# draft

**RELATIVITY REVIS(IT)ED**

*ltiple space dimensions, like the 5 ^{th} dimension the artist fails to render in the hypercube do not exist in reality. Those objects are mathematical, linguistic fictions caused by the fact that any language of information is inflationary, as literary fictions are. The beauty of some mathematical theories, as the beauty of literature obscure those self-evident facts.*

** **

** Special Relativity: Time is not the 4 ^{th} dimension of space.**

The key question regarding Relativity on the fractal paradigm, once Causal, Dynamic Triangulation has shown that from a bidimensional, holographic Universe we can build the 4 dimensions of Relativity, by fractal ‘reproduction’ (modelled as a diffusion system through fractal space) is the meaning of the 4 dimension of time in Einstein’s equations. The answer is in the previous sentence: *present reproduction. Space-time is a self-organizing, emergent network of Non-Euclidean points that form a ‘body-background’ for future growth of more complex particle, by expanding a present sheet of space.*

Indeed, when we apply the in-depth-philosophy of fractal space-time structures to illuminate the why of those 2 masterpieces of mathematical physics, CDT and Relativity, all becomes conceptually cleared. The first blue print the Universe creates is the sheet of present space-time by the fractal growth of a previous smaller scale. CDT doesn’t inquire about the ‘meaning’ of that time arrow but clearly establishes its nature as a reproductive, fractal arrow; while the jargon of relativity defines present with the term ‘simultaneity’. This in this and the next paragraph we shall translate the jargon of quantum and relativity physics the general jargon of multiple spaces and times and correct some errors of classic relativity, clarifying its concepts as we have done with other theories.

* Dimensions as motions of time and fixed space.*

In the graph, dimensions are not only static forms of space but also dynamic time dimensions, which are created by the motions of time arrows since fixed space, according to the duality of the Galilean Paradox has always a degree of motion.

In fact we live in a membrane of light-space, whose Entropy /motion and dimensions are those of light quanta that constantly evolve, warp and produce virtual particles, while other particles dissolve in scalar big-bangs returning to the vacuum light-space.

Moreover in the Organic Universe dimensions are finite, reaching always a limit – either the limit of the membrane or ecosystem or the superorganism in which we measure.

Those dimensional distances in our light-membrane are given by the maximal distance/life span of light, which contrary to belief dissolves itself back into the gravitational space membrane after 10 billion years of fractal reproductions in the gravitational space-time quanta. In a diffeomorphic being, like a human being those dimensions grow till the limit of our space-time membrane, and so on. Thus, beyond the limits of a certain superorganism, there is a discontinuity from microcosms into macrocosms, which can only be ‘bridged’ with transitional spaces.

In the case of physical space we talk of two membranes of space-time, the smallest of which is our Euclidean, 3-dimensional light-space and the bigger one, the non-Euclidean gravitational space,. And between both membranes there are ‘doors’ called black holes and ‘transformative’ forces, called weak forces which transform particles from one membrane into the other, and flows of Entropy and information that can transcend through a transitional spacetime known in Relativity as a ‘Rosen bridge’.

Dimensions are complex motions, interpreted according to the Galilean paradox (dual motion/form analysis), also as forms of static space, in the same manner you see a car ‘line’ in a night still picture or a ‘fixed wheel’ when it rotates too fast.

*The partial application of Non-Euclidean Geometry by Einstein*

Those clarifications are needed to consider some conceptual revisions to General Relativity regarding its meaning reach and limits due to its analysis of only a single space continuum and a single time arrow.

The result is only an approximation to reality, with some errors and deep insights, which works as long as we establish a conventional rod of spacetime measure – the postulate of c-speed as absolute – and deal with phenomena in a single spacetime continuum, either in the light-space studied by special relativity or the gravitational space studied by general relativity.

Indeed, what Einstein did was to apply a mathematical advance, the discovery of the 5^{th} postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry to the understanding of gravitational space. Now that we have corrected the other 4 postulates, we can resolve and advance much further the Physics of spacetime into the new paradigm of a Universe made of scalar membranes, each one a network of non-Euclidean, fractal points, whose e-st-r parameters (universal constants of Entropy, information and reproduction) and exo actions (existential forces) define all the events and forms of reality.

In that regard, Time and its natural language logic, is the first language of God, wider than mathematics. For that reason, Frege and Hilbert were able to derive the isomorphisms of mathematics from the isomorphisms of logic time, the ‘true language of God. Albeit a dualist logic more complex than the simple, lineal logic of Aristotle that physicists use in its spatial study of time. So time is a deeper phenomenon that encompasses all the spaces that there were and will be transformed by 4 possible arrows of time; and what truly matters is to learn the logic rules that transform in each species, a fractal, vital space, from past to future, between birth and extinction, guided by one of those 4 main time arrows.

*The restricted formula of time-change as motion of space.*

In that sense, the image physicists have of reality is restricted by the concept of lineal time and a single arrow of entropy, which also limits the solution of physical questions and introduces errors as the cosmological big-bang or the evaporation of black holes, mentioned before.

Physicists have spatialized time, defined with a single dimension, as a parameter of changes in motions and space, t=s/v.

This limited study of only one type of change, however is often forgotten, creating conceptual errors, such as the fantasy of time travel (as they don’t realize there are infinite clocks of time in the Universe and so all time travel is local, within a certain organism as in the processes of death.)

In fact, when physicists confront the phenomenon of time, they do so only from the perspective of spatial change, a very limited part of the entire realm of time=changes. And so both, Galilean relativity and Einsteinian relativity are theories about the motion and Entropy of space, its invariances and isomorphisms, not a theory about all types of Time-change as this work is. And when someone like Hawking affirms that time travel is possible because time-motion gets to zero in a black hole, he merely forget he is speaking about the time-motion defined in the previous formula, t=s/v or its self-similar Einsteinian version not about the sum of the infinite time cycles of the Universe that remain unchanged.

The readers must be therefore aware of the limits of study of time *in any physical theory, from Galilean to Einsteinian Relativity. *Today, when Physicists talk about time they talk about is a parameter, t, which appeared first in an equation of speed, V=s/t, that Galileo found when studying translational change in space or ‘spatial movement’. Furthermore, because that rate of change in space is considered infinitesimal, V=ds/dt, they talk about present changes in space, which Einstein defined with his concepts of ‘present simultaneity’.

This was fully understood by painters, who started to paint simultaneous, present time, in a single bidimensional space, as the sum of fractal movements (Duchamp’s staircase models and Picasso’s cubist perspective), but surprisingly enough the people who grasped with more difficulty the concept of spatial, present simultaneous analysis of time, were the same physicists that had invented this model of time analysis.

Moreover, ever since physicists have denied there are many other ways in which time=change happens in the Universe, beyond the limited study of ‘changes in speed’ that Physics analyzes. This has been explained many, many times to Physicists, since Bergson and Poincare explained to Einstein and Minkowski that they were ‘spatializing time’, or rather analyzing how vacuum space changes in time, (so Poincare could establish with Topological analysis self-similar equations to those of relativity).

Yet there are many other things besides vacuum space that change in time. We humans change in time our morphology (not our speed). Evolution changes in time the form of many species. Time is thus a synonymous in most sciences of a change in form, in the in-form-ation of species. And this type of informative change is basically ignored by Physics. This shows a general misconception of the meaning of Time in Physics, which has been termed as ‘simplistic and reductionist’ by philosophers of science. Because indeed it is.

Time is philosophically defined as ‘change’ and divided in the study of ‘translational change’, which is carried out by Physics, and the study of ‘morphological change’; which is carried out by Biology. In that regard, Galileo defined only a limited type of time-change, translational change, with his equation, V=s/t. He ‘spatialized Time’ (Bergson), reducing the study of Time to a single process of change, movement.

*Special relativity: the study of the light-membrane.*

On the other hand, special relativity studies changes in the motions of the light-space membrane, *departing from a rod of Measure – light speed – taken as a convention.*

Einstein chose a postulate without proof, the postulate of c-speed as absolute. Of the 3 elements in the definition of time-motion by physicists, V=s/t, he could have taken any of them as absolute, but he chose light-speed. This is merely a matter of choice, as if we want to make a metric space able to ‘measure’, we need a ‘fixed rod’ value, which Einstein chose to be c-speed. Again, we could consider light speed variable and fix instead the time cycles/frequencies of light (so red light with lesser frequency/form travels faster than violet light and finally dissolves into non-local gravitation without form, dying about 10 billion years after birth – which solves some key problems such as the expansion of intergalactic space). Yet since we humans have a biological brain that fixes all light rays and extract instead the ‘color/form’ information of light, the convention of C-speed establishes a rod to create metric spaces and reduce the fluctuations of topological, real spaces. So far, so good, but as we shall see this convention to achieve the measures of relativity becomes a much bigger error when c-speed limits are applied to the gravitational membrane, when they should be limited to its use in the galaxy of light, since it is a limit caused by the substance of the light-space membrane, light itself.

Ultimately a true theory of spacetime Relativity, the concept that matters in Einstein’s work, means that speed is also relative to the scale we observe and c-speed limits only apply to vacuum space and other forms with higher information (since the general formula of speed in all systems is speed=energetic space/temporal information; so forms with higher information are slower, as they have to build in each translational step all its form across multiple planes of complexity).

But Einstein in his analysis of space-time still used a single ‘continuum space-time’, the abstract Cartesian plane, and was interested only as all practical physicists by the creation of a ‘metric space’ in which instrumental measures were possible. He did not realize that time-space was discontinuous and at least structured into st-planes, the gravitational space of masses and gravitational forces that move faster than light and have a density of order inferior to 0 K (black holes, quarks, intergalactic dark Entropy, etc.) and the light-membrane limited to c-speed. This error was understandable, since we can only observe the light space that fills up with background radiation the entire galaxy and imprints gravitational space, ‘forming’ it into light. Hence in the galaxy indeed, light space imposes a c-limit of speed to all motions; but that is not the case when we go beyond light space into intergalactic gravitational space that experience shows to move up to 10 c speeds according to the natural decametric scales of the Universe.

*Galilean Relativity: the error of Cartesian, continuum space.*

The 2^{nd} error of relativity, the continuity of spacetime is caused by a misunderstanding of the curved, geometrical nature of time and its dimensions, caused by the Cartesian plane of lineal time: To draw a clock-cycle of temporal information we need at least 2 dimensions, as morphology requires form, in-form-ation; and so lineal time with a single dimension cannot study it. Thus when Descartes and Galileo simplified time into one dimension, he eliminated the analysis of morphological change and information, the 2^{nd} arrow of the Universe, from most disciplines of science.

All cycles have 2 directions or arrows to complete its form. In the pre-scientific age, those 2 arrows of relative past and future were understood as the 2 sections of curved times cycles. So times are indeed, as Einstein thought, curved, to the point of closing themselves into causal cycles that return all beings to their origin, but they have 2 dimensions, height and rhythm. So it does space. Each local times ‘curves the Entropy of space’, creating fractal in-form-ation (masses and forces in physical, evolving information in biology, etc.). Since a cycle needs 2 directions to close into itself and create a form. Entropy consists in an amorphous, relative surface of undifferentiated quanta, a plane without form, which the creation of time cycles shapes into information and makes it recognizable, thanks to its 2 dimensions. Both geometries, cycles of time and planes space, are bidimensional. When both systems merge, the sum of fractal, bidimensional fields of time and Entropy, create only one more, 3^{rd} intersecting dimension of combined time-space, *width,* which has a rhythm of temporal movement, the 4^{th} dimension of time=change that we observe as *reality*.

Unfortunately the error of Descartes and Galileo, which simplified cyclical time into a single-dimensional line, had as a first consequence the reduction of time in human sciences to a lineal duration, measured with a scalar number, similar to the way we measure space. It is what philosophers of science call the ‘spatialization of time’. Now spatial time becomes a secondary parameter to calculate spatial and energetic motions and processes – not an objective of knowledge in itself. Accordingly, Galileo defined time as a measure of ‘translational, spatial change’, of movement in lineal space or speed (V=S/T), simplifying time into a lineal number, defined in terms of movement and space.

*Light and dark Entropy Interaction: gravitational space warping.*

Physicists are always referring only to the arrow of time=change in the motion of beings (t=v/s), which is by tautology a function of space. Thus, Philosophers talk of the spatialization of time, which is made dependant of Entropy and movement. Einstein was perhaps the only physicist aware of this error when he said ‘I seem to be the only person that believes there are many times with different rhythms’. So when his followers say that time is the 4^{th} dimension of space, he did not agree; but he pointed out that even in Relativity Time has an inverse, negative sign, so its properties must be opposite to those of space. But physicists ignored his dictum: ‘we cannot send wire messages to the past’, he insisted. And when Meyerson, the French philosopher of time published a rebuttal of Minkowski’s reductionist theory of time as the 4^{th }dimension of space, *‘La deduction Relativiste’,* 1928, and he could express his ideas without the enormous peer pressure, usual in this profession of fundamentalist scientists, he praised it as one of the most remarkable books written about the relativity theory from the standpoint of epistemology (the scientific method) and explicitly agreed with its rejection of the spatial interpretation of a world-line of Minkowski.

Time motion in Relativity has a negative sign, since it refers to the implosive arrow of information that contracts space, NOT to the expansive arrow of spatial Entropy and entropy. Time in General Relativity is the factor that warps Entropy into information, evolves form, trans/forming the Entropy of gravitational space into the frequency of form of light-space. Time in special relativity warps the Entropy of the vacuum, as light imprints its form. Thus Time is –t^{2} in the equation of Special Relativity:

*s ^{2} =x^{2} +y^{2} +z^{2} – c^{2 }t^{2}*

Space is positive and time is negative because it forms, contracts space into a wave-frequency that carries information.

Yet the why of that warping of the gravitational membrane by light-information could not be understood by Einstein since it required fractal, Non-Euclidean models of discontinuous space-time to describe how form evolves. So Physicists ignored the informative effect that warps Entropy into form.

*Einsteinian relativity inherits the error of spatial time.*

Let us study that conclusion in more detail. This tendency increased further when Einstein used the same concept of translational, spatial change to define time. In that respect, it is popular to talk of time as ‘the 4 dimension of space’ in Relativity.

This is a misconception of Einstein’s equations, which do not include all time=changes, as the 4^{th} dimension of reality, but only spatial change, moving space, what Galileo defined as S=vt.

In Einstein’s formalism moving space writes as ct, since Einstein studies phenomena that happens as the speed of light; so vt becomes ct (where c is light speed).

Thus s=ct, the 4^{th} dimension of Special Relativity, is not time but ‘moving space’, defined as the product of translational change=lineal time-duration, t, and light speed, c. And so there is no philosophical advance respect to Galilean Relativity that already defined time as a change/dimension of moving space.

Yet this capacity of time to measure change in space is only a fraction of the properties and modes of change that time measures in the Universe, and reveals nothing about the frequency and form of physical time cycles.

Though Einstein latter, in his General Relativity went deeper and discovered that Time is a curved clock geometry, which in the Universe bends space into masses, in his initial work, ‘Special Relativity’ he was still a classic physicist who declared as Galileo did that ‘time is what a clock measures’ and so he still used the Galilean, lineal concept of time-speed, v=s/t, to define it.

However, Einstein never said that time is ‘only’ a dimension of space as lesser physicists say today routinely. This reductionist, ‘spatial concept’ of time was provided by Minkowski and Einstein opposed to it, saying ‘that time behave differently since wires didn’t travel to the past’.

Time indeed is causal, logic and defined by time arrows which are not symmetric; that is left and right are equal but motion to the past (informative flow that devolves into Entropy) and motion to the future (Entropy flow that evolves into information) have different properties. This is known in the wording of classic physics as the ‘breaking of symmetry’ in processes that involve time evolution (those mediated by the weak force), or ‘chirality’ in other systems of physics and chemistry.

Yet the simplification of Minkowski became popular among physicists, as it allowed to keep Galileo’s tradition of studying time as a lineal parameter dependant of speed (V=s/t).

In that sense, though this work is conceptual to facilitate its comprehension to a wider audience and so we have reduced equations to a minimum, it is worth to consider that spatial vision of time in Special Relativity in more detail, given the simplicity of its mathematical equations.

Think first of two dimensions, the surface of a sheet of paper, for example, of length x and width y. The shortest distance s between two opposite corners is given by Pythagoras’ theorem: s^{2} = x^{2} + y^{2}. If we now go to three dimensions, the shortest distance between two opposite corners of your room, for example, one on the floor and the other in the opposite corner on the ceiling, where the room is x long, y wide and z high, is given by: s^{2} = x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2}. So what happens if we go to four dimensions, trying to include ‘lineal time’ and ‘moving space’ and measure the space-time interval between two camera flashes, for example, one happening at one corner of your room and the other happening at the opposite corner but a few seconds, t, later?

We might think, if we follow the concept that time is just another dimension of space that the answer would be: s^{2} = x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2} + t^{2}, but we would be wrong:

– First, cycles of temporal information, as we have seen, are inverted to spatial Entropy, so the term t^{2} must be negative.

– Second, time is not space, and we are measuring space.

We are just adding now a time-related term of moving space or speed – Galileo’s formula – to our measure; we are not adding pure time but moving space, so to be able to add apples=spaces and pears=time we have to convert time into moving space and we do so with Galileo’s equation v=s/t, hence s=vt, which means we ad, s=vt. Now, the big question arises: what kind of moving space we are measuring?

Or in other terms, what is V; the speed of the space we are measuring? The answer of Einstein was ‘light’, since the velocity of light was found to be equal in all systems, regardless of the speed of the observer, light was a kind of space-time itself, uninfluenced by the movement of the relative points we were measuring.

So Einstein added a corrective factor of measure or 4^{th} coordinate of space, related to the translational speed of the light-space between the 2 relative points we were measuring. Light-space, the space our eyes see, is made of light, a quantum of Entropy. Space is not static but, as the impressionist painters thought, we see light-space and so we have to add a parameter to correct for the movement of that light space to make accurate measures: s=vt=ct, moving light space. It is not pure time, cyclical time or frequency or lineal time or duration.

Thus, it is absurd to say that time is the 4^{th} dimension of space. What we should say is that light-space has movement, s=ct, a parameter to ad in any measure of translation, in a Universe of moving spatial energies. And the relativity equation adds those underlying moving flows of spatial Entropy and speed: s^{2} = x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2} – c^{2}t^{2}, which gives us the space-time separation, s, between two points of any space-time subject to motion. Finally, rather than measuring the distance across an extended interval of space-time, it is important to deal only with the separation of adjacent events separated by an infinitesimal change in the coordinates, dx, dy, dz, dt.

So the correct expression of the infinitesimal separation of 2 adjacent events is now: ds^{2} = dx^{2} + dy^{2} + dz^{2} – c^{2}dt^{2}. This is called the metric of flat space-time. If we want to include ‘curved’ space-time then we put a coefficient, not equal to one, in front of each term, dx^{2} etc., which bends the specific coordinates. This allows the possibility that a trajectory in space-time might be ‘curved’, which was the big discovery of Einstein, by creating many adjacent points and joining them in all types of trajectories in space-time, as those you trace in your daily life.

In order to find out the separation between two events you have to add up, or integrate all the infinitesimal ds intervals along the light path. And then it is when things can get as complex mathematically as you want, allowing you better measures of the shapes and movements of the Universe.

This is all what there is to it: an improvement on Galileo’s study of translational space. Yet in that equation time is not a 4^{th} dimension of space, but a measure of the speeds of the space-time background. The 2 important discoveries of that equation are the curved nature of space-time; and the use of c instead of v as the speed of that spatial background. Einstein realized that the wobbling of space could be incorporated adding ct as a parameter of translational change, which he did. But he did not added time as a 4^{th} dimension but the moving properties of the fractal space-time or light-space on which our electromagnetic world builds itself.

*Informative contraction: light imprints gravitational space.*

Einstein latter adapted Galileo’s formula to a fluctuating space-time background adding the implosive, -ct, arrow of gravitation to all translational movements. Thus he realized that Time in Physics also has a component of morphological change, as time warps Entropy into in-form-ation, not only in evolutionary processes, but also warps the Entropy of vacuum into in-form-ative masses.

And this is in fact the most important finding of the previous formula, which becomes crystal clear when we consider a ‘standard’ plane of two arrows of time, Entropy and information, which is represented by negative, imaginary numbers.

Thus what the negative symbol behind the ‘square’ of time, easily reduced to an O number really means is that the imprinting or reproduction of the light wave over the gravitational space in which imprints its information provokes a contraction of form, proportional to the informative time cycle and reproductive speed of the wave of light, according to the general isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times, in a phenomena comparable to the dragging of any motion over an opposite flow. Since indeed, what light does from its p.o.v. is to feed on an opposite flow of gravitational forces where it reproduces itself, and in doing so it obviously suffers a drug, like the recoil of shooting a gun or the slowing speed of a plane dragging Entropy from air through its wings

*Absolute Relativity: c is not the limit of speed of the Universe.*

It is yet another proof of the scalar structure of the Universe, as electrons which emit light first ‘connect’ through the gravitational non-local plane (giving birth to the entanglement process) and when they are locked they emit a flow of light. A fact which also explains the Postulate of absolute speed of light as a ‘local effect’, NOT an universal law; since electrons only emit light when they are locked, and we can only observe light when our instruments lock with the emitter and so there is no a sum of speeds as Michelson thought (though there are several ways to measure this, and so Relativity is right as a system of measure but wrong as a philosophy of time-space). This postulate is further proved wrong by the fact that the diffeomorphic principle of relativity establishes a relativity of space and time, but speed=v=s/t is a parameter of space and time; hence the limits of speed are relative according to the scales we study; which means C is only the limit of the light-space membrane in which we inhabit but not the limit of gravitation that is the force of the other membrane of the Universe.

Yet, those conceptual clarifications born of a model of multiple space-time membranes and time cycles were not available when Relativity was deduced in mathematical terms, and so new errors in the conception of time appeared soon. Minkowski first though that time was the ‘4^{th} dimension of space’. Then, because of the mentioned error of a single arrow of time for the entire Universe, Physicists thought that when they measure NOT the change in translational time of the formula of speed, v=s/t, but all the time of the Universe and time travel was possible. Yet when time appears with a negative term, it doesn’t mean, as people like Minkowski or recently Hawking think, that time is traveling to the past. Such patent nonsense comes out of the generalization of the parameter t=s/v, the equation which defines time in physics (or –ct in Einstein’s improved formula), to the entire range of time=changes of reality, including morphological time-change.

Special Relativity uses time, as a t parameter of space and speed as physicists always do, in this case to measure moving spatial Entropy – the flows of gravitational and electromagnetic space-time that act as the scaffolding of the world we inhabit. The fact that a century later most physicists still think that all what matters about time is its use as a parameter of translational change, s=ct, shows how much time has been degraded and distorted in modern science due to its lineal simplification in Galilean Physics and Cartesian geometries by the concept that there is only one arrow of time for all the cycles of the Universe, which is ‘what a clock measures’ (Einstein, Galileo).

