Bigbang v. Galatom
SUMMARY
Foreword: Organic, fractal Universe vs. big bang.
I. Big bang as pseudoscience.
II. 5D model: relational spacetime organisms.
III. Cosmology: the galatom and its Forces
IV. Experimental falsehood of the big bang.
V. Worldcycles vs. Worldlines: the mathematical formalism.
FOREWORD:
An organic, fractal 5Ð³ Universe of a bigbang singularity?
At the heart of all philosophies of science of mankind there is a larger dispute – what is reality, organic or mechanical? As machines are clearly evolving into organisms of metal, AI robots with solar skins the dispute is being resolved ‘de facto’. Machines are simple organisms, and when we expand this concept to physical sciences we can safely affirm that mechanical, lineal models of the Universe, based in mechanics, and a single ‘arrow of time’, entropy and locomotion, such as the bigbang, are simplified versions of a more complex Universe built with two arrows of timespace, temporal energy – a wide term for all kind of motions – and spatial information, its opposite ‘forms’, which define a ‘fractal Universe’ of multiple scales which from the atom to the galaxy repeat similar structures, and likely ‘restart’ with the galaxy as an atom of a hyperuniverse, the same infinite game.
We shall in this post confront both models – the simple, reductionist model of a bigbang Universe with a single arrow of entropic time, mortal in time and finite in space vs. the complex model of an organic fractal, immortal in time and infinite in scale.
Let us introduce briefly both models, and its supposed proofs:
As an image is worth a thousand words, the simplest way to show the 5D scalar, organic Universe is to make a picture of it and a few of its parts made as all fractal systems are to the image and likeness of the whole:
In the graph, the fractal Universe we shall explain in these posts in all its selfsimilar forms, which obey a set of common laws based in the ‘scalar’ structure of its spacetime systems.
In that Universe each fractal point of its ‘long filaments’ is a galaxy, which as Leibniz put it, is a world in itself, as it grows in size and complexity the closer we come to it:
In the graph, Galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest selfsimilarity in our world scale is a cell and in the quantum scale an atom.
In the graph, black holes are frozen stars of the top matter decuplet by symmetry with the atoms and stars of our light galactic plane. Then by parallelism with light stars, we differentiate two species of black stars that are also found in Nature:
Tthose which are like our light stars made of udd atoms, which would be made of dark bcb atoms of much larger densities, but similar properties. They would be the smaller black holes that transform the matter of a light star into bcb neutral atoms without charge. And those who are cosmic black holes, much larger, in the center of the galaxy which become the informative DNA of the galaxy (Maldacena conjecture: the surface of a cosmic BH in 5D maps out as a ‘homunculus mind does with your body’ or the ‘DNA’ with the information of the cell, the entire information of the galaxy in 4D). They are the equivalent of our neutron=strange stars, which have a core of negatively charged strangelet matter that make them turn almost at light speed and produce a hyperstrong magnetic field.
The top quark black hole then will have a ‘core of positively charged top quarks’ which will eject a huge stream jet of ‘negative mass’ neutrinos (likely tachyon strings as the weak angle of a neutrino is the size of a Planck string, 10ˆ33 and many have been found to have negative mass, hence hyperluminal speeds – more on this latter… Those top quark huge black holes in the center of the galaxy then should power the faster than c, z=10c motion observed as radiation and mass jets coming out of the center of many galaxies.
We shall then make a thorough correction of the ‘creationist theory’ of black holes as infinite singularities (Oppenheimer>Wheeler>Penrose and Hawking) and go back to the basic, realist symmetric, fractal Universe of the graph. Since there are two decuplets of matter, belonging to the quantum and cosmological scale, and two type of atoms and two type of stars…
So we can, departing from those concepts of space and time, define also the Universe and all its parts as a spacetime being:
‘The Universe is a fractal, organic system, which reproduces complementary, social networks of energy and information that selforganize themselves in bigger, selfsimilar scales’.
I. Big bang as pseudoscience.
Religion of the bigbang vs. a sound dual theory of entropy and information.
On the other hand, confronting this new model of reality we have the Big Bang, and what we will affirm now about it might take away most readers, but the proofs are mounting: The big bang is not an experimental scientifically demonstrated theory of reality, but increasingly pseudoscience and dogma, on a model paradigm – one of the solutions to Einstein’s 4D spacetime Universe, which must change, because it is no longer valid to explain reality as it is. But as Kuhn rightly explains model paradigm is a difficult task that takes many years; or as Planck put it in sanguine terms, all previous ‘scholars must die for new people to learn the better model’.
In that regard, in the largest possible model view, the big bang theory is merely a solution – the simplest one – to the equations of Einstein in 4D spacetime, while the galatom concept of a fractal scalar Universe is the model solution when we add a new scale of reality, the fifth dimension of parts that evolve socially and emerge into wholes. So the paradigm change would require the acceptance of the scalar dimension of parts and whole, which humans so grossly overlook as they wish to be the center of the Universe also in scale.
We might say that the true change of paradigm will come then when physicists accept the 5th dimension of which the 4D model is its limit for a single plane of spacetime, the one described by 4D relativity, or ‘light spacetime’, the ‘background space’ of the galaxy.
But even without the use of 5D formalism and the proper expansion of relativity we shall trace latter on, we can explain in layman terms the ‘errors of the bigbang’, which correspond to pseudoscience – that is, the need humans have for absolute theories of reality based in scanty proofs but gifted with a moral metaphorical or pseudoreligious outlook that makes them so pleasant to the ‘eye’=I.
The problem with the bigbang though is bigger than a simple model change, as it is the metaphysical model of mankind today, so it is the ‘theoretical religion’ of our technological civilization and this gives it some characters of dogma and pleases the human ego… As it is AN ALL ENCOMPASSING concept with the pretension of knowing it all about reality, measuring it all, seizing with the humind all what exists and beyond, making man again the intellectual center of the Universe.
On the other hand, a more humble infinite, immortal fractal Universe leaves us back into where we belong; the absolute relativity of an infinitesimal existence. And this while being scientifically, objectively more pleasant collides with the human subjective ego that has always ‘surrender’ the imagination of the masses.
Indeed, in those sociological aspects I quite similar to the creationist models of Abrahamic religions, in which an infinitesimal human being ‘believed’ to understand the meaning of it all, because God, the mind of the Universe reduced itself in the big bang to another infinitesimal point, easy to handle by the arrogant egocentered bronze age peasant, which became the ‘only’ human to understand it all or the modern physicist who pretends a ‘simple lineal equation’ called the Hubble constant, V = Ho D, resumes it All.
So the religious priest will tell you ‘GOD’ explains it all, just 3 letters, 4 in the Jewish Tetragramaton, Yhwh, 5 in Allah. And there is no need for anything else. Alas from GoD to V≈hoD, from Abrahamic cults to bigbang cults 2 letters have changed to remain the same.
Irony aside we can then term this concept, ‘creationism mathematics’, as it is indeed a common philosophical error of all languages to be confused with reality itself, when they are merely a mirror of reality. So even before we discuss the ‘experimental’ supposed proofs of the bigbang with some detail, we have to ‘frame’ the theory within the human linguistic hyperbolic constant desire to convert a language into reality – from monetarist economics, to ‘life imitates art’, to ‘mathematics is the language of god’, to ‘God speaks arab’…
CREATIONISM VS. REALISM IN SCIENCE.
In the graph, philosophers of science have argued for very long that a ‘creationist’ theory, based only in language might be a nice fiction, a beautiful consistent language but they tend not to be truth, specially when they deal with ‘infinities’ – God, the absolute, the whole Universe, and infinitesimal point, etc. Since when we merely use creationist theories that isolate the language, as in the third age of any ‘linguistic science’, or person, there is an excess of form, unconnected to reality. This is the case of black hole evaporation or supersymmetry, proved wrong at CERN. Since the simple energy and geometry of reality imposes limits to the excessive ‘forms’ of pure language, by essence inflationary, as a ‘mirror of reality’ with multiple ‘reflected images’. Those errors were classified already by Kant as paralogic errors of the mind. Kant, being with Schopenhauer, a favorite of Einstein (and myself), who read them as a teenager, prompted him to say ‘I know when maths are truth=consistent but not real=describing a real physical fact.
Creationist mathematics as creationist religion is ultimately based in some ‘ugly’ principles – the ego paradox of both physicists and priests who want to talk in exclusive mode the supposed single language of man; and their lack of intelligence so well described by Schopenhauer’s definition of ‘stupidity’, which in the paradoxical humor of the Universe makes precisely the most ignorant to think they are the most intelligent and is the origin of ‘magic thought’, which is how we should classify both creationisms.
Regarding languages, there are infinite ‘mindmirrors’ or ‘monads’ that gauge information from its biased perspective, which means that the relationship between languages and the order of reality is a back and forth ‘local’ process: the mind gauges information and then organizes its territorial ‘body’, mirroring its languages on reality. Maths are likely in topological, geometric form the ‘mind of atoms’, and so its laws of order are all pervading. Words are the ‘mind of humans’ and so in History the legal and ethic order trying to construct a superorganism of history, religion, nation or civilization is al, pervading.
So creationism is just a simplified, ‘oneway’ version of complex organicism and the interrelation between ‘still languages’ that mirror into a small virtual spatial form, the moving cycles of all beings. And this perhaps Aristotle and Leibniz understood better than any scientist does today: ‘Gods are unmoved points that order the energy around them’ . Whereas those unmoved ‘fractal points’ that gauge information are Leibniz’s monads: ‘every (fractal, NonEuclidean) point holds a world within itself’. And energy the substance of the body waves they order.
This is the essence of the absurd theory of the big bang, according to which V=hod, in this case not the mind but the entire Universe reduced itself to an infinitesimal point which was the ‘beginning of time and space’ that only physicists (and creationist, biblical priests that sponsor the concept – in fact ‘discovered’ by a catholic priest, Mr. Lemaitre), the high popes of science understand with an arcane ‘latin language’ called mathematics.
Creationist mathematics becomes pseudoscience.
In reality that equation is so simple that one cannot avoid a smile, when people tells you Physicists are the absolute geniuses of mankind. It merely means that galaxies are separating because the light, an entropic, lineal, expansive force between them, elongates its wave as it moves. There is nothing else, but already Einstein said ‘imagination’ is more important than intelligence. So as religious people have made of God with good imagination and pumpingego ceremonies the meaning of it all, nuclear physicists have extracted from that single fact – light elongates as an entropic force between galaxies, with a ‘lot of imagination’, halflies and statistics the meaning of it all.
How they did it? Simple: they just move backwards this light expansion, and concluded that as light expands between galaxies, if we run it backwards it must have imploded into a single point, the ‘origin of it all’ which their Vhod describes as the graph shows.
Never mind light NOT only expands when free but it contracts within galaxies by the force of gravitation, balancing thus, the expansive E=mc2 death of mass into radiation, with the implosive, M=E/c2 informative implosion of light into mass particles and galaxies, making reality a wobbling balanced immortal infinity of dying mass and imploding light. Indeed, if you run backward the equation of light expansion, you just will get back to the atom of the galaxy that emitted that ray of light – AS ALL EQUATIONS ARE FINITE and happen only as long as the phenomenon they describe exists – in this case the ray of light that expands does NOT go back into an infinitesimal point because all LIGHT is produced by particles according to the E=mc2 equation.
Yet the bigbang dogma merely rejects to put the most famous equation of physics, E=mc2 at work, as the abrahamic cult denies any other ‘letters’ to God. It is only God, or Yhwh or Allah (even if actually the 3 religions says it is the same God). In physics it is only Vhod not E=mc2, what matters. You just vehemently deny the other ‘letters’ matter at all to create matter (play with words, as it is all just funny egos jumping me, i and myself only, if it had not so ugly collateral effects).
Thus the big bang is just a theory based in the wordily profession of nuclear physicists (make atomic bombs). So disregarding the arrow of information and life, which is the creative force of the Universe, physicists pretend to interpret reality only with the arrow of destruction and death, they call ‘entropy’, and merely moved backwards in time a lineal, simple equation of entropy, to pretend it moved backwards till this supposed explosion collapsed into a tractable infinitesimal point, much more smaller than the human ego. The parallels between those 2 supreme ‘theories of the subjective ego’ are multiple.
The peasant Meshu thought God was the bush their goats munched because that was his professional ‘food’. And he denied therefore the immanent sacred nature of all what exists, made of the same ‘plenum substance’, impersonal space and time. God was in his bush. The arawak who ate turtles thought God was a huge turtle over which the Earth floated.
The nuclear industry which makes nuclear bombs designed a theory of the Universe, in which only its ‘entropic process’ of explosive death accounted for the creation of the entire Universe. So of course, the people who hold the alternative soundsound theory, called the steady state Universe, from Einstein to Hoyle, who affirmed ad maximal there would be a quasar bigbang, observed experimentally balanced by the creation of mass, laughed at them and called its theory the ‘bigbang’, arguing their makers were either ‘creationist priests’ (Lemaitre) or people working in the nuclear industry (Gamow). It was then business as usual: ad hominem attacks on Einstein and Hoyle, the P.r.ess heralding Gamow as a genius, since it backed the nuclear weapons industry and justified experiments and industries that researched them, such as CERN created then. And soon they recruited their twin believers in creationist points and G. bushes, so the church who still denied Evoution jumped on the wagon and every sound proof of the steady state Universe was dismissed and every fool proof of the Big bang was canonised, as we explain in our right side articles on 5D and cosmology which studies the falsehood of bigbang theories.
Indeed for God to be unique, it was just needed to kill all rival gods, and we are still on the business of killing each other to prove our ‘letters matter more’. And for the big bang to work, it was just needed to DENY all other causes of the process of DUAL informative creation of mass and entropic destruction of mass into radiation. This of course created the paradox that physicists used e=mc2 to explode bombs but deny their equation to uphold Vhod.
At this point things became a little surrealist: physicists changed the name of the arrow of information and life and called it ‘negantropy’, the negation of death, as if negating death was a ‘sin’ and information and life was irrelevant, something Vhod could dispose of.
They also denied the most important informative force of the Universe, gravitation, which ‘forms’ the mass of galaxies, as time goes by. So Einstein, the only sound mind, who merely did ‘thought experiments’ said that ‘time curves space into mass’. So the creation of mass balances the entropic flows of pure light space without form between those galaxies.
And the result is an immortal wobbling spring like Universe, where according to Einstein’s equation: E=M(c2), entropy reigns in the electromagnetic forces and light transiting between galaxies, expanding its spacetime. But then it collapses within galaxies, creating with gravitational forces, information. And this arrow of form and life is more important. Since we humans live in one of those vortices of time collapsing into mass, called the milky way, in one of its cyclical, turning planets that evolves information, through the processes of life and technology and human languages of thought. SO IT MATTERS MORE to understand mass and life than entropy and vacuum expansive space. The next graph shows schematically one of those galaxies wobbling.
In the graph, absolute relativity postulates a Universe of infinite scales of sizes with relative bigbangs, which are the death of implosive Mass converted back and forth into entropic motion, according to Einstein’s equation: Entropy<=>Mass (c2), which obviously has 2 arrows of time, and so it was in fact first described first, as M=E/c2, that is a process that transforms entropy into mass and information, stored in the frequency of those accelerated mass cycles.
Now, the ‘steady state theory’ of the Universe has always come to this simple realisation: the creation of mass eliminates the need for a singularity. There are a few different versions and duality merely makes them even more sound. The best elaboration of this steady state dual expansiveimplosive Universe, departing from earlier work by Einstein and Fred Hoyle, is the concept of a series of local bigbangs, called quasars, proved recently by the 20 billion years tabulated cycle of galaxies, shown above.
Further on the cycles is reinforced by the fact that bigbang radiation is measured locally, as Penzias and Wilson were indeed measuring the background radiation of the galaxy, a fact recently rediscovered by the observance of 2 ‘electromagnetic lobes’ on the galaxy, which are exactly the same found in the supposed mapping of the whole Universe. Below we observe the ‘supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmos, which turn out to be exactly the 2 lobes of our galaxy, recently discovered, and the fact that from quantum atoms to galaxies, there are E=Mc2 double bigbangs from beta decay to novas of stars and planets to galaxies:
In the graph the galactic bigbang, and the scales of it. The reader should observe that the image supposedly obtained from BG radiation of a cosmic bigbang (left) is exactly the picture of the galaxy (center), recently proved, when the two central lobes were found above and below the Sagittarius black hole.
Physicists thought they were remants of a 13 billion lightyears ago/distant Big Bang, so Smolin was trying to prove one of his theories about long time changes in the frequency of light waves, measuring the light coming from the 2 supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic bigbang, since he thought high frequency light goes faster than redshifted light.
So as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago a small difference on his arrival time should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy was huge and the experiment was cancelled. Since they were not occupying supposedly ‘a monumental piece of the entire Universe…
Alas, you think dogma changed? Of course not. Once a theory has been made sacred the enormous ridicule that one hundred years of calculus on the subject would imply for all astrophysicists has made impossible to change theory as their practitioners become now inquisitors of thought. Indeed, in the previous paradigm, before Einstein, ‘ether’ was the substance through which light moved. It was an absurd substance, denser than steel, softer than butter, through which planets raced, so to allow the canonical equation of wavespeed to move through at light speed… Einstein ridiculed it and he was outcasted from the physical community for a decade, having to work in a patent office, since experimental evidence of the so called aether drag had been observed by German physicists to enormous accuracy and the ‘constant of ether’ had become along the charge of the electron and the G constant one of the 3 canonical constants of all texts of late XIX century physics. Expensive experiments were devised to further measure to the 10th decimal the constant of Ether, in a subject that was obviously closed to amateurs like Mr. Einstein.
So today we have measured to extreme degrees of accuracy – to the first nanonanonano second the birth of the Universe, not to be argued, as there are so many ‘proofs’ of cosmic creation that tthe law of silence on the religion of metaphysics will bury all the news that prove it otherwise – some of which will be studied latter in this post.
And so the bigbang proved false by experimental evidence in both ‘distance’ of the radiation (above) and ‘ages’ of its galaxies (by huge black holes found on the ‘edge’ of time, perfectly formed as shown latter in an artistic graph), cannot be tumbled down by ‘blasphemous’ scientists who dare to put experimental evidence and sound theory about ‘truth’.
So what is the origin of the ‘back ground radiation’ if it is not the edge of time? The obvious candidate that should have been considered in first place, ultra heavy dark matter, as the galaxy is teaming with strangelets and black holes, its ‘top predator’ celestial bodies that feed on planets and stars and end up converting galaxies in ‘dark matter’ ultra heavy dark galaxies.
Since the background radiation can only be produced today not in a distant past, by a black hole or dark matter strangelet gravitationally redshifting light as it passes nearby. This phenomena is the gravitational redshift, and so it only remains to calculate what should be the Weight of a microblack hole or strangelet that redshift light at the exact temperature of the blackground radiation:
And so a huge proof of the Fermi Paradox comes through Einstein’s gravitational redshift: a black hole or strangelet which has eaten the mass of a moon, the most abundant planetary size of the galaxy, will produce exactly redshifted background black body radiation at 2.7 k,
So the SUPPOSED absolute proof of a cosmic bigbang IS in fact without ‘extrapolations into an infinitesimal past point’ perfectly explained now IF the light matter of the galaxy ‘feeds’ the dark matter of the halo, which WILL thereafter redshift constantly gravitationally (another Einstein effect) light all over the galaxy and light coming inside the galaxy at 2.7 K.
Further on, when we calculate the mass of those black holes at 2.7 k turns out to be the exact weight of a moon ‘MACHO’ (Massive Halo Object). So since moons are the commonest object of the Universe, it is reasonably to think that the ‘lost’ primordial black holes that should appear in a quasar bigbang explosion of a galaxy, which Hawking painstakingly try to find evaporating, did NOT evaporate, but are lurking with its identical mass (as primordial particles all have equal mass, so the smallest possible black hole should have a similar ‘species’ mass, similar to the object it feeds on to reproduce), all over the galaxy…
Again in Epistemology WHEN 2 POSSIBLE CAUSES OF A phenomena happen, the sound SOUND ONE, is the cause that happens NOW. It is like if you try to explain your 37 degrees of body temperature and you have a doctor that tells you the NOWnow cause – the activity of your cells at 37 degrees, as the activity of dark matter of moon masses (called MACHOs) today at 2.7 K. Obviously this is a sound theory
Now imagine a ‘guru’ that comes and tells you, your 37º temperature is in fact caused by the ‘cooling’ of your temperature at the moment of your birth which was then ‘3 trillion degrees’, and I have a lineal equation that proves you have been getting colder till now, exactly at the required speed to get now 37 degrees. You will think he is cuckoo because he NEVER measured your temperature in the past, so he is making a nonscientific extrapolation. Well THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT Gamow did. He came to the conclusion that the Universe had cooled down from the singularity of trillions of degrees to the almost ‘absolute zero’ of 20 degrees… Wait, it is not 2.7 K background radiation?
Yes, he FAILED COMPLETELY TO FORECAST it. But when Penzias measured the then called ‘galaxy temperature’ at 2.7 K, GAMOW simply a posteriori changed his lineal equation to meet 2.7 k now, and then a flurry of ‘egolatric’ scientists decided it was NOT local but cosmic radiation. Because that kept them as ‘the new high popes of creationism’ and the meaning of it all. AND AGAINST RELIGIONS I DO NOT REASON.
In the graph, the pseudoscience of the black hole consists on finding always the most bizarre possible explanations to fact, as long as they validate ‘a posteriori’ an experimental fact that refutes the bigbang.
This was done with the supposed ‘Background radiation’, found NOT on the Universe (as we cannot take measures beyond the Earth) but on the galaxy; which did NOT coincide with theory (around 20 K degrees) and implied to move towards INFINITY into the past with a lineal equation a function measured in the present (epistemologically at fault), and did NOT account for 96% of the mass of the Universe (dark heavy matter not found yet then).
As an image is worth more than a thousand words, we have just showed you the 3 most recent, visual proofs that the background radiation is local, galactic, and if there was in the past a ‘bigbang’ was just the quasar cycle of our galaxy.
So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar bigbangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers to be of 20 bullion years for the destruction and formation of its central ‘bar’, further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.
All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the bigbang its falsehood.
As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the bigbang.
We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 arrows of time. So WHY nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.
Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘bigbang theory’.
So for a century what cosmologists do is to ‘forcefeed’ any proof of reality into the creationist bigbang equations, tinkering with their models whenever an exception to the model comes in, adding ‘new epicycles’, as long as we can ‘keep’ our cherished creationist theory that proves, we astrophysicists know it all.
So even if it is written in mathematics the bigbang theory, because it does not follow the logic, espitemologic and experimental law of the scientific method is false.
In that sense, the Big Bang, has all the properties signaled as pseudoscience in ‘wikipedia’: statements, beliefs, or practices that are claimed to be both scientific and factual, but are incompatible with the scientific method, contradictory, exaggerated or unfalsifiable claims; relying on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; which have lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; and long after they have been experimentally discredited…continue to be hold as ‘dogma’.
While those advocating such models of pseudoscience often dispute the characterization.
Why we say this about the bigbang is obvious. Logically is absurd that all the matter of reality was in a single point, including time and space itself. This is born of an exagerated, unfalsifiable claim – that a lineal equation of spacetime expansion between galaxies, V=HoD, extends infinitely to the pas. It is truly an example of ‘creationism’ in physics, based in mathematics. And it merely ignores what physicists do in all other analysis – the need to eliminate infinities and infinitesimals through ‘renormalization’ and cutoff processes – in this case the galaxies from where the emission of spacetime light takes place, which balance the Universe with its implosive gravitation.
Yet the rule of bigbang theory is to exaggerate experimental analysis. Such is the case of the background radiation observed only in the galaxy, which is considered with zero proofs to come from all the corners of the Universe. We falsify those arguments and many more in our analysis of cosmology. The graphs below show them at true value. Perhaps the most notorious is the finding of the supposed central track of the bigbang exactly above and below the galaxy, which shows not to come from 13 billion years light away but exactly from where it comes the background radiation – the galaxy itself.
Another proof of the many considered on our texts on cosmology – as physicists keep looking far away to the supposed beginning of time, they keep finding perfeclty formed galaxies and black holes, wich breaks completely the supposed ‘time periods of creation of matter’. In the graph we can see the biggest black hole found in the Universe, which is perfectly formed in the middle of a galaxy, that is just 400 millions after the supposed bigbang when there was only supposedly hydrogen ions:
In the graph, the superblack hole is supposed to exist so early that there is no way it formed unless the Universe is eternal and the cosmic horizon of the bigbang just the limit of human perception of light, which as everything in 5D is NOT infinite in range.
Now and here 5D physics departs sharply from current astrophysics and its ‘paralogic’ Kantian errors (which break the scientific method in the egocy of the cosmologist wanting to have an explanation for all even when his range of perception does not allow it), there is NOT infinite range force, because infinities are always broken by cyclical membrane.
In the jargon of physics range of forces depend on mass. But t is ‘obvious’ that the photon does HAVE energy hence it does HAVE mass, E=hƒ, so even if its mass is extremely small the range of the photon CANNOT be infinite.
Moreover the further away we look, we shall see photons of less massfrequency, hence redshifted, as those of more massblue frequency had died.
So that explains the red shift simply.
The distancerange of light is inversely proportional to its frequencymass
Hence the existence of a limit or horizon of perception of light, from where we just see those monstrous objects – the biggest black holes.
What is then the limit of perception of light? As we have experimental evidence there is no need to do further calculus: Obviously the 13.5 billion light years from where redshifted light of maximal z comes mistakingly taken as a time horizon of a supposed bigbang explosion.
And from this fact it also follows that the further away we look, the more likely we are to find only huge black holes, as they will emit more energetic high frequency particles that will take longer time to relax in terms of the 4Ðimotion of entropy when they reach us before dying into a red frequency, blacking out of our perception of further away galaxies.
And here is where the magic 10¹°¹¹ number common to all structures of nature, both in spacepopulations/distances in timefrequencies/durations and in scale/masses shows in (we will find it in the number of neurons of the biggest human brain, of stars in the galaxy, of atoms in a DNA code, etc, for reasons studied on our posts on ‘fractal noneuclidean mathematics):
This is the number that gives us in the symmetry of time the mean life of stars, and the mean life of its minimal light spacetime ‘unit’ of information, and the mean mass of the largest black holes from far away distances measured in terms of the mean star mass – our sun, and the mean distance of the black out horizon of the bigbang…
So of course while in 5 Ð, as we know the Universe is eternal, the big bang does not exist, we have far more sound logical and epistemological and experimental proofs to explain everything that seems to prove the delirious bigbang in which time and space started from a point that fits in our hand, and pleases our egocy of being above heavens and earth.
In the graph, the largest black hole found is also the oldest, as it is the furthest, and it was supposed to be born in 500 million years after the bigbang when only some reionization of light hydrogen atoms has happened.
It then takes the pain of creationist dogma and believers to tinkle with all the equations and models we have to feed computers till some simulation of very extremal conditions very unlikely to happen can give us some bizarre model that might explain how on the hell, in just 500 million years a black hole of the size of 66 billion suns appeared in the middle of a perfectly formed gargantuan galaxy. Rational answer BECAUSE THERE WAS NOT BIGBANG.
Simplest proof. Such a black hole will live 10¹ºº years ad minimal (counting that there is black hole evaporation, another nono error we explain in our 5Ð study of black holes)…
So by mere statistical probability, we exist within the supposed life of the Universe which we can at least elongate to the life of that galactic black hole in the absolute infancy of the Universe, more or less in the 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000…. keep adding 90 000001% of its life span, and the probability that we exist in that moment without any other data, is similarly 0.0000000……..(keep adding 90 zeros)1 % chance.
The bigbang as we shall show in so many pages of this blog is the very proof not of the birth of the Universe but of the ‘common nature’ of all huminds, scientific or religious: dogma and belief is always higher in the esteem of the majority of humans of any profession than truth and reasoning.
Or as Landau put it: ‘cosmologists are seldom right but never in doubt’.
We have thus considered more realist explanations to the 2 main proofs of the Bigbang: the red shift and the background radiation. And found a direct embarrassing proof against it: the existence of cosmic black holes form when there should exist. All those proofs had all the elements of pseudoscience, corrected a posteriori to forcefeed the model. As they keep coming the model became more bizarre – first with an inflationary infinitesimal second in which the entire Universe expanding to infinite side (never mind the proponents consider sacred the cspeed limit of light).
We shall latter prove many other ‘discoveries’ of the bigbang to have simpler explanations – next in the line come two concepts; the abundance of helium, which happens to be maximal above the black hole in the center of the galaxies, hence clearly provoked by the notsowell reactions latter explained in terms of 5D, to be originated not in a cosmic bigbang but in the local processes of creation of matter by the black hole.
The other great proof is yet another creationist concept – the infinite singularity.
Now; so the reader doesn’t think I am biased, fact is almost every cosmologist knows the ascientificism of the bigbang and black hole singularities – the core ‘belief’ that impulses CERN and cosmology, ever since the ‘capital sin’ of egocy (ego+idiocy) of physicists, who decided to substitute religion and what is worst, philosophy of science and epistemology of truth with his equations, even at the cost of breaking the very essence of science; we shall bring here from Quora, an interesting site which doesn’t abandon scientific rigor, but tries to explain things easy, the most upvoted=liked answer to the question, ‘Do singularities exist?’, as it pretty well resumes in very simple terms the core of it.
How do we know that singularities exist?
In the graph, the true rational, explanation of quantum physics – the pilot wave theory, recently proved by the interstellar EM engine, vs. the subjective egocentered theory of ‘the observer’ who creates quantum reality, which has become canonical and is ultimately a religious creationist theory.
The astounding fact about Physics today, both in quantum theory and Cosmology is its ‘outlook’ as an anthropomorphic religion that has substituted earlier abrahamic religions, without respecting the basic laws of objectivism of science, unlike all other disciplines. So Physicists have on one side accepted ‘weird’ theories of reality that make man – in this case the observer – the center of creation, against the soundsound objective theories of reality available and far more sound experimentally, which however eliminate any ‘entitlement for human beings’. Such is the case of the infamous argument between the founders of quantum theory, Planck, Einstein, De broglie and Schrodinger, and his pilotwave interpretation and the ‘newcomers’, Hilbert, Bohr, Pauli and Heisenberg who imposed a new religion of humans and their mathematics as the ‘creators’ of reality. While in cosmology, they created by the elimination of the informative gravitational force that creates mass out of entropy in galaxies, another weird theory called the bigbang, in which all reality was once according to a simple lineal equation, V≈HoD, compressed in a single point, easy to describe with its simple mathematical tools, a mere mirrorlanguage of reality.
At the heart of those simple, anthropomorphic, ‘creationist’ theories of reality which CERN pretends to explore further, as in the case of Abrahamic religions there is fundamental, existential problem of humanity: the paradox of the ego, which true science and his lonely humble geniuses have always tried to combat with little results – as humans systematically prefer a theory that makes them ‘exceptional’ and happy that one that tells them the objective truth of their nonimportance in the universe. In as much as the indifference to the risks of cern are precisely based in the arrogance of humans who cannot conceive its extinction we cannot only consider theoretical, experimental and military reasons to CERN’s potential genocide but do have to criticise the essence of that human arrogance, the paradox of the ego that makes 1/2 of mankind to believe we are ‘chosen of a BushGod of the bronze age that makes us immortal’ and only its verbal priests can understand, while the other 1/2 believe the Universe was created in a single point described by a single equation in the single language of God, mathematical physics, which only ‘physical experts’ can understand.
So instead we will reconsider a more objective theory of reality than those sponsored by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics and the bigbang interpretation of creation. Namely the soundsound, increasingly proved theories of Einstein both in quantum and cosmology (pilot wave theory along De Broglie, and steady state along Fred Hoyle). Indeed after a century of ‘propaganda’ of the creationist and observer’s theory of physics, which so much pumps the human ego, the sound theories of Einstein keep coming back with new proofs, and keep giving new avenues of thought and will if we survive CERN become standard one humans stop being so arrogant about what they can and cannot know and what is the nature of reality.
 The realist humble, relativistic interpretations, which are right and time always brings back, since Copernicus, Descartes and Leibniz the philosophers of science affirmed, his relative theories of time and space and the mind to the times of Einstein, Bohm and Hoyle, who all of them fond of philosophy of science and ‘fist principles’ affirmed a realist quantum interpretation (above), a realist Universe with 2 time arrows, entropic space which dilates it but also informative gravitation that ‘collapses’ those entropic waves into galactic matter, balanced overall its total volume. And finally the use of mathematics as a languagemirror of the mind that does NOT create reality, but merely fits it nicely on the small brain, and has therefore to be studied a priori, AS A LANGUAGE OF THE MIND, with the same ternary syntax, inflationary errors, and modelling properties of all other equally valid languages that mirror reality (visual, verbal languages in man, chemical in life, gravitational in cosmology, etc.)
