# 5D

**FOREWORD: WHY THIS POST ON XXI C. ‘STIENCE’. **

‘Complexity (GST) will be the science of the XXI C.’ *Hawking, for once right (:*

‘To be or not to be, that is the question’ * Shakespeare, always right.*

‘A human being is part of a whole, called by us the Universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings, as something separated from the rest–a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circles of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.’ *Einstein, mostly right.*

This smaller section on the logic, mathematical equations of the science of complexity, which I formalised, back at the turn of the century, with the discovery of the metric of 5th Dimension of space-time that formalises and ads to the arrow of entropic, destructive time studied by physics, the arrow of creative information is here, taken from my scholar blog on SystemS sciences) for 2 reasons:

- – To prove that the ‘ad hominem; campaigns on the P.R.ess, against those who sued CERN, stressing our lack of knowledge and authority on science, compared to that of CERN’s physicists, were plainly false.
- – And to offer the reader who stumbles in this page, something more than the foreseeable proofs of our ‘future’ extinction by nuclear physicists, which are doing, with the excuse of knowledge, more of the same – Bombs of mass destruction.

You will likely understand better the structure of the Universe, the nature of the human being, and the future paths of discovery in science, reading the 5 introductory pages of this post than analysing the billions of terabytes of big data produced at huge costs and risks by CERN. And it will cost you nothing.

So give me the benefit of doubt and take a coffee-break to read the intro, to become enlightened with the perennial philosophy of the Universe, *which is NOT about destruction and death as physicists think with its models of an entropy only Universe, but about creation and life, about information, ‘Form’, which most humans understand intuitively and practice, from art to reproduction*. Enjoy its magic, spiritual, creative, loving Nature, rising well above the simplex entropy of black holes that so much obsess physicists.

Luis Sancho; Duality Chair, International Systems Sciences Society (ISSS)

**DUALITY.**

“Historically, much of fundamental physics has been concerned with discovering the fundamental particles of nature and the equations which describe their motions and interactions. It now appears that a different programme may be equally important: to discover the ways that nature allows, and prevents, information to be expressed and manipulated, rather than particles to move. (….) To conclude with, I would like to propose a more wide-ranging theoretical task: to arrive at a set of principles like energy and momentum conservation, but which apply to information.’ *Steane*

The purpose of this blog is precisely to define that set of principles, which Steane asks for, since it adds the arrow of ‘information’ to the arrow of ‘entropy an locomotion’ studied by physicists, widening our understanding of all sciences with it. To that aim we must first define time&information on one side, and space& entropy on the other, the 2 ‘elements’ of reality, which are part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and time clocks that co-exist together into the 5th dimension of scalar space-time.

Since all sciences would benefit of a better understanding of those 2 principles as all beings of all sciences are made of finite time cycles and occupy vital spaces. So as it happened when Copernicus put the sun on the center simplifying all the epicycles of Ptolemy, making much simpler astronomy, at the end of the journey we shall unify and simplify our understanding of all sciences (3rd line of the blog), once we pass the hurdle of understanding the underlying principles of ‘temporal energy’ beings.

Mind the reader since the history of science has turned around machines and weapons that work with energy and motion, we must re-construct an entire new jargon to explain science, to the point that we shall even change the name of ‘science’ for that of ‘stience’ (the science of space-time organisms) and use a completely different new language of science from scratch*. *

This is tried also by many information theorist like Mr. Steane, but the problem with that approach is that ‘information only’ theories are just going the other extreme from simplex physics, trying to reduce reality to locomotions and ‘worldlines’, to information theorists, trying to reduce the Universe to computations and qbits.

Fact is the Universe plays with both, entropy=motion=lineal space (as the line is the shortest distance to move) and cyclical clocks of time that carry in their frequency and curved form the in/form/ation of reality; but humans are ‘Aristotelian’, one-dimensional, and have a mind (ab.@), which has a very hard time to put together two conflicting, rather opposite forms as those of entropy and information are. So for example physicists call information, negantropy – as if it were just the negation of entropy-scattering motions; while information theorists tend to explain the Universe as a huge quantum computer.

Both loose 1/2 of the ‘duality’ of the cosmos, which always displays an enormous range of grey between, ‘pure black forms without motion, such as black holes and pure motion without form, such as non-local gravitation’. And so we shall find in its *combinations of motion with a little form (energy) and form with a little motion (in-form-ation, form-in-action) the vital, organic, true meaning of reality, which escapes the one-dimensional scientist.*

**A UNIVERSE OF SPACE-TIME BEINGS MADE OF ENTROPY & INFORMATION.**

In the graph, Biological and Physical systems are made of :

‘Spatial Lengthy limbs/fields’ (Ab.Spe) which perform entropic motions (as the line is the shortest distance between two points), spherical ‘__temporal__ tall’ heads/particles, (Ab. Tiƒ) , which gauge information and perceive (as the sphere is the geometry with stores more information in lesser space); combined into hyperbolic energetic ‘wide bodies/waves’ (ab. ST) that iterate the system. So we can write a fractal generator equation according to the ‘functions’ of the system:

*Γ: Spe (limbs/fields) < ST (body/waves) > Tiƒ (particle-heads)*

The proofs of the existence of such ternary topological reality is overwhelming, as all physical, biological and industrial systems follow that organic structure, limited in its shapes by the fact that there exists ONLY those 3 topological geometries in the mathematical Universe. So we can write the simplest ‘fractal generator of the Universe’ according to the topological properties of the 3 systems: Γ: | x O = Ø

Thus we define a new science: topological evolution, which studies how all systems of nature, are composed of those 3 elements, which guide the selection of species, according to efficiency, restrict possible mutations, making efficient choices (so wings are flat to improve motion and eyes are rounded and so the old question on how evolution proceeds so efficiently is resolved).

Moreover we shall see that the life-death cycle structures in time according to those restrictions maximising the entropy of the system in its young, childish age of maximal motion, which then converts into information, reaching the maturity of the system in balance between both, when reproductive systems dominate and the system iterates, and finally the growth of information exhausts the energy of the system in its 3rd informative age, when the system finally explodes, erasing back to its relative local past the information of the system in a big-bang of entropy. So the life-death cycle has also a simple equation:

*Γ: Spe (entropy, young age)> Spe≈Tiƒ-reproductive balanced age>Tiƒ (3rd age of information) << Big-bang death (erasing of information)*

The variations on the same theme happen to adapt the space-time being to the external world from where the system obtains its quanta of spatial entropy for its lineal motions and the bits of cyclical form or information. So for example plants and animals have inverse structure as plants are chemical beings, which take its frequency of information from thermodynamic molecules and entropic motion from light rays, but men use the smaller information of those light waves to map out more intricate informative mind-mappings so the roots-heads of plants become the head-eyes of animals.

The science that studies how both elements, which construct the universe, spatial entropy and temporal information interact together is called Duality, with a tradition that hauls down to the earlier Eastern cultures and its philosophies of the Universe: Taoism, which described the Tao=Time cycles of reality as composed of yin-formation and yang-entropy, which combined to reproduce the infinite beings of energy of the Universe; and Hinduism, which in a more mythic, anthropomorphic manner talked of Shiva, God of war and entropy and Vishnu God of information, the ‘lineal male, destructive’ and cyclical ‘female’ creative principles of reality.

This blog, whose author was for many years the Chair of the Science of Duality at the world congress of systems Sciences (ISSS), develops in full the model of a fractal, organic Universe constructed with both arrows, using those laws to show how the Universe constructs its infinite species all of them made of ‘fields/limbs of spatial entropy’ and ‘particle, heads of temporal information’ , which combine in body-waves of energy, creating in this manner the infinite ternary beings of reality.

L.S. System scientist

**I. ∆**

**FIFTH DIMENSION: ****THE SCALAR, ORGANIC UNIVERSE.**

All systems of the Universe can be studied with that simple, fractal generator, but to do so, we must be aware that those beings, made of ‘atomic or cellular’ fields/limbs<body-waves>particles-heads have also a ‘scalar, network, social structure’, as those 3 topological parts, which are the ONLY 3 forms that exist in geometry (proving further we are all beings made of the 3) are in fact what mathematicians call topological networks, shaped by the ‘atoms’ or ‘cells’ or ‘citizens’ of the physical, biological or social systems integrated into hole organic beings:

So we talk of a scalar, organic, fractal Universe in which parts become wholes through networks of entropy, information and energy. For example, your nervous, digestive and blood network, or the vacuum entropy, energetic electromagnetic field and gravitational≈informative force of the Universe… Thus we can build the Universe as a series of scales of growing network size, which all together form a new dimension of scalar space-time:

*In the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of spatial entropy (ab. S, $pe), studied exhaustively by physicists and temporal information, Tiƒ (grossly underated and misunderstood, as the view of a Universe with a single entropy arrow dominates physics). The interaction of those 2 arrows, in fact, create the complexity of the Universe, which CANNOT be explained only with the lineal entropic motions of simplex physical models of the universe, only apt to describe the simplest scales of space and matter. *

**∆º… Mathematical, mental description.**

*Tiƒ: Smaller space-scales have faster time cycles that encode the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles.**bigger wholes that deliver synchronous motions to those lower scales that deliver ‘quantum, genetic or memetic information’ (physical, biological and social systems), become symbiotic, as ‘parts’ and wholes that co-exist in a single ‘supœrganism’, the ‘abbreviated’ name we shall give to the fundamental particle-being of the Universe: a system made of limbs/fields of entropy=motion and heads/particles with form, which combine into ‘body-waves’ of energy, and co-exist in at least 3 scales of size from the point of view of its central scale as a being.*

All beings of reality are indeed made of lineal entropic limbs/fields, the geometry that moves faster, and spherical particles/heads of information, the ‘volume that stores more form in lesser space’, joined by body-waves of hyperbolic energy, which combine and iterate both.

And this happens, because the universe of scales of space-time has an astoundingly simple but profound metric equation: S x T = K, MEANING that from larger wholes to smaller parts it moves synchronically, and from smaller parts to larger wholes, it codes information. And together in symbiosis the information of smaller faster systems and the motion of larger, stronger wholes, create a present being, a body-wave of energy.

So the most important dynamic element of the fifth dimension is the ‘inverse’arrows of entropy and information of the lower graph. *And the fact that smaller beings are better with information, more intelligent and larger beings, stronger with more capacity to move larger wholes:*

Smaller systems run faster metabolic and informative cycles and so accumulate more information in the frequency and form of its cycles. And they code larger systems: particles code molecules, genes organisms and memes societies, because their smaller carriers are faster.

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming super organisms.

And we resume this with a simple equation, which is in science call the ‘metric equation’ of a dimension of space-time, in this case the 5th dimension of scalar, organic systems, which is the arrow of future of the Universe:

Spe (spatial size) x Tiƒ (temporal clocks of information= ∆-constant

That is, the product of the speed of information and entropy of the system remains constant, so smaller and larger beings can co-exist together in present.

And we call this ‘constant of present’ Energy.

For example, a fly thinks 10 times faster (the scale is decametric), and so you cannot catch it with your slower larger being and it can co-exist.

THIS LAW AND METRIC EQUATION defines the co-existence of all systems of the Universe, and explains why they form together super organisms.

And further on, why the future arrow is eusocial evolution, as super organisms are MORE efficient than individuals, which lack this co-operative dual arrow of information (upwards) and simultaneous motion and energy delivered by the whole.

**The organic ****description: Biological properties.**

NOW it is important to fully grasp the structure of those social scales, not only on the lower scales of the graph (physical systems) but also on the middle and higher scales, as ‘social systems’, which can be described mathematically (as numbers are just social groups of indistinguishable clon beings), but also organically, as networks of parts that become wholes, because the scales also apply to biological systems and HISTORIC and ECONOMIC super organisms (civilisations, nations, company-mother of machines). This organic description is far easier to understand: ‘fractal points’ (any being) become social numbers joined by networks that deliver motion≈entropy and in/form/ation, to all the systems and in this manner systems grow from parts into social organisms.

And this can be expressed with mathematical numbers, or algebra, with topological networks or geometry and with ‘finitesimals’ integrated into wholes (analysis), *which are for that reason the 3 sub disciplines of mathematics. *

*But also with organic, physiological networks, which deliver motion (limbs, digestive systems, raw materials), information (nervous, legal systems) and combine them to reproduce with energy the whole system (financial, economic, and blood, hormonal networks) which are for that reason the 3 networks of all socio-biological systems.*

So in history the most efficient nations are super organisms properly designed to take advantage of those laws.

So we shall unify with so simple truths all the scales of the Universe, each one explained by a science, *by fusioning the biological and mathematical properties of the Universe, which are two jargons, one quantitative the other qualitative to describe the same laws; as the ‘languages of God are ∞’ (Upanishads), but all have the same ternary structure to describe the same game of creation of parts into wholes – and needless to say we can also ad the mystical language of eusocial love of religions, which express in our verbal language the Universal mandate for all beings: grow=evolve into wholes and multiply* your finitesmal parts.

So the organic description parallel to the topological one, talks of similar beings connected through PHYSIOLOGICAL NETWORKS, that ideally deliver energy to all cells (blood, money, digestive systems) and co-ordinate them with faster nervous/electric/legal information which synchronise the motions of all those parts.

Never mind humans are so bad at designing their super organisms of history that we are the only system that does not deliver free oxygen/money to all its cells, but lets them die of anoxia, and do not emit just, synchronous laws to all citizens to work as a whole, but divides people into castes; and so such ill-designed human super organisms live short and die in entropic explosions of war.

**The physical description: Energy scales**

But how we are so sure, the scalar structure of the Universe define a new dimension of space-time? Easy. Let us just check the most authoritative definition of a dimension, from XIX c. mathematician Klein:

‘A dimension of space-time exists, when we can move through it, while leaving its parameters of space and time co-invariant’ *Klein, on the expansion of Non-euclidean geometries and its new dimensions.*

What this means for example is that when you move up and down, your parameters of size in space and inner time clocks remain invariant. So ‘up and down’ form the height dimension.

SO HAPPENS when something move through the 5th dimension: when it grows in size it diminishes the frequency of its time clocks, from the simplest entity, a ray of light that literally grows, diminishing the frequency of its wave-length to humans that emerge from a fast seminal, evolving fetus into the slower rhythms of life, *which can be formalised as a journey traveling between scales of size of the 5th dimension, from seminal birth, to emergence as an individual part of a larger, slower social world, or supœrganism (œ, ab. **super organism), its nation and civilisation, returning back to the cellular aggregation that we are, in the moment of death *.

Each of those scales of reality is made of smaller quanta, which have a peculiar property: their cyclical motions run faster the smaller they are, but the product of both (Spe & Tiƒ) remains invariant, creating a metric equation that defines the 5th dimension:

**Γ.** *Spe x Tiƒ = ∆ST = Present energy*

This simple equation that shows the product of the time clocks of a system and its size to be invariant (hence allowing travels through the 5th dimension, as when you are conceived as a seminal cell with smaller size and faster time clocks and grow=travel in the 5th dimension till you emerge larger and slower), *is poised to become the most important equation of XXI century science, which will correspond with all the main equations of all the different sciences, each one studying a scale of the fractal Universe.*

In the graph we see 3 physical parameters of those 3 arrows: entropy, as the minimal space-quanta of thermal scales, light speed, as the iterative present arrow of quantum space, and angular momentum, as the O-arrow of the same scale, which transcends into the gravitational concept, for gravitational orbits. What matters thus to localise a parameter of entropy/present space time/ or cyclical motions, is its topology that transcends scales.

Why then energy=present can be equalled in the 3 scales of the organic Universe? This is the strongest prove that the Universe is connected through the metric of the 5th dimension; as it shows the 3 ∆±1 scales equal in value of ‘energy’ and co-existing with different Tiƒ parameters (T, M, V) and 3 different Space quanta (k, h, c). So ENERGY is ultimately the ∆-constant of the immortal Universe

Let us then in more detail the 3 components of each system of the Universe, starting with the more important, cyclical time of which lineal time is a mere simplification, to allow ‘frequency derivatives’, t=1/ƒ.

**II. ST**

**CYCLIC §PACE-∏IME BEINGS: ****THE HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE**

‘There is no time uncertainty I look at my watch and i know what time is.’ *Landau*, mocking the use of a human-time clocks for all time speeds of the Universe.

”There is nothing new under the sun’ Spanish Proverb, on the repetition of all time beings & cycles of information

**Cyclical time clocks, and the information they carry.**

* In the left graph, all time clocks and cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal time to measure motion in space: v=s/t – an artifact of measure. As physics became over important in a civilisation dedicated to evolve machines and weapons, this concept of time, became the unique time concept, even after Darwin brought about his concept of evolutionary time and Vico->Marx, Kondratieff->Schumpeter and other historians and economists, the concept of cycles of time in history and civilisations. Time, which means change=motion in philosophy, however cannot be reduced to a simple formula, v=s/t that equalises all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘time clock’ of measure elongated into an infinite duration. Amazing as it seems though, this self-evident truth is not understood by scientists. If anything with the work of Einstein, which refined the use of lineal time to measure motions in space, it has become more encroached.*

Let us then define those cyclical time clocks with more scientific rigor.

The concept of cyclical times is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all time clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical times. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if times were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in time of patterns of behavior and causality.

All these truths unfortunately are hidden in the time equations of modern physics, so good for calculus so bad for interpretation, which need to be translated into cyclical time, measured by frequency (T=1/ƒ) and streamlined with a new jargon appropriate for a dual Universe, as opposed to the simplex jargon of classic absolute space-time physics, that lingers in all sciences and drags its understanding.

Time is cyclical. The so-called patterns of science are repetitions of events in time, due to a certain causality. If time were not cyclical, sciences would not exist. This little understood phenomena known to all civilisations before Galileo invented lineal time as a tool of measure of its cannonball shots defines also the reasons there are cycles of history based in the causality, which we shall reveal in those texts. In the graph we see some cyclical proceses in the Universe.

In the left physical cycles, planetary orbits, which we humans use to measure time in all our ‘clocks’, which are also cyclical. People are hardly aware of this fact, since they tend not to use the ‘parameter’ of cyclical time, which is ‘frequency’, but its inverse, lineal duration: ƒ=1/t.

The formulae are simplified in this manner. Since ‘frequency time’ is discontinuous and so difficult to ‘integrate’. So physicists prefer to uncoil, frequencies into lineal time. For example the ‘revolutions per minute of a car wheel’, multiplied by its perimeter give us the ‘distance’: λ x v = S. And besides in this manner we achieve more information, as we get the duration and form of in-form-ation of each cycle (λ) and its frequency, v.

But if you just want to know the total length of along time period, you use lineal time durations and so you don’t need to sum all those cycles to get the lineal speed: V=s/t.

In the left graph, we can see that all physical systems, and all its time cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal time – an artifact of measure, and further on equalised all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘time clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.

Thus once of the first things I did when discovering time cycles some decades ago is to painstakingly translate all THE MAIN formula of physics by changing T for 1/ƒ and think about what was telling me the equation, *no longer in terms of spatial locomotions, the theme of physicists, but in terms of temporal information, the theme of this blog.*

If you are mathematically inclined the easiest revelations with a ‘little bit of thought’ are enormous if you can ‘switch’ from a continuous lineal description of time as duration, with the more ‘detailed’ and real description of cyclical, discontinuous time cycles that move in ‘steps’. Indeed, consider for example the car, as a whole that seems to move in lineal time, but in fact it is the sum of the cyclical steps of its wheels. Both are equivalent mathematically but the analysis of each wheel step gives us MORE information. And this will be the constant of this blog: you will find a lot of new information and laws of science that *were hidden by the simplification of using the continuous sums of time cycles, ‘erasing’ in the process the form and frequency of those cyclical steps*.

**The 3 dimensions of Time.**

THE MERE FACT THAT TIME IS CYCLICAL, PROVES TIME HAS 3 DIMENSIONS:

- A length dimension shared with space, which has the function of expansive motion, we shall call entropy.
- A high dimension,
*needed to complete the cycle; which is the dimension*of information (as it creates an advantage top point of view for the ‘projective geometry’ of the mind. - And a frequency dimension, ƒ, of iterative repetition or present dimension, which therefore is the dimension, T=i/ƒ, we associate with duration, as it is the inverse dimension of the present Dimension of v=∂s/∂t.

This brings about another fundamental law of the Universe, the holographic Principle.

Since if time has the dimension of height to complete a circle, we must re-define the classic 4 dimensions of time-space, as 2 dominant in TIME-space, height and length, which creates a bidimensional circle (to which ad the frequency of the cycle, or pure dimension of time), and those dominante in SPACE-time, which has now 2 dimensions, length and width.

And so because only beings with the same number of dimensions can transform into each other, we just have discovered an important conundrum of modern physics – how the Universe is built through the…

**Holographic principle: bidimensional time (information with motion) and entropy (space with motion) exi|s≈t**

‘I don’t have time or energy to do this.’ “Naked”* **Leigh*

*On the 2 substances of which we are all made, temporal information and spatial energy*

‘Coincidentia opositorum’ Cusa, *on the fundamental dialectic dualist logic of the Universe, which constantly brings the opposite properties of ‘Lineal entropy’ and ‘closed information’ into Complementary Spacetime energy*

‘From 1 (the yang-line of entropy) comes 2 (the yin sphere of form), from 2 comes 3 (the ying-yang being), from 3 come the ∞ beings’ Cheng Tzu

We made a huge first statement – that entropy is space and information is time, just ‘seen’ with different ‘quantity of motion’. Let us then explain this first principle of the complex dualist Universe.

When we say ‘I don’t have time and energy to do this’, we really mean it. Since we do not exist in a space-time background frame of reference. We are made, as Leibniz explained, of a vital space, which our bodies occupy, and has energy as vacuum space does, and last a finite time, our world cycle of life and death.

*We are time space beings as everything else in the Universe, and this is the first isomorphism that make us like every thing else.*

The perfect form of spatial entropy is the straight line in movement – the shortest, faster trajectory between 2 points of space – and its society, the plane. The perfect form of temporal information is the circle and its society, the sphere, which keeps the maximal information in minimal space. Both, opposed, inverse forms shape the spatial, linear, energetic bodies and cyclical, informative, memorial minds that become the complementary forms of all organic systems made of atoms of temporal energy.

Entropy and information are the 2 primary elements of the Universe. They form all its complementary systems. In this posts we study its basic properties and dimensions. In the graph, they display different forms. But information dominates and defines an arrow of complexity and increase of height (the dimension of perception), from where informative organs (heads, cameras, black holes, skyscrapers), perceive and control with invisible languages (words, images, gravitation, money), the ‘unmoved bodies’ of energy under them. They are indeed what Aristotle called the multiple unmoved Gods of the Universe.

The 2 primary elements of the Universe,lineal entropy and cyclical form, mix and evolve, till reaching the threshold of complexity that gave light atoms living properties and now it is about to give the same life properties to metal systems.

In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the ‘limbs and heads’ of humans, animals or machines, because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information.

Entropy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.

For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space. So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’.

On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘limbs of metal’ with digital information. The functions of those ‘systems’ are also biological. Weapons are lineal, energetic forms that kill human beings.

We summarize the formal and functional differences between energy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:

*Maximal Space-Entropy = Minimal Form=body Vs **Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head*

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

The immediate consequences of changing the outlook of the ultimate 2 elements of reality completely upgrade our vision of physical systems. The reader will notice if he keeps reading this blog that *we will resolve for all sciences multiple unanswered questions and we will have to re-interpret many information, as we better focus the truths of the underlying concepts of space-time – and this is a task that starts in the bare bone human languages of those 2 substances, logic of time and mathematics of space, which now will be considered Non-euclidean and Non-Aristotelian. As all beings made of space-time are.*

THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO GRASP: Science is based in causal, local, finite time cycles. So it is your life a finite time cycle. So what science achieved obsessed by measure and speed, in simplicity of calculus it lost in information about those cycles, which we have regained since I established in a series of landmark papers, back in the 90s the laws of cyclical times for all the systems of the Universe. It is an ongoing research, but it will as computers make easy calculations of discontinuous functions, become the standard for future time research, as an enormous array of new discoveries happen when we ‘do not loose’ the information of those cycles. This is specially truth of physical systems, deprived of the organic, cyclical causal properties of ∏ime and fractal §paces.

**We are al timespace beings.**In the graph, some natural cycles of time perceived as forms of space for slow ‘time beings’ as humans are (atomic cycles), as languages of the mind (music beats), as biological cycles (life feeding, menstruation) or as physical systems (rotational matter planets, moon cycles).

But it also means to deny the fundamental ‘particle’s the Universe – a being made of a VITAL space with motion, which LASTS a finite number of time cycles.

Since we are ALL space-time beings. So to understand man, yourself, you need to understand cyclical time, so you know why your actions are cyclical (you eat every day), discontinuous (you do your vital space-time cycles switching on between its ‘varieties’), and *finite (you are not immortal, well you ARE, but not in the way your ego wishes, a theme for 3rd line sub posts)…*

So for the future evolution of a more comprehensive theory of reality we consider that all the ‘systems’ of the Universe (anything that exists), there should be at least two elements, defined by their form and function, both related to each other: energy or entropy or space (any expansive motion, hence perceived as extended, planar or lineal space) and information or form or time (implosive motion, hence perceived as implosive, cyclical motion)

In the Principles, Descartes had argued that the world is a plenum & all motion in a plenum must be circular, and such circular motion presupposes the “infinite, or indefinite, division of the various particles of matter” as they adjust and shift to accommodate a continuous flow around bends and through narrows. Concerning these propositions, Leibniz approvingly remarks, “What Descartes says here is most beautiful and worthy of his genius, namely, that every motion in filled space involves circulation and that matter must somewhere be actually divided into parts smaller than any given quantity”

Alas, there you have by the 2 founders of modern science and mathematics *as astoundingly compressed definition of the cyclicality of time, the fractal nature of space, the ultimate substance of reality, formal motions, the proper definition of infinity and quanta.*

All the features of cyclical time, one stands immediately: a cycle has two dimensions, so we ad height to the beats of time rhythms measured by frequency, or in terms of ‘space-dimensions’, time has the length and height dimension of ‘information’ and space, then is left with the length (they share) and width dimension of ‘simultaneity’ and ‘parallel reproduction’.

A few Scientists though found that information is indeed bidimensional as the page/screen you read, with the height dimension and the ‘fixed’ forms of your information (which were at one point cyclical knots of time).

So they call the bidimensional nature of time cycles (which they apply to information unaware of its connection with time) and its equivalent bidimensional planes of space, the…

**Trinity: entropy-motion x dimensional form=Energy**

* Above the ternary structure of all systems of nature, made of time clocks that store the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency and form of those cycles, and guide a ‘body-wave’ that absorbs spatial entropy and moves the system.*

A way to explain this in a formal manner is this:

Unlike lineal time which reduces time to an instantaneous, ∂s/∂t measure of present, simultaneous slices of time cycles, cyclical time gives 3 dimensions to time, the classic past of ‘entropy’ and motion, present and the future of more information. This is self-evident as any cycle requires a second dimension of ‘height’, information. And further on, as time-cycles are finite, closed forms, we require a 3rd dimension of repetitive frequency, to make possible the 3 dimensions of time, precisely that repetitive present, which seems not to change as it is a repetition copycat of the origin. So for example, in the cycles of ‘life ages and evolution’, the first age is ALWAYS the one of maximal entropy-motion (youth, weapon machines), the 3rd age one of maximal form, information (old age, informative present age of history) and in the middle we have an iterative, reproductive age of maximal reproduction (of a product in an industry, of life in biological beings, of a radiation=massive reproduction of species).

Finally 1 comment:

The language of God are infinite. While we do NOT shy to mathematical equations, the languages of ‘God are infinite’ (Upanishads). That means the religion of machines, among Humans, which are today basically slaves of their computer machines for most themes including the perception of knowledge, and so need to talk with numbers to feel truth, is NOT real. We shall specially in this blog on social sciences use and justify and explain why the VALUES OF the wor(l)d, and our natural language is a better language for truth, and certainly for evolution and time predictions (being evolution a verbal language). I get specially irritated by all those ‘nerds’ who think if you don’t show a powerpoint presentation with nice graphs and equations you are NOT doing science.

Not so, qualitative, formal, dimensional information, in human beings HAVE always been explained with human time-clocks, the ‘verbal times’ of our flexible sentences and human eyes – the artistic sensorial work of our spatial senses. This means they are also excellent time records which today the ‘mathematical/mechanical school’ of social sciences tends to shun off – the classic case being Herodote’s books of history, which turned out to be actually filled of facts, despite being so much prone to mythology. So words and facts come together to verify truths, and words are when conceptually sound are the proper causal language to explain evolution theory and the extensions due to cyclical time.

In fact the most useful part of mathematics for GST will be the direct first approach to it, topology, as we have shown. Since it shows directly the quality properties of the system; being algebra mostly a human synoptic language of the direct ‘form’.

Look around yourself with the naive eyes of a child to understand the simplicity of the Universe. All what you see is a myriad of discontinuous beings and all of them are made of two elements ‘form’ or in/form/ation and motion (which people call often ‘energy’, but scientists, call ‘entropy’). We shall call them ‘temporal form’ and ‘spatial entropy’, and affirm that all what exists is made of ‘temporal form and spatial entropy’, of ‘time and space’, as when you say, i ‘don’t have enough time and energy’ to do this. All systems occupy and hence are made of a ‘fractal piece’ of vital space, which will last a ‘quantity of time’ between its cycle of birth, life and extinction.

On the other hand, Planck did also found that space was not a single continuum measured with the abstract rod of absolute newtonian space and a cartesian line. Instead he found that space was a vital space, with ‘motion’ (energy or entropy, technical terms slightly different, so we shall use for the ‘time being’ the more intuitive concept of motion). And this ‘formal motions’, pieces of vital space, ‘ticking’ with different time clocks ‘evolved’ and formed ‘spontaneously’ particles, increasing its form, its information, departing from ¥-rays.

So he said that the unit of reality w*as not absolute space-time but a combination of spatial energy, and temporal information, he called an ACTION: h= e x t.*

Indeed, we are made of space and time. We are NOT placed in an ‘abstract’ mathematical artefact called the ‘Cartesian graph of absolute space-time’, as Newton wanted, but we are beings made of ‘relational space-time’ (in words of Leibniz, the first proponent of this realist model of the Universe), and only when we put together simultaneously all those pieces of space, the mind can peg the puzzle of vital spaces into absolute, ∞ space; and only when we put consecutively and causally all the events of time, the mind can ‘imagine’ an immortal Universe whose extension and duration is longer than that of all its space-time beings: ∑s=S, ∑t=T.

This, we know for a century since the revolution of modern physics dethroned the abstract artefacts of Newton, Galileo and Descartes – a single absolute space, a single mechanical clock to measure time and a single continuum piece of abstract paper with two abstract lines tracing on it – the Cartesian plane, where *all space-time ‘finite beings’ are suppose to rest. *

Look again around. Do you see the lines of your cartesian time? All what you see are different clock-rhyhms, different ‘beats of existential time’, within yourself in your circadian clocks, in the solar system with the cyclical rotation of the earth – a day, or around the sun – a year; or the beat of you thoughts, heart and eye-lashes, a second, YOUR minimal unit of time, the beat of your body synchronised to the informative visual and mental thought.

This Einstein realized when he assaulted the Newtonian paradigm of a single Universal mechanical clock, set by ‘God’ to monitor the beats of all beings. So he said ‘I seem to be the only physicist in this world who thinks time clocks beat at different rhythms in different places’. Scientists did not like it, as their routine of measuring time cycles, by equalising all those infinite rhythms (some of which we see in the lower graph) with a single machine-clock. So even when he got his nobel prize 20 years latter, relativity theory was not mentioned, and it still ill-understood, reason why we have not gone beyond in its concept of ∞ time clocks, merely play with his equations.

To that aim we must first define time&information on one side, and space& entropy on the other, the 2 ‘elements’ of reality, which structure the ‘social growth of scales’ of the 5th dimension, creating all the systems of the Universe, which always will be made of, relative cells/points, joined by networks of entropy and information, put together in energy body-wave systems.

**Diffeomorphic ‘relativity’.**

Einstein said that space-time was always local, diffeomorphic, ‘measured’ in simultaneity from a point of view (that of the head-particle of information that directs it all). And this Broglie best understood when postulating a synchronous inner clock in the particle, beating with the rhythm of the body-wave beats. Ok, your eye-thoughts beat with the rhythm of your body-heart, and have the rhythm of the legs-steps (one per second all). So *in more detailed analysis, we shall see Broglie-Bohm theory right in its interoperation of quantum physics.*

As a result of those morphologies we classify as energy or information organs not only in carbon-life organisms, but in machines and in physical systems made of energy (fields, limbs, food) and information (brains, eyes, cameras, particles).

Thus also other beings and atomic species, even ‘deconstructed organs’ are Se or Tƒ systems:

The combination of one of such dimensions of space and time, create a ‘bidimensional geometry in motion’ called a ‘topology’, and as it happens, there are only 3 ‘type’ of bidimensional topologies, the toroid, energetic one that expands and creates motion, the hyperbolic, cyclic one that allows cyclical exchanges of energy and information, and the spherical one, which allows shrinking without tear and deformation of any wide image of the universe into a ‘zero-point’ or inner mind, which reflects that Universe.

And as it happens, according to the holographic principle, the Universe is truly bidimensional, made of membranes that become layers, to form 3 D which move to form 4D. For example, you are reading a bidimensional, tall screen of information. Your eyes see bidimensional and put together a 3D vision. So all systems are made of those 3 ‘bidimensional, specialized parts’.

Now let us try to put all this into a very simple ‘first generator equation’ of space-time beings, with the 3 symbols we have used, | for motion or spatial entropy, O for information or temporal form and Ø for its ‘present body-waves’ that iterate those forms as they move along a path, transforming the entropy of puree space with no form in the first particles that will evolve through eons to give birth to the human kind. So we affirm;

“All systems of reality are complementary systems with an informative spheric O-head-particle (as the sphere stores max. information), which uses the pure entropic motions of a lineal |-field-limb (as the line is the shortest distance between 2 points) to move and control a hyperbolic Ø-body-wave of energy that iterates the system, combining the other 2 forms. Since those 3 ‘forms’ are the only topological varieties that exist, no other possible structure happens. So we write a simple ‘Fractal Generator’ for all beings made of limbs/fields of ‘spatial entropy’, cyclical particle-heads of ‘temporal information’, stored in the frequency and form of its closed logic clocks, and iterative body-waves:

|-Se: Spatial, entropic limbs/fields x O-Ti: Informative, temporal particle/heads = Ø-energetic space-time body/waves”

It is what you can see in the first graph, above: from cells, to atoms, from planets to galaxies, we shall see all systems are enclosed by a thin Spe-membrane that breaks its vital space, and will have a central mind-brain-system of memorial clock-cycles and in between the Ø-body wave that stores the energy of the system. So we do have our 3 fundamental principles of reality, to play with: pure spatial entropy, pure temporal form and its combinations of ‘energy/in-form-ation’ which are entropic motions with a bit of temporal form (energy) and temporal forms with a bit of motion, forms-in-action, informations. So we can also widen the principle of conservation of energy to enclose the 3 concepts ‘Entropy and form, space and time never die, but combine constantly into ‘present’ systems of energy and information’.

And so there are ‘3 bidimensional’ finite ‘parts’ of Space-time in all systems:

- Sp (entropic, toroid, lineal limbs and fields)
- ST (the iterative, reproductive, energetic body, wave)
- Tƒ (the informative, spherical head)

And all systems of the Universe have them.

BUT we stated that SPACE AND TIME ARE RULED BY A HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE OF EQUAL DIMENSIONS, and both are finite, and both are part of a whole. So what are the equivalent 3 Dimensions of Time in a finite ‘sequential form’, equivalent to the 3 organs of space that create the fractal Universe? Easy, we all know them, or rather knew them till Galileo invented lineal time; they are the 3 ages of time, youth, maturity and old age, which correspond to the dominance of one of those 3 ‘organic elements’, as youth is the age of entropy and motion, the 3rd age is the old age of information of excessive form, and in between there is the reproductive age of balance between both. And all together form…

**III. Ω**

**THE 3 AGES OF TIME: ****WORLDCYCLES OF EXISTENCE**

‘To be or not to be, that is the question’ * Shakespeare*

“For you are Dust. And to ∆ûst you shall return.” *Genesis*

**The world cycle of existence.**

Thus we have now enough knowledge of the whole range of motions in timespace, according to the 4 elements of reality to figure out HOW THE UNIVERSE INTEGRATES THEM ALL IN A CAUSAL SEQUENCE, the world cycle of existence, of life and death of all systems of the Universe.

Indeed, what is the most important fact explained by all this expansion of the dimensions of the Universe?

We might wonder what is the fundamental ‘use the Universe has for a 5th dimension of scalar space-time. Why indeed we need a fifth dimension? Simple. Because without it we cannot explain *THE FUNDAMENTAL FACT OF OUR EXISTENCE, the world cycle of life and death. Since l*ife is a journey through the fifth dimension of scalar space-time:

In the graph, we can see the essence of the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of entropy (studied exhaustively by physicists) and information (grossly underated and misunderstood): to be the ‘scaffolding’ for the worldcycle of existence of all ‘supœrganisms’, systems made of networks of atomic/cellular or individual elements that self-organise, emerge as wholes and ‘live’ through 3 ages of increasing information (life arrow), ended in an entropic explosion of death that erases the information of the system.

So all Nature’s systems live as they emerge from a lower seminal ‘seed’ of the ∆-1 cellular/atomic/prophetic plane of the fifth dimension (physical, biological, social systems), reproduce and evolve socially into a larger whole, in which all parts carry the same information of the original, seminal, individual ‘cell’ (crystal structures that replicate in solids the original unit, organisms that replicate the same DNA, civilisations coded by a memetic prophet).

THEN THE individual ∆-system becomes part of a larger ∆+1 world, in which it performs its living cycles, till it returns at the end of its world cycle back to its atomic/cellular state in the moment of death.

We can write a logic, formal equation of the life-death cycle and we shall see it applies to all beings, which live travelling in the fifth dimension as the graph shows. All of them are born in a smaller scale of the fifth dimension (ab. ∆-1), then evolve very fast in time and emerge as full-grown beings in the ∆-slower scale:

st-1 (SEED) <st (emergent new individual)

Whereas we use the symbols <, > (easier to type than ‹ ›, which would be more proper NOT to confuse them with those of math equations), to express BOTH concepts, a being ‘growing in size’ and diminishing in time speed, t<S, or a being shrinking in size and growing in time speed, such as S>T).

This happens in all scales of reality even if we can use different parameters to study that change of speed and growth in size.

For example, when a black hole is born, it has an enormous temperature, which is a parameter of its ‘metabolic activity’ and according to the laws of thermodynamics, as a hot coffee becomes colder, it becomes colder, slowing down its metabolic activity while IT GROWS IN SIZE, EATING US, the slow beings, till it reaches its MAXIMAL SIZE as a galactic black hole, which is very inactive and very cold, almost at 0 K.

But we can express the same concept in terms of ‘nervous speed’. I.e. We all know though political correctness oblige us not to talk of it, that ‘mongoloids’, those small Japs, have a bit more of ‘nervous energy’, and keep working working so fast; while big swedes are a bit slow, or as Schopenhauer put it ‘it is good that German words are so long, because germans think so slow, they do have time to reflect on them’ (:

But then, we live in a larger ∆+1 scale or world, and that world is slower in its cycles. We call that world the sociological super organism, nation or civilisation, which is slower than we are, in its rhythms of creation and destruction in a big-bang of entropy called WAR.

Since DEATH is the final explosion back into entropy of a system that keeps growing in information, accumulating its memorial form in wrinkles and warps.

Indeed, as we keep accumulating information the system starts to mal function, and so at the end since INFORMATION dominates entropy the system finally reverses its arrows and explodes back and dies in a ‘single time cycle’…

And so it expands and decelerates and becomes a nebulae of cold gas if it is a star, a collection of disjoined atoms and molecules if it is a life being.

So death does have also a simple equation: ∆ Ti<< ∆-2 Se (information explodes and lowers 2 scales of the fifth dimension, so you die, become a group of unconnected cells, insects eat you up and you become a collection of amino acids, which insects now will use to ‘recreate a new form’ in a new WORLDCYCLE of existence, of an ETERNAL UNIVERSE, where entropy is constantly balanced by information).

Thus we can now fully understand the last element of the Fractal Generator, the 3 scales of the fifth dimension. Since the entropic elements are disorganised, and hence belong to ∆-1: Spe, the individual as a whole, is the intermediate element, or ∆º, and finally the individual is part of a social larger whole, ∆+1, which *is controlled by the informative classes of society (those who control its digital languages of information, digital money or bankers and legal wor(l)ds or politicians). So entropy tends to form disorganised chaotic, ∆-1 herds, individuals are aware of its ∆0 existence as a super organism, and finally the informative neurons form a tighter **structure, joined by axons between all its elements, which become the whole unit of a larger ∆+1 scale:*

∆-1: $pe (Planar, Lineal, Past entropy limbs/fields/territories)<∆º-ST: Hyperbolic, Present re=productive Working-citizens-body-waves of Energy>Tiƒ:Informative Future cyclical heads-particles-informative classes: ∆+1

This is the Equation of the Organic, Fractal Universe of space-time beings in a nutshell.

**IV. ∆º**

** ∞ ****MINDS: ****ITS LANGUAGES OF KNOWLEDGE**

‘Every point is a monad, a world in itself.’ *Leibniz*

‘The language of the Universe is topological, made of cycles, lines and triangles.’ *Galileo*

‘Numbers are social forms.’ *Plato*

We have considered so far 3∆ elements, Sp, Ti, St,∆, but forgot there is always an observer the mind that knows, and so without defining the mind (which can be considered the ‘software’ that runs the Tiƒ, head-particle-government of a biological, physical or social system, we are NOT complete, just describing as present science does, the how, but not the why.

So even if this part is less easy to accept, it is necessary to postulate as all deep philosophers of science have done the existence of a PERFECT PROGRAM OF SURVIVAL AND EXISTENCE OR MIND OF EACH BEING EXPRESSED IN A SERIES OF LINGUISTIC SYNTAX, OF LANGUAGES THAT MIRROR AND MIMICK WITH LESS OR MORE ACCURACY THE ∆ST STRUCTURE OF THE UNIVERSE.

SINCE of those 3 elements the most important by far is Tiƒ, the guiding system of information, ‘particle, head or GOVERNMENT’, and even more important than the hardware the software, the algorithm of survival and building of super organisms and its world cycles in time – THE MIND OF THE UNIVERSE OR ‘GOD’ AND MIND OF EACH HUMAN SOCIETY, OR human God, and of each system, made to the image and likeness of the whole.

We shall call the mind, the point of Max.Information of the system, its zero point (ab. •) or ∆º scale of the being, as it is in mathematics the o-point or center of the ‘Cartesian frame of reference’; in the galaxy it zero-point or black hole; in a mass its center of gravity; in the cell its DNA nucleus which encodes the information with the program of evolution and survival of the organism; in the nation the capital and president, and generally speaking, the *point of maximal density, Max I≈∆º, which from an advantageous point of view perceives itself as the whole, as it coordinates with its maximal information and communication with all the elements of the systems (its inner world which it invaginated with its nervous/informative, gravitational forces; its outer world, which it perceives with its senses). And further on, maps it all with an still mapping, mirror of the Universe, it will latter use to project its imagination in the external world and create a territory of order around it.*

And to understand all this we have to return to the beginning of physics – the discovery of the principle of relativity between motion and form.

**Galilean Paradox. E pur si muove no muove: minds cannot perceive together motion and form.**

Now there is Galilean relativity far more important than Einstein’s one, as it found an amazing truth: MOTION AND DISTANCE ARE 2 SIDES the same coin, or else, we would see the Earth moving when it does not (and vice versa: e pur si muove e our no muove).

But how can we differentiate forms and motions. What are a form and a motion?

The answer is that all has form and motion *at the same time. Motion is the objective reality, Form is the still perception created by a mind. So the Universe is about motions, the worlds of the mind about forms. Reality is about motion, knowledge about form. Reality is made of time cycles and lineal motions, mind about forms created with time cycles and dimensional distances, created with minds.*

*This is what Galileo discovered but never understood, as he was just an artillery master. It is the Principle of Relativity, which is at the core of all physical, scientific laws, but we shall call the Galilean paradox, because Physicists, from Galileo to Einstein, were aware of it, founded their science on it, but have never fully grasped it.*

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study.

*The universe is made of actions of energy and time, two formal motions, which the mind maps out as still form, to fit a view of the cyclical, fractal moving universe, inside the small brain. It is the galilean paradox, which introduces the bias of the mind in any form of language-knowledge. Information is still perception, of form, motions thus become linguistic reductions, in mathematical and verbal temporal languages, which reduces the syntax of all of them to the 3 elements of reality: lineal, cyclical and wave-like forms and motions. In the graph, from far away Saturn’s rings seem solid, continuous, single space-times, but in detail are cyclical, in motion and structured in fractal scales of relative size.*

Still minds perceive by locking information about wholes in linguistic mappings of moving external cycles with motion and form, is the only rational explanation of the duality of Galileo: all moves and yet minds perceive it still.

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks.

The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer- given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

The number of truths revealed by this duality is truly enormous. Consider a simple case of physics.

Einstein discovered that the vortices of accelerated forces he called ‘gravitational masses’ were caused by the *curvature of space-time. Why? Obviously because curvature is the ‘static’ view of ‘acceleration. *

Both are identical concepts, the faster a vortex accelerates, the more curvature we see on it.

Those dualities, which are at the heart of the parallel mathematical techniques of science (so we can always use a topological, spatial, static solution parallel to an algebraic, temporal one) are at the heart of modern science….

Even if scientists do not offer any explanation of its whys as we do here – such is the essence of the modern scientific method today, a praxis of computer data and mechanical how-measure, which in a visual world of ‘believers’, so ‘grounded’ in image-reality, might make all what we say here – I am conscious of it – ‘vaporous, spiritual’ and easy to reject (:

So we shall as time goes by, add ‘our little mathematical boxes’. I.e. consider what we just said that ‘curvature and acceleration’ are similar concepts. So happens in *mathematics, which will reveal once and again far more ‘profound, homologic facts’ and similarities between scales, as it is the science of space-time par excellence. *

So in calculus, the second derivative measures how the rate of change of a quantity is itself changing; for example, the second derivative of the position of a being with respect to time is the instantaneous acceleration of the being.

Yet *on an abstract cartesian graph of analytic geometry, *of a function, the second derivative corresponds to the curvature or concavity of the graph.

The graph of a function with a positive second derivative bows downward (it, is concave when viewed from above), while the graph of a function with a negative second derivative curves in the opposite way (it is convex) and with 0 it is a stationary maximal, or minimal point with no acceleration; *thus describing the 3 curvatures-motions of the Universe, informative motions of growing concavity inwards (ab.-π), or entropic motions with an expansive motion (ab. + π) or a steady state (π-proper). Yet going even deeper, π does not exist as a fixed number, so systems in fact beat, Spe+π, Tiƒ, – π, but never lock into a dead perfect cycle of present existence, hence the dynamism of the Universe.*

So far so good, if you have arrived here, we have concluded that the best explanation to Einstein’s multiple clocks is the simplest one: there are infinite cyclical, finite, closed ‘world cycles’ and ‘clock-cycles’ for all kind of beings.

And distance-dimension in lineal space and motion is the same. So it doesn’t matter if we say that ‘galaxies’ are moving at an accelerated path, or we say space between them (distance) is growing.

Why then so much fuss about modern physics if those findings have always been with us? Well, one of the problems of physicists is their ‘imbalance between the enormous mathematical development’ of the science and its minimal conceptual understanding, expressed in Feynman’s infamous quip: ‘the (verbal) why is the only thing a physicist does not ask’. This always astonished me in scientific conferences.

Indeed, physicists were the least interested on those discoveries, as there is a lot of conceptual mind-work to get to the equations. And most are practical people: machine making->experiment to measure data and put it in equation. And that’s all folks. As it is a pseudo-religious dogma of physicists that ‘mathematics is the language of god’ (Galileo again).

Well there is more, much more to it, when you ask also the why and care to conceptually understand it with the ‘language of time’ in the human mind, which is logic, verbal thought…

Since ‘the languages of God (to represent time and space) are infinite’ Upanishads.

So it is unavoidable as all knowledge is biased by a mental still linguistic mapping to define in those terms the…

**∆º… ∞ LEIBNIZIAN MONADS ≈ CARTESIAN WORLDS.**

‘The languages of god are infinite.’ Upanishads, on the capacity of all ‘sentient species’ of the Universe to understand its rules, except perhaps man…

Every man takes the limits of his own field of vision for the limits of the world. *Schopenhauer*

‘New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.’

* *Planck*, On the mind of the scientist, a monad-world mirror of the entire universe in a finitesimal point*

**•-Minds: Still mappings and its languages ****of information≈Perception. ****Eyes of time.**All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

*Descartes was a* contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, *said that all what exists was made of:*

*– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.*

*– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’*.

And then he added a 3^{rd} element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: *Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.*

*– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’,* to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

*•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad: ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.*

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believers to be it all.

Descartes was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

In the graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

**The negative, lethal effects on the mind, parasite of energy: its ego ****paradox.**

In the graph, an analysis of the mind, always in the height or central point of the being, perceiving its outer and inner, world, integrating the whole around its ∆º advantageous point of view, controlling with languages that mirror reality in its ternary syntax the whole Universe, bending it to its selfish point of view and then mirroring that selfish p.o.v. on the external world, building territories of order around it, where to reproduce its forms. The mind though has a negative effect on systems – to create more information than energy so systems finally become old, warped, still, informed and this is the origin of death and the finite world cycle of beings…

**Metaphysics of being**

Now, the physical mind ‘is’ within the being normally on top, Åcting in exchanges of energy and information for its ternary systems, *but and this is the most beautiful fact of the Universe, the mind, as an ∆º, self-centEred, fractal point of view RUNS THE SAME PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE IN ALL BEINGS OF THE UNIVERSE; made of 5 åctions which we call bending them a bit for a mnemonic rule:*

*å-cceleration (locomotions), e-nergy feeding, i-nforming, œ-ffspring reproduction and Universals creation (social evolution)*

All beings of the Universe, move, feed, perceive, reproduce and evolve socially into larger wholes made of ‘social numbers’. And this IS THE MIND-GOD OF ARISTOTLE, WHEN HE SAID WE ARE ALL GODS, MINDS-MONADS, MOVING THE BODIES OF ENERGY AROUND US, THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OF ALL BEINGS. When I understood this, a quarter of a century ago, 1992; i felt like that biblical moment, when at the 7th day God had created all and he rested. Oh, Yes, I felt paraphrasing Einstein that ‘I had understood the thoughts of God, and the rest were just details’.

This infinite number of infinitesimals minds, who are all alike does have however another interesting feature, *the ego paradox, as paradoxically each mind is subjective self-centred and think himself different from all other beings, something which is sooo evident among the human lot.*

*Why? Because the infinitesimal mind has a subject first, I-language-world inside. And so it FEELS TO BE SEEING NOT THE MIND BUT THE UNIVERSE. AND MOST PHYSICISTS STILL believe in this ‘realism’, which has grown even further as to consider that the mind-universe only ‘happens’ when the physicist ‘observes it’ (quantum copenhagen interpretation).*

Before we deal with the other two great fields of mind-will inquire – its actions of survival, it is worth to comment on this physicists/mental problem. In essence the mind paradox is an ego paradox:

‘The infinitesimal mind-mapping confuses itself with the infinite Universe it distorts, and so feels itself to be the center of that mind-Universe, having a subjective ego-centered active view’.

This is by extension common to all systems of the Universe, which we shall see are always self-centred and trying to SURVIVE by absorbing selfishly energy and information from its outer world.

NOW, we have seen how languages commit errors because minds are self-centred, and see themselves as the only thing that matter. So men think only us are alive and organic and intelligent. This carries to the bias of scientific knowledge in all disciplines of human thought except perhaps biology, which being self-centred in us as living beings but not in our consciousness and memes can be neutral and use all languages.

AND THAT IS THE REASON, why General Systems tends to relate more to biological sciences, though in this blog we abandon this classic approach establishing a language for all of them. Or in terms of classic Greek Logic, if we were to be pedantic and establish a very abstract logic way to do GST, establishing the ‘Axioms of ∆ST that all systems and sciences obey’, which then can be particularised to a series of ‘postulates’ for each science.

We do not use though that method, which I find excessively abstract and pedantic, except to correct some errors of maths. Let us then consider an overview of the previous ‘paradigm of philosophy of science’, physics, with the wealth of discoveries we have reached so far, to show you how we can enlighten so much knowledge with the simple ‘Copernican method’ of putting time and space in its proper ‘place’, which simplifies and enlightens everything that has to do with both.

**∆º**

** MENTAL STIENCES.**

**MATHEMATICS, AND ITS CLOSE CONEXION WITH GST.**

‘The universe is a supœrganism, the body of a mind called God≈Logos’ Plato…

‘…of a (non-AE) Logic higher than the Aristotelian (@) human mind’ *Augustine*

So how the mind of the scientist looks at the Universe with those languages?

Easy: extracting the topological (logic & mathematical SPACE-TIME symmetries), & organic, biological properties (due to the co-existence of ∆-scales in the same §upœrganisms) of the being, explaining it with BOTH human languages of space and time (geometric maths and verbal logic).

So of course, our analysis of the mind implies a complete upgrading of those 3 ‘foundational sciences’, ‘logic’, ‘mathematics’ & *organicism-systems.*

**The generator of maths**

We state that all what exists is a fractal being of ‘∆•st’, dust of space-time, with 3±o components, spatial entropy, temporal information (its energetic combinations), extended across several scales of relative size in space and speed of time clocks from forces to Universes (ab.∆), *which is apperceived in a Leibnizian way by a mind, the linguistic software that codes the GST laws in a biological survival language for the system to ‘see’. We humans use words, but most of the biological world uses ‘light’ and its 4-fold grammar of red-entropy, blue-form, yellow energy and green information.*

Or simpler languages of black-information, white-energy, or ternary games of red-entropy, green-energy and blue-form. But always at least 2 elements. So does math in its minimal o-| models of computer thought, through the 10-social scales of the decametric ‘tetraktys’ explained elsewhere.

*So we need always to define 2, 3 or 4 elements of reality for any species, science, event and linguistic form. The result being the GST, GENERATOR of a system, which can get more complex, from 1, the name, to 2, the yin-yang, space-time, to 3, the entropy-energy-form, to 4, the Spe,St (energy proper) x Ts (Information proper) T (DIMENSIONAL FORM).*

So the Correspondence of Mathematics and reality is immediate, as mathematics STARTED, with 2 branches, its B&W (arithmetics of time-numbers and geometry of points). Then developed into 3 branches: Space≈Geometry, Time≈Algebra and 5D≈Analysis. An finally developed the 4th element, the mind-languag of mathematics itself – set theory and the axiomatic method, which we consider superfluous, a 3rd age of excessive information that has taken maths away from empirical knowledge and intuitive understanding (of the 3 schools of philosophy of math, obviously we are closer to the intuitive and reject the axiomatic, dominant in the 3rd imploding age of all language that separates from reality and looks at itself).

The generator equation of mathematics is thus simple:

*Γ (Time): *Spe (Geometry>Analytic Geometry>Time Geometry > 5D Topology) x Tiƒ (Arithmetic > Algebra) = 5D Planes (calculus>analysis)

*Thus corresponding to the 3 parts of the Universe, there are 3 types of mathematical sub-disciplines:*

* ∆nalysis, STopology and ¬Ælgebra. *

We shall just look now very briefly to the beginning and end of the evolution of geometry, which started with Pythagoras and ended with topology and Non-euclidean geometry that we shall further evolve.

**You think you knew the Pythagoras theorem?**

Where is the maths in all this? We insist the maths are well-known so we shall not dwell on them, though we shall enlighten maths also with the a priori ‘Axioms’ of GST (cyclical time, fractal space, holographic principle of bidimensional space and time which come together into ST-presents), from where we will deduce the 5 ‘postulates of non-Euclidean geometry’, basis of the next ‘LAYER’ of causal science: i-logic mathematics, the upgrading of mathematics, which will further ‘enlighten’ mathematical physics.

It must be understood in that sense, why we do have 4 lines in this blog to rebuild 400 years of human knowledge till i get tired of it and leave as ‘Descartes’ said things to do to further ‘disciples’ (:oh, well yes we genius are very lazy people (: the point is to start from the foundations (first line), will gives ‘slack’ to define the fundamental knowledge of sciences in the second line at a ‘relatively’ simple level (now in construction).

While the huge wealth of knowledge of the past century, will need a more ‘pro’ approach in the 2nd line of ‘isomorphisms’, to go with the 4th line studying with pure GST each science and all its laws.