The concept of a fractal point and the relativity of space and time and its parameter of speed, only absolute within the limits of a certain spacetime brane, has 2 immediate formal generalizations:

*‘The maximal speed of a space-time membrane corresponds to the limit of speed of its more extended, less formal spatial substance, such as **“** exo=k _{i} -> max. c = c (max. e x Min O).’*

In other words, because we live in the light membrane, the limit of speed is c. If we were in the gravitational world, the limit of speed will be that of Gravitational forces > c; if we consider from the relative point of view of our size, the world of life beings, the limit of speed is that of the cheetah and so on.

The second, deeper consequence of absolute relativity and the difference between space displacements and temporal displacement is even more radical: because measure is relative to the point of view of the observer, the Universe is not a metric space but a topological space, in which distance and speed are absolutely relative and do not change the type of reality we describe. This again solves many questions of physics and we shall return to it, when analysing in more detail black holes as a ‘sample case’ of the applications of Multiple Spaces-Times to cosmology.

*Fantaphysics: bizarre theories based in a single time arrow.*

Today, because of that erroneous sentence, ‘time is the 4^{th} dimension of space’, an entire bizarre world of ‘manifolds’ with multiple ‘spatial, fixed dimensions’ developed as a ‘serious’ branch of physics, whose authors believe religiously, and a series of theories of a Universe with only entropy (evaporating black holes; Universal big-bang, etc.) have become the foundations of astrophysics despite their theoretical fantasy and increasing contradiction with experimental evidence. Those physical theories use the limited definition of time to create imaginary worlds of mathematical thought as irrelevant to our understanding of the cosmos as the fictional, idealistic characters of Quixote, despite the linguistic beauty of the wor(l)ds of Cervantes, or the beauty of hyper-cubes, which have nothing to do with reality.

*Recap:* Time is not the 4^{th} dimension of space, a misleading definition, caused by 2 errors in our conception of space-time and dimensionality:

– The error of a lineal, ∞ space-time misunderstands the cyclical and hence finite nature of the dimensions of all space-time cycles, reduced to the limits of the cycle. Since space/time has a fractal structure whose dimensions are not all in the same continuum space-time; but evolve across several scales that transfer between them Entropy and information under self-similar isomorphisms described with i-logic geometry. Yet each ‘relative plane of space-time’ or scale of reality, acts in many ways independently from the others.

– Galilean Paradox. What we perceive as quiet space (i.e., a moving time cycle) is in perpetual movement. The Galilean Paradox is an error of perception that hides the dual nature of any growing, real dimension, both as a movement in time that becomes a fixed form of space. Since the subjective minds tends to fix ‘time movements’ into space objects.

In Relativity, the misunderstanding of the Galilean Paradox – a perceptive error that makes moving cycles seem static dimensions of space – has caused a conceptual error: its interpretation of time as the 4^{th} dimension of space. The Galileo Paradox converts dynamic time processes of change into static, spatial distances, hiding the dual nature of dimensions that are both, a movement in time and a fixed form of space. Since the subjective minds tends to fix ‘time movements’ into spatial objects.

Yet since space is a motion and light flows over the inverse motion of gravitational space, the key factor of the Special equations of Relativity shows light contracting by (cti)^{2}, as it flows against the simpler gravitational spacetime, which causes a drag calculated by the metric space of special Relativity.

**Main symbols of T.Œ:**

Those are the essential symbols of ¬Æ used in the simplex first 2 lines:

- ¬Æ: Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean, i-logic mathematics (Formal language of T.Œ).
- To, temporal clock, Ot, informative time (its spatial, static view), particle state, future form.
- Ω: Timespace symmetry of 3 ages
- Œ: Present system of vital space and temporal energy, present form, body-wave.
- Se, Spatial Entropy, Es, Entropic space, its dynamic view.
- B, Topological spacetime Symmetry
- >›: Motion through states of cyclical time. Informative flow that diminishes size in space and accelerates clocks in time
- <‹: Motion backwards through states of cyclical time. Kinetic energy that increases speed or enlarges Œ in space.
- <<«: Entropy, Death. Quantum jump from future to past.
- >>»: Emergence, Conception. Quantum jump from past to future.
- ≈ reproductive, present flow, wave state.
- Λ, ∆: 5
^{th}dimension. Arrow of eusocial evolution, ‘love’ and life; emergence into a larger scale of the 5th dimension, minimal action in the 5^{th}dimension. - ∨, Ñ : 5
^{th}dimension. Arrow of social devolution and death to a lower plane of the 5th dimension. - X: 5
^{th}dimension, static view as 3 co-existing planes of existence. - ∑: reproduction in space; ∑Q: herd loosely connected in limbs/fields; lower social class of micropoints.
- X: Perpendicular Darwinian, invasive relationship.
- ≈: Parallel, eusocial relationship
- ∏: reproduction across scales of the 5th dimension; ∏o: upper, informative class of hierarchical, fully connected heads/particles.
- X, N ±1; Networks-planes of the 5th dimension.
- Å, Â, ∆ Space-time cyclical actions through the 5
^{th}dimension, divided into simplex actions, Å: ±∆e,I; ∆a, moving action, acceleration ∆e, energy feeding, ∆o: absorption of information, perception, or emission, communication and complex social actions, which are composite of several actions across the 5^{th}dimension: Â: ∆i, iterative communicative reproduction, ∆u: evolution of a parts into Universals. - œ,¢-1: cell or, fractal finitesimal action of the whole in time or space; Œ, whole, U, Universal World.

Those symbols suffice to explain the structure and transformations of all 5D space-time systems, departing from its 3 space organs, symmetric to its 3 time ages and its 3 5D planes.

The symbols for the 3 co-existing planes of super organisms in space and its cyclical actions in time are:

X, n -1: ¢ (spatial forms as points-particles) ≈ ±∆ a, e, I, o, U (actions in time).

X, n: Œ (Spatial forms as distinguishable individual) or Œo ≈ A or Λ in time for the i-ndividual scale (organic, thermodynamic).

X, n+1: U (Universals, superorganism in space) W (worldcycle in time for the larger scale) ≈

Those symbols suffice to explain the structure and transformations of all 5D space-time systems, departing from its 3 space organs, symmetric to its 3 time ages and its 3 5D planes.

**The content of this post and blog.**

Since physics is the most extensive discipline of science today, we can hardly introduce its main themes in this post.

The structure of the web when reasonably completed in its 2 first lines by Christmas 2016, will be simple:

1st, simplex (and 3rd complex line) explains the isomorphic laws of 5D fractal knots of space-time (all what exists).

2nd, simplex (and 4th, complex line) makes an analysis of the main human experienced systems of fractal space-times in the Universe with those isomorphic laws of T.Œ. (a Theory of Everything), starting from:

U±∞, the ¬Æ (non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean algebra, which evolves logic to accommodate 3 time arrows and mathematics to accommodate fractal points and 5D planes), dedicate to the logic, mathematical language of 5D space-time, which defines all the laws of all the planes of the Universe, following with…

The U>3, galactic and cosmic planes, the U-2, atomic plane, the U+2, Geological planet, the 3 strictly physical planes of time-space following…

Closer to human beings, with the U±1 life-plane the Uo, human mental and individual plane, the U1, historic plane of social superorganisms of mankind and the U2, eco(nomic)system that is terraforming the Earth into a global planet of machines, ill-managed by the primitive social sciences of today.

I am now confident I will complete those 2 lines on time, for anyone who truly wants to understand reality with a jump of depth never witnessed since the last huge r=evolution of times theory took place (Darwin in biology, Marx in history and his disciple Kondratieff in economics and Einstein and Planck in physical space-time). The difference being that cyclical time r=evolves all their disciplines TOGETHER plus the human creative time (art, religion, etc.)

Then 3^{rd} line will expand T.Œ with a detailed comparative analysis of those scales through the 10 isomorphisms of nature derived of the 3 x 3 + 0 elements of all systems (its space, time, 5D planes and O-points). This, the reader should grasp from the beginning: Time-space is fractal meaning each part can be sub-divided for more detailed analysis in 3 sub-parts which will show the same ternary symmetries. So we can get as detailed as we want.

And for that the 4^{th} line should be an encyclopedia of all sciences and human creations, which future generations will complete after my worldcycle concludes.

As I suffered recently a stroke and some anoxia to add to other life-threatening sicknesses, the task of ordering thousands of pages of 20 years of research is titanic; so I often throw desperado blocks of information with no proper grammar and a lot of ‘entropy’-disorder, just in case. Sorry about that. All I promise are the 2 lines by Christmas 2016, at professional level – enough for anyone who cares to understand, to upgrade its mind and understand the pantheist Universe.

On the 3^{rd} and 4th hopefully I will be able to leave enough ‘good work’ for Asian thinkers, who certainly will find cyclical time=Tao and the explanation of the Universe as a constant game of Yin=information=Vishnu and yang=energy=Shiva (to put T.Œ in relationship with their earlier philosophies of science), to take notice and go further if by chance or word of mouth they stumble upon www.unificationtheory.com.

If not I will drop around 4000 pages of ¬Æ studies on them in the present ‘difficult condition’ for future researchers to take advantage of it; since regardless of this finitesimal of human thought, outside objectively there is an entire realm to explore –that of the 5^{th} dimension, which humans NEED to know to fully understand and survive in the living, organic Universe, to which they are today mostly blind, merely perceiving it with mathematical equations they have ‘found’ without even rationally comprehend what they mean.

Thus the main purpose of those 2 first lines is to show the isomorphic nature of all species of the pantheist Universe. We dealt with cosmology in the previous U+3: Galaxy, post and will deal with Geology in the U+2: Earth. So this post, which completes the triad on astrophysical sciences deals with the bulk of classic, thermodynamic and quantum physics in between the particle and the molecule.

The post is structured in 2 main parts:

– First we describe physics, as we do with any other system, through the 10 isomorphic sets of 5D space-time laws that physical systems obey as all other systems of Nature. That is, they show a ternary structure in space, a worldcycle in time of 3±L ages between conception and extinction; and complex organic relationships between 3 co-existing planes (n-1: electromagnetic, quantum plane; n: Thermodynamic, human plane; n+1: cosmic, gravitational plane).

# **II. THE PHYSICAL SCALES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION**

**THE GENERATOR EQUATION THROUGH ALL THE SCALES OF THE 5 ^{TH} DIMENSION**

**The ‘Generator’ equation of space-time beings and its ternary logic.**

Unfortunately the beats of the universe are difficult to understand because the logic of present man, especially that of physicists seems ‘lineal Aristotelian’: A causes B.

Reality though is more like the Eastern philosophies of Vishnu-yin-information and Shiva-yang-energy/motion:

A<=>B, that is A and B interact to create a ternary <=> present element.

Reason why there is conservation of Angular and Lineal Momentum, there is Space and Time, Energy and Information, O-Particles/Heads that store time cycles and limbs/fields that move them, mixed in bodies and waves that reproduce both of them.

Humans of course, naturally have always expressed this ‘Ternary’ Structure of the universe.

And so the parallel syntax of the languages of knowledge we use to describe those Universal beings – verbal, mathematical and visual languages – all have the same ternary ‘grammar’, which I have called the ‘Fractal Generator’ of the Universe:

Tƒ (Subject or Function of ‘temporal information’) < ST: action, operandi or verb ≥ Sp (Object of ‘spatial energy’).

We associate counter-intuitively ‘cycles with motion’ and ‘lines with Still space’.

It has to do a lot with the limiting errors of classic physics, where only lineal inertial motion matters. Fact is big-bang explosion DECELERATE speed till it becomes Still lineal distances and dimensions, that is pure lineal space with no motion or vacuum space (as in any physical big-bang of entropy). While the equation of cyclical vortex, is Vo x Ro = K (2-manifold, simplest variety), which counter-intuitively accelerates (∆V) when distance becomes smaller, (-∆R) to maintain K constant.

Thus clocks, frequencies and vortices accelerate ,and have more ‘time’ content, that lineal motions that decelerate to a halt.

Now, we explained before that in duality Space was slower, extensive, Sp, Size, and time was faster, cyclical, accelerated (so are its maths). But now in ternary symmetry we have the need to ‘extend’ the meanings of time and space to the duality of the 3 motions of time and the 3 organic parts of spatial bodies and this makes some confusing choices of terms, such as:

Space will be the still, formal view of reality and Time the motion view. And so we shall talk of 3 ‘topologies of formal space’, and 3 ‘ages of time motion’, which together shape the fundamental duality of reality, the view of organs in simultaneous space and the view of beings living a worldcycle of 3 ages of time:

Sp (limbs-fields)≈ Young, past, expansive age < ST: Present, repetitive, hyperbolic body-waves, adult reproductive age>Tƒ (Temporal, future informative, cyclical old age).

Now here the convention I have adopted is to *Use the same symbols for either symmetries, the limb-field<body-wave>head-particle or spatial simultaneous view of an organism in space, and the Young-past-expansive < present-Adult-reproductive>Old-Informative 3 ages of time.*

This is where things seem confusing because the whole thing transmutes. The old age of future time has more information and it is cyclical, properties of time cycles, but it is also slower, property of space decelerating motions. The young expansive age has more motion, a property of time more than space and so on.

But as I have told you B & W and 3 color view are new worlds, and this is the closest way to express past references and correspond with human expression of all this.

A way out to avoid confusions with the ternary symmetry is to use more when dealing with the still, simultaneous spatial view, the ‘symbols of geometry-topology, |, O and Ø:

|-Limbs/fields < Ø-waves-bodies> O-Heads/Particles

And the same for time ages with the reference of time motions:

|-young past < Ø-present, reproduction > O-Information, future, old age.

So it shows the symmetry with the symbols | , Ø, and O.

If in the future anyone goes through my 30 years of research in all this, they will then find that I profusely use those symbols.

But trust me if you really understand T.Œ which is more a question of mental attitude, the understanding will be clear from the beginning.

**The generator equation.**

So I wrote the Generator Equation, a symbolic equation that represented all the systems made of fractal space and cyclical time and its space-time combinations, whose geometries ARE the 3 ‘only’ Topologies of the Universe we perceive:

**Γ**. Generator: Toroid Sp(limbs/fields) < Hyperbolic ST(st) (repetitive waves-bodies) > Spherical Tƒ (head Particles)

Since limbs and heads, fields and particles interacted and mixed their lines and cycles into ‘conic bodies, and elliptical orbits and hyperbolic waves’.

Or as Cheng-Tzu the Taoist philosopher put it: from 1 (time cycles or Tao), comes 2 (the yang-line of energy and the yin-information, broken line) and from 2 comes 3, and from 3 the infinite beings.

(Asian cultures defined always time as cyclical, without the distortion of lineal physical time, also for cultural reasons we shall soon explain.)

So I could classify all the different space-time beings made with the 3 topological formal motions of the Generator.

Since Nature ‘*pegs’ those 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous*, spatial organisms:

It is clear that Informative Time, It, is far more important, as a cycle has more dimensions, more length, and stores lines inside. So the Time, informative system (the head/particle) controls the line, the energy/limbs/fields systems. And all systems had one on top or in the place where information is more available to them. The plant has its ‘head in the roots’ that absorb chemical information; the galaxy in the black hole in its center that absorbs gravitational information, the human in its head that sees light information, inverse to the plants. And each one creates a different world map with it – a monad.

Those cyclical Tƒ-particles/heads are cyclical precisely because the sphere is the form that stores more information.

**The ultimate truths: the simple a(nti)symmetries of the Universe.**

Again we MUST stress that contrary to pedantic belief and computer details, the ‘Universe is simple and not malicious’, and the laws of truth are simplicity, minimalism (Ockham’s razor) and Correspondence (max. number of facts explained). So I knew I was in the correct path. How 5D metric related then to the Generator Equation? Simple, if we consider Sp, Spatial Extension and Tƒ, the Informative, temporal head, or future logic element that guided the past limbs and hence defined the future, its combination was the Present perceived form.

So it was in fact THE 3RD SYMMETRY THAT defined the Generator Equation, symbolized with the letter Γ:

- The antisymmetry of the 3 ages of time, as youth-motion and informative-old age are inverse.

- The symmetry of the 3 forms of space, as bilateral parity makes left and right essentially the same.

- The asymmetry of the 3 planes of existence, the œ-1 (quantum/cellular), Œ (thermodynamic, organic) and U+1 (social, ecosystemic or gravitational cosmic), which co-exist thanks to those metric in all ‘super-organisms’ of the Universe, as
*those scales become symbiotic, when information flows from ∆-1, energy flows from ∆+1 and both merge in the balances of n-scales. So genes code you, the world gives you energy and you co-exist in balance; quantum particles code atoms, matter states give energy to those atoms and atoms co-exist in balance; etc.*

**And the ¬Æ formalism that better express them.**

Then I realized why mathematics was a language, so closely related to 5D space-time.

Since geometry was the science of space, logic algebra, with its sequential social numbers, the time language, and analysis the 3rd branch of mathematics, the study of the 5th dimension, of infinitesimals and wholes.

So it was easy to translate the laws of mathematics into isomorphic laws of 5D space-times, with the proper corrections to account for the fact that each point was a world in itself, when we came closer to see it – the true meaning of the 5^{th} non-Euclidean postulate which defines points as crossed by infinite parallels; part of waves, connected into planes, that grew through the fifth dimension into co-existing organisms, which used the clocks of time of different speeds to build up its complex forms. It did not matter so much that form, as knots made it convoluted, but the functions of those networks, which now became the 3 ‘physiological networks of all systems’, again described by the Generator equation:

Sp; Digestive-energetic network of Non-AE points < ST: reproductive, ‘blood’ networks > Informative, nervous networks: Tƒ

** **Of those elements, the most important is the most spiritual of them, the mind, defined by the 5th Non-AE postulate of pan geometry:

5) Definition of a mind: O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time (world)= Linguistic mapping (mind).

**SPACE QUANTA AND TIME FREQUENCIES IN PHYSICAL SCALES: Sp X Tƒ = E∆**

Now we will extend a little more in the understanding of physical systems and its generator equations, and scales of the 5th dimension of which 3 are paramount (susceptible to be analysed by the ternary fractal principle of i-logic Non-AE algebra in ternary sub scales): the quantum scale with its frequency clocks, and h-constants of space, the thermodynamic scale with its temperature clocks and entropy k-constants of space, and the gravitational scale with its speed clocks and its mass-densities of space.

**Organic vs. abstract interpretations.**

As we shall repeat once and again ‘the Universe is simple, organic and not malicious’.

So for example:

– The collapse of a wave into a particle, is exactly the same process that collapses a school of fishes when a huge predator comes, but this implies to accept that particles do gauge information and do follow a survival program, and do evolve socially. And anthropomorphic humans never will accept this. So we do have all kind of absurd Copenhagen interpretations of the particle-wave duality.

– The Compton wavelength of a particle is equivalent to the wavelength of a photon whose energy is the same as the rest-mass energy of the particle.

The standard Compton wavelength, λ, of a particle is given by:

λ=h/mc

where *h* is the Planck constant, *m* is the particle’s rest mass, and *c* is the speed of light. So we can define the existential nature of the particle (its mass and wave-length or Tƒ<ST function) with the Compton wavelength, but this matters not to physicists. What matters to them is this:

The Compton wavelength expresses a fundamental limitation on measuring the position of a particle, taking into account quantum mechanics and special relativity.

This limitation depends on the rest mass *m* of the particle. To see how, note that we can measure the position of a particle by bouncing light off it – but measuring the position accurately requires light of short wavelength. Since for photons of frequency *f*, energy is given by:

E=hƒ=hc/ λ=mc^{2}

And Light with a short wavelength consists of photons of high energy. Thus playing with both similar formulae if the energy of these photons exceeds *mc*^{2}, when one hits the particle whose position is being measured the collision may yield enough energy to create a new particle of the same type: l x mc. This renders moot the question of the original particle’s location: which one?

What matters to Œ=SC^{3} is that when you give enough energy to a particle, as when a living mother feeds enough, you have an offspring of new particles, children, hence the particle REPRODUCES! IT does follow one of the living action ∆œ of the program of the Universe.

The physicist or human doesn’t care for that. The philosopher DOES.

Now we have given you two clear examples of organicism:

– An entity, which is ORGANIC, made of connected parts, NOT a single dimensional being, and a being that is reproductive, as survives.

**MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS**

**Temporal ¬Æ Algebra. The Generator Equation of the Universe.**

Now geometry is the simplest description of reality. The next scale is Algebra, where the unit is the social number (not the imagined set), which does have as Pythagoras clearly understood ‘geometric forms’ (hence it would be much better explained in a bidimensional plane – reason why ‘bidimensional numbers’, are so useful). To the point, let us define the fundamental unit of ‘temporal algebra’ and its 5Dimensional analysis:

*A number is the social sum of undistinguishable fractal points.*

Thus we return to reality and make the point of geometry and the number of algebra, the units of mathematics, which reflect the Universe, and eliminate the Axiomatic method, which Gödel proved to be incomplete without experience, and the metalanguage of set theory as an absolute form of proving truth, which is just a ‘worldview’ deformation of the mind of ‘idealist Germanic cultures’, latter studied in more detail.

It is then when we can fully understand a mind-world as a higher elliptic scale of the 5th dimension, in which a social group of ‘points’ become a ‘scalar number’ – a field of a lower hyperbolic ∆-1 dimension, becomes a fractal network, connected to the ‘point-particle’, ‘mass’, ‘molecular being’, in a dynamic way.

in Algebra, function overcomes geometric form but only putting together both we can see what is the existential life of ‘algebraic numbers’.

So we shall first consider the more ‘algebraic of all the postulates’ of geometry, the 5th postulate, which really reflects the meaning of a mind.

And then we shall consider the ‘non-aristotelian’ ternary algebra and the generator equation of:

* Sp (past, spaces; lineal entropic limbs-fields) ST(present, iterative hyperbolic waves-bodies)>Tƒ(cyclical future, informative particles-heads)*

The 5^{th} postulate of Euclidean geometries can be easily understood then from the perspective of perception, departing from its equivalent postulate, first stated by Wallis that we can shrink or grow triangles without deforming its angles and proportional sides.

This equivalent postulate, would mean that the angle of perception of species do not vary as they change side (no other meaning has an angle of a triangle, but the capacity to allow us to calculate trigonometric distances, reason why trigonometry was the first theoretical form of mathematics born of arithmetic calculus, which allowed Erastotenes already to measure the distance to the moon, the size of the earth and the Sun distance). However they vary. Angles diminish as we become smaller in hyperbolic geometry.

So an ant will see a world with a hyperbolic vision and a lesser angle, reason why it needs a larger circumference view (spherical eyes, or eyes around a 360 perceptive point of view in Tƒ, highly informative aracnid species).

On the other hand, in larger beings the angle will become inversely larger, so the eyes become the opposite concave and planar in form; reason why satellite antennae and telescopes which represent the larger view of a planetary organism have paraboloid forms.

This and many other truths of the ‘strange Universe of the 5^{th} dimension’, in which the 4^{th} dimensional Universe is both a distorted human point of view, using a single time clcok, by using a single space-time continuum, of a limited number of 5D planes exactly – 2 relative planes of size, the humane lectroagnetic and the graivtatioal larger plane, (special and general relativity).