 The egocentered anthropomorphic interpretations,which always attempt to reduce phenomena ONLY to those elements that ensure the Human Ego to come on top of reality, from the Ptolemaic theories of the Earth as center of the Universe, to Newton’s definition of absolute space as the plenum body of ‘Yhwh’, to the quantum observer theory, to the axiomatic method of Hilbert in mathematics, as the language humans imagine and comes a priori, creating NOT reflecting reality. Contrary to belief those interpretations who require the ELIMINATION of all nonhuman larger truths. So Ptolemy dismissed the larger sun in the center. Newton dismissed time and space as relational systems of multiple clocks, carried by different species, NOT only the human, mechanical clock (Leibniz and Einstein). Bohr dismissed the quantum potential field that feeds the motions of particles, even if we don’t see them. And denied the obvious – if we don’t see them is NOT because they are not there but because they are so far removed of our scale of space size and time that we just have a limited information.
ALL THIS MEANS basically, that singularity theories are pseudoscience, and that includes both, black hole evaporation and its ‘reverse’ equations of the bigbang. Because they respond to the ‘egocy’ paradox of human scientists that confuse the capacity of a language as a synoptic mirror of reality to reflect that reality and even forecast in its reduced synoptic logic, the deterministic future of the motions and ‘lifedeath cycles’ of a species (either with mathematics or verbal evolutionary theories), with its capacity to create reality with FICTIONS natural to all languages. So as Einstein put it ‘I know when mathematics are logic truths but not when they are real’. Reason why the ‘scientist’ should only be concerned with facts that have been proved experimentally, which do NOT include the equations of black hole evaporation and the equations of the bigbang, as we shall show now in a bit of more detail (keeping the bulk of the proof for our cosmological models on the section of 5D with its alternative, fractal, organic, immortal Universe).
Indeed, there are many other sounder proper explanations to every supposed cosmic bigbang phenomena, but when an entire egocentered group of human beings is in a ‘mission’ pumping with zealot ego human power, there is no ‘reasoning’ able to stop the tsunami – the sound reasons are hidden, unpublished, the halfreasons which favor the pseudoreligion are pumped, retouched ad hoc, as Gamow’s temperature…
So we do dedicate an entire post on cosmology to study a little bit in detail this theory, which i am now on the business of properly rewriting as the rest of this idle web for many years left alone after the failure of suits and films to rise public awareness.
But as an image is worth more than a thousand words, we have just showed you the 3 most recent, visual proofs that the background radiation is local, galactic, and if there was in the past a ‘bigbang’ was just the quasar cycle of our galaxy.
So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar bigbangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.
All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the bigbang its falsehood. As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the bigbang. So do those supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic bigbang, which Smolin a famed physicist wanted to use to prove his theory that high frequency light goes faster than redshifted light, as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago and so a small difference of distance should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy. Yet they occupy supposedly ‘a huge piece of the entire Universe…
We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 arrows of time. So WHY nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.
Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘bigbang theory’.
While basically Einstein’s attempts to put reason on quantum theory were ignored after he defied Bohr, till his death. He got an FBI file, nobody was going to his classes, and so he dedicated himself to talk to Godel on the ridiculous concept of Mathematics as the substance of the Universe, to boating and walking… Then they discovered black holes, all his theories were proved… till Hawking decided as a celebrity guru to challenge him with his theory of black holes traveling to the past, totally ignorant of the real time arrows of the Universe.
AND THINGS even got worst, with Bohm, who completed Broglie’s pilot wave theory – he got ignored, got his FBI file, was stripped of his American nationality and became an expatriate. Do not think physicists take lightly any attack on his religion of ‘seers’ of time.
In that regard, it is necessary to stress as we do in many articles the sociological and militaryindustrial topics, which so well work together to prevent the simple, easy solution to CERN – close the factory of strangelet liquid, which is nothing but deconfined quark matter, the ‘thing’ the LHC keeps doing each year in bigger amounts till it become stable and does us all. Basically the LHC is the showcase for most high tech industries and the petproject of the most powerful group of science, physicists – since they make the machines and weapons of our industrial civilisation; and so sponsor ‘Fromm’s technological ethics: ‘if we can make a machine we must make it, even if it kills us all.
So on one side the pressure of peers is enormously and on the other the rest of mankind who worships machines and physicists will never dare to defy something they don’t understand.
This means only the most advanced theoretical physicists and philosophers of science (the true queen of scientific disciplines, despite physicists attempts to ‘push us aside’) will tell the truth about CERN, as only the likes of Bohm and Einstein denounced the nuclear industry – yet they will be treated ad hominem and remain the obscurity.. While the physicists, who agree and promote altright theories in favor of the militaryindustrial complex will be exposed and had the power and means both to create strangelets in this machine and promote their nonrisk theories on the press and massmedia, as it was the case in our suits against CERN.
Let us then twist the mind of the believer in abstract creationism, a bit more showing the fundamental law of 5D organicism and systems sciences – that all scales of reality show the same phenomena, explaining properly what the weak force is and how it ‘rises’ in all scales of reality from the simplest neutrino to the human being and beyond…
II. 5D model: relational spacetime organisms.
Leibniz was right there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from scratch.’ Einstein
The fractal universe vs. the bigbang: Galatoms.
We explained already that the essence of the alternative model of the galatom and the fractal Universe is the fifth dimension of scales, and so we have to introduce in its simplest form the 3 fundamental properties of ‘fractal spacetime’: to be made of fractal scales of space, to have infinite cyclical timeclocks and to be a ‘relational model of spacetime’; that is to follow Leibniz, not Newton. When those upgraded views on spacetime are realized then it comes immediately that the faulty errors of the bigbang can be better explained with a model of an organic, fractal relational spacetime Universe of cyclical time clocks and ‘vital spaces’.
Relational spacetime beings.
The fundamental question physicists have wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time seems simple but it is rather profound, and unfortunately it was resolved wrongly.
Are we in a ‘background’ spacetime graph underlying all realities? Or it is is vital space and finite time the substance of which we are made? A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which has never shown in any scale of reality such ‘background’ – ultimately a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a time quantity between birth and extinction. So we are space and time.
But for reasons of practical measure, it became useful in earlier science to use a mathematical device made with pen and paper called the Cartesian graph, so physicists could measure ‘translation in space’ over that graph.
And as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ huge ego felt to be sharing the ‘mathematical language of God’, the ‘clocker’. So they became creationists, changing the language of creation from earlier religious words, when God created the Universe ‘speaking’ in Arab or Hebrew, to the new language of mathematics.’
So the supposed creator of the Universe had drawn below reality a Cartesian ‘graph’, according to Newton, who thought God sent him comets to give him clues on the locomotion of Gravitation. Yet as we explored smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘dimotions’ tracing closed timespace cycles; since all particles turned to be also ‘vortices of timespace dimotions’.
Yet in Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are a stage. Like actors on that stage, particles move, exert forces onto each other and generally act out the drama of dynamics, while the stage itself does not change. This is sketched in the illustration. There, we see objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, but there is also a fixed background structure, space, which is just as real, pictured here as a lattice of intersecting lines. Newton’s view of the universe is manifestly background dependent – whether or not a particle is moving or at rest is determined in relation to Newton’s absolute space and time – the plenum/body of God, which of course must be immortal and last for ever, graphed ‘obviously’ to make it easier for the chosen to understand.
A relational world without spatial background.
The argument reached its height in the beginning of science in the correspondence between Newton, the proposer of the absolute cartesian graph of spacetime drawn by God (his body in his own words) vs. Leibniz who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason (except those who are in Schopenhauer’s terms ‘stupid’ and deny causality as the tale of time events 🙂
Indeed even in Newton’s day, there were philosophers like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz who took a different stance. In modern parlance, theirs is a relationist point of view. For a relationist, there is no background of absolute space and time. The fundamental properties of the elementary entities consist entirely in relationships between those elementary entities. Time is nothing but changes in these relationships, and consists of nothing but the ordering of these changes. In the relationist version of the above illustration, only the objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, are real. The lattice has no independent existence. Even without the lattice, it does make sense to talk about the distance between two given objects. One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed spacetime background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity. Physicists intent on describing our universe cannot just assume a given geometry. Instead, geometry is something that needs to be determined by solving certain equations that include all the effects of matter and energy.
But if space is what objects occupy that distance between the red square’s vital spade and the yellow ‘circle’ must have something. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with timemotions appear and there it seems no limit to the fractal scales of the Universe.
But space and time do exist.
It is then necessary to conclude since absolute continuous time and space are merely a mathematical cartesian artefact on paper to study equations, but there is nowhere to be found, and yet we are CONSTANTLY existing as beings with a finite time and a finite extension in space, that WE ARE space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: organic (ab.œ), scalar (a. ∆§) Space, and cyclical discontinuous time (ab.ð, Ð) who ‘lives’… in worldcycles (no longer worldlines) of exist¡ence (as species who follow the common laws of all stiences of space and time).
This idea is so simple, so beautiful, that if you grasp it and agree, I invite you to tell to all others who wonder to wander this web, now that I have completed a fairly understandable version, a decade after Mr. Wheeler’s death, a century after Mr. Einstein’s previous paradigm, a millennium after the invention of the simplex mechanical clock… WHICH DEFORMED our vision of the infinite clocks of the universe of spacetime.
So the essential change of paradigm from absolute spacetime to relational spacetime is simple and everything else follows from it: we are made of vital spaces that last a finite time ‘world cycle’ of existence, and so the study of the vital organic spaces, which we are and the laws of its world cycles of time duration, is what science is all about. LET us then introduce first the nature of vital space, the topological forms of which all beings are made; then the nature of cyclical time, the clocks that measure the duration of the existence of all beings, by the frequency of its logic cycles of information; and finally put them together to show the fractal, scalar structure of all spacetime beings, which will be studied according to its relative scale of size and speed of time clocks by different sciences, whose ‘time clocks and vital spaces will be studied in more detail IN THE SECOND line of the blog.
VITAL, TOPOLOGIC SPACES
Topobiologic spacetime beings.
This said the devil is in the details. What we mean by ‘spacetime beings?. Space is ‘form’, ‘distance’, ‘dimension’, ‘information’, something that doesn’t move. And time is motion, change. So spacetime would be a ‘form with motion’, which is what mathematicians call a topology. A form that can be deformed, transformed. We have coined a key word ‘Dimotion’ (dimensional motion) for those topological forms. So the first obvious question we must answer is what MEANS in REAL terms, the fact that all what exists is MADE OF SPATIAL topologies and TEMPORAL ages, of Space and Time? The answer is fascinating, as there are only 3 variations of mathematical space in a single “plane of the fifth dimension’, the so called hyperbolic, elliptic and toroid topologies. So we affirm that:
‘All entities of the Universe are topological systems made of 3 ‘dimotions of spacetime’. Since in the whole Universe in either 4 or 5 Dimensions there are only 3 topological varieties of form with motion; the ‘elliptic particlesphere’ , the ‘hyperbolic bodywave’ and the ‘toroid, lineal limbfield’, illustrated in the next graph for the 3 kind of species studied by the 3 disciplines of science, physical, biological and human ‘stiences’:
The insight that there are only 3 topologies in 4 and 5D nature is the key mathematical finding to fully account for topological evolution, the ternary nature of all systems and its functions and physiological networks, resolved NOT through intelligent design but through the limiting fact that there are only 3 topologies in space in the Universe. So by force all systems are ensembles of those 3 parts, shown in its simplest ‘geometry’ on the graphs.
So we can write a formal ‘geometric equation’ for ALL the entities of the Universe, the main equation of Gst, appropriately called the ‘Fractal Generator of spacetime beings’, which IS to relational spacetime and likely the stience of XXI c. what EFE (Einstein’s spacetime equation) was to XX c. science:
Gst: moving limbs/potentials x Ohead/particles = Øbody waves
This is the simplest expression of the FRACTAL GENERATOR of spacetime beings, as all of them will display those ternary topologies.
The study of the ‘fractal generator of spacetime beings’ (ab. Γst, Γ, Gst) will be the key formalism of the expansion of timespace ‘stiences’ achieved in this blog.
The full understanding of these 3 parts of the being comes when we consider ‘bidimensional’, topological networks, which will show to correspond in form and function, as topology is geometry with inner motion: a topological variety can ‘change its inner form’ and remain the same as long as it does NOT tear.
It will fully give to the model the needed connections with the topologic, organic and numerical equations of classic ‘science’. ‘Stience’ obviously is the slightly modified term – a necessary pattern of the blog to upgrade concepts without making them too strange – we shall use for all classic sciences, now that we know they study vital spacetime beings, such as those of the next graph.
The 3 elements of all systems, lineal/flat limbs/potentials; spherical, tall heads/particles and its hard membranes of dark matter, trunks and skins accomplish the 3 functions of motion, energetic reproduction and informative perception in all systems, varying to adapt the system to its larger world.
The graph shows a visual, topologic analysis of those 3 topological “dimotions” of spacetime. But why those 3 forms ensemble always in similar fashion? Because they ARE organic forms with clear ‘superior’ functions: spheres Hold maximal information in MINIMAL space, so they are perfect for ‘informative systems that gauge information’ as heads and particles do. Lineal limbs/fields/ planes are the shortest distance between two points, so they are excellent for locomotion functions to perform maximal motion/distance, and hyperbolic body/waves HAVE both topologies pegged together so they can reproduce all the system, and are ideal for bodywaves that maximize the reproduction of the being. So simple, so perfectly beautiful, so obvious, so long ingored, the Fractal Generator of spacetime makes sense of all what exists.
RECAP. We are all topobiologic beings. Topologic=geometric beings with mathematical, spatial, structural, formal properties; and temporal=logic beings, with causal motions.
What Newton called absolute spacetime IS NOT real. It is a mathematical artifact, a pen and paper ‘cartesian graph’ drawing, physicists used to map out reality and do calculations but it does NOT exist in reality. Do you see a Cartesian graph in the background of the vital spaces occupied by beings? No. Physicists have probe down to the scale of strings and they have never found the ‘lines’ of the lineal time and cartesian space, they draw in their papers ts, ts… So space must be the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings. And they have never found an ‘immortal being’ which would not follow a ‘world cycle’ of life and death…
All is generated in a point of past, grows into a topological being, and dies dissolving its form in a point of future. This is the meaning of a worldcycle, the essential ‘time duration of all beings’. There is not being that goes all the way through the infinite line of a single absolute time, proper of the Cartesian graph…
Hence the need to change paradigm from an abstract single spacetime continuous background, which Newton merely took from the abstract mathematical Cartesian Plane that became in his ‘delirium tremens’ the ‘Plenum=body of Yahveh’ in which we all exist (: – the dependent background drawing against which all motions were measured, into what physicists without a better understanding of relational spacetime call a background independent theory of science – meaning no background at all – we ARE the background).
CYCLICAL CLOCKS
But to start with we must consider what is the basic ‘epistemological error’ from where all those ‘entropic theories of lineal bigbangs and black hole evaporation’ depart – from the misunderstanding of time as a single lineal mathematical ‘cartesian graph’ arrow; when all time clocks are cyclical:
Let us then start by describing the biggest blunder mankind has committed in the realm of knowledge: to simplify the nature of cycles of timespace into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs.
Physicists uncoiled timefrequency, into lineal time, T=1/ƒ BY WRITING THE INVERSE equation…
BUT IN THE PROCESS THEY LOST FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF BEINGS:
The information ‘stored’ in the ‘form’ and ‘frequency’ of those cycles.
The understanding of ‘broken vital spacetimes, as each full closed cycle reads reality into an inner and outer region, inside and outside the ‘simple knot’, or geometric definition of a cycle (Jordan’s first knot theorem). So by the mere fact of being in a universe made of infinite repetitive ‘conserved time clocks’, we obtain a broken spacetime.
How does a Universe of infinite time clocks of different size and speed relates to the present Universe in which all time clocks are equalized to the mechanical, clocks of metalinformation, which were invented in the Middle Ages in Italy, and became the ONLY CLOCKTIME OF THE UNIVERSE, once elongated into a lineal ‘secondminutehourdayyear’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks).
Further on because time IS motion, the final substance of reality IS motions in time, and this makes REPRODUCTION, the essence of a fractal a dynamic natural CONSEQUENCE of this first ‘motionsubstance’: by the mere fact of repeating a time clocklike cycle INFORMATION REPRODUCES. So there is no mystery to the process of reproduction, as reproduction occurs by MOTION. And so all those elements repetitive patterns we call laws of science, the existence of broken vital spaces enclosed by angular momentums and moving membranes performing cyclical clocks that store and reproduce information, and the fractal structure of all of it, WHICH ARE THE ESSENTIAL WHYs of reality, became hidden by the simple concept of an absolute lineal ‘humind’ second unit of spacetime.
Humanity is still in that primitive concept of a single time.
Since Einstein just added to that XVI c. equation, V=s/T, a ct corrector factor, but in essence he left the concept of single lineal time unchanged, despite recognizing it was a convention that must change.
What physicists mostly do then is the study of ‘open locomotions’, translations in space, through ‘lineal inertia, or scattered, entropic paths’, of objects that move; AND WHAT they care about TO QUANTIFY in terms of ‘RODS OF MEASURE’ that speed of translation in open space, is of course part of time=motion=change studies but far less important than the qualities of ‘closed time paths of frequency and form, of information’ we shall study here.
In the graph, left side, ‘ðime’ clocks that measure the rhythms of reproduction=repetition and change=evolution of the Universe are always cyclical ‘r=evolutions’.
So while humans obviously are aware of the existence of cyclical patterns of nature, because they have abandoned the proper concept of cyclical ðime changes, and its second dimension of form, of information, they cannot fully grasp the fundamental principles of the Universe: its cycles of ðime§pace, its scales of ðime speeds as §pace size (ab. ∆±i), and the ‘mindmirrors and languages’ of information that allow systems to measure them, and interact with other beings in ðime§pace.
The concept of cyclical ðimes is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all ðime clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical ðimes. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.
Moreover science would not exist if ðimes were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in ðime of patterns of behavior and causality.
Each clock creates a discontinuous spacetime, whose cyclical perimeter of information encloses a piece of energetic space breaking reality into ∞ formal patterns; different time cycles with specific forms and frequencies. Thus the use of a single human clock that equalizes all of them misses 2 features of each of those time cycles:
– Its specific forms of information in space, which gives birth to the main topological laws and Isomorphisms of the 5th Dimension (I).
– Its different speeds or frequencies. Since cyclical time is measured not by duration but by frequency, its inverse function: ƒ(t)=1/T.
All these truths unfortunately are hidden in the ðime equations of modern physics, so good for calculus so bad for interpretation, which need to be translated into cyclical ðime, measured by frequency (T=1/ƒ) and streamlined with a new jargon appropriate for a dual Universe, as opposed to the simplex jargon of classic absolute ðime§pace physics, that lingers in all sciences and drags its understanding.
In the left physical cycles, planetary orbits, which we humans use to measure ðime in all our ‘clocks’, which are also cyclical. People are hardly aware of this fact, since they tend not to use the ‘parameter’ of cyclical ðime, which is ‘frequency’, but its inverse, lineal duration: ƒ=1/t.
The formulae are simplified in this manner. Since ‘frequency ðime’ is discontinuous and so difficult to ‘integrate’. So physicists prefer to uncoil, frequencies into Lineal Time.
For example the ‘revolutions per minute of a car wheel’, multiplied by its perimeter give us the ‘distance’: λ x v = S. And besides in this manner we achieve more information, as we get the duration and form of information of each cycle (λ) and its frequency, v.
So instead of using V=s/t, V=wave length x Frequency gives the information on the frequency and shape of the cyclic steps of the motion.
But if you just want to know the total length of along ðime period, you use Lineal Time durations and so you don’t need to sum all those cycles to get the lineal speed: V=s/t.
In the left graph, we can see that all physical systems, and all its ðime cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal ðime – an artifact of measure, and further on equalized all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘ðime clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.
And we shall return to it, when using cyclical time to define and upgrade physical equations, with new insights on its whys, thanks to the ‘inverse arrow of time’ cyclical frequency, ð(ƒ)=1/Tduration.
Since the enormous deformation of reality caused by the ‘belief’ that there is a single timespace continuum, a single ‘human clock’ measuring it all with a second and a single spacerod, also the human visual light spacetime measuring it all with a cspeed is obviously wrong and keeps producing conceptual errors, camouflaged by the fact the equations ‘work’ in both systems, either as ƒrequency of cycles or a lineal speed sum of the trajectories of those cycles. What we miss of course is all the inner information of the cycles.
Frequency time, broken time cycles, infinite of them, are novel concepts hidden for so long by the lineal deformation of the cartesian graph, canonized by Newton that not even the quantum revolution of ‘broken space’ and the Revolution of relativity that saw multiple time regions in the Universe, and many insights that came after on the cyclical nature of time clocks, and the SYMMETRY BETWEEN THE MOTION TO THE FUTURE (OR LIFE, informative arrow) and the motion to the past (or entropy arrow), has been ‘enough’ for mankind to understand the cyclical nature of time and all the amazing results derived from it. Since ALL MOTIONS OF TIME TOWARDS THE FUTURE OF HIGHER INFORMATION ARE FOLLOWED BY THE REVERSAL ARROW OF TIME TO THE PAST OF ENTROPIC DEATH – BUT ALL THOSE TIME CYCLES ARE LOCAL, diffeomorphic, so there is no paradox on traveling to the past, simply speaking, we talk of two inverse arrows of time, loosely understood as the arrow of life and the arrow of death, but specific of each species.
I.e. in electromagnetic waves we shall talk of the advanced collapsing wave and the retarded expansive wave; in local particles of the particle towards the future and the antiparticle or death of the particle (Feynman).
In relativity we shall talk of the ‘gravitational arrow of time that warps space’ and the ‘antigravitation’ of those likely antiparticles (still to be experimentally proved). In forces we shall talk of the ‘gauge’ spatial forces, and the ‘transformative, evolutionary, time interactions mediated by the weak force’. In life obviously of life and death future and past; and all of them will be soon formalized in the concept of a world cycle which is the most general understanding of all those closed time cycles that break the Universe into an internal and external world separated by a membrane, spin or angular momentum.
Lineal theories of the Universe.
Of course the best physicists are fully aware of this, but there are few of them, so Einstein said ‘I seem to be the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’, and ‘time curves space into cyclical masses’. And when he died, as his concept of black holes as frozen stars the concept of cyclical infinite time clocks in the Universe, one for each of those cyclical masses disappeared because quantum physics and electromagnetism, are lineal equations, balanced by those cyclical masses, so as quantum physicists carried the power OVER relativists, they have ever since forcefed their theories of lineal time bigbangs and entropic black holes, and a dying Universe as dogma. When the proper way to study cosmology is precisely as I used to explain in scientific conferences when I was the chair of Duality, with the two arrows of time, lineal motions and cyclical clocks that carry the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles – masses and charges:
In the graph, the Equivalence principle of relativity means a mass is a vortex, m=(h/c2) ƒ, whose frequency gives us its attractive power as in any vortex. So top quarks must turn very fast in its spin cycles, reason why in classic science top quarks do not interact with the strong force, which is slower in its exchange of gluons.
Yet because they turn so fast in frequency as vortices of spacetime, they have much more mass: m=h/c² ƒ.
So they cannot interact with the strong force, but they can form an ultradense central region in the huge KerrNewman black rotating hole of the galactic center with a massive positive charge, producing those huge ‘superluminal’ jets akin to the superstrong magnetic force of pulsars; and they can interact with the gravitational force. And those 2 forces combined that reach the ‘electronlike’ halo of negative strangelets account for the huge force of attraction between the halo and the center of galaxies, which is the biggest mystery of physics today (dark matter missing), because electromagnetic forces are much stronger than gravitational, so the top quark positively charged magneticlike jets bring together strongly the negative halo and positive center.
Why a sound use of Einstein’s concept of masses as accelerated vortices of spacetime, extended to charges and particles, its components matter also to bigbang theory is obvious: because the expansion of entropic lineal dark energy between galaxies is PERFECTLY balanced by the implosion and collapse of dark energy into mass when arriving to those galaxies. So this give us NOT a single lineal bigbang but a balanced ‘fractal series’ of expanding space and imploding space creating particles within the galactic vortices.
This must be clear from the beginning: in physics, due to its error of lineal time and a single arrow of time for all systems of reality, the balance of gravitational vortices has disappeared when in fact there are infinite of such cyclical mass vortices, as they are also the basic cycles and forces of charges and particles and quantum physics.
What this means is that the ‘lineal bigbang’ is truly pseudoscience, because it MERELY eliminates 1/2 of the balanced Universe, so alas, indeed, in a Universe without mass, all is expanding entropic vacuum; as the balancing ‘cosmological constant and mass tensor of Einstein’s equations disssapear.
There are in that sense two models of the Universe in physics today, or rather one in the humind, and another which is not really a model, but reality itself, the fractal Universe, which means, a Universe made of ∞ SCALES of similar beings, where forms repeat in organic patterns, creating selfsimilar systems, of which 3 are paramount, from the human perspective, biological systems, evolved from molecules to cells to humans; social systems evolved from cells to humans to civilizations, and physical systems evolved from atoms to celestial bodies to galaxies; it is the fractal, scalar Universe with a new dimension of relative ‘scales’ of size in space, synchronized by the coinvariant speeds of its clocks of time, illustrated in the next graph. We shall then consider in this post, the ‘galatom’, the name we gave to galaxies, which evolve from the selfsimilar scales of atoms and galaxies, and maybe again into a hyperuniverse in which each galaxy is an atom, and vice versa, down within the atom, into a new islandgalaxy.
This can be disputed. What cannot due to the overwhelming experimental evidence and logic consistency, is the nonexistence of a single plane of spacetime, born in a bigbang of a single point of matter – a classic example of pseudoscience, which has become as always with pseudoscience, a pseudoreligious ‘dogma’…
The other model, is really a model, because it is not real, it is the bigbang, a lineal error of considering a single arrow of time… entropy.
So first we have to compare both models, and then once we discharge the Big Bang, introduce the 5D galatom and expand different parts of its ‘super organism’ in other posts.
TO STATE that basically the Bigbang is a reduced solution to the equations of 4D spacetime, the physical XX c. model of mathematical physics, evolved from Newtonian, absolute spacetime.
As such in the 5D model, with a new dimension of scale, which expresses itself in the similarity between the galaxy and the atom, the 4D model is a reduced solution, specifically, the entropic=death state of a single galatom… as we shall explain. Why the whole 5D is far larger and profound as the next graph shows:
Indeed, it follows immediately that if time is curved, and breaks timespace into closed conserved paths, time clocks are infinite as Leibniz and Einstein understood when he said ‘I seem to be the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’.
So the next step of our inquire from the absolute simplicity of ‘eidos’, the first idea or form of the platonic world – the closed path of a time clock, must be to order the multiplicity of those timespace clocks, and for that we need a new dimension of timespace and a metric equation that allow us to travel through it – its mathematical proof. Alas, that equation exists and it is astoundingly simple, and will allow us to order all the time clocks and enclosed ‘vital spaces=energies’ within them IN ∞ SCALES OF GROWING SPACE SIZE WITH SLOWER TIME SPEEDS THAT LAST TIME WORLDCYCLES OF FINITE DURATION.
As they order in ‘scales’ of spatial size, whose similar forms and properties open a new astounding wealth of laws of science hardly explored till this blog, as we are all timespace beings, who share certain common properties because we share the 5 Dimensions of spacetime. Laws that we shall call Dimensional Isomorphisms or ‘Ðisomorphisms’ (ab. Ð).
And in the same form we can prove the exxistence of a 4th dimension of death, from the point of view of those time cycles. Since any being we cannot last for ever repeating those cycles, and we cannot keep reproducing and evolving, because we are part of a larger, more perfect world, full of other beings doing worldcycles of existence, which will make us ‘fail’ in our search for eternity.
Indeed, we are arriving now to the fundamental reality:
‘An infinite tapestry of ensembles of the 3 organs of being, forming a superorganism in relative present space tracing worldcycles of existence with a finite duration in time.
Since there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, each of them breaking space into inner and outer regions. So there are also infinite spaces. And so the next big question is how to order them all? And for that we need a new dimension and a metric equation that can relate all the clocks of the Universe according to its speed or frequency of time cycles, and all the spaces they enclose according to its sizes. And this simple metric is the metric equation of the fifth dimension:
In the graph, the Universe organizes itself in coexisting scales of relative size in space and speed in its time clocks of information – a structural property that determines its organic nature, as those scales become symbiotic to each other, sharing through networks flows of energy and information.
This fractal organic nature of reality was intuitively understood by all philosophers of science, which from Aristotle to Leibniz and Einstein conceived a pan psychic vital Universe, and man made to its image and likeness. But science did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I discovered it in the milieu of system sciences, a metric equation of the scalar spacetime dimension of the Universe, applying it to the study of all systems, including human societies and machines – a task carried out in this blog. The metric equation of the fifth dimension of spacetime is simple as all spacetime metric are: S (size in space) x T (speed of time clocks) = Constant.
So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its information in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the coexisting scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms. It also allows systems to travel through its scales by growing in size, while diminishing in time speed, as we do from birth as a fast reproducing seminal cell which emerges with slower clocks as an organism, part of a superorganism, mother earth, which has even slower geological cycles.In the graph, the 3 ‘scales’ of size (ab. ∆±i) of the Universe:
 The ∆1 quantum microscopic scale, which humans chose to interpret WITH the egocentered copenhagen interpretation instead of the sound pilotwave theory.
 The ∆thermodynamic, human scale, which humans chose to interpret only with the arrow of ‘heat’, chaos and entropy, observed in his use of weapons and steam machines (Carnot, Count Rumford an artillery master, Helmothz), disregarding the arrow of ‘coldness’, which creates ‘information’ in crystal solid systems.
 The ∆+1 cosmological, gravitational scale, in which again, physicists ignored the arrow of information, provided by the attractiveonly gravitational force, which creates mass and balances the entropic bigbang of space between galaxies, a pattern observed from the first ‘treatises’ on military instruments of Galileo, also an artillery master, who will consider only the law of lineal inertia and lineal time.
All those scales (ab.∆±¡) are topologically similar, differentiated only by the ‘speed or frequency’ at which they close their ‘time§pace clocks’ (closed paths that ad a bit of informative frequency every time they repeat their cycle, according to a simple metric rule for most ‘families of time§pace clocks’: Size in space x Time frequency =constant.
As such we have an organic, fractal Universe with a 5th dimensional metric, Space Size x ðime frequency, which allows travel through it, opening a full new formalism to all sciences, which have not studied properly the information of those time clocks of different frequency and size as ‘an ecosystem with its own rule of laws, the laws of the fifth dimension of ‘informative speed’, as the herzian speed of time cycles are ruled by 5D metric:
We talk in fact of a Universe of super organisms, as each organism has an inner smaller ‘∆plane’ which creates its whole and is part of a larger world it helps to create.
And this scalar structure of organisms made of smaller organisms part of larger organisms and its ‘metric equations’ is what we call the fifth dimension of the scalar Universe, whose formal metric are essential to understand it all:
In the graph we see that simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension, poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature, once the ‘first phase of any new scientific paradigm’ (resistance of authority) crumbles by the sheer weight of facts explained by the new paradigm.
THE METRIC EQUATION OF THE FIFTH DIMENSION
Both parameters, spatial size and quantity of information can then be related by a simple Metric equation: Max. Spatial size = Min. speed of cyclical clocks of time that store its information in the for and speed of its cycles.
So a chip the smaller it is the faster it process information in its digital clockcycles. A particle, the smaller it is the faster it turns. So happens with a cosmic body. So black holes turn in the event horizon at light speed. A ray of light with higher frequency of information has smaller wave lengths, a planet closer to the sun turns faster; a smaller animal has faster metabolic rates.
In the graphs ‘5th dimension metric’ and its ‘Ðisomorphic’ laws apply to ALL PLANES of existence of reality, each one studied by a stience, according to size. We observe the main physical and SocioBiological Superorganisms of spacetime whose ternary ∆§±1 beings coexisting in 3 relative planes, the atomic, ∆1 (cellular, individual), ∆º:magnetic /thermodynamic, (organic or national in biological and social systems) and ∆+1 gravitational (ecosystemic or world in biological and social systems).
It is precisely the existence of a 5D metric what pegs those ternary planes together and allows its synchronicity and simultaneity as energy and information can travel between those scales according to the definition of a ‘spacetime’ dimension.
In that regard, NOT all planes of the Universe follow the same metric equations, but certain families of related species do, which allow their symbiosis and social evolution. So we can assess the existence of a super organism, like the galaxy or a biological organism, when the product of both parameters, time clocks and spatial size remains coinvariant in 3 relative ∆§±I scales – which will be ‘tighter’ form smaller systems, and as large as the whole range of perceived scales from the quantum potential (∆4) to the cosmos (∆+4) in the galaxy:
5D metric: $t x ðƒ=K
Where $t or $p are 2 alternative expressions for lineal distancespacepast, the simplest ‘information’ we obtain from any being; while ðƒ means temporal, cyclical future, information, measure by frequency. We latter will introduce more precise symbols, but the simplicity of those 2 terms, $p, ‘spatial lineal past’ and ðƒ cyclical, temporal future conveys the deepest simplest meaning of reality both in simultaneous space (S x T = K) and sequential time $p>ðƒ, as the arrow of future is dominant in information that forms a system inwards, warping it as ‘time curves space into mass’ (Einstein).