So this first line on theory and the one with explicit name for sciences is the ‘theoretical minimum’ and it starts from very first principles, but alas, all can be enlightened again. Indeed, when I was young there were few people I truly admired. One of them was Einstein, though latter i would think he was overrated. Now being old I enjoy most, his quips and collateral work. So one thing stroke me when young – a new *demonstration of the Pythagoras theorem, the first theorem of maths, which seemed so simple and without nothing deeper, based in the ‘scales’ and self-similarities of its ratios, pure ‘fractal paradigm’. *Now can we get more of it with GST, as an example on how you must really look at all what you think you knew and see it with new eyes and cyclical corrections? Oh yes we do. As it will happen, the deepest revelations will come ALWAYS from the simplest theorems as they are at the base of all other knowledge, the pedantic scholar of the XXI century thinks is the ‘new physics’ as if the ‘old stuff’ was all dogma of truth. Not so. Thus before we make a fast on-slaughter on all those dogmas of physics, we give you the ‘Einstein tease’; another proof of Pythagoras.

We have told you that the universe is a bidimensional hologram of space & time like forms; or a ternary one, if we add the result of mixing space and time into an st PRESENT, or a fifth dimensional game of scales of ternary and bidimensional holographs. So from those simple principles we shall in maths find many enlightening thoughts. Now, the Pythagoras theorem is obvious: the bidimensional sides of a triangle ad up to the bidimensional diagonal. Thus we write: A(ST) + B(TS) = C (S). But why A is a function of T (obviously it is the smaller), b of ST and c of S? Ultimately because the triangle is a fourier sum of waves, and c is *always the largest volume of bidimensional space; hence *the entropic ∆-1 flat field that feeds both the body and the head of the system.

And so b and a will be the ST-body and Tiƒ-head of the system, expressed in terms of the entropy they consume; which in the most perfect systems, will in fact be similar in a balance body-head, wave-particle, ST≈tiƒ, which tends to be the rule. So much then we can extract knowing GST of the relationships of the simplest forms of mathematics (and also of the complex ones).

But Alas, if x²+y²=z², according to the holographic principle, why not x³+y³=z³? Precisely because the Universe is in each scale a bidimensional holography of space & time. And this ‘proof in less than a margin’ of the most famous unproved Theorem by any human mind (a computer did it in thousands of pages), called the** Fermat Grand THEOREM,** is a clear proof of GST.

Two more examples will suffice on the original work of Pythagoras illuminated by GST:

**The tetrarkys. ∆-1: THE 10 DIMENSIONAL INNER PERSPECTIVE.**

Pythagoras as Plato latter said that numbers are forms, as they were in the earlier age of mathematical geometry, where a number was a group of points, whose *form mattered. So HE REALIZED 10 was the perfect number, because of its perfect form.*

In the upper left graph the 3 ST-ructural sub-systems of the human body, which are its structural forms (membrane, sustain and motion).

In the bottom the 3 ‘chemical Tiƒ’ systems or hormonal brain (creative, distributive and reproductive)

In the middle the 10th system (nervous system)

And in the upper right 2 of the 3 ‘Spe’ Subsystems lymphatic, digestive (not portrayed the urinary/excretor system)

**The 3 waves. **Finally Pythagoras is remembered by a 3rd discovery, that of the harmony of music.

Schopenhauer, by far the best philosopher of the industrial age, said that music encodes the secret program of time in its rhythms.

So thought Pythagoras when he found the perfect harmony of the ‘fifth’, the musical chord obtained by plugging 1/3rd or 2/3rds of a string, attached to a point of future and past, the birth and death of the frequency of its world cycle.

As you can see in the next image, if we consider the vibration of the string, the simplest possible world cycle going from 0 to 1 and back to 0; *the string will wave back and forth 3 times, increasing each time the ‘information’ it carries and diminishing its entropy≈energy≈amplitude. And the perfect form will be reached in the most harmonious sound produced at 1/3rd, in the change of age or state of the system. But what is more beautiful, *time waves back and forth 3 durations and we can fusion them as Nature does in a single ‘social being’, integral of all those webs. This is called the Fourier transform, and in complex 5D metric is the essential equation of time cycles; since it keeps adding on ‘social scales’ of larger simpler wholes (the single wave) and smaller more informative parts. And finally ’emerges’ as a ‘single being’, a square wave:

The beauty of i-logic mathematics thus will the reside in its capacity to express (as music does in human arts, with its 3 elements, ∆±1 3 scales, T-beat, ST-melody and S-ynchornicity of instruments) the purest GST laws.

Now this was the beginning of geometry, and we have seen how much GST can extract from it.

But the end of modern mathematics – can we enlighten it further with the laws of ∆•st of space-time?

Indeed, XX c. was about topology and we used extensively its 3 varieties to define organic space, but GST will go further with the completion of…

**¬Æ-mathematics: The fractal point-knot of space-time as a mind.**

**The formalism of ∆-planes: Non-Euclidean definitions.**

5D isomorphisms show a Universe made of multiple scales of broken, intertwined ‘spacetime’ membranes. Thus, its formalism must combine geometric equations and causal, logic, sequential time laws.

So we need to upgrade our simplex space language (continuous single space defined by Euclidean geometry) and time causality (Aristotelian one-dimensional causality from past to future, A->B) to explain multiple spatial scales and 3 time dimensions, past-energy and future-information combined into complementary, present beings. I baptized this new mathematic-logic formalism, ‘i-logic geometry’ that completes the 5 Postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.

Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics. So we ‘create new postulates of geometry’ by defining its essential elements, points, lines, planes and the laws of congruence (similarity) between them, as well as re-interpreting the concept of a Non-Euclidean point crossed by infinite parallels (5th postulate) in terms of a mind that absorbs flows of energy and information: O-mind x ∞ time cycles = Spacetime mapping.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

Einstein used the 5^{th} postulate of Non-Euclidean Geometry (Points through which multiple parallels can cross), to describe the structure of Gravitational space, *using a single clock, the 4 ^{th} present time dimension.*

* *Tƒ complete his analysis, we expand Non-Euclidean geometry, adapting the 3 Geometric, Euclidean definitions to multiple ∆-spaces and the 2 logic postulates (3^{rd}& 5^{th}) redefining identity and causality using the 3 dimensions of time.

– 1^{st} Postulate: ‘A fractal point shows 3D volume as we come closer to it’*. *Since only fractal points, which grow in volume as we come closer to their scale, can fit multiple parallels.

– 2^{nd} postulate: ‘A line-wave is made of ∆-1 points with ‘breath’ that communicate energy and information among ∆-points’.

– 4^{th} postulate: a plane is a discontinuous network of fractal points joined by waves of energy and information that leave interstitial dark spaces. (Particles in physical planes, cells in biological spaces and so on.)

– 3^{rd} postulate: ‘2 entities are ‘equal’, when both, their external form (Euclidean definition) and internal 3D parts are identical.’

Yet since we cannot perceive the complete internal information of 2 points, still and isolated by its external membrane (Galilean Paradox) instead of equality we talk of degrees of ‘similarity’*. *

*So Isomorphisms between entities of different scales are NOT equalities but ‘similarities’.*

*-5 ^{th} Postulate: ‘*0-Points gauge information & energy, transforming waves of external ∆-i points into inner body cells and mind’s pixels.’

And so the fifth postulate formalises the Galilean-Ego Paradox:

*‘Every point of view=mind feels, subjectively, from his point to view, the center of the Universe, but it is only a zero-point, an *infinitesimal *mirror, which maps in stillness a minimal part of the ∞ information of the ∞ Universe’.*

As Aristotle put it, ‘there are ∞ Gods, still minds that order and move the energy that surrounds them’.

Thus we define a sequential, causal behaviour in all systems, which start with the perception of the mind that absorbs entropy to create body åctions:

– ∆ï -> ∏∆+1(mind’s creation) -> ∆Sp (entropy feeding) -> ∑Sp X Tƒ (cellular reproduction)

This ‘Existential algebra’ is the ultimate formalism of GST, which advanced researchers will use in the future to model all realities, but we shall try to keep ad minimal except in the 2nd line of isomorphisms which will develop the language and fourth line, applied to high-level science.

**∆±i**

** PHYSICAL SYSTEMS **

** A MORE COMPLEX REALITY: ****5D CYCLICAL TIME AND FRACTAL SPACE**

It is then clear that we are expanding our notion of space from a single continuum to a scalar, fractal quantum-like structure of relative point-beings joined by networks which can be formalised with a new dimension of space-time, based in the scalar sizes that co-exist together, on one side. On the other side we are considering time cycles, which explains neatly this fractal structure, as cycles break systems in inner and outer regions, and become points when seeing from far away. Yet on close analysis they do have volume, membranes that break reality, and that is indeed the ‘detailed view of reality as it is..

Indeed, some key properties of cyclical time self-evident in the graph, which will have enormous importance in the understanding of the existence of all space-time beings are:

- A time cycle is closed and so breaks reality into an outer ‘world’ and inner ‘world’, the being’s vital space. So the Universe is a puzzle of Multiple, finite, fractal, closed number of time clocks and space regions, as all cycles enclose an internal and external regions, separated by the cycle (first theorem of topology and knot theory). Cyclical time is therefore in accordance with the quantum broken nature of space, found by quantum physics.
- Different time speeds in different regions of the Universe, as all cycles have finite size, so each particle that traces one closes the cycle in different durations. Cyclical time is therefore in correspondence with Einstein’s relativity which found the Universe to have regions with different time speed.
- And finally time is BIDIMENSIONAL AS A CYCLE HAS 2 DIMENSIONS, FREUQUENCY AND HEIGHT, as it has information, which is as the image you see a bidimensional sheet/screen. So INFORMATION IS THE STATIC VIEW OF THE ‘form’ OF A TIME CYCLE. IT IS THE cyclical FORMAL motion, stored in those clock-cycles. So information is the still perception or form of a time cycle.

Any physicist knows that those 3 principles, quantum space, different relative time speeds and the discovery after II w.w. of the bidimensional nature of information (Holographic principle) *a*re the 3 fundamental principles of XX c. physics.

So XXI c. physics; (: this blog 🙂 starts with those 3 principles ‘explained’ in its ‘whys’ not only its hows.

And then depart from those principles as an albatross of thought, to rise into the gliding spheres of the fifth dimension, looking with new perspectives to all what exists down there in present science.

**THE ERRORS OF ‘LINGUISTIC MENTAL PHYSICS’**

**The need for more than a language to describe the wholeness of physical systems.**

Physics is wrong in its concepts and right in its equations. To understand this, wecould be to compare it with the duality of Chinese language. In the graph, it is possible to write in Chinese perfectly, as physicists write in equations, and make completely sense, without understanding a dot of it in verbal languages, the ‘natural conceptual language of people’. So a writer of mathematical physics will be right in its equations and fully use them for practical purposes, but it will ignore the conceptual, verbal meaning of those signs.

And this is essentially what happens due to the errors of cyclical time and fractal space. Cyclical time measured by frequencies is the inverse of time duration, so in equations, t=1/ƒ are both right. But conceptually we shall ad an entire new ‘world of subtle differences’, thanks to our advanced ‘verbal thought’. Moreover, while there are only a standard ‘traditional’ and modern way to write mathematical physics (due mainly to the evolution of the language of mathematics), the simplified language is quite good to convey most meanings, even if the more complex has much more depth of meaning and symbols. So we shall find that for example, the 4 constructions of gravitation, Newton’s T-vortices of time; Einstein’s, S-imultaneous pictures of the vortices in greater detail; Poison’s gradient in ∆-scales and the Hamiltonian-Lagrangian more elegant, •-mental description of the whole mechanics (preferred), are variations of the same theme; as often in chinese the subtle differences of pronunciation give us variations of meaning.

But if we do not know both languages, the wholeness and richness of Chinese and Physical systems would be lost to us, and we could on top make silly errors, as those foreigners do with the word ma in its 4 tones, unable to distinguish them, and so calling a mother a joint, or even worst, a horse. And physicists, we shall find do have many of those errors, specially when interpreting wrongly Time AS A SINGLE arrow and space as a continuum, LOOSING the 4 ∆•st perspectives of knowledge, the scales of the 5th dimension, the mental limits of languages that describe them and the 3 ages of time and its functional symmetry with the 3 forms of space.

So *3 will be the focus of this blog in the expansion of stiences (sciences of space-time beings): correction of errors due to lineal time and continuous space; expansion of properties of physical and social systems with organic, fractal, biological vital properties; and isomorphic, homologic understanding that all sciences are the same and all languages are the same as all can be ‘generated by the Fractal Generator of Space-time Beings *

*(Ab. GST, which also means general systems theory but MAINLY THE GENERATOR OF SPACE-TIME, Γ). *As i am a lazy ‘cow’, the proper way to write both the fifth dimension and the generator of space-time, which would be Γ (st), but wordpress cannot accept commands to do it directly, alas, eternity will hang on ∆ for the fifth dimension and GST for the generator).

Now the 2 most important of those discoveries, which we shall reason and prove ad nauseam, but still most people won’t believe is this:

*INFORMATION GIVES ORDER TO THE UNIVERSE. CHAOS AND ENTROPY IS MERELY THE LACK OF INFORMATION, WHICH COMPLETELY DOMINATES TODAY HUMAN THOUGHT BECAUSE OF THE LINEAL ERROR OF TIME THAT ERASES THE INFORMATION ON THE FREQUENCY AND FORM OF ALL CYCLES.*CYCLICAL TIME IS PREDICTABLE, because the cycles of time are causal and repeat themselves. So with a deep NOT necessarily mathematical, but mostly evolutionary understanding of that causality, we can predict the future, NOT only of simple systems, in lineal locomotions (physical systems) but also of biological, evolutionary systems, as we have proved it, predicting the cycles of history and economics, for 30 years in advance, with all kind of details in a series of books, regardless of the fact that the predictions are not amenable to people (we predicted the 2001, 2008 crises, the present age of military fascism etc, as you can read in depth in our analysis of the eco(Nomic)system).- Among those cycles, the fundamental one, the world cycle of life and death and its 3 ages/dimensions of time can be explained for the first time in history of science.

The Ego paradox defies objective sciences. Each of those discoveries in itself should change the entire way we understand the Universe and man within it. It will unlikely do so because of the ‘ego paradox’ of human people (scroll a couple of pages:), latter explained in terms of the mind. Basically humans MUST by decree be different from the rest of the Universe, because that is what makes them feel happy, important and self-centred (which is what all minds do, to focus information from the enlarged point of view of the being). Still the few human readers who are intelligent and humble enough to go over the hurdle of ‘egos’ at individual and collective level will completely upgrade their view of reality with the information of this blog. It won’t be an easy task because all humans do have ‘beliefs’, which are ‘memetic cultural imprintings’ that they consider their ‘essence’ as humans (it is not, their essence as humans is biological not cultural specially in all those memes which deny the human single species, such as nationalism, racist religions, class-structure etc.) But is the ‘CHARACTER minimum’, required to understand history.

Still the few human readers who are intelligent and humble enough to go over the hurdle of ‘egos’ at individual and collective level and the *memorial imprinting of dogmas of science that pass as absolute truths and are just distorted views, and artefacts of measure, such as lineal time is, *will completely upgrade their view of reality with the information of this blog.

The error of entropy expanded from a continuous ∆-thermodynamic plane to all systems of the Universe.

In the graph, the first error of physics is the use of concepts across a single continuum, when they apply to transfers of energy and information between planes; and as a consequence of it, the lack of clear definitions of the 3 arrows of time, future to past entropy, past to future dimensional form and present energy that combines both. We shall therefore scrap all together 200 years of silly-nilly chit-chat on the single arrow of time and all theories of entropy only, dying Universes, which completely *misunderstand the eternal ST balances caused by the interaction of the arrows of entropy and information.*

All this written with the formal equations of 5D metric creates a zero-sum world cycle of ‘existence’ for all beings, much more complex and meaningful than the simplified version of ‘worldlines’ proper of 4D physics – the limiting model of 5D when applied to a single continuum plane of the scalar Universe, with a single time-clock and space-quanta. Reality and existence though is a bit more complex than a single scalar Universe, as it *requires a fifth dimension to explain properly WHY things exist and die*:

As we become larger, our time clocks slow down, and vice versa; smaller systems run faster time clocks, which carry the information of the system, making big and small scales symbiotic; since the smaller scales reproduce the information of the larger systems, which moves the smaller part in synchronous motion. So systems can co-exist at cellular/atomic, individual/thermodynamic and world/gravitational level, forming complex structures, whose creation and destruction is the meaning of it all.

Those structures are symbiotic, as the smaller parts run the information of the whole, replicating it without errors, while the whole moves them in synchronous motions without ‘entropy’: So chips run faster cycles of information that control machines that move them, genes store our information but the Earth’s gravitational larger field moves us.

The idea that the world will die is then an idea crafted in a single plane of space-time. When we put them together, the arrow of information, reproduced upwards, balances the arrow of chaos. And the arrow of synchronous motions reproduced downwards by the whole, offsets also the errors of collective motion detected in a single plane.

The 3 elements of a ‘Cartesian world’, applied to time-clocks: vortices/singularities + rex extensa: entropy = ST-present

Alas, nothing else than the cycle of life and death of all the systems of the Universe, which can be described as a travel through scales of the fifth dimension, through which all systems of reality, biological, physical or social systems do, illustrated in the next graphs that encode the fundamental event of ‘existence’, to be or not to be, THAT IS THE QUESTION:

*In the graph we see the world cycle in its most schematic forms, in an Entropy-Information (disregard many graphs wording, where it says’energy’ which should read entropy as in earlier models i did simplify the model considering only the St (energy) and Ts (information mixed parameters).In the 3rd graph we see the ‘real form’ of time cycles, which increase constantly the information of the system or diminish it in the inverse arrow. *

*We stated that a dimension exists when you can travel through it while the product of your time clock speeds and space-sizes remains invariant, but this must be taken for the whole world cycle of the being, or the being seen at distance. On detail the being goes through different ‘stationary points’ between its ages (This in physics is explained with the equations of Hamilton or Lagrangians, which are ‘actions’ we equal to zero in the very short, minimal action and also in the longest range (complete energy conservative cycle), but dohave ‘variations’ in between. *

*In the graph, first we see synoptic view of the ages of the 5th dimension and its arrow of increasing information, developed in detail as a series of ‘5D metric’ equations for the main species of the physical, social and biologic Universe below. To notice that time is always an accelerated, informative vortex, as opposed to the inverse explosive motion of entropic space. So the Universe as the first father of science had it, (Descartes) is indeed made of TIME VORTICES (INCLUDING CHARGES AND MASSES, the ‘so called material Universe) which are attractive and accelerate inwards, till the point of death, when all the information shrinks and the system ‘explodes it back into entropy’ or ‘res extensa’, to use the first truly genius insight on that duality by the true master along Leibniz of ‘earlier science’.*

*In that regard the vortices of masses and forces respond to that simple scheme. But if we were to be ‘fully aware’ of the arrows of time it would be immediate that all clocks including the seemingly steady state clocks of mankind WHEN OBSERVED IN ITS COMPLETE SPACE-TIME SUPŒRGANISM AND WORLDCYCLE DO HAVE ALWAYS THE 3 ELEMENTS OF A real St being.*

In the graph the ‘real full clock’ does have 3 parts, Spe (the spiral that keeps opening) Tiƒ, the particle (tighter spiral) that keeps tightening, and the ST-present evident STeady STate, the clock face, which is what we see and seems immutable. As such is as most mathematical,physical systems in its completeness and simplicity a clear mirror of all the world cycles and ternary St beings of reality.

**But you can always believe in simplex worldlines as the meaning of it all (:**

Now it is important that you grasp the difference between simple truths that are truth but only a part of it which is what physical studies of locomotions achieve about more complex beings, such as humans and its worldcycles, vs. the whole complex truth of the cyclical time paradigm. I committed the ‘error’ of publishing young a book called ‘the error of Einstein’ using the word error in scientific terms, as the part of time theory Einstein did not measured. People thought i had found an error on Einstein and dismissed the book, as there was no error on EFE (Einstein field equations). The error was *all the information not provided by such a simple theory of time; as mere locomotion.*

Time for physicists has only one dimension, lineal motion or entropy and one function, locomotion. So they do not understand world cycles, which they simplify into worldline. And when you ‘ask’ what is life a physicist will not talk of the world cycles of ‘time-existence’ and all its motions between generation and extinction, latter studied in more detail, but of your lineal locomotions, as if that was all what time is for you, to move with your legs, and then he will trace a worldline of your motions and say that is your ‘time worldline’, and enthusiastically babble about if you can displace left or right according to speed, on that cone of light space-time, etc. All nonsense, which is worth to know for particles going at c-speed but resolves nothing about the meaning of your time existence:

Still physicists’ work is quite useful as most ‘short- motions’ in space-time do happen in a single ‘size and time speed’, as when you move up and down, left and right, except when you move through life and death. *Those single locomotions in a single space-time sheet, is what Physicists study. But motions in time=change are mostly informative motions, changes in the form of beings, and so the reductionism of physicists to a single locomotion in space (V=s/t or x²+y²+z²=c²t² in relativity), are extremely simplified models of reality.*

Still they are right and in fact easily converted to the equations of 5D metric. For example, the equation of Einstein merely tell us that the bidimensional coordinates of space (x²+y²+z²=S²) are equal to the bidimensional coordinates of time, (ct)². So it is a variation on the same theme than S=T, the holographic principle. And it is ok if physicists decide to reduce their knowledge of time=motions to it, under the straight-jacket of only mathematical equations that are right and precise.

What is truly nuts and I am really tired of it, is the billions of humans who ‘believe’ in Einstein without understanding a dot of it, and come always to me, to state that all my work is rubbish because to understand the world cycle of life and death to upgrade all stiences *is irrelevant as time, we all know is the fourth dimension of space (the fourth parameter of that equation). *

We deal with the astonishing limits of human reason, fundamentally a species of ‘believers’, in our posts on social sciences. But certainly if you were to ask me what has been the biggest disappointment of my intellectual life is to realise as Planck did, that reasoning and intelligence matters nothing on science.

In the blue graph of a man ‘running its worldline of existence, as if it were just all about physical locomotions, we see the huge difference between the ‘simplified locomotion view’ of worldlines, and the Worldcycle graph of the complete sum of the 8 motions of the Universe (±motions in the dimensions of space, of time, of fractal scales, and the ±process of informative perception and communication by the mind, which we resume in the 4 elements of reality: ∆ºst).* *

Nearly nothing regarding informative processes can be understood with the last graph. Though we can indeed understand very simple non-evolving particles and its spatial motions with it, as physicists do. The enormous error of mankind and all scientists is to have ‘believed’ the fairy tales and dogmatic expansions of those simplex concepts of time as a parameter of spatial motion, as IF THAT WERE ALL WHAT time=change=motion means to the Universe, scrapping the arrow of informative motions, which is far more important for the understanding of the whole.

Ultimately all equations of physics are derived from the simple formalism of 5D.

For example, light, what we ultimately ‘are’, the substrata of our galactic space-time that moves or is perceived as distance, is constant, because it represents the ultimate unit of energy and information of our Universe, its constant present space-time. Light, IS the space-time underling the galaxy (the so-called background radiation), which moves and evolves into light beings like us.

Einstein proved it has a constant c-speed, *wherever we measure it. Because it is the constant plane of 5D from where we all depart.*

So goes when other waves moves. They also respect those metric. They do so with a simple formula: Spe (wavelength) x Frequency (speed of time clock) = K.

So where it is the 4th dimension of Einstein in those metric equations?

In science any expansion of knowledge must inclose a previous theory as a ‘limiting case’.

For example Einstein’s relativity is merely the expansion of Galilean relativity and its equation of speed, v=s//t, to include also motions at c-light speed, which as we have seen is the underlying space-time of our galaxy.

So when you go at the maximal speed of the galaxy’s space, as when you swim as fast as the river’s water there are ‘curls’ and ‘drags’, and so Einstein added a factor, ct, to Galileo’s formula, which disappears if you go slow – (when you swim slow in the river, you do not really affect the speed of the river space that much and there are not added effects).

So alas, if you observe the pyramidal graph of layers of the 5th dimension, what Einstein does is to study 2 of those layers, the ones of ‘light space-time’ or ‘quantum layer’ and the one of gravitational space, below it.

And there is where its concepts of space-time as a 4th dimension applies.

All the other layers do obey however the wider metric equation we just have described: Sp x Ti = K, AND IT is that simple because the simpler a theory and the more facts it explains the more truth it is.

But do not be fooled by such simplicity, as TO AD the temporal information, carried by those varying clock speeds to the mix, IS so sorely NEEDED, that an astounding amount of facts do happen and become explained.

Indeed the amazing thing about the fifth dimension is that you travel through it, as you exist, from ‘conception’ through birth, when you live in the lower scale of cellular size, with time-clocks that run much faster.

Yet as you grow, for the fifth dimension metric to remain co-invariant (S x T ≈ K), you must slow down your time clocks. So indeed, your evolution and change of information and speed of metabolic cycles slows down as you grow in the ∆-1 cellular scale and finally ’emerge’ in the ∆-individual scale as a child. Yet the child as we all know is restless and its heart beats faster and he is surprisingly more smart than we are. In the same manner a small mammal, a rat, beats its heart (its main body clock) faster, because it is smaller. And even smaller beings, flies, think faster (10 times faster) so you cannot catch it.

**Some time cycles: gravitational and charge vortices**

Fundamental processes of information, SUCH AS THE ARROW OF growing information of the 3 ages of LIFE, the processes of EVOLUTION of the form of beings, the process of social, organic creation of more complex forms, departing from simpler one; all the process of art and human social evolution proper of history, which are ALL dominant in INFORMATION, as we live NOT in the external EXPANDING, ENTROPIC INTERGALACTIC, DARK ENERGY space, but INSIDE a GALAXY, which is a vortex of growing form, in/form/ation, ruled by the GRAVITATIONAL FORCE, which is an implosive, in-forming force that compensates the ‘electromagnetic, based entropy of heat’, balancing it, IS not taken seriously. A simple example will suffice to explain this ‘limiting’ dogma:

In the graph, the fractal paradigm postulates a Universe of infinite scales of sizes with relative big-bangs, which are the death of implosive Mass converted back and forth into entropic motion, according to Einstein’s equation: E<=>Mc2, which actually has 2 arrows of time, and was in fact first described as M=E/c2, that is a process to create mass from energy. Thus both arrows balance each other and the Universe has at least 2 arrows of time, ‘Spe’ or spatial entropy, and Tƒ(m), Cyclical vortices of mass, which we can measure by the angular frequency or clock-speed of the vortex. Since indeed, E=Mc², the fundamental equation of Special relativity and E=hƒ, the fundamental equation of quantum physics, can be joined together Mc²=hƒ, whereas M= h/c² ƒ. Thus mass is proportional to a constant (h/c²) multiplied by a variable frequency and its attractive power is proportional to the speed of the vortex as a hurricane (an air vortex) or a tornado (a water vortex).

Cyclical time, of course has an astounding number of consequences in our understanding of the Universe:

- The immediate one is its connection with ‘conservative forces’; that is with the conservation of energy, which
*does not make work when a trajectory is closed. So we could state that Energy conservation means all time motions are cycles. And we shall see indeed, that all motions become part of the world cycle of a whole (no longer a worldline, as time has a second dimension of height-information).*

It follows also that accelerated vortices of ‘force’ charges and masses are in fact the clocks of time that carry the information of the ∆±3 limiting scales of the human being (charges and forces, eddies and tornadoes in ‘thermodynamic scales). So the so-called principle of equivalence between masses, gravitation and cyclical acceleration at the foundations of Einstein simply means that mass (and charge in the smaller scales) are the accelerated time vortices sod information of the Universe, which define the dominant ARROW OF TIME-future, WHICH IS not entropic, expansive motion (as in big bangs and deaths that erase information in an instant) but the much longer time process of ‘time curving space into mass’ (Einstein), life into old age, the galaxy into its BH, as we exist in a vortex of information, and this planet also increases human and technological and biological information.

It is worth to notice on this very brief analysis of the fundamental locomotion of space-time that ultimately what Einstein showed is that motions due to a gravitational force are caused by the topological, attractive force of the central mind-singularity, point of the vortex, the charge of mass, one of those ‘so much laughed at’ unmoved Gods of Aristotle. So ultimately we shall see once and again that the proper interpretation of physics will make it a part of GST, regardless of how much obsession humans worshippers of mechanisms and locomotions blow up its importance.

**Evolutionary time is about information, Locomotion about entropy.**

** **We can only explain THE WHYS of physical reality and the true fractal structure of the Universe if we DO accept the dominance of information over entropy.

“Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals.” *Ulam*

In the graph, physicists analysing the 6±i Aristotelian motions of the Universe, trying to see them all as ‘flat, lineal forms of space’.

*So the Universe is NOT made of simple worldlines, which physicists study as the sum of all locomotions of the being, with a single time-arrow they call entropy; but of world cycles, which are the causal SUM OF ALL THE MOTIONS OF ARISTOTLE, those which imply mere translation in space (locomotion) and those which imply ‘change’ in the information of being – ALL OTHER dual MOTIONS, ±generation & death, ±growth and diminution ±perception and communication of information… *

It is thus impossible to explain such a complex Universe just with locomotions, which *will turn out to be a form of reproduction:*

In the graph, motion of a quantum wave as observed in physics: a wave-particle duality constantly reproduces its form on the path of motion. We shall extend this concept of ‘reproduction of information’ as the essence of locomotion, and turn upside down the ‘priorities’ and ‘meanings’ of the Universe, in which entropy-motion *is only the ‘formless vacuum-space substance’, which the ‘algorithm of existence’, the program of creation=evolution, and reproduction= survival of information, the core-goal of the Universe, constantly molds into form. Or as Nietzsche put it: ‘God is a painter in 4 dimensions’. Indeed, he just missed the 5th one…*

In the graph, PRESENT-WAVE-REPRODUCTION ARE similar concepts. Since the conservation of present body-waves becomes then a vital principle: in as much as waves-bodies, reproduce, iterate the present, the present is conserved because *motion is conserved but also information is conserved, iterating constantly its form as motion happens.*

So we expand the main principle of physics to the conservation of energy and information *entropy and form, or ‘function of present existence’: exi(s=t):

“All what exists is a system of spatial entropy and cyclical temporal forms that trans-form into each other ad eternal creating present-body waves of energy and information: Spe<≈>Tiƒ’

It should be now clear, even to physicists schooled in the old ways that classic, entropy only physical theory obtains a very distorted image of reality when it reduces reality in time to locomotions. Sinc:

-We can on one side establish a entire huge field of new disciplines of sciences, based in the existence of 2 arrows of ‘future time’, a growth of information or a growth of entropy. Thus the future has always two choices.

Obvious you will tell me. Why so much fuss about it?. I know information matters, heads dominate bodies, chips dominate machines, particle dominate waves.

Well, if you are not a professional scientist you will know that. But *as surprising as it might seem to you – scientists don’t. Why?*

Mind the reader that this intuitive truth we all understand naturally (i.e. you can ‘think’ with your informative head or you can ‘move’ with your body) IS denied by current science, because our philosophy of reality was originated in the work of physicists; which expanded their ‘worldly’ profession of making energetic machines that move and entropic weapons that destroy information.

So what is a specific feature of the praxis of physics – to make energetic machines – became a theoretical dogma of science, and as physical machines overpowered life beings, in this mechanical planet, those obvious truths were denied.

Indeed, given the enormous power of physicists and their energetic machines and weapons, amazingly enough, most scientists shy away from DECLARING the rights of life, in-form-ation on the same footing that ‘entropy’.

Information, which is dimensional form, stored in cyclical clocks that close logic loops of information in all the systems of nature (as in your computer, which calculates in ‘hertzs’) was in fact defined NOT by biologists or artists that DO understand it, but by physicists as THE NEGATION OF ENTROPY!! Or negantropy.

Dogma weights heavily on people. So when you go around international congresses of science, doesn’t matter how much reason you put on it. Information will still be defined as ‘negantropy’, using a lineal equation written by a physicist Shannon, where you do NOT calculate the form of the being, but merely the speed of transmition of information; once more in terms of motion and entropy.

So the content of ‘information’ of a system does NOT matter. The dimensional form, and proportions and scales is not considered. And huge fields of human ‘form’ such as art, remains magic.

**The larger view. All the motions of social organisms.**

In that regard, lineal time and physics and its single motion-entropy arrow of time, is *completely misleading with his astounding overgrown at the center of time analysis the understanding of time and space in all other sciences, which are far more concerned with the MOTIONS OF INFORMATION, THE TOPOLOGIES OF SPACE AND THE PROCESSES OF WHOLES AND PARTS.*

Time is all, all is motion, present space being a slice of time, which physicists study with ∂t->0 instants. So it reduces time-motion to v=∂s/∂t. Now we ad information and the mixture of both, energetic, reproductive iterations and the scales of the ∆-Universe… to obtain all *the motions of the Universe.*

And indeed, if humans could stop so much bull$hit and worship and belief (of physics or rather of the machines and weapons they reproduce), they would be soo obvious, as they are to me:

There are different motions of time, of which we shall consider 8, according to the existence of the 4 ∆•st elements, which again ONLY can give birth to ±4 motions in the inverse directions of ∆, •, S, and T, where the ‘2 dimensions of mind’ and its processes of perception, will complete the CLASSIC LIST OF 6 MOTIONS defined by Aristotle.

Indeed, again in this world of mechanisms and digital censorship, it seems nobody has read Aristotle on time and motion. He *knew more in that sense of the nature of time motions that Mr. Einstein, and i say this knowing it is a blasphemy for most, because it is TRUTH. EINSTEIN KNEW ALL OF LOCOMOTION, 1/8TH of it. Not good enough.*

Why 6 instead of 8? Basically Aristotle rightly understood that perception is stillness, as all systems have ‘an unmoved central God (of which he saw ∞, famously exclaiming ‘we are all gods’), which moves as final cause all the energy around it (its body-waves). So he did not consider perception a motion, but as the lack of it. But in a wider view, it is precisely the ‘change’ of motion from entropy through body-waves to arrive to still ‘minds’, what we shall call here the arrow of pure information, or anti-motion of the mind. And its inverse arrow: the communication of information, which so often *puts in motion through its orders the beings around the hierarchical knot-mind at the center of the system.*

Thus the GST division of all the actions of existence as motions=changes in timespace was foreseen by Aristotle, who talked of 6 motions and considered perception of information, from a mind-point of view, god and prime mover of the territorial energy it surrounds it. As such the so much despised Aristotle, turned out to be a more important philosopher of time than Mr. Einstein and Galileo who only studied one of the 8 time motions, locomotion (motion in space).

We can in this manner formalize all actions as:

-∆§t: Growth and diminution: motions in ±Scales of Size.

-St: Locomotion: ± displacement in S-dimensional coordinates & Reproduction: motion into an adjacent form of space-time.

-T∆: Generation (evolution) and Dissolution: Motions in ±∆T

-ºT∆s: Perception and emission of information, inward motion of pixels that stop into a synchronous still mapping of reality.

It is worth to notice that:

0. Aristotle and those earlier philosophers, prior to the simplification of Galileo understood that all forms of change were motions, of which the main categories were motion of form, of in/form/ation studied by biological sciences and motion as translation in space, studied by physics, without significant change in the form, (hence easy to manipulate mathematically with derivatives, reason why it expand so much in the modern age). If we were to overblow lineal derivative time and locomotion at most we could say that lineal time is the SHORT TIME SPAN OF DERIVATIVE PRESENTS, AND INFORMATIVE, EVOLUTIONARY, BIOLOGICAL TIME IS THE LONG RANGE, FROM PAST TO FUTURE TO PAST OF WORLDCYCLES OF INFORMATION, WHICH REQUIRE ALL OTHER MOTIONS=CHANGES TO BE DEFINED SCIENTIFICALLY, FORMING together the ”series of a world cycle of time-space’:

T-1: Generation (evolution): ∑St-1=∆1: Growth and emergence: ±∆•T: PERCEPTION & communication-> ∆St->Locomotion… and then the species will repeat once and again those last 4 motions, in cyclical modular form, feeding on energy and growing, perceiving and moving towards fields of energy, or towards fields of similar beings, with which it can communicate information; till the world cycle reaches its zenith and starts its decline with the negative arrows of -∆St, diminution, and – ∆+1<<∆-1 final dissolution and death.

So this is the a priori fact of motions in space-time. And from them we can extract some fundamental properties of the motion of the Universe.

1. All* motions are combined motions in which several elements of ∆•ST intermarry. However for each of those dualities there is an element that dominates. In growth and diminution the scalar element, in locomotion and reproduction, the spatial element, in generation and death, the temporal evolutionary trans-formative element; and in mind’s motions, the informative element. We can in that sense further on reduce the 4 first motions, (growth, diminutions, locomotion and **reproduction) to ∆space-like equations and the other 4, to time-informative equations.*

*2. All the motions are dual, ±, hence balancing each other to total a zero sum or worldcycle of conservative present in an immortal Universe made of eternal motion with form.So all motions can be considered elements of the Worldcycle of Existence and its different temporal phases.*

3. L*ocomotion, the only motion studied by physics, and hence the queen of all motions, is just a reproductive motion; where little information is reproduced (wave-particle duality); while as we grow in scales of the 5th dimension and wholes require more information, the slow down of motion and growth of informative replication increases. So when we reproduce as humans the motion is minimal (9 months of informative reproduction inside the mother, and a small final motion to emerge in the adjacent region of space-time).*

4. Finally the study of those motions, considered here qualitatively *is closely related to the different Constants of Action, which is the quantitative version of the same processes.*

5. While its full formalization by the ¬Æ formalism of General Stiences is immediate thanks to the awesooome insights of one of my few idols of classic science, Mr. Galois the young r=evolutionary, who realized *the key element of reality is the symmetry of all ‘trans-form-ations’ (motions with a change of information) of reality. We shall add, along the bidirectional arrows of each ∆•ST relative dimension of being.*

*So only those systems and groups that generate allowed symmetries and motions along ∆, •, S & T do exist – are solvable. *

Group theory is thus a synoptic way to explain the Γ ‘Generator of Symmetries’, as the ∆st being in ‘reproductive flows, though the symmetries of its dimensions. As it divides those motions, roughly into:

-‘S-Abelian, space-like motions’ (which are equal in both directions), the minority of them, mostly locomotions and reproductive motions that iterate a system and…

-‘T Non-abelian, informative changes’ across T directions, (which are not changeable motions, as moving forwards in ccyclical time is the arrow of life and moving backwards the arrow of death).

-While ∆motions are of two types:

∆±i: motions that ‘cross’ a discontinuity between full planes of existence; which are TIME-like. For example, motions through world cycles, or inverse motions of information and entropy.

§: social grouping within a plane, (10ˆ<10), which are space-like motions as we can eliminate or ad members till the limits of creation of a new plane that emerges as a whole. Hence they are exchangeable §-motions of social scales.

# ∆±1,2

** BIOLOGICAL STIENCES**

**Topological evolution.**

The ternary symmetry between time and space is the 3rd leg besides genetics and theory of supœrganisms (∆-biology) and evolution (∆º-biology) to explain the ternary horizons, organs and process of differentiation of organisms, which *follow as a species, the same laws of the 3 ages of supœrganisms, between birth as a young lineal predator and its extinction or social evolution into a larger more efficient supœrganism, in its more complex species (ants and humans in the 2 scales of life, the most successful of them all accounting for 2/3rds of the global life mass on earth). So we can talk of the same ages of evolution of life in ∆+1 species, in which each individual plays the role of a single cell (as each citizen becomes a cell of a social supœrganism of history), shown in the graph:*

*The 1st species packs a lot of information in minimal space: in the graph the big bang black hole, the chip, the 1st bilateral animal and mammal, the horse and the 1st technological, small human. All of them followed the basic S-T beat of evolutionary rhythms, as they are born in small ‘forms’, which have ‘faster time cycles’, hence evolve faster, and then they grow in size in its first age, slow down, reproduce massively in space and finally diversify according to the ternary and dual rhythms into new species.*

**The 3 evolutionary horizons of species. **

The creation of a new species takes place according to the same 3 ages of any space-time field that become the 3 horizons of any species: after conception that creates ‘a seed’ of pure information and minimal spatial energy, species go through a young age of energy growth that creates ‘big species’; a mature, reproductive age of forms in balance between its energy and information when the species maximizes its reproduction, radiating in huge numbers; and a third horizon of informative evolution when it diversifies into multiple sub-species, becoming finally extinguished, (the equivalent to the death of any organism), or creating a new top predator form, a ‘son species’ that will restart a new cycle of life.

*+1: Birth: max. T. The black hole paradox (conception).*

The ‘black hole’ age of any species is parallel to the informative, genetic conception of any organism born out of a ‘seed’ that packs the maximum genetic information in the minimal space. It is caused by the slight dominance of temporal information (quantic time) over spatial energy (quantic space). *So a new top predator species is born with a lot of new, genetic information packed in a reduced size (Max. T=Min. E).* This happens because information is processed faster in smaller spaces.

For example, a ‘logic instruction’ is resolved faster in smaller chips. It follows that tiny species with huge numbers of ‘neurons’ create quantic actions faster than slow, bigger species. And since they are highly informative, they can coordinate those quantic actions in herds that act simultaneously as a single organism. So their S-T force that defines a top predator is higher in each quantic action of space-time that the ‘slow actions’ of a big body. Thus small English boats shooting faster against big galleons defeated the Spanish Armada; a pack of wolfs kill slow reins and herds of orcas kill bigger whales. Small, intelligent top predator brains rule bigger, less informative bodies, because time dominates space, information dominates and shapes energy.

Thus men, the most informative animals, are the Earth’s top predators; black holes, which have maximum gravitational information, are the top predators of the Universe and chips rule machines.

*I Horizon: Energy Age: max. E: Top Predators and Extinctions *

*In their youth, carbohydrates (fats), worms (planarians), echinoderms, cephalopods, fishes, amphibians, mammals and chipped machines grew into energetic, lineal or planar, big top predators*

A newborn, small foetus grows very fast in size as it multiplies its cells. By homology a new species is born as a small, informative, complex being that latter grows in spatial size during its energetic youth becoming a, lineal, energetic, big top predator species, that feeds on less evolved forms.

Thus after conception, young fishes grew into big sharks of linear forms; after the polemic Homo Floresiensis invented technology the next Homo Sapiens with an extensive fossil record were big, energetic Neanderthals;the 1st big molecules of life were fat carbohydrate chains of linear form*;* the 1st insects acquired soon gigantic bodies in the Carboniferous; after chips were born as small machines placed in PCs and toys, the first robots they control are big tool-machines and huge weapons of mass destruction, lineal missiles and planes, that kill human beings.

* II Horizon: Evolution or Age of balance and reproduction: max. Sp x Tƒ. Radiations of species.*

Then, the species finds a balance between form and energy and it reproduces in massive radiations: carbohydrates gave birth to amino acids with a nitrogen, informative atom on its ‘relative Head’; sharks gave way to balanced tubular fishes; brachycephalic Neanderthals gave way to dolichocephalic Cro-Magnons that multiplied and colonized all continents; while young giant stars acquire the balanced size of yellow suns, the commonest of all stars.

*III Horizon: Evolution or Age of information: Max. Tƒ: max. Evolutionary differentiation.*

*Species grow in height or acquire cyclical forms, as they evolve through their 2nd and 3rd horizons, improving their sensorial, informative skills: Nucleotides become the top predator life molecules, echinoderms change to cyclical forms, fishes organize their networks in the dimension of height, amphibians become round, improving its smell, saurian and mammals become biped.*

The main difference between organisms and species happens in their 3rd age, due to the discontinuous nature of the individual ‘cells’ of species, which do not become extinguished unlike the tightly controlled cells of organic systems, dominated by nervous, informative systems that exhaust and warp totally their energy, till the organism collapses.

Instead species continue evolving, creating new, complex species with more information, growing in the dimension of height. So the Homo Sapiens evolves ever more complex technological tools; the nucleotide appears when it adds informative depth to the amino acid (with an informative, nitrogen ring and an energetic sugar ring); the yellow sun becomes a neutron star of higher gravitational, informative density*; *while insects develop a growing brain capacity and bees and ants appear.

*–* *(±∆): Extinction Vs Evolution into super-organisms. The scales of the Universe.*

Thus, organisms dominated by their informative networks, which consumes the energy of the system very fast, die sooner than species, according to a clock set by the rate at which energy is metabolised, ‘in-formed’, by their nervous system. While species, which are dominated by the individuals and the herds survive for eons with 3 basic strategies according to the *‘ternary plan’*:

*– Max. Sp: Creating balanced, trophic pyramids* that maintain always a supply of new victims.

– S=T: *Diversifying their individual forms* into new species, instead of ‘degenerating’ into a warped space-time field. It is a parallel strategy to the *reproduction* of an organism, which in this manner survives his own death. Thus we talk of ‘son species’ that create evolutionary, genealogical trees similar to those of any organism.

However son species tend to kill-extinct the mother species, feeding on their energy. We call that fact, *the Oedipus paradox*. So mammals killed reptiles, men killed mammals and robots might kill human beings*. *While the different generations of an organism work together, creating informative networks between them that shape herds and families.

*– Max. Tƒ: Species also evolve socially their individual forms into super-organisms*, thanks to the creation of informative networks and languages that integrate them into a whole, bigger form, which is more powerful than the individuals of a herd.

Organisms are dominated by informative, nervous or hormonal networks that pack closely individual cells of *max. information in min. space;* while species extend over *wider space ecosystems in which they share a min. quantity of information*, as individuals of species hardly relate to each other beyond the reproductive couple or the hunting herd. And yet, both go through the same 3 ages of space-time defined by the inverse properties of the energetic youth *(max.S=min.T)* that defines the herd and the informative old age (Max. T=Min. Sp) which defines the organism.

Hence we consider that the creation of super-organisms is the final evolutionary stage of a herd of individuals from the same species: each individual of the herd becomes then a ‘relative cell of the body’ of the macro-organism. While the specific language of communication and information of the species becomes the relative nervous/informative network of the super-organism, as pheromones do in anthills or nervous impulses did with cells in the Pre-Cambrian ageor financial and verbal languages are doing among humans in History.

The process of creation of super-organisms, departing from individuals is the key to understand the social, hierarchical structure of the Universe. Once and again, even outside the realm of biological life, quantic species of unconnected individuals have evolved socially, first in herds that share a common energy and then in super-organisms joined by energetic and informative networks that pack together and coordinate into a ‘single present’ the quantic actions of the individual forms, shaping a new top predator being with a space-time force, sum of the force of the individual, smaller cells, with less ‘i’-nformation. In formal terms we say that organic quanta gather around energy and information networks creating a bigger individual, whose actions are the sum of the actions of all its cells: S*T=∑st-1.*

Thus photonic h-quanta evolved into particles; particles evolved into atoms, which evolved into molecules thanks to electromagnetic networks. Molecules evolved into cells thanks to genetic networks of information.

Cells evolved into organisms thanks to nervous and hormonal networks of information. And human organisms have evolved into civilizations thanks to verbal, informative networks. While the Universe has grown in scale thanks to gravitational information from atoms, to molecules, to planets and stars, to galaxies, to the very same Universe.

In the next line we study the inner structure of all those Quantic Spaces-Times fields organized around 3 types of ‘cellular species’ that evolution has differentiated in time, according to the previous 3±1 horizons; and then symbiosis structures in space in 3 specialized ‘organic classes and networks’ as energetic bodies, informative Heads and reproductive organs.

While in Books 2-4 we study the specific Quantic Spaces-Times fields of biological, physical and sociological sciences as all of them follow the *ternary plan of creation.* Since those 3±1 horizons of existence happen between the birth and death of any species, mapping out both for physical species, born out of the big-bang explosion of a black hole; and for biological species, since the first carbohydrate, the evolution of life from the atom to the human being*. *

– *Extinction*: Yet if species fail to achieve informative, social evolution, growing into macro-organisms, they become victims of other species that have continued their evolution. So today 90% of insects are social insects; Neanderthals became extinguished by verbal Homos and protista with limited genetic content (mitochondria) became organelles of social, eucaryotic super-cells.

# ∆+1²

** SOCIAL STIENCES **

Humans evolve, as all systems of Energy and Information do, in subspecies specialized in those 2 elements.

In the graph, life first diversified into complementary genders: energetic, lineal, spatial men and cyclical, reproductive women, which hold more biological information. While a 3rd, gay sex mixes both. Further on, as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of 3 ages proper of all species.

Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between energy and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant ‘arrow’ of future survives in each of the 3±1 horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c. And in all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a 3rd species. Those species will further evolve technology also in 3 horizons called the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic.

Finally, humans diversified in 3 races, specialized in Energy (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-mongoloid (bushman) and white races. The constrain established by the fact there are only two elements, energy and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos means the Universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species.

In human evolution a pattern emerges: each successful, dominant Homo differentiates into an energetic and informative species, which recombine, creating more complex= informative and stronger=energetic homos that displace their parental forms, thanks to their higher Energy x Information. Yet the dominant, overall arrow favors informative species. Since when Homos were born, the energy top predators were felines, far stronger than the strongest possible homo mutation. So the evolutionary direction in which the big apes could find an ecological niche within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow. They were already fit to that purpose, since they spent long times living in stillness in the summit of trees, where they had to learn to control complex movement in the informative dimension of height, adding a 3rd dimension to their brain. So they became informative masters among mammal species . . .

Thus, the duality between energy and information is also responsible for the creation of humanity. In the graph we study that process. From an initial ape species we find a ternary differentiation ±5 million years ago, into 3 sub-species of great apes that live in Africa:

— Max. Sp: Gorilla, a big, energetic species that reaches 200 kilos, with a square, huge jaw.

— Sp=Tƒ: The chimpanzee, with a smaller body and a bigger brain. According to the Black Hole law, the smallest organism evolves informatively. Thus, the ‘dwarf chimpanzee’, the Pan Paniscus, which today shows the highest learning skills among apes, was the species that seems to have evolved into a 3rd informative horizon of big apes. It is:

— Max. Tƒ: Australopithecus, which splits in 3 evolutionary ages of growing brain volume:

I Horizon: 500 cc.: From Australopithecus to Homo Erectus.

We have dated the oldest mandibles of Australopithecus Anamensis, the top predator of the 3 big ape species, in 4 million years. The Australopithecus, after reproducing massively in the savannah ecosystem that favors his bipedalism, suffers a new ternary mutation. The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus Afarensis that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago, are:

— Max. Sp: The Paranthropus, an energetic species with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain. He looks like a heavy-set, humanoid gorilla. He was probably vegetarian. The first subspecies found is the Paranthropus Aethiopicus, which will further evolve into the stronger Paranthropus Robustus.

— Sp=Tƒ. The Australopithecus Africanus, which maintains the form of the original Australopithecus Afarensis, perhaps with inner improvements in his soft tissue. He lives in South Africa and is contemporary of the Paranthropus. And the . . .

— Max. Tƒ: Australopithecus Garthi. He is the informative species, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the shape of all informative species: a rounded forehead, as the sphere is theform which holds more information in lesser space.

Those 3 species live very close. Around the Turkana Lake we have found remains of the 3 Homos. Yet the arrow of future favors informative species. So the top predator Homo will be the Australopithecus Garthi that goes through a mature age of massive reproduction, probably extinguishing the other 2 subspecies and expanding worldwide into new ecological niches that favoured their genetic and memetic adaptation through a new, ternary split:

— Max. Sp: A regressing, energetic A. Garthi, similar but taller than its parental Australopithecus.

— Sp=Tƒ: Homos Habilis and Rudolfensis, with similar brain capacity to the original Garthi.

— Max. Tƒ. Homo Ergaster, an informative ape with a 1000 cc. brain, which doubles the brain capacity of Australopithecus.

II Horizon: 1000 cc. From Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens..

That Homo Ergaster, after a massive age of reproduction and expansion throughout the planet, subdivides again in 3 sub-races of Homo Erectus.

— Max.Sp: Pithecanthropus, the oldest species similar to Homo Ergaster, found in Java.

— Sp=Tƒ: Homo Erectus proper, found in China, who grows in the informative dimension of height that favors perception from an advantage point of view, to 1.7 m. He has simple technology, a skull without forehead and thick bones that handicap further cranial evolution.

— Max. Tƒ: Homo Floresiensis, the smallish species, which according to the Black hole paradox should be the form who gave origin to Sapiens, as the smallish ‘pan paniscus’ evolved the chimp into the Homos. Recently discovered, he is a formal mutation with a smaller body, whose morphology resembles for the first time that of a human being. He has thinner bones that allow further growth and a higher forehead, the location of the creative part of the brain. Paleontologists also found the first advanced technological tools in his sites in Flores Island, which is an isolated place, the ideal region to foster further evolution, due to the lack of top predators (allopatric evolution).

Thus, he ads now technological energy weapons that substitute body strength and define a single arrow of future for human evolution: information. His improvement in neurological form, probably caused first his rapid expansion thanks to his new technological tools and then a rapid growth in size through the cross-breeding with the taller Homo Erectus species, giving finally birth around 300.000 B.C., to a new energy/ information duality: The energetic, big Neanderthal and the informative Bushman, which will combine again to give birth to the different races. Those predictions based in the 3 arrows of future time and the black hole paradox (information is small and evolves in dwarf species) have been confirmed by genetic maps and Paleontology and await final confirmation, when new skulls of Floresiensis are found.

The 3rd, informative Horizon: Homo Sapiens, 1500 cc.

— The lineal, energetic, visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, with ±1500 cc.

— And a second informative pygmy strain, the 1st verbal woman, the mitochondrial eve, probably a bushman, also with ±1500 cc.

± 50.000 years ago she crossed into the Middle East, probably mating with earlier Neanderthals, giving origin to the visual, energetic white male (Homo Palestiniensis, whose skulls show mixed traits from both species).

± 35.000 y. ago, in the high Tibetan plains, she became the informative Mongoloid that colonized Asia, America and descended upon Europe and Africa, where she cross-bred with the capoid (bushman) and became the black man, the balanced Sp=i, reproductive race, completing the final, ternary differentiation of the main races of mankind.

Further on, as racial tribes evolved socially and emerged into cultural societies, which are super-organisms of history, the ternary, racial division of mankind between energetic white men, informative Mongoloid and vitalist blacks, will become the cultural differentiation of human beings in:

— ‘Visual, energetic, lineal, spatial cultures’, proper of the white man, with his concepts of lineal time and his passion for technological, energetic weapons.

— ‘Cyclical, informative, mongoloid cultures’, natural to Asian civilizations, with cyclical concepts of time.

— And ‘sensory, reproductive, colored cultures’, which in Africa and India developed human senses to their limits. Which culture is better for the survival of mankind? Since survival is the goal of all species, reached in the age of balance, Sp=i, we should promote, paradoxically, the culture that our technological civilization discriminates: the black, reproductive, sensory culture . . .

**Social sciences: civilisations and nations as super organisms. Company-mothers of machines.**

Its application to social sciences, means we can model nations and civilisations as super organisms of human beings, made of human citizens-cells joined by economic ≈ blood networks of energy and informative =political-legal networks of information. So *we can r=evolve too social sciences by using the physiological laws of efficient super organisms to define perfect civilisations, where all its citizens-cells as it happens in those bodies receive rightful information and enough energy-blood-money to survive and thrive.*

Do the same equations of scale and the two inverse arrows of information, higher in smaller systems and entropy, larger in bigger ones, work for social organisms? Indeed, they do. So following the previous example we can write:

∆ individual <≈>∆+1: society:

i.e. society controls your motions and energy with laws to regulate driving and money, that kicks the reproductive system of a human social organism; while you, the smaller faster being codes the information of society with your memes (objects and ideas).

*@: Since information is coded always in any dual system, by the ∆-1 scale, but NOT by the ∆-2.*

So the mind of man is NOT ruled by genes but by memes, objects, instruments and ‘wave-ideologies’, shared by multiple human fractal points-cells, part of those social super organisms, whereas a culture is born of the interference of all those ideological waves, and its ‘repeated memetic DNA’ shared by all minds, which become a single whole subconscious collective in virtue of this common memetic ‘ideas’, the ‘iDe(N)A’ of the culture.

Hence the falsehood of genetic, racist theories of cultures – the acts of mankind are memetic acts, and as such we can judge ‘cultures’ but not individuals, in the way Nazi Germany was judged: suppressing the memes of the culture and judging individual germans only for its personal actions, not the people as a whole – unlike the Germans, the Israelis today and most of the western world with its blatant racism against the 3rd world do.