Temporal Algebra is the most fascinating discipline of ALL sciences. Trust me. I had huge mental orgasms for 30 years since I first discovered, and after a couple of rejected papers and a small print book on it, have been exploring it by myself all this time.

It is resumed in the ternary Generator Equation of all systems and its fractal flows of time. So we have seen a bit of it already, but before we introduce it on full, we shall acknowledge the existence of some predecessors to the ternary motions-forms of space-time in the philosophers of science of the East, which reached its zenith in Taoism and the book of changes around the time the first Abrahamic ego-centered believers in the west expanded its ‘ego’, in this case the tribe subconscious collective or ‘social God’ to cosmic proportions making it the creator of lineal time and the whole Universe.

So each western tribe decided that his valley was the promised land, his tribe was ‘God’ who spoke of the supremacism of his people over all other humans and the infinite, reaching a paroxysm of ego-centered infinitesimal beliefs that would be ridiculous and laughable if it had not been so tragic for the non-future of mankind.

**PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS**

In the study of the phenomena of nature, partial differential equations are encountered just as often as ordinary ones. As a rule this happens in cases where an event is described by a function of several variables. From the study of nature there arose that class of partial differential equations that is at the present time the most thoroughly investigated and probably the most important in the general structure of human knowledge, namely the equations of mathematical physics.

**What partial differential equations mean.**

Let us first consider oscillations in any kind of medium. In such oscillations every point of the medium, occupying in equilibrium the position (x, y, z), will at time t be displaced along a vector u(x, y, z, t), depending on the initial position of the point (x, y, z) and on the time t. In this case the process in question will be described by a vector field. But it is easy to see that knowledge of this vector field, namely the field of displacements of points of the medium, is not sufficient in itself for a full description of the oscillation. It is also necessary to know, for example, the density ρ(x[…]”

**V. THE PHYSICAL GENERATOR ****& ITS 10 ISOMORPHISMS**

**The cultural, anthropomorphic bias of ‘Mechanical Germanic Physics’.**

*Few scientists given their dogmatic beliefs in the absolute, quasi-religious nature of scientific truths realize how much of the ‘Biblical’, Jewish-German culture, likely the most subjective, anthropomorphic and dogmatic – many readers already offended (: human way of thought. *

*This is the philosophy behind physics today which nobody even realizes it exists, as it is embedded in the way to do physics, as it is embedded in the way to do economics, and has generally as all western culture a dogma: *

*MAN IS THE SUPERIOR ONLY INTELLIGENT BEING, BLIND TO ANY LIFE PROPERTY OF ALL THE OTHER PARTS OF THE UNIVERSE as chosen of Go(l)d by the grace of the sword. And if you tell me that I kill you or don’t talk to me anymore – I take it personally.*

*Now if you haven’t taken personally, you have pass the first hurdle to understand 5D physics. *

This vision when applied to human beings, gave us also modern social sciences, as the Americans conceive them in the age of metal-minds, where the only change from the German idealism for the worse, is the concept that what a machine measures is what it is, in the language of the machine – mathematics.

So the meaning and truth of social sciences is A POLL and statistical analysis of humans as indistinguishable point-particles, in the fashion of the analysis of Heisenberg and Bohr of particles. And what matters of humans in the economic realm is THEIR financial, digital value as ‘credit’ or ‘cost’ particles of an economic equation, or a ‘probability’ of death in a Pharmaceutical, health or insurance company which average us ‘as numbers’.

We are though more than a probability of an event in an insurance police, and so are electrons, and protons and particles.

Let us then consider a few of the of myths by physicists and the truths they hide:

- Physicists believe that the Universe is a mechanism, so they think machines are needed to understand the Universe. The truth is that machines are not the model of the cosmos, as the Universe is organic, and so it is made to the image and likeness of man, whose mind suffices to explain the Universe.
- Physicists believe that the only language of God is mathematics. Hence all equations are truth. This is false; equations can be fictions when they break the laws of the scientific method as Hawking does since mathematics is just a language of information and the “languages of God” are infinite (Upanishad).

- They believe the Universe has only an arrow of entropy, energy, and death and the arrow of future information is a mere exception called negantropy – the negation of entropy. This is false – a myth born of their worldly profession as makers of energetic weapons – since information creates the Universe – hence it is the arrow that dominates the future and evolves the in/form/ation of life, which physicists ignore.

- Hence they believe that mass is given by an energetic particle, the Higgs that collides with other particles. This is false, since Einstein defined mass as a vortex of information,.
- Unfortunately the sheeple believe, don’t understand that truth in science has nothing to do with authority. Authority is given by power, by weapons and money. But truth is based on the three legs of the scientific method—logical, mathematical, and experimental consistency. This myth makes look serious science made with machines and money and an easy target to ad hominem campaigns, the true genius of science, those who evolve the languages of the mind, which lack the big budgets of mechanist science and do, as Einstein put it, “thought experiments.”

- Physicists believe that time is only change of motion, t=v/s; and motion is measured with clocks. So machines of measure obsess them. It is not. Times are all types of changes, measured with all cyclical systems, not only with mechanical clocks.

- Nuclear Physicists believe that the Universe was born in an explosion of entropy from a mathematical “singularity”; since their worldly profession is to make bombs; and so they created a ‘big-bang’ cosmology to the image and likeness of those bombs. This is false. There is experimental evidence that the big bang explosion coincides with the data of a quasar explosion, the birth of a black hole. The big bang is just a myth created by the makers of nuclear weapons.

- Physicists believe that huge machines like the LHC, not new theories, will usher mankind into twenty-first-century physics.

That is the point of view of the dolichocephalic, visual, white man and its lineal, visual, ‘all whammies’, military, entropic vision of the Universe will offend the ‘believer’, but it is at the core of the reasons why we do believe in the big-bang and somehow have selected the data to fit our vision of reality.

Alas now we put some backwards lineal equations to the bros’ creationist burning bush.

It must be stressed that Neanderthal Sapiens did believe first on the hypnotic power of gold and fire, which they used to enslave mankind and smith iron into weapons to murder it, had revealed in the desert, the meaning of the Universe to those 2 bros, who saw G. Bush, not the Neanderthal president but a God Bush burning.

Now they were observing the fire of Shiva, the destroyer of worlds, when alas, Mr. Gamow came with the fruitful idea that all was fire and a wall of fire had created the Universe, and the big bang ‘mocking’ name for this theory of the whole was reborn again. Revivalism at its best (-:

So in as much as the big-bang is part of the lineal religion of time of Founding Father Physicists, mostly Germanic believers in the sacred lineal length of weapons, and its agglutinative grammar that pegs words into lineal truths (German language, is made of long sword-like unbreakable words that made any German a believer) it is absurd to argue a ‘religion’. This section of course is for future cyclical Asian ‘thinkers’ that reason.

Now the Germ(an)s have in the sociological model a clear role: to make weapons of mass destruction as ‘animetals’ that worship the power of iron that extinguish life and European southern civilizations in each cycle of history. This is just their modern Thor/Shiva cult.

Since they all died? Ah, but they believed in ‘Abrahamic religions’, this strange thing coming from a bronze age book of history of the Jewish people, similar to any other book of history of the bronze age, when the word nation did not exist and so each nation was a ‘God’, and the same name was used for the land, capital, tribe, God and even king of the tribe (so Assur was the land, capital, tribe, God and King of the Assyrians) and Judea, written Yvwh in ancient Egyptian maps was the God, tribe, land and people living in their ‘promised land’. What this has to do with this introduction? Simple, Newton dedicated more time to study the Bible than to physics, and his view of a mechanist lineal universe was to him the proof of Yvwh’s manifest destiny for an ‘intelligence like his’.

Now, there is an Israeli chap called Bekenstein, very respected on the circles of ‘experts’, which affirms the anthropic principle – the Universe is like it is because (Yvwh) has created it with the constants needed to create man. Of course, he just changes the causality of time: we are not the cause (in the past) of creation but the consequence (in the future). It is the same argument. Newton made it a machine because an organism is self-reproductive, but a machine needs a cause before – a God to create it.

The big-bang equations resolved by a priest also needs a creationist God, ‘before’. A cyclical organic, eternal, self-reproductive Universe however does not need God. It is therefore the ONLY non-Abrahamic scientific cosmology available. And that seems to be nowadays a big problem.

It is ACTUALLY science not belief. And as we go along this blog you will see that actually ‘belief’ dominates most disciplines of western thought. Economics will reveal itself as the creationist ‘belief’ of the Biblical Bankers, overwhelmingly belonging in the west to the culture of the go(l)d chosen who believe they have the right to monopolise the invention of money, the language of social power (the so called idol-ogy of capitalism), but it is sold out as science. The big-bang will reveal itself as the ‘belief’ on the creationist people who think they know better with its lineal time concepts. In biology we shall observe the massive advancement of creationist beliefs.

We thus now will consider the proofs of the not-known 5D model physics; to explain the expansion of interstellar space, namely that in the 5D cosmological scale as there are transversal waves between atoms that expand space, there must be expansive…

**The living Universe**

With all the respect given to mathematical physics and the achievement of quantum theory in the understanding and capacity to manipulate experimentally the world of atoms, in what is perhaps the highest practical achievement of our civilization and the basis of our XXI culture, this blog dedicated to a higher goal – the understanding of the ultimate whys of the Universe, the thoughts of God, not its details, will offer those thoughts, and contradict the ‘interpretations’ in use by quantum physicists and as its conceptualizations have spread to other branches of physics, its philosophy of science.

This is therefore one important key element of T.Œ in physics, without denying the equations of quantum physics to explain properly what they mean in terms of behavior, and the organic, fractal nature of the Universe. We provide the philosophy of science the equations lack.

This is a shame on my view, due to the practical mind of physicists. Simple speaking they do not have the slightest interest on understanding the world they describe, as they are busy-busy making machines, as economists care nothing about the meaning of money as they are busy busy manufacturing it. Ultimately though s how the universe works: it is about space-time actions that combine Se x To = Present actions, NOT about To, the thoughts of God, or Se its details but its messing in useful facts. As I believe if there were philosophers of physics I would be quite easy to state all what I have to state here, trivial thoughts in certain way, but important to know to see the pantheist universe at work in all its scales.

In that regard I found always ridiculous the selfie importance given to the questions of observer and observable when what truly mates is to see how the Generator equation, of physics, Se-1 fields<Sti-waves>To+1 particles interact in such a manner that each can be perceived from the other point of view, each can generate the other, each of those 3 co-existing scales of the 5^{th} dimension is essential to the other.

So we can explain from the perspective of fields (quantum field theory) all other elements, as ‘excitations’ of such fields, as we can explain from the bio-chemical and genetic perspective the generation of organisms and even of recently we try to explain the social activities of humans in the outer external world.

And vice versa we can explain from the perspective of wave-particles, the Sti-To complementary system of body-heads in physics the system. So we do have the external world, the field, the ‘being’ the particle-wave and the 3 together form the interconnected Universe.

This shows clearly one of the fundamental thesis of 5D physics, that light space (c-speed distance-energy), light space-time (wave and photons) and light time, electronic and electric flows (electrons and currents) are the 3 ‘scales’ of the Universe we exist in. SO each one is a fractal part of the next scale whole.

And then we can do the same with the quark-world and its 3 scales. The world of gluons, quarks and chromo dynamics well beyond the scope of this introduction focused in our ‘light world’.

A second task more important, as the first should be considered trivial and immediate is the understanding in terms of ‘real facts’ the equations, constants and relationships of physics, within the context of the Generator equation of 5d fractal space-time cycles. This is a new, huge field that when future physicists take on – disgracefully this Copernicus didn’t get them interested, so we will have to wait to the next Galileo who takes seriously the understanding of T.Œ and has the prestige among physics, which I don’t have for obvious reasons of having confronted them for a decade on ethic, moral basis, to put aside the ‘ethic priesthood of mankind’ and take the r=evolution for its pure intellectual value.

The Universe is a living organism and T.Œ explains it as all living beings with the different perspectives we have on organic systems:

- The point of view or 0-mind that leads the system, which in physics is called a frame of reference; and gives birth to the paradoxes of motion and perception of form, stop and go processes, relativity postulates that make impossible to distinguish motion from form (Galilean relativity: the earth moves but doesn’t move, Einstein’s relativity, the light is both our space with no motion and our motion with no form, etc.)

- The organic parts of the system, its Se-Fields/limbs of energy, its STi-waves/bodies and its To-heads/particles of information which organize the motion, reproduction and gauging of information of the system, which in physics are call exactly that – Fields, waves and particles. And so there is a complementary principle of particles and fields which we however cannot see together as the entity interacts with us as a particle when we ‘attack it’ with huge electrons, and moves as a wave, as all herds do, in an open field, and further on gauges ahead the field with faster-than-light phase waves, its perceptive system.

- And the physical Universe is made also of Superorganisms, moreover co-exist in 3 different Ξ±1 planes of size, from smaller cells/atoms to regular organisms/matter systems to larger social wholes, ecosystems and cosmic forms, which in all physical systems give birth to Ξ-1 electromagnetic, Ξ-thermodynamic and Ξ+1 gravitational, cosmic level.

- And the Universe of systems interact each other through cyclical actions of space-time exchanging energy and information between its parts with boson waves that carry the energy in its speed and momentum, the information in its wavelength and frequency, giving origin to the forces whose range follows the laws of the 5th dimension: (Se x To = K: max. information/force min. space/range). So particles do follow those laws and perform the 4 actions of life beings, absorbing and emitting energy and information, with motions -∆e, feeding on forces, +∆e, information gauging and communication, +∆, and deocupling, iteration, reproduction, -∆i and reproduction coded by its 4 quantum numbers, 4 field equations, 4 dimensions of space-time (electric, magnetic, c-speed field and color in light).

- And finally the Universe is organic because parts become wholes, force quanta becomes particles that socialize into atoms that become social molecules that become matter that become cosmic bodies that organize galaxies and beyond clusters and local Universes.

Thus to understand the Universe we must use all those languages and point of view, and add according to the isomorphic method and the symmetries of 5D space-time planes of existence, mathematical description, with algebraic equations generated by the Universal Generator of 5D space-time beings: [Se≤≥STi≤≥To]³ across the 3 co-existing planes. The Universal constants and ¬Æ equations of physics then appear all crystal clear as mere ratios, which is the meaning of most real numbers, of those parameters, equivalent to the vital constant of life beings. We find immediately the meaning of quanta of space-time actions (h in the quantum n-1 scale, K in the thermodynamic n-scale) and can relate the particle states, which are clock like accelerate vortices (e- charges and masses, attracted by the curvature-speed of its q and g constants easily unified by the metrics of the 5th dimension). And then when all is resolved, all the equations explained in vital terms, we can see ‘unraveling the life’ of all of it.

We can see the particle head, the photon, or electron, guiding the wave -body that reproduces its form along the field of energy, the electromagnetic or matter wave, in tune with its internal clock-frequencies of the group wave of cellular fractal parts, and the head-clock in the same tune, but sending ahead the faster-than-light action at distance phase wave in De Broglie equations, exploring the path; we can see the inverse spins tuning as genders do, mating closing in and reproducing, decoupling into new particles, we can see the electron jumping to feed on the photon, which it will store in its fractal nebulae, we can translate the mathematical entelechies into real actions, we can see that our mind is just a complex iteration of the beats and rhythms of the life of those lower and higher scales of the 5th dimension.

And then we do know what Einstein tried to peer and never fully understood, the thoughts of god, and of course, also its details. Such is the beauty of the mind of man, when it is tuned to the laws of the whole and its parts.

And yet physicists hardly see of that enlightened world but a few numbers they merely count. As Hemingway said to Dietrich, you confuse motion with action, as Wells said to the producers of evilwood, you are just accountants, I am the artist, as Nietzsche said to Einstein, ‘God is an artist on 4 Dimensions’ – he missed one – because it constantly creates, reproduces and combines in symmetries and topological paintings, the 5 dimensions of reality to set its existences travel through them.

**Physical systems and scientific knowledge about them.**

Now 1^{ST} we must clarify a fact that escapes present science: physical systems including those far removed from human beings (cosmic and quantum scales), in which information is scanty (uncertainty and dark energy & matter) ARE isomorphic with all other systems, without ANY difference in its scalar (anti)symmetries of space, time and its co-existing Planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

This is not recognized by physicists because of 3 peculiarities of their science, which prompted the creation of this alternative T.Œ, based in cyclical time and its relationship with information, namely:

– Reductionism: Physics is the science of external motions-translations in space and so it reduces all the types of times=changes of the Universe and its arrows to a single external type of change, that of motion. This is expressed in its equation of time: V=S/T, where Time=S/V becomes merely a parameter to measure the changes in space (S) produced by motions through it (V).

– Linearity: as a consequence, it reduces the nature of reality to lineal equations, having always a huge problem dealing with cyclical, non-lineal equations, cyclical inertial motion, and in-form-ation carried in the frequency and form of cyclical times.

– But and this is the gravest of all problems, it does NOT recognize those limits. Physicists would be OK if they knew their limits, and made them explicit. For example, they define information (Shannon’s formula) as the equation, inverse to entropy, which measures the quantity of bits (without any caring for what those bits mean in terms of form and function), ‘moved’ through a lineal dimension of space (the message carrier, most likely an electronic charge or electromagnetic flow that carries 0s and |). We shall use that equation when studying the ‘motion of information’ along a single plane of existence, but this is NOT the full meaning of in-form-ation, form, which is dimensional form and frequency encoded in time cycles. So goes for their use of time only as lineal duration. Duration is the simplest information about time, and reduces all the time=changes of the Universe, including the infinite number of physical time cycles, charges and masses that encode the information of the Universe to a single number.

So physicists are reduced by their method and their arrogance, which excludes any argument on what they do by philosophers of science, to seek very limited facts.

Unfortunately their worldly power as makers of mechanisms and machines has spread their notions of time and information to ALL other sciences, which abandoned their more sophisticated concepts of information and time in their sciences. So you have the parlance of philosophers on Relativity time equations, of which Feynman rightly laughs. Instead they should be laughing at Feynman for believing that what Einstein or Galileo considers time – ‘what a clock measures’ (Einstein), meaning the single lineal clock duration of a mechanical machine – is ALL what there is to time. Instead they should be talking, as we do, of time as Change=Motion, being physical motion one of the many types of changes of the Universe.

This said, once we are aware of it we can do two things with physics of time:

– To expand its concepts, illuminating them with cyclical time.

– And to limit the use of duration and entropy, to lineal, external motion analysis, NOT to the meaning of it all, with big-bang ‘cosmic statements’ and reductionist entropy-only, explosive theories of time as death.

**THE INFORMATIVE QUANTA – H-PLANCKTONS.**

Now we explained that the perception of a universe as euclidean or elliptic or hyperbolic depended on the long overdue respect we must give to the a priori parameter of all worlds: r²/L²=Tƒ/Sp. When this parameter tends to zero, we have an Euclidean geometry, above zero we have hyperbolic and below zero we have elliptic.

The parameter which defines the mathematics in which we live is so essential that it will come constantly. For example, we can consider that systems exist at one side of the parameter, at the side of c speed as a limit – in our euclidean world – or over c speed (in the elliptic gravitational world) at the side of T=0k as the limit of the thermodynamic plane, etc.

So we need now to complete the definition of our world, to deal with the nature of our square ‘radius’ parameter of information. What is the minimal quanta of information of our electronic eyes, that feed on h-quanta of light energy, well, we just said it, the h-quanta which measures in the minimal amount known, the spin of a particle, which is rather obviously the minimal unit of its angular momentum, of its informative perception.

And for that reason as h/c is truly a minimal amount our relative 0, we live in that Euclidean world.

The first and most important of T.Œ’s 5 actions of all systems that want to survive, is ‘perception of information’ How do particles perceive?

Of all those levels and actions the one physicists understand worst and less is the action of informative perception of smaller particles, called SPIN, which is the absolute minimal unit of reality we measure after deforming it fully (quantum uncertainty), a quantity called angular momentum, h/4 pi, which is as a ‘form of information’, ‘space-form’ NOT motion.

And since h is in the above equation, E=ƒh, a whole, hence a sphere (whatever it has inside), the ‘essential topology of all wholes’ by definition enclosed disks-sphere (in ¬ Æ topology a disk is a 1-sphere, a sphere, a 2-sphere, a sphere in motion a 3-sphere, which as motion is a dimension seen in motion, can be of different varieties, etc.), a spin is ‘logically’ is a n-sphere divided by 4 π:

Now the graph gives us possible choices, as we depart from a ‘whole’ of a light beam, which could be a cylindrical cut, as in some lineal worms, or a ball. As 4π comes in the ball, we have 2 choices or the surface of the ball, or the solid sphere but NOT all, only a section, called a ‘solid angle’. This gives us a first duality between ‘human measure ‘and ‘true property’. The true property is the solid angle from the surface to the center, r^{3}/3, the human measure is the external surface, r^{2}/2.

As all space-time organisms have truly 2 components, the ‘internal’ open ball topology (meaning the ball without the surface membrane and the center of the point) or ‘present-evident, wave-like ST form’, and then the membrane and o-point in the center, or Sp x Tƒ, ‘past x Future’ particle (limbs-external sensorial membrane and central mind) together:

Why we know spin is a solid angle of information? Because if it were a motion, as Pauli, the guy who is credited with its discovery, put it to his real discoverer, as speed it will be 137 times faster than light!: hc^{2/}e^{2}=137 (inverse fine constant). This in 5D physics is NOT a problem, c-speed is Einstein’s postulate to adapt the Universe to the human perception of it – our rod of measure, as electronic minds. But here Pauli does have a point. A Spin does NOT rotate, as you do NOT rotate when looking outside, but is a ‘wedge’ into the sphere, through which information enters.

We see the surface of it and so it seems a momentum, the being sees the solid angle of it and so it is an intensity. Because the being is down there into the zero-point soul of the particle, mind of mathematical perception, it does open and close the sphere to ‘look’ through the windows of the membrane. In the simplest form, it is a pi cycle of 1-sphere, which is made of 3 closing diameters, which leave π=3, 0.14 d apertures, or 0.14/π=5% of light and 95% of dark matter/energy, the proportions light space-time beings DO NOT see of the Universe.

So now in the ‘dialectic’ Socratic method (remember my culture) I use to find things, I deny myself. What if I consider NOT a solid angle, BUT a spin, which IS a slice ‘SEEN’ through the 1/3rd ‘D’ apertures between the diameters of the pi-1-sphere (cycle) or the ‘cuts on the 2-sphere’. We realize this ‘will be a slice’ with the exact parameters of angular momentum, and there will be 3 holes, hence only 3 spin angles, and they will be further on quantized – jumping from part of part of the whole:

*In the graph the proper description of Angular Momentum as a plane of Information, the minimal unit of perception of our Universe, proper of Relativity is more clear than the classic dynamic Time description as r x **mv – both have their different uses/perspectives. H is the rod of informative measure of the Human electronic eye-mind, so small compared to c, the human rod measure of light space that the constant of geometry, r²/L² of Lobachevsky’s pan geometry becomes close to zero, creating our perceived Euclidean space, deformed to a hyperbolic geometry for smaller beings (Special Relativity, quantum physics) and to an elliptic geometry for larger gravitational scales (General Relativity)*

Now, this is the modern ‘Hilbertian-Einsteinian’ description of angular momentum, just what we said it is, P, is the ‘cut’ on the n-sphere, x the radius, equivalent to P in ‘distance-motion’, and its product an amount mrv which is the spin. You can think of it as an information bit or an energy bite (space or moving perception) of the being.

