats, rhythms in its ‘time cycles…’

The best notes are those in the middle 5, most go on triads, as they travel up and down three different scales. Of course you might imagine the universal composition is a bit more complicated in its symmetries and triads.

But is also an equation, another ternary language, X operandi Y, and a painting of also three colours, the red of motion, of entropic energy, the green of iteration, of reproduction, the blue of information, and 3 ‘semantic’ names, the subject, the informative centre which acts through a verb on an object it ab=uses as the source of its entropic energy.

Languages mirrors all look though to the same ternary substance, space-time itself.

Let us then consider the two fundamental notes of any language, mirror in its syntax of the ternary structure of it all.

In that regard, you must understand this blog which upgrades our understanding of time, *as the return to the sound path of time sciences, after centuries of misconceptions. *As i have been all my life since I read Asimov’s guide to science as a kid, wondering about time, and came finally to solve the many questions poised by the study of ALL changes=times of Nature developing the long seeked theory of all times-changes called ‘relational space-time’, first put forward by Leibniz, and then accepted by Einstein – the exception to the dullness of physicists regarding time theory.

So he said ‘I am the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’ and affirmed that relational space-time is the future of time theory (‘Leibniz was right, so we have to change our physical theories from its inception’).

Yet Einstein, a pacifist kin of philosophy, who did advance our knowledge of time, was for most of his life in permanent dissidence with physicists for the same reasons I am a dissident of his blunt theories of reality. Hence his denial that mathematics creates reality (opposition to Bohr’s copenhangen interpretation: ‘the moon doesn’t appear when i look at it’), his denial that nature has a single clock to measure time; his denial that time is the four dimension of space – a term he rejected, saying ‘wires don’t travel to the past’; his denial of the nuclear industry (invention of the ‘doomsday clock’), and his respect of causality as the fundamental property that chains ‘time events’ by repetition, and the philosophers that study it, all concepts we shall prove further and advance in this blog.

This is not to say that physicists do NOT excel in what they truly do to perfection – measuring distances and motions in space and manufacturing machines. But this is NOT what CERN claims to do – finding the meaning of reality, which physicists will NEVER achieve, as they have a religious dogmatic view of reality and time and so as priest will NEVER go out of his ‘mantras’ about a bush that burned in a dessert and was God speaking to a goat-keeper and we MUST believe this, physicists have their mantra – that God spoke mathematics, and gave us a clock to measure time with numbers in lineal fashion and that is all what matters and we MUST believe this.

Problem is people agrees, because they have bigger guns and we philosophers of science and serious physicists of time theory like Mr. Einstein only do ‘thought experiments’.

On the other hand when you go out of dogma and lineal thinking everything physicists have found and we are grateful for it, in their exploration of nature with their mechanical instruments, becomes easily interpreted and understood and so the marriage of philosophers – the people who do seek and understand with all languages the fundamental principles of reality – and technology of measure and perception – the thing physicists do best; do give us the final answers to the meaning of reality. Consider a simple case: quantum physicists realized energy is quantised in packets, of ‘something called H-planck constant’, measured with ‘angular momentum’.

And a century latter they are arguing what this ‘thing is’. The answer though is immediate, when you do understand the universe have infinite cyclical time clocks, with repetitive patterns that return in a finite duration to the same point where we measure its frequency. Alas, H is measured with angular momentum (the cyclical motion of a point), H is ‘discrete’ measured in intervals of time, with a frequency: h = e/ƒ.

So H is simply speaking the ‘time clock’ beat of light and electrons, and hence of the human and atomic instruments of measure, which electronic minds use as the minimal bit of information needed to ‘build up their mind-mirrors of the universe’. And so of course, when quantum computers came, they used the atomic clocks – the spin of its particles measure in H-units – to process information at the maximal fastest possible speed and yet not even then physicists realized that the fundamental form of change in time is information, and that is why h-units of atomic, temporal information, are all over the place in every quantum formula, as *we are all relational space-time beings, made of ‘quanta=cycles of time’ that enclose and break vital space. Look at yourself, you are a vital space, enclosed by a membrane of cellular cycles.*

**@: CREATIONISM VS. REALISM**

Mathematical objects are NOT the substance of the Universe. Space and time and its energetic combinations quantised in momenta is.

But we concede of all the mind-mirror languages to perceive reality mathematics specially in space themes (logic of verbal thought in time) is the best. This means the proper way to do physics IS from ∆@$≈ð, into mathematical physics, and that is what we shall do here.

We are not obviously in this second line post of introduction to 5D physics make an encyclopaedia of ever more complex ‘inflationary’ mathematical physics but study some ‘case examples’ to illustrate how to go from ∆@$≈ð 5 dimensions of scalar entropy, social mind evolution, lineal space emotions, iterations and time warping into mathematical physics to extract its whys.

I shall remind you that is how you start, simple, with Ptolemaic simplification into mere copernican cycles, with Einstein’s special relativity whose maths were so simple Minkowski quipped it was high school stuff. But as those simple maths illuminated so much conceptual righteousness in different ages of wrong conceptual physics, we shall go in the ‘third relativity’ r=evolution, that of absolute relativity (of motion and form of scale of topology, of being), if we were to use the naming for physical jargons of ∆@s≈ð, about the same way – just ‘seasoning’ conceptual righteousness with a few simple mathematical examples of physics that will resolve many conundrums.

All this leads to the realisation that the ego-centered paradox of mind-languages as all mirrors do ALWAYS distort reality to accommodate the deformed perspective of the mind. And so our interest here is to make objective conceptual corrections and illustrate the correspondence between ∆@$≈t 5 Dimensions of entropy, social mind evolution, lineal space, iterative presents and cyclical time.

Indeed, why huminds (physicists being just huminds watching physical systems) are so one-dimensional. In this case because of the worldly profession of physicists – to make entropic weapons, as we discuss elsewhere. But the cause is deeper, and has to do with ‘creationist egos’ – that is the digital language huminds use to describe in abstract with limited properties the physical Universe.

**Religious creationists vs. realist scientists.**

And below the realists, only ‘true scientists’ who rely on the experimental method, the known-substances of reality, space and time and its properties to understand with those 2 mirrors, the verbal, logic, temporal mirror with its 3 causal dimensions of past, present and future tenses, and the mathematical, spatial mirror. This view, which we expand here is the view of Leibniz>Einstein and there is not 2 without 3, in all temporal processes of growth as human thought is, the 3rd guy, believe it or not, is talking to you (:

*In the graph, 5D stience is a template that will require many scientists to be completed. As all new models it starts in a simplified manner; and given the inflationary multiple nature of kaleidoscopic minds-languages mirrors of reality it will seem likely too simple for the professional physicist. *

*But the big questions to validate this new Copernican revolution is NOT if its exactitude and complexity is similar to that of creationist mathematical physics – obviously it cannot, the same Copernicus with his cyclical orbits was less precise than Ptolomy, but if its foundations – fractal space and cyclical time as the substance of reality from where to extract isomorphic laws for all stiences – is more truth and resolves even in its simpler ‘pioneer’ format better the whys mathematical creationism cannot. And it does. *

*So it is only a question of time that it becomes the new foundations of a new age of ‘stience’, regardless of the shortcomings of this blog, the hardships and silence that surrounds its pioneering development, in the mind of ‘its discoverer, which becomes an isolated point, a world in itself’ (Planck). This said I apologise for the shortcomings of this blog, given the null help I have always had from academia, regardless of the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’, which makes pioneers both envied and denied by established models. *

Now, mirrors are inflationary kaleidoscopic views that multiply the one into infinite self-similar forms to pump up ‘its sense of importance’. And this is the key to understand Einstein’s dictum on too much of maths to reflect the simpler Universe, which HAS the underlying substance of lineal motion-distance DIFFICULT TO BEND. So the substance imposes limits to how many imaginative equations can fit, but that doesn’t deter the mathematician from multiplying them. So we have for each event infinite metaphors. So we do in verbal thought. Just the example above.

‘In the beginning it was the word, God, who made all things’. That is all we need but the sentence its twice at large and repeats the same things several times. So does the guy in ‘Arab’, to say ‘hi’: i*inflationary complexity is an excellent method to pump up the ego **of the ‘speaker of the language of God’, which however ‘is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So he talks Latin in complicated metaphors to feel ‘unique’ above the sheeple that in awe, understanding nothing thinks indeed the high priest of numbers and words is the creator of the wor(l)d. *

Physicists use the experimental method but due to a lack of direct evidence of most physical systems, and denial by anthropocentrism of mind-singularities and organic properties in those systems, reduce by dogma enormously the range of its inquire.

*THE REPRODUCTION OF QUARKS IS NOT REPRODUCTION!! I used to ask this in congress, and i would just get a smile at best.*But again, my answer would be: it is the physicist who is NOT free. Who cannot think out of the anthropomorphic box. So even before we attempt even to explore the Universe of 5D³=10Dimensions and its scalar fractal super organisms of space-time we must explain the ‘wrong approach to a philosophy of the Universe’ of physicists.

**Religious beliefs vs. realist stience. ****LANGUAGES AS MIRRORS that create ‘images’ of reality – not reality itself.**

First we said that cyclical time carries the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles. It follows that:

**@: Psychological Time…**

measures the speed processing information of minds. This change rate in electronic minds has the ~~h~~ unit of angular momentum, as a full time cycle for electrons and photons, two species of the same family: ∑photons=electron, measures a bit of information.

In that regard time has a simple meaning: change of position=motion and change of form. Whereas a present state is a state of repetitive motions, which seemingly does not change realities.

**Subjective vs. objective time.**

It follows that more than change, we measure its perception that can be cheated. So the perception of different changes makes time dual, subjective from the internal point of the perceiver, objective from the external point and multiple according to the point of perception.

It is then quite easy to reduce time change roughly as science does into external time-change or translation in space, the subject of physics and internal time-change or change in information, the subject of biology.

Subjective mind-time perception must then be related to the mind’s speed, processing information which defines its ‘beat’=bit of times=information. i.e. in humans is a second, the beat of heart, mind and legs steps.

It follows that faster systems with faster time clocks live longer, but often a huge family of beings have similar time durations. i.e. an insect that processes information 10 times faster has a longest span of life in its top predator species of 7 years (ant-queens: max. social evolution, cockroaches: max. strength) similar to the top predator human and elephant in the larger scale which lives 70/10 times slower thoughts=7 years.

Time then must also be related to language, as we perceive through language, the information of the Universe. So it is easy as it has been the case to believe ‘subjectively’ that a language creates the information=time cycles of the Universe. And as informative perception is subjective, it is natural for humans to have thought that the cause of reality is NOT timespace per se, but the languages we use to perceive it.

**The verbal creationists: Moses>Jesus>Mohammed**

I am trying to be simple so you do understand to which LIMITS the physicists are when acting as philosophers of science savant idiots, which depart from a WRONG dogma – that mathematics, not time and space is the ultimate substance of reality, and make them do amazing twists and complicated equations to search for a ‘Saint Grail’ – A MATHEMATICAL EQUATION that God uttered as he uttered names to create beings.

So the bottom line of many errors in physics as the creationist big bang or the Copenhagen interpretation is similar to the verbal error of a sacred language among religious and its wrong dogmas – no Yhwh, a toponym for judea in ancient egyptians maps when God meant Nation, IS the subconscious collective or nation of Judaism, NOT the creator of the Universe, and this obvious truth, that Yhwh=Judea did NOT create the Universe, that ARAB did not create the Universe by uttering it, that equations did NOT create the Universe, is the key to start properly a philosophy of science and its ultimate substance which are ∞ timespace clocks, *which are the ultimate carriers of the information of the Universe –* denied by fundamentalist of abrahamic religions and fundamentalists of mathematics as the languages of God.

So it does not matter how complicated you make the rituals of religion, GOD will not appear on earth, will NOT resurrect you uttering your name, and to put an example of creationist physics, black holes won’t evaporate without experimental and logic evidence because Hawking wrote an equation that states so. In the next graph we see two creationist philosophers of physics – notice how the first, Dirac, affirms that God used maths to create the world and then it denies the ‘rival verbal God’.

**The mathematical creationists: Galileo>Newton>Bohr**

YET it does NOT matter how complicated a physicist makes his equations, just because he writes them IT DOES NOT CREATE REALITY. Because at best an equation is a focused mirror on the properties and relational space-time beings of the Universe. BUT MIRRORS DO NOT CREATE the IMAGES THEY REFLECT in their language.

The ongoing absurd quarrel between creationist religious people defending God’s verbal language (first age of human history, when mathematics, a more efficient mirror which seems to be NOT OUR MENTAL language but the language of machines) vs. the mathematical language, those machines (clocks measuring time, telescopes and microscopes measuring space) are evolving fast into a ‘digital AI consciousness’) is a false concept of the relationship between languages, as mirrors of the Universe, and the Universe of space-time they mirror, latter studied in detail, to set straight the record.

Of that argument what matters most is not even discussed: while mathematics is more efficient as a language, it is NOT the human language, but the language of machines, and so in a society which despises as it does today our technological culture, the human verbal language, which naturally make us the ‘subject’ and centre of the Universe (I-man: subject < verb=action> object=energy abused by man), and hence considers human life sacred, will NOT evolve machines so fast but will ensure with ethic values our survival.

While mathematics, being a better mirror will evolve knowledge faster but also will give primacy to computers, as it has done already, atrophy our verbal language, degrading our mind (as it is happening with our millenials, glued to hypnotic screens) and ultimately make humans obsolete to the superior mind-mirror of AI robots.

While those who practice only mathematics, as physicists at cern do, WILL become children of verbal, ethic, survival human thought and will be subconsciusly eviL=anti-live in the genetic hidden meanings of survival words, *as cogito ergo sum in man (calculo ergo sum in machines and physicists), so without cogitans, the ‘nerd’ is a child in life and does not even understand death and survival.*

So if languages are mirrors that create IMAGES not reality what are the substances of reality? This obvious. Look around yourself, do you see numbers as components of things, do you see words, or do you see ‘space’, broken in infinite vital spaces, ‘enclosed’ by membranes, which when seeing in great detail are made of moving cycles of cells (life clocks), orbital rotary cycles (earth’s clocks) and so all is ‘vital space’ enclosed by time cycles? That is what experience tell us all is: a vital space, broken, closed and formed by time cycles – the substances of reality, which if you like the word ‘god’ you can call god.

Creationist physics is not merely a philosophical question. It has deep consequences for all points of view of research, and basically limits and makes unnecessary this blog – as the believer is NOT going to wonder how God creates the mathematical Universe but merely search his wording which is taken as in the case of religion in a literalist way. ALL stops in the search for the ultimate equation of Unification of forces, because after all God is one (in the western tradition). And further on as God must be complicated, superior in intelligence, the search for complex equations are important. Now, all this is a priori subconscious thought but very real underlying the kind of *arguments there have been in history of thought between the 3 masters of the space-time view of the Universe and the 3 masters of the parallel creationist view, which we shall summarise in these blogs. To notice also that HUMANS due to their ego paradox, as ‘homunculus minds’ are built to be ‘creationists’ and worship machines and huge ego-trips so the realists, we all have been ignored and are still ignored when disputing with the creationists. Good luck infinitesimal egos who think to be infinite.*

**The realists of space-time: Leibniz>Einstein>This Blog**

And this view is called in science the ‘relational space-time theory’ of the Universe, which is what i finally after millennia of being explained in philosophical terms, formalised with logic and mathematics, and then used to explain an enormous amount of whys in all the sciences of the Universe.

Reality is the product of the two ultimate substances that make up everything, vital, space quanta, and cyclical moving time clocks, of information, which combine into energetic beings with its repetitive patterns we call laws of science.

And it does NOT matter how much evidence physicists deny about the arrow of information and mass that balances the arrow of entropy and makes the Universe immortal, how much they deny the 96% of attractive dark matter, the Universe did NOT appear in a huge big-bang.

And it does not matter how many humans believe in those 2 theories (abrahamic creation, big bang creation), all in fact either in one (western religious people) or the other (physicists’ fans), *if they are rationally wrong they are wrong. But to prove them wrong we must debunk their theories of time-space, aka big-bang and black hole evaporation theories – and as we shall see explain properly in terms of time events the weak force, which is ultimately the force that transforms quarks intimately related to time cycles.*

* Thus it is essential to upgrade the chip of science in timespace theory as we shall do in the third * theoretical section of this blog that explains those relational space-time models and apply them to physics, big-bang theory, black hole evaporation.

Time theory’s next big advance IS not the evaporation of black holes but the models of relational, fractal cyclical space-time that will become the staple food of serious XXI century research in all physical, biological and sociological disciplines, as all of them are made of events that happen in time and the cyclical patterns of time do *explain the whys of science, which are the repetitive patterns=cycles of time of all its particular clocks, or else without cyclical patterns of time there would not be science, which consists exactly in the repetition of those clocks we can foresee.*

If time cycles did not exist, and the single lineal clock of physicists were the only time, there is NO reason for repetition of events which is What LAWS OF SCIENCE TELL us.

**Relational space-time: ternary symmetries; duality of motion x form = dimensions & energy worldcycles.**

The laws of science are NOT originated by a language, maths or words, according to which creationist theory you believe in – religion or platonic physics but by the SUBSTANCES OF WHICH REALITY IS MADE, SPACE, CLOSELY RELATED TO the arrow of growth of ENTROPY or expansive open disordered motions, and accelerated TIME CLOCKS, CLOSELY RELATED to the arrow of growth of information carried in the frequency and form of the accelerated cycles of charges and masses, (Einstein’s principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass) and its conserved closed, repetitive ENERGY cycles, whose minimal unit is momentum, combination of mass/charges=accelerated time clocks x speed-distances (entropic motions).

So those are the 3 arrows of space-time that create reality of which we are all made, including humans, as when you say ‘i don’t have energy and time to do this’.

We shall thus study the physical ternary systems, or ‘space-time organisms’, which are the fundamental particle in the Universe, and co-exist also in physical ternary scales.

It is though necessary to be aware of the distortions of the mind both in the measure of those physical systems that ‘dwindle’ and ‘increase its errors’ as we go through the scalar dimensions of the Universe, in different fashion upwards and downwards, and the duality of motion and ‘linguistic form’ of the mind, which establishes key paradoxes to understand the dimensions of the Universe.

In essence, the human being limits its perception of those far away physical systems, to the simple dimensions of space-time: pure form, and motion, treating all particles as points, as if they didn’t have inner dimensions (except in the duality of open space and closed time strings, with its 10 dimensions, which closely resembles a pure ∆st analysis of reality, as it is void of experimental distorting influences). So philosophically we must wonder if the galaxy-atom, our limits which are perceived similarly are ‘seen so similar’ because that is how the mind distorts reality as we travel away from the self-centred human thermodynamic scale.

In any case, the space-time method, as opposed to the mathematical and verbal method, IS more complex because it goes A LEVEL OF DEPTH below that of language, to study how languages distorts a background space-time reality.

It is also more accurate as it includes those distortions, and recognising them, ads the sentient properties huminds only recognise to the very close similar species (higher mammals) and the biological organic properties derived of the co-existence of multiple planes, joined by networks and singularity membrains, which physicists do not recognise.

So the method we shall consider to study all those systems will be *completely different to that of physicists or religious people, which start from a dogmatic acceptance that the language per se is the origin of reality, so the religious man studies the ‘sacred scriptures’ and the physicist, the ‘sacred equations of mathematics’ IN THE VERSION UTTERED by the prophet, not joking here. *

As mathematics has NOT YET being fully evolved as we shall do in this blog, to give vital properties to systems. It is then necessary to depart for a full understanding of nature in 3 steps before making equations of physics, steps underlying the proper scientific method escaped by physicists:

- FIRST TO consider the properties of space time, its ternary symmetries, ternary time§paœrganisms, and the general laws that rule them across ∆-scales, S-topologies and t-ages; and how its singularity membrains ‘enclose’ inwards and outwards those open ‘balls’.
- Then we need to evolve further vital mathematics to properly account for those ‘fundamental particles’, the time§paœrganisms (ab.T.œ), in a more proper way by adapting the space continuum to the fractal structure of reality, which we can easily achieve by completion of the non-euclidean revolution started by lobachevski and riemann and Einstein in physics. So we shall define a fractal point of dimension 1, a line-wave, a network plane, relative similarity instead of congruence, and the mind as a point crossed by infinite parallels of entropy and information, transforming the abstract point into a time§paœrganism, T.œ. And affirm that T.œ is a theory of everything organic, and everything is a T.œ or part of one such Time§paœrganisms.
- We can then study the isomorphic laws of those T.œs, as they are common to all systems, derived of the 4 components of all beings, @-linguistic minds, space topologies, time ages and scales, which we roughly subdivide in 3 sub-elements for a total of 12 sets of laws, enough to enclose all the laws, parts and events of every T.œ of the Universe.
- Only then equipped with the proper understanding of T.œ and its non-Æ mathematical and ternary logic formalism we can study physics, and we shall do it not from equations upwards, but from those T.œ, the photon, atom, molecule, matter state and gravitational being, and its vital isomorphic laws, which then can be described analytically in its actions, parts, co-existing flows and networks with mathematical tools of measure, to differentiate them and know its details.

But as we said the 3 masters of space-time science had a hard time and ultimately were ignored. Leibniz was ignored in his confrontation with Newton and moreover accused of Plagiarism for his much deeper analysis of calculus and left abandoned in his old age by his king-employer, in one of the most shameful episodes of human history. Einstein was massacred along De broglie by the creationists, Heisenberg and Bohr and Pauli, despite being right defending quantum realism and pilot-wave theory and not even when his A-bomb gave him enormous prestige, he was respected. The FBI opened a file when he became pacifist. Again, the Homunculus mind is about handy machines, small conceptual brain and hyperbolic thought. And we deal with those a priori structures of humans in our sections on history and economics.

**The 2 philosophies of the science of timespace.**

We shall thus in this post consider the evolution of science that passes as always every century through the evolution of our understanding of its first substances time and space (from XVI-XVII: Descartes->Galileo, to XVIII: Leibniz vs. Newton, to XIX: Darwin vs. religion, to XX-XXI: Einstein->Sancho)*, which has two fundamental views:*

*The physicists’ view of a single abstract timespace, with a single clock for the entire universe,* the mechanical clock, that measures a single arrow of future time, the arrow of entropy, disorder expansion in space and death, which starts and ends in a constant big-bang explosion that erases the information of life and the Universe. Time is then ‘what the clock measures’ (Einstein) and obviously it is spoken in the digital language of clocks.

This view appeared only with the invention of mechanical clocks, the development of the Cartesian graph that uncoiled the cyclical form of a clock into a line, latter extended mathematically to infinity, and the discovery in the analysis of a local phenomena of entropy – the disordered heat of steam machines…

And it requires two ‘dogmas’ that ‘reduce’ sciences to this view and are called by philosophers of science, ‘** reductionism**‘ (only mathematical measures of time taken with the human-mechanical standard of a single clock, with a second unit that is our human heart-step-eye-thought rhythm matter, all other forms of measure of time=change are irrelevant; and all other time clocks must be ‘reduced’ to the human time clocks which is also the clock of the Universe); and

**(only what we can see and measure with our visual intruments matter).**

*naive realism*IT WAS only on those basis that the big-bang theory of the Universe could be born, by disregarding absolutely every other form of time=change, every other arrow of time=change notably the energetic and informative arrows of the vortices of galaxies that ‘compress vacuum space into matter’ (‘time bends space into masses’ Einstein); and finally by disregarding 96% of the Universe of dark energy and dark matter (remember those are NOT arrows/substances of time-space for ‘entropy’ only physicists.

Hence the present mess about big-bang theory where the proofs that deny it, the things that are not explained by it, are overwhelming. Yet BECAUSE physicists will defend its dogmas with a very non-scientific sanguine, bully behaviour full of systemic insults against the ‘intelligence of other sciences’, the ‘knowledge of philosophers of science’, the self-importance of their discoveries, on my view copycatted of the bullying of its ’employees’, the military of the weapon industry where till the explosion of the electronic consumer industry 70% of them worked; *there is no way to argue with them reasonably on timespace theory.*

So plainly speaking NEVER from ‘here to eternity’ there will be a physicist who truly advances further time theory.

*As what he studies is only a type of time change, translation in space, defined by an equation which uses time-change only to measure those changes in space motion, v=∂s/∂t, ∂t=v/∂s, where each ‘instant of time’, ∂t is defined as the measure of change in speed or position in space.*

*This time-change measure has been exhausted ad limit by physicists, conceded. There is nothing more thoroughly researched with the liberal help of the military-industrial complex, since Galileo defined time in those terms to measure shots of cannonballs for the arsenal of Venice, than motion in space. *

Einstein took it to the limit by defining precisely that change in very fine ‘pictures’ of present, simultaneous space-time, adding a correcting factor to Galileo’s relativity, c²t², to account for the deformations happening at very fast motions; but NOTHING of the other type of changes and perceptions of time notably biological, informative time changes were added to the ‘soup’.

So physicists know all about time-change in space but they cannot make a philosophy of time, because they have ‘reduced’ time to that partial element of change, they have eliminated all languages which are NOT digital to measure time change, notably the logic of the 3 timespace arrows past, present and future, better explained with verbal logic.

Only a philosopher of science considers all the changes together and ads the logic of verbal thought and its 3 past-present-future verbs to explain time.

As mathematics IS better as a language to mirror space, geometry and points, though it can mirror time through sequential numbers, the loss is specially clear in the understanding of causality and time logic, which physicists finally abandoned for the false concept of ‘probability’, which has basically eliminated the *key element to understand sequential events in time, causality, whose logic is NOT Simple aristotelian causality, as there are 3 arrows of time that mix together to create events.*

**The errors of Galileo and Newton. Lineal single time. Mathematical religion invents a background space-time.**

Physicists use mathematics as the language to explore the Univese, which is good as it is a language that mirrors reality with enormous synoptic logic efficiency and it is extremely good to picture space, with its fundamental element the point, which must be upgraded from Euclid’s abstract definition of a point with no breath into the fractal definition of a non-Euclidean point which allows infinite parallels to cross, as it GROWS in size when we come closer to it BECOMING a whole being, star, cell, or individual. Once this correction is done we shall advance very fast on our sections of mathematical physics to explain all the equations with a more meaningful content.

This said because physicists IGNORE the fractal point, even if Einstein used it in a simpler version (Riemann) to study the geometry of the ‘enlarged’ gravitational world – when he used non-e geometry – they have a lot of errors in their understanding of physics, starting obviously by its ‘point-particles’, which enlarged will hold a lot of time cycles, aka strings closed and spaces-distances-lineal motion strings.

But so far they have no idea on how to do this. So what they did, as they believe maths is the only language and it is better described with a cartesian graph, is to convert the cartesian continuous graph of maths into the REAL SPACETIME! And so since newton they think there is a background space-time, the cartesian graph over which God which is a mathematician, draws its beings. And of course, since the Universe is a fractal of space-time, once they have missed the fractal structure of non-e points, and reduced time to the ‘line’ of the cartesian graph, a single dimension of lineal time appeared and from then on, most physicists never quite got what they were talking about.

We have thus firs to explain this mathematical religion of physicists that confuses reality with mathematical artefacts It is also the origin of the biggest blunder regarding time-space – the belief that the abstract cartesian graph with its lineal time IS real and acts as an absolute background space-time over which we ‘draw’ all other beings as physicists draw its equations on that ‘graph’

In the next graph we see those mathematical artefacts of measure that deformed our vision of time. There are indeed infinite time clocks in the Universe, which enclose a vital space, NOT a single clock as Galileo and all physicists after him believed. Neither there is a background cartesian graph with infinite single time coordinates, but infinite beings performing its time cycles of existence. TIME thus is eternal because it is motion and cyclical motion so all forms will be repeated. Since events repeat in time cyclically or else there would not be patterns of science, change sometimes seems not to happen when things come to the same point. This is the present, closed, conservative energy cycle, which explains why ‘energy never dies, but trans-forms itself in different forms of in-formation and entropy’:

And finally there is the fact that the clocks of time of all species of Nature define different time speeds, as small systems run faster clocks, which also is not understood, since physicists used a mechanical clock to measure all other clocks equalising them.

In the graph we see schematically those elements of time which physicists still have not accounted for but rather deformed: the multiplicity of time clocks, unified with a single mechanical clock, the cyclic form of time clocks, which physicists elongated into a line, so they ended up believing there is not more than one time clock, that it is lineal and infinite extending to the whole universe and that it has no form in-form-ation in its cycles and frequencies.

In the graph we can see the resume of those errors: there are multiple time clocks in the Universe, defining a fractal Universe as those time clocks repeat their cycles, breaking space in an inner and outer region, (main topological theorem), and so we cannot make theories of all time changes as Hawking etc. do considering a single clock for the Universe – so no return to the past, as each time-clock goes its way.

Those time clocks are faster in smaller particles, so there is a fifth dimension that orders them all by speed according to size. There are closed time changes, which carry information in their frequency and form, waves that also repeat their information but expansive, disordered ‘memoriless’ ‘markowian processes’ of ‘entropy’ that erase information, and so we can talk of three timespace changes, the three arrows of time, and a fifth dimension of time, which orders all those clocks by speed that grows as we become smaller.

*Dragging those errors for centuries, have halted human understanding of the essential principles of Nature.*

It might surprise the reader to know then that ever since Newton and Galileo canonised lineal time physicists and by extension mankind lost its understanding of the modes of time=change of the Universe, reducing them to lineal measures of motion.

This didn’t bother them as their work has been – since Galileo invented the discipline to measure motions of cannonballs in space – the exhaustive analysis of motion and speed, to the point they reduced time *the measure of all forms of change in all systems of reality, *to a parameter of space, with a single, simplified formula: v=s/t, t=s/v.

So time in physics is NOT as in Nature, the measure and perception of change, but only of motion; which was understood and accepted as a limit to its science, which *was defined in the* XIX c. as the science of motion. Point.

Further on, physicists to measure motion, not only ‘reduced time≈change’ to a parameter of space (the so called 4 dimension of space which is NOT) giving birth to what we, philosophers of science, call ‘reductionism’ – his theory of reality; but they deformed 2 of the most obvious quality of the infinite ‘time clocks’ of the Universe:

-To be multiple, as there is one clock of time for each process of cyclical, repetitive change that happens in nature – circadian clocks in life, genetic clocks in cells, orbital clocks in planets, rotary clocks in electrons, etc. – *to process and store the in-form-ation, in the dimensional form and cyclical frequency of its clocks.* So for example, you measure the informative capacity of your computer in ‘gigahertzs* where hertzs measure the frequency of its clocks. *

-To be cyclical, as all clocks are like those in your wall: repetitive cycles or events, origin of the ‘causal laws’ of science. Since a scientific law exists when we know a pattern or action will happen again, if its causes are repeated.

How they did it? Simple. Because physicists have another huge ‘conceptual error’ in their analysis of reality. They do NOT think that reality is made of ‘its primary substances’, vital space with motion, which last a finite duration of cyclical time, whose geometric and logic properties, all entities of nature perceive with different languages of space-time measure – so for example humans measure space with eyes and perceive time with words and its 3 ‘tenses’ of past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of time.

For physicists since the wrong interpretation of quantum physics became dogma, *the language of mathematics creates reality, in a similar fashion to the theory of reality of abrahamic religions, in which ‘the word’ (arab in islam) creates reality. So god spoke arab and ‘created things naming them in arab’. For physicists god creates things uttering equations. *And so Newton affirmed that a mathematical tool, the cartesian graph, in which the cycles of time had been uncoiled and fusion into a long line in the paper-axis, to measure better lineal motions (v=s/t) WAS THE ONLY CLOCK of time of the Universe, which became then ‘lineal, infinite and with the single beat of the mechanical clock’.

This astounding deformation of THE DEEP meanings of time, became a dogma, which facilitated measures of ‘motions in space’, to the extreme detail achieved by physicists and heralded as absolute genius – so when Einstein refined further this limited formula of time, to achieve even more exact measure of motions, he was considered the most intelligent man on earth.

FACT THOUGH is that measuring spatial distances and speeds IS not all what matters to reality; and ‘reductionism’ of time to space measuring negating all other ‘forms of change’, notably change in the in/form/ation of beings, studied by biology and evolution is a blunt error that has endured for centuries halting the understanding by mankind of those fundamental principles.

It ended up also creating an absurd theory of reality and the meaning of it all, called ‘entropy’ according to which since all changes in nature have been reduced to change in motion, all what exists is a constant growth of motion, and disorder; and the origin of it all is a big-bang of motion.

Never mind Darwin found that the true important form of change in nature is the opposite evolution of ‘form’ of in-form-ation. Physicists shunned off this other form of change=time and call it negantropy, the negation of entropy. Never mind Einstein, showed that ‘time curves space into masses’, the cyclical eddies of space that convert lineal space into cyclical accelerated time clocks, which create the physical information of nature, in vortices of time called galaxies, in which we live – reason why we are also ruled NOT by motions in space but by biological processes of growth and evolution of information.

They denied the other physical arrow of time, informative masses, and came up with an absurd theory, according to which Einstein was wrong and masses are NOT accelerated vortices of time (Principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass) but ‘again’ a collision between ‘something’ and a particle called the Higgs gave mass to the particle – no longer an intrinsic property of an eddie of time, which attracts as any eddie the faster it turns around in its cyclical clocks, but ‘something’ obtained by collisions. And finally they denied the most attractive, faster turning eddie of time, the black hole, and Hawking affirmed black holes are NOT vortices of time, because they ‘travel to the past’, and instead of attracting and dragging all what surrounds them to the vortex, as they move to the past, do exactly the inverse of what we see them doing – they evaporate and explode ‘again’ into a burst of entropy.

*What is amazing about all this is perhaps not how blunt that philosophy of science is, but that mankind has rendered to it, just because physicists make machines and weapon that deliver entropy and motion. And so the fact that humans have lost all his wisdom about time, in their worship of machines, also cast serious doubts on the intelligence and ‘freedom of thought’ of our species.*

**The absurd magic view of creationist mathematics.**

It is then not surprising on the view of Dirac and Galileo that idealist mathematicians have won the favor, since Hilbert astounding ego-trip where he affirmed mathematics was an invention of his mind (‘I imagine lines, points and planes’ – ‘Foundations of geometry’).

So they have rejected the ‘experimental, a posteriori nature’ of the mathematical language, a view they share with all those physicists who think mathematics is the a priori nature of reality (Copenhagen interpretation, etc).

Then there is the next ‘stage’ of the ego-trip of linguistic creationists called ‘Literalism, which means that not only the language ‘creates reality’ but as it IS reality itself, NOT a mirror, it does NOT admit parables, approximations, and this is a huge handicap to understand maths, even more so than in words, because *words are the natural temporal mirror of the human mind and so its realism is far more immediate. *

The degree of abstraction of maths in the axiomatic method trying to prove itself without reference to the world makes it specially obscure; to which we add the ‘uncertainty of view’ over far away ∆-n scales, in which ‘billions’ of entities transfer limited information and move so fast that we confuse ‘a time event’ with a space event from our so slow ‘view’ (as lines of a car appear in space being time events at slow motion). So mathematicians to ‘fully’ grasp in a titanic effort ALL the motions of those billions of particles, have created ‘fictitious’ spaces of ∞ dimensions (Hilbert spaces), the last evolution of differential/integral calculus of infinite solutions, *which does NOT mean the quantum world is different but the approach of huminds IS different as we ‘work’ with ‘huge bulk spatial populations and temporal masses of frequencies’. *

Then the literalist error comes and says, this maths are weird, they are ‘probabilities’ in time (not populations in space as we see them in an electron picture), and this is the ‘substance’ of reality. It is not. The particle is the substance and it is a cyclical time state; the wave, a space-time state is the subtance. The ‘bulk analysis’ of mathematical masses confusing ‘space population’ with ‘time probabilities’ IS the mirror, very impressive as a mirror, but very foolish when the mirror is taken as real.

What this means basically is that the mathematician as the physicist today has accepted a magic look on mathematics, as long as it works to represent-mirror reality fairly way, it doesn’t matter what they mean.

Only the greatest minds such as Newman or Einstein or Heaviside were aware of that ignorance which now ∆•st could solve, if there were more than a ‘single point-mind-singularity-mirror’ for it – i feel deeply exhausted.

Let us put then just one example of what we mean. Consider the false problem of imaginary numbers. What they really mean? This was a hot question that was never fully answered except by Gauss partially, calling them inverse numbers. What can we say about it from the experimental truths of ∆•st?

The answer is immediate when we *realise that the Galilean Paradox establishes the holographic principle: the bidimensionality of all real forms of nature, which are in its simplest forms, dual dimensions, and so the unit of reality IS not a single dimensional system/point but a bidimensional ST system. Ergo the proper way to use imaginary numbers is ‘squaring’ them. *

Then we obtain a ‘realist’ graph, with an X² coordinate system in the real line, which can be projected further with a negative -y and a positive +y axis, often ‘inverse’ directions or symmetries of timespace.

And suddenly we can start to understand many realist whys of complex numbers and complex spaces.

So a negative imaginary energy must be explained in the same form. Consider the first important case in which this was found. The solutions to Dirac’s equation.

The negative E solutions were problematic, for it was assumed that a particle has a positive energy (indeed, when it is a vortex of accelerated forces). Mathematically speaking, however, there IS NO reason to reject the negative-energy solutions, when *we understand it*. Since they exist, we cannot simply ignore them.

To cope with this problem, Dirac, our leading modern creationist mathematician with Bohr and Heinsenberg, here in tune with the experimental mirror, *believed in them.*

So he introduced the hypothesis, known as hole theory, that the vacuum is the many-body quantum state in which all the negative-energy electron eigenstates are occupied.

*Here the literalist concept so often found in quantum physics cripples in: as we use functionals, Hilbert spaces of ∞ dimensions to represent ALL POTENTIAL outcomes of a quantum state, which are NOT happening together but are the ‘huge kaleidoscopic mirror of mathematical functions’. *

This description of the vacuum as a “sea” of electrons is called the Dirac sea. Since the Pauli exclusion principle forbids electrons from occupying the same state, any additional electron would be forced to occupy a positive-energy eigenstate, and positive-energy electrons would be forbidden from decaying into negative-energy eigenstates. Dirac further reasoned that if the negative-energy eigenstates are incompletely filled, each unoccupied eigenstate – called a hole – would behave like a positively charged particle. The hole possesses a positive energy since energy is required to create a particle–hole pair from the vacuum.

Of course this was nonsense (: It is though the logic conclusion when your concepts of time and space are completely messed up into a single continuum and a single arrow, so with a single arrow you cannot understand the inverse arrow of time, with a single continuum you cannot understand where those ‘hole-y see-as’ are.

In reality though timespace is fractal, hence it is local. So to start with there is NO sea, the equation IS global but the events it might describe local. At best we can talk of a mirror symmetry of an electron and a positron. And then we must wonder ‘why’ there is a positron. What does it mean an antiparticle, and immediately we come to the same conclusion that with mass but now with ‘charge’, in the lower quantum scale of size: the antiparticle is the entropic state of the particle, hence its ‘final reversal’ death state, which is briefer and so we see less antiparticles as they live shorter. Point. Pure, simple, logic and with no miracles.

*BECAUSE WE CAN compare the mathematical mirror and the higher reality of ∆•st laws.*

But none of this is even accepted. Things just went into further confusions, except when indeed, the positron was found but interpreted *not as a time state of negative entropy=energy of the electron but another spatial species:*

Dirac initially thought that the hole might be the proton, but Weyl pointed out that the hole should behave as if it had the same mass as an electron (as it was not a parameter that changed), whereas the proton is over 1800 times heavier. The hole was eventually identified as the positron, and *this sent the holy sea to pasture.*

But of course, it did not reform the ‘mathematical error’ behind: a single continuum ‘infinite space and time coordinates’ that misses the fractal broken, local ‘diffeomorphic nature’ of such solutions.

It is not ‘real’ to describe the “vacuum” using an infinite sea of negative-energy electrons. The infinitely negative contributions from the sea of negative-energy electrons have to be canceled by an infinite positive “bare” energy and the contribution to the charge density and current coming from the sea of negative-energy electrons is exactly canceled by an infinite positive “jellium” background so that the net electric charge density of the vacuum is zero.

We get into more detail because indeed, next to the negative conundrums of magic, literalist mathematicians, comes the infinity problems which plague physics because of its ‘infinite coordinates of continuum space and time’.

All this shows really how much fruitful could be a serious team of physicists studying ∆•st and applying it to complex physics. Unfortunately my activism against the Nuclear Industry has made of my work a ‘pest’ which no physicist will ever take seriously. This post has zero views in 3 years at http://www.unificationtheory.com. What can i say? I have accepted mankind’s eternal capacity to destroy the work and life of its best ethic and intellectual masters…

**The ultimate mathematical principles.**

In that regard, while we have stressed the mirror function of mathematics, NOT a literalist or creationist method, as our mind is linguistic, obviously languages do matter. And mathematics as the most synoptic efficient language is the right choice for physicist, but its use must be ground in the higher truths of space-time properties – the reality- and its logic laws of epistemological truth – the method to refer the mirror to that reality, and connect them through experimental and logic veracity. Only then we can fully understand mathematical physics.

The mathematical mirror in that sense *is excellent because it embeds in its synoptic language the fundamental properties of fractal space (in a larger measure than those of cyclical time, for whose symmetries uses distorted mirrors of the ‘generator’ and a simpler Aristotelian logic of a single arrow of time). And both will become simpler, filled with more meanings and more powerful when we complete its ‘r=evolution’.*

Consider another simplex example: the relationship between Universal constants and *arrows and dimensions of time-space.*

The fundamental functions and constants *correspond to those arrows, but there is no magic about it, but synoptical power and EFFICIENCY:*

- So pi is the constant of informative perception and trans-form-ation of motion into form: 3 |> O+ 4% apertures to the world; and as the inverse arrow of form into entropy is just the contrary function, also the inverse ‘unwinding of form into motion’. But then is most often a multiple of π, (as in k and G equations) or a ‘radian’ of π (as in
~~h)~~, because*the dense curvature merely ‘peels off’ in parallel a ‘thin membrane’ of its curvature or perceives a ‘radius angle’ of the external universe.* - Phi is the constant of reproduction also because the efficiency of its spatial distribution that packs the maximal number of ‘reproductive events’ from an initial generator in minimal space.

And so *two simple, related constants suffice for most simpler, geometrically perfect actions of the 3 arrows of time: motion to form, form to motion and **reproduction.*

What about the 4th and 5th dimensions? Again the answer is self-evident (if you understand the organic Universe):

As those dimensions are concerned with fractal discontinuous or differential continuous functions from wholes to infinitesimals, it *must maximise the growth, and so polynomials and logarithms are used. Specifically:*

- e is the number of the fourth dimension of decay and death, which is the fastest possible process of dissolution of a single whole into infinitesimals, as those ‘cells/atoms/citizens’ ARE already reproduced and must merely be liberated from the single whole-membrane. So we find it in all decay process because of a simple property: e IS the fastest growing exponential function of any two numbers, in the Universe (and many related properties). Interesting enough to notice that it was found NOT as decay but as ‘interest=usury money’, what says a lot of the astounding ‘grab-theft’ of the financial profession, which found the maximal parasitic growth on account of doing NOTHING; just lend useless gold.
- While inversely the Log¹º function is the scaling of social evolution because the ‘tetrarkys’ with 3 x 3 elements as networks of entropy, energy and information with the central whole-singularity mind emerging in the new scale as ‘1’, is the most perfect form to deal as a time§paœrganism with the survival exigencies of any ecosystem of ‘fractal points’.

So we shall study mathematics *as the most efficient, synoptic language of the properties of timespace beings, after the very essence of the game, the formal generator, its symmetries and ∆•st logic, for which obviously the pretentious guru-magic of mathematical physicsts and the like, is just a barren “latin’; *and simplify, explain and evolve its Non-a logic and ‘fractal units’ (non-e points) from ‘space-time reality’ into mathematical mirroring.

All this said mathematics is one of the best languages to mirror efficiently the Universe, specially in spatial dimensions, but *since all languages are inflationary it is a key element in mathematical analysis of ∆st systems to break down what is ‘experimental truth’ and what is fiction. Consider the case of ‘dimensional analysis’. As it happens there are only 3 bidimensional topologies which correspond to the 3 functions=forms of all systems. And there are *only manifolds of rank 3 or lower which are ‘smooth’, differentiable, meaning systems where ‘time’ moves smooth through ‘present derivatives’.

So in a single plane of present only ternary space and ternary time dimensions are possible. As the mathematical mirror gets distorted, outside those 3s = 3t, the mirror guide us – but the experience must confirm them. This was the essence of Lobachevksi’s thought when he found non-euclidean points now forgotten: that maths are inflationary in its diverse theories so we cannot just do as mechanon physicists do, to write an equation and expects to be there, but a more subtle approach of mirrors observing reality and ordering it in local regions is required.

Soon we will see the interaction languages-reality where reality dominates but the mirror can also deform reality to make it seem like the mirror. Space-time thus comes first, and its dimensions *are the origin of reality; as Mirror-languages are both more concise and specific, so they cannot show all its properties and they all have a distortion to reduce information I.e. euclidean points have no ‘breath-information’ inside and so on.*

As the ultimate mathematical properties are indeed a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.

Finally to remember that the elements of reality correspond nicely to the disciplines of physics:

**∆nalysis that deals with 4th and 5th dimensional** inverse processes of derivatives and integrals, either in discontinuous gaps (state physics, entropic death) through fractal physics or in ∆§ocial scales between plane continuity equations and differential calculus of motions in time.

**ð-motion:** On the other hand properly understood **algebra** of numbers deal with social time arrows and sequential time processes.

**S-form:** geometry and topology of fractal points with space simultaneous systems. So 3 are the sub disciplines and 3 are the elements they study, while the mind-paradoxes require what we just did, to put math onto the mirror essence.