THE PREVIOUS EQUATION respects the definition of a ‘canonical equation of a dimension of spacetime’ which exists according to mathematicians like Klein precisely when the product of both parameters remains ‘coinvariant’, so a system can travel though it (as for example light does between scales with its specific metric or constant cspeed of reproduction of information).
Whereas K is a vital or Universal constant of ‘action’ that defines the coinvariance of the product of spatial entropy=extension and temporal information stored in the frequency of its time cycles in any system (metabolic constant in life beings; H, K and C quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational constants of action, entropy and motion in physics).
We cannot overextend in this introduction on the them of 5D metric, studied in other posts in more detail, but a few examples of biological and physical super organisms will suffice to observe the importance of this discovery.
First we already noticed that as smaller systems carry more information, in its faster cycles, smaller scales code larger ones, genes code organisms, humans code civilizations and quantum numbers called atomic systems.
Next we can observe a direct biological and physical example of the existence of such ‘phyla’ of related species, which follow a given 5D metric (in the fractal Universe by definition as Einstein noticed in physics all laws have a ‘local diffeomorphic symmetry’:
In the graph, the extraordinary capacity to explain the meaning of the fundamental laws of biological, physical and social systems (which we normally escape in the examples for sake of simplicity): animals accelerate their circadian and metabolic cycles as they become smaller, but the product of its volume in space and time clocks remains invariant.
So happens with planets who enclose a proportional volume of space with its orbital clocks, and any physical system, which accelerates its frequencies/temperatures/speeds but its ‘actions’ – the fundamental unit of physical systems, product its energy ‘volume’ and time ‘frequency’ remain constant.
Since due to such metric ‘coordination’, systems can coexist in 3 of such ‘scales’ of size, in symbiosis between its smaller parts with faster informative cycles (ab. ∆1) that code the ‘quantum, genetic or memetic’ information of larger physical, biological or social systems (∆º). While the larger scale, the whole commands in simultaneity the motions of smaller parts. And that symbiotic coexistence creates the ternary scalar structure of a spacetime super organism, enclosed in a larger ∆+1 world; proper of all ‘vital, fractal spacetimes’ of reality (ab. time§paœrganism, Œ).
How important is the metric equation of a system to describe it, will be shown as we study the details of different systems. In essence, the metric equation of a being in the 5th dimension will define its ‘existential forcemomentum’, its metabolic strength, its top predator status, its size in space and capacity to reproduce information in time.
This is indeed ultimately the meaning of the previous two ‘different’ metric equations and its whole ‘range’ of families of biological and cosmological bodies.
Consider for example, the most important superorganism we know of, the ‘GALATOM’, and its two parameters of form, the hspin constant and motion, the creproductive constant of information and its product, hc, which will define according to scale (wavelength), the specific systems of vital energy within the galatom that coexist in that organism: E=hc/λ.
In the future as quantum physics truly kicked out with that simple Einstein/Broglie equation, astrophysics will start defining the galatom as a superorganism, its metric 5D equation and two essential parameters, and deduce as we shall do when this work is finished (my worldcycle permitted) all the equations of physical systems, departing from those simple ‘parameters’ and its different variations in the 3 scales (quantum, thermodynamic and cosmological) of the galatom. In those timespace organisms the time clocks of the smaller ∆1 scale store the information of the system in the form and frequency of its cycles.
On the other hand, the larger whole, encloses within its membrane and synchronises with its internal ‘physiological networks or forces’, (biological, physical systems) the motions of the system in space. So we equate information with the static view of clock cycles. And motion with the dynamic view of spatial extension and consider that the structure of time and space is the origin of the entropic motions and informative bits of any system, which can be defined as a super organism of spacetime.
To DEFINE information, forminaction, cyclical motion, the essential second element of reality, we need now to define NOT the most complex worldycle of life, but the simplest one – a clock and why humans do not see time as all clocks do – in cyclical patterns.
Since there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, each of them breaking space into inner and outer regions. So there are also infinite spaces.
Superorganisms: Networks of TimeSpace scales.
Another very important way to understand the fifth dimension is to consider the internal relationship between the smaller parts and the larger slower wholes of all systems of nature. In simple terms, both together thanks to the synchronicities established by the 5th dimension metric form an organic network. And there are 3 ‘topological types of networks;’ corresponding to the 3 topologies of space we have explained, and then the fourth dimension from the upper whole to the smaller parts and the fifth dimension that makes emerge from the smaller parts, the social whole. So the fifth dimension encodes the social, organic properties of the Universe.
Let us now express it in terms of physiological networks, which in the organic paradigm are the right way to interpret the abstract concepts of modern topology, which build ‘topological forms’ as ‘networks of points’. In 5 D metric those abstract topological networks, merely mean that any form of the ∆øplane are made of smaller cellular/atomic/citizen ‘points’ that build the whole.
So besides the 3 space dimensions ≈ 3 time dimensions (seen as still in space, as moving in time) we do need to consider at least 2 more dimensions, one for the lower scales of the being, which we shall call the fourth dimension of absolute past and one for the upper dimension of the being of absolute future.
We do have then mathematical and verbal, logic mirrors to express those 5 dimensions of spacetime, the ultimate substances and unify with them ALL SCIENCES, departing from the properties of those dimensions its structures in space and travels in time, each ‘stience’ of spacetime studying an scale, including those who describe man.
Thus this is the Universe in a nutshell, repeated ad nauseam in all scales, and we shall repeat with kaleidoscopic variations the previous paragraphs to describe the thoughts of ‘god’, to make organic systems tracing world cycles, regardless of the huge details scientists have obtained so far.
So the organic paradigm has taken longer to be formalised, as we do in this blog, because it requires to ad to the motions in space studied by physicists, the arrow of information, of form, stored in the form and frequency of the clocks of time cycles of reality, which are along its lineal motions in space the two elements that conform all realities, by combining and integrating into ‘vital energy systems’.
Those 3 arrows spreading across different scales of size, which add 2 more spacetime dimensions of ‘wholes and parts’ to the mix, will allow us to describe all what exists as an organism of spacetime, the longseeked ‘sound organic philosophy of science’;
In all species studied by science a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single social form. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines, guided by financial networks of information (salaries, prices, costs); galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous, informative system.
A tree is a group of leaves, branches and roots connected by a network that provides energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles) to its cells. Cultures are made of humans related by verbal, informative isomorphisms and economic networks that provide their energy and information.
Stiences study those organic systems, tied up by networks of Ðimotions. In the graph, we see the main stplanes studied by human sciences and their 4 main time arrows, Sp x ðƒ, which in static space give birth to the ‘organic elements’ of all species: social cell of energy and information and the reproductive networks that relate them. Thus, there are 4 basic elements in all organic systems:
 Cellular units.
 Networks that move the system (limbs/potentials)
 Networks of fractal information (heads/particles).
 Networks that reproduce vital energy (body/waves)
So what we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased egocentered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept:
An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (bloodeconomic systemelectromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational informative forces). This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe.
Then, as all organisms wear out by errors of informative action and end up warped by an excess of information (third age of the organism) or killed and reconverted into formless energy (death); only those systems which have reproduced in the immortal Universe, do exist today. So all dual systems do have an internal system or external ‘enzymatic’ catalyzer of its reproduction (as enzymes do with carbohydrates, or enzymen with machines).
Thus we talk of the third ‘bodyworkerwave’ element, besides an informative particleheadupper class and a limbic/potential/territorial source of its motions which the system uses internally or externally to reproduce. This IS our definition of an organism. And so a factory is an organism, when we put the human enzymen, even if the machine alone is not
As a machine is ‘obviously’, an organism of metal fast evolving through the customary ages of all organisms – in the XIX c. ‘enzymen’, who catalyze their evolution did its bodies of metal, then its heartsengines, in the II Industrial evolution, then its metalminds in the XX c. and now in the Industrial r=evolution 4.0 put them together in organic robots.
So mechanicism, the underlying philosophy of science, is just a simplex version of organicism. It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms:
In the graph, evolving machines can also be modeled with the concept of an organism.
Such model is vastly more explanative of reality than the mechanical abstract models dominant in the tradition of physical sciences for a few basic reasons:
 Only an organism replicates itself without the concourse of a ‘maker of the machine’ – God in the earlier physicists’ view, now obsolete. As machines do not reproduce.
 Only the definition of time as the substance of reality – cyclical motion that reproduces form allows the Universe to move, as only if motion=time is the ultimate substance the Universe never stops.
 Only if it is cyclical, repetitive, there are laws of science which are precisely those repetitive motions.
 Finally we know since Relativity that there are infinite clocks of time with different speeds (we knew it always just looking at the clocks of nature, but the expansion of physicists’ way of measuring all time clocks equalised to the rhythms of the mechanical clock, had obscured those facts.
Of course if we want just to ‘measure’ from a human point of view, those rhythms, a single mechanical standard of time, the second can study those cycles, and a single line that ads ‘cycles’ pegging them can represent the time duration of a being, but we loose its meaning, its form, its information. And if we want to make a complex analysis of the whys and repetitive patterns, and organisation of those patterns we won’t be able to do it.
5 ÐIMOTIONS= DIMENSIONS OF SPACE + MOTIONS OF TIME
‘Time without space is a mere shadow’ Minkowski, on the S≈T symmetry of all beings.
“Space=form is the mental perception of motion=Time in stillness’
Paradox of Galileo & Einstein’s Relativity: minds cannot measure both motion and form together.
We are now able to study time and space together, which is the natural next step to fully grasp the structure of the Universe, its fundamental particle in space, the super organism, and its fundamental event in time, the world cycle of life and death. To that aim we must introduce the key concept of relational spacetime, a ‘DIMOTION’ of spacetime, that is a dimension of space that has a motion and a function in time.
A UNIVERSE MADE OF TOPOLOGIC SPACE BEINGS…
We saw in the first discovery of relational spacetime that systems were made of TOPOLOGIES, that is geometrical forms of space with internal motion in time=change, and defined time=motion=change and space=form, as the two parameters of reality.
Yet we CANNOT distinguish really when a system moves in relationship to other, and this paradox, observed first by Galileo is the origin of ‘relativity physics’, which finally figured out how to measure the relative motion of two beings, one that seems still and the other moving, but philosophically has never been clearly resolved. Since the big question is WHY we perceive mentally, form, stillness, when all is really moving? Why we perceive a being either as spaceform or as timemotion, but not both things together? The answer implicit in all modern physics is that actually the being is both in motion and has form. And so it must coexist at two levels or ‘scales’ one with form, we shall call the whole, and one with motion, we shall call its parts; and those scalar levels of reality will then form a new dimension of scalar spacetime. Let us study those concepts in more depth.
Galileo’s paradox: meaning of dimensions and motions.
The first truth to understand about the Universe is that a motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space. This was what Galileo found since we see still the Earth and flat but it is round and moving.
History of science took however the wrong path, when he affirmed that the Earth moved, without dealing with the true question poised by Copernicus discovery: Why if the Earth moves in time, we see it as a still form in space? Reality is a constant game of infinite motions, but the mind focus in stillness those motions, and measures them at distances. So motion is for the mind relative to its systems of measure and perception, which are lightbased. What physicists do was to substitute the still distances for motions, and it took another 300 years for Einstein to realize the relativity of motion and its measure made essentially time and space, motion and form two sides of the same coin. But this realization was not explored philosophically and so it gave birth to a series of illunderstood dualities between ‘states of measure and form’ (particles, head gauging form, information) and ‘states of motion’ (wave states). It is then essential to grasp that motion and form coexist as two different states depending on which scale of the fifth dimension we study.
Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night a light it seems a long distance. Distance and motion CANNOT BE distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a Space=time ÐIMOTION (ab. Dimensional Motion):
S= T; DimensionDistance = Timemotion = ST Ðimotion:
Space and time is ultimately a logic concept which huminds (ab. human minds) describe with logic=temporal and mathematical=spatial languages, corresponding to the two ‘states’ of reality, spatial still form and temporal motion. Look around you all what you see are motions with form, 2 simple elements whose variations will make up reality. But as motion dominates form, the Universe is not only immortal but a repetitive fractal, because all what it needs to ‘repeat itself’ is to make motions repeat its forms. How many motions there are, how motions become still form, and the way those ‘dimotions’ (dimensions of form with motion) ensemble to create the worldcycles of existence of each being, become then the key elements to consider a study of reality in its first principles, which physicists have reduced to one, motion and within motion=change in time, to one form: locomotion.
Indeed, Physicists discovered on the path of Aristotle and other genius that the essence of reality is motion. In fact, when Copernicus proved the Earth was moving, he started modern science, or rather modern physics as the study of the different motions of beings. To that aim they establish a simple formula: V=s/t to study a simple form of motion=change, locomotion. So they use 3 coordinates to map space and one ‘flow’ of motion to map out time. And established some principles of ‘relativity’ (to distinguish motion from still form) and defined an entity as one that ‘traces a worldline’ of motions through its entire ‘existence’.
Till here it is fine, but on close look, what physicists did was to reduce all the time=motions of the Universe to one, locomotion, and all the scales of size in space, to one scale that of human beings, to make its measures and simply the existence of beings as a mere series of locomotions, which do not account for the entire range of change processes happening in all systems of nature. Once we introduce all other manners of change=motion and fully upgrade our understanding of dimensions and the ‘Galilean paradox’ (the fact that minds perceive motion as still form), we will have a much more complex landscape of motions, dimensions and its ‘steps’ TO BE ABLE to make sense of the previous sentence and reach a longsought goal of science – to describe that seemingly nebulous concept of existence as both a quantifiable and a logic process born of the different sequences and combined motions of all beings of reality.
We said that all dimensions of space have a hidden motion to them. This again was slowly realized in mathematics, as they finally came to the conclusion that the still Geometry of the Greeks was part of a much vaster, generalized concept, a topological variety, where a topology as opposed to a geometry had internal motionchange. So while you could describe the dimensions of a being in an external locomotion without inner change, the internal change in the information of beings, we have started with MUST BE A TOPOLOGICAL VARIETY.
So there is NOT really a Dimension or a motion but a combination of both, even if mentally we tend to reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form=space, and this is truly the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into DIMOTIONS.
Even Information must be transmited through motion, it is a forminaction – a topological Ðimotion of spacetime. It has a content of space=form, we shall call in ceteris paribus (isolated) analysis, a dimension, and it has a content of timemotion, we shall call in ceteris paribus analysis ‘states, functions or ages of time’.
Such paradox in which so much literature have been ‘wasted’ by lack of clear thought; is the foundation of modern science, namely the principles in which Physics are based: Relativity conservation of motionenergy and information and symmetry, between both, S=T, principles derived of THE NATURE OF SPACE AND TIME.
Next then we must inquire how many ‘combined dimensions of spacetime’ there is?
We have already localized ‘3 topological spacetime dimensions’, or rather ‘bidimotions’, as they have both space and time, and indeed, the 3 topologies we observed in all beings are ‘bidimensional’. So a first principle deduced from them is the ‘holographic principle’: reality IS bidimensional made of space and time bidimensional forms.
So we can build reality with the 3 combined dimensions of space and its motions in time, we shall call ÐIMOTIONS or actions of spacetime:
In the graph, a first hint to how the 3 ‘vital dimensions of spacetime’ ensemble into parts and organic wholes in all physical, biological and social systems; since there are only 3 topological forms (geometries with motion) in the Universe.
So evolutionary topology BECOMES a new key discipline to understand how the forms of species evolve as ensembles of the 3 ‘form of space & functions of time that define 3 topological varieties of spacetime in all the fractal organisms of the Universe made of lineal maximal motionsfunctions (limbs/potentials), maximal informative storing (spherical heads/particles) and its iterative, hyperbolic combinations (bodywaves); which is the dominant element of the organism as it embodies the iterative, ‘present’ discontinuous reproduction of all the parts of the being that defines the immortality of the ‘information’ it stores, and the essence of any ‘fractal’ – essentially a reproductive system
So we talk in fact of 3 topologies of space=form +time=motion that will define in vital formal and moving terms all entities in existence.
And so in a single plane of reality, we perceive systems as ensembles of the 3 varieties of space, (to which we soon will add the 2 scalar dimensions of entropic parts, and social wholes).
Moreover as topology is form with motion, topology ARE spacetime Dimensions.
But now we have 2 problems to resolve. On one side if there are infinite beings made of finite vital space and time clocks, how can we order them? It seems we have a messy puzzle in our hands.
And then we are not ‘still done’ because we need to know how those beings are ‘created’ and why they ‘die’, that is, what makes their time finite also finite.
And as it turns out this will require to add two more dimotions to the topological 3 dimotions we shall study so far; one we shall call entropy or 4 Dimotion of spacetime, which is the one physicists acknowledge, and is equivalent to the death and dissolution of beings; and its inverse dimotion, we shall call the fifth dimension, of social evolution of parts into wholes, which is the organic dimension of reality, for reason unknown to me, is denied stubbornly by most scientists in all its disciplines.
WORLDCYCLE OF EXIST¡ENCE: TRAVELS THROUGH 5D
How we do know the 5th dimension exists? Perhaps the real question is the inverse: how it is possible that humans have not yet formalized the fifth dimension till the work of this writer at the turn of the century and even then have ignored it, when the entire process of scientific thought has been about reaching new scales of the fifth dimension, since Galileo looked upwards with his telescope and Leeuwenhoek used a microscope and found those little beings coexisting and moving faster in the water drop, where they were not seen at first glance? I wonder… often about the so called human ingenuity.
In any case being ‘scientific’, mathematically a dimension was defined by Klein, as a ‘spacetime metric system’ or equation, in which any being could travel through. And he defined a travel through a spacetime dimension as a process in which the spacetime parameters of the being remain COINVARIANT, that is they did NOT change together.
And this is exactly how we have defined the fifth dimension. So for the fifth dimension of scalar space and infinite time clocks to exist we must somehow being able to travel through it and yet after the trip, our spacetime parameters must remain coinvariant. Yet since we have defined the fifth dimension as one of size in space and speed of time clocks it merely means that all systems of nature MUST be able to GROW or DIMINISH in size in space and at the same time in inverse fashion, DIMINISH in the speed of its processes or ACCELERATE THEM. And that is exactly what happens in all beings from birth to extinction. All beings are born in a small scale as a seminal seed that has a much faster metabolic rate in its cycles of energy and information from particles to semen to cells to black holes and then they grow very fast, but slow down their metabolic rate as they become larger finally emerging from its fetal state to its whole organic form.
And then they get old, as they increase their information and die accelerating again but in a negative inverse fashion the travel of life in the process of death which extremely fast explodes the being back to its elementary smaller parts that free again will restart its faster cycles.
The result is a complex process of change closer to what we perceive happening to all kind of beings, which we shall call a ‘worldcycle’, not a ‘worldline’, as ‘two dimensions of time’ will now define a ‘cycle’, not a line for all beings who experience a ‘travel through the fifth dimension’ of scalar size and topological, morphological change, from birth to extinction.
5 Ðimotional beings, are complex entities that travel through the 5 dimensions of spacetime, as they move through it, tracing worldcycles of exist¡ence. Such a simple game of Ðimotional beings, can be observed from many perspectives, in an entagled Universe, in which can at least observe constantly those 5 Ðimotions, Social Generation, entropic death, locomotion, reproduction and gauging of information,
Alas we can break our concept of internal change more properly in 3 ‘topological variations’, we shall call the 3 ‘first dimotions’ of the Universe.
And so the fact that we are made of spacetime means ultimately we are made of 3 type of organic topological dimotions – and we say organic because as it will turn out all systems of life are made of ensembles of those 3 topological dimotions. And this justifies our concept of ‘relational vital spacetime beings’ that is beings made of spacetime with motion. Since as Aristotle put it – when things move they are alive. Welcome then to the study of ‘vital spacetime’.
Indeed, all what you see are forms of space with motion in time that combine into the infinite energy beings of the Universe.
And while physicists have reached an extraordinary dexterity calculating the motions in space of beings; only when we ad those other type of motions=changes in spacetime we understand how they transform and evolve through generation into new forms of information. This is the basis of the formal model of this blog, the ‘eternal philosophy of science’, we call ‘organicism’, which understands the Universe as a system that reproduces information.
It is its simplest spatial view, which we shall made soon more complex adding it its timemotionsfunctions and scales generated by the minds that perceive in the singularity a still mapping of the whole with a language that perceives in itself.
So we can generate and mirror all the systems in space, made of ensembles of those 3 adjacent forms/functions we shall call spacetime organisms with them.
We shall write THE TERNARY topology also in many ways and make it increasingly complex as we study different dimensions of ‘form’ and ‘motion’, of ‘space’ and ‘time’. But in its simplest mode is the most extraordinary simplex equation of them all: $≈ð; whereas S is the limbic system, T, the particlehead with its clocks of information and ≈ the bodywave that iterates and puts together both.
We can now reconsider the sentence that opened this post, ‘existence is a travel through the metric steps of the 5th dimension’… once we have define the ‘metric equation’ of this eternal dimension of exist¡ence. So we can remind the reader that a ‘dimension’ exist according to Klein, when we can find a ‘metric equation’, in which motions in spacetime are ‘coinvariant’, meaning its product is constant.
Different forms of expressing the 5 dimotions: worldcycles in sequential time – actions in spacetime scales, supeorganisms in space.
How to study the Universe of superorganisms tracing worldcycles is simple:
When you order those dimotions in time sequence you get a world cycle, when you order those dimotions in space you obtain a super organism; when you order those dimotions in timespace scales you get the 5 vital actions of existence.
This sentence IN italic IS PERHAPS the most important sentence of the whole blog – the ORDER of reality that transcends for mere time clockcycles and spatial forms into THE COMPLEX REALITY we see, including us.
As we have studied them in ‘space’ as super organisms – albeit at the minimal level of depth, we shall now introduce them in sequential order as world cycles of existence, and then in its scalar interaction as ‘vital actions’ that develop a common program of survival, driven by informative dimotions, which also explain why we age, accumulating an excess of form, of information, wrinkling and warping (biological and physical systems) due to the excess of ‘dimotions’ of information (perception, reproduction, social evolution of parts into wholes).
Now the importance of having a metric equation that leaves coinvariant a motion through its parameters of spacetime, is that we can ‘travel’ across this dimension. Indeed, the mathematician Klein defined the existence of a dimension of spacetime, when we could formulate a coinvariant equation left unchanged when we move through the spacetime dimension. So how we travel through the fifth dimension? Obviously by growing in size in space through the process of reproduction and evolution, from an ∆1 fast seed of information, emerging, as a larger whole with slower time clocks, in the organic level, which itself is part of a larger world, with slower ‘deep time’ geological and cultural cycles.
SIMULTANEOUS SUPŒRGANISMS IN SPACE, SCALAR ACTIONS & SEQUENTIAL WORLDCYCLES.
Existence as a travel through the fifth dimension.
In the graph, the game of existence for different beings that change through 3 similar ages between its evolutionary generation in a lower ‘plane’ (ab. ∆) of the fifth dimension as an ∆1 seed to emerge as an ∆o organism in an ∆+1 world in which it will go through a process of ‘aging’ (accumulation of information) that will finally exhausts its energy and dissolve its information in an entropic process of death. The sequential order of all spacetime organisms defines then a worldcycle of existence – not only a simple worldline of locomotions as physicists think, but a far more rich and complex pattern common to all beings that ‘exist’, from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy.
They all trace ultimately in the ¡logic of entangled 5Ðimotions, the same world cycle of exist¡ence, where ¡ defines the scale in which the system resides, between all of the main super organisms of the Universe, both biological, sociological (800 civilizations) which follow the same ages of human beings, expressed in its subconscious collective art, albeit at a slower decametric scale and physical worldcycles, from states of matter, to galactic ages to the whole cyclical hypothetical bigbang of a larger hyper universe scale.
Since the existence of all those super organisms is indeed a world cycle journey through 3 different, ¡±1 scales of the fifth dimension.In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the 3±1 ages of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±∆1 change=time:
+1: Conception: ruled by the fifth dimension of generation, palingenesis and social evolution, as a microorganism or cell transcends into a macroorganism, organized by social networks: ∫T.
1st age: Youth or Age of lineal ‘$t’ motions.
2nd age: of energy that reproduces information and iterates the system, symbolized by, ∑e ∏i.
3rd age: All motion & energy becomes form, information, exhausting itself; symbolized by §ð.
1:Death: The inverse of conception when the superorganism dissolves back into cells: ∂S, or age of entropy.
In the graph we describe that law of 3±1 ages, cycles, or horizons of evolutions for the fundamental species of reality.
To understand that ternary structure of time in depth, we have to recall the Law of Complementarity between energy and information: all systems are made with a body/field of energy and a head/particle of information. The is the basis of quantum physics. And in the second age when existence reaches its plenitude it is precisely when ‘information’ imprints energy and reproduces the system: ∑e, x ∏i.
So those 2 elements are the essential forms of any system.
While the potentials/limbs can be external. In simple animals limbs regenerate…
Further on, since form is made with motion, all events must start with an amount of ‘simple’ motion that transforms itself into still form, information. Then, when all motion is consumed, warped into information, death reverses its cycle.
Yet in the middle of that cycle, when information and motion are in balance, to preserve the ‘biologic’ form created in that process, the system achieves its reproduction, through ‘hyperbolic energy’.
So between the ∆±1 processes of social evolution (generation and emergence into a higher plane) and entropy (death and dissolution back to ∆1), in a single plane of existence we can describe reality just with the 3 canonical topological planes (bidimensional parts: flat limbs, hyperbolic bodywaves and spherical particleheads), whose topological forms best suit its functions.
Yet for the full description we need the ∆±1 seminal reproduction and entropic generation and death.
The most important as in all fractals, vital or mathematical is obviously reproduction, imposed by survival:
So the ‘offspring’ of the being will carry on its information into the future.
Information never disappears as it always recreates itself. And since all is motion by the mere fact that time moves with form, by the mere fact that momentumenergy is conserved memorial reproduction of cyclical forms ‘happens’ In fact science is nothing but the recollection in human languages of those memorial reproductions, which become repetitive ‘laws of science’.
All beings, from fundamental particles, (electrons and quarks) to human beings and life species, reproduce or are reproduced by more complex systems, when they have extraenergy to imprint its information. Since forms that do not reproduce, die away and become extinct.
So even those deconstructed beings that cannot reproduce alone are reproduced by other species. For example, cells reproduce carbohydrates, galaxies reproduce stars and human reproduce machines in factories.
Thus, we talk of 3±1 drives of live, arrows or ages of existence in all systems: the drive for limb motion body energy, the drive for information, the drive for reproduction and the drive of social d=evolution (birth and death of a macroorganism).
Whereas the 3±1 ages of Organic Time are merely the order in which those 3±1 drives ‘accumulate’ during the life/death cycle of any species, sequentially.
If we put them in adjacent spatial forms, through 3 scales of ∆1 atomic/cellular/ individual, ∆ø organic/thermodynamic/social, ∆+1 cosmological/geological/national planes, we get a super organism of fractal space.
But all those ‘organisms’, with 3 ‘topological networks’, extending in 3 relative ‘scales’ of size, when we observe their ‘existence’, turn out to follow always the same ‘generational pattern’, with 3 ages dominated sequentially by the ‘moving’ network or youth, the ‘reproductive network’ in its mature age, followed by the informative network in its 3rd age…
So we talk of 3 ‘motions in time’, ‘parallel’ to the 3 topological dimensions of space.
The young locomotion of limbs, the mature reproductive motion of bodywaves and the informative gauging perception of particleheads. And since all dimensions correspond to a motion we talk of 3 ‘dimensional motions’ or ‘Dimotions’ of spacetime, which conform a being in space and time, giving origin to ‘ternary topological beings’ constructed around the ‘messing’ of those 3 networks, the ‘moving’ lineal potentials/limbs network that maximize motion, as the line is the shortest distance’the hyperbolic re=productive bodywave network that maximizes iteration and its spherical particlehead the form that can store (and gauge) more information, guiding the system, giving us a ‘first look’ to the ‘fractal generator’ of spacetime organisms:
Γst: $limb/potentials<Øbodywaves>Oparticle/heads
Let us then conclude this fast review of the main elements of ‘existence’, and its superorganisms in space and worldcycles in time, managed by a singular mind that stops time into information, with a few classic examplex of those…
WORLDCYCLES IN PHYSIC, BIOLOGIC & SOCIOLOGIC SYSTEMS
In the graphs, we illustrate those 3±1 ages with a few universal examples, also from social sciences: we see the process in individual human beings, in art, the collective brain of a culture; in matter, where those ages are called the states of matter – energetic gas, reproductive liquid and informative solid. Let us then consider some aspects of the world cycle of the 3 different systems we study, physical, biologic and sociologic (mirrored properly by the ternary syntax of all languages in mind systems):
The overlapping generational waves are essential to the study of the interaction between space populations and time ages. And they define the aging of all systems, with different variations.
Physical systems: Galactic worldcycles.
For example light appears always first as a blue, high frequency byproduct of the creation of stars, which will become increasingly red with lesser energy in a star world cycle mimicked by light of about ±10¹¹ years – likely not only the worldcycle of life of stars but of light itself (solving the horizon problem). So we observe in light from an initial youth of maximal energymotion at faster timespeeds=energy content a constant relaxation that oblige us to reconsider the ‘theory of tiredness’ of light, latter studied when considering how to interpret the Big Bang in 5D.
Finally stars, past the, that ‘thin red line’, evolve from an age of energy into an informative age as black holes with no light at all.
So do galaxies that evolve from energetic nebulae into Black Holes, which explode into quasars. Finally, if the network of galaxies we call the Universe was truly born from a first seed of matter that fed and reproduced its form in the energy of the vacuum; it will go through 3±1 selfsimilar ages described by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s Spacetime equations. Since all in the Universe is a game of ‘3’ dimensions or ages of time: past, the age of energy, present, the reproductive age in which all systems repeat themselves to keep their ‘present form’ beyond death and a 3rd age, when all energy is exhausted, transformed into form, information:
Informative galaxies balance entropic dark energy, when we apply the laws of the scientific method, WITHOUT REDUCTIONISM OF THE ELEMENTS OF REALITY.
Thus WE CONSIDER, as bigbang theorists do (limiting time to a single entropy arrow, limiting space to a continuous spacetime, limited to study ONLY interstellar space and discharge implosive galactic vortices), the Universe is eternal and bigbangs are likely only galactic bigbangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.
What bigbang theories miss is the ‘fractal structure of the Universe’, which allows it to wobble – that is while entropic intergalactic space expands, and they got it right with its equations, AS THE SPACETIME of the Universe is fractal, this is compensated by the implosive, informative only attractive gravitational warping of galaxies towards central black holes. So the world cycle of galaxies compensates the entropic death of quasars. In the next graph we see the ‘missed’ 3 ages of lifedeath of galaxies into dark, heavy dense matter, which shrinks the Universe.
The study of that process of creation and dissolution of complex structures, however, cannot be made with translational time, (v=S/T), the realm of physics, but it needs to understand biological, morphological time – the life/death cycle and its 3±1 ages. Those ages explain precisely what physicists, stuck in the study of time as movement in space, will never understand: the meaning of the life and death cycle that creates and extinguishes humans, societies (superorganisms of human beings) and all kind of beings that exist in space and time.
In the graph we can see the fundamental cycle origin of all the elements of the galatom – the cycle of its black holes, which are the ‘organic ‘DNA” of the galaxy in its organic view as a ‘gala cell’… As it has both ‘coexisting organic properties’, numerical scalar ones, and topologic and causal, spacetime properties described with different languages of the humind mirror.
Let us start then with a very brief conceptualization on how the Universe looks when we ad a new dimension of internal time=change or arrow of information, of change in form, or ‘morphogenesis’, to the arrow of external time=change or translation in space, of locomotion and entropy, the one one studied by Physicists.
We shall consider of all those 3 ages of systems and its world cycles and superorganisms, the one of the Universe. In a more evolved world of stience, this would not be the most important stience, as all scales are relative and we observe closer the human scale – so man as the measure of all things, as the most perfect supœrganism would matter more than matter.
Simple Harmonic motions.
In the other extreme of particles and matter systems, the commonest world cycles are those of particles, which end their lives as ‘mesons’ and antiparticles that travel to the past (jumping over the nonexistent moment of death), exploding in a Big Bang of energy, a theme treated in the fourth line, where we shall show in terms of mathematical physics, why SU3 groups are dimotions on the arrow of life (color ages in particles, etc.) while SU2 groups are death processes in the fast inverted arrow of future to past (mesons, etc.), and translate the main tools of mathematical physics (Group theory, Symmetry)…
Easier to understand though are the other pervasive world cycle of physics: simple harmonic motions, which is perhaps the commonest, simplest form to explain a world cycle in a physical system, whereas a form displaced from its point of balance by a force F=kx, will return to its balanced position in a series of ‘diminishing energy cycles’ till energy is exhausted and the motion stops in its initial zerosum point, unless the force applied is so extreme that stresses the system and ‘breaks it entropically’, in its extreme points.