Now those are the spins, quantized, and you can see there are 2 or 3 ‘cuts’ to perceive, with different orientations, and DO NOT come in bigger numbers. The maximal thing is this work of art, called ‘female and male spins’.

We won’t enter on this (-; just to mention the bidimensional nature of those spins (left graph) in the left side, which ARE the quanta of all information humans, electronic eye-beings, perceive about the world. And the obvious capacity to process and orientate they give as the ‘eyes’ of the atom, to each particle.

Moreover, they get ordered, orientated by the external magnetic field, the larger time-enclosure that orders from ∆, the ∆-1 quantum field. Now ask a physicist what is a spin, he will put a lot of formulae of abstract maths, which it will take you half a year to memorize, without understanding. Why? The idea that particles perceive is out of the ‘picture’.

Now the magnetic field, they like, as all heads turn to her the speaker in human groups, all atoms spin in tune, and we use it to control them, as speakers use the word nation and god. Same law of mass-control. I call it lanwave. A Wave ordered by a language of energy and information they speak. The magnetic field is the language of space that transcends atomic parts into the next scale; forming them; the electric field is the time force that put them in motion. That is how we transcend from quantum to our scale. The best at the job of ‘feeling’ magnetic lanwaves is the iron, and it becomes the top guy of the next scale. It forms perfect organized masses.

Once we are here, those motions are ‘activated’ by temperature, vibrational clocks of our molecules.

Temperature is the ‘electric field’ that moves us in the ∆-scale. What is the ‘spin’ for Molecules?. They use van der waals forces and ‘angles’, giving by slave atoms.

And the boss of those perceptive ones in our body is the nitrogen. It has 3 H systems to perceive:

Here you have an amino acid working his life around, with its oxygen legs kicking in and out water, its carbon body with lateral arms of many kinds and its nitrogen head.

You *are made of a lot of those.*

** I-LOGIC GEOMETRY. THE 5 ¬Æ POSTULATES.**

**Euclidean Geometry vs. Non-Euclidean, fractal points.**

Space is in mathematics represented by geometry, which has 3 ages of evolution:

- Pure bidimensional Space: Euclidean Geometry, only on the plane
- SPACE-time: Analytic geometry mixed with algebra
- 5D: Fractal spaces: Non-Euclidean Geometry.

Those are the 3 ages of Geometry studied in these posts, which represents an obvious ever closer ‘homeomorphism’ (correspondence) between the language and reality

(We won’t use many technical mathematical words of the 3rd age of formal mathematics, with the exception of topology, as the essential science of space and the basic concepts of time logic and 5D analysis.

Since it is a RULE of 5D sciences to ‘simplify’ jargons while making more ‘complex’, similar to 5D reality the laws of sciences – a process which all 3rd informative ages of systems subverts by making jargons more complex, at the same time that the science departs from reality, becoming a metalanguage. This is a process all too obvious in cosmological physics, which has blown up the ‘local’ models of entropy (thermodynamics) and Relativity (galactic light space-time) to become the ‘absolute new time arrow’ and absolute total space of all the scales of the Universe. LOL – how humans always blow up their finitesimal ego to the infinite – the harder they fall.

Here the trick is, due to the cumbersome mathematical crunching of Relativity (a conceptual simple theory but difficult to solve with non-lineal differential equations), and the complex maths of quantum physics (whose concepts are not so complex but appear so, due to the null understanding or rather anthropomorphic denial of its organic and logic properties), is to substitute all serious scientific, strict conceptual analysis of its truth, by mathematical jargons and computerised calculus that allow the scholar to pump up their pride, with jargons.

As we shall repeat once and again ‘the Universe is simple, organic and not malicious’. So for example, the collapse of a wave into a particle, is exactly the same process that collapses a school of fishes when a huge predator comes, but this implies to accept that particles do gauge information and do follow a survival program, and do evolve socially. And this never will be accepted by anthropomorphic humans. So we do have all kind of absurd Copenhagen interpretations of the particle-wave duality.

In mathematics, the age of set theory and the Hilbert formalism, followed by the idealist ‘gothic’ german school, with its proverbial incapacity to ‘see reality’ (treated in the cultural parts of this blog), meant the abandon of the true concepts, points and numbers; hence the HALTING on the evolution of the concept of a point with parts, and the curved parallels of energy and information that cross them (1st and 2nd Non-Euclidean postulates), truncating the evolution of the discipline after the great insights of Lobachevski and Riemann.

And as everything else in the Universe, it represents the 3 dynamic ages of evolution of systems, for a pure ‘spatial state’ in this case (E-geometry) to a balanced analysis of both T and S together (analytic geometry which should properly be called geometric algebra), and finally to a full informative form with less relationship with reality, and old metalanguage. This is the phase of Non-Euclidean Geometry.

After that there are always two choices for a system, ±n, that is:

-I: to die away in the baroque form, and become a non growing excessively formal state of mathematics, which is what mathematics has become since set theory took over. Or:

+n: to evolve further into a whole by the proper fusion of all the other ages into a more complex fusion form. This final social evolution is I-logic geometry, the geometry of networks of non-euclidean fractal points across multiple planes of the 5th dimension.

In its origin, Mathematics, as a language that represented reality with simplified symbols, only numbers and points with no parts, had a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplified and integrated the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath. However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content.

But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.

So we will propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s. So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of Entropy and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point. This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels.

Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye. That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of Entropy and information that defines them.

Thus to fully represent the Universe of the 5th dimension, of multiple vital spaces and cyclical times, we need to evolve our understanding of mathematics, away from the straight-jacket of excessive formalism and a snobbish pretention of absolute truth.

Instead we must return to its beginnings, following the dictum of Einstein: ‘Leibniz is right but if so we must rebuild Western sciences from its foundations’.

But before we study the first age of mathematics, obviously we must do so with the reference of the higher learning of 5D fractal Non-AE points. So we must do a general introduction to the true structure of mathematical systems. As this will allow us to make in-depth comments as we survive the discoveries of the 3 ages of mathematics, and corrections, which should make sense of that mankind has discovered till this age.

We shall thus introduce the theoretical minimum of the 5 non I-logic postulates that structure the Universe of points-numbers. And then start thought he age of ‘Greek mathematics’ (it is the age dominant in space-plane geometry), the II Age of European Mathematics (Dominant in Analysis and mathematical physics, which is as always in all systems the classic most important age), the 3rd age of old-formal mathematics ( with its baroque, unneeded formalisms of set and categories) and its new toppings of topology, Non-E first insights and fractals and functionals (with wide projections unlike sets – have you seen a set of all sets around nature of lately (-:, in biology, geology, physics and quantum theory).

We won’t for mere humanism and self-respect deal with a part I practiced when young, I.A. information algorithms and Boolean algebras (digital thought), that is the birth of Artificial intelligence.

** **

**i-LOGIC GEOMETRY. 5D ST VERSION: FRACTAL POINTS**

**I-logic, non-Aristotelian, organic. Non-Euclidean topology.**

*In the graph a resume of the 5 postulates of i-logic geometry.*

Amazingly enough we can study the 3 ‘formal languages’ of the Universe together, departing from the classic Postulates of Geometry, which started also the adventure of Formal Knowledge with the Greeks.

Albeit a reformed 5 set of Geometric Postulates to adapt it to the Nature of scalar space-time, where ‘points have parts’, lines are waves that communicate energy and information, planes are organic networks, and the similarity of systems define their behavior.

*-1*^{st}* postulate:* __‘A relative fractal point is a topology with breath & motion that grows in size as we come closer to it’.__ *-2*^{nd}* postulate.* Yet if a point has form and motion so does a line of spherical points. Thus: ‘__A line is a wave of energy and information that communicates 2 bigger points’__.

Such ‘i-waves’ evolve into 3 social networks that are:

–*4*^{th}* postulate:* ‘A __plane of existence is a network of i-points sharing energy & information through i-waves.’__

‘A __superorganism is a system made of 3 networks=planes of existence’. __Yet besides 3 ‘geometric postulates’, Non-E geometry has 2 i-logic, causal Postulates that define the ‘Will of all 10Di superorganisms’:

–*5*^{th}* postulate*: __A O-Mind is a Non-E point crossed through eyes & mouths by ∞ parallels of energy & information’__.

–*3*^{rd }*Postulate *that defines *the rules of engagement* between Wholes with 3 parts, no longer externally but internally *according to the similarity of its Dimensions*. I.e.: O-points-minds that perceive each other as equal across its informative time Dis communicate and evolve together into Wholes.

Systems who have different informative Ds and cannot communicate, but have equal n-1 scalar dimensions enter in Darwinian prey-predator relationships by sharing the same space in which the predator tears the topology of the prey, provoking toroid flows that dissolve its i-scale, absorbing it as n-1 energy, etc.

Further on, membranes enclose points’ parts. So external camouflage confuses preys that engage as equals with predators, becoming an essential strategy of 0-points in search of STe-Feeding. Thus the 3^{rd} Postulate reduces all possible behaviors among species according to their 10Ds similarities. Thus 10Di-logic mathematics means the biggest advance in both sciences since Euclid & Aristotle found the mathematic-logic formalism of 4Di. Without it, GST cannot exist.

We shall use the following symbols for them:

**Œ, ***the function of existence***,** a point with volume and parts, the Informative (O) and Energetic (E) lineal fields, is used for ALL fractal points in general.

It will be the general symbol for an i-point, along** ‘i’,** which also expresses nicely the energy line with its top head of information.

So for its conceptual use in ¬Æ we shall use:

**Θ** for the 1^{st} postulate, as the point has internal parts.

**Φ** symbol for the 5^{th} Postulate, as the points is cross by a flow of information.

Both are also symbols for a O-point mind, which normally has an axis of informative perception in the dimension of height and a wider opening in the equator or mouth to absorb energy. So the first and 5^{th} postulate ultimately represent the inward state of the mind and its outward perceptive state.

**≈** Represents the **2**^{nd}** postulate** (a wave instead of a line).

**‡** Represents the 3^{rd} postulate of relative equality, as it shows both the perpendicular + and parallel = dual relationships of beings, with species they feed on (equal energy, different information) or evolve together with (equal information) forming

** ‰**… for the **4th postulate** of a plane-network made at least of 3 points with parts joined by lineal networks.

**1ST & 5 ^{TH} POSTULATES. FRACTAL POINTS.**

**Fractal, Non-Euclidean Points of view. Upgrading the foundation of space-mathematics.**

Euclidean Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified spatial points with ‘no parts’, has a limited capacity to carry information.

Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplify and integrate the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath. However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content.

But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe *suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity*. So we propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s.

So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of Entropy and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point. This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels.

So we must consider that what Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time is its fractal nature: points seem *not* to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye. That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of Entropy and information that defines them.

Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:

*Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel*

*E*uclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:

*Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:*

**. ____________**

Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:

*A point external to a line is crossed by *∞ *parallel forces.*

* Real, discontinuous, n-dimensional points: ***===========** **o**

This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.

*So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. *The mathematics are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of Entropy and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on. So *each point is in fact a 3-dimensional point, and if we go to the next scale, a 3×3=9 dimensional point and so on.*

* Yet those dimensions are the so-called fractal dimensions, which are not ‘extended to infinity’ but only within the size of the point. *In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension, but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions that we observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point: *To be a fractal world, a space-time in itself.*

*‘Any Non-Euclidean point is a fractal space-time with a minimal of 3 internal, topological, spatial dimensions and an external time motion in the st+1 ecosystem in which it exists’*

This simple law is the most important law of the 4th paradigm, foreseen by Leibniz in his Monadology, the foundation of the mathematical model of Multiple spaces-times that completes the 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean geometry and gives us the tools necessary to create a complex new logic and new mathematical model of the Universe, easy to connect through topology with the isomorphisms of the previous paradigm of a single metric space-time continuum.

Further on those points must be described always in 4 dimensions, with motion. This should have been obvious, but abstract mathematics simplify entities into numbers and static forms, and organic motion properties disappear. Yet we Still say ‘San Francisco is at 8 hours from LA’, because we mean that journey is a combination of the motion of a car and the spatial distance. Thus we measure reality in Time-space, not only in space as Euclidean mathematics do.

Thus, in the same way Saturn’s rings stop being planes without volume when we come closer and observe them as fractal points, called planetoids; Non-Euclidean points acquire both motion and volume when we approach to them. *In words of Klein, a sphere is not a continuous static form, but a group of points in cyclical movement. So in the same way the Saturn’s rings are a group of planetoids, a Klein space – the space-time that fills a point has motion – it is the sum of a series of cycles5.*

Einstein didn’t go further, adapting the other 4 Euclidean postulates to the new Geometrical unit: a fractal point with volume. Only then we will be able to define the 2 planes of physical forces, the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism, or any system in which several planes of space-time co-exist together (as in a human being extended from atomic to social planes of cyclical existence).

In all those systems planes are made with cellular points, Riemannian spheres with volume that form lines, which are waves between points that exchange Entropy and information and planes, which are organs of self-similar points that process Entropy or information in parallel networks. Thus the 5 Postulates of Non-E Geometry vitalize the Universe as a series of networks of Entropy and information of self-similar cellular points. Since the line and the plane acquire volume and become self-similar to the commonest forms of the Universe, the wave and the network of points with a 3-D volume.

This simple fact explains one of the most important discoveries of modern physics, the Holographic principle, according to which information might be bidimensional, as in the screen of a computer or the page of a book. Now bidimensionality no longer becomes ‘magic’ since the 3rd dimension is the relative size of the ‘fractal point-particle’. Thus bidimensional sheets of information do have a minimal 3rd Dimension; the inner content of the point, which in a relative universe of infinite sizes seems to us a particle-point without volume, as we don’t see either the volume of a sheet of paper or a pixel.

All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks.

Now this might sound absurd to the anthropomorphic reader that thinks humans are different from the rest of points of the Universe, but it is a fact that those points obey in their actions and communicative flows within a network the same isomorphisms: humans and electrons behave the same when they move through slits or in herds, the geometries of social groups are also the same and the ultimate purpose of those points, to feed on Entropy and information, whatever kind, is also the same in all networks of the Universe. And so that group of isomorphisms of networks becomes a primary why for all beings of the Universe.

A fact the leads us to the final element needed to understand the why of the Universe: ‘non-Euclidean points’ organize networks that become points of a higher scale, which reproduce and organize new networks; and so the Universe keep growing in fractal scales, from particles that organize networks and become atoms that organize networks and become molecules that organize networks and become cells, that become organisms, that become planetary societies and planets and stars form gravitational networks that become galaxies, organized by dark matter into Universal networks.

*Because all entities have motion reproduction is merely the repetition of a motion with form.* Because each entity has 4 time arrows, all of them trace multiple trajectories in search of those arrows, hence they realize multiple time cycles.

*For example, *a human feeds on Entropy and information with body and head, reproduces through multiple social cycles and evolves into societies. Our actions are more complex but essentially the same of those of any particle.

So the unit of reality is a space-time cycle, and many of them create a knot of time cycles or entity of reality, which will be reproduced by repeating those formal cycles with motion in other region of space-time; and many of those knots of time cycles, which are self-similar, since they are born from the reproduction of a first form, come together with self-similar beings into networks.

Some of those networks are spatially extended with a lot of motion (fields in physics, bodies in biology) and some are very tight, formal, with a lot of in/form/ation, (particles and heads or nuclei in physical and biological jargons). Both types of networks together then create a complementary organism, which is fitter to handle both Entropy and form; hence it survives better, it ‘exists’.

Today scientists of measure scorn philosophical and logical analysis of causality in time because it cannot be easily put in numbers. But *numbers are only one of the languages of information in the Universe, and many of its properties of bio-logic nature are better described with logic words. *In that regard, we can now fusion philosophy and science answering the fundamental question, ‘why we exist’; since once we realize that we are ‘made of time cycles’, knots of time cycles and networks of knots of time cycles, an intelligent, informative, eternal universe of motions and wills of existence makes the dogmas of deism and mechanism, childish myths.

‘What is existence’ cannot be revealed from the simplex point of view of a mechanical world, which cannot explain the fact that we are made of motions with form that leave a trace on space but are essentially actions in time that have a social finality – to create more complex networks, chaining knots of actions into systems. This social will of every point and entity of the Universe is completely at odds with a mechanist, fixed, solid, senseless, dumb Universe.

Motion in Time and social evolution are concepts that require the capacity to gauge information and interact with other self-similar points to create those organic networks. Further on, dual networks tend to evolve and reproduce new points through exchanges of Entropy and information.

The result is the creation of 3rd network/system: the reproductive network. And so most systems of the Universe are organic, ternary systems made of points (which can be anything from atoms to cells to human heads) organized in 3 networks. We exist as organic networks, to sense flows of Entropy and gauge information. Existence justifies itself.

Those Non-Euclidean points crossed by infinite parallels are able to gauge information, which implies a perceptive, intelligent Universe in all its fractal, self-similar scales of reality – a world in which even the smallest atoms can act-react to the environment, ‘aperceiving’ light and gravitational forces.

Aristotle and Leibniz, the 2 foremost predecessors of the 4th paradigm of biological whys distinguished conscious perception from vegetative and mechanical perception. It means perception has degrees of complexity. So the simplex particles of the Universe act-react in a mechanical way; yet they Still gauge information, reason why quantum physicists called their theories gauge theories, and they Still have 2 complementary networks of Entropy and information, reason why quantum physics is based in such complementary principle.

**Fractal i – 1 points gauge information with infinite parallels.**

Yet this intelligent, active, temporal, informative Universe can be described with the formalism of logic and mathematics because its fundamental unit – a spacetime cycle – can be explained with ‘feedback’ equations, used in system sciences to explain the back and forth interaction between two poles or elements of an equation. Se<=>To where Se is a component of spatial Entropy, a motion element, body or field and To is a cycle of time that carries information, particle or head, becomes the syntactic, logic, minimal unit of reality.

These simple first elements of reality – points with volume that exchange Entropy and information, creating waves of Entropy with form (no longer lines – 2nd postulate), according to a set of isomorphisms based in their self-similarity, (no longer equality – 3rd postulate), that makes them evolve into different topological networks (no longer planes – 4th postulate) – make mathematics an organic language able to describe the logic of creation of all systems of the Universe made of infinite fractal, organic networks intersecting and creating when we put them together under those isomorphisms and topological restrictions, the puzzle of reality that the simpler, 3rd paradigm called the space-time continuum and becomes now a General System of Multiple, Fractal Spaces with vital Entropy and Time cycles with information, the two substances of which all beings are made.

And so with those 3 scales of ‘existence’: time cycles, knots of time cycles and networks of knots of time cycles (Non-E Points) we can explain all the ‘actions’ and systems of reality made of those cycles, knots and networks; and describe a complex Universe that exists ‘in time’ more than in fixed space, since it has always motion; it is also dynamic, made of cyclical, feed-back equations whose causal relationships, forms and trajectories are the essence and purpose of existence. We thus consider a more complex analysis of time arrows, beyond the duality of Entropy and information, which combine creating a reproductive arrow, exi, and further on socialize, ∑exi, creating networks. And so the universe has also an organic will: to create networks of self-reproductive points of Entropy and information.

Yet the most astounding property of those points is to be points of view, points with will, which perform actions with the purpose mechanical or not, but probably felt in all scales as the inner freedom of the point, of obtaining Entropy, information reproduction and social evolution.

The 4 wills or whys of the Universe are indeed embedded in the postulates of i-logic geometry. The point to exist has to be complementary, to feed and gauge Entropy and information and to last beyond its wearing it has to form part of bigger social networks or reproduce itself to last beyond death.

This simple program self-selects those species that reproduce and evolve socially even if that contradicts the primary individual arrows of the point. Thus the engine of the contradictions of behavior of points is that tug of war between the Galilean paradox of all points which gauge bigger his nose than Andromeda but need to hunt in herds and control the forms of the Universe with self-similar minds, joined in networks, this eternal duality of freedom vs. order, individual ego vs. collective spirit.

To exist is to act with motion and form, trying to achieve the ‘arrows of time’ or will of the Universe – feeding your Entropy network, absorbing information for your informative network, reproduce your system and in doing so, starting an external process of social evolution with self-similar entities to yourself. Those processes can be described with mathematics but we have to accept an intelligent, perceptive, fractal, self-similar Universe of infinite points of view gauging reality in a mechanical, vegetative or conscious way to explain why it happens. Their mathematical description stems from the duality between geometric form and logical function (hylomorphism).

Thus, the postulates of fractal i-logic geometry define also the basic arrows= cycles/dimensions of the Universe: the 1st and 5th postulate define a point as a system whose inner parts are able to transform and emit Entropy and information, E>O<e; the 2nd postulate defines an exi wave of communication that reproduces Entropy and form between 2 fractal points; the 4th postulate defines the social evolution of a herd that creates a fractal plane – a network with dark spaces; and the 5th postulate explains a point mapping reality, as it absorbs Entropy and transforms it into information through its small apertures to the Universe. Since even a minimal quark, as Einstein affirms, should be crossed by a relative ∞ number of strong forces.

It* is the organic will of all systems that search for those 4 arrows what makes the quark to exist as a knot of such flows of time arrows: a physical particle traces energetic cycles described by the principal quantum number;* shapes the form of its trajectory, a fact explained by the secondary quantum number; iterates along the 3 coordinates in similar shapes, an act described by the magnetic number, and gauges information to evolve in social groups, a fact described by its spin number. And those 4 numbers define it as a Non-Euclidean quantum knot of complementary Entropy and information with a 4D will of time. *And as it happens they express the 4 arrows of time: E->Principal number; I-> secondary number; Re-> spin number; 4-> social evolution: magnetic number.*

Further on, we can reduce all those topologies of social numbers and networks to the canonical 3 topologies of a 4-dimensional Universe, proving that those 3 topologies have the properties of Entropy, information and reproductive events. And so we talk of 4 ‘arrows of time’ or dimensions of change that create the future: energetic and informative systems and events, which reproduce a wealth of self-similar beings that organize themselves into social networks, creating bigger wholes – new scales of reality.

*And this simple game of complementary beings that in favorable conditions reproduce self-similar beings, self-organized into bigger social networks becomes the why of all realities*. Even the simplest particles, quarks of maximal information and electrons of maximal spatial extension and motion ‘decouple’, reproduce, when absorbing Entropy into self-similar forms, and associate in complementary networks called atoms, made with a central informative mass of quarks and an energetic, electromagnetic, wider body of electrons.

The 3rd paradigm of metric measure is not at ease with such ‘dynamic, spiritual concepts’, even if they can be described with the same mathematical formalisms as the previous example of the quantum numbers show. Those apprehensions however are dogmas, which stem from anthropomorphic beliefs.

Fact is that even the simplest complementary systems (quarks and electrons) interact together and if they can absorb more Entropy=motion they are able to repeat=reproduce the cycles of its system.