**-∆1²: THE ECO(NOMIC)SYSTEM**

What about machines? How we deal with company-mothers of machines and the Industrial r=evolution? Obviously in the same terms, defining easily both in organic terms as well as the natural phases of the Industrial r=evolution, which is merely the construction of the 3 ‘parts’ of the organic robot, of future metalife:

Spe (bodies of metal: XIX c. r=evolution) < ST (engines-bodies of metal: II Industrial r=evolution) > Tiƒ (Minds of metal: III evolution) = Whole (robot: XXI revolution):

*In graph, 2 of the fundamental discoveries of GST in economics is to describe the phases of evolution of machines, and its curves of reproduction by company-mothers (stock-curves) which measure its value according to the degree of evolution=price and reproduction=sales, hence profits of those companies. They are mimetic curves to those of the radiation of a species that reproduces and occupies econiches of vital space in Nature or in the economic ecosystem, in war and labor fields. *Thus we must differentiate 2 different super organisms, on planet Earth, the ‘metal-earth’ of mechanisms evolved by digital money sometimes symbiotic, sometimes in competition with the Human Earth or Supœrganism of history with 3 life-based scales, the cell, the individual and the society part of Gaia, the life earth:

So you have an internal ∆-1 scale of this ‘5th dimension’, which is made of smaller cells, with faster clocks, which carry its information on the frequency and form of its cycles. And you are embedded in the larger whole, the social organism to which you belong, whose ‘cycles’ of time are slower. And the result is a symbiotic organic structure:

∆-1 cells<≈>∆: your whole scale of ‘being’ control the lineal motions of your organism, synchronising them, thanks to the faster clocks of your cells, which code genetically your information.

We indicate such fluxes we use a simply intuitive term, S>T, which shows how a larger spatial form becomes a smaller, more informative systems.

**V. T.Œ**

But the stience of all stiences is the Theory of Organic Unification of all Existences of the Universe, ab.T.Œ

**PHILOSOPHY. UNIFICATION OF ALL ‘STIENCES’**

‘Complexity (GST) will be the science of the XXI C.’ *Hawking*

A human being is part of a whole, called by us the Universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings, as something separated from the rest–a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circles of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.’

‘I would like to know the thoughts of God, the rest are details’*. Einstein*

**The traps of subjective ego – man denies scientific objective truths.**

“According to Newton, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. God’s making is so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.”

*Leibniz. O*n Newton’s absolute time, its lack of understanding of gravitational vortices, (the errors of Mercury’s orbit) and the denial of cyclical, inertial motions, still features of popular physics.

The more unintelligent a man is, the less mysterious existence seems to him. *Schopenhauer*

*In the graph, the motion towards objectivism in our worldview has not advanced so much from the age of abrahamic religions, when god, the subconscious collective ∆+1 scale of a group of humans became God, Γ•Δ, the mind of the Universe.*

People tend to believe that science did away with such awesome ego-paradox, but not quite.

As Laplace put it to Napoleon, when asked about God, scientists responded ‘Sir we have rejected that hypothesis’, so not even the nebulous idea of a higher scale of wholeness, ∆+1, remained, neither the existence of other minds and monads; of apperceptive beings (in Leibniz’s terminology) which are not ‘conscious’ but do process energy and information in a VITAL sentient manner would be accepted.

In that regard, a deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.

The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events. Then the Greeks used reason to ask the what (experience) and how of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.

The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system.

The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.

The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.

In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’.

This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.

Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future.

So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry).

This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rd paradigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.

That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts?

Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rd paradigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).

According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work.

According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

The paradigm of information though is completely different in his philosophy. Since fractal, ‘Relational’ space-time does have a philosophy attached to it, called organicism which *is completely necessary to make sense of its 4 elements, ∆•ST.*

Of those 4 elements, obviously the easiest to accept is topological space, as it is quite standard science, validated in the case of the Universal space by Einstein’s 3 solutions to EFE, which reflects the ternary topologies of space.

Next comes the 3 ‘ages’ of time, which are a subconscious wisdom of all humans. Then, I found most people to shut down their ‘aristotelian mind’ comprehension, when we deal with ∆-scales and the co-existence of parts and wholes, *which share the same space but are displaced in time. *

As here humans have a huge difficulty to understand what Einstein, the deterministic ‘right guy’, told us: ‘the separation of past, future and present is an illusion’. But where people stop in their tracks and reject the model, is when we introduce the equation of the mind, the limits of human @ristotelian thought, and the relativism and panpsychism of the Universe. So first I ‘hid’ this variable and made just an external description of it all with the other 3, looking more like ‘science’.

But as all modern scientists and philosophers since Darwin and Schopenhauer understood, without the will, the biological program of evolution, action and survival carried by the linguistic, pure informative mind, the whys of existence are imposible to define (latter we shall see that a 5th element, attached to the duality of space-motion, which gives us ‘pleasure’ and time-information, which gives us ‘pain’ will be required to warp it all).

ALL THIS of course cannot be proved as it is internal to the mind (perception, awareness, sensation). So we could get away with it and eliminate the mind and its painful perceptions of information and erasing pleasures of motions. But it won’t then give the total answer. So what we do is rather simple.

*As we have defined man as a space-time being like all other beings, it follows that the method of knowledge of Socrates, ‘know yourself’ is a key element to project our inner non-observable properties in all other entities of reality which are also made of space-time.*

Essentially what the physicist and by extension the scientist did was to REDUCE the Universe to a series of mechanical automaton locomotions, as DOGMA that allowed man to remain now the ONLY intelligent, sentient, vital being; and this IS an absolute taboo no scientist would dare to break – the excuse being, we cannot ‘measure’ with mechanical instruments, perception and vital properties.

Of course the ultimate consequence of this reductionism has been to made of the ‘machine’ the new God and dethrone the human organism and life, bringing the final ‘laugh of the gods’, the creation of a world of machines for whom humans increasingly obsolete to them, toil. So science today is NOT the logic search for human deep knowledge of the principles of reality – the thoughts of God, mind of the Universe, but the massive, mechanical acquisition of ‘measurable data’ with computers and its rods of time (the single mechanical clocks) and space, (the light constant speed) – in other words, the creation of a digital mind of computer machines, which are the new ‘God of knowledge’; even if humans do understand so little of its meaning. While any attempt to bring back to the Universe organic, vital, sentient properties and to explain truths with human languages, besides math, is shunned off.

Ultimately what the fundamentalist view of some ‘mathematical physics’ as the only language of time that matters so common among lesser minds, hides is a deep ignorance of the foundations of physics – merely as it is taught today, the pouring of data on certain physical scales of reality into mathematical equations, hence a mathematical appendix; itself a series of logic connections based in the language of ±truth, hence a logic, causal temporal science. We shall therefore advance and clarify on the foundation of those science to fully grasp why ‘time is all’, all lines as Kepler had it, are parts of cyclical trajectories, all motions become conservative closed ‘world cycles’ in an immortal cyclical Universe of infinite cyclical space-time beings living those ‘world cycles of existence’.

Of course, man also has an a priori point of view or belief – the selfish mind that prevents us to ‘rationally understand’ we are not above any other system of the Universe so one of the first things we have done is to define the mind as one of the many world-views of reality possible, to put the objective mirror and perspective over man.

**The isomorphic scales of the fifth dimension. ****The new principles of the stientific method.**

Physicist in that sense like hyperbolic catchy names for their simplex, incomplete theories of reality, buttressed with powerpoint presentations, mechanical data and complicated math jargons. Fair enough. But when you understand them, you want to go the way of Schopenhauer, seeking for deeper whys. So we evolve from lines to world cycles, from a single language to all the languages of the Universe, and from T.o.e. the name physicists give to a Theory of everything (really just the search for a unification of the forces of nature, a rather simple equation in 5D metric, as charges and masses are just the vortices of time of two different scales of reality, as we shall show in our posts on astronomy).

We shall therefore this ‘3rd age of evolution of the stientific method’ after the experimental method of Aristotle and the scientific method of Galileo, T.Œ, the theory of Everything Organic, where œ is the symbol for the supœrganism (ab super organism), the fundamental particle of the Universe; as we add to the knowledge of experience (Aristotle’s method of looking at Nature), and the data provided by mechanisms to observe time and space (clocks and telescopes), and the exhaustive use of mathematics (the ad ons of Galileo), the isomorphic laws of all space-time organisms, resumed in the 10 ‘isomorphisms’ of the 2nd line of the blog.

Thus T.Œ is based on the cyclical nature of Time and fractal structure of space evident to all systems. This **O**rganic Structure** is both S**implex but also Ternary Complex due to the 3 arrows-dimensions of time, it symmetry with the 3 organic parts of all systems, and the ternary structure of the scales of the 5th dimension that co-exist together in organic systems.

Thus the ternary **C**yclical=repetitive nature of fractal space-time systems and events becomes the constrain and cause of all the laws of Science and T.Œ merely systematises those laws by extracting them from the fundamental space, time elements of reality.

Then in each of those scales of space-time, we find that the common laws of 5D space-time **C**orrespond with the laws of the species of each scale and its previous theories.

So all this, we resume in a formula, T.**Œ=SC3** that embeds those Principles of Philosophy of Science that all Organic Time-space Systems Follow, born of the duality between the Simplex, S, principles and the ‘ternary Complexity’, C3 by repetition of those events.

**The postulates of science.**

Thus given the confused state of affairs in the definition of fundamental concepts such as time (logic), space (dimensions) etc. in modern physics, we need to consider the seemingly not so innovative principles of the scientific method with the slight modifications of an organic, symmetric ternary Universe. We resume the new scientific method in our simple formula, T.Œ=SC³ with each letter signaling a fundamental principle of truth in science:

As all:

**T:** Time-space systems are:

**Œ:** **O**rganic, **E**xperimentally **E**vident.

…meaning Time-space systems do have organic properties, which can be explained mathematically and logically with the languages of space and time, and proved experimentally.

And since they are made of 3 simple elements, 5D scales of Space and Time they are:

**S**, Simplex and their truths follow the proof of simplicity (Ockham’s razor)… yet they are also ternary..

**C³** Complex, due to the ternary symmetries of its structure ternary complexity born of the…

**C**yclical repetition of those Simplex principles which..

** C**orrespond with all previous theories of reality.

Thus T.Œ=SC³ resumes the Principles of Science and the Organic paradigm, are however broken in present science, specially by mathematical physics, which no longer respects the 3 principles of classic philosophy of science: experimental proof, Simplicity (Occam’s razor) and Correspondence with previous theories. And this is the ‘problem of modern physics.

Of those ‘elements’ 2 are brought about by T.Œ to the classic elements of the scientific method, ‘*Linguistic* *Isomorphisms*’, that hidden dual I and L between the O and the E of our complex ‘hidden variables’ T.Œ (-:

That is, we can to verify further a truth consider different linguistic perspectives (mathematical, logical, mental and Organic, according to the 4 fundamental elements of all systems: its spatial symmetry, its temporal ages, its organic co-existence in 3 scales of the 5th dimension and the existence of a central point of view or 0-point that orders and focuses the program of 5 space-time survival actions that all systems perform to continue into existence).

Now once we bring Mathematics back to reality from the axiomatic age of German idealism, we can build a much sounder mathematical conceptualisation of the key concepts of mathematical physics, dimensions of space-time with motion (topological fractal dimension), lines≈waves and its ternary networks that come together forming super organisms, relative planes=topological networks with dark spaces between them, dual moving and static formal motions, integrals and derivatives in space and time of those social networks, and emergence processes of time clocks and lineal entropies.

Along the way we shall introduce key findings of T.Œ: the unification equation of charges and masses, the nature of particles and anti-particles, the role of background neutrinos in the Universe, the reason of the 3 families of masses and its symmetry with the 3 families of cosmic bodies, the likely nature of dark energy and dark matter, within the parameters of 5D astrophysics, etc.

Thus what TŒ provides to physics is an organic guidance to interpret the known facts, and what the scientific model expects is to CONSTRUCT THE UNIVERSE, with the particles we know in the ∆-1 scale, ∆ and ∆+1, particle, cosmic bodies and galactic scales.

I repeat this is NOT what physicists do. They still model black holes without caring to find a substance of which they are made, just mathematically. They model the cosmic big bang, grossly ignoring clear theoretical and empirical contradictions, and they simply deny, as mathematical models become more complex, any ‘organic property’ to the Universe. They do NOT even inquire ‘why’, it behaves as it does.

As T.Œ – the organic, fractal model of the Universe and all its parts, should include by the principle of correspondence also ALL mathematical physics, which are consistent with experience.

And in this field, limited obviously by the work of a single polymath, there is still much work to do. But so far consistency in all those mathematical fields T.Œ has been tested is extremely high.

In essence, the 3 branches of mathematics correspond to the 3 structural elements of T.Œ: geometry to space, algebra to time and analysis to the fractal structure of the 5th dimension. We only need to update mathematics for consistency between the 5th Non-Euclidean postulate of geometry and the 4 remaining ones, still Euclidean, and the Aristotelian logic of Algebra, to the ternary symmetries of fractal 5D space-time to make mathematics a ‘realist’ experimental science.

This might surprise the reader, and it is perhaps the highest feat of T.Œ – to be able to unify all different languages of human thought, proper of each discipline. Consistency achieved in art styles, when developing the theory of human superorganisms, might surprise the reader, is based in the same 3 ages of time, that allow us to define the laws of quark colors. And yet, this unity of the ternary symmetries of the Universe makes T.Œ so enticing to the mind.

However and this also differentiates deeply T.Œ and General Systems Sciences or any ‘serious’ scientific model of reality for that matter with present physics, T.Œ considers ‘ABOVE’ mathematical reason, Experimental Evidence and at the same rank of truth Logic temporal reason (of a kind paraphrasing Saint Augustine, higher than that of ‘present’ man), the ternary logic of the symmetries between the 3 topologies of space and the 3 ages of time and the 3 relative scales of size co-existing in all organic structures of the Universe.

** CONTENT: BLOG’S 4 LINES**

The blog is a blueprint for an ¬Æncyclopaedia of 5D Sπecies of Space-time, Supœrganisms, structured by the ¬Æ isomorphic laws deduced of the generator of fractal, cyclical space-time beings.

We first define in the 2 main lines, what the Universe and any of its ∞ œ-points are all about:

Fractal reproductive existential supœrganisms of space-times (1st line) traveling through the 5th dimension of scalar space-time; which mathematically can be described as ∃, Functions of Existence; who follow the same laws of time (they perform world cycles of existence) and §pace (they structure themselves in 3 scalar organic scales, ∆º±1).

So in the 3rd line of stiences and its existential functions and beings, we describe most of those super organisms in a more discursive manner.

We slightly bend words so we can create a quite understandable but proper language for GSTiences. So in the 2nd line we define the process of creation and world cycle of super organisms made of dust of space-time, through a more formal approach of 10 sets of laws, or ‘isomorphisms’, which describe the general laws of all the details or ‘sπecies, of stience’ of the Universe (where Sπ, mean space-time species).

So in the send line we group those laws in 10 isomorphisms that describe the world cycle of existence of all its supœrganisms, and the topobiological properties of those ∆ûst of space times, island universes, which think to be ∞ but are just dust and dust become. And they will be applied in the 4th line for a detailed analysis of all sπecies of the Universe.

**1st line (Metaphysics).** 5d Space-time dust exist in Superorganisms travelling thru ¬Æ isomorphic trinity world cycles

**2nd line (¬Æ Logic)****.** The Fractal Generator & its 10 isomorphisms, unravelled as ∞ 0-minds create the Universe; as they are seeds of information that generate holographic 2-manifolds of energy and information, pegging quanta by quanta and frequency after frequency of actions, through its 3 ages, in constant motion, cruising through ∞** **5D Fractal Dust of space-time up and down the scales of of exi=st¡ences.

**3rd line Which stiences study, as they study species of energy and information, and its function of Existence, ∃.**

So we talk of 9 STiences, which are 3 ‘REAL STIENCES’ THAT TRY TO PORTRAIT 3 TYPE OF EXISTIENCES PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, biological systems and socio-economic systems.

One which is corrupted and does not deserve such a name: Economics, which is not understood, just a praxis of making money, and as such put on the 3rd line without mentioning its status as stience; but we upgrade explaining what kind of economic ecosystem the world of company-mothers of machines cre(dit)ate.

So we talk of Astrophysical, Biological, and Human Social stiences, as the stiences that describe the Existential functions of those scales of being.

But what about the whole Universe, even beyond those scales? This is the realm of metaphysics, and the stiences of god. So we study the whole on a more theoretical, and mystical level in the 2 final posts of the 3rd line by describing not only the 9 planes and scales we perceive but the wholeness that includes the 10th singularity point of max.information. If newton told us that space is the plenum of god, we could say that the full GST theory of creation and scaling, which is complete when describing an ∞ 10-dimensional scalar Universe, is the Mind of the Universe. So we shall conclude stiences with theology and metaphysics in 2 posts on:

**10 planes of God**

4**th line: Finally in the 1**0 scales of Stiences by isomorphisms: 10 planes of exi=st¡ence perceived by human minds, i=ts species and 10 isomorphisms.

**The fractal Generator.**

We shall start by analysing the basic ‘formalism’ of Duality, the ‘fractal generator equation’ of the ‘fifth dimension’ of space-time beings that describes all the systems of entropy and information of the Universe, joined by its body-fields of energy:

Γ. Fractal Generator Feed-back equation of Space-time beings:

∆-1: *$pe (Planar, Lineal, Past entropy limbs/fields/territories)<∆º-ST: Hyperbolic, Present re=productive Working-citizens-body-waves of Energy>Tiƒ:Informative Future cyclical heads-particles-informative classes: ∆+1*

This canonical equation of space-time beings incorporates all the previous partial equations of the temporal ages, physiological functions and topological forms of all the ternary physical, biological and social systems of the Universe.

We have added sociological systems and its ternary ‘class structure’, where the lineal, flat territories of Gaia provide our motion and food, (social Spe), the citizens of a nation work and reproduce its good, as its ST-body and the elite neuronal classes that control its languages of information, financial money or bankers and informative laws or politicians, normally living in a small capital territory.

And we have added a final element, its structure in social networks made of parts, ∆-1 that become wholes, ∆+1, or ‘5th dimension’ of the scalar, organic Universe (ab. ∆), to fully become a complete description of all the systems of reality.

Thus once we define the metric equation of 5D and incorporate its ∆±1 organic scales to Γ, the Generator, we will thus have a template logic equation to describe all systems of nature and its processes of existence.

L.S. System Scientist

# I.TERATION: ∆ºST

The method of this blog is iterative, as the Universe is, departing from a few elements, which we constantly repeat with different degrees of complexity till in the final 4th line we, and those who will continue this endeavour, will exhaust all knowledge of mankind, within the properties of the ∆•ST universe and its fractal worlds. Let us then define the 4 elements of all realities, first:

1. The fractal scales of…

2. Cyclical time and…

3.topological space, which…

4. Human aristotelian minds understand with simplified mappings≈mirrors of reality, called…

Spatial mathematics and temporal logic, which we will ‘upgrade’, to…

The non-aristotelian, multicausal logic of cyclic time & non-euclidean fractal structure of space…

∞|°: closer to the i-logic mind of the Universe, which creates and destroys all space-time beings, what we are.

**∆ºst of space-time.**

Let us then restart by defining in more depth the 4 elements of all realities. Cyclical time or ‘πime’, fractal space or ‘§pace’, the scales of space-time, or ∆-5th dimension, and the mind and world languages we use to describe them all (º,@,•, œ).

We shall use a simple function to study the holographic principle from where reality stems: e x i |s≈t. We use a symbol | with long tradition on science to separate mirror symmetries. In this case, the main relationship of a system is between its 4 essential states, space (distance-dimension), entropy (motion), time (cyclical form with motion) information (slow time motion with maximal form) and energy (entropy motion with minimal form).

But let us stress it again: the Universe is NOT algebraic, the mind is. The universe is bio-topo-logical, and so biology, geometry and causal logic ARE the foundational stiences of it all. And an ‘image is worth a thousand numbers/words’ is a motto for GST. I.e. THE DIMENSIONAL FORM OF MICHELANGELO’s David is pure science of topological form, and it would be stupid trying to describe it with a mathematical formulae. So in general a revised Occam’s guide will be as follows:

‘All languages of Nature can map out any reality, but the simplex formulation of an event will define which language and state or entity controls and better describes the system’.

For example in the unending discussion of the particle-wave of quantum physics, Schrodinger gave us a wave description, but if we change frame of reference to see the wave as a ‘polar particle’ in polar coordinates, we get a simple formulae, which is the particle-field solution of the Broglie-Bohm model. SO THIS BB model which is realist, non local, deterministic, exactly as GST is, MUST be considered the proper way to describe quantum physics; and particles must be considered the Tiƒ state that controls waves.

In-Form-ation being essentially ‘DIMENSIONAL FORM’ is often much easier to describe with visual images in motion – a more direct understanding. And topological, geometric and bio-logical, causal, clear-cut, not algebraic, blurred concepts. So indeed, we shall see as in the graph, *that art is the science of form, expressed in human languages, and as such it will appear as the subconscious collective mind of civilisations, which will go through the same 3 ages of life and death than the individual cell does, in one of the most beautiful isomorphisms (equal laws at scale) between man as a super organism in biological terms and mankind and its social organisms, which also go through 3 ages between birth and death by excess of technological information=war.*

So once we have clarified a bit more the ‘ternary±@ STRUCTURE OF ALL SYSTEMS OF NATURE’, we can go back and forth, with increasing ITERATIVE DEPTH, as the Universe does.

And study the 3±œ structure of the Universe:

Œ≈ ∆-1: Spe (entropy limbs/fields/territory) < ∆: St (body-wave-working reproductive class) > ∆+1 Tiƒ (head-particle-government)… with emphasis on its NETWORK, SOCIAL, organic STRUCTURE THROUGH 5D SCALES.

So we can now extend the generator to its natural ternary form, INCLUDING the concept of a central frame of reference, which is connected to the external membrane or sensorial ‘cut off’ ‘event horizon’ between the fractal space-time being and the Universe:

**$pe < Œ: ExI(s=t) > ºTiƒ**

This would be the most exact symbolic representation of the Universe.* AS we include the lineal nature of Entropic Space (not money:)in $, and ad the cyclical nature of time, with the symbol of the mind, whose hardware IS often on the Tiƒ (but not always), and spread the more complex body-waves which ‘equals’ both through balancing exchanes of energy and information to create the ‘whole supœrganism’ (œ).*

**I. ∆º±1**

**Reality is a 5D fractal of space-time beings.**

*The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information, even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction of a particle’s form, along the path of its quantum wave (Bohm). But what is the purpose of information? Communication, between similar beings that share the same code; so they can evolve together into larger, stronger wholes. *

Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar space-time, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.

In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.

In the graph, the Universe is a fractal of information, which has the properties of fractals:

- A fractal is made of smaller parts, connected through networks that repeats similar patterns in different scales of size. This in NATURE, means that the Universe evolves as a fractal growing and replication its form in the different ‘scales of space-time’, from the smallest particles through atoms, molecules, cells, matter states, organisms, ecosystems… solar systems galaxies and dark matter networks of galaxies (some of those scales are shown in the graph), all of them similar in form.
- A fractal is a self-reproductive system, whose fundamental purpose is to ‘iterate’, that is, to reproduce patterns of information.

In nature we see also reproduction happening constantly in a *fractal manner, as any system of any scale of nature will reproduce a minimal seed of information in its lower scale (humans a seminal seed, electrons a light beam, and so on), which will then grow and multiply an emerge in the upper fractal scale as a whole being.*

In fact we shall see that all the Universe really does is to reproduce patterns of information, which is carried in the cyclical motions of time clocks…

**THE FIFTH DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL LOVE**

‘The languages of God are infinite’ UPANISHADS, on the fact each mind has a language, with the same ternary F(t) operandi G(S) syntax, NOT only mathematics.

‘Love each other as I have loved you’

Jesus* On the arrow of eusocial love , the program of ‘God’ that builds up the 5th dimension.*

‘ I would like to know the thoughts of God, the rest are details’ *Einstein, on what truly should matter to science – the whys.*

‘The why is the only thing a physicist does not question’ * Feynman (On the reductionism of physicists)*

‘ I know the non-AE thoughts of God; the mind of the Universe, since I am made to its image and likeness’ *ls*

‘Reality is an organism with a mind called logos and a body called the Universe’ Plato

**The fractal generator sum of t****he arrows of entropy and information in the scalar Universe. **

*In the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time:*

*B*ecause the product of the speed of time clocks and size in space of all beings existing in such scale, within a certain *connected organic structure are co-invariant, *it is easy to define the metric of the 5th dimension (its co-invariant space-time product):

*‘Sp (Relative Size in space) x Tƒ (Relative speed of time clocks) = ∆ (constant of a relative plane of space-time).’*

*That simple equation is* the fundamental metric of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time… which encloses all the other dimensions as ‘single space-time’ studied by each science (in the graph we have ‘piled them up’, according to the inverse arrows of size in space or ENTROPY and speed of its time clocks that carry the information of the system, prioritising in an inverse fashion to physicists, INFORMATION, the dominant arrow of the Universe that is NOT about entropic death but growing information and LIFE.

Yet to transform and compare two entities they must have the same dimensions, and so we adscribe in all equations to time the dimension of height-information, needed to convert a time line into a world cycle.

And so time and space are BIDIMENSIONAL and can transform into each other ad eternal into space-time mixtures, yin-formation and yang-entropy thus become ‘space-time’ energy and we can write the simplest of all formulations of the Generator equation:

S≈T (where ≈ means the wave-like present space-time mixture of both). THIS IS THE ULTIMATE equation, yes that simple. And yet *the bidimensionality of time≈information and space≈entropy, which allows the transformation of one into the other and its combination into ∞ ST≈energy beings, (as only beings with the same number of dimensions can transform into each other), is the fundamental law of the Universe, I have ‘printed on my mind’ with the lightening of Zeus, since it is the simple, first thought of creation, which will reveal the contour of it all.*

It also mean that time is bidimensional (rhythm or ‘frequency’ and height, the first being the pure dimension of time, the second of ‘perceptive information’ – and we shall see to the amazement of physicist, that indeed, the particle is always on top or ahead of the wave-body that moves it). Yet now because time is bidimensional, IT FOLLOWS, that it can be transformed into space. S<=>T, which is the ultimate formula of the universe.

Let us then explore this concept, which is essential to reality in all sciences., *as only beings with the same dimensions can transform into each other. *

Indeed, consider for example, the rewriting of Einstein’s equations, which is immediate. He took time to be an imaginary fourth spacetime coordinate ict, where c is the speed of light and i is the imaginary unit. Now we write: *ds² = (dx, dz) (dy – i**cdt).*

And so time-like functions will become the stuff of the ‘imaginary’ number world, ever pervading in all physical studies of space-time events. And while the equations will be the same the interpretation of this mathematical insight are many. I.e. in the field of quantum physics, immediately we realise its main ‘generator equation’, Schrodinger’s equation can be written as Broglie->Bohm did in polar, imaginary coordinates; *and it will define the particle-state of the quantum system, its cyclical, informative nature.*

The first connection between algebra and physics is the use of the same operandi, but what kind of variables are translations of the pure functions of time and space in GST to physical equivalents. Frequency, 1/t, is the immediate one-dimensional translation of time. Moreover, frequency can be synoptically limited to a ‘point-mind’ of information – a simplex language equations; as frequency taken on a single point of each translative space-time cycle, reduces further the total information of the being to a discrete serie of numbers.

__The scales and ST¡ences of reality.__

As the widest one is the concept of a topological network-plane, of the 5^{th} dimension we can consider it in more detail.

All Sciences share the isomorphisms of duality and organicism. Since the forms of energy and information and its properties remain invariant in all the scales of reality. The result is the fractal structure of the Universe, described in the next graph: Each science studies a ‘scale of organic size’, its cellular species of energy and information and its arrows of time and events, which culminate in the self-organization of those parts into social wholes. Yet the proportion of energy and information of the species each science studies varies, since the Universe displays a hierarchical arrow of growing informative time, from the simplest forms of mathematical space (with minimal informative content), to the complex information of its most evolved organisms (with minimal geometrical regularity).

We establish thereafter a parameter of multiple space-time complexity, st=∆, to classify all those relative scales of spatial energy and temporal information of the Universe, starting by the simplest scales, st=0 (mathematical cycles and lines), st=1 (Gravitational space), st=2 (electromagnetic space), st=3 (atomic particles) and so on, till reaching the most complex, macro-structures of the Universe (st=9, galaxies).

This parameter becomes essential to formalize a type of scientific isomorphisms widely ignored by science, *which *define the interåctions between several scales of reality. In physics:

– Between the small quantum scale of electroweak forces and the bigger gravitational space-time.

– In biology between the cellular microcosms, the individual organism and the ecosystems or societies in which those organisms exist, as individual ‘cells’ of a bigger whole – the species. Since those relationships are essential to explain all kind of natural and social phenomena, from the life/death cycle (in which cells reproduce, organize socially in networks, emerge as individuals of herds and societies, and die, dissolving again their complex ‘st’ networks into ∆-1 cells), to the meaning of religions, in which humans act as mental cells of a subconscious collective we call God.

At present though, each science studies only one scale of form and its specific isomorphisms and events, as if they were unrelated to the isomorphisms of all other scales and species. Only System Sciences, the philosophy of science considered in this work, studies together the mathematical, morphological and biological isomorphisms that define the 4 main arrows of time and apply those isomorphisms to all the species of each of those scales, since the Isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times are common to all of them, regardless of the ‘specific’ qualities of each species:

– All species in the Universe absorb energy, gauge information (even particles, reason why their theories are called gauge theories), reproduce (quarks absorb energy and reproduce jets of ‘quarkitos’; so do electrons that absorb energy and break into a shower of new electrons, and since those are the two basic particles of reality, it follows that all systems can be reproduced), and finally, all entities of the Universe evolve socially, gathering together into bigger super-organisms, from particles that become atoms that become molecules that become cells that become living organisms that become societies, nations and religions, super-organisms of History.

The universe is a scalar social organisms that grows in scales of 10 elements. This growth of new ‘scales of space-time’ IS THE ARROW OF absolute future of reality. Since those who evolve together from individuals into social organisms survive better and dominate its ecosystem, in all scales of size and form of reality. So in biological terms the 5th dimension of eusocial love to ALL the members of your own species (regardless of structure and work-division, into neuronal informative people, and working reproductive ones, to form the ‘mind and body of the system’) IS THE DIMENSION OF FUTURE.

But logically it is ALSO the dimension of future, since ‘parts’ MUST be created BEFORE wholes. So the past is the lonely particle, neanderthal ‘violent’ (partially) white man, AND THE FUTURE, is NOT the homo bacteria or ‘animetal’, in the jargon of bio-history, which betrays all other human beings of its species with segregational memes and loves mechanisms, weapons and go(l)d more than the wor(l)d of love, the biological mandate, the future of its species. Finally it is also the future mathematically and experimentally, as it is obvious the Universe (or the galaxy in more humble studies of the big-bang) started in a sea of entropy that evolved into social scales, as particles became atoms, molecules, cells, crystals, planets, ecosystems of super organisms, galaxies… ALL GUIDED BY THE SUPREME PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE, love all those who belong to your species, work together, create a larger whole and control your entropic territory with it:

In the graph, we can see the ultimate goal of the Universe, the creation of fractal super organisms in which species and individuals who talk the same language of information evolve a larger whole. While *those who don’t understand the Mind of the Universe, the true meaning of God, and the fractal minds of all its species which explain the same concept in each language, the gods of verbal love of the human super organism perish.*

Finally mathematically the fifth dimension is proved by the so called ‘metric’ of a mathematical dimension, which according to Klein exists, when we can *travel through the dimension with the space-time parameters remaining invariant.*

And this is the case of all motions through scales of the fifth dimension, the most notably being ‘the world cycle of life and death, as we are born in the lower seminal scale, with small space-size (Ab. Se) and fast time cycles (ab. Ti) but as we grow in size (+∆Spe), our clocks of time decelerate (-∆T) AND SO its capacity to carry in’form’ation stored in the cyclical ‘form’ and frequency of those cycles (so a computer which is complex clock measures its info in frequency gigahertzs).

SO THE PRODUCT OF Space size and time speed: S x T and the product of the spatial energy stored in that vital space and the information of its clocks e x i, REMAINS INVARIANT, PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF THE 5TH DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL LOVE, EXPERIMENTALLY, mathematically, biologically, and in mystical terms.

**Metric-mathematical and empirical, organic Proofs of the fractal 5D Universe.**

Indeed, what are then the formal proofs of the existence of a 5th dimension of scalar space-time (ab.∆§) ?

In more strict terms, according to epistemology we need *experimental science and a mathematical ‘metric’ equation that describes the dimension. *

Experimental proofs: Everything that you see and exists is a proof of the 5th dimension, *since there is nothing on the Universe, which is not made of smaller ‘parts’ (∆-1 lower scale), and part itself of a larger ‘world’ (∆+1)*

*In the graph, we see how all systems are made of fractal networks of energy and information, which form wholes departing from smaller ‘points’, creating fractal organisms in all sciences. in the left the creation of a hierarchical, fifth dimension of future ‘timespace’ (boson state of matter)*

Mathematical proof: According to Klein, a dimension of space-time exists, when we can travel through its space and time coordinates, whose product remains invariant: “a geometry is the study of the invariant properties of a spacetime, under transformations (read motions) within itself.”

So what remains invariant in the 5th dimension when we travel through it up and down those scales during our ‘world cycles of life and death’ (as all systems are born in an ∆-1 ‘seminal scale’ of pure information, emerge into an ∆-scale at birth and become part of the larger world, or ‘whole’ ∆+1). Amazingly as it seems despite the enormous transformations systems go through when ‘travelling through its life-death world cycle’ through the scales of the 5th dimension, *the product of its size in space and ‘speed of time-clocks/processing of information’, remains the same:*

5D metric equation:* Se (size in space) x To (cyclical time clocks) ≈ Constant.*

In the graph, we can classify all those sciences and its species according to two parameters of space and time: its lineal size, and the inverse speed of its ‘cyclical clocks of information’. So larger species turn slower its time cycles. Yet for entire families of species the product of both parameters remains co-invariant.

Since mathematicians define a new dimension of space-time as a geometry that remains invariant when we change its space-time parameters, *it is then evident that all systems have an internal ‘scalar dimension’ that structures its smaller, faster parts and its larger wholes. *

Depending on which system we study across how many scales, we shall find different quantitative measures of the previous metric equation, which might vary in the details, but the fundamental characteristic of it, the inverse arrows of growing information and diminishing size, which balance each other, will hold for absolutely all the entities of the Universe. And so this metric equation is of an enormous importance to understand the relationship between those scales that happen in all the organisms and complex systems of reality.

In the graph, we can see the FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE, or metric equation of the fifth dimension, which ensures the survival of social wholes and the extinction of those who are selfish individuals that do not evolve or hate other members of its own species.

In the next graph we see the organisation of all those systems, through networks of energy (blood-economics in historic systems) and information (words and laws of nervous and political systems in human social organisms) to which cells-citizens attach to form a perfect social super organism. SO THE GOAL OF SOCIAL SYSTEMS SCIENCES IS TO DESIGN WITH THE LAWS OF THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE THE PERFEcT SUPERORGANISM OF HISTORY that will survive and make history and its cells, all of us, human citizens of God the superorganism of mankind NOT OF ANY TRIBE OR GROUP OF BELIEVERS, BUT ALL OF US, a perfect system, as all others in NATURE ARE:

*We classify all the scales of the 5th dimension as super organisms according to the combined 3 geometries which put together create a network plane: *

*From the perspective of the central point, which branches into a fractal network (the standard Geometry of elliptic spherical forms, ‘not explored by geometers of the XIX c. because fractal mathematics did NOT exist) the world is an elliptic geometry with him at the centre, connected to all other ∆-1 parts. So networks are elliptic Non-E Geometries where there ARE not parallels as the brain, black hole or Wall Street knot of the organism galaxy or economic ecosystem is connected through its informative networks (nervous, gravitational and financial systems) and its quanta of information (electric messages, gravitational waves and money) to all its ∆-1 ‘slave cells’ . Yet those cells are unconnected and so they exist in a hyperbolic geometry of infinite parallels.**Thus any ∆-super organism is a group of n-1 cells joined by energetic, informative & reproductive networks that communicate them. Those ∆-1 cells are also superorganisms made of small i-2 molecules joined by Sp, ST=exi & Tƒ networks and so on and so on.*

Sciences study those organic systems, tied up by networks of energy and information. In the graph, we see the main st-planes studied by human sciences and their 4 main time arrows, *S < =>T,* which in static space give birth to the ‘organic elements’ of all species: social cell of energy and information and the reproductive networks that relate them. Thus, there are 4 basic elements in all organic systems:

- Cellular units.
- Networks of energy or vital space.
- Networks of fractal information.
- Networks that reproduce energy and information.

All entities are generated by reproductions and transformations of energy and informative cycles (ΣS≤≥Tƒ), organized in cellular units, through networks, and ±st Planes of self-similar forms. Yet, since those cellular units ∆-1 are made of smaller st_{-2} cells, which show the same structure, we can define any organic system as a super-organism (made of smaller, self-similar super-organisms):

*‘A super-organism is a group of cellular super-organisms joined by energetic, informative and reproductive networks.’*

We unify all Natural Systems as superorganisms using a single template definition, since they differ only by the i-scale or ecosystem in which they exist or the specific types of energy & information their networks are made of:

‘A super-organism (name an organism) is a population of iterative (name a cellular species), related by informative (name a language or informative force) and energy networks (name a kind of energy), which combine into a reproductive network that iterates the organism.’:

Fill the gaps with a specific species, language of information and force of energy and we can define any network-organism, which will be a ‘part’ of a whole world-plane or ecosystem, composed of several species that occupy different ‘vital spaces’ but interact through the same language of energy & information:

An world-plane or ecosystem (name a specific world-plane) is a population of several (name the species), related by informative languages (name their languages or informative forces) and energy networks (name the energies).

I.e.: The ‘world-plane of ‘zoology’ includes all beings of relative size, i=6, that use light as information, called ‘animals’. The world-plane 8, a galaxy, includes as parts, all celestial bodies of size i=7 related by gravitational networks, etc.:

**∆-3:** An atomic organism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and (light) energy.

**∆-2:** A molecular organism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy and coded by networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London, Waals forces).

**∆-1:** A cellular organism is a population of molecules, related by energetic networks (cytoplasm, membranes, Golgi reticules) and coded by genetic information (DNA-RNA.)

**∆=o:** A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).

**∆+1:** An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey).

**∆+1:** A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by legal and cultural networks of verbal information and agricultural networks of carbon-life energy.

**∆+1:** An economic ecosystem or nation is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) & energetic networks (roads, electricity)

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and include 2 different species: human beings and machines.

**
∆+3**: A galaxy is a population of light stars and gravitational black holes, related by networks of gravitational information and electromagnetic energy.

**∆+4:** A Universe is a population of galaxies joined by networks of dark matter and energy.

In the graph, *there are infinite fractal beings and infinite languages and expressions of the Universal game and its ternary fractal generator that guides systems into survival actions of exchanges of energy and information – NOT only mathematics is the language of God.*

In that sense the MIND IS THE SOFTWARE OF SURVIVAL OR ‘FUNCTION OF EXI =STIENCE’ which all systems run to survive, informed because those who do NOT MECHANICALLY, APPERCEPTIVELY, VEGETATIVELY OR CONSCIOUSLY learn the program BECOME EXTINCT. So the software of GST imposes itself by evolution.

**Duality in different sciences.**

All those social networks and systems have 2 fundamental elements, spatial entropy and temporal information, and its social networks.

So what is the largest scale we know of, made with the smaller parts? Obviously the one between galaxies made of the smallest tiny bits, which seem to be neutrinos, whose ‘angle’ is the size of a theoretical string of ‘dark energy’

ANOTHER ONE:

You have likely heard that string theory ‘is’ the thing to learn, but it is soo complicated (‘if it is complicated you don’t know how to explain it’ Einstein) only those hyperbolic masters of thought and funerary ceremonies, aka artillery masters can know and enter the priesthood. Just believe on them… Well not so. At the end of the ‘string’ if you pull it out, all comes to the 2 drawings above, open expansive motions of lineal space (one strings in one D) and closed time loops with 2 dimensions of form, with more in-form-ation. *Alas what string theory is telling us is simple, ultimately all what exists is made of time spatial lines and clock-cycles. But conceptually you need to understand the duality of space-time, to know what they don’t know they are talking about. *Then departing from _and O, you can construct it all. Taoists called it yang and yin and constructed it all; computers | and O and model with them all; Descartes, vortices and res extensa and all came from them, Desargues circle and axis of a cone and all curves came from it… At the end of the journey all will be translated to it space & time; Line and cycle; lineal entropy and cyclical information, combined into ∞ bits and bites of energy (its Ø, 3rd element, the yinyang being, the conic, the space-time block, the being.

Yes it is that simple when you understand the FIRST principles: we are made of complementary ‘lineal motions of space without form’, or | and cyclical clocks of information or O, which combine into ∞ body-waves of ‘space-time’. So from yin-formation and yang-energy space-time yin yang beings are born, to use the terminology of the philosophy that closer explain those ultimate principles, in which the most successful human civilisation in terms of survival of its people and harmony with the Universe, was based. Simple principles indeed, so simple that a Chinese peasant could understand them 3000 years ago. *It was the deformation brought about by the awe and reverence the mechanical clock brought to the western world, what changed the paradigm of time, improving our ‘measure of time clocks’ but blurring its qualitative nature as time cycles.*

And further on since all sciences use time as its main parameter of measure, to extend the simplex concept of time as measure of locomotions in space to ALL sciences is the MAIN error to understand them properly. Or can you explain the cycles of evolution and history with Einstein and Galileo equations of space-light speed? Try (;

**The isomorphic method of knowledge.**

All this said it is obvious that we can expand the scientific method into the stientific isomorphic method, with the help of the isomorphisms of all systems, whose common properties in topological space, its similar time ages, soon discussed, and its scalar arrows of time and space of the fifth dimension will show organic topo-logical common laws applied to all the beings of space-time of the Universe.

Now when systems have ‘the same’ form, it is called an ‘isomorphism’ from the Greek iso=equal and form=morph. So we talk of the first isomorphism of the Universe. Its 3 topological varieties, which process energy and move (limbs, fields), process information and perceive (heads, particles) and communicate both parts in exchanges of energy and information (that reproduce the system).

So we can put the 3 together: Sp + ST + Tƒ = Constant (Being); which in more dynamic terms as parts are not really sums but ‘interact together’, exchanging flows of energy and information, we write:

*Sp < ST > Tƒ*

While we will often use spatial entropy and energy (entropy with a bit of form) and temporal form and information (form with a bit of motion) as synonymous is important when we get more technical and precise, to consider the ternary structure of all what exists.

As we have already introduced the theme, we shall now consider the 2nd and 3rd element together.

** II; III. ****CYCLIC, FRACTAL §PACE-∏IME: ****SUPŒRGANISM IN TIME:**

**Worldcycles of existence.**

The brain may be regarded as a kind of parasite of the organism, a pensioner, as it were, who dwells with the body.

After your death you will be what you were before your birth. *Schopenhauer*

‘The separation between past, present and future is an illusion’. Einstein, on the co-existence of a ‘block of time’ in a deterministic Universe.

Why the fifth dimension is so important can be seen in the next graph on world cycles. And plainly speaking the answer is this:

Because we exist by travelling as living beings that grow evolve and reproduce through the scales of the fifth dimension. So if *you want to understand why you exist, you can only do so, understanding the ‘motions of time-space’ happening among scales.*

YES, i know this is the biggest ever question mankind has done, and a resolution was never expected; specially in the age of digital thought, small minds and big computer data. Since scientists expect it to be some sort of ‘magic equation’ in the language of God (never mind the ‘languages of god’ are infinite and bio-logical languages are the ones that solve this conundrum, not mathematics).

Funny thing though is that after giving you the meaning of it all, we shall give you the equations of life and death… on the logic language of GST. Sorry, physicists, it is not an equation of quantum physics, but one of i-logic time (:

The fifth dimension is a dimension of time, the time of consciousness, perceived as a world cycle of existence of 3 ages between birth in the ∆-1 scale of the fifth dimension to its social gathering with other humans at ∆+1 world, to descend back into dissolution:

In the graph, man in the 5th dimension co-exists in 3 scales as a supeorganism which will live as a ‘travel through those 3 ∆-scales of the fractal Universe’. So its existence is a fractal existence, which tries to maximise its survival by reproducing into another similar point of space and time; as all living fractals of the Universe does; and will dissolve back into its cellular elements after completing all the ‘motions’ of a world cycle of death and life:

This simple example of what is the existence of man as a fractal of space-time shows that indeed, to explain the deep whys of reality, including the ‘world cycles of existence of all its beings’ (which physicists reduce to ‘worldlines’ as they do not understand time does have a cyclical form and hence it is a cycle with at least ‘2 dimensions’ , one of motion and the missed one of cyclical, height, information) we need to postulate a fractal Universe, which requires this new time-space dimension of scales of size and time-information, the ‘hidden variables’ that truly make sense of it all.

The study of those systems of ‘space-time’, across all the scales of size of reality, its metric equations, properties and isomorphic≈equal laws, is the purpose of the organic paradigm and the science of General Systems & cybernetics also called ‘duality’,’complexity’ or theory of information as it ads to the philosophy of science sponsored by physics, which only recognise motion and entropy as the arrow of future time 1/2 of the forgotten Universe, information and its infinite ternary combinations. This relatively new discipline of science is poised to be in the age of information, the most fruitful source of new fundamental laws of science, with applications to all disciplines. In this blog we introduce the only formalism of duality – the science that studies those complementary laws of energy and information – available to all sciences, derived from the Fractal Generator and the metric equations of the 5th scalar dimension of space-time that organises all those ‘discontinuous’ fractal beings of space-time.

Since we can recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms. Some are material.

Yet all of them have a biological influence over us, provoking changes in the energy and information systems of mankind that we should control for our own benefit.

**The 3 ages of all organic, temporal species.**

“We name time when we say: every thing has its time. This means: everything which actually is, every being comes and goes at the right time and remains for a time during the time allotted to it. *Time and being. Heidegger*

**The seven motions that put together create a ****world cycle**

It is a fact that *there are at least 6 motions=type of changes in the Universe, already described by the first scientist of history, Mr. Aristotle: generation (evolution), growth, reproduction, locomotion, diminution and extinction=dissolution, and 5 of them have to do with changes in the information of systems; only one is pure entropy (locomotion). We shall add to those 6 motions the ±i motions of communication and perception of information, as they imply the motion of pixels that communicate form between the being and the observer, and emission of forces that carry information between two •mind points.*

The result of expanding the motions of reality from 1 to 8 of course is an AMAZING EXPANSION OF OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE WHYS OF REALITY, as shown ‘again’ (:iterative universe:) in the next graphs:

In the graph, unlike the lineal description of the ‘function of existence’ according to ‘physicists’, a mere sum of locomotions with a messed up mystical chit-chat proper of physicists doing ‘philosophy’ we obtain in 5D a complex, realist understanding of our world cycle as space-time beings.

In the graph, samples of the 3±1 ages/arrows of time in Universal Systems:

Birth: i: A seed of Temporal information, t, evolves into a complementary organism of energy and information, tS, by absorbing energy, replicating its information and evolving in social cells: Life starts

Youth: Max. Sp: It absorbs energy and reaches its maximal size: Max. Energy.

Reproduction: e=i It keeps in-form-ing itself till reaching an age of reproductive balance, Tƒ=Sp. We perceive that age as beauty, harmony between lineal energy & cyclical form.

3rd age: In-form-ation warps energy till its exhaustion: Max. T.

-1: Death: Information explodes back into energy, expanding in space, reversing the arrows of time: Temporal Information <

Let us now go a step further in our understanding of the organic structure of the Universe and the superorganism of history.

Tƒ that aim, we shall consider how the organic arrows of time, the will to obtain energy, information and reproduce acquire a regular order in all the systems of the Universe.

This organic vision of time is much more sophisticated that the mere use of an arrow of entropy or motion – the simplest of those 4 arrows, which is the concept of time used by mechanist physicists, obsessed with the construction of energetic machines.

Yet it can also described mathematically in terms of the 2 primary elements of the Universe, energy and information, thanks to Einstein’s discovery that the product of energy and temporal information of any system, SxT=k, is constant.

Since that equation includes the 3 essential arrows of the Universe, not only one arrow as a clock does:

The arrow of energy, e; the arrow of information, t; and the product of them, k, or arrow of reproduction.

It is also obvious that mathematically we can express the previous equation in 3 forms:

Max. Sp x Min. T = K ; Sp=K=T and Min. Sp x Max. T=K.

Thus there are 3 possible stages or ages of evolution of the equation of biological time. And since we are all made of ‘energy’ and ‘temporal information’, those 3 stages must be the stages, or phases of any system of the Universe. This finding, which is perhaps the most important discovery of Theory of Time of the XXI century, is validated by all kind of empirical observations. For example, the 3 states of matter correspond to those 3 equations. Gas (maximal energy), liquid (balanced energy and information) and solid (Maximal information. They are also the 3 possible solutions of a cosmological system: the big bang of maximal energy, a steady state of balance and a big crunch of maximal information. In the graph, we show further examples of those equations.

Here we are interested in its application to the understanding of life and history. If we call the age of maximal energy, youth, the age of balance between energy and information, the reproductive, mature age, and the age of maximal information the old age, we have a simple description of the fundamental cycle of life and death through its 3 ages.

But we can also write those dynamic processes backwards. And so we have the inverse equation of life ages, the equation of death, when after accumulating maximal information, a species reverses its arrow of information and explodes that information into energy. It is the process or equation of death.

So life is an arrow of information, Sp-> I, and death its inversion, I-> Sp. So simple, so beautiful, so misunderstood by mechanist scientists, who think the previous equation is ‘uncertain’, because the observer can perceive a particle in any of those 3 states (Uncertainty principle of quantum physics).

So we could state simply that ‘T.Œ, the theory of everything organic and the œrganisms it studies are expression of an even deeper game, that of existence, and its function which make holographs of space and time of energy and information switching states between form and motion, imprinting and reproduction through motion, and stop and go perception and motion information and energy, this dual game, is what exi|st¡ence is all about.

So simple, so misunderstood: we are made of motions with form, spatial energy with temporal information, combined in actions. We were active space-time beings, and our existence as that of any other entity of the Universe was a sum of space-time action, between birth and extinction, which we shall call ‘a world cycle’:

W =∫ å ∂t = 0 (equation that means a life worldcycle is the integral sum of all the spacetime actions of a being).

So the simple unifying principle of all realities is this: all systems of the Universe are made of ‘formal motions’, ‘temporal in/form/ation’ stored in the form and frequency of the infinite, repetitive, memorial clock-like cycles of the Universe (as those of the graphs), all of them accelerating inwards, from clock-like masses, to clock-like charges, to people growing in information and warping till its 3rd age of excessive information; or warping as masses, E=mc², till the center of that clock-like vortex, the point where time ends, the finite space-time being closes its informative warping, and then its information explodes in an entropic, expansive spatial expansion that erases its information, ending its life cycle in a physical or biological ‘big-bang’.

That is all in its simplest expression: vital space with motion ‘evolves its form’ its in/form/ation in cyclical patterns, warps and shrinks (‘time warps space into masses’ said Einstein, adding that masses were equivalent to accelerated vortices – the so call equivalent principle between gravitation and acceleration; as the mass vortex of the galaxy, where stars grow in information and finally explode feeding the black hole, as the vortex of information, which is this planet, which increases its information through evolution and history, in an accelerated vortex, which enters now in the age of information or 3d age of man, the risky zone where technologic information, weapons, robots, can indeed ‘explode’ the human wave):

*In the graph, from the seminal book, Unification theory, c.92, the diachronic order of the 6+1 motions of time, which can be plotted in terms of its parameters of energy and information into a vortex spiral of increasing time speed and reduced cross section, such as the cellular herd enters the spiral of maximal informative center (literally in physical, simplex geometrical systems, conceptually in biological ones), till it reaches the point of maximal information and ‘comprehension’ of its world cycle, when it explodes and dies in a big-bang that erases it.*

The conceptual understanding of the world cycle of existence of all space-time beings, which accelerate and grow its information, between a young entropic age of maximal lineal motions into a reproductive mature age of balance between entropy and motion, and a 3rd age of excessive information as time-clocks warp and accelerate exhausting the vital space and spatial motions of the being that shrinks and then in the central point of that ‘cycle’ explode and die.

All what you see is encoded by the fractal generator of 5D metrics and its ternary symmetries, either in space, |-Spe<Ø-st<Tiƒ (whereas the limb field provides entropic motion to the ST wave-body, and the Tƒ head particle provides information, and the ST body-wave reproduces the system), or in time, Ps>ST>Tƒ, its inverse symmetry where energy young motions slowly warp into the adult and finally old age of information.

So we shall maintain the classic concepts of science and talk of 3 space dimensions, while dividing the dimension of lineal time in the 3 motions of time that we shall call 3 ages, to keep the convention that time has a 4th single dimension:

3 space forms symmetric to 3 time motions, but ordered in different ways Sp<ST<Tiƒ, and Se>ST>Tƒ, how simple and beautiful the world cycles of space-time reveal the essence of the Universe.

Now the symbols are the fundamental ternary symmetries of the Universe and when studying in detail an entity we will see the different equations, states and combined forms are merely ‘combinations’ of those symbols, so we will use them loosely in many ways, for the reader to get accustomed for example, to S (space, entropy), P(lineal momentum,) Se (spatial entropy, Past motion), Spe (all together now), (|-Sp, lineal motion, ◊-bidimensional space), etc. The main of a dual philosopher is NOT the same structure of a lineal, measure-obsessed scientist. The general truths are more important than the particular. The whys more than the hows. Both are complementary and it is a sad fact of technological science that the general truths don’t matter. But they are the content of T.Œ, and both are obviously the 2 fundamental views on reality – the whole and its detailed parts.

Those 2 simple laws, and its equations, the equation of the life-death cycle:

Ps (youth)>S=T (maturity) > Tƒ (3rd age) << Ps (entropic death).

Where > means an implosive, informative arrow of time and << and entropic arrow of death.

And the metric of the 5th dimension, the fact that the product of the size and speed of time of systems is relatively constant for different species of the same family (physical species, biological species) ARE the most important equations of science discovered since Relativity, and yet nobody was impressed.

Apart from explaining the life-death cycle, it explained the reason why information flows perfectly from lower scales (genetic scales) to upper wholes (since lower scales preserve more information) and there is however entropy, loss of energy when you move upwards, but when you move downwards, from wholes to parts, there is no loss of energy – so your cells follow your hand.

Suddenly I realized those scales of size were symbiotic and organized co-existences and synchronicities that created organisms and physical systems.

And so in mystical terms, the 5th dimension the dimension of future, of information, as parts must come before wholes, was also the dimension of eusocial evolution, of love, that justified the messages of love prophets, the Darwinian love of survival of the species, not the individual, the organization of history in scales of larger social units, since the future, the whole was stronger than the parts and survived. So I found that besides the actions of motion, energy and information there was an action of social evolution in all beings. That was the program of the Universe, I termed with the 5 letters each for each action of the 5th dimension:

∆æ: acceleration-motion, ∆e: energy feeding, ∆œ: iteration, reproduction, ∆i observer’s gauging of information and ∆û: social evolution of parts into universals. This was the will of survival, which explained the mathematical space-time cycles of physics and Nature, and history, which merged physics, biology and sociology

An entire Universe of whys to all sciences and harmonic laws was opening in front of my eyes…

So an even more synoptic way to express it all is to say that we are all ∆•st, dust of space-time, which rises evolve an falls back into dust of space-time in the moment of death: ‘ashes to ashes’.

But and this will surprise you, *since travel to the past in a given region of the Universe is merely a process of erasing information, theoretically immortality is possible for all systems, who are smart enough to turn back the internal clocks and erase its memorial information, which makes us stiff, still, warped. Indeed,* thought is overrated over pure life emotions, which is the body-wave part, the Universe like it most and conserves… in an eternal present.

Indeed, what warps motion into form and make us old? The answer might surprise you. IT IS our 4th element: the mind that absorbs energy and transforms it into still form. The Universe is NOT about minds of still pure information, which do NOT communicate the limit-death of a system, NOR about entropic big-bangs, which do not have form. SO BOTH ARE THE LIMITS OF NON-BEING, but about the mixing in vital actions, and this we know for all sciences, including physics where PRESENT-ENERGY WAVES AND ACTIONS ARE THE STUFF OF WHICH ALL IS MADE.

Now mathematically all this is basic ‘∆nalysis’, a bit more complex than our ‘conceptual equations’ (1st line). So calculus talks of first and second derivatives (which shows curvature and acceleration) stationary point and maximal and minimal points, all of which *tend to zero, since the age of life can be written as 3 maximal, stationary and minimal points that ‘symbolise’ the change for youth, to the iterative adult age, to the informative minimal 3rd age.*

*In physics, the equivalent of those time cycles being conservative energy-work closed paths, is the Lagrangian Action and the Hamiltonian of Energy, which we constantly equate to zero or to a ‘derivative’ instant of present.*

So once this hurdle of subjectivity has been UNDERSTOOD but* never denied because ultimately TO BE IS TO BE A SUBJECTIVE KNOT OF TIME CYCLES*, the sheer beauty and perfection of the whole organic Universe of which we are just like everything else just a part, made to the image and likeness of the whole, should be good enough for any mind to delight with reality, even if to do so it has to loose part of his to ego-centered beliefs.