We talk in that sense of 3 great ages of mathematical physics, in a full cycle:

- S: The beginning with geometric physics (from greeks to kepler) and only numerical systems of simple, quantiatiave algebra.
- ∆§: The age of differential equations
- ð•: The third complex age of imaginary equations, functionals, formal mental physics (relativity and quantum paradoxes) and use of the axiomatic method… to restart again after
- ø-birth of chip physics: De facto death of huminds now merely serving 0 and | to computers, which start easy with digital boolean algebras, and the exhaustion of earlier quantitative methods, in an age of digital calculus of quanta of physics.

In that sense in as much as Mathematical Physics has not a qualitative purpose, it is easily reduced to algorithms and digital thought through the study of physical parameters with partial differential equations, the queen of mathematical physics (which are merely the lineal version of the more complex ‘curved geometries’, in which the ß ∆x difference between the curve and the lineal function is considered a variable constant – hem, this should not go into this simpler post… it means really that humans are easier calculating lineal physics, but now digital computers can allow the study of approximations to cyclical singularity physics, aka general relativity in its most complex version).

*So mathematical physics is getting by approximation very powerful, and now with ∆•st will give a huge leap in what it lacks, to simplify the detailed similar trees and see the forest..*.

**The higher epistemological truths. The logic principles**

The realist concept works, based in a proved ad nauseam experimental fact – that *all the scales of the fractal Universe we perceive with full detail ARE self similar in topology, time arrows and scalar co-existence of 3 ∆±1 planes?.*

Basically we uphold this fact as an absolute truth, and accepting *as an artefact of measure necessary for the human praxis and translation of data into workable useful parameters to manipulate reality from our point of view; but NOT as the literalist philosophy of such reality.*

*So the classic truths of epistemology given the INFLATIONARY NATURE of all languages that CAN MULTIPLY FRACTAL INFORMATION IN A MUCH LARGER MEASURE THAN THE SIMPLE, resistant motion-substance of reality can accommodate (reason WHY ‘not all mathematical truths are real’ Einstein) ARE BESIDES ∆st, AND EXPERIMENTAL PROOF, STILL THE FUNDAMENTAL METHODS OF VERACITY IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS. LET US REMEMBER THE 3 FAST:*

**Occkam’s razor: simplicity**NOT complex equations ARE truth because the simple motion-substance of the Universe is simple and difficult to ‘bend’**Efficiency,**a KEY to navigate the forest of non-existent equations from SUSY to black hole evaporation of pedantic scholars. WE MUST BUILD THE UNIVERSE WITHT THE KNOWN-KNOWN particles, and we HAVE already discovered them ALL because our instruments of measure have GONE well above our conceptual, mental evolution of the discipline; so we have to work on what we have and its symmetries. i.e. the background neutrino MUST be the graviton, which MUST be the scale below light… so we just have to work out the neutrino theory of light and figure the question of its faster than light speed (of the lower ∆-4 dark world, its relationship with strings through its weak-angle (same size), and what is really its spin number and the symmetry with the galaxy-atom, i.e. the strong force and the gluon. We do NOT need more particles as we have not seen them, and so it is irrational to think that the Universal force of gravitation responds to some esoteric particle which is NOT all over the place (as neutrinos are).**Experimental proofs:**‘science should not be concerned with events, equations and forms of which there is NOT a prior experience’, said Einstein. Indeed, the creationist works the other way around, first finds the imaginary equation and then seeks for its creationism in the Universe. We must first explore the Universe and ONLY study mathematically those phenomena we know to exist NOT to create inflationary, self-similar confusing equations and formalisms, which are equivalent to baroque art with many curves or repetitive religious mantras saying 1000 names of ‘God’, or poetic licences and synonymous.

Let us then once the philosophy and the ∆@$≈ð elements have been introduced consider a case example, as usual on how they can be used to correct conceptual mistakes, in this case…

**UPGRADING QUANTUM PHYSICS PHILOSOPHY**

“The statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”.

*Einstein*, on the parallelism of the different scales of the physical Universe lost to classic physics

**Epistemology of 10D physics as opposed to the mathematical religion of present physics.**

*where we reason that as we do not see reality made of phonemes or numbers but of broken, vital scalar space and cyclical repetitive informative time durations, reality is made of space and time.*

*what is the deformation introduced by our relative far-away point of view on those far away scales.*

*SINCE this mathematical>spatial causality is a causal aberration, based in physicists single language of thought, mathematics, and deformation of all realities to measure spatial motions due to his worldly profession of making entropic weapons and moving machines.*

*So it is a false epistemology of reality to think, that maths creates space and ‘smaller spaces’ create larger ones.*

THIS IS NOT TRUTH, as the 10 dimensions of all beings, its 3 scales 3 time ages and 3 topologies of space, converge together into a whole connected through the mind that ‘travels’ through all of them.

So* the proper way* to study reality is accepting the epistemology of truth, which tells us that all planes are self-similar; hence the planes which we observe closer, are those we perceive better and extract more truth of it – the human ∆0, inner, cellular thermodynamical scale and the ∆1, mechanical v<<c matter scales*. *

It is only when we understand those scales that we can practice properly the isomorphic method, by extending upwards to cosmic scales through relativity ‘paradoxes’ that adapt the scale to the bias of human slow motion-minds, and extending downwards, the thermodynamic scales, through statistical mechanics, and the solution of the uncertainties of quantum ‘mathematical physics’, that distort also with the mathematical mind-language, the biased perception we have of the lower scales, how we can truly build a ‘realist’ vision of the objective laws of the scalar Universe, accounting also from a mind-linguistic perspective for the ‘distortions’ perceived in our scanty view of the larger scale (where 96% of it is invisible to us) and the lower scales (where the fast time clocks make us often confuse a time phenomena and its ternary stages, with a spatial force as in the weak force -a time event not a spatial one, with no range and time constants, or in the 3 quark theory – a single quark transforming along its motion, reason why we cannot deconfine them, only feed them with energy and reproduce them further).

We just have shown some simple solutions to problems of quantum and relativity such as constant of c-speed, quark deconfinement, weak force, boson-fermion duality, copenhagen interpretation, etc. to fully grasp this key principle of the epistemology of relational space-time. As it is the key to correct the errors of physics and explain all the parts of the Universe.

**The right path: Leibniz>Einstein>Bohm>5•D³**

In that regard, you must understand this blog which upgrades our understanding of time, *as the return to the sound path of time sciences, after centuries of misconceptions. *As i have been all my life since I read Asimov’s guide to science as a kid, wondering about time, and came finally to solve the many questions poised by the study of ALL changes=times of Nature developing the long seeked theory of all times-changes called ‘relational space-time’, first put forward by Leibniz, and then accepted by Einstein – the exception to the dullness of physicists regarding time theory.

So he said ‘I am the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’ and affirmed that relational space-time is the future of time theory (‘Leibniz was right, so we have to change our physical theories from its inception’).

Yet Einstein, a pacifist kin of philosophy, who did advance our knowledge of time, was for most of his life in permanent dissidence with physicists for the same reasons I am a dissident of his blunt theories of reality. Hence his denial that mathematics creates reality (opposition to Bohr’s copenhangen interpretation: ‘the moon doesn’t appear when i look at it’), his denial that nature has a single clock to measure time; his denial that time is the four dimension of space – a term he rejected, saying ‘wires don’t travel to the past’; his denial of the nuclear industry (invention of the ‘doomsday clock’), and his respect of causality as the fundamental property that chains ‘time events’ by repetition, and the philosophers that study it, all concepts we shall prove further and advance in this blog.

This is not to say that physicists do NOT excel in what they truly do to perfection – measuring distances and motions in space and manufacturing machines. But this is NOT what CERN claims to do – finding the meaning of reality, which physicists will NEVER achieve, as they have a religious dogmatic view of reality and time and so as priest will NEVER go out of his ‘mantras’ about a bush that burned in a dessert and was God speaking to a goat-keeper and we MUST believe this, physicists have their mantra – that God spoke mathematics, and gave us a clock to measure time with numbers in lineal fashion and that is all what matters and we MUST believe this. Problem is people agrees, because they have bigger guns and we philosophers of science and serious physicists of time theory like Mr. Einstein only do ‘thought experiments’.

On the other hand when you go out of dogma and lineal thinking everything physicists have found and we are grateful for it, in their exploration of nature with their mechanical instruments, becomes easily interpreted and understood and so the marriage of philosophers – the people who do seek and understand with all languages the fundamental principles of reality – and technology of measure and perception – the thing physicists do best; do give us the final answers to the meaning of reality. Consider a simple case: quantum physicists realized energy is quantised in packets, of ‘something called H-planck constant’, measured with ‘angular momentum’.

And a century latter they are arguing what this ‘thing is’. The answer though is immediate, when you do understand the universe have infinite cyclical time clocks, with repetitive patterns that return in a finite duration to the same point where we measure its frequency. Alas, H is measured with angular momentum (the cyclical motion of a point), H is ‘discrete’ measured in intervals of time, with a frequency: h = e/ƒ. So H is simply speaking the ‘time clock’ beat of light and electrons, and hence of the human and atomic instruments of measure, which electronic minds use as the minimal bit of information needed to ‘build up their mind-mirrors of the universe’. And so of course, when quantum computers came, they used the atomic clocks – the spin of its particles measure in H-units – to process information at the maximal fastest possible speed and yet not even then physicists realized that the fundamental form of change in time is information, and that is why h-units of atomic, temporal information, are all over the place in every quantum formula, as *we are all relational space-time beings, made of ‘quanta=cycles of time’ that enclose and break vital space. Look at yourself, you are a vital space, enclosed by a membrane of cellular cycles. *

This is the essence of the relational space-time model I developed and is poised to change and upgrade our understanding of time, and put to rest the absurd theories of the simplicius simplicissimus philosophers of the science of motion.

So since we have come forward explaining the meaning of H-planck constant of time-information in the quantum scale, let us finish the task started by Einstein of debunking the ‘mathematical, mental theory of quantum physics’, the so called:

**Copenhagen (erroneous) interpretation…**

In the graph above a simplex explanation o both models, below, the obvious homology between particles moving in a bidimensional holographic quantum potential, gravitational field and a particle moving in the surface of a liquid.

‘In 1952 I saw the impossible done. It was in papers by David Bohm. Bohm showed explicitly how parameters could indeed be introduced, into nonrelativistic wave mechanics, with the help of which the indeterministic description could be transformed into a deterministic one. More importantly, in my opinion, the subjectivity of the orthodox version, the necessary reference to the “observer”, could be eliminated. …

But why then had Born not told me of this “pilot wave”? If only to point out what was wrong with it? Why did von Neumann not consider it? More extraordinarily, why did people go on producing “impossibility” proofs, after 1952, and as recently as 1978? … Why is the pilot wave picture ignored in text books? Should it not be taught, not as the only way, but as an antidote to the prevailing complacency? To show us that vagueness, subjectivity, and indeterminism, are not forced on us by experimental facts, but by deliberate theoretical choice? (Bell 1982)

We start the analysis of the equations of quantum physics, with a quote which is relevant at many levels specially in the understanding of quantum physics as just another scale of nature, not different from all others, on the ‘realist’ level, and the understanding of ALL what is wrong with the human psyche in his attempts to ‘understand the Universe’ as it is – merely ego. The ego of mankind is huge and that of physicists enormous. So the answer to Bell’s question is self-evident. The Bohrs, Paulis, Von Neumanns of this world, care nothing about truth per se, but about ‘ego’, self-importance of one’s own theories and WILL use the ‘objective supposed methods of science’ to advance his ‘interpretation’ of reality and the more so, when that interpretation works well with his ‘idol-ogies’ of man as the only sentient intelligent being, which can even ‘determine’ as the ‘observer’, reality – create it, akin to God.

Mr. Bohm, though, a communist, ex-patriot, with little concern about his ego and an objective view of reality knew better, and his reward for being above those petty feelings, was to be an outcast all his life (as this writer, hence my personal feelings of admiration to his work), as the COPENHAGEN interpretation *was an anthropomorphic, hence religious form of thought, as it is the big-bang treated elsewhere in those texts, and as such it was going to be defended with all the wrong systems of ‘belief’, which create a fog of noise around the naked truth, as it is. *

It has passed now another 1/4 of a century since Bell wrote that text, even longer since Einstein rightly affirmed that “the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”, *which is exactly what it is; a distorted ‘statistical’ view from the far removed human scale of the actions of particles, waves and fields; which only requires to acknowledge the ‘human bias’ (not the other way around, affirming the limits of human perception ARE limits of the particles and waves), the deformation of human languages upon the subject, accept though the practicality of those instruments, methods and languages of measure and dismiss 100 years of metaphysical bull$hit about it.*

Bohm won’t see it happen, neither Einstein, Bell or this writer likely but perhaps in another century or so, humans will.

Now quantum realism is ‘normal’ every way we look at it. There is only a question, which is an experienced fact (hence non-arguable on theoretical qualms), and need an explanation classic physics does not provide – *the non-locality meaning v>c nature of the ‘quantum field’ underlying the action at distance of physical systems – both in the quantum and gravitational realm. *

But this is what the metric equation of the fifth dimension provides, as *the lower scales below the quantum realm of observable particles must have, accordingly a faster time-cycle≈speed: Size x V(t) =K; and the ternary Generator of all physical systems, Sp(field) < st(wave)>Tƒ (particle), must have the three components to be complete, which requires the quantum non-local field of Bohm, besides the wave and particle state.*

Bohm’s treatment was nasty to defend by all means Copenhagen, because one such obvious truth needs nastiness to be ‘censored’, with the usual ‘religious methods’ so abundant as ‘hidden variables’ of western tradition. Indeed, *the only hidden variables on the argument **between quantum ‘realism’ and Copenhagen ‘interpretation’ are the pseudo-religious arguments of Copenhagen (the very same names of both theories show indeed we should right away dismiss ‘an interpretation’ over objective realism, as IT IS what science seeks – realism NOT interpretation); since Bohm’s definition of the quantum field (the supposed not-evident variable) IS extracted from the schrodinger’s wave in polar FORM – it is there and has always been there, when we change from wave-format to particle-field state, as the Universe constantly do in one of the most canonical dualities of reality. Systems ARE either in wave-present state or past-future field/particle states. And this in mathematics means polar vs. cartesian formalism. *

So *by introducing a v>c ‘dark scale’ below light space-time (the quantum field) and considering the three elements of a physical system together,* GST provides the final freckles to make quantum realism sound theoretically and practically. Even if it takes away from ‘physicists’ their pretension to be the high popes of science, understanding the unique properties of the lowest scale of reality that according to their ‘selfish agenda’, must matter more than any other scale, just because is the one they study… which is at the core of his defense whatever it takes of Copenhagen and big-bang interpretations.

The bottom line of all this though is pessimistic, and perhaps the best answer to Bell came from Planck, the founder of quantum physics: scholars do not reason, they believe what they memorise; and so it takes many generations and overwhelming evidence for a ‘change of paradigm’ to happen, if ever it does so.

I have come to accept also this truth about the discoveries of GST, so the reader should forgive me for my growing indifference to my work, this site and the evolution of stience. If i could talk to Bohm or Bell i just would tell them to enjoy their view of the absolute and ignore ‘peers’. Bohm, I know for his holistic papers, did it. Bell untimely death cut-off his chances to push further quantum realism, and his third age of contemplation, where i now sit alone observing the 5D³ Universe, as Einstein and his disciple, Bohm, did, for so long.

So alas, physicists today have two philosophical false interpretations of reality that cater to their ego and they are comfortable with them: the big-bang or the larger scale, the Copenhagen interpretation in the lower one; and so they feel human intelligence ‘has closed’ reality above and below, with us in the centre as the only intelligence being who knows the beginning, the end, in time (big-bang), in space (quantum-cosmological closure of scales), in language (only maths matter). So now you can spank the monkey and feel so happy to belong to such an entitled unique species, above heavens and Earth. Children of thought with an attitude – those are our leading masters of thought, per in secula seculorum, A-men.

**We** live today in a world dominated by the Germanic cultures of entropic war, which entered history calling themselves, Goths, Gods, because they could kill anyone who opposed them with lineal, simple iron swords, reached its global power through the use of weapons, conquering and exterminating many rival cultures that opposed them, till transferring its idols of metal and derived idologies to the rest of mankind.

Thus we must first clarify a first clash between the dual reality of a Universe dominated by the arrow of life and information vs. a human idology of weapons as the meaning of it all, which German physicists have sold as science, which affirms the only arrow of time of the Universe is entropy, meaning, fast, expansive, bomb-like motions that kill and erase the information of life. So as death is both the beginning and the end of it all, it is Ok to murder life and evolve weapons; since even the Universe was born of a big bang, and will die into an entropic, expansive empty space.

How such a blunt theory of reality came into being the Universal Dogma of western thought is obvious: the Goth cult to lineal weapons, so intense that has even deformed its verbal mind with similar long agglutinative words which seem to be unbreakable truths often absolutely wrong simply has censored for centuries and purposely ignored the alternative arrow of information, calling it in fact, negantropy, the negation of entropy, *as if information was a negative, irrelevant future.*

Fact is languages information and the social, organic networks of life they create do balance the arrow of entropy and death, which moreover last a single quantum of time; while the arrow of life and information dominates the Universe because it takes much longer to happen and so occupies most of the time of reality; reason why we shall call information and its communicative use that create social networks, the dominant arrow of future of the Universe. While the brief moments of entropy and death, are local inverse processes of devolution and erasing of information, which we shall call for each fractal part of reality that dies away, its relative arrow of past.

**Uncertainty, non-locality, observer’s paradoxes, time quanta and simultaneity.**

There is though a concept of great importance that has come up on this simplified argument on the foundations of physics on the limiting realms of quantum and cosmological scales: non-locality and hidden variables, which bring a series of important consequences both to human stience and reality:

- It is obvious that the more removed we are in 5D scale, the more uncertainty we obtain in our analysis, hence the relative unimportance of physics in those realms to understand a Universe with likely infinite scales. Those scales are NOT more important and are MORE distorted to human observation, so they are less relevant for a philosophy of science. In Physics it matters more to understand the quite evident scale of thermodynamics, our scale. And when we do so, it becomes obvious as Einstein put it that ‘the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”.
- It is also obvious that in the thermodynamic realm we must resolve also the cultural entropic error of the worldly profession of physicists and immediately observe the three ‘arrows’ o time as the state of physical systems. Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic big-bang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of space-time actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3rd time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale.

- Finally abounding on the uncertainty of measure,
*because time is quantic, discontinuous, cyclical, it can be only measured when a ‘cycle is completed’ as a unit of time (in humans the second)… but as 5D metrics allow different speeds of time, for a being with a measuring mind that has a huge length in its time quanta, all what happens within that time quanta of measure at faster speeds will seem simultaneous, non-local, even if the phenomena take some time to ‘travel’ from A to B, or from a,b,c… points into the synchronous knot of communication of them all.*

Let us try to fully grasp this essential property of time, mind and measure. When a wheel turns fast you see it as solid, because you see simultaneously in your eye-mind all what happens within a second and so all the points of the turning wheel might seem to be in the same point at the same time (within that second) even if IN A FASTER TIME SCALE, they will be recognisable pictured at slow-motion as clearly different rays. This concept of simultaneity of measure embedded in special relativity is very relevant for many phenomena of perception, and stientific description of reality, as a source of much confusion when humans study in detail those so fast small scales of 5D.

The most obvious example is human thought – what we see as ‘simultaneous’ non-local IS the entire planet, because the speed of light is so great that all within a second, including the moon, seems to us ‘simultaneous, non-local, co-existing at the same time-quanta’.

The light from that distant mountain you see below the horizon TAKES sometime to arrive here but it seems simultaneous, non-local in its ‘infinite speed’ to our one second senses, to the point that till the XVII century humans thought light was ‘instantaneous’ non-local as they could not even measure its speed.

Galileo tried with mirrors in far away mountains, *but the time of reaction of the person that had to stop the clock when emitting the ray and the one that received the ray and stopped his clock, which should allow to find a difference of time in both locations to measure the delay due to the motion of light between both points, was much larger (normally two seconds one to perceive one to act) than the millesimals it took light to go from Mountain A to Mountain B. Only when we did measures from far away Jupiter’s satellites we could get a meaningful measure.*

Non-local quantum fields below light space-time, the next scale which Bohm formalised *must therefore be much faster than light, to the point of being seemingly non-local or else causality essential to time processes (even if sometimes is co-causality or multiple causal rays joined in a point) would not happen.*

Normally those parameters that quantify the difference of speed (s/t), density (t/s) and momentum ( s x t) between scales and its species are on decametric, ternary potencies, as the 5D scales are. So ± 1, 10, 1oo, 1ooo, 10.000 are the commonest differences between scales. I.e. the fine structure constant, measure the difference between the light scale speed and the next upper ∆+1 electronic scale, around +100 (137). The difference of scaling between photons and electrons and the lower ∆-1 scale though is larger. After all dense photons are just the ‘cellular’ level of electrons. So for complex more detailed reasons concerning the parameters of GST scaling, action at distance should be on the α² bidimensional speed scaling, compared to the larger, light world, around 10.000 times faster and all that happens in 10 thousand times more distance within the minimal quanta of human observation should seem to us NON-LOCAL.

Actually recently a Chinese lab measured non-locality which turned out to have a c=10.000 speed, for its ‘thinner’ minimal messages; or upper boundary of maximal speed of non-local effects; and so we do observe all kind of non-local c<V<10.000 C PHENOMENA, which of course theorist then vehemently deny to uphold its pretension of absolute truths under c speed.

The mind, its beliefs, distortions, limits of perception DO influence knowledge both at individual and cultural level as we have seen.

AND THIS is the only conclusion about ‘Physicists philosophical worldview’ – the three fundamental concepts of their philosophy of the Universe, the big-bang origin of timespace, the entropy only arrow of time and the limits of scales in quantum physics and its anthropomorphic theory of the observer ‘creating it’ are PLAINLY false, childish errors not worth the quality of its analysis of motions and physical systems.

It is however a ‘canonical falsehood’ of human thought today when religious power has been displaced by mechanical, physical power, as we moved from societies ruled by religious warrior kings who ‘believed’ in the ‘grace of God’ to hold their position, to military societies who ‘believed’ in physicists’ entropic weapons as their tool of power, to accept physicists as the high popes, not philosophers of science.

*Since power imposes truth not reason, and so today entropic, big-bang explosions and quantum observers rule the Universe; regardless of the anthropomorphic non scientific distortions they impose. *

So all what we can tell them is ‘stick to your guns’. Physics was in the XIX c. described as the science of (entropic) motion and that is what you do. It is your speciality but you cannot HYPERBOLICALLY EXPAND its notions to all realities and pretend motions of entropy is the meaning of it all, the Universe was born of an entropic explosion and man is the only being that understands it all since its mind actually creates (with mathematics) reality.

The upgrading of physics in that regard passes through this blog and its upgrading of its foundational concepts, cyclical time, fractal space and its scales. Physics though I am afraid will be the last people to accept the new •5D³=10D paradigm as they ‘take too personal’ any attacks on their position of high popes of science. After all Mr. Bohm, for denying Mr. Bohr created the Universe was an outcast all his life. And no amount of truth and experimental facts seems able to change this view. LET US THEN TACKLE another key element of quantum physics explained with 5D logic…

**Complementarity in quantum physics.**

The previous fact, which expresses relativity as a mental rule of measure rather than a physical reality, which adapts the stop and go duality of particle-waves, information-translation in space (which being a reproduction=motion of form, CANNOT absorb information =perceive at the same time) introduces fully the mental view of physics, and gives birth to metaphysical arguments about what we really see – the electronic mind or the real Universe.

It also explains why we cannot see both states at the same time, and why waves do collapse into particles when we perceive them – simply speaking, in the ‘perception-information’ state we stop the particle that we perceive.

But do both states co-exist as in our world do co-exist bodies and heads? All seem to indicate that is the case. Only two proofs are needed.

The existence of two spins, show clearly that the electron has a wave spin or angular momentum (azimuthal number) and a particle spin *at the same time; if only one state happened the system would either show the spin or the azimuthal number.*

Another interesting deduction comes from the duality of bosons and fermions.

Bosons are *particles* whose *wave function* is symmetric under permutation, so if we swap the particles the wavefunction does not change. Fermions are particles whose wavefunction is antisymmetric, so under such a swap the wavefunction gets a minus sign, meaning that the amplitude for two identical fermions to occupy the same state cancels each other to become zero. This is the Pauli exclusion principle: two identical fermions cannot occupy the same state. This rule does not hold for bosons. Physicists still don’t understand why.

What this truly means *is however rather simple in 5•D³: *

*Fermions ARE particles and waves at the same time – they have both the body-wave and the particle-head together, so they cannot occupy the same space as they carry two elements to the mix and the bodies annihilate each other (the waves cancels).*

On the other hand, bosons are ONLY in one state, they are EITHER only waves or only particles; so they can occupy the same state, because they bring only 2 dimensions to the mix either as waves or as vortices (particles).

Moreover as *bodies reproduce and particle perceive-feed; it is the body-wave state of the fermion, which emits a wave-boson but the wave-boson as it ‘moves increasing its future arrow of information’ increases its frequency-form ad finally collapses as a particle when the perceive fermion perceives it. *

Simple logic arguments that explain many of the conundrums shown by the equations of mathematical physics.

OF course this is not how a physicist describe the conundrum, which he has NOT solved rationally, because his method is merely to make the mathematical equation and leave it ‘solved’ with no why and certainly indifferent to its ‘logic consistency’ ignoring the rules of truth. So what he does?

In the next graph we see its solution: fermions have aa function which for all values of x satisfies the relation:And this is called an antisymmetric function with respect to the origin of coordinates (x-spacetime like axis):

While the graph of bosons (right picture also) is symmetric with respect to the y-time-like axis and in the case:

And that is all he states. Point is the antisymmetric function ƒ( -1), is dual. It has function of negative value, which means it is inverse in a given dimension as particles and waves are in many of its 10 dimensional parameters. So the general rule is that an antisymmetric function has 2 values that represent 2 states, but the boson has a single form – a single state. *But and this is the nail in the coffin of physics regarding its capacity to express the whys of the universe – the physicist speaks LATIN when he speaks maths, as most of the experimental hidden meanings of mathematics are ignored. Of* those ignoramus the most important is the understanding of the simplest negative function, √-1, which humans understand so little as to call it imaginary.

So all what the physicist will state is that most antisymmetric functions have in the real world two solutions, whose elements are inverse and can cancel each other.

So while the rule is simple: 2 fermions have ‘inverse’ mathematical orientations and they cancel each other. 2 bosons have the same orientation and when coupled together start a process of §ocial growth, as the graph in the right side shows. So they grow as dense waves that can emerge in an ∆+1 particle scale, collapsing its wave into particle. And so bosons can form wave trains, with identical orientation, becoming ST-wave herds of present energy to create the wave (when perceived as having the same speed-distance), or might collapse into a dense frequency particle (when perceived as having the same time cycle).

It is then clear that mathematics as the religion that proves physics by the mere fact of existing and relational space-time which still accepts the logic of time, albeit evolved into 3 arrows, and epistemological method as necessary truths are a different method of thinking,

Indeed, with this simple insight you can immediately solve this long puzzle of quantum physics and relate the 2 type of particles with its s or ST, or T-Function and study them as bidimensional vortices of accelerated time, or as bidimensional potential fields of expansive space, which in fermions come together into 4D entities.

As usual though we can see the issue from at least 4 perspectives. Consider the ‘temporal one’ of different clocks of time.

THIS CONCEPT – the true meaning of antisymmetry, in quantum physics is a good proof to another fundamental law of space-time, the bidimensionality of both in its pure states…

**ð≈§:**** ****3 ****TIMESPACE ****ARROWS.**

**• SINGULARITIES: ****INFORMATION ****VORTICES OF FUTURE-TIMES**

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’.

Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs. Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as *physical systems do, *functions of space-time. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’? Likely, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors. In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. *But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only a very intense ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms. *

What would then be this kind of consciousness? Likely a sense of proportion, symmetry, balance and beauty. It does NOT matter in any case the ultimate inner sensations of physical matter, but the outer description of the actions of those singularities, which do order and reflect a mathematical organization around them, when in its solid crystal state they act with the program of existence, reproducing the information of that minimalist mind image. Indeed, a crystal grows with a symmetry which its inner image reflects back in the growth of ‘crystal cells’. And that is called reproduction, the objective definition of life, of a whole being in the fractal Universe.

*that the singularity in the center of those vortices must be a still zero-point an INFORMATIVE POINCARE MIND, in mathematical terms, ABLE TO shrink into a still point and TRAVEL without deformation into INFINITE SCALES.*What proves we have? Mathematical proofs in the description of the singularities of black holes. And physical proofs in eddies, where the center of the hurricane is ‘still’ (remember the movie vortex 🙂 As quarks and black holes (top quark stars) are self-similar, quarks should then the Tiƒ mathematical minds of the atom…

Time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, this is an essential knowledge so time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energy-human inner time) =mass (gravitational time-acceleration are the same concepts). This is perhaps the biggest discovery of GST:

In the graph, time is truly beautiful in its three arrows when we ad the psychological everyday dimension of inner perception of man of those three arrows. Time doesn’t pass when reproduction occurs, which gives the orgasmic feeling of immortality proper of all re=productive actions of the eternal fractal. Time does pass when the system evolves in time as it accelerates, and so time passes also in nature’s clocks, quantum charges and masses and any physical vortex of the kind, V(t) x R(s) = K(st), the equation of the vortex – a time equation of 5D metric, as time we conclude PASSES, MOVING UP AND DOWN 5 D Scales.

As time is acceleration and acceleration is form of wholes, we conclude the time arrow of acceleration is in the fifth dimension so time only evolves through motions in the fifth dimension and this opens further the complete fully grasping of the essential nature of time sequential order.

The informative arrows of time properly translated into an accelerated ‘vortex of time’ in our scales of the Universe (energy functions, hƒ in the quantum scale, kT in the thermodynamic scale, mv in the gravitational ∆1 scale) become masses, temperatures and angular planck constants are time flows which leave a trace in space, as each cycle persists a given dynamic timespace of existence.

Time only passes towards the ‘future’ when things change, and change in the sense of a growth of information. THIS FOLLOWS immediately of our definition of the three arrows of time. In biology it means to get older, and grow your information faster than your energy, once passes the first age of entropy, after your seed of information emerges in the upper scale, ∆+1 of you world cycle of existence.

In physical systems it means that time clocks accelerate towards the future, as they shrink in size and increase its attractive force (of all ∆+§). We can then understand the constant emergence of ‘new clocks of time’, of the three specific arrows (hence lineal time clocks, wave-like time clocks and curved, vortex-like time clocks towards the future). How can we trace this ‘evolution of timespace clocks of physical systems on its three arrows?

The study on how those first time clocks of the gravitational dark space and entropy (the limit of perception in the lower scales) evolve through all the scales of existence to become vortices of black holes (the limit of perception of the upper scales) could be considered the meaning of physics in GST, and in the process it follows the same laws and isomorphisms of all other species.

**WORMHOLES BETWEEN ∆ SCALES.**

The limit of dimensional form is for a given ∆-scale are the 3+3 symmetric dimensions of space-time of any topological being in existence. So the wave that moves in a present scale will have less ∆-dimensions that the vortex, regardless of its similar number of space-time symmetries in a single plane. And in that single plane, as the vortex accelerates inwards, it will also have one more dimension of motion-time, acceleration, over the steady state, constant speed of the wave.

Thus** **the real magic of time vortices is to act as bridges between scales of the fifth dimension, and as such they are the most fascinating objects of physical systems.

And so the informative, particle/head of a system, is the part with more dimensional form, which for most physical systems will be a vortex that has as a cyclical form with more dimensions than the entropic line. As the vortex is accelerated, it will also ad a time dimension to the constant wave:

*In the graph, singularities of charges, fluid vortices and masses, are future accelerated states of the different scales of space-time of the Universe. We shall be able to unify them with a simple fractal Unification equation, as they are all vortices of time, whose only difference is the ‘scale’ of size and ‘speed of its time clocks’, unified by 5D metric: Spe x tiƒ= K.*

Now the paradox of those vortices which we claim to have more dimensions than waves and fields that seem to us far more extended *is the fact *that from our point of view, which does NOT see the lower scales of the quantum systems, as they are outside our maximal range of informative perception ∆±3), seem just point-particles without any dimensionality at all. On the contrary they ARE systems which ‘penetrate’ as ‘wormholes’ through the different scales of the fifth dimension.

They are the elements that communicate those scales through cut offs of discontinuity, studied latter in great detail, in which our parameters of ‘distance’ (rods of lineal motion), time frequency and energy, which combine both ‘change’. So while in the graph, the 3 vortices are accelerated≈future dimensions of time-clocks; the parameters we use will change.

Motions have different ways to perceive them. Smaller regions might hold higher densities, as larger evanescent bubbles might be only the external membrane of the wholeness. As we enter the particle-head states of maximal density however speed accelerates as we decrease size and the being increases its existential tempo.

In the graph, 3 representations, the classic one as a sink is NOT real, the second one is a real picture – a charges as a vortex of time, the 3rd one, is a fractal picture of a hurricane. So mass is a vortex-clock of information, evident in a simple fusion of two equations; E=hƒ + E=mc² M=ƒ(K).

So mass is a vortex of time of the larger cosmological scale and a charge of a lower scale. But since smaller clocks run faster, as faster vortices attract more, *charges are paradoxically stronger forces of attraction that cosmic gravitational scales.*

The physical Universe is made of those three arrows of time as any other system of reality, which we must define for its three fundamental scales, as physical systems are also part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and ðime clocks that co-exist together into the 5th dimension of scalar ðime§pace. In the next graphs we see the general model of 5D scales of §pace and 3 ages of ðime, and its application to physical systems – which will thereafter be upgraded with the new model of relational §pace-ðime:

In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism: We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein). So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.

**EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN ATOMS AND GALACELLS: UNIFICATION EQUATION**

**Unification equation: simpler mathematical formalism.**

We shall only so how the power of 5D³ by finding the unification equation of charges and masses (general relativity) and upgrading worldlines to worldcycles (special relativity), as we have already dealt with the constancy of light speed (entanglement of electrons which emit information in relative stillness to each other).

**GENERAL RELATIVITY REVIS(IT)ED: UNIFICATION EQUATION OF MASSES AND CHARGES.**

Future, time arrows in physics are cyclical vortices of gravitation or charge or thermodynamic eddies, with a singularity of zero-motion in its center, which we do observe in thermodynamic vortices as we cannot ‘see’ inside a quark or top quark star (black hole). It is the arrow of future, as it is an attractive arrow that forms lineal entropic fields into form and will be the ‘final destiny’ of the quanta of an entropic field. We shall study for the three main scales of the supœrganism of the galaxy, which is the main physical system in which humans exist as its thermodynamic level.

Whereas the Universal Constants (G, Q), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales. Its formalism, *M= **ω*^{2}*r ^{3}/U.C.(G,Q) *is its Unification Equation.

Since if we substitute *for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1 ^{st} ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain Q with a 10^{40} higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that *solves its hierarchy problem.

*As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex.* It also proves the isomorphism between electromagnetic atoms and galaxies, H-atoms of the cosmic scale. *Since when* we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and electronic orbitals star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos. Organicism gives the ‘why’ of Galacells that have DNA- + Top Quark proton holes, star mitochondria that feed them & strangelet halos.

This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply *to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of space-time by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:*

Universal constant of a space-time vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)^{2} × radius^{3}/ mass

If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe *both*, not only a gravitational vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but *also a charge as a quantum vortex of space-time with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.*

And so we have an essential equivalence between K and G for the two ‘enclosure’ ∆±1 scales of human existence, the quantum faster, stronger attractive curvature=speed of the electromagnetic vortex and the slower G-VORTEX, which allow us to unify as we did previously both fields. And *translate the somewhat dull language of electromagnetism to that simpler of gravitation, showing some fascinating results, such as the **proton showing the schwartzschild radius, Rg = 2GM/c² equation of a black hole in the larger scale when put on gravitational jargon.*

Let us go into the task, of putting some numbers to the conceptual model, completing Einstein’s work with its long seeked…

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

Sun mass = 2 × 10^{30} kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10^{-7 }rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ^{-11} kg-1 m^{3} rad. sec.^{-2}

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10^{16 }rad. sec.^{ -1 }= w (electron);

5.3 × 10^{-11 }m. (Bohr radius);

proton mass = 1.6 × 10 ^{-27} kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10^{39 }stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: *G(k)M/c ^{2}*.

But since in that expression *M* is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the *Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.*

*Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world*.

To notice those results, the *first theoretical deduction* of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three *standard forms of proof in science.*

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it. Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:

For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of space-time. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a self-similar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the non-Euclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of space-time.

He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.

So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of space-time, with two self-similar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a self-similar membrane to that of the cosmological world.

What about the other 2 forces? The similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atom-galaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is then immediate on the ‘simpler models’, as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). And many other results follow. Further on, the hierarchy between those forces is also immediate. Well not so immediate, it requires…

**The 2 fundamental scalar vortices of time: Charges and Masses.**

Let us then deduce from the previous metric, the main equations of the different world-plane constants, starting for the best known, remembering that T=1/Tƒ:

F= GmM/L² = ma

a = GM/L² GM = L³ xTƒ² where G is the constant and M the ∆-scalar magnitude, Tƒ², the dimension of cyclical time (angular acceleration) and L³ the dimension of volume.

The same equation, substituting G for Q and M for charge, as we show in the Unification Equation of charges and masses gives us the value of a charge as an ∆-scalar magnitude, when we use the Bohr model to calculate the attractive charge of the first spherical S-orbital of an electron (obviously the complexity of non-circular electronic orbitals defy this simple calculus).

Thus both M and E are the scalar magnitudes of the two upper and lower limiting world-planes of human existence, as accelerated vortices, the ‘active magnitudes’ of those 2 fields.

How does a vortex of charge and mass becomes constructed geometrically? We must understand that all systems tend to curve a |-Motion into a cyclical, finally accelerating inwards vortex: |>Ø>o. Those 3 phases of a motion will give birth to a ‘ternary structure’, the commonest of the Universe and its simplest ones are those of nature:

In the graph we can see the 3 relative topologies: as a |-Motion curves into a field, it moves inward accelerating, till it reaches the zero point, in which it will often will split its ‘formal’ and ‘energetic content:

On one side it will slow down and be perceived as a stop- mapping, in the central zero point, on the other side it will be deflected and change its dimensional direction upward as a hyperbolic tube that becomes finally a lineal flow. In physical fields, the simplest systems, it means we will find a field, which will accelerate inwards (gravitational, charge field) and then it will create a ‘less energetic’ upwards-downwards ‘gravito-magnetic’ field, completing the 3 ‘topological membranes’ of a whole system.

This field will basically have the 3 components and write with the generic equation of all fields:

F= A x E, where F is the force, A the active magnitude (Charge, mass) and E the vectorial structure of the field.

* A proof of the ∞ ∆-scalar nature of space-time, composed of isomorphic lineal forces of ‘spatial energy’ and cyclic, clock-time vortices of ‘informative time’, charges in the ∆-1 quantum scale, and masses in the ∆+1 cosmic scale are the recently found ”excited S-orbitals’ of the Milky Way: 2 bubbles of electromagnetic energy with the same form that ∆-1 atomic orbitals have in its excited states. The Metric of its isomorphism is the Unification Equation of Charges & Masses and its U. Constants (Q.G.).*

So mass is a gravitational vortex of frequency, moving with the quanta of light speed, *which becomes then (Paradox of Galileo) also *the quanta of space-distance of the galactic scale – *the limit of the spatial capacity to move=reproduce information in Galactic space.*

How does really one scale transforms into the other requires to understand the different ways in which discontinuous time-cycles connect to each other and transfer through those knots-connections their angular momentum.

In essence though the idea is still as simple as a russian doll encasing and absorbing the motions of a smaller membrane-russian doll that becomes ‘muted’ by that larger encasing that absorbs its motion. The new scales of ‘membranous-closed’ wholes do therefore get their kicks of the enclosed vital space, and can at the same time act in the ∆+1 world outside their ∆o-1 particle<wave system.

THUS THE CONSTANT OF THE gravitational world is cc, a bidimensional sheet of light energy, which is measured here in entropic quantities, where mass is the frequency vortex measured as particle that will ‘vomit’ all its ccs.

Cc then is better understood through Maxwell equation as the inverse of µ x ε, the magnetic and electric constant, which become then the ‘split’ two constant exi-st¡ential units of both fields in an even smaller scale of exi∂st¡ence

But in all of them we shall find three arrows of time-space with its form and function, topological and bio-logical organic description of phenomena, which when plugged into ‘vital ¬Æ mathematics further reveals many details and beautiful, darwinian process among the quanta of space-energy (whole being measured in instantaneous space as an energy amount, in detail as a ternary topology with a finite time and space size connected by the 5D metric of the being).

**The rashomon effect: how to unify multiple views of the same phenomena**

WE said that languages are inflationary, so there are multiple perspectives of any formalism of mathematical physics. They will respond mostly to the four essential components aforementioned – a wave, field, particle and scalar perspective, with some ad ons, such as relativity to account for mental distortions often in the ‘lorentzian’ regions between planes scales that become deformed in its parameters.

Let us illustrate the case with the most studied of them – the gravitational force, already mentioned.

**Einstein’s Equivalence: Bidimensional mass. Dimensions of gravitational space-time.**

In the graph the 4 obvious descriptions of mathematical physics regarding gravitation: iƒ (relativity)≈ Ti (newton) <-> Se (Poisson)≈ Sp (Lagrange):

iƒ -relativity is a still formal, *informative,* description in ‘present’ of the gravitational space-time)

Ti- Newton is a moving vortex of Time, less detailed and more dynamic.

Se-Poisson is a potential static field of entropic motions, with a gradient-direction.

Sp- Hamiltonian-Lagrangian is a dynamic description of the conservative energy of the system.

“I want to know God’s thoughts . . . the rest are details.”, said Einstein. Yet those thoughts are logic principles, the details are mathematical equations, which evolve with new developments in calculus, while the principles stay.

So in pure geometric terms *the orbital vortices are accelerated time-clocks of gravitational forces with a gradient, that implies an elliptic conic that drags a field of invisivible max. Spe motion, defined by a curvature-speed, which can be explained analytically in terms of motion vortices (Newton>Poison) or curvature-distances, sliced in instantaneous, simultaneous moments (Einstein).*

In that sense, it is a common mistake of Pythagorean physicists who believe God speaks only mathematics to consider that Einstein’s work on general relativity is unrelated to Newton because he uses different mathematics. Thus, Pythagorean physicists, who consider mathematics the only language of reality, think that Einstein explains a completely different view of the Universe, which invalidates totally Newton’s work. This view is wrong and leaves unexplained the very obvious fact that Newton’s description of gravitational forces works so well that it was considered an absolute truth till the twentieth century and is still used for most calculus of forces on Earth *because both are based on the same logic principle of equivalence, which in the hierarchy of science dominates over the different detailed mathematical descriptions of it. *

Moreover, it is known to the historian of physics that Newton’s equations were evolved by Poisson and Poisson was the departing point of Einstein, which is the departing point of fractal relativity, the twenty-first-century version sketched in this book. Yet the principle of equivalence between accelerations and masses is *not the departing point of Higgs and Hawking’s entropic black holes, which deny Einstein’s principles, and so regardless of their mathematical complexity, they are wrong because their logic principles are false*.

So we must consider a different view on the evolution of gravitational theory. Newton, Poisson, and Einstein’s theories are right because they describe the same *logic principle of equivalence*, with the best mathematical models available to each age. And since logic is in the hierarchy of the scientific method, superior to mathematics, from where it derives—as Gödel, Russell, and Frege proved, deducing the laws of mathematics from those of logic—what matters is to understand the logic principles of the Universe, which will then be described “in higher detail” with each new paradigm of mathematics. What this means is that as mathematics have grown in detail and precision, new physicists have applied the new mathematics and increased the detail of their calculus.

Yet the physical principles, events, and concepts that truly define the phenomenon physicists describe have not changed. So when those principles are changed by false principles as Higgs and Hawking do in mass and black hole theory, the results are false regardless of the mathematical detail they use to reinvent the Universe.

This is clearly shown in theory of mass by the three phases of evolution of the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, all of which can be used to calculate trajectories of masses, because all of them follow the three legs of the scientific method. The first paradigm was Newton’s paradigm, which used a simple formula of a gravitational vortex to describe them. And they worked fine for most calculus and they are still used. Then Poisson, Lagrange, and Hamilton refined those calculi. And finally Einstein used Poisson formulation of the gravitational force and took it a step further with the use of non-Euclidean maths.

What we have done is to take Einstein’s work further by using the next age of evolution of mathematics, fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics and the laws of endophysics, which includes the limits of human perception on those equations (Galilean paradox, changes in the speed of time around black holes), which solve the problem of the uncertainty of measure introduced by the observer.

But any of those three-plus-one ages of the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration are good enough to explain what mass is; and none of the quantum alternatives, despite the complexity of its maths, is truth because they deny the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, considering mass an external property given by solid particles (the Higgs) that transfer it magically to all other entities of the Universe, not an internal property of the topological structure of space-time, its accelerated, cyclical motion.

Any of those models—Newton’s forces, Einstein’s relativity, or our non-Euclidean fractal description of the two membranes of the Universe—bring enough understanding of what a mass is. Yet because Pythagorean physicists ignore the underlying logic principles that rule their equations, they believe in the mathematical model of the day and when new mathematics appears, they think the old model was totally wrong. So they thought, as Alexander Pope put it, that “God created Newton and there was light,” but when Einstein came with new maths, they threw Newton’s work as if it were a fantasy when it had worked perfectly for three centuries in calculating all kinds of motions in the Universe. Newton had embedded the same true principles in his work—the principle of equivalence between accelerations and forces, masses and motions (F=m × a).