And so we talk of a 3rd reproductive system: from quarks and electrons, the fundamental particles of the Universe that decouple in new particles when they absorb new Entropy to living organisms, the fact that all is motion with form makes easy to reproduce those formal motions in an organic way.

Thus the new concept of a world made of formal motions brings about also a more complex philosophy of reality – organicism.

Organicism and its mathematical units, fractal points, that gather into social networks called topological spaces substitute the restricted concepts of Euclidean points, continuous spacetimes and mechanism, explaining why all those time cycles exist, guided by 4 time arrows:

Entropy feeding, information gauging, reproduction and social evolution. Those 4 categories are the so-called drives of living beings, the quantum numbers of particles, the 4 dimensions of our light space (electric-informative height, reproductive magnetic width, energetic length and social colors). Thus, there is a ‘Universal Plan’ with an existential finality: to create organic systems, departing from Entropy bites and information bits evolved 1st into social networks, then into complementary systems and finally into organic systems, news points of a bigger fractal whole: particles become atoms that become molecules that become cells, organisms, planets, galaxies and Universes. It is the 4th organic why that completes the adventure of science and this work explores in all its consequences.

Reality can be resumed in 2 words: *networks,* whose flows of exchange of Entropy and form create the patterns and events of reality and *organicism,* the philosophy of reality based on them. Organicism means reality and all its fractal parts are made of *vital spaces* (bodies and forces) and *time cycles *(informations).

We do not exist in an abstract background of time and space but we are made *of time cycles and lineal spaces, *cyclical and lineal strings if we were to use the restricted jargon of physics, a specific case of the wider jargon of general systems*, which evolve socially to create the complex systems of each science. *

Those wider, more complex definitions of time and space will substitute and absorb according to the Principle of Correspondence that makes each paradigm a particular case of the new, wider view, the limited concepts of a single space-time continuum and a mechanist description of the Universe, proper of the age of metric measure, which the pioneers of systems sciences and complexity have wrestled with throughout the XX century.

**Recap**: the minimal unit of the universe is a Non-Euclidean point/number, which classic mathematics defines as void of inner form and organic properties, to simplify the networks of numbers and point-like entities of the Universe for its geometric study. In reality though, points have breath; that is, they are real entities with Entropy and information parts, and so we have to upgrade Euclidean postulates with the new tools of Fractal and Non-Euclidean mathematics to make the language of geometry closer to reality.

**Frames of reference.**

The graph also explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as Still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view. But they do enter the mind of people who do science. And it is important to remember it, because the 5th dimension brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe.

And so a definition in brief of the 5th dimension illustrated in the next graph will be:

‘The 5th dimension is the dimension of spatial size (abb. Se) and speed of temporal clocks (Abb. To). Both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its time cycles slows down and vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster and bigger ones tick slower, as it happens in galaxies, human beings or DNA.’

Indeed, if information can only be obtained from a fixed point of view, it follows the Universe is made of egos. Or as Aristotle put it, God is the unmovable ‘ego’ that moves all the Entropy around himself and there are infinite Gods, particles that gauge information, heads that see, minds that smell… This must therefore be included in the next paradigm of science to build an even more objective, less anthropomorphic reality.

Now in the 5th paradigm, this again changes and we have even a larger point of view. As we affirm there are infinite clocks of time, and infinite broken spaces and we adopt the point of view of all of them.

This is illustrated in the graph: In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.

Physicists however, limited in their logic and philosophical reasoning, never cared that much for the ultimate meaning of what they measure. That is why philosophers called their theories ‘naive realism’ and Hawking affirms that philosophers of science criticize him because they don’t know mathematics

It is not that the case, but rather the fact that a mere mathematical description of spatial measures, is NOT enough to explain the Universe. And the graph shows why. What physics has achieved is a rather perfect description of distances and motions from the perspective of light.

This has been done increasing human accuracy with metal-eyes, telescopes and microscopes, LHC-like accelerators and electronic devices. But it Still is only a light-mind. In reality in the Universe there can be infinite different minds and sciences of each mind. A dog’s mind will map the universe with smells – big atoms as pixels. It will be simpler than the pixels of instruments looking at light but Still a valid mind.

So there are ∞ mappings of the Universe from infinite points of view and multiple possible pixels.

**THE SECOND POSTULATE OF I-GEOMETRY. WAVES OF COMMUNICATION**

Now all this is formalized by the 2nd postulate of i-geometry which studies the flows of communication between 2 i-points that create a wave, and then as multiple i-points communicate, a network (4th postulate). A social gathering of points into herds, and then the gathering of several planes, creates an organism:

That is the game. And understanding how to exist in balance, in the golden mean, the best way to play it:

*In the graph, the maximal creative function combines energy and information from two polar beings, establishing a balance of to and fro transformation of energy into information that make the system stable, ‘existential’, to last in time. When the E and O components of the event are unbalanced, it is a predatory, darwinian event in which the pole with maximal exi force will absorb the other as relative energy extinguishing the entity. Thus in death (max. O or Max. E) an unbalance breaks the ‘ties’ of existence between body or field and particle or head and the system becomes extinguished.*

*A line is a wave-like event which communicates 2 st-points through a herd of fractal micro-points- a lineal action, exi, of energy that carries a frequency of information in which a message is encoded. The language of information is highly invisible to points outside the network that emit those messages as a flow of micro-points, self-similar micro-replicas of the mother-point that travel in waves across the external Universe transferring energy and information.*

*In most events those flows balance one point with more energy, Eo, that each science defines with different slangs, (‘a white hole’, ‘energizer’, ‘past form’, ‘male’, ‘body’, ‘yang’, ‘moving field’, etc.); and an informative point, Ot, the smaller form (‘a black hole’, ‘codifier’, ‘future form’, ‘female’, ‘head’, ‘yin’, particle or ‘center of perception’, etc.) Both become united by a dual wave that transfers energy from Eo to the informative point of relative future, Ot, and information from the future point, Ot, to the relative past point, Eo, creating together a cycle of temporal energy. The description of those points and cycles, which are common to all beings of space-time, creates a fractal, i-logic geometry common to all sciences and Universal species.*

**The 3rd and 4th postulate: Social networks**

It is now when we can consider what those points do beyond the couple formation: the answer is obvious, the create social groups, networks, which seem plane but are quantised as flows of entropy and form communicated between two poles (perceived as energy and information, as they ‘transit’ through a relative ‘active support’ of mass-charges-vortices of time).

Those poles that create through a relative support or ‘field of energy and information’, flows of entropic lineal motions carrying cyclical frequencies of form, which communicate between points codified languages that express a common will to absorb energy and information, entropy and form. This is what points do: *to absorb entropy and form, to move and perceive, to enact their will of existence, and repeat, reproduce their existential momentum, their existential force:
*Max. Se x To < ∑se x to (se≈to).

Why, who, when just by survival chance? this program was imposed we do not know. But the natural enactment of the program is to increase the network flows between points to create bidimensional waves, that become rlative S-T planes susceptible of being excited by, and carry and reproduce a certain wave of energy and information, STi=se x to, an existential being.

In the subtle commanding flows of reality, it remains to be understood if the larger ST field forces the existence of certain smaller seto beings codes the smaller being or vice versa. In any case, as the points share actions of energy and information, similar to their selves, an ∑n-1 dense flow of energy and information surrounds a network, which starts to pop up self-reproductions of itself, which will constantly share energy and information as they keep reproducing and tying up networks of communication. To that aim all growing network of similar cells must have access to a simpler field of quanta of energy which they can absorb and mild into themselves, and for that their larger existential force, as wholes will ease the task.

As the networks become denser they will finally self-organise themselves socially into a whole, with a hierarchy of ‘organisation’ along S=10 scales of social growth, in which cells will specialise in the ternary 3 x 3 sub-systems of entropic, informative and reproductive tasks, and emerge as ones of new decametric scales.

Networks thus grow both in the 3rd and fourth dimension of space-time, filling up a space-time plane but in the social growth of its elements, and its fractal diminution into smaller cellular scales. This ‘invagination’ of an initial being through the program of absorption of energy and information, replication of form and social evolution: ∆o->∆a->∆e->∆i->∆U, is what we call the program of existence:

Points perceive to orientate (∆o) its motions with accelerations and decelerations and change of orientation, ∆a, which allow the being to feed on energy, ∆e, in order to reproduce its systems either individually or sexually to iterate itself, ∆i, and then evolve socially into ∆U niversal new single planes of existence. The program of existence of the being thus make it grow constantly, and by growing, its ‘Generator Equation’, which represents its complementary systemic nature, its ternary elements and on the whole its ‘existential force’, that is its Spatial entropy, temporal information and reproductive capacities, ∑ Se x To = STi, becomes more efficient, and makes the whole ‘networks system’ stronger.

And so by a mixture of restrictions of spatial topology, time cycles and i-plane ‘mathematical structures’ and a will of surviving and enacting the game reinforced by various methods in the zero-points, the astounding wealth and variety of forms of the sentient, eternally moving Universe and its ‘existential forces’ keep evolving:

** In the graph, **the planes of existence and some particles of the human being – with an informative scale, Max. Ti=Min. Si. The human being interacts along all those planes to extract its ∆a actions of motion ,∆o, perception, feeding, reproduction and social evolution. We does co-exist in all those scales, and our components act in all of them allowing our motion, etc. Our actions, our program of existence, which is not different from any other being. And in each plane each point enacts actions which are synchronised into waves of actions, of larger ‘existential forces’ that group into new cyclical waves of actions, emerging once and again in an upper scale.

How all those scales co-exist together? The answer is an interesting but difficult concept to grasp:

In the smaller world there are more time cycles than in the larger world. How does we adjust this ‘time longitude’, larger in smaller worlds respect to bigger simpler worlds

In a strictu senso, if we consider all the planes to have departed from a single past-point, T, the upper scales will have a ‘time delay’ similar to the delay of any web respect to its harmonic initial focus, only though we are measuring time delay. Thus the smaller world will be in a ‘relative future’ to the upper worlds. On the other hand, the upper world must be done into the future, with the smaller worlds already sustaining them as past forms. Here there is a fascinating first contact with one of the most complex elements of 5D-ST theory – the relativity of past present and future states, that co-exist in quite mixed orders.

In brief, the smaller worlds have more ‘time content’ than the larger worlds, which are both, slower and increasingly lagging in a relative past to the smaller worlds actions which code them, *but both are from their relative frame of reference futures, as the larger worlds see the smaller as their sustain, and the smaller code the larger as their past. Consciousness of what is time past or time future is thus relative to the point of the scale of planes we occupy.*

**The Generator Equation. The 3 Points of view of its topological planes. **

*There is always a first observer which starts an action of perception in space-time from a perspective that usually is biased by the function of the observer (STi, Se or To coordinates), which correspond to the Cartesian, Cylindrical and spherical, polar coordinates of science*

The Universe is a sum of a series of action, ∆aeiou, of them, the first action is perception by an observer, ∆o, of a field of energy, ∆e, to which it will move, ∆a, in order to feed, ∆e and use that energy to reproduce its information, ∆i, iterating a form like itself, which will gather with clone forms to create a larger, ∆U universal social plane.

This is all what we should describe when we reduce to minimal cyclical space-time actions the total reality of any self.

But to do so from a merely formal point of view, we do need to consider first the point of view that kicks out the world cycle of actions of any function of existence, ∆o, which is thus the minimal and first Unit-action of the Universe.

And this point of view and its relative frame of reference, will start the comprehension of an external reality.

*Thus the departure point of any mathematical course, should be the definition of the 3 fundamental coordinates which any entity uses to ‘adapt’ the perception of reality to its mind-view and the equation of the mind, which in terms of mathematical co-ordinates writes:*

**0.** O-point* x ∞ Universe = constant, static frame of reference.*

Thus the Observer is not only the dominant element of those 5 actions in the real Universe, but also the initial ‘point of view’ of any mathematical analysis, and analytic geometry rightly the first branch of mathematics to be studied.

And as it turns out in the first of many fascinating symmetries between ‘iTS’ and each science (isomorphic, |-space & O-Time, the abb. most commonly used for the 3 components of the Universe), 3 are the fundamental points of view and frames of reference of analytical geometry, each one belonging to a ‘fundamental state’ of being, in the Universe.

The temporal polar point of view, centred in the O-point and its external membrane determined by the radius and angle of perception; the cylindrical, lineal, energetic point of view, determined by the lineal axis of the frame of reference or ‘altitude’, the Z co-ordinates, and finally the Cartesian ‘hyperbolic plane’, corresponding to the STi bodies & waves of physical and biological systems.

From those 3 ‘mathematical perspectives’ the Universe constructs its vital geometries that we call ‘existential beings’.

And so the observer’s causal, logic, cyclical, informative sentient properties that allow it to perceive time cycles are the first questions to inquire.

To, is the first element to describe in reality.

And it is a frame of reference, an observer, an inertial point in relative fixed form with no motion that can perceive and map the Universe, an O x ∞ constant mapping mind. The observer.

Then I realized why mathematics was a language, so closely related to 5D space-time.

Since geometry was the science of space, logic algebra, with its sequential social numbers, the time language, and analysis the 3rd branch of mathematics, the study of the 5th dimension, of infinitesimals and wholes.

So it was easy to translate the laws of mathematics into isomorphic laws of 5D space-times, with the proper corrections to account for the fact that each point was a world in itself, when we came closer to see it – the true meaning of the 5^{th} non-Euclidean postulate which defines points as crossed by infinite parallels; part of waves, connected into planes, that grew through the fifth dimension into co-existing organisms, which used the clocks of time of different speeds to build up its complex forms. It did not matter so much that form, as knots made it convoluted, but the functions of those networks, which now became the 3 ‘physiological networks of all systems’, again described by the Generator equation:

Sp; Digestive-energetic network of Non-AE points < ST: reproductive, ‘blood’ networks > Informative, nervous networks: Tƒ

**The content of this post and blog.**

The post is structured in 3 main parts:

- First we INTRODUCE the elements of T.Œ, the laws of the scientific method, the fractal, 5Dimensional structure of space-time cyclical actions, and its Generator equation applied to physical systems.
- In the second part, we describe physics, as we do with any other system, through the 10 isomorphic sets of 5D space-time laws that physical systems obey as all other systems of Nature. That is, they show a ternary structure in space, a worldcycle in time of 3±∆ ages between conception and extinction; and complex organic relationships between 3 co-existing planes (∆-1: electromagnetic, quantum plane; ∆: Thermodynamic, human plane; ∆+1: cosmic, gravitational plane).
- Finally we study the main scales of the 5th dimension of physical systems, and its 3 x 3 sub scales, time clocks (frequency, temperature, speed) and space quanta (h,k,cc), as they evolve and transfer energy and information between scales and its point-particles. We do NOT study the galactic and dark scales, which are the subject of astrœphysics.

Since physics is the most extensive discipline of science today, we can hardly introduce its main themes in this post.

The structure of the web when reasonably *completed in its 2 first lines by summer 2016,* will be simple:

1st, simplex (and 3rd complex line) explains the isomorphic laws of 5D fractal knots of space-time (all what exists).

2nd, simplex (and 4th, complex line) makes an analysis of the main human experienced systems of fractal space-times in the Universe with those isomorphic laws of T.Œ. (a Theory of Everything), starting from:

∆±∞, the ¬Æ (non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean algebra, which evolves logic to accommodate 3 time arrows and mathematics to accommodate fractal points and 5D planes), dedicate to the logic, mathematical language of 5D space-time, which defines all the laws of all the planes of the Universe, following with…

The ∆>3, galactic and cosmic planes, the ∆-2, atomic plane, the ∆+2, Geological planet, the 3 strictly physical planes of time-space following…

Physical systems study the systems of Nature with a peculiar philosophy of science – that of the lineal physicist who only recognises a form of time, lineal time, and a form of motion, locomotion. Thus while the systems of physics, atoms, of the ∆-1 quantum scale, molecules of the ∆-thermodynamic scale, and cosmic bodies of the ∆+1 gravitational scales.

Closer to human beings, with the ∆±1 life-plane the ∆o, human mental and individual plane, the U1, historic plane of social superorganisms of mankind and the U2, eco(nomic)system that is terraforming the Earth into a global planet of machines, ill-managed by the primitive social sciences of today.

**The fractal paradigm.**

The fractal paradigm is by far the most r=evolutionary advance in all sciences, which allows unlike ‘physical only theories of reality’, to unify the concepts of time and space of all sciences, each one studying a relative scale of size and time speed of the ‘5th dimension’. In this article we shall study only the laws of the fractal paradigm applied to the largest cosmological and galactic scales:

In the graph, the main scales of the 5th dimension. Each scale of different entropic size in space, ∆i, is studied by a different science. Its fundamental metric equation is the co-invariance between the speed of the time clocks of the species of each scalar science – hence its capacity to process information – which increases as the system becomes smaller, but for an entire family of co-related species, remains invariable:

*|-Spe x O-Tiƒ = Constant ST∆±1 ≈ Conserved ‘Present’ Ei*

In the graph we can see how the 5th dimension organises all the time clocks with different speeds, and scales of size in the Universe, from the largest, slower beings to the fastest, smaller ones. 5D metric therefore introduces in fact ‘2 new dimensions’ or arrows of the Universe, downwards, towards faster clocks of time, and upwards towards larger slower wholes which ‘contour’ the internal vital space of any system.

Yet since wholes *require the parts to appear before they are formed, the 5th dimension is in fact a dimension of time, which establishes a new absolute time arrow, which is the arrow of eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, of points into ‘social numbers’, of ‘finitesimal quanta’ into super organisms, as particles become atoms that become molecules, cells, crystals, planets, organisms, societies, solar systems, galaxies and beyond… The existence of more ‘forms of time motion than mere locomotion’, of organic character, a fundamental element of philosophy of science, ignored by present physics is thus readdressed by 5D metric, opening an astounding number of solutions to pending questions of all sciences. *

*Can we classify all those ST beings according to their form and purpose? *Yes we can. The 3rd element of T.OE, the 5th dimension orders the different speeds of time clocks and sizes of the Universe. Its metric allows us to order all those lineal and cyclical space-time ‘formal motions’.

Since bigger systems (galaxy) run slower than smaller systems (DNA) which carry more information, but both are invariant together, Sp x Tƒ = ∆.

And this invariance is the origin of the order and structure and co-existence of all those different systems of the Universe, as the growth in size is balanced by the loss of information and vice versa.

In the graph, the main scales of the 5th dimension. Each scale of different entropic size in space, ∆i, is studied by a different science. Its fundamental metric equation is the co-invariance between the speed of the time clocks of the species of each scalar science – hence its capacity to process information – which increases as the system becomes smaller, but for an entire family of co-related species, remains invariable:

*|-Spe x O-Tiƒ = Constant ST∆±1 ≈ Conserved ‘Present’ Ei*

** The bias introduced by anthropocentric, mechanocentric clocks to measure all the times of the Universe.**

*In the graph, the infinite cyclical clocks of time of the Universe and its relative ‘parameters’ that measure its motion, speed, temperature and frequency were ‘forgotten’, when mechanisms substituted Nature as the ‘measure of all things’, with the arrival of mechanic clocks. *

*Then Galileo founded ‘ballistics’, today called physics, in his book ‘On military instruments’, dedicated to the study of locomotions and lineal trajectories of cannonballs, ‘for the delight of philosophers and the practical use of artillery masters’.*

* His goal was to reach the maximal lineal distance possible with those cannonballs. To that aim he established the principles of lineal time, cyclical inertia and a single, steady state mechanical clock time to measure the lineal duration of those canon shots. And soon the single lineal clock became the standard clock and time concept for all time rhythms of the universe. And so the informative properties of those time rhythms and cyclical forms, the multiplicity of time clocks in the Universe, its order and causal laws disappeared.*

*But of course our capacity to make machines and measure them and put clocks on them, today converted into computers increased. So paradoxically as we forgot the clocks of nature, we grew in our dexterity to make machines to measure nature.*

Before we study the Cosmos and its organic laws and world cycles, (including the big-bang moment of death and re-birth), we need to widen the worldview of the reader, no doubt schooled in the very limit description of reality made by physicists. Thus we shall make an introduction to all space-time systems, extracted from the main post of this blog and an introduction to physical systems, its relative clock of times and quanta of space (the so called Universal constants), and then enter in full on Cosmology, which is the study of the larger scales perceived by human beings.

Thus, the reader should be aware that there are 2 scientific view of reality, which have always fought for supremacy in Science:

– The larger, all encompassing view of philosophers of science – larger in time, as it can be dated to the first Mathematicians, Pythagoras and Plato and the first Logicians, Aristotle, in the western ‘decoupling of history, and to their counterparts in the East, the Taoists, WengWang and Lao, and the Hindi and Buddhist philosophers – and larger in space, as it aims to explain ‘all’ knowledge of Humanity’, that is not only the experimental facts of all species, and all languages of knowledge– the mathematical languages of space, the temporal verbal languages, but also the human perceiver himself and its senses and artistic forms derived from them Vs.

– The reductionist view of physicists, which only considers a restricted part of reality – physical systems, only accepts a language of description, mathematics, only defines a form of motion in time, external translation in space, and yet surprisingly enough pretends with those very limited ‘parts’ of reality to have a Theory Of Everything that makes sense of all what exists. And what is more surprising, it has achieved global recognition as the ‘high popes of science’, excluding the work of philosophers of science from the search of ultimate knowledge.

This is largely the product, not of the achievements and merits of physical theories in the explanation of reality but of its praxis – the construction of machines and weapons, which are the ultimate source of power of our technological civilization.

But the confusion of technology with science and knowledge, is of course a falsehood, which carries a heavy toll for our understanding of reality. It first eliminates all internal elements of knowledge, the mind, and its languages.

YET the information of the universe is carried in its natural clocks – NOT IN HUMAN mechanisms, nowhere to be seen outside the surface of this planet. And when scientists forgot that, a huge gap on their conceptual understanding of the Universe ensued.

The concept of cyclical times is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all time clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical times. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if times were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in time of patterns of behavior and causality. So to deny cyclical times is to deny science, logic and objectivity. But it also means to deny the fundamental particle of the Universe – a being made of space-time cycles that ‘thinks, therefore exists’ as a world in itself.

Now we shall state why biology is the most correct of science. It is not only because the relationships between co-existing scales of the 5^{th} dimension are organic as they exist in simultaneity and must balance and coordinate and synchronize its exchanges of energy and information working together, but because they have the maximal information due to its closeness, and since each scale follows the same laws, it ‘follows’ it does not matter size, scaling, and so the supposed advantage of physics (to study the smallish and largest scales) is irrelevant. On the contrary it introduces paradoxes of perception that made them ‘less correct in their interpretations’ of reality.

Of course, given the paradoxical transformations of the Universe, and the lack of true understanding of its structure by any science, there is a lot of puzzling and ambivalence on the treatment of Energy, as there is in biology with the understanding of the arrow of genetics that carries information from the lower cellular to the larger organic scales as opposed to synchronous motion carried from upper to lower scales, or ‘energy arrow’. And even more in the social organisms, between the re=productive ‘working’, energetic middle class and the informative ‘neuronal’ upper class and how they must manage together a society.