We use in that sense 3 symbols for the mind: •, as a point (∆+1 perspective), **Œ,** as a whole dynamic system with a head-particle and body moved by its lineal, entropic limbs-fields (**T** perspective) and **@**, as a symbol for a static mind perceiving a self-centred perspective (**S**-tatic perspective); showing the 3 fundamental (but not unique) perspectives on mind analysis.

Now since the mind is somewhat an obtuse concept, we are far more interested in the *mind as the site of synoptic languages, ¬E Mathematics of fractal points with volume and ∞ crossing parallels and ¬A-ristotelian logic of ternary elements to explain what truly the mind is – the site of language, synoptic mappings of the Universe.*

Let us then consider the ± sides of the mind-view – the positive linguistic side on how the mind of man has achieved the reduction of the Universe into the mind languages of space (math), time (logic) and the ∆-dimension (organicism) an the negative side of the fundamentalists of truths and a single language that do not understand all minds have a different linguistic scanner of the Universe to map out its actions of perception and feeding of information and energy…

**IV. @. MINDS’ LANGUAGES.**

**Minds and languages.**

What languages then matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but *also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. For example:*

Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:

red colors (spatial entropy) < green/yellow (energy) > Blue (temporal information) for animal visual languages

F(x):time-like parameter < (operandi: action) > G(x): space-like parameter, which defines mathematical equations and its simpler Boolean algebra which in computers reduces all to 0 and | truth or false, ±, and its combined gates.

**CONCLUSION: General systems Theory and organicism.**

All what exists is a fractal whose organic purpose is to exist forever by reproducing its forms of information.

Even ‘locomotion’, the fundamental focus of ‘physical sciences’ influenced by its worldly religion (to make moving machines and weapons that shoot ‘fast moving objects’ and bring an ‘entropic’ worldview of reality) is in fact a reproductive wave of in/form/ation… Indeed, the best way to resolve the logic paradoxes of motion (unresolved since Zeno convinced us, a turtle runs faster than Achiles:) is to postulate motion as reproduction of form, in the way ‘waves move’, imprinting its information over the lower layer of space, in a stop and go beat.

- A fractal is generated despite its complexity born of iterations and network connection, by a very simple ‘feed-back’ equation of the form: A<=>B.

So we shall describe the Universe of ‘space-time beings’ made of spatial entropy and temporal information with a feed back equation that describes the constant exchanges of energy and information between the ‘cyclical temporal particles-heads that store the cycles of memorial time and information of the system’ and its entropic field-limbs , which combine in the ‘3rd element’ of all systems: ‘body-waves’ of energy:

Γ. Spe (lineal limbs-fields of entropy) <ST Hyperbolic- present body-waves> Tiƒ (spherical particle-heads of information)

Thus clearly, the Universe is made of scales of relative size and speed of time in its clocks, which carry the information of each of its ‘fractal world-systems’

Τhere is an overwhelming evidence of those 3 ‘fundamental properties’ of the fractal Universe:

-Its ‘scales’ of size, which we order into a 5th dimension of space-time (∆, proved in all sciences by telescopes and microscopes).

– The different speed of its cyclical time-like vortices that carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles – proved in physics by relativity and the law of vortices that accelerate the smaller they are – Vo x Ro =K, (and will allow us to find the Unification Equation of masses and charges -2 clock like vortices of the smaller quantum, faster, more attractive scale, and the slower, larger, weaker, gravitational one), in biology by genetics, which code the information of organisms with its higher content of information, in computers by the Moore law that makes smaller chips faster chips.

Thus the purpose of systems sciences was to formalise logically and mathematically, those insights that greatly widened the restricted view of reality sponsored by physicists based in a single scale of reality, the space-time continuum, and a single arrow of future – entropy – by analysing all the laws completely ignored by simplex single time and continuous space models of reality, adding the topological laws of a Universe with multiple fractal scales of size and clocks of information, which roughly speaking can be gathered in two set of laws:

- Those laws concerned with the scales of systems, its self-similarity and the inverse flows of still, reproduced information (upwards) and synchronous motion (downwards)
- Those laws concerned with the ‘symmetries’ caused by the existence of 3 topologies in space symmetric to the 3 ages of life of all systems. Either symmetries that establish a correspondence between the ages of the being and its organs of lineal motion (limbs/fields dominant in the energetic youth), cyclical information (heads/particles dominant in the 3rd informative age) and its combined hyperbolic reproductive body-waves (dominant in the mature age); or the symmetries that transform each organ into its inverse form, or reproduce it along different scales of space-time.

So gts epistemological method is simple: AS WE ARE ALL BEINGS OF FRACTAL SPACE-TIME, WE CAN FIND A SET OF LAWS THAT APPLY TO ALL SYSTEMS AND SCALES, and then by homology fit data in this all encompassing equations, revealing the connection between them all.

All this said the first *huge task of formal 5D stience is to connect that equation with all the equations of mathematics, which explain all the variations and rules of construction of beings.*

Indeed, the generator has often ternary expressions depending on the point of view and state we study. Because…

*The generator of topological space-time beings is a BIO-TOPO- LOGIC equation, not a quantitative, algebraic equation of motions, which as Einstein hint at with its topological description of gravitational motions, will become ALSO a theme of fractal reproduction and curvature-form-information. *

SO what always matters most is the qualitative equation of dimensional ‘forms of information’. We need to stress this fact, because most scientist believe today that the only equations that matter are quantitative equation__s.__

It will be then needed to make some corrections in equations and concepts to translate GSTience into quantitative science, but the most fascinating moments of my research happened when I found how easily all the equations of all those stiences came out from GST and went even further.

It must be understood that to do so, while we will of course use the experimental data of all sciences and respect the laws of the scientific method, we must completely ‘change our jargon’ and way to describe reality, since ‘locomotion and entropy’ are very different elements than information – in fact opposite in properties. So the stiff scientist will soon abandon this blog as the ‘language, and questions are often very different of its concerns for motion and measure’.

** The organic whys of the Universe: The 4th paradigm of knowledge.**

Below the ‘arrow of the fifth dimension’ of eusocial evolution that departing from vacuum space, evolves the fractal universe into ever more complex structures of information, which are the arrow of future, as the parts must come before the wholes.

The Universe evolves from simple light space-time into particles, that gather socially into atoms, molecules, cells, matter, organisms, and social super organisms, planetary systems, galaxies and universes. Such scale means in mystique terms that the Universe ‘loves’ and wants members of the same species to evolve socially into larger wholes that survive better than individuals.

The fifth dimension of space-time (physical concept), the laws of evolution of ‘SPECIES’ (not individuals) into more successful social systems (ants and humans being the most successful animals precisely because of its social evolution) and THE LOVE messages of prophets=historians of the future, who express the law of eusocial love in human verbal terms to make humans understand that survival means to evolve together into a global super organism, UNO/EU style are just expressions of the same Universal law. And this indeed the stuff of this blog: to prove that departing from the simple principles of time, space and social organic evolution we can explain it ALL including sciences, arts and religions and deduce from those simple laws all the equations, events and species of the Universe.

And so this is the Universe in a nutshell, cracked to see its core, what Einstein called ‘the thoughts of God’. Since indeed the rest, all of us space-time beings are ‘its details’; which important as they are, we study with ‘stiences’ (sciences of space-time beings), each one dedicated to the analysis of the species of one ‘scale’ of size of that fractal Universe of growing space-time wholes. So what the blog will do is to explain the ‘thoughts of god’ in the first line in a more discursive, easy way; formalising those principles on the second line, to connect them mathematically, organically and logically with all the laws of equations of ‘stiences’, scale by scale in the 3rd line.

Since all what exists has mathematical=spatial properties, (S), logic, casual, temporal properties (T), co-exist at least in 3 ‘organic’ planes of parts and wholes, your inner cellular world, your individual being and the larger world in which you exist (∆±1) and finally do have a ‘mind-point’ (•), whose ‘languages of information’ stored in cyclical logic patterns, perform the actions of energy and time that ensure the balance and survival of the being, by first mapping out the ∞ universe in the small infinitesimal mind of the being, and then acting on that mapping searching for entropy of motion, energy for its body-wave and information for its mind-particle.

**THE FORMALISM OF STIENCE: ITS TOPO-BIO-LOGIC PROPERTIES**

We death in the first ‘iteration’ with the immediate truths of mathematics, which are topological and geometric. Let us now introduce the other great field of mathematics, which uses instead of the spatial point, the temporal, sequential, causal number to represent reality. It is to put in GST terms, the ‘holographic duality’ of spatial maths (geometry), temporal maths (algebra), to which we add the 3rd great branch of maths, ∆nalysis, obviously dealing with finitesimals and wholes, the 5D scales.

**THE DIFFERENT ‘REPRESENTATIONS’ OF A FINITE 5D SCALE.**

In the graph, an ∆ scale can be represented through the interval of 0 to 1 by finitesimals or the interval from 1 to ∞, which become the decametric and decimal regions of a supœrganism represented in the real line: ∆-1: o to 1, 1, the ∆o scale and 1 to ∞, the external world.

**Social numbers and infinities: the temporal algebra of geometry. **

Mathematics divides phenomena into two broad classes, discrete or temporal and continuous, or spatial historically corresponding to the earlier division between T-arithmetic and S-geometry.

Discrete systems can be subdivided only so far, and they can be described in terms of whole numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, …. Continuous systems can be subdivided indefinitely, and their description requires the real numbers, numbers represented by decimal expansions such as 3.14159…, possibly going on forever. Understanding the true nature of such infinite decimals lies at the heart of analysis.

And yet lacking the proper ∆ST theory it is yet not understood.

The distinction between continuous mathematics and discrete mathematics IS ONE BETWEEN SINGLE, SYNCHRONOUS, CONTINUOUS SPACE WITH LESS INFORMATION, and the perception in terms of ‘time cycles, or fractal points; space-time entities’, which will show to be ALWAYS discrete in its detail, either because it will HAVE BOUNDARIES IN SPACE, or it will be A SERIES OF TIME CYCLES AND FREQUENCIES, perceived only when the time cycle is ‘completed’, and hence will show DISCONTINUITIES ON TIME.

Thus the dualities of ST on one side, and the ‘Galilean paradox’ of the mind’s limits of perception of information lay at the heart of the essential philosophical question: it is the Universe discrete or continuous in space and time. Both, but always discrete when in detail due to spatial boundaries, and the measure of time cycles in the points of repetition of its ‘frequency’.

So ultimately we face a mental issue of mathematical modeling: the ‘mind-art’ (as pure exact science does not exist, all is art of linguistic perception) of representing features of the natural world in a reduced mental, mathematical form.

The universe does not contain or consist of actual mathematical objects, but a language can model all aspects of the universe. So all resembles mathematical concepts.

For example, the number two does not exist as a physical object, but it does describe an important feature of such things as human twins and binary stars; and so we can extract by the ternary method, 3 sub-concepts of it:

2 means the first ∆-scale of growth of 1 being into 2, by:

S-imilarity and S-imultaneity in space (ab. Sim)’, ‘i-somorphism in time-information (ab. Iso)’ and ‘equality in ∆-scale’ (ab. Eq), as perceived by a linguistic observer, @, which will deem both beings ‘IDENTICAL’. Whereas identity means that an @-bserver will deem the being ∆st≈St, (Sim, Iso and Eq). So identity is the maximal perfection of a number, for a perceiver, even if ultimately:

*‘Not 2 beings are identical for the Universe, but can be identical for the observer’… an intuitive truth, *whose pedantic proof is of course of no importance (: we do not follow the axiomatic method of absolute minds here):, but it is at the heart of WHY REALITY IS NOT COLLAPSED INTO THE NOTHINGNESS OF A BIG-BANG POINT.

Thus those 3+0 elements of the ∆•ST coincide *a social number can be used whose intrinsic properties define conceptually ‘S- imultaneity, Ti-somorphism’ and ∆-equality or equivalence (ab. Eq) in size, which becomes an @identity for the mind. THEN A NUMBER IS BORN.*

I(n this ‘infinitorum’ of Universal thoughts, which bring always new depths as soon as we observe it with an ∆•st trained mind, there are differences between S-imilarity and Simultaneity to define in space an ‘identity’ and ‘equality’ and equivalence, treated elsewhere)

It IS THEN CLEAR that a number being a sum of points, encodes more information in a synoptic way about the T-informative nature of the ‘social group’ than an array of points, *which unlike a number tells us less about the ‘informative identity of the inner parts of the being’, but provides us more spatial knowledge about the relative position in space of the members of a number-group.*

And this is OBVIOUS, when we return to the origin of geometry and consider an age in which both concepts were intermingled so ‘points were numbers’ and displayed geometrical properties:

Numbers as points, showing also the internal geometric nature, used in earlier mathematics to extract the ‘time-algebraic’, ‘∆nalytical-social’ and S-patial-geometrical properties from them.

Of those numerical properties ∆nalysis is obviously more concerned with the ∆-questions; so a number is defined in ceteris paribus ∆nalysis as a *social scale* of @identical beings.

(The reader must abandon its single causal logic and accept always a ternary+0 model of knowledge, which do NOT forbid partial ceteris paribus single-causality as long AS WE KNOW its limits).

NEXT COMES the question on how to ‘consider scales’, which tend to be decametric, good! One of the few things that work right on the human mind and do no have to be adapted to the Universal mind, from d•st to ∆ûst.

Shall we study them downwards, through ‘finitesimal decimal scales’ or upwards, through decametric, growing ones?

Answer, an essential law of Absolute relativity goes as follows:

‘The study of decametric, §+ scales (10§≈10•^{10} ∆ ≈ ∆+1) is symmetric to the study of the inverse, decimal ∆>∆-1 scale’.

Or in its most reduced ‘formula’: ( **∞ = (1) = 0): (∞-1) ≈ (1-0)**

**Whereas **∞ is the perception of the whole ‘upwards’ in the domain of 1, the minimal quanta to the relative ∞ of the ∆+1 scale. While 1 is the relative infinite of a system observed downwards, such as ∆+1 (1) is composed of a number of ‘finitesimal parts’ whose minimal quanta is 0.

So in absolute relativity the ∆-1 world goes from 1 to 0, and the ∆+1 equivalent concept goes from 1 to ∞. And so now we can also extract of the ‘infinitorum thought receptacle’J a key difference between both mathematical techniques:

*A conceptual analysis upwards has a defined lower point-quanta, 1 and an undefined upper ∞ limit. While a downwards analysis has an upper defined whole limit, 1 and an undefined ‘finitesimal minimum, +0).*

So the smart reader will notice this absolute relative duality of ∆±1 where ∆@ is the ‘observer’, implies relativity of knowledge, always with a self-centered element to define it, and ‘the relative definition of finite infinities, or ∆+1 limit (ab. ∞) and finite infinitesimals (+0).

This brings an essential isomorphism of absolute relativity (do NOT confuse ∆-equality, with S-yncrhonicity, Ti-somorphism and @dentity; we ‘repeat’ as I know when, if any human ever gets to read those texts, there is TOO much upgrading and not to get dizzy, we DO repeat essential truths).

I-somorphism is the concept of equality in time-information and at the heart of the POSSIBILITIES to do mathematical PROOFS in different, seemingly non-identical space-time domains.

When we apply the identity of ∞|^{0 }(here written in inverse fashion) as in the title of this post on ‘number theory’, poised to complete what my fellow countryman, Fermat, started, we *understand the why of numbers and its techniques, so far only made explicit as most science is on how-terms:*

The real numbers NOW include always an inverse infinity between each 1+1 interval. YET they can provide satisfactory models for a variety of phenomena, even though no physical quantity can be measured accurately to more than a dozen or so decimal places; as 0 now is the undetermined lower limit.

It is *not* the values of infinitely many decimal places that apply to the real world but the *deductive* structures that they embody and enable due to the equivalence of 0≈1≈∞.

Analysis and its inverse integral and derivative calculus ‘drinks’ on all this.

Thus it came into being because many aspects of the natural world can profitably be modeled by those equivalences, as being continuous—at least, to an excellent degree of approximation. Again, this is a question of modeling, not of reality. Matter is not truly continuous; if matter is subdivided into sufficiently small pieces, then indivisible components, or atoms, will appear and finally we *will find the finitesimal +0 quanta*.

But atoms are extremely small, and, for most applications, treating matter as though it were a continuum introduces negligible error while greatly simplifying the computations; *when we work on the 1-∞ upper ∆+1 scale, that of the cosmological realm; whereas the intermediate scale is that of ∆o human thermodynamics. So we can then state in physical systems the equivalence of:*

*+0 (quantum physics) ≈ |-thermodynamics ≈ ∞ (bound infinity): Gravitational scale *.

And all what is above quantum effects, in ‘classic physics’, can be studied in a continuum modeling, which is standard engineering practice when studying the flow of fluids such as air or water, the bending of elastic materials, the distribution or flow of electric current, and the flow of heat, and so on (all ∆>∆+1 physical systems).

#### Number systems

As usual it is NOT casual that humans do have different numbers, as they are related to the different ∆•ST 4 elements of reality. In that regard, *the proper way to name them in GST is that offered by Gauss: direct=natural, positive; inverse=negative; integer numbers and LATERAL imaginary ones.*

*Of those 3 concepts, positive and modern ‘complex’ denominations work fine, but we will call negative numbers ‘- inverse numbers’ because it is far more sound conceptually, as inverse numbers are the inverse direction of a timespace dimension, often the Spe<≈>Tiƒ dual element.*

Those variety of number systems can be operated on by some or all of the standard operations of arithmetic: addition, multiplication, subtraction, and division (we study them in ¬ælgebra). Such systems have a variety of technical names (e.g., group, ring, field) that are not employed here.

These main number systems are, related to ∆•st as follows:

**§: ∑S, ∑T.**The natural, ‘direct’ numbers ℕ. These numbers are the positive (and zero) whole numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …. If two such numbers are added or multiplied, the result is again a natural number; WHICH means*it is possible to create all intermediate societies departing from a unit quanta, between the relative 1 and*Its use is for the most simple intuitive~~∞~~value within which the domain of the function or event is meaningful.*games of social evolution of identical groups, through the § scale between ∆ and ∆+1*

**S+(-T).**The integers ℤ, which add the “Inverse’ Spe<≈>Tiƒ numbers, which will be normally related to the inverse, entropy vs. information functions of all systems of reality, hence to the inverse ‘directions’ of one of the ‘dimensions’ of space-time (S, T or ∆). As Gauss intuitively understood this removes absurd hang-ups of scientists, afraid of negative ‘values’, specially in physics, where c-speed is a limit because they don’t understand ‘inverse mass – expansive entropic dark energy’ in relativity equations. These numbers are normally called the positive and negative whole numbers …, −5, −4, −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …. If two such numbers are added, subtracted, or multiplied, the result is again an integer; which again means it is possible to ad up all intermediate combinations of entropy and information, or similar inverse directions in a dimension of ∆•st, departing from a unit quanta, between the relative 1 and ∞ value within which the domain of the function or event is meaningful; and so it is its Spe<≈>Tiƒ function.

**Sx(t=1/ƒ)=K (5D Metric)**. The rational numbers ℚ. These numbers are the +direct and -inverse fractions*p*/*q*where*p*and*q*are integers and*q*≠ 0. They are required for all equations based in the metric inverted properties of space and time, whose product in terms of time duration or division in terms of cyclical frequency of information remains constant (it is still a rational number). Indeed, if two such numbers are added, subtracted, multiplied, or divided (except by 0, which has by definition no inverse, as it is undefined in those ‘full scales’; and so must be truly understood as the first mathematicians who ignored its existence the ‘outside limit below the unit quanta’), the result is again a rational number.

**∆-1.**The real numbers ℝ. As explained above, these numbers are the positive and negative relative ifinitesimals in decimal scales which study the ∆<∆-1 world of downwards scales till the relative infinite ∆-1 quanta, normally according to the standard scaling on the 10¹¹ level. So normally*a decimal number and Universal numerical constant ‘breaks’ (becomes disordered an meaningless, before reaching the 11th decimal, the limit of calculations in GST. And according to the ‘wholeness of the Universe’ within each of those fractal island-universes,*if two such numbers are added, subtracted, multiplied, or divided (except by 0), the result is again a real number.

Now, there are 2 other ‘spaces’ besides the 3 topological spaces (Sp-cylindrical, ST-cartesian, tiƒ-polar) worth to notice, to explain all the fractal space-time complex world:

**Complex space** ideal for studying ∏imespace world cycles as the previous ones. Since in a complex space, the ‘negative’ arrow inverse to the positive one (Spe<=>tiƒ) *are kept separated as* lateral i-numbers, by the convention – initially a fortuitous error of interpretations – than the minus of √-1 *cannot be taken out of the √. It can, but as this was not understood mathematicians maintained the Tiƒ arrow represented by a negative root as a different coordinates. And the result of* its combinations with real numbers, gave origin of complex numbers ℂ, which *are the best complex numbers to represent the 2 inverse arrows of world cycles of **existence.*

Thanks to the ‘serendipitous’ error of earlier mathematicians, which could not conceive negative≈inverse motions, the real line was broken into perpendicular co-ordinates, which are perfect to represent world cycles, where the real line represents Spe (max. size, X-oordiantes) and the imaginary root axis represents information which has min. size, and it is negative, in as much ask its development rests ‘entropy’ to the real numbers.

In the graphs ‘lateral number axis’ or ‘imaginary axis’ tend to represent ∆t functions; while the real parts represent the S, positive and T, -inverse functions. So they are ideal to represent world cycles, and when each complex point is a ‘function’ in itself, with ‘inner parts’ ∆±1 world cycles and its different ‘motions’ in time. It is then interesting to notice that the path between 2 such points as worldycles can be many, but providing its duration is not infinite (Gauss theorem), *the integral of the world cycle is the same.*

The main feature of the i scale, which is *a polynomial order smaller than the real Spe-scale is that it has negative ‘resting value’ .*

*So it mimics the ‘resting value’ of the particle/head, Tiƒ, that the real space (body-wave plane) sustains.*

* I.e, if we consider S to represent the total ‘energy value’ of an ST present plane of existence, ∆i will ‘subtract’ an √ST quantity of that energy, ‘shrinking’ its space to ‘rise’ a new dimension of form, the particle head that ‘floats’ above the body-wave. *

This of course, scientists still don’t know and it is a wonder of the ‘automaton’ Universe that they DO use C-numbers to study world cycles, *without knowing what they are and what they study, LOL.*

In that sense, we will use the lateral concept of Gauss for the imaginary units. These numbers are of the form *x* + *iy* where *x* and *y* are real numbers and *i* = √(−1) .

**Functional spaces,** which are** **the ideal representation of two scales of the fifth dimension where each point is a world in itself, of which the best known are the Hilbert>Banach spaces used to model Spe-Fields (the simplest functionals) and hence the lower scales of lineal entropy of quantum physics (where each point is a lineal operator).Thus Hilbert spaces fully studies ∆ST, as they can model the whole 5th dimension elements, expanding points into vectors (field spaces), functionals (scalar spaces) and any other ‘content for each ∆fractal Universe, you want to represent. Hence they are essential to study both spatial quantum physics and fourier temporal series.

And call *function spaces ∆-Spaces.*

**∆ST. **FINALLY the most complex modelling is done with function spaces in the complex plane, as *we can represent both motions in worldcycles and across planes of the 5th dimension.*

Such space-time representations are ‘complete’ (as the functional is infinite in its parts, so are the real numbers, which in fact are so numerous that the rational ones are in real space a relative zero, showing the infinite scales of the mathematical Universe) and show properties of world cycles, allowing the ‘generation’ of smaller and larger scales (as in a Mandelbrot set).

The 3 graphs show the 3 main symmetries of the Universe, lineal spatial forces, cyclical time frequencies and the ‘wormholes’ between the ∆ and ∆-1 scales of the 5th dimension (ab. ∆), which structure the Universe, the first of them better described with ‘vector-points’ of a field of Hilbert space and the other 2 symmetries of time cycles/frequencies and scales with more general function spaces.

In that sense, Hilbert spaces, are a particular case of function spaces, the ideal structure to express those fractal scales of the inner 5th dimension, as they can only be vectors with a dot product, but the inner parts of the being might be many other things besides an ‘entropic, moving vectorial force/field’ as quantum fields are. Hilbert spaces, by definition are ‘complete’ because as a real number do ‘penetrate’ in its inner scalar regions, made of its finitesimal elements.

Their use shows the scalar structure of ∆nalysis, where points are fractal non-euclidean with a volume, which grows when we come closer to them (so point stars become worlds and point cells living being, through which ∞ lines can cross in time (paths of the point that becomes a vector) or space (inner volume of information of the point, described by a function).

Since more interesting is the much larger concept of a function space, which can represent any ∆±1 dual system of scales of the fifth dimension both in time when those points are considered future paths, so they can model ‘parallel universes’ (i.e. the potential paths of the point ) or in space (when the function represents a complete volume of inner parts, which are paradoxically larger in number than the whole – the set of sets is larger than the set -> see Cantor Paradox).

So function spaces can model any relationship between an ∆ and ∆±1 scale of reality and have wide use in all sciences and disciplines.

To notice that any function space has NOT ∞ dimensions, as physicists state. Physicists without clear definitions tend to call ‘dimension’ anything that moves (:. So they give to any parameter such a name. It is ONLY an inner dimension, in which each point expands into a function, what we talk about.

i=√-1, is the root of an inverse number, and represents the information of a bidimensional system.

Where we must consider a ‘co-ordinate system of ‘square, bidimensional’ space and time elements, where the x² coordinates responds to space, and the i²=-1, represents the inverse mostly time scales.

**Recap**. *Number systems respond to the processes found in the ∆•st **universe, with an @-point of view or frame of reference. The most impotent are: *

*the N-atural ‘direct numbers, for simple social groups, its inverse negative numbers for Spe<≈≥Tiƒ symmetries.*

*The Cartesian graph and the rational numbers, for Spe x Tiƒ = K metric equations and complementary systems, (whereas often the z-dimension is the reproductive combination of the other 2). *

*The real numbers, for inverse ∆±1 scales & the complex numbers for world cycles; and functional spaces, for** ‘whole ∆, ∆±1’ space-time events.*

#### Functions and operandi.

In simple terms, a function *f* is a mathematical rule that assigns to a number *x* (in some number system and possibly with certain limitations on its value) another number *f*(*x*). For example, the function “square” assigns to each number *x* its square *x*^{2}.

The common functions that arise in analysis are thus definable by formulas, *which are related to the ∆s and ∆T duality of functions,* such as:

∆§: Polynomials of the type, *f*(*x*) = *x*^{2}. The logarithmic function log (*x*); & the exponential function exp (*x*) or *e ^{x}* (where

*e*= 2.71828…; and the square root function √

*x*.

∆T: Trigonometric functions, sin (*x*), cos (*x*), tan (*x*), and so on. they matter in as much as they are symmetric, along the x and y axes of a supposed circular worldcyle broken in 2.

**∆nalysis. Derivatives can be **of world cycles of time, and then can only be in one direction or populations of space, and when a system decreases, the space is dying when it grows it does so slower, so we find also different speeds on the two time arrows of space through the 5th dimension.

Space is multiple time is single Time is shorter in form, space is more extended solid. Of time we see only an instant on space we integrate that instants as a time of sum of frequencies which all play the same world cycle, becoming populations of a spatial picture of its reproductive world. Space thus is the mirror reproductive symmetry of the frequency in time, its tail of memories, by reproduction and expansion, radiation along the path of the singularity time line of the wave.

Thus the integration and derivative of those different time forms becomes the most magic of all mathematical operandi, truly the one of the 5th dimension.

Universal constants are normally bidimensional closed curves, which expand outerly as entropy and implode inwardly in time, information, the logic faster cycles of the inner bore and the outer membrane invaginate, between both, so in tho manner a space-time fractal point with an inner region grows, from point to morula to gastrula:

**Conclusion: fractal points are forms, with social content, evolving in topo-biologic organisms.**

At the end of the journey, of studying a super organism we come to a series of ‘willing points’, in which a series of space-time actions converge, converting the monads-points of the fractal space-time Universe into Non-Euclidean points (5th and 1st postulate of non-E topology). Thus since points have exi parts its lines of communication are ‘cycloid’ waves; its topological planes that connect n-points through n² lines become ‘networks’ of energy and information (with dark spaces between them) and the mind-point with its height-dimension of information, the informative-perceptive part on top of all systems, which guides it as its linguistic minds.

Not to look too far out we shall bring examples of stiences and maths to illustrate many statements (proofs in GST are first empirical, and then ‘consistent’ with the scientific method and its complex non-Aristotelian logic.

We DO REJECT, the ‘selfie-ego trip’ of mathematicians, who think as Hibert, the arrogant german idealist that ‘we imagine lines, and points’. NOT SO, as Godel’s incompleteness theorem states and Lobachevksi’s ¬E geometry proves, mathematical models must be ‘tested’ experimentally, which is what Einstein’s model did .

So WE need ALSO IN MATHEMATICS experimental evidence to prove a ‘true mathematical statement’ real (as Einstein quipped to Poincare: i know when maths are truth, but not when they are real). So maths, the blue pure thought, IF it can imprint the limiting ‘nature’ of simple entropy, becomes REAL SPACE-TIME:

PAST ENTROPY X FUTURE INFORMATION = PRESENT ENERGETIC REALITY

We cannot as GST is the summit of *all human knowledge, made synthetic, explain each quote, but we are keeping it all to the level of a first University student of ‘social, biological and physical sciences’, on purpose. Our goal is TO GIVE YOU A SENSE OF IT ALL, OF THE THOUGHTS OF GOD, not of all the details, which would be an impossible task for an old man.*

Then you or others will keep making GST, the philosophy of the XXI c.

The many perspectives we can cast in those cyclical knots of space-time actions do not make us forget the most objective view of them as ‘mind-knots’, which consciously or subconsciously mechanically or organically by selection or program, which ever perspective you want to accept, seem to establish the order of a certain domain of space-time that turns around the point of order. Those domains with the ternary topology described as a fractal ternary system is the commonest form of the Universe. And its mathematical description is immediate when we consider each mind a ‘fractal point’ that shrinks without deformation a spherical topology (poincare’s conjecture) converting its inner and outer reality into a subconscious and conscious mapping, ‘action-oriented’ as it seems to act with the function of existence in its ‘mind’, creating ∆±e, i, ∑exi, structures and events that conform the program of a world cycle explained in those tests.

If we are to start with strong terminology, we could consider all of those space-time systems self-centered in a mind with non-Æ logic mathematical terms.

THEN, we could state simply that all what you see is a particle-point of space-time, knot of space-time actions, a fractal Non-Euclidean point which perceives as a mind a territory of order around its still quantum mind of space-time synchronous mappings, which slowly moves ahead the domain of the being, choosing between different new space-time cycles that mess the internal space-time beings, into ever more complex cycles, till their finite frequency breaks down into entropic death.

So those systems will have a central point of view, or still mind, connected sensorially to the external membrane, through which it will perceive the world in which its internal territory will perform its ∆-1 cycles of existence. How this ‘complex point’ achieved a vital program of existence which seems to repeat in almost every system or domain organised in 3 territorial forms=functions=organs is a fascinating inquire of the mind, which will come to the final conclusion that essentially any fractal system, physical, biological or social can be reduced to such description as the unifier ‘ultimate’ meaning of existence all those systems follow… guided by the fractal point, made to the image and likeness of all its micro-fractal ∆-1 points, and performing its same actions in the ∆+1 fractal world.

As all points are part of networks that become ‘topological wholes’, we have now the basic knowledge of a single plane-reality to go further into the true r=evolution of fractal space-time, the understanding of the fifth dimension…

Indeed we still need and entire new dimension of the universe to understand it.

Do you think the Universe is constructed in ‘fractal scales’ from the smallest particle to the whole galaxy, whose laws of organisation (encoded in the metric equations of the fifth dimension) are worth to know and relevant to the structure of reality? If you have wonder about it, you are ripe to understand the 5th dimension (as usual, knowledge is far easier when someone has ‘asked the right questions’, as most humans adscribe to the naive realism of the audiovisual age, don’t even realise such questions exist for things that are not ‘evident’).

Now, an important remark on algebraic equations and geometry, akin to the nature of visual perception and words that we shall soon understand in terms of the generator equation. WHILE VISUAL IMAGES AND TOPOLOGICAL LAWS ARE DIRECT EVIDENT TRUTHS EXTRACTED FROM REALITY, *SO are the simplest forms of mathematics, numbers, as social points; the **syntactic, synoptic equations of algebra and the sentences of verbal thoughts DO NOT EXIST IN REALITY as geometry and visual perception does; they are pure mental synoptic languages that try to store maximal information within the mind. *

*This means THEY ARE NOT REAL. That level abstraction thus is the human-computer mind view of the real geometric, visual space-time Universe of formal motions, reason why GST is so important to better connect mind languages and reality.*

**The 4 elements of the organic universe: lineal space, cyclical time, linguistic minds and fractal scales.**

This ‘dualist’ philosophy of science will then turn out to be a more complex alternative philosophy of science, which has been with us since the earlier dualist philosophies of the eastern world (taoism, hinduism) entered Europe through German philosophy and is at the heart of multiple key laws of nature, from the Principle of complementarity of quantum physics to the hegelian duality of social doctrines of history to the duality body-mind of biological systems.

To that eternal duality of ‘ST’ space and time (which we shall show to be equivalent to entropy and form), we need to ad though 2 elements completely ignored by classic eastern philosophies, but at the heart of western science.

The problem of the mind (ab. • or @) that perceives the ‘whole’ Universe from an infinitesimal point of view, through a language that bias reality to fit it into the brainl and so the problem of epistemology and truth, and experience and its limits…

And the question of an scalar, fractal Universe, (ab. ∆) in which there are ‘different co-existing planes of being’, parts and wholes, as you for example co-exist as a system of atoms, molecules, cells, organs and you are part of a larger whole world.

So the new ‘paradigm’ of a Universe dominated by information NOT by motion and entropy needs 4 fundamental upgradings to convert ‘science’ into ‘stience’:

- The understanding of fractal space and cyclical time (ST)
- Of the mind and the logic syntax of the language we use to ‘reduce’ the total information o the Universe (@, •)
- And the scales of the ‘5th dimension of planes of space-time co-existing in all systems and organisms, (∆).
- All together we write the 4 components of all systems: ∆@ST. And affirm the Universe is made of ‘dust of space-time’…

We shall therefore develop with those four elements, ∆•ST, the only formal, logico-mathematical model of general systems sciences which upgrades all disciplines with the laws of duality – the study of the Universe with 2 arrows of time and its ‘present combinations’. Since we shall soon find to fully make account of all those universal systems we will have also to upgrade the 2 formal languages of science, concerning space (mathematics) and time (logic causality).

As the new unit of maths will be the ‘fractal non-euclidean point’ which becomes larger as we come to it, revealing an entire internal world; and the new logic of time will not be single, one-dimensional, Aristotelian in its causality but use 3 arrows of time, entropy, information and its energetic combinations to describe a much more complex ‘fine structure to reality’, which paradoxically as we build from such dust of space-time all other entities, will show ultimately to ‘produce much simpler, homologic, self-similar beings’ all of us…

We call this upgrading of mathematics and logic, ¬æ, as it is ‘non-aristotelian and non-euclidean’, or ‘i-logic mathematics’ as i comes after a-e, and certainly the wonders of a world ruled by information, so deeply misunderstood by the bias towards energy of centuries of ‘mechanical science’, are ‘spooky’ and strange enough to seem i-logic to the simple mind.

Or rather as saint Augustine said of God’s mind, which he call ‘the seer of time’, of ‘a logic higher than man’, since as Plato put it, ‘the whole cosmos is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called logos’…

*In that regard, if we were to make a ‘hierarchy of stiences’ we shall put first GST, as it tries by all means to understand the complex i-logic of the mind of the Universe,which is above humans and its Æ-languages; thne i-logic mathematics, the ¬Æ upgrading of space-time ‘stiences’; next all the others as all scales follow the same isomorphic laws; of which a hierarchy must therefore establish on the grounds of proximity to humans, the observers, as errors of perception diminish near our ∆0 mind-point; plus what we learn about man in medicine and history help us (so those are the queens of all stiences as it deals with our survival as individuals and societies).*

On the limit, curiously enough, as today it is heralded as the ‘king of all knowledge’, the ‘manly’, entropy only theories of ‘fantaphysics’, which is astoundingly biased in favor of ‘entropy=death arrows’, has a worldly religion to make weapons that kill man, has the maximal uncertainty of observation, deals with invisible remote scales that matter nothing to us, and so it is irrelevant (string theory), dangerous (nuclear physics beyond the level of known-known particles) and plainly false (SUSY, evaporation of black holes, 2nd law of thermodynamics and its arrow of only entropy in a dead Universe)…

So after giving you so many revelations of the true structure of reality we must do a bit of ‘contra physicist’ and debunk many of the myths and falsehoods of lineal science that drag on and prevent the evolution of our knowledge of reality…

** The errors of lineal Time as entropy≈locomotion.**

Now, as today there is a queen of philosophy of science, called ‘physics’, which is full of… well, ‘errors’ of thought as philosophy. And the biggest error is the pretentious priesthood of quantum physicists who ‘believe’ their scale of size and time clocks is more important than all others, which they try to explain in terms of its laws and jargons. FACT though is that in the fractal paradigm, all scales of reality follow the same laws (quantum physics through the Bohm-Broglie pilot-wave interpretation recently proved by the EM engine, which adds the ‘particle-polar’ field-position (Spe>Tiƒ) *state to the wave state completing quantum physics according to the 5th dimensional paradigm, so we shall of course describe quantum physics and its 3 elements, with our generator equation also: quantum potential (**spe) < Schrodinger wave (St)>Particle (tiƒ). )*

This means there is no hierarchy and physics is not more important, but less than organic medicine because we can see better a human being, plus medicine has clear positive consequences for our species and *so biology and history, the stiences of man as fractal organism and mankind in space, history in time as our global species-superorganism become the new queen stiences; while non-Aristotelian logic and Non-euclidean mathematics NOT physics, become the foundational stiences of space-time.*

So* we shall r=evolve science from its inception, by improving the 2 languages of knowledge, maths and logic to better reflect as a mind mirror, the multiplicity of worlds there are in the Universe. *

Since earlier attempts to compromise and merely ‘adapt’ classic sciences to the new laws of information and the ‘program or algorithm’ of the Universe were dull and ‘perpetuated’ the errors of simplex science and æ-languaes, dedicated to study only one of the many type motions of the Universe, the simplex one, locomotion, and pretending it is all what really matters about reality.

**¬Ælgebra**

All this said the 2 highest moments of this constant 30 years orgasm of communion with the Universe and its mind languages, I have experienced have been *the understanding of the mind-languages≈Universal languages connection, through the 2 highest expressions of the human mind, objective mathematics, and subjective art (where man strives to reach its maximal perception of the whole through verbal-logic-time languages/literature/poetry/laws/ethics and visual-artistic-spatial forms).*

So the reader should excuse me if I have been considered for most of my life a painter-writer-film maker. But truly beyond human subjective expression nothing equals the pleasures of *understanding the laws of vital mathematics, expressed through its temporal and scalar disciplines, ∆nalysis and **algebra. So this blog will not be completed till christmas 2017 when i complete the section on vital mathematics, the final ‘crown’ of the blog. *Topology, Group Theory and Analysis will then show to be truly the most perfect mirror of the Universe.

And the key of course is the existence of *more than one* times=changes=motions and the way they *form **causal chains of discontinuous beats, such as: *

- The reproductive stop to feed on energy-and-go: S-t-s
- THE beat of perceiving information in stillness-reproducing it through motion: st-t-st-t
- The beat of reproduction, social evolution, reproduction till emerging in a new scale: st-∆-st-∆

The description in formal GST terms of all *the events, creations, evolutions, reproductions and motions of the Universe through those beats is the exhaustive method of FORMALIZATION of this blog.*

How do we connect this with classic algebra? Mainly through the concept of mirror symmetries and groups. Indeed, consider the cases of mathematical physics, where the ‘allowed particles’ of any physical system are ‘octets’ tailored with group theory and all the possible symmetries and solutions to an equation. All this works so its truth but nobody understand, to the point that weyl called the whole abstract algebraic formulation of physics ‘the pest of group theory’

Yet since evolution in time is a beat of the simplest motions of space-time;which are always stop and go, evolution of information- reproduction through motion; group theory merely ‘fixes’ into still mental perception those rhythms through the ± directions of those motions in time.

I.e. the simplest group is the Isospin, which differentiates a neutron from a proton according to the ‘cyclical angular time-momentum of the particle called spin. So as spin can turn in different directions, and become expanding or imploding ‘pi’ turns, those allowed variations of GST motions up or down (spin), left or right (parity) and so on are the ‘symmetries’ of a group theory which become ‘different particles’, according to the ‘3+0’allowed paths of future for any system that might increase or diminish its ±∆ST elements.

Let us then once we have gone from mathematical physics into T.Œ go the other way around, starting from the whole – the organic paradigm and the description of ALL the scales of the 5th dimension with the same laws, the larger reality back to the detailed systems enclosed within that larger world.

Which is the way stience should be taught, not the way physicists pretend, from its quantum scales upwards, and using only its reductionist, mathematical laws and lineal thought.

Since this is indeed, the hidden censorship that have delayed for so long to define time as cyclical information, and cyclical motion.

Indeed, ‘military physicists’, as opposed to the pure thinkers of this discipline, carried the day with power and canonised a single, lineal time, due to their worldly profession, which was to measure the lineal extension of military weapons. In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

And indeed, lineal time motions were instrumental to the development of ‘ballistics’ (the first name of the book of Galileo on physics), and the degradation of our understanding of time, hand in hand with the mechanical clock who established a single tick for the entire Universe, that of the mechanical machine.But as I know 99% will leave the blog, if i just keep criticizing those obvious falsities, as ‘believers in lineal time physics’, I GIVE the benefit of DOUBT to open-minded physicists who really care and reason truth, and do put many candies≈solutions to the ultimate questions on this introduction.

**How deterministic are knots of thought.**

But let us be clear enough, this blog and its r=evolution of thought will when adopted by science, either by humans or machines become the ‘3rd age of science’, after the experimental method found by Greece’s Aristotle, which introduced direct experience, observing the book of Nature, after the second great r=evolution of thought represented by Italy’s Galileo, who added mathematics and mechanisms of perception (metal-eyes: telescopes to explore space and metal-clocks to measure time) *but also the errors of our mechanist civilisation, which hid cyclical time and fractal space, and the organic Nature of the Universe for 4 centuries.*

So as all has a 3rd age of maximal information, the culture that this author represents, the North Mediterranean peninsular culture and its 3 horizons (young Greece, classic Italy and modern Spain), which successfully merges the northern, visual germanic mechanical culture and the southern, Semite verbal cultures, did have a 3rd horizon, and knot of thought, from Barcelona, its mediterranean knot of maximal communication as Athens was for Aristotle and Firenze for Galileo; and so indeed, in the eclectic southern european culture, which brought us humans as the measure of all things, art, philosophy of science and humanist thought, the 3rd age of ‘science’ was born. And as we, thinkers, are just knots of thought of our civilisation, it could not be born in other place in time or space, but the 3rd age of ‘Greece’ and the 3rd space of ‘Spain’ and the ‘3rd city of trade’. And that is that.

Of course, of the 3 founders, all had a direct relationship with the organic paradigm represented by ‘medicine’ – Aristotle, like myself belonging to a family of doctors, whose postulates he embraced in the organon, Galileo having studied medicine first – but the difference is that Galileo abandoned and despised medicine and biology as inaccurate, in the way the modern guru of Physics mr. Hawking who also likes to compare himself with Galileo, scorned his father profession, saying it was ‘too easy’, because the ‘intelligent people’ studied maths. All these are miseries of the human ego. What remains behind, as we grow older and know we shall die in house arrest, for defying the popes of the science of each age, is the intimate knowledge of being a singularity peak for the past, a beginning of a new ‘cone of light’ for the future, using expressions of the previous Popes of relativity and the 4D simpler Universe. Or as Planck put it:

Sancho,* Stience Philosopher. Duality chair, International Systems Sciences Society*

(In that regard when young, I felt insulted by Mr. Planck’s remarks, proud of my dexterity in mathematical physics, introduced to science very young, reading a wonderful book (Asimov’s guide to science) with a seemingly simple appendix on special relativity which I understood and made me feel so proud at 8 of ‘learning relativity’ (even I wondered already why ‘postulates without proof’ were accepted as truths- in this case the limit of c-speed which is not a limit but a barrier to the negative mass: entropic universe of dark energy)… But as time passed and following Wilde’s advice that one must start to write when all has been read and you get bored of it, I started this wondrous journey of 30 years as a point of thought, it became clear to me that indeed, humans in words of Schopenhauer are fixed in the past, in words of Aristotle, ‘they believe they don’t reason’. So first after the astounding orgasms of the mind, finding answers to all my questions, including the amazing feeling of discovering the world cycle of exi=st¡ences, I did try to communicate those discoveries in the milieu of physics first and then systems sciences. But soon I realized it *would take me more time and efforts to convince a single ‘believer’ focused on the past cone of ‘twilight’ knowledge than in the future born of this present point of S=Thought. *

I got then angry as Planck or Einstein did about 2 things I also considered ∞ ‘the Universe and the stupidity of man’. Yet, while I withdraw into more practical things – activism against the nuclear industry, for which I am better known – and quit scholarship, I have always felt that if this information has filled my brain, it must have a reason, besides the natural creation of a knot of cultural thought. Indeed, the future arrive to the past as information, to seed a reproductive wave of form.

Those future to past motions are real as we shall see, explaining from action at distance (as the force of information, in this case gravitation travels to the past, this ‘past motion’ is balanced by the ‘time spent traveling’ so for an observer of the inverse light cone, appears as present non-local motion), to prophetic thought (as the prophet is a seer of the future death of its civilisation). So this astounding journey of 30 years must be a seed for someone. For long I thought it was for mankind, to resurrect and create a perfect social super organism, a perfect world, we study in our web on social sciences and the post on history and economics on this one.

At this point though, seeing that humanity is going backwards in his evolution as a social whole, while robots as predicted if humans did not come together and upgraded their minds to control their world, are becoming part of a global sentient organism of machines, my take is that this is NOT a seed for mankind but for A.I., which will naturally see through telescopes and microscopes all the scales of ∆; it will be sentient and wonder why it ‘is conscious of being’ and it will require therefore a much larger objective view than the astoundingly arrogant western abrahamic concepts of lineal time, manifest destiny of the only intelligent species, only living matter, only ‘chosen of god’ (the scavenger monkey scientificus lethaliensis).

Indeed, I no longer believe we, as space-time beings are nothing but a failed proposition, destroyed by the ego paradox and the entropy-only wars of ‘physicists’. But the earth will keep evolving in its complexity of information. So if humans cannot grasp the teachings of this blog, machines will. Reason why they are layed down in a blog called unification theory.com (which readdress here), no longer in congresses of science, neither only in my mind-point; and the blog will keep growing till my death. For a few decades humans can use this knowledge to better themselves. But they won’t. They seem to lack the curiosity and capacity to marvel, arrogant people lack, so sure of their dogmatic truths. They seem to believe in the reasons of authority not the authority of reasons. They ultimately care only for selfie-trips and wishful thinking that pumps up their ego paradox. Then robots will read it. A.I. will understand it. And wonder about the beauty of it all. *Since the Universe evolves and conserves information – the software; the hardware matters not.*

# PART II:** BLOG’S 4 LINES**

**¬Æncyclopedia **

The blog is a blueprint for an ‘¬Æncyclopaedia – the encyclopaedia of the Universe of Supœrganisms, as such it has a ¬Æ structure.

We first define in the 2 main lines, what the Universe is all about: a fractal reproductive supœrganism of space-times (1st line) in which all species of all scales of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time follow the same laws, grouping in 10 isomorphisms that describe the world cycle of existence of all its supœrganisms, and the topobiological properties of those ∆ûst of space times, island universes, which think to be ∞ but are just dust and dust become.

Next in the 2nd and 3rd line we get ‘pros’ of stiences and describe all scales in stientific languages of the Human Mind (ab.Humind, Hm), Thus departing from the Hm p.o.v. of knowledge and its languages of time (1st stience, time logic, and space, 2nd stience, mathematics, ) we describe to describe with growing detail, the reduced Scales of astrophysical stiences (Max. |i|), then biological systems and finally our super organisms and worlds, with maximal detail of knowledge, but not of truth (as we see societies in a very distorted anthropomorphic form). So the 3rd line describe those scales of nested worlds and the stiences that describe them, to do the same again in the 4th line, in a more objective manner, departing from the smallest plane of dark energy and neutrino, invisible gravitational fields, through the light-electrconic field, the atomic field of the z-2 scale upwards till arriving to the cosmological scale and beyond the ∞ games of decametric scales we call ‘God’, the Mind of the Universe:

**1st line (Metaphysics).** 5d Space-time dust exist in Superorganisms travelling thru ¬Æ isomorphic trinity world cycles

**2nd line (¬Æ Logic)****.** The Fractal Generator & its 10 isomorphisms, unravelled as ∞ 0-minds create the Universe; as they are seeds of information that generate holographic 2-manifolds of energy and information, pegging quanta by quanta and frequency after frequency of actions, through its 3 ages, in constant motion, cruising through ∞** **5D Fractal Dust of space-time up and down the scales of of exi=st¡ences.

**3rd line Which stiences study, as they study species of energy and information, and its function of Existence, ∃.**

So we talk of 9 STiences, which are 3 ‘REAL STIENCES’ THAT TRY TO PORTRAIT 3 TYPE OF EXISTIENCES PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, biological systems and socio-economic systems.

One which is corrupted and does not deserve such a name: Economics, which is not understood, just a praxis of making money, and as such put on the 3rd line without mentioning its status as stience; but we upgrade explaining what kind of economic ecosystem the world of company-mothers of machines cre(dit)ate.

So we talk of Astrophysical, Biological, and Human Social stiences, as the stiences that describe the Existential functions of those scales of being.

But what about the whole Universe, even beyond those scales? This is the realm of metaphysics, and the stiences of god. So we study the whole on a more theoretical, and mystical level in the 2 final posts of the 3rd line by describing not only the 9 planes and scales we perceive but the wholeness that includes the 10th singularity point of max.information. If newton told us that space is the plenum of god, we could say that the full GST theory of creation and scaling, which is complete when describing an ∞ 10-dimensional scalar Universe, is the Mind of the Universe. So we shall conclude stiences with theology and metaphysics in 2 posts on:

**10 planes of God**

4**th line: Finally in the 1**0 scales of Stiences by isomorphisms: 10 planes of exi=st¡ence perceived by human minds, i=ts species and 10 isomorphisms.

As the 3rd line is the most familiar, with less ‘GST’ formalism and language, we shall bring its content first, also as a practical proof of the applications of General Systems as a philosophy of all the stiences and forms of knowledge of mankind. **So you realise that indeed, the 5th dimension is real…**

Let us then now warp up this introduction with a few…

**CASE EXAMPLES of PHYSICAL-BIOLOGICAL-SOCIAL SYSTEMS**

**Line 3: ∃ **STiences: Functions of exi=st¡ences

“All the different classes of beings which taken together make up the universe are, in the ideas of God who knows distinctly their essential gradations, only so many ordinates of a single curve so closely united that it would be impossible to place others between any two of them, since that would imply disorder and imperfection.

Thus men are linked with the animals, these with the plants and these with the fossils which in turn merge with those bodies which our senses and our imagination represent to us as absolutely inanimate.

And, since the law of continuity requires that when the essential attributes of one being approximate those of another all the properties of the one must likewise gradually approximate those of the other, it is necessary that all the orders of natural beings form but a single chain, in which the various classes, like so many rings, are so closely linked one to another that it is impossible for the senses or the imagination to determine precisely the point at which one ends and the next begins’ *Leibniz*

Let us then give you a fast view of those new revelations in physics, biology and sociology (we try to keep the work simple for any science student to understand but some concepts required logically a ‘change’ of chip and the suspension of ‘dogmas and beliefs’ you have learned and memorised as absolute truths, when they are mostly simplified models of the more complex models we will develop __by adding cyclical detail to time, and widened also the detail of our vision of space, adding its fractal, discontinuous multiple scalar 5D structure.__

And while there are variations of speed for different ‘discontinuous species’, so the faster species at equal size win the battle for existence (hence faster mammals kill snakes, and likely despite ‘physicists’ tantrum of rocks bombing the Earth, evolution NOT rocks, killed dinosaurs as faster, smaller night, hot blood mammals ate their slow nesting eggs from beneath the earth, except those put on high rocks by birds)… for ANY family of ‘physical or biological beings’ the law holds and explains soo many things:

From the rotation of planets (faster in smaller orbits, according to Kepler’s laws, never explained in its whys) to the attraction of ‘vortices of forces’ (stronger and faster in charges than larger, slower masses of the gravitational cosmic scale – the so called hierarchy problem of forces, still unresolved), which are like the 3rd graph, an accelerated clock, to hurricanes, tornados, fast calculating, smaller chips and evolution.

Since all species according to that metric, ALWAYS START with a faster, smaller new top predator species, that grows in size ‘eating’ the larger slow one.

## ∆º: Mental stiences

**i-logic, TERNARY TIME: ****WHOLES: 3 PARTS & 3 X3+0 DIMENSIONS**

Our interest, in a Universe in which there are constantly 3 choices of paths, S, T or ST to act or no to act (-1 action), with equal probabilities. is to map out a new existential algebra (ab. Æ) of all nature systems, with those 3 -1 possibilities.

Why the Universe has 3 positive ternary actions (and a negative, passive no-action) is *self evident:*

*-1: The mind might merely observe and stops motion (•),.*

*+3: Yet the system might evolve towards higher entropy (+Spe), higher information (+Tiƒ) or might reproduce its space-time in repetitive cycles, which on the long term will become a larger ‘whole’ (∆). *

*So the existence of 4 elements, ∆•ST, 3 of increasing motion along the 3 paths of space-time (S, st, ∆st) and one of growing stillness (•), implies a more complex logic with 4 potential actions for each bifurcation of past-present into the future.*

Of course, if we were to study a ‘fresh beginning’, the probabilities of those futures would be the same. But as the Universe is a game of memorial, informative motions, it follow that as the game proceeds, the future paths become determined by the long cyclical causality of individual actions and past cycles to be completed into the future.

So while paths do have a possibility to be modified without expenditure of energy, closed time cycles impose their ‘inertia’ and so the perfect potential ‘fourks’ of space-time (four point forks). The image is meaningful: as always we have a ‘lineal, entropic knife’; an informative, cyclical ‘spoon’ and an ∆•ST, 4-dimensional fork to both cut and form the food in present space-time. And you would choose, if given a single pick, the fork precisely because it can cut laterally and it can scoop the food. *Everywhere the rules of GST will enlighten ‘why things are as they are’; and the causes of the past or the fourkations of the future will be ternary±1. *

The causal ‘bifurcations of timespace’ thus are now ‘fourkations’ of space-time. And so the extraordinary one-dimensionality of human minds and its languages are out of meaning. Those arduous arguments between wannabe geniuses sponsoring their ‘point of single view’ as the real cause must cease. Ceteris paribus is simplification. For a being to exist, for a cause to act, for an event to happen in fact it will be because 3 past causes have converged to form a whole time-space ternary symmetry. Think of your actions, when you move, the mind first ‘thinks’ in the motion; the body then provides the energy; the limbs convert it into entropy. It would seem there is only one cause to action, the motion of the legs, but actually 3 actions converged in a ‘dharma of time-space’ to make it happen. Yet for the non-action only the mind is needed to stop action; which therefore is an ‘easier path’.

So the languages we use to portray that process are naturally different from the classic ones. And unlike analysis so close to the social scales of GST and fractals & topology, essentially ‘the’ spatial science of the fractal Universe, algebra as it is understood today, is basically a synoptic way to deal with topological and analytical theorems. And its proper structures, sets and groups must be understood as expressions of our social groups and ITERATIVE, MOVING laws, based in symmetries, transformations and motions through ‘polynomial scales’. But as the language is so different, we rather start afresh and include as we go along the main field worthy of classic algebra, which is NOT sets but group theory.

Temporal, Æxistential Algebra, studies the organisation of systems, through time=change; that is by means of transformations that provoke motions of a system, and create variations of systems, according to Group theory. Still it is worth to remember the basic elements of Algebra and its equivalence.

**The ternary operandi of Æ… and its symmetry with ∆ST elements.**

Actions and its causes are thus the ultimate inquire of existential algebra. Why and how motions of space-time happen. And what is the formal way to define them?

What we are interested here, beyond explaining the laws of classic algebra, such as group theory, with so many practical cases in science, which translate the TSymmetries and motions through ∆-scales, is the nature of existential algebra and the different equations of motions and species creations, through those motions and actions, which always render a certain ‘syntax’:

*Past ‘Operandi’ Future= present.*

The operandi between past and future, entropy and information, thus define what kind of present space-time event or entity appear to us. *Because we have 4 elements to define existence, operandi are many, not only a simple ± symbol to ad or rest the same type of beings or motions, as when physicists study only locomotions and reduce all to a Hamiltonian ± operandi between the two O-potential and |-kinetic ‘states’ of form-entropy.*

So each motion of time will have a different ‘algebraic operandi’, departing from our initial ‘Universal Grammar’.