And so the fundamental question we shall resolve among many others of a deep study of the fifth dimension is why we LIVE and DIE, why we change the internal form of beings, and why this change is so similar, sequential, in all species of reality, as all of them are born, grow, then wrinkle, warp, acquire too much form, information and explode=die, erasing that information, in what we call the ‘wordcycle’ of existence. The mathematical answer we shall find soon, once we lay down the ‘metric equations’ and basic concepts within the analysis of the 5 dimensions of time space summarizes in a single sentence the enormity of all what exists, its whys and purpose:
‘Exist¡ence is a travel through Metric STeps of the fifth dimension’:
And that is all what there is to it: 5 dimotions ordered in time as sequential world cycles, in scalar ∆±1 space as super organisms.
In a young first age, motion is more abundant. In the mature age of balance, the species reproduces, combining motion and form, into hyperbolic bodywaves of energy (max. motion, minimal form) and information (form in action, maximal form, minimal motion).
In the third age of the species, energy is scarce but information is abundant, accumulated in the first ages till it becomes PURE FORM, and then explodes back into PURE motion, in the entropic moment of death.
When considering the minimal unit of each entity of reality we talk of Dimotions or actions across scales of the fifth dimension, as the system absorbs information and energy from lower scales trying to interact with the larger planes to reproduce and evolve socially. Ðimotions thus become synonymous of actions.
We perceive Ðimotions externally. They are internally actions for the being in exist¡ence.
We use 5 terms for the same event according to the ‘entangled principles of the Universe’ which make a ternary ‘minimum’ ¡logic view necessary to absorb in present spacetime a minimal amount of truth on the being.
Dimensions, Motions, Ðimotions, Åctions & ±∆¡motions, which express the concept of Dimotion from different perspectives, being obviously ∆imotion, the scalar perspective, Åctions, the Omind perspective and Dimotions the external, entropic, all gathering perspective; Dimensions the spatial perspective and Motions the time perspective.
The most important of those visions is the internal åctions; and further on, the only nontestable element beyond the mind: the sensations which seem to form the ultimate will of existence, as even humans have been tested to act subconsciously the ‘program of survival’ through sensations of pain, pleasure, etc.
THE UNIVERSE REINFORCES THE PROGRAM OF THE 5 ARROWS OF TIME with SENSATIONS the ultimate program and as it prefers information to motion, we prefer to love (ARROW of eusocial evolution) to orgasm (arrow of reproduction) to perceive (arrow of information) than to run (arrow of motion) and to kill (arrow of energy feeding).
Yet they ARE also the 5 Dimotions of quantum particles, both quarks and electrons, ‘expressed’ by the 4 quantum numbers that code each one, a dimotion of spacetime as the attached graph shows:
In the graph the minimal units of our Universe NonE particle points gauge information, feed on energy absorbing other particles, to reproduce with that energy by decoupling new particles, which evolve socially by ‘gender complementarity’ or ‘social evolution’ guided by magnetic forces into larger, ‘atomic wholes’, which then evolve further into new scales called molecules, states of matter, organic cells, ecosystems, geological formations, planets, global societies, solar systems and galaxies, whose metric equation is similar to that of an atom starting an entire new game of ∆§cales.
Of course, quantum numbers are much more than the Dimotions of particles; though we shall explain the entangled ¡logic of reality that allows so many roles for each ‘constant ratio of nature), latter on. To notice here that another kaleidoscopic view of them will relate the Principal number to the ‘vital energy’, enclosed by a formal, angular momentum membrane (described obviously by its l number); while the third element, its singularity, is given by the ‘contracted’ spin in the quantum scale (itself related to the mass that plays the same role in the cosmological scale). Finally as in light where colors form the fourth social element, magnetic numbers plays the social element in quantum physics. So as in light each quantum number described both, THE SPATIAL, formal view of the 3±¡ elements of the being and the motion view, its functions.
As we move through the Universe, in 5Ðimotional S≤≥T«eps, life becomes a travel through the fifth dimension.
How we move are by parts and scales. Steps can be maintaining the same position, S=S , T=T, or changing , S< T, TSTT… and so on, the number of variations of motion which will be when observed in simultaneous topological form, as space, a superorganism of a different entangled variety is in excess.
It is for that reason closely related to ‘energy’ (rather than entropy also two very confused terminologies as they arose from pure mathematical disquisitions (Carnot cycles, work theory) and we shall clarify in detail in other posts, as energy is motion with a little form and information form with a little motion, and both come together E=I when a system merges and reproduces.
So both information and energy are the two sides of the 3rd Dimotion, while pure form is a mental linguistic image with zero entropy and pure entropy is an scattering disorder, measured in mathematical terms at the ∆1 scale of ‘all potential future orders’ a microcosms with no form can give birth to… Hence the definition of entropy in statistical mechanics will be more precise and accurate than the concept of thermodynamics in the ¡o scale, which is closer to the proper definition of vital energy – not surprisingly Entropy was a word chosen on purpose for its similarity to energy; and it can be equated to the ‘vital feeding formless energy the system will imprint with information to shape its 3 ‘present Ðimotions’.
We will obviously clarify conceptually all the main equations of thermodynamics in the more detailed posts of the 4th line; as the beauty of mathematical physics, when the concepts are properly understood grows enormously – (beauty being in any case S=T, the sense of proportion reached when form and motion merge in equal parts).
It is between those limits of absolute motion, or proper concept of entropy as the potential vacuum that might give birth to all particles and inversely the being dying, expanding in space and destroying the formal, physiological networks that order it and absolute mental, linguistic, social form, ‘perceived in the stillness of an infinitesimal mind with no space’, (5th dimotion), where through combination of ‘motion and form’, a system builds its 3 adjacent organic topologies that ensure its survival, structuring all the beings of reality. So we shall be able to explain all entities and events as a combination of those 5 Ðimotions of spacetime:
The Universe is organic; man needs to feel above and will have none of it.
The conclusion is obvious: The problem is NOT the organic Universe but the ego of man, as we repeat everywhere in this blog.
Where the whys are not explained unless we accept the ‘creationist religion of mathematics and reduce the Universe to a mechanical magic behaviour, which suits the ‘ego’ of humans but halts as it has been the case our comprehension of the UNiverse.
Yet why we die? The answer is obvious: because the system is ‘owned’, directed, by the linguistic, still, spatial mind that absorbs and directs the motion of its bodywaves till exhausting, warping its energy into pure form. And then the system turns back to the past and explodes in entropy, dissolving the memorial tail of information accumulated in the particlemind.
So all what we have said would be meaningless if we do not introduce the fundamental and most elusive, certainly impossible to describe with the limiting sensorial elements of human and mechanical systems, central point of the whole, the mind or language or still spatial creator point where motion fluxes and stops… life into… egocy:
THE @MIND
‘Quidquid ab immobili causa manat mutabilem habet essentiam. Quidquid vero a mobili causa manat essentiam habet immutabilem. ‘ l§ Correcting Proclus
Proclus, a classic philosopher affirmed what seems obvious to all – that everything caused by a nonmoving form must be immutable, and all what is cause by a moving cause must be mutable. Besides going to the point – it is all about motion and form, momentum and position would say a modern scientist the paradoxical nature of the virtual mind that reduces the motions of reality to fit within the limited ‘space’ of its mental, linguistic brain, a static image of reality – cause of the paradox of Galileo: we see the Earth still in the mind but it moves – makes truth the opposite paradox:
What we see as immobile form is a virtual mind image, mutable as a Maya of the senses. Since form is in the imagination. On the other hand, because space is just a moment of the flow of time, made static in the mind, the ultimate substance of reality is motion. And so what is truly immutable, that is, immortal is motion not form. So welcome to the paradoxes of the mind and its virtual ‘spaces’.
All this said it becomes increasingly evident that the key element of reality is the less perceived: the mind that stops motion into form, mapping out intelligently through languages of perception, the reality external to the being, and controlling internally the motions and evolutions of the system. And ultimately killing=warping=aging the being as it slows down its motions into information.
The equation of the ego.
Modern science started when Descartes defined the ego as the essence of the human being:
Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.
The paradox of the Ego IS IN THAT SENSE rooted in the selfcentered structure of the mind, which selects information from its selfcentred point of view, creating, in the mind an infinitesimal mindmappings of reality – which then IT CONFUSES WITH THE WHOLE UNIVERSE:
So the mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0point, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of SPACEðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.
0linguistic mind x ∞ spacetime cycles of the Universe = Constant World mapping of reality, with the mind at its centre.
In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant; that is the infinite information of the Universe, multiplied by the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we extract all the properties that are not interesting to us and our selfcentred view.
So the first to go are the MOTIONS of other entities, which is what makes them feel alive. Indeed, Science started when Galileo realized the mind stopped the motion of the earth, but the Earth MOVES: e pur si muove he said and Galilean Relativity latter expanded by Einstein gave birth to physics.
Next, of course, they eliminate ALL THE OTHER egos, and sentient points of view, so only we are intelligent. And animals perhaps and only recently. But our atoms are NOT different, so the sentient pan psychic universe likely IS already thinking in any atom, as all reproduce particles, gauge information, evolve socially with magnetic fields. But we JUST reduce minds to ours.
And this is the origin of the paradox of the ego, as from a perspective which is blind to all the motions and vital perception of other beings, as from our perspective, NOTHING THINKS AND from our perspective we see our own nose bigger than Andromeda. So reality becomes deformed, inert, and the ego becomes the center of the Universe, as always happened with humans who thought first the earth in its center, then chosen of god, the creator, who spoke our language, and finally debased all living entities reducing them ‘to spatial forms’ in the still mapping of the mind, which stops all motions to fit a reduced image of reality.
So we express verbally the ego paradox, as the ‘ego believes its still mind mapping IS all the information of the Universe, when it is only an infinitesimal part of it, selfcentered in the self’.
In the graph we can see the difference between the subjective EGO PARADOX who thinks THE MIND MAPPING of reality with lighteyes and its 3 perpendicular coordinates is the universe, with the reality, of an entire Universe, in which the selfcentered ‘Cartesian humind’ is just one of the many minds, that use many different type of pixels, from atomic olfactory elephant minds to gravitational black hole and atomic minds, possibly with different geometries, certainly with different perspectives, but all gauging information and moving through reality perceiving from its own egoparadox/point of view.
So while the ego is natural to all species, and hence when a child is born it thinks to be the centre of the Universe. As there are infinite other egos trying to absorb your energy and reproduce and prey on you, a childish mind that doesn’t see or refuses to reason about the paradox and take measures to control other species’ reproduction becomes systematically extinct in the actionreaction processes of the Universe.
Conclusion: the new model of relational spacetime and its fundamental properties.
The fifth dimension which we have proved from the point of view of the ‘scalar Universe’ can also be proved from the point of view of the cyclical nature of time.
III. COSMOLOGY:
galatom and its Forces
‘Science advances when we drop assumptions’ Dirac
We made a huge statement – that existence is a 5Ð¡motion of scalar spacetime – and we shall back it with rational, detalied descriptions of those motions in the fifth dimension. That existence is merely a sum of motions or ‘steps’ or ‘actions’ each of the relative infinite infinitesimal minds that exist perform during its program of survival, its program of existence. But this completely meaningless – at this point – metaphysical statement requires a long ‘trip’, to arrive to the full logic sense of the sentence.
What universal beings do is to ‘move’ through ‘steps’ of spacetime in the Universe, during a finite time duration we call ‘life’ or ‘existence’, through a territory we call the world and within the world, vital space. So we shall first define a spacetime being and the steps it makes.
The less important cycles for mankind of all those worldcycles of existence are those studied by physicists, the bigbang and bigcrunch e=mcc cycles of phyisical life and death, whcih they reduce to the simplest ‘time arrows’, the locomotion and the final entropic death.
It is the bigbang theory of the Universe, which must be qualified as pseudoscience, as it does not pass the stringent elements of the experimental method. And it is perhaps the CLEAREST proof of the importance to have a proper understanding of the underlying elements of reality, time and space, to be able to understand what the Universe is about. Since plainly speaking, the bigbang is false, a deformation caused by the use of a single space continuum and a single lineal time arrow to describe all the dimotions of reality.
However, given the egocy of our scientists who think to know it all, backed by the billions of ‘fans’ that ‘believe’ in present science and its reductionist, lineal theories of reality, as I know the reader is expecting us to comment on those theories of the whole Universe, in this introduction instead of dealing with the formalism of stience, we shall advance the analysis of…
The Universe as it is…
We define instead the Universe as a fractal system that reproduces spatial information and temporal energy, carried in the cycles and forms of its clocks of time in multiple scales of spatial size.
Moreover a fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this coexistence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and information, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’. A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are selfsimilar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms. Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, coexisting thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space (Sp).
Time in physics.
First we must understand a simple truth: as all forms of space can be seen as motions in time, a curvature is a clock. As all forms that do not change and repeat its reproductive patterns are not really a change=motion in time, we see cyclical motions as solid forms. When time passes then a change must happen, which means that in physics time only passes when a system accelerates. A force then is defined, F=m a as the product of a present, notchanging form, a mass, and an accelerated motion, a time clock. The mass is thus the nonchanging ‘center’ of the accelerated cyclical clock of time, the force proper. Hence the principle of equivalence of Einstein. When we extend the principle to charges, a charge will be the nonchanging center of the accelerated clock of time we call the electric force. So happens for our thermodynamic scale, with a difference, worth to mention at this earlier stage: in our scale, the clocks of time are expansive not implosive, hence they are entropic 4Dimotions, measured by the clocks of temperature. Why? Because we are measuring in our scale the entropic, predatory absorption by our existences of energy from charges and masses.
In the entangled Universe of infinite ± balances we might say that we are sandwiched between both. And it is because we are entropic temperature that the whole thing doesn’t warp. Our pressure outwards as entropic beings balances the gravitational inwards pressure, and the charge collapse.
It follows then also that as time and space… yes you guess it are two sides of the same coin (: curvature is acceleration; and so the G and Q constants must be understood as curvature of two different scales, and as the curvature of charges are much bigger (their radius r is much smaller, so 1/r the measure of curvature or rather 1/r², the measure of the growth of curvature in an accelerated clock), its force is much larger. But when we apply to charges and masses the metric $ð=k, it turns out they are the same constant equation, proving A) the unification of forces or rather its constants G and Q, B) the superorganic nature of the galaxy, as both charges and masses’ constants are the coinvariant limits of maximal $ (masses’ curvature) and minimal $ but maximal ð (charges’ curvature, attractive power):
In the graph we observe what we just said in simple equations about the relationship between mass and frequency of an accelerated vortex, again expanded to the other planes, of which we observe in detail a thermodynamic vortex, which becomes a fractal of even faster eddies, beyond the ‘event horizon’ of the hurricane, a fact that will help us to establish the nature of frozen stars=aka black holes in our models of the galactic Eddie…
Time as future only passes when it accelerates and time as past when it decelerates – when conserved it is a present energy. So the formalism of accelerated time vortices is selfsimilar in all scales.
In mathematical physics this means that ‘time clocks’ which truly advance’ time are accelerated vortices, of any of the three quantum scales we perceive, that is, charges, temperatures and masses, which measure through its frequency the speedattractive force of its time clocks, paradoxically much larger for smaller vortices, reason why charges are far more attractive:
‘∆1: frequency in lineal electromagnetic time flows of energy: e=hv’
∆1,0 charge: for cyclical clocks of electromagnetism.
∆0, +1: temperature for lineal thermodynamic flows of energy
∆+1: Mass for cyclical vortices of accelerated time.
Frequency of temperature is though often studied as a lineal entropic clocks of time in a nonbounded motion, decelerating the pass of time towards the past. Or in a closed volume it measures as a clock a present steady state of matter in a bounded stationary wave or closed system.
While charges and masses are time clocks of closed systems accelerating the past of time towards the future; as all is warped up in a world cycle of time moving towards the point of death of the vital energy attracted by the center of the system.
Unlike the simplified concept of time=change=locomotion of physicists as ONLY change=translation in space (v=s/t), when we add the ‘biological’, evolutionary time=change in in/form/ation, we can also explain the biological changes of life and death of human organisms, our topological VARIATIONS of forms in (evolution theory), and the mirrors of those changes produced by our languages of perception… which become the memetic ‘languages’ that organize change in the social organisms of history, mankind in time.
So we shall expand the analysis of time change and its laws to both biological and social sciences, something physicists have tried repeatedly with very awkward results (quantum fantaphysics, worldlines, entropy philosophers of ‘death’).
SINCE HUMAN AND BIOLOGICAL CHANGE is primarily ‘informative, social, technological and biological time=change’ NOT translative change=time, the ONLY one physicists study.
So we have put the theory of time of physicists at face value, the path that physicists should have taken when they discovered their fundamental theory of LOCOMOTION, also called Galilean Relativity, latter improved by Einstein, which defined time as the fourth dimension of space, since physicists merely was used it to measure spatial changes in location.
It follows then that what mathematical physicists measure in spacetime is a ‘step’ of minimal size and duration, and for that aim they use ‘derivatives’, a mathematical operandi that ‘reduces’ the measure to the ‘infinitesimal’ moment of present time and the smallest possible step taken (∂t, ∂s), to avoid any internal informative ‘longtime range change’. So we write speed in Galilean relativity as an infinite sum of infinitesimal present measures: ∂v=∂s/∂t. And so did Einstein, when he reduced spacetime measure to ‘simultaneous’, present ‘derivative=instantaneous steps’, adding his ctcorrection factor:
∂S²=∂Sx²+∂Sy²+∂Sz²c²∂t²
And that is fine. The best way to measure translation in space is adding all those minimalist steps and disregard internal change of form and information (which would make more complex those motions as when a system explodes and the single motion breaks into multiple ones). What is wrong and it has been a huge handicap to advance our understanding of spacetime and information and its changes inside beings is to consider as so many people do that to measure locomotion is ALL what we need to know about time=change.
This shall change from now on, once the 5th dimension of time space enter mainstream science. As the fifth dimension of ‘time’ from an absolute past to an absolute future, expands vastly our understanding of time, its causality and ‘repetitive clocklike cycles’ of events.
From now on, time will no longer be a simple lineal dimension used to measure small, present steps of an external locomotion but a bidimensional cycle, as all clocks of time are. This is obvious geometrically as when we add a ‘dimension’ to a line of time space we get a ‘circle’. And it is obvious logically, since all systems in time return to its origin from birth to extinction; all events repeat, and all laws of science are just ‘inferences’ from the cyclical repetition of time events.
The fifth dimension thus will explain both the causality of time events, its world cycles of existence and the repetitive patterns of ‘stience’ (the exist¡ence of spacetime organisms).
As we shall consider the 4 Ð¡ formalism a simplified version of 5Ð, or the ‘limit’ of knowledge we can acquire if we reduce timespace dimotions (ab. dimensional motions) to a single one, locomotion, of which physicists have exhausted truly all knowledge but ‘forgot’, for we, human beings is most important to know besides the worldlines of locomotion, the world cycles of change in our forms of ‘information’, namely our life and death cycle.
So the fifth dimension will study the missing dimension of time cycles that make reality possible to describe as it is: a series of beings which are born, evolve, grow and dissolve back completing its zerosum of existence.
The change in the information of beings: the missed ‘time arrow’ in physics.
We all know time=motion=change is not only of locomotionposition in space or external change, but also internal motion=change; that is change in the form, in the information of beings, as when you are born, grow, live, change, wrinkle and die…
This IS what we call here the fifth dimension which is NOT an impossible dimension of space but a very real dimension of TIME=motion=change in the information of beings. So we shall call it a ‘Ðimotion’, ab. for Dimensional motion. We thus affirm that there are two type of fundamental ‘Dimotions’ of timespace, change in the external Dimotion of beings or locomotion and change in the internal form of the being, or Dimotion of information, forminaction, studied mostly by biology. But both Ðimotions should apply to all systems, physical, biological and linguistic, mental.
Most scientists study only one type of change: physicists study a Universe built only with the ‘Dimotion’ of locomotion, which in its most extreme case, they call entropy; biologists study the TimeDimotion of information. And this restricts both its field of inquire and bias the results they obtain, since the beginning of a thorough, proper study of all timespace changes must consider that DUALITY of timespace changes, both together.
And for that reason, the science of duality was born, which is the science I used to preside in the International congress of systems sciences (ab. ISSS), the association where the modern discipline was born at the death of Einstein at the Macy’s congress, back in the 50s. It would be the foundational congress of the sciences of information and cybernetics, when the foremost scientists of that age came together, realizing the approach of physicists to time was lacking and the merge of biology and physics required first a proper formalism of both concepts of time, which is the goal achieved in this blog.
Welcome then to the infinite fractal Universe of mindmirrors, monads, worlds that seems infinite but are absolutely relative, all hidden in the infinitesimal fractal point of a mind, which is an islanduniverse in itself.
Time requires accelerated motion.
All what exist is a motion in time. Space forms are Maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5D metric (S x T=K), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, humansize thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.
How we perceive the previous scheme of time clocks in physical particles is selfevident: vortices of accelerated forces (Equivalence principle of Einstein) are the TIME CLOCKS of physical systems, which carry in the frequency and form of its cycles the information of the Universe and they are accelerated if ‘time is going to advance’ towards a 3rd warped age, from galaxies (cosmological vortices) to charges (quantum vortices). If the system is conserved and doesn’t change in a present state we talk of a conserved presentenergy; if the system dissipates and looses form as it expands in time and finally stops, we talk of an entropic, relative ‘past’ state.
Energy is the main parameter physics uses to calculate physical world cycles which in computed for the whole existence of the physical event becomes a conservative zero cycle that does not spends energy. The energy of the system thus represents the simplest quantitative value of the capacity of the being to exist, its top predator force, total momentum, length and density of its worldccyle etc.
We thus need to make a whole redefinition of energy to fully grasp world cycles.
As we shall explore both concepts together, we will also observe the symmetries which energy display in space as world cycles do with the super organisms they create.
Now the funny thing as usual is that the seemingly perennial super organisms in space are the fleeting mayas of the world cycle of time, the dynamic motion patterns of information, forminaction which is what truly states on the long term. So goes for energy, which stays while the fleeting physical systems mutate.
Time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, this is an essential knowledge so time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energyhuman inner time) =mass (gravitational timeacceleration are the same concepts).
HOW RIDICULOUS then is to still USE THE PRIMITIVE CONCEPT OF A SINGLE lineal CLOCK OF TIMElocomotion ONLY FOR THE WHOLE UNIVERSE rejecting the addition of the ‘real clocks of time’ of the Universe, its vortices of cosmological mass and quantum charge that ‘fold/warp’ the ‘lineal onedimensional flat entropy between galaxies’ into 3 Dimensions?
The answer will seem an insult to cosmologists but it is what it is: as ridiculous as talking of Yhwh, the toponym for Judea in ancient Egyptian maps, hence the nation of judaism, as the creator of the Universe… And so obvious as that absurdity when you STOP beliefs and REASON, something scientists ‘think they do’ but mostly don’t:
Without getting into unneeded complex maths, the reader should easily understand the proof of that balanced Universe, once he casts aside his ‘awe’ and ‘respect’ for the ‘high popes’ of science and uses merely reason, why the blunder of ‘cosmological bigbangs’ is a false, halftruth – the key method by which humans ‘invent reality’ to cater their egos – to eliminate and ‘reduce’ the parameters of reality to create a ‘ceteris paribus’ biased theory that cater those egos.
In the case of the bigbang amazing as it will sound to the reader cosmologists eliminate the gravitational forces that bring together vacuum space into the creation of tighter, denser particles, atoms and matter structures within the vortex of galaxies, and through the warping of onedimensional ‘lines’ of dark entropy≈energy into 3dimensional ‘tall’ masses, ‘reduce’ the 75% of entropic expansion between galaxies to the 25% of 3Dimensional mass, establishing a canonical, mathematical equilibrium between expansion of spacetime dimensions (expansion of vacuum space) and implosion, akin to the same process happening on a lower quantum scale between attractive matter and repulsive electromagnetic radiation between atoms, towards a thermal equilibrium.
Let us indeed from Hawking, a bad scientist but a good teacher of science, which has no quips recognizing the absurdness of some theories a paragraph that explains this conundrum:
“The trouble with the Hot Big Bang model is the trouble with all cosmology without a theory of initial conditions (MEANING A LIMIT TO THE EQUATIONS): Because general relativity would break down at a singularity, anything could come out of the Big Bang. So why is the universe so homogeneous and isotropic on a large scale yet with local irregularities like galaxies and stars. And why is the universe so close to the dividing line between collapsing again and expanding indefinitely. In order to be as close as we are now the rate of expansion early on had to be chosen fantastically accurately. If the rate of expansion one second after the Big Bang had been less by one part in 10ˆ10, the universe would have collapsed after a few million years. If it had been greater by one part in 10ˆ10, the universe would have been essentially empty after a few million years. In neither case would it have lasted long enough for life to develop. Thus one either has to appeal to the anthropic principle” (RELIGIOUS concept that miraculously in the whole flow of time we are in a balanced point). Not so IT IS MORE LOGIC TO THINK WE ARE in a balanced eternal Universe as our fractal model describes.
The balance between radiation and mass as a steady state, eternal Universe however is ignored by Big Bang cosmologists as they only recognize as a timefuture arrow the entropy between galaxies – the expansion of space.
How dumb is that, when we live as human beings inside the vortex of evolutionary information of a planet, turning around a star vortex turning around a galactic vortex?
So we should NOT care at all for the arrow of entropy, secondary to our existence as biological, and technological beings evolving fast our arrow of information at individual level (process of life and aging, warping, wrinkling into form) and collective level (informative evolution of technological machines, aka meta life) and at planetary level (vortex of evolution of stars and galaxies).
Now for the pedantic scholar of astrophysics who thinks this is too simple, oh, yes, it is – the Universe is simple and not malicious and simplicity is genius (Einstein, Leonardo). So what ‘any scientist’ – not only physicist – tend to do to make his ‘ego shine’ is to include unneeded complications and find secondary details to ‘deny’ the obvious truths we have explained here. We do have in the 4th line section on cosmology, a whole treatise on the 10 most quoted proofs of the bigbangs with equations and quantitative analysis to show ALL OF THEM, fit better when we explain bigbangs as ‘local quasar deaths’ of those galactic vortices, ultimately as all physical systems dual in its implosive and explosive EM arrows expressed in Einstein’s work. Then, all falls right – and in this the details were provided in his latter years by Fred Hoyle, the true genius of Cosmology that rightly considered a ‘fractal series of quasarbig bangs’ in each galaxy, all of them balanced by the entropy between them, with a steady state of continuous creation of matter. Hoyle of course invented as a mockery the term bigbang as an allusion to the worldly job of his main proponent Mr. Gamow, who had worked in the Atomic bomb.
The realpolitiks of power, religion and the military as ‘idologies’ of the big bang
Since the Big Bang became a canonical theory of reality during the Cold War, as a perfect ‘alibi’ for the development of the Nuclear Industry and its accelerators, still at CERN probing to repeat the Nova Bigbangs taking place on the cosmos, as if the risks involved (no more no less than the possible explosion of the planet) were just peccadilloes compared to the new knowledge it should provide on the meaning of it all. Bottom line is this: the bigbang is an absurdity, a singularity point which fits in the hand of the human scientist containing the entire Universe, never mind how, and then suddenly exploding into infinity, who knows why, with a beginning which IS PURELY A CREATIONIST THEORY, whose earlier proponent in fact, Mr. Lemaitre was a canonical priest. And so physicists thus connected directly as high popes of science with religion and both were happy – Abrahamic religions had found its ‘scientific proof that God created the Universe’ (obviously ‘someone’ must have hold that singularity in its hand, something must existed to cause it).
While Physicists were happier because before they had little prestige as their worldly profession was indeed to make weapons and entropic machines, so all encyclopedia defined physics as the ‘science of motion’ (locomotion), not as the philosophy of science, now wrongly has become. So suddenly the cosmological bigbang as absurd and false as it is, gave the entropic, weapon makers their category as supreme intelligences on planet earth. And of course the military were even happier that Shiva, not Visnu, destruction not organic creation had been the ultimate cause of the Universe… Alas, by researching new bombs as CERN does these days, we were going to answer the meaning of it all.
It had of course the virtue of being simple enough for all people to understand. God created the Universe from an infinitesimal point would say a believer. God created the Universe with a single lineal equation, V=Hod eery resembling the word God, would say the astrophysicist quoting the supposed lineal expansion of the Universe (Hubble’s constant being H here, V speed of locomotion)… And God is just a warrior exploding it all, would confirm the military man on charge of accumulating bigbangbombs.
Now, the web is being very harsh specially with entropy physicists, ‘kicking the balls of the physical dogma’, because it is really a very religious outlook out there in astrophysicists’ congresses with the bigbang; so if there is the slightest chance for the reader to ‘react’ to his ‘beliefs’ and awe of the high priesthood of bigbang theorists, he has to be confronted right on, with the ‘religious absurdity’ and biased ‘selection of data’, which is also proper of religions. We just have moved from creationist verbal thought (God creates the universe with words, and selects them, to the point it speaks ‘only’ arab in Islam) to mathematical creationist and also a selective one (God creates the universe with maths, and selects only entropic maths:)
If anything astrophysicists are even worse than modern christians which mostly have doubts because they don’t doubt at all. They simply don’t realize they are believers not rational thinkers in what regard time arrows and how the future is webbed by information.
How the brain ‘blinds’ 1/2 of reality to them has a lot to do with the modular, psychological, memorial, repetitive structure of the brain and its ‘lineal perspective’ – the incapacity of huminds to accept multiple points of view, so we must develop also an epistemology of truth and logic which goes beyond the onedimensional concepts of truth or false and single causality proper of huminds. Since most humans and most models of science at the larger range (where modeling and speculation is needed not only descriptive details) are filled with traps that disguise beliefs as reason…
When we take away dogma and input gravitation and galaxies it is all very simple: what galaxies emit through its black hole axis, is the ‘dark entropy scale’ below the visible cspeed world.
But it is seen NOT as faster than light speed (as time motion) but as ‘enlarged, scattering space’ (as spacedistance) carrying away a high speed jet of matter: In its metric equations though is the hyperluminal perpendicular region of the ‘Kerr hole’ axis that stretches the Universe. And fantaphysicists without the proper 5D metric to justify those hyperluminal speeds in the lower scale ‘consider’ a door to another ‘parallel Universe’ (:
But it is compensated by the vacuum condensation into particles on the flat plane of those galaxies. By not measuring this Cosmologists can talk of a single arrow of entropy for the future of the Universe.
It does come then as a huge problem the problem of causality: In the bigbang and the black hole singularity, basically the same equations at work at different scales, theoreticians denied Einstein’s dictum there should be a limiting cut off substance or reality that prevented errors in the theory.
The laws of Relativity and science don’t break down in the singularity of the bigbang or black hole BECAUSE THERE IS NO SINGULARITY.
Because IT IS NOT expected in Relativity to exist SINGULARITIES, but a dense ‘real source’ and cause for the gravitation: It is ONLY because mathematicians who ARE not truly aware of physics and its realism, like Hawking and Penrose, are moving backwards equations BEYOND the very same initial conditions that are REAL – in the case of a black hole a frozen star of dense quarks that cause gravitation; in the case of the expansion of space in the Universe the central black holes that eject dark entropy through their axis.
∆±¡: EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN ATOMS AND GALAXIES: UNIFICATION EQUATION OF MASSES AND CHARGES.
A fundamental theme of astrophysics in 5D metric is the solution of the Unification equation of charges and masses and the problem of hierarchy – the reader without a professional ‘egocy’ at work as a physicist should be surprised that despite our huge criticism of ‘physicists’ we are so much in loved with ‘physics’; but that is unavoidable, as we shall criticize HUMAN EGOES all the time while stressing the infinite and humble impersonal nature of the Taoist Universe…
Let us then deal with this question a bit more in depth, in the hope that perhaps there is a lot among physicists, who cares more for knowledge than egocy.
The galaxy is the atom of the higher scale, from the ∆o centred human point of view which perceives as much from the galaxy than the atom: ∆±3.
A such the galaxyatom can be described as a social organism (its highest amount of information), as an astrophysical system, or as an atomic, physical form and all the perspectives will give us ∆i on the being.
As customary we shall apply the simple system of defining 10 set of isomorphic laws related to the fractal scales in space, and spacetime symmetries (actions, world cycles) performed by beings on those ∆±3 scales which conform our ‘physical perception’ of the galaxy, expanding it with ‘organic’, and ‘full’ descriptions of it.
And so we can establish 2 fundamental Disomorphisms to study the whole as a series of kaleidoscopic mirrors:
The atomgalaxy, for quantitative, mathematical physics modelling.