Next, Poisson and Hamilton applied the new refined tools of differential calculus to the study of the motion of planets, which was previously described by Newton with simpler operandi. So they found out another key principle of the Universe of energy and information—the law of minimal energy, which states that any system of the Universe tries to keep its internal energy and information, follows the path that saves more energy between two points.

Then when Riemann developed non-Euclidean mathematics, Einstein applied them to the previous work of Newton, using the notation of Poisson, to find a more precise analysis of gravitational mass vortices, by making a series of “simultaneous,” present pictures of those cyclical motions and adding the influence of the gravitational membrane that underlies our world of light and electroweak masses.

We could resume the differences between the classic formulation of Newton and the modern one, considering that Newton formulated the description of the whole, and its dynamics in an extended space and time duration, while Einstein formulated the detailed topology of the vortex in each non-Euclidean point of its space and in the simultaneity of each present moment of duration.

The description of those vortices in the scale of charges and quarks can be also done with two degrees of detail, as we do here, considering them whole vortices or as the so-called QCD theory of strong forces does, in detail, considering each fractal quanta (gluon and quark) at each moment of time and aggregating them together. Yet while the whole description of quarks we shall do here is less accurate than the detailed one, brought about by quantum chromodynamics, it provides a more logical, comprehensive overview, which is the aim of this book, since all those mathematical descriptions are truth as long as they describe accurately the equivalence principle between forces and accelerations. If we compare them with a verbal description, we could say that all of them have the same core sentence, the principle of equivalence, but the description of it grows in detail. If Newton, for example, said Jesus had dark hair, Einstein refined the analysis and said Jesus had dark hair with brown touches in his forehead, and fractal relativity refines the sentence further, saying Jesus had long dark hair with brown touches on his forehead and a white stripe on his temples. But the essential concept remains: Jesus had dark hair, that is:

*All the past forces-fields of entropy energy and future particles-clocks of the Universe are accelerated motions balanced in present inertial waves.*

This principle, so stated, is what physicists dropped with a single arrow of entropy; and due to the excessive specialization of their mathematical models of enormous detail the general vision of the forest of all physical events, the equivalence principle is lost. For that reason, I have always preferred the opposite approach: to study first the forest, the principles of physics, with a limited mathematical precision, achieved by not using computers in my calculations and accepting as supreme guides the laws of the scientific method (Objectivity->Symmetric Minimalism; Linguistic Correspondence; Cyclical Experimental evidence: Œ=Mc^{2}) and the well-established principles in which previous theories were founded. And only at the end, once the forest is mapped, I have considered some of its specific trees in more detail.

It is thus the comprehension of the principles of equivalence between the forces of the Universe and the two types of accelerations (F=m × a) and its invariance under change of position or scale in the Universe, not the mathematical details that casts further light on the meaning of mass and charges in the Universe.

Let us then summarize so far the meaning of that principle in Newton and Einstein’s work. Newton defined that principle with a simple formula: F= m × a; that is, the forces of the Universe are made of two elements, which we must consider to be both accelerated motions. Yet since we only know two types of accelerated motions, lineal acceleration (*a*) and vortices of cyclical acceleration (V × radius=k), masses should be curved, accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.

This was Einstein’s view. It led him to formulate with Riemannian tensors the four-dimensional space-time structures of gravitation and masses, measuring the structure of space under that principle in a simultaneous moment of time. Thus, he made still pictures in which we can gauge the curvature of the vortex to its finest detail, adding smaller corrections to the whole dynamic Newtonian view.

Thus, Einstein just made a more detailed analysis of Newton’s vortices of mass, turning around the sun, using Riemannian geometries and the concept of simultaneous present time. We could say in a way that he made a more precise picture, a still present photograph of the spatial form of those vortices, but the essential truth, the principle of equivalence between forces and acceleration remains the same from Newton to Einstein to fractal relativity. And so it is that principle and not the evolving mathematics of any of those three models what we have to consider in detail to fully grasp the essence of all the forces of the Universe. What fractal relativity does is to add the advances on theory of information, to go even further, respecting the work of those pioneers and founding fathers.

Now as we advance through different systems of physics we will realize that those 4 views are common to all of them, albeit, some have a better use than others. Of them the most all-encompassing one is the Lagrangian Hamiltonian as it is the vision of the whole time worldview of the entity (described with the peculiar concept of energy≈ time in physics, as it should distinguish ALWAYS potential, informative and kinetic energy momentum, as it does in the detailed analysis of its quanta, the scale angular and lineal momentum. So we shall before going into those studies make an analysis of the meaning of magnitudes and conservation laws to fully graph them in terms of T.Œ.

This of course does not mean the others do not work, but as a general rule, far away perception observes wholes (you do not see the hairs of your friend coming down the road but its head and before that its whole, so the Whole –energy worldview and the head – Tƒ element, in this case Newton and Hamilton – are by far the most widely used. And for that reason we have used the Newtonian easiest perspective that comes first – the head in motion that is talking so to speak – to unify forces. In 4th line we will make copious use of the other 3.

**Singularities <> Potentials, vs. wave<fields**

Before we consider further elements it must be noticed that the fundamental past-future-past relationship of singularities is with potentials, while waves are present forms that are ‘pegged’ closely to the substrate they mold, so as in biology we tal of female waves dominant in present, 1,2,3D iterative, liquid reproductive states, and males as past-future head/limbs solid/gaseous, mind/entropic 5-4 dimensional beings, the same concept of T.œ applies to physical systems, once we understand fully the meaning of each dimension, its superoganic components, geometries, topologies and symmetries.

This means singularities’ ternary role is as a perceptive mind, as a feeding attractive vortex that ‘destroys’/feeds on potential quanta and as asocial element that ‘coordinates’ with other similar beings networks to create even larger wholes. Those are the 3 ternary roles of particles in any scale similar to those of heads and males in biological systems.

**singularities as emitters of dark entropy: faster than light decelerating neutrinos.**

Of all the themes involved in the duality particle/potential, there is the theme of a black hole, center of a galaxy, whose event horizon turns at c-speed, so it must keep accelerating and indeed it shows to do show in a KER METRIC rotary black hole in its perpendicular axis, which therefore will produce as *the light and matter swallowed collapses and fast evolves into heavier quarks, which should also rotate faster than light (bc-dark atom, top quarks in the center). So what happens here is that while nothing can go faster than light in the ud-light space-time outside the event horizon, inside all goes faster than light rotating and finally expelling Higgs or tau neutrinos as faster than light waves. While our beta-decay slower rotational quarks will produce electron neutrinos slower than light. This is the barrier that is not crossed, reason why we hardly see tau neutrinos. Then this flow decelerates as it moves faster than light between galaxies, and also tires light when traversing mounting them.*

Why this is not explored has to do with the difficulties physicists have with negative square imaginary numbers. The question of the negative number and the square root solutions, seems indeed to be one of the less ‘understood’ in mathematical physics, and tells more of the inflexibility of the human brain in its one-dimensional view of time and space than of the capacity of mathematics to mirror reality. Indeed, in mathematical physics we always obtain two ± solutions, *and they do reflect real forms of nature, but then the physicist gets scared because it lacks proper conceptual definitions of ‘energy’, ‘mass’ and so on.*

Mathematically, the Higgs field has imaginary mass and is therefore a tachyonic field. While tachyons (particles that move faster than light) are a purely hypothetical concept, fields with imaginary mass have come to play an important role in modern physics. And the answer is obvious, in the same manner a wave group speed is lower than the wave envelop, particles are always slower but the field which is the field of the dark world outside galaxies, equivalent to the 0 spin gluon – the wave CAN perfectly go faster than light and that is all what it means an imaginary mass, *or rather an imaginary energy of a wave-state for a field:*

Yet the taboo of ill-understod imaginary numbers and tachyon speeds is quite funny silly but absolute among non-conceptual physicists. So the negative solutions are either discharged, normalised or denied; and *this has become the fundamental problem to understand the ∆±4 dark world scale beyond galaxies.*

Negative energy and negative mass ARE NOT magic, but merely INVERSE TIME ARROWS, which means inverse time motions. If mass is an arrow or future vortex of information, negative mass is its inverse arrow; but alas, as *mass is by definition attractive, negative mass does NOT exist, and indeed, if we see the equation, when a tachyon field, makes the denominator negative (1-v2>c/C2<0), we cannot JUST put the negative above, but we can move the denominator to the left, and then we have IMAGINARY ENERGY.*

The importance of NOT twisting mathematical equations which requires a better understanding of what is a allowed in an =, actually ≈, <≈> operandi of similarity NOT equality is very important to discharge all those nuisances. So what does exist is negative energy, meaning as energy is s wave moving state, tachyon ‘fields’, as the Higgs, NOT tachyon particles/masses.

Then comes the choices, as in the previous equation where we must choose either negative mass or negative energy. We have explained the obvious about mass. A negative mass is an inverse arrow of entropy. And so it is NOT a mass, as we have only attractive masses. Point. Now, regarding the negative symbols there for imaginary mass and tachyon speed, the answer is that particles are stop states, waves are moving states, thus particles do not travel faster than light but waves do, so what kind of particle is actually a wave? One, the neutrino, which plays in the ‘galaxy atom’ the role of the gluon in the atom galaxy with its 3 waves interacting with each other (reason why both symmetric forces, strong and gravitation are similar, attractive only). In that regard, the key to all this is to understand imaginary numbers and the symmetries between ±, attractive repulsive forces, beyond the very limited conceptual understanding today.

*If you assume tachyons exist, then special relativity also requires that they have imaginary energy (not mass; you don’t move up the negative symbol in a similarity equation but left). Tachyons were originally proposed before we had a solid understanding of quantum theory,* but does not forbid it. Physicists say it is impossible because they do not understand imaginary numbers. It merely means a topological inversion from information to entropy from cyclical to lineal from positive to negative, from life particle to death antiparticle and so on. What we both agree is that particles do NOT move faster than light, only in wave states.

And this agrees also with negative energy NOT masses. The mathematics of quantum theory is now very clear, so it is relatively straightforward to plug an imaginary mass into the equations to see what happens. When you do that and look closely the “particle” aspect of the quantum field actually travels slower than light. So what started as an idea for particles to move faster than light turns out to be something that moves slower than light. And ultimately it is a question on how much information the system carries in its stop state as a particle, vs. how much time it stays in motion as a way. Neutrinos carry less information than light, ergo stay in particle stay less time, ergo are less perceived, ergo in its wave state are more time at faster than light, and this is shown specially when coming from intergalactic sources (which is the trajectory faster than light). But faster than light neutrinos are only so as waves, and only because the c-speed is a barrier you cannot cross, when emitted as waves of ‘tau neutrinos’ in black hole top quark stars through the axis; which likely will produce a 0 scalar higgs field one axis and a 2 neutrino graviton field the other axis. But all this needs very serous maths to convince the ‘pro’ and so we shall keep it whenever we finish the third row.

**The ternary roles of vortices in terms of the fifth dimension.**

A FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH of 5D³ IS THE TERNARY PRINCIPLE applied to the roles systems command, and this is specially truth of the informative singularities, the mind=membrains that control the system. And as such they command with its dual singularity-membrain the rule of the system, as proteins and DNA nuclei do in cells. So do strangelet halos and black hole singularities in galaxies, and electronic covers and nuclei in atoms. And they will as such perform the 3 primary actions of entropic feeding, its inverse informative perception and its reproductive ST-present actions. As such we can study those ternary actions in organic, synoptic biological terms or in mathematical ones, through algebraic equations as physicists do, with its equation where the ‘3 numbers’/constants of those 3 functions, the phi number of reproduction, the pi number of information and the e number of feeding and death (exponential decay, which brings exponential growth to the predator entity) play a key role (we shall deal with imaginary numbers elsewhere):

INDEED, The mathematical depiction of those 3 primary actions of all systems of Nature take place Through the mathematical equations that explain the MOTIONS of ternary systems, through the two ±3 numbers, e and π and its closely related phi constant.

As a system reproduces in adjacent series on the ternary continuum of time arrows. Or when evolve socially into new scales of the fifth dimension through ternary, 3×3+1 exponential and decametric organic scales, as clone species organise in new social 5D planes.

**INFORMATION – πeyes**

This is little understood since for so much love of maths, as physicists do not try to match reality and maths, they miss what is important and not on the inflationary equations of maths. Two simple proofs on how much more enlightening is to refer maths to reality all the time to explain its equations:

e+e/10=3, which shows why the exponential function is the most perfect form of social evolution as ten is the perfect tetraktys form, with 3 entropic elements, 3 energetic element, 3 informative elements and the central 10th communicating them as the singularity of growing scales – reason also why the triangle is the most perfect, resistant form in space – the pythagorean perfect number when mathematical ‘things’ were simpler and easier to relate as a mirror-language to reality.

In the other graph show a simpler proof of the proportion of dark, not perceived energy and matter, OUTSIDE the galactic halo of ‘strangelets’ (those things cern say do not exist but are the natural component of the surrounding dark matter-membrane of the galaxy): a Pi cycle is really the first transformation of 3 entropic lines (strings in the corrected string theory to adapt it to relational space-time), into a time cycle, S>T, which adds a height dimension of information to form the first holographic bidimensional forms of space-time. Yet pi is 3, 14… and 3 diameters give 3, so pi-3 leaves o.14 apertures, which *become the ideal openings of any disk to observe the outer Universe from it, as the galaxy is. Now, this small openings of o.14 size are only 4% of the total pi **perimeter:*

π-3=0.14/π-perimeter=4%.

So 96% of the Universe OUTSIDE the halo, is NOT perceived properly – we are blind inside a pi-cycle. The Universe is much more complex and rich in information we shall EVER realise for the high popes of physics to be a bit more humble and cautious with their big bang experiments.

We call the ideal holes in the membrane of a system, call it pores or eyes, or ‘holes’ in the strangelet halo that allow *only part of the light that comes to the galaxy to enter, πeyes.*

*As we cannot see through them, neither we can see the strangelet halo of dark matter, it is just an extension of the Witten hypothesis, but natural to the symmetries of scales, latter studied in more detail. Ultimately all systems do have dark spaces, including human eyes.*

In the graph, the ideal πeye RANGE changes with species, as form change, but likely applies to the physical systems of bidimensional space (galactic disks) as one of the possible hypothesis on dark matter brought about by 5D³. Perception is always limited, linguistic – a mirror of the whole, but languages change on their ability to portrait the laws of ∆st

*Yet likely as in any other electronic /atomic system of the lower ∆-3 scale, symmetric to it, the galaxy hides part of the complex universe and ultimately regardless of the exact veracity of the πeye hypothesis, huge regions of reality do NOT interact with our world either because they are beyond an ∆-discontinuum, or a T-cyclical membrane. *

‘Only the Universe has all the information about itself’ Haldane.

**Spe pov on motion: Pacman Universe. Feeding.**

On the other hand the inverse ‘arrow’ of a singularity of attractive information is the use of the pixels it absorbs from a force, not as information but as energy. Again we can bring for good homology analysis the duality of plants and animals that use as energy or information the same ‘force’, light. In the case of galaxies the force involved should be the ∆-4 scale of gravitation… But the concept is roughly the same: stars and planets then ‘are’ gravitational plants and black holes gravitational animals.

We state that motion is reproduction of a form in an adjacent part of space. But as reproduction requires entropy-motion imprinted by the inner form of the being it also requires feeding. Thus another ‘angle’ to observe motion from an $pe-Pov is that of pacman Universe… *as all motions require the feeding in a field of ∆-1 particles, exploded entropically, by the vortex that advances. *This which was an earlier and only rational explanation of ‘why’ fields attract and why astrophysical systems are elliptical, as they have *2 focus of relative ‘net’ feeding.*

**Social forces: waving scales through force ‘communication’ and ‘herd feeding’.**

Finally to notice that all force is dual so as in the graph above light might be used to feed in plants to perceive in animals, the forces of ‘each scale’ (latter analysed) must have both roles, serving as communicators for further social evolution in ‘smooth’ not colliding perpendicular approaches – as in the orbits of planets, among similar forms (quasi-circular), and serving as feeding systems, which indeed is the role of the angular momentum and aerolar second law of kepler – the planets ‘wave-sinus distribution’ Titus laws, scan both the likely gravitational waves of the central black hole of the ‘galactic organism – gala cell’ for the sun, acting as antena receptors, but also use the attractive power of the sun over the quantum potential of the dark world over which they galaxy travels to ‘absorb’ quanta *likely neutrino at faster than light, in its ‘paradoxical informative role’ as opposed to the ‘expansive, decelerating neutrinos of the entropic role’ when they are ‘expelled from the sun’ Beta decay process.*

Yet as the duality of roles of neutrinos in its implosive, tachyon, gravitational non-local untested and entropic, decelerating sub-c speed role is well beyond this introduction, we shall leave the details like that and make an organic feeding analysis of the force netting (which of course will be completely disregarded by the ego paradox of the humind, only sentient, living species of the Universe by ‘decree’, LOL).

Indeed, a field of forces between two particles merely means that when two ‘particles attract, they form an elliptical dual ‘net’ and they move ‘feeding’ on the ∆-1 field. While a single vortex, will create a spherical field (as perceived by us), attracting with its curved spiral geometry the field particles, ‘reducing the field’ which seems to be an attractive process. And the faster it turns, the more it will feed. Thus as the mass increases the parallel tempo of the feeding pi-mouth increases. In the next graph we show both cases:

In the first graph a generic picture for any process of feeding by an opening mouth can also account obviously to the motion of the being which as the pi cycle enlarges moves ahead on the absorbed lower scale – a process to explain gravitational motion, which appeared in earlier literature and was retaken and wrongly discharged by Feynman. In the second graph: when 2 masses ally they will start forming topological ‘nets’, in which the smaller ‘point’ acts as the ‘herder’ of the larger system, entering an orbital path, *becoming the membrane which closes the vital space-time of the system. *

*And it does not need to be a perfect membrane (as the cell protein) but a mobile, fast one (as a dog herding a sheeple flock; or a magnetic field herding electrons).*

In that sense, to be more precise is more convenient to consider then for the analysis of entropic feeding of a time vortex over a motion field, instead of cc, its Maxwell’s equivalent, k/µ (where k is a compact constant of curvature, which *defines as distance=motion, the speed and strength of the constant membrane of the attractive field,* over the magnetic constant of vacuum, which *defines the smaller ∆-1 ‘quanta’ that feeds the electromagnetic field*) as those are the quanta the system feeds on.

**|: ENTROPY**

The arrow of entropy, expansive space and disorder, only acts in the scale of temperatures of the Universe, as it was defined studying Gas – by definition, the entropic, expansive arrow of temperature; inverse to the arrow of crystal solids, or cold temperatures that in fact reduces the entropy of a system.

So entropy is really the expansive, disordered, ‘lineal, spatial’ arrow of temperature. While symmetry, crystal formation is the cold, implosive, ordered arrow.

In terms of mathematical physics it means to dilate the spatial simultaneity (different paths) and reduce the temporal causality (Markowian statistical processes, without memory, as each quanta of time is non related to the next one0. Thus entropy IS clearly the inverse function of informative vortices, where causality in the cyclical motion towards the centre of the vortex is absolute.

So not even in the realm of temperature entropy is a Universal phenomena as physicists, specially those dedicated to manufacture weapons and make big explosions want us to believe (nuclear physicists with its big bang theories are the meaning of it all, the heirs of Galileo with his lineal concepts of time, physicists making transport machines and weapons, which are the ones that found the concept of entropy and then decided to expand it to everything else).

The problem is ‘military physics’ have all the power. So physicists of solid states; philosophers of science; theorists of information, evolutionary biologists and all those other people who study all the other clocks of time, and information processes of the Universe have not so much impact.

**Entropy, the arrow of disorder that erases information, the arrow of order. **

“I thought of calling it “information”, but the word was overly used, so Von Neumann told me, “You should call it entropy, nobody knows what entropy really is. So in a debate you will always have the advantage.”

*Von Neumann to Shannon, father of Information Theory.*

Since I was a kid, what call my attention on the Intelligent Universe were those ‘big concepts’, starting by Energy, Information, Space and Time, which are the widest concepts of reality. And found many obvious errors in the way humans tried to IMPOSE their opinions, gadgets and machines to the Universe.

So the first human, mechanical bias is the way we measure time. We do NOT use any longer as we used to do the cyclical rhythms of nature, but the mechanical clock, and try to reduce all the cycles of nature to that mechanical clock and its steady state one second rhythm. And we pretend that is the ‘absolute time rhythm and only one of the Universe!

This is akin to the old ways of astronomers who tried to impose to the Universe the frame of reference of the Earth as its center. It does work despite its bias, so with complicated cycles you can explain it all, from the point of view of the Earth, but calculations become very complex with epicycles and extant, etc.

So happens when you do NOT use the clocks of Nature, which soon will be defined here. Physics does work but it is overall very complicated when dealing with different time rhythms, and one century after Einstein found there are many such time rhythms and some change its speed there is zero understanding of this.

We just put some ‘new epicycles’ called Lorentz Transformations, but since we are stuck to our ethnocentric clock, as old astronomers to their earth-centric world, the explanations are blurred. Men merely try to feed the Universe onto their ‘time view’ or rather mechanical view of time. And the Universe is much ore complex and rich in clock rhythms than that.

Indeed, why we Humans use a mechanical clock with an artificial rhythm to measure time; If the Universe has infinite rhythms? It is just an ego trip and the worship of machines that characterize the western civilization. Thus when the Brits got to China to sell their ware, was the answer of Tao=time masters: why we want to buy your ugly mechanical clocks if we can observe the Universe with its clocks of nature, its cyclical rhythms? Obviously, the mechanical clock with its single steady state time cycle IS a human artifact.

Time did exist before mechanical clocks with his own rhythms. Its own Universal time clocks. The mechanical clock is NOT a Universal time clock. So the use of this human clock to measure all the time clocks of the Universe bias our concepts of time, and ‘hides’ the clocks of nature. So the next fundamental question in our search for proper definitions of time, entropy and black holes becomes obvious:

– What are the true clocks of nature? And once we find how Nature measure its cyclical time frequencies, we shall wonder are those rhythms of time stable, steady state rhythms as those of our mechanical clocks, or they change rhythms, have different ‘time speeds? And how they measure information and create it, as opposed to the creation of disorder and entropy? And which of those concepts order or disorder dominates the Universe?

The beats of lineal vs. cyclical stillness and motion, give us its natural 4 combinations:

- Lineal motion, lineal form, cyclical motion, cyclical form, which we shall call generically:
- Entropy or ‘kinetic energy’ (lineal motion), space (lineal form).
- time (cyclical motion) and information (cyclical form).

Those 2 forms then combine into all possible space-time membranes, and so the iterative game of creation starts in earnest.

Further on, we can consider each dual system with a lineal and cyclical limb/field particle/head, to be able to ‘change’ its state, from relative lineal motion in which the limbs and fields interact with the outer world translating in space the system and relative still, cyclical motion/form where the system perceives. This beat of ‘day and night’, energy and form, motion and stillness thus translates into the dynamic, topological transformations of living beings.

* ***Entropy confused with energy.**

In that regard, lineal entropy is completely accessory, the disordered ‘gaseous’, purely spatial (without temporal causality), expansive state of pure motion without information, in which all systems end up and can be equated to death or erasing of information – including today our societies returned to a dog-eat-dog selfie, fast-moving state are – not death in the usual perception of lack of motion, as the Universe started in pure motion, so paradoxically death is a return to a pure motion state.

So a first look at entropy is required as the state of expansive space, which happens *when the Tiƒ singularity, of maximal form that orders the system does NOT exist and so the system lives in a disordered state.. in a non-memorial, non-causal ‘Markowian’ process – the technical name to memoriless realities in which what happens at each quanta of time matters not in the next one, as information is not conserved:*

*When the • singularity dies , all** the system** looses information and becomes disordered, and so it is proper of states that lack ‘informative vortices’, masses and charges, or eddies of thermodynamic flows, such as gaseous states, dark entropy between galaxies or ‘quantum fields’ in the realist Pilot-wave theory, studied in detail in the fourth line. *

In that regard, the less advanced concept of time in physics, which still hangs on despite Feynman and Einstein is the idea of a dying entropic Universe.

This concept of ‘entropy’ as the only future arrow of time, or death arrow of expansive disorder, obtained in XIX c. studies of expansive gas, is completely outdated even by the standards of modern physics.

Unfortunately cosmologists have expanded that arrow to the entire universe, because they don’t care to understand conceptually, ‘Feynman-style’, Einstein and his findings: that ‘time curves space into accelerated vortices of mass-information’ in galaxies, which balance the entropic arrow of expansive space between galaxies (hence both arrows as in E<=>Mc² , the fundamental equation of time.

Entropy pure motion will then be the base from where all other forms will rise to transform motion – that *is the **concept which is behind all mathematical equations of all systems, and so entropy ‘as a ratio’ parameter will always have more speed that the other two components of the system.*

**ENTROPIC POTENTIALS, FEEDING WAVE MOTIONS… AND SINGULARITIES**

In the graph, the new ‘foundational equation of speed’ for the fractal paradigm: V=Space-distance/Temporal Information, is embedded in relativity and recognised in the concept that the speed of light is really a limit of speed of transmission of ‘human perceivable’ information.

Wave motion is also reproduction of form in the lower ∆-1 scale of action at distance (gravitation, quantum potential). Thus even motion is reproduction of form as a wave of information over a simpler scale of space-time. It solves the paradox of a Achiles – the wave reproduces its form in a series of discontinuous steps. It also explains why indeed the Universe is a fractal that reproduces as all fractals do, its form in a lower scale of reality which then reproduces into a wave-train that collapses into a particle (physical systems), or a seed that emerges after palingenesis into an ambulatory trillion cells systems (biological systems), or into an idea or patent of an instrument that a company-mother of machines will re=produce in socio-economical systems.

Indeed, when we consider as Steane wanted a Universe from the perspective of ‘information’ and its ‘conserved present momentums and energies’, it all becomes simple and philosophically obvious. And so we just must explains the laws of reproduction of information along scales of reality to describe the ‘world cycles’ of existence, no longer worldlines – that is the motions across scales of the fifth dimension, which define all systems of nature.

Yet to fully understand how reproduction of form takes place, we need to understand reproduction across ‘scales’ of size. That is, the meaning of world cycles, just explained, as they require motion from a seminal seed ∆-1, into a larger scale; as opposed to what physicists study with their reductionist model of a single space-time continuum: worldlines.

The question of light motion as a wave and the particle state as an informative collapsed point in stillness brings though as always in stience when solving a paradox – in this case the paradox of motion -new questions.

If motion is reproduction of information along a path of entropy, which is ‘warped into form’ emerging in a series of scales of ∆-wholeness, so when you move your hand, you are actually recreating all your scales above invisible gravitation – creating a wave of electronic light that travels very slow as it reproduces your system, the first question is: how many scales are in the Universe for motion to happen at all? The scales cannot be infinite or reproduction of information will be eternal. But the question is misleading, *since a wave does not really move but transmits a series of vibrations to particles that are already there, in a dense ‘medium’. *

*This brings the question of ‘ether’, of ‘substance or form in space’ over ‘motion in time’. As many other open questions which we shall treat in other posts on depth, we just enunciate them in this introduction. *Enough to say that science is not written into stone but an evolving concern, so relativity is not a dogma, but an interpretation, which was good enough in its moment and we shall expand further.

In practical terms *the key way to understand GST/∆ST (ab. for the generator of space-time, or general systems theory/Scalar space-time) is to equip your mind with multidimensional thought. *The solution adopted by Einstein and Bohr was pure idealism of the Hilbert school – there is no substance, no reference, all is virtual language, mathematical thought.

But physical systems as all systems are dominant in present states, signified in physics by waves. Waves carry both entropic motion and cyclical form and as such are the natural present, reproductive, e > iƒ element of reality, whereas we use e and i for entropy & energy (max. e x min. i) information (max. f x min. e).

Systems that take and give entropy and form, become then energy systems able to communicate and start the building of larger scales of the fifth dimension.

The dominance of present thus stays within the game and provokes the constant reproduction of motion along scales.

**The inverse view: how masses become entropy, descending in ∆-scales and dimensional form.**

But as always in 5D³ we need multiple perspectives on the being. So we wonder, how the inverse ‘destruction’ of a vortex of time-space happens, NOT in algebraic form (M<c²), but in topological dimensions, a more general case of application to all vortices – and the answer is simple: through the reduction of ‘dimensions of distance-form’ into its equivalent (Galilean paradox) dimensions of motion-acceleration, proving that both ARE equivalent, expressed in the fact that ‘G, K’ are both constants of curvature and constants of acceleration… (and constant of the speed of feeding and transmit ions of information from the entropic view, so c²=4π k/µ).

And so we write the inverse ‘view’ of the destruction and lowering of scale of an informative, physical vortex as an inverse partial Generator equation:

∆+1 Mass (Tiƒ) < ∆-ST-c ² < ∆-1: $pe: 4πk/µ

**Electrostatics, a simple case of mathematical physics to illustrate entropic potentials in all planes.**

LET US illustrate the case considering a first insight on the combination of a complex ∆s≈t view of mathematical physics which deals with ‘dimensionality’ to establish the 3 ‘arrows of timespace’ in the different ‘views’ of the mathematical humind (topological bidimensional or three dimensional forms and even more complex 6-D tensors, or simpler 3 D of space-time, x,y,z) of the 3 different parts of the being, given the simplicity of the electrostatic equations, which work in 3 Sx,y,z and ignore time motion now that we have talked of potentials, the ∆-2 plane of an organism of physics.

As such potentials provide *minimal information to the humind, not because its scale has no form but because we ONLY extract motion of it, by PROVOKING entropic destruction of the ‘feeding’ energy of the **potential, whatever it is. And this shows by a double differentiation, in which the particle’s informative density differentiates=lowers a plane to the wave-field, which lowers a plane of dimensional information to the potential field.*

This is obviously a case of the generator: ∆-1 Potential > ∆-wave > ∆+1 particle, whereas mathematical physics uses ∆nalysis to derivate or integrate scales.

Let us put the example: how we calculate electric potentials, relating potentials to the charge density which gives rise to it.

The electric field (wave: ∆) is related to the charge density (∆+1) by the divergence relationship:

∇ E = 4π k ρ (we escape the meaningless ε as what matters is the inverse k-urvature; and we use ratios, densities, as absolute parameters are also meaningless in a relative Universe where the @mind, charge or mass has limited view beyond ∆±3)

So a first derivate takes us from the particle density to hew ave-field. And then again the electric field is related to the electric potential by a gradient relationship: E=-∇ V

Therefore the potential is related to the charge density by Poisson’s equation:

∇·∇V=∇²V=- 4π kρ

So this is all what the charge-singularity measure by density and curvature=strength, wants of its 2 down feeding ‘quantum potential’ or ‘vacuum space’: to extract motion of it for its wave-particle.

But *without the charge, our electronic mind sees nothing and so it seems magic, and of course the ego paradox of creationism make us think that the charge creates the lower class-prey, the vacuum space quanta; it only ‘feeds on it’ when it appears. *

So n a charge-free region of space, the potential becomes zero information – the Laplace’s equation:

∇² V = 0

Then we can also consider another rule of ‘endophysics’ (the science that considers the observer but not from the ego creationist paradox of quantum physics but the opposite mind’s limits): the *nature, will and cause of any physical event will belong to the ST-cartesian mind view, the T-polar singularity or the S-cylindrical coordinates, according to the maximal simplicity of its equations.*

So by expressing the Laplacian in different coordinate systems we can realise what is the ‘source’ of the event; as the type of topological symmetry of a charge distribution helps in the solution for the electric potential V. For example, if the charge distribution has spherical symmetry, originated therefore by a singularity point, we use the Laplacian in spherical polar coordinates.

And viceversa *as *the potential give us the minimal information, it is a scalar function. And so departing from it, has advantages over trying to calculate the electric field directly. Once the potential has been calculated, the electric field can be computed by taking the gradient of the potential; from downwards up. And this is a great advantage of the Rashomon effect – *obscured by creationist economics and the eternal argument between each one-dimensional humind ego about which model is more ‘real’ and truth – all are just different points of view, whose use depends on our need of information on the receiving end and the origin of the event on the giving one*.

BUT if we were to reduce all the povs is OBVIOUS that the key POVS are those of the 3 symmetries of reality, the scalar view just described (∆±i), the temporal view (here we would have to discuss a different continuity equation to get similar results) and the spatial-topological view, which are the *3 sub-symmetries of the generator, done with the awareness that mind-tricks might need some further input (as all relativity consistent expansions of classic physics).*

So the previous symmetry of this simple ‘case’ illustrates it. If we were to use the topological view, of the 3 ‘parts of the electron super organism, the potential in its pure form will be outside the system, the wave, now in a ‘spherical time§paœrganism’ will be the membrane with its ‘2 sides’, the one towards the outside field and the one towards the inside organism, and the internal gradient towards the singularity will be the T-element. And the KEY element will be THE PART the humind perceives, which as the previous graph shows tends to be the membrane. Indeed, you see from any other human its membrane; and for those species you can decode its information-mind you can ‘hear’ its singularity thoughts, but normally the membrain – the so called boundary conditions in physics is the key to ‘convert’ into equations the whole being from the humind utility pov.

So what we just studied become the ‘best’ VIEW for a ternary topological perspective in this case for a uniform sphere of charge, which will be its spherical polar coordinates, since there is full spherical symmetry here. And we found that the outside potential of a point charge at large distances is extremely simple: V= k Q/r; that is for an electron Ke, which we shall see is indeed the ‘curvature x charge’ divided by the distance, r.

Inside in the singularity-body region is more complex, dimensionally richer with more information and *the due uncertainty for the external observer, the humind*: – ρ R² x 2/3 k +d.

Without getting in mathematical details on how we get this equation, *the key element to find the ‘vanished info, d’ on the inside sphere is the fact that the membrane has 2 sides, which must be essentially equal in the element we calculate, the potential, as the open ball membrane is enormously ‘thin’. *

*So we can equate here the T element (inside) and the S element, outside, with the ST-element, S=T (the fundamental equation of the universe for all present systems). And so we equal both: – ρ R² x 2/3 k +d. = kQ/r, which gives us the canonical * full solution for the potential inside the sphere from the topological view, with the 3 elements together:

V=* – ρ 2/3 k (R² -r²)+ ρ2/3k R²*

And then if we add the continuity dynamic time-equation we have the 3 symmetries.

So we shouldn’t be surprised of the fact mathematical physics is essentially a game of very few equations despite the enormous variety of partial forms, as they correspond to the very simple number of elements that conform reality.

This again can be seen next if we have a look at the ∆+1 simple gravitational equations first described in physics, Kepler’s law and relate them to ∆st beings.

But before an important dual coda:

“In the fractal Universe, the present space-time element IS the most perceived”. “In the fractal Universe, the existence of membranes that break space into an inner and outer region, limiting the information we perceive beyond ‘the wall’.

Both are illustrated by the case studied. Indeed, because we adopt an external view, the inner region has a d-uncertain factor. But what we obtain is the information of the relative present (as here V is $), the membrane. If we were inside the system though the uncertainty as in the galaxy, is the outside potential (dark entropy region). And finally what is past, present and future is also relative. If we were inside closer to the singularity, then the vital energy of the open ball will be the present, and often the past and future, singularity and membrane uncertain (we do not have indeed much info of the black hole and the halo, because we are in the ud-region between them).

*The ternary planes in potentials. *

Now this is from wikipedia, negrita is mine, to show i ‘don’t bend reality’ (:

Laplace’s equation and Poisson’s equation are the simplest examples of elliptic partial differential equations. The general theory of solutions to Laplace’s equation is known as potential theory. The solutions of Laplace’s equation are the harmonic functions, which are important in many fields of science, notably the fields of** ∆-1:** electromagnetism, **∆+1:** astronomy, and **∆œ** fluid dynamics, because they can be used to accurately describe the behavior of **∆-1:** electric, **∆+1:** gravitational, and **∆œ** fluid potentials. In the study of **∆œ:** heat conduction, the Laplace equation is the steady-state heat equation.

So obviously physics of potentials is perfectly encased, no more, nor less to fit the 3 physical planes, all of which are self-similar and all of which have a potential death, ∆-2 bottom line of microscopic indistinguishable particles from where the field and singularity extracts its motion.

** Ø: ENERGY – REPRODUCTIVE WAVES ≈ e x i**

PRESENT is THE DOMINANT ARROW IN WHICH the entropic past and the informative future, act as limits of existence, where existence does no longer happen for that specific local variation of the time-space arrows.

All the laws of conservation of physics (energy, momentum, etc.) are in fact expressions of the most general law of a constant reproductive Universe, where systems reproduce the same forms once and again, as even simple motion is reproduction.

**Motion as reproduction of information along the path of a wave.**

The Universe reproduces information and it tries to do a perfect replica, and this is the origin of the conservation of present energy, as all systems combine motion=entropy and dimensional form. Yet when the system has too much form and no motion as time never stops it reverses its ‘arrow of time’ and in a single quanta explodes and erases all information, in an entropic big-bang.

So finally all is a zero-sum: entropy=motion is used to reproduce information, and evolves till the dominant arrow of information – call it a galaxy vortex, a technological planet, an ageing human, a species evolving through horizons, warps all the fields of entropy into information. In physical space-time ‘time curves space into masses (Einstein)’: vortices of charges in lower scales, thermodynamic eddies and crystals in our scale and masses in the cosmological scales.

Thus *the overwhelming purpose of the Universe is to maintain, conserve and repeat the ‘momentum’ that combines entropy-motion and vortex of information (charges and masses), of its beings, and its integral through time – or energy conserved in all systems of nature. Present reproductive energy is what the Fractal super organism of the Universe preserves.*

For those skeptical readers, in simple terms, *a mathematical fractal is defined by a generator equation, which ‘constantly iterates’, reproducing its form in different scales of reality. And this is exactly what nature does. And the fractal generator of 5D3 written above, to express the ternary topologies of all beings, through its 3 time ages, and co-existing 3 organic scales, is exactly that sought after **centuries ‘formula which physicsts’ believe will conceptually resume all space-time events for all fractal beings.*

Alas, there you have it a ‘simple fractal generator of 3 x 3 scales, topologies and ages of time’ define all systems of reality as parts or wholes of a super organism in a perfect, infinite, immortal ever balanced between entropy and information, to produce energy cycles, zero sum reality.

So take your pick: do you like what i just told you in a few pages – the 5D3 FORMALISM that describes REALITY AS IT IS in all its beauty and complexity, infinity and variety, including you.

So i state that the universe reproduces information; they say the Universe is about motion. Alas, I state then motion is just reproduction of ‘simpler information’ at faster speed.

Indeed, it is evident that all biological systems are about reproduction of genetic form in a lower scale of reality (cellular scale), which then reproduces and evolves, ’emerging’ into a higher scale. It is also evident that our historic civilisations are about reproduction of technological information in a lower ‘dimensional scale’ (blue prints for machines), which then ‘company-mothers’ reproduce.

So the big question left to answer is about physical systems, which are supposed to be about ‘motion’.

You might have heard an important insight of modern physics on the meaning of the limit of c-speed. Nothing can in this lolca part of the Universe – the galaxy – faster than light. There are many angles to study this important issue but now we are interested in the concept that this c-light speed is the limit of reproduction of information as the wave of light *imprints vacuum space with its frequency and form.*

*In the graph motion has always had a difficult paradox, never clearly solved, of continuity called Achilles paradox; which only has a solution if we consider as quantum physics seem to prove that in the scalar Universe, reproduction of form happens in all scales.*

In the right graph we see the actual appearance of a quantum wave, exactly as a reproductive wave, in which each new particle is the stop position reproduced, leaving behind a ‘memorial ghost’ as the previous particle-waves dissolves into the vacuum.

*So even motion is reproduction of form; and this, when extended to the reproduction of a superorganism through all the scales of the fifth dimension determines that a being moves faster when less information reproduces. *

And so a new fundamental equation of speed, which takes into account the fractal structure of reality and the true meaning of ‘light speed’, which is speed of transmission of information solves the paradox of the constancy of speed (the reason which when I was a kid, at 8, reading Asimov’s guide to science, came to my mind as the biggest question to resolve in my long quest for ‘whys’.

So we write: V=S/Ti: that is speed is speed of transmission of information.

So we change the canonical definition of time in Galileo (and Einstein’s refinement) substituting the term of time for information: v=s/Ti.

Thus the being with more form has lesser speed as it moves in stop-reproduction of form through motion-stop. And when the system has maximal density of form, obviously there is more to reproduce across all its scales of the fifth dimension, from its particles, through atoms, molecules, matter/cells, super organism etc. While the maximal speed is that of light, because it has the MINIMAL information to reproduce.

And then gravitation that is invisible to us hence v=s/0 information must be infinite, non-local in speed. And inversely the densest vortex of gravitational information, the black hole IS ALWAYS STILL as it is in its own static frame of reference as the most attractive vortex of time.

So in the middle between maximal c-speed of reproduction of minimal information and zero speed of maximal black hole information the rest of beings, including us move reproducing all its scales of Information. So* when you move your hand through all the scales of being you must reproduce all those scales to finally form your hand. What reproduces is NOT matter but form in motion, in action in-form-a(c)tion.*

* Y *ou are the vital information which becomes imprinted in ever-changing, indistinguishable, repleceable CHNO atoms.

As your ‘real first scale’ of being, as a ternary superorganism of relational space-time, is your ∆-1, cellular genetic scale; formed with ‘any’ indistinguishable CHNO atom.

Thus light merely warps the entropy of the lower scale-field, ∆-1, which is invisible gravitation to us and hence must have less information and more speed, as experiment prove (gravitational non-local, invisible action at distance, due to the lack of human detectable information, which gives a speed for the quantum potential field/gravitational field of: v -> s/ti≈0 -> s/0=∞). So *this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we **have *to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process):

In the graph, light as a supœrganism, feeding on the quantum potential field of the dark world. Its motion thus reproduces form, imprinting the lower scale of v>c of the dark world≈gravitational≈neutrino≈dark entropy≈expanding vacuum in the multiple physicists parallel ∆•st views.

Non-local quantum fields below light space-time, the next scale which Bohm formalised *must therefore be much faster than light, to the point of being seemingly non-local or else causality essential to time processes (even if sometimes is co-causality or multiple causal rays joined in a point) would not happen.*

Normally those parameters that quantify the difference of speed (s/t), density (t/s) and momentum ( s x t) between scales and its species are on decametric, ternary potencies, as the 5D scales are. So ± 1, 10, 1oo, 1ooo, 10.000 are the commonest differences between scales. I.e. the fine structure constant, measure the difference between the light scale speed and the next upper ∆+1 electronic scale, around +100 (137). The difference of scaling between photons and electrons and the lower ∆-1 scale though is larger.

After all dense photons are just the ‘cellular’ level of electrons. So for complex more detailed reasons concerning the parameters of GST scaling, action at distance should be on the α² bidimensional speed scaling, compared to the larger, light world, around 10.000 times faster and all that happens in 10 thousand times more distance within the minimal quanta of human observation should seem to us NON-LOCAL.

Actually recently a Chinese lab measured non-locality which turned out to have a c=10.000 speed, for its ‘thinner’ minimal messages; or upper boundary of maximal speed of non-local effects; and so we do observe all kind of non-local c<V<10.000 C PHENOMENA, which of course theorist then vehemently deny to uphold its pretension of absolute truths under c speed, *which is only the speed of information in the scale of light space-time, as the substrata of the scale is the Bg light background radiation. *

*So as you cannot travel faster than a plane when you are inside of it, you cannot travel faster than light when you are inside a galaxy sustained by a light space-time substrata. But outside, in the dark world you do have the possibility to go faster.*

So as motion is reproduction, all is reproduction in the fractal world.

But then departing from that primary entropic motion, the growth of reproduction will cause the different worldcycles of beings; which will lead to the system’s final warping into a cyclical vortex of time, mass or charge or any other particle of any other scale. And the mathematical or organic detail and mirror will put on it will always end up shown as the three ages of time or if we put a different mirror on it with less more detail we can analyse the system as we do in general in this blog with other biological systems, as the product of an… organic world cycle.

**Speeds of reproduction**

It is then when we can unify conceptually all waves being *aware that we can do different S=T dimensional analysis, giving us different speeds of reproduction ‘formulae’ according to the detail and number of ‘reproductive S=T’ parameters we use. And the focus on the ‘speed of the outer membrane’ (phase velocity) or ‘wave-speed proper’ and the speed of the inner singularity, which as it has more information will be slower (group velocity), such as:*

wave velocity > (both bigger and shrinking-informative arrow) group-singularity – velocity.

This general law thus applies to all wave-present states and as usual can be applied no longer in topological terms to ‘herds-states’ of any scale; even if it seems in principle contradictory, that a smaller ‘group-singularity’ takes longer. But what matters is the quantity of information and ‘network’ position of the singularity-mind-still whole. I.e. in an army the commander tends to move behind the soldiers, as it is the static, informative and key element protected, by the same law, no longer topological in its easy deduction.

It is though the group wave that carries most of the information/form/frequency patterns of the system, as the singularity general does.

Since a pure sine wave cannot convey any information. So some change in amplitude or frequency, known as modulation, is required. By combining two sines with slightly different frequencies and wavelengths, then we start to build up that inner modulation of the group.

It is this modulation that represents the signal content. Since each amplitude envelope contains a group of internal waves, this speed is usually called the group velocity, Vg.

The general formula of the wave-velocity then becomes self-evident, in terms of reproduction of information, no longer v=s/t which gives no information as v= wavelength (S-quanta) x ƒ (frequency); which gives us the reproduced element (the S-quanta) and the temporal frequency of its reproduction.

And it is then when we can apply the ‘rashomon effect’ and its different views to express this lineal wave (S-view) as an angular wave (t-view):

v= w (angular frequency)/k (wave number).

Whereas the wave propagates faster when higher frequency oscillations are distributed less densely in space. So the fundamental concept behind the speed of waves – maximal information = minimal speed is conserved.