It must be clear though that the confusion is a lack of ‘proper rightful mirrors of information’ on the parameters of the Universe. The Universe has not that confusion. It is paradoxical, dual and ternary in its logic structure, which is NOT the same as confusing. It is rather efficient, and dynamic, vital, so systems are ternary. They tend to have ternary uses and each part can be broken into ternary systems, and they have dual opposite function, entropy vs. mass, limbs vs. heads and so on. But it is because of its efficiency and economicity.

For that reason we must ‘FIRST’ depart from the mathematical formalism and generator equations of the fractal Universe, and coin a language of philosophy of science above any science, and only then when the reader does HAVE a referential language above those of physical, biological and sociological and mental, linguistic systems, the 4 legs of scientific knowledge we will be able to deal with ambiguities in science without being too confusing.

This physicist re the less prepared to accept because they pretend due mainly to its praxis power (as makers of the mechanisms and weapons that dominate our society) that their language is the ‘first’ one, above the scientific method, above the mathematical and logic language sand above all other scales of the 5^{th} dimension – so somewhat to study particles is more important that to study human organism. In this T.Œ differs greatly and considers rightfully the opinion of the triad of geniuses and friends of the beginning of the past century rm. Einstein, Mr. Eddington, who put Einstein in the map with his proof of relativity and Mr. Gödel, his closest, who proved that mathematics is also an empiric science. They were fully aware and often express it in cutthroat sentences disliked by their peers that physicists ‘invent’ by lack of direct evidence many concepts, and simplify Nature, and so organic closer sciences, like biology are the most accurate depicting each scale of reality.

We talk of 2 ‘paradoxes of knowledge’ that affect the upper sciences and lower sciences to the direct biological scale:

– The quantum paradox of uncertainty (the human observer is so huge it affects the observable, making measure uncertain)

– The Antiquantum paradox of social sciences (the human observer is so small and within the social body that the observable, the elites in control of the informative languages of power, bankers with money, politicians and military with laws and weapons affect the observer and bias its message in its favor).

So biological sciences ARE the top sciences in certainty, detail of observation and capacity to be objective, and that is why THEY USE ALL THE LANGUAGES (Mathematic, quantitative measure, verbal logic, bio-logical evolutionary theories) and study ALL the relationships between scales (genetic information, mechanic motion, ecosystems).

And so T.Œ is a Theory of Everything Organic because the Universe is organic. But of course we do USE concepts of all the other sciences, drawing heavily on Physical sciences, and true social sciences, which surprisingly enough will have little to do with academic history but more with art and love (as academia in history hugely biased by the Antiquantum paradox, so nationalism, the belief that the humans species must NOT help each other to survive as a single species as Darwin and the prophets of eusocial love explained in our languages, but must be divided in tribal military groups, so the people-caste of parasites on power, the military and bankers who monopolize the issue of our social languages of power, can have a ‘excuse’ to justify themselves).

Entropy is the proper name for expansive motion, but physicists use it as expressing disorder. Its proper nature as opposed to order or form, is quite accurate. Energy on the other hand is an ‘all encompassing concept’, which puts together lineal and angular momentum, better specific synonymous in physical systems of lineal and cyclical motions. So energy aggregates both and its principle of conservation means the immortality of the Universe as a game that constantly transforms energy into information. Further on energy integrates multiple ‘motions’, multiple momentums, and so as a ‘larger scale concept’ will be related to time, understood as the sum of multiple ‘space-moments’ or ‘steps’ or ‘space-time cycles. We do advance all those ambiguities, for skeptical physicists, though they are not of so much importance at this stage.

Thus the reader should not search for the specific equations used in physics, except when we do specific analysis of this discipline.

In physics in that sense, energy IS both, lineal motion (kinetic energy), cyclical form (potential energy), and its ultimate meaning means merely that our 4 concepts, of entropy(energy), Space, information, time, are constantly transforming into each other. So we would rather write:

“Energy never dies it transforms constantly back and forth, from Spatial Extension into Temporal Form: Sp < =>Tƒ’

Thus Past, is better understood as Sp, Spatial Extension and we shall use that symbol constantly instead to familiarize the reader with the relationship between space and past entropy and future and time-form.

Of course, physicists will not like it. But T.Œ departs not from physical reductionism, but from philosophy of science, and aims to explain much wider principles, regardless of its capacity to enter then into details on each science. Ad Maximal what Physicists call a T.Œ is the search for a unification equation of charges and masses, a trivial result when we understand the 5^{th} dimension, found in other posts of this web. We go well beyond.

While physics is essentially the science of ‘perceiving’ the Universe with technology – time with clocks instead of words, space with telescopes and microscopes instead of eyes – and its langauges of measure – mathematics. But that IS not all what there is to reality.

We shall use thus our larger terms, which will make more complex and ambivalent our general analysis, but far more flexible when we apply those universal logic principles to different disciplines and specific species.

**The clocks of nature. Its purpose: to process the information of each species.**

Since I was young what call my attention was Nature as it is, not the human description of it, with those mechanical Instruments. To me the Universe was both Intelligent and organic, living Nature.

So I was intrigued by those ‘big concepts’, Space and Time, life and death, and the ages between them, Energy and Information, and the way both mixed in the living systems around me. Those were the widest concepts of reality and certainly the definitions I found of them in abstract science did not convince me – there were not really definitions but tautologies and descriptions.

For example, Einstein, who was supposed to be the foremost expert on time, said: ‘Time is what a clock measures’.

But then I wondered, ‘What kind of clock embodies the full meaning of time’?

The clock of the seasons, which animals used to synchronise their reproductive cycles?

The clock of the days, of the Earth rotating, which life used to synchronise its rhythms of activity?

The clock of the stars, of the beats of birds flying? The clock of a flower blossoming and dying? The clock-beats of my heart, which synchronised the rhythms of my eye winks, synchronised to the rhythms of my thoughts – a second?.

Each of those clocks had a different rhythm and the Universe was filled of them. Yet all had certain qualities: to repeat themselves, and hence when described in a trajectory in space; to be closed cyclical paths, hence with form, and frequency the 2 properties of information – so we will call them all Tiƒ. And to work in harmony, in synchrony, as certain clocks were chained to larger clocks, forming complex patterns of information. Time clocks and information therefore were intimately related.

The limited information of physicists time.

Physicists in that sense used only a mechanical clock, which closed into itself with a fixed rhythm of a second. And they used it to obtain information about the external motion of beings, or speed. But unlike me, who were essentially interested on the meaning of time ‘alone’, for physicists time was just the submissive, needed parameter to obtain that information about speed in space – time was not the goal but the means to what physicists truly studied motions in space, distances.

So they defined space NOT time. Galileo wrote: V=s/t, where what mattered was to measure V-speed and s=space distances=vt.

Einstein did NOT changed this at all, merely substituted s=vt for s=ct, that is the speed of the object for the speed of light, in his corrections and calculations of the measures of speed and space of objects moving at the speed of light. Again this must be stressed given the profound influence that physicists as makers of the machines and weapons of our civilisations have in the collective subconscious:

Physicists do NOT study time. When a physicist tells you that time is the 4th dimension of space, he is referring precisely to that equation and only that equation, either S=vt or S=ct, this ‘ct’ is what he calls the 4th dimension of space. So he reduces time to a parameter to measure space and speed, because indeed ‘time’ is the parameter that measures ALL KIND OF INFORMATIONS, including speed in space. BUT THERE ARE OTHER KINDS OF INFORMATIONS, IN WHICH TIME CYCLES ARE THE PARAMETERS AND CARRIERS OF INFORMATION.

**Informative computer and life cycles.**

For example, computers process information and they are basically a series of time cycles, digital clocks. So both time and computers are measured by the speed of its time cycles, in frequency Herzs, Tiƒ. So we said that a computer is more intelligent when it has more ‘gigahertzs’, when his time cycles run faster, when its ‘speed of time is faster’.

What do then a computer time cycles have to do with space? Nothing. There time is still a measure of information, carried in the form of its logic circuits and the speed at which the algorithms of those logic circuits are traced. But now it is NOT measuring the information on the speed and distances of space.

Consider the evolutionary time rhythms discovered by Darwin. Evolutionary time measure the rhythms of change in the form, hence in the in-form-ation of beings. So the fittest species, those with more efficient forms and which act faster in time survive. Think of in-form-ation as ‘form-in-action’, because it is what time is. We perceive time cycles which are, forms in motion, changing forms, temporal forms, forms-in-actions, informations.

The problem though with physicists, as we have said is their megalomaniac, bully attitude; as their worldly profession has always been to make weapons (70% of them still work in the US as makers of weapons). So power corrupts, and their military power corrupts their attitude towards other scientists. So they think what they study is ALL what we must know. Their particles ARE essential. And all other forms of time, informations and beings IRRELEVANT to the ultimate nature of things. Alas, power imposes its view. So whenever you pretend to explain people, scientists and of course physicists, the much wider meaning of time, it is like if you were committing a blasphemy against the religion of time-physics: s=ct≈vt. And that’s all.

So Physicists introduced two reductions of the whole concept of time in nature – to reduce it to study a single type of form in motion, in-form-ation – the translation in space of physical systems or ‘locomotion’. And to reduce and equalise all the clocks of nature, from orbital systems, to living systems and their world cycles, to evolutionary cycles, to mental cycles, and logic cycles, to a single clock tic – that of the clock. So they came with the infantile concept that time has a single tic, and that tic is like the clock, a steady tic. Yet it is evident as you have experienced with the growing speed of time of your computers and mobiles that even among mechanisms there are different speeds in their clocks, and this speed increases with the evolution of the clocks that keep processing ever more information.

And, so happens in nature, where new species are ever faster in their clocks of time. So mammals are faster than reptiles faster than plants. And the next ladder in the evolution, robotic machines are faster than men – and for that reason they are displacing us in all informative processes, as the new white collar pcs, blue collar workers and terminator soldiers, in fields of labor and war (cause of the present existential crisis of mankind, hidden by our financiers and economists working for corporations that make money with them).

So to me the first, most obvious error about Nature, was the way in which humans tried to IMPOSE their gadgets and machines of time measure over the Universe, WITHOUT any respect of the beauty the different rhythms of that Universe showed.

So I threw my mechanical clock, and never have worn one.

In the next graph we show you those concepts visually so you can realize that all is made of cycles of time (seen as information in still relative no motion) and planes of space (seen as kinetic lineal momentum, in its relative motion):

**The principle of relativity of motion and form. The holographic Principle.**

Next in the ‘awesome’ smartness of our geniuses talking on black holes, is the so called ‘theory of information of black holes’, which is so to speak the inverse to their theory of entropy of black holes. Here actually they got some smart results which they wonder and wonder because they don’t understand. Let us explain it to them. What they found is that the Information of a black hole could be stored in its bidimensional surface. From here, as they don’t understand what they talk about (remember Neumann) they deduced that the Universe could be a bidimensional holography. Ok. The first result as usual is good. Information is bidimensional, the second is a bit speakeasy Neumann style. Let us explain it properly.

To fully understand how spatial planes in motion and cyclical clocks can mess together to create the space-time beings we all are (we ARE NOT in a background space-time, we ARE made of vital spaces with rhythms of motion defined by its time frequencies in our human case mostly metabolic temperature regulated cycles), we need to make a further clarification, at the heart of Physics.

It is with the conservation of energy and information the most important law of physics, the principle of relativity, expressed by Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove: the earth moves but doesn’t move – we do NOT see it moving), by Einstein and Poincare, the mathematician that found in parallel this principle: ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness, from ‘form’. Look around, all what you see are forms in motion, but we cannot distinguish clearly what part is ‘form’, ‘position’ and what part is ‘motion’. They are very mixed.

What this means is that our two parameters, quanta of space, and cycles of time, do have both, ‘motion’ and ‘form’. But space, does have a lineal, planar, ‘res extensa’ bidimensional shape. We talk fo ‘planes of space’, and clocks of time, are tall, cyclical, informative cycles – you look at information and its forms and cycles in tall broken cyclical forms, a s the screen of your computer.

So we do have certain clear ‘bidimensional properties’ of form and motion for space: Flat planes moving in lineal paths, and Time, tall cycles, moving in repetitive frequencies. And we know that the product of quanta of bidimensional space and time frequency cycles gives us the relative Energy of reality. And we have a very generic formula for it: Ei = ∑Sp x Tƒ.

Now this resolves a fundamental conundrum of modern physics – why information is bidimensional. Now it is easy: because it is the frequency and form of time cycles that now are bidimensional, tall and with a bit rhythm, a dimension of motion.

And so in the graph we can see the principle of the Holographic Universe, physicists are trying to define (10.000 papers only in the past decade about it) but have not yet grasped as they do NOT understand space, time, information and energy, (kinetic, potential, its integral, etc.).

We can then see that the holographic principle merely means that if you give to ‘time cycles’ the dimension of ‘height’, then you do have the 4 dimensions broken in 2 for spatial lineal, planar kinetic energy, width and length, and 2 for cyclical time clocks, beat, frequency-motion and height.

And alas, because only things with the same dimensions can transform into each other, now we can truly understand the holographic principle: Our 4 dimensional Universe is made of flat planes of spatial lineal kinetic energy, we shall call Spe and tall cyclical bits of information we shall call Tiƒ. When they combine they create a being of space-time, in 4 dimensions.

In the right we see the simplest one, a light beam clearly made of a tall, informative, electric field, perpendicular to a magnetic, energetic magnetic field, reproducing along the length of its c-speed.

Below we see humans and machines, which do have lineal, energetic, planar limbs//bodies, or as in weapons, lineal systems of release of kinetic energy, and cyclical, informative, eyes, brains, heads particles that gauge and process logically or mathematically information.

Below we further see how a black hole, the informative nucleus of the Galaxy, similar to the DNA-informative nucleus of a cell in a smaller scale, does have a tall high dimension and an enormous clock-like cyclical rhythm, the event horizon turning at c-speed. So if light is the quintessential plane of space, with both components but clearly dominant in flat, length, the black hole is the inverse, extreme case of an informative cyclical clock-like vortex of time.

Now entropy is generalized unnecessarily and without rigor by physicists to mean expansive, disorder, spatial motions. And what is absurd – expanded outside the realm of temperature to fit the entire Universe within a supposed absolute entropic arrow of time for all what exists – a huge leap of faith from the study of steam gas in vapor machines, where the concept first appeared.

What Hawking did, giving entropy to black holes, WHICH ARE EXACTLY THE INVERSE informative vortices of gravitation of the Universe, is just the last ‘leap of faith’ in the attempt to reduce all what exists to lineal cannonballs and lineal motions – the last step of the process started by Galileo.

The fact is the Universe is made of both lineal and cyclical motions, space and time, lineal and angular momentum, quanta of space and time clocks.

And the Universe is made of informative mass vortices, with gravitational information, as the galaxy we are in, reason why we are informative beings. Yet between galaxies, there are fractal planes of flat space with dark energy similar to the expansive entropy of gases. And both balance each other in the fractal universe.

Now because physicists; do not understand or want to accept despite amazing number of proofs, the fractal structure of the Universe, they do NOT realize that the expansive entropy of flat space between galaxies is balanced by the implosive conversion of that flat space into mass by cyclical clock-like tall vortices of information – black holes.

So they can go around with absurd concepts such as ‘the entropy of black holes’. And to make it possible, instead of describing black holes as systems that absorb in-form, with gravitation, the galaxy, inventing a motion to the past, changing its arrows of time as Hawking does and bringing its absurd time machines.

We see though that the arrow of information or arrow of evolution increases the dimensions of tall information, and so life evolved from flat worms into tall informative humans. So it does space, which time bends into cyclical vortices of mass. Or as Einstein said ‘time curves space into mass’. This is the Universe which Einstein said is ‘simple and not malicious’. And he put it in a simple equation E= M (c2), which explains how the Universe constantly transforms its kinetic energy/entropy (light, electromagnetic, thermal radiation) into informative masses, back and forth in big bangs and big crunches.

Now the graph clarifies the meaning of time – a tall cycle or clock; information, and its equivalent perception as still; information.

It shows the meaning of a generic quanta of space, a flat plane with lineal momentum or kinetic energy which is the lineal motion of a plane of space.

**The key dualities of cyclical, temporal information and Expansive, Planar, Space**

Now the key to understand the Universe is to understand the complex meanings and multiple possible perceptions of those 2 x 2 elements, its ternary combinations (as space-time), and its symmetries and antisymmetries (inversion of properties). So algebraically the representation of the Space-Time Universe is the hyperbolic function:

INDEED transcending the material reality of those 2 formal motions, the logic underlying truth of all this is the inversion of the two poles of the Universe:

*In the graph, the most important function of the Universe is the inverse function between Spatial expansion and Temporal Implosion in its infinite manifestations (in physics those laws are always of the type: Energetic information (ST) = Space quanta (H, k) x Time frequency (v, T).** So we can easily derive the fundamental laws of quantum and thermodynamics and the meaning of its constants, with the left side equation (which the nuclear physicist will immediately identify with the decay rate of an atom, and the ‘entropic believer’ with the Pv=nKT law of gases). *

*Its commonest mathematical function is the exponential, (1+1/n)™ whereas ‘1’ is the value of the whole system, n, the number of fractal ∆-1 cellular parts, and T, its temporal repetition, which defines all processes of growth and decay, in which in each time period the system grows or diminishes a space-quanta (hence its time derivative is always proportional). In that regard, one of the most fascinating elements of T.Œ is the enlightenment of the equations of mathematics, the MOST REALIST of all sciences, as it describes in its 3 disciplines, ‘fractal analysis’, Non-Euclidean Geometry, and ‘non-Aristotelian Algebra’ the common isomorphic laws of all species of the Universe. Time permitted by Summertime we will add a 4th post to this section, with the fundamental laws of ¬Æ, ‘i-logic’ mathematics’.*

In that regard, departing from the duality of Relativity (all dimensional forms are indistinguishable from relative motions), we have 4 possible ‘entities’ according to the duality of form and motion or the duality of Cycles Vs. lines:

- We shall call Cyclical motion, time clocks, which carry information in its cycles and frequency. So there is also:
- We shall call Cyclical form, information.

And then:

- We shall call Lineal motions, energies or entropies or lineal time duration.
- We shall call Lineal form, space dimensions.

This order has given primacy to the duality of lineal and cyclical forms, and its Ø-wave like combinations.

And so the Universe conservers both cyclical and lineal motions & still forms:

- Cyclical and lineal motions, that is, angular and lineal momentum, become then the main motions of time, which combine in∞ Ø-waves.
- Cyclical information and lineal dimensions, that is spatial forms, which also combine to create complex organic systems with heads/particles of cyclical form that store information and lineal limbs/distances that process energy with its still forms.

Science is full of variations on those different symmetries and studies, and the interchangeability of both ways of observing the Universe to get the same results.

To stress though, that of all those terms, the most ambiguous is the physical concept of energy, which here we use sometimes as a synonymous of entropy or lineal motion (kinetic energy) in the common sense expression (I don’t have energy, you have too much energy), expressed as the capacity to move, and opposed to information, also a wider term than the restricted concept of Shannon in physics, more akin to the common use of information as forms that can be perceived. Hence related to form. As a cycle do have more form than a line.

Reality thus is a game of two elements, spatial energy and temporal information and its combinations and transformation, symmetries and species made with them.

We thus fast forward to the expression of the Generator, feedback equation of the Universe of space-time beings, which Galileo and Newton missed (but Leibniz, the ignored Genius understood with his concept of fractal space and relational time):

|-Sp (Spatial Extension: fields/limbs) <ST (iterative waves-bodies)>It (heads-particles of temporal information).

If we see those 2 motions as forms, we talk of lineal space and forms of information. If we see them moving we talk of kinetic energy and cyclical clocks of time.

If we see them sequentially, we talk of flows of time. If we see them co-existing in simultaneity, we talk of a simultaneous organism of:

Sp-limbs-fields<ST-Bodies-waves<Tƒ-Particles heads.

Since we ARE made of time cycles and lineal motions of space, perceived either as It: information, or Sp: space, in stillness, or Es: kinetic, lineal energy and Tƒ, cyclical time clocks when in motion.

This is the next huge advance of T.Œ, to know what we are made of: Es, energy and Tƒ, cyclical time, as when we say, ‘I don’t have energy any time to do this’, perceived in stillness as Sp-bidimensional planes of space and tall, bidimensional planes of information, It; where bi-dimensionality means a ‘thin sheet’ as the thin screen of information which you are reading this blog.

Physicists call this fact the holographic principle of Information. They wonder why black holes seem to store all the information its bidimensional surface. They wonder how space and time can mess in space-time relativity IF only entities with the same number of dimensions can mess.

So we shall soon consider those concepts in physics. But before we do so we need to introduce the third element that structures the Universe and orders all those time cycles and vital spaces – the 5^{th} dimension of relative sizes in space and speeds of time clocks.

We shall start our change of paradigm with the ‘fundamental principle of it all’, Time and its different motions.

**The 3 motions of time.**

Time we say is motion in visual terms, CHANGE, in logic terms. And Aristotle, the father of logic science told us there were different types of motion:

-External ‘locomotion’, or translation in space, studied by physics; which we shall call ‘energetic, entropic motions in space’, **Sp.**

-Internal change in the ‘form’ of beings, in their in-form-ation, which we call evolution, and said it was studied by biology, and we shall call Temporal, Informative motion, proper, **Tƒ.**

-But this 2 great fields of change, external, physical, spatial change and internal, temporal informative evolution, or cyclical change, combine constantly and reproduce similar forms, and so we can talk of a 3rd type of ‘formal motion’ or change, not so evident as it is a conservative change, we shall call reproduction, or revolution, product of both type of changes, ST(st), or **ST**.

**The separation between past, present and future is an illusion. The symmetry of time and space.**

Now we are confronted with a problem, which is the enormous ambivalence of human languages in the use of those 2 fundamental words, space and time, and its ternary formal motions, Sp, SxT: ST and Tƒ.

So we need to attach certain mathematical, geometric and logic concepts to our verbal terms to avoid so much ambivalence. Let us then return to Descartes and put some properties attached to those 3 symbols, which we advance ARE the ‘ultimate’ formal motions we care for, Sp, ST, Tƒ.

**Sp or Spatial Extension**, is ‘res extensa’, something extended in ‘space’. So it is a motion that expands in space, as in a big bang. And contrary to belief as it expands in space it decelerates in ‘time’ so it looses its ‘time motion’ till it becomes truly what ambivalent words tends to call Space- a still form. Thus space tends to slow down and extend itself; it does have motion but becomes finally a ‘flat’ extension.

**Tƒ****or Informative time cycles**, which carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and cyclical form of its cycles, is INVERSE in properties, as it actually accelerates inwards, as it becomes smaller, as all vortex do, V x Radius = Constant. Thus smaller radius, turn faster, as it happens with angular momentum, black holes or hurricanes. And they become ‘taller’.