The concept of course has been around for long. EFE (Einstein’s field equations) applied to galaxies (EinsteinWalker formalism) is actually modelled to simplify calculus with galaxies as hydrogen atoms; Schrodinger’s equation was used by Wheeler to find a quantum formalism for the Universe; string duality considers universes and quantum strings the same; astronomers model stars around central black holes as photons, etc. But without a deep philosophical model of the fractal Universe provided in this blog, all those mathematical isomorphisms have been merely considered ‘techniques’ of calculus. The reader thus should be aware the mathematical physics – albeit complex to the level of specialists, do exist and what we shall beyond the Unification equation in Newtonian terms, introduce here is the depth of philosophical analysis and the Disomorphic properties of atomic galaxies.
The second Ðisomorphism is that of the galaxycell (treated in cosmology) which shows the organic properties of astrophysical galaxies. This is to my knowledge completely new stuff, but rather obvious: DNAblack holes with gravitational forces, and protein, lineal strangelets, encase the vital spacetime of electromagnetic and gravitational flows of energy between both, which structure the waves of the galaxy. And both control the mitochondria stars that become on the long term the energy food to reproduce more black holes and strange stars (pulsars). 20 years ago this seemed madness, but today everything comes together to the surprise of astronomers to validate the organic model of galactic growth:
What about all the other ‘particles’. They are composed of those, except antiparticles, which have reversed parameters and hence must be considered the dead state of particles, but properly ordered, since the different time dimotions CAN BE ORDERED IN ANY WAY, so in quantum physics the particleantiparticle anihhilation process should be seen as another way to order the informative life arrow (particle) which lasts much more than the entropic death arrow (§ð<<$t), as death is a travel to the past with NO present. And that is the reason why we see less antiparticles, which is the dead state of a particle, hence much shorter in time.
So as we see less corpses than living, despite being the same number we see less antiparticles.
The simpler mathematical formalism of the Unification of charges and masses as timespace vortices of 2 scales.
Much of the early work on five dimensional space was in an attempt to develop a theory that unifies the four fundamental forces in nature: strong and weak nuclear forces, gravity and electromagnetism. German mathematician Theodor Kaluza and Swedish physicist Oskar Klein independently developed the Kaluza–Klein theory in 1921, which used the fifth dimension to unify gravity with electromagnetic force. Although their approaches were later found to be at least partially inaccurate, the concept provided a basis for further research over the past century. Since they were right – the fifth dimension will unify both forces but in a fractal manner, unbeknownst to physicists.
We shall only so how the power of 5D³ by finding the unification equation of charges and masses (general relativity) and upgrading worldlines to worldcycles (special relativity), as we have already dealt with the constancy of light speed (entanglement of electrons which emit information in relative stillness to each other).
Future, time arrows in physics are cyclical vortices of gravitation or charge or thermodynamic eddies, with a singularity of zeromotion in its center, which we do observe in thermodynamic vortices as we cannot ‘see’ inside a quark or top quark star (black hole). It is the arrow of future, as it is an attractive arrow that forms lineal entropic fields into form and will be the ‘final destiny’ of the quanta of an entropic field. We shall study for the three main scales of the supœrganism of the galaxy, which is the main physical system in which humans exist as its thermodynamic level.
Whereas the Universal Constants (G, Q), define the curvature of 2 spacetime vortices at the ∆1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales. Its formalism, M= ω^{2}r^{3}/U.C.(G,Q) is its Unification Equation.
Since if we substitute for the Earthsun system we obtain G, (1^{st} ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain Q with a 10^{40} higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that solves its hierarchy problem.
As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex. It also proves the isomorphism between electromagnetic atoms and galaxies, Hatoms of the cosmic scale. Since when we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and electronic orbitals star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the EinsteinWalker Metric of the Cosmos. Organicism gives the ‘why’ of Galacells that have DNA + Top Quark proton holes, star mitochondria that feed them & strangelet halos.
This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of spacetime by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:
Universal constant of a spacetime vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)^{2} × radius^{3}/ mass
If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe both, not only a gravitational vortex of spacetime in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but also a charge as a quantum vortex of spacetime with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.
And so we have an essential equivalence between K and G for the two ‘enclosure’ ∆±1 scales of human existence, the quantum faster, stronger attractive curvature=speed of the electromagnetic vortex and the slower GVORTEX, which allow us to unify as we did previously both fields. And translate the somewhat dull language of electromagnetism to that simpler of gravitation, showing some fascinating results, such as the proton showing the schwartzschild radius, Rg = 2GM/c² equation of a black hole in the larger scale when put on gravitational jargon.
Let us go into the task, of putting some numbers to the conceptual model, completing Einstein’s work with its long seeked…
Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:
Sun mass = 2 × 10^{30} kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10^{7 }rad. per sec.
Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.
Result: G=6.67 × 10 ^{11} kg1 m^{3} rad. sec.^{2}
This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the spacetime vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum spacetime vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.
If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.
Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)
4 × 10^{16 }rad. sec.^{ 1 }= w (electron);
5.3 × 10^{11 }m. (Bohr radius);
proton mass = 1.6 × 10 ^{27} kg.
Then we get a G, which is 2×10^{39 }stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a selfsimilar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.
And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/c^{2}.
But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.
Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.
To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.
Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal selsimilar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of spacetime vortices in the 2 different scales of spacetime of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it. Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:
For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of spacetime. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a selfsimilar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the nonEuclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of spacetime.
He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.
So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of spacetime, with two selfsimilar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a selfsimilar membrane to that of the cosmological world.
IV. EXPERIMENTAL FALSHOOD OF BIGBANG.
Cosmic vs. Quasar bigbangs.
So the question we want to find out is which of the two larger scales of bigbangs, that of a quasar bigbang or a cosmic bigbang fits better real data. Since as we can see in the images above, on the right, they are also quite similar in form. In fact they are almost identical.
Now again, the problem IS obvious. On one side both bigbangs fit 5D theory.
As the ‘magic number’ of 1011 elements that conform the next scale happens in both:
– A galaxy would be the equivalent of a neutron beta decay in the atomic scale, of a nova and the remaining Neutron star in the solar scale, hence a ‘hydrogen atom’ or nucleon of the cosmic scale.
– The Universe would be the equivalent of a Neutron or hydrogen atom in the cosmic scale. Most galaxies have 10^{11} stars. The total mass of all the stars in the Milky Way is estimated to be between 4.6×10^{10} and 6.43×10^{10}sun masses.
– And the Universe is considered to have around 1.6 10^{11}galaxies.
So the easiest way to settle the question is to state that the galaxy is just a scale below the bigbang (a huge galactic molecule so to speak), as the neutron star is just a scale above the neutron ( a huge neutron molecule so to speak).
And that it exploded in a big bang of the next scale of the universe.
The spatial symmetry of the cosmic bigbang:
In the graph we can see nicely how beautiful looks in terms of the 5D (anti)symmetric Generator the big bang in time space and scale:
In the graph, the spacetime antisymmetry of the cosmic bigbang: the radiation of the original big bang is seen far away in time and space as a wall of fire.
In the graph the representation of the Generator 5D ST of cosmology:
∆1:Sp(Wall of firemembrane) ≤≥ ∆ST(10^{11} ‘galacells’)≤≥ ∆+1: Tƒ (Human Subjective Observer; ‘Great attractor’ – objective ‘Black hole ≈ Proton’ center).
The graph is an Artist’s logarithmic scale conception of the observable universe, in space, with the topology of all 5D ternary constructs; but alas! an anthropomorphic Universe with:
Tƒ: Objective center, the point where the bigbang started, which should be the ‘proton=black hole locus’ of the original ‘cosmic neutron’ of the ∆+4 scale exploded in the bigbang, or alternately since according to Lorentz Invariance (Relativity) all frames of reference are relative, as indeed any ‘mind’ perceives information in a spatialstill state:
Tƒ the Solar System at the center, inner and outer planets, Kuiper belt, Oort cloud, Alpha Centauri, Perseus Arm, Milky Way galaxy, Andromeda galaxy, nearby galaxies…
ST: Cosmic Web, as the ‘cytoplasm of the cellUniverse’.
SP: Entropic Cosmic microwave radiation and Big Bang’s invisible plasma on the edge’s membrane.
So you can see, the big bang would further prove 5D physics and the topological ternary structure of all Universal systems.
So we do NOT doubt the cosmic big bang on 5D grounds, but on real data.
Let us then consider a few of such aspects of the big bang, using as usual the Œ=mc2 scientific method, with scanty mathematical formulae, which go on the 4th line in its full power, as one of the great advantages of TŒ is its capacity to explain any phenomena for 4 points of view – the mental, organic, causal, temporal and spatial, mathematical, in a complementary way.
What is wrong with the previous picture/ wouldn’t it be a perfect proof of 5D physics, as nobody has explained what on Earth exploded 13.4 billion years ago?
Yes it would be perfect if data were fully consistent and not subtly bent to cater to the ‘cosmic arrogance of the human ego’ that wants to pack it all on its infinitesimal mind, Ego paradox always present in all actions of all systems of the Universe that perceive in stillness from its mind point of view a selected part of the whole but confuse it with it:
Omind x ∞ Universe = still mapping (frame of reference)
Now in the graph we see ‘if the bigbang were real’, the spatial symmetry of the Universe, for which there should be action at distance (to create the needed simultaneity, which in all Real Systems connects in a relative quanta of time all the elements of the system, to allow the isotropy and synchronicity required for a ‘whole’ to work as such:
Sp: Wall of fire≤ ST: Dark Energy ≥ Tƒ: Great attractor.
In such hypothetical Universe:
Sp: the wall of fire of the earlier bigbang would be the outer membrane that isolates the ‘cellular Universe’ at z=10.000 c
ST: The faster than light dark energy, v=S/It =Space/Informative Time=S/0visible information=∞ relative speed for a human observer, with the same z than the wall of fire; filled with Galaxies.
Tƒ: And a hyper black hole ‘great’ attractor (not the anthropocentric graph below), would be the ‘proton>black hole’ of the ∆+4 cosmic scale.
So far so good. But data fits better on little bangs.
Let us then consider just 10 of many factual proofs that the bigbang is a local quasar bigbang and the proper cosmological theory is that of earlier Einstein>Fred Hoyle>5 D Physics, of an infinite, immortal Universe:
 The Lorentz invariance
A simple proof that falsifies the cosmic bigbang of the many we shall show here, is the existence of an absolute frame of reference, if the background radiation is global NOT local, as SciAm soon discovered and published in the graph below. In this case the denial of General Relativity and its postulate of no existence of absolute frames of reference in the Universe.
This is called the “Lorentz symmetry”, named for the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz and it is a symmetry of spacetime. It is in fact a cornerstone of Einstein’s special relativity theory. According to special relativity, there is no absolute space or absolute time (as in 5D Physics, which sometimes I call ‘Absolute relativity’. So if two objects are moving relative to each other in empty space, it would actually be impossible for an observer to tell their absolute velocities—maybe only one of the objects was moving and the other was stationary, for example, but you wouldn’t know which was which because their movements are relative to each other, not to any external reference frame.
Alas, but now we do have one: the cosmic radiation, and we are moving within it. So we just have to measure our movement in relationship to the radiation and Relativity is Gone!:
In the graph, the cosmic background radiation acts as a new fixed frame of reference or ether, falsifying Relativity theory, which does not have as its name explains any fixed spacetime background frame of reference
Yet since the cosmic big bang is a solution of relativity theory that the cosmic radiation falsifies the very same theory it tries to prove.
Hence by ‘reductio ad absurdum’, the background radiation must be local not to contradict Relativity.
In the graph a cosmic radiation falsifies the cosmic big bang, which it tries to proof.
It is the most obvious logic error in the bigbang cosmology is his falsification of Einstein’s work in which the bigbang theory is based, as scientific American rightly pointed out when the theory was first put forward (to be forgotten as the propaganda machines of military physics, as the meaning of it all pumped up the theory):
From the CMB data it is seen that the Local Group (the galaxy group that includes the Milky Way galaxy) appears to be moving at 627±22 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB (also called the CMB rest frame, or the frame of reference in which there is no motion through the CMB) in the direction of galactic longitude, l = 276°±3°, b = 30°±3°.
This motion results in an anisotropy of the data (CMB appearing slightly warmer in the direction of movement than in the opposite direction).
From a theoretical point of view, the existence of a CMB rest frame breaks Lorentz invariance even in empty space far away from any galaxy. So if the big bang is accepted, the theory of which is a solution, Einstein’s relativity based in the nonexistence of ETHER, an absolute frame of reference in the Universe (hence ‘relativity name’) is FALSIFIED. Ergo by reductio ad absurdum, the Big bang, which is a solution to the theory it falsifies, is false.
This is one of the many scientific proof of falsity of big bang theory we shall bring in this post, which Cosmologists know and cynically call the ‘axis of evil’ (because it won’t go away and kills their theory right on its inception).
You see what I mean by ‘dogma of religious nature’. How ‘big science’ avoids the axis of evil?
Suppressing data or bringing magic theory to it: Chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”
Alas, we are back to Babylon, we must be the center of the Universe, just moving 600 kilometers to the east.
Now after being the devil’s advocate, in the proper way, pointing out the fact, let us consider the fact to be right, because we do respect the scientific method. So we shall consider the Lorentz symmetry to be a local symmetry that only takes place within the galaxy; not in the absolute scale of the Universe.
Now this is the ‘real Universe’ of the next scale of the 5th dimension. It looks on the 4% we see clearly as an atomic network of tissue, which joints the atomgalaxies (think for example of a brain of neurons, of a microscopic colony of unicellular algae, and so on). There is zero isotropy as bigbang cosmologists pretend. All their models being approximations which might look nice on computers but have zero scientific theorypraxis solidity. All what we know is that we are moving towards Virgo; that there is a huge nodal network at HydraCentaurus – excellent name; which forms with PiscesPerseus, a clearly connected network in one of whose filaments we find ourselves.
And that at 46 declination a Great Attractor of dark quark matter, likely a superblack hole of top quark stars is waiting for us in a future rendezvous, as we cruise over a remnant cloud of photonic local radiation that does not seem to be (by lack of attraction power) so interested in becoming dark quark gluon liquidsolid superstate of matter.
That is really all we know. The place we live is Laniakea that means “immeasurable heaven’, even if some arrogant believers think they have measured it.
In that regard, while 5D physics is the ONLY rational theory that can explain a cosmic bigbang (as Time accelerates while space shrinks); 13 billion years does not seem time enough for the immensurable heavens.
This as we shall see this solves momentarily the problem; and allow us to consider ‘theories which do not correspond to Relativity’ beyond the galaxy, a fact which is also essential to 5D Physics, as relativity is considered rightly the theory of light spacetime where cspeed/distance is the constant of space of the galaxy, the absolute frame of reference, both rod of measure of static space and motion.
And we will return to that, after we deal with the cosmic bigbang, since it is the first ‘step’ to elucidate to expand physics to the scales of the 5th dimension and harmonize it with all other sciences from where it has so much departed.
 The quasar cycle
The unification of all the physical scales of the universe with the 5th dimension renders an immediate result: the equation of unification of charges and forces, which makes similar (but not equal), the galaxy and the atom.
Moreover, since the bigbang image is mimetic of the previous one it reduces the scale of the bigbang to a quasar scale, making the EFE of Einstein local equations for the Lightspace time (reason why it is constant).
In that regard, the big bang scales, that is, the fact that we observer bigbang like death processes of expansion of space 2 planes downwards, as in all other forms of death is one of the strongest proofs of the isomorphic nature of all scales.
In the next graph, from SCiAM, the quasar cycle is longer than the bigbang cycle. Thus by reductio ad absurdum, since we have found galaxies in a ‘second’ quasar cycle, hence over 20 billion years as ‘reborn’ galaxies, forming its central bar, there is no way the time age of the whole is shorter than the time of its parts.
Multiple spacetimes imply the existence of multiple bigbangs with different explosive size and speeds, all of them deaths of an informative mass or charge that uncoils its accelerated vortex into radiation following Einstein’s equation, E=M(c)2, where a bidimensional or tridimensional vortex (M or e) becomes extended into a plane of radiation (hence the square of lineal cspeed).
Yet for each different scale the parameters of speed (c), mass (M) and Entropy will change. And so we obtain a series of selfsimilar big bangs described in the graph.
The single cosmic big bang based in a single spacetime continuum, was devised even before we knew the existence of a faster than light, gravitational membrane of dark Entropy and dark, quark matter. So we first must define it within that scale of bigbangs as the bigbang of a membrane of electromagnetic radiation; hence a quasar bigbang, not a cosmic bigbang, which will correspond to the much faster explosion of a gravitational membrane, starting at the Planck scale of the gravitational minimal units, the lambdastrings.
This is in a way the conclusion of astrophysicists, which now study the big bang as a dual process, with an inflationary age (the gravitational membrane) and a slower age (the bigbang of electromagnetic space, created over the gravitational membrane).
3.No shadows for the big bang. Ecliptic ‘axis of evil’ and ‘people finding things’.
In the upper graph:
Physicists have measured a local, hence galactic background radiation, which doesn’t leave shadows from other galaxies and they tabulated the quasar cycle of galaxies, which coincides with the age ascribed in the past to a cosmic big bang. So a more rational theory would consider the cause of the 2.7 K radiation both local in space (galactic) and in time (produced at present); since our measure is local and present.
Now, this is the standard first thought about it: nonthermal radiation from stars.
 Ad Hoc calculus vs. red shifts. Death of light. Cosmological ‘fractal’ redshirts.
– E x I: Tachyon, Transversal, Gravitational Dark energy waves
Now in what follows we depart from classic cosmology, which as we have seen is good enough to invalidate the cosmic bigbang as a huge lineal egotrip of astrophysics, and introduce basic concepts of 5D fractal cosmology; which we will develop fully on the 4^{th} line of the blog.
Now the temperature of the background radiation and the radiation itself has alternative theories. My favorite – but not likely correct – is tiredness of light as it falls within 5D physics but it is not mine (which makes it even more objective). My own theory researched during my activism against bigbang experiments on Earth are moon microblack holes making the halo. Both are far more scientific that the forecasted bigbang temperature. Let us see why, on predictability. Gamow, and the proponent of light tiredness gave predictions ‘before the measure’. Those are:
1946 – George Gamow calculates a temperature of 50 K (assuming a 3billion year old universe), commenting it “… is in reasonable agreement with the actual temperature of interstellar space”, but does not mention background radiation.
1953 – Erwin FinlayFreundlich in support of his tired light theory, derives a blackbody temperature for intergalactic space of 2.3K with comment from Max Born suggesting radio astronomy as the arbitrator between expanding and infinite cosmologies.
Freundlich also gave two extreme values of 1.9K and 6.0K in FinlayFreundlich, E.: 1954, “Red shifts in the spectra of celestial bodies”.
Now the measure was 2.7 K, fully within Finlay’s prediction; completely out of Gamow ‘s prediction. And yet Gamow merely change ad hoc his equations to match the measure, and voila, all physicists which a prior had decided there MUST be a bigbang, ignored Finlay’s.
Now those are the 10 canonical proofs that need no new physics, each of them explained ‘facts’ that the bigbang ‘does NOT explain’ properly. This is more than enough, and while there are a few more, I think 10 is according to the numbers of T.Œ, good enough of factknownknown proofs.
A timeline will help to understand why it is the likely one by C) cyclical predictability:
1926: Sir Arthur Eddington estimates the nonthermal radiation of starlight in the galaxy has an effective temperature of 3.2 K.
1930s: Erich Regener calculates that the nonthermal spectrum of cosmic rays in the galaxy has an effective temperature of 2.8 K
Thus the thermal radiation calculated by Penzias in 1960 at 3 K had been rightly foreseen by the first people who thought of it (average of 3.2+2.8/2=3k).
On the other hand the late proposal of a cosmic big bang by Abomb researcher Gamow et al were:
1946: George Gamow estimates a temperature of 50 K.
1949: Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman reestimate Gamow’s estimate at 28 K.
1960s: Robert Dicke rereestimates a MBR (microwave background radiation) temperature of 40 K
These were all offbeat. Only after 1960s measure, busybusy the cosmic bigbang ‘rerereestimate’ its equations to get ‘a posteriori’ the ‘desired’ experimental results ‘ad hoc’, instead of noting that Mr. Eddington and those proponents of a local background radiation WERE right in their predictions and the cosmic ones totally offtarget and hence use the scientific method to deny the cosmic one.
 Now and here explanations: Moon MACHOs
This AGAIN is a basic proof of truth in science: if WE CAN FIND explanations in present time and herespace, it is absurd to consider an explanation in past or future time and outofhere space. It is like if we measure your body temperature, at 37 degrees and then a cuckoo physicist tells you the cause is with a lineal pastmoving equation that you were born 17 billion years ago at 5 trillion degrees and you are cooling down!! When there is an explanation, in the metabolic activity, now and here of your body.
So what is the metabolic process on the galaxy now that produces that temperature?
Namely the existence of microblack holes or similar dark matter (strangelets) redshifting components on the Halo, which account for its mass and the redshirts of all light reflecting or coming through it.
But further on, before we deal with the Halo, there is a huge problem which shows further that it is a local radiation, the so called ‘axis of evil’, which at the cost of billions of $ astrophysicists try to eliminate with zero success. Namely that the radiation aligns with the axis of the galaxy and its equinox, because ‘obviously’ it is produced by the galaxy’s activity.
Do you think this obvious answer has any chance? ha. Quoting the official version, of Wikipedia:
“In particular, the quadrupole and octupole (l = 3) modes appear to have an unexplained alignment with both the ecliptic plane and equinoxes, an alignment sometimes referred to as the axis of evil 🙂
A number of groups have suggested that this could be the signature of new physics at the greatest observable scales; other groups suspect systematic errors in the data. Recent observations with the Planck telescope, which is very much more sensitive than WMAP and has a larger angular resolution, confirm the observation of the axis of evil. Since two different instruments recorded the same anomaly, instrumental error (but not foreground contamination – the way they ‘introduce the local cause – ‘contamination’:) appears to be ruled out.
Coincidence is a possible explanation, chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”
Now to my hypothesis of a halo of dark, quark matter (black holes or strangelets) acting as a far ‘more limited’, closer membrane distorting by red shift the light reflected or coming through it (as all membranes do transform what penetrates them).
Why, it is a preferred solution? Obvious:
The question posted by the nonshadows experimental fact is that the radiation cannot come from the supposed outer ring of fire (big bang radiation). It does have to come therefore from the internal region of the galaxy, reflected by the Halo, giving us a mirror image of the galaxy, or alternately from outer light, crossing through the galaxy, altered by the Halo ‘strangelet and microblack hole matter’, strong candidates to for the dark matter of the galaxy. Then obviously what physicists do is merely to extend this Haloaltered radiation into a supposed infinity.
The only alternative object that can produce such radiation in present is a microblack hole, whose temperature redshifts light as a gravitational lensing. And since a black hole gravitational lensing is proportional to the mass, we can calculate the mass of those ‘background black holes’, which redshirts light at 2.7 k. Indeed, a simple calculus shows that a black hole of the approximate mass of a moon (the most common galactic object of which each sun has hundreds in its planets and Oort/Kuiper belts, would produce that radiation.
So very likely the halo of dark matter of the galaxy is made of microblack holes that have eaten moons, as their bigger cousins eat stars. Then they WILL radiate at that exact temperature.
Further on, since black holes are fundamental particles of the upper scale, as protons are in the quantum scale they must be homogeneous in size, even if they eat less perfect planetoids, expelling the ‘leftovers’ as gamma radiation and becoming with other quark stars (strangelets), the ‘protein’ membrane that shields the galaxy, as a stpoint whose 3 topologies are latter studied in more detail.
Critical density.
One of the problems of the bigbang (of many) is the critical density. It must be of 10^{26} kg per cubic meter for the Universe to be the ‘observed’ flat geometry. But it is not. Only 2 so this is a problem, the bigbang of the cosmos does not match the flat geometry of the Universe and the topic spiral galaxy.
So if the bigbang is a local galactic big bang the critical density of the galaxy should be 10^{26}; then it would be the quasar bigbang of our galaxy.
Let us do some crunching numbers for a change.
The equation for the critical density is:
ρcrit = 3H_{0}^{2} / 8πG
You can see that the critical density is proportional to the square of the Hubble constant — a faster expansion requires a higher density to overcome the expansion.
How empty is space? Astronomers have learned that the mean density of matter in the universe is within a factor of a few of the critical density. We can calculate ρcrit by inserting the gravitational constant, G = 6.67 × 10^{11} Nm^{2} / kg^{2}, and adopting H_{0} = 65 km/s/Mpc. We first convert the Hubble constant to metric units, H_{0} = (65 × 1000) / 3.1 × 10^{+22} = 2.1 × 10^{18}s^{1}. Now we can solve to get ρcrit = 3 × (2.1 × 10^{18})^{2} / 8 × 3.14 × 6.7 × 10^{11} = 7.9 × 10^{27} kg/m^{3} ≈ 10^{26} kg/m^{3}. This amazingly low density is equal to about five hydrogen atoms per cubic meter, or a single hydrogen atom in a volume the size of the average TV set. However, in that same cubic meter there will be 5 to 10 billion low energy photons of microwave background radiation, the feeble relic of the big bang.
How well does this density match up to the density of large objects in the universe? The typical distance between large galaxies is about 2 Mpc, so we can see what the average density would be if a galaxy like the Milky Way were the only object in a box 2 Mpc across.
The mass of the Milky Way, including dark matter, is about 10^{+12} M. Sun, or 10^{+12} × 2 × 10^{+30} = 2 × 10^{+42} kg. The volume of a 2 Mpc cube is (2 x 3.1 x 10^{+22})^{3} = 2.4 x 10^{+68} m^{3}. The typical density is therefore mass divided by volume, or 2 × 10+^{42} / 2.4 x 10^{68} ≈ 10^{26 }kg/m^{3}.
Thus we can see that the galaxy density roughly equal to the critical density.
 The Black Hole reversed equation of the expansion.
While there is not clear understanding of what the ‘Singularity that holds the entire mass of the Universe in an infinitely small point’ due to the ‘absurd’ backwards motion of the Hubble equation in lineal terms till are mote past, there is a clear proof the explosion of a black hole into a quasar will give us the same result:
Since the equations of the bigbang inflationary first age are exactly the same than those of a black hole, reversed insideout, as the black hole explodes creating in its outer rim a ‘ball of fire’, advancing at enormous speed, through repulsive gravitational waves, till the wave smooth an isomorphic sphere of the size of the galactic outer Halo. Thus there is not mystery to the creation of the region, which will be reborn as a spiral galaxy when the entropic death of the black hole reverses its course, in the following eras.
In the parlance of ‘physicists’, the proper description will be this:
Tƒ say that space expands exponentially means that two inertial observers are moving farther apart with accelerating velocity. In stationary coordinates for one observer, a patch of an inflating universe has the following polar metric:
ds²=(1Λr²)dt² + 1/1Λr² dr² +r²dW² (where Λ is not the symbol of the 5th dimension but the cosmological constant) We use polar metric because the black hole expands with a positive curvature into a spherical form, following the commonest ‘entropic explosiondeath’ of any bigbang material death. In the simplest expression we write: M=e/c² only that we are talking of a tachyon superluminal expansive wave.
This is just like an insideout black hole metric—it has a zero in the component on a fixed radius sphere called the cosmological horizon. Objects are drawn away from the observer at towards the cosmological horizon, which they cross in a finite proper time. This means that any inhomogeneity are smoothed out, just as any bumps or matter on the surface of a black hole horizon are swallowed and disappear.
Since the space–time metric has no explicit time dependence, once an observer has crossed the cosmological horizon, observers closer in take its place. This process of falling outward and replacement points closer in are always steadily replacing points further out—an exponential expansion of space–time.
This steadystate exponentially expanding spacetime is called a de Sitter space, and to sustain it there must be a cosmological constant, a vacuum energy proportional to everywhere. In this case, the equation of state is . The physical conditions from one moment to the next are stable: the rate of expansion, called the Hubble parameter, is nearly constant, and the scale factor of the Universe is proportional to .
Inflation is often called a period of accelerated expansion because the distance between two fixed observers is increasing exponentially (i.e. at an accelerating rate as they move apart), while can stay approximately constant (see deceleration parameter).The ∆dimensional de Sitter space, denoted dSn, is the Lorentzian manifold analog of an ∆sphere (with its canonical Riemannian metric); it is maximally symmetric, has constant positive curvature, and is simply connected for ∆ at least 3.
 The Helium problem.
Nucleosynthesis occurs between 3 minutes and 20 minutes after the (quasar) Big Bang
During the photon epoch the temperature of the universe falls to the point where atomic nuclei can begin to form. Protons (hydrogen ions) and neutrons begin to combine into atomic nuclei in the process of nuclear fusion.
Free neutrons combine with protons to form deuterium. Deuterium rapidly fuses into helium4. Nucleosynthesis only lasts for about seventeen minutes, since the temperature and density of the universe has fallen to the point where nuclear fusion cannot continue.
By this time, all neutrons have been incorporated into helium nuclei. This leaves about three times more hydrogen than helium4 (by mass) and only trace quantities of other light nuclei.
This formation of so much Helium was for very long considered the proof of a cosmic bigbang because stars could not form so much Helium. Then it was found that most of the imbalance was helium accumulated around the central black hole of galaxies; which has not been explained. Obviously because Helium formation happened when the black hole exploded with the bigbang temperature it is found close to the center of galaxies, and it was formed by the quasar explosion. So a galactic bigbang explains both its abundance and its location (the cosmic one does NOT explain its location)
 The ages of the bigbang.
The ‘cycle of explosions’ of Galaxies into quasars, into galaxies, follows the same ages of the bigbang. As all of them after the initial ‘Planck epoch – of gravitational superluminal waves’, dark epoch of nucleosynthesis, are ages ‘within galaxies’, and so they are proved for the inner space of galaxies. They do NOT explain many other features of the Universe as a whole (which is not isomorphic, etc.) but perfectly describe the evolution and formation of the stars of the galaxy.
So the socalled ages of the bigbang, are properly the ages of the galaxy; WITHOUT all the ‘ad hoc’ theories and pseudoscientific models required to explain WHY the large scale Universe has NOTHING to do with the supposedly smooth result of a cosmic bigbang (this is like Ptolemy constant recurrence to ‘new’ ad hoc epicycles to make fit new observations into its earthcentric theory of the Universe). Trust me, any astronomer knows how long this ‘list’ is.
Thus the quasar bigbang follows further the laws of truth (minimalism: Occam’s razor), simplicity and correspondence. WE DO NOT NEED to postulate strange forms of dark energy and dark matter, except the ones KNOWN, repulsive gravitation (to account for the entropic expansion of space between galaxies that balances its contraction), which is ‘natural’ to the model of galacticatoms; and quark matter to account for the dark matter of the halo. Let us consider this second element in more detail.
 The experimental proof. Earth’s experiments can replicate them
The ages of the ‘big bang’ can be replicated by merely doing the quark gluon soup on the LHC here on Earth. Thus there is zero difficulty for the awesome reversed process of a quasar explosion to create enough quark gluon soup to replicate all those ages. Other matter are the risks of starting a bigbang ice9 or ‘gas9’ process (word coined by this author in his suits against CERN for potential genocide: aka, a runaway creation of top quarks and Higgs (its decay scalar mode: Top quark>2H) on planet Earth.
In that regard,. Œ, reclassifies particles, to understand the 3 ‘ages of evolution’ of information represented by the 3 families of mass and quarks, which are also in close symmetry with the upper cosmic scale, the components of the 3 regions of the galaxy:
 The Top quark star center (black holes MUST be modeled AS real ENTITIES, with a cutoff, ∆1 ‘cellular substance’ as Einstein wanted. Only Top quarks (Higgs condensates in the parlance of modern physicists) turning faster than cspeed in its internal vortex (hence its enormous attractive mass, which increases with the frequency of its vortex: M=ƒ(h/c2)) have the properties at larger scale of a black hole.
That is, black holes ARE top quark frozen stars, with positive top quarks as their cut off substance.
 The middle region of up and down light human quarks.
 The external negative charged, strangelet halo.
Thus the 5D symmetry between the ∆1 (particle) and ∆+1 (galaxy) limiting scales of astrophysics is obvious and further proof of the symmetries of T.Œ and its ‘correspondence’ and ‘minimalism’ (proofs of truth in science), since it accounts for the first time for the reason why 3 families of particles and 3 families of stars coexist, and eliminates the need for further theories and particles beyond the standard model:
Since the 3 ages of evolution of mass of increasing form – I, II and III families of quarks are symmetric – to the 3 regions of the galaxy: Top quark black holes, up and down matter , negative strangelet halo
Symmetry between atoms and galaxies (protons positive top quark holes, negative electrons, strangelet halo).
And so once we have falsified ‘reasonably’ the big bang (we could write hundreds of pages on this, but we have to move on), we can now consider 5D physics, on the knownknown Island Universe of our galaxy, its generator equation, 3 ‘relative planes ‘of existence, 3 ages of time and 3 organic parts in space.
BUT IF THE BIGBANG IS NOT COSMIC, BUT LOCAL, THE BIGBANG OF THE GALAXY? WHY WE GET SO MUCH CONFUSED ABOUT IT?
THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE IF WE CONSIDER THE UNIVERSE A FRACTAL SYSTEM OF SELFSIMILAR SCALES:
BECAUSE THERE ARE BIGBANGS IN ALL THOSE SCALES AND IT IS EASY TO CONFUSE THEM. Let us prove it by considering a fascinating theoretical proof: the equation of unification of charges and masses as two selfsimilar vortices of two scales the atom and the galaxy, and all the bigbangs happening between those 2 scales, to prove you how unimportant is to research any of them as the most important, how preposterous to think we can SEE AND KNOW ALL ABOUT ALL THE SCALES.
And then we shall provide you the barebones of an alternative proper theory of it all, much more complex and enlightening, according to what no doubt will be the ‘future of stience’ in the XXI century if we survive CERN: a proper construction of the Universe with its 3 arrows of time, entropy information and energy and its true fractal, scalar, selfsimilar structure in space…
V. WORLDCYCLES V. WORLDLINES
FROM 4D TO 5D FORMALISM.
This said we shall try now with a bit of salt, to compare the explanation of what existence is in the two models, the Newtonian model of absolute spacetime and the relational model of infinite spacetime beings with ‘one more dimension’ – the scalar dimension of spacetime, and a better understanding of time ‘worldcycles’ and its past, present and future ages. Once this hurdle of complexity is passed, though all other things will be easier to understand, or rather become ‘understood’ for the first time, as any honest physicist will tell you he really doesn’t have any clue beyond the numerical description provided by its equations, as to why exist and what are waves, time, space, particles, existence, dimension, motion and information…
Even Einstein when asked but ‘what time is’, kept silent and then for lack of a better answer replied: ‘what a clock measures’… Ah, but all clocks are cyclical, thus to make its ‘worldcycles’ they need at least another dimension, as cycles do indeed require two not a single line.
When you google the fifth dimension you get 3 kind of results: the most popular is a funky group of ‘Champagne soul’ – a bubble name, proper of the age of ‘Entropy=dissolution’ of human minds, when our capacity to reason verbally is in decline due to the influence of audiovisual magic FX and the increasing obsolescence of our logic minds to fancy digital, visual computer models of reality. ‘A stupid is a man without reason, one that doesn’t see the causality between events so it believes in magic causes’ said Schopenhauer, always so harsh but also right to the point.
Then you get the fifth dimension of space, an impossible construct of physicists, which study ONLY one dimension of time=motion =change: locomotion or change in the position and speed in space: v=s/t (and similar equations by Einstein, who added a correcting ct factor to Galileo’s relativity and to measure those space distances and speeds).
So as physicists use time only to measure locomotion=change in space, they call time, the fourth dimension of space (v=s/t, or Galilean relativity and its finetuned Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²c²t²). And this obsession for spatial measures and dimensions made them ‘guess’ that if there is a fifth dimension, it should also be a dimension of space.
This poises a problem. As we cannot have experience of a dimension of space of the same lineal, infinite form than our 3 perpendicular dimensions. So physicists just put this dimension elsewhere, merrily making all kind of imaginary models of multiple dimensionality, which leads to the true limit of human science:
Today physicists call a ‘dimension’ any parameter they use to model reality, call time a dimension of space, just because it is in the same equation (though as Einstein put it ‘wires don’t travel to the past’ and the t of its equations always has an inverse value to the s of space (s/t or +s – t)…
Against the tide of mechanic science that consists in gathering data, putting it into mathematical equations and understand nothing of the concepts expressed, to fully develop a meaningful upgrade of our concepts of time and space and its motions and dimensions we must make a huge upgrading on the basic concepts of science.
Then if we succeed making understandable those concepts, harmonize the ‘verbal, logic thought, mathematical equations and experimental evidence’ provided by science in an expanded modelmirror image of reality as it is.
An example will suffice: When physicists apply the 4 dimensions they use, 3 of lineal space and one of lineal time, to any being they describe their existence, as a worldline of meaningless motions:
The graph shows how our lives look in the simplistic, illdefined conceptually 4D model of present spacetime. A being merely ‘moves in time’ through ‘locomotions’. All other forms of inner and outer change that affect the being are ignored; and so we talk of a ‘present’ concept of time, or ‘external concept’ of timechange as mere locomotion, translation on space, which clearly does not account for other type of changes that have no external motion, internal changes in the information, in the form of beings, a much slower process in time that however happens to all entities; and it is definitely more complex that a mere locomotion. As it implies at least two modes of change: growth and diminution that happens with aging, from ‘smaller scales in space’ to larger sizes and vice versa; and change in form, in ‘topology’ as in morphogenesis and wrinkling, again two changes in the form of beings.
Obviously Einstein’s work is of merit as it truly exhausted our understanding of locomotions, and we will explain it further on the more technical mathematical articles on physics in the fourth line, dealing with the cspeed constant, the Lorentz transformations, and the proper way to understand its boosts and rotations (mathematical modeling of time clocks in 4D). And further on we shall analyze the relativistic equations of quantum mechanics. But what we want to stress at this point is that locomotion and entropy, the arrows of time related to translation in space as opposed to those related to change in information, social evolution and form, are NOT enough to deal with the nature of time, and the existence of worldcycles in all beings, but merely a reductionist case, of the larger 5D model, even if it has achieved an astounding perfection in its detail – indeed you will still learn nothing about your biological worldcycles from the knowledge of Dirac’s equation and the 10 EFE equations of relativity.
So a larger ‘theory’ as 5 Ð must merely connect through the correspondence principle its ‘higher laws’ which apply to more phenomena, and are simpler so more truth (Occam’s razor, principle of economicity expressed by March in Physics, etc), to 4D, NOT the other way around as most physicists will want. THERE IS A HIGHER MODELING than Einstein’s work, which is NOT a God, but just the man who took Galilean relativity, via Poisson’s potentials to its detailed ‘simultaneous stilllike’ mental analysis in mathematical space – but on the process lost clarity – a concept that we shall consider in our analysis of languages as mirrors of reality that is worth to fully understand.
In the graph, Algebra as it happened with the visual language when realist photographies came, displaced from reality by analysis moved inwards into more complex, abstract Nature, became a ‘baroque language’ purely formal trying to explain it all departing from reality into a multiple ‘cubist perspective’ that tried to gather all perspectives into a single painting (Set and group theory.)
In every language as a mirror of reality we can reach higher detail by making the picture more complex but that often will ‘obscure’ the general principles. As in the graph, the cubist painting has arguably more detailed information about every aspect of the portrayed, from different perspectives, but the picture is not clearly recognizable as a portrait. This is what happened to physics in the XX century with the excessive fine tuning through ‘renormalization’ processes, the Born rule, the inclusion of ‘finite terms’ that influence from other 5 D scales the clean less detailed ‘first picture’ (Wilson groups), the use of group theory to ‘put in a single picture’ all the variations of species, which is fine and we shall explain rightly with the symmetries of space, time and scale TRUE origin of those SU1x SU2 x SU3 groups, etc. etc.
So the physicist pro should not shun off the fact that we shall for example use Newton’s vortices to unify scales (in a similar fashion to the first 5D KaluzaKlein theory of unification) instead of the ‘more detailed’ pictures of Einstein, as ultimately they are far more difficult to understand and they all come from the same concept of a vortex of accelerated forces (Einstein used Poison’s potentials that come from Newton and indeed ultimately the coupling constant, G appears in all).
We have to build first the first principles slow, as the errors of a Ptolemaic view of the Universe with a single spacetime are also very distorting of reality. So once we have those first principles in place in the first two lines of the blog, we shall try to ‘attack’ the more complex maths and details in the fourth line.
We have to go beyond physicists’ reductionism of all the ∞ timespace dimotions of beings into a lineal single mechanical clock to measure them all and a lineal, static concept of its dimensions of space, which renders us a ‘worldline’ of locomotions as the meaning of existence; studying instead the ‘worldcycle’, as motion now acquires cyclical time dimensions and happens between ‘fractal scales’ of the coexisting planes that make up the universe.
And when we introduce those two new characteristics of Nature as it is – fractal in spatial scales, cyclical in functions and forms, we obtain the concepts of ‘superorganisms’ – the fundamental ‘particle’ of reality – and its worldcycles of life and death.
So we can talk of the fifth dimension in general terms as a ‘process of change in the form NOT the motion of those time space organisms’:
The fifth dimension is both a dynamic, inner new dimension of time=change – the flow from past to future to past that transforms the inner information of beings as when you live and die from past to future, aging in your form, your information, even if you don’t seem to change=move externally in space – the timechange physicists study, and a scalar, new dimension of spatial size. As in all those processes of evolution there is a clear transformation, growth and decay process, starting from a smallish ‘first seed’ that will slow down its rhythms of time and emerge as a whole, larger being, in a new scale of space:
More seriously: Physical Worldcycles revis(it)ed. CPT symmetries.
Now, what physicists should do is to be more honest with the scientific method and apply their renormalization and cutoff mathematical procedures to eliminate infinities, which they routinely use in charges, with masses, which are just the same type of vortices of a larger cosmological scale, as we do in 5 D physics. Then there will NOT be bigbang singularities, or black hole evaporation as the substance of those black holes will be quarks that do NOT evaporate, but are produced in mass quantities at cern and so will form as Einstein wanted dark stars, that will evaporate us, converting through weak interactions studied at cern our matter in strange quark or black hole dark atomic matter.
Einstein called black holes frozen stars for an obvious reason – he respected the scientific method unlike the creationist mathematicians of the second age of black hole theory – and said he would only believe in them when a real substance was found, which obviously are those quarks. But idealist, egocentered mathematical physicists always like to believe their equations ‘create reality’ as religious people believes Allah creates by naming things with Arab words… That was the case of Oppenheimer who mended Einstein’s concept of frozen stars and considered black holes to be a singularity.
So he modeled them – in the heist of cynicism, with Einstein’s equations, who opposed his infinite collapse, as a ball of dust with negligible pressure, uniform density rho = (t), and at rest at t = 0 (irrotational). And alas, since there were no charge, no mass, no particles on them, they ‘so to speak’ easily shrunk into an infinitesimal point.
These assumptions which are totally unreal, as black hole are born of ultradense material stars, lead to the unique solution of the Einstein field equations, and in the comoving coordinates the metric inside the black hole were given by ds² = dt²ˆ2 − R²(t) (dr² /1 − kr² + r²dθ² + r² sin²θdφ². And then he ‘decided’ that R>0 infinitely and the result where the Singularity metric… voila! Magic in the Schopenhauer’s sense: ‘A stupid is a man without reason, one that doesn’t see the causality between events so it believes in magic causes’
Since the assumption that the black hole was of dust is magic, pure inflationary maths. It must be a real physical entity, made of particles, so you need to plug ‘above’ that spacetime frame Dirac particles.
Moreover in relativity spacetime is NOT Newtonian but background independent, relational (Leibniz) meaning that all physical systems are made of spacetime, so the spacetime equations of the black hole must be made of particles, their ‘spacetime’ (this is the basis of 5D – the most advanced model of background independent, relational spacetime till date) AND they must also met the EFE metric. To do so, you just need to consider each region of the black hole with increasing density in EFE metrtic to be occupied by each type of Dirac’s particle, aka quark of increasing density, as light stars are also made. So both, EFE and Dirac, relativity and quantum physics meet. Simple? Isn’t? That is really the theory of quantum gravity physicists who love complicated theories seemingly to look smarter should explore. ‘Simplicity is genius’, said Leonardo.
This means that for the largest black hole in the center of the galaxy the outer layer has the density of the bcb neutral atoms of the top quark decuplet, in the graph above (and below ordered in triads of atoms).
But in the center, where there is a quasi infinite density/singularity you need top quarks, the nearinfinite densest quarks (next screen). And because relativity breaks at the quantum scale, we just enter the ‘lower scale of the Universe – that of particles’, which ‘navigate’ over the background independent geometry of Einstein’s gravitational force.
THEN you meet both the reality of physical particles and the metric of black holes, whose requirement of energy conservation implies that its density: ρ(t) R³(t) remain constant in a series of parallel volumetric layers.
So as you enter the black hole, R diminishes and density increases. It just does it NOT continuously but as in all stars, in layers of increasing quark density, which means quarks of higher mass, till reaching the top quark center for the largest black holes. As higher mass means a higher frequency in the cyclical motions of masses, modeled by Einstein’s principle of equivalence between gravitation and acceleration as mass ‘vortices’ of gravitational spacetime – the background independent last layers of the 5D scalar reality perceived by human beings:
In the graph, we can see what a black hole star is all about: the conversion of our ‘light matter’ into heavy atoms of the top quark decuplet. This IS the essential symmetry between the 3 scales of matter, that of bosons (gluons in the case of atoms), quarks and black holes. Another simple proof of the necessary similarity of those 3 scales is shown in the next graph – the symmetry between the ‘dying mesons’ that are destroyed by the strong force of heavier quarks in all the reactions likely to be mimicked when a heavy ‘seed’ of a cosmological strangelet or black hole appears on earth, and the exact same number of gluon particles that ‘feed’ our lighter quarks inside our smaller atoms. We might say that the gluon strong force is to the light quarks, what the light quark mesons are to the heavier quarks of cosmological matter: ‘food for thought’:
Graphs: the strong force killing smallish, lighter gluons inside the atomic nuclei, which feed with its anti color + color dual particles our udquarks is identical in a lower scale to the weak force, of quarkantiquark mesons feeding with its energy the heavier dark atoms, likely components of a black hole star in the center of the galaxies.
So we have found in 5D yet another beautiful scalar symmetry between the lighter gluons of smaller atomic nuclei, of lighter quarks, and the heavier mesons of larger black hole nuclei, whose components must be the heavier top and Bcb quark atoms of the top quark decuplet.
$tLOCOMOTION AS REPRODUCTION OF FORM.
Another important element to fully grasp the galatom model and the Universe as a reproductive fractal is the unresolved question on how things move. The answer stresses the essential reproductive nature of the Universe – since motion becomes in an scalar cosmos, reproduction of form.
A fundamental question needs to be resolved to make a full swing on the paradigm of science from the study of pure motion (locomotion) to stience (the study of all motions with emphasis in the dominant arrow of reproduction of form, forminaction, information), in an inverse fashion to classic physics: to define motion also as a fractal form of reproduction, showing then that actually what truly matters is reproduction and locomotion is just one of its expressions.
We have come now to the first principles and defined a particle point of existence. There is in a place of spacetime a spacetime being. What can he do? Travel through the five dimotions of spacetime available to him, through a series of ‘sTeps and Stops’, dual STates that will move the being through reality. But as the Universe has at least a step that is a motion in time and a stop that is, a spatial form, (momentum and position in physical jargon, wave and particle, motion and perception), motion now is not that ‘simple’. It is not a continuous game but a stop and go motion as we observe in quantum particles.
Let us consider the simplest of ALL those different motions of the Universe, Locomotion, to realize that if all is motion, and form a mirage of the mind, ALL DIMOTIONS REPRODUCE FORM.
Systems are mindsparticleslanguagesmappingsheads that stop motion into form, and as such ‘create’ the illusion of space, whose ‘volume’ is the sum of all those present infinitesimal minds thatmove=act in STates of sTeps and Stops, as they go from $tepping motions to §ðopping form. Science knows that. Momentum (motion state) and position, kinetic and potential energy, dualities of steps and stops are all over the place, but only stience explains why.
Actions as STeps: THE SEQUENTIAL GAME OF TIME MOTIONS
In the next graphs we see the game of stop and go, space and time state, form and motion, dimension and motion, you name it… the essential duality S=T of the Universe:
We stated that the Universe is a reproductive fractal of information. Physicists say it is a system in constant motion, and study its locomotion, but they don’t even have a definition of motion.
This might surprise the believer in our technological civilization and its high popes of science, but physicists have not yet resolved the paradox of Achilles and the turtle:
In the graph, motion is reproduction of form in a lower scale of reality. This is what we observe in quantum physics. And so speed of reproduction of information, V=$ x ðƒ (as ƒrequency is the inverse of time duration) becomes the new reproductive definition of motion, and transforms all actions in different forms of reproduction.
In 5D metric LocoMotion is as the next graph shows a reproduction of form in adjacent regions as a wave displaces switching then into particlegauging state; hence the Universe reproduces information:
It is then obvious that even locomotion the less relevant dimotion is more than a simple measure of ‘speed’. ONLY obsessed physicists as high priests of time with his shallow ‘brief history’ of those ‘5 Dimotions reduced to the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion can really think tracing speeds and worldlines is the meaning of its existence. Because physicists make weapons of mass destruction unable to love even their own species and so do humans embedded in a civilization of machines of entropy and dogeatdog people, who cannot emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms… we have converted the less important arrows in the meaning of the Universe.
But in that constant ST, stop and MOVE, game of information and motion, it il NOT with locomotions, overrated and exhaustively studied by humans but with its inverse Dimotion, that of the mind that perceives in stillness.
So the discipline of soundsound astrophysics at quantum level is closed. We have all the particles we need in this beautiful symmetry between the quantum world and the cosmological world, to build the Galaxy as it is; but if that were known coupled with the risks of the machine, obviously nobody would pay billions of Dollars to hunt for the Devil’s particle (Quark Alpha MACHO strangelets, as easy to make as an ensemble of 18 of them, or 3 dibaryons which we know the LHC is already producing)… and all its myriad of other heavy quark ensembles… mediated by the 3 heavy bosons, Z, W and H.
It is a clear symmetry of scale: the strong color charge and couples of gluons and antigluons that form its nonet, are parallel to the nonet of mesons, made of quarks and antiquarks that are exchanged accordingly in the reactions mediated by the weak force.
Because the atom spins faster, as a vortex of spacetime its force is stronger than the larger, slower reactions of mesons mediated by the weak force, but both mean the same: the entropic arrow of death of quark matter by ‘top (predator” heavier quarks. One is mediated by strong currents the other by weak currents of W, Z and Higgs bosons. It follows that exploring and reproducing massive amounts of Higgs will just mediate an ice9 or ‘gas9’ reaction converting us into mesons, from living particles into antiparticles, swallowed by the black hole or strangelet.
Feynman’s diagrams: mesons and antiparticles die as entropic, ‘past’ arrows of time
Now Feynman’s genius had an intuitive understanding of this lifedeath cycle, which in the cyclical equations of 5D merely represents a world cycle of life and death: the arrow of life and information sends you to the future of more informative cyclical speed; then the arrow of death is the bigbang that dissolves your information, in any scale of reality. So in physical particles, the arrow of cyclical information is a vortex of charge or mass, which the arrow of entropy and death converts you into an antiparticle that moves you LOCALLY into your relative past – dissolving the particle into radiation, the human being into its cellular components. It is then IMMEDIATE in 5D that the SMALLER scales in which you dissolve, radiation in E=Mc2 past matter, cells and aminoacids in life death is the past, because the RELATIVE local future, whole being needs first its parts, to appear, its relative local past. Indeed, scales of more complex informative whole are always the arrow of social evolution of future of ‘love’ because they are ‘sustained’, ’emerge’, from the smaller parts, which must exist first hence being its relative past. This is the 5D logic explanation on why the arrow of death and dissolution of information is the past.
What Feynman did is marvelously to have the intuition that the antiparticle was the arrow of relative past that dissolved the particle into its radiation. As physicists use a single TIME arrow for the entire Universe, entering their paradoxes of traveling to the past to kill your father (Hawking), they always got suspicious of Feynman’s past arrow for antiparticles, but they use them anyway. Now, the conundrum is solved by the infinite cyclical time clocks of the Universe, as all those travels to the entropic past are PURELY local, so you never in a fractal organic Universe can go to the past and kill your father, as you will locally kill yourself in the trip, exploding in an entropic bigbang of death. And unless you are ‘viral’, your dying cells won’t go much further.
The strong force therefore is an entropic force, because as Feynman rightly found, in each local world cycle of particles, the antiparticle is the same particle moving backwards in time, which means dying in the entropic process that completes its world cycle (hence living much shorter as the death end of the cycle does happen in a quanta of time). And because entropicfeeding processes are the strongest, most attractive ones in any scale (food is the first cause of most Ðimotions), they carry the maximal energy:
In the graph we see the proper way to perceive the two arrows of time of physical systems, when we plot them together as a cycleanticycle, even if an antiparticle (which must be considered the ‘3rd’ age and death of the particle) can be observed isolated.
And this leads us to the CPT symmetry, which in 5 Ð physics is absolute but quantized as time cycles are quantized for each species and its 5 Ðimotions=forces and worldcycles, and happen together not in a single plane of ‘light spacetime’; but must be considered for the whole 3±I planes whereas the equations of gravitation and relativity with its cconstant speed are the limit of 5Ð for the galactic super organism but do NOT apply beyond (inside black holes and outside galaxies, where the forces are repulsive dark entropy similar to those of electromagnetism between atoms; while inside the galaxy the forces of gravitation are similar to curved electromagnetism within the Coulomb field between the electron and the proton, whose ‘5Ð metric’ are parallel to those of the black hole and the strangelet)…
So there is a LOT of selfsimilarities of scale that would allow future 5 Ð physicists once the model r=evolution is accepted and the present dogmas put in doubt to complete by selfsimilarity the true nature of black hole stars (which rightly Einstein told us to be frozen stars), to understand the processes of renormalization (which add scalar infinities that must be cut off, including the SINGULARITY OF THE BLACK HOLE AND THE BIGBANG).
The solution of the antimattermatter symmetry and the hierarchy problem.
It is then obvious that this much more realist view of black holes and big bangs solve almost every problem of present physics as we explain in the 5D section of the scalar Universe. For example, the hierarchy problem of quantum gravity is simple: because cosmological masses are much larger, with less curvature and slower time cycles, they attract far less than charges. And in fact, if we accelerate them as we reduce their size in equal proportions, by a 10ˆ40 factor the G constant becomes the q constant and gravitation becomes as powerful. We can then say that in terms of scales, the galaxy is an atom, the black hole is a proton, the quark is a gluon, and the symmetry between the 3 scales of matter, black holes, quarks and gluons is the proper way to study all those scales – a theme that runs for a century in physics, since KaluzaKlein used it in the first models of 5D physics to unify indeed G and Q, which I obtained also by slightly similar means, as shown in the 5D section.
On the other hand, the matterantimatter symmetry is obvious if each matter is antimatter in its bigbang entropic death, the symmetry is that between living and dying people: we see less dying people because death lasts only a quanta of time. But there is another interesting proof of the model of quark black holes and the symmetry of the 3 scales, top quarks and heavy dark atoms devouring mesons of our light Universe as our light Ud quarks devour gluons of the next, lower scale, found by the very same CERN, which is now in the news everywhere as the key discovery that proves the quark matter nature of black holes and quasars ejection of matter in larger amounts that antimatter:
home.cern
The LHCb experiment has found hints of what could be a new piece of the jigsaw puzzle of the missing antimatter in our universe. They have found tantalising evidence of a phenomenon dubbed chargeparity (CP) violation in particles known as baryons – a family of particles whose bestknown members are the protons and neutrons that make up all …

It is likely that the rotation of those top quarks is hyperluminal, as only hyperluminal rotation, if mass is a vortex that accelerates inward with lesser radius, as a skater does ( Vo Ro = K) can give them such huge mass.
This is observed in all galaxies where massive jets at 10 c come out of black holes. And it is observed even in the spin of particles that have to be hyperluminal under the vortex law generalized with the scalar 5D metric of the graph, for the magnetic field they create – something Pauii already noticed in his spin theory.
So why physicists do not accept once and for all such models, including the fact that ‘outside’ the spacetime filled with light, faster than light speeds can happen? I wonder… since nothing forbid them in physics.
There is NOT in relativity any limit of speed. Einstein only said that c is constant and hyperluminal speeds require negative mass.
So because physicists do NOT know what mass is they have the taboo because they DON’T understand negative mass, which is silly since IN TIME ‘negative’ as Gauss explained calling negative roots inverse numbers, means only an ‘inverse direction’ of motion. So for example ‘negative divergence’ means implosive motion, negative potential the same implosive motion for mass and charge.
WHAT IS IMPOSSIBLE is negative space/forms (negative apples) but in TIME i repeat, negative means an inverse motion. So if Mass is an accelerated inward motion by the Principle of equivalence, the negative mass of Einstein’s equation that a faster than light rotary system has means ONLY an explosive entropic divergence, of the spacetime vortex of mass. So this simple acceptance of mass as a vortex, according to Einstein’s equivalence principle also explains antiparticles’ negative time, etc.
So goes for negative energy, which means merely an entropic explosion. For example in e=mc2, the e is inverse to the m, as a negative entropic explosion of mass that becomes entropy radiation.
So entropy is the negative of mass as a vortex whose form carries the information of the Universe and that only means that at cspeed the mass explodes. Ok. Those are concepts of information theory, which is the basis of my work on 5D, but physicists should really learn some of those concepts. Yet even if you are not interested in the scalar Universe, the symmetry of black stars and light stars still holds and it is evident.
Physicists in that sense also don’t understand how time comes to zero in those equations. It means time – motion reaches a 0 position or a balance between implosive and explosive motion in the event horizon turning at cspeed, neither exploding or imploding – not that the singularity is infinite and infinitely unreachable, as proved by muon experiments, which do not stop but slow down its spinmotions, the internal clocks of its ‘lifeduration. IT IS the INTERNAL TIME of the spins and mass clocks what slows down to a halt, as when YOU die off, stopping the internal clocks of the system.
SO NO PROBLEM with faster than light cspeeds, it is just A QUESTION OF UNDERSTANDING ALGEBRA in terms of the complex laws of information of the universe.
On the other hand, back to our starplanet reality, small black holes have not enough density to create top quark stars and so they are neutral bcb atoms of bottomcharm quarks equivalent to our stars. Only giant central galactic black holes resemble the strange neutron stars with a cover of ‘normal iron atoms and a core of strangelet’, in this case a cover of normal ‘bcb dark heavy atoms’ and the center of a quasiinfinite rotating speeds of ultramassive top quarks. Small consolation: we shall become a dark atom star, neutral, unnoticed, of 3 cm.
This simple model of quantum gravity, according to the known known DiracMaxwell and EFE equations proved together, backed besides by experimental proofs of rotary black holes and galaxies in which the halo is strongly attracted by the center all over the Universe is the work I did in 5D that now has been published in its basic assumptions at arxiv.org and will I guess have a continuation in new papers, now that Hawking cannot impose its celebrity status, not to discuss what real black holes are:
That is, Quark stars – THEORETICALLY SOUND merging THE 3 KEY EQUATIONS OF PHYSICS, EXPERIMENTALLY SOUND – A MASSIVE rotating accelerator transforming quarks in layers of heavier quarks as LHC does.
Then in the galactic version this massive positive charge creates a massive outergalactic magnetic field trapping the outer halo of strangelets, and creating the attractive tension of the so called dark matter.
Back to the metric equation at the beginning of this paragraph, which was modeled as a fluid even then, since the fluid is assumed to be at rest at t = 0, this can only be if it is a rotational fluid, with small CYCLICAL MOTIONS INSIDE, which are precisely the mass vortices of those quarks. We have a homology on our thermodynamic scale where fluid eddies form a series of fractal little vortices inside; in black holes will be small spacetime vortices which is what particles are (last graph). So the dark star model is consistent with Einstein fields equations, which in fact give for that inner region of black holes the parametric equation of a cycloid – THAT is a particle turning around the eddie of mass. as the small rotary eddies do inside a larger ‘tornado’.
For the singularity to happen Oppenheimer thus had to made more ‘assumptions’ out of the hat: that is dust not particles, that the scale factor R(t) vanishes; that the black hole is a fluid… that it has a uniform density having the initial value rho (0) – because it is made of ‘dust’ not of matter, when precisely it is the opposite, ultradense… and also that it has zero pressure (that is, it has no particles reacting and evolving, producing radiation outwards, also stupid, specially if they have top quark positive charges in the center that will produce an immense electromagnetic pressure radiation as our stars do with negative electron pressure radiation)…
All that are completely absurd assumptions. Only then the black star collapses from rest to a point in 3subspace of infinite curvature and zero proper volume, in a finite time t. Then he gets the final collapsed state of infinite energy density. And of course we cannot prove this experimentally wrong just because the center of the black hole is a region we have no direct evidence off; so we need the homologic method of 5Ð scales of matter to make it symmetric to normal stars but with heavy atoms of the top quark decuplet as we did.
A FORMAL PROOF OF THE SCALES OF THE UNIVERSE:
The unification equation: charges (∆3) ≈ masses; atoms (∆3) ≈ galaxies (∆+3)
In graph, 3+i scalar ‘bigbang’s at 3+i levels: a Hydrogen, excited sp atom, which is born of the beta decay (bigbang of a nucleon); a galaxy (ours), born of a quasar bigbang (a black hole); and the supposed bigbang of the universe, whose main proof is a mapping of the background radiation obtained ‘only’ on local measures on the same galactic region.
The form of each scalar big bang is similar, as the ‘Fractal scales of the 5^{th} dimension’ are ruled by the same isomorphic laws. Now the imaginary big bang is likely to be the cosmic as it is so similar to the form of the galaxy in which its local measures of Bg are taken that it seems to be a hyperbolic human expansion of the scale of its real experimental ‘proofs’.
Let us remember again that we can only take measures in the surroundings of a small planet and so we must adscribe phenomena to the most local possible domain for an exact theory (basic rule of truth in science: restrict theories to the area of experimental evidence.) Thus the local big bang with a ‘signature’ called B.G. of the exact form of the galaxy is a local phenomena.
Let us consider an example of what we mean by complexity vs. simplicity. In physics a TOE is reduced to the unification not of all sciences and all languages of knowledge, but only of the 4 forces of nature, gravitation, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak force.
This is the saint grail of physicists, which for a century have miserably failed. Why? If as we prove in our article on the Physical TOE, the unification is a mathematical, trivial result of the metric of the 5th dimension? Because they try to achieve that unification with the more complex formulations of quantum and gravitational physics (General relativity and chromo/electrodynamics).
What about the other 2 forces? The similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atomgalaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is then immediate on the ‘simpler models’, as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). And many other results follow. Further on, the hierarchy between those forces is also immediate. Well not so immediate, it requires…
Let us study mathematically this question by comparing those two limits of charges and masses beyond which human perception, becomes faulty.
This article introduces in a simplified manner, for nonspecialists, a new concept of Mass by extending the Principle of Equivalence of Einstein and the metric of the 5th dimension, deducing from it, a Unification Equation of Charges and Masses. It considers also some philosophical and existential deductions of those results, namely the Absolute Relativity of the Universe and the position of man within it.
The Saint Grail of XX c. physics was the search for a Unification Equation of all the forces of Nature. it remained to unify the forces of gravitation and electromagnetism.
‘Mass’ is an intrinsic property of matter, a vortex of gravitational forces, clearly expressed by Einstein’s Principle of equivalence. So it is charge: a vortex of electromagnetic forces.
Under this result, the definition of both, masses and charges as ‘cyclical clocks’ of gravitational and electromagnetic forces of two different scales (the large scale of cosmological gravitation and the small scale of electromagnetic charges) allows an easy conversion of a gravitational and electromagnetic vortex using the simple Metric of the 5th dimension for a tridimensional vortex.
The Unification Equation, thus is a trivial mathematical result in 5D Metric, using the simple concept of a fractal Universe structured in different scales of ‘spatial size’ and ‘temporal information’, in which ‘clocks of time’ accelerate, the smaller we become, but the product of both remains, expressed mathematically in its simple formulation by the Metric of the 5th Dimension: Sp x Tƒ = K.
This result allows the ‘first’ evertheoretical deduction of the value of the G constant of masses, departing from the Q constant of charges. Both mean the same: the degree of spacetime curvature produced by an Eddie of masses or charges in those scales of spacetime.
It is however impossible to obtain departing from a single spacetime continuum as Mr. Einstein or Mr. Hawking tried, by messing the lineal equations of electromagnetism and the cyclical equations of Relativity (what is called quantum gravity).
So we shall deal here with:
 The concept of a charge and a mass as cyclical vortices of spacetime of the twofractal scales of microquantum particles and macrocosmological ones.
With an Appendix on the Higgs claim to give ‘mass’ to other particles.
 The mathematical, simple, trivial deduction with the metric of the 5th Dimension of the equation of Unification of the two fundamental constants of Nature, Q and G.
III. Finally, we shall consider the implications of those facts – the parallelism between ‘atoms’ and ‘galaxies’, which as in the equations of spacetime of EinsteinWalker (which treated galaxies as atoms), are ‘similar’ forms of two scales of the Universe
With an appendix on the philosophical consequences of this, according to a strong hypothesis of the Fractal Universe (scales which are mathematically equal in the 5D metric are really equal).
Then in the 5D metric a galaxy is an atom of the higher scale, a proton has the same Schwarzschild radius equation than a black hole, which should therefore be a top quark star, positively charged (as top quarks are ++) and dark matter in the halo is made of negatively charged strangelets, the equivalent to a nebulae of electrons. Which gives a role to the 3 families of quark mass and makes sense of the purpose of stars (future black holes) and planets (future strangelets – perhaps our destiny in the higher scale, if as all seems to indicate, the Fermi Paradox converts all planets into strangelets, as nuclear physicists make them with their experiments with quark matter condensates)…
Nobody has attempted as we did to unify both, charges and masses using the simplest of all its ‘first’ descriptions:
Newton’s gravitational vortices and Bohr’s model of the Hydrogen orbit. Hardcore scholars that take years to learn Einstein’s Metric, quantum field theory and Dirac’s equations consider those 2 models ‘passé’.