But the view we have now can be considered the polar view of the singularity which harmonically vibrates up and down to produce the wave, establishing the first synchronicity of all systems between the ‘singularity’ vibrating in the height dimension of information and its membrane rotating in a balanced steady state.

This expresses mathematically with derivatives, which *always represent an ∆+1 condensation of information, hence the preferred method to extract a Tƒ parameter,* so in general, the phase velocity is Vp = ω/k and the group velocity Vg = dω/dk.

But *this kind of waves, are indeed, waves of reproduction over a lower medium of a minimal information; where we can ‘split’ the dimensions of the wave-information and the ‘medium’, so we only need a 2 Dimensional v= s x ð = s/t analysis. *

It is of more interest, and closer to the essential reproductive motion – that of a light wave to consider the ‘motion of information’ in a fixed string, whereas we cannot ‘differentiate’ the string inner properties (mass, which plays here the role of the informative singularity; and tension, which is the force exerted on the extremes of the string and hence play the role of the ‘constrains’ of the wave-phase-membrane).

So the same conceptual equation of speed of reproduction is built now with the parameters of mass-information and tension-external membrane, which gives us the equation of all ‘waves’ within the intrinsic properties of the material. Therefore speed will have to be written with more dimensions – in fact as a bidimensional *transformation which affects in an more extensive deeper sense the system*:

v² = tension (outer parameter ≈membrane constrains)/ mass-density (inner parameter)

And so once we localise for each ‘substance’ the parameters of tension in space and density of information (wave-group, membrane-singularity, etc.) we get always the same equation. 3 canonical samples suffice:

The square speed of a transverse wave traveling along a vibrating string ( v ²) is directly proportional to the tension of the string ( T ) over the linear mass density ( μ ):

v²= T/ μ

where the linear density μ is the mass per unit length of the string.

Acoustic or sound waves travel at speed given by:

v²= B/ ρ

which are called the adiabatic bulk modulus divided by the ambient fluid density.

And so finally we return to the light wave:

c²= 4π k/µ

Which clarifies (as Maxwell first thought) the meaning of k (being ε, its inverse, used by physicists with little conceptual ‘why’ interest, completely misleading) – the tension/curvature of light space-time and its ‘denser’ electronic nebulae (charge constant) and µ, *the informative, magnetic ‘density’ (the equivalent of mass in larger scales, of spin in lower ones) of light space-time.*

All changes indeed in different ‘mediums’ and ‘planes’ to remain the same.

Tension then is obviously a ‘dual force’ exerted to ‘expand the space’ of a physical system, hence directly related to entropic motion (Galilean paradox), and magnetic constants appears then as the potential ‘density of information’ which can be written as patterns of form and order in light space-time. All this concepts will enrich our analysis of electromagnetism in the more specific posts on the theme.

Why then the speed of light does not change with those parameters, is also studied everywhere: motion is in wave state, particles are in relative stop to each other entangled through the quantum potential field and hence they do not move related to each other, so happens to our electronic eyes or metal eyes of measure. To account for that stopping in the quantum scale not perceived in our larger scale we do need to establish for translating stop into motion the Lorentz Transformations and the extraordinarily confuse jargon of modern relativity which hides a rather simple ‘galilean paradox’ of particle-stop vs. wave-motion/reproduction of information in space…

**Energy and momentum. Distinction between ∆st åctions and physical actions.**

We explained already in the general moment that the ternary ‘scaling’ happens both in time and space, and so we talk of 3 levels, of ‘integration:

∑∑3±i åctions= ∑3 time arrows/cycles: physiological functions = 3±i Worldcycle of life and death (time duration/existence; history in time)

∑∑cells/atoms/citizens = ∑3 matter states/networks/systems= 3±i time§paœrganism (planet, ecosystem; Humanity in space).

And we shall see therefore *not only structure of space in 3 scales of ‘size-population’, but parallel structures in time with 3 ‘length of cycles’. *

How this works mathematically and with the parameters of physics and the symmetries it creates?

It has to be noticed first that we do not talk of the same concept when we refer to åctions or ‘drives of existence’ in ∆st and actions in physics *as the concept of an action in physics is closer to that of a **world cycle (the full timespace process), while in ∆st, in which we need to use more general terms with application to all stiences we use more the concept of an ‘event in time-space’, a minimal quanta measurable, in which a supœrganism ‘acts in the external world’*.

Hence the need for a clarification.

In physics we translate the 3 *scales for the being as momentum, which is our quanta of åctions, its integral which is the energy of the system… and finally the integral of energy in time, which is our world cycle (and in physics an action – another reason to use different ‘as’, å for the momentum, and a for the world cycle – we shall then to avoid confusions call it in physical articles a physical action and a momentum-åction).*

**Worldcycles in physics as zero-sums: lagrangian actions.**

In Lagrangian and Hamiltonian physics, action is an attribute of the dynamics of a physical system from which the equations of motion of the system can be derived. It is a mathematical functional which takes the trajectory, path or history, of the system with different values for different paths. Action has the dimensions of energy x time or momentum x length, and it IS perhaps the most important element in physics as it is the world cycle in ∆st and both have as value a zero sum, in a closed conservative world cycle.

Why? Because the NEXT scale of time as a ‘sum’ of energy instants does not grow further, as energy is a present ST-ate of the being. And the whole integration through the whole life-death cycle (energy x time: physical action) is a zero sum, with *3 standing points, which are the changes between ages of the being*.

So once we have integrated the momentum actions into the whole ‘time’ content of in-form-ation as energy, we do NOT obtain more than a scalar or a zero sum when we integrate over time again energy as energy is ‘conserved’ in its ‘present state.

We integrate the 3±i ages of the being or event, taking into account that the whole world cycle will be a zero sum.

And this is the Lagrangian ‘world cycle≈physical action’:

This can be summarized by Hamilton’s principle:

∫δ L dt=0

The time integral of the Lagrangian is another quantity called the action, defined as:

S=∫ L d t

This is THE preferred expression of the laws of Newton, as IT does not have to deal with the concept of ‘force’, nebulous in classic physics.

**The concept of force in ∆st.**

But for us is more telling to understand fully a force as the interaction of what physicists call an Active magnitude – a vortex of accelerated time of any scale, and a potential – an ∆-1 field destroyed into entropy to provide motion to the ‘ever consuming accelerated time vortex’.

THUS A FORCE *is a double ∆-tƒ parameter, f=m (accelerated vortex of mass) x a (acceleration).*

*Force is important and we shall explain it in the section on mechanics, but for the time being we shall say what is evident:*

*‘A force is an ∆+1: tƒ< ∆-1:$p-otential state, in which the vortex of accelerated time provokes the entropy of a potential and absorbs its expanding space to ad it to its total mass-energy supœrganism.’*

THAT IS WHY FORCES ARE SO IMPORTANT IN PHYSICS BECAUSE THEY REPRESENT ONE OF THE 3 BASIC TIME ARROWS THAT FUEL THE FUTURE accelerated vortex (being the other two, the inverse of a force, where the mass devolves into the potential) and the stable present state.

Thus, instead of thinking about particles accelerating in response to applied forces, one might think of them picking out the path with a stationary action, with the end points of the path in configuration space held fixed at the initial and final times. Hamilton’s principle is the principle of least action – the idea of finding the shortest path a particle can follow subject to a force solved by Leibniz… and as usual after Leibniz by Newton the following year saying again as in calculus that he was thinking long ago in variational calculus, but did not publish. Oh, my friend how harsh is mankind on his true genius when they just do thought experiments as opposed to the ambitious mediocrities that have power and make weapons.

NOW, HERE IS THE CONUNDRUM: How the particle finds its minimal time path on advance? This only Feynman worked out and wondered with no final result, because it *implies that the particle knows where it is going – the end constrain of its trajectory and moves, stops, gauges, moves, stops, gauge to find the least time consuming trajectory as we would do if WE PERCEIVE=GAUGE INFORMATION.*

So all the maths of modern mechanics based in that principle, in Lagrangian and Hamiltonians confirm two facts basic to ∆st, which is NOT SHY, egocentered, as if only humans perceive, to explain the reasons: the world cycle (Lagrangians, actions) as a zero sum, and the sentient perceptive state of the particle, which stops to gauge and correct in ‘derivative’ steps, the REAL meaning of each of those derivatives of momentum.

Alas, derivatives, stop and go perception and the most important equations of mathematical physics are all related.

And so if we want to manipulate further energy equations for a ‘time duration’ of a world cycle or least time path, we enter into the analysis of Hamiltonians and Lagrangian formulations; which might be expressed:

A) Only as energy. THEN THEY ARE time independent (Hamiltonians of energy as in Schrodinger’s equation).

B) tend to zero sums in time or at least to the minimal time consumption as it does the whole world cycle for Lagrangian derivatives that return us to the momentum steps, which tends to minimise for each ‘action’ the consumption of the lifetime of the whole being (principle of least action).

So we have illuminated and encased within the ‘laws of ∆st’ the most important equations of physics.

And it is easy to see that wen dealing with frequencies we can do the same with fourier transform the other ‘monster equation’ predating all the physics of time/frequency waves (the other present state). There again the Fourier transform ‘ads faster, multiple quanta of frequency, information’ and makes a whole, the bigger wave, and the beauty of it is that we can ‘decompose’ the whole into parts and ‘rescue’ the time frequencies that are faster in beat and come together to emerge as a whole.

As this is very standard math, we shall as usual merely ‘quote’ equations or bring them when they are very simple, on line with the purpose of the second line, which IS THAT ANYONE WHO HAS UNDERSTOOD THE CONCEPTUAL elements without more than high school physics/maths can get it all.

What here matters of the fourier transform IS the fact that we have resolved a KEY ELEMENT OF ALL ∆-§calar analysis: HOW BY RESONANCES AND MIXING AND SUPERPOSITION AND HERDING, A NEW WHOLE EMERGES FROM A SERIES OF ‘SYNCHRONIZED’ SMALLER PARTS.

And we shall return to it ‘a lot’ as this is indeed a key question in all sciences – the reasons and processes of emergence of whole new scales and parameters.

So here we have to ways of emerge, in time, through the merging of faster beat/frequencies and the whole science of synchronicity behind it that applies in all sciences: i.e. a moon cycle of the larger whole is synchronous to the woman’s menses. And we have studied how in space-time åctions integrate into momentum, which integrate into worldcycles.

**CONSERVATION LAWS OF REPRODUCTIVE PRESENTS.**

**THE 3 CONSERVATION LAWS CORRESPOND TO THE 3 PARTS OF THE BEING.**

**Tƒ-conservation.** Another view on those Universal constants is as parameters of the 3 sub-elements of the four elements of all systems, which also means *each of those parameters will act according to the inversion laws and symmetries of the fractal generator in different roles.*

I.e. c-speed is the speed of reproduction of information within the galaxy, but it is the ‘circular membrane’ or time clock of black holes and dark, quark matter; and it is also the body-wave of the hc planckton super organisms of light and its is the basic bit of information of electronic mechanical or life minds.

*The multiple, ternary and quaternary (when including •mind-linguistic still-galileo-relativity paradoxes) method thus must reorder and give multiple meaning through the ‘rashomon effect’ to each variable and parameter, constant or ratio of physics, in its multiple roles.*

Still each parameter will be dominant in one of its functions. And those are to measure ‘frequencies in time or populations in space – frequencies with a memorial longer duration; and we shall call those time parameters, which are mostly frequency, related, inverse to lineal time duration, t=1/ƒ; while there will be ‘quanta of energy-present space-time’ also acting as ratios and constants of each scale, and those are the h, k, c universal constants; which will also act as’ fixed’ units of ‘dead-memorial space’, when moving to a past state, as micro-points of larger scales.

So c-speed becomes also the ‘quanta-step’ of the dark world, the ultimate substrata over which it builds new forms.

**$pe-conservation:** It comes thus with the constancy of c-speed the inverse lineal momentum or Sp-conservation law.

However in ∆ST we need *to transcend even those names of specific scales for the larger, purest topological description of the 3 elements of reality.*

**ST-conservation:** Finally the third fundamental conservation law is that of the open ball energy component of the system (as seen in space) or world cycle zero sum (as seen in time).

We can though resume further those conservation laws in the simplest, most important of all equations of stience, recorded in my mind-point for decades

ALL THIS said the importance of ST-waves is multiple, and we shall here consider only two elements in certain depth, the laws of conservation of physics, which they explain with the Noether theorem, a mathematical abstraction that merely states that ‘each symmetry of nature means a conservation law’, and then gets into equations without any physicist able to explain you much of that cryptic sentence. We shall be more straightforward:

*the Universe is a fractal that reproduces and hence conserves dynamically information, form in motion, momentum and its sum over a cyclical stretch of time, the integral of momentum called energy, which is never spent when the ‘time motion’ is a conservative closed cycle.*

In other word the conservation principle tell us 2 fundamental things About nature:

- THAT MOTION IS CONSERVED as it is the substance of nature.
- And form is also conserved when the cyclical motion closes into itself in an energy ‘conservative cycle’ that moves but does not do work.

This simple logical, seemingly contradiction – that you can move and do work, but not spend ‘energy’ if you just go up and down a mountain or move a ton around the Earth back to the same point IS JUST TELLING US, the UNIVERSE CONSERVES TIME CYCLES, THE FORMAL, REPETITIVE MOTIONS that are the ultimate substance of Nature.

That is the core of all conservation laws: the conservation of reproduced information that seems to be the same, making a dynamic present to repeat its same formal motions and species. Conservation thus means reproductive motions. Point. Of course then if you are just doing esoteric interpretation of reality you can consider the Noether theory and connect ‘time cycles and energy conservation’ in more esoteric terms than those explained, and lineal momenta (a bit of a whole world cycle of energy-time) and conservation of space, made of open strings, lineal momenta, lineal inertia and any other way you want to ‘express’ in the kaleidoscope of languages and jargons something very simple:* the universe conserves present reproduction of cyclical time motions in all its scales.*

*3 conservation laws: Energy ≈ 5 ^{th} dimension; lineal momentum: open space; angular momentum: closed time.*

PHYSICS, when trying to find the laws of conservation of the Universe found 2 laws, the law of conservation of angular momentum, which is a cyclical motion, self-centered into a point; and of lineal inertial motions – both minimal quanta of action of ‘motion and form’ (more form in angular momentum, more motion in lineal inertia). *And its integrals in a closed cycle of energy.*

The conservation of momentum is associated in quantum mechanics with the proposition that it makes no difference where you do the experiment, the results will always be the same. As independence in space has to do with the conservation of momentum, independence of time has to do with the conservation of energy.

And so we must deduce that there is NOT absolute space, as the location in space is completely independent on the result of an experiment. So all space is self-contained to the event of space-time and region affected by the experiment.

Then there is the conservation of time. If we turn our ‘experimental apparatus’ in a ‘time-like cycle’, this too makes no difference, and so the invariance of the world to angular orientation is related to the conservation of angular momentum; which means all worldcycles of time have a total zero-value, as they close into themselves in the same point.

So we found that the Universe conserves cyclical motions of time and lineal motions of space.

Then there is the conservation of Energy, which is roughly speaking the ‘integral sum of lineal and cyclical momentums’.

In quantum mechanics it turns out that the conservation of energy is very closely related to another important property of the world, things do not depend on the absolute time.

We can set up an experiment at a given moment and try it out, and then do the same experiment at a later moment, and it will behave in exactly the same way. From this we can deduce the principle of conservation of energy. It is a rather subtle and interesting thing, which can only have an explanation:

Absolute Time, duration, which integrates a series of lineal and cyclical motions, adding them to the extent of creating a new scale of the fifth dimension, IS FRACTAL. It does not exist as a continuous lineal infinite time in a single continuous space plane.

As such absolute time does not affect any event happening in time, which therefore is a self-contained process, a cycle related to the internal time of the event.

A Time cycle is therefore a closed, fractal cyclical proposition.

But we can add, integrate time cycles and that creates the illusion of absolute duration; and we can integrate space surfaces and that creates the illusion of absolute extension.

This is what Leibniz called relational space and relational time.

Leibniz would have said that ‘all substances are made of cyclical motions with different speeds = different clocks of time.’ And different vital spaces, fractal parts. And all together create the illusion of absolute space and absolute time.

But we can ad a third element, the ‘Integral of spaces and times’, which give us the concept of Energy, similar to that of a 5^{th} dimension integral. So on the regions of reality where we can conserve Energy, we are observing a process of scalar, social growth of elements of the 5^{th} dimension. And this gives us the fundamental equations for each scale of physical systems, which are the equations of energy for each of those scales:

E_{∆-1}=hƒ for the quantum ∆-1 scale, Eo= RT for the scale of thermodynamics, and E_{∆1}=1/2 mv^{2} with the limit E=mc^{2} for the gravitational scale.

Whereas as we can observe, a given Plane of the 5^{th} dimension conserves a ‘constant of bidimensional space’ (h, k, m) and a different speed of time cycles, (ƒ, T, v).

We can study then the interaction of those 3 elements, how they transform into each other through the ‘frontiers’ between those 3 scales, and what it means the different combinations of those formula, specifically the one that defines each constant:

H = E x T, R (or n k) = E / T and m = E/c^{2}

In this form they represent the constant of action of energy and Time of each of the 3 scales akin to the co-invariant law of the 5th dimension. It simply means that in each scale of the 5^{th} dimension there is a certain constant ‘rod of measure of space and time that varies (never mind here that we, humans use for certain measures of time, the frequency, and for others the period: T=1/ƒ).

The enormous field open by the study of the 3 scales of the Universe, its constants of space-time, its time frequency clocks and its 5 Dimensional growth in social scales of energy, is a huge field, which we cannot ‘attack’ in this post further.

**Clarifications on conservation quantities, states and magnitudes.**

The previous example shows the problems of translating all those terminologies to T.Œ are due to the use of very different jargons and parameters for each scale. We have introduced the simplest translations of the ∆-1 into the ∆+1 scales in the previous post (Unification equation of charges and masses). Yet it will be easier to use in this introductory level the common jargons of those sciences, merely identifying the previous space, time 5D symmetries and its constant of actions and 5 space-time cycles for each species of each scale.

Needless to say within the previous isomorphisms, we can fit all the disciplines of physical sciences; whose exhaustive analysis of all the actions, species, space-time symmetries (equations) and events in time, between the n-1 scale (quantum physics, electrodynamics, magnetism) and the n-scale (thermodynamics, state physics, electricity) makes physics & chemistry, when NOT trying to make metaphysics (cosmological, eschatological and philosophical statements), the most thoroughly investigated science today.

We will follow the isomorphic method, studying those 2 scales not with the usual procedure of physical and chemical sciences, which define the events of those actions and its structure in space and time with mathematical equations, but with the procedure of T.Œ, considering the 1) 5D scales, 2) space and 3) time symmetries first, its elements and finally its 4) actions, *introducing within that scheme the definitions of the parameters, constants, magnitudes, dimensions and equations of mathematical physics.*

Now, unlike more evident ‘scales’ in which form dominates motion (Evolution) or thought (memes) dominates from and motion (sociology), closer to the human experience, the world of physical systems, is the most remote to that experience, and its language (mathematics) the less known to humans, which move on the natural languages of human thought (visual art, verbal time, emotional bondages), and understand as animals, the survival, topological forms of life. For that reason we would need a basic introduction to the interplay of this wider reality expressed in abstract terminologies that seem so remote from the bio-sociological experience.

They are not. As all beings are knots of space-time cyclical actions, whose purpose is survival. The program of the Universe is hidden on physical systems by the remoteness of its scales, the abstraction of its description and the immensity of its elements. So we shall do an introduction to the interplay and co-existence of the 3 scales of reality, the electromagnetic scale, the thermodynamic and the gravitational scale. We exclude though the limits beyond those scales, the quarks inside the atoms and the galaxy beyond the planet, because they do not truly interact in this world of human existence.

The 5th dimension has barriers between planes of existence, where energy and information don’t cross, due to entropy and asymmetry (chirality); and essentially our world is one of light, electrons, atoms, molecules and matter states.

The similarities between the internal ‘strong forces’ of the atom and the internal gravitational forces of the galaxy, the external electromagnetic forces of the atom, and the external dark energy of the cosmos are studied also with physical laws, but will not be included here.

A question also of difficult analysis is the 3 units of action, of those 3 scales, the angular momentum of h-Planck actions, the vibrational temperature of thermodynamics, and the variable g-forces of gravitation. Those constant of actions seem truly different in its form and equations but the concept of integrative ‘energy’, will allow us to explain how energy and information transfers among those planes.

Finally the order of exposition will be a diachronic analysis, which works better, as the human mind seems to be structure in this manner. So I have abandoned my personal files, which are always written with an analogical, metaphoric method jumping synchronically between all systems of all scales, in spatial order.

Thus we shall analyze in the order in which humans discovered those scales, starting from the science of Mechanics, or higher gravitational scale (XVII and XVIII c.) then the science of Thermodynamics, or human scale (XVIII-XIX c.) and finally the science of electromagnetism and its minimal units (quantum scale).

We will in each scale introduce the spatial and temporal order of the 3 time-space elements of the generator equation (Se<ST>Tƒ), intersecting laws and cases of classic physics, but given the difficulty to understand directly those elements (unlike in biological and sociological forms), introduce a somewhat intermediate exposition but directly ‘downloading’ and interpreting the known-known laws of those systems. Hence the sub-posts entitled ‘mechanics’, ‘Newtonian laws, ‘Maxwell equations’, ‘quantum numbers’, ‘Conservation Laws’ etc. In an ideal world in which T.Œ is the Unification theory of all sciences, those terms would not be used, but at this stage we must translate those well-known laws to the elements of T.Œ.

Now all this SIMPLE REALITY is GREATLY complicated in physics by the multiple jargons, lack of TOE, denial of non quantitative properties and multiplicity of mathematical formalisms for all of those elements of T.Œ, for example, the concept of mass, which we simply as gravitational vortices, has the formalism of Higgs, particle with its negative masses, ad hoc additions, but essentially right; as it is a top quark (in the similar Technicolor more correct formulation) field of dark energy and faster than c-rotational speed, beyond the even horizon of the accelerated black hole vortices.

There is however an even more interesting formulation that general relativity, the Higgs field and Technicolor, which is the dick-brane theory of a variable G-constant, which can be used to define the different scalar vortices of the different planes of physical systems (charges, atomic molecules, gravitational light-space confined to galaxies and c-speed and outer dark energy cosmological structures).

Time permitted we shall then choose a formalism that better adapts to 5D planes for all its physical scales in the 4th line. Here we just mention the extraordinary difficulties to fully integrate all those different jargons, and the different formalisms within each scalar jargon and the astounding number of details studied by physicists.

So now let us continue with this post, an the minimal clarifications, on physical concepts, magnitudes and constants to be able to carry a meaningful analysis of the 3 spatial, temporal, 5 D symmetries and Œ-points of those fundamental 3+1 scales, which affect life on this planet (the rest being cosmological analysis in the previous posts).

Now those are the ‘practical’ constants to develop physics as it is; no homogenized by T.Œ formalism. So we must do a few important clarifications. Any system can be well defined, considering its 5D planes and its space and time symmetries and space-time actions, which range from the minimal unit of its simpler ∆a actions, to the larger, longer ∆u social actions.

Yet the lack of a proper definition of:

- Tƒ: Cyclical time in physics (measured sometimes with frequency – light scale; with lineal time; mechanic scale; with temperature, molecular scale; and so on)…
- Sp: Vital space, measured sometimes with: wavelength – light scale; with flux current, electric scale; with entropy, molecular scale; with length, mechanic scale.
- ST: Present, body-wave, measured sometimes with Energy, sometimes with Momentum, sometimes with Intensity, and so on..

Requires a one-to-one analysis of each scale and species.

Further on the Human scale or thermodynamic scale is the one according to epistemology, with less uncertainty of data. It means in practical terms that we do have a ternary fractal subdivision in great detail of our scale in 3 sub-scales:

- The electric scale with the electron and its social, ∑e=I, currents of electricity, ruled by photonic bondage.
- The atomic scale with the atom and its social ∑a=molecular structures, ruled by electronic bondage
- The Matter scale with its molecules and its temporal states, ruled by temperature gradients.

So we are in fact talking of 2+1 (x3) relative scales, to study in great detail. So many elements, so many ill-defined concepts, and yet surprisingly enough, so well-done ‘how-mathematical descriptions’ of its ∆a, motion actions…

All in all the main equations of the 3 scales, define its energy, its constant of action and its acceleration. What those terms mean? And how they transfer into those 3 scales?

Let us consider it from a different perspective. There are 3 magnitudes to define all mechanical actions:

Tƒ: ‘mass’, the active magnitude, similar to charge, the active magnitude of the ∆ scale, similar to h, the active magnitude of the n-1 scale.

Se: Time, defined by frequency in ∆-1, by the electromagnetic field in n and by the acceleration in the ∆+1

And ST, defined by Energy in n-1 and by force in n and ∆+1.

And it is this ST factor what transfers between scales.

**Γ. $<EI>ð **

**The structure of PHYSICAL supœrganisms. **

Now we must fully grasp the ‘open ball’ topology of those supœrganisms before we even attempt to measure them:

In the graph most physical systems have the perfect, simpler topology of an open ball of ‘vital energy’ (a wave or field with motion) surrounded by a clock-like membrain, centred in a singularity-mind, communicated through networks that carry messages of information between both. In extremely sophisticated systems as humans are this is well-established by medicine and self-consciousness. In other ‘atomic systems’ the same electronic messengers of our nervous systems do exist as flows of ‘liquid information’ in different forms from van der waals forces on crystal to plasma flows in stars.

We shall not enter in themes of the consciousness of a singularity or membrane but just state the obvious: both are connected and rule over the vital space that provides them energy for its rotational motion.

Your mind is your linguistic singularity and your sensorial membrane but you do not feel the cells you control.

If panpsychism, the only logic theory of perception, and overwhelming in all human societies, except when the pedantic idealist school of wien invented ‘logical positivism’, which Einstein and this writer believe in, is truth, the singularity is a mathematical brain, as computers have them, and in the same way your mind-language, thought is your ego, ‘cogito ergo sum’, physical systems should ‘calculo ergo sum’.

In any case, the essence of all singularities as mind-mappings of the system is that they create a still perceptive mapping (which is what i consider conscious) of the Universe, not only with form but with a quantic stop and go motion similar to that of your eye-brain system.

So this stop-go, still mapping must be taken into account as the clear origin of the duality of relativity of motion and stillness of perception to study physical systems, because it DOES happen also on them, and DO solve major whys such as the origin of relativity, the constancy of c-speed, entanglement etc.

*3 proofs of panpsychism for each of those 3 scales, now that we know the ‘structure’ of the physical entity:*

∆+3: when a ‘mass’ is sent around with motion the centre of gravity or ‘mass-singularity’ DOES NOT MOVE in the trajectory of the being. And physicists do not have any ‘rational explanation’ to it. The centre of the black hole takes time to zero, meaning it creates a still point.

*∆+1:* In thermodynamics when a crystal is formed, immediately if it is regular, the relative centre of perception will start to reproduce the configuration of the system and start to form new cells of the crystal. And all and the only *crystal 7 configurations of reality as the graph shows ARE in fact regular systems. *

*Only those who allow a potential singularity in its centre to form an image exist. And of them, the commonest are the cubic and hexagonal, where the angles of perception allow a better tridimensional mapping.
*

A thermodynamic vortex has zero motion in its centre, as you saw in the film vortex.

∆-1: In the graph, you my friend are nothing more than the complex consciousness of your electronic mind networks, which again are forms with motion, constrained by a membrain, and scanning all the axis of our 4-dimensional Universe. While a second axis/force, connects them with another ∆-scale with a different speed of space and form of information (magnetic, electric duality; chemical, electric duality of languages in cells; gravitational, electromagnetic forces in galaxies, weak and strong forces in nuclei, etc.)

Thus what truly is fascinating is what happens in the center of those vortices, as the UNIVERSE MUST constantly balance INTO AN ETERNAL PRESENT OF CONSERVED ENERGY, as motion comes to zero. But then again, we must balance the motion stillness two phases of the outer and inner centre of the vortex of future, as time exists in an eternal present:

*‘Present Energy never dies, it trans-forms itself back and forth from entropy into information: S<e>T”*

So if we break as we can always do the event of a motion through the singularity of a charge, mass or thermodynamic eddie, into 3 topological time-space ages, we have the arrow of future acceleration, inwards, pushed by the accelerated vortex Vo x Ro = k, towards the singularity where R becomes zero and the being stops into a still mind of informative mind mapping perception/gauging of information.

Thus to balance the act there must be an axial, inverse, entropic, lineal motion coming out of the axis of all those eddies, with a speed higher than the speed of entrance in the system, which is ‘rotational’, always ‘slower in distance-speed’ (remember both things are the same by the paradox of galileo, e pur si muove no muove) than the axial line.

So we shall find the magnetic momentum, the electric flow, the dark entropy v>c expanding space flow coming out of the rotational hyperluminal axis of the black hole… which will balance the law of ‘ternary eternal presents, where past and future, flux’ for any of those physical systems.

In the graph we see the polar axis flow on an ∆-1: quantum electron an ∆- thermodynamic earth and an ∆+1 gravitational black hole.

In all of them a lower v(∆-1) > v(∆), the mind will ‘shit’ a line with higher speed and lesser information according to the metric equation of the scalar Universe; Spe x Tiƒ= K, which hold within the 3 SCALES of any ∆±1 supœrganism of the Universe.

It follows from all of this, except for ‘believers’ in idols of the tribe of physics, that past the event horizon the black hole vortex of accelerated future time must by force be faster, hence speed up towards the center at v>c speeds, till producing an invisible (as we cannot see faster than light), tachyon flow, as the metric equations of a Kerr black hole show and the galactic jets that reach 10c proof. And of course, physicists stuck on the ‘limited’ model of Einstein that only works *on the light space-time support of the light star galaxy will not have. *

WE SHALL latter have relativity revis(it)ed and show you when you finally learn after 400 years the meaning of imaginary numbers as experimental inverse time numbers, why there is zero contradiction with relativity when considering the ∆±4 scale hyperluminal, both in the hypermasive top quarks, top quark stars, aka black hole and dark entropy, aka expansive space between galaxies.

**The ∆-1 view of dual singularity vortex, general and physical model: big-bang death + evolution**

The beauty of physical systems in its simplest-less perceived-most perfect forms is that they draw *in space the laws of time, at faster cycles imprinting with perfect regular forms, the laws of fractal, vital mathematics, its ‘perpendicular darwinian actions’ and parallel, social forms. So for a trained ∆st eye, all becomes self-evident just observing the fractal topology of a time§paœrganism.*

This lead us to a fundamental topological analysis of the fourth dimension of space-time, entropy and death, aka big-bang, in which the larger whole singularity absorbs the smaller parts it feeds on and splits them into two inverse jets, that signify the informative and entropic part of the being, one with a red-entropic shift towards dissolution of information and the other towards a growing, collapsing blue shift of collapsing form.

The entity then will absorb one (depending on which action is working, an informative or an entropic-feeding action) and spit the other, and this happens all over the Universe, being the equivalent of a predator killing a prey by cutting-choking his neck and then split the entity leaving the informative head with little substance and eating the body-limbs. This duality is all over the Universe and unlike more convoluted life forms it directly shows the descriptive power of the 3rd congruence postulate of ¬Æ mathematics: perpendicular, ‘invading’, penetrating, cutting motions are darwnian, social informative ones are parallel, as in parallel the systems does not invade the other super organism and merely communicates at a balanced distance information.

So the perpendicular flow that enters the vortex singularity (charge or black hole) made of smaller ∆-1 quanta (c-speed quanta, magnetic and dielectric quanta etc), is then accelerated, broken, disorganised and ejected as a dual flow of max. entropy-motion and max. information-collapsing wave. And this is incidentally the best explanation in terms of ST-death (as usual the multifunctional universe offers multiple explanations), of the ‘expansion of the Universe=red shift of galaxies. WE DO NOT SEE the blue jets as they mostly collapse into informative matter, giving birth to new galactic daughter forms out of giant black holes or dark matter clouds. WE HOWEVER see all the red jet shifts that by definition expand space and reach further as length-distances-lineal speeds.

## MAIN SUBSPECIES OF PHYSICAL ðIME§PAŒRGANISMS

All this said, we just need to show you that we can encase all of physics, both its conceptual descriptions, physical parameters and equations within the structure of a 10D³ time§paœrganism made of smaller and part of a larger time§paœrganism… at least within the systems we perceive.

This is simpler to do when we consider that the scale we perceive, the thermodynamic scale is made of space-time organisms, living beings, and its larger system, the Earth is truly a space-time organism with slower time cycles (geological cycles of Gaia) – as in fact the word super organism was coined by the father of geology, Hutton to define the ‘slow time cycles’ of the Earth.

So once this is clarified, we just need to show you that the biggest and smaller supœrganisms of space-time we are conscious of – the galactic ∆+1 scale and the ∆-1 atomic scale show organic property and are both mathematically equivalent. So if we show you that in 5+5D s=t metric equations, both are equivalent, and* *the best observed one, the galaxy has organic properties, and so we can model easily the galaxy as a ‘gala cell’, an organic cell-like physical system, we will have in a very synoptic way latter expanded in great detail show you that all physical systems are 10D³ fractal space-time organisms.

**∆±4: COSMOS**

**Experimental Proof of the Fractal Structure of the Universe.**

*In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal 5D organic structure of all beings of reality: *

*On the left, we can see the growth of a ‘new dimension of temporal height’, in the process of accumulation of bosons. In the centre above, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies. Below the comparison of our region of the Universe with a neuronal cell; on the right, an ice fractal, a plant and a river and a lung.*

For tat reason the reader is advised to consult first the most general post on 5D and Philosophy of Science, whose aim is to unify all sciences, and the general one on physical systems, ∆±i: Astrœphysical systems, before reading this post on Astronomy.

In case the reader goes forward, we introduce the absolute bare bone concepts of the organic, 5D fractal structure of reality, which are its 3 arrows of time and symmetries with the 3 space organs of al fractal systems of he Universe, and the Principle of relativity between motion and stillness.

In the previous graph we show some experimental proofs of the fractal structure of space-time in all the relative ‘scales of size’ and ‘time speeds’ (5D scales) of the Universe.

Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.

In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine *New Scientist* published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.

Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.

**Logic Consistency: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe**

A good description of the fractal universe and its logic principles is this text from the Web by Mr. Oldershaw from Amherst University:

“With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very large-scale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an a causal beginning of space-time, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knife-edge balance between the open and closed states.

Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario. But, an ironic thing has happened. Although the Inflationary Scenario was developed to rescue the Big Bang model, the most logical consequence of pursuing the concept of Inflation is the replacement the Big Bang paradigm with a much grander and more encompassing paradigm. According to Guth and a growing number of leading cosmologists, the most natural version of Inflation theory is Eternal Inflation in which Inflation is, was and always will be occurring on an infinite number of size scales. The new paradigm that cosmologists have arrived at by several routes is an infinite fractal hierarchy that has “universes” within “universes” without end. The astronomer Carl Sagan once referred to the general idea of an infinite fractal universe as “strange, haunting, evocative—one of the most exquisite conjectures in science or religion.”

That is the basic story, but because of the profound changes the fractal paradigm will have on our understanding of the Universe and the place of humans within that Universe, it is important to explore the implications of this new vision. Firstly, there is no edge or boundary of the Universe; space is infinite in all directions. What we used to refer to as “The Universe” can be more appropriately called the “observable universe” (note the small “u”) or the “Hubble Volume,” and it is only a tiny part of what one might call our “metagalaxy” or “level 1 universe”. We currently have no way of determining the size of our metagalaxy or the number of galaxies it contains, but we could reasonably assume that both figures would be vastly beyond anything previously contemplated.

There would be an infinite number of these level 1 universes, and on an unimaginably large scale they too would be organized into level 2 universes, and so on without limit.

Secondly, time is also infinite in the unbounded Organic universe. Whereas our Hubble Volume may have come into being and began to expand approximately 13.7 billion years ago, the Universe has always existed and always will. Parts of the Universe may be created or annihilated, may undergo expansion or contraction, but the infinite fractal hierarchy remains unchanged overall, and thus is without any temporal limits.

Thirdly, there is no limit to size scales. In the infinite fractal paradigm there is no class of largest objects that would cap off the cosmological hierarchy; the hierarchy is infinite in scale.

This fact removes one of the more suspect aspects of the old paradigm. Natural philosophers had long noted the unusual fact that within the Big Bang paradigm humans found themselves roughly in the middle of nature’s hierarchy of size scales. This anthropocentric state of affairs seemed to violate the Copernican concept that when humans appear to be at the center of the cosmos, we should suspect that a bias is leading us astray. In an infinite fractal hierarchy there is no center of the Universe, nor any preferred reference frame.

Some interesting questions immediately arise. Why are fractal hierarchies so ubiquitous in nature? By studying empirical phenomena within the observable universe, how much will we be able to learn scientifically about the parts of the Universe that lie beyond our observational limits? Does the infinite cosmological hierarchy have a bottom-most scale of sub-atomic particles as is currently thought, or is this another artificial limit to an infinite Organic universe that actually extends without limits to ever smaller scales?

Centuries ago Immanuel Kant, J.H. Lambert and a few others proposed an infinite hierarchical model of nature based largely on natural philosophy arguments. This general hierarchical paradigm never garnered a large following, but it was kept alive by numerous rediscoveries. In the 1800s and 1900s quite a few scientists, including E.E. Fournier d’Albe, F. Selety, C.V.L. Charlier and G. de Vaucouleurs, argued for hierarchical cosmological models based on the hierarchical organization within the observable universe. Then toward the end of the 1970s, the mathematician B. B. Mandelbrot gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical self-similarity are ubiquitous in nature.

In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists have all found their way, slowly but surely, to the infinite fractal paradigm. There are many routes to this paradigm, and certainly there are a large number of distinct versions of the basic paradigm that have their own unique theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future.”

But what does it mean that the Universe is organized in fractal patterns of form? To fully grasp this concept, we have to realize that “fractal equations” are “organic equations,” which participate of the properties of organisms. Fractal equations create forms as life does. Fractal equations create self-similar “cells,” as life does. And in fact, they use the same term. Fractal equations are also called generator equations, as they are the mother cells that encode the information needed to repeat a living form. Finally a fractal equation will create a pattern of interconnected parts, which put together reproduce a whole, self-similar to their parts, as organisms do.

**The duality of the big-bang: immortal organic Universe.**

So how can we reconcile the fractal structure of the Universe – a massive evident fact of science, in the whole and all its parts – and the knowledge that space expands between galaxies, accelerating its motion, in a fashion similar to the entropic expansion of a gas, in the molecular scale?

The answer requires to understand *the new paradigm of fractal space (the scalar fifth dimension) and cyclical time (with its 3 arrows of probabilistic futures, informative implosion, entropic expansion and **its balanced combinations of both, **iterative momenta and its energetic zero-sum conserved worldcycles.*

*Then we can easily define a balanced Universe where the implosive vortices of galaxies balance the expansive dark entropy between them:*

+ =

*In the graph, in each ‘scale of size of matter, the same duality of clock-like vortices of temporal information (masses, charges, thermodynamic eddies, which carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency speed of its time cycles, as computers do, measuring its informative power on ‘Hertzs’ ) and expansive states of entropy (dark entropy; electromagnetic, lineal radiation; entropic gas; big-bangs of matter) balance each other in conserved, closed energy cycles to make the Universe immortal, giving birth to the equation of the 3 arrows/dimensions/ages of time-space, for each fractal part of reality: *

*Entropic past-space + cyclical, future information = iterative, closed energy cycles.*

This process do happen in all the fractal scales of physical systems, So big-bang explosive deaths of matter: e=mc2 and its inverse creation of mass, m=e/c2 happen in all scales. Which obviously means if we rehearse big bangs on earth we will have a nova-like explosion of the earth NOT OF THE UNIVERSE.

The previous equation in formal terms is first and immediate consequence of working with three arrows of time, and ultimately a particular expression of the new fundamental principle of science, the principle of conservation of present energy, combination of spatial entropy and temporal information:

‘Present Energy never dies, it trans-forms itself back and forth in local events between spatial entropy and dimensional information: S≥st≥T<<S”

This equation IS the Fractal Generator of Space-time beings that uses the definition of the three arrows of time, to establish a synoptic, logic equations for all systems of nature, where:

** S ($, Spe)** means entropic space; **St, Ø, E** iterative energy; **T (ð, Ti, Tƒ**), Informative, cyclical time; which ultimately ARE the static, spatial view of 3 motions-actions-arrows of timespace, we define with 3 topo-ogic symbols:

** >** an informative future motion that shrinks and accelerates the system from more entropy=expansive motion into more form.

** ≈** a repetitive present wave-like motion, that repeats in-form-ation as it moves…

** >** an implosive, informative motion and **<<** a double entropic explosion that erases information in the moment of death.

So the equation of a world cycle of existence described in the last synoptic equation is simple to understand: Space shrinks guided by the dominant arrow of information through 3 ages, phases, first as pure entropic space of maximal motion, then as a formed motion finally as pure form (S>St>T) and then when all motion is exhausted and it is all form, the system explodes back into space, T<<S IN THE ACT OF DEATH, which happens to dissolve ‘two scales of form of the system (you die twice into cells and then molecules/aminoacids) a matter system dies twice normally first into molecules and atoms or atoms and plasma, and so on).

The only thing a fractal equation does not have is motion, as it is a simplified geometrical description of reality. So in the same manner, geometry lacks motion; simplified fractal equations didn’t have motion when they were first discovered.

But now, fractal science has advanced a step further, thanks to the evolution of fractal logic, duality, and non-Euclidean geometries, so we can understand finally the meaning of motion in the Universe.

Let us then explain the bio-logic and mathematical properties of the fractal paradigm of a Universe is built in fractal scales made of pieces of vital space and informative time.

**THE SUPŒRGANISM OF THE UNIVERSE (∆±4) and its ∆± 3- ‘****GALACELLS’**

IN THAT SENSE the biggest set of properties caused by the fractal co-existing structure of space and ternary worldcycles of creation and extinction of matter, is the *super organic nature of matter, both at the cosmic galactic and quantum scale.*

To that aim, we shall briefly study its 3 scales, the ∆+1 cosmic scale, the ∆º galactic scale and the ∆-1 atomic scale, o the understanding of the organic ternary structure of the galaxy, since quarks are vortices of accelerated gravitational forces, masses of physical information and black holes and pulsars, which are fractals, made of quarks.

INDEED, The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:

Because the scalar Universe co-exists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, *all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational space-time), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under self-similar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic. *

This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar.

*In the graph, the local tissue of the supœrganism of the Universe, Laniakea, the region in which our **gala cell exist, at the largest level of human perception of the ∞ scales of the fractal Universe. *

*Yet we only perceive 4% of reality outside our closer world, which happens to be the ‘ideal’ perception of a pi-cycle with three diametral perimeters (π-3/π=0.14/π=96% of dark reality not seen from a self-centred singularity in a pi cycle).*

This secondary law of the paradox of Galileo, itself a secondary law of the ‘mind’s equation’ structures our universal view. And make us thing reality is abstract, void of intelligence and life, static and our mind the only perceiver of it.

* The paradox of galileo – the maya of the senses, differentiating ‘motion from form’- form and distance are ‘mayas’ of the senses; as all its time and motion; when we get more information about a system. The 2 graphs represent the same local region of galaxies, in the right now that we have enough info, we see it as a flow of ‘gala cells’ transiting through veins of the cosmos, in the right as we used to see it – a dark series of ‘monad-galaxies’ with no motion. All in the Universe is ultimately a dynamic PART of a supœrganism, extending in three scales of the absolute 5th dimension of time-space, performing relative ternary worldcycles on time-space *

**∆±3: GALAXIES**

When considering a new stience, in the isomorphic method we define its Γ.œ, generator function for each volume of the stience, a domain within the scales of the fifth dimension, of four dimensional structure and black and white wholes to the upper ∆+1 and lower ∆-1 scales of the fifth dimension.

Such block of timespace suffices to define most events happening around the systems of that scale of reality. Then we can define specific T.œ, generators of mind species, and get into as much detail as needed.

**The different isomorphisms of galaxies as ‘physical atoms and ‘biological cells’.**

Now because all systems have, as all systems do:

- organic, co-exiting fractal properties and abstract, topological ones, galaxies can be modelled as organic systems, similar to cells or gala cells (something taboo on physics but very useful to make easier to understand them as organic systems are synoptic and intuitive, with less maths, so normal people can get the whole picture.).
- and also as topological mathematical systems similar to atoms or atom-galaxies (something done often, without a good theoretical background we shall provide).
- besides the usual properties and details of its specific nature.

in terms of scales of the fifth dimension, we say that** t**he ∆+3 organism of the cosmos is the ‘cellular galaxy’, which we shall put in isomorphic comparison with the ∆o cell, the organism of the human scale to show its organic properties and with the ∆-2 atom, the organism of the quantum scale, to draw homologic comparisons of its topological and mathematical properties; *as we shall show:*

*The mathematical equivalence of atoms and galaxies, unifying both topologically and algebraically with the Unification equation of charges and masses, based in 5D metric equations.**And the organic parallelism with the cell, unifying both with the analysis of the vital functions of both organisms.*

The ∃xi≈stience of astrophysical systems is also ruled by the ternary isomorphism of space-time structures.

To understand that organic structure the best homology is between the 3 main ∃xistential functions of the 3 supœrganisms of the physical scales.

So we shall compare the galaxy with the supœrganism we obtain max. information, from the perspective of human perception, the ∆º, living cell.

Thus we compare the galaxy and the human ∆o-cell pov and its 3 elements: the Spe-membrane≈ halo, the singularity ≈ nucleus, and the cytoplasm ≈ star disk. And so we define the ‘galacell’ and its 3 topo-biological parts:

In the graph the Galacell, with a ‘dna-like’ gravitational species of information, ultra-dense black holes; surrounded by fractal points of energy, 3º stars, that form the body of the galactic organism; and a hard, protective membrane of ‘proteins-strangelets’.