So this shows some fundament facts of **Sp vs. Tƒ. **They are inverse. They are both FORMAL MOTIONS; but space has LESS of both; it is flat on the long term, and slow to stillness, and Time is faster and a cycle, which tends to be tall. So we can ask also define them by dimensions. Of the 4 dimensions used today, space tends to have 2 of them, length and width, and time, width and height. And so they combine in the ‘width’ dimension, which brings us the 3rd element:

**Sp x Tƒ: E x I: Reproductive, wave-bodies**that combine the entropy of space and the form of time clocks into ‘meaningful’, workable parameters, ‘energy’ (entropy with direction) and information (form with meaning).

**The fractal universe. We are all made of flat space surfaces formed by cycles of time.**

*In the graph, the universe is a fractal of flat space surfaces with energy quanta, Sp, formed, in-form-ed by time cycles of tall, cyclical form. This mean, reality is as we see it, a discontinue of infinite vital spaces, surrounded by bidimensional surfaces of information, time cycles that control and information vital energy they enclose. So humans form a membrane of information over the planet Gaia. And the information of black holes can be calculated in basis of its surface. Yet since information IS the inverse of entropy the holographic principle PROVES THAT BLACK HOLES HAVE 0 ENTROPY, as the forms with a surface of maximal information of the Universe.*

Thus while humans perceive time with mechanical artificial clocks and space, with human rods of measure (meters), Natural system has multiple, different time clocks with different rhythms and multiple ‘quanta of space’, for different species. Thus as science becomes more objective, away from human anthropomorphism, the next great r=evolution of thought, after the heliocentric theory that put the center of our local cosmos away from the earth, and the Darwinian theory, of biology that put the origin of life away from Abrahamic gods, is the use of Nature’s clocks and space quanta, to streamline the equations of mathematical physics and harmonize the concepts of time, space, energy and information of the different sciences, each one studied a relative scale of size and speed of time of the Universe.

In the graph, the 4 main scales of size and time speed of the physical universe, the quantum scale, ‘∆-1’,whose clocks of time are ‘frequency’, quanta of space are h-Planck quanta of ‘angular momentum’, and constant Energy and information, the product of both: E=hv; the thermodynamic scale, ‘∆’, where the clocks of time are temperature, the quanta of space k-Boltzmann ‘entropy’, and the gravitational scale, ∆+1; where Nature’s clocks of time, are speed, and quanta of space, mass, and the formula that integrate them as a volume of energy and information for each ‘being of space-time’ fo that scale, E=nkT,

However the arrival of lineal physics and the mechanical clock hid this self-evident Universe made of infinite space quanta and time cycles, substituted by abstract Newtonian models of an absolute continuum space drawn over a paper (the Cartesian Plane), in which all those parts of space, are pegged together, and a single clock and time rhythm measured with those mechanical clocks that equalized all rhythms of nature to its steady, tic-toc. But Nature does have its own clocks to measure time, which ultimately is the repetition of cyclical forms of in-form-ation, different for each species, which processes that information with logic, formal cycles of different lengths, durations and speeds.

So the ultimate meaning of a Universe of infinite time cycles, regulated by Nature’s clocks, was lost, and time became, in words of Einstein ‘what a clock measures’. Moreover as the clock had a relative, steady state speed, and can be elongated ad infinitum, rewinding its engine, the fact that the cycles of temporal information (ab. O-Tiƒ, in the jargon of Fractal space-time, ab. ∆St) of any system are always finite (by the very same nature of a time cycle that closes into itself) and do have different forms and speed at different moments, became also forgotten.

This is self-evident when we realize that Nature measures time with different physical clocks, for different families of species. It uses the **frequency** of waves to measure time in the quantum scale (ab. ∆-1 ST, in the jargon of Fractal space-Time). It uses molecular vibrations, which humans measure with **temperatures (ab. ∆ST)**, to define the cycles of larger molecular systems, and it uses different forms of speed, notably angular speed, in the even larger **gravitational** ‘∆+1’ Space-Time Scale.

And so the infinite cycles of time of Universal beings, and its different clocks of Nature (frequency, temperature and speed), whose rhythms and forms carry the in-form-ative patterns, became also forgotten, with the arrival of artificial, mechanical clocks, which established a steady single, human rhythm to time, of infinite duration. Of course, because using a single human rod of measure for space, or ‘quanta’, the meter, and a single human time cycle or ‘second’, equalizing all other systems with them, allowed a perspective on reality from the human practical point of view, the use of seconds in time and meters in space, facilitated measure and construction of machines, weapons and buildings, greatly improving the praxis of human life.

So what man lost in his philosophical understanding of reality, he gained it in practical power. And as measures with single clocks and single space rods increased, many regularities of Nature were tabulated, albeit deformed by its equalization with clocks and single space continuums. However, and this is a key element to understand why a Universal model, slightly deformed in its fundamental principle works, a system with a distorted perspective, such as the Ptolemaic system with the Earth at its center, can fully describe reality, merely by adding complex corrections to cater the distorted point of view.

So human measures of reality with a single time and space are more complex specially at conceptual level than the more realist model, using the proper quanta of space measure (the so called Universal constants) and time clocks of Nature (frequency, temperature and speed) but they do work. Moreover they have established a scientific praxis for 400 years that would be extremely costly to vary, as the Industrial revolution, converted the clock today evolved into a computer in the model of all temporal things, and the meter, today the speed of light, as the quanta of all spaces.

And so physicists are comfortable with this absolute space-time picture of reality.

We, Philosophers of science, however are not practical beings, only concerned with the objective truths of the Universe. So we are not satisfied with Physicists’ models and the purpose of this blog is to establish a more objective picture of the Universe, using the different clocks of time and quanta of space we find in Nature (as science is ultimately the search for an objectivity that goes beyond the subjective human anthropomorphic view, so science moved from earth-centric models to heliocentric models, and should move from human time models into Universal time models).

So the quantic nature of space and cyclical nature of time was forgotten, and the fact that we are ‘relational space-time beings’, made of space quanta and time cycles, – Leibniz’s alternative model to that of Newton, remained ignored for 2 centuries.

Then in the XIX and XX century, new advances in mathematics, physics and biology made unavoidable the resurrection of the ‘real models’ of Nature, as Darwin found the evolutionary, time rhythms of nature and its species, which were neither infinite in duration, nor it follow the steady mechanical, artificial rhythm of human time clocks; Lobachevski found that space was indeed discontinuous, with different geometrical forms in different regions of the Universe, Einstein found time clocks were multiple and run at different speeds, and defined the quanta of the larger gravitational scale of size, or rest mass, while quantum theorists discovered in the other extreme of size, the H-Planck bidimensional quanta of angular momentum h, was also a constant; and Boltzmann found the Universal quanta of space of thermodynamic world, ‘Entropy’, was also a constant K.

When physicists discovered that in fact even the smallest spaces do have motion and are made of quanta, and Einstein discovered that the rhythms of time varied and had different speeds, the routines of this ‘simplistic’ Newtonian model had to be changed. As Einstein put it: ‘Leibniz is right, but if so we have to change the entire scaffolding of western science from its foundations’.

Thus human concepts of a continuous absolute space and lineal absolute time, invented by Newton and the mechanical clocks, are no longer valid, and we must substitute them for the real concepts of nature and modern physics: a world of multiple space quanta with motion and a world of multiple cycles of time with different speeds.

Why a philosopher of science and not a physicist has completed such a model should be obvious to the reader. The philosopher of science is concerned with the big questions, what is time, space, energy information and with the unification of all sciences and scales of reality form quantum to astronomy through biology and social sciences. So themes of such wide range as those treated here are more proper of philosophers of science.

Further on, the philosopher of science departs not from the study of a specific type of space-time systems (physical systems of matter) but from the principle, laws and mathematical and logic languages of time and space, we humans use to perceive reality. Thus once the physicist gather experimental evidence with its instruments, he is at loss with the theoretical analysis on the widest possible terms of those experiments There is where the work of the philosopher of science, master of languages of thought more than of machines of perception, comes in.

Since science is a logic, mathematical statement about reality, so there are also clear new advances on logic and mathematics, which in the XIX century r=evolved scientific thought and again have not yet fully incorporated into our models of reality.

Science is based in mathematical languages, and language is based in geometry, scientists faced in the XIX century the shocking fact that Euclidean geometry is not truth; since the 5th postulate of Geometry, which defines points with no breath, through which only a line also with no breath, can cross, proved false. There are different possible geometries, in which points do have breath, so several parallels can cross their volume, or points exist in a different surface through which no parallels exist.

How can we then introduce the new concepts of points with breath, surfaces with different numbers of parallels, in the scientific discourse of different sciences? Here again little advance was done, and so mathematicians at the beginning of the XX century decided to get away with the problem by merely NOT defining any longer the concepts of points, planes, lines and the relationships between them (their relative similarity or ‘congruence’ and the way they ‘intersect and lay on’). Thus two new false solutions were devised. On one side, instead of points and numbers, the classic units of mathematics that made them a realist science.

So physicists and philosophers of science have been aware for a century that space is quantic, with motion, and there are infinite time cycles-clocks in Nature. Yet the difficulty to re-define the fundamental original proposition of science, paralleled by the constant needs for merely parched the model.

Look around you. All what you perceive are 2 type of ‘forms in motion’, lineal forms that we shall call space, S, when perceived in stillness or lineal momentum, |-p, when perceived in motion, and cyclical forms, which we shall call time cycles or angular momentum when in motion, measured by frequency, |-Tƒ and information form when seeing in stillness.

And so those 2 elements, |-Spe and O-Tiƒ, spatial momentum and temporal form, and its infinite combinations, measured with different time clocks, frequency, temperature, speed and space quanta, H-Planck, K-entropy and M-ass, and integrated into different types of ‘energy and information’, is truly what all the Universe is made of. And so we can write a simple Generator equation of the Universe:

Ei= Sp x Tƒ for all scales of reality, which breaks down for the 3 main physical scales into the 3 most important equations of mathematical physics: E=hv (for the ∆-1 quantum scale), E=knT (for the ∆-human thermodynamic scale) and E=1/2mv2 or E=mc2 in Einstein’s relativity for the gravitational ∆+1 scale.

*The new paradigm of a Fractal, non-Euclidean Universe has slowly evolved since the Times of Descartes’ multiple worlds and Leibniz’s relational space-time and Non-Euclidean Monads, till the more rigorous formalism of this author. It implies to evolve our understanding of Time and information in topological terms, beyond the dubitative first steps of Einstein with his theory of multiple time clocks, by defining a new arrow of time, opposed to the arrow of entropy and disorder: fractal information, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce over a canvas of simpler, entropic motions. The combination of both generates the 3 dimensions/ages of Timespace: *

*Spe (spatial past entropy) x Tiƒ (Temporal Informative Future) = ST (Present, iterative space-time)*

Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but the ‘entropic’ arrow, Spe, of the dual Einstein’s equation: E (Spe) ≈ c² M (Tiƒ) that describes the trans-form-ation of lineal radiation into cyclical mass vortices, the fundamental, accelerated ‘time clocks’ of the cosmos that store its information in the frequency and form of its cycles.

Any local big bang and big crunch dual process (E<=>M), splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality.

The fractal paradigm is by far the most r=evolutionary advance in all sciences, which allows unlike ‘physical only theories of reality’, to unify the concepts of time and space of all sciences, each one studying a relative scale of size and time speed of the ‘5th dimension’. In this article we shall study only the laws of the fractal paradigm applied to the largest cosmological and galactic scales:

In the graph we can see how the 5th dimension organises all the time clocks with different speeds, and scales of size in the Universe, from the largest, slower beings to the fastest, smaller ones. 5D metric therefore introduces in fact ‘2 new dimensions’ or arrows of the Universe, downwards, towards faster clocks of time, and upwards towards larger slower wholes which ‘contour’ the internal vital space of any system.

Yet since wholes *require the parts to appear before they are formed, the 5th dimension is in fact a dimension of time, which establishes a new absolute time arrow, which is the arrow of eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, of points into ‘social numbers’, of ‘finitesimal quanta’ into super organisms, as particles become atoms that become molecules, cells, crystals, planets, organisms, societies, solar systems, galaxies and beyond… The existence of more ‘forms of time motion than mere locomotion’, of organic character, a fundamental element of philosophy of science, ignored by present physics is thus readdressed by 5D metric, opening an astounding number of solutions to pending questions of all sciences. *

Now, still to fully grasp the fact that entropy only acts as a ‘expansive quanta of space’, in the ‘scale of thermodynamic clocks’, we need to dwell on the 3^{rd} fundamental concept of the fractal universe, the fact the Universe is made of such relative scales of space quanta and cyclical clocks, because *it is a fractal, made of discontinuous pieces of space and cycles of time. Yet as we say we have the wonderful fact that Energy and information, the integral and still perception of all those quanta put together is conserved, to relate them all and ‘do mathematical physics’.*

Why Energy works in all the scales of size of the Universe? And yet it is so improperly defined, with so many ambiguous terms.

Now if you have grasp those simple concepts, Ei =∑ Sp x Tƒ ‘void’ of any historic bias, we can get into the order of all of them, called the ‘5^{th} dimension and streamline physics and define properly Entropy.

Since now, Ei = ∑Sp x Tƒ, has become the most general possible equation for all the fractal systems of energy and information that integrate all the vital spaces and time frequencies of all the systems of the Universe. This is what we call the ‘Metric’ equation of the 5^{th} dimension.

And while Energy seems to be a concept applied to all realities we have also localized different ‘quanta of spatial lineal motions-distances’, and different clocks of time for those quanta.

*So what are the real clocks of time of Nature? *

*This requires us to define time in more precise terms, as cyclical motions that carry the information of the Universe in the form and motion of its cycles.*

Indeed we measure and process information through computers, which are the modern version of time clocks, now converted into repetitive logic cycles called algorithms, whose frequency or relative time speed defines the capacity of a system to process information. So a computer process more information when its clock like logic cycles have more Hertzs, more frequency.

This means that in nature there are several species of time-clocks – processes that measure frequencies of vibration, of which the most obvious ones are 3: the frequency of waves; the temperature of molecules and the angular speed and orbital motion of all time of particles, including the planets of those graphs.

So *frequency, Temperature and Speed are the 3 main time clocks of nature, and they do vary its relative speed, as Einstein would find, and they carry information in the form of its motions, and the frequency of its cycles. And so time is a much more interesting process to study than the mechanical steady tic of clocks. *

*Now I’m trying to be fast and simple to get to the core matter, black holes and entropy, but the reader with a minimum knowledge of science will realize how different is a non –anthropocentric, mechanocentric view of time, and how much rich in meaning is. We are here in a short of Copernican revolution, sorely needed, from the perspective of philosophy of science, which is concerned with ‘language, experience, pure science, NOT with machines of measure’ as physicists are. So I do have zero bias, in my direct experience of the Universe.*

*But time is very closely related to space – this we know since Einstein, and so we need to define now space, to advance in our enquire.*

Regarding space it seems obvious again that humans have deformed it with its instruments of measure. We use a Cartesian infinite abstract paper graph to draw space. And so we decided that space was continuum as the paper and infinite. But reality around us – follow Leonardo’s method ‘saper vedere’, not your books – shows that space is not a continuum. Look around you and you will see an infinity of small, broken parts of space. Your vital space-body, the chair you seat, the computer you read, are different ‘pieces of space’, ‘fractal space’.

So what is the relationship between Sp-ace and Tƒ-Time, what does Sp/Tƒ and Tƒ/Sp means now. The first is the formula of classic speed and the second the formula of classic density, which if we add Sp x Tƒ the formula of classic momentum, ARE the 3 absolutely essential formulae of mathematical physics. Let us then upgrade them.

Some too far out comments on density and speed.

Now 2 other general formulae become of great importance to understand reality, way far out, and i guess i shouldn’t even mention them, but i can’t help myself (:

Tƒ/Sp, or density of information of a system, which defines the geometry of a world (it is equivalent to the Gauss≈Lobachevski parameter that defines how we see the Universe, as curved geometry, planar or hyperbolic). Tƒ is the ratio of information, Sp the size of the quanta of space. So when Tƒ is larger and Sp smaller the information carried by a system, or perceived by a mind grows.

In our human electronic mind that perceives light, Tƒ, is the minimal quanta perceived by an electron, h-bar, and Sp the speed of light, and H/c is so small *that we have a mind that processes very little information and in terms of Lobachevski’s parameter is a flat Euclidean World:*

*In the graph, you can see what i talk about. You see light and light has 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions. That is why your mind is flat and Euclidean. But in the right side you can see the real Universe, made of infinite Leibnizian Monads – each one has a different mind and geometry. *

*For example, an ant, which has a Tƒ very large (a pheromone) and a Sp very small has a hyperbolic mind that fusions all other ants into a perception of a super organism. A whale that has a Tƒ based in sounds and a Sp of limited distance has also a complex minds. Humans who have a big verbal development (blind people, Mongoloids with wide heads and far more developed verbal brains) have in general a higher IQ than dolicocephalic white men, who are more energetic, have a larger Sp-visual brain (with the axis eye-occipucius larger); black holes who have a gravitational mind of action at distance, infinite Sp have a 0-brain, which will destroy our world they **don’t see.*

Now this is too far out for the anthropomorphic white man with null, flat brain and astounding arrogance. So as an insolent philosopher I couldn’t help to put it in. More seriously (as we cannot enter other’s species mind to check the previous statement), the parameter inverse, or density of energy, still called in ‘primitive physics’ (-: speed is:

V=Sp/Tƒ. Now since Time is cyclical time, information, we can of course find very interesting results (well I can find, as it seems nobody cares anymore, the dolicocephalic, white man is doing ‘visual flat pictures of entropic big-bangs, that is what they think is knowledge – here a bit of self-humor, as a basque-sephardim mostly, i am undoubtedly a gifted neanderthal (-; Ok let’s get serious again. Sorry John Landis said in this world either you have some sense of humour or you commit suicide. I was for a decade angst about mankind committing suicide. Now frankly the entire world is so ‘cuckoo’ and evil=anti-live that i moved back onto the ‘surrealist’ sense of humour, proper of my culture.

The interesting thing here for our concern on black holes is what is the limit of speed our our flat, euclidean light space-time Universe. And we know it is c-seed *but only on that world-minds which perceive light space-time, and generally speaking the galaxy which has a space made of light (background radiation, star light), but NOT necessarily outside the galaxy or inside the black hole. *

SPEED is the speed of TRANSFER OF INFORMATION, AND THAT IS THE meaning of the LIMIT of c-speed. It is NOT light speed. It is the LIMIT OF V= Sp/Tƒ.

Again this 30 year old discovery, which I made in my youth, before my life became erratic, a la ‘Ali’ (draft dodger, against the military always) starts to dawn on physicists. Pity when I resurfaced I ‘fuc* it up again, against the military – now CERN and the system erased my information. Ts, ts, time is cycle repetitive.

So what this means is that inside black holes, where light ceases to exist and outside galaxies, it is possible to have faster than light speeds, as the equation of Kerr holes, Einstein’s seminal papers, and the expansion of space that ads speed to light shows. So now the proper definition of c-speed limit is the limit of information carriage, but *this physicists don’t yet understand, only for minds with the lobachevski’s ratio close to zero, with light minds. Gravitational minds with a larger Sp/Tƒ can process and send information at faster non-local, relative speeds. For us this information is invisible, 0. So we perceive the speed of those flows as V=Sp/Tƒ:0 = sp/o=∞.*

And this is the explanation of some funny effects such as the entanglement of particles, which should be connected by gravitational space and the action at distance of gravitation.

There are therefore 2 parameters, the 2 inverse ratios, the one of Lobachevski, the ratio of speed, the ratio of the informative mind, and the inverse, the ratio of energy and speed.

I write it Tƒ/Sp, or information density, as opposed to Sp/tƒ or energy density or ‘speed’. The laws and constants that relate those 2 parameters are ALL OVER mathematical physics.

They range from the cosmological constant to the laws of matter states, to the ages of life, which merely moves from a young age of maximal energy density to one of old age where we will have maximal information density. So we can write a simple equation of the arrow of life or future arrow of information: Sp/Tƒ (youth) > Tƒ/Sp (old age) < Sp/Tƒ (death).

And we will return to that when we explain you the cycle of existence of black holes, humans and all species of reality, the most important ‘Worldcycle’ no longer worldline of timespace and the discovery of my long life of solitary research of which I am most proud.

To the point, in those terms, C-SPEED IS THE LIMIT OF ENERGY DENSITY OF THE GALAXY, IN WHICH THE INVERSE FUNCTION of photons of spin 1, CARRIES its INFORMATION. And if we multiply both, Sp/Tƒ X Tƒ/Sp = 1, we obtain the constant c-speed, 1 in planck units.

Now this is sound-sound science. We depart from what quantum physicists and Einstein found. We put in the information theory we have researched, solving the unresolved meaning of Non-Euclidean geometries, which mathematicians never fully understood, and put it on the cocktail of the mind, shake it, shake it and distill some serious new findings, which correspond – that is do NOT contradict all what was there before.

This is what intelligent people do. Smart people as we said just say ‘whatever’ and with charm convince you specially if you know nothing about it. That’s ok. But when my life and that of mankind is at stakes… well you understand why i got nuts with ‘Hawk et al’?

Now we have to deal with the 3rd set of principles of physics, the conservation of Tƒ x Sp, that is momentum and its integrals or energies and informations of the system.

**The 5th dimension, and the conservation of energy and momentum.**

Now this is a verbal explanation, and visual explanation of the fractal Universe and its Temporal, informative vortices, worldcycles and planes of flat distances-motions in space.

We can now be more precise with basic mathematical equations, trying to put some order on all of this. Because that is indeed, the advantage of the simple, biased, erroneous models of physics with a single mechanical clock that deforms the essence of all clocks of nature, and a single space continuum that pegs all the spaces of nature – the model of absolute space-time of Newton.

For me it was clear from the beginning that model was wrong. So I looked for an alternative model, which is the model of relational spaces and times of Leibniz, but the problem of this more truthful model was clearly expressed by Einstein:

“I seem to be the only physicist that think there are infinite time clocks in the Universe running at different speeds. Leibniz is right but if so we must rebuild the foundations of physics from the beginning’. Leibniz told it to Newton: there is not an absolute time clock. And he laughed at him, when Mercury showed not to follow the same rhythm that other planets, when told that Newton expected ‘god’ to correct the clock of mercury. If god is perfect, why it has set up a clock with different rhythms, and now has to correct it? Why he didn’t put it right the first time?

The mechanical clock though was the god of time of physicist, and they would NOT explore the clocks of nature as Taoists had told the Newtonian brits. I found in Indonesia travelling inland a temple in the mountains filled with carillons. Those were the gods of the Dutch that the tribal Indonesians captured when fighting them, and took it to their temples. They thought they were the gods of the Dutch because they were all day looking at the clock and whenever an Indonesian followed nature’s rhythms he was told that was ‘blasphemous’. The clock-time for salaries, measuring workers, for measuring of Nature rhythms is what matter to the physicist.

So when they asked Einstein what time was he said ‘what a clock measures’. He had failed to put into a formal mathematical metric Leibniz’s right relational infinite quanta and cycles of space-times, and had go back to the fold.

So this is what I did – to formalize Leibniz’s concept of an infinite number of spaces, fractal pieces of space of different sizes, which only peg together like a puzzle, in the human mind gave us the continuum space. To that aim I ordered them by size, from smaller quanta to larger quanta, from small atoms to larger galaxies.