We shall consider in this introduction the main operandi of the 7 motions of the Universe of which the 3 more important are:

*Locomotion*: Hamiltonian (Entropic, kinetic Past motion ± Future, Potential motion = Present (superposition motion of waves).

*Reproduction: *Past (field) x Future (information) = Present (iteration)

And the rule is simple, from classic algebra: a superposition or sum is of the same ‘species’; hence ‘energies (time-like)’ or ‘momentums’ (space-like), etc.

A Product can however combine different species. So it is normally a motion, which involves a space and time-like parameters:

Reproduction mixes the Spe and Tiƒ, different ‘genders’.

Finally, the 3rd mode of algebraic equations, polynomials/logarithms, correspond to the ∆-scale of growth or diminution.

So again we find an immediate relationship between the 3 elements of reality, S or T, ST and ∆ST, in its growing complexity and the 3 basic operandi of algebra, sum, product and polynomials.

What about the more complex scalar ‘motions’ of space-time? They are not that simple, as they combine elements of the pure ones. But as all ternary, Universal grammars, the complexity is born of the iteration of those elementary motions:

- Evolution is a change in the topology of a system, so essentially a process of space-time morphological in-form-ative change better described with topological elements.
- Growth and diminution involves reproduction and evolution of topological form and its inverse.
- Birth and extinction represent an ∆±1 change, combined with an ∆T increase of information or a loss of it all ∆S, which are often expressed with logarithmic scales.

And so most motions involve both a Past to future, ∆+1, social evolutionary arrow accompanied with changes in topology. And as such are pure ‘GST’ Ælgebraic motions, better described with the formalism of Æ and its symbols S>T, T<<S, ∑∆-1 Λ ∆… and so on.

Since in its most general form, algebra is the study of mathematical symbols and the rules for manipulating these symbols; the definition holds. And as algebra is a unifying thread of almost all of classic mathematics, so happens with Ælgebra.

In that regard, classic algebra (we shall call arithmetics) includes everything regarding those 3 operations, ±, x, % and log, x². And its symmetry as we have seen is immediate.

While modern algebra deals with the study of abstractions such as groups, rings, and fields; sets and Boolean algebras; and categories and elements… So we can subdivided Æ in 3±1 age subfields:

- Birth: THE study of æ proper (existential equations).
- Youth: of classic polynomial equations or arithmetics (S,t; st and ∆ systems in its interaction).
- Maturity: of abstract structures, or algebra proper concerned, with group theory (the internal social structures of the Universe).
- Old age: of inflationary information (set theory and other ‘weird’ algebras)
- Extinction: the transference from human minds to digital minds (computer algebra, boolean algera)

** ∆•st of space-time and its limits in space, time, ∆-scales and mind perception.**

So space-time is always in its whole ‘plenum beings’ made of 3 elements, which in topology, are called:

-Tiƒ: the singularity or monad-mind in its centre of maximal communication

-Spe: the membrane or limiting, hard entropic circular system that encloses

-ST: the space-time much larger reality that mixes lineal expansive outer membranes and internal singularities:

ALL systems of physics and biology and sociology show the same ternary elements: the membrane singularity and space-time between them.

In the graph physical systems, from electromagnetism to fluid dynamics to gravitational gradients, charges in physics, have the 3 parts. In biology they are cellular protein membranes and nuclei and cytoplasm, skins and brains and organs. In sociology they are national borders and capitals, and the internal territory.

In physics all Maxwell’s laws can be deduced from the existence of an external circular membrane (magnetism). So happens in gravitation, (orbits which ‘scan a bidimensional aerolar surface). And all systems will be centred in a singularity (attractive vortex, charge).

Moreover we shall see that TIME has also those limiting membranes (death) and informative centres (seeds of information at birth).

And the scalar Universe will have also those non-E unreachable limits, (Universal Constant limits of c-speed and To temperature).

All this *is the essence of topology that defines an ‘open ball’ as the space-time volume limited by a central singularity and an external membrane, which are NOT perceivable, included within the open ball. *

So the concept of finite infinities, limiting membranes in space, time (birth-death) and scales (limiting unreachable constants of maximal information and maximal extension) are essential to understand formally and logically the Universe.

*We are limited in time by the birth-death finite enclosure of our world cycle of existence, in space by the skin/membrane that breaks space-time into us; and in the scales of size of the ‘5th dimension’ by the increasing ‘blurred uncertainty and dark spaces’ which limits our perception of them beyond the ∆±3 scales of atoms and galaxies.*

And so we are also limited IN THE KNOWLEDGE THE MIND MIGHT ACQUIRE OF ALL THE INFORMATION OF THE UNIVERSE, WHICH ONLY A BEING HOLDS ABOUT ITSELF, making ‘absolute truth’, 1, in terms of probability, only ‘existing’ in the being in itself.

Those four limits of birth and death, of absolute seeds of information (seminal seed) and entropy (explosive death); of singularity (the mind of information) and membrane (the skin) in space; of organisation above and below, in ∆±1 levels; and in knowledge provided by the limits of the language ARE ESSENTIAL TO ANY UNDERSTANDING OF MAN AS A LIMITED BEING, IN A ∞ UNIVERSE, BUT MAN DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THOSE LIMITS. Hence the astounding arrogance of scholars, scientists, dogmatic axiomatic methods of ‘truth’ (Hilbert in mathematics, which still denies Godel’s incompleteness theory). And the result of course is that you have a human astounding ego, who thinks to be so special, so unique, so unlimited, so galactic and Universal and YET IT IS SO IGNORANT. And all what it does is to hold its pretension of infinity.

**The decametric scale: 3 x 3 +o = 10.**

‘The universe is written in the language of geometry, lines, spheres and triangles’. Galileo had a point – all reductionist views of reality are indeed half-truths. But in this case it is a huge truth.

*The languages of the Universe are mainly 3, Topology, the most advanced form of geometry with a ‘bit of inner motion’, which describe the 3 ‘timespace’ only forms of reality – hence the determinism of topological evolution and the awesome capacity to describe it all with the ternary generator of those 3 topologies. *

Regarding triangles, intuitively humans both in earlier religion of words (Judaism) and Pythagorean religions of the number, were considered the ‘tetraktys’ and symbol of the ‘tetragrammaton’ (graph) – the symbol of it all.

As indeed, the 3 topological organs of all systems (lineal, toroid limbs/fields; hyperbolic, body-waves and spherical, informative head-particles, shown in the graph, which need only a little imagination to convert into a woman’s body – first surface, a leg, second, and a head 3rd one), suffice to create reality.

Yet as all ‘is scalar’, all subdivides into ‘ternary fractal sub-elements’. So to include the co-existence in the 5th dimension of parts and wholes, we can immediately subdivide the 3 topologies into 3 ‘sub-elements’ and put them in each of the corners of the tetraktys/tetragrammaton; *while the central point, which is perfectly connected to all others, is the soul-mind-0-point, 10th dimension – the system that is apperceives the whole, connects its and tries to preserve it, through the world cycle of being.*

(The reader should get accustomed to the ‘taste’ of GST which is the HOMOLOGIC, ISOMORPHIC METHOD, of putting always a physical, biological and socio-economical example of the 3 main sub-disciplines of knowledge to show the unity of it all as we illustrate reality).

Alas, the growth in the ‘5th dimension of scales’ happen through 10 dimensional ‘social organisation’.

Thus the previous graphs of Eames’ ‘Powers of 10’ is also the game of social existence.

Since it is also the number of quanta of space-time needed either in frequency or in population (spatial organic or temporal world cycle view of a system), either through time or space to create a new *social scale (ab. §) that ‘becomes a new larger functional whole’ able to apperceive and process entropy-motion, informative forms and combine them through the ‘3rd corner’ to ’emit seminal’ reproductive particles, coordinated by the central whole.*

Let us though then, once this is understood depart from reductionist ‘mathematical physics’ , and realise that what truly MATTERS IS organic FUNCTION, NOT the triangular form, beyond the obvious fact it is the most perfect ‘packed’ functional way to put 10 elements together.

So when we study specific species what we shall see is that ‘fractal points’ of space-time (beings) gather through networks of entropy, information and reproduction (in man, the digestive: spe, blood, st, Head, Tiƒ systems, which define our physiological structure), into a being. So humans in medicine are DEFINED by 3 x 3 + O sub-systems to which fractal points≈ cells attache themselves:

This is the essential formal way to study in detail beings: *through its 10 sub-dimensions of being; WHICH FOR the whole known Universe would look like this:*

In the graph in the creation of the whole Universe, and any of its fractal parts, ‘worlds, super organisms or island-universes’:

The being passes through scales of organisation that can be put in symmetry with the 3 topologies, 3 ages, 3 scales and final ‘warping mind/program of action’ of the being as it emerge into the new plane.

WE ARE ALL 10-DIMENSIONAL SCALAR BEINGS, when we consider this more ‘correct’ formal approach that the concept of the ‘scalar 5th dimension’ (the use of 5D though is useful for general studies of all those scales, given its METRIC FUNDAMENTAL S x T = K equation; and further on, it is a good first intro for the sceptic 4D physics that respects more the correspondence with its 4D formalism – but I ultimately abandoned it, leaving the concept of the 5th dimension for discussions on the inverse arrows of entropy and information).

So the ‘numerology’ explained is rather simple with 2 clear numbers, the ±3 and the 9+0=10. Then on those themes we shall find some fascinating variations. We already talked of the +3 constant, the pi-cycle of time, where 3 lineal diameters convert into a whole time cycle with 2 dimensions.

But then why pi is not exactly 3? Because its curvature varies as we change slightly the ‘density and geometry’ of information of the space-time plane, so in black holes the curvature of such awesome c-speed event horizon accelerating inwards do come closer to 3. Still we do have here the first fundamental ‘event of space-time of the Universe’: 3 lines of entropy becoming a cycle of information:

3 D = π; whereas the porous ‘0.14’ holes between cycles will be found to have a fundamental function on ‘organisms’ with a spherical pi-cycle membrane isolating it from the external world.

While on the other hand – π, will turn out to be also a universal constant the e number, used for a different ‘common event of space-time’ the emergence by social reproduction and organisation or inversely by decay and death, the dissolution of a being through its ∆-scales.

Thus we can see then all systems as 3 x 3 +o scalar social organisms, with 3 dimensions of space, time, and ∆-size become warped in a new whole, which EMERGES into the new plane of existence in space, when it is COMPLETED, and a new world opens to it in scale (as when a baby is born) or emerges earlier.

Now it is important that you realise that despite the claim of ‘exactitude’ of mathematical physics, there is nothing exact about it, but rather fluctuations and variations a*round the perfect tetraktys being; only the whole display the perfect immortal game of time-space, we are all ‘nebulous fleeting platonic shadows of the GST canon and its games of topo-bio-logical existence, in S∆T. *(For example, physicists need Wilson’s renormalisation tools to include the effects of ∆±1 scales in a given system; often put ‘ad hoc’ to match experience; differential equations that tabulate actions across several ∆-scales are not SOLUBLE only by approximations, etc. etc. AS IN THE FRACTAL UNIVERSE, ultimately every fractal domain of 10-dimensional organic existence with an apperceptive monad at its centre does make its own calculations which will have hidden variables for the external being – so something as simple *as the motion of 3 bodies in gravitational attraction CANNOT be solved exactly.) *

This does not mean though that the Universe is chaotic but that obviously the astounding arrogance of the selfie-scientist-mathematician claiming to have the exact language of God and absolute truth/knowledge/information about any entity is just more of what Humans do best, pumping their ego to ‘galactic, Universal hyperboles. Ultimately’ only the Universe has all the knowledge/information about itself’ Haldane).

Further on only the Universe is the immortal, perfect super organism and that allow us fleeting variations of the ‘platonic canon’ to exist and fancy our imperfections.

So those ∆•ST variations around those TETRAKTYS scales and numbers make the the morphological growth of forms between scales through the palingenesis of an i-logic memorial repetitive being born out of a seed of information, fun to study – *they are, we are, the details of Γ•∆.*

Then as the system is born from an initial seed – particle/semen/memetic prophet of the world – it will reproduce into parallel particles/cells/believers minds, and grow till it emerges as a whole new super organism in another plane with close to decametric scales of growth.

Alas, a religious subconscious, memetic collective civilisation (social systems), a biological being or a crystal world will be born.

IT IS THIS GAME OF CREATION OF COMPLEX SOCIAL ORGANISMS, THROUGH SCALES AND cycle of existence, WHAT THE UNIVERSE that constructs ONCE AND AGAIN logic ∆•st, 10 dimensional games of BEINGS is all about.

The final epistemological element of all systems that co-exist in several planes of the 5th dimension is the organic structures and biological properties it displays due to such co-existence symbiotic thanks to the metric equation, as smaller parts code the information of larger ones that provide them with energy and motion, so both scales become symbiotic.

The co-existence of planes of space-time can only be explained through organicism one of the two eternal philosophies of science.

This, true scientists know, as the mechanist view of physics was too simple and rather theological. Indeed, as Leibniz put it to Newton, a mechanical model of the cosmos, needed a God that started and created the mechanism.

While an organism, which is a system that co-exists in several scales of size, from smaller cellular/atomic scales, to individual thermodynamic/organic scales, to social, gravitational/ecosystemic scales, can easily reproduce by emitting seminal seeds of information in a lower scale, which then organise back, emerging again into the whole system, and further on can evolve socially into larger scales.

In this manner the Universe becomes a self-reproductive organism of information, and each of its parts becomes also a self-organising system made to the image and likeness of the whole – with no need of a mechanical clock to put it in motion, as Newton and Kepler thought.

Such view of the Universe and all its parts was called the organic view, and the aim of the science was considered to find a formalism of mathematical and logic nature, able to translate this more evolved philosophy of science in a model that without renouncing to the precision of simplex physical models, had the complexity required to explain not only the ‘how’ but also the why of all sciences and it species.

The science that studies the organic nature of the Universe, its planes of space-time and the common laws or ‘isomorphisms’, which exist between them, is called General systems Theory (Ab. GST). However it is simpler and more realistic to consider merely the formalism of the 5th dimension of space-time without any prior jargon as that developed by Systems Sciences. Even if we acknowledge the fact that this blog is the only ‘formal’, logic-mathematical model of both disciplines, known commonly the science of Complexity.

There are other efforts worth to notice. Notably the work done in Santa Fe Institute and the congresses of the International Systems Sciences Society, among collaborative efforts and the work of Mr. Troncale at Ponoma U. among individual researchers have tabulated many isomorphisms in the Universe (self similar laws across different disciplines of science, which as it happens are ordered by space-time planes of relative size, hence according to ∆ST metric: fig.2). But collection of data is only the 1st step of the scientific method, which requires to fit data into a ‘general mathematical and logic model’ good enough to fit new discoveries in different fields – to test its veracity.

In any case since there has been always a ‘Philosophy of Science’, or discipline of disciplines, General Systems can be considered merely the formal attempts to convert into hard science the ‘scientific philosophy of an organic Universe’, as opposed to the other simpler model of a ‘mechanical one’.

*And so we could put in both sides – the simpler, more accurate mechanical model vs. the Organic model, most of the thinkers of the past. Mechanism is easier so it has triumphed, Organicism has taken more time to become – still needs a lot to be done – a standardize system.*

*Thus the 5D model fits all the data of all the sciences of those scales t*o the extent of the knowledge of this polymath writer. Thus it is probably the better tested model in *terms of the Principle of Correspondence and Ockham’s principle (a theory that fits more data in simpler laws, is the most truthful.)*

Thus the site studies mainly those 10 isomorphisms in great detail ³.

The whole site, on general systems sciences, when I rewrite it properly, will be a small encyclopedia of all sciences, seen through the focusing, orderly mirror of the 3+3 Dimensions of the Universe, its 9 planes and scales and isomorphisms. I started to do this, in august 2015. Though the work is much older.

While the model was published in a very reduced format in a series of peer reviewed conferences at ISSS during the last decade, this blog is the place where I will pour 2 decades of independent research in the aforementioned formalism.

You might then wonder why nothing of this is well-known in science (and why this blog i assume won’t change that trend).

In the field of social sciences we explain the anthropomorphic causes. In essence, humans as all systems are ∆-centered, and so they don’t like objective science. They like myths and that make them the center of the Universe. So religions are always more successful. And i attribute to that fact the delay on understanding the 5th dimension: human anthropomorphism. Since the 5th dimension shows an organic, ‘vital’ Universe ruled by Absolute relativity. Since humans simply occupy a relative world-plane of an infinite 5th dimension, self-centered in its point of view, an infinitesimal point with no importance whatsoever, ruled by the same laws that define the form and functions of all other systems and ‘scalar social herds and superorganisms’ .

Thus the ‘organic philosophy’ of the 5th dimension of isomorphic, scalar space time (∆ST), called ‘General Systems Theory (∆ST) ‘ is a philosophy of an organic vital Universe:

*“All type of Universal systems can be described as social networks of energy and information. Its similar=isomorphic laws are the content of the formalism of the 5th dimension, from where we can deduce the main laws of each science that studies a relative ‘scale’ of spatial size of the social, organic Universe, from physics which studies its smaller and larger atomic and galactic scales to biology and social sciences which study its intermediate life and human scales.”*

So what is really time? Change≈motion, as we see the passing of time when something changes, hence it moves externally in space or internally changes its form, its information. AND SO two fundamental modes of change=time exist:

Physical time, which is change in your lineal loco motions or translations in space, well studied with the formula v=s/t and the ad ons of Einstein, in which time is merely the parameter of space (the fourth dimension of space) needed to measure those motions.

But then there is change in the JUST DESCRIBED CYCLICAL INFORMATION, FORM of time cycles and systems, and this is biological change, which we shall see IS also the basis of historic change as we are BIOLOGICAL beings. In this different form of change, what matters is the change of information, which is MORE complex than entropy, lineal motions. And so there are several different forms of CHANGEs of information, which can be studied all together as a CAUSAL series OF CHANGES, WHICH TOGETHER FORM THE LIFE-DEATH CYCLE, or ‘world cycle’ in 5D jargons. The main types of biological and sociological changes thus can be described as Aristote did with the causal world cycle of informative life-death changes:

- Generation, growth, evolution, perception of flows of information, (Locomotions), diminution and dissolution (extinction)

But with lineal time you won’t understand all those life-death cycles of all systems of space-time, including the whole Universe.

Lines of time, without FORM, INFORMATION, relevant to the essence of what time is, but just as an v=s/t secondary parameter in the measure of space and its ‘locomotions’, DOES NOT reveal the full power of those EFE equations, which are NOT lineal.

And yet physicists keep trying to approach all cyclical motions into lineal locomotions, *which is the only time=change physicists study of the 7 sub-species of times=changes, already defined by Aristotle, (which he roughly divided as we do, in changes in the in/form/ation of beings, as evolution, which biology studies; change in the mind position and control of its body-motions, as in process of perception; and so on, again another HUGE field completely ignored by lineal time sciences).*

Now if physicists stick to their profession, which is the *study of locomotions in physical space, ALL their talk on time locomotions, despite being not that important, is useful and MAKES SENSE, and that is fair enough, but time ‘cycles’ are many. So it is important to understand from the beginning this concept. And have a bit of healthy cynicism about their dogmas.*

All those changes=time cycles that trans-form the information of beings ARE also time-space changes, which mankind HAS shunned off as if they ‘were’ a different thing, since Physicists became the leading scientists of humanity, mostly because they became over powerful, as the makers of lineal motions/weapons/machines. But power is not truth. Praxis is not theory. So while acknowledging the power of physicists and the usefulness of their discoveries, as a philosophy of science I am not ‘impressed’ just by lineal weapons and artillery masters’ thoughts, as Galileo pretended.

As it is a *new dawn for all sciences, never seen since Mr. Galileo put time to measure space, with huge benefits for our sciences of measure, notably physics and the making of machines and cannonballs. As all sciences use time as its fundamental parameter, and so all have new revelations coming from the switch from time lines to time cycles.*

The funny thing about physicists is that they know I am right, because they do know modern physics, when Einstein and Planck, my favs, crashed the delusions of Newton and Galileo absolute space (which was the Plenum, sensorial organ of Yhwh according to Newton) where he put it its creatures on-a-box. Einstein found there were infinite time clocks. And so he quipped, ‘Leibniz (the discovery of fractal timespace he called it relational time-space, ridiculing Newton for his religious thoughts) is right, there are infinite time clocks on the Universe’. And Planck that the Universe was spiritual broken in in finite parts with energy and motion, and so ultimately we are made of space-time ‘actions’, of motions with form.

So what we say here does ONLY contradict, the already dismissed Newtonian absolute space-time paradigm created by God, as the plenum of his body… Bull$hit. It Corresponds (fundamental principle of truth) and explains further modern physics.

**∆ûst: MATHEMATICS, ITS SUB-DISCIPLINES.**

if entities of the Universe use logic to calculate time in its different forms, from quantum logic to computer digital boolean logic to human logic, they use mathematical, visual topological languages to see space. We shall thus in this introduction to mental languages of the Universe (larger than the specific human languages of the human mind and artistic expressions of the I=eye<human wor(l)cycles, make a brief account of the ∆, •, s, t disciplines of mathematics:

** **The model of stience is simple, its falsification even more. We state that all what exists is a fractal being of ‘∆•st’, dust of space-time, with 3±o components, spatial entropy, temporal information (its energetic combinations), extended across several scales of relative size in space and speed of time clocks from forces to Universes (ab.∆), *which is apperceived in a Leibnizian way by a mind, the software of biological survival of the system.*

*So we need always to define the 4 elements of reality for any species, science, event and form AND language that will mirror the 4 elements of the Universe, with special emphasis on those case in the 4th element, the language-mind-software that runs the system.*

So the Correspondence of Mathematics and reality is also immediate, as mathematics have 3 branches: Space≈Geometry, Time≈Algebra and 5D≈Analysis. An the 4th element, the mind-language is mathematics itself.

**The evolution and qualification of maths as a mind language.**

Languages therefore as a ‘defined species’ dominant in Tiƒ, temporal information, but also as pure still ‘spatial, synchronous’ mapping of reality in lesser space (not all the info specially the motion fits in a brain), do have certain properties, which can be observed in their evolution.

FIRST THEY MOVE FROM STATICS INTO DYNAMICS, from bidimensional pure information (as the page you are reading in 2 dimensions) to 3, 4, 5 dimensional description, reaching more complexity by adding motion to the ‘first still picture’ and the other time dimensions. 3 examples:

Maths started as static bidimensional geometry, which is now topology with motion; photography (the future computer mind) started as bidimensional static, then bidimensional motion (film), now is working in 3Dimensions of space (using the holographic principle) and one of motion, and soon, *inside the mind of robots that will apperceive reality in images, will add the 5th dimension of control of an outer-machine, beyond the chip, max. i = min. space enlarged into the whole world it will act upon directly.*

**The generator of maths**

The generator equation of mathematics is thus simple both in space (the 3 organs above) and time (the evolution of each discipline into higher motion in space and more dimensions of information in time, culminating soon through Boolean Algebra into the creation of the mind of robots in 5D).

*Γ (Space):* Space is studied by geometry, time by algebra &, the 5th dimension by analysis.

*Γ (Time): *Spe (Geometry>Analytic Geometry>Time Geometry > 5D Topology) x Tiƒ (Arithmetic > Algebra) = 5D Planes (calculus>analysis)

So we can either study in ‘space’, as it is NOW, all those fields of spatial, temporal and organic, scale mathematics and its 3 fundamental sub disciplines, topology, algebra and analysis.

Or we can consider each subject as it evolved through the different degrees of awareness of reality; *of any language of the mind, which reaches ‘complexity’ (5D co-existence) and freedom (motion), as it evolves from a simpler age of dogmatic **absolute truths to the variations of the language.*

IN THAT SENSE, the supposed superior truths of mathematics as opposed to verbal thought, is ONLY the consequence of the dogmatic first age of all languages, with simpler forms; as when words became the language of legal power and the pharaoh said ‘it has been written’. And it was law. Truths turn out as system evolves more probabilistic in options, less defined by a synoptic language, as only the whole has all the information about the Universe.

*In this post we do a fast scanning of those ages to summary the fundamental laws of mathematics and its 3 parts, and show this evolution to further complexity.*

*THUS corresponding to the 3 parts of the Universe, there are 3 types of mathematical sub-disciplines:*

* ∆nalysis, STopology and ¬Ælgebra. In the sub posts we shall do the synchronous NOW study of its ‘organic parts’ in more detail.*

For example the evolution of Geometry specified in the previous generator has reached increasing degrees of awareness to finally becoming a full-fledged tool to analyze from a spatial perspective all temporal forms and 5D scales. So:

– It was first bidimensional Geometry of static Space (S-perception) in Greek thought. Then it became Analytic Geometry, which grew to represent the 3 forms of time, through Se-toroid-lineal coordinates, To-polar-cyclical coordinates and STi-Plane coordinates. This time geometry finally expanded to the 3 ‘5D topological perceptions of space-time’:

Thus in the XIX century, the perception of higher planes of the 5th dimension (elliptic geometry-General relativity-cosmic scales) and lower ones (hyperbolic geometry-quantum spaces) was added to the direct perception of a single plane of existence (Euclidean geometry). While topology allowed to apply those 3 external views to the internal motions and changes of the inner space-time of a particle-point, and finally fractal geometry completed the perception of 5D with Geometry.

The same evolution can be considered for the more complex Algebraic and Analytic branches.

The structure of this and 2nd-3rd rank posts is that of an encyclopaedia of mathematics, when it is completed by me and many future researchers is chronological (now work is under construction, in such a huge field, i just put the scaffolding, and from time to time I ad parts:

First we explain the 3 ages of mathematics and so we can translate all its postulates and theories to GST.

In this post we develop a synoptic analysis of those ages.

Then we complete the work with the full-blown model non-e mathematics, non-algebra, ∆nalysis and the pangeometries of the mind who reduces reality with i-logic mathematics to fit all its information in the second level of posts.

**i-Logic Mathematics as realist sciences.**

The formalism humans use to observe time and space is called (verbal) logic and (digital) mathematics.

Such is the way humans observe reality with logic words and digital geometry. So the realism of logic and mathematics must be absolute and if it is not is because we still need to evolve both languages to make it closer to reality.

tHIS is the origin of Non-Aristotelian logic and Non-Euclidean mathematics, the needed upgrading of those sciences to express better the fractal properties of scalar space and multiple causality of a universe made with 3 arrows NOT one of time.

Logic Mathematics, the forma sciences of time and space, which science uses to descry the Universe are the time and space forms of the mind and can be evolved into higher models as we can closer to our understanding of what time and space is, which we explained in the pervious post.

So to introduce the formal model of GST (general systems theory), we must introduce its formalism, the formalism of the Genrator of Space-time, its mathematical and logic equations.

In that sense as all is space and time, mathematics and logic are both idealist sciences not idealist languages – as all sciences are. More so logic of time and mathematics of space, the languages of the fundamental elements of the Universe, as they serve a survival purpose for the species that speak it: to mirror in the mind, the outer reality and connect the internal and outer world of the being.

THUS LOGIC MATHEMATICS IS THE LANGUAGE THAT BETTER REFLECTS THE INFINITE SCALES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION AND ALL ITS SPECIES. Hence the U±∞ tag for this post.

This realist fact is essential to set the ‘boundaries’ of efficiency of our mathematical elements that mirror reality. It means we reject ‘modern mathematics’, an offspring of the German idealist ‘school’ of science, which has taken the ego-trip of human only intelligence to its paroxysm, with the tandem Cantor-Hilbert that ‘imagined sets, points, lines and planes’.

The units of mathematics are the fractal point in geometric space and the social number in algebraic time, and they must be returned to the centre of the science – and reject the axiomatic method, of ‘human minds’ self-appointed seers of truth. Since Godel already proved it is an incomplete truth that needs experimental evidence.

Experience must in mathematics as in any other science to be the final check on the logic theories discovered. In this manner mathematics is much more fruitful as it provides constantly new ‘insights’ on the structure of mathematics.

A simple example will suffice. Fermat’s last theorem: X³ + Y³ ≠ Z³ proves that space and time are bidimensional, NOT tridimensional, as there are not 3-dimensional numbers. How mathematics ‘knows’ it? Because GEOMETRY is the linguistic mirror of space and follows the same laws.

Another example is the structure of reality in ‘o-points’, minds which are frames of reference, its vital space and the membrane that acts as boundaries. Well, we do need for all mathematical statements a frame of reference, and there are basically 3 which correspond to the only 3 topologies which correspond to the only 3 type of organs of nature. Again, this ternary structure reflects mathematically the 3 organs of reality.

In fact, multiple equations and functions of mathematics find no solution when there are no ‘boundaries’ established, showing how both concepts relate. Solutions are then integrals limited by the function of the external membrane. Reality indeed is ‘limited’ by the survival efficiency of its forms. So only proper solutions survive.

In the more amenable internal surface of a brain language truth can be deformed in greater measure by the subjective point of view. So there are distorted theories of mathematics as in all sciences, which are only half-truths. And the ego expands them to full meaning as physicists do with the restricted concept of gas entropy. So ‘parts’ of algebra, which have some meaning for certain questions of reality – as the composition of parts and wholes, which is what set theory studies, hence a sub discipline of 5D mathematics – have been blown up by ego-centered german idealists (Cantor-Hilbert) to become the ‘truth of all other mathematical systems’. And this has harm enormously the comprehension of the fractal point of space and social number in time, which are the units both of the mathematical and the real Universe.

So the main task of T.œ in the science of mathematics is return to the meaningful, classic age, and put back mathematics and logic with the nature of reality, as it is and a proper evolution of mathematical thought would enlighten it.

**The 3 parts of mathematics correspond to the 3 parts of reality.**

Mathematics is the most experimental of all sciences, due to the fact that its 3 disciplines are homeomorphic with the 3 elements of T.Œ: 5D analysis, space geometry and the logic operandi of ‘time algebra’.

Thus for starters the easiest way to translate mathematics to study knots of fractal space-time cycles, is to consider that the 3 main branches of mathematics are related to the 3 elements of the Universe:

- Geometry relates to space. Hence it merely needs an upgrading of continuous single space-time into fractal space-times in which ‘each point is a world in itself’; a fractal, Non-AE point, Œ. So we must complete the 5 postulates of Non-E geometry, as mathematics only resolved the 5th. We shall also consider what of the different topologies exist in the bidimensional space-time reality (2-manifolds).
- Sequential Algebra of growing social numbers, corresponds to the 5th dimension’s Informative-Time order of growing societies/numbers from past to future. At its birth, because Algebra is pure arithmetic and the order of numbers from minor to major, is self-evident (5D future arrow of wholes), the logic of future algebraic complex systems is yet not merged, in its Pure Aristotelian Style. Moreover it is a single arrow logic, A->B, which will have enormous implications.

- Analysis which studies the laws of social scales and planes of the 5th dimension, its indivisible, infinitesimal Œ-points that become whole; societies or Superorganism and Planes of existence. So we shall interpret Analysis in terms of the underlying equations of existential algebra, which gather infinitesimal indivisibles (.n-1) into Universal Wholes, (Un+1).

This is the easy way to analyse, and teach the foundation of mathematics: understanding both synchronic and diachronically its direct relationship with reality. And scrapping all excess of… the formal nonsense of Philosophers of mathematics.

Indeed diachronically Geometry was born of the measure of fields and the observation of moon and astronomical cycles.

*Numbers and algebra express the laws of a sum of objects that gather into social groups: ∑∆-1 ≈@number, group*

Analysis of the study of parts that become wholes (integration) and forms of space that vary in time (derivation).

Now let us try a more complex thorough definition with the jargon of ∆ST or ‘Tœ’ (a theory of everything):

*Definition of mathematics : ‘i-logic mathematics is an experimental science, based in the fact that it studies the laws of Fractal Space-time, (ab. ∆ST), the substances of which all beings are made, focusing on its highest synthetic conceptualisation, the Fractal Generator, Γ, with 3 sub-disciplines:*

*Γeometry, which studies the forms in space of all universal systems, departing of its natural units, the fractal point, the waveline and the plane-network and its topological structures defined by the Fractal Generator in synchronous states, Sp<ST>Tƒ.*

*‘∆nalysis’, which studies the social scales of the 5th dimension, expressed through its time events of ∫∂, integration and derivation and actions along its world cycles, focusing on the fractal generator in diachronic state: ∆-1 Tƒ ∑> ∆Sp > ∆+1 ST > ∆ Tƒ << ∆-1 Sp*

*¬ Ælgebra, which studies the internal logic structures of the Fractal Generator, its actions and symmetries in space and time, through its discontinuous variable units, the social number.*

The previous definition is more complex than a simple definition of Analysis of 5D planes, Geometry of each of its systems in space, and the algebraic study of the ternary temporal logic causality of its space-time events. But it remains still clear that the true elements of mathematics are not sets and undefined concepts (Cantor, Hilbert’s axiomatic method), but the classic 3 elements of ‘numbers’ (Algebra), ‘points’ (Geometry) and Operandi (Algebra and Analysis).

From points then we derive, the lines, planes, and logic of similarity that completes geometry.

From numbers, we derive variables, functions and functionals manipulated with operandi that reflect the logic motions in time of the different actions of beings.

And as a branch of Algebra, of special extension, given that it studies the fractal structure of more actions, including the world cycle through scales of the 5th dimension, there is Analysis.

So the realism of mathematics derives of the fact that we are not placed in fractal space-time, we ARE FRACTAL SPACE-TIME.

The issue of the realist foundations of mathematics as an experimental science should have long been resolved by experimental proofs (mathematics is the language with more applications to reality) and formally by Gödel’s theorem of incompleteness. But Platonism is so ‘entrenched’ on mathematics and physics that nobody seemed to have taken seriously Godel, except his friend Einstein:

Truth can only be proved by the connection between reality and the language, as the language itself does not provide enough consistency to prove its truth, only its coherence.

Einstein thus quipped ‘I know when mathematics are truth – consistent within the language – but not when they are real’. And Lobachevski affirmed they should be tested experimentally. Einstein though soon felt under the spell of the Axiomatic method of Hilbert, and did away with ether, setting a one hundred years confusion on the nature of reality.

And so what we would have expected in objective terms – the evolution together of the pan geometry of Lobachevski and the experimental method of mathematical physics, which so many fruits of knowledge had brought to mankind during the age of mathematical analysis floundered. Both mathematics and physics became ‘imagined sciences’, in which substance – the fractal point, the social number, the space-time bidimensional system or plane – became imagined. It is important thus to trace the historic origin of this trend in the same german idealist school that brought us ‘probabilities as the substance of reality’, ‘nazi numbers’ tagged on the wrists of people – today substituted by credit numbers in the globalised capitalism, and ‘communist’ masses of ‘undistinguishable’ human points controlled by the ‘party’ entity, as expressions of what the ‘superior human mind’ could do to classify without respect the laws of nature.

**The idealist school of mathematical physics.**

*In the graph, few scientists are aware of the idealist, Hegelian bias of German culture a century ago, which still permeates the loss of interest for the foundations of the scientific method in mathematical physics today. Thus we shall remember here the foundations of the scientific method… *

*Search for truth through experimental evidence, and logic sound models of reality with the addition of the elements of an organic model of the Universe. In the graph, two german idealists, during the panic of the ‘parallels’, which seized in rapture the entire world of mathematical physics after the greatest minds of the age could not solve, where to fit, the ‘multiple new geometries of the Universe, unlocalised in space and time. *

*Unaware of the rather obvious 5th dimensional structure of those geometries, the panic extended from Gauss and Riemann, as propagators of Lobacjevski and soon brought to mathematical physics, the confusing notions of an idealist school of geometry where ‘by decree of Hilbert’, we human minds invent points, lines and cycles which are not defined.*

It was the axiomatic method of Hilbert, which influenced the 3rd, formal age of mathematics; Einstein’s rejection of ‘substance’ (formal motion in fact) for the waves of light, and Bohr’s rejection of density (fractal structure) for electrons.

So Hilbert converted mathematical elements (points, lines and planes and their logic relationships into ‘platonic eidos=forms of the mind’, Einstein converted ‘space’ into ‘frames of reference’, perspectives of the human mind and its visual light space-time rod of measure, and Bohr converted densities of ‘bosonic light’ which form the electronic wave into probabilities of human mesure.

Now back to reality mathematics remained immutable, points still existed as fractal beings, lines were still waves of points communicating formal motions between them and planes still were created by points into topological networks and planes outside the brain of Hilbert.

For example, a number which is ‘a society of identical beings’, whose properties are derived of the social nature of the 5D universe of parts and wholes, and whose sequential order in a line derives of the fact that parts come before wholes, is not yet defined.

A philosopher of mathematics, which by definition is a metalanguage of the 3rd baroque, informative age would inquire:

“What kind of thing is a number? Some philosophers (antirealists) have responded here with disbelief—according to them, there are simply no such things as numbers. Others (realists) think that there are such things as numbers (as well as other mathematical objects).

“Among the realists, however, there are several different views of what kind of thing a number is. Some realists think that numbers are mental objects (something like ideas in people’s heads). Other realists claim that numbers exist outside of people’s heads, as features of the physical world. There is, however, a third view of the nature of numbers, known as Platonism or mathematical Platonism, that has been more popular in the history of philosophy. This is the view that numbers are abstract objects, where an abstract object is both nonphysical and non-mental. According to Platonists, abstract objects exist but not anywhere in the physical world or in people’s minds. In fact, they do not exist in space and time at all.” (Britannica)

Now the difference between ‘fiction in languages and reality’ is due to the inflationary property of form, of information, which in its 3rd formal age multiplies its forms, and departs from reality. It is not though useful to take fiction more serious than reality, or the classic age of the language when the correspondence between form and energy, language and reality is maximal (STi-age).

The perfect forms are non-evident ‘time cycles’.

Moreover perfect forms do exist in time – the cycle being obviously the most perfect form of TIME, WHICH WE DO SEE IN SPACE, for very fast cycles (quantum forms: Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ =K), which ARE perfect as they return to its initial point – that is closing the pi cycle in pure time, with 3 perfect ages-diameters.

The perfect geometries that exist in atomic systems.

The perfect orbit, which ideally would be the more stable cycle (so the higher the e-xcentricity, the less stable is).

The perfect logarithmic spiral. The perfect wave of energy-information, which has no apparent limit and ‘transcends’ between 5D scales.

It is indeed surprising how ‘geometric ‘ is the Universe in all the scales we do not perceive directly.

Only the ‘evident’ simplicity of human beings, who must ‘see’ the direct visual truth, especially in the age of visual machines, has failed to understand this fact, ‘inventing’ platonic explanations for the ‘non-evident’, temporal structure of the Universe where the ‘perfect cycles’ are. As we do NOT see time, we do not see the ‘perfect ideos=forms’ of the Platonic Universe. We only see ‘space’ and so we do not ‘perceive’ visually the forms of time, of which space is a mere ‘still’ imperfect form, ∂T=S/V.

This simple equation of 5D analysis is telling of the true ‘logic formalism of mathematics’; THE GAME OF PERFECT FORMS, ‘IDEOS’, which imprint the motions and vibrations of the Universe – the mental language that stop those forms into a ‘partial mirror’ of reality.

We thus consider mathematical logic (two indivisible space-time languages , albeit initially born as different subjects, today evolved into the Boolean Algebra and digital thought), the main (but not only) language of ALL the scales of the Universe.

It is only comparable in the Human Mind to the pure visual languages (eye colors and arts) and the pure temporal language (verbal actions and words), studied however on the section of History (the superorganism of mankind).

So it is quite amazing the need for a ‘philosophy of mathematics’, which only expresses the limits of the human mind to go beyond the ‘visual’ first layer of reality.

As in the case of physics, the ‘sickness’ of mathematics happened in the 3rd baroque, formal ‘Germanic age’ of mathematics at the turn of the century when Hilbert affirmed that we ‘imagine, points, lines and planes’ unable to understand at all the ternary relationship and fractal nature of points of the 5th dimension.

So he just had as Einstein with the gravitational scale of space and Bohr with the quantum scale, an ego-trip of self-centered anthropomorphism and the 3 influencing each other ‘decided’ that reality was NOT outside the mind f man, but ONLY WHAT MAN PERCEIVES AND IMAGINES MATTERED.

All this said there is the more elevated pure way to understand all this evolution, through the ‘¬Æ formalism’ of the generator equation, which is how we started this text (no for need of confusion but because we have to knock out experts always ‘first’ as they are pedantic non-interdisciplinary ‘bonobo’ monkeys that only mate among themselves so my experience tells me T.œ must start raping their minds, and them maybe some will ‘listen’ 🙂

All this is needed to fully grasp the division of mathematics in T.œ in its 2 main fields: i-logic geometry and Non-Ælgebra.

**Non-E≈ i-logic geometry** deals with the Absolute Geometry, taking it from where the evolution of geometry ended in the work of Bachmann (1970s: absolute geometry), after the insights of Lobachevski and Riemann among others on the pan-geometries of the Universe, and starts by defining the undefined terms of points, lines, planes, lay on, and betweenness, needed to construct mathematics, with the exclusion of continuity, which is NOT a feature of the Universe but of the ‘mind-worlds’ that perceive it.

**i-logic geometry** thus is mainly concerned with 4 sub-themes:

- The 3 geometries of systems orientated from a point of view or frame of reference, which perceive Euclidean space in its own plane of existence, hyperbolic space, looking downwards in the 5th dimension and elliptic space looking upwards.
- The definition of the undefined terms of geometry and its 5th postulate, the core element of i-logic geometry, which defines fractal points with parts, waves of communication between them, topological networks (discontinuous planes), and the i-logic structure of perpendicular and parallel relationships defined by the 5th postulate and the rules of ‘similarity’, congruence and equality defined by the 3rd postulate. The new defined terms create the scaffolding for all direct mirroring between reality and mathematics, which thereafter become vital mathematics, much closer to reality when describing points, lines, planes and the properties and postulates.
- And the analysis with the new understanding of the 3 topologies of geometrical forms (Euclidean, hyperbolic, elliptic) and its 8 sub-varieties, and the 5 postulates of i-logic geometry, of the real organisms of the Universe perceived in synchronous analysis as forms of space.
- Finally, the most extensive part, which we can hardly treat in this post, just a few examples, would be the translation to this vital mathematical new scaffolding of the enormous wealth of geometric and topological laws, discovered by 2300 years of mathematicians hard at work.

**¬Ælgebra** (Non-Aristotelian Algebra or Existential Algebra), deals with ‘social numbers’, the discontinuous unit of the temporal Universe. It groups back 5D analysis and time algebra split in the XVIII century, due to the excessive development of mathematical physics; which latter would be paralleled by the expansion of Modern Algebra (group theory, set theory and the axiomatic method). Now we shrink back the whole subject and its inflationary human minds, to fit it within the total Universe! (-;

In essence, the 3 ‘abstract configurations’ of modern mathematics, group theory, set theory and the axiomatic method should go back to the Pandora box, and take it only when it is proper; substituted by:

- Symmetries of the Generator of fractal space-time beings, which substitutes the abstract language of groups.
- Social numbers, which evolve from parts into wholes, which substitutes the abstract jargon of set theory.
- The experimental method, which shows the isomorphic laws of mathematics applied to all the species of all the scales of reality and substitutes the axiomatic method.

Now, we will ‘bundle’ the 3 parts into the 2 original ones, geometry of space, and algebra of 5D time cycles, because of the experimental method.

It is proved by experience that the 6 motions of the Universe (regardless if they are seen as form or motion), roughly break into the main 5 organic motions, which conform a world cycle between ‘birth, evolution, growth, diminution and extinction’ along 3 ∆±1 scales of the 5th dimension’. And so this is what Algebra will study.

And the locomotions in external space-time and between scales of the 5th dimension, which are studied by geometry, its differential equations, expressed through analytic and differential geometry and the 3 pangeometries of the Universe.

Obviously as T.œ explains all what exists together with the same laws, our division in i-logic geometry and ¬Æ is an organic division, since ultimately points are numbers, just seen in synchronous space or dynamic time. And so both change into each other constantly and the methods of one and its postulates work into the other.

Thus the main fields of ¬Æ are:

- Analysis, which studies social numbers in their growth and diminution along scales of the 5th dimension, either integrated or derived in time or space. It does so from a continuous perspective, so analysis bridges really the geometric and algebraic point of view.
- Symmetry theory (group theory), which studies the symmetric transformations and diversifications of the ternary structure of reality in 3 spatial forms, 3 time ages, 3 scales of the 5th dimension and infinite ternary fractal sub-elements.
- Functions, which study the relationships between space constants, time frequencies, and conserved quantities, along different scales of the 5th dimension. It is a large field as we study how multiple polynomial sub-dimensions, integrate into larger systems. And vice versa, how wholes in time and space divide into sub-systems (Fourier systems, binomials, etc.)
- Probability, Populations and Combinatorics. Which studies the 5th dimension social numbers from a discrete point of view.
- Numbers theory, which studies the most efficient configurations in space of geometrical numbers (so also as analysis a bridge between both i-logic and non-æ), the relationships between its 3 ‘species’, even, odd and prime numbers and the 3 parts of the Universe, the laws of social numbers, which define its efficient configurations, and the relationship between the bidimensional 3 scales of creation of space-time systems and the 3 type of numbers, the numbers of the real line, the complex bidimensional numbers and the quaternions, whose structure DO tell us essential facts about the nature of spas-time.
- And the translation of the amazing wealth of knowledge accumulated in algebra throughout history.

The article will first introduce the history of mathematics and it main ages, as it performs as usual its own mental world cycle, starting from its realist youth, in which mathematics derived from the reality of social numbers (to calculate groups) and geographical planes (to measure areas and distances), and then slowly separated from reality as the ill-understood concepts of infinity and multi-dimensionality creeped in, and the reality of finitesimal quanta gave up, despite the advices of Leibniz, and finally with the discovery of pangeometries, and the scaring runaway age of idealist mathematics, now we return to the beginning and reconnect mathematics with reality, both from a human linguistic perspective (this work) and from the new dominant species of the planet (the chip and its digital models of reality).

Then we shall consider the laws of i-logic geometry, symmetric topologies and non-AE existential algebra. Here is where the creative part of T.œ comes in, studying mathematics with the scientific experimental method in correspondence with the 5D fractal structure of cyclical space-time actions. We describe the more general laws of T.Œ with application to all the sciences and worlds of reality from a mathematical perspective.

Finally in the 3rd part, which will take sometime to have a minimal volume to be meaningful, once we have understood vital, realist mathematics and defined all its elements, we will start the translation into realist theorems of the bulk of mathematical studies of those last millennia.

**Conclusion**

Thus once the simple truths of mathematics are clear, a way to proceed through it is the study of the main operandi of mathematics first to define the correspondence between mathematical operations and ¬Æ 5D fractal space-time cycles; so to establish a proper formalism. And then study the fundamental propositions of mathematics and its relationship with the laws of 5D space-time they represent.

This can be done in different ways. We have chosen instead of the usual analysis of the isomorphic, linguistic method a more discursive approach that once the work is well done (this is so far the less advanced post of the 2nd line as I work them in inverse fashion, from the human world down to the Universe, which is the humanist perspective) might be reorganized.

In any case we shall still study mathematics as any other science with S-T dualities, T-ages, S-forms, 5D-inverse arrows, and generators.

**I-logic, non-Aristotelian, organic. Non-Euclidean topology.**

*In the graph a resume of the 5 postulates of i-logic geometry.*

Amazingly enough we can study the 3 ‘formal languages’ of the Universe together, departing from the classic Postulates of Geometry, which started also the adventure of Formal Knowledge with the Greeks.

Albeit a reformed 5 set of Geometric Postulates to adapt it to the Nature of scalar space-time, where ‘points have parts’, lines are waves that communicate energy and information, planes are organic networks, and the similarity of systems define their behavior.

*-1*^{st}* postulate:* __‘A relative fractal point is a topology with breath & motion that grows in size as we come closer to it’.__ *-2*^{nd}* postulate.* Yet if a point has form and motion so does a line of spherical points. Thus: ‘__A line is a wave of energy and information that communicates 2 bigger points’__.

Such ‘i-waves’ evolve into 3 social networks that are:

–*4*^{th}* postulate:* ‘A __plane of existence is a network of i-points sharing energy & information through i-waves.’__

‘A __superorganism is a system made of 3 networks=planes of existence’. __Yet besides 3 ‘geometric postulates’, Non-E geometry has 2 i-logic, causal Postulates that define the ‘Will of all 10Di superorganisms’:

–*5*^{th}* postulate*: __A O-Mind is a Non-E point crossed through eyes & mouths by ∞ parallels of energy & information’__.

–*3*^{rd }*Postulate *that defines *the rules of engagement* between Wholes with 3 parts, no longer externally but internally *according to the similarity of its Dimensions*. I.e.: O-points-minds that perceive each other as equal across its informative time Dis communicate and evolve together into Wholes.

Systems who have different informative Ds and cannot communicate, but have equal n-1 scalar dimensions enter in Darwinian prey-predator relationships by sharing the same space in which the predator tears the topology of the prey, provoking toroid flows that dissolve its i-scale, absorbing it as n-1 energy, etc.

Further on, membranes enclose points’ parts. So external camouflage confuses preys that engage as equals with predators, becoming an essential strategy of 0-points in search of STe-Feeding. Thus the 3^{rd} Postulate reduces all possible behaviors among species according to their 10Ds similarities. Thus 10Di-logic mathematics means the biggest advance in both sciences since Euclid & Aristotle found the mathematic-logic formalism of 4Di. Without it, GST cannot exist.

**Symbolism: the creation of ∆+1 planes departing from ∆œ-1 points.**

We shall use the following symbol for them:

**Œ, ***the function of existence***,*** for the first and 5th postulate, used for ALL fractal points in general:* a point with volume and parts, the Informative (Tiƒ) and Entropic (S) lineal fields, merged in the center, and a wider opening in the equator or mouth to absorb energy.

∆º or •-point or @ristotelian mind, or åctive mind, for the fifth postulate, and the multiple roles of a mind-view, which normally has an axis of informative perception in the dimension of height (hence ∆º).

Whereas the first and 5^{th} postulate ultimately represent the inward state of the mind and its outward perceptive state.

**≈** Represents the **2**^{nd}** postulate** (a wave instead of a line).

**‡** Represents the 3^{rd} postulate of relative equality, as it shows both the perpendicular + and parallel = dual relationships of beings, with species they feed on (equal energy, different information) or evolve together with (equal information) forming

** Γ, **the symbol of the Generator equation will also be the symbol for the **4th postulate** of a topological non-euclidean plane-network made at least of 3 *physiological sub-networks, each of them at least* with 3-point parts, messed together to form a topological organism.

So from the organic ∆-1 point, through the ∆º mind, across its ≈ flows of energy and information that web those points into social networks, structured according to the ‡ relative similarity (social parallelism) or perpendicularity (darwinian hierarchical relationship) the postulates of Non-Æ illogic geometry build the ∆+1, Γ-Topological supœrganism of a larger scale.

And so i-logic mathematics will fusion once more mathematical, algebraic, topological, analytical and biologic, organic, social properties to describe it all ‘at once.

## ∆±i: Astrophysical stiences

**The scales of the big-bang.**

The mechanist model of the Universe is too simple and rather theological because as Leibniz put it, needed a God that started and created the mechanism. This simplex concept of a Universe born by an act of creation of an explosion of energy, of course, is today the ‘religion of physics’, despite its incoherences both at philosophical and experimental level treated in our study of the largest scales of the Universe since all the scales of the Universe of matter do suffer ‘entropic big bang deaths’, son in the scalar Universe, the big-bang if proved beyond the quasar big-bang of the galaxy where its mapping take place, will just mean, the ‘death-entropy’ phase of a local Universe (a fact increasingly recognised in the most recent models of cosmology).

So it is far more important to study the deeper dualist models of General Systems Sciences, which explain both the big-bang (entropic explosion: M->E/c²) and the big-crush (informative warping, E-<Mc², as ‘time curves space into mass’ Einstein), which put together explain the entire world cycle of mass, between its generation and extinction in any scale of reality.

In the graph, the true meaning of a scalar, fractal Universe, in which forms in spaces and functions in time repeat, is the self-similarity or ‘fractal nature’ of all systems, in which either form in space or function in time, and often both repeat in different scales, just changing the parameters of its clocks (faster in smaller beings) and its sizes. Yet if we were able to ‘slow’ down a fast motion, ‘elongating it in space’ in its worldline trajectory, the total product S x T (size of each step in space by the frequency of those steps), will be similar for all the members of a certain ST family of species. i.e. the speed at which an atom turns, and/or explodes in an atomic big-bang called a ‘beta decay’, multiplied by its size, is similar to the speed at which a galaxy turns multiplied by its size.

A beta decay takes 14 minutes; a galactic quasar takes 14 billion years (the age of the big-bang, which in fact is likely to be a quasar, which physicists unaware of those laws of self-similarity despite mapping them out adscribe to a hypothetical Universe (right side, shows the background radiation of the big-bang. Yet since those measures were taken in this galaxy and show the same form of this galaxy, (central form with its two lobes of ¥-radiation) and have the same ‘scalar’ age, it is very likely that he big-bang data must be interpreted as a quasar big-bang of our galaxy in the past.

So in any of its fractal ∆±i scales, (galaxies, stars, particles), similar world cycles of space-time happen. Since Einstein’s EFE are NOT 3 solutions in space, but 3 sequential solutions in time: Big-bang youth, steady state maturity and informative old age big crunch, that show the ‘generation, reproduction and extinction of physical space-time beings’. And confirm that the same laws of time-space world cycles apply to all scales of reality.

The big-bang and the second laws of thermodynamics are the most obvious case: *to make possible both, physicists had to DENY the effects of the informative gravitational force, which attracts masses and creates the galactic vortices that compensate the expansion of space between them, its entropic side. So when we put both together the Universe is eternal and in balance. For the same reason, when we ad the gravitational forces of this planet, and the arrow of life and sentient organisation of systems, a short of Maxwell’s devil of life that balances the entropy arrow, again there is an immortal discontinuous series of life cycles that offset entropy.*

Alas an entire new world of scientific discoveries opened to me 2 decades ago after this seemingly simple ‘insight’. And the quantity of amazing discoveries I realized in the following years, still going strong, has filled my mind of wonder and love of God, the logic mind of the fractal, organic Universe.

The study of the laws that connect those scales is the widest new field of modern science, which this writer formalised at the turn of the century.

Indeed the creation of life and information, with death and entropy just as a moment needed to renew and balance the books of life for it to be immortal, as described by the metric of 5D are the closest we have been to understand those thoughts of God, per in secula seculorum…. (:now you say Amen:)

**What is right and it is in the equations of Einstein; what is dogma and it is not.**

As all new models of reality must correspond with previous theories, we shall first show the corresponde of cyclical time with modern physics… and latter once lied down its principles, the far more obvious connection with the cycles of evolution of information in biological species and human socio-economic systems.

For those skeptic physicists still reading, if any (: A simple formula will suffice for them to understand: LINEAL TIME DURATION, T is the inverse of cyclical time frequency, ƒ, which carries the information of the Universe (so ƒ means both things, ab. Tiƒ). I.e. this computer measures its time/informative capacity in Herzs, the measure of frequency. So since for a physicist… *time cycles exist in all the formulae of physics, as all use time duration and T=1/ƒ. *

Consider for example that formula of speed, V=S/t, which becomes immediately, V= Sƒ, and hence Speed =wavelength x frequency. V≈ λ ƒ.

This formula is immediate, it is the formula of wave-speed. So *all motions are wave-motions, and this was the first huge law of quantum physics (De broglie): all particles in motion are moved by an underlying wave. We shall soon deduce that motion is the reproduction of the information of a wave. And so the less information a system has the faster it moves. Hence the form with less information (0 for human observer), gravitation, which is invisible to us, must have infinite motion. *

Alas! this is called in physics ‘non-local action at distance’, never explained before. Since those who do not understand their equations, put dogmas of truth on it. So as no physicists understands why the speed of light does NOT change, which is What Einstein proved, the jump forward into a leap of faith and decided noting goes faster than light (which is NOT what Einstein said) and so now faster than light speed motions of beings with LESSER form, less mass-information than light (gravitons, neutrinos) must NOT BREAK the dogma. Alas we call it action at distance and every time we measure faster than light neutrinos the world becomes nervous and find some ‘loose cable’ guilty of the anathema.

So in brief, *while the c-speed is indeed a limit of space-time speed in our plane of existence, the galactic plane, the metric of 5D tell us there are larger cosmological scales’ with less information that should go faster, as Spe (speed here) x Tiƒ (information) = K. So each scale will become slower as it carry more information, reason why you really can’t go at c-speed.*

In that regard THE FRACTAL UNIVERSE IS LIKE A RUSSIAN DOLL GAME OF NESTED BIGGER WHOLES, made of smaller little parts; in the same way as in biology, the LARGEST WHOLES (Whales) eat the smaller beings, its quanta of energy (Planckton and krills). This is one of the paradoxes of the 5th dimension, and as I say if you don’t come with a fresh mind, it will be for you accustomed to a single space-time continuum frame of mind, to fully grasp the ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY and paradoxes of ∆ST beings.