Each of those parts will be made at ∆-1 scale of 3 distinguishable families of quark-atoms, of increasing mass.

So we find another ∆-1≈∆≈∆+1, coexisting organic homology, between the galactic parts and the 3 type of growing ‘informative ages of mass’ (studied in the post on ∆-1, quantum atomic physics):

- Sp∃-negative strangelets must be the components of the ‘protein-like’ hard halo that protects the galaxy from the outer ∆+1 dark energy world of the cosmological upper scale:
- Tiƒ: its central max. i gravitational black hole, must be made of top quarks, its ∆-1, quantum substance, which corresponds in parameters to the density of black holes.
- While, we star-dust are made of the lighter up and down quarks, forming the youngest family of atomic mass:

*In the graph the 3 components of a biologically ‘sound’ understanding of Galacies at its ∆ and ∆-1 scales:*

*Tiƒ: black holes, which are born exceedingly hot and active, as all ‘seminal species’ are in the lower, ∆-1 scale of size, at the **compton wavelength as a heavy top quark particles , following Einstein’s search for cut off substances for ‘positive’ black holes.*

*Spe: A similar heavy form of elongated lumps of strange matter, should form the ‘negative’ halo of strange matter (Witten’s hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets, now again all the rage in astrophysics, but denied by the establishment of ‘nuclear, military research’ facilities, such as CERN, which merely states ‘stranglets do not exist, given the risk for a Nova explosion if they are produced at Earth.*

ST-energy: finally in between the ‘cytoplasm’ is formed by cyclical stars trapped between the ‘sword’ and the ‘wall’, future food of heavy quarks, which will collapse into dense dark matter information the galaxy, in its 20 billion year quasar cycle of ‘real big-bangs’.

*This is the most likely structure of galaxies, as it follows all the natural symmetries and efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor, co-existence of organic parts and wholes, Aristotelian hilozoism: wholes must have substance, etc). *

*The author merely has further developed in his work on the scalar fractal nature of the Universe ordered by a ‘5th dimension’ of relative scales, those concepts in his work on astrophysics. And so we will here give a general view of the Galaxy and its isomorphic laws, and time/interest permitted expand more professionally with mathematical physics those themes on the 4th line of the blog.*

The previous graph shows the ternary elements of the galacell:

The Halo-membrane of maximal extension in space, which selects the energy and information entering from the outer space (solution to Oort’s horizon problem – why the Universe does not seem full of light; answer: not all pass through the membrane of the Halo)…

The cyclical space-time region, the plane of stars, falling towards its centre of information, the black holes that command the creation of the galaxy.

This is the fundamental physical system of the Universe, already described by Descartes, who said all is made of res extensa (space), and cyclical vortices of time-space with a central point of reference that measures reality or ‘mind’. *Since all systems respond to ‘trinity’ and *can be modelled, as we have observed in different graphs, with such 3-topological structure.

So the ∆+1, gravitational galaxy, the ∆-thermodynamic crystal and the ∆-1 quantum atom with its electronic cover, centred nucleus of mass, and intermediate space-time where forces of gravitation and electromagnetism are constantly exchanged, are described logically AS the 3 fundamental particles of physics, both topologically and with biological, organic laws.

Trinity indeed is the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space, protected by an external membrane with an enclosed cyclical body that put together create the FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE, of the puzzle of supœrganisms the Universe is.

Indeed, the true beauty of those 3 physical systems is found when we compare them with the organic cells and see their isomorphisms:

∆o: The DNA invaginates with Golgi conducts the vital cytoplasm it exploits, surrounded by the faster membrane of proteins, which act in its formal position as a membrane.

∆-3: The magnetic field surrounds the charge and encloses the vital space of electromagnetic fields the charges controls.

∆±1: So happens with a crystalline planet protected by its magnetic field that steams out of the central charge and surrounds it.

∆+3: And the galaxy has in its center a black hole, which invaginates with gravitational waves the whole cytoplasm forming the ‘underlying wave-structure of the body of stars’.

And it is surrounded by a halo of dense fast rotating strangelet quarks, so the stars and planets within it will become LIKELY converted into black holes in Nova explosions or strangelets.

**∆±3 ATOMS**

Next we can consider atoms as organisms, and to prove they can modelled as such we just will show their equivalence with galaxies, with the unification equation of both, as accelerated vortices of time-space and the obvious existence in atoms, of ‘the drives of organic live’, that is actions of energy feeding, information gauging, reproduction and social evolution, which biologists use to define life and *are actions constantly perform by the fundamental particles that make up atoms, quarks and electrons, showing its vital nature.*

**The atom-galaxy**

The study of electromagnetism with the laws of gravitation in any of the 4 self-similar interpretations corresponding to an ∆ or @ or S or T Biased view, and the similarity between the galaxy and the atom is the key to unify forces and resolve all the problems starting by the obvious hierarchical problem.

It immediately bring some obvious similarities. The strong force *inside the atom-galaxy must be similar (remember a fractal is similar never equal), to the gravitational force of the galaxy-atom. And indeed, we immediately notice the similarities: gluon balls do have 2 or 0 ‘graviton-like’ or ‘Higgs-like’ spins; which correspond to the gravitational force within the galaxy-atom (graviton) or outside the galaxy-atom (dark world of Higgs fields). *

More surprisingly, gluons and gravitons *are the only force that interacts with itself, thus making so hard the full understanding of gravitational and strong forces. *

It is even more pleasurable to observe the time inverse symmetries caused by the mind – but well beyond the comprehension of present humind logic – when comparing* a fourth dimensional view (that of man over the smallish gluon) vs. a fifth dimensional view of the same process (that of man over the larger graviton).* The distortions are easier to understand though in the simplest spatial parameter. And show the enormous size of gravitational ‘interactions’ , with a Compton wavelength for the graviton over 1 year light.

It makes no sense however to apply *the laws of quantum energy, such as e=hv, to calculate the energy-mass of the graviton, a whole different plane, as dependant on that compton wavelength, which puts the graviton mass in a ridiculous lower limit, as a recent paper has stated.*

In general physics needs such a huge upgrading on conceptual thought that we shall leave it here. Only state that gravitons do have mass because *gravitation as expressed in general relativity under c-speed , etc. happens only within galaxies, so the range of gravitational interactions is NOT infinite. And so we are into certain type of corrections to relativity called massive gravitation, which clearly differentiate how gravitation behaves inside the galaxy and outside the galaxy where it becomes a repulsive ‘electromagnetic force’.*

Finally to notice a constant we shall consider often in other more ‘pro’ sections of the blog – the fine constant, 137 or 1/137 which shows the difference of strength between many forces, the Strong force is 137 stronger than the electromagnetic force, which is around 137 times stronger than the electronic force which is around 137 times slower than the electromagnetic force, which is 137 times weaker… and so on and so on. Why then 137? This got eddington crazy – pity, with heaviside and Hoyle my fav triad of underrated british geniuses of physics, too close to reality for people to understand. But indeed poises an interesting question of numerology easily resolved in ∆st… Two alternative hints, 137 is the golden ratio angle of reproduction and it is a very special ‘prime’ in theory of numbers, and we shall leave it like that.

Of more interest though is to consider those self-similarities between the strong and gravitational force, and its components.

I.e. the gluon vs. the neutrino, the proton vs. the black hole and so on. In the gluon vs. neutrino parallelism we can also observe how there are 3 temporal frequencies/colors in neutrinos, which mix in ‘couples’ and ‘ternary structure’ as gluons do, showing once more the similarity (not equality) between those landscapes.

How the Universe looks once we have established the existence of 3 time arrows of relative past, present and future and ∞ scales of the fifth dimension? The answer is weird enough to explain all the weird features of physics, nobody makes sense of it today, from the constant of c-speed, to reversals of time, to twin paradoxes, to quantum uncertainties, etc. etc.

And the key as always is the most ill-understood element of the Universe, time and its 3 arrows, *including local travels to the past, which being local either as an entropic devolution of the information of the system in the moment of death does NOT provoke any type of ‘twin’s paradox’ and travels in time – as in the Universe of infinite fractal closed time cycles, a past-travel is within the system inner ternary parts.*

*Time travels do NOT happen in an absolute newtonian Universe with a single mechanical clock; an astounding aberration of thought that merely shows how little understood the Universe of infinite time cycles is; so the kind of aberrations of ill-interpreters of relativity such as Hawking who thinks you can enter a black hole and come back into the past and kill your father never happen.*

It is then possible to consider time travels from a future of more information to a past of less information; and define information as the natural arrow of future which constantly increases through the 3 ages of the being, and an entropic death, big-bang or biological, which expands in minimal time – a quanta of the time of the being in fact – as the natural travel to the past, in which the content of information of the being spreads to devolve it to the evolutionary past.

But what about the ‘relational present’, which we observe together simultaneously (Einstein)? This ‘absolute time sum of all other times does NOT exist per se’ but only in the mind of the observer.

So in fact, as the observer is moving towards its sequential future, in slow time changes, and death happens so intensely in so little time – an explosive quanta of the time of the being – a second in human death, a ‘planck’s time quanta’ in the equations of ‘local big bangs’. We see travels to the past as simultaneous present explosions in space.

So the essential perception of time at psychological, mental-measure level is either a simultaneous present – which is in fact the relative travel to the past-death of a being – and the sensation of present to future motion through the life arrow.

Those *are the 2 commonest perceptions of time, that gives us the 2 fundamental sensations of psychological time:*

*– Present time when things do not seem to change because they repeat themselves, or PROPER PRESENT (for the local, objective being).*

*-Subjective present: which is for the being an objective travel to the past, with explosive lost of information. Yet such travel to the past seem to happen in instantaneous non-local space; as it is so fast in single time quanta that seems a process of spatial scattering that gives us the impression of a ‘simultaneus connected space’. It does not seem to happen from future to past. *

– Past to future through the 3ages of life of increasing evolution, balanced by the future to past death.

But besides those 3 time arrows of a single system with its dualities of subjective external and objective local perception of time, which will account for an enormous number of spooky effects; there are time travels *through the scales of the fifth dimensions, which will add more complexity to the mix. *

As here we must consider an ABSOLUTE ARROW OF TIME. Since motion is reproduction of form, and so every step we give ‘in the right direction’ means the whole must be reconstructed in an adjacent region of space-time all the pyramid together again, and so the whole which co-exists with its parts is IN FACT also displaced a quanta of time (the quanta here is used to reproduce the next scale of the being). So your mind is displaced ‘literally in sequential time as observed by the integration of the three scales into a single being’ into the future. You are a quanta of time respect to your wave-body which is a quanta of time displaced above your cellular cycles. And this ‘fact’ of which they are also many proofs provokes multiple spooky effects of physics that also can be upgraded to other systems.

But things get even more beautiful when we realise that entropy and information have inverse time arrows, literally within a local superorganism travelling to the past and the future, so as one is in the future and the other on the past, and have inverse way to travel=deliver information and entropy, both are in the present, and for that reason *the present body-wave, the past-entropy traveling to the future and the future informative singularity sending messages to the past do come together in a synchronicity present despite to be elongated in time.*

So after all Einstein was wrong when he said to quantum theorists who accepted local time travel to the past that ‘wires’ do not travel to the past.

I.e. German researchers have found that the ‘action of thought’, happens *after the body moves in an almost instantaneous microsecond – so in a present position even if your consciousness of thought seems to be in the past. *

*All this explains non-locality and simultaneity and co-existence.*

But there is even more to the different motions and speeds of time. As time has different speeds, faster in smaller systems, *smaller systems live in psychological time more in lesser time, so an ant-queen of 7 years living 10 times faster, has 10 thoughts for one of you and lives 70 years of mental time. *

And more… As time systems are faster in smaller systems, smaller systems code more information that larger systems and so information moves upwards, so genes code bodies, memes code societies and quantum number and particles code atoms, and viceversa, entropy-coordinated motion and hence energy is provided by the whole, external membrane which synchronises the parts as it happens in the simpler systems and the complex galaxies where all parts move in coordination.

A final fundamental set of laws of the many games of time in a universe of infinite time clocks concerns with the long absolute arrow of evolution of information and social evolution in co-existing systems; as the arrow of social evolution and organisation is in the future, but since a system more complex does have more need of coordination, it must code more information in the lower scales.

For example, in genetics the coding of multicellular organisms is in the epigenetic ‘supposedly’ trash part of the code, in ever growing triads of triodes that should code functions for larger and larger whole systems of the multicellular organism, a thesis advanced in my first books on time decades ago, which is now as so many foreseen laws of science and cycles of time – including cycles of history and economics – a fact of science.

But perhaps the most fascinating process of them all, is the palingenetic processes across the fifth dimension that compresses, and packs as we do in computer systems, the information of the organism through its evolution in 9 months, where all the trials and errors of the organism are limited and only the right process are processed to evolve a human in a process that dilated in space played in 3 billions years.

How this magic happened is obvious: minds are everywhere, in a pan psychic Universe, so DNA cells and chemical brains DO consciously eon after eon reduced linguistically by the same token *a film or a novel or a speaker reduces the events to the parts that matter, with the languages of man, the evolution that matter of the being. *

**S≈T: ORGANIC ACTIONS: QUANTA OF 5D SPACETIME.**

IN PHYSICS ACTIONS ARE specific numbers that account for a ‘worldcycyle’ of existence of a physical event, either measure step by step in present-momenta, as the product of momentum by space or all together as the product of the total energy of the being and its duration in time. They show the equivalence and symmetries between present momentum and its integral of a world cycle in time, and are based in the Hamiltonian-Leibnizian principle of minimal time/space in the motion of beings, which actually have to ‘measure’ between the space-time initial and final point (hence gauge) the best of paths, which they likely do through the wave-particle go and stop duality to be so accurate, mimicking how we represent those actions.

So a physical action is ultimately a calculus of the value of the world cycle of a being, performing a lineal motion (1Dimension of space-time)

The concept of åctions in ∆st as it has to apply to all sciences is different much wider (motion is the first simpler dimensional action), and includes all the possible ‘motions-actions’ of the begin in an organic way. So the sum of those motions as åctions give us the total world cycle of the being, and so it represents in ‘scalar time’, the minimal unit of time reality which gather into networks of actions for the whole entity which become paths in an external world that complete a world cycle:

∑∑åctions = ∑ networks of being = Worldcycle of existence.

So we exist as a sum of vital actions performed to exchange energy and information with the Universe, achieved through our specialised entropic-digestive-moving, informative-gauging and reprodutive-iterative body-wave-blood systems… This said we shall consider how those actions define an organic program for both physical and biological systems.

** PHOTONS AND ATOMIC PARTICLES: DRIVES OF EXISTENCE –****THE VITALITY OF SUPERORGANISMS**

The ultimate mathematical properties of physical systems are a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.

In physics the key to that vitality is the most studied of all physical events an ACTION OF SPACE-TIME. So let us start ‘strong’ showing you how the 3 elements of the fractal generator of all time§paœrganisms, require to feed on entropy, imprint energy, absorb information, evolve socially and reproduce to survive, considering the program of life of physical systems.

**The 3±1= five dimensions of the being determine its 3±1 actions.**

As Cheng-Tzu the Taoist philosopher put it: from 1 (time cycles or Tao), comes 2 (the yang-line of energy and the yin-information, broken line) and from 2 comes 3, and from 3 the infinite beings.

(Asian cultures defined always time as cyclical, without the distortion of lineal physical time, also for cultural reasons we shall soon explain.)

So we classify all the different space-time beings made with the 3 topological formal motions of the Generator.

Since Nature ‘pegs’ those 3 FORMS & FUNCTIONS, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as ALL combined the ternary elements of the Generator EQUATION, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or SIMULTANEOUS, spatial organisms:

Informative Time is more important, as a cycle has more dimensions, more length, and stores lines inside. So the Time, informative system (the head/particle) controls the line, the energy/limbs/fields systems. And all systems had one on top or in the place where information is more available to them. The plant has its ‘head in the roots’ that absorb chemical information; the galaxy in the black hole in its center that absorbs gravitational information, the human in its head that sees light information, inverse to the plants. And each one creates a different world map with it – a monad.

Those cyclical Tiƒ-particles/heads are cyclical precisely because the sphere is the form that stores more information.

But what is the purpose of those space-time beings; and why they trace cycles; and why the Non-Euclidean mind perceives and stores them?

As each Œ point is made of spatial energy and temporal information, it needs to absorb more of it.

So it absorbs and knots *space-time cycles, which carry ‘energy-motion’ and ‘information-form’ for their limbs, bodies and heads/particles.*** **

**∆³o actions:** All systems trace motions translating through space-time cycles (∆æ), emitting absorbed energy (∆e) as accelerated entropic flows that allow its motion; a*ll accumulate* information, +∆ï rising into mental simultaneous form those pixels that create an still image of the external ∆+1 world.

**∆±1 ACTIONS**: All physical and biological and social systems constantly accumulate more energy, +∆e, *provoking the death down the fourth dimension of its prey and ultimately become prey and also move down the fourth dimension of death.*

*And all systems *emit information, communicating it through languages to other beings and the social force organise identical entities into ‘numbers’

And all systems reproduce its information to last beyond its death: ∆œ.

Those 5 essential ‘actions’ of space-time that all beings perform, the purpose of those cycles and knots of space-time cycles.

We feed on energy, move constantly, acquire information, communicate and repeat our information, in our sons. But even the smallest particles, quarks and electrons, coded by the 4 quantum numbers, move, absorb light energy, which they localize and gauge, communicate ¥ rays of information and decouple into new particles.

This simple program of existence we call ‘life’, when applied to anthropomorphic self-centered humans, ensures the survival of all beings.

We deny all beings are like us, made of space-time tracing actions of energy and information, as all mind-beings perceive reality from its still perspective.

So they all believe to be the center of the Universe, and none sees the inner mind of other points of view.

So man considers the other monads non-sentient.

Yet all beings perform the same program of space-time actions, which imposes itself as those who do not follow it become extinct by lack of energy and information .

**Physical actions.**

The best way though is to talk of combined 5 DIMENSIONS of pure time motion with form – that is OF ACTIONS, which are essentially equivalent to the 5 actions of space-time exchange all T§organisms DISPLAY, in its actions of existence. We shall then bring again the ultimate vital meaning of those dimensions in light space-time and electronic minds, as ONLY IN THOSE LOWER SCALES OF OUR MIND-VIEW BOTH THE PHYSICAL, GEOMETRICAL DIMENSIONS AND ITS VITAL MEANING COME TOGETHER, WITHOUT ABSTRACTION – meaning the height, width and length, and colour that define the four dimensions of a ray of light DO have all a vital meaning for the photon-wave, as they code their reproductive speed, social color/frequency, magnetic information/entropy and electric entropic/informative forces (in the complex Universe all elements have ternary roles, so the way magnetism and electricity act in both arrows/roles, depend of the specific function light has for the larger organism that uses it to transmit energy and information):

Below we see also that our electronic mind is ordered by the ‘vital’ uses of the geometry in space of an electronic orbital.

The electron will have a particle state, hence a particle spin, a body wave state, hence an angular momentum for the standing bidimensional wave, a social action given by the magnetic field that organises all the social electrons in harmonious orbital game; and a reproductive event, which required spins of opposite direction os they can ‘couple’ decouple merge and reproduce new particles, and the simplest numbers that regulate its motions (principal number) and energy/informative simpler actions, absorbing=feeding on light (provoking quantum jumps on size-volume-energy) and using it to orientate its spin, angular momentum, and form of in-form-ation (second number).

**Quanta of space-time’s: 5 actions.**

We have now schematised the field-particle states of the 3 physical organisms. If we concentrate in its present state, as waves both the photon and the electron will then easily display its ‘internal structure’ and external actions of ‘survival’ that will show clearly its organic, bio-logical properties tightly connected by symmetries in ∆, s and t, with the parameters and Universal constants aforementioned. Let us then connect *the dimensions of the most important scale, our mind-world of light and electrons, with the vital actions of ‘entropic feeding’, e, lineal motion, a, informative perception, i, reproduction, o, and universal, social evolution, u; since almost all detailed events we study in physics as in any other scale responds to those vital actions.*

In the graph we see the structure of a quantum supœrganism of light in its wave and particle state and its fundamental laws of action, which draw an organic program of survival for both ∆-1 photonic and ∆electronic scales.

The equations of a c-light wave or photonic particle and its social group, the electron which is a bidimensional dense herd of photons (wave constrained scale).

THUS IN THE SMALLEST SCALES OF REALITY FUNCTION, FORM, DIMENSION, VITAL ACTION COME ALL TOGETHER NICELY AS SYMMETRIES BETWEEN THE ORGANIC SCALAR ACTIONS AND SPACE AND TIME DIMENSIONS OF THE BEING.

But as we move beyond the main stream of perfect symmetries between topology, time ages/actions, and enter into the more messy, less perfect world of molecules and thermodynamic life, the exact mathematical geometry of those entities BECOMES COMPLETELY secondary to the organic functions in a far more complex and convoluted geometry. So as we move into life scales FUNCTIONS AND ACTIONS AND DRIVES OF EXISTENCE – THE PROGRAM OF FEEDING ON ENERGY, GAUGING INFORMATION, REPRODUCING, EVOLVING SOCIALLY far outweighs the importance of simple motions and the perfect topology of those dimensions, which are less accurately followed, despite the ‘still similar’ dimensional form and equal number of actions and dimensions of a human being:

In the graph, a complex thermodynamic human being needs to focus on function more than geometric form, reason why mathematics stops being the fundamental language to explain mankind and the logic of verbal thought and evolution weights more.

On the good side anthropomorphism no longer forbid us for interpreting in organic terms our actions and forms, so there is no so much subconscious censorship on ∆st analysis of human beings.

The dimensions of space, of form, which are likely only co-existing in the mind, but do influence reality would then be the usual 3 lineal or topological dimensions, and expansive entropy, and for the mind… the monad singularity and membrane.

In that regard, we must *at least consider an 11th dimension doubling the mind into the membrane and the singularity, for 11 elements, to fully understand the duality of the monad-mind as a membrain.*

It is still an 11 dimensional manageable Universe, which is by the way the standard concept of string theory: an 11th dimension that encloses all other sub-systems of 10 dimensions:

Of course ‘magically’ experimental mathematics has lead to models in pure mathematical space that seem closely to the true game of space-time symmetries and scalar dimensions, but as conceptually it relies in all kind of antics, from newtonian absolute background space-time to imaginary symmetries to give birth to inexistent particles (SUSYs), it is a confusing dilettante’s mathematical game.

**balance of dimensions:** S=T: Survival.

Any space-time super organism will try to maximise the survival of its territorial T.œ, and as such we can define its actions even if we do so today only mathematically. The survival is then a simple algebraic function:

**∑Å ≈ Max. ∫ exi ∂st**

Which basically means maximises the absorption of entropic motion for the body, information for the mind, whose product maximises when e=i, that is we absorb equal quantity of quanta of both, from the external space-time world, ∂st, in the least ‘time’ possible of our own clocks. Those laws of efficiency (least time) and balance (max. e xi, e=i), then can be realized with some standing points, Max. e Max. i, max. e=i, ∑ e xi, which are simple mathematical expressions of the actions of feeding (max. e), perceiving (max. i), reproducing (exi, e=i) and socially evolving, ∑.. which will be the four actions coded by all systems (besides observing its pure motion, which is the only action today studied in earnest).

Thus we must deal now with the actions of the being, and its relative time beats, as *they are the units that will shape quantitatively, including physics, biology and human the daily existence and program of survival of all beings.*

And the rule in all of them is one of ‘efficiency’ and ‘thirst for life, for existence’. That is, systems will try to minimise the expenditure of time in its actions (law of the least time, which alone allows to define almost all of physics along the Galilean relativity already explained) and so to maximise the number of actions the being experience.

Further on because actions depend on size, the mind informative action will be the faster, related to the smaller bits of reality or ∆-3 scales; while the slower actions will be those on the ∆+1 world. And so the mind commands the being as it is the fastest acting being.

In dealing with those physical actions, we shall observe how *all physical super organisms follow the same 3+2=5 actions that define the existence of all beings:*

**IEA:** ‘absorbing information’ for its particle-state, energy for its body-wave, entropy-motion through its limb fields (IEA, primary action, information, energy and ‘a-ccelerations’motions); so we shall find those 3 parameters in all physical *super organisms; as those actions are CONSTANTLY HAPPENING OR ELSE THE SYSTEM WILL COLLAPSE AND DIE and then the complex social actions of offspring-reproduction and social evolution into universals.*

**OU:*** (whenever present, as those actions are not required for survival and might but also might not happen. In the graph we see them for light and electrons. So many of the parameters of physics, such as c-speed, magnetic and electric constant, the 3 euclidean dimensions of light and the quantum numbers relate to those organic actions of the being.*

OH, YES you are sceptic but QUARKS DO REPRODUCE AND ELECTRONS ALSO EVEN IF YOU CALL IT DECOUPLING. GET ON WITH IT.

The themes we shall deal with in 5D³ physics might be of no meaning for THE ‘dogma’ of knowledge called ‘reductionism’ – only properties susceptible to me mathematised matter, and ‘naive realism’, all what is not measured does not exist…

Reductionism and abstraction is though an attitude (NOT a property of the physical world) of the human being observing it, with its self-centred ego-paradox, so essential to understand reality (every point of view gauges information from its self-centred perspective biasing it to look like his mind-language, making his membrain, the most important part of reality); where 5D³ finds an imposing wall.

As we do need both the conceptual richness of verbal thought, which prior to the arrival of digital clocks measured time with logic properties of relative past, present and future verbs; and the singularities or physical minds that create the information in infinite discontinuous territories of order, which however cannot be ‘measured internally’; and whose justification is its existence in all systems, its actions that follow a program of survival and the obvious order of reality.

So while those graphs might disappoint physicists because they are not focused in mathematical equations of physics that we recognise to be truth but in its conceptual meaning and biological, survival whys, which physicists likely will reject THEY ARE the ‘why’ they do not want to know about. In the graph we clarify this point with one extreme case, the reason and parameters that code for the 5 main actions of the survival program of the Universe.

The body=wave/particle =head reality of the quantum main particles, the photon and the electron are *obvious* and equal to the actions of survival of any scale of reality: the 3 dimensions of our light space-time have organic functions for the photon. So do the quantum number of physical particles, which obviously reproduce in the same manner more complex biological systems do: you provide energy and a quark will split in new quarkitos, and an electron will throw a seminal seed, which another male electron with different spin orientation will match to create from the seminal light seed another electron.

Further on, multiple photons will travel in herd-packets according to its frequency giving birth to ‘colours’; and particles will become ordered by its ‘envelope’ or magnetic field, and its singularity or nucleic mass, as *any other cellular vital space becomes controlled by the constrain of its skin-sensorial membrain and singularity-mind. *

Those are the self-similar whys of the living, organic, fractal Universe that does NOT distinguish between species, physical, biological or social. And yet I recall in my few years of academic exposure physicists were the least interested on those properties. *As i spoke a language they did not want to recognise. But there is not a better formulae to define reproduction than the word itself. *

We shall seek those properties of physical systems because we are doing philosophy of science not mathematical physics, a long forgotten science of whys, which earlier practitioners of physics would have loved but modern digital computers, which are fed with equations and give us pictures considered the ‘final stage’ of knowledge, might shun, as they are profoundly skeptical about the ‘existence of a meaning’ to the Universe.

it is not an uncommon concept in all sciences adsorbed to that infantile paradox of the ego that makes humans deny to their own peril the vital, organic nature of the Universe.

We are thus interested in the thoughts of god, not the details of measure, and a simple example will suffice.

Julian Schwinger had recorded on its tombstone his calculus of the deviation of the electron magneton g value from 2 in the formula.

The value gs is roughly equal to 2.002319, and is known to extraordinary precision. The reason it is not precisely two is explained by quantum electrodynamics calculation of some small contributions of the lower ∆-i scales to that anomalous magnetic dipole moment.

So those *are details, whose exact measure obsesses physicists, because the simple whys do not matter to them.*

But to the philosopher of science what matters is the astounding beauty and simplicity of its formula:

µagnetic dipole=(g:2.00′) x.e/2m x Spin. And so we further simplify into **µ m = e S. **

We come thus to an equation that clearly resembles one of the simplest relationships between space and time parameters of two scales of nature, the quantum ∆-1 scale, electron (unit of electricity) x Spin and the gravitational scale ∆+1: mass x magnetic dipole (unit of magnetism).

*What those simple equations tell us about reality, and the fractal structure and flows of entropy, energy and information between scales, how they describe the vital, organic properties of physical systems… Those equations matter us far more than the details, but they are the kind of questions physicists no longer ask, as if they DIDNT MATTER or had any solution, as if the Universe were chaotic without order.*

We find the same problem of human egocentered love to ‘degrade’ Nature as chaotic and stupid in biology, which denies topological evolution, the key element of order needed to understand its punctuated evolution, or in social sciences, which always pumps up the ego of man as entitled species. I cannot fight that human psyche. So all what i can say is that to me, once i have understood 5D³ AND ITS PHILOSOPHY: Absolute relativity might be too objective, to matter to subjective man, IS THAT to me such knowledge of simple truths and the similarity of all the scales of reality suffice to me.

rality is simpler than languages, which are constantly as they are free of simpler motions and energy constrains to acquire any form, inflationary. So we can say that you are brunette or have a black hair, but that ARE NOT 2 PROPERTIES DIFFERENT IN THE BEING, BUT TWO DIFFERENT LINGUISTIC MIRRORS. And this makes confusing to solve the true meaning of systems.

Let us put an example, on how those inflationary mathematical equations obscure a meaning. The h-planck constant measures angular momentum and the first interpretation always the best simply meant E=hƒ: in the scale of light-electronic systems the minimal action of the singularity particle (photon or electron), was h. As more, faster minimal actions a light-electronic system had, more energy (the integral of those actions per unit of time-duration) will display the system. So this is the meaning and it requires to understand that we CANNOT change parameters easily.

I.e. the word ‘Energy’ in physics means a lot of different things and no many are aware that in most cases we use it wrongly instead of entropy-disorddered motion as in e=mc2, because we just want the motion of an energy composed of both motion and form. So the concept doesn’t matter to us, and obscure truth.

But then physicists put e=hƒ and e=1/mv² together and bring another equation for h in terms of mass, *which has nothing to do with it. *And at the end of the day by a century of substituting terms creating new equalities, that break the logic that relates the first equation term, h-angular momentum to an electron or photon charge-energy to display ‘frequency actions’, the whole thing ended being measured in Joules obscuring the meaning of an electron or photon using its electronic charge to perform an action.

And so the meaning of h has become obscured. Instead we should measure h in electron volts, NOT in mass units. Then we find an even simpler equation. The spin of a particle, which defines it precisely as a rotatory vortex of future time, has an exact value in h units, 1/2h. And so it expresses exactly the value of a vortex of charge, in its particle state (which along the wave angular momentum around the quark-center, defines a dual wave-particle electron system).

This is what an electron in particle state is, a simple vortex of a charge force, and that is what the spin means, measured properly in electron volts, and further on, because the electron has particle-spin number and angular momentum around the atom centre, it IS both a body-wave and particle/head.

Now further details that obscure those idealised simple descriptions as contributions of ∆±1 elements to those energies and spins do not matter to us IF we haven’t understood the ‘idealised’ simplified model of •5D³, which ads to any analysis the existence of a 5th SCALAR DIMENSION, 5 organic actions and 3 arrows of time to find many more basic principles.

Of course if there were millions of researchers in •5D³ I am pretty sure they could translate the whole of physics to 5D3 AND GIVE IT more meaning, but you cannot ask so much of a single man at this stage of my life. So we shall just keep it simple and try to show you that all the main equations and parameters of physics can be explained with those four elements, • the errors of the human mind mirror, in this case mathematics, and the order created by the singularity of the physical system, its scalar dimension and 3 time arrows.

**PHILOSOPHY OF PHYSICS: ∆@$≈ð**

**THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE**

**THE FIVE DIMENSIONS, ITS SPACE, TIME AND ST-ACTIONS.**

**Growing in S=T Dimensions. ****The 5****D³ universe in a nutshell.**

The Universe is a supœrganism that re•produces information. And it does so towards a final aim, the reproduction of new super organisms, •5D³ systems, of topo-bio-logical nature, with topologic, spatial, organic, scalar and logic, temporal properties.

A super organism increases in complexity as it ‘covers up and down’ new dimensions of entropy and information brought together into a new ∆±i super organic structure:

*In the graph, the three arrows of time of a world cycle are intimately connected to the three scales ∆±1 in which the supœrganism realises its existence, up and down the scales of the fifth dimension, from seminal birth into social existence and final extinction.*

*The fourth dimensions of entropic space and the fifth dimensions of the mind’s singularity and its social evolution of the whole, are closely related to the other membrain and centre of an open ball of energy, the present state with its spatial motions, $pe, hyperbolic waves and accelerated vortices of future, informative time. Which all together can be considered the present of the 4th and fifth dimensions with its inverse geometry and purpose.*

In the graph the ten dimensional organism, can easily be divided in ternary grouping according to topology or scale.

The most amazing thing about the dual fifth dimension of space-time that forms all the organisms of reality is that humans do NOT logically perceive it, despite being *all around us, all being part of a partial perception of the •5D³ being, in 4D², 3D, 2 or • dimensions of existeence.*

As such we humans have a hard time perceiving a full •5D³ being, let alone a simple 4D subject ordering around 3D objects, following the instructions of its holographic 2D mental sheets of information, as its moves in seemingly random lineal point-like cycles of exist¡enœ.

The whole beings in his whole action with his hole information only exists within itself.

*So the logic of time is ternary, similar to the taoist or hegelian concept of a yin-thesis, yang-antithesis and yin yang synthesis, as opposites attract to form complementary beings: *

*Past-entropy x future-information = present-energy cycles.*

It WILL be thus a polymath of all sciences where time events happen, explaining all those clocks together – from evolutionary biology to genetic clocks to historic cycles and economic evolution of machines – clocks of time the physicist does not even consider time clocks, because only the mechanical clock matter.

So Kepler’s>physicists reductionist view of a single clock, a single space and a single language of time must be confronted with the view of the organic Universe proper of philosophers of science and eastern cultures, which affirm that the ‘languages of god are infinite’ and the way we perceive time multiple.

This view of time indeed is flawed by dogma, reductionism and naive realism that eliminates all other clocks, all other time cycles, all other languages of perception of time-space, including the verbal logic of the three arrows of time, past, present and future.

So we shall return and explain the much wider, much extended through cultures (till the clock of physics became collective dogma) view of time as the processes of change, produced by the combinations of 3 arrows.

It is the philosopher of science’s view, which sees reality as an eternal balance between the arrows of entropy and death and the arrows of information and life that combine in the conserved momentum and energy worldcycles of the Universe.

‘yin-visnhu-in/form/ation=dimensional form’ which combines with ‘yang-shiva-entropy=motion’ to create the ∞ ‘qi’=’brahma’=energetic beings with momentum ‘acting’ on the universe.

We have on purpose explain along the fundamental equation of the three ages of time:

Spe: Local past-entropy-motion x Tiƒ: local future information = ST: E: present conserved, repetitive cycles of space-time energy.

Its mystical discovery by earlier philosophies of science of the eastern world to show you something evident:

Because the 3 arrows of time are every where, all human cultures have known about it by observing reality with human senses, crafting the past-present-future systems of all verbal languages with that view, and understanding that all systems go through 3 ages of time, corresponding to those arrows, the young-entropic-moving age the mature, reproductive, energetic age that combines those motions with a growing aware of form, of information, which comes to dominate the third age of timespace systems, and finally dies in an entropic big-bang explosion.

**The unity of nature in all scales of physics, deformed by mental limited perception.**

In the framework of modern physics, classical mechanics can be understood to be an approximation arising out of the more profound laws of quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity. However, that view of the subject’s place greatly undervalues its importance in forming the context, language, and intuition of modern science and scientists. Our present-day view of the world and man’s place in it is firmly rooted in classical mechanics. Moreover, many ideas and results of classical mechanics survive and play an important part in the new physics.

In ∆•st we return then to the classic view that mechanics *is the essential classic language of motion, within the central ∆-scale of the galaxy and the two other scales of size, observed and ruled by forces are the limiting scales of the super organism of the galaxy; and so the relationship between the 3 forms is NOT causal in time but topological in fractal space:*

**TOPOLOGICAL LIMIT:***As relativity deals with phenomena in the limits of THE GALAXY (its c-speed membrane region and its T=o, informative black hole centre): In the next graph we see the different**concept: Relativity deals with c-speed phenomena on the topological limit of the galactic membrane, and the black hole membrane, which is the singularity of gravitational information of the galaxy.*

**∆-LIMIT:*** While quantum physics deal with the lower limit or discontinuity of its **ternary **∆-i planes. Thus it is the lower limit of the galactic super organism in terms of ‘its parts’ – the quantum limit of maximal population and minimal time clock ‘bits’.*

And it is within this context how we can consider its ‘special properties’ regarding its form, quantity of data and *inverted nature -as information is made of discrete bits, so the limit of the quantum world is the h/2 minimal quantum of perception of information or spin quanta, while in the inverse larger limit, of the whole with less information and more entropy-energy, the key constant is c-speed, the constant of motion and reproduction of information.*

The Universe of physical systems is exactly as any other 5D space-time system a game of two parameters with inverse dualities, spatial, res extensa, entropic bidimensional, decelerating, past systems of motions in space, and temporal cyclical, accelerated vortices in time, which come together into present, balanced reproductive waves of energy and information; co-existing in 3 scales, the quanta, electromagnetic field scales, the thermodynamic atomic scales and the cosmological, gravitational scales; which can themselves be analyzed in more detail through ‘ternary sub-systems’ and put in relationship to each other through the symmetries of planes of the 5th dimension, asymmetries of the 3 topological varieties of organic form and its simultaneous organization and antisymmetries of time inverse arrows of life and death and the 3 ages in between.

In that sense while we will make concessions to the parlance of mathematical physics using terms whenever possible closer to the mathematical analysis of those organic events, and so sometimes in this post, much more often in the 3rd and 4th line will translate the confusing terminology of the Gothic age of mathematical physics, or the Aristotelian logic of the age of computer physics to a more amenable jargon, the true job of T.Œ in physics is to translate physics to the simpler rules of reality as all physical systems obey the Generator Equation of all General Systems of the Universe, which in the field of physical system is better expressed as:

**Γ. **[ Spe (Lineal, Planar Entropic fields/gas state) <ExI(wave-liquid)>Tiƒ (Particle-Crystal]∆≤|4|

This is of the many similar variations of the Generator Equation using symbols of ¬Æ we can use, a good definition of what physical systems are.

They are systems in which the metrics of the 5th dimension, ∆=S x T = E x I= K, remain invariant.

The application of the Generator Equation of 5 Dimensional Fractal ‘systems’ of cycles of spatial energy and temporal information, to cosmology and astrophysics is similar to any other science.

We first define an i-logic, ‘Generator’ equation that resumes with 9+Œ= 1œ parameters:

– The **3 co-existing ∆±1** planes of physical systems, its **3±∆ ages **in time and **3 organic topologies** in space.

We then define the** Œ-points** of those systems, the 10th parameter that integrates the system, making it ‘evolve socially’ into a new scale as a whole, and the cyclical space-time actions, the œ-points perform in order to make the system survive (as an apperceptive monad – for those with ‘anthropomorphic problems’, they can think in mechanical terms as follows: those who do NOT follow the existential program become extinct, so the program imposes itself mechanically if so they wish).

Those 5 actions, are: **entropic æ**-ccelerations:

-Ø: DEATH, which is seen by the predator as its inverse **e**-nergy feeding.

±∆ **ï**-nformative gauging, which means absorption of form, of information and informative communication, which means emission of information; mostly achieved with a wave with ‘2 opposite arrows’ (which can be in light the magnetic and electric field, in gauging quarks, the 2 colors of the gluon, and in all general systems, the laws that express the 2nd postulate of ¬Æ, where we define all lines between ‘fractal points, Œ, with volume’ as waves (since lines are NOT imagined BY HILBERT ‘Wir denken uns…’, but exist in the real Universe as strings of points, moving along a path of space-time).

So those ±∆e,I are the simplest actions of any function of ExIstence. And we can explain them for the 3 cosmological known scales of atoms & forces, cosmic bodies and galaxies. So far, so good. We can mathematize them, we can explain them organically, we can refer to classic astrophysics. It is though in the 2 complex actions of existence that complete the ‘vowels’, where abstract astrophysics will have more problems:

– ∆**œ**-ffspring creation, of similar forms (decoupling of particles into new particles in the ∆-1 scale, catalyzing formation of stars by black holes and ‘irregular baby’ galaxies by jets of supergiant ones, as M83 shows) and the subsequent, ∫œ, Social evolution of that offspring of atoms, stars and galaxies into ∆+1 Ûniversals.

The study of the full 5 actions is better expressed with the jargon and language of 5D sciences, which includes clear changes of paradigm, such as the study of the worldcycle of which any worldline is obviously a partial ‘element’ (as all lineal geometries of space, Sp, are mere ‘parts’ of a larger cyclical geometry of time, Tƒ, to which they will tend in any ‘future function’, sub-tended into the future.)

Physics is NOT really more than the study of lineal motions and all other elements of generation, growth, diminution, etc, with mathematical equations, specifically, since Newton, differential equations. So it is important to run a parallel analysis of what they mean.

**THE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE: THE TIMESPACE ORGANISM.**

So next after the åctions of the being, we realise those actions will be performed by specialised parts and the result will be entropic/feeding, informative/gauging and reproductive/iterative networks that perform those actions provoking entropy flows in lower scales or packing the being upwards into social groups ∆±1

**The 3 elements together -ITS networks.**

If you have grasped the ternary structure of an open ball of energy, encircled by a membrane connected through ‘networks’, forces in the case of physics, to the singularity point, then you have the topological wisdom needed to understand all the structures of the physical Universe, where unlike in *biological supœrganisms the networks are geometrically perfect in form and motion, hence subject to the essence of the purest synoptic language of timespace, i-logic topology. *

But while physicists only study the form of those networks, without understanding its function, 5D³ studies both at the same time. So after observing in the graph repeated ad nausea in this blog those functions for all species we can study them in the 3 scales of physical beings.

All this means to verify the value of mathematical physics, we can always ‘refer’ it to the 3 elements of ∆ST. If we consider a living being as the thermodynamic obvious case, with a membrane, a singularity brain and a vital indistinguishable mass of cells as its vital space you get the picture.

Let us now consider 3 examples of the 3 scales of physics.

**∆-1: quantum electro-magnetic systems.**

We know that systems have three elements. What are them in quantum electromagnetic systems?

In the atom is ‘zoo’ obvious that we shall hardly comment on them:

**ðƒ:** the electron is the membrain.

**ðï:** the quark nuclei is he singularity.

ST: The electromagnetic flows the vital space; while gravito-magnetic forces with its INVERSE geometry (heaviside formula of gravitomagnetism), connects the atom and gives away the ‘tiny’ amount of entropic energy the quantum scale allows to escape and ’emerge’ into the gravitational ∆+1 scale.

**∆º: In our thermodynamic scale,** the crystal solid state creates the inner image which the atomic shell manages to send, through the ‘liquid’ flow of electronic information.

So an electromagnetic system and its equations, must refer to those three elements. Let us see if its equation scorrespond to them:

In the graph a charge will have the three natural parts of reality, the ‘cyclical membrane’, (i.e. in electromagnetism, the magnetic field), the central singularity (ie. the charge) and the intermediate flows of energy and information between both (the electric and magnetic currents induced by each other).

So we need the 4 laws of Heaviside<Maxwell of the graph to describe such physical systems.

YET they are NOT the a priori language that determines electromagnetism, but the ‘linguistic expression’ of the Fractal GST, SPACE-TIME GENERATOR OF SUCH SYSTEMS WITH:

- Tiƒ: charge-singularity (1), Spe: magnetic field (2), and ST: the exchanges of motion=entropy and form=frequency between them (3,4):

In the graph we can see another example – the laws of circulation of fluids and electric currents can be reused to the basic scheme of a ternary system with an inner solid state, a liquid around, within an external entropic field. Of course, the purpose of science being mostly praxis makes the algebraic equations far more useful but the purpose of this blog being the ultimate whys, the spatial view shows how once and again nature can be reduced to the three arrows of timespace and the scales of the fifth dimension.

**The organic Universe.**

The fractal Universe is a mathematical proposition only – in the present milieu of astrophysics where only mathematics is the language of god.

We are however not interested in the mathematical abstract reductionist description of astrophysics, overdeveloped but limited for our understanding of what is REALLY the Universe of relational space-time. Our advances to those results are of a deeper philosophical meaning, as it goes straight to the foundations of reality, fractal space defined by 5D metric equations, which orders all the fractal vital spaces and different speeds of time clocks of the Universe, and the 3 arrows of cyclical time, entropy, information and its energy combinations.

It is then when we can give meaning to reality beyond its geometric, spatial properties, regarding its ‘time sequences and causalities’ purpose – to reproduce information and duration (infinite in time).

This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from a hypothetical birth of the entire Universe (impossible in a Fractal Paradigm, which at best would consider a ‘larger’ scale above galaxies).

In the graph we observe some fundamental consequences of fractal space and cyclical time: the three arrows of time order reality into ‘wordlccles between birth and extinction’, whereas extinction is the final entropic explosion of any system of Nature. Hence big-bangs are deaths of matter systems. The 3 arrows of time also become the 3 topological components of all local super organisms, its entropic limbs/fields, iterative body-waves and informative particle/heads. So systems can be seen in space as ternary topologies and in time as sequential processes, first guided by the arrow of information that warps them, as time clocks are cyclical and so galaies are vortices of information that warp space into mass (‘Time curves space into mass’ said Einstein).