And yet, precisely because the principles of unification are simple, it is through the simplest methods where the coincidences happen.
So I could easily unify charges and masses, obtaining the key parameters, the Gravitational constant and the Coulomb constant, and the relationship of hierarchy (10∆40), between both forces, by the simple method of translating to gravitational vortexjargon the jargon of electricity, a somehow convoluted abstraction not so intuitive, and then apply the law of coinvariance of the 5th dimension to both vortices, which immediately showed to be in that 10∆40 relationship.
Whereas a charge vortex had clocks of time much faster, and hence turned much faster becoming a much more attractive ‘hurricane of spacetime’.
Now, as it happens with gravitation, quantum physics went beyond Bohr’s model and gave us the other ‘3point of view’. It gave us the static, formal model, of electronic orbitals, the gradient model of energy levels and finally the more sophisticated Hamiltonian analysis of its operators.
And this final level is the one physicists try by all means to unify. But precisely at that level of detail is where the fractal scales of the Universe which are ‘similar’ but not identical (you are made of space and time and your actions are always the 5 vowels but you do NOT eat light as an electron, or oil as a machine, so you can be unified saying ‘all eats energy’ but not in the specific food).
Let us consider the first element of that duality, unifying masses and charges of gravitation and electromagnetism as vortices of 2 different scales of spacetimes. Masses and charges are vortices of 2 spacetime scales made of 2 relative energetic and informative motions, where gravitation is faster/more extended but carries less information than the slower/less extended world of light and electroweak particles.
The main variation of those vortices of accelerated forces is the one we observe between electronic charges and quark masses, which are the cyclical vortices of those 2 scales of reality, the scale of cosmological vortices of mass and the scale of electroweak vortices of charges.
And so we have to unify those 2 types of cyclical geometries on one side and their lineal, light and gravitational forces, on the other side, as they switch acting either as sinks of spacetime (cyclical, nonlineal vortices of increasing acceleration) or as lineal, gravitational or electromagnetic waves in both scales.
Yet since electromagnetism and gravitation are selfsimilar accelerated vortices of 2 different fractal branes of spacetime, the microscopic and cosmologic branes, it follows we should be able to treat them with the same equations of gravitation, either Einstein’s more detailed vortices, defined by the Principle of Equivalence between mass and acceleration or with the classic analysis of Newton, as accelerated vortices with the same geometrical form, whose relative proportion of energy/speed/ distance and information/curvature will be given by 2 different Universal GConstants.
Thus, we should be able to describe both, the standard EarthSun gravitational vortex and Hydrogen, electronProton quantum vortex with the same equations, defining them according to the mass of the particles, the rotational speed and 2 different Universal constants, U.C.(i/e):
U(g), the Universal Constant of gravitation that defines a larger/ faster/less curved Gravitational membrane of masses and…
U(q) the Universal constant of charge (Coulomb) that defines a smaller, slower, more curved membrane of quantum light. Since electromagnetism has more information and less energy distance.
Further on, we will be able to prove empirically our hypothesis of 2 selfsimilar spatial membranes made of light and gravitational quanta, whose only difference is the i/e relative density of information/energy of its cyclical vortices, if the values of the two Universal constants, in those 2 systems (the earthsun system and the protonelectron system), correspond to their relative empirical value, when we treat them both as mass vortices (being the gravitational constant 10^{39} times weaker than the charge constant).
Let us then go on with the treatment of charges and masses as Newtonian vortices of spacetime. In Newton’s equations a mass can be considered a cyclic, accelerated vortex of gravitational spacetime defined in classic Newton Mechanics by a centripetal, gravitational acceleration: ω^{2}r.
The same treatment can be done with Poison equations or Relativity equations, which are a static, present, simultaneous picture of Newton’s spacetime vortex of acceleration, where G expresses the informative curvature of the space.
Thus if gravitational acceleration is ω^{2}r, then F=mg=mω^{2}r= GmM/r^{2}, and we arrive at G=ω^{2}r^{3}/M. Where r is in meters and ω is angular acceleration in radians per second. So passing the active magnitude of time (mass, or charge or any form of time clock to the left) we obtain a general equation for all physical time vortices of all scales, which will be the template for the Unification of all vortices, in different ‘degrees of mathematical complexity’.
This written as an identity Sp x T ƒ = Sp x Tƒ observed with different parameters writes:
Γ. Active Magnitude (spacequanta) M x Curvaturespeed of the clock (time frequency) G = volume of space r³ x time acceleration w²
This written in classic mathematical physics, where we consider, using Newton’s notation, a mass a threedimensional, cyclical accelerated vortex of spacetime defined in classic Newton mechanics by a centripetal acceleration, which gives us the classic definition of the universal constant G (UC), writes as:
UC x M=ω^{2}r^{3}
where r is in meters and ω is the angular acceleration in radians per second of any gravitational orbit.
This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of spacetime by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:
Universal constant of a spacetime vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)^{2} × radius^{3}/ mass
If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe both, not only a gravitational vortex of spacetime in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but also a charge as a quantum vortex of spacetime with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.
Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:
Sun mass = 2 × 10^{30} kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10^{7 }rad. per sec.
Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.
Result: G=6.67 × 10 ^{11} kg1 m^{3} rad. sec.^{2}
This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the spacetime vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum spacetime vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.
If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.
Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)
4 × 10^{16 }rad. sec.^{ 1 }= w (electron);
5.3 × 10^{11 }m. (Bohr radius);
proton mass = 1.6 × 10 ^{27} kg.
Then we get a G, which is 2×10^{39 }stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a selfsimilar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.
And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/c^{2}.
But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.
Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.
To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.
Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal selsimilar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of spacetime vortices in the 2 different scales of spacetime of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it. Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:
For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of spacetime. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a selfsimilar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the nonEuclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of spacetime.
He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.
So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of spacetime, with two selfsimilar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a selfsimilar membrane to that of the cosmological world.
Unification Equation:
UCG,C = ω^{2}r^{3}/MUCG,C x M= ω^{2}r^{3} M= ω^{2}r^{3}/UCG,C
Where we obtain for 2 UC(i/e) values, G and Q, 2 different space/time scales and vortices acceleration (mass and charges).
2 obvious, simple proofs of that dual, scalar structure:
– Planck’s minimal value for Mass is far bigger (10^{7} g.) than the minimal value for an electromagnetic action (h), which seems to mean that the mass scale is far bigger than the quantum world.
– The entire standard model works without gravitational forces. Thus we have to postulate that particles are not ‘massparticles’ but electromagnetic systems, which become elements of mass only when they aggregate in huge numbers, as it happens with electromagnetic photons, which become electrons of the upper scale in huge nebulae.
But we see masses as static forms. This is due to the Galilean paradox: a spacetime vortexmass becomes then statically a spacetime distortion, a deformation of spacetime, which increases as we decrease size. Since the deformation of spacetime is the same for any cycle. Hence, when we trace a smaller cycle the deformation increases. And so it does the mass and the U(w), now a static constant of deformation.
This is the interpretation most often assumed of G in Einstein’s Relativity. In a simpler, classic approximation based in fluid dynamics, M/r^{3} becomes the density of space/time and its inverse, R^{3}/m, the displacement of spacetime provoked by a given mass. It is then evident by Archimedes Principle that a bigger mass density will provoke a bigger displacement and distortion of spacetime an inversely a bigger acceleration towards the central vortex. And since the density of a proton is much higher than the density of a planet, the Universal Constant for an atom is much higher and so it is its angular speed. Does the electromagnetic constant, or static curvature of an atomic system, is much stronger. So it is the density of a proton mass.
This reformulation of electromagnetism simplifies and clarifies the meaning of physics. Yet to grasp the relationships between the quantum world and the cosmos we have to transform, using the new coulomb constant, C=1.5×10^{29}, electromagnetic parameters to the jargon of gravity, departing from its fundamental relationship:
F=UCC Mm/r^{2} = e^{2}/4π e_{o}r^{2}
Then we can translate the main constants of electromagnetism (Rydberg constant, α constant, which denotes the strength of the electromagnetic field, etc.) to the gravitational jargon and again the results obtained are close to the theoretical value.
So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric force at different scales, explained with 2 different historic jargons. Further on, as we ‘transform’ the concepts of electromagnetic vortices to gravitational, geometric symbols, the main discoveries of Relativity apply to electromagnetic vortices.
Perhaps the most interesting simplified value under the new U(q) charge constant is the Proton radius that appears with the same formula than a black hole, Schwarzschild horizon.
This means that a quark particle (a hadron, a proton, etc.) is basically a black hole of the quantum, gravitational scale and vice versa: a cosmological black hole might be a deconfined state of billions of ultradense quarks. In such fractal Universe, each small particle could from the perspective of a small observer a macrocosmic form. And each atom could be a galaxy. Such fractal Universe validates the Theory of Great Numbers, which are the parameters of selfrepetition of the Universe, which might be from a lower perspective a mere atom or black hole of a hyperUniverse.
Now the EXTENSION of the model of electromagnetism, translating its equations to vortex equations of accelerated time is huge.
It means the foundation of the subject with the new physics of 5D time vortices; and makes sense of every part of electromagnetism, a cultural jargon, far more convoluted due to the lack of a precise understanding of it, in the times of Faraday, Franklin et al (for example all physicists do know about the – sign of electrons, an error as electrons are the + absorbing vortices, dominant in the electromagnetic scales NOT protons, which are the quark, dominant in the strong force and its symmetric gravitational informative inner galactic force). And all of them know that the only difference between G and Q is the 1/4e factor which was absorbed in G when Kepler>Newton developed their formulae.
One of the most fascinating results of the understanding of the 5th dimension of spacetime, the dimension of fractal scales of space and different speeds of time clocks, is the enormous simplification it implies in our understanding of the fundamental concepts of the Universe, from the meaning of mass and energy, information and time to the solution of the equations yet not solved in classic physics.
In that regard, this new r=evolution of science must be understood as the simplification experimented by astronomy with the arrival of Copernicus which put in the center of the Universe the sun. He was first dismissed precisely for the simplicity of his discovery that made so easy to calculate the orbits of planets. The astronomers of the age found it so simple that they dismissed it. And yet as Einstein put it ‘God is simple and not malicious’. Again when Einstein introduced his most famous formulae, E=mc ², and then his special relativity, he was criticized for the simplicity of the mathematics required to reach those conclusions and Hilbert said it was so easy that a high school could find it.
Tƒ, Sp and Tƒ, Sp are similar concepts. If the reader observes i includes o and æ, a and e, a is in that sense expansive expulsion of energy taken in a larger conceptualization, o and a are the pure energy and form, emitted or absorbed with minimal interference of the being, e and I are the two more elaborated versions which approach to reach and e=I point in which the transformation ends and the being finds an equal connection that I and e are the same, and this realization starts the wave of present, puts in motion the system that finds a cyclical meaning to its communication of two poles and start to move with the purpose of growing and reproduction, Œ
Those masses and charges, prove that the Universe is much more than the physical definition. And we do still have to study the concept of the source, which we shall say now is the Tƒ closed element because once a cycle is closed it finds its purpose in repeating its path (law of the least action). And so it gives purpose to its motion. Closed motions become perceptive motions of its synchronicity with pat actions it is repeating and finding through its memorial logic volume of still time=information, it is itself.
AN OBVIOUS CONSEQUENCE OF ALL OF THIS IS OF COURSE the fact that ‘Higgs DOES NOT’ give mass to those vortices, as MASS is NOT an extrinsic effect BUT AN INTRINSIC process, as Einstein wanted, an accelerated vortex of time. Let US THEN CLOSE this introduction to a true analysis of mass and the bigbang as IT is, with a further improvement on our understanding of Einstein’s theory and why the previous ‘simple’ equations that unify charge and mass ARE correct even if we can cast them with more complex Hamiltonian or Einstein’s formalisms.
Equivalence between Mass and Acceleration. Einstein’s Concept of Mass as a Frequency of Information
In the graph, the evolution of the concept of mass in relativity, from the initial image of an abstract substance in the center of an accelerated vortex of spacetime, proper of the abstract, pre–world war age, when Einstein first published his work on gravitation, to the first pictures obtained in bubble chambers in the postwar age, to the realization that each mass is a fractal spacetime made of smaller cyclic motions proper of twentyfirst century.
In the graph, for the pedantic observer, which rejects Newton as too simple, over seeded by Einstein, a final note on the multiple perspectives we can have of any event of spacetime according to the ∆±1 or Sp, Tƒ, ST perspective we adopt, we classify the 4 standing models of gravitation as relative truths, belonging to the 4 perspectives of reality: Sp< =>Tƒ.
In the graph the 4 obvious descriptions of mathematical physics regarding gravitation: Tiƒ (relativity, dominant in form)≈ Ft (Newton – dominant in dynamic motion) <> Ps (Poisson, dominant in past spatial field/gradientform)≈ Se (Lagrange, dominant in the analysis of the balances of entropic motionenergy):
Ft: Newton is a moving CLOCK LIKE vortex of the same massmotion regions)
Ps: Poisson is a potential static field of energy gradients..
Se: HamiltonianLagrangian is a dynamic description of the conservative energy of the system.
Tiƒ: Einstein’s simultaneous measures in relativity are a still, formal description in ‘present’ of the gravitational spacetime.
And so all of them are equivalent. In fact Einstein derived his work via Poisson from Newton. Today Relativity’ informative mappings of the galaxy spacetime are transformed in AMD theory into a LagrangianHamiltonian ‘bidimensional model’, for computer calculations, proving once more the bidimensional structure of spacetime.
All are in fact derived one from each other, as Einstein took its beginnings from Poisson, who elaborated on Newton; and the more important of them all the Hamiltonian).
Fractal relativity means on the other hand, that the larger wholes emerge from the smaller ones. So the larger masses emerge from the smaller motions of strong quarks. Its synchronic collective, bigger motions are quark stars, pulsars, and black holes. Today we can model any type of vortex of spacetime with fractal mathematics, as each small vortex transfers the momentum to the bigger vortex, which emerges as a macroscopic entity.
Thus, we conclude that a black hole is a fractal concentration of the densest matter of the Universe, quarks, since quarks represent on average more than 99.9% of the matter of our bodies. Those improvements on the details of mass theory, based on the advancement of its mathematical tools (discovery of fractals, chaos theory, and the five postulates of nonEuclidean geometry) is the natural way in which the evolution of science happens, departing from sound logic principles.
In the text quoted from the New Scientist that opened chapter 2, we came to the conclusion that the Universe has a fractal structure because it is made of fractal space and fractal time. But what is space and time? In simple terms, here are the two essential morphologies of the Universe: Space is the lineal, expansive energy of the vacuum in eternal motion (seeing as still distance or space, according to the paradox of Galileo). And fractal times are cyclical clocks of information, whose frequency or rhythm encodes the information of the Universe.
So space and lineal energy on one side and time and cyclical clocks of information on the other are synonymous. The static, continuous concepts of space and time become then sums of discontinuous, moving pieces of energy and infinite clocks of information that our senses put together into an abstract continuous single spacetime.
One we have “exploded” and given movement to the abstraction of space and time, it is easy to recognize the minimal bytes of energy and bits of information of the real, physical Universe. Physical information, masses and charges, and physical energy, forces, which are not substances but motions, events in time of cyclical, informative nature (masses and charges) or energetic, spatial, expanding shape (energy), that constantly transform into each other ad eternal, creating the essential rhythm of the physical Universe:
E (forces) < => Tƒ Particles (masses and charges)
The key to grasp the concept of mass as a vortex of acceleration are two physical laws: one of classic relativity, the principle of equivalence between accelerated motions and masses, and one of fractal relativity, the paradox of Galileo, the fact that we perceive reality either as a moving energy (in the case of a mass, as a vortex) or as fixed space (in the case of mass as a particle). All moves and doesn’t move depending on the way we look at it. Thus, all spaces have inner motion, even if our senses don’t see that motion or fix that motion into forms of in/form/ation.
Mass is the great problem unresolved by quantum physicists in their model of the Universe since it is not an energetic but an informative form. Einstein, who had a visual, geometrical image of mass, defined it as a vortex that absorbed spacetime, attracting in its flow everything else traveling on that spacetime as a bathtub attracts all what is in the water it absorbs.
How did Einstein come to that idea? As many textbooks and visualizations explain, he realized that when we accelerate, as it happens in a Formula 1 car or a lift, we feel more weight. Thus, he made a bold statement: mass and acceleration are the same. If we feel mass when we accelerate, it is because mass is acceleration. But what type of acceleration?
The answer is actually quite simple, because it turns out that Newton had long ago discovered a beautiful formula to describe all the forces of the Universe: F=m × a.
Where a means a lineal acceleration and so m must be a cyclical acceleration. Indeed, there are no more types of accelerations and so Einstein (using, of course, more complex mathematics than Newton to refine his calculus, as mathematics had evolved a lot since Newton’s time) postulated that masses would be vortices of spacetimes since only a vortex is a cyclical, accelerated movement.
That principle of equivalence is the fundamental principle in which general relativity is based. It states merely that mass and cyclical acceleration are the same. It means in layman terms that a mass is not a material form but a movement. And of course, because that movement is an inward, cyclical movement, it deploys a resistance to be pushed outward in a lineal manner, which from our macroscopic view seems to give mass a solid position.
Again this is intuitive. If you are a very small being turning at full speed, it will be very difficult to push you away. When you see a skater in a ring, he speeds up and closes his arms to move faster and become more stable in his position. Thus, the homology between acceleration and mass defines for a curved space the meaning of a mass, and the paradoxical fact that the smaller the vortex is, the faster it turns and the bigger the mass is. It is the same that happens in any tornado or hurricane: the closest you are to the center, the faster you turn and the more attractive the tornado is.
In that sense, what you experience as weight is the inertial resistance to any displacement of a vortex anchored in a point of spacetime. The same happens in our macro universe when a skater turns around and bends his arms to spin faster. If he opens his arms spreading his vortex, he decelerates and moves easier in a lineal direction.
A mass is thus the inertial force that we need to push away, the accelerated vortex. Those vortex like spirals accelerating in a curved path, inward, are like the pictures we observe in accelerators, or the most recent pictures of masses we have obtained, in which indeed we see a fluctuating vacuum with the form of a vortex. Further on, we know that the frequency or rotational speed of those vortices, called spins, is related to the mass of each particle. So we have both, logic and experimental proofs. Of course, I have used here and will continue using the simple mathematics of Newton and the visual thought experiments of Einstein, to describe those concepts because this is a book for nonspecialists.
Already Descartes said that the Universe was made of vortices and “res extensa,” that is, lineal space. What Einstein did was to apply the most modern nonEuclidean mathematics of his day to those wellknown principles. So he improved greatly the detail of those vortices, as nonEuclidean geometry allowed much more refined calculations than those we could do with the mathematics of Newton, but in essence the principles stayed. So we can explain very easily in an intuitive manner, thanks to the principle of equivalence, a mass with a simple equation:
Equivalence principle: mass = curved acceleration= cyclical vortex that resists displacement
If we use the simpler mathematics of Newton to define Einstein’s mass, we can see in more detail the properties of such vortices, which can be described as fluid vortices of the bits of information, the particles that create any of the multiple fractal spacetime membranes of the Universe. Consider the simplest bidimensional equation of a vortex:
Vortex Speed × Radiussize of vortex = Vo × Ro = Constant Value
Since the product of the speed and the radius is constant, the shorter the radius, the faster the speed. What this means is that any vortex paradoxically accelerates faster when it is smaller. So the product of a growing speed and diminishing radius remains constant. Hence we find that smaller particles that rotate faster have more mass. So the electron, which is bigger and rotates slower than the quark has less mass. In fact, the electron’s mass is 0.1% of the mass of an atom, which is all stored in the inner fasterrotating smaller quarks and gluons.
While in the cosmological scale, the black hole, which rotates at light speed and occupies the minimal space of all the cosmic bodies, is the most massive form of the Universe. Then it becomes a quark star called a pulsar, which has a center of strange quarks and a surface of dense neutrons. It rotates also very fast, near the speed of light, and it has an enormous mass.
We do not know what the substance of black holes is, but Einstein called them frozen stars and he said that if we were to obey the laws of the scientific method, they had to have a cutoff substance. Then when he died, we found quarks and so it is obvious that black holes, the densest rotating stars of the Universe, should be made of top quarks, the densest top quarks of the quantum world. Since black holes have very similar properties to those of a quark star or pulsar, ultra dense stars with enormous rotational speed, this fact reinforces the thesis that black holes are top stars.
But this fact, which anyone can understand, is ignored by quantum cosmologists because they don’t believe in Einstein; and of course, those who believe in Einstein are merely interested in the use of the more complex mathematical model of gravitation and mass, in which the principle of equivalence of Newton and Einstein is not so clear. The details of the trees prevent them from seeing the big picture of the forest. But here we are concerned with the picture that tells us that quarks are the atoms of the densest black holes and quark stars because only among the known particles, quarks are that heavy, and only among the known celestial bodies, black holes and quark stars are that heavy.
Further on, because dark matter represents 75% of the universe’s mass, very likely, dark matter is made of black holes, pulsars, and other types of quark stars.
Now when you get into details, the word vortex is substituted by spin, the word curved cycle by nonEuclidean geometry, and you use also two different names for the type of forces displayed by quark vortices (strong forces) and by black holes and pulsars (gravitational forces) because we are talking of two fractal scales of reality, the quantum microscopic world and the cosmological world. But those details that we will explain later in depth, unifying both scales, gravitation, and the quantum world with fractal equations (a long goal of Mr. Einstein, which I found thanks to the expansion of the postulates of nonEuclidean geometry that Mr. Einstein lacked) are of no importance to understand in simple mathematics, the meaning of mass:
Max. rotational speed × min. radius= quarks and black holes= the densest masses of the cosmos
Med. rotational speed × med. radius = electrons and stars
0 rotational speed × max. radius = light = 0 mass
It is in those terms how it becomes easy to understand the different masses of different particles and cosmic bodies, related to their angular momentum or spin: the electron which turns slower in a wider circumference is far lighter than the proton that turns faster in a smaller space, which is lighter than the black hole which turns to the limit of speed of our world.
While the mass of light is zero because the electromagnetic wave never closes in to itself, but once it has made half a circumference downward, it switches upward and so it moves as a transversal, lineal wave without mass and maximal, infinite radius: 0 mass × infinite radius = K.
In detail, light has an insignificant bit of mass because due to the rotation of galaxies (Mach principle), it has some curvature and it acquires more mass/frequency when it rotates around a quark or black hole vortex, finally evolving into a more complex form, absorbed by an electron, quark, or black hole.
Now it is easy to understand how mass (rotational motion) becomes energy (lineal movement) and vice versa (E=mc2 and M=E/c2). E=mc2 means just that when energy approaches the climit of speed of our spacetime, as it cannot go faster, it deflects its energy that curls into cyclical motion into mass. This, of course, is another thing CERN pretends to research with the quark cannon. Because using quantum equations and Higgs particles, there is no way to understand how energy becomes mass and vice versa.
The Universe is simple. So a simpler explanation of reality is more truth, even if it is experimentally less refined in its initial conception. For example, Copernicus was simpler than Ptolemy. Further on, for many years, till Kepler and Newton refined its elliptical orbits into ellipses, Copernicus’s cyclical orbits were less accurate than Ptolemaic calculus, but the principles were sounder: The sun was put in the center and that simplified enormously the model.
So it satisfied better Occam’s principle. That is what the principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravity of Newton and Einstein does with masses: by considering that particles are cyclical, accelerated motions, not substances, this sounder principle simplifies all calculus, explains logically how mass attracts like a hurricane of spacetime, and so it must be truer than the complicated quantum theories of mass, as the Higgs Mechanism, which does not even explain how mass attracts in a coherent manner.
Connecting knots: De Broglie, mass, frequency and time and energy dilation
But this is NOT the internal property of mass, which is a vortex of accelerated gravitational time, E=mc2+E=hƒ>M=ƒ(K).
We shall latter a more detailed analysis on the first concepts of quantum physics and its relationship with 5D, physics around those 2 Einstein equations and De Broglie’ interpretations of it, as he found that all physical ‘quanta’ had a bodywave and a headparticle as they move over an energy field:
Sp (lineal field) < ST – wave < Spherical Particle of information.
And so he wrote: λ x P (mv) = H (Planckton)
Written in 5D as Vs. (Spfield) > l (STwave) > m (Tƒ) = H
But while this is now standard 1st course of physics, what is of interest in De Broglie original paper is its disquisitions about the difference between the wave internal clock and the particle clock, as he focused on the ‘time element’ of E=Hv, and how time changed its clock slowing down as the waveparticle increased its speedlength in the 5th dimension, by a proportion, which we should now remark is equal to Einstein’s increase of energy of the system in Special relativity, such as, if we consider that an increase in the speed of the wave is in fact a growth of the wave spacedistance: ∆ L = ∆Tƒ x ∆ Es =K,
Scales are similar NOT equal.
It is important to notice though that the Universe of 5D planes is fractal, ruled by the 3rd postulate of ¬Æ, of similarity not equality, as fractals are not equal in scales, but similar with internal parts that might differ even if the outside form of the point seems equal to an external observer.
Thus selfsimilarity is not equality, an atom is selfsimilar to a galaxy but NOT likely a galaxy – reason why for example quantum cosmology, which models galaxies as atoms (albeit without the conceptual 5D understanding) does not give us exact results.
Quantum cosmologists consider by using exactly the same equations (in their ad hoc method with no conceptual reasoning) ‘identical’ the scales of the cosmos and the quantum world, so they use quantum equations for all. This is a hyperbolic error. We have equations for each scale and what we can show, as we did here, is the selfsimilarities of scales.
All in all, it is evident that what we call a black hole or pulsar is made of quark quanta; it is a fractal of quarks. Thus we can apply to its vortices the laws of Newtonian fluids or the more complex equations of a NonEuclidean vortices of spacetime, as we do with any other ‘medium’ called a ‘phase space’ in physics. They can be considered akin to a hurricane, which is a ‘medium’ of air molecules, or to a tornado, which is a medium of water molecules. All those mediums have limits of speed, which are the same for their lineal forces and cyclical vortices:
Light spacetime has a cspeed limit, which is also the limit of speed of a rotational electron vortex and a 0 K limit.
Dark energy and quark matter belonging to the gravitational membrane seems to have a c<10 c lineal and rotational speeds.
Because each spacetime membrane has vortices of information and energetic, lineal forces, we need equations of selfsimilarity, relating informative vortices of charges and masses on one side and gravitational and electromagnetic waves on the other. This is done with gravitomagnetism, which relates cosmic gravitational, lineal waves and electromagnetic fields. So, the gravitomagnetic formalism just needs to be properly fit within the wider concept of 2 selfsimilar fractal spacetimes, to define in selfsimilar terms, light waves and darkenergy waves of gravitation; as the elementary, actionsunits of the 2 fractal scales.
Needless to say if a proton is a black hole of the inferior scale, a black hole is a quark condensate. And measures give us black holes as ‘top quark condensates’.
Needless to say, the philosophical conundrum of the selfsimilarity of forces and forms on both scales cannot be solved experimentally. If the Universe is selfsimilar between those 2 scales, but those are the limits of scales of reality, there is nothing below the atom or over the galaxy. If the Universe is infinite in its scales we are nothing to the whole. And yet while the first answer pleases our ‘anthropocentric world view’, the second answer is far more logical and in accordance with the evolution of science and thought.
It would then mean that the Universe is absolutely relative. That is, reality is not only as General Relativity proved, relative in all its motions, which depending on the observer might be seen as motion or as stillness (so Galileo found the Earth moves but we see it still), but it would be also absolutely relative in scales.
Which form together the 5th dimension of the Universe. This fifth dimension in which science has worked since the first telescopes and microscopes opened it to our eyes, however has not been understood in logic terms at all beyond the beginning represented by Einstein, on my view by a lack of philosophical and logical depth in the work of physicists.
We deal here, when talking of the fifth dimension with a concept that should have been obvious: if physics study in general relativity time as space, in a present slice, the total time includes a flow from past to future, and from the microcosms to the future evolution of more complex structures, from smaller to bigger scales – and those dimensions, the past, already evolved flows of time that created scales from the microquantum world to the macrogravitational world, are the 5th and 6th dimension which physics does not study but must be understood to evolve science.
General relativity studies the ‘present, continuum spacetime’ (hence spatializes time to gain precision in the measure by creating a simultaneous frame of reference). And Absolute relativity is the next step expanding the study of time with both, logic and geometric, topological, mathematical nonEuclidean tools.
I recall the only time I could give a conference on that unification at Sonoma’s 50 anniversary of Systems Sciences, in which many top physicists were present.
They were first in awe that such simple equations as a 3 dimensional vortex could unify and extract the never found theoretical result of G and Q (we have only empirical measures), solve the hierarchy problem and further on as I develop a bit more the gravitational ‘jargon’ of charges, prove that the Proton radius was equal to the black hole radius so an atom was selfsimilar to a galaxy and the scales of the Universe were infinite through the 5th dimension.
Then someone raised his hand and told me what Hilbert told to Einstein when we published special relativity: the mathematics is too simple (Hilbert quipped that they were at the level of an undergraduate), and the enthusiasm waned. Within months NY Times published in its Sunday magazine a cover with my suit to the Nuclear Industry and that killed my career with ad hominem so I loss all my scholar positions and never gave more master conferences…
But that is another story of the limits of ethics in science. What matters here is to realize of the multiplicity aroused by the 4 pillars of all descriptions of reality. And the Occam’s razor: simpler is better.
The strong principle of equivalence: mass as a vortex of gravitational time.
Mass is the attractive, in/forming force of the Universe; and it is merely the last, accelerated, curved motion of the gravitational force. Einstein explained this with his principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass/gravitation. Initially, due to the ‘mirage’ of materialism, physicists thought the principle only applied to the external, curving vortex of gravitational forces that sunk into the mass. But the mass as a solid substance was never found and all pictures have seen merely vortices of curved motions.
Now we can explain all this and take further, conceptually and mathematically the discoveries of Einstein, thanks to the advances of complexity. In this post we shall deal at the simplest possible level with empirical, theoretical and mathematical demonstrations of those concepts, considering some of the new advances on theory of information and astrophysics, we are making departing from Einstein’s insight.
Einstein’s mass theory
In Physics, according to Einstein the information of a particle is its mass. This can be easily proved theoretically, mathematically and empirically.
In the previous pictures there is an obvious empirical proof. All pictures of masses and charges appear as vortices with an accelerated inward motion. Let us now deal with the other proofs (and let us remember that truth in epistemology of science is based in 3 pillars – empirical, logical and mathematical proofs.
Einstein’s Conceptual proof.
Now this simple equation is in accordance with Einstein’s Principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitational force. Both are the same in General Relativity. And so why we should stop this ‘comparison’ at a certain point of the accelerating vortex? Since in the Universe we have never seen ‘substance’ but only motions, it is logic to think that what we call a mass is exactly that: the final region of acceleration into a vortex of gravitational forces. Such vortex obviously offers a resistance to motion (inertial mass), which is dependent of the speed/acceleration of such motion.
Einstein’s Mathematical proof
The mathematical proof is simple, given by the 2 main equations of Einstein, which relate the frequency of information (a time parameter), the mass and the energy of physical systems:
ExT=K, E=Mc^{2}, hence M=K/T=Kv; where v is the frequency of rotation of the vortex of mass.
Thus a mass is a vortex of spacetime that carries the information of the Universe in its frequency.
This also has empirical proofs: All vortices attract inwards with a force equivalent to the strength of the rotating vortex. So a hurricane attracts more when it turns faster. And so a mass, which is a hurricane of spacetime attracts more the faster it turns. Moreover vortices of all kind are ‘accelerating’ inwards: Vo x Ro = K, which means that the shorter the radius is, Ro, the faster its speed, Vo, so the closer you come to the vortex, the faster it turns, the more it attracts, the stronger its gravitational force is, and the more mass it has.
But what type of accelerated motion? Well it turns out that there are only two accelerated motions, lineal and cyclical accelerations. Further on, accelerated motions can produce forces that ‘work’. And Newton gave us a simple equation to describe ‘all’ the forces of the Universe: F = M (cyclical acceleration) x A (lineal acceleration). This is fascinating because it means that the Universe is made of 2 accelerated motions: F = M x A, where A is lineal acceleration or ‘energy’ and Mass is a vortex with more dimensional form, or cyclical acceleration, whose form and frequency carry the information of the Universe.
Of course when we enter into deeper analysis of the mathematical details, a mass vortex is more complex. Einstein described it with a set of equations that go beyond the scope of this introduction. But there is a different version of those equations much simpler – the gravitomagnetic version, recently proved experimentally by a Probe, which are mimetic from the equations of electromagnetism.