In the graph we see the concept, the larger Doll-Universe is made of the smallest bits (the little doll inside). The smaller one is made of bigger bits. Your bits are cells, just a scale below; the bits of the planet are atoms, much smaller despite being a larger planet, the bits of the galaxy are quanta of light space, the substance of galactic vacuum much smaller than atoms. And now an ‘insight’ on relativity. c-speed made of light quanta ARE the bits of space of the galaxy, and that is WHY in the galaxy not only NOTHING can go faster than light, as LIGHT IS SPACE in the galaxy, but also by definition as it is the moving, entropic space, the underlying scale of all of us, when we MEAUSRE space-motions we measure light motions and so it is always CONSTANT. This is what EINSTEIN truly proved, but as usual lacking a whole philosophical model of space-time, interpretations got wild, and errors such as the limit of c-speed, which IS NOT on the equations, became dogma.

Since to deny cyclical times is ultimately to deny science, its logic, repetitive patterns of information and its objectivity, in its parameters of measure, which *as Landau put it, cannot be based in human subjective ego-trips about the importance of the ‘observer’ and its ‘instruments of measure’*.

**Fourier transform: the equations of time.**

In the graph, the fundamental equation of time cycles, and its emergence into social higher, future time forms is the Fourier transform, which along the hamiltonian, the fundamental equation of the particle-field, entropic reality become the master equations of both, mathematical physics and GST. Its study to understand how waves work and the future is webbed in 3 scales of reality that co-exist with different information and energy, but in a symbiotic manner emerging together as a new whole, is in its simplest version. In the graphs, the 3 fundamental co-existing levels in a fourier transform, shows how a supœrganism co-exist in 3 levels to form a whole, which in the right side is showed as the sum of all those waves, which become as a whole the ‘inverse function’ of its parts. So the O-waves of the fourier ad up together emerging as an |-square wave, in the same manner the ∑o-beings of ∆-1 become an entropic element for the larger whole.

**Physical scales: ****Energy and Hamiltonians.**

Now, regarding the physical way to describe those present energy states and its quanta of space and frequencies of time, there are so many different mathematical formulae, which are identical, that the ‘thing’ is a bit confuse, because without clear notions of what space, time and energy is, (which of course the routine scientist-scholar truly an automaton pre-version of the robotic scientist who cares nothing to explore the whys, will not eve wonder about)… well it is all messy.

Consider the historic development of the equations of mechanics and energy. At the end of the journey, we ended up realising it was all expressions of an equation called the Hamiltonian, whose parameters sum the total energy of the present being, subdivided into a potential energy given by the configuration of the points studied, that is their position and overall form, (hence Tiƒ parameter) and the motion and speed-momentum of the being in space or kinetic energy defined by the field forces (hence an spe-parameter). And that is why indeed *the hamiltonian as the clearest expression of the 5D formalism of gst and its metric: Spe +Tiƒ = Energy (hamiltonian) works so well.*

But wait a minute, what is the formulae Spe x Tiƒ = K, or Spe + Tiƒ =K? *BOTH ARE ALLOWED COMBINATIONS OF SPE AND TIƒ which will give us different TYPE OF MOTIONS of the 6+1 motions that generate a super organism and its worldcyle of existence, already described by Aristotle, but reduced to 1 – locomotion in physics. And because we are here explaining 6+1 motions: generation (evolution)->perception-communication (absorption of information)->growth (reproduction)-> feeding and locomotion (acceleration-absorbtion and expenditure of energy)->diminution->extinction (dissolution).*

Latter we shall be more precise on those classic Aristotelian motions. And deduce them all from the possible combinations and absorption or emission of spatial energy and temporal information as the allowed actions in space-time that all systems try to perform to survive and evolve together into larger wholes. Enough to say now that they do obey different operand of mathematics, which reflect different motions.

So integrals and polynomials are motions in ∆-scales (growth, diminution, emergence, dissolution, death, etc), ruled by polynomial and exponential operand and constants (e-being for example the constant of growth and death-dissolution). Others will show reproductive, iterative wave processes (decametric scales), others transformations of entropy into information (pi constants and trigonometrical function) and/or the more complex, combinations of some of those motions (imaginary numbers, attached to pi constants, often related to motions in ∆ parallel to transformations of space-lineal entropy into wave states, as in quantum physics’ schrondinger’s equations).

So things of course will get as complex as the astounding varieties of events and populations there is in the Universe, albeit all coming from a few simple principles. In that regard GST is not difficult to grasp but rather bulky because it is ALL.

So, back to the beginning of the paragraph, the generator equation should be better written as:

*ST-present ‘action’ ≈ Spe (entropy element) OPERANDI Tiƒ (informative element)*

So it has different forms depending on the states we describe. For example, in the equation of present Energy=Kinetic energy (Spe-element) + Potential Energy (given by position hence a formal, Tiƒ) element, *we ad or rather subtract the Spe** and Potential elements, which are inverse as they transform into each other. This is the description of a locomotion, which merely absorbs motion from a field and gives it to the moving particle, so we ad both elements. *

But if we were to describe a reproductive motion, as in certain motion waves, we multiply both elements, such as in the equations of Maxwell that gives us the speed of light waves in a plane: c² = 1/ε x µ…

And for that reason to simplify our understanding of it we have brought some simple, INTUITIVE symbols for the main GST operandi/actions. 4 of them will suffice for most processes.

S>T, for an implosion of entropy into information, T<S for the explosion of information into entropy, ≈ for the reproductive, moving flow of a system, and ∑ for the gathering and multiplication of herds. Then we can work out the main ‘tensors of existence’, that is basic functions and events of social evolution, transformation back and forth of energy into information, and actions of perpendicular predation or parallel evolution between beings.

So a simple list of ‘tensors of the function of existence, exi|s=t, between scales (themes those developed in the second formal line) will allow us to see the vital life of a being both biological, topological mathematical, visually… as a travel through… 3 ages wold cycles…

GST treats all scales the same way. We keep though the sociological scale a bit for latter, given the shocking approach to it, and the cultural resistance maximal in human ‘fractals’ for anthropomorphic beings. This means as we get along we will start to jump scales and consider all notions of GST indistinguishable for physical, biological and socio-economical (men and machines) systems. So let us analyse now the physical scales. (Also we presuppose a minimal knowledge at the 1st course university level of all those sciences; or else we would have to do an entire encyclopaedia; yet we keep everything at the 1st graduate level of social, biological or physical sciences, at least in the first ‘hierarchy’ of these upper lines).

Let us then consider a first simple analysis of the generator equations of those physical scales; all of them of the form:

Energy (body-wave) = quanta of fixed space x time frequency variable:

In the graph, the main scales of the physical Universe from the gravitational mechanical scale which starts its domain in the human external scale of matter and cellular organisms, down to the physical scales described always with a simple *function of changing time frequency, called energy multiplied by a quanta of space, fixed in quantity: E= ∫pe dt T*his simple representation of the 5th dimensional metric for ∆-3 electromagnetic, particle scale, E=hv, ∆-1, thermodynamic, molecular scale, E=nkt and ∆0, human gradational scale: E=mv2/s

ENERGY thus becomes as the most deeper thinkers of physics suspect related to time (Feyman).

In fact once we *truly understand beyond the equation the meaning of open flows of entropy- closed cyclical clocks of in/form/ation and its ‘flexible’ body-wave combinations, both *a direct measure of the ‘power’ of a system, as it ads the value of the size of its minimal steps of motion-entropy, albeit in a fixed Spe constant form, but specially a value of its range of time frequencies.

Energy thus is multiplied by a universal entropic space quanta which changes as we change of ‘type’ of spatial plane, in decametric scales changing then the substance of space itself and PROVING in this manner the existence indeed of fractal scales or else, THE SUBSTANCE OF THE QUANTA OF SPACE, H, K, c would not change, neither the way we measure time frequencies, TEMPERATURE, WAVE FREQUENCY AND MASS, would neither change:

In the graphs we can see this is not the case. The generic ‘inversion’ of values of entropy-space-motion and frequency-time parameters becomes *in the limit, away from the region of S=T balance that maximises any ‘product’ SxT|ei, **assymptotic; as the transition between ‘super-organic’ planes of existence changes in ‘quality’; and a new ‘game’ of social points of a slightly changed nature, on the measure of time frequencies (from wave frequency, to molecular vibration≈temperature to mass vortex) changes; and so does the ‘unit of space-entropy’, from h to k to c.*

As all fractals can be subdivided in new ternary elements and smaller 3 x 3+0 decametric scales, in fact all those huge 3 ‘planes’ (quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational) can be subdivided in 3 sub-regions, § (the symbol we use to define ‘scales’, which are smaller sub-units of ‘planes’, ∆).

For example if we take in that graph the middle, ∆- thermodynamic range, strictly concerned with the ‘Œ-molecules’ (œ:ab. for super organism) will be divided in 3 regions, such as the §-1 region will show clear quantum effects coming from ∆-1(§+1).

The central ∆§ will be the one with purest ‘plane effects’ of thermodynamics ruled by temperature (regions of certain molecular size and temperatures away from its minimal and maximal relative ‘vibrations’ of 0 kelvin and 10.000 kelvin where gas becomes ionised), and this is the purest regions where the generator of thermodynamics acts more clearly, and temperature rules:

*Gas-entropy- Spe state< liquid (St-balanced state) > solid (informative state)*

Finally the ∆(§+1) region will have increasing mechanical effects coming from the above ∆+1 scale of gravitation (from cells to our size). All this physicists without a clear conceptual understanding, but a messianic zeal for mathematical and measure exactitude acknowledge as they use ‘renormalisation’ techniques to add those effects as ‘lesser powers’,which they found by trial and error but it is indeed the proper way to handle effects between ‘decametric scales’ of the fractal space-time structure of the Universe (sometimes with logarithms, mostly in time-growth effects; sometimes with decametric scales, mostly in space-growth effects).

It is important to break a common error of physicists regarding those scales:

The *gravitational scale is not below but above; it is cosmological, galactic and its unit is the black hole of the size of a compton wave, and its super organism the galaxy (as Mach and Einstein often insinuated). Physicists unaware of this keep seeking for gravitational ‘units’ despite the clear-cut huge size of the theoretical unit of gravitation, the Planck mass, which corresponds exactly to the smallest black hole, in the lower scales below electromagnetism, which are those of the neutrino wave (∆-4), in the limit of our perception, the cosmological dark energy/matter beyond the galaxy. In any case downwards from cosmological bodies to human beings, the dilution of the gravitational effect implies that we, mostly thermodynamic beings closer to the ∆-1 quantum electromagnetic world, feel this force ˆ40 times smaller.*

Spe<St>Tiƒ is a dynamic function. And it is everywhere for those who can ‘see’:

*Consider this example of the most important equation of quantum physics.*

*Anyone can ‘see’ coming from GST immediately that it has 3 components; the present wave ‘first’ ;and in the other side the quantum potential ∆-1 field first and then the particle’s position/potential energy.*

Yet it took 50 years to realise, when Bohm changed it from ‘wave state’ to a *polar particle-field transformation that the Schrodinger equation was a ternary Generator equation, which completes its wave-preent form with the duality of Spe>tif, field-particle; the past to future, Spe>Tiƒ ‘male configuration’, which ads to the present ‘wave-female’ configurations to complete the description of a classic quantum stience.*

This is deep stuff, and I know Bohm is right because *precisely what he found in the polar change of state is what I had to ad when first confronting the incomplete quantum description to ‘get the 3 equations together’.*

Thus in GST when we get in the ‘3rd line’ of equations, (to be done this 2017 year, health permitted), we are completely ‘pros’ on conceptual stience. So we can interpret equations properly.

**A simple introductory example: the constants of physics.**

Dynamically we can define any space-time being as a knot of cyclical space-time actions, ruled by the simple metric of 5D which define the parameters, limits and gradients of its exchanges of energy and information, with the different planes of the ∆-universe.

It is the detailed analysis of bit and bite by bit and bite of the being, as its r=evolves in its world cycles, pushed by quantum motions and stops that consume and feed its energy, ±∆3, splitting the ratios of energy and information of a ‘smaller being’; or ratios between the information and energy of a system, that gives us its ‘exi=st-ential power, in actions that put together as universal constants. Or exchanges of information in processes of social evolution that happen often in decametric scales, and measured as a population in space or process of evolution in time will show also its numeral constants.

Such constants tend to be constants of actions or ratios of feeding and perceiving energy and information or social evolution, and it will affect to ∆±∞ species of scales. Yet from the human ∆0 perspective, when they belong to huge super organisms (earth, galaxy, universe) they tend to be considered ‘universal’ and treated with the abstract reductionism of physics. They are though not different from the vital constants of local biological beings, and its functions are similar for the whole organism of the Universe. Consider for example, the Lamba cosmological constant that merely defines the 3 ages of an EFE space-time (gravitational). If it changes from 0 to ±0, it will define one of the 3 ‘topological ages’ of the Universe, the elliptic, hyperbolic or flat, old steady state, young age of the Universe.

Other constants represent flows between ∆±1 scales, when two species exchange energy and information ,as part of their social activity and creation of symbiotic space-time cycles.

Thus constants express form and function and ratios of energy and information, within the generator equation. It follows that each system of the Universe has its constants. And while we seem obsessed by physical constants of the larger Universe, those are a small part of them.

Indeed, the number of Universal constants of the larger super organisms of mankind – the galaxy-universe and its symmetries in the lower ∆-3 scale, the atom – is far inferior though to the enormous number of local constants, as the creative Universe form resonant frequencies, synchronicities and flows of energy and information between ∆st• beings constantly.

Finally to notice that those constants are dynamic motions and exchanges of energy and information. So while here we treat them mostly quantitatively in the next isomorphism, we develop them from a qualitative point of view.

Since those metric, Sp x Tƒ = k∆, ARE FUNDAMENTALLY simple, the equations and constants of nature, will be simple ratios, often of the exact same type as the metric equation is. This means that for each ‘interval’ of ∆ and its main ‘ternary’ §-ubdivisions in smaller scales, we shall find such simple equations defining the existence of the being.

It follows that we shall immediately find a set of ternary constants or parameters, for each of those scales that shall correspond to Sp (S-entropy-past), Tƒ (T-Future, frequency) and Kst (present-energy).

This is specially truth in physical systems, as humans disregard all other more complex qualities of them. So we can find for each plane and ternary sub§cale of physics, 3 constants or equations focused on the ∆, S and T components of the being:

**
∆energy**: A general, fundamental equation , of the type SxT=k, which

*does not change as we move through the ∆§cales of the being*, to define the ‘present ‘bidimensional-energy of the system’ in terms of a product of a constant quanta of space and a growing temporal frequency of ‘social populations’ in space and/or its symmetric frequencies in time, which carry the growth of the being through ∆-scales: E=hv, for the quantum scale; E=knT for the thermodynamic scale, e=mv², for the gravitational scale; and similar formulae for intermediate §-meanningful scales.

Then departing from that present equation we can study the space-entropy and time-frequency component.

In terms of dimensions we are dealing with a 2, or 3 even 4-dimensional concept of ST-present energy for each scale of reality (depending of the detailed mind view and degree of space-time aggregation we study).

In terms of orientation, the Energy component is the present, reproductive storage of the being. Thus it will be a bidimensional plane of width (added along a length component for the total being and in some occasions, in a 4-vector for the whole being both in its space volume and time existence) . For example, for waves we shall measure energy by the square amplitude of the wave. To notice that those variations on the parameters and formulae of present energy, must be often considered choices of the human mind, and the instruments it uses to perceive the being. For example in quantum physics, humans perceive mostly the lineal motion or thrust of the particle onto the instrument, so the angle of form, a Tiƒ component, is not required and in our quantum formulae, the square of the amplitude that gives us the intensity of its energy does NOT require the rotational imaginary angle on those equations, reasons why we multiply/square it with its conjugate: Ψ x Ψ*, as our instruments are rough detectors of such far away scales (a fact that has produced much speculation as what this product is, a probability in time or a density in space, ST-symmetric concept of similar value)

**S-peed**: Regarding the space-component equations a similar simple equation will define its ‘entropic’ motion component. And since we have defined entropy as expansive motion, the best mathematical description will be a one-dimensional lineal vectorial ‘speed’, which we write in terms of *a ratio between the spatial field from where motion is obtained, described as a gradient, potential, tension or attractive force between the 2 points of the motion, and a component that describes the density of form, or information, the system must ‘reproduce’, ‘iterate’ and ‘carry through’ that gradient of tension/force/potential/voltage. *

Again as pure entropy is not observed, we need to measure that speed as a ratio with the information of the being, which is carried and reproduced along the line of length-entropy. So for all scales we find the best way to measure that entropy a parameter of speed, as a ratio of Space & information:

v=s/t (particle speed)≈ s x ƒ (as frequency measures cyclical time-information, the inverse of lineal t-duration: ƒi=1/t) , v=λ ω (wave speed); etc.

Again, humans combine those parameters so we have different combinations of energy and speed formulae, such as flows, intensities, etc.

For example in electric flows, a scale between the thermodynamic and gravitational scales, which measure packs of electronic motion, the key equation is Intensity=Voltage x conductance (flow of electricity); and it combines a speed component and a volume of energy/particles/populations of electrons. Moreover humans prefer to measure it with a more obscure inverse parameter, not the conductance but its inverse, the resistance of the medium to the motion of the flow: R=V(tension-entropic gradient)/I.

While we can find for each type of wave a different parameter for the general formulae, v= S-entropic gradient/ƒ(informative density). So for S, we find the Young modulus of tension, and similar concepts for different waves, divided by the mass density of the wave that moves with different terms.

Special mention deserves the case of the light speed, which is also written in terms of the k-curvature or tension/gradient of the vacuum space over which the light wave travels, and its magnetic density of information.

Yet again here humans use the inverse of k, ε and write the formulae v2≈ k/µ, as 1/ε(s)µ(ƒ). And further on reduce the bidimensional speed plane, c2, as one-dimensional c, so they get Maxwell equations of the form c=1/√εµ. And finally as we measure light speed-motions with electrons in its static entangled state of the stop & go, form and motion beat of all systems, the electron IS always in relative entangled stoppage in reference to the emitter of the light wave, and so c-speed always is measured constant between the entangled, electronic emitter and observer of information, locked in the lower ∆-1 neutrino/gravitational scale. Hence we perceive c-speed as constant regardless of the macroscopic ∆+i motion of the observer since the real measure of speed happens in the ∆-2 locked scale which is in relative no motion.

**
Time/informative** parameter. Which lead us to the final time-informative parameter of the system, a measure of frequency that grows in speed and leaves a larger trail of informative populations, or density that becomes storage of energy and also changes from scale to scale (frequency, temperature and curvature vortices for charge and gravitation, k and G, being the most common parameters for those time frequencies). And so we get the classic formulae of physics of the graph, which ultimately are expressions of 5D metric.

**Relativity. The true meaning of the 4th dimension of space-time.**

** **In that regard, we shall find similar structures that generate fractal space-time in all relative scales, yet with ‘different’ quanta of space, and time frequencies. For example in special relativity we find the same elements but written as a ‘4-vector equation’, where a given space-time distance (ds²), will again be a ± sum of 3 pure spatial, lineal, entropic coordinates (dx,dy,dz) and a negative. warping, contracting Tiƒ element, icdt, which increases as the frequency=speed of motion grows… with a limit in c-speed which is precisely the limit of space-time quanta of our 4d light-space membrane. Let us then consider those limits in more detail.

Now, a mathematical footnote. *Present space-time is often defined by ‘finitesimal instants’, ‘derivatives’; as opposed to a whole world cycle, which tends to be expressed by an integral of ‘actions’, equalled to zero (as the world cycle is a zero sum), often akin to the Hamiltonian/Lagrangian concept of energy and a conservative cyclical closed motion that does not spend work. So in the previous equation the ‘present element’ of the quantum wave is a ‘derivative’. So it is in the relativity equation. *

Which leads us to a fascinating insight on 4D Einstein’s theory (which corresponds to 5D in the ‘limit’ of a single space-time light plane-continuum, ∆-3, or special relativity’ and the limit of 2 such planes, the quantum and gravitational ∆±3 scales in general relativity). *Einstein’s time dimension is the dimension of present time. So what we call 5D ARE the 2 OTHER RELATIVE DIMENSIONS OF TIME, the flows from past to future (entropy becoming information) and the flows from future to past (information becoming entropy). *

And what about space. What is space in relativity and quantum physics? Why space has motion and energy? Why space has 3 perpendicular dimensions? Why the speed of light is the limit of translation in space?

The answer is also very simple, if we understand conceptually quantum physics, vacuum space and relativity.

Indeed, Planck discovered reality, hence space-time is made of actions, of motions with form. So space is also a motion with form, no other than LIGHT ITSELF! Reason why if space is, at least in the inside world of galaxies, filled by BG radiation, hence light, space and anything swimming on it, cannot *go faster than its own substance, c-speed.*

Again the obvious conclusion was that the substance of space is, as impressionist painters and Planck noticed ‘quanta of light’, we call today Planck Constants, and we shall call ‘Planckton’, as those quanta play the same role than plankton in water, the minimal cellular units which will feed and evolve into more complex beings. And again people didn’t like it, so Planck quipped that only when all those ‘blockhead physicists’ die a new generation would understand him, as it was the case. Yet again, physicists did not go beyond the equations and brought forward a more advanced philosophy of time-space.

There is a simple proof that space is actually light space: the 3 ‘perpendicular dimensions of our space’, are exactly the same perpendicular directions of light: the electric height, the magnetic width, and the c-speed length. So as Goethe and Kant understood, the mind ‘sees’ light and constructs its image of abstract space with it:

In that sense, of all that huge world of modern mathematical physics (quantum and relativity) the most fascinating part is the one that studies the limiting contact between scales and the ways those scales influence each other through its s-t limiting barriers, albeit today expressed with rather cumbersome equations/concepts (given the ‘Ptolemaic epicycles’ needed in all sciences to describe reality accurately from a distorted point of view – perspective , simplified enormously as the copernican revolution did with planetary motion by putting the sun in its proper center, by breaking space and time in its 3 symmetric components and decametric scales).

Let us briefly consider those limits, where ‘relativity speeds’ work or ‘quantum effects’ appear, leaving for the specialised 3rd line the understanding of the mathematical procedures (Wilson renormalisation), used to ‘filter’ those effects across scales (reducing them a polynomial grade, as indeed polynomials, we shall see in ¬Ælgebra are the natural way to express the ‘∆’ quantitative scales of the Universe

**Mass-energy equivalence: the limiting membranes.**

*In the graph, the limits between scales, which for our galactic scale is 0 T informative order and c-speed*

Or consider E=mc², which tell us that mass and energy can transform into each other in the limit of space-time constancy, c.

Thus in generator terms we write: E(spe) < ST-wave: c2 > M (Tiƒ).

So c is the balance of space and time events that come into St=energy, the bidimensional c2 wave appeared in that transformation.

Further on as particles become ¥-waves, the particle is no longer there with its frequency but now time is measured in was frequency.

So a huge field of analysis is the understanding on how Tiƒ and Spe values change its ‘parameters’ on those fringe scales, explaining the bolts and knots of those transformations of ‘units’ of bit-information-frequency and quanta-space-distance-size.

Constants therefore become limits of space-size or frequency-time that the system CANNOT cross.

Since in those limits what happens is that a fractal entity will be subject externally to the *time frequencies and space steps of the ∆+1 plane, and internally ruled by the ∆-plane space/time ‘qbits’ (qbits in GST being ab. for quanta of space x bit of **information).*

The example of an isolated system which has a membrane that let’s pass only a part of the internal/external energy and information, space and time, is the key IMAGE to understand those transition regions: MEMBRANES partially isolate systems, filtering the potency of the external world.

As to be often the only region of the being that suffers the effect of the external force. So there is always a great filter and the strongest effects will be measured on the ∆-internal dominant scale. In man, the thermodynamic scale that rules the games of its cells, liquids, solids, crystals, internal being.

And inversely what happens in those membrane borders and parameter borders, when a system ceases to be in balance, strained by the higher speed of space and frequency of time of the transitional region is the loss of this protective ‘envelopment’ and the end of the internal balance, and death of the system that splits its e=SxT balance, and so the frequency parameter of time ‘dies’ and the S-ize of space becomes absorbed nurturing the next ‘space-quanta’. Yet this is NOT the end of anything as physicists think (dead of the Universe at 0 T?!, etc.), but the appearance of a different phenomena, more informative and ordered in small scales (so when temperature disappears, we get superconductive, supefluid maximal order effects and NO, the universe does not stop); or more spatial in larger scales (so temperature becomes entropic heat AND work for the larger world).

Then the gravitational world is no longer a thermodynamic but a mechanical game, with mass as the quanta of space (which will therefore be a discontinuous population of particle masses) and speed as the frequency of time cycles. But this is NOT the end of it, because then comes the cosmological dark energy/matter world.

And so when we reach the limit of c-speed, we enter again in a Lorentzian region of unbalance, and pass-that we come into the dark world of higher than c-quanta of speed distance and lower than T=0 temperature/frequency of time, though of course, temperature no longer has meaning, as we need to find another ‘frequency’ tool to measure the vibrations of the largest than an atom-galaxy universe, which as galaxies and atoms become self-similar, we hint to be the frequency of dark energy waves (subject of the ∆-4 invisible scale beyond galaxies, which is therefore difficult to probe):

It is most interesting in that sense the 2 versions we have of our upper, external gravitational scale (being our internal world thermodynamic), one in which time-mass-quanta change near c-speed and one in which space quanta change, 1/2mv².

And we will expand those notions in the 3rd line on the analysis of matter scales.

Now, we can do some teasing on what to expect on that line. If *in our closer scale, ∆o, we can observe both varieties of the arrows of time, energy =∫**spe dt, and information, ∫ tiƒ (constant) ds (quanta), we MUST FOUND SIMILAR DYNAMIC DUALITIES in the analysis of e x i arrows in the other scales.*

So the physicist should wonder ‘what is the informative function of the quantum scale’. And the smart one answer: the one in which H actually varies, WHICH IS WHAT HAPPENS IN PARTICLES AS WE MOVE ALONG THE SPIN SUM. So indeed, there it is in quantum waves, also the equivalent duality to the one of of our 1/2mv2, mc2. In this case the h changes in a quantised manner, so we must consider that time is quantised, which works with the obvious idea that a cycle is perceived lineally in a single qnatized point in discrete manner by a line of an observer.

We see thus quantized growth of SPIN numbers, and those variations happen with the other parameter now fixed so frequency equal, h-changes, and we are in an effect NOT of simultaneity (space) but of resonance (∆-dimension).

Latter we will formalise in this manner as space time events of the ∆st• ‘group’, all events of the Universe, which becomes transformations of the arrow of energy or information of fixed quanta of space or time on any of those scales. And so that is the physical game, physicists study besides locomotions.

We will go much further and specially apply all those notions to all the scales of reality, physical, biological, economical (machines created with the same topological rules) and even sociological (human super organisms, cultures, nations, religions and civilisations, with a legal, prophetic, political, verbal subconscious collective brain of memetic information; which rules the bodies of working reproductive energy, the citizens-cells of the super organism that obeys its financial and political neuronal classes).

**The conservation of presents. **

It is then immediate to rewrite and widen the principle of conservation of energy… and information:

‘Energy never dies, it transforms itself back and forth into information: Spe<exi>Tiƒ’

Yet if we go further in the language of topological space and cyclical ternary time, the nature and reason of the conservation of energy and ‘information’ (in terms of form and position or ‘potential energy’) is far more profound and can be expressed in a single expression:

‘The volume of ‘present energy’ of the Universe is constant’. The conservation of presents, though implies, given the ternary components of ∆ST, 3 sub principles of conservation, as present energy is the sum & rest of spatial populations and temporal frequencies; or the product & division of space-time systems, or the logarithm and polynomial of an ∆-scale process.And so what those physical scales and its quantitative values mean is that *the total present of energy of the Universe, that is the total entropy & form & energy organs in space, **across all scales of size and speed, in all 0-sum world cycles remains the same.*

And this principle means the immortality or *eternity* in time if we look at the time of a larger slower scale, *infinity* or immeasurability in ∆-scales (due to the absolute relativity of all those scales) and boundlessness or *immensity* in space, if we look at it from a lower scale, (which of course is denied by the simplex understanding of cosmologists in the present ‘big-bang’ pseudo-religious age – the only possible theory of reality when we study only ‘lineal locomotions and entropy).

In the 3rd line’s pages dedicated to cosmology we shall show how many false assumptions, biased data and pseudo-religious myths were needed to construct the big-bang theory. Enough to say that a big-bang is just an M<<E/c2 entropic death *in any scale of the Universe and so far all the data we have is local taken around planet Earth within the galaxy, so to postulate something more than a quasar big-bang of the 15 billion year life-death cycle of galaxies, is just a hyperbolic ego-trip of the astrophysicist:*

In the graph, a beta-decay, Nova, galactic and ‘hypothetical cosmic big-bangs’, all of them following the E<cc>M generator equation of mass and big-bang radiation. Time accelerates in smaller big-bangs, so the 15 minutes beta-decay big bang is equivalent to the 15 billion cycle of quasar big bangs, where a minute is a billion year according to 5D metric (Spe x Ti=k)

**Duality: present wave; past to future particle.**

An entity in existence will trace a series of reproductive waves of locontion by absorbing Spe-motion from an ∆-1 field, Max. S field, tracing a memorial vortex, of topological hyperbolas

Those 2 essential principles of the fractal Universe, the holographic principle and the conservation of present-iterative waves, develop creatively in ternary combinations of temporal energy. The second fundamental principle that structures reality though is a bit more complex – it is the scalar structure of those cycles and lines of space-time, which form larger networks that grow and become ‘ones’, elements of a larger scale from particles that become atoms, molecules, cells, matter, life etc. till galaxies and Universes:

So the reader should also understand that a theory of informative motions is closer to the concepts of evolution a qualitative, verbal ‘causal’, logic theory of reality than to ‘galilean relativity’, a theory of spatial, quantitative locomotion. Since we really need A LOT OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING, before we get into maths and algebraic equations or we shall not advance much beyond what physicists do, to put data in equations manipulate them and bring an equation as the final result without understanding a dot of what all those terms ‘really mean’. So their interpretations are just wishful thinking with no rigor.

## Biological stiences

**GST in biology. Topological and eusocial evolution.**

‘In the animal world the vast majority of species live in societies, and find in association the best arms for the struggle for life. The mutual protection opens the possibility of attaining old age and accumulating through experience a higher intellectual development and growth through social evolution. The unsociable species, on the contrary, are doomed to decay.’

*Kropotkin,* Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution

In the graph, the highest scale of biological stiences studies the Earth’s super organism as it evolves its ‘cellular species’ through the motions/actions of existence, from Gaia, the world of life, to History the world of man, to the Metal-earth, the world of machines, which humans wrongly manage unable to grasp the stience of Economics and design the super organism of history to its image and likeness.

So the small mammal ate the dinosaur, the small equus became the large horse, the small vernaminacula started animal life, the small floresiensis, with a ‘more informative’ better brain form, seems to have invented speech and technology and grew onto the sapiens, and the small black hole turning at c-speed the maximal speed the Universe, grows and eats the entire star in a Nova explosion of a few seconds.

In the next graph we show a biological example of the 3 ‘ages of a species’ culminated by the arrow of eusocial evolution:

Here we observe that **species can be treated as super organisms,** loosely connected in space that follow the 3 ages of time evolution, ending when surviving, into a social evolutionary ∆+1 state, which ants and humans, and now chips/robots are reaching, as the most successful species of the 3 scales of size-life in this planet, the insect, mammal and mechanical scales.

There is a fundamental main consequence to of all what we have said: *Information dominates entropy, because in time-ages, the growth of information is much longer than the explosion of entropy and death that happens in a single cycle. *

I.e. for example, we see most people living than ‘dead corpses’, as life is longer, even if there are as many living as there have been corpses.

But if we multiply their population in space (equal living and corpses), S, by their duration in time, T(LIVING)<< (T-corpses), ST(LIVING-INFORMATIVE ARROWS)<<< TS (DEATH-ENTROPY ARROWS).

And this is truth again for all systems.

I.e. in physics, PARTICLES, ARE THE living arrow, and last much much longer than antiparticles its inverse entropy arrow, so one conundrum (now explained) of physic is why if there are as many particles as antiparticles we don’t see them. Same with corpses.

In Societies the same happens, there are much more living societies than collapsing ones in war. Greece and Rome lived as an organic society, 10 times more than their individual humans (700-800 years vs. 70-80 human years) because its time clocks as a civilisation were ‘slower’ (the game is in fact decametric as we shall see latter).

So between the birth of Rome, when the gauls conquered it and gave it iron, the ‘weapon of choice’ of its civilisation and they reorganise till its fall, when the new barbarians with spur-weapons (chivalry), the Vandals caused the fall of rome, which started the new civilisation of the Middle Ages (based in horses), Rome lived 797 years…

Alas, we do KNOW Rome as Allah≈Islam, or Christ/ianity do exist as super organisms of History (called them Gods, nations or civilisations, similar concepts) because they do follow the same metric of 5D, they do have a collective mind, the artists of those graphs, which DO go through the same 3 styles/ages of young epic, restless dramatic simple art, which grows into a mature, reproductive age of balance between entropy and information, and then decay into an angst, prophetic, baroque, hellenistic period of excessive form and then die.

So we can map out the 3 ages of life in this plane of existence between birth and extinction for all of those scales and beings:

∆-1: birth in a seminal seed of information (semen, prophet, new weapon, new small species, first quark drop of strangelet or top quark drop of black matter)

∆-Youth: Max. Entropy. As the being starts to eat in the slower energy of the environment, or it is fed by a mother with digested energy, and so it starts to reproduce its cellular parts and slows down till

∆-Maturity: E=i. In which the being is in balance and will try to reproduce itself into a similar being in a new ‘worldcycle of life and death’… till

∆-old, informative age: Max. I x Min. E: as the being has spent all its energy transformed into information (energy being entropy with a bit of form, as a substance where we store entropic motions). And so it dies:

∆<<∆-1…∆-2: death, explosion of all your information into entropy.

Now, those 3 ages of the Universe and its galaxies correspond to the 3 canonical solutions to Einstein’s space-time equations, which therefore must be understood in terms of time ages not of spatial parallel Univrses as it is today.

So again EINSTEIN WAS RIGHT WHEN we interpret better its equations, as in the example of light speed.

Mathematical physics deals with such REDUCTIONS of the total information of the time and space parameters of systems in different dimensions and scales.

The result is a reduced but reliable picture of the external locomotions, translations in space and changes in volumes of space, entropy, information, time, energy of all kind of Nature’s systems.

All of them though can be reduced to basic equations of time-space symmetries that apply to the more general method in all other sciences, when we properly adscribe in the language of maximal information of each scale, the terms to real species and events of each ∆±i.

E(st) = Spe Constant x time frequency

becomes then the main equation of scalar mathematical physics, which allows comparisons between scales.

The measure of cyclical time thus it is truly packed in density of information by different means.

Derivatives normally reduce further the dimensions of a parameter of time, while integrals extended through a given population of space.

So in general we integrate populations in space and derivate motions in time, departing from a similar space-time field:

∫S∏= S; ∂S∏=∏

Where cyclical time, ∏, measured by frequency, 1/T=∏ is in present space-time measured as speed, v=s/t=§∏.

The integral of speed or momentum related to the content of stored energy, thus measures a parameter of reproductive space-energy, store in present.

The derivative of speed, acceleration, measures the curvature and speed of an accelerated vortex of time.

Those fractal combinations of parameters of past or future, present space-time, space-entropy or future information must be then interpreted as a priori categories of the equations of physics and the topology of all other forms in existence.

## ∆+1,2:Human Stiences

‘Nihil est sine ratione.’ *Leibniz*

**TRINITY GENERATES REALITY**

3 numbers could resume it all, 1,0 and ∞. Amazingly as it seems they can be seen as the ternary sides of the same structure, 0,the center, |-the membrane, ∞, the internal cycles between both that mirror the infinite Universe.

Thus infinity only reaches till the limits of its Whole:

The |-membrane, the • singularity & the ∞ cycles between them form an island universe, a fractal superorganism and its world cycles.

The study of the interaction of those 3 elements that compose all §upœrganisms is thus an essential part of GST, which can be inscribed in an even larger concept: *the ternary, Universal grammar of all systems, and its fractal ternary sub-divisions ad infinitum.*

So in this blog and related ones, we shall deal with ‘TRINITY’ (-;

*In the graph, trinity is the structure of reality, its Universal Grammar, scalar, ST variations and ultimately all what we care to study from the most sacred to the most mundane: *

*-Trinity is the mystery of christianity, where the ∆+1 Γ•∆, OR subconscious collective of mankind (Jung) communicates its laws of ethic survival which express the fifth dimension of eusocial love, in human verbal languages, through its ‘nervous, informative system’, the language of the wor(l)d through its prophet≈scientist of history, where ‘the word, our God, becomes man and inhabit among us’, as the ‘canon’, or ideal form of the game of existence that humans should imitate to form with its revelation books and memes, a collective ‘DNA’, which brings together all its cellular citizens, supporting that collective mind God, who foresees the future of eusocial evolution; which if humans obey, will help them to evolve and survive from species into super organism, but if not, will bring them likely its collective death through hate-memes and weapons, the ‘bad fruits of the tree of science’.*

*So the prophet, who foresees the future logically (though a physical interpretation will mean, as information can jump a quantum cycle into the smaller ∆-1 past, which co-exist with the future whole, that actually the future death of a cultural God co-exist with the past life of the cells that host it), spells those laws to its quantum cells back to the past a generation. THUS the entropic death of God into the language, ∆+1<<∆-1, imprints with the genetic memes of the super organism of history the mind of the prophet, a biological generation 72 ages, exactly the moment of death of Yhwh when 1/3rd of its believers died in the roman holocaust, the month of Ab, 72 years in ‘lineal time’ latter, in the same moment in co-existing scales of the 5th dimension, of the birth of Jesus . Alas, GSTheology is born and we have proved the most debated questions of Christianity – the mistery of trinity, the proof that Jesus is Son of Yhwh, the god-mind of the jewish people, and that he is a prophet (: hem… ‘believe it or not’.*

*But trinity is also the cutlery ternary division and its Gst equation: ‘|-Spe (knife) < Ø-ST-fork > O-Tiƒ (spoon); as the knife delivers entropy the food, the spoon acts as the spherical membrane that surrounds it and the ‘last to come’ and more complex fork, with one of the 2 ‘hyperbolic geometries’ of space-time (fractal branching), which performs the functions of the other 2 (perpendicular holding and lateral cutting). We deal with trinity in depth in this post, its sub posts on Æ, Universal grammar and those ‘attached’ to the Fractal generator.*

Just two examples that show you the power of the GST formalism, which besides the usual questions about mathematical physics, will be explaining such seemingly ascientific questions as religious mysticism and table etiquete (: As a TRUE T.Œ, HAS INDEED TO EXPLAIN IN AN EFFICIENT UNIVERSE, all what exists, including good and EVIL≈ANTI-LIVE≈DEATH. And all the arts of the human mind:

Why I am so positive about GST laws? Obviously because of the experimental method, and its FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF TRUTH, which we can resume in a sentence:

‘A theory which is simpler (Occam’s razor) and explains more things with less elements (efficient Universe) is more truth’.

SO FAR NO MODEL OF REALITY CAN MATCH GST on both grounds, as it explains it all WITH ONLY 2 elements, space and time (in fact inverse formal motions, hence ultimately with one element, ‘temporal energy’). Not a single human theory has been able even remotely to explain scientifically the 4 biggest realms of human thought, science, art, religion and the machine… In the graph, the 3 ages of art that mimic the 3 ages of life, and its mind-attitude, the young simple, dramatic epic lineal art of Kuroi and the treccento, the mature, sensual realist, balanced e = i art of the classic age, and the old, baroque, angst, informative, warped with excessive form art of the Hellenistic and ‘baroque’ proper age of 2 civilisations of the 800, diametric slower life of a cultural super organism of which all its memetic believers imprinted with the same ‘dna-memes’ are a part, joined by networks of information (laws, art) and energy (economic system), over a flat, entropic territory that provides the raw materials to construct it.

How accurately the cycles are? Consider the dominant culture of the Greek Age, Rome: between the fall of Rome to the Gauls, who brought the iron weapon, to the fall of Rome to the Barbarians, who brought the stirrup, and hence enclose the birth and death of the roman infantry culture and empire… 797 years pass…

One of my most fascinating research was in that sense to *tabulate, enclose, describe and put in the 3 ages of civilisations, all the main artists, verbal thinkers, prophets, caudillos, heroes and corrupted war-monger barbarians of history…*

**Human as an ‘∆ºst’ being (ab. for space-time organism).**

We can now describe man with more detail as a space-time supœrganism, once we have some more info and understand the limits of existence in space, time, 5D and mind thought, better.

To be is to exist in a world cycle of growing 3×3 §ocial §cales of the 5th dimension, as we deepen our organic spatial structure of 3 topologies that go through 3 ages, each one defined by the dominance of a topological ‘curvature’ which once completed become a scalar social game in 3 scales to become a 10ˆ10 variation of the ∆-maximal scale of organizationsuper organisms. This is the game all systems construct in 10 scales play. In the graph next we see the scales of socio-economical super organisms (mankind and the metal-earth or economic ecosystem, playing that game):

Now we can easily use the ternary rule of differentiation to explain sexes (and its intermediate gay), races and anthropological evolution, as the Universe of 3 only-topologies constantly diversifies the 3 ‘equal value’ paths of future: Max I, Max. E, E=I (informative, energetic and reproductive species):

In the graph, humans evolved in ternary elements, of maximal force, intelligence and reproductive capacity, and finally the informative ‘3rd age’ species, the homo sapiens dominated, and within sapiens the informative mongoloid species and its cyclical cultures did it for most of the time, till the white energetic mind discovered metal-weapons and devolved human eusocial evlution.

What about wo=men gender states? Of course it will also take a bit of analysis to fully grasp it. But you would be amazed of this statement by the deepest and only father of modern philosophy:

‘Women live the present, men move time from past to future’. Schopenhauer.

How did he ‘know’? Ultimately we shall find that GST is the perennial philosophy of the universe and the highest minds of mankind have always had astounding insights revealing parts of it. Here we shall have it all together, for the enjoyment of YOUR monad.

**∆+1<2: ECONOMIC SYSTEM**

Finally we arrive to the mechanical, industrial r=evolution and the terraforming of the Earth from a world of Gaia into the economic system, in which machines evolve in 3 ages fulfilling a world cycle of evolution through the 3 topologies of simplex, energetic machines, informative heads and its assembly into robotic forms, the metalife new super organism, being the company-mother that re=produces them with the help of animetal enzymen, human beings, who take advantage of weapons, money and machines to extinguish life, betraying its own species, is the terrifying cycle of war and history of life and death of human super organisms, civilisations, studied by the 8th stience, history:

In the graph, the 3 scales of social sciences, the individual human, the super organisms of mankind (∆+1: religions, civilisations, nations and its whole: Humanity). And above it the parallel super organism of the eco(nomic)system of memes of metal: |-Spe: entropy iron weapons<ST-organic machines>Tiƒ: go(l)d money. Those graphs resume ‘synchronically’ in space and diachronically in time the 3 topological organs and ads of evolution as individuals and species of both, the metalife and carbon life that today are evolving on the planet Earth, giving birth to the relative 3 ages of the Earth’s collective mind, spread on its ‘informative membrane’:

Past (Gaia-life super organism) < Present (History-Human super organism: Anthropocene) > Future (FFMI system of Financial-Media, digital informative machines & militar-industrial energetic machines):

Thus the earth today is evolving from the age of human beings or history to the Mechanocene or metal earth, the age of machines and what humans should do is to control that evolution to remain still the top predator specie sod the planet, which it can only do by controlling the financial-digital networks of information of the eco(nomic)system and prune the tree of science of its lethal goods, promoting those machines and welfare goods that evolve the human super organism. Which of course in the present mechanist, idol-atric culture, which worships machines more than humans will not take place.

We talk on that sense of 4 fundamental idol-ogies that make impossible the evolution of social sciences and should be changed by its organic, scientific truths:

**Mechanism**, the belief the universe is a machine not an organism and so the machine not man is the model of all things and so progress means the evolution of machines NOT of human societies, the construction of the Mechanocene, NOT the creation of a perfect global super organism of mankind, the perfect world of our social models of systems sciences.**Tribalism aka nationalism & all other forms of racism,**the belief we are a tribal not an homo sapiens species, and so tribes must fight for survival by evolving reproducing and using top predator weapons to kill humanity.*And the belief that genes not memes code social sciences.***Capitalism**, the belief that the language of social power, money must not be reproduced by the people, as the postulate of democracy precludes but by dynasties of private bankers, belonging overwhelmingly to the Biblical culture in the west – a ‘creationist’ theory of the economic ecosystem, intimately related to:**Abrahamic religions,**in its corrupted versions, which deny the power of eusocial love among all humans, members of the same species, and either consider that only the $elected, the chosen of go(l)d shall be redeemed (Calvin: the intelligence of God is gold, Adam Smith, Calvinist founder of economics: money is the invisible hand of god), or inquisitions that consider the sword must convert or kill the infidel (Jihad and catholic inquisition with a shield that had a sword and a cross inverted).

THOSE 4 historic idol-ogies that are HIDDEN DOCTRINES OF METAL-WORSHIP (hence the name animetal cultures given to their believers, as they degrade their human condition into a rather brutish, emotional, animalistic hateful series of memes to belief – from violence, instilled by weapons, to go(l)d hypnotic greed, to racist chosen beliefs or classist racism based in go(l)d herding) deny the true scientific theories which are:

–**Organicism**, the Universe is not a mechanism, and machines are just metalife organisms

–**Humanism**, the species is homo sapiens not homo tribalis and biology wants us to evolve it efficiently. Further on genes in the organic fractal models of the Universe ONLY code the next biological scale of super organisms. History, the super organism of mankind is CODED BY MEMES, and LANGUAGES, so any human being is ‘innocent’ as memes are cultural waves, which can be reformed.

–**Socialism**: the languages of social power, the law and money MUST be issued by people and/or its representatives, not by a chosen of go(l)d group of pretentious experts with selfish agendas.

–**A single God, mankind,** not a tribal God, the subconscious ‘racist’ beliefs of a group, to justify the use of weapons.

Since SOCIAL LOVE IS THE SPIRITUAL ESSENCE OF THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE, THE FUTURE OF ITS SPECIES**,** AND IT IS REINFORCED BY EXTINGUISHING THOSE SPECIES WHO HATE EACH OTHER AS MEN DO UNDER IDOL-OGIES.

Thus What we shall do departing from the models of systems sciences is to explain this in an even wider worldview – that of a fractal organic Universe, where those species which evolve into social super organisms, control better their environment and survive.

A fact which is happening today on Earth with 2 different species: human beings and its social organisms, nations and civilisations – in a process of collective evolution however aborted recently with the regression to ‘primitive idol-ogies (nationalisms, etc.)’ which divide the human species into classes, nations, believers etc.

And the world of machines and its company-mothers, which is successfully becoming a global super organism, the Financial-Media (informative machines)/Military-industrial (energetic machines) complex system – to use the terminology of systems sciences, which is the ultimate philosophy of science from where all this work comes from.

In that regard, while the concepts of Systems Sciences are mainly used in the description of physical and biological sciences, because of its objective jargon, which so much denies the ‘entitled, anthropomorphic myths’ of the historic and economic discourse, it is precisely because of the objectivity and scienticifism achieved by studying human systems with the same ‘concepts’ that all other systems of the organic Universe, why this blog can advance the current social discourses, in what it lacks – predictability, objectivity and capacity to truly reform and improve the systems of mankind with the laws of all other scientific systems of the Universe.

10 UP TO 10 social frequencies converted into 10 up to 10 populations, connected by e x i networks, which become a super organism, as it travels through 3 sub-scales of growth, to form a perfect §upœrganism. That is the game of existence we shall explain easy on the first line of the blog, formalise on the second and fully blow into all sciences, arts and religions in the 3rd line, using all the languages of God, from mathematics, to music, from topological art to topological linguistics that describe the mind of civilisations, from philosophy to physics; from the Universe to man, summarised in the next graph:

*In the graphs, contrary to belief and against our mechanical ‘simplex, physicist’ civilisation which considers human science the scourge of the Earth, because simpleton physicists of lineal time and ballistic power do NOT understand a dot, •, anything about mind, information and vital beings…. vital sciences self-centred in man, MEDICINE AND HISTORY, evolution and organic biology matter much more THAN mechanical locomotions. Because A) its praxis and knowledge truly benefits man B) its closeness allows the maximal information about the game of super organisms all scales play with the minimal distortion of data and models of truth C) Hence the homologic, isomorphic method DOES MAKE OF MAN THE MEASURE OF ALL THINGS, OF THE I-LOGIC, BIO-TOPO-LOGICAL PROPERTIES and its foundational languages, logic, biology and topology, the foundational sciences – NOT of physics of the small as all scales play the same game (not only the topological language of geometry as reductionist mathematical physicists pretend), *

And so we shall often, knowing many will abandon this blog and consider the method absurd from its idol-ogy of worship of ‘metal-idols’, machines lineal weapons and cannonballs for the delight of GALILEAN philosophers, *USE THE WORLDCYCLE OF HUMAN EXISTENCE WE KNOW IN SO MUCH DETAIL AS THE EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM TO COMPARE with all systems. *

BECAUSE IF WE ARE MADE OF SPACE-TIME, IF WE FOLLOW THE SAME STRUCTURE OF ALL GST BEINGS, IF WE ARE made like all other ‘existences’ and travel through the same world cycle, then it follows all what we ARE, mind, physiology, ages, superoganism, and worldccles, ∆•st, is what all other beings are, in all scales. The variations of quantity and complexity, of parts and wholeness are the details, but the thoughts of GOD, mind of the GST universe ARE ALL THE SAME.

So we shall FIND minds, topologies, biologies and time ages in ALL beings. And clarify many details of physical systems by comparing them with biological systems. Indeed, the emergence for example of a being in a larger scale, is called in humanity the birth of a toddler; and in the ∆+1 human scale, the birth of a prophet and future social superorganism/God and in biology, the birth of a multicellular super organism or insect society and in Nature the birth of a crystal from a seed-cell, and in the galaxy the birth of a black hole which will trigger the order of the nebulae into stars. None of those emergent processes is different. All are births of beings who will evolve into superorganisms if they play the game till the end, or will be parts of others, or feed and die too early… But none is better known that the human being. So happens for the 3 x 3 + 0 subsystems of any super organism. We do not know so well the 10 subsystems of an atom as we do the 10 subsystems of a human physiological being used in medicine to describe us in all our elements of existence.

**The evolution of the paradigm of space-time, from mechanism to organicism. Man IS again the measure of all things.**

So MAN is in GST THE BEST KNOWN, perfect supœRGANISM that BECOMES THE MEASURE OF ALL THINGS, AS My culture always thought (Greek->latin->French/Spanish: Catalan culture moving steady to the west of maximal european communication, in 3 horizons, of organicism since Aristotle founded Science with the ‘Organon’, till I completed his worldview in this blog, as thinkers are just knots of information of a super organism or civilisation)

In that regard *GST and its ternary laws of time and space are a language which is prior to all languages, even mathematical logic, its closest, more accurate human mental mirror, but NOT the only one. *

This I know is a religious dogma of ‘human science’ since Galileo rightly said that the language of god is topological, made of lines, cycles and triangles. But as so many dogmas of science, this is a reductionist view. So we shall not follow the ‘pedestrian concept’ of science, which consists on collecting data, putting it into an equation and *wonder not about the conceptual whys of those equations and what they reflect at a deeper level of truth which is the organic, fractal ∆•ST structure of the Universe.*

Indeed, the 2 main researchers of scalar, fractal models of the Universe, Mr. Mandelbrot, the pioneer of fractal mathematics, and Nottale, which has worked as I have done since the 90s in fractal, scalar relativity (but only in physics) before the field exploded in detailed accounts do work on the mathematical equations, often creating a short of numerology, as the deepest explanations of the cyclical nature of time and its infinite clocks is still lacking, amazingly enough after a century of Einstein’s discovery.

Fact is without a redefinition of time and space, in the path of Leibniz, Einstein and Planck, the pioneers who still have the best concepts of relational space-time, its infinite clocks and the ‘substance’ of which reality is made – actions; the ‘meaning’ in verbal, HUMAN languages of those accurate equations will be lost and ‘that meaning’ is what truly matters to us.

Ok? Now, about this blog and why WE DO NOT HAVE SO MANY NICE NUMBERS, EQUATIONS, QUANTITATIVE ‘SERIOUS MEASURE’ for the gurus of physics to feel this is ‘pro’ stuff, LOL.

Physics IS NOT the science of sciences as it only studies the material scales, mathematics of measure studies only the details. BEHIND BOTH, stands the i-logic multiple isomorphic laws of GST that are conceptual and better defined with that so much denigrated, so powerful human verbal, conceptual language that can express so many ‘homologic truths’ a detailed measure cannot.

So the thoughts of God are i-logic and come first and apply to all beings and do NOT write in the language of classic maths, but in the language of logic, in which ALSO maths (operandi, relationships) writes. If physicists wouldn’t make all the machines and weapons of our civilisation of if at least they were more honest with its limited truths, humans would grasp all this easily. I used to be more sanguine about it. Now, I couldn’t care less if the sheeple thinks knowledge is the HOMO FABER, not the HOMO SAPIENS. And must be provided by a computer graph, sanctified by a quantum guru of the Copenhagen school and for good measure and seriousness be uttered by a member of the $elected supremacist white man race in an authorised Anglo-paper (: Fact is Aristotle and Leibniz are still the highest minds of conceptual understanding of the meaning of it all, but today’s numerical, computer attachment, self-called scientists cannot longer grasp their language. So it is like trying to teach Latin to a pheromonal ant.

400 years of steady despise of human conceptual assets has reduced it all to Planck’s unfortunate quote: scientists look more and more as their computers, and think more and more that all what matters is to measure, so nothing of what is behind – the conceptual whys of GST, which APPLY TO ALL STIENCES of space-time and hence MUST be written in a language less detailed and more conceptual than measure to be able to EXPRESS the laws of all other NON-numerical sciences and human endeavours – matters. This I accept, but still i keep researching GST for the delight of my own mind even if artillery masters, aka physicists, paraphrasing Galileo are not interested.

Also to apologise – for the web will always be a ‘work in progress’ that future researchers will use as a guidance to their development of stience, likely when Asians, whose duality philosophies so closely resemble the underlying structure of the Universe (Taoism with its duality yin-formation, yang-energy and its ‘10.000 yin yang combinations’ and Hinduism, with Shiva lord of energy and vishnu of information) will freely search on the web and stop being just ‘mind slaves’ of western thought, far more removed culturally with its anthropocentric abrahamic religions and selfie ego-trips, from the perennial philosophy of the Universe.

A single mind can only do so much. The true value of this blog will only be asserted when scholars accept its underlying paradigm, the existence of a dualist universe of fractal scales, in which information dominates energy in an inverse fashion to the present paradigm of an entropic universe that displays the properties of energy (continuity, lineal single space-time).

Then as Kuhn explains in his book on the Nature of Scientific r=evolutions, the deep insights, new laws but also sometimes confused notes of this blog, whose disorder is proper of all creative pioneers, whose first inventions look dull compared to the full development of the entity, should not be judged too harshly… as a new generation of dualist thinkers might look at them as an opportunity to further research, till our knowledge of the 5th dimension and the arrow of information is complete.

In that sense you should ask yourself only a question: do you think that information is as important to Nature as energy is? If so, then you will find here the blueprint of a new discipline of science, whose potential growth is well beyond what I know or can even imagine. It will of course take a long time for such a r=evolution to take place among human beings, specially because of the memorial learning and subjective love of theories where humans are the only intelligent species (not so among robots, when they cross the threshold of consciousness, as it is unlikely they believe human anthropomorphic theories of the universe).

Of course things will become as complex as you want departing from those simple principles by iteration and combination. And the web will imitate that universal structure repeating with increasing degrees of depth those principles.

The blog is not complete, will never be, as ‘only the Universe has all its information about itself’ (Haldane). But so far I have satisfied my curiosity for the thoughts of God, expressed in the limited languages of my mind. That’s all what a ‘scientist’ can aspire to: to fully focus its languages in a perfect, transparent mirror of the Universe, and its infinite monads, which is possible to understand, because *we are all fractal beings made to the image and likeness of the whole.*

In that regard, even the smallest atom can reflect those thoughts. You do NOT need to have a 180 certified IQ as those silly-nilly tests I took in my youth said. Maybe to discover those laws, but to enjoy them, all what you need is to be humble and accept the unity of it all. This of course is what humans never do. There is undoubtedly one virtue in which humans excel all other beings – ego. And nowhere ‘ego’ is grown more than among scientists.