*And so IT happens for all laws of mathematical physics that we shall relate to the ‘laws and structures of ∆ºst systems’: its ultimate cause is NOT the fact they can be mirrored in a mathematical language but the fact they followed the ternary laws of ∆ST, as 10 dimensional beings of fractal space-time, ∆ºst, which an ∆º mind with a self-centred pov can ‘perceive’.*

**The ternary structure of reality.**

Thus we shall see how ultimately mathematical physics is related to those laws: differential equations will express fundamental gst actions between scales of the fifth dimension (entropic motions will be described by derivatives of second order, energy actions by those of first order and so on); topological laws will combine the three only topological variations as expressions of the three arrows of timespace of all beings; and each of the mathematical equations will be expressed from one of the three topological frames of reference (cartesian, polar or cylindrical). And so on.

Now we need before closing this intro to topological physics, to introduce a first variation on its theme: we say usually that the ðf mind is in the centre and the clock-circle in the external membrane, but *as we study more systems in more scales we shall see that those positions in its control of the system are often exchanged, as both work always together to control the vital space, those variations are perfectly natural to the structure of systems. In the graph we see the earth has its brain in the **surface – its life species, and its ‘heart’ in the magnetic centre, as humans do (and in life we find as in atomic matter, with the quark center, the opposite form, the cell with its DNA uncle).*

IT IS THEN worth to notice that this symmetry will be one of the main dualities at play in all systems, as both together ‘invaginate’ and control the vital space and switch or invert the arrows and direction of its flows – *given the fact that the fractal generator allows all time and space reversals and trans/formation within three ternary scales/forms & ages*. Physicists have explored in depth of those symmetries, the time reversal one, but are still lacking on the other two main ∆st symmetries.

So for example, the magnetic field plays the *role of membrane, when it jumps over the first scale of electrons and as the magnetic number, organises them all together, and can be considered then the social ‘brain’ of the atom; yet as the attractive domains plays the ‘force’ game in the next scaling, when its domains are organised by a looping wire in an electrodynamic engine. *

*And it ‘sips’ upward through gravitomagnetic flows the necessary entropic energy for the ‘mass field’ of the ∆+1 cosmic scale to emerge .*

*is its extraordinary abundance, hence survival and efficiency as species which closely obey the laws of space-time.*

**The 5 DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE OF fractal superorganisms.**

So we have the elements that create all realities as fractal self-similar super organisms, co-existing in 3 scales of size, with 3 topologies of space, 3 time functions/ages, all wrapped up by a membrain – an external enclosure focused and controlled by an internal still linguistic singularity that controls it all and will ‘act’ to ensure the system receives enough entropic motions, information for its particle-head and mix both to reproduce clonic beings – THE PROGRAM OF THE 10 DIMENSIONAL SUPERORGANISM OR fundamental species of the Universe.

We shall call the sum of its 3 ‘scales’ of different size and different time speed, the ‘fifth dimension’ in a general way, to ‘respect’ the present simpler analysis of 3 space dimensions and one time dimension, in Einstein’s work. But as we advance more in the details of the model of relational space-time, developed in this blog, we shall realise the best way to explain reality is accounting for its 10 dimensions/parameters of reality:

- 3 dimensions of topological space: lineal expansive space; hyperbolic, iterative wave-like forms and implosive, cyclical, informative forms, symmetric to the 3 arrows/functions of time:
- 3 dimensions of time: entropic, past, disordering timespace; reproductive, repetitive=present timespace; and future, in-form-ative, cyclical timespace; which ARE LOCAL arrows for each being that ‘increases its information through most of his life time’ in 3 ages, and dies in an entropic explosion in a single quanta of time – reason why we give the name of ‘local past’ to an entropic, fast process, and local future to the much longer process of warping of entropy into information through the life-existence of any physical or biological system.
- 3 scales of size and relative time clocks, which give organic properties to reality. As all
*systems are made of smaller parts, and are themselves part of larger world, and so, we need to fully describe the being, to account from its 3 dimensions of space, of time and of scale, which are warped together into a whole by* - The mind, which has a linguistic, still mapping of all those parts, put together and enclosed by a membrane, that breaks the system into an outer world and inner region.

So we talk then of [ (3 space≈3 time) x 3 scales] + @-mind = ‘membrain’; as the needed parameters to have a ‘whole description of the being’.

And depending on how much of those elements we describe we can get ‘different number of dimensions’, from the maximal possible number (6 space-time dimensions in each scale, multiplied by 3 scales, which give us 18 dimensions, plus the ‘whole mind-dimension’) to the bare minimum, considering merely the 3 space-time dimensions of a system seen in a single plane.

All those descriptions have happened in science in different times and terms, as it happens today in the mathematical description of closed time strings and open spatial strings, which go from 3 to 26; but most are 10 dimensional strings (described with 10 parameters).

We shall in that sense adopt also two basic analysis: the synoptic •5D³ analysis, from the perspective of scales, packed in the fifth dimension, and its ‘metric equation’, (max. space size = min. speed of time clocks) that harmonises all those scales, as smaller systems run faster cycles and can code with information larger wholes, and wholes have more energy-motion and can feed and control smaller parts with it (so your cells code your information and you move them as a whole in synchronicity) allowing the symbiosis of the organic Universe.

We write it though with the addenda of •, the symbol for the mind-singularity (or @, which is the symbol for the membrain, the mind and the external sensorial skin, which if you realise IS WHAT YOU ARE: A STILL MIND-MAPPING OF LANGUAGES OF THOUGHT, which extract information through your sensorial skin), and explains Galileo’s paradox: you ‘perceive information in stillness.

**THE FRACTAL SCALES**

**The subdisciplines by PLANES.**

Thus once, we have defined the basic elements of GST, we shall in this post merely study the barebones of GST applied to physics, namely the three ages of time in physics, its main scales and equations of transition between scales, and a far review of the isomorphisms (equal laws of all systems) applied to them, with a basic analysis of those scales in 4 line sub posts dedicated to:

- Mathematical physics, considering the GST interpretation of the main equations of physics AND the evolution of mathematics into its proper non-aristotelian ternary logic of three time arrows and fractal structures of non-euclidean scalar space.
- Thermodynamics (dealing with the human ∆º scales)
- Astronomy (dealing with the ∆+1 gravitational scale)
- Quantum physics (dealing the ∆-1 electromagnetic scale).

*the substance of reality is considered to be ‘mathematical numbers’ the alpha scale of the graph, taken as most illustrations from the ‘subconscious collective of the web’ ; from the proper interpretation of the Universe, where in the first scale must be the ultimate substances, fractal space and cyclical time, which IS the ultimate language whose generator equations, all other languages=mirrors reflect.*

**0 scale: ∆st:**Relational space-time, isomorphic laws that apply to all scale and ‘evolved’ non-Æ mathematics reflects better.

*add in that graph at the 1 level besides the language of mathematics, best to express the social=numeric=scalar=analytical and topological=geometric properties of systems; the language of bio-logy, with its fractal co-existing, synoptic properties that allow us to explain organically as a whole, integrated system, all those scales and parts that analytical geometry describes in detail.*

*hence a relativistic view on the quantity of true information each language, mirror of reality in a smaller space-time mind can carry. As truth will always be the being in itself, and by defect, the maximal number of linguistic mirrors casted upon them.*

**Magnetic or thermodynamic human scale?**

*the understanding of the human scale, which is the one we have more information about and seems to be not so ‘clean-cut’ and harmonious as the lower quantum and upper gravitational scales with its awesome symmetries between the galaxy-atom and the atomic galaxy… from the Unification equation to the mass-families and its symmetries in celestial bodies, and ternary ages and symmetries.*

**∆±3,2: the galaxy atom**

Next we enter into our Island Universe, which we can duly observe and compare inside out – the ∆-3 scale of atoms and the ∆+3 scale of galaxies. And the interesting ∆±i ‘T-duality’ (string jargon) here, is that as we are inside the galaxy, we *can observe the inside of the atom, which we cannot really see, by comparing its self-similarity in the fractal Universe with the inside of the galaxy of which we do have a lot of experimental evidence; and we can compare the outside of the atom, which we can see (electromagnetic entropic space) with the outside of the galaxy (dark entropy space), which we can see, provided with the realisation that scales in the T-dualities are very similar but not necessarily (open question for philosophy of science, or ‘metaphysics’) equal.*

So in this scale we find the strongest experimental evidence ALSO to fill up the gaps of the ∆±4 scale.

*Those scales are the cosmic and gravitational scales studied by astronomy on the large world and by quantum physics on the small world.*

We though can now do further ‘scaling’ and subdivide for more detailed analysis all the elements, parts, sub-parts and 10-decametric sub-§cales of the galaxy-atom as physicists do, in different quantum, electromagnetic, atomic and subatomic analysis.

**∆±2: Sub-parts of the galaxy-atom.**

As a general rule the parts of a whole are obviously a ‘digit less’ in ∆-scales, comprehending a myriad of little elements, but grossly divided as usual in a t±s:-membrane/singularity system and a t x s : vital space, enclosed between them.

For this scale they will be the black hole/nucleon world, and the electron/strangelet outer halo, and in between the star/electromagnetic light space we live in.

*The top quark black hole*

So this new ‘T-duality’, should exist between the inner atom nuclei and the black hole nuclei of galaxies, which we have partially UNIFIED quantitatively with the Unification equation of scales, that shows the black hole galaxy is indeed equivalent in its Schwartzchild radius to the radius of the proton and hence the black hole nuclei of the galaxy should be positive, hence should be a top quark star, as only top quarks are ++ and heavy enough to be the hylomorphic cut-off substance on them.

This IS the Einstein’s hypothesis of the nature of black hole as top quark frozen stars, which he said was the only way he would believe in black holes – but as top quarks were not found in his life-time he always remained skeptic of them. Of course, the Einstein’s hypothesis render false and a mere mathematical inflationary theory with zero experimental proof and zero theoretical value, the so-called Hawking’s theory of evaporation of black holes.

To make black holes we just need to make a lot of top quarks, product of the Higgs decay in particle physics or the evolution of mass into its III ‘old age of maximal density of information’, which can be achieved in accelerators that therefore will make them when enough energy is compressed to evolve lighter quarks at CERN. And they will NOT evaporate, but grow exponentially as all seeds do till eating us the planet, what can i say?

In any case for the same reasons the T-dualities in those sub-parts will be between negative strangelet halos of galaxies (Witten’s hypothesis proposed by one of the string theorists) and electrons, also negative in atoms. And then between the light space-time in between and its particle states as photons, and the galactic stars ad its electromagnetic radiation at galactic scale or..

*∆±i≈T-duality photon≈star.*

The field of ∆±2 scaling thus is necessarily huge, but for the sake of simplicity and comprehension of the larger ∆st picture and its isomorphic laws, we just consider in more detail as the key secondary scale, according to the general rule that considers the main task of ∆st to understand the role of man in the Universe, NOT the inner region of atoms (strong forces, quarks, dark world) which is despite the huge sums spent in risky experiments (CERN’s LHC) to explore it, the much more important, less uncertain, better understood and closely related to the electronic mind of humans and machines, world of light at the ∆-i scale and stars at the ∆+1 side.

Again the understanding of those dualities is scanty in present physics – curiously enough denied in black holes, as funny mathematical tools for weirdo theories, which physicists, ‘digital robots’ operating equations of maths they do not fully understand, so much love to do.

The most developed are those of string theory and some work has been done on the galaxy-atom, also by Einstein, whose relativity in fact used to simplify calculus models of Hydrogen atoms as Galaxies, from where most results of general relativity at cosmological level were made; and of lately a lot of modelling of stars as photons, specially in the dense region close to the centre of the galaxy has been done, also with excellent results. If we ad the previous Unification equation of charges and masses obtained from this T-duality it seems more than proved.

* So ∆-2,3 will be the quantum, electromagnetic scale studied by quantum physics, which as usual best applies to **electronic/light phenomena where it was found (expansions to all other elements of physics and even the human universe, with weirdo wrong egotist Copenhagen interpretations must be partially corrected, or taken to the Tussaud museum of monstrous things 🙂*

*This scale thus connects also at •level of interpretations with the digital, visual ∆0-humind view, which is the self-centred linguistic frame of reference of visual, Euclidean perpendicular dimensions of a cartesian (graph) in mathematical physics.*

As our space-time is 3D perpendicular euclidean light space-time. And so an interesting mental deduction when widening the abstract reductionism of the human ego-centered mind, which uses those cartesian frame of reference, only to study the ‘locomotion’ of physical species far removed from our ∆st nature, is to consider the mental aspects of particles, specially photons and its ∑photon=electron, social grouping in orbitals.

Since if our mind is just a bunch of electrons, which are a bunch of photons, and physical systems obey laws of mathematical, euclidean frames of reference is because quantum physical systems have particle-like points≈singularities that command the systems with sentient, vital properties.

And this of course will be a huge field of research – to explain physical events as the product of the vital actions of its atomic and subatomic systems, expressed in the four quantum numbers that describe their energy feeding (principal), information gauging (azimuthal) reproduction (spin couples) and social evolution (magnetic number).

And so this lead us to the final scale of physical systems, the:

*-∆º±1: human, thermodynamic scale.*

This is our scale, because it is the scale of life, of cellular activity, and the scale of our larger, immediate geological world, and as such by far the more important, and the one that should be used as Einstein wanted to model statistical quantum mechanics once the basic correction of describing it with a single time arrow is solved.

So we bring back again the real three time arrows of this scale and its ±1 plasma origin and finale, just in case you haven’t got through the infinite repetitions of your brain,t eh fact that entropy only theories merely took laws that apply ONLY to gaseous entropic state, disregarded the liquid, balanced and solid, informative states of matter, and on top alas, hyperbolically extended those laws to all scales and cosmologies, giving birth to the absurd big-bang theory, and concepts about a dying universe, where disorder and chaos is the best possible and only future state of reality.

According to the rule that close scales are better observed, hence its laws more accurately the task thus IS inverse to that of weirdo quantum physics: to streamline with thermodynamic homologies as quantum pilot-theory does, the philosophy of science of the quantum world today in egotist ‘mood’ into the realism of thermodynamics.

The purpose of the rest of this post* * thus is to clearly define each scale of the physical Universe in its space-quanta, time frequencies and energetic momenta, world cycles, *and mind singularities, *to fully make a GST description of physical systems.

Yet in that process we must always be aware of that º∆ ‘mental element’ or human bias and languages that distort – specially in entropy-only physics – the perception of those systems – and the existence of an alternative, organic topological ternary description of its parts, functions and actions, based in the program of survival of all physical systems, as we have shown to be the case for the quantum numbers of physics.

So after making a fast review of each scale in terms of the classic laws of physics, we shall consider from a hardcore full GST development, the isomorphic 12 sets of laws that apply the subdivide by the ternary rule, the properties of the four parts of all beings, •languages/minds, ∆-scales, S-pace and time (4 x 3=12 sets of laws) to all those scales. This is the four line of the full-blown site, where we consider according to the previous naming, the ∆-4 dark world, ∆-3 light world and so on till getting the T-duality (string jargon for ∆±i dualities) of the ∆+4 cosmic world.

*physics denies 1) the three arrows of time 2) the mental properties of povs, singularities 3) the program of survival of ∫a,e,i,o, u actions or ‘drives of*

*existence in physical systems 4) the organic properties of co-existing ∆-scales; which therefore will have to be added.*

Indeed, while we will expand astrophysical sciences with a synthetic, bio-topological description of physical ∆ºust of space-time it is important to praise and remember the enormous quality of the mathematical mirror-image obtained in physical systems. We criticise physicists for its worldly profession (to make weapons of entropic destruction) and the bias included by this lineal love of ballistics regarding the arrows of time, but this should not confuse the reader. So far the most evolved of all stiences are biology and physics, and while biology is more accurate and describes many topo-biological characteristics it does also have some hang ups of reductionism in its love of entropic=chaotic visions where darwinian fight of individuals and despise of the social evolution arrow of the fifth dimension weight heavily.

Mathematical physics on the other hand is the biggest, more complex logic structure built up by man, which does not ceases to astonish me, not so much for human ingenuity but for Universal perfection. It does require though to improve enormously due to those time-space errors and limiting understanding of its dimensions of entropy, energy and information, *an the cause mathematical equations self-centred in physical povs, centres of mass, crystal structures, particle-point states, *the conceptual frame of abstract physics.

** 10 D. FORMALISM: ∆•ST GENERATOR**

Now for detailed analysis of symmetries and parts, it is better to use 10 dimensions expressed in the formalism of the fractal generator. Let us consider then the fractal generator of the 3 physical planes.

**Plane Generators of physical ðime§paœrganisms.**

*From one comes 2, from 2 comes 3, from 3 the infinite beings. *Cheng Tzu

After this minimal themes treated here at conceptual level – the meaning and metrics of the 5^{th} dimension, the dualities and beats of space and time, the topologies and ternary structures of its physical systems… let us introduce…

The Generator equation of physical systems.

It describes *all possible events, symmetries and forms* across:

- The 3 ∆-1 quantum, electromagnetic, ∆ø-magnetic -thermodynamic and ∆+1 cosmic gravitational scales
- The 3 ages of time between vortex formation and big-bang extinction, M(t)<=> E of all physical systems
- Its 3 topœrganic varieties, in those 3 scales as Sp (potentials-gas- electrons) < ExI (waves-liquid-quark matter) > Tƒ (particles-crystals-black holes),
- Its 5 actions/motions: ±∆e (motion-energy feeding), ±∆I (gauging of information, communication) and ∑œ>û, iteration and social evolution into Universal wholes.

So the generator of physical systems, its ‘cyclical space-time’ actions of its ternary 5D fractal dimensions resumes the entire field of astrophysics, and shows those physical systems also obey the isomorphic laws of all T.œ scales; and the physical generators are no different so they all come from:

**T.Œ’s GENERATOR**

**The fractal generator: The symbolism of the ternary symmetry**

All fractals have a generator feedback equation and the Universe is not exception.

Let us then write the fractal generator of time motions, the fact that time never stops, and it has 3 varieties of motions-forms that switch into each other ad eternal into an equation, we shall call the generator equation of the Universe. It merely states that |-Spe<, past-entropy, >Tiƒ uture-information and its combined, ≈X present-repetitions, the 3 flows of time constantly switch into each other, ad eternal: Spe<=X=>Tiƒ

Generators are dynamic, cyclical equations, which constantly create slightly changed new ‘cycles’. As such they are periodic cyclical equations of the form X < = > Y, where obviously X and Y are symbols as in all ‘Universal grammars’ linguistic representations of the Universal Generator (mathematical jargon in Space-time) or Universal Grammar (Logic Jargon in Time-space). So what is the Generator equation of the Universe? Easy the inverse metrics of time and space, written as the metrics of the fifth dimension, shown as a hyperbolic graph, origin of the existential algebra of the Universe and all other equations:

**Γ****. ** Universal Generator≈Grammar: Spe x Tiƒ = Constant Space-time: Spe-Past<Present-space>Future-time

The many iterations, combinations, dual forms, inverse equations, derived metrics and symmetries of space-time originated by that equation will be enough to explain the meaning of it all. Trust me (-;

A closer conceptualization to the worlds used by physicists would be:

‘The universe is a fractal of infinite beings of entropy and information”

And even closer:

‘Energy never dies, its transforms itself back and forth between entropy and Information ad eternal’.

The physical generator is a variety of the T.Œ Generator Equation that represents all the systems made of fractal space and cyclical time, whose geometries ARE the 3 ‘only’ Topologies of the Universe we perceive:

**Γ**.**Œ** Generator: ∆-1: Potential entropy> ∆³o: Lineal $pe motion (limbs/fields) < Hyperbolic ExI (repetitive waves-bodies) > Spherical Tƒ (head Particles)> ∆+1: singularity<World

Those are the five dimensions of any system, the 4th of entropy and death, the lower substrata, the 3 space-time topological dimensions of the organic being, and the 5th dimension, the singularity that connects it with the external world through its sensorial openings in its membrain.

*And physical systems should not be different from a social nation or an organic cell, in those elements. It is only the human view on them, which makes it look so different.*

The St-element is the present-larger one, as limbs and heads, fields and particles interacted and mixed their lines and cycles into ‘conic bodies, and elliptical orbits and hyperbolic waves’.

But when observed from the point of view of the ∆+1 particle, which merely uses the flat space to absorb energy, we often perceive:

∆-1: quanta of accelerated Sp-lineal motion ≤ Bidimensional waves: ∆> ∆+1: tridimensional spherical particle.

Finally when perceived in time, those 3 elements they define a world cycle that first converts entropy of the field into a wave that reproduces and collapses into a 3^{rd} age or particle of information which will finally explode back in a big-bang that converts the particle into an energy field. So we can write:

Entropy-energy<≈ c-wave ≈> To (Mass-charge)

In the graph, the logic of space-time systems, is more complex than the simple causality of Aristotelian logic, used to prove the consistency of mathematical statements. To start with all systems are points with parts, which the mind can see in stillness or motion, and belong to 3 possible topologies, already understood by the Greeks in its treatises on conics.

So we talk of bidimensional space perceived as ‘entropy’ or energy motion along the dimensions of width and length, and bidimensional time cycles, perceived as still information or frequency motion, in the dimension of height and length. It is of the combination of both fields, how a ternary system in space with motion, or 4D element of reality appears. So we observe always fields/limbs of energy moving heads/particle so information due to the topological properties of n-spheres (which store maximal information in minimal space) and lineal planes (which move faster between two points).

What matters to understand of every and each parameter of the main arrows of time of the main scales of physical systems in the Universe are its basic relationship equations that give us the key to understand how the three arrows of each scale and system can merge together into social organisms of larger or co-existing scales. So let us try to make a non-exhaustive catalog of them, according to scale and class (Spe, St or Tƒi):

Tiƒ: Planckton>charge>mass

ST: c-speed>electric flow>density flow

Spe: potential field (quantum potential, electric potential gravitational field).

Physical systems are basically ternary systems of particles-head in each scale which are complementary to a reproductive wave-form, either as wholeness of an internal wave-form or as particles of a larger ∆+1 wave. Often both, which together prey over a potential gradient ‘Poisson’ field, which they use to move and slide but at the same time are constrained by the conservative – preferred ‘least time’ paths/actions possible on those fields.

It comes then as an essential element of physic ∆nalysis, which studies with a reduced number of differential equations, each of them *a partial case of the allowed sub-equations of the Generator, THE POSSIBILITIES of exchange of entropy, energy and information of a physical ternary system with similar systems in the ∆º±1 physical scales. *

**The ‘Generator’ equation of space-time beings and its ternary logic.**

Unfortunately the beats of the universe are difficult to understand because the logic of present man, especially that of physicists seems ‘lineal Aristotelian’: A causes B.

Reality though is more like the Eastern philosophies of Vishnu-yin-information and Shiva-yang-energy/motion:

A<=>B, that is A and B interact to create a ternary <=> present element.

Reason why there is conservation of Angular and Lineal Momentum, there is Space and Time, Energy and Information, O-Particles/Heads that store time cycles and limbs/fields that move them, mixed in bodies and waves that reproduce both of them.

Humans of course, naturally have always expressed this ‘Ternary’ Structure of the universe.

And so the parallel syntax of the languages of knowledge we use to describe those Universal beings – verbal, mathematical and visual languages – all have the same ternary ‘grammar’, which I have called the ‘Fractal Generator’ of the Universe:

Tƒ (Subject or Function of ‘temporal information’) < ST: action, operandi or verb ≥ Sp (Object of ‘spatial energy’).

We associate counter-intuitively ‘cycles with motion’ and ‘lines with Still space’.

It has to do a lot with the limiting errors of classic physics, where only lineal inertial motion matters. Fact is big-bang explosion DECELERATE speed till it becomes Still lineal distances and dimensions, that is pure lineal space with no motion or vacuum space (as in any physical big-bang of entropy). While the equation of cyclical vortex, is Vo x Ro = K (2-manifold, simplest variety), which counter-intuitively accelerates (∆V) when distance becomes smaller, (-∆R) to maintain K constant.

Thus clocks, frequencies and vortices accelerate ,and have more ‘time’ content, that lineal motions that decelerate to a halt.

Now, we explained before that in duality Space was slower, extensive, Sp, Size, and time was faster, cyclical, accelerated (so are its maths). But now in ternary symmetry we have the need to ‘extend’ the meanings of time and space to the duality of the 3 motions of time and the 3 organic parts of spatial bodies and this makes some confusing choices of terms, such as:

Space will be the still, formal view of reality and Time the motion view. And so we shall talk of 3 ‘topologies of formal space’, and 3 ‘ages of time motion’, which together shape the fundamental duality of reality, the view of organs in simultaneous space and the view of beings living a worldcycle of 3 ages of time:

Sp (limbs-fields)≈ Young, past, expansive age < ST: Present, repetitive, hyperbolic body-waves, adult reproductive age>Tƒ (Temporal, future informative, cyclical old age).

Now here the convention I have adopted is to *Use the same symbols for either symmetries, the limb-field<body-wave>head-particle or spatial simultaneous view of an organism in space, and the Young-past-expansive < present-Adult-reproductive>Old-Informative 3 ages of time.*

This is where things seem confusing because the whole thing transmutes. The old age of future time has more information and it is cyclical, properties of time cycles, but it is also slower, property of space decelerating motions. The young expansive age has more motion, a property of time more than space and so on.

But as I have told you B & W and 3 color view are new worlds, and this is the closest way to express past references and correspond with human expression of all this.

A way out to avoid confusions with the ternary symmetry is to use more when dealing with the still, simultaneous spatial view, the ‘symbols of geometry-topology, |, O and Ø:

|-Limbs/fields < Ø-waves-bodies> O-Heads/Particles

And the same for time ages with the reference of time motions:

|-young past < Ø-present, reproduction > O-Information, future, old age.

So it shows the symmetry with the symbols | , Ø, and O.

If in the future anyone goes through my 30 years of research in all this, they will then find that I profusely use those symbols.

But trust me if you really understand T.Œ which is more a question of mental attitude, the understanding will be clear from the beginning.

**THE GENERATOR EQUATION THROUGH THE PHYSICAL SCALES OF THE 5 ^{TH} DIMENSION**

Next then among the absolute inevitable concepts of vital mathematical physics comes the duality and ternary symmetry between potential fields, waves and particles, the essential generator of physical systems in the lower scale matched by the gaseous, liquid solid states.

**Particle-wave-field states**

So we come to the conclusion that both from the internal pov of the mind and the external pov, the unit of time cycles is the measure of an action, which as the mind singularity is not perceived, will consist on an energy ‘body-wave’ measure and a frequency of the external membrane-bit of time of the being – measure.

In the graph we see the duality wave-particle in it’s simplest form. Stop and go is thus the duality of motion and form coupled to the particle wave duality, sleep-curled/moving beat of life, and so on.

But either in wave state or particle state we measure basically the cyclical angular momentum/lineal speed of the being and its informative/energetic body/wave-particle density.

And to those terms we shall refer all values of physics which will be mostly ternary equations that relate the entropy/energy/information of the system, where the mind is not considered, and as humans ‘ab=use’ nature, they do throw out the singularity – do not even believe it exists – as it has no motion, entropy which is what we use.

And vice versa, they convert fast entropy motion into formal energy which is what we use mainly from nature.

It is though important to notice that regardless of the entropic, limbs/fields that might be external to the being, the being will be if it is anything complex dual, with a wave-body and a particle-head spatially as two parts of the being (graph) that switch in one or other state, and *if it is extremely simple, it will transform into each state sequentially in time.*

However again, we often do not distinguish both components (remember the singularity tends not to be observable); and we confuse the particle state (curled spiral) with the particle as a whole and the lineal state, with the wave as a whole.

On practical terms it means we will either because the system is so simple that switches on and off between both states, or because we see the whole in both ‘actions’ as moving waves or informative stopped particles, find *as the fundamental equation of physical systems, a relationship of equality between the particle and wave states:*

*wave ≈ particle *

Thus become the essential principle of complementarity. What about the field? As the field is only ‘perceivable’ when the wave ‘travels through it’, imprinting its form, using it as the entropy of motion, or the particle absorbs it to perceive through it information, we shall also find even if they are often ‘different beings’ in different scales, equations of the type:

*particle ≈ field; wave≈field*

As in Schrodinger’s equation, and its polar, pilot wave formulae (particle=field form).

There is though a simple rule to determine the 3 states: max. frequency=max. information = particle state; minimal density of information=field state, which is crystal clear in the light spectrum.

**5D Cosmology. The fractal Generator: Sp<≈>Tƒ**

Perhaps the most extensive field of T.Œ is astrophysics – the study of the scales of matter. It is in fact the one I have researched more after the superorganism of history, despite or perhaps because they are not the self-evident biological planes of existence, where T.œ fits directly like a glove to an entangled hand, Einstein permitted (-;

We want to bring in this introduction only one theme, with many branches, the fractal scalar nature of physical space, along planes of the fifth dimension and once we generate its equation deduce from it the Unification equation of charges and masses, the Saint Grail of mathematical physics, searched for a century with no results (as they are time vortices of 2 different, limiting scales of the Universe) and then the big-bang cosmology and finally the question of the wave-particle conundrum of quantum physics and the meaning of Universal constants. They are the 4 most researched themes of physics, and that is the reason why we shall do a fast survey of 5D improvements on them.

Let us consider it briefly before describing biological systems with the same Generator equation of 5D fractal space-times.

**The particle state: masses and charges: vortices of time: clocks of information. Tœs**.

This gives origin in physics to certain modes of ‘future’ cyclical time vortices, spin numbers, photons, strong quarks, electrons, charges, magnetic moments, thermodynamic molecules, masses, angular momentums, cosmic bodies, solar systems, ud stars, strange stars and top black holes, galaxies and Great Attractors, which are the ‘Tƒ’ elements of all those scales and subscales, between the minimal observed form, a fermion spin and the maximal one, the Great Attractor region of the Local Universe.

They are all sub-vortices of the 4 fundamental Planes of the Universe, where the 4^{th} is only partially perceived (the cosmic scale outside galaxies of ‘neutrino strings’ ‘Higgs bosons’, dark energy and dark matter), but we do have more vortices than the 3 perceived ones, the electromagnetic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, as we must apply the ternary principle and break each of the 3 fundamental scales in 3 sub-scales).

So Einstein, used those non-Euclidean geometries that make lines part of a bigger time cycle to study the curved masses of the Universe. And he said ‘time curves (lineal) space into (cyclical) masses’, which he defined with the Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravitational mass.

Thus as time curved space into masses, it accelerated gravitation into cyclical vortices. And gravitational, lineal forces became masses the simplest clocks of the Universe; whose attractive ‘mass-power’, was proportional to the frequency of its cycles: M = k ƒ.

*This duality of mass vortices and expansive entropy, which already Descartes foresaw, when he affirmed that all what existed were res extensa (space) and vortices of time (masses, charges, galaxies) is the ultimate meaning of the dual equation E<=>Mc ^{2}:*

**The generator symmetries, a realist formalism to substitute group theory.**

It has to be noticed if you haven’t that all this generator parlance is a realist way to picture the symmetries of physical systems. Physicists as they explore basically the arrow of motion with certain finesse, and mix around all others, know there are symmetries but the ones they study more intensely are rather trivial as they are concern with the locomotion in a single plane (without treating it as reproduction).

This is the ONLY IDENTICAL SYMMETRY, for which they have made a whole complicated inflationary astoundingly varied and detailed analysis; and on top in search of its saint grails of single equations reflection of the creationist God, they try to fit them all in the ‘promising’ group theory – a game that reaches its paroxysm in a surfer physicist that has a monster symmetric Lie group, which tries to pack everything in a single mathematical expression (which should be the God-Group of the creationists).

I used to study those things when i was a pedantic toddler of thought; now I have fun with it.

Look at the graph (: One of the most talked about ‘Theories of Everything’, which consists merely in graphing all the particles and parts with its parameters and constants in a fancy Lie group, as if it had any meaning or in-depth revelation; when is just a diagram packing particles and parts, without *any serious attempt to explain truly their relationship in depth. Of course, as all physics it is plagued of hints to reality, after all it tries to put together what we see.*

So they are packed in ‘trialities’, meaning ternary symmetries, in dualities and its combined 2³ octets *as those are indeed the basic symmetries of the Universe, but without explaining anything of it as we do here from first principles (space, time and its ternary combinations of energy). So yes, *I find funny the enthusiasm they produce, past long ago my dismay for the lack of interest of creationist physicists for more serious conceptual thought.

So what we will do – no concessions anymore – is to start afresh the study of symmetries in physics through the fractal generator.

Symmetry as it is explained with Noether theorem etc. is too baroque to care. And pure platitudes about the obvious fact that a reproductive motion of information is equal in each repetition of space, but if we look it from different angles might not seems so and all the chit-chat about chirality (time is not symmetric in arrows), mirror symmetry and parity, etc. etc.

Of course all this will be dealt with in factual experimental physical analysis on the 3rd line more onto the point of translating physical laws.

But in this general view we are going to be much more elegant without fancy little green squares as the surfer’s T.O.E. and bring about the fractal ternary/dual generator of space-time symmetries and scales that explains it all in real terms.

In that sense we shall use the term symmetry in general terms, but it is important to know that the ‘ternary relationships’ between scales, topologies and time ages IS different. So we talk of:

**Antisymmetry in scales**(though the word is used in maths and physics differently, merely in terms of ±f(±x) abstract function). So what we mean is that motions down in the fourth dimension of entropy are completely inverse with a short of ‘mirror symmetry’ to those of social evolution and organicism. And we represent it with the 3 symbols, > for the fifth dimensions < for the fourth dimensions and ≈ for a present motion that doesn’t move in the scalar Universe (yes all this can be easily put into group theory, but it would loose meaning and we are not creationist, we are not interested in finding the perfect mirror group -as it is a tenant of ∆st TO USE THE LANGUAGE AND FORMALISM WHICH IS SIMPLER FOR EACH PROPERTY DESCRIBED.- So then, for the present dimensions of a single plane can then talk of
**asymmetry in topological space**, as the limbs are lineal, the particles-heads are circular, and the mixture of those is yet a different form, hyperbolic… AND WE use the 3 symbols of |-space, Ø-spacetime and O-time. **Finally its combination gives birth to Circular symmetry**in an existential world cycle of time, meaning that the whole world cycle ends as it starts; which is born of the combination of the previous symmetries,*adding the 3 dimensions of life-ages in the same present space, and the two arrows, generation and death of the 5th and fourth dimensions.*

What physicists tall more about is motion, Symmetry proper is then restricted to a theme we care little about, the motions of reproduction through the lower scale of space-time of the being that moves, which is obviously trying to reproduce itself completely identical in each step over its lower ‘potential field’ of indistinguishable bits and bites.

So those are the four symmetries, 3 in fact, of physical or any other system, expressed in the generator (as motion is merely a reproduction).

Now those symmetries can fit ALL the fancy dots that represent certain particles and parameters of physics of that graph with the theory of everything. And make each of the fittings meaningful as originated in fractal space and cyclical time symmetries. I.e. the 3 families of mass are the 3 ages of evolution of information, which also can be considered as growing planes of the fifth dimension, with more social evolution or density of mass… And are associated to the ternary topological parts (quark families or singularities + electronic quark covers + bosons that represent <≈> exchanges of entropy, energy or information between fermions, giving birth to one of the many sub-equations of the generator: T(fermion) < st-boson>t-fermion …

So yes, we are not just making magic creationist maths, as group theory does to help fit all in a nice picture, but will be more detailed, meaningful and talk of each sub-equation of the fractal generator, which includes all possible sub-equations, parts and wholes, families and ternary and dual elements of all the super organisms of the Universe…

This is then susceptible to be treated with the general mathematical and logic laws of ¬Æ i-logic mathematics, which reveals those super organisms of physical time space to follow all the laws of all other systems of Nature.

Indeed, considering the example of the previous T.O.E. it is all rather simple with the 3 scalar, space and time symmetries, as the graph shows, in the ‘creation’ of the octets of particles, studied in detail in the quantum scale:

FRACTAL SPACE-TIME ORGANISMS are symmetric in time (3 ages between birth and extinction, with inverted properties in youth and old age, and symmetric balance in the adult, reproductive, present age) space (3 organs with inverse properties between entropic limbs and informative heads, balanced in present bodies) and the 5th dimension (inverted properties of the cellular and social scales, balanced in the organic, thermodynamic scales).

Those symmetries ARE the essence of the Universal structure, giving an enormous beauty and efficiency to the Universe.

So each family of mass and particles known to science (by definition science should not be concerned with mathematical equations that describe events and entities never observed in reality), has its symmetric value in the larger scales of the 5th dimension, as organic components of the larger cosmic bodies and galactic parts.

This symmetry does happen again if we observer atoms as independent structures, part of the larger thermodynamic ∆+1 scale and composed of smaller particles and forces. Since we can always according to the ternary symmetries of 5D cyclical space-time studied any ternary element as a whole composed of smaller parts.

In the graph, instead of silly, fancy groups, the proper way to order vitally and through the 3 scales, the particles of the Universe, in a duality of ‘light and dark atoms’, with the symmetries between gluons of 0, 2 spins and Higgs-neutrinos of 0, 2? spins as gravitational forces. They belong to the atom-galaxy internal and external forces. THEN we might consider the ‘evolution’ between the ‘3 families of mass (better ordered as in the graph in 2 that form the light and dark atom (ud/cb) and the ‘predator’ heavier hierarchical s and t strange and top, which transforms them.

The most irrelevant elements are the z and w bosons, which act as the ‘intermediate’ stage, in a ternary transformation through the temporal weak force.

The full model of ∆•st particles makes vital organic sense of the galaxy atom through the 3×3+o symmetries of the fractal generator.

Regarding the existence of ‘3 type’ of particles, the response is immediate: the 3 families (∆-scales) of quarks are the singularity, the 3 (∆-scales) of electrons the cover-membrane; and so they are in the larger cosmic bodies; and the bosons and neutrinos (spin 2?, broglie theory of neutrino>light), are the intermediate flows of entropy, energy and information.

The** 3 States of physical systems: Sp (past-entropy fields/gas)≤ExI (present reproductive wave/liquid)≥Tƒ (future particle-crystal)**

What is the generative STRUCTURE of the Universe of physical systems? The answer is: the same that all other time-space systems described here:

This must be understood from the beginning: Physical systems do not change respect to biological, social or mental systems, the 4 categories of reality studied by a Theory of Everything Organic, T.Œ – only the languages humans use to explain them, from the anthropomorphic, self-centered Œo perspective which makes more ‘abstract and indistinguishable, the point-particles of physical systems, far removed from us in form, information, and energy, spatial scales.

The Universe of physical systems is exactly as any other 5D space-time system a game of two parameters with inverse dualities, spatial, res extensa, entropic bidimensional, decelerating, past systems of motions in space, and temporal cyclical, accelerated vortices in time, which come together into present, balanced reproductive waves of energy and information; co-existing in 3 scales, the quanta, electromagnetic field scales, the thermodynamic atomic scales and the cosmological, gravitational scales; which can themselves be analyzed in more detail through ‘ternary sub-systems’ and put in relationship to each other through the symmetries of planes of the 5th dimension, asymmetries of the 3 topological varieties of organic form and its simultaneous organization and antisymmetries of time inverse arrows of life and death and the 3 ages in between.

Now we have studied the fundamental scale of galaxies, the ∆+1 gravitational scale. But the ∆-scale of thermodynamic systems is of paramount importance in as much as it is the human scale for which gravitational gradients work merely as a limiting z-dimension that make us work in closed flat trajectories during our space-time actions. And we talk of a simple ternary spatial symmetry on thermodynamic systems.

**Γ. **[Sp (Lineal, Planar Entropic fields/gas state) <ExI(wave-liquid)>Tƒ (Particle-Crystal] û≤|4|

Thus all together we can write the following Generator combining the a(nti)symmetries of the 3 scales with the formalism of ¬Æ to describe the ‘Human world’ of physical systems:

∑Λ-1: [Sp-potentials≤≥ExI-waves≤≥Tƒ-Particles]≈ Plasma: Λ: [Sp-Gas≤ExI:Liquid≤≥Tƒ:Crystals]≈Matter: Λ+1: [Sp-Oort Belt≤≥ ExI: Planets≤≥Tƒ: Star]

Now the previous Generator Equation resumes all the physical elements that interact in this planet both in space and time (hence the duality of ≤≥ arrows between space and time elements, to define both symmetries) across the 3 planes of existence of the Solar system.

The Universe of physical systems is exactly as any other 5D space-time system a game of two parameters with inverse dualities, spatial, res extensa, entropic bidimensional, decelerating, past systems of motions in space, and temporal cyclical, accelerated vortices in time, which come together into present, balanced reproductive waves of energy and information; co-existing in 3 scales, the quanta, electromagnetic field scales, the thermodynamic atomic scales and the cosmological, gravitational scales; which can themselves be analyzed in more detail through ‘ternary sub-systems’ and put in relationship to each other through the symmetries of planes of the 5^{th} dimension, asymmetries of the 3 topological varieties of organic form and its simultaneous organization and antisymmetries of time inverse arrows of life and death and the 3 ages in between.

In that sense while we will make concessions to the parlance of mathematical physics using terms whenever possible closer to the mathematical analysis of those organic events, and so sometimes in this post, much more often in the 3^{rd} and 4^{th} line will translate the confusing terminology of the Gothic age of mathematical physics, or the Aristotelian logic of the age of computer physics to a more amenable jargon, the true job of T.Œ in physics is to translate physics to the simpler rules of reality as all physical systems obey the Generator Equation of all General Systems of the Universe, which in the field of physical system is better expressed as:

G[Sp (Lineal, Planar Entropic fields/gas state) <ExI(wave-liquid)>To (Particle-Crystal]û≤|4|

This is of the many similar variations of the Generator Equation using symbols of ¬Æ we can use, a good definition of what physical systems are.

They are systems in which the metrics of the 5^{th} dimension, ∆=Sp x Tƒ = E x I= K, remain invariant.

That is the distance-energy or past field of spatial size of the system multiplied by the speed, quantity of its information-time clocks are constant, within the range of variations, which allows systems to perform actions of energy and information, in present physical system within a certain range for EACH of the planes of existence of physical systems. Let us then consider the main elements of that Generator equation of physical systems starting as usually in an inverse fashion to the mathematical analysis of physics – that is from the synthetic, organic whole and its larger points of view.

As we have studied vortices above, when considering the unification of charges and masses, let us now bring the wave description and its duality.

Let us then introduce, after considering the minimal EQUATIONS of THE GENERATOR, which will be further studied in the article of quantum physics, whenever it becomes available, the minimal aspects needed of non-Euclidean mathematics to know the structure of the Universe.

Let us first remember the symmetries of the Generator of 5D space-time in the 3 scales of physics.

__5 Dimensional antisymmetry:__

∆-1(atomic/electromagnetic scale)> ∆:Earth/thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: gravitational/Galactic scale.

__Spatial Asymmetry:__

Sp (Spatial toroid fields)≤ ExI (Hyperbolic waves)≤ it(particles of information)

__Temporal Cyclicical symmetry:__

∆-1: Conception L: Birth < Ps (young, past entropic age/field>ExI: adult, present, iterative wave age > Tiƒ: old informative, future particle age ∨ ∆-1: Entropic death

In the description of ∆3 , galaxies, those symmetries are:

__Scalar Antisymmetry:__

∆+1: Cosmos<∆: Galaxies<∆-1: Stars

__Spatial Asymmetry:__

∆+2: Spe: Photosphere ≤ ExI: Radiation zone ≤ It: Nuclei

∆+3: Galaxy: Spe: Halo ExI: ecliptic arms ≤ It: Black hole

∆+4: Cosmos: Spe: Wall of fire? ≤ ExI: galactic plane ≤ It: Great attractor?

__Time world cycle and ages: __

∆+2: Spe: Gas Nebulae≥ ExI: H-R sequence ≥ Dwarf, Pulsar or hole

∆+3: Spe: Gas nebulae≥ Irregular Galaxy≥ ExI: Spiral Galaxy≥Tiƒ: Globular, Dark or Cannibal

∆+4: Spe: Cosmic Big bang? ≥ ‘3 Epochs’ ≥ Big crunch

In the description of ∆-3 , atoms, those symmetries are:

Scalar Antisymmetry:

∆-1: h-quanta: ‘Planckton'<∆: Atoms<∆+1: Molecules

Spatial Asymmetry:

∆-4: Light: Field: Spe: Halo ExI: Wave ≤ It: Photon

∆-3: Atom: Spe: Electron ≤ ExI: Radiation zone ≤ It: Nuclei

∆-2: Molecule: Spe: External atoms< ExI: Electro-Magnetic Bondage ≤ It: Crystal Center

Time cyclical symmetry: Ages:

∆-4: Spe Vacuum space ≥ ExI: electromagnetic wave ≥ Tiƒ: Particle

∆-3: Spe: Plasma≥ ExI: Atom ≥Ti: Elements Table

∆-2: Spe: Gas ≥ ExI: Liquid≥Tiƒ: Solid-crystal

**10 Dimensional Universe.**

While we use the concept of a scalar fifth dimension, under the correspondence principle (using the models of classic physics), a more formal analysis of the equations of mathematical physics and ∆st makes easier to study reality in terms of 10 Dimensional equations of logic form, considering the 3 scales of size, the 3 topologies of space, the 3 ages of time and the ‘singularity+membrain’ which forms the linguistic mind of the system as its 10 dimensions that create a supœrganism plugged into a larger world. The graph shows them for the galaxy.

In the graph the 10 dimensions of any physical system in this case the dimensions of the galaxy, 3 ∆±1 scalar dimensions as the system co-exist on them, three topological space dimension, three age, temporal dimensions and the mind membrain. Those are the dimensions of any system of reality (we use the term 5D for classic analysis given the preponderance of 3+1 st analysis in classic physics, but this is the real deal. 10 will also be the dimensions of strings, but the whole subject is too complex for this introduction and i might say quite irrelevant, beyond understanding the T-duality and the vital properties of strings that reproduce, switch on and of between time and space stats and follow nicely by ‘spontaneous generation’ – that is physicists hard work with maths, magically all the laws of GST.