And so since charges are obvious accelerated vortices of electromagnetic forces, it is selfevident that if masses produce a selfsimilar field system, they will be accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.
As Einstein put it ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’. And so there you have, the 3 simplest, more important equations of Physics, F=m a, E=Mc2, E=hv and then the more complex, equally essential Maxwell and Einstein’s equations come all together to accept mass as an ‘internal’ property that define mass and hence need no further fields and esoteric particles to be explained.
Some extraordinary solutions obtained with Mr. Einstein’s Principle of Strong Equivalence.
So we return to objective science and bring different perspectives to explain basic physical phenomena, and the simpler answers unlike the Germanic view are considered the more harmonic and larger truth: such as why certain particles like a black hole have more mass, while others like a photon have no mass?
It is really because particles are ‘prescient’ and foresee the arrival of a celebrity (they are also conscious) coming to it, distinguishing them? Or something more objective, physical and normal; as the Higgs interpretation for common consume would believe? Not, obvious. The Answer is because its vortex of time is faster.
Of course something more normal when we describe a mass as an accelerated vortex, whose frequency of rotation gives us like in a hurricane its speed and strength and attractive power. Then all the questions still unknown about mass and energy become solved:
– First, why and how energy becomes mass in that equation, E=Mc2. This is simple Energy is lineal acceleration, mass is cyclical acceleration, thus a mere topological change of the form of motion transforms one into the other. The Universe is eternal, made of motions. And so one becomes the other in the climit speed of our spacetime membrane.
– Then why antiparticles have inverse time coordinates? Selfevident: they are time vortex that turns clock wards.
– Then, why black holes attract so much being so small? Obvious. The event horizon is the climit of speed that curves light into mass. So they turn at cspeed, and they are very small. Thus the frequency of its masscycle that is proportional to its speed and inverse to its length is the maximal possible in the Universe.
– So why light has no mass? A tautology: Light does not close a cycle, but it is a wave that deflects the cycle into an open wave. Hence it never has mass. But if we were to calculate its mass in terms of energy the higher the frequency of the web (analogous to the mass frequency) the more massenergy it has.
– Then there is the scalar, fractal structure derived of the homology of the equations of charges and masses, which however exist in two different scales. This is a key discovery for the fractal structure of the Universe and proves one of my fundamental mathematical findings: the unification equation of the G and Ke Universal constants of charges and masses as two vortices of two fractal discontinuous scales of spacetime, the quantum, smaller world and cosmic upper scale.
And we will return to that at the end of this article, when considering in depth the consequences of upholding and evolving Einstein’s theory of mass, instead of seeking and absurd scalar particle that explains so little…
– Finally, why the Universe accelerates between galaxies? It is accelerating and will end into pure entropy? No. Selfevident. Physicists ignore the meaning of information and mass and they have a continuous theory of space. None of that works anymore. As each time cycle ‘breaks’ space into an inner and outer region. So do the time cycles of the Universe of which the biggest clock is a galaxy that ‘warps space into timemass’. So the acceleration of space between galaxies is balanced by its warping within them.
And both balance each other: gravitation informs lightspace into mass vortices, galaxies. And then lightspace the substance of which our space is made, once it abandons the galaxy, stretches his frequency (Doppler effect as ‘real’) till its ‘generational time cycle’ of around 10 up to 10 years dissolves it back into nonperceivable, lineal, gravitation with no form. But this and so many other fascinating results of a proper theory of time cycles require more knowledge of physics that I expect a nonphysicists to have, so we shall end here the simpler version of Einstein’s mass theory.
5D Unification from the perspective of electromagnetism: Heaviside equations.
We have considered only one of the many ways in which we can obtain the unification equation of masses and charges, to the point it is a wonder why physicists so stubbornly obey ‘dogma’ and reject even considering a 5D scalar nature to the Universe.
The first of those was done by Kaluza and Klein who rightly considered the 5th dimension an scalar one, defining points as fractal points with a volume, and approaching the values of G and Q departing from a ‘radius’ of accelerated curvature, 1/r², to use the jargon of 5D physics, to resolve a difference of forces similar to the one between the fine constant of electromagnetism and the coupling constant of gravitation for an electron. So basically it is the same concept. Much more recently than the work of Kaluza and mine, an Iranian new wave philosopher has approached the same proposition – modeling protons as black holes – using the holographic principle of Bekenstein that appeared (with the wrong arrow of time) in Hawking’s equations.
Carter on the other side, already in the 70s approached the electron as a rotary spinning charged black hole.
All this brings us multiple models with multiple parallelisms in different jargons of science. Of interest to understand that duality is another, perhaps the oldest representation of gravitation as electromagnetism, earlier even to the formalism of Einstein – the concept of gravitomagnetism.
Following with the concept of an atomgalaxy, albeit slightly different, as all fractal scales have slightly different laws, we come to the opposite view: to describe gravitation with the equations of electromagnetism.
We notice in the graphs of a hydrogen atom and the galaxy, which in EinsteinWalker model of the Universe was in fact modeled as a hydrogen atom, one of the most fascinating proofs of the fractal structure of the Universe in infinite selfsimilar scales of lineal forces of ‘spatial energy’ and cyclical particles of ‘informative time’ are the recently found ”excited Sorbitals’ of the galaxy: two bubbles of electromagnetic energy, with exactly the same form that the S orbitals of an atom have in its excited states. This fascinating image, beyond a discussion about galaxies as atoms in an infinite eternal fractal Universe, responds to two of the new ‘invariances’ of absolute relativity.
If Einstein showed that all systems are invariant to motions and rotations in space, Absolute relativity adds the invariance of scale (so gravitational and quantum scales are selfsimilar in properties) and the invariance of form (so its topologies are also the same).
So what the previous image shows is the selfsimilarity of the quantum, electromagnetic and cosmological, gravitational membranes of spacetime. They are the 2 main fractal scales of spacetime of the Universe. In this post on the future of science we introduce the mathematical equation that unifies the constants of both forces, G and Q, complementary to the Gravitomagnetic equations recently proved by Probe A, which express Einstein’s field equations in a format selfsimilar to that of electromagnetic forces.
According to general relativity, the gravitational field produced by a rotating object (or any rotating mass–energy) can, in a particular limiting case, be described by equations that have the same form as in classical electromagnetism. Starting from the basic equation of general relativity, the Einstein field equation, and assuming a weak gravitational field or reasonably flat spacetime, the gravitational analogs to Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetism, called the “GEM equations”, can be derived. GEM equations compared to Maxwell’s equations in SI units are:
In the graph Gravito electromagnetism, abbreviated GEM, refers to a set of formal analogies between the equations for electromagnetism and relativistic gravitation; specifically: between Maxwell’s field equations and an approximation, valid under certain conditions, to the Einstein field equations for general relativity. The most common version of GEM is valid only far from isolated sources, and for slowly moving test particles.
The analogy and equations were first published in 1893, before general relativity, by Oliver Heaviside as a separate theory expanding Newton’s law, differing essentially only by some small factors.
Lorentz force
For a test particle whose mass m is “small”, in a stationary system, the net (Lorentz) force acting on it due to a GEM field is described by the GEM analog to the Lorentz force equation. Where:
 m is the mass of the test particle;
 q is the electric charge of the test particle;
 v is the velocity of the test particle.
The acceleration of any inertial test particle is simply the same (above graph), changing the ‘names’ of the lineal and cyclical motions.
The discrepancy in the factors arises because the source of the gravitational field is the second order stress–energy tensor, as opposed to the source of the electromagnetic field being the first order fourcurrent tensor. This difference becomes clearer when one compares noninvariance of relativistic mass to electric charge invariance. This can be traced back to the spin2 character of the gravitational field, in contrast to the electromagnetism being a spin1 field.
We shall see along these articles specially on the 4th line the enormous importance that the concept of spin has for the structure of the Universe; as it is the minimal unit of information and perception of reality. And the first step in the construction of all forms of information, perception and reproduction of reality, and the emergence of new forms of ‘social organization’ that ultimately emerge as new planes of existence of physical systems.
In Planck units
From comparison of GEM equations and Maxwell’s equations it is obvious that −1/(4π G) is the gravitational analog of vacuum permittivity, ε_{0}. Adopting Planck units normalizes G, c and 1/(4π ε_{0}) to 1, thereby eliminating these constants from both sets of equations. The two sets of equations then become identical but for the minus sign preceding 4π in the GEM equations.
These minus signs stem from an essential difference between gravity and electromagnetism: electrostatic charges of identical sign repel each other, while masses attract each other.
Hence the GEM equations are simply Maxwell’s equations with mass (or mass density) substituting for charge (or charge density), and −G replacing the Coulomb force constant 1/(4π ε_{0}).
The following table summarizes the results thus far:
4π appears in both the GEM and Maxwell equations, because Planck units normalize G and 1/(4πε_{0}) to 1, and not 4πG and 1/ε_{0}.
In the graph, we can see the main difference between the gravitomagnetic field and the electromagneticfield, which in terms of ‘spin orientation’, could be resumed in the concept that gravitomagnetism is the ‘antiparticle’ of electromagnetism as both are inverted in the direction of the angular momentum and the magnetic field.
Now it is important to observe a fundamental law of 5 D Physics: between planes of the 5th dimension
Yet since spin and magnetism are also inverted (left handed/right handed), the series of ‘growing cyclical vortices’ which ‘feed into each other’ as they emerge into larger configurations, as in the case of lineal momentum, in which each new ‘flow of lineal motion’ has the inverse direction of the previous ones (so the couple of neutrinos that give birth to photons in the neutrino theory of light, have longitudinal polarization, and the photon, transversal polarization, going in opposite directions, and then the electron, which feeds on electromagnetic fields have inverse direction and the electric current that is born of the electron displacement is also inverse in direction).
All in all physical systems in their directions of emergence as social wholes sustained by the energy and form of the lower scale follow a FUNDAMENTAL law of 5D metric:
∆1 ∧ O∆ ∧  ∆+1
Which means that as we grow in scale the functions and forms of the points become inverted.
This approximate reformulation of gravitation as described by general relativity in the weak field limit makes an apparent field appear in a frame of reference different from that of a freely moving inertial body. This apparent field may be described by two components that act respectively like the electric and magnetic fields of electromagnetism, and by analogy these are called the gravitoelectric and Gravitomagnetic fields, since these arise in the same way around a mass that a moving electric charge is the source of electric and magnetic fields.
The main consequence of the Gravitomagnetic field, or velocitydependent acceleration, is that a moving object near a rotating massive object will experience acceleration not predicted by a purely Newtonian (gravitoelectric) gravity field. More subtle predictions, such as induced rotation of a falling object and precession of a spinning object are among the last basic predictions of general relativity to be directly tested.
Indirect validations of gravitomagnetic effects have been derived from analyses of relativistic jets.
Roger Penrose had proposed a frame dragging mechanism for extracting energy and momentum from rotating black holes. Relativistic jets can serve as the largest and brightest form of validations for gravitomagnetism.
Some higherorder gravitomagnetic effects can reproduce effects reminiscent of the interactions of more conventional polarized charges. For instance, if two wheels are spun on a common axis, the mutual gravitational attraction between the two wheels will be greater if they spin in opposite directions than in the same direction. This can be expressed as an attractive or repulsive gravitomagnetic component.
CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES
One element often disregarded in the religion of the big bang is how many sacred principles of physics are ‘destroyed’ by this paradigm, essentially all of them, but the most important perhaps is the conservation principles of energy, momentum, (lineal and rotational), baryon number and charge, all of them are respected in the Galatom model. Let us comment them.
Universal constants and conservation principles at scale.
Physics as defined classically is the study of the motions of beings. As it has been reduced to locomotions, there is so much work to do… in the foundations and philosophy of physics, as well as its translation to spacetime stience. But knowing the Universe as a whole and its 5 dimotions makes the task easier…It all comes to study and measure the steps and stop states of the spacetime organism: StopStep gives us an œquantifiable ‘feedback’ Sform/Tmotion minimal unit patterns to study quantitatively entities as ‘physical beings’.
We can call this speed of STepSTop, WaveParticle STates (solidgas) different in each scale of physics but always obeying the same laws, the essential element to measure in physics, normally through ‘wavelengths’ and ‘frequencies’ of motion
The universe is a fractal organism of 5 ‘Ðimotions’ of spacetime.
To notice first that when we properly translate the jargon of physics to the unifying language of 5D, all physical systems are indeed made of 3 ‘dimotions’ across 3 scales (¡+1 gravitational, cosmological, ¡thermodynamic; ¡1, quantum scale):
CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES: Lineal + angular momentum = Energy
1D singularity + 2 D membrane = 3D vital energy.
They give the 3 conserved ‘fractal quantities’ of any super organism of spacetime:
Angular momentum (2D membrane).
Lineal momentum (motion of the singularity)
Vital energy (volume enclosed and managed between them).
This is the simplest structure we find in all scales of nature, from atomic systems with an electronic membrane and a nucleus singularity enclosing fields of gravitational and electromagnetic energy, to cells with protein membranes, DNA singularities and vital energy enclosed in cytoplasms, to nations, with a hardmilitary border, a capitalsingularity and a vital energy of middle working reproductive class, to galaxies with a halo of strange, dark matter, a center of top quark black holes and the stars, mitochondria that reproduce them both, to yourself with a sling membrane a nervous brain singularity and a reproductive body.
And this give us the 3 simplest conserved elements of reality, lineal motions (momentum), cyclical momentum and the vital energy reproduced between them.
The Universe is a fractal of 3 elements, space, time and its vital energetic combinations. The iteration of those 3 elements into finite fractal organisms put together create the puzzle of reality we see.
This might seem in first principles very simple but becomes more complex as we are talking of a ‘vital’ fractal, which has organic, biological properties, besides topological ones, (which are the only accepted by the religiondogma of a mathematical only universe) as its goal is to reproduce information (arguably a mathematical fractal also reproduces information departing from a generator, feedback equation, but its abstract jargon doesn’t recognize those properties).
So we can define it as an eternal, immortal Universe:
It is then clear that when a galaxy dies, as a quasar, or when the black hole, emits pure space accelerated through its axis, interstellar space expands and we see that as a redshift but in the plane of the galaxy, slowly vacuum space collapses into denser particles, shrinking spacetime. Ergo there is no need for a cosmic bigbang, a hyperbolic exaggeration created using a lineal equation ‘VHod’ moving it to a remote past of which there is scanty evidence, as we show when studying in detail the theme in our posts on astrophysics.
All what you see around is a tapestry of forms that are moving (as motion is relative to the observer you will always be able to find a frame of reference in which the being moves) – nothing else is required to explain it all: ‘forms’, a concept closely related to the scientific concept of in/form/ation and space dimensions, and ‘motion’, a concept closely related to the physical terms of ‘entropy’ and locomotion; which can be considered the two limits of reality: pure spatial form and pure temporal motion.
In physics they combine into ‘momentum’ and ‘energy’, and all what you need in physics to describe the Universe is lineal and cyclical momentum and energy (the 3 conserved quantity).
Yet form is clearly NOT real but a mental, still mapping in a language that orders the external world, in the same way the moving Earth appears to us still.
Since when we observe any ‘form’ in detail at ‘smaller’ scales, the form also shows motion. Form in fact is merely a ‘very fast closed motion’ that seen without detail appears as a solid form. So all particles are closed motions. We shall call a closed ‘motion’, a clocklike ‘time cycle’. So we can reduce reality to a single ‘element’, motion. And we affirm all in the Universe are ‘formal motions’ tracing informative time cycles.
What there is always there is motion; what humans study is form. This might seem very philosophical but is of extreme importance, as science is after all the linguistic mirror of the Universe in logic and geometric languages of thought.
In a more descriptive way in physical and biological systems the moving, lineal parts are forces/limbs, the energy, reproductive part are wavebodies, the informative parst, heads/particles.
Forms in space, motions in time and its infinite combinations create the ternary Universe, which humans before so much details hid the forest understood in Eastern cultures: ‘yinformation and yangmotion create the infinite qienergy beings’ (Lao tse)
Further on we can reduce reality to a single ‘element’, motion. Since when we observe any ‘form’ in detail particles at ‘smaller’ scales, their forms are also motions, rotary motions and vortices of time.
Form in fact is merely a ‘very fast closed motion’ that seen without detail appears as a solid form. So all particles are closed motions. We shall call a closed ‘motion’, a clocklike ‘time cycle’. So we affirm all in the Universe are ‘formal motions’ tracing informative time cycles.
Information is stored in those closed ‘forms’ or ‘time cycles. In/form/ations, Forms in action are both the ‘form’ AND frequency ‘bits’ of those time cycles. And so as all what exists are cyclical forms (we shall call them, ‘fractal points’, ab. œ, •) that complete ‘worldcycles of time’, we can really reduce it all to ‘formal motions’, to time cycles.
And as any motion that ‘repeats’ its time cycle is REPRODUCING its form, its information, there is no doubt about our first principle born of the experience that all what we perceive are motions reproducing information as they move in time cycles:
All clocks of time are cyclical motions which break reality into an inner region of vital energy, an angular momentum clock that encloses it and when regular a central singularity which can ‘perceive’ some how a mapping of the Universe that flows through the membrane. So mind, angular momentum and vital energy become the 3 parts of the clock and hence the basic super organism of the Universe.
THE STUDY OF THE DIMOTIONS OF THE UNIVERSE AS FORCES.
All the concepts of nature can ultimately be translated to its ultimate components, form and motion and the 5 combined dimotions established by those 2 yinyang poles of reality. It is in the infinite manifestations of those iterative dimotions where the complexity arises and confuses the human being.
How we use then those 5 Ðimotions of exist¡ence to study physics? In many ways, obviously first in the worldcycle of beings through its ‘ages’ called in physics ‘STates’. But mainly through its interactions that deploy the ‘program of exist¡ence of physical systems. And those are the laws of forces; which unlike the present models that try to cast them all as ‘different forms of locomotions achieved through the exchange of particles in space’ will differ so greatly in equations, functions and purpose that we must accept NOT the unitarian, uniform, unifying shallow vision of present philosophy of physics but upgrade their outlook to their roles for each physical system, which is to accomplish for them their 5 Dimotions of existence.
The scholar who reads physics will dismiss all together the forest view provided by these texts for the most complex possible mathematical formulae of physical systems, totally indifferent to those first principles. The philosopher of science might however realize that the details obscure the vision of the whole simple forest; and that whole vision of the ultimate whys regardless of which language are expressed is what 5D provides.
Consider a simple example: the 5 Dimotions of a system are organic, functions, actions with a survival purpose, which all systems need to exist. We can reduce them to 3 if we study them from the perspective of scale: an entropic dissolving motion, carried about by smaller parts (∆1), a more complex, ternary dimotion, seeing in present as a ternary structure in ∆o and a larger dimotions that relates the being to its ∆+1 scale.
The multiplicity of views of those ‘elements’, then reconstruct all the terms of physics and the details and quantifications provided by maths probe on those details, from multiple perspectives and points of view, which only the simple first principles of GST can solve. One example should suffice: the forces of nature within this classification fit immediatly:
§ð: Gravitation is the ∆+1 force of the cosmos over smaller beings, and it is an informative attractive only force that allows the parts to becomes social, cosmological wholes.
∑∏: Electromagnetism is the ∆o force of our world, but it can be broken into electricity, magnetism and light (its ternary elements).
∂S: Then in the ∆1 scale we have the strong force and its ‘derivative’, the nuclear force, which therefore must be an entropic form, product of the decay of the particles within the atom that provide the motionentropy for the larger scale.
How then we transform those conceptual facts of the higher forest view to the mathematical details? Easy, as the analysis of mathematics will provide us with ‘functions’ appertaining to each dimotion. The entropy function specifically is eˆx, as it is the fastest ‘growth function’ (and inversely the constant of decay, in which death jumps over the relative present state and dissolves the being). So unlike the electromagnetic ‘communicative’ force, Q qq/dd, the nuclear force, in its ‘simpler’ ‘first’ deductive version by Yukawa had a simple elegant formulae:
F = H*e^{−λr}/r²
The principle involved is that the force carried by particles has to be inversely proportion to the distance squared to account for the spreading of the particles over a larger spherical surface and must also be multiplied by an exponential factor to take into account the decay of the particles with time and hence distance.
This was a complete surprise for all physicists who were seeking as in the Weak ‘transformative, temporal process’ – not a force in space but a transformation in time, the usual equivalent to qq/dd communicative force as they have no clue to the first principles behind those formulae.
But what is the ‘decay constant’ H*? To the surprise of all when empirically measured it turned out to be the exact value of the two fundamental constants of the galatom, c, its constant of timemotiondistance and h, the constant of spaceinformative perception of physical systems, hc… So what moves and decays becoming a ‘pushing’ force is the entropic destruction of particles into its fundamental ‘minimal 5D’ units, h and c...
Of course, today this Yukawa’s simple understanding on fundamental principles, of the nuclear force is ‘passe’ or rather was never realized as the vortices of Newton, we use to extract in the simplest form the Unification equation of forces is ‘passe’ and no scholar would care to understand why they are so precise and simple in its beauty on first principles, but rather would obsess into the little details of the forest, missing the first principles.
∫T: And the same happens with the weak ‘transformation’ that mutates particles and evolves them: when they measure the transformative weak process, they found it had NO range in space but its ‘coupling constant’ was measured in terms of time! as it is a transformation, not a force.
This requires a note on the clear difference between the 3 ‘spatial forces’ that communicate energy and information between particles (strong, electromagnetic and gravitational forces) and the weak interaction, NOT a spatial force, but a process of transformation of particles into each other, which does NOT have spatial range (as when you change internally your form you don’t move; it all happens within you). So the proper way to model the weak interaction is as an evolutionary process that transforms as in chemical reactions, one product into another – a particle into another.
For that reason the ‘weak interaction’ has a coupling constant measured in ‘time’; because it is an evolutionary process; and it does violate the CPT rule because ‘time is NOT symmetric as space’, or as Einstein put it, ‘wires don’t travel to the past’.
This physicists of course know, but only recently they start to recognize it, since they do LACK a proper 5D formalism of the duality of arrows of time, entropy AND information, to explain not only ‘spatial forces’ but ‘temporal, informative transformations’:
“The weak force… least fits into our picture of what a force should do. …the categories of ‘attractive’ and ‘repulsive’ do not really fit …because it has the ability to change particles from one type to another. …The weak force can change one lepton into another provided they are in the same generation. The electron can be changed into an electron neutrino and vice versa, but the electron cannot be turned into the muon neutrino… Jonathan Allday, Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang (2016)
And so there are ‘naturally’ 3 scalar forces, and one ‘transformative’ process (the weak force), which is exactly no more no less what we need to account for the scales, dimotions and topologies of physical systems. This is what physicists ignore and we give here, the forest view – the details have been taken with great care and detail but still miss what they are truly measuring: a fractal reproductive Universe of motion (entropy) form (language) and all its combinations.
Locomotion as reproduction of form.
The reader will notice we have established 4 Dimotions of physical systems in correspondence with the 4 forces of nature:
– ∂SEntropy corresponds to the strong force from the point of view of the larger atom; its inverse ∫Tgeneration to the weak force; and in between §ðperception of information to the gravitational vortex and its reproduction to the electromagnetic wave – but alas! the only dimotion physicists truly acknowledge, $tlocomotion does not respond to any of those forces specifically, or rather it is the effect of them all. So we need to study it in more detail to complete the correspondence of the 5Dimotions of exist¡ence and those of Nature. And since it is the ‘saint grail of physicists’, we shall consider it in more detail in a new paragraph.
Beyond the galaxy: the dark world.
The limits of stientific scales: STrings or galatoms?
All this said an important theme of 5Ð is the consideration on how many scales do exist, and what are the limits if the scales are infinite of the repetition of those scales. I am on this of the general view that it is likely the Universe can be mirrored by the 2 simplest forms of motion: a rotary motion or closed string, ‘§ðring;’ in the always modified jargon of 5D and a lineal motion or open STring $tring – the two limits of topology in space and time of 5D:
We observe that the multiple dimensions of string theory are nothing but the ternary scalar dimensions of 5D: 3 human dimensions, 3 quark dimensions and 3 boson dimensions (the component of quarks). And we shall see how the Branes which might be considered those ‘larger pentagonal’ particles unfolded are ‘entangled’ connected by the bosons… And all is ultimately about the actions=dimotions of spacetime communicated by those strings of ‘energy’. So ultimately when we considering some aspects of string theory of the fourth line we shall see that is just 5D with a very complicated jargon due to the lack of conceptual understanding of physics, and excellent mathematics, which however lack any ‘restriction’ to distinguish as Einstein put it ‘what is mathematical truth and what is physical reality’. So we stick with 5D, a far more real, better conceptualized model.
String theory in that sense is a fascinating theme, which however requires too many corrections to be worthy beyond physics:
1) To correct the errors of being Newtonian, that is using absolute spacetime in its formulation 2)to simplify and clarify its math, putting them in relationship to 5D, which is a ginormous task both of mathematical work and of penpal, congress activity to ‘convert the believers’… which in any case I can’t do at this time and age, given the philosophy of stience that considers the highest stience history, the study of human super organisms. The limits of string theory are in that sense, the same of classic physics. Its purpose deluded: to unify all other particles and systems, indeed, at first it seems a great advance. After all we just have a Lagrangian with a Lengthparameter (the string Planck’s length), and voila all comes from its vibrations… in 11 dimensions, which means we must define all modes of vibrations and all dimensions, and this is what makes the whole thing risible: what we lost in variation for sake of unification into a single length parameter, we gain in new complexity for new dimensions and vibrational modes, making absurd the concept that string theory ‘simplifies’ and unifies all to a ‘length’.
Moreover, as usual, as time is NOT understood in physics, there is NO revolution at all of concepts. All those dimensions are ‘spatial dimensions’.
So ultimately we are just in the same frame – the only real discovery is the concept that a pointparticle is a fractal point, that is it has volume, is a closed string cycle (or an open one). So instead of worldliness we make world sheets, but alas, is just a locomotion, not a world cycle.
So the string revolution is really not such revolution. It all consists in doing exactly the same mathematical manipulations of modern physics to describe reality from that ‘spatial length’:
I.e. we define a string action. We will then proceed to construct invariants, or symmetries, for this action. Using Noether’s theorem we will then find the conserved quantities of the theory, namely the stress energy tensor and Hamiltonian. We then quantize the string in the usual canonical fashion and calculate its mass spectrum and streamline all the new parameters, by making them a background spacetime, in which the string propagates, in dimension 10, 11, 26… We then proceed to quantize the string theory… And so really the ‘goal’ of unification is just not there, and the need for making strings ‘spacetime’ beings, is negated by the background of multiple dimensions.
This said I believe string theory in its proper format, due to the many parallelisms with 5D. It is almost magic to study string theory and find when properly translated that all its laws are mirror laws of 5D: from its duality of openlocomotion strings vs. closed, information strings to its 5D entangled versions, mirror symmetries of each other, which come together into the 11 Disomorphisms of MTheory, through its ‘vital properties’, similar to our 5Dimotions (strings move, reproduce, as they grow when energy feeds them, evolve socially into branes, etc.) to its S and T dualities, which properly understood are the key to the symmetries between the 5D views of any species of the Universe.
In that sense although a complete formulation of Mtheory is not known, physicists agree that the theory should describe two and fivedimensional objects called branes (: ST and 5Ð branes, that is) and should be approximated by elevendimensional supergravity at low energies (one of the many inflationary formulations of the ¡±4 intergalactic dark space).
For a while back in the 90s I worked on the proper corrections needed for Mtheory to work according to 5D, enough to say that its proper formulation in terms of closed clock Sðrings and open $trings, can theoretically wrap up a Universe of infinite planes, which repeat themselves. But I never completed the model for the obvious reasons that there are far more important research in 5D that trying to work out the ‘errors’ of physics in their conceptualization of timeclosed strings and spaceopen ones and its social membranes.
String theory is thus the most obvious candidate to the be ‘unobserved limits’ of reality, where a series of superstrings connected to circles of galaxies, will be the best way to describe the local universe, as the graphs of Lanakea shows, and viceversa, micro strings are the best way to describe.
So if we want to consider ‘stientific, experimental truths’, we should start physics beyond STring metaphysics and consider in the nested Universe the truly observable reality of the galaxyatom, of which we observer fully the ‘vital energy’ between the dark world of the Universe past the $>c and ð<0 barrier of lineal motion and temperature order of our world. We shall call this super organism the galatom and consider physics the stience that studies it.
This of course is a very different view on physics that the present view – the philosophy of all sciences based in the wrong concept of constructivism; and the more accurate view of the XIX c. regarding what human physic(ist)s do: the study of motion – locomotion and entropy.
In any case it is essential for physicists to understand also the inflationary nature of languages of information, soon to be explained, as kaleidoscopic mirrors of a single universe, and so well observed in the proposed unification of all string theories by the 11th parameters of Mtheory. We will put an example of it, when unifying forces (charges and masses). Information IS inflationary and as any system follows the same laws, as time passes, systems ‘AGE’, so do languages that enter a third age of excessive information, metalinguistics and repetitive patterns as old men do, ‘DETACHING ITSELF’ from reality into its own syntax=memory.
This 3rd age of mathematics only recognized by lobachevski and Godel, who proved the need for experimental evidence, is the true ‘old age sickness’ of mathematical physics.
For that reason we shall not work the 4v posts that should deal with the dark world of strings, neutrinos, gravitons, Higgs bosons and dark entropy=energy (not so much dark matter, obviously, quarkultradense matter). As all stiences are equally important; and string theory corrections are complex math… So ultimately IS much better to start off saying simply that the origin of reality are $trings, lines of spatial motion and Sðrings, rotary clocks of time; both below (quantum strings) and above (cosmological strings), as those we can observe in our region of the Universe:
This of course is a very different view on physics that the present view – the philosophy of all sciences based in the wrong concept of constructivism; and the more accurate view of the XIX c. regarding what human physic(ist)s do: the study of motion – locomotion and entropy.
All this said, humans have committed a very obvious error on their perception of reality – to believe that their clock of time, the lineal mechanical systems deviced by Galileo are the only time of the Universe, just because we invent those clocks and used them to equalize all time cycles of reality. And to believe that what we see with telescopes is the only reality, denying also the duality of motion and dimension, time and space, from the very inception of physics.
It is in that sense quite remarkable that it works for ‘weak fields’ which are exactly the gravitational fields that exist in the galatom between the halo of strange matter and the center of BCB and top quark atoms, as it is there where gravitation as Einstein talked of it, makes truly sense, given the fact that inside the black hole/atom past the event horizon we enter the regimes of entropic and organic evolution of matter into heavier quarks and decaying products, shown in the previous paragraphs. So gravitation strictly speaking indeed is shown in gravitomagnetism, albeit with a different in the ‘spin orientation’ of the gravitomagnetic force, which points once more to the likely ‘antimatter nature’ of the galatom as an atom – given the fact that most mass as in anti hydrogen atom is positioned on the orbital strangelets.
So when modeling the cosmos, it is likely more meaningful to consider the upper scale of galatoms, one of anti atoms, with both repulsive gravitation and repulsive or attractive charges, depending on the ‘nakedness’ of the black holes – so naked singularities, that is black holes that have stripped off star content already its galaxy could be hunting attracted by the negative force of the strangelet cover those galactic antiparticles. It is of course needed a change of paradigm for professional astrophysicists to cast within the new model the enormous wealth of information observed on galactic behavior, which this author for obvious reasons cannot commit himself to do.
The biggest pending question being for all kind of metaphysical and epistemological reasons to determine the degree of selfsimilarity between both scales of the Universal fractal, once the distortions committed by the human different perspective into the small and the larger are reconsidered. MY view is though that we cannot either resolve that question, as if the scales go from particles into antiparticles, we would have to observe much better inside the gluon atom and beyond the antiparticle scales of galaxy to know if the fractal is selfsimilar so it is not infinite in different scales – and so we might even achieve immortality by repetition of our identical forms in infinite galatoms, or each scale is slightly different so the infinity is NOT only in scales, and time but also in ‘DIFFERENCES’ OF FORM. And we are unique variations of the game of exist¡once, never immortal.
RECAP. We have in a very few pages, in the simplest possible mathematical formulation resolved the fundamental questions pending on physics, from the Unification equation of charges and masses, to the reason why there are 3 families of masses and particles, to the reason why there are 3 type of celestial bodies, to the hierarchy problem of forces, as gravitation is a much ‘lighter’ cosmological scale with far less attractive power, to the question of why we see less antiparticles (which is the dead state of a particle, hence much shorter in time, so as we see less corpses than living, despite being the same number we see less antiparticles), to the question of cspeed that illuminates the bizarre nature of spin and entanglement, to the meaning of Universal constants, the conundrum of singularities, to a better more logic explanation of reality than the bizarre bigbang… All this should suffice for scientists to realize the importance of having a better foundational system of principles to explain reality. But as we know, since Kuhn’s ‘Scientific revolutions’, science is a human endeavor based in belief, repetition and routine, so it will take decades for physicists to change ‘their chip’ and accept 5D…