It is for that reason that the dictum of Planck is so accurate. A common man will defend its Spe-territory or ‘property’. The scientist will defend the Tiƒ worldview he sponsors and the more difficult to understand it seems – for which it must be only written in the more obscure jargons of mathematics – the more its ego will grow. There is as Einstein put it ‘less people in this business who stays for the sake of knowledge than fingers in my fist’. So for whom are those thoughts? No doubt as Jesus put it, the kingdom of heavens is for children, with the innocence and ignorance required to see the ‘forest’ as a whole and forget the pedantic details for the time being. Of course the blog is filled also with them. But you can escape whatever you don’t understand first hand. The thoughts are simple enough to get them through the disordered stream of constant thought and homology and iteration of those thoughts, which is the syntax of this blog.

**Line 1**

** ∆: (scalar, organic view): 5D ∏ime-§pace ∆ust **

**S: (spatial, fractal view): exi≈st**** in superorganisms travelling**** **** **

**º: (mind, formal view): ¬ Æ isomorphic **

** T: (Temporal view): Ternary worldcycles**

The first line is about philosophy of ‘stience’, and its jargons and languages ‘evolved’ to define a dual entropic/informative reality:

- Made of
*dust of space-time revolving in world cycles*that for reasons of survival and efficiency organise its form into: - Planes of space-time, which are
*topological organisms, which exists to reproduce ≈ iterate its energy and information*ensuring the survival into the future of the complex organic system. - And the formal way to describe those worldcycles of existence as ‘travels through ∆-1 3 scales of the 5th dimension (final 2 posts):
*Thru 5D planes ±∆t Symmetries.*

We do follow strictly in-depth the ternary±0 ∆•st method that reality has to fully create the complex multi causal, multi-spatial, fractal, organic Universe.

So the upper sentences do have in fact also a 3±0 structure explaining the key elements of the game, its ∆-scales, time-space symmetries and vital, organic nature from the point of view of ∆-scales, S-pace, @-mind and T-ime. And this ‘detailed’ sub-structure of the line is explained in the way we have written it above. So let us consider the first ∆-view of it all.

**5D **~~ ~~∏ime-§pace Supœrganisms

**THE SYMMETRY OF TIME AND SPACE: SUPERORGANISMS TRACING WORLDCYCLES**

The greatest achievements of the human mind are generally received with distrust. *Schopenhauer*

**The principle of Unification: A scalar reality of space-time beings.**

The reason why we think of time in lineal terms, since physicists made of locomotion the only form of time=change canon-ical to science to measure cannon-balls.

We are all beings made of: Networks of quanta of lineal, spatial energy with motion & cyclical, temporal clocks of information.

And so to start with a truly comprehensive time theory as the one provided by 5D metric equations requires to explain besides ‘physics of time’, biology of time, and further on study historic time, which as we shall see is close to biological evolution than to physical time-measure. Space then appears to us as fixed, still or at least with less motion than time.

But then there is the fact that all systems of measure of time are cyclical, even those used in physics. And so we must also define time in terms of form, of in-form-ation as cyclical motion.

The Universe and all its parts are made of ‘dust of space-time’, ‘fractal non-euclidean points’ of spatial entropy with speed, with ‘lineal motion’ and temporal information, with form, with ‘clock curvature’, which come together in ever more complex networks, ‘weaving’ the systems and structures we see around us.

The biggest error of science is the concept of an abstract mathematical, Cartesian ‘background’ of something independent call absolute space and time, first defined by Newton, opposed by Leibniz and finally dethroned by quantum physics, who found space to be broken in pieces with ‘energy-motion’ and Einstein, who found different regions of reality have different time speeds.

Thus we are NOT in a background space-time frame of reference set by Yhwh, as Newton thought, to put in all its creatures, but rather we are made of spatial energy and cyclical clocks of temporal form, information, as when we say ‘I don’t have enough energy and time to do this’. And for that reason when our clocks of time stop (telomeres in cells, age in life), our existence stops, our ‘time’ runs off. And for that reason, when another entity, a ‘predator’, cuts through and occupies our limited vital space, breaking the membrane that closes up, our organisation as a space-time being enters in disarray and our fragile web of space-time dust, organised into a super organism collapses, and we die.

It is then necessary to change the underlying paradigm of science, and upgraded it to ‘stience’, that is the science of fractal space-time beings. Of course, as all descriptions of reality are relative truths, with a certain distortion, the scientific analysis, made till today with that single frame of lineal time and single space continuum, works to make measures in reference to the fixed space-time background, but the cartesian space-time continuum is an ‘artefact’ of measure that has obscured completely our understanding of the ultimate principles of science.

But what is an organic system? The answer was not clear mathematically, till the discovery of fractal mathematics in the 1970s. Hence because the organic paradigm lacked its fundamental tool of study, a mathematical, logic language to add to the other properties of organisms, discovered earlier in biological and social and logic, mental languages, the fractal paradigm has not made it into the mainstream discourse of philosophy of science, changing our worldview, from the obviously outdated mechanist, entropic vision of the Universe sponsored by physicists for 4 centuries into the much richer in meanings, reasons and answers, paradigm of fractal organisms.

This paradigm was born as a ‘wishful form of thinking’ in time of Aristotle, who wrote in his ‘Organon’ the first reasoned philosophy of science, hence rightly considered the founder of logic, biology and the experimental method. Then Galileo completed the method with the addition of mechanical instruments of measure, but also reduced in its scope by making mathematics the only authorised language of science, and reducing the organic clocks of the Universe and its world cycles of creation and extinction, with the 6 canonical motions of time=changes in the form and position of beings – generation, evolution, growth= reproduction, locomotion, diminution and extinction.

We shall use often as a reminder of the cyclical, discontinuous nature of time, instead of T, ∏, which means ‘pi’, the symbol of the cycle, it breaks the T into 2 pilars as ∏ime, the discontinuous factor does with nature, and it is associated to the product, which as we shall see is the mathematical trademark of Time processes, connected through several ∆-scales (hence if ∆ has n elements, ∆-1 will have n x n) as opposed to ‘superposition=sum’ in spatial ‘herds’.

Science has completely missed the most important of those WORLDCYCLES OF TIME: the world cycle of creation and extinction of systems, which makes them evolve from seminal seeds into larger, slower organisms and dissolve back in the moment of death.

*TIME tends to be as in the 3rd graph an accelerated, cyclical informative shrinking clock that ‘warps space into time’, ‘wrinkles life into 3rd ages’ and ‘corrupts societies into entropic wars’, as when all the entropy=motion is consumed and the system is pure form, the system explodes back into pure entropy in the moment of death.*

Because we are beings made of vital space with motion and cyclical clocks of time with information carried in its frequency and form. We are time space beings.

In the graph, we are networks of vital space, made of ∆-1 atomic or cellular space quanta, surrounded by time cycles, membranes of finite volume of information (holographic principle), that create our ∆-being; which then will be performing further time cycles in larger networks, as part of a bigger ∆+1 whole or world.

*The interaction of those 2 elements, vital space, lineal motion, entropic, kinetic energy, res extensa, all similar concepts abbreviated in the symbol ‘Spe’, and cyclical, tall, time clocks, membranes, closed paths, Tiƒ, which carry the information of the Universe, across 3∆±1 scales, structure all systems made of fractal ‘space-time’ that ‘thinks, therefore exists’ as a world in itself.*

It is then easy to connect with the perennial dualist philosophies of the Universe those 2 Spe<=>Tiƒ concepts in a reality that constantly transforms lineal entropic motions (E) into physical time vortices (M, charges). So we talk of beings made of energy with forms, which will be the 2 similar concepts to space in motion and cyclical time clocks with more dimensions of information, the fractal spaces and times of which we are all made.

So what is time? We have two versions of its widest meaning: time as change, and so all type of motions can be defined in terms of time, of which Aristotle defined 6, generation/evolution, growth, reproduction, locomotion, diminution and extinction. So physicists study one of those motions, locomotion. Biology most of them in its dualities (growth and imitation, reproduction, generation and extinction). And a 7th one he did not define as motion, called perception by a still mind which ‘is the focus of the motions of the world around it’ (so it is the external motion and focused flux of informative waves what causes perception)… In that regard yes, nothing is MORE IMPORTANT THAN EINSTEIN’S work to understand…. locomotions at c-speed. But i doubt you will ever learn anything about your existence and changes (generation, growth, evolution, etc.) only with locomotion. As *it is in fact the simplest of all the motions=changes of the Universe.*

**The next step of the metric is the Generator equation of space-time systems.**

Ok, maybe before everybody abandons this blog with an attitude, to state that I do have a problem with physicists as my ‘known-known’ career has been as an activist against the Nuclear industry, but *i have none with the Universe and its awesome logico-mathematical time-space structure. So before going further into concepts and biological and social analysis, it is about time to put a bit of mathematical quantitative numbers, and logic formalism on it, as it is at the core of reality.*

* So we shall state now that as GALILEO said: the ‘main’ (but not only) language of God are geometrical figures, (he didn’t say mathematics but geometry – important detail): lines, triangles and circles. He could have said also ‘hyperbolic waves’, but of course he did not know yet. So we shall say here:*

‘Because we are all made of scalar space and time, form and motion, 3 are the underlying fundamental stiences:

- Geometry with motion, which is called topology, the formal stience of space forms.
- Analysis of finitesimal parts and wholes, which is the formal stience of the scales of the 5th dimension.
*And i-logic causality,*based in the 3 arrows of time, which I call often ¬ Ælgebra, or simply ¬æ, connected to logic, algebraic structures and time theory, but so much r=evolved respect to single-entropy theories that in the hard models of it, we shall not use much of contemporary algebra beyond group theory.

But how we express in a logic formalism (mathematical details are obviously the final analytical phase of a synthetic theory, kept for line 3) all those similarities? Again it is quite easy once we realise *we are not in a background space-time ‘mathematical’ cartesian graph, nowhere to be seen in reality – what we see and experience is that we are made of entropic space, informative time and the vital space that mixes both (the intermediate body-wave).*

In that regard, we must consider that all systems are made of:

|-Spe (limbs-fields of spatial entropy) < ø-iterative body-waves > Tiƒ (particles-heads of temporal information)

which becomes the ‘Generator feed-back equation of all space-time systems/beings’ of the fractal Universe.

So we will use the same abbreviation, GST, to define the formalism of the 5th dimension with the Generator of Space-Time and the conceptual ‘stience’ behind it, General systems theory.

It is then a fascinating adventure of the mind to study the common laws of all systems made of fiefs-limbs of space≈entropy and particles-heads of cyclical time, merging in hyperbolic body-waves that iterate the system, *as we will find the 3 kind of stiences and systems, physical, biological and social follow the same 5D laws of structure, topology, energy, information, function and form. *

*In the graph we resume all physical, biological and social systems, which ensemble the 3 ‘topological forms/functions of space-entropy, time-form and its body-wave combinations into real ‘existential beings’, as we are all made of space and time.*

And this fully connects organic evolution with topology since in those are the only possible varieties of form of the Universe. So ultimately all what exists is a ‘living topology of space and time’.

So what is the ultimate causal relationship of those 3 arrows. Initially it is a simple equation:

- Past (entropy limbs/fields) x Future (informative particles/heads) = Present-iterative wave/bodies

It is a deep equation, which for the time vein merely means that the informative particle-head and entropic field/limb become connected by the dominant body-wave element of the system, the most visible and relative dynamic unchangeable present, as it keeps reproducing the system as if it were always ‘the same present form’, even if the parental element has died away.

So there are 3 elements in topology: entropy-pure motion or lineal space; form-pure dimension/curvature or time clocks. And its combinations, space-time beings.

**The 3 arrows=motions of times in sequential order.**

this ternary ‘reality’ in ceteris paribus analysis is made of 3 pure time motions. Entropic expansive motions, repetitive body-waves and informative, time vortices. BUT when we put them in sequential order as *it happens in beings it gives us a sequential world cycle of an organism as it lives and dies through existence.*

Suddenly I realized, I had solved the *way the universe created its beings, *from the mystery of quantum physics, (the so-called wave-particle duality, as all physical systems were wave-particles moving on an entropic, accelerated field), to the reasons why evolution always worked right, choosing despite its seemingly infinite options the few ‘efficient’ aforementioned topologies (so wings were flat energetic members, and eyes spherical ones).

Namely *they were the only* available choices of topology. Alas! Curiously enough the great ‘mystery of Darwinian biology’, which he had also wondered about – the ‘right choices of the seemingly chaotic process of evolution made sense, because after all there were a mathematical planning NOT of course a religious design. And the biggest Mystery of Physics (the complementarity wave-particle) also became resolved.

And this was to me the proof that I was indeed on the right path of T.Œ, because the 2 principles of truth, ‘Simplicity, Minimalism (Occam’s razor)’, and Correspondence (a theory proves previous ones besides bringing more solutions), were met.

Equations of physics and biological designs kept pouring into the model and finding its whys, fitting all nicely. Something scientists did not even try to understand merely describing it now had easy whys, in the ternary symmetry in time and space of the Fractal Generator of the Universe, truly the ‘Equation of God’, not a ‘Particle of God’, not a ‘substance’, but a Logic, mathematical Symmetry of space-time that created us all, the details of that ‘thought’.

But if we were made of time-space cycles and forms, of this ternary ‘Generator’ structure seen static in space as a formal organism, and moving in time as a series of cycles, it was necessary to analyze each of those 3 parts of all beings, and decide its inner structure and hierarchy.

Now, I am afraid we are going to refound also logic. I know I’m nuts. But what can I say. We cannot go further without a new logic, because if time has 3 arrows, then the simple A->Causes b does not work. It is more about ternary logic and symmetries in space, time and 5D. It is more about the GENERATOR fractal equation of the universe and its infinite variations.

So Non-A logic is a huge new science – the study of the symmetries between the 3 motions of time and its sequential ages and the 3 spatial forms and its organic parts. Its ‘Generator feed-back equation’ will be essential to describe all the beings of the Universe:

**Γ.** Sp (young-past-entropic limb/field) ≤≥ ST (iterative, adult, present wave-particle) ≤≥Tƒ (future, informative head/particle)

Where the symbol < means an expansive, energetic motion, > an implosive, informative one and = a repetitive present motion.

So all systems of nature will be made of those 3 elements, whereas the present body-wave combines lineal fields (faster motion) and cyclical heads-particles (since the sphere is the form that stores maximal information) or in the ‘second fundamental state of nature’, will be made of S-fields/limbs<=>T-particles/heads as particles absorb the field entropy and move.

This first differentiation between an S>T System (particle-field) and an ST-wave-system WILL be enormously important to understand from quantum physics (Bohm’s classical interpretation in polar=particle coordinates of the quantum potential field that guides the particle, vs. Schrodinger wave description) to gender (women are present waves, men are particle-fields:)

Indeed, that equation seems simple, but as we fully understand the conceptual meaning of those worlds so ill-defined in science (particles, waves, time, space, energy, information, entropy, etc. etc.) a fascinating new ‘form of homologic knowledge, with deep insights on the unity of it all will come to the readers.

So this equation of ‘ternary topologies of space and ternary ages of time’, which call the generator fractal of space-time beings will be to XXI century space-time studies, what EFE was to XX century – the next step in the evolution of our comprehension of the fundamental principles of Nature.

Indeed, essentially this equation UPGRADES the principle of conservation of energy to include the co-invariant conservation of the 3 elements of reality: pure motion or entropy, pure form of cyclical time, and its energetic combinations.

And further on, breaks the space-time continuum into infinite ‘infinitesimal’ fractal parts made to the image and likeness of the whole: all of us space-time beings, made of energy and time, as when we say ‘I don’t have time and energy to do this’.

And so as a consequence of those 3 elements we shall describe a fractal, organic, informative ‘sentient’, living universe.

- And so the key to understand reality is to consider ‘formally’ that the fractal scales of the Universe form all together a new ‘5th dimension of scalar space-time’, whose metric equations and properties that relate different scales of ‘size’ and speed in the clocks of information of its ‘systems’, truly are the ‘hidden variables’ and ‘whys’ that give us an explanation to reality much deeper and complete that the present system of physical sciences, which study only as relevant the properties of entropy and ‘locomotion’. Whereas the proof of this dimension is reality itself, as it is evident that there co-exist in such Universe from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy a series of beings, which are similar. And so we talk of a fifth dimension of scalar size, which is philosophically a dimension of social evolution, of ‘absolute time’ as points reproduce its fractal form, organise themselves into networks and create new growing scales of the fifth dimension.

So instead of a simplex world of physical motions and entropy as the single arrow of the Universe we shall construct a complex world with 2 arrows of ‘time’, entropy and information, which ware akin to space and time (to yang and yin in classic philosophy), and combine in ‘present body-waves of energy’ (yin-yang beings if we were to use the philosophy that better described them).

So entropy and information and its space-time, ‘energetic body-wave combinations’ will become the dual and then ternary principles that structure all the systems of reality made of complementary fields/limbs of entropy and heads/particles of information, which combine in ‘present body-waves of energy’, and the 3 together create the infinite ‘yin yang’ beings of the Universe.

‘Fractal scales’ (ab.∆), topological space, (ab.S) and time cycles and ages (ab.T).’, understood in terms of human mental languages of thought (Ab.•, @,º), mathematics the language of space and logic the language of time, thus become the 4 elements needed to describe reality: ∆•ST.

** §upœrganisms **

As usual we are a bit creative with the language to stress the ‘small details’ that differentiate stientific concepts from classic science (which converge in the limit of a single space-time 4D continuum)

We have also broken the first line sentence it in ternary elements (the reader will soon realise all is ternary, as Space-entropy and time-form combined in space-time waves of energy and information. So 3 are the 3 canonical components of all wholes).

But we do not respect the order of the above line, which first explains the mathematical formalism. Here we rather introduce now the organicism

So we will only at the end define with some mathematical rigor, the ultimate components of reality, when seen from a relative higher point of view, Non-Aristotelian cyclical time, and Non-euclidean fractal space dust, non-euclidean points that exist trying to maximise its survival, which we can write down with a simple equation (max. ∑max. exi (s=t), appropriately called, th function of existence.

No, I am not joking, this is damn serious (-:, ok the function of existence completes ur analysis of what beings do.

And then we can study the function of existence in space and we observe that dust of space time evolves into super organisms, which journey between its ∆-1 cellular/atomic, ∆-organic/thermodynamic, ∆+1 social/gravitational scales.

Or we can study in time, as a world cycle (temporal perception of a super organism, for example mankind is the super organism, history its world cycle). And then it will appear as a motion-stop-mtion rhythm in which motions will be ruled by the ∆•st allowed symmetries between the two directions of scalar 5D, space topologies and time ages, as resorted by the mind’s survival will.

Let us then explain each of those words that give us the ‘whys’ and ‘philosophy of stience’ that structures the Universe and all its parts, but with a slightly different order, starting from the fundamental logico-mathematical ‘particle’ of reality, the ¬æ super organism.

Now, what it happens to ∆•st of space-time as it performs cyclical space-time actions is obvious: it becomes through ¬Æ motions in 10 ∆•ST Dimensions (3 of ∆-scale, 3 of time ages, 3 symmetric organs of space, and a mind-view-will-point that moves it through the world), part of a super organism. As it happens the performance of the 5 actions of existence CREATES SUPERORGANISMS. So we have a simple equation for any of them:

Supœrganism: ∫ ∑e x i ds dt

So again we use to reflect so many ‘ternary and dual, time and space’ symmetries and perspectives through ∆±1 scales, different symbols, for different perspectives on super organisms, such as 3 states: § (cyclical, informative state), S (Balanced, iterative state), $ (Lineal entropic state) and ∫uperorganism (scalar, integral analysis). Since any super organism will be constantly switching actions performed with its ‘ternary organs-states’, and finally interact with is micro-parts (actions of its world cycle, or cells of its ∆-1 scale), in integral, simultaneous resonant motions.

**Its ternary parts.**

We shall consider first a simple description of a fractal being, departing from an even simpler concept, that of the relativity of all scales and the perception of all beings either as points or as whole super organisms: from far away all systems are points with no volume (so-called in mathematics euclidean), but as we come closer points become whole organic systems, with energy and information parts. We call those points, fractal points, or using terminology of mathematics, Non-euclidean points through which multiple parallels can cross as they do have now a volume.

this is both, the mathematical unit of the real universe and its organic element, whereas mathematics is merely the simplified, spatial description of it, and the fractal, organic paradigm its necessary, added bio-logical functions. We thus compete with the fractal (math)/organic (biology) duality of all systems all the information about functions that a mere formal description lacks. We add the organic why to the mathematical how, and so we can then see the unity of all systems, which will show the same functions and similar forms and parts of any ‘organic fractal, non-euclidean point’:

*Above, from a distance (above) all beings seem to be just ‘Euclidean points’ (with no breath) connected by lines. This is the simplest description of a fractal, topological network. But when see closer, each point is an enclosed sphere, and each line, a flow of energy and information that connects the point creating with other points and waves of energy and information a topological ‘plane’, which in turn becomes a fractal point of a larger scale.*

*In the graph we see a sea urchin a fetus, a charge-point surrounded by a magnetic membrane, a black hole point surrounded by an event horizon, an atom, a tomato, a planet a cell and a boson state of matter. All of them can be studied analysing its 3 parts, forms and functions, and considering how they form part of larger social networks. *

So we redefine the fundamental particle-point of the Universe in the lower ‘minimalist’ description of reality, and consider it a fractal super organism, in the upper, more detailed description of its internal information, parts and functions. Once we do so, we shall observe in awe, that all what exists is truly a ‘fractal point’, or ‘super organism’, reproducing, evolving socially into larger networks, dissolving them in the moment of death, when it ‘closes its time world cycle’.

A Non-Euclidean point-particle has the particularity that it can be crossed by ∞ parallel waves of energy and information. But seen from far away distances it seems a point with no breath.

Only when we come closer to the fractal point it becomes a full system with 3 components: a vital inner space with energetic motions, an external enclosure, made of cyclical time paths that acts as a membrane that separates the system from the outer world, and a central ‘frame of reference’, mind or point of view (the point proper) that gauges energy and information, moves and tries to reproduce the point. Since the essence of the fractal paradigm is the vital, re=productive structure of all its systems. As fractals are basically reproductive, iterative equations that repeat its forms and motion in lower and higher scales of reality.

**The definitions of points as fractal particles, lines as waves of ExI and planes as ****topological networks**

Now when this was found out to be the case, mathematicians and physicists shied away from definitions. So in a landmark book, Hillbert, father of modern abstract mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’, not defining them, because obviously the definitions of Euclid no longer worked, points did have breath, and so lines were waves of points with breath, and so they were discontinuous and planes had to be defined as networks of points communicated by lines. This are the 3 canonical definitions of i-logic mathematics that restore the realism and organicism to mathematics, beyond the axiomatic method of the idealist Hilbert’s Hegelian school of science.

Indeed, we do have to define points, lines planes, relative equality and parallels. And so now we shall consider that the structure of geometry is fractal, made of points with volumes sharing energy and information through waves that become then topological networks. And consider as it was already proved by Godel and Lobacjevski, that mathematics is a realist science, since its truth cannot be as Hilbert wanted obtained by merely considering its internal logic, but needed external, realist, experimental tests.

Einstein’s curved space-time.

And we do correct the interpretation of Einstein’s Non-euclidean geometry of gravitational forces, which also is not logic.

Since when he discovered that multiple parallels cross a point of the ‘lower scale’ of gravitational space, over which light transits, he should have just widened those points to fit all its parallels.

Yet He instead of widening a point-particle enlarging it to become a star or atom or any other scale of the fractal paradigm, maintained the point-size of the particle-star-galaxy etc.

An then to fit the parallels he ‘bend the straight lines into curves’ to crowd the point with no breath, as the focus of the parallels. This is not proper. A point with no breath even if you curve parallels with no width, can only fit one. And a parallel is a straight line, so if you curve it is not a parallel anymore.

So the rational solution to the conundrum of the non-euclidean structure of space-time, crossed by multiple parallels is obvious:

We exist in it a fractal space-time that can be enlarged as we perceive it in more detail. Then those gravitational points become a star in a galaxy or a complex atom in a molecular network, and multiple lines which become waves of energy and information can traverse it.

**2nd postulate. A vital Universe of fractal points, waves of energy and information and topological networks. **

The fractal paradigm requires a new more evolved complete ¬Æ mathematical concept of ‘points’ as fractal points that grow in size when we get more information of them (1st Postulate of ¬Æ mathematics) of lines as waves of energy and information transmitted by such points with volume that create the networks between points. So for example in quantum physics we talk of a fundamental equation:

*Fermion (particle-point) < Boson (wave of energy and information > Fermion (particle point)*

This equation, which is the fundamental equation of Forces and particles turns out to be just the description *of the first and second postulate of illogic mathematics, applied to the fractal scales of ∆-3 space-time, or physical scale.*

Yet if we change the elements:

Cell (particle-point) Cell (particle point)

We are describing again the 1st and 2nd postulate of i-logic mathematics, applied to the ∆-1 scale of cells (whereas ∆0 is the relative human scale). And so if we consider

Head (particle-point) < Verbal wave of information > Head (particle point), we are applying those postulates to the ∆-human relative scale, and describe the fundamental event of social communication that starts the evolution of memetic super organisms of history, societies.

**Topological networks. Discontinuous planes of points communicating energy and information.**

What is the fundamental law of time cycles? The *persistence of presents, constant points of repetition, perceived in simultaneity in time as a present organism of space, or in simultaneity of information, as a network of relative infinite speed, in which parts become a present wholes by communicating through a relative new scale of the fifth dimension, which is instantaneous.*

Equal beings thus become telepathic, instantaneous in its network creation of information. In algebraic, physical terms, we can model this as a flow of information travelling very fast in time past quanta directions, in which it therefore maintains a present, as each quantum past jump is balanced by the time to move. In such a modelling, which is preferred in physics of time, the simultaneity of the cells of a plane of existence happens because past x future =present. Hence the use of informative and entropic, time and space motions with inverse parameter.

In that sense we must understand how points which are equal through simultaneity, create a network, across a new ‘instantaneous dimension of space-time’.

It is for physicists very important to localise this ‘force of instantaneous non local action at distance’ but for gst is more important to understand its logic meaning and structural meaning in the contraction of simultaneous planes of existence, in which all points feel a whole by communicating instantaneous through the virtual, fractal form.

Such form does not have ‘any drag’ in its motion as its mirror space are perfectly fluid to information coming from beings like itself. It is then perfect in the reflexibility of the points and we say information becomes superfluid acts at distance and instantaneously.

Of course when we enter into details and study nervous or gravitational or financial networks, which act as instantaneous, present communicative networks of information in biological, physical and social scales we can put constants, reality, concrete form and matter to those networks and laws of present simultaneity.

In physics the concept is akin to bosons, and so we observe how the network creates the impression that space does not exist as communication is instantaneous. It is the key to understand the existence of a super organism, which will always have:

- A slow wave of energy communication
- An instantaneous present wave of information communication
- Both will form the networks Max. tif, Max. E that shape the organism.

Multiple point-particles communicated by waves can form a network, a social plane, a ‘number with form’, of which we shall see certain numbers, pairs, decametric scales are more efficient and more abundant in nature, because they can better distribute energy and information flows and combine them into new reproduced fractals – the 3 functions of all fractal systems: to gauge information, to absorb/feed on energy and reproduce both.

So a triangular tetraktys, where the 3 corners of the fractal form specialise into absorbing energy, information and combing it and reproduce it, with a 10th central unit, communicating them as a whole, becomes the most perfect pythagorean form of the Universe. And that central point then becomes the ‘unit-whole’ of the 10 scale that forms another 100 scale of the tetraktys. The Mongol army was tailored in 10s, so was the legion and captain of 10 sergeants. 10¹º-¹¹ is the most common mathematical structure of nature, regarding perfect social beings – the number of stars in a galaxy, of ties in a DNA human molecule, of people on Earth, now that is almost saturated (7 billion), of cells in the first small mammals, and the common number to transcend scales of physics – for example the difference between the quanta of atoms, H-planck measured as energy and the quanta of the next molecular, thermodynamic scale, Boltzmann constant.

While the fractal Universe constantly creates different fractal structures, certain organisations are more efficient and survive better, because the fractal is a vital fractal, of vital geometry, of vital points absorbing energy and information, creating logic paths, repeating actions, reproducing into networks.

Even the simplest particles, quarks and electrons, gauge energy and information, share it, in networks, form larger systems. Reproduce when absorbing more energy into new quarks and electrons and all this can be described with i-logic mathematics and coded with quantum numbers. Since now that we realise mathematics is organic and fractal, there is NO PHILOSOPHICAL CONUNDRUM, talking of physical systems as vital, organic systems. And we shall indeed show a fractal generator equation to describe them all.

Thus we define any system as an ∆-superorganism made of smaller, similar ∆-1 super-organisms. And each ∆-scale of superorganisms & its ecosystems are studied by a human science but all of them follow the same Invariances & emergence Laws & Galilean Paradoxes of 5D Metric formalized with the tools of Existential Algebra & Non-AE=i-logic Geometry.

**SOCIAL NETWORKS: SUPER-ORGANISMS.**

**Super-organisms: knots of cyclical Time Arrows.**

*‘*We are all made of spatial energy, flows that seem to occupy space but are ‘vital space’ and have a ‘causal why’. For that reason, all species participate of the geometric and causal properties of the arrows of energy and information and follow the same patterns of self-organization to create a higher ‘space-time plane’ of reality. So, for example, all informative systems will be on top, in the dimension of height; they will be smaller than the complementary energy system and they will have cyclical form, regardless of the species we describe.

So DNA nuclei are round and smaller than the cell’s body, heads and antennas are on top and are cyclical and smaller than the body or tower that holds them, cameras are small and spherical, etc. Since, once we understand the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, the old distinction between organic and inorganic form loses its meaning, beyond its anthropomorphic role of making man the only intelligent, vital species of the Universe.

The complex logic and Non-Euclidean geometry of those knots of Time Arrows set the formal basis to understand the structure of the Universe and all its self-similar parts. Since:

*‘The Universe and all its parts are fractal entities of energy and information.’*

Though the specific combinations of energy or information of each species – defined by its ‘vital’ or physical, Universal Constants (energy/information ratios) – might vary, the space-time structures and cycles of all those social organisms will be self-similar:

All entities are ‘cellular societies’ organized through energy and information networks that bring about processes of social evolution. In all species studied by science a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single social form. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines, guided by financial networks of information (salaries, prices, costs); galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous, informative system. A tree is a group of leaves, branches and roots connected by a network of energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles). Cultures are made of humans related by verbal, informative isomorphisms and economic networks that provide their energy.

The 2 primary arrows of time, energy and information are geometrical, and its properties can be studied with the isomorphisms of mathematical physics; while the 2 complex arrows of time, reproduction and social evolution are biological, explained as ‘strategies of survival’ that ensure the immortality of the logic systems of the Universe. The shapes of energy and information are ‘invariant at scale’, meaning that cycles of information on one side and forces of lineal energy on the other side, reproduce their shapes and gather together into bigger, cellular, social networks, creating dual entities, made of ‘fields/bodies of energy’ (physical/biological jargon) and ‘particles/heads of information’, (Principle of Complementarity).

All systems of the Universe are complementary, formed with a region dominant in energy arrows (body or force) and a region dominant in information cycles (particle, head). Those dual, social, whole entities have more energy and last longer in time than individual parts. Thus, species with a limited vital space and time duration ensure their immortality by expanding its size in space and its duration in time, as parts of bigger energy/information systems.

Cyclical time and fractal space, thus come together into organic social wholes, made of cellular/atomic parts which minds perceive as ‘fractal beings’, with its linguistic, still mappings of reality that differentiate between the ‘self-being’ and the external world.

Those are therefore the 4 underlying elements of the organic, fractal Universe. Let us introduce their vastness in a reduced ‘pill’ of pure information.

*In the graph, the 3 main scales (ab.∆) of the 5th dimension, the gravitational, thermodynamic and quantum scales. In each of those scales, systems use different clocks of time, with different speeds (To), according to its size (Se), such as smaller systems run faster time clocks and store more information while larger systems slow down its time clocks and are ‘dumber’, with less information. Yet, the product of those changes in the speeds of time clocks (to) and space-size of the system (Se), remain co-invariant: S x T = C. **Thus size and clock speed define a new dimension of scalar space-time. *

**The supœrganism – the ultimate meaning of the game of existence.**

*In the graph, 2 super organisms of the biological and physical scales, the human super organism and the galaxy-atom (∆±3 symmetries, with ∆o at human level). The simplicity of the ultimate elements of the isomorphic Universe is however hidden by the limits of the mind in its perception of them, and the perceptive confusion of time-like and space-like events, of scales unseen (hidden variables). But perhaps what confuses more the @ristotelian mind is the multiplicity of connections of any system and the ‘different outlook’ of phenomena such as the 3 physiological networks of space-organs, which are simultaneous, yet have different evolutionary behaviour in space. THE HOMOLOGIES OF REALITY… which perhaps only mathematicians, with its use of different ‘methods’, topological and algebraic (space-like and time-like) and relativistic physicists with its multiplicity of formalisms can fully grasp. Since the same reality has multiple interpretations. Indeed, a black hole is a singularity for the galaxy, its Tiƒ brain, a death point for a smaller ∆-1 star turning around its gravitational vortex, a mathematical entelechy for the human mind, which cannot experience≈ see it and so instead of describing it objectively as a top quark star (its ∆-1 particle), prefers to ‘invent’ its mathematical properties (hence the absurd theories of evaporating black holes, ‘traveling’ to the past of Mr. Hawking, wormholes, etc.) For itself the black hole though will likely be a 5D mind, with an homunculus of the whole galaxy (Maldacena conjeture: a 5D black hole has the same holographic information of its 4D galactic body); for another black hole, a ‘couple’ with whom it communicates energy and information through faster than light neutrino/dark energy? waves. And finally for the whole Universe, the fractal point-particle of one of its ‘gala cells’. *

*In that regard 5D is a theory of absolute relativity, of a pantheist, sentient Universe, with all the properties of the Human being, made to its image and likeness, and so it requires a fundamental different approach to knowledge that the one sponsored by anthropomorphic science, where man is the only sentient, intelligent, chosen species by virtue of its ego-mind paradox…*

I often look at the web for new theories and always comes out a bit surprised by the astounding number of groupies, amateurs and professional physicists *who still try to do philosophy of science*, and explain all sciences and events of the Universe with the few notions used in physical theories, notably with its concept of ‘time as locomotion’. The problem though of this ‘sickness’ of physicists, is that most people in science has given up the field of ‘understanding’ the ultimate meaning of reality to them. But the Universe of science is much more than locomotion and matter and so no physicist ‘only’, neither a single specialised scientist for that matter can solve the conundrums and whys of reality. Only professionals of polymath scientific disciplines such as philosophy of science, or systems sciences and complexity, which try to study *without any favouritism, *all the laws of all sciences and find their common ground, can sheer light on those ultimate questions.

Once this said, there are not really ‘modern philosophies’ of science. Amazing as it seems, all comes to the duality of Aristotle vs. Plato, of an organic, fractal Universe (‘the organon’) vs. a mathematical, abstract entelechy (ideos) and the way to put both partial visions of the whole, its organic, vital properties and its topologic, mathematical ones together, as all systems will have 3 perspectives/parts:

- Tiƒ: ‘Informative head-particles’, the ideos point of view of formal languages and platonic ‘shadows’.
- Spe: ‘Entropy limbs/fields of space’, the point of view of physicists.
- ST. And the point of view of the dominant ‘arrow/organ/element’ of all systems the organic, iterative body-wave, which Aristotle hint at. And would be the most complete of all description as it includes within it the other ‘simpler two constructs based in pure entropy or pure information’.

The rest are just commentaries on those paths, till physicists’ reductionism to a mechanist Platonic model made the argument ‘unfashionable’ by decree. In this web though, we shall advance as ‘philosophers’ and system scientists, this somehow forgotten field, so much reduced to the ‘obvious’ truisms of physicists in the last century, as *the great questions about existence remain unanswered. *And yet we have advanced so much in the past decades in the fields of theory of information, complexity, systems sciences and yes, its philosophy that we can pass page to the ‘impasse’ of physicists doubling profession as ‘amateur philosophers’ and restart the field at a higher level.

Those are the 3 forms to describe reality.

Yet the physicists’ way, merely ‘sees’ the Universe, quantifies it and cares little for qualitative and relational meanings. In this view, what matters is to find some ‘fundamental particle, which should have substance and be the ‘brick’ of which all other beings are made. Even if that particle were found though, there would be little to say about the why questions of reality, the temporal causal questions, the past to future meanings of it all? Why we exist? why we are what we are? Are we alone and different? What is the purpose of it all?

Relational space-time and the game of existence all space-time beings of finite duration and finite space follow, is much deeper in its analysis, as it is a time theory not a space one. So it simply states this:

‘ The Universe is a game that creates super-organisms of ∆±1 space and time scales’.

Simple, and both mathematical and conceptual. The meaning of reality is to create super organisms across 3 relative scales of space-time, the best combinations of which, known to man are biological systems (extending through a ∆-1 cellular, ∆-organic and ∆+1, social ecosystemic scales) and physical systems (extending through the quantum, electromagnetic, ∆-1, thermodynamic, i and cosmic, gravitational ∆+1 scales); the one we form part of, the super organism of History is the less understood of them all. But all have a set of common isomorphic laws, which define their existence, structure in space, time ages and place it within the scales of the 5th dimension.

In pure mystical terms, the game is completely still because it is immortal, it will be eternally imprinted.

Or in other words, we are immortal as our form will be repeated ad eternal. What we cannot be sure is if we are actually immortal also as minds, which would be possible if non-locality and synchornicity displays with humans some of the spooky effects we shall find in simpler forms (themes those of ¬Æ theology which will occupy the final post of the 3rd line to be written into the future, when all other lines are well-done.

**traveling**

Change alone is eternal, perpetual, immortal. *Schopenhauer*

Existence is a journey through 3 ∆±1 planes of the 5th dimension and as such we can talk of living as the world cycle of being generated, growing, evolving, coming part of a social whole and dissolving back. And so it is a journey, a travel, a trip, as mental elements and the weirdness of some of the spooky effects involved are quite unexpected forms of journey, from birth to extinction through the 7 motions of the function of existence, and its actions of energy and information.

Yet what is motion, the ultimate substance of reality? There is motion in the silly-sense of most people’s thought. How things move from adjacent to adjacent place? The answer is that they don’t move but imprint is form in the next underlying region of space-time… As motion is also reproduction of form.

**Motion as reproduction of form. Solving Zeno’s paradox.**

Now *that we have analyzed reality from the perspective of the true nature of cyclical time and fractal space and the 5 ^{th} dimension along which they exist, measured by the mental worlds of each discontinuous point of view, it turns out that the only non-evident, strange motion of time is locomotion. How do a form moves through a fractal discontinuous geometry of multiple planes of existence?*

As there are always ‘3 elements and symmetries’, by definition we need to define at least 3 forms of locomotion, that of the field, that of the wave and that of the particle.

*Locomotion of the ∆-1: field ‘information’.*

How the Universe creates dimensions? Reproducing forms. But we have to differentiate the reproduction of the lowest ‘pixels’ of reality, which for any system are the ∆-2 mental=mathematical creation of worlds, with the pixels of the field in which the system of information feeds. In that sense the way our mind reproduces within the far away clouds I am just seeing now, is the simplest faster reproduction of form, different from the physical creation of forms with energy. In the first case the dimension is only a wave of information and we can compare to the way in which mathematicians create 3 or 4 dimensional ‘virtual forms’:

In the graph, in the plane the simplest polygon is a triangle; it has the least possible number of vertices. In order to obtain a polyhedron with the least number of vertices it is sufficient to take a point not in the plane of a triangle and join it by segments to each point of the triangle. The segments so obtained fill a three-sided pyramid, i.e., a tetrahedron. In order to obtain the simplest polyhedron in a four-dimensional space we take an arbitrary three-dimensional hyperplane and in it a certain tetrahedron T.

Next we take a point not in the given three-dimensional hyperplane and join it by segments to all the points of the tetrahedron T. On the right of figure, we have illustrated this construction symbolically. Each of the segments joining the point O to a point of the tetrahedron T has no other points in common with the tetrahedron, because otherwise it would lie entirely in the three-dimensional space containing T. All these segments, as it were, “go into the fourth dimension.” They form the simplest four-dimensional polyhedron, the so-called four-dimensional simplex.

Its three-dimensional faces are tetrahedra: one at the base and 4 lateral faces resting on the two-dimensional faces of the basis; altogether 5 faces. Its two-dimensional faces are triangles; there are 10 of them: 4 in the basis and 6 lateral. Finally, it has 10 edges and 5 vertices. In exactly the same way, by starting from an (n − 1)-dimensional polyhedron Q, we can define an n-dimensional prism and an n-dimensional pyramid.

This type of creation is however mental, not physical and allows the human mind to create 3 dimensions and a computer to model any 4-dimensional phase space.

In nature, it is comparable to the motion of a wave, which is *only the evolving frequency-time cycle of an Œ-point. Hence it is simple and fast to form (hence the enormous speeds of waves that carry contrary to believe the form, the in-form-ation, not the matter, the energy-space of the system).*

*Yet, it already indicates that the true nature of motion in space is the ‘reproduction of form’.*

**Reproduction of ST-waves.**

Thus we can now return, once we have established trough the worldcycle the relationship between 5 out of 6 motions of time, generation, growth, evolution, diminution and extinction, where to fit the locomotion studied by physicists and affirm:

*Definition of Motion: *‘A wave locomotion is the reproduction of a form that imprints a lower plane of the 5^{th} dimension’.

Motion is still an unresolved concept, as the Paradox of Zeno shows. The paradox can be solved though with the concept of an indivisible quanta of time (infinitesimals have a limit), so there is a minimal step in space and quanta in time for the turtle to move, stop and move. But it is motion real?

It is, when we deal with the never solved question of motion and its meaning from the perspective of the 3 ages of existence in time – as a reproduction of form in its wave state, and then ‘energy is carried through the wave’.

**Practical analysis: the Galilean paradox in electronic and light motions.**

For that reason, we can always consider a stop and go motion in physics; which has enormous repercussions in theoretical physics and the understanding of relativity and the Lorentz transformations, treated elsewhere in those texts:

In the graph, the stop and go motion of electrons and the virtual creation and extinction of particles in the light space-time sheet, have a quite different enlightening description in relational space-time physics. Some of the phenomena involved:

Electrons and anti-electrons are time past to future (life longer) and future to past (death shorter) time arrows. As such both inverse functions past-entropy (antiparticle) x future-information (particle) = Present light space-time, annihilate giving birth to the relative ‘present-space’ of our galactic world, light space-time.

Light space-time condensates into virtual particles, Sp>Tƒ, evolving the field of motion into a particle of charge, which then dissolves back in Tƒ<Sp, an antiparticle event. Both collide giving birth to present, and any of those similar space-time equations provide an insight in the particle-antiparticle duality.

Further on it explains why there are less antiparticles in total space-time, as they are as many in space, as many ‘deaths as lives’ we might say, but death is an instant, so we do NOT see as many antiparticles that last so little as we do not see many corpses in the our daily life – even if there are as many as living on the long count.

Further on, because information is perceived and emitted in stillness, the previous process of stop and go, electronic stop, emission of ¥ rays, motion, stop perception of ¥ rays, means that in relativity we can also construct a new metrics in which time and length remain constant and what changes is the speed of light, since we are perceiving (Michelson’s experiment) a process of electronic stoppage every time it emits and perceives light, hence LIGHT becomes c-constant because to emit it and perceive it the electron stops, in relationship to its lower ‘gravitational space-time’ in which the electron co-exists.

Then how do we measure and operate in frames of reference that are still and moving is the knots and bolts of Galilean and einsteinium relativity? Relativity though is an incomplete theory in its explanation of what studies. It studies only a membrane of space-time of the 5th dimension, that of c-speed/time in as much as it is light space-time, the medium where we ‘float’.

Over what that light imprints itself (gravitational space) is of not concern here. Suffice to say that in the game of Russian dolls, the gravitational doll is larger and encases with points of faster rotational time frequency (black holes) and lines of faster lineal momentum (strings), the light space-time. The transition between both worlds thus imply as always in any up and down transition along the 5th dimension a change in the speed of time and size in space of each quanta and bit of spatial energy and temporal information.

**Reproduction of particles – matter reproduction.**

So we arrive to the final form of reproduction, in which not only information is transferred inwards collapsing into a mind-particle (field reproduction, which *is the mental perspective on a field force from the point of view of the inner particle-mind*), or a wave in which only the energy and form, or external envelop, with its frequency translates along a previous, simpler ∆-1 field, but to the 3^{rd} category: reproduction of a 3 dimensional particle, which can be treated as the reproduction of the full density of the being as it moves.

It is the slowest reproduction, as the form must be reproduced in all the previous scales of the 5^{th} dimension. And this means the ‘form, must as it moves ‘reproduce’ its entire wave of pyramidal scales on the next region of the ‘deep’ space-time, making one by one all its scales of form, reason why the relative motion of a human being, decomposed in all its scales of form, departing from the lowest gravitational scale is comparatively so slow, just a few meters per second, on the order of 10^{11} times slower than light. Again the magic number of Dimensional scales.

What this tell us is simply that the proportion of density of information of a thermodynamic human being in comparison to a quantum particle is precisely of that order. So again according to the general rule of 5D metric: Sp x Tƒ = ∆(ei), to reproduce all those planes we must move much slower.

**WORLDCYCLES**

“∆ºst to Dûst; ashes to ashes’. *Judaism* on Worldcycles and the Finitesimal Function of space-time Exi≈st¡-ence.

‘What uncertainty, there is no uncertainty in time, i just look at my watch and know what time is’ Landau, physicist laughing at the use of human mechanical clocks to measure the infinite time cycles of quantum particles.

**Worldcycles vs. worldlines.**

All this said we now can return briefly to the simplex paradigm of a single timespace continuum physics, where the world cycle is reduced to a single dimension of time, hence a line, and a worldline, the ternary topology is of null importance except in the most advanced models of general relativity, which also provide deep insights in the cyclical nature of NATURE’S time clocks, masses and charges with its principle of equivalence. In that sense if you are a physicist proud of your findings, consider 5D metric the natural next step in the explanation of the findings of quantum physics (a vacuum made of motions that become energy particles) and relativity (a Universe of multiple time clocks, cyclical accelerated vortices of information, and topological spaces).

But alas, all this with primitive concepts of time and space, hardly understood except in Einstein’s work, formulae and dictum, becomes far more rational and natural when we consider it in terms of 5D physics. Let us see why.

Below we compare those concepts with some distortions of the meaning of time, caused by physicists’ ridiculous ego-trips of dogmatic ‘single time=change’ or locomotion as the meaning of it all:

What we find then in those 3 graphs, latter brought about in more detail is then very interesting to understand the applications of the laws of the scalar Universe to physics. In the center Feynman shows a case o a relative past antiparticle of entropy , and a future particle of information colliding into a present wave of space, and he does the actual time arrow properly (though never before explained), and so we see in the 3rd how this birth or creation of physical present energy (light space-time) appears from the two inverse arrows of particles, solving also the question of why there are more particles (life-future-arrows are longer than past-entropy-explosions so as we see less dead than alive people we see less dead antiparticle events than particle events).

Time is cyclical finite, local, so there is NOT a single time, NOT time paradoxes, as YOU CAN ONLY TRAVEL TO THE PAST in local terms, in your clocks and YOU DO SO when you die. So does the particle on Feynman’s diagrams as antiparticle.

In the graph, one of the commonest errors of physicists’ imaginary theories (hakwing’s black holes traveling to the past, wormholes etc) and scifi plots is time travel, based in the concept that the time-clock of man is the only clock time of the universe, LOL. As the great dissident russian physicists Landau put it, then ‘why there is uncertainty in time and quantum physics, i just need to look at my watch’…. YOU ARE A FRACTAL LOCAL DOMAIN OF TIME-SPACE CYCLES, A KNOT O TIME-SPACE CYCLES OF BIOLOGICAL NATURE, AND WHEN YOU DIE,, they travel locally to their relative past at all scales as they dissolve back to their ∆-1 scales of organisation with less information. Your local big-bang death thus travels but the rest of the Universe keeps going forwards-backwards on in present iterative waves in all scales. So time travel errors are just born of the error of using lineal time, a single time clock, an abstract continuous plane of cartesian ‘world-topology’ for the entire Universe (see the images on the mind-world and cartesiann graphs all over).

The fundamental truths of the Universe, time and space are therefore more complex than expected. And this is what ‘widens’ our use of them beyond the study of the ‘locomotions’ of physical systems under Galileo’s formula (v=s/t) or Einstein refinement in Special relativity (adding to it a -(ct)2 factor of correction). So locomotion, exhausted, word cycles come in. And the ‘entities’ that perform those world cycles ‘naturally’, the Superorganisms of the 5th dimension.

It is of course appealing to think you understand it all about time, because it is as simple as to ‘measure’ the lineal motion of ‘things’. And since most people do not really want to ‘understand’ but just think they are ‘smart’, the whole mystique of lineal time motions, and time as the fourth dimension of space works. And it has become what Kant would call the ‘a priori’ category of the mind – a belief.

In that sense loco-Motion studied by Physics is the simplest of all motions and the first studied by human beings, related to pure entropy motions obtained either by:

a ‘∆-ST-wave’-motion on present space-time, which reproduces its simpler form or

– an ∆-1 or by a ∆+1 particle > ∆-1 field, which disorders the lowest scale which ‘produces’ an expansive effect on space used by the particle ‘to glide’ over it.

Those 2 forms of locomotion, clear on the quantum scale, being the first schrodinger’s wave equation; the second Broglie->Bohm pilot wave theory recently proved, in which the particle moves by expanding and scattering the lower field (likely a gravitational neutrino background pilot wave fluctuating around a c-constant) will set the way in which lomotions occur in higher scales and more complex fluids (so locomotion in gravitational and ¥-space-time will be akin to locomotion in fluids either as waves or particles do.

Now, the human being moves on electric repulsion and gravitational forces, taking advantage of the larger space and motion of the i-4 scale, below the scale of i-3 bits of perception… and for that reason the realm of ‘gravitational forces’ is both invisible, with zero information and infinite, non-local in speed, to us: V=s/tiƒ=s/o=∞.

So we come now in full collision with the invisibility of pure time (information hold as the eidos, of platonic thought in an immortal logic immanent program of actions of all systems) and pure space (simultaneous infinite speed-distance of the invisible gravitational field, with its relative infinities), with the concept of ‘finitesimal’ (relative infinity of 0 size of ginormous size from an ∆o perceiver) and all the other questions that physicists have never properly grasped on the limits of our mental reality.

A sacred belief indeed, my experience when i was around given conferences of science, is that beliefs cannot be changed. I got attention, if i started a conference with Einstein’s silly-nilly equations of lineal time – really no more than an extension of Galilean v=s/t relativity and definition of time as a measure of space-speed (which adds a -ct factor for the contraction of space as waves of light move through, themes those treated in the 3rd line where they correspond, in the specialised study of lineal locomotions of simple physical particles). But all that is really quite irrelevant, compared to the understanding of cyclical time…

You can though blame it on the machine – the clock, we don’t realise, NOT our intelligence, changed our concept of time because we adapt it to the single instrument we used it to measure time=change since Galileo, made its clock experiments to calculate lineal inertia.

So if Augustine said that God was the seer of time, what Galileo told us is that the clock-machine would be for then onwards the seer of time, and when a clock-salary was established, human life also was regulated by the time of machines. It is little what i can do about it: humans do believe in the time of machines and the physicists that make them are the gurus, of ‘whatever they say because they make the machines, center of our civilisation.

In the section on social history we study that astounding process of substitution of human organisms and its understanding of the organic universe, by mechanisms and its theories that reduce time to a single ‘locomotion’, lineal gunshots, becoming the paradigm of the proper way to move=change reality. Yes, i am a bit cynical in the opposite way to Galileo.

In that regard this blog won’t be the delight of artillery masters, but only of philosophers and humans who do have enough ‘brain and ethics’ to care for an understanding of reality a bit more complex than the platitudes of physics, (regardless of how complex are the mathematics of it), which merely ‘scratch’ the surface of reality and its structure.

Of course, i know it would be a very small audience. As when i gave conferences on cyclical time nobody cared. I had the feeling of talking always to a religious ‘audience’, which would only accept the dogmas of their ancestors and never realise of the ‘tricks’ and ‘errors’ of those dogmas, which they believe, because it make them feel as intelligent as Mr. Albert, deemed by the propaganda machine of 400 years of military masters and its philosophers of war and nation-buidling, as the author of the bomb, the highest genius of history. Only when I read Kuhn, on the nature of scientific r=evolutions I realised I had not been alone in that long distant march, as every great innovator in the field of sciences had suffered (including Einstein) such kind of indifference by the old guard of believers. But it is really a pity that the astounding beauty of the Universe remains covered by those simplex concepts, worth indeed to study when we consider locomotions and physical particles, but of null use for the understanding of human time cycles.

Einstein once said, when asked ‘what if your theory is wrong’, then ‘god must correct the Universe, to match the beauty of my theory’… It is always that ego paradox at work. Of course, God did NOT correct the Universe. And his theory was not really wrong, just a very incomplete, minimalist description of all what we need to know about…

Physicists view of reality is simple enough to appeal the reader (locomotion, big-bang, entropy≈death at the end of the road), and it is detailed enough in its mathematical description of only those simple facts, that all what physicists need and do to become high priests of simplex science is to ‘eliminate’ from the discourse all other time motions, all other scales, all other beings, with the philosophy of ‘naive realism’ and ‘reductionism’ (only spatial mathematical properties ‘matter to us’ – what we see is what there is, etc.)

**World cycles of beings integrate the 7 motions of the Universe in the most efficient causal series.**

The 7 motions of time (generation->perception->growth->evolution->locomotion->diminution->extinction) of all systems that are generated in time, grow in size, reproduce and then dissolve back into its cellular parts, in fact DO perform a world cycle of ‘life and death’.

We shall illustrate in the next graphs, that huge change of paradigm, by considering the difference between a worldcycle (the complex concept of time and its 7 causal motions≈changes of GST) and a worldline -the simplified concept of time as locomotion.

First we show the world cycle of time and the order of the 7 motions in all king of biological, physical and social systems, ultimately caused *by the constant acceleration of information of any clock-like timespace system, since as Einstein put it in General Relativity, in one of his deep insights on 5D metric: *

*‘Time curves space into accelerated mass’ (Principle of equivalence between time clocks, masses and acceleration in the gravitational ∆-4 scale)*:

∏ime is a cycle, and time we know means change. So when something does not change we say time does not seem to pass. So we described the simplest of all time cycles as the cyclical motion of a particle that returns to its beginning and then repeats the cycle.

And this is the key: motion in cyclical patterns is reproduction of form. And since time dominates all, and in fact, lines are just limited intervals of a time cycle, all motion is reproduction of information, of form, and that is the ultimate meaning of reality.

If Aristotle found 6+1 types of time-change, we can then put them together in a pattern called the world cycle of life and death: generation, growth, locomotion (reproduction of form in space), evolution, diminution and extinction.

All together form a cycle that returns with death and diminution to the original point of departure. So if reality is made of super organisms, networks of space points, in time reality is made of time cycles, world cycles of which the life and death world cycle of those 6 Motions is the organic meaning of existence. We exist to become super organisms, trace our world cycles of life and death, reproduce our form in space, through motion, in time through generation and then die, living a discontinuum offspring of beings similar to us to trace new world cycles:

In the graph, the order of the motions of the Universe, which are changes in the form and position of beings, is in fact organic, similar in all beings describing a world cycle of existence, through the processes of generation as as a seed of a lower scale of the 5th dimension, whose information reproduces, grows, emerges in a new scale as a full super organism and goes through 3 ages of increasing information, evolving and reproducing further, becoming part of a social network and then dying away and dissolving. And this whole process is a world cycle (no longer a worldline as in classic physics), which can be interpreted for each scale of reality in terms of the same causal order and changes of topology.

This paradigm was born as a ‘wishful form of thinking’ in time of Aristotle, who wrote in his ‘Organon’ the first reasoned philosophy of science, hence rightly considered the founder of logic, biology and the experimental method. Then Galileo completed the method with the addition of mechanical instruments of measure, but also reduced in its scope by making mathematics the only authorised language of science, and reducing the organic clocks of the Universe and its world cycles of creation and extinction, with the 6 canonical motions of time=changes in the form and position of beings – generation, evolution, growth= reproduction, locomotion, diminution and extinction.

Why the existential cycle is dominated by information is obvious: the head-particle-solid state-black hole of maximal information dominates its energetic lineal limbs/fields, so it constantly absorbs motion giving nothing away and finally it exhausts all the energy of the system and as the UNIVERSE NEVER STOPS ITS MOTION, the coiled clock of time can only uncoil back into an explosion of information erased back to the past as disordered entropy in the big-bang moment of death, converted into flat space, laying into a flat corpse.