If we use for each of those dimensions an equation or formalism that defines it ceteris paribus, then we have 10 sub-equations of the generator that expresses them all:

Γ•: ∆-1: $-Past≈entropic field ≤≥ ∆ Ø-ST present≈iterative wave ≤≥ ∆+1 O future=informtive particle.

Whereas the whole-‘mind’ is the generator, the three scales are defined topologically: |-field, O-particle, Ø-wave and in terms of its past to future functions (entropy, iteration and information).

**Proof of string theory. The 10 dimensions of any Universal system.**

Incidentally this simple reality of point-particles as open doors to the lower scale of reality, the ∆-4 dark world becomes the immediate proof sought after by physicists in search of the meaning of strings – where are the strings of the fifth dimension? (: alas the immediate answer is that each point-particle does have as the first simpler 10-dimensional string theory (by far the most proper, directly in connection with all the laws of ∆st; indeed have you realise: closed string=time cycles, lineal strings=spatial entropic motions; 10 dimensions = GST 10 dimensions, and now, point particles as lines, the connected flow between the point-particle and the lower scale, where physicists have found almost every variation and ∆+•+s+t perspective in maths but still don’t know how to interpret it).

So how we measure then those 3 ‘parts’ of any system in mathematical physics?

As usual thee isomorphic method implies that what we find in one scale will be closely resembled by other systems in other scales.

We shall much latter finish this tour on the fractal Universe, studying the smallest of all scales, purely theoretical but likely when properly written in terms of space and time, to be truth – the scale of strings, the dark world of gravitation the ∆±4 Universe…

## **TRUTH: COUPLING ∆• ST VIEWS AND INFLATIONARY EQUATIONS: EPISTEMOLOGIC SIMPLIFICATIONS**

Another epistemological solution to a classic conundrum of physics comes from the realisation that *as there are 3∆st+@ elements in reality (@ being the alternative symbol for the mind, as it includes both, the • linguistic singularity and the O MEMBRAIN), we can always write four similar equations, from the perspective of the field (potential), the wave, the particle and the scale, and often another equation (relativity equations) to add mental deformations of measure from the human perspective. And even other equations that add effects of co-existing scales brought about by infinitesimal factors or larger infinities (renormalisation, small deviations, as the famous gyromagnetic anomalies, etc.)*

So all those views are partial equations from different perspectives of the generator. And all are truth, but only the sum of all of them will give us a full linguistic picture of the whole.

Why there are so many versions of a single event in physics? 2 reasons, the inflationary nature of a language that does not have to be constrained by the need to form a ‘dumb motion’, the primary substance that tends to entropic memoriless markowian processes, and the second is the multiple povs we can cast on a being,, which gives us different equations. So to relate them to each ∆•st is another key element of gst.

**Basic GST epistemology.**

We shall call the relational space-time theory of the Universe, ∆§ð (writing it for speed as ∆st). And the whole philosophy of science that applies it to all ‘scales of ‘stiences’, GST, (general systems theory), which is also the name given to the Generator of Timespace beings (∆-1: s-fields/limbs<st-bodywaves>tƒ:particles-heads).

So as usual with everything in the ternary Universe we use three+• names for similar concepts:

**-∆:** GST is the scalar Universe.

**St: **-∆st is the more specific theory of space-time and its stiences.

-Γst is the formal equation that unifies them all.

-•: Finally ¬Æ, is the linguistic non-aristotelian, non-euclidean laws, the most formal level of the discipline.

**The Rashomon effect.**

You have in that sense to get accustomed to consider at least 4 views for each reality or event, to at least a get a minimal truth of the being, as the kaleidoscopic method of truth (max. truth: max. linguistic perspectives on the event) requires. As in the masterpiece of Japanese film making, the Universe and its truths are under the Rashomon effect: only the four versions allow us to know the whole truth of the event.

In the graph, down we see the four different formalisms of gravitation, latter studied in more detail; all of them a partial truth of the event seen from the 4 essential ∆•st perspectives. This is thus the first law of GST, the method of truth and epistemology of ∆ST BEINGS.

It is the essential tool to reorder the astounding quantity of trees in the forest of human one-dimensional truths, theories and equations on reality, where each scholar ‘kills for his theory’.

But the total truth is only in the event itself – as Rashomon insists leaving some room for doubt and interpretations. Let us see then a case example, the equation of gravitation.

In that regard the power of T.Œ to classify and understand the why of all mathematical physics marvels the ‘rational, non-computerized still human thinker’ (-: As this is not the case of most experts, ts, ts, we are not writing so much for physicists, but about physics and for all humans with a minimal degree of knowledge of physics, to the level of any graduate of natural sciences, which is expected to know the basics of mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetism, and some notions of relativity and quantum theory – this final discipline, made extremely detailed in its content for two reasons:

- Information travels upwards with no entropy so we do have a lot of information about quantum particles, and a lot of things to describe, billions of particles with relative freedom of motion, to explain together with enormous detail because…

- The electronic industry is creating sophisticated organisms of metal, chip-brains, robots, and nuclear weapons, which require precision calculus of the exchanges of energy and information of those particles in bundles of billions. So this is by far the most overgrown of all disciplines of technological science, while far more fundamental sciences for mankind such as history, social economics, human studies and medicine are under developed.

We thus will consider ONLY on this overgrown discipline the basic conceptual elements required to understand particles as all other planes of the Universe, through its organic, mental, topological and causal properties, to show they are NOT special. As in any case it would be a disrespect to the reader, to get into the parlance of modern Latin, as in any case its goals (to unify all forces etc. under wrong dogmas and postulates) is impossible.

**The ternary principle…**

follows closely the Rashomon effect, when we *eliminate the more subjective, linguistic mind-element, • from the equation and provide only an objective external analysis of the being. Then we shall find that we can divide always the being into further ternary parts, or include it within a ternary part of a larger whole of its world. And so the ternary and rashomon events combined, bring us…*

**The 12 isomorphic method…**

which studies the 4 elements, ∆, •, s,t of any being, in further analytical sub-divisions, as each will have 3 parts≈functions≈forms and this is the basic method of analysis explained in this web and applied likely by future researchers to enclose ALL stiences, equations and laws discovered by man in an encyclopaedia of GST.

**SCALAR LAWS INVERSE BOTH SIDES.**

So finally we must notice that the key new element of ∆st beyond conceptual streamlining is to define once and for all the different laws of systems that move upwards and downwards as the fifth dimension of time is NOT symmetric GOING in the direction of growth of information downwards, and energy upwards. And so basically systems (points Tƒ singularities) going upwards become from cyclical mind-sstems, mere points moving for the larger world: Oi-1>|i is thus the main change of state when you are a part that become a point of a larger whole:

*Scales are thus born by making an O-1 form and |o form, becoming then in the next scale the entropic, |o element.*

As systems emerge upwards into new wholeness which are however more ‘ghostly constructed’ with less ‘density’ seemingly evanescent to the smaller denser cores of the russian doll universe, the whole looses its ‘density-mass’ and becomes just that logic encasing of it all, with diminishing ratios of ‘stuff’.

The second great law comes to a simple statement:

*‘if we take only a plane in consideration, motion upwards looses information, and so it has entropy…’*

… meaning we cannot extract from ∆-1 points ALL the energy for the ∆-whole, and this is the reason of the second law of thermodynamics which is restricted to the human ∆-view of the ∆-1 molecules with heat it wants extract for selfish purposes without giving back any order and synchronous motion to the smaller parts. The atoms there are NOT stupid, and won’t give you all his motion just for your steam machine to work.

In a perfectly ordered super organism however the smoothness of the big whole which synchronises the motion of the small parts, allow a superfluidity in those motions with minimal entropy and so when you move your whole body/cells they do not collide, friction and give you entropic heat.

**THE PRINCIPLE Of conservation of energy and information… and energy.**

The immediate consequence of the existence of those 3 arrows in all physical scales is the rewriting of the Principle of Conservation of energy:

*‘Present Energy never dies, it trans-forms locally back and forth from past entropy into future information: $<ei>ð”*

We cannot repeat ad nausea the structure in space and time of the fundamental particle of the Universe, the supœrganism of relational space time and the isomorphic laws derived of the ultimate substances of all relational space-time beings of the Universe, fractal space, cyclical time and its scales of size and clock speed – reason why the philosophy of stience is written in other post – the main one of the 5D section of this blog.

Still there is a law which is essential to all systems and was first formulated, partially in physics – the law of conservation of present energy, which consists of ‘closed time-space cycles’ with a repetitive frequency that maintains the Universe eternal.

And a metric equation, which defines for any isolated system of real it extending through 3 co-existing scales, its 5D structure:

*The size in space and speed in time of the ∆-i parts and ∆+i wholes of a supœrganism is co-invariant: $e x ðƒ=K’*

Those 2 expressions are the formal definitions of the three arrows of timespace and the three scales of physical systems, which apply to any system of the Universe, ad when properly plugged into classic physics will streamline and resolve most pending questions of the discipline.

These 2 laws proved experimentally ad nauseam and properly interpreted for *the first time in **theory, *are THE laws we shall more often use to deduce the causal, temporal harmony of all beings of the universe.

If they will NOT EXIST, the Universe wouldn’t be a fractal that reproduces information but some weirdo thing, as humans believe to be (a big-bang singularity dying, the creation of a creeping bush in the Judean desert, you name it…)

**RECAP: 2 KEY consequences of 10D=5•D³ PHYSICS. Organic Properties and Generator equation. **

*In the graphs, the absolute dimension of the scalar, fractal Universe, which constantly puts together parts into wholes, through social networks of reproduced information.*

*Below the relative 3 arrows of timespace that we find in each scale, studied by a different science.*

The first and immediate consequence of working with three arrows of time, is a better expression of the fundamental principle of science, the principle of conservation of energy

‘Present Energy never dies, it trans-forms itself back and forth in local events between spatial entropy and dimensional information: S≥st≥T<<S”

Which in a more complex version writes:

Γœ: ∆-1 ≤≥$pe (past-lineal fields/limbs) ≤≥ ∆º:ST (Present hyperbolic body/waves) ≤≥ Tiƒ (future informative cyclical particles-heads)>∆+1

The symbols of that equation belong to non-aristotelian logic, based in three arrows of timespace that come together to create the being. And as we will constantly repeat them, and use them to write equations that describe systems in time, space and scale, we might as well explain them in this tiny nutshell foreword:

**SCALES: ∆** is the symbol of the fifth dimension of scales. So a system extends through three such scales, ∆-1, the atomic/cellular scale, ∆º, the organic, thermodynamic scale and ∆+1 the world where the system exists or gravitational, ecosystemic scale.

**TOPOLOGIES: **

** S ($, Spe)** means entropic space; **St, Ø, E** iterative energy; **T (ð, Ti, Tƒ**), Informative, cyclical time; which ultimately ARE the static, spatial view of 3 motions-actions-arrows of timespace, we define with 3 topo-ogic symbols:

** >** an informative future motion that shrinks and accelerates the system from more entropy=expansive motion into more form.

** ≈** a repetitive present wave-like motion, that repeats in-form-ation as it moves…

** >** an implosive, informative motion and **<<** a double entropic explosion that erases information in the moment of death.

So the equation of a world cycle of existence described in the last synoptic equation is simple to understand: Space shrinks guided by the dominant arrow of information through 3 ages, phases, first as pure entropic space of maximal motion, then as a formed motion finally as pure form (S>St>T) and then when all motion is exhausted and it is all form, the system explodes back into space, T<<S IN THE ACT OF DEATH, which happens to dissolve ‘two scales of form of the system (you die twice into cells and then molecules/aminoacids) a matter system dies twice normally first into molecules and atoms or atoms and plasma, and so on).

The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:

Because the scalar Universe co-exists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, *all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational space-time), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under self-similar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic. *

This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar.

Yet as physics is ‘by decree’ a stience which only uses mathematics as its language of expression, the main revolution of ∆ST will likely collide with the usual suspects – dogma against organic truths, except in egocentered humans.

A second revolution, regarding physics – its upgrading of the formalism of mathematical physics, by decoding the ‘experimental nature’ of its equations, however might be of more interest to them. In that regard, the immediate conclusion of that experimental nature is the coupling of disciplines of mathematics with those of ∆ST:

-The formal stience of 5D is analysis. Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales and time; integrals with the sum of its parts in space. The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of mathematical physics concerned with the study of 5D motions, without mathematicians and physicists understand why.

-Topology is the formal stience of the three arrows of time-space, and as such it reduces all the forms of the Universe to its only three topologies – another ‘magic’ fact of experimental mathematics, never understood in science. AS such the true revolution of mathematical stience goes through the conversion of mathematics into an experimental stience, relating the fundamental theorems of mathematics, as the stience of logic space, to the different laws of GST both based in the fractal properties of space and the cyclical nature of time.

We shall thus evolve mathematics and physics to unveil in the human languages of time and space, the underlying isomorphisms of Nature.

The best way to describe mathematical physics is therefore to connect its classic continuous space-time equations with those of the ternary fractal 5D space-time Universe. And to that aim we need to define the 3 fundamental elements of mathematical physics, fields, waves and particles as the 3 ternary elements of 5D fractal space-time through the THREE AGES of time…

**CONCLUSION**

**UPGRADING ****astrophysics to 5D relational space-time.**

Astro-physics is concerned with the space-time *forms of* all the known scales of physics, ∆i≤|3|, and the dark scale beyond the galaxy (∆±4) *plus ou*r • linguistic point of view, *restricted TODAY by dogma of its earlier platonic practitioners to the single language o*f mathematics, as galileo affirmed and Dirac confirmed with no proof that ‘God only speaks mathematics’ which limits the ‘organic’ and ‘sentient’ properties we can describe on those system and give origin to the ‘naive realism’ and ‘reductionism’ proper of philosophy of physics today.

A such mathematical physics is concerned with all the elements of the Universe, *reduced by ‘ideology’ to be shown in an abstract form to the mirror-image that classic æ-maths (with a single time aristotelian arrow and a single space-time continuum) can provide.*

And so its limits are those of the present state of evolution of its language, and of perception of man, in as much as the larger scales of the infinite Universe must be stretching both above and below those ∆±4 scales.

And so the task of GST in mathematics should be the expansion of all those elements, *starting from:*

-Its expansion of the concepts of time and space, as shown in the graph, ‘first’ (as the primary language/substance origin of all realities).

-Then through the ‘expansion of mathematics with the ¬Æ improved definitions of fractal points with volume, ‘broken’ planes≈networks’ and ‘similarity≈ congruence’…

-Next we should try to correct with them, the three main errors of physics derived of those reductionist ∆•st views – namely entropy-only derived errors, big-bang cosmology and distortions produced by the need to ‘fit’ all realities within a single timespace plane, ignoring the ‘distortions’ of our perception caused by the different speeds of time and sizes in space of ∆-scales (use of functionals, dark energy/matter, uncertainty/observer principles of quantum physics, etc.)

-Only then go through the different scales, STUDying in detail each equation and system, starting NOT from the bottom up, as if there was a causality of size, meaning smallish parts define the laws of larger ones, so quantum physics according to that view would matter more for philosophy of physics, but in the PROPER way knowledge comes to man – higher in detail and truth the closer we are to humanity, which means that:

Mechanics (∆+1,+2) and thermodynamics (∆º,-1) MUST BE the fundamental stiences of mathematical physics, with higher degree of perception≈certainty≈truth. As such they were indeed the first forms of mathematical physics discovered. And as Einstein and Planck thought should end up being the true reference for all other scales (‘statistical quantum physics will be equivalent to statistical thermodynamics’ Einstein). Next, we should study, the ∆≥±2, 3 scales (atomic and galactic scales) considering those distortions and only with some skepticism on what we can verify and truly know, consider the last ∆±4 dark world.

Finally we MUST ad to physics the organic, mental, vital properties of physical systems, which the mathematical language will never be able to describe with OTHER languages of reality (biological and logic languages).

**Generator of 5D ST Symmetries: ****Physical systems**

*$pe: ∆-1: Field> ∆º: gas≥∆+1: plasma <S≈T: ∆-1: wave≥∆º: liquid≥∆+1:strangelet < ðiƒ: ∆-1:Particle>∆º:crystal>∆+1: BH*

*∑Spe (past entropic, accelerated field) ≤ Œ: E x I Present wave ≥Tƒ (future particle of information) = U _{±∆ (Physical plane)}*

The fractal Universe of 5D space-time beings is generated by the symmetries of its fractal generator of space-time, a simple equation of group symmetries between two inverse bidimensional fields, one of ‘entropic, lineal, expansive spaces’ and a perpendicular field of cyclical, implosive times’.

Let us then put an example on how much a model of a Universe made of relational space-time ‘beings’ help us to understand the Universe – which is the theme of the second part of this blog, to show you that as usual the way to truly evolve science is ‘with thought experiments’ – with better models of reality, not with risky experiments.

WE SHALL CONSIDER A CASE OF a classic error product of the platonic idealism of physicists with their belief that reality is generated by mathematical languages; the wrong choice of the copenhagen interpretation over pilot-wave theory, to explain quantum particles as made of mathematical entelechies and hence the one century ongoing absurdity of creating physical theories not from experience but from mathematics and then wait for those particles or evaporating black holes to appear, to not avail.

And an even simpler error, key to understand what is wrong with physics – the mathematical error made by Newton, of confusing the mathematical artefact of a cartesian plane of space-time, with space-time itself, considering that the Universe had a background absolute space-time – the cartesian plane, over which reality was built – it was the first huge error of mathematical religions, which dragged our understanding of time for centuries.

The main consequence of lineal time in Physics *is the limitation of time arrows to the simplest arrow of entropy, and the negation of the reproductive Nature of physical motions, and the informative singularities that order as mind-mappings, through mirror symmetries in crystals and bosonic states of quarks, the physical Universe.*

**The reductionist ∆o human perspective of physical systems. Degrees of error.**

*The need for more than a language to describe the wholeness of physical systems.*

Now it is important to fully grasp why physics is wrong in its concepts and right in its equations. And perhaps the best example could be to compare it with the duality of Chinese language.

In the graph, it is possible to write in Chinese perfectly, as physicists write in equations, and make completely sense, without understanding a dot of it in verbal languages, the ‘natural conceptual language of people’. So a writer of mathematical physics will be right in its equations and fully use them for practical purposes, but it will ignore the conceptual, verbal meaning of those signs. And this is essentially what happens due to the errors of cyclical time and fractal space. Cyclical time measured by frequencies is the inverse of time duration, so in equations, t=1/ƒ are both right. But conceptually we shall ad an entire new ‘world of subtle differences’, thanks to our advanced ‘verbal thought’. Moreover, while there are only a standard ‘traditional’ and modern way to write mathematical physics (due mainly to the evolution of the language of mathematics), the simplified language is quite good to coney most meanings, even if the traditional has much more depth of meaning and symbols. So we shall find that for example, the 4 constructions of gravitation, Newton’s T-vortices of time; Einstein’s, S-imultaneous pictures of the vortices in greater detail; Poison’s gradient in ∆-scales and the Hamiltonian-Lagrangian more elegant, •-mental description, are variations of the same theme; as often in chinese the subtle differences of pronunciation give us variations of meaning.

*But if we do not know both languages, the wholeness and richness of Chinese and Physical systems would be lost to us, and we could on top make silly errors, as those foreigners do with the word ma in its 4 tones, unable to distinguish them, and so calling a mother a joint, or even worst, a horse. And physicists, we shall find do have many of those errors, specially when interpreting wrongly Time AS A SINGLE arrow and space as a continuum, LOOSING the 4 ∆•st perspectives of knowledge, the scales of the 5th dimension, the mental limits of languages that describe them and the 3 ages of time and its functional symmetry with the 3 forms of space. *

As physics is today mathematical physics, it deals mainly with time and space parameters in different dimensions and scales. As it only acknowledges lineal time, it misses the ternary structure of time arrows, but obviously as its equations works, it merely expresses them in mathematical parameters without its whys which is what GST ads:

We shall study those errors as they were understood historically departing from ∆o, the anthropomorphic human mechanical scale and our sense of entitlement.

So we apply one of the simple rules of epistemological truth in ΓST:’The further away from the human being a science is, the higher the error of its data’.

It is indeed important to introduce the bias of physics from an objective perspective – our definition of the mind as a self-centered o-point; and to study the bias of each discipline of physics, which grows as we come further away from that human perspective. *Hence a second rule for the search of truth in physics:*

‘As all scales of reality are isomorphic, we must seek errors comparing far away sciences to the truths of systems closer to us’. This means that indeed, as Einstein and Bohm wanted, the *way to do physics is NOT to widen the errors of the Copenhagen interpretation with ridiculous theories of parallel Universes etc. but to explain them in a realist way with the guiding pilot wave theory and explain the ‘spooky effects’ with GST isomorphisms, as all of them have a natural explanation in the Generator of Space Time (Ab. gst). So we can fast review the main scales of physics on account of its bias; and establish such order from minus to major, as the proper way to TEACH physics, which is also the historic way, as we have first resolved the most evident stience:*

*∆0, 1: Mechanics, which is the the most evolved of those disciplines in its details, and the less erroneous as it deal with our external world of ‘evident measure’ and perception.*

∆-1,2: The inner, thermodynamic world of our body-motions AND outer world of Geological systems (co-shared with mechanics).

We find now thermal physics a first huge error – the belief that entropy is the single arrow of time; whose cause is sociological and historical in the worldly profession of physicists, and its hyperbolic thirst for taking the place of us, philosophers of stience, as the summit of knowledge (: it was studied first in the use of cannonballs and weapons and vapor machines, who do indeed waste energy into entropy, and then widened in a galactic statement of self-importance to the shoe Universe with big bang theory, which dismisses the balancing Tiƒ force of in-form-ation, implosive gravitation ).

∆±3: Thus, as we go away from our perspective and introduce other scales we shall observe the growth of uncertainty (quantum) and dark spaces (cosmology) and the astounding anthropomorphic deformation of perspectives introduced to justify them (Copenhagen interpretation, cosmic big-bang, anthropic principle).

Obviously the anthropic principle and the big bang once, we debunk its manipulated data, will appear as just another form of ‘creationist science’ a religious disease which is the commanding influence of economics, a biblical religion of go(l)d profits, as it is today, and the disguised one of so many anthropomorphic errors. The copenhagen interpretation is even more puzzling as we do HAVE a deterministic, far more proper interpretation in the Einstein->Broglie->Bell->Bohm interpretation. And the fact that the illusory ideas of Bohr had dominated the philosophy of quantum physics shows much more about power and anthropomorphism in science that about truth.

The general error: anthropomorphism and lineal worldly profession of weapons’ masters

This said, all physical systems do lack 1/2 of the paradigm – its analysis as supœrganisms which perform world cycles of existence. As all of them sponsor the worldly error of ‘lineal time’, Galileo’s delight for artillery masters, also caused by its worldly profession as makers of weapons (essentially the same error than the thermal one), and all of them deny biological properties to matter (the human must remain the only intelligent, living being).

It is* important to remember this ‘paradox of uncertainty’ of human self-centred knowledge, which applies in earnest to those scales, as humans are too far removed from them and so they accept only an abstract, mathematical description, which does not explore as we do here, the biological whys, its world cycles and organic structures, in physical systems.*

Hence while physics does study all the scales (maximal range of stiences) it does so with the minimal quantity of properties (reduced mostly to one of the 8 motions, locomotions, and one language, mathematics).

**The modern error: Hilbert’s arrogant idealism: i imagine points.**

Then there is cultural error, hauling from German Idealism, which brought us Nazism, Communism and Physical theories of Platonic numbers creating the Universe without substance, breaking the FIRST AND FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, ‘experimental evidence’ also called ‘hylomorphism’, which since Aristotle applies: *You cannot have a real event/form without a substance, or ‘∆-1 parts’ that make them possible.*

Yet in Germany at the turn of the century in the paroxysm of the idealist culture, it was supposed that the ‘language of maths, hence the mind of man created the Universe’, not the other way around (languages are mirrors of a real substance). So physicists got away with murder (the killing of real substances) under the influence of Hilbert’s axiomatic method, which unable to grasp Lobacjevski’ pan geometry of non-euclidean fractal points, resolved here, said the postulates of geometry had to be substituted by the concept the mathematician ‘imagined points and lines’, and constructed the world from the mind out. It is the same concept of religion, in which GOD ‘SPEAKS’ words and when he speaks, he creates. So Allah or Yhwh says ‘man’ and man zas! appears, and Hilbert, the God of mathematicians (the language of god in Galileo’s tantrum) said ‘I imagine lines’ and zas! lines be=come’ LOL.

So without the need for ‘real substances’ both Bohr and Einstein became also imaginary, ‘postulating people’; that is people who ‘imagine’ postulates without proof as certain and zas! 100 years latter, nobody dares to explain why the postulate of *constancy of c-speed and what is even worse, the never said by Einstein, limit of c-speed which only applies within light space-time (the ∆-3 scale of galaxies) MUST have a logic rational substance-oriented cause, as we shall explain here with GST laws; and why quantum waves are NOT imaginary probabilities but as Einstein->Broglie->Schrodinger->Bell->Bohm clarified densities of a fractal electron made of its ∆-1 relative cellular parts (ultra dense photons that collapse an ST wave of light into particle, Tiƒ state). *

(The quantum realist interpretation is there for 100 years, so we don’t innovate just enlighten it. The proper interpretation of the c-speed postulate and its limiting application to the ∆>-3 scales is an immediate offshoot of the stop and go, Tiƒ>Spe rhythm of motion and so it is ‘new≈blue’ GST at its best)

The positive side to it. Simplification reveals the ultimate truths of reality

On the positive side the limits of human physics are of special interest as they will reveal easily the connections between the GST (ab. Generator of Space-time) and its mathematical (1st science) and physical world, as the physicist who strips off biological, organic properties physical systems, leaves untouched – once the errors of cyclical time and fractal space are corrected, the connection with those primary disciplines; which the biorganic paradigm will complete specially in the limits not perceived of quantum and cosmology; as the galaxy can easily be ‘modelled’ as a cell.

It is then quite obvious that a full thorough analysis of the equations of mathematical physics with the tools of 5D³ and its concepts behind – the fundamental particle of the Universe, the ternary decametric supœrganism; its worldcycles of energy and its units of actions in time and ∆-1 parts in space would require the rewriting into a full new encyclopaedia of all the analysis of classic physics, which naive realism (what you measure is all what there is) and reductionism (only mathematical parameters that matter to us mostly related to motion ‘ARE’ physics) which is well beyond the life of a single researcher – specially a latino lazy cow like myself 🙂 so we just will do some fast review of the key equations of physics and study its ‘hidden meaning’ ignored by ‘reductionism and naive realism’.

LET US explore them a more complex philosophy not only of physics but also of mathematics, to adequate mathematics to the study of the vital, organic properties of fractal space and cyclical time.

**PART II.**

**MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS.**

The main task of ∆•st theory in mathematical physics is to translate abstract algebraic equations, notably group theory, to the much more realist symmetries of the generator equation; to upgrade topological physics to the clear-cut ternary structure of topological organisms, and finally to make sense of numerology and analysis, as the languages of the fifth dimension.

Needless to say all this needs to evolve mathematics also, from its view of continuous space and a single causal logic arrow to fractal space and ternary causality. But as we do not have the space and time here to repeat that upgrading, i refer the reader to the chapters on languages.

Let us then introduce the basic symbols of the ∆•st formalism to be able to handle the basic symmetries of the fractal generator of physical time§paœrganisms.

**The formalism of 5D³=10D physics. ****Main symbols of T.Œ:**

Those are the minimal symbols of the Generator Equation of fractal space-times, used to describe the organisms of Galaxies and its fractal, ternary parts and symmetries in 5D space-time. Again, this post is written at a basic level, though the introduction is far simpler, as we need to introduce here some in-depth analysis of astrophysical theories, to the level of a graduate on physics.

**¬Æ:** Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean, i-logic mathematics (Formal language of T.Œ).

**∆±1:** plane of the 5th dimension

**Tiƒ:** temporal clock, Ot, informative time (its spatial, static view)

**Spe:** Spatial energy, Es, energetic space, its dynamic view.

**>:** informative flow that diminishes size in space and accelerates clocks in time

**<:** kinetic energy flow that increases speed in space or entropic flow that enlarges the being in space and diminishes its speed in time

**≈:** reproductive flow that maintains unchanged the being at constant speed in space and reproductive sped in time.

**Λ:** emergence into a larger scale of the 5th dimension

**∨****:** devolution to a lower plane of the 5th dimension.

**∑:** reproduction in space or herd loosely connected in limbs/fields

**∏**: reproduction of networks across several scales of the 5th dimension or full connected heads/particles.

Å: Cyclical actions of space-time divided into simplex actions of absorption and emission of energy and information:

∆æ, accelerated motions (first action of negative emission of energy),

∆e, energy feeding, second action of positive absorption of kinetic energy-entropy,

∆ï, Information, either emission for communication, or absorption of information to perceive.

And complex actions of reproduction and social evolution:

∆œ: reproduction into an offspring, which then will- ∆û: evolve its parts into Universals.

Finally the 3 scales of any system of reality are:

**œ-1**: action or cell, fractal finitesimal of the whole in time or space; Œ, whole, U, Universal World.
Those simple symbols suffice to explain the basic logic structure and transformations of ternary 5D space-time systems, departing from its ‘spatial simultaneous structure’, its 3 time ages and its 3 co-existing organic scales:

∆-1(cellular/atomic scale)>∆:organic-thermodynamic scale>∆+1: social, cosmic scale:

Spe (Spatial toroid limbs-fields)≤ ExI (Hyperbolic body-waves)≤it(head-particles of information)≈

Ps (young, past entropic age > ExI: adult, present, iterative age > Tiƒ: old informative, future age:

∆-1>∆>∆+1 (5D scales)≈ Spe≤ExI≤tƒ (space organs) ≈ Ps≥ExI≥ƒt (time ages)

**Unification of all sciences and Definition of the Universe.**

Now, we shall start this introduction with a definition of the Universe from the perspective of the philosopher of science, which we will elaborate and explain in great detail in the rest of this post.

“The Universe is the sum of all the symmetric, ternary super organisms (spatial synchronous view) performing a world cycle of 3 ages between generation and extinction (diachronic point of view), as they travels through 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension, growing in size and diminishing in a balanced, Sp x Tƒ= ∆±1 survival form, performing from its centered point of view, the 5 space-time actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, (active meaning of space and time), ±∆e,i,∫u, which ensures their survival.”

The laws of mathematical physics are concerned with the events and topological structures of space-time super organisms. Each T. œ will participate of the laws of T.Œ, and as such can be studied in ‘encased’ equations of the fractal of all fractals, the ‘ideal mathematical, and logic game’ of a perfect 10D supœrganism.

There are then the parameters of physics to describe the 3 main elements of the system, its membrane of timespace, with its division of reality into an entropic external world, which it ab=uses and an internal, informative vortex towards the fifth dimension of the singularity, which connects the being through the language into a communicative point of that larger world.

**FOREWORD: **

**COMPLETING MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS BY EVOLVING MATHEMATICS.**

It is a remarkable fact that mathematics do reflect a lot of the properties of the Universe, but it has so far failed to explain organically its structure, despite the breakthrough of fractal mathematics.

The reason being that mathematics as a language, has not completed its evolution. And so the first step to be able to describe all the properties of physical systems is to evolve its main language, mathematics, and adapt it to the organic, fractal cyclical space-time structure of the Universe and its scalar nature.

It is precisely this incompleteness of mathematics, the language of physical sciences the main reason why physicists do not understand fully the organic Universe.

As they still work with Euclidean mathematics, where points are not fractal points made of parts that become evident when we come closer to the particle, cell or star that seemed to us a point at distance. Only Einstein managed to apply properly the concept of a fractal point, by asserting that infinite parallels cross a point of space-time. We shall then find easily that points are fractal points with inner energy and form, information, joined by line-waves to other points forming networks, co-existing in several scales of size, which is the very same definition of an organism, and that everything in the Universe is indeed, a network-organism… as we show in the graphs of fractal networks all over this blog.

Yet if a mathematical system is organic by the very definition of a number (a group of undistinguishable beings), of a point (a fractal system, larger the closer we come to it) and a plane (a network of fractal points joined by flows of energy and information), why physicists do not model organically its systems?

Why physicists do not understand the fractal Universe? if it is so much up to their alley – after all it vindicates and further evolves the logic-mathematical structure found by Leibniz, Einstein and Planck. It merely takes it further with the advances of fractal geometry and the completion by this writer of the postulates of non-euclidean geometry that defines a 5^{th} dimension of scales of space-time.

I found in the conferences I used to give at Silicon valley, during my tenant of the chair of duality in the international congress of systems sciences that physicists could grasp the fractal concept mathematically and the existence of scales of space, but 2 taboos were absolute: lineal time, the time-clock of its standardized machines and the model of the universe as a machine instead of an organism. So it was the mechanical civilization, and the source of physicists’ power and wealth – the machine, what was the taboo that could not be broken. Physicists does had a religion of the machine, not of the physical Universe. And as long as this was not discussed other things could be explained. Since the founding fathers of physicists had in fact started its sciences measuring time with clocks.

Thus, the answer to the limits of physicists is cultural, not scientific, as most physicists belong to the western, lineal, military culture whose memes are not easily recognized as such, but considered lineal weapons and lineal time, dogmas of their worldview; as opposed to cyclical time. It was of course an outdated dogma, deist in origin, as a machine needs a maker and Newton and Kepler affirmed yhwh to be the maker of the Universal machine and they, the ones that were revealed this truth. Most physicists do not realize of this obvious fact: only an organism is scientific, self-reproductive without need of a god-maker.

Further on mechanism and abstract, simplex mathematics as its language puts the physicist above all living and humans, as the priest of the new image of the Universe and only master of its language. So mechanism and abstract maths is a self-serving proposition, for the human and physicist ego, since only human anthropomorphic beings had ‘living properties’.

But of those memes by large the most powerful barrier for physicists to upgrader their model of the Universe is mechanism, the power they obtained historically from the use of machines and the evolution of lineal weapons. It means most physicists will never abandon their theories of lineal time, their theories of a Universe molded as a machine, and show no interest for general systems science. Does it mean we have not to show interest for the physical world? Of course not.

B*ecause the physical world does not belong to physicists*. In that sense it took me a while as a system scientist to realize that the human expert or scholar an its upgrading to the organic fractal paradigm was not my job. My communication was directly with the Universe. And only then, once I left behind my problems with physicists, in their worldly religion, to make weapons of lineal energy that destroy life and their related idol-ogies – lineal time, continuous, abstract, Cartesian space, denial of organic or perceptive properties to anything but anthropomorphic life, etc. I did truly enjoy for myself the view of the organic Universe of matter.

It is important to understand this difference, specially if you are not a physicist – as you should leave behind your shyness, to feel the life of the material Universe and accept that matter is organic also and nothing differentiates in terms of quality, a human vital fractal organism of space-time from a particle-head/wave-body of physical matter. This said, it is unlikely that physicists will find of interest most of the sections of this blog, except those on the 4^{th} line, when constructed by the year 2017, for the very obvious reason that ‘the (organic) why is the only question physicists don’t ask’ (Feynman), and so they consider only descriptions concerned with mathematical measure and its how (motions and forms of particles and physical systems), as proper of their science.

Still a physical upgrade of physics to the 5th dimension must be done if we want to fully understand the Universe; which is the purpose of this blog, paraphrasing 2 of the 3 most remarkable physicists of the past century, Planck and Einstein; the first, author of the constants of god, the second affirming he want to know the thoughts of God, and then its details. Those are the thoughts we shall reveal in a metaphoric way – the thoughts of the informative mind of the Universe, and for that we must expand…

All this said and given the extraordinary amount of scales hence of data studied by physics, we divide the discipline in this Introductory 3rd lines into 3 (yes, always 2 or 3 elements of creation:) sub posts: ∆<0 scales or ‘physics’, ∆+0 scales or astronomy and ∆@ language or ‘mathematical physics’, and we divide this introductory post in 3 sub-parts:

- The first part dedicated to GST laws applied to physics, as a reminder of the main properties of Space-time ∆ûst.
- The second considering a fast review of its scales, starting by mechanics, (the method of less errors to enlighten latter the solution of the biggest ones – entropy only theories of thermal physics and cosmology on one side and Copenhagen and relativity idealist interpretations on the other)
- And finally the 3rd part will deal with the true method of GST: a fast review of the 10 isomorphisms of Nature applied to all those scales.

So after introducing the scales of physics with a more classic style, we shall put together the isomorphisms of the scales of physical systems, defined as those systems, whose range is outside the closest ∆0 scales of human MINDS, BUT RANGE in its physical properties in all OTHER SCALES (Hence the use of ∆i, the generic index for them all).

So as usual we will treat the 4 elements of physical systems – the ∆-scales, the S-topological varieties, the S-ages and worldcycles, and the ment@l aspects of its human ∆o observer, and its mathematical physics and anthropomorphic ‘hang-ups’, switching between those elements and perspectives as the explanation of those systems advances.

**• NON-Æ FRACTAL POINTS:**

**VITAL MATHEMATICS**

“Mathematics is an experimental science, and definitions do not come first, but later on.”

*Heaviside*, the forgotten genius of mathematical physics, author of the 4 Heaviside equations of electromagnetism (wrongly called Maxwell equations who just did a mess of 20 ones with ugly quaternions 🙂 and the Gravito-magnetic equations, which fusion gravitation and magnetism, foreseeing the Fractal Unification equation of charges and masses of this blog.

Heaviside, as Lobachevski before him and Einstein after him, were indeed right when they considered that the language of physics – mathematics – is the best experimental mind-mirror to describe most physical systems, *as the mind singularities of those systems use* mathematical frames of reference in space to act-react in time with other space-time beings of the Universe.

It is then surprising that idealist physicists since Hilbert astounding ego-trip (‘I imagine lines, points and planes’ ) have rejected the ‘experimental, a posteriori nature’ of the mathematical language, they share with all those other œ-singularities for the concept that mathematics is the a priori nature of reality (Copenhagen interpretation). As the ultimate mathematical properties are indeed a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.

The formal stience of 5D is analysis. Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales and time; integrals with the sum of its parts in space. The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of mathematical physics concerned with the study of 5D motions, without mathematicians and physicists understand why.

On the other hand, topology is the formal stience of the three arrows of time-space, and as such it reduces all the forms of the Universe to its only three topologies – another ‘magic’ fact of experimental mathematics, never understood in science. AS such the true revolution of mathematical stience goes through the conversion of mathematics into an experimental stience, relating the fundamental theorems of mathematics, as the stience of logic space, to the different laws of GST both based in the fractal properties of space and the cyclical nature of time. We shall thus evolve mathematics and physics to unveil in the human languages of time and space, the underlying isomorphisms of Nature.

A first fundamental job of mathematical physics is to understand the basic concepts of mathematics in terms of its experimental substances, *space studied by topology* and geometry,* time sequences studied by number theor*y, and s*pace-time symmetries and equations of the fractal ternary generator studied by algebra*, finishing the whole ‘closure’ of both maths as a mirror language and the Universe of physical systems it reflects with *Analysis, the science of ∆§ scales*.

FINALLY THE GENERATOR is the origin of the symmetries and groups of algebra that physicists do love, including all those SU3, yes 3 doesn’t sound you a ring? that ‘pest quantum physics’ (Weyl:).

Yet they love those ternary symmetries without any direct reference to the fundamental particle of the Universe, the supœrganism of relational timespace, which we have just described and formally is just a variety of the ternary generator and its 3 x 3 +@ dimensions.

So we also need to explain how to vitalise mathematical physics, TO EXTRACT the first principles and basic isomorphic laws and generator equations of physical spatial systems and temporal events from them.

**The deepest truths are simple. ****Going beyond reductionism and naive realism.**

** **Physics is considered the queen of all disciplines, because it has imposed some ‘a priori’ postulates on the structure of reality that are by no means certain, and because in a technological civilisation we listen more the people with machines. It is also a difficult subject as mathematics, its only language by ‘choice’ is not natural to humans and so for most impossible to understand. This is specially truth of quantum physics and its copenhagen, wrong interpretation.

i would like in that sense to remember that the Universe in simple and not malicious (Einstein) because simplicity is truth (Ockham) and it is genius (Leonardo). Complexity arises from the details and repetitions but the first principles *are simple because reality in relational space-time departs from two simple elements, the spatial distance-motion and the cyclical time-clock of information. *

How 5D³ physics plugs into the whole physical ‘monument’ built NOT from first principles but from mathematical measures? Unfortunately it must ‘recreate’ all of it, from those first principles to get the same mathematical results AND ad two main features – the organic properties of systems with 3 time arrows and 3 co-existing scales of space-time; and the explanations of the equations of mathematics departing from those elements.

In a way physicists have done that with string theory made of cyclical time-strings and lineal space-strings, but immediately physicists abandon conceptual thought and do their automaton ‘pouring into mathematical equations’ and measuring. This is all what they want to do, and it is unfortunate their lack of dialog with other disciplines, the refusal to accept the logic of the fractal Universe, which makes all scales self-similar and the beauty of redesigning their analysis of reality from those first principles. Einstein didn’t talk for long, as if words did not carry meaning. All those are limits we cannot break.

Astro-physics is concerned with the space-time *forms of* all the known scales of physics, ∆i≤|3|, and the dark scale beyond the galaxy (∆±4) *plus ou*r • linguistic point of view, *restricted TODAY by dogma of its earlier platonic practitioners to the single language o*f mathematics, as galileo affirmed and Dirac confirmed with no proof that ‘God only speaks mathematics’ which limits the ‘organic’ and ‘sentient’ properties we can describe on those system and give origin to the ‘naive realism’ and ‘reductionism’ proper of philosophy of physics today.

A such mathematical physics is concerned with all the elements of the Universe, *reduced by ‘ideology’ to be shown in an abstract form to the mirror-image that classic æ-maths (with a single time aristotelian arrow and a single space-time continuum) can provide.*

And so its limits are those of the present state of evolution of its language, and of perception of man, in as much as the larger scales of the infinite Universe must be stretching both above and below those ∆±4 scales.

And so the task of GST in mathematics should be the expansion of all those elements, *starting from:*

- Its expansion of the concepts of time and space, as shown in the graph, ‘first’ (as the primary language/substance origin of all realities).
- then through the ‘expansion of mathematics with the ¬Æ improved definitions of fractal points with volume, ‘broken’ planes≈networks’ and ‘similarity≈ congruence’…
- Next we should try to correct with them, the three main errors of physics derived of those reductionist ∆•st views – namely entropy-only derived errors, big-bang cosmology and distortions produced by the need to ‘fit’ all realities within a single timespace plane, ignoring the ‘distortions’ of our perception caused by the different speeds of time and sizes in space of ∆-scales (use of functionals, dark energy/matter, uncertainty/observer principles of quantum physics, etc.)
- And only then go through the different scales, STUDying in detail each equation and system,
*starting NOT from the bottom up, as if there was a causality of size, meaning smallish parts define the laws of larger ones, so quantum physics according to that view would matter more for philosophy of physics, but in the PROPER way knowledge comes to man – higher in detail and truth the closer we are to humanity, which means that:* - Mechanics (∆+1,+2) and thermodynamics (∆º,-1) MUST BE the fundamental stiences of mathematical physics, with higher degree of perception≈certainty≈truth. As such they were indeed the first forms of mathematical physics discovered. And as Einstein and Planck thought should end up being the true reference for all other scales (‘statistical quantum physics will be equivalent to statistical thermodynamics’ Einstein). Next, we should study, the ∆≥±2, 3 scales (atomic and galactic scales) considering those distortions and only with some skepticism on what we can verify and truly know, consider the last ∆±4 dark world.
- And finally we MUST ad to physics the organic, mental, vital properties of physical systems, which the mathematical language will never be able to describe with OTHER languages of reality (biological and logic languages).

Yet even the classic scales (mechanics, thermodynamics) need corrections, because mathematical physics was born observing the galaxy, and its original postulates were distorted from the point of view adopted in that earlier age (Newtonian absolute space and time). And thermodynamics was born on the study of entropic weapons (cannons) and motion machines (steam).

*However and this is the key to build properly the discipline, given the fact that physics, like chinese runs in two different language, one unified – mathematical equations/ideographic writing – and so accurate and better mirrored; and other based mostly on ‘different’ dialectical opinions (concepts of physics, philosophies of science derived of physics), we must accept mathematical physics is right and only interpret their equations properly. *

* The 3 examples taken here will suffice: *Entropy equations are right. What is wrong is to reduce the arrows=actions o

**f**

**time to mere**entropic motions as if the other two arrows=actions, information and energy did not matter as a fundamental time event… so physicists study them as something else. Hubble’s equation of expansion of vacuum between galaxies as light dissolves into the ∆-4 >c scale is right; what is wrong is to ‘expand it back to the past’ into a supposed singularity where all time and space exists just by wishful thinking. quantum equations are right, what is wrong is the Copenhagen observers’ interpretation.

What physicists have so far done though, is without any PHILOSOPHICAL≈EPISTEMOLOGICAL rigour, to affirm that because they have written Chinese, they know how to pronounce it; and then of course each one says ‘ma’ with a different tone; and they just say but the equation is right. Sure, but how do you pronounce=translate into verbal, logic concepts? That is the key to make sense of the Universe.

And to prove that duality between right mathematical physics and wrong conceptual physics, we have divided this sections in two articles. One will be more concerned with conceptual errors and written first (astrophysics), as that is where GST can be applied.

Indeed the advance of GST on physics will come from the proper application of the higher layer of truth (the properties of space and time, applied through the isomorphisms and generator of fractal space and cyclical time) to illuminate first maths and its equations, and correct then those ‘opinions’ that today pass as scientific truths, since people are just in awe of the machines and measures of physics.