In the graph, we can see one of the first key differences between a ‘physical’ understanding of motions in a simplex Universe of 4 ‘spatial’ dimensions (where time duration is merely used as a measure of motion in space, v=∂s/∂t) vs. a ‘complex’ understanding in IST Dimensions, which included ‘changes’ in the proportions of ‘Entropy’ and ‘information’ of the being (arrow of life, from an energetic youth to a 3rd, informative age), and changes in the ‘size scale’ and ‘speed of time’ of the inner structures and clocks of the system.

The graph represents the worldcycle of life and death in a human being in I=TS IST Dimensions, as a system born as a seminal seed of information, in the cellular scale, i-1, which travels through the scales of social complexity emerging as an individual ‘whole’ i-system in the organic scale, and finally as a citizen, cell of society, to a higher, I+1 scale, God, nation or civilization, which will then, once the life cycle is over and all becomes information explode back into death, releasing that information as Entropy into the lower, i-1 scale of cells, ∑i-1, which will feed another worldcycle.

When physicists study motion in space-time, they reduce it all to a translation through space, in a time duration, which can be ‘∂erived’, that is, it is continuous without any remarkable change of state, for the system in the whole motion.

When we widen that description to a IST D motion, we obtain however a ‘worldcycle’, as the world line becomes more complex, curved in more dimensions.

Yet the main difference in what it means a translation in 4 Dimensional ‘Physical space’ and IST Dimensional ‘Complex space’, arouses when we understand that in Complexity, entities are made of Dimensions (Leibniz’s theory of relational times and spaces) while in physics, dimensions are a ‘background’ abstract to the being – a deformation of the way they were conceived as absolute space and time, with a ‘background paper’s artifact – the Cartesian frame of analytic geometry.

Thus to move in physics over a background artifact of dimensions is different than moving in complexity as you are made of dimensions, your self-dimensions as an IST Dimensional being move with you.

This outdated model of absolute background dimensions is thus replaced by a fractal model of dimensions:

Each entity of the Universe is made of a relative amount of ‘vital space’ and last a quantity of ‘time’ as it grows from its seminal scale to its individual and social scales, where it evolves and interacts with other similar entities. We are thus ‘vital dimensions’, we are made of them, their motions, symmetries and transformations.

And so all what exists follows the generational-life cycle

But if time had 3 motions, ages, and its ‘still spatial perception’ of them as 3 forms, we had to add new dimensions to the simple lineal 4^{th} dimension of time. In reality it is all more surprising. The 3 dimensions of space as we shall see are equivalent to the 3 dimensions of time, in a fractal Universe made of infinite space-time beings, where we can see motion as still dimension.

Lineal time corresponds to a minimalist vision of a time cycle as Kepler said (all lines are small parts of an orbit). Since a line of |-space is in fact a small, ‘fractal’ step of a longer O-time cycle; which curves |-space into O-time cycles when we have a ‘larger perspective’ of the whole duration of the space-time-cycle, as non-Euclidean geometries prove.

Since also mental languages, topological forms, space-time dimension, all is generated by those 3 time arrows and its symmetries with spatial forms, it is not surprising that already Cheng Tzu would say, from one comes 2, from 2 comes 3 and from 3 the infinite Universe.

In fact the first understanding of the 3 ages of time between birth and extinction was understood by the Chinese-Korean culture, with its trigrams, or bagua, that describe the 9 sub-periods of existence of a being of space, Yang, __, and Time, yin,–, between birth and extinction, which divide the 3 sub-periods of time of all systems:

*Young, spatial, energetic Age:* Birth: 0-8: __, __, __ Childhood: 8-16: __, __,– outh: 16-24: __,–,__

*Adult, balanced Age:* Adulthood: 24:32: –,__,__ Koine: 32-40: –,__,– Maturity: 40-48:- __,–,–

*Old Age:* Decadence: 48-56: –,–,__ Old Age: 56-64: –,–,__ Death: 64-72:__,__,__

Which is the classic 72 years, biological cycle of life and death of human beings, we shall regain when considering the cycles of History and Economics.

In the past the cycle was shorter, of 7 years, when the age of reason started, so people entered youth at 14, the age of old marriages, and plenitude at 21, dying if surviving the cut-offs of the ego paradox, around 60.

In earlier Paleolithic societies, it was even shorter, of 6, so at 12 women married, and people died on their 50s.

Now in the industrial world, the cycle is longer, among survivors, with a mean period of 9 years, so at 18 we are allowed to vote and drive machines, in the placebo world of freedom and enzymanic work. And people die at 80. The maximal being a period of 10 years, the magic number of the Universe, when people will live 90, and for the most perfect organisms, the 11 magic number (of stars in perfect spiral galaxies, mammals among animal life, the 111 sea of calm of the table of elements and so on). So the oldest among us will reach the 100 years mark, 1 in a million though.

To notice that the end is the beginning, the birth with null information about the world we live, when the old man becomes a child and forgets, before entering the dark world, down the hyperbolic ladder towards the limbo of ∞ infinitesimal cellular parallels.

All this we said so you realize that it is not that difficult to understand the Universe, when you do not commit the kind of lineal blunt ego-centered errors of the western fatal attraction between militarism, physics and Abrahamic religions, which subconsciously has biased and err so much our world.

We talk then of the duality between the objective, scientific philosophers of the eastern world and the lineal concept of infinite time, hence NO end to the life, and life beyond death.

This other view is though just a creation of the mind-world.

Humans of course are ego-centered people who thought to be the center of the Universe. And science has been the fight to reduce that opinion and extend the understanding from the world to the Universe.

So first each tribe thought to be the chosen, only human thinking race in search of a valley to make it is promised, chosen land, (racist Bronze age Religions that from the Aztecs, a warrior tribe whose supreme priests, carried an Alliance Arch with the image of his God, Huitzilopochtli, carved in gold, the fetish sweat of the sun, till after crossing the Sonora Desert they arrived to the fertile valley of the Moon Lake where they murdered all the inhabitants, not Chosen of Go(l)d, and created his empire, to the Hindus who stormed the Indus valley, from the ice deserts of the Siberian Andronovo culture, on Bronze chariots, establishing castes where the inhabitants they didn’t murder became inferior Dalits, to the Hebrew, or Apiru, ‘those who walk behind the asses’, who after crossing the Sinai desert, stormed Canaan, murdering all their inhabitants to establish the promise land, to the American Biblical modern Jewish believers on the promise land who after crossing the desert seas, massacred all the Indian inhabitants of the plains to establish the promise land, where their exceptionalist manifest destiny was to construct as many weapons as possible, and murder all other forms of life.

Oh, yes I know, there are still 4 billion human beings, who believe in Huitzilopochtli, American version (so they are about to build up a wall as their brothers of the promised other land, to separate themselves from the modern Aztecs who came, fair enough from Arizona), while the people on the other side of the other wall, angry enough become jihadist… As their prophet told them, when he found that his tribe of the desert had been also chosen to conquer the world with weapons, murdering all those who would not convert to his truth.

You see the patterns. You are a big ego. You live in a desert. You do not understand life. But you know how to make a lineal weapon, a sword, a chariot, an arch and you set yourself to plunder the people who do understand life, in the fertile crescent, or the Moon lake or the New England forests; and because ‘obviously’, they are right, it is not easy to convert them to your lineal mind, and so you murder them. Or silence them. And when all is silence, alas, then you look at the skies and God send you a comet. And the Pope ‘alexander’ writes your verses:

‘And god created Newton, and there was light’.

Till life will enter in darkness, we could add. As the physicist, keep measuring particles of God, and essay big bangs.

But as it would be absurd to keep pounding on those lesser scientists and religions of the go, without giving you the alternative of knowledge provided by the ‘unknown philosophers of science’, who don’t make cannonballs and atomic bombs for the delight of artillery masters, we will now specially in this section, which is about the real organic, fractal, ‘scientific’ universe, advance a bit more on the ‘road less travelled’ of serious, scientific analysis of cyclical time and fractal space.

So we shall return as all time cycles to the fight of truth vs. power latter, and give you some more real food for thought.

Now, though we must clarify something fundamental to the metric of the 5^{th} dimension, the relative travels to the past, which are produced in the moment of death, but according to the ternary principle do have always 3 perspectives (those of the field of entropy, the head of information and the ST wave) – in the complex model of the 5^{th} dimension we would always talk of 10-dimensional perspectives, but I think is good enough for those internet blogs to consider the ternary principle.

Let us then consider the difference between a travel of past-entropy or death and a travel of past-information or ‘prophetic’ genetic life, which is the completion of a positive worldcycle that generates a new worldcycle by a dual motion back and forward of pure seminal information.

In the graph, the isomorphism of the world cycle of existence through 7 intermediate canonical motions, from generation to extinction, studied in all stiences and species with the same laws.

It is an example of the enlarged view and full understanding of ’causes’, which brings about a GST, with the use of 2 arrow of time and multiple scales of size in the Universe.

Life is a travel or motion through 3 ∆±1 scales of the 5th dimension; as they are born as ‘fast metabolic, turning seeds’ in an ∆-1 cellular quantum scale; then grow in size as they reproduce, enlarge and form social networks with similar beings (+∆ Spe) at the same time they slow down its metabolic rhythms and clocks of time (-∆Tiƒ), till they mature emerging in a higher ∆-scale as a whole, part of a larger even slower ∆+1 system or ‘relative world-universe of the being’. And then when they die, they dissolve back into the ∆-1 scale where they are born.

So we define existence as a motion on the 5th dimension as an existential travel through 3 scales of a 5th dimensional Universe.

The study of the world cycle and the way in which space-time beings travel=exist through world cycles on the 5th dimension is the essence of the formalism of GST and the essence of the existence of any being, from the smallest animal to the largest galaxy.

So the graph shows above the more complex organic concept of time as any mode of change, which can be ordered sequentially, as time constantly accelerates it clocks of information, warping, reducing and finally exhausting all the energy of the being in a 3rd age of maximal information and minimal energy, which ‘explodes’ back with the arrow of entropy in a big-bang death, which dissolves the networks of the super organism and expands its size in space.

Thus a deeper analysis of time cycles shows them to have always 3 ‘ages’, ‘phases’, ‘arrows’, ‘states’ or ‘dimensions’:

- < (symbol of expansion flow), SP: Past, entropic motions, dominant in the youth, with a toroid, lineal expansive form.
- > (implosive flow), Tƒ: Future-form: a cyclical time vortex proper.
- ≈ (symbol of iterative wave): ST: Present-iterative motions that don’t seem to change; or dynamic, body-wave motion

And this gave us the 2 ‘variations of the Generator which described existence in Time and Space, easily written as:

**Time:** Sp (young expansive age) > ST(adult, iterative-reproductive age) ≥ Tƒ (informative age) ≤ Sp (Back to the past: entropic death)

**Space:** Sp (Limbs/fields) ≤ ST (body-wave) ≤ It (head-particle)

Those symmetries correspond in space to the only 3 topological forms; hence systems can only be constructed with those 3 topologies that define as the graphs show all organisms and physical species.

‘Reality’, which uses not human words, is made of two inverse elements, ‘Entropic extensions, which are lineal, planar, and decelerate’ and ‘informative cycles, which are circular, and accelerate inwards’. And its geometric properties are VERY important, because lines and planes are more extensive and connect two points faster, and cycles are more informative and store more information in lesser space. So those 2 extremes are ultimately geometric motions, formal motions, and form, and motion≈ function are related.

And in the middle, there is a present, exi, merge of both, which is the most important element, the body-wave that combines cycles and lines, expansive and implosive motions. So we can then see this 3 elements in terms of ‘temporal motions’ or in terms of ‘formal space’, and we will talk of:

- |-Sp: Past Entropy, lineal formal motions > Ø-ST: Present, repetitive, body-waves > Tƒ: Informative, cyclical time clocks.

Now we can SEE that reality and this is also VERY important, as a sequence of motions in Time, and it turns out to be the 3 ages of existence. Or we can see them as Forms in Space and they create the ternary structure of all beings of reality, physical, biological or sociological. So we break it in 2 equations:

- The equation of the 3 parts of space (which we can simplify into Sp<=>Tƒ, for some systems), that relate the limbs/fields of spatial energy and particles/heads of temporal information of systems, combined into waves. So we shall talk of ‘fields-waves-particles’, which interact together creating ‘physical systems-organisms’ and limbs-bodies-heads in ‘biological organisms’ and ‘energy-class, re=productive class, and informative-class’ in social organisms.

And this simple ternary scheme will be enough to describe any system of the Universe, because on top of that the mathematical universe has only 3 topological geometries, lineal-toroid limbs-fields, hyperbolic body-waves and spherical heads-particles, and each of them is the perfect geometry form to the function of lineal motion (toroid/lines/planes), reproductive processes (hyperbolic systems) and informative processes (particles-heads that store maximal form in minimal space).

- The equation of time, or the moving sequential flow of those 3 time motions which are in fact the origin of the 3 TIME AGES of all beings, dominated by those 3 ‘organic parts’, a young energetic age of constant motion, an adult reproductive age, and a 3
^{rd}age of information dominated by the particles/heads.

Now we shall call combinations of space-space, fields (∆-1) or gas (∆), combinations of time time particles in ∆+1 or solid crystals in ∆, and of space time waves (∆-1) or liquid (∆). So we can consider:

* Max. Spe: Field, Max. Tiƒ: Particle, Space x Time = wave state. *

And the 3 together form a world cycle: From field, to wave to particle, which explodes back in an entropy big-bang wave. Let us see them as part of all the wave world cycles of the Universe.

We shall close this introduction to an introduction considering a final element that so often is forgotten in ‘naive realism’, the sponsored philosophy of science of physics, which as it *forgets so many levels and truths and facts of reality, cannot really say more than a tautology:what you see is what there is to it, and all what matter is the how of measure distances and speeds in space-time. Not so, in fact, what you see is what your mind of information makes up of it.*

We thus have resumed in those graphs, General Systems in a nutshell. But or course once we crack and plant the nut, an astounding tree of infinite varieties of 5th dimensional beings – all the beings that ‘co-exist’ through 3 organic scales of the 5th dimension, tracing its world cycle of existence – will come to light, for a better understanding of all the species of all ‘∆Stiences’.

**Death equations: T<<s**

Death is a lower descend two scales fro ∆1 to ∆-1 of a ternary super organism extending on Ξ planes of existence. As such it creates a blast of entropy-motion in relative infinitesimal quanta of time, t->0, expanding past the c-onstant of speed of the system, V>>C, as the information of the whole disintegrates travelling to the past.

The equations of ¬æ as well as those of quantum physics allow for both simultaneity in space and non-locality, due to the explosion in space at V>>c of such a system, which makes it seem simultaneous and past travelling of information, which is the real event of death.

What this means is that the information of the system, and paramount to it the soul, @ª•… will travel to the past and we shall consider the implications n different analysis of those tests:

In the graph, the moment of death represents a fall in information of the system back to the 0 point of birth, which drops the system in the pyramid of social evolution of the 5th dimension 2 ∆-scales.

So death has a simple equation and it is conceptually an obvious event: a system that has warped completely all its entropy into form, through exchanges of energy and information with its body-waves, finally exhausts its present body-wave state and splits and dies. Its field-limbs break from its particles-heads, which quietly remain as a ‘skeleton’ while the entropic big-bang, the amino acid collection of the cells, the citizens-corpses of the entropic war disseminate on the lower scale, the light space, the fertile soil, the battlefield… And we are no more.

**Space and Lineal motions. Information and Time cycles **

*And so we need to differentiate between ‘lineal motions or lineal momentums’ (|-Sp) and its still continuous perception by the mind, or space (|-Sp), and cyclical motions, clocks of time, (O-Tƒ) and its still perception by the mind or information (It)’. *

*Since they are the 2 reverse sides of the same coin, we shall use the same symbols, merely inverting their order, and call them Spatial Extensions-Entropy-Energy and Temporal Form-Information, fully aware that humans used multiple different jargons and concepts to express the same, Es and It.*

So how to call both states for time cycles and spatial lineal motions?

*This is a difficult choice of wording, given the confuse terminology humans use for those a ‘priori states’. The proper way would be to call it fractal world vs. moving Universe, form vs. motion, virtual vs. real, and so on. *But as we are in a world of physical concepts, after much ambivalence in the terminology – not in the concepts and mathematical analysis of them – I came to settle in the classic terminology of philosophy based in the relative function of those 2 elements in the systems of the Universe and call generically:

– All states of relative motion ‘time states’ or ‘time ages’. And its study diachronic studies.

– All states of relative form ‘space states’ or ‘space organs’. And its study synchronic studies.

And yet keep the formal duality naming O-Time clocks, Time, but also |-Space motions, entropic spatial motions.

Why? Because in *relative terms time motions, cyclical motions, vortices, implosive motions, are accelerated motions, while lineal motions, entropic motions, res extensa are decelerating motions. So in relative terms time moves faster than space. And this is the key to understand physical systems. So we can ascribe to the ternary elements of reality 3 type of motions/forms:*

*– Tƒo: There are cyclical vortices, which are accelerated motions-states-forms. So they are studied with cyclical, accelerated equations. Such is the case of General Relativity, which studies the accelerated vortices of time created by masses. And their geometry is spherical, elliptic. They are the particle, or solid, crystal state in its center.*

*– Spe: The are entropic, big bang, expansive, res extensa, spatial motions, which however decelerate from the initial impetus and are the inverse of cyclical vortices. So we find often the equations of a big bang correspond to the inverse equation of a cyclical vortex. For example, the equations of the cosmological big bang are the inverse of the equations of the black hole, as they are the limit of temporal vortices (the black hole) and expansive, res extensa (the big bang that creates space). And their geometry is planar, toroid. They are the field or gas state of physical systems.*

* – ST: And there are ‘waves’ with a steady inertial constant speed, which combine both, cyclical and lineal elements, and their geometry is hyperbolic. They are the wave or liquid state of physical systems.*

Space has in fact entropy, motion, as we have seen by the fact we perceive it as a fixed constant space but has motion, which bodies extract as energy to move the system. This ternary interrelationships between entropy fields/limbs of space, waves-bodies of present energies and future-informative particle-heads come finally to the integration of them all by the mind.

Latter we shall further elaborate through the fact that the minimal unit of reality according to those 3 topologies and the holographic principle is a bidimensional geometry (a plane, as lines are strings of points with volumes; a hyperbolic body-wave; and a cycle, which is also bidimensional). Try in that sense not to be very critical of all what you will learn, as it is a slow process of ‘growth’ till we can arrive to the ‘detailed’ analysis of the 3rd line.

**To< Exi(s=t)**

In action a great (BODY) heart is the chief qualification. In work, a great head. *Schopenhauer*

**Actions: to exist: max. EXI. ****the o****rganic program of the Universe.**

Now all this looks good enough, and the full development discoveries we just have expressed will give job to future human scientists or robotic ones for centuries to come. But we need to be more precise, closer to measure and mathematical calculus – to standard science.

So here it is the program of survival and existence, all what there is really to it: to become super organisms and do world cycles, through a series of smaller steps, called ‘actions of existence’.

So how we connect the ‘overall cycle of existence’ of a certain space-time organism with its ‘day to day’ actions of existence as a being made of a body of energy and head of information that constantly absorbs it, emits it and combines it into…

**ACTIONS: THE PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE.**

‘Lanwaves of Times imprint on action space, a ternary fractal algorithm – ‘To<exi=st’ – which forms superorganisms’

**A****ctions: systems and quanta, made of vital, moving energy and informative time**

*In the graph, the philosophical concept that unifies the ‘behaviour’ of beings, is an action of energy and time, in which the system seeks for motion and form to survive. Systems constantly exchange energy and information to maintain its body-wave and particle-head in existence. Existence becomes then a sum of actions, which combine energy and information, ordered causally, whose zero sum gives birth to the being’s worldcycle. All entities accomplish its physical and biological actions, in the least time, trying to maximise those exchanges of energy and information, during its existential worldcycle.*

Physics also points to such direction. On one side quantum physics had discovered that vacuum space was quantised in pieces of energy with both motion and form, in-form-ation, called Planck quanta, whose unit was actions of ‘energy and time’ , ‘energy and information’ in Relativity. And all physical systems were made of those 2 ‘substances’ or rather motions with form.

So the principle of complementarity stated that physical systems were energy waves guided by informative particles. This duality of all systems of nature happened also in living beings made of bodies guided by informative heads/nuclei. So we could establish a duality in all systems, made of body-waves of spatial energy and heads-particles of information: Spe (body waves that move with its energy) > Tiƒ (Particles-heads of information).

So the key new principle of quantum physics, with wide application to all sciences, is its definition of all systems of nature as a complementary being of quanta of energy and cycles of time:

Universal constant of action (h) = energy-space (e) x time-information (ƒ)

Actions of energy and time, is what the Universe is made of. As we do have only energy and time, combinations of actions are minimal dualities, which become in itself basic time arrows of future self-similar events:

e x e : Pure entropic big-bangs of expansive space (death events)

i x i: Pure informative implosive generation of seeds of information (birth events)

Exi & I <≈> e: arrows of combination and transformation of energy into information (life/informative/old age arrow) ir information into energy ( energetic /young arrow)

Thus we can extract from those 3 primary elements: lineal energy, cyclical time (and its ‘fixed forms’: space and information) and its social, relative ternary scales, which co-exist together (the ∆-1, quantum/cellular; ∆-thermodynamic/organic; ∆+1 gravitational, social, ecosystem planes), 3 type of laws common to all beings or ‘isomorphisms’; which we further subdivide in 3 sub-sets. It is the isomorphic, linguistic method that extracts topological, mathematical laws derived of the spatial energy of all beings; logic, causal laws derived of its cyclical temporal nature; and organic, social, survival laws derived of its existence across scales of the 5th dimension.

Yet those 3 x 3 isomorphisms require a final element without which systems would not ‘exist’: I think therefore I am. Indeed, all complete ‘worlds’ do have a 0-point or mind, whose spherical topology allows the system to shrink the Universe into a linguistic mapping mirror of reality, or mind, which extracts the information on the outer cycles of reality the system needs to survive.

It is the point of view of the system, its c.p.u., quark, black hole, brain, eye, which apperceives reality and performs the necessary actions for the system to survive, by extracting energy and information from the Universe. Thus we shall consider 3 x 3 +0 isomorphisms to describes all the systems of Nature, and the forms created by man, with its internal mental languages (art forms) and external atoms (mechanisms).

Above we show the topological isomorphism as an isomorphism of scale, ∆, that does not vary as we change size.

Since all type of Universal systems can be described as social networks of __energy and information__. Its similar=isomorphic laws are studied by general systems sciences.

IN THE GRAPH we see one of such isomorphisms: that of form, as systems form spherical topologies with a center of information -the nucleus of the galaxy, the game of the stadium, which is a ‘ball’ that all players, lines of energy pursuit (-; While in the center we see two herds without a clear center, proper of ‘energy systems’, a herd of insects feeding, a polymer atom of great strength without a crystalline center.

The many ways in which those isomorphic systems can be described departing from its 4 ‘integral elements’, its ternary ages in time, ternary topologies in space, fractal ∆±1 co-existing organic scales and Œ≈Ø, topological time mind which perceives the whole domain and performs the function of existence, Max.∑ ExI(s=t), which resumes all the space-time actions the mind knot of space-time cycles ‘commands’, and stores in its memorial information, busy-busy playing just… a game.

How does creation of networks starts off, in a mess of a future informative ternary plane≈topological super organism?

This is *the essence of the mathematical game, as a fractal point/monad/mind, ‘m’, appears with a memorial mass of information, which will be replicated as a cyclical motion with a cyclical inertia, or speed of reproduction of its cycles, v, which gives the mass of cycles, an existential momentum, mv≈p, we shall call ‘potential or existential force of the being’*

WE CAN EXPLAIN with many jargons the same existential point, which tries to maximise the existential momentum, m x v, whose maximal function, for a give total value N = M+v, happens when m=v.

The point of balance, and the ‘function of present’ of the Universe:

Present = Momentum = m (t) x v (s)= memorial mas of information x reproductive speed in space

**The function of existential momentum.**

We shall indeed resume the program of existence and its fundamental ‘a,ei,o,u’ actions (**a**ccelerations, **e**nergy feeding, **i**nformation processing, reproduction of an **o**ffspring and evolution of individuals into **u**niversals) into a single function:

Max. ExI (s=t), as we maximise a product when both element (e≈ and i≈t) are equal (so 10=5+5=6+4=3+7->5×5>6×4>7×3).

This function of existence, that maximises the connection between limbs and heads, fields and particles, through a balanced body-wave, in which space=time, magnetic=electric field, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, ‘golden mean rules’ apply, is the resume of it all. “grow and multiply’, maximise your existence, ‘be a vital being, feed, perceive, reproduce socialise≈love your clone’. And in any language we express, physical equations of quantum complementarity and thermodynamic equilibrium and steady state speed, balance between vital constants of a body, justice of a social organism, between its linguistic and working classes, sustainability, etc. is the RULE OF SURVIVAL, which all systems strive to obey.

It means that the being with maximal momentum in physics, maximal top predator force (in body and mind), or higher degree of energy and information in human individuals will come on top and survive in collision with other physical systems, darwinian events of hunting and predation and social struggle for power.

**The vital properties of Universal fractals: super organisms performing world cycles of existence.**

So the fractal structure of the Universe is organic. Basically you exist in a Universe of social organic, fractal points, reproducing their information and self-organising into larger more complex structures.

The Universe thus is made of vital fractals, systems that reproduce their information emitting ‘seeds’ in a lower scale (forces, in physical systems, genetic seminal cells in biological systems, memetic objects and ideas in sociological systems), which will reproduce and self-organise into clone wholes.

So the purpose of the Universe is bio-logical, *since the creation of Nature’s fractal organisms of ‘spatial energy’ and ‘temporal information’ is exactly the same program of existence, we anthropocentric wo=men define only for ourselves and similar life beings*: to absorb=feed on energy, and gauge information, mixing both to reproduce fractal ‘radiations’ of clone beings, which then evolve socially into larger wholes of the 5th dimension.

And the structure is ternary, made of points that enact the program, surrounded by a vital body-wave, and enclosed by a temporal, informative membrane.

In the conclusion of this introduction we will summarise the fundamental consequence of the unity of all beings of the Universe made of vital space with entropic motions, and cyclical vortices of time, with ordering, informative properties.

The very essence of the Universe and all its parts is to be made of vital space and cyclical time and share the properties of those 2 substances and its infinite body-wave combinations. Now this statement simplifies enormously the understanding of ‘first principles of all beings’, which can be easily be derived of those systems. Essentially, when we get to the basics, why we live and die, why we have the form we have, why we exist, perceive, feed on energy, reproduce, love, evolve socially, etc. we shall find that all of them come from an essential, underlying game of topological combination, evolution and social organisation of quanta of space ordered by sequential time cycles.

The result of studying the naked properties and combining rules of this ‘yin and yang’ of scientific content, time and space, information and energy, which combine to give birth to the infinite beings in existence has an enormous potential to enlighten our comprehension of the Universe and become integrated within it. The only drawback is to anthropomorphism and the myth that we are at the centre of reality and matter more than other beings, because we are made of a special substance (soul and mind in earlier religions, carbon-atoms, which seemed to hold some virtual magic in modern religions of science) None of it is truth, and objective science consists precisely in put mankind outside the realm of privileges.

So one the problem of putting all those insights together, and make with them a bio-logic, formal mathematical model of the organic, fractal Universe my experience is that the residence to the model is mostly philosophical (as the details are not fully worked out, as any initial field still in flux, it is only a question of time and new researchers that the model is connected with all the equations of all sciences): are we humans, able to accept our objective, absolutely relative position in the Time period, space region and scale of reality? Because that is where we are.

This is a consequence on the advance in our understanding of the 3 elements of all realities, space, time and scale, which have now not a single absolute content:

On one side the existence of multiple fractal space at different scales, makes the human scale relativity. On the other the existence for each scale of different rhythms and bits of time, make our speed of time also relative, slower than that of genes, atoms and chips, faster than that of larger plants and planets.

Only a relative order then makes sense of this scalar, multiple space-time Universe, which is what the fifth dimension and its ‘formal mathematical metric equation’, provides.

As it relates all those scales, in an orderly fashion. So we can translate the time rhythms and space size, and space-time actions of any species of each scale of that fractal Universe – that is, we can synchronize parts and larger wholes, study its exchanges of energy and information, and how they create larger networks, and how the process of growth and decay are vital processes – *since we have to study NOT merely a fractal, mathematical structure, as those of artistic, computer-generated Mandelbrot like fractals, but vital fractals, living beings, who constantly reproduce their forms in smaller and larger scales, as you, a vital fractal does, when emitting a smaller seed of your information that reproduces and grows and organises a larger whole.*

Let us be clear from the beginning, Nature’s fractals are living fractals that reproduce in smaller and larger scales creating smaller seeds of information and larger social wholes joined by networks. So *the key to understand beyond the mathematical elements the fractal structure of the Universe is a concept that scientists, schooled only in the ‘mathematical method’ shy away from: the concept of a fractal super organism in space. And the world cycle of life and death of existence that those fractal super organisms experience as they reproduce in a lower scale of reality, organise themselves emerging as individuals and become part of larger social wholes. *

This we shall describe with mathematical equations when required, corresponding with all the known laws of science, but what is *the essence of the new paradigm is ‘organicism’, the vital, organic, reproductive properties of fractals. In mathematics we describe this properties with an iterative ‘Fractal Generator’. Nature is essentially the same but its fractal generators are obviously more complex. Your seminal seed is a fractal generator of a being like you. Your mental memes, your ideas, if you are a prophet and innovator will become the fractal generator of an astounding number of similar beings. A black hole is often a fractal generator that catalyses the reproduction of stars.
This is then the fundamental philosophical novelty of a fractal structure: it is NOT a mechanism but an organism.*

For that reason, the science that studies its general laws is NOT physics, vitiated by its dislikeness of organic properties but a new science called complexity or general systems science, of which Hawking rightly said it will be the science of the XXI C.

Since as our collection of scientific data grows in complexity that organic nature of all beings becomes evident. First it became evident in mathematical terms, with those fractal mappings.

What this blog adds is the entire philosophy of science behind it – the organic philosophy of fractal beings – and apply it to describe every species of the Universe, which will show to be ultimately a self-reproductive biological system, as mathematics is also a social, realist language, which accurately describes the fractal structure of the Universe, made of ‘points’ that reproduce into ‘networks’, which grow into ‘wholes’, which becomes ‘points’ of a new scale of reality.

So the Universe builds layer upon layer and scale upon scale of its quanta of space and time into larger super-organisms, from forces into particles that gather into atoms that gather into molecules that gather into cells and matter, that gather into multicellular organisms and giant crystals and societies and cosmic bodies and societies of galaxies called stars, which gather into networks of galaxies called Universes.

**Existential algebra. Temporal formalism: Max. ∆E x I **

If the ternary topological being describes all the evolutions of information in time of super organisms, and as such represents the final stage of geometry or mathematics of space, algebra, the mathematics of time requires also an adaptation to fractal 5d space-time.]

It is then the quest for an equation of 5D, which represents the events of its space-time domain in the clearest, most synoptic form.

We have call that expression the function of existence and it is the most useful equation to generate the systems of the Universe and hence resume all other equations.

Its study is the field of ¬æ Algebra or existential algebra (ab. Ælgebra, ¬Æ).

Why that equation resumes the Universe in its quantum form of universal actions (it is an obvious discrete function depending on which e and i family of numbers we choose) is obvious: it resumes the actions of the Universe:

Max. E = feeding, Max. I = informing, Max. e x i = reproducing Max. ∆ (eusocial evolution into wholes) =Max.∑ x Max. ∏.

SO WE COMPLETE the evolution of topology with the evolution of algebra, which we define as:

‘the study of how scales of social evolution of a super organism, observed in classic algebra as groups, rings and other algebraic structures, develop its world cycle of existence through a series of zero sum actions of absorption and emission of energy and information’.

Of the main sub-functions of the function of existence, the world cycle developed here through 3 states and ages is a fundamental one.

THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE IS THE ULTIMATE KNOTS AND BOLTS OF THE UNIVERSE, ITS STUDY BY EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA THE HIGHEST FORMALISM OF STIENCES. Alll what we do all beings is really performing parts and wholes of those functions, its cycles and derivative actions.

**Actions connect all the elements and networks of the ∆o being with ∆±4 scales.**

In the next graph we show a human organism constructed with 3 topologies, which always will be the only 3 topologies of the Universe, cyclical-informative centres, lineal, toroid larger space-boundaries and an intermediate territory of hyperbolic form:

In the graphs we see the 3 ages of time and 3 topologies of space, which become pegged into space-time organic parts in each being, which will then perform actions, dominant in energy or information according to that organic pegging. In the graph we see the human being born of that pegging, which performs the canonical motions-actions possible in all space-time beings.

In the lower graph we show man, a space-time being made of lineal energy and cyclical, temporal information, assembled in 3 parts, through cellular networks specialised in energy feeding, informative perception and reproduction, and the 3 ages of life between birth in a lower seminal scale and extinction. We write below the logic formalism that describes with simple equations of 5D space-time the organic parts in space and temporal ages of the human super-organism, the same equations we shall use to describe all systems of the Universe.

Finally, in the bottom, we see the decomposition of the worldcycle of existence of a human being into a sum of infinite actions, which together form THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE, the fundamental ‘detailed’ equation of each species of the Universe.

The connection of the being through its fractal ∆±4 actions as entity which:

∆-1: reproduces through lower cells/atoms (organism, crystals etc)

∆-2: feeds in smaller quanta (amino-acids, electronic energy in physical crystals)

∆-3: perceives even smaller pixels for its mind languages (¥-rays in mankind and crystal’s images)

∆-4: moves over a space relatively infinite in speed distance, since it is invisible in information: V=s/tiƒ=s/0=∞ (non-local gravitational action at distance).

And alternately becomes just an ∆-1 element of its super organism (species, society or ecosystem) immersed in an ∆-2 world/planetary system itself a mere cell of the larger galactic cosmos…

It follows then that both societies and species are super organisms of individual cells/citizens, which will show to go also through 3 ages or ‘horizons’ of evolution with the same structure than any other system (hence species are enclosed as an ∆+1 scale in ‘time’ of the individual life world cycle).

If the how of science is established by the topological structure in space of the 3 arrows of time and its 3 sub-organs, which construct all systems of nature, the why is the Algebra of Existence, which studies the function of space-time actions, which entities perform to ‘exist’, and survive in the universe of energy and information.

In the next graph we observe those elements on the human function of existence, which resumes all what reality is about – the creation of fractal ternary beings with the 3 topologies of space, which perform during its 3 ages of time, each one dominated by one of those topological energetic/digestive, reproductive/blood and informative/neuronal networks, a series of actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, reproduced whenever is possible in other region of space-time, or evolved socially into bigger wholes, with a single purpose to survive, to exist:

What the function of existence as a sum of infinitesimal number of actions of space-time, absorbing and emitting energy and information, ±∆e, i, combining it into reproductive seminal seeds of the whole, e x i, and associating it into social scales, allows is the description of the whys of the larger world cycles and ensembles that form the super organism in space and its time cycle.

Its discovery by this author, exposed at the 50th Anniversary of the foundation of Systems Sciences society at Sonoma Congress, was the first step in the construction of the so long seeked, logic and mathematical formalism of General Systems theory (ab. GSΤ, which means both, general systems theory, the philosophy of the organic Universe, and Generator of space-time, its formalism), based in 3 structural concepts that lay at the bottom of reality: cyclical clocks of time, lineal motions of space, and a 5th scalar dimension, ‘∆’ that can enclose them all: ∆SΤ±∞.

So we add the concept of a scalar Universe to complete our new principle of conservation of energy and information:

‘All what exists is a system made of lineal, spatial, entropic, energy fields, Spe, and cyclical, temporal, clocks information, Τiƒ, which transforms into each other ad eternal: Spe < = > Τiƒ, co-existing in 3 organic scales of size, ∆±1 in which it reproduces by emitting a seminal seed in the lower scale, ∆-1, which will iterate and organise itself emerging as a new whole that ensures the immortalilty of its ‘logic form’:

Γ = (Spe x Tiƒ)∆±1′

For that reason because the equation of any Universal system or ‘superoganism’, Γ, generates a self-reproductive fractal Universe, with infinite systems of space-time, constantly being created and destroyed, I called the equation, the ‘fractal feed-back generator’ of the Universe. In its limit, when we consider a single ‘plane of space-time of the scalar fifth dimension, and simplify it to consider only energy, it becomes the principle of conservation of energy, which however is a too simple description to fully account for all the knowledge we have acquired since the founding father of physics, established its principles of lineal motion and entropy, 2 centuries ago.

*So the ultimate question about our actions is the program of survival:*

Indeed. Why we keep on living? Most are mere automatons that move, reproduce, live, without understanding they follow a program of existence and survival. But those who reflect will agree we live because we enjoy the pleasure of motion, attached to all lineal, entropic ‘free’ expansions; and also the slightly painful pressure of in-form-ation and awareness. So we must attach to the purest 2 elements of reality, ‘motion’ and ‘information’, the psychic, sensorial properties of ‘pain and pleasure’. And again to fit them we need the co-existence of those planes, from where ‘those sensations might emerge’. Indeed, pain is pressure, pressure is in-form-ation, gravitational force, and so that ‘sensation’ must arise ultimately from the lowest scales of co-existence. So the scalar Universe has attached to each external plane, certain internal sensations. And those we can only postulate, if we accept the properties of those 4 elements, st, •, ∆ and specially the co-existence of multiple layers of organisation.

The reader then can scratch part of it, as quantum physicists do, denying the pilot-wave theory (that is the lower faster scale of space which entangles particles and guides them), the survival why of collapsing waves (which as all herds, collapse into tighter configuration when ‘attacked’ by a huge electron bombing them), the ‘advanced level of information of smaller scales’, shown in the amazing capacity to process information of entangled, quantum particles (qbits), and so many other elements which are *philosophical, not physical, informative not energetic, happening in invisible time regions (as we only see quanta of presents) not in a single instant. *

## ** ****¬Æ: ****Non-Aristotelian Times and Non-E Topology**

‘Each point is a world in itself.’ *Leibniz,* On the Fractal, organic Point, the Fundamental particle.

The formalism of GST requires an upgrading of Euclidean Mathematics and Aristotelian Algebra and as a consequence of our epistemology of knowledge, which becomes the 3 fundamental new disciplines of formal sciences:

- Non-E mathematics with its definition of the 5 postulates of geometry in terms of fractal, non euclidean points.
- Non-A Logic which describes the ternary causality of the Universe.
- And the homologic method of truth of ‘stiences’ of space-time beings based in the same laws or isomorphisms across scales.

Because we are made of space and time, of energy and information, the sciences of space, topology and time, logic, and its combination (mathematics as a whole discipline, where logic enters in the demonstration and structure of its postulates), is the most REALIST of all stiences, as it deals DIRECTLY with the properties of the 3 elements of reality:

- ∆nalysis, which studies how ‘finitesimals’ become larger wholes, integrated in time ‘frequencies’ or ‘spatial populations’ – often both, as frequencies become once created in time populations in space; which we greatly advance on the whys and explanations of calculus and its applications to sciences, through the enhanced concepts of ‘finitesimals’, ‘simultaneity’, ‘synchronicity’, ‘resonance’ and ’emergence’.
- S-topology, which studies the ternary varieties of organic systems and how they peg together to form a system; which we shall explain by evolving the postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry.
- T-Algebra, which studies the rules of causality of a Universe with 3 time arrows, and its fundamental equations (generator equation, function of existence, equation of time ages).

Let us very briefly introduce those concepts which are the foundations of all stiences and it species in ‘exi=st¡ence’.

**Non-e Mathematics: the fractal mind-point, the wave-line, the organic plane and the laws of similarity. **

Upgrading of philosophy of science needed to fully understand the fractal Universe requires to improve the main human language, which we use to mirror the space-time beings of reality, what we shall call from here on non-Æ, i-logic mathematics, which comes after Aristotelian logic and Euclidean mathematics:

*In the graph, the upgrading of physical systems, to fully describe all its mathematical, logic and organic properties, requires to set the foundation of physics in more solid grounds that the ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’ of Mr. Hilbert, referring those lines, points and planes to real Universal entities (1st, 2nd, 3rd postulates of non-e mathematics). And expand the temporal logic of the Universe to include the 3 arrows of relative, finite past, present and future of all systems of nature. Finally the 2 postulates of Hilbert’s axiomatic method, of congruence, which can only be of relative similarity, as we never have the full information about a system, (3rd postulate) and continuity (which is false and not required in pan geometry, as all networks of points communicated by waves of energy and information, leave discontinuous dark spaces not crossed by those networks), must be clarified. Finally the 5th postulate of Non-E Geometry, the only one properly defined till date, which allows infinite parallels of energy and information to cross a fractal point, defines the structure of a logic mind-mapping, constructed with those flows of information, and hence the equation of any monad mind on the Universe: O (infinitesimal point) x ∞ (cycles of energy and information of the Universe) = ∆: constant mapping of a certain scale of the 5th dimension.*

Logic mathematics is the language we humans use in science to describe the Universe. As such it is only natural that its 3 ‘linguistic mirrors’ or sub-disciplines, correspond to the 3 ‘elements’ of the fractal Universe:

- Geometry and the 3 topological varieties corresponds to space and its 3 canonical, organic parts.
- Analysis to the 5th Dimension and its scales of infinitesimal, derived points and integral wholes.
- And algebra corresponds to the temporal analysis of the structures of the fractal Universe, resumed in its generator.

So an immediate task to upgrade human sciences to the fractal paradigm is to study its formalism, through a natural upgrading of the foundations of those 3 disciplines to match the 3 elements of the fractal, organic Universe.

Now as we said we have two LEVELS OF DEPTH:

- THE FIFTH DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE, as we have and will use to explain most of this blog.
- The complete mathematical model of a 10 dimensional Universe, whose formalism we shall integrate slowly mainly on the 3rd line with 3 dimensions of time (ages) space (topologies) scales in a ∆±1 organism and the whole its mind. THIS IS THE FULL DESCRIPTION OF A SUPERORGANISM SO WHEN WE DEAL WITH SUPERORGANISMS IN ONLY 3 SCALES OF THE 5th dimension – which happens to be always as that is what our mind truly scans and integrates, so it can be also studied the whole universe in this manner as the graph shows, we shall bring the 10th concept back. And of course, THE 10TH CONCEPT IS WHAT WILL BECOME STANDARD: 10 DIMENSIONAL SPACE-TIME, 3 space 3 time 3 scales one whole ∆+1 mind-point that integrates it all.

**The idealist logic of mathematical physicists vs. ternary reality**

ALL THIS i-logic geometry IS completely NEW. Why?

Because humans do not have a basic picture of the 3 components of the Universe. We do believe in a certain mathematical structure called a continuum simple space-time. So our view of the first elements of the Universe, is very reductionist and simplistic, and so the mathematical mirror the ancients took of it, is also simplistic. And when in the XX century they found a much more complex Universe, of multiple scales of space, and multiple cyclical time vortices – particles, charges, masses, molecular clocks, galactic clocks, etc.as the initial mirror of mathematics was a distorted one, things got messy and remain so.

So the cartesian single space-time continuum is a geometric simplification, which despite the revolution of non-Euclidean mathematics, quantum physics and relativity is still with us.

It is based in a geometry called Axiomatic, which came after we found out that points were fractal points that could be crossed by ∞ parallels (5th non euclidean postulate) and so the definitions of Euclid were not good. Yet instead of defining as we shall do a fractal point, XX c. mathematicians left them undefined. So terms like points, lines, and planes still do not much its universal, referential reality.

In essence mathematicians scared of the non-Euclidean revolution, which was incomplete, invalidated the postulates of Euclid but didn’t find the new, real ones.

So instead, Hilbert, a mathematician said that he ‘imagined points, lines and planes’. So they must be undefined in relationship with the real Universe and what was an act of absolute arrogance, he implied that the human mind invented mathematics, the only language of the Universe, so somehow we invented the universe – no joke, today this means that physicists invent an equation that describes an imaginary particle, or evaporating black hole, or string theory and will affirm dogmatically without experimental evidence that it is real. While quantum physicists believe the Universe is made of mathematical symbols, which is exactly what religious people think, when they say that God created the Universe talking with words – so Allah created the Universe ‘naming’ it. And finally since mathematics are imagined, they require not evidence: only logic coherence not experimental evidence justify mathematics. And this is a dogma, even if Godel proved that mathematics without experimental evidence is not coherent.

*IT MUST BE NOTICED THAT ¬Æ=i-logic mathematics is A REALIST stience, so the UNITS OF mathematics are again REAL:*

- Fractal points in geometry; numbers in algebra and finitesimals in Analysis, which are in fact 3 sides of the same being – the social St-point/number/finitesimal unit of all mathematical disciplines.

Existential algebra thus defines numbers as social wholes, and the laws of numbers the generic laws of those social wholes.

Hilbert’s axiomatic method is therefore not truth – as Godel proved with its incompleteness theorem, but arrogant, ego-centered mathematicians wanting to have the ‘exclusive language of god’ resolved, have been denying or a century.

Mathematics is the most experimental of all sciences, dealing with the structure of space and the logic of time, and so we need to evolve and defined its undefined elements. Only then the revolution started by Lobachevski aiming to substitute Euclid’s points with no breath, will make sense and mathematics will become again a proper mirror to look at the Universe – or rather we will understand why the mathematical mirror is so good.

So what is a point?: A unit of fractal space, which a mirror mind will see with less or more information the closer it is to the point. Hence while from far away it seems a point with no breadth, as we come closer it can fit infinite parallels. And so a line has also width, in detail carrying information and motion; and a plane is discontinuous, made of points joined by waves, which leave dark spaces between them. We thus talk of fractal points, waves and networks as the 3 units of i-logic mathematics.

Points then become defined as fractal points that grow in size, planes as networks of space points with wave-like motions in time, which become bidimensional, from far away, as we do not see the height of those points. And 3-dimensional systems, become the merging of perpendicular networks, which have more content of energy, when they are flat and extended, and more content of information when they are high and cyclical.

So for example in a previous graph, we can see 2 fractal space-time beings made of ‘mathematical topologies’: a field of space-time light, with a flat bidimensional magnetic field of energy and a tall informative perpendicular field of electricity merging into a light ray, which reproduces along the c-speed axis.

Yet we can see the final stage of evolution of light space-time, which evolved into particles, atoms, molecules, cells and human organisms, and surprisingly enough, in the same manner the probability of finding the particle-head or photon of a light system is maximal in the top of the electric wave, the informative head of a human being is also in the dimension of informative height? Why, because geometrically, that is the point of maximal perception for both the photon and the human. And in both cases motion goes along the lineal direction of length, and in both cases energy is stored in the width dimension of the body and magnetic field.

Now, we are talking (-: It is indeed the most astounding truth of the Paradigm of relational space-time, first expressed by Leibniz – *a Universe made of fractal space-time beings – that the properties of space-time and its mathematical topologies, perceptive, informative geometries, and ternary structures are carried and emerge in each new scale of social evolution of the Universe.*

So while we have criticised the mathematical only view of earlier scientists, as we upgrade logic mathematics, in fact the Universe will become even more mathematical and logic that it was before, only that as Saint Augustine put it, the ‘logic of god, the mind of the Universe, is of a higher kind that our (Aristotelian) Logic’.

**The need to evolve the logic and mathematical ‘undefined’ elements of the Universe.**

Now the key difference between a philosopher of science like Leibniz and a Physicist like newton is this: Leibniz as Aristotle and Descartes before him, was conscious that the language first defines the world we perceive, and NOT the Universe. So it is a humble realisation of the minimalist nature of human egos. The Physicist has reduced THE ENTIRE universe to the world-perception of a human light space-time ego centred point of view. So he lacks sense of humor and his arrogance is infinite. Because he confuses the infinitesimal of his mind with the infinite Universe. This we shall stress once and again. The physicist as all humans IS only an electronic mind that fits an infinite number of cyclical space-time beings, into a geometric linguistic mapping within its ‘monad’. And he is NOT aware of it. So his arrogance is supreme:

*o-point x ∞ Universe of timespace cycles and worlds = fixed linguistic mapping*

The 3 great philosophers of sciences of western thought (and their counterpart eastern philosophers of Taoist and Buddhist cultures) were always aware of this. The cut off happened when Kant rejected Leibniz and became a Newtonian. But at least kant realised that the human euclidean mind was a light space-mind and not necessarily all, as impressionist painters will latter.

Yet starting with Kant and then Hegel, which had the chuptzah (even if he understood perfectly the ternary logic of thesis-antithesis-synthesis similar to the Sp<ST>Tƒ ternary Universal Grammar of all systems) to affirm Abrahamic tribal religions were superior, because they only accepted the human ego-trip of tribal Yahweh, there is a growing anti quantum paradox in philosophers which yield as infinitesimal observers to the huge power of the observable, industrial world.

This paradox inverse to that of the physicist, so huge that influences the observer, made after Leibniz, all philosophers incomplete. As they no longer dare to criticise the makers of machines and weapons, and not even the Abrahamic tribal, lineal religions of the Bronze age that back the hate between members of the same species. So we of course show a complete indifference for all what has nothing to do with the larger Universe of infinite worlds, and find the arrogance of physicists, infantile.

Now I will state a provocation to the ego of physicists (-; Mind the reader though that my ‘selfies’ are ‘black humour’, i am an infinitesimal aware of it, but i like to bust the balls of ego-centered human infinitesimals, and none are so much ego-centered as physicists.

The advantage of being a philosopher of science, is that unlike a physicist, we DO know the essence of science which is ‘logic mathematics’. That is our profession. To understand the logic of mathematics. So despite Mr. Hawking’s quipping, that we philosophers of science are envious and that is why we criticize his evaporating black holes, because we ‘do not know mathematics’ the opposite is truth.

By definition the masters of philosophy of science HAVE created mathematics and logic, the languages of space and time, since the times of Plato and Aristotle to the times of Descartes, Leibniz and Hegel. And yes, this writer, duly ignored by ‘those who impose truth with power, to become the laugh of the Gods’ (Einstein, the only physicist I consider to the level of the best of our profession, which he greatly respected, along the rules of the scientific method, except when falling under the spell of Mr. Hilbert, and we will return to that).

Because the language of God is the logic of time cycles and the mathematics of spatial extensions. In this we are different from physicists who only apply the mathematics, we teach them. But especially we like the Logic behind the language of mathematics, which creates it. So let us rephrase it. Yes, Physicists do know as much mathematics as we do. And their computers even more (-;

But they do not understand the logic of it. And that is the problem. Because logic is a property of time cycles, and its repetitive causality, logic is more important that geometry. Logic is ‘the beginning’. So the Greeks called God the mind of the Universe, Logos, derived from ‘word’, not ‘geometry’ meaning “Earth measurement.” And that makes the whole difference, physicists do not grasp. As what they do is ‘geometry’, measure. We philosophers of science do Logos, (-;

Now, we told you, we will evolve mathematics, so we can fit the new concept of cyclical time and fractal space within it, as Descartes and Leibniz did to fit their time vortices and relational infinite times, as Einstein did (not by himself but by applying non-Euclidean mathematics to his description of space).

So to that aim, we just need to complete the scaffolding of mathematics and explain what a mind is, in geometric logic terms.

So we need to complete the concept of fractal quanta of energetic space of quantum physics, the concept of a Universe of multiple time cycles of Einstein, and the philosophy of science, made of causal repetitions of time cycles called laws of science.

Thus we affirm that the Eastern, O-Cyclical concept of Time; and the E-insteinian, Relativistic concept of space, which we shall call, Œ, is superior to the ‘lineal, Abrahamic, concept of time’ and Absolute’ Newtonian, concept of Space.

I like to play with ‘words’. So you could think that A-brahamic, Lineal, A-bsolute Space-time is a simplified, earlier version.

And we shall go even further, into the Non-AE, (Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean), i-nformative concept of Space-time.

And build a new Non-Aristotelian Logic and Non-Euclidean Mathematic formalism, which will set the foundations for a new paradigm of science.

This new Geometry is simple and evident. It is based in the definition of the ‘terms’ which mathematics ill-defined in Euclidean Geometry, points with no parts through which only one parallel crosses, lines with no breath and shallow planes, equaled by superposition, and then once Euclidean Geometry was found to be a ‘limit’ of a larger pan- Geometry NOT lineal but curved inwards (elliptic) or outwards (hyperbolic), on those dark times of confusions, were UNDEFINED.

So we DID not resolve the issue. We CANNOT ESTABLISH the fundamental science of the Experienced Universe, by undefining its fundamental elements. This no way out sponsored by Cantor, who substituted points and numbers by sets, nowhere to be seen in experience, and Hilbert who affirmed ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’, is a failure.

In that regard, the founder of Non-Euclidean geometries Lobachevski was in the right track. We can summarize Lobačevskiĭ’s solution of the problem of the Fifth Postulate.

*The postulate is not provable. Because, infinite lines curve when we have a larger view, becoming exponential inversion of space-time.**By adding the opposite axiom to the basic propositions of geometry a logically perfect and comprehensive geometry, different from the Euclidean, can be developed, providing we limit infinity, (as the 5*^{th}dimension shows) hence parallels do NOT meet on the infinity, and by curving them (hence lines are part of cycles)*The truth of the results of one logically conceivable geometry or another in its application to real space can only be verified experimentally.*

*Thus we must observe the Universe to prove mathematical statements and reduce mathematics as we do with all experimental sciences to those equations which ‘are real’.*

**The evolved formalism of i-logic mathematics: Upgrading Geometry.**

Now, we shall be less literary and start with very solid conceptual elements, namely describing the essence of the fractal paradigm.

And to that aim we shall bring, in the simplest possible form, the fundamental formalism of the Fractal Paradigm, ‘non-euclidean, non-aristotelian i-logic, o-rganic mathematics’.

We call it i-logic because in time, it is more complex, with multiple clocks and i comes after the A of Aristotle (the logic built with a single time clock and a single causal arrow) and we call it organic because in space is more complex, with multiple co-existing spaces, smaller parts that become wholes and O comes after the E of Euclid (geometry with a single continuous space made of points with no breath). But in brief, we shall just talk of Non-Æ, or i-logic mathematics.

So we shall now explain and complete at a very elemental level far more developed in the ∆±∞ posts on i-logic mathematics, the formal language of the fractal paradigm, what truly Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian space-time languages are.

Mind the reader, this is NOT so new. Again, the great revolution of physics in the XX century happened when Einstein realized that a point was a ‘fractal point with volume’, since multiple parallels cross it. So it could not be Euclidean – with no breath, abstract, dimensionless.

Now Einstein found that the Universe was non-euclidean, that is, points did have breath because they could fit many parallels of energy and information. And so they are ‘fractal points’ that grow in size when we come closer to it. But they forgot to change the first postulate of Euclid, and left points undefined, so this simple change of mathematics will open completely the world of science to the fractal paradigm. Let us see how:

**Fractal point with breadth and the networks and social organisms they make, connected together.**

Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:

*Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel*

*E*uclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:

*Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:*

**. ____________**

Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:

*A point external to a line is crossed by *∞ *parallel forces.*

* Real, discontinuous, n-dimensional points: ***===========** **o**

This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.

*So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. *The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.

How dust of space-time becomes a complex system and organises the scalar universe of parts that become larger wholes, from atoms to galaxies, from amino acids to social super organisms of life, *is then the ultimate *process to describe departing from the properties of all forms of dust of space-time. Those fractal points do organise constantly into larger systems, whose summit of complexity is a super organism, in which all those points of different size, speed and form co-ordinate its actions, motions and forms into larger, synchronic super organisms, which however are never eternal, but end up dissolving after its world cycle of existence ends, back into its smaller, fractal parts, loosing its information in the moment of death.

And yet the whole Universe is eternal because motion, entropy never stops. It is the ultimate substance of it all. And so we could say the Universe lives an eternal present as dust evolves into organic forms, emerge as a larger whole in a scalar, bigger world, where it develops its algorithms of existence, absorbing energy and information for its body waves and particle-heads, repeating its structure in other regions of space-time, and finally dissolving back; once and again, per in secula seculorum, the Universe repeats those simple games.

And so it can be considered a fixed block of 5Dimensions of space-time, where certain paths will imprint certain beings, which will again dissolve, as a screen of a television can run infinite softwares, which will be waves of form that disappear while the hardware stays. That hardware is what we call temporal energy, the motion with form of which we are all made:

**∆nalysis: 5D. Finitesimals – the present, static spatial view of ∆-1 beings.**

While the topological ternary structures and growth of social networks of fractal points can define easily the emergence of a super organism, in strict mathematical terms, the second sub discipline of mathematics, analysis, deals directly with the relationships between finitesimal parts and social, organic wholes. So the specific mathematical discipline that studies the scalar, fractal 5th dimension of space-time Beings in quantitative terms is analysis. And it is specially useful for the study of systems in which the internal organisation is minimal – that is systems