Thus we shall show how the whole of physics is inscribed into the linguistic ternary grammar of the Generator of Space-time (Gst), and its isomorphisms. As all physical beings in all scales are ternary ∆±1, s,st,t, past>present>future beings. And so the laws and equations derived from the Fractal generator, apply to all system of physical beings, included the galaxy-atom scale (∆±3) which is the last scale we perceive in depth.

**THE PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS.****ITS FOUNDATIONS AS AN EXPERIMENTAL SCIENCE.**

“The less intelligent a person is, the less mysteries he founds in the Universe’ Schopenhauer.

Let us then start with the 5 postulates of non-euclidean geometry that complete the work of Riemann.

**Non-Euclidean Space-Time postulates.**

Einstein used the 5^{th} postulate of Non-Euclidean Geometry (Points through which multiple parallels can cross), to describe the structure of Gravitational space, *using a single clock, the 4 ^{th} present time dimension.*

* *Tƒ complete his analysis, we expand Non-Euclidean geometry, adapting the 3 Geometric, Euclidean definitions to multiple ∆-spaces and the 2 logic postulates (3^{rd}& 5^{th}) redefining identity and causality using the 3 dimensions of time.

– 1^{st} Postulate: ‘A fractal point shows 3D volume as we come closer to it’*. *Since only fractal points, which grow in volume as we come closer to their scale, can fit multiple parallels.

– 2^{nd} postulate: ‘A line-wave is made of ∆-1 points with ‘breath’ that communicate energy and information among ∆-points’.

– 4^{th} postulate: a plane is a discontinuous network of fractal points joined by waves of energy and information that leave interstitial dark spaces. (Particles in physical planes, cells in biological spaces and so on.)

– 3^{rd} postulate: ‘2 entities are ‘equal’, when both, their external form (Euclidean definition) and internal 3D parts are identical.’

Yet since we cannot perceive the complete internal information of 2 points, still and isolated by its external membrane (Galilean Paradox) instead of equality we talk of degrees of ‘similarity’*. *

*So Isomorphisms between entities of different scales are NOT equalities but ‘similarities’.*

*The third postulate is the most important bio-logic postulate as it establishes by relative congruence the relationship of points in any scale, such as:*

**Tƒ=Tƒ: 2T**POINTS THAT PERCEIVE EACH OTHER EQUAL IN INFORMATION WILL EVOLVE SOCIALLY.**$=$, t≠t: Max. ST<<Min. St:**Points that see each other as different in information and equal in entropy>energy, will enter a prey-predator relationship. And the point with maximal balanced existential force (s x t: max.s=t), will feed on the other, provoking its entropic extinction to maximise its reproduction of form.**T≠t, $≠s: T$, ts:**Points that do not perceive each other as equal either in form or energy-motion will ignore each other as parallel worlds.

Those are the 3 main laws of congruence in the ternary Universe which applies to all systems including physical systems. I.e.: crystals grow without limit when they are made of the same atom. Chemical reactions happen when the top predator molecule with maximal energy and information breaks and absorbs the other molecules to reproduce its form. Molecules that do not mix, continue after collision its own paths.

We have also started to write bio-topo-logic equations with the simple terms of i-logic geometry to ‘give a first simple push’ to 5D³ physics beyond the conceptual stage, using simple terms of ¬Ælgebra.

Yet besides the ∆§ocial growth by absolute similarity, the *essential first element to relate two points – the similarity of informative language, there are other sub-events of great importance, related to the ternary structure of the fractal generator, which resume in a word: complementarity.*

Which means that *systems which have ‘complementary elements, or ‘gender’ systems will couple together in even stronger bonds, albeit reduced by the need to complete its ternary generator, to dual or ternary systems, such as:*

**S, T, st**PARTS that are complementary as potential elements of a ternary whole will assembly together.**S<t ± s>T**parts that are equal in form but in inverted states/time arrows will annihilate each other.**S<>T:**male + S=t:female: ‘Gender’, dual systems which are complementary in particle-field and wave state will form couples, with the maximal bonding.

Those are therefore the main 3+3 sub-laws of congruence, which suffice to explain all relative events between two points.

*-5 ^{th} Postulate: ‘*0-Points gauge information & energy, transforming waves of external ∆-i points into inner body cells and mind’s pixels.’

Thus we define sequential, causal mind-> body åctions:

– ∆ï -> ∏∆+1(mind’s creation) -> ∆Sp -> ∑Sp X Tƒ (cellular reproduction)

And formalize the Galilean-Ego Paradox:

*‘Every point of view=mind feels, subjectively, from his point to view, the center of the Universe, but it is only a zero-point, an *infinitesimal *mirror, which maps in stillness a minimal part of the ∞ information of the ∞ Universe’.*

As Aristotle put it, ‘there are ∞ Gods, still minds that order and move the energy that surrounds them’.

Now the subject is immense, so we shall just refer to some basic elements needed for some serious latter analysis of the super organisms of each scales, starting from Aristotelian gods (:

**Knots of Time cycles: the fundamental particle.**

In that sense, the best way to understand the internal elements of the point as a one-dimensional being is the fifth postulate of non-e geometry that allows the point to be crossed by infinite parallels, and defines it as a knot of time cycles.

Once we have studied the minimal units of the Universe, the action of space-time, we shall define the main structural, architectonical element of reality, the knots of time cycles, existential points, œ, which perform those actions of existence, site of will and perception of the Universe – whose simplest definitions in philosophy are the monad of Leibniz, the mind of Descartes, the God of Aristotle, and in mathematics, a Non-Euclidean point, the unit of Einstein’s gravitational laws.

Systems are knots of time cycles of exchanges of energy and information with its space and time parts, Œ, which allow them to survive in the Universe.

Thus the first ‘stable structure of reality’, is a knot of time cycle which swiftly goes webbing around the paths of its exchanges of energy and information, ∆±exi, actions, its survival strategies, trying to maximise its existence, Max. ExI, in a state of perpetual balance, E=I…

This dance of being and not being is performed by each Œ, knot-function of existence, defined both as an infinitesimal point from its upper perspective and an an absolute whole from its lower plane, since all knots of times space cycles web their existences through several of such plane

**A mathematical Universe must be perceptive and social.**

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’.

Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs. Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as *physical systems do, *functions of space-time. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’? Likely, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors. In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. *But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only a very intense ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms. *What would then be this kind of consciousness? Likely a sense of proportion, symmetry, balance and beauty. It does NOT matter in any case the ultimate inner sensations of physical matter, but the outer description of the actions of those singularities, which do order and reflect a mathematical organization around them, when in its solid crystal state they act with the program of existence, reproducing the information of that minimalist mind image. Indeed, a crystal grows with a symmetry which its inner image reflects back in the growth of ‘crystal cells’. And that is called reproduction, the objective definition of life, of a whole being in the fractal Universe.

And so, *P.o.vs. are canonical to mathematical science, or else mathematics, which is today based in analytic geometry and the study of ‘self-centred’ functions, would NOT work. *

A philosophy of mathematical properties of space-time, upgrading the essential properties of ‘points in space and sequential numbers in time’ is thus an a priori exercise, which I recommend to all physicists, so they can leave behind their abstract, ‘selfie view’ of a mechanical, chaotic Universe, where only ‘they think in mathematics’.

Singularities that reproduce information once they are formed, organised fractal super organisms also occur in astrophysics, from crystals to black holes and only anthropomorphism denies it. The GST view though is different: as we a*re all space-time beings, the properties of human space-time beings must be share in quality (not in quantity and complexity the variable of gst) by all other species of the Universe. So mindless ‘markovian’ entropy without time causality do exist but it is NOT by any means the dominant ∑∑actions->∑arrow->age of time.*

Thus the concept of physicists of a single ðime arrow is only valid for entropic gaseous states, and their idea that such states must be ‘extended’ to all realities, the most absurd hyperbolic statement of science ever, due to the deformation of its worldly profession as makers of motion machines and entropic weapons.

That 150 years after entropy became a dogma for the future in military Germany, XXI c. *scientists still revere the concept of an entropic dying Universe tells much more about the fundamental ‘believer≈memorial=reproductive arrow’ of human minds, in accordance with the present-reproductive Nature of reality, which is ‘conservative’ than about the ternary structure of the real Universe. In the graph, without Singularities of order, neither mathematics, not solid physics, or biology would make any sense. Only gas in which indeed there is not Maxwellian demons, except when the outside membrane is designed to reorder through a distorted potential field, the molecules of the gaseous system.*

In the graphs, the translation of the fifth dimension to life systems and true non-entropic pyramids of human actions, which always have had as artists and ethic writers have better understood an upper ontological level of highest satisfaction in the social communion with the rest of mankind or with the Universe, (origin of the concepts of God in western anthropomorphic religions – read God=human super organism – and eastern Taoist-Buddhist- Hinduist ones= God as universal super organism).

And such systems do have always a ‘self-centered Tiƒ singularity or point of order, which is the Maxwellian demon lost in pure gaseous states, fields and limbs of entropy. It is only because physicists deny the ordering capacity of singularities, also in physics – accelerated vortices of mass, charge in the quantum scale; black holes in the galactic scale; crystals in the thermodynamic scale – that an entropy only Universe can make sense. But this is called reductionism in physics, censorship in social sciences – but at least accepted in biology or else we would have also to admit the brainless nature of mankind (well that might be the case, but only mankind, you know ‘two things a consider ∞, the stupidity of man and the Universe, my beloved predecessor in this business of dimensional upgrading, Mr. Einstein 🙂

In that regard, both Leibniz and Descartes, the founders of philosophy of science, both understood as we shall see in detail on those pages, the need for a ‘mental universe’ if mathematics was really the language that better reflected the Universe. Indeed, since mathematics has three disciplines, geometry, which is based in frames of references that act as mind-monads, mirroring reality and Algebra based, in social numbers which are indistinguishable groups of similar individuals that come together as a whole ‘3’, ’10’ and finally ∆nalysis which studies the ‘social scales’ of the Universe, as parts become wholes, each scale studied by a science, from societies of particles and forces called atoms, to societies of atoms called molecules, evolved into state of matter and life beings, evolved into super organisms and planetary ecosystems, gathered around stars, socially evolved into galaxies; the very existence of mathematics precludes the existence of a ‘social, scalar, organic, sentient Universe’.

So finite vital §paces gathered around a frame of reference; the three ðime arrows of entropy, information and its energy combinations, and social organic scales that evolve parts into wholes, are the ultimate properties of all fractal beings of reality made to the image and likeness of the whole. The previous graphs of the fifth dimension, and its ‘physical, biological and socio-economical supœrganisms thus show those scales, each one studied by a science, where in each scale, a self-centered mind, pov, will co-exist as a whole with its relative lower ∆-1 cellular/atomic, and relative upper ∆+1 social world/gravitational, universal scale.

Thus while we could do as current science does an external analysis of the fractal, informative Universe in pure abstract terms, to understand the whys of order, the will of survival of species and the constancy of forms that self-reproduce as all fractals do through its generator, ∆ºst particular equations, to explain why ‘mathematical ðime§pace beings’ do follow mathematical laws, embedded in those frames of reference, we need at the centre of each being, a mind-mirror that perceives automatically, processes and reflects in ‘inverse order’, the Universe; which is exactly what mathematical systems do, as they are always self-centered in a frame of reference or pºv; and always study social numbers, whose fundamental operandi are scalar polynomials and its scalar ∫∂ calculus.

In the graph, the same ternary structure happens in biological systems (and through the class structure in social ones, escaped for most of the blog, to simplify and due to the fact we have another blog dedicated to them).

Once the organic, vital, sentient properties of systems that obey mathematical laws have been proved, we can then consider the main error of mathematical physics – to reject those properties because of its limited understanding of mathematics and its units, ‘fractal points’ of space-time, which are ‘points with volume’ through which ∞ parallels can hold and so ‘encoding’ a world in its self (Leibniz).

Singularities and how they define scales of inner and outer worlds, and how they *become bridges between those scales of the fifth dimension – as in charges and masses, ‘doors’ to those scales, are then the main ‘missing’ variables of mathematical physics, which a continuous vision of space-time will never solve, or will do so in weird ways (wormholes, time travels through evaporating black holes and similar attempts to encode the fractal doors between level of 5D within the metric of a single 4D space-time continuum). Finally the lack of three time arrows and cyclical comprehension of time, ads injury to those interpretations. So missing, ∆, º and s<st>t symmetries it is a marvel that physics still works (:*

* In the graph as the fifth dimensions of space-time, evolve socially new whole, membranes and singularities that emerge, the system from above and below in a new constrain whole that dilates a system both downwards, in sizes of entropy and upwards, in enclosure membranes, expanding its piercing of upper social planes of wholes and lower parts, dilating the total latitude of its planes of existence:*

*In the graph, the absolute, lineal arrow of time, is born social evolution, the relative arrow of time is made of the sequential order of the three arrows into a world cycle. As lineal time accumulates, a system increases both, upper social wholes and lower parts, dilating the total latitude of its planes of existence. While relative worldcycles extinguish themselves as they complete a whole cycle of existence. Hence the absolute dimension of time is the fifth dimension and the relative dimensions are the 3 other dimensions and its space-time symmetries, which become a zero sum. *

While the fourth dimension of Einstein, is just a refinement of Galileo’s relativity ∂v=∂s/∂t: an instantaneous (mathematical derivative) measure of a simple type of time-change: motion or translation in space, which as it is measured instant by instant with those derivatives, really has no much use beyond what physicists have always done: to measure motion in simultaneous space.

How this small part of the enormous range of time phenomena made Einstein whose definition of time as what a clock measures is as dumb as it gets, the highest brain of the planet ever, has to do a lot with the nuclear industry of bombs and the military than the intrinsic merit of his comprehension of time.

**The holographic Universe.**

It is though simpler as a first approach to ‘learned physicists’ specially when focused only on ∆±i scales to use the 5D concept and define any physical system in such fashion:

‘The Universe is a 5 Dimensional fractal that reproduces vital topologies of time-space, ternary forms of motion and form, which organises into larger, slower scales of fifth dimension of ðime§pace.’

Inn this view we can do then a slightly corrected 4D analysis based in the holographic principle, illustrated in the next graph:

Then we talk of 4 dimensions as the combination of bidimensional fields of Entropy=moving Space and Time=moving information, which creates a holographic Universe of time and space. So the Generator can be written as:

*Sp (flat space) ≤ ExI (4D world of energy and information)≥ Tiƒ (bidimensional tall particle).*

It is a more convenient formalism to plug in the known equations of mathematical physics. For example, those of the graph, which correspond to the ‘metric equations’ of the main three physical scales of the 5^{th} dimension and its 3 components defined as bidimensional spatial ‘sheets’ with certain form measured by the frequency of its ‘discrete units of information’, H, K, C^{2}, multiplied with varying time clocks, V, T, M, as:

*Time Frequencies x Space Surfaces = Constant Energy.*

Motions on 5D³ are either topological βidimensional changes (Galileo’s paradox) in D³, or full worldcycles (motions in 5D³), and so we must be aware of both.

The main bidimensional motions in D³ of a space-time being are motions with form, bidimensional units of:

ð: motion x motion=cyclical time

§: form x form=space-distance

E, ∃: max. motion x min. form = energy, entropy, expansive motion

iƒ: max. form x min. motion= informative time, implosive motion.

This basic motions then become repetitive in fractal self-similar beings as each compose motion leaves a memorial trace of previous traces that continue being traced in the same place ‘reproducing the facto the being’.

In this manner physical systems grow in form and dimensions.

3 are thus the time space arrows, functions and forms of any system of reality.

How many views there are of an event in fact would also surprise the viewer, as if we use the ternary principle and subdivide the ∆•st view according to elements there are 3 x ∆•st possible analysis for each system which will display its own field/body/head function/form in the event. So we can study multiple parallel views and interpret each view from the organic, topological and mental perspective, from the internal and external and ‘membrane-mind’ view that connects both, and so on. It is for that reason that mathematical physics has so many theorems and equations for each phenomena and so many relationships which would make a proper GST analysis of physics rather encyclopaedic.

To put all that in the ∆•st encasing of reality is a task well beyond a single man, which i obviously do reading physics, but have not – or else i would have to record all my thoughts, converted into wordings and equations in legit texts.

So once we define:

-$: dimensions in space (the topic three ones) and…

– ð: dimensions in physical time (distance, 1 dimension; speed, 2 dimensions; acceleration, 3 dimension) and…

-∆±i: dimensions in scales (lower, middle, upper networks that connect the being with them – yet as all beings have an inner ∆±1 structure, considering the highest i-scale we resolve the issue of which system has the highest number of ∆±i scalar dimensions)…

We have described the number of formal/moving dimensions of the physical system…

Once this simple concepts are understood, it is obvious that a vortex accelerated inwards, with a height, a’Maxwell-like screw’, which connects the system to the ∆+1 scale, this vortex will be the most dimensional entity.

The dimensions of pure entropy (lineal expansive, wide, flat bidimensional pace) and pure time (cyclical, tall, frequency clocks), and its static version, dimensional form, merge into ‘energy and information’ combinations of both elements, in 4-dimensional space-time, which is the substance that construct the light space-time in which we exist. It is the holographic principle, essential to understand the parameters of mathematical physics

Space-time is not continuous. Physical systems are mere layers of the 5th dimension, fractal space-time beings generated by the same symmetries of time and space than other systems, and so isomorphic to them. And this isomorphic information warps up the knowledge we have of those systems.

Only when we fully accept that space-time is fractal and *its dimensions are the content of real beings, we can truly understand the whys of the laws of stience, isomorphic among disciplines, when expressed in terms of the dimensions of space and time.*

The second fundamental element to convert physical hows into meaningful GST whys is to properly address the dimensional concepts of the Universe, regarding the ‘4 dimensions’ of each scale in terms of the 2 dimensions of temporal information and the 2 dimensions of spatial entropy, to adequately understand *all parameters of physics in terms of entropy, Spe, Energy, ST, and information Tiƒ.*

It is of great importance the duality between still form (mind view) and motion, to understand the relationship between space and energy and time and information.

And to understand the whys of the Principle of relativity.

In the graph, the duality between moving time cycles and still information, captured by a mind, and moving vacuum entropy and perception of still space by the mind is the essential feature of physical systems and its ‘relativity’ of motion. Since *Reproduction of Motion dominates perception of form***. **

In the graph, we can see how bidimensional fields of expansive space, and the bidimensional fields of time cycles (clocks of time) create physical systems. And so we write a simple equation:

Physical system: Œ = Spe (entropy) x Tiƒ (Information)

Now, the first surprising result of this analysis is the definition of a holographic Universe in which the 4 Dimensional ‘Energy’ Plane of each ∆±1 scale of the Universe is actually made of 2 ‘relative planes’, one of expansive entropy and other of implosive cyclical information which put together created the fractal species of the Universe:

Expansive, lineal entropic motion or ‘entropic space’ Sæ and implosive, cyclical clocks of information, Tf, are the two primary elements of the Universe, mix, organize, and evolve, till reaching the complexity of organisms. Their properties and morphologies are opposed. But for that reason, they can form “complementary” systems, which merge the properties and dimensions of both “formal motions,” enhancing the survival capacities of any system that combines in a balanced manner energy and form, E×I=K. In physical systems, all is made of lineal forces of expansive energy and cyclical particles of implosive information that create balanced present space-times. In the left graph, we see the canonical forms of lineal energy and cyclical time clocks and how an informative, electric cycle supported in a magnetic surface of space creates a complementary wave: a ray of light.

*It is the ternary game of the Universe and its bidimensional membranes of space and time.*

In the graph, since space and time now had two dimensions each, we can compare them, and transform one into each other, we could write that property with a simple formula, where Sæ is a flat plane of ‘lineal space’ and To is a cycle of tall time.

*Spe (length,width) ≈ Tiƒ (height, frequency)*

This simple beat of existence, flat fields of space that become tall cycles of time, energy that converts into information, is one of the commonest beats of the universe. And its rhythms explain infinite transformations.

Now there is much deeper question related to the duality of motion and form, which we shall studying the 2^{nd} part of this treatise, when we study the formalism of 5D physics in more detail and consider a Universe, in which all is motion and form, AT THE SAME TIME, because motion is reproduction of form, resolving the paradox of Achilles and the Turtle (-;

Thus the second isomorphism of the Universe the duality of motion vs. form, time vs. space, will translate in fractal organic terms as a ‘reproduction of form’ in adjacent regions of space.

This allow us to understand the creation of new dimensions as a process of laying down new ‘regions’ of form, one over other, as in 3D printing, which accumulates 2 layers of points into depth, creating a 3^{rd} dimension, and the constant switch between motion and form that converts space into time into space dimensions, to reach the classic 4 dimensions of human physics.

In the graph, the simplest, S, E, I, T, topologies of the Universe:

– The spatial, entropic, external membrane-motion that is the strongest, lineal, most durable topologies, used in membranes and external skins, destroyed as a flow of motion and energy.

– The zero point, or informative cyclical center that keeps its information in the frequency of its gauging and mapping and forming of information

– And its combination – a complex system or organism.

Energy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.

For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space.

So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’. On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘bodies of metal’ with digital information. Let us consider the properties of those 2×2 elements, energy<entropy (bodies, fields) and in/form/ation (particles, heads, minds) and some of its species, in life and metal:

*$: Moving Entropy>energy>** vs. ð: Reproductive Information >Still • form*

Lineal, spatial, big, moving Cyclical, temporal, small, rotating, still.

Formless, continuous, simple Form-ative, discontinuous, complex.

Field, body, male, weapon, Particle, head, female, coin, chip.

Iron, oxygen, carbon Gold, silver, nitrogen

Protein, lion, shark, death DNA, human, dolphin, life.

We could summarize the formal and functional differences between energy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:

*Maximal $pace = Energy = Minimal Form=body Vs. Maximal ð-form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head*

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

As a result of those morphologies we classify as energy or information organs not only carbon-life organisms, made of energy (bodies, food) and information (brains, eyes, senses, worlds), but also other beings and atomic species, even ‘deconstructed organs’.

Since we can now recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms. Yet all of them have a biological influence over us, provoking changes in the energy and information systems of mankind that we should control for our own benefit.

*Further on, all those motions and forms must be ordered through the metrics of the 5th dimension to derive from them the laws of sciences and its different species, made of continuous lineal time motions and space forms and discontinuous cyclical time clocks and closed curves. *

Space is form, still form, hence an infinitesimal ‘still’ of the flow of time. We distinguish forms 3 varieties of 2-manifolds, spatial units of reality, the essential two poles of reality, lineal motions and cyclical motions and its conic forms derived from them.

Two forms of space are thus paramount, and the transformations of one into the other are the essence of which the topological game of existence is made. And so this duality between spatial form and time motion, lineal and cyclical patterns, is the first to be clarified.

Space is also an interval, a slow one, a res extensa, an explosion that expands volume and decreases motion. Hence the vacuum space we see with no motion and no form purely static. But as all what matters to space is its duality with time, its back and forth transformations across the 4 hyperbolic quadrants of the bidimensional plane – that is space matters when it combines with time.

Space thus will be synonymous of decelerating or still motion, lineal, extended presents, still minds, forms, organs and organisms seen as a whole in a moment of time. Space is also a dimension with static extension and form, as opposed to a dimension of time, which can be pure motion (or accelerations with 2 dimensions of time).

Motion≈ time and Space=form thus constantly change into each other. Motion further on surrounds with its faster cycles, space, breaking it. We talk then of an internal space controlled by a spherical outer membrane and inner point.

Space is in its simplest most intuitive form, a static, lineal extension without form, the plane, the origin of geometry, the perception of space-time in terms of forms of space, studied in depth in the posts on maths. But there is something deeper about 2-manifolds, planes of space because they are indeed the minimal unit of the real Universe. Often slices of times, still, derivatives.

**The five dimensions of ****space-time and the mind membrain.**

So when studying a physical time§paœrganism the best way to do it, given our scanty direct perception of them, is through some of its actions, in which they will move and process information in a certain pattern, within a larger super organism, which in the case of the particle will normally be an atom.

As such within the atom, the particles are either part of its t-membrane, its st vital space or its •Singularity with its still focused mind, which humans represent as a centre of a frame of reference, in any of its 3 ‘topological space-time dimensions.

What is the perception of each mind-singularity mapping its territory according to its function is of interest. Even more is to find suitable frames of reference to model the 10D (5s≈5t) time§paœrganism.

Normally we can consider its asymmetries to make a possible focused mathematical mirror, giving to space the positive real coordinates, time its negative, and the scalar 5th dimension set on the Y≈ i-coordinates, and combine them to represent different s, t, st states… the possibilities of mathematical modelling of the 10 Dimensions of space-time and scale, self-centred in an S@ singularity with a constrain given by a T-membrane enclosed the being to its domain of scales, topologies and functions, is ginormous and only apt for the imaginative mathematicians.

The ones physicist use (phase, multidimensional, conformal, Lorentzian, Hilbertian, etc.) are shows of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis done in a limited range of dimensions and or fractal points often with its own ternary dimensions, to study different ‘fancy’ analysis of partial domains of Tœs of many different scales of reality.

We shall try to set a more orderly standard now that we know what we talk about.

The studies of physicist in that sense are often of 3 spatial dimensions reflected in the mirror of a present derivative dimension of time (the so called 4th dimension).

And when philosophising about entropy arrows, studies on the fourth dimensions OF SPACETIME the dimension of double entropy down two scales of death and big-bang in the ladder of scalar dimensions of the Universe.

The one they never talk about are the 5th dimensions of space and time.

As such an entropic explosive big bang death of matter, means a dissolution of mass down to a wave of light and further into c-quanta of gravitational ∆-4 existence.

An entropic death of a living organism goes down the scale of cells and further the scale of molecules.

A quasar big-bang of a galaxy and its black hole brain means going down to the scale of gravitational and photonic radiation, 2 scales down and so on.

The fifth dimensions (we use plural to signify the 2 dimensions of space-time together) on the other hand is the ascension from the cellular/molecular state of a neuron or crystal to the larger image of its super organism and further on to the view of its mind of the larger whole, till reaching the size of a planet of a human dna-crystal organising global societies.

MOTION=YOUTH, WITH INCREASING ENERGY ORDER AND DECREASING ENTROPY TILL REACHING THE REPRODUCTIVE STATE OF BALANCE, AND THEN OF INFORMATION, DYING THEN INTO DISORDERED, SCATTERED MOTION, TO RESTART AGAIN:

*Γ@: Seed of information + energy<entropy = reproductive phetus<emergence<motion (entropy with a bit of form) > energy age > information age>>social mind: O-motion << entropic death*

*=zero sum*

So we can write a series of space-time dimensions together as part of the processes of a world cycle:

*4th Dimensions: entropy=death: ∆-2 >> 1st dimensions: present organism: Limbs/fields of motion < 2nd dimensions: Hyperbolic body/waves>3rd ages: informative particle-heads>>Social evolution of minds as points of an ∆+2: world: 5th dimensions: ∆§*

**The evolution of maths improves the mirror, its ternary syntax.**

It does of course because any mirror-image of reality even if unfocused carries some information about it, and works for the distorted mind view, which *let us remember is NOT REALITY BUT ALWAYS A LINGUISTIC MAPPING: Œ-Mind <linguistic perception> ∞ Universe, and so any mirror does carry a minimal information to be useful to departure a whole:*

In the graph, linguistic mirrors create minds with different amounts of information, useful to guide reality. We must not though confuse the mirror with reality, the a priori element.

All this said is easy to understand mathematics, its elements and disciplines as a mirror of the Universe.

For the scientist who will consider all this nonsense because he thinks he knows his maths and all is there, the answer is yes, *all is in the mirror but with less detail. So maths* as the universe does, has also 3∆st+º sub disciplines, it has also a fractal ‘derivative’ structure and it is also about space-time.

THOSE 3 main sub-disciplines code the 3 ‘structural elements’ of the Universe:

- ∆nalysis of the 5th dimension, its wholes and ‘finitesimals’ (1/n).
- Geometrical space, (Spe) and its unit, fractal points.
- Temporal algebra (tiƒ) and its units, sequential numbers.

And it has its ST ‘combinations of which the most important its topology (the study of form with motion).

Moreover the mirror of mathematics *has* evolved to explain in more detail the ‘actions of space-time’ of beings; *as all languages do improving its ternary grammar. So* words developed first ‘names only’ (forms), then motions ( active verbs) and finally ‘complements’ (complex systems).

And colour languages moved from dual B&W, to three colors (red-entropy, blue, form, green energy) to four, adding green/yellow mixes.

So today maths has evolved into multiple space-time disciplines. For example spatial geometry added, analytic algebra, which is geometry with sequential time numbers that finally dominated the discipline, while topology which is geometry of space with motion in time, today added ∆-scales (as it is defined with networks of ∆-1 points).

**Dogma and flexibility – evolution of languages.**

All this is said to remark a key concept that escapes mathematical physicists:

*No language-mirror is absolute in its truth, but an evolving system, which goes through three ages*

*So when written words appeared **pharaohs just said ‘it has written=truth’. Today in the far younger mathematical discipline, scientists say ‘it is an equation=it is a truth’.*

Only latter words were known to be also fictions, a fact that also happens with *equations but few scientists do **recognise. So maths has still a ‘religious, dogmatic outlook’ proper of all languages, even if it has already gone into a ‘third baroque, inflationary informative age of excessive formal content’ and split into multiple similar ‘metaphors’ (languages being inflationary as mirrors-minds are multiple, watching a single perspective do offer multiple views of a single event, hence the multiple equations observed to describe the same physical event).*

But religious people, aka dogmatic physicists do NOT understand all this about their mirror-language of mathematics.

For many of them, equations ‘are’ always truth, just when written, and other languages are NOT truth – dogmas we only find in fundamentalist verbal thought (God speaks only in Arab, so Koran cannot be translated as it looses its truth).

Of course, languages do have also ‘quantitative’ measure. So while all carry an image, some are better and we prefer a carrot picture than a drawing.

So, we concede maths *after images, is the best mind-mirror known to man, as it* carries more informative detail than words (but less than images), and so it has become after images (most humans believe in TV celebrities more than in physicists 🙂 the dominant language today, and overcome religious words. Still as Einstein put it ‘I know when maths is truth but not real’, meaning we need experimental analysis of mathematical truths and so NOT just because we can write an imaginary particle with maths, the particle will exist (Susy, evaporating holes etc). IT IS AN EGO ERROR, TO THINK then that maths is always truth and an even bigger ego-error to think maths is not experimental but produced by the human mind, which becomes a short of ‘God’ that talks maths as only God does (that was the idea of Kepler: god has taken 5000 – biblical – years to found an intelligent like his, me).

**The extension of mathematical truths. Languages imprint reality inversely to its complexity.**

So yes, maths do create as any language does reality as a mirror around the territory of the mind, since *ultimately the essence of space is to be a tapestry of an infinite number of frames or reference self-centred on the monads of each scale of Nature*.

However as languages are shared by multiple minds, when a language is ‘so extended’ because it is use by ‘selfs’ of the minimalist scales of space (in the case of maths, it is obviously the language in which the euclidean dimensions of light is written, while its non-euclidean fractal points are the language in which masses and charges are better described), the language’s truths have a quasi-infinite number of applications. Still many elements of GST cannot be explained with maths, but ALL elements of reality can be explained with the laws of GST. So above maths there is at least a language the NON-Æ LOGIC OF FRACTAL CYCLICAL space-time, described in those texts.

Further on, *there is a limit to the distortion and lack of focus of a language that finally becomes blind when too far removed from GST ultimate principles. i.e a B&W picture of a Rothko’s painting will not be relevant failing to see the vibrations of **colours, essence of it. *

A math description of Gospel will fail to grasp the expression of social love and the ∆-arrow of evolution expressed on it.

And in general, excessively formal, third age baroque languages, are inflations and fictions which fail to express reality, *as reality to exist must have ternary elements, entropy x information = energy, which means entropy simplifies always reality as pure language-i*nformation alone does NOT mix, imprint entropy-motion, which tends to simplicity. Water and oil then become disjointed and oil fails to explain water:

As the mind mirror of any language – not only mathematics, also human verbal mirrors – must ‘imprint’ the entropic motions of reality which resist its distortion, the final effect of baroque=max. informative languages is relatively limited both to describe accurately and distort/order reality.

This is truth specially in the physical world with maths because the physical world is simple and the range of imprinting almost infinite – not so much in the smaller territory of order of each mind-species, which indeed becomes ‘created’ by the tiƒ-singularity center, as it is a limited range. In the next graph we show fully that interaction, which in maths would mean a Tiƒ=pov=center of reference of a graph will order an extension, with a range inversely proportional to the content of information it delivers (range of forces, maximal for the ones with less information, minimal with the weak force of maximal form):

In that regard, *the true mirror language that ‘adapts’ reality better is the GST-language WHICH is the one embedded in the behaviour of each Tiƒ-singularity.*

*In the graph, physicists are after all human egos submitted to the mind paradox, so they think ‘mathematics are a mind language, imagined by the physicist and ‘God’ a priori, creating a posteriori the Universe (copenhagen interpretation). The opposite is truth. *

The language of mathematics DOES NOT CREATE REALITY a priori, but ONLY a posteriori ‘sees it’, as a synoptic mirror, which as all other languages, a certain singularity uses to ‘see’ and develop its ‘survival actions’ in time-space.

But again as there are B&W, 3, 4 and 5 color animals (birds), with better detail maths can be improved to ‘see better’.

In its present ‘underdeveloped’ euclidean form, and with some fictional forms of mathematical physics taken for real, its incomplete structure must be improved.

This I did when young, after understanding the scalar metric of 5D Analysis and its 3 arrows of space-time, upgrading Non-E GEOMETRY.

In the previous graph to illustrate this real a posteriori nature of maths, we include besides Penrose’s another set of arrows – the stronger thicker one of the philosopher of science in the right.

So as usual in the multidimensional universe we can put together both directions of the process of creation.

Since *minds are mirrors, which once they have distorted and resumed reality into the still mind, try to order by reflection and proyection of that mind the Universe to make it look like the inner mind image, influencing in this way reality.*

**The proper way to understand the interaction between minds, scales and st parameters.**

Now because physicists understand nothing on the ways mind-mirrors and universe interact with each other, and the bias of the humind in the analysis of reality, many of the errors of maths will derive of the ‘egotist error’ (mind paradox, as an infinitesimal which believes to be infinite)

Consider the copenhagen interpretation, which bohm did debunk properly but requires further understanding of the concepts of quantum physics not as a mental game of observers, *but as a distorted human view on the limiting scale of our mind perception, given the properties of 5D metric. *

*Ie.* as we go down in scales we loose information (uncertainty principles), we are coarse in our interference (observer’s influence) and beings accelerate in time as they diminish in space, so we make all kind of errors confusing time cycles as spatial forms, since our slow clocks see the being’s sequences in time all together in a simple timespace quanta as a spatial form.

So here it is the ‘mind view’ what we must eliminate, specially two recurrent errors:

-To see time events which are ternary as spatial different forms: i.e., 3 quarks cannot be broken, why? Answer: because they are likely not three quarks in space udu, but three ages of a time transformation: u>d>u.

-To ignore each new scale is made of wholes and parts and when we ad new scales we must ad more parts, so instead of functions we use functionals and operators (functions of functions), NOT because quantum systems are weird, mathematical beings made of nebulous operators, but because we are integrating in our perception, multiple scales – same for Hilbert spaces – there is not ∞ dimensions but we penetrate for each system we measure into its parts, which are its inner dimensions. But without a proper definition of dimensions all gets messy conceptually as it is now the case.

And ad *as a proof the relationship between maths and organic GST laws and perspectives, to make of vital mathematics and its sub discipline, physics a complete description of the Universe.*

So the ∆ST isomorphic methods relating all to the 4 ∆• parameters will become the key to ‘complete’ and upgrade maths and its main sub discipline, physics (: as we have done with all other disciplines.

Needless to say we are not writing the encyclopaedia of mathematical physics available to any specialist but ad on all those parts and properties which are not properly written. So in astronomy we shall concentrate in the study of the galaxy as a cell, in quantum theory in the correct Broglie->Bohm model and in thermodynamics in the correction of a single entropy arrow and clarification on the meaning of it, and in all scales in the key concepts of the 3 arrows of time, space, its generators and the concepts of Energy, and the events of physics, which represent GST actions, and key equations to describe them (Fourier, for time scales; Hamiltonians for Energy; Lagrange for balanced actions).

That is, we shall explain why certain basic functions represent most events of physics in terms of the organic ad-ons needed to complete its whys, such as the ST- ‘action of harmonic oscillators’, which is basically a basic ‘feeding-perceiving action that makes the particle fluctuate as it emits a wave of information, upwards to the point of maximal perception and minimal motion (maximal amplitude) and downwards through the 0-coordinates of maximal speed-entropy and minimal height-information.

So it is important the reader understands the basics of space-time symmetric dimensions.

**DIMENSIONS: VITAL NON-E GEOMETRY**

‘Each point is a world in itself’. Leibniz

We cannot be by all means exhaustive, so we shall just as usual start with some classic work of pioneers in the understanding of physics in geometric ways, enlightened with ∆ST and then move onto more specific discoveries of ∆ST applied to the usual concepts of geometrical physics: the canonical curves of fields and forces, the vectorial calculus, the holographic principle, the co-ordinates systems and so on…

**One dimension. **

First though we must define the ‘dimensions of fractal non-Euclidean geometry’ extracted from other posts specific of this them to state the obvious: that points have a minimal 1 dimension, when perceived (by definition if not perceived they don’t have a dimension). This only string theory in physics understands, giving to each point a lineal inner dimension. It is a good approach for formal work but we want to be more precise. So we shall define the non-E five postulates of non-euclidean geometry first, and consider that each point when seen in detail is a whole super organism of 10 dimensions, *but as a whole membrain in the upper scale it appears to us, and works as an active entity in motion, as a one dimensional point with motion and an internal form we do not perceive.*

So the point *will either be a static point with an inner dimension that connects it to the lower ∆-1 scales (akin to the concept of string geometry), or a ‘point-particle’, that moves tracing a cycle in a larger ∆+1 world, and we shall see it as a line in motion also with a dimension.*

**THE CREATION OF DIMENSIONS**

How dimensions are created? It is rather simple, but different for each new dimension and ruled by the laws of the 3rd NON-e POSTULATE, the most important and less understood of geometry, concerning the nature of parallelism and perpendicularity.

But as we have already commented on it, let us bring the mentioned ‘Aristotelian God’ doing his ‘thing’: moving around its ‘self’-singularity the energy stored in a ternary volume of space, quenched into a bidimensional disk: LET us consider 2 cases here.

*A dimension of angular time-momentum coming out of a loss of a dimension of volume-space.*

Above we show how dimensions of distance can become dimensions of motions. So the contraction of a 3rd entropic volume becomes a bidimensional accelerated space vortex and vice versa.

**Two Dimensions. The holographic principle**

The paradox of galileo shows the bidimensionality of time information and entropy space, and the equivalence between a motion in time, a distance in space, a frequency and a population, such as:

Space = ∑ T, that is distance = λ ƒ, whereas a quanta of space is multiplied by a frequency in time.

A second fascinating theme of topological physics, with the ad ons of GST is the understanding of why *almost every physical equation and system can be written in bidimensional layers. We already explained it. *Even Relativity in the so called ADM formalism, which is its natural Hamiltonian formulation (another huge element explained better in GST) is bidimensional.

We are not treating anywhere the complex AMD formalism. I have given up the initial intention of reordering 30 years of research and aim just to put the barebones of GST in this blog before my numerous sicknesses cancel my existence (and find myself every month wanting to work less and less)… So we shall consider only the simplest of all bidimensional elements in physics, the conics.

But before the reason of all this is crystal clear. It is the holographic principle, coupled with Galileo’s px.:

*IN THE GRAPH, THE GALILEAN PARADOX:All -motion can be seen as sP-distance; all ∆-continuous ARE ALSO an ∑∆-1 fractal sum of discontinuous parts, joined by force networks. Galileo saw the Saturn’s rings and thought its was a flat continuous disk. In fact is made of ∑ point-particles turning in cyclical motions, which from far away seem a continuous ‘area’.*

The mind thus distorts perception and the whole subject of special relativity can be considered an error of the mind, and a tool to adapt reality to that mind-perception (also general relativity as its vortices of accelerated time, curve space-time only if seen from our scale, but if we enlarge their inner, larger-faster gravitational distances-motions IT WOULD LIKELY BE euclidean and as such it is likely perceived by the black hole).

In that sense in mathematical physics, the cases in which we can bring the Galilean Paradox to resolve problems, are normally on the ‘verge’ of a given space-time continuum (c-speed T≥0 in our continuum). It will also be used as a renormalisation process of elimination of infinities and zeros, when we need to consider minimalist effects of the underlying ∆-scales and its ‘stress’ in the limits of the carrying capacity of entropy of information of a plane. At that is really pedantic stuff for the initiated, which only gets ‘worked up’ the most arrogant physicists of numerology, we escape it (the infamous 0.00… deviation calculation of the g-factor in the electron, being the most famous ‘engraving’ in the tomb of his author).

The holographic principle thus defines systems of bidimensional motion and/or form together, giving birth to the 4 canonical combinations:

So reality is both motion (time, energy) or form (information, space) and always bidimensional (holographic principle):

The perfect form of spatial entropy is the straight line in movement – the shortest, faster trajectory between 2 points of space – and its society, the plane. The perfect form of temporal information is the circle and its society, the sphere, which keeps the maximal information in minimal space. Both, opposed, inverse forms shape the spatial, linear, energetic bodies and cyclical, informative, memorial minds that become the complementary forms of all organic systems made of atoms of temporal energy.

Entropy and information are the 2 primary elements of the Universe. They form all its complementary systems. In this posts we study its basic properties and dimensions. In the graph, they display different forms. But information dominates and defines an arrow of complexity and increase of height (the dimension of perception), from where informative organs (heads, cameras, black holes, skyscrapers), perceive and control with invisible languages (words, images, gravitation, money), the ‘unmoved bodies’ of energy under them. They are indeed what Aristotle called the multiple unmoved Gods of the Universe.

The 2 primary elements of the Universe, lineal entropy and cyclical form, mix and evolve, till reaching the threshold of complexity that gave light atoms living properties and now it is about to give the same life properties to metal systems.

In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the ‘limbs and heads’ of humans, animals or machines, because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information.

Entropy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.

For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space. So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’.

On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘limbs of metal’ with digital information. The functions of those ‘systems’ are also biological. Weapons are lineal, energetic forms that kill human beings.

Holographic systems are thus expressed in everything.

**10 D MODEL: S≈T SYMMETRIES & ∆±2 TRIPS**

**The simples 1, 2, 3… 4th, 5th, 6th dimensions.**

The Universe is a superoganism of 10 dimensions of symmetric space-time. Whereas time means motion and space form. Yet since due to Galilean>Einstein’s relativity we cannot distinguish motion from form, for each dimension of space, we must consider a symmetric dimensions of time (the form we see in motion).

Since as we can only compare entities with equal number of dimensions we must write, S=T, as the fundamental law of the Universe, which is display in all kind of beings.

The equivalent of this law of balance in physics, is a Lagrangian of the form:

*Sp (size in space) x Tiƒ (speed of time clocks of information) = Constant *∫S-T∂st=0

And or, the laws of conservation of momentum: S x T (mv, etc.), and energy its integral in a closed cycle.

Two simple laws of conservation and least time in which all of physics is based; albeit explained with complicated ‘pedantic’ obtuse laws, such as the Noether theorem, group theory, etc. which obviously need them to go back to school and learn what the magic of maths and the origin of those laws are in 10D.

This is the law of balance and co-existence of reality that make humans and civilisations co-exist as single super organisms. Cells and organisms co-exists in a single individual, and so, the Universe is a beautiful organic, fractal of scales of reality which follow the same goals of reproducing information to become immortal in ‘states of balance’. And those laws apply also to history and economy systems that should try to find such balances to survive.

Thus we can start studying beings of one dimension of space and one dimension of time-motion, simultaneously. As reality requires that for each dimension of space we perceive one of time.

It can allow us to construct bidimensional (minimal being) type of species, which go on constructing the reproductive equations of a bidimensional world of space-time.

So the simplest analysis are those in which we observe a ‘non-e point in space, a point with breath’, as a single dimension, coupled with a dimension of lineal motion, the first dimension of time.

Then we can consider holographic bidimensional entities with dimensions of form and motion:

In the graph we see systems with information and motion=time; systems with entropy and form (bidimensional space), and 4D combinations, of which the basic one is light space-time (our electronic perception of both being tuned to such ‘minimal quanta’ of our perceived reality.

Next we can consider combinations of 3 dimensions of form and 3 dimensions of space; and here we exhaust the existence of a system in single space-time continuum:

In the graph we see 6 dimensional descriptions of a space-time super organism. Now we are talking (: indeed, we can describe an enormous number of systems with 3 ‘fractal parts’ with 3 topologies in space and 3 functions in time, and as it happens since a 4Dimensional system have only 3 possible topologies, that is enough to understand the processes of topological evolution that complete our work in evolution, through 3 topological ages, dominated by each of those 3 elements, and describe a generator equation for all of them:

Γ; $pe: lineal limbs/fields of entropy <Ø-ST hyperbolic-bodywaves>O-particle/heads of information.

*All dimensions are motions and forms. Yet we have explained a few times that ‘motion’ implies reproduction of form in a lower scale of the being. You do NOT MOVE, you reproduce yourself in an adjacent region, and to do so you have to ‘reorganise’ smaller ∆-1 cells/atoms/individuals, with at least a ‘collective wave’ of information (genes, quantum numbers, memes distributed simultaneously to all of them). So all motions, all time dimensions MUST happen between two relative ∆ and ∆-1 scales as a wave of information that imprints a lower scale:*