And I ordered according to their speed of cyclical frequency, all the different clocks of nature, all the different closed trajectories, cyclical motions, from atomic orbitals to galaxies.

And then matched them together, by the simple method of multiplying them, Sp x Tƒ , and found alas, the miracle of miracles, that for huge entire families of related systems, including atoms and galaxies in the 2 extremes of the physical Universe (but also for biological systems, from cells to multicellular and ecosystemic systems, and even for cycles of history), *the product of the spatial size and temporal frequency of the whole family of related systems, remain invariant. Sp x Tƒ = C.*

*This C-onstant, conserved co-invariant dual parameter of the Universe could obviously not be anything else but the Principle of Conservation of Energy and Information, which worked for entire families of reality, and in the case of physical systems, clearly defined 3+i scales of reality (one i-maginary, in the sense we know little about this scale beyond galaxies, of dark energy and dark matter, which I call the dark world, in which we find black holes, interstellar dark energy space and the halo of galaxies – but whose properties I would deduce by extending the metric equation beyond the 3 scales we do know):*

*In the graph you can see the 3 main scales of the Universe, the gravitational scale of big galaxies. The thermodynamic scales of human beings, the electromagnetic scale of quantum atoms, and beyond a possible dark world scale. And since the quanta of space grows in size-distance-speed (remember we cannot distinguish speed from distance), and slows down in time speed, this dark world beyond our galaxy likely will go beyond the c-speed distance of our light space-time galaxy, and below the 0 temperature clock of our thermodynamic World.*

So while we cannot be sure of this dark world we ill never truly see or experience, I could just use the metric patterns of the other 3 scales to define the 4th scale as one that happens, beyond the c-barrier and 0-temperature of space-time.* This is the world CERN is working on, and the danger is obvious: the expansion of such world will erase our ‘other side’ of the c-speed barrier, the electromagnetic world.*

Thus there are only 3 known-known scales, where the invariant Sp x Tƒ constant product gives us the ‘Energy and information’ conserved in the Universe.

And so for each of those scales I just had to find an equation of “energy’ that describe the system, in each relative plane of size and time speed, and then find its ‘parameters to measure’ the frequency of its motions and the constant quanta of fixed space of each scale:

Ei = Sp x Tƒ. And once such equations were found, *I found the main clocks of time of the Universe for each scale of the fifth dimension, and resolved the conundrum of the meaning of mathematical physics, Energy, the Universal constants of space and the different clocks of time of the Universe that have existed well before humans invented their mechanical clock:*

In terms of energy, Space and Time, I had resolved the details of the general equation, Ei=Sp x Tƒ for each scale:

*Now you can see in the graph, the ‘specific’ equations of the 3 known-known scales of the Universe, *which we call:

The ∆+1 gravitational sale (∆ being the symbol for a relative scalar plane of size and speed of time of the 5^{th} dimension, which is the sum of all of them). Here the quanta of ‘space’ is obviously mass, which is what occupies the volumes of space of this scale, and the quanta of time motion, is speed, angular frequency or wave motion, with the limit of c-speed. So the equation is:

E=1/2mv2 or mc2 in Galilean and Einstein’s’ relativity.

Now the reader should realize that speed, angular or wave speed DOES change the frequency of its steps. A wheel turning cyclically to move a car can move at higher r=evolutions per minute

*Let us then return to those graphs and clocks of time, as we are now close to the more strict concept of entropy.*

The ∆-thermodynamic human scale is the next scale of the 5^{th} dimension’s relative planes of size and speed. And here we realize while Energy is conserved, the total quantity of formal motions, angular and lineal momentum clocks of time and quanta of space are conserved, *as the speed of time clocks and the quanta of space change, we need new ‘concepts’, new ‘clocks’, new Universal constants of space-quanta to measure it. *

So in thermodynamics we have a new equation, E=nkT (with small variations fro specific fractal species of thermodynamic matter, gas, liquid etc.). And here obviously n being a number of atoms, is really E=KT, where T is the temperature of the system, the thermodynamic clock, so cold systems are slow in time, hot systems are fast in time, hot mammals have fast metabolic clocks and thoughts, cold reptiles and plants slow, but alas the beauty of the Universe is that this big cold plants and dinosaurs do live longer than the fast, small humans, since roughly speaking for each family of reality, Tƒ x Sp = Constant.

So Temperature is the clock of time of the thermodynamic scale and its constant of space, lineal, expansive motion is K, the Boltzmann constant, which has the dimensions of ENTROPY. So ENTROPY is the quanta of expansive spatial motions, of the thermodynamic scale, and only makes sense for thermodynamic systems.

Any attempt to transfer a clock of time or quanta of space of one scale into another larger or smaller space as physicists do unaware of the fractal structure of space-time of its multiple time clocks and quanta of space, without the slightest idea of what those Universal constants and terms mean is speakeasy bull$hit as Neumann told to Shannon. Only smart guys INVENT physics on terms they don’t understand.

Finally we get into the ∆-1 scale of electromagnetic quantum systems, and here again the equation is obvious Ei=H ƒ, so the quanta of space is H-Planck, the Universal constant, and the frequency of time, is ƒ, the frequency of the wave. So those are the 3 scales of physical systems. Its fundamental equations, time clocks and quanta of space.

All in the Universe is thus a mixture of space and time but both concepts are not the same bidimensional reality. We measure space with bidimensional quanta in each scale. They ARE the 3 most important Universal Constants of Physics, H-Planck, a bidimensional angular bijector, k-Boltzmann constant, the quanta of entropic space in the thermodynamic world, and c2, the quanta of constant space in the gravitational world (reason why we do NOT see it varying in speed-distances, as it IS the substance of which our gravitational light space-time is made):

In the graph you can see all the bidimensional planes of space of each scale, entropy, cc speed-distance and angular momentum (H-Planck).

So, your quanta of space=universal constants change, as you change scale of physical systems, in harmony with the change of ‘time clocks’ …

But the product of both, space quanta and time clocks, remain the same:

* Sp x T ƒ = ∆ = Ei*

This, physicists call it the principle of conservation of energy and information, clueless as they are about what ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘clock’, ‘energy’ and ‘information’, let alone the fractal space-time scales of the 5th dimension means.

But the concepts are easy to grasp, since the Universe is indeed as Einstein said simple and not malicious. So if we are still here, in a century or so, kids in a high school, will understand and find obvious what I just explained you – as now those kids find easy to understand Galileo’s equations. So let us go on with them.

Thus in the same manner there are infinite time frequencies and time cycles in nature – though we have found 3 parameters to measure them, frequency, speed and temperature, there are a lot of different ‘quanta of space’ around us, which we just defined, and so we can now tell *you what that magic word, nobody knows in physics what it is, called, ENTROPY, means – merely the quanta of molecular space, which expands in gases, contracts in crystals. And DO NOT EXIST IN BLACK HOLES. OK? So now that we know, there is no room for nice smart guys to talk about what people ignored. My advice to Mr. hawking therefore is: find another theme nobody knows about to do speakeasy, and get your Ig prize to the worst **scientist of the century. *

**The conservation of energy and information, lineal momentum≈space and cyclical time≈angular momentum.**

*But for you *to grasp this, I will have to keep explaining the foundations of that fractal structure of space and time, long proved experimentally, and formalized with the metric equations of physics, in a more mathematical way. Don’t worry we will keep it simple, because as we said, the advantage on working with the proper time clocks, as in the case of the proper ‘heliocentric theory’ is that all becomes really much more simple. So Copernicus was much ore simple than Ptolemy.

Now in physics all is about Spatial, Lineal Motions (Lineal Momentum, which is similar to our spatial quanta) and angular Momentum, which is the minimal bit of our Temporal, cyclical clocks of Information.

So alas!, we have an immediate translation of the 2 ‘formal motions’ of which all is made; spatial, lineal quanta and angular, cyclical, informative cocks of time.

And this quanta of spaces of lineal momentum and cycles of times, angular momentum are the 2 formal motions conserved in reality.

But Physicists ‘integrate’ those concepts in the concept of Energy, which they divide into Kinetic energy (related to lineal momentum) and Potential Energy (related to the internal, angular momentum and form-position of the system)

As those are historic concepts, born of praxis – as all in physics, they are not ‘scientifically’ as wide as precise, as the concepts of space quanta and cyclical time clocks – the concepts of fractal time and space. Since physical concepts drag the mechanist errors and historic professions of physicists– as theory is always as secondary element to the worldly profession of physicists – to make machines, weapons and measure reality wit them.

But they are good enough, and by trial and error very slowly physicists have given us a lot of good mathematical stuff to define reality, so with a bit of ‘conceptual cleansing’, and repositioning we can easily get into a much richer and beautiful understanding of reality.

So just correcting those historic routines, and the conceptual errors dragged from them, the huge confusion of the present picture Physicists have of the Universe can be focused to see reality in all its astounding beauty and symmetry. So far we can save the essential concepts, we just expressed, writing them as follows:

Ei (Total Energy and Information of a system) = ∫ lineal and angular momentum = ∑ (Lineal Space motions x Temporal, angular frequencies) ≈ (abbreviated: ∑ Sp x Tƒ)

*So now we have multiple time clocks and multiple space quanta, and while we might use different clocks (frequencies, speeds, temperatures) to measure time and different ‘constant of space quanta’ (H-Planck, k-Boltzmann, Mass) to match those time clocks, we do have that jewel of harmony in the Universe which is the conservation of energy and information (which of course, hawking’s musings break all over the place). *

So we can write a very general equation for all the systems of reality made of vital spaces and time frequencies, including human systems, physical systems and biological systems:

Ei (Energy and Information, the quantities the Universe conserves) = ∑ Spaces x Time Frequencies

This simply tells us that the total energy and information of a system is the sum of all its vital spaces, each one with a different natural rhythm of time – measured by its time frequencies, which process and carry its information, in the cyclical forms and frequency of its cycles.

Since we do have 3 very simple equations that reflect the previous ‘5D metric’ that works for any scale, in each of the 3 scales of relative size of the Universe, worth to repeat to stress that simplicity and straightforwardness that shows truth in science, the so called Ockham’s principle:

∆-1 (quantum scale): E= h v;

∆ (thermodynamic scale): E= kT;

∆+1 (gravitational scale): E= c2 M

As shown in the above graphs.

Frequency of a quantum wave, temperature of a molecule, speed of a mass are the one-dimensional Clocks of Time that ‘change’ within a stable range in each scale.

H-angular momentum, K-entropy and Cc, are the bidimensional quanta of space that put together create the stable Ei, energy and information conserved in the 3 ∆±1 planes of physical systems that interact with the human being.

In 5d physics, we simply say the Universe conserves its quantity of ‘present space-time’. That simple statement includes all conservation principles of all sciences.

This canonical definition of H, K, and C, bidimensional angular momentum, entropy and Speed, the space quanta which of each scale means that entropy DOES not apply at ALL as a concept BEYOND the thermodynamic scale, roughly on the 0-10.000 temperature beyond which it breaks down, that is molecules cease to exist and become plasma ruled by electromagnetic flows, hence by the clocks of ‘frequency’.

**Back to the beginning closing the cycle.**

Now look at the second equation, E=kT.

if you substitute E for M its inverse then we write: M= k /T.

That is Mr. Hawking’s equation of a black hole evaporation, quoted at the beginning of the article, with *the proper sign*:

As temperature diminishes, Mass grows. So he black hole is born hot, follows the laws of thermodynamic entropy, diminishes temperature and eats up our world, till Temperature clocks come to zero, temperature disappears, the black hole reaches 0 entropy and perfect informative order, as experimental and theoretical facts, both in 4D Einstein’s EFE, equations and 5D Metric shows.

Why? Look at the next graph…

__The dark world.__

In the next graphs, when we cross scales of the 5th dimension, the simple Sp x Tƒ = E, lineal relationship and nice equations of conservation of energy and information ‘break’ and suddenly the equations do NOT work as we enter a ‘transitional region’ between two scales of space-time. Whereas the time frequency of motion no longer behaves lineally. It finds a limit and cannot grow more. And those barriers are met with the equations that Planck and Einstein discovered (and a few more for thermodynamic systems), which are no longer lineal but exponential equations, barriers where the system breaks, explodes and dies away, ‘crossing finally the barrier’ into the next world scale:

Now, the graphs, *explain the other huge conundrum of physics: why in the ‘steady state’ regions of those relative planes of size and time speeds, all is lineal, but when we go to the borders, equations break, and in the ‘transitional region’ the whole thing becomes hyperbolic.*

On the discontinuous verge between planes of space-time of the 5th dimension, the equations break and they are no longer lineal.

So they become hyperbolic geometries of exponential growth, unable to break the barrier of c-speed (relativity), temperature (violet catastrophe of radiation) and h-Planck quanta (uncertainty principle/limit).

Thus when you reach the limit between 5D planes, the region becomes catastrophic and you get the ‘barrier’ speed does no longer grows, but is absorbed as mass, temperature does no longer cools but it is converted in mass, frequency does no longer increases. And alas, once you cross the barrier you are again into a steady state region:

Simply stated, you MUST cross a discontinuous region between scales and things get rough, the previous parameters of time and space ‘are saturated’, you cannot longer increase your frequency, and speed, or you reach the inverse limit of 0 temperature, rest speed, and ‘cross between planes of 5D’ with NEW clocks and NEW time quanta. You exist in a Universe roughly divided in 3 fractal, scales=planes of space-time, which we shall call, ∆-1: quantum scale, ∆-Thermodynamic scale and ∆+1: gravitational scale.

When you change scale, YOUR CLOCKS of time=formal motions change. So you move from quantum frequency of radiation to thermodynamic temperature clocks, and then again to speed motions. But *as you change clocks, obviously the ‘time tics’ are transformed, the previous time tick fades away *and the new time tic grows. And those ‘discontinuous’ barriers in which we change of ‘parameters’ are signaled by a change in the lineal steady state graphs of mathematical physics that measure them.

So in the barrier between frequency and temperature you have the asymptotic ‘violet catastrophe’ of temperature≈radiation, which Planck found and made him postulate quantum theory; and on the other side, in the barrier between temperature clocks and speed, you have the c-barrier that made Einstein, discover Relativity theory, as the ‘simple equations of our thermodynamic world, where temperature is the clock of our activity (so hotter means faster in time, mammals vs. reptiles to put an example, solid vs. gas etc.) ‘break’. Therefore it is NOT meaningful to talk of ‘temperature and entropy’, once we are in the realm of Mass and the dark world with no temperature of dark matter, quarks and black holes.

A black hole is NOT an electromagnetic, expansive, thermal vortex, but *the opposite, *a gravitational implosive in-form-ative force vortex that ‘eats temperature’ and electromagnetic energy and converts it into ‘cold’ 0-temperature gravitational mass.

So black holes with 0-temperature when they grow fully into mass HAVE NO ENTROPY.

Now this dark world beyond c-speed and below 0-Temperature (or rather a world where c-speed and o-temperature break and have no meaning, as quanta of space and clocks of time), is NOT our world, our concern, it is beyond our parameters of survival and existence, it should not be explored by a kind of people who does not even know what temperature or speed is, just because they know they can do their science-fiction on that field and occupy their ‘free time’ and computers. Cogito?

All this is simple and beautiful and real.

So now, the reward, if you have been so patient to stand this insolent basque amateur philosopher, a la Fermat (-:

Something you always wanted to know, why you live and die, as everything else in the Universe, including black holes, Mr. Hawking and me – though of course, it is stupid to do it, for no reason, no knowledge, just a machine… the FUNDAMENTAL CYCLE OF TIME OF THE UNIVERSE, THE WORLDCYCLE…

But before, just honouring Mr. Fermat, on the margin, a proof of his Ultimate theorem which states that no natural numbers x, y, and z exist such that x³ + y ³ = z³ (i.e., the sum of two cubes is not a cube). This is the simplest proof of the bidimensional nature of time and space, as mathematics is the most realist of all languages, defining as Lobachevski thought despite the idealist Hilbert-Copenhagen school, the nature of reality through the proper understanding of its logic laws.

Numbers are social groups of equal entities and they organise by superposition into bidimensional planes, which are added to form the 3rd dimension, or multiplied perpendicularly to form space-time beings. So there are only single numbers, bidimensional complex numbers (where the imaginary axis is the axis of time, for reasons beyond the scope of this limited analysis of black holes) and quaternions for space-time complex beings, but NOT ternary numbers, NOT x³ + y ³ = z³ . You see, it fit in a margin (-; The proof found 400 years latter though required thousands of pages of computer thought, and this is the difference between good simple science and complicated work. The Universe is simple and not malicious. And mathematics is as lobachevski explained, an experimental science which needs as Godel proved, experimental proofs as the reflection of the structure of space and time. Space and time are bidimensional so we have only 1, 2, 4 dimensional numbers. Nobody has succeeded creating 3 dimensional scalars, or found a way in which to superpose cubes. So growth in the Universe happens as the sum or multiplication of bidimensional cycles of temporal information and bidimensional planes of space.

It is the study on how all of us through the frequency of our natural clocks, build systems along the height of our informative dimensions to go back to a flat, corpse or a flat big bang on the moment of death, what defines therefore the essence of existence…

**The worldcycles of nature.**

Now, if you have gone so far, you probably understand that there are infinite time clocks, they are all cyclical paths, and they are all storing and processing information. So really what time is the different rhythms of processing information of beings, and that obviously changes. Consider yourself, you are born with a lot of lineal motion, and little information, you keep acquiring information till old age, and then you die and erase your information, ending your time life-cycle, back to the beginning of your process – the seminal dissolution of your cells.

The galaxy goes through an age of implosive creation of form, from vacuum space – so Einstein said that time curves space into mass, but then a quasar explodes the galaxy that throws information into space: E < = Mc2. Again we see a similar worldcycle Soon we will define those cycles with mathematical equations for different time cycles and quanta of space. But we are MORE interested in the qualitative nature of those processes.

What it is clear is that all systems perform those time cycles with the same pattern, going from an age of maximal lineal motion or youth into an old age of cyclical information and then back in the process of death to the dissolution of cyclical form into planar expansive motion – disaggregation of cells, of matter into energy etc.

So *time is NOT a steady constant tic as the mechanical clock of humans in nature, time can accelerate, decelerate or move at steady speed for each system moving and this is one of the many deformed features of reality which Physicists have made canonical errors of our universal world view by putting ‘first his mechanisms’ over theory. *

*So what is the rhythm of time? Simply speaking, a series of worldcycles of life and death, of expansive and implosive motions, ordered in a natural manner in all systems of the Universe.*

Now remember, I told you i was the chair of duality, expanding our understanding of the Universe with both arrows, entropy and information? So this is so far what I have tried to do now, but to fully complete the world cycle of a black hole we need the 3rd dimension of time. What can this be? If we have already entropy, disorder, the erasing of information? And we have information, order, the natural arrow of life towards an old informative age, in a fractal universe of infinite space-time beings? Well, if we call youth, the past, with maximal Sp/Tƒ, density of energy (so you move a lot) and Tƒ/Sp, the old age of information, as we do in life, in this planet, in the galaxy moving towards the central informative black hole, *as we move from the relative energetic past into the future informative maximal Tƒ age, we must cross through a central region where Sp=Tƒ, or present region. So we call:*

Sp (spatial past) > ST (PreSenT) > Tƒ (Future Informative Time)

the equation of the 3 ages of a world cycle. Look how clever the symbols are s-p spatial past, Tƒ, Temporal Future. Ha, ha, it took me a decade to find them.

So what I did long long ago is to complete the model of the fractal Universe, adding the 3rd dimension of time, to the relative ‘entropic past’, the relative ‘future information’: its ‘relative present combinations’.

Further on, those 3 ‘time arrows’ are symmetric to the 3 dimensions of space – the 3 only topologies that exist in the universe:

- The lineal, toroid, past, spatial flat planes proper of limbs and fields that move you as the line is the shortest distance between two points.
- The hyperbolic present, body-waves that reproduce the form of beings: Sx T
- And the cyclical, spherical, informative particle/heads, as the sphere stores maximal information in lesser space.

*In graph, the symmetry between the 3 ages/dimensions of time & space, which put together create all the forms and functions and ternary organisms of the fractal universe, a tapestry sum of them.*

And this fully completes the work of Einstein and quantum physics, and fusions it with evolutionary theory, a theory of the evolution of information, and allow us to define, NOT the particle of God, but if we were so pedantic, the ‘Equation of God’, but as we are ‘normal people’, we call it the Generator Equation of the Fractal Universe of space-time:

Γ. Sp (past-lineal, toroid limbs-fields) ≤≥ ST (hyperbolic-planar body-waves) ≤≥ (spherical future particles-heads)

Whereas we introduce some basic symbols of 5D Metric, Γ, the G-enerator equation, which can be studied for each fractal space-time system in detail and its 3 parts: <, the arrow of expansive entropy, > the arrow of future information and ≈ =, the arrow of present balance, ST, that puts together, Sp: Spatial Limbs/fields and Tƒ-cyclical, temporal clocks in present beings.

So, if we see a system as Sp>ST>Tƒ *constantly ‘informing’, > through time the system, we are in the 3 ages series, in a diachronic system, as ‘time bends space into masses’ (Einstein). But if we are:*

Sp-limbs/fields > ST-body/waves <Tƒ-heads/particles, whereas the limbs/fields give energy to the body/wave and the heads-particles give it information, we are in a living organism in balance,in a relative present immortal state. And this is the ideal state of existence, since ‘The Universe conserves its present’.

Why then we die? Well if you see both equations together you will notice that adding up space and time states, there are in the time series two >> arrows unbalanced, as information grows excessively since the ‘head’ is selfish and the particle absorbs energy into information and finally exhausts energy, all converted into information, so at the end there is a reversal of time arrows, and we need 2 << fast explosive erasing of information, to restore the balance and *maintain the whole reality as an eternal sum of dynamic present fluctuating between energy and information states, back and forth in the long arrow of life and the short arrow of death, since now in the reversal flow of death, << we jump over the present. So all death moments do not have present, are immediate closing of the world cycle in a big-bang death. *As a big-bang is not the birth of anything but the physical, instantaneous death in 0-time, of the system. So you die in a second and the Universe if there is cosmic big-bangs, the galaxy in a quasar, the black hole in a nova will kill you in a fraction of time, to restore the balance on ‘this lost rock in a corner of the cosmos where a mush called mankind’ (Schopenhauer) is busy busy killing all other forms of life.

This quantum physicists understand a bit better, specially in Feynman diagrams, when they say that relative past to future and future to past (informative and entropy motions) are possible. But they are ONLY possible, because the Universe is fractal, broken into infinite relative systems, which acquire more information as time goes forward with the arrow of life, and loose their information as time goes backward with the arrow of death. So Feynman wrote the antiparticle ‘moment’ of death as a past arrow. And indeed, the particle is the life, informative arrow, the antiparticle the past arrow, which last only the moment of death, and then the present light space-time is restored as a wave. And that is the reason why we see less antiparticles, as we see less corpses. They last far less, with no present, and that is the wisdom of the mind of the Universe, which makes death only a moment and time-future-life a much larger experience, yet, the sum of both is a zero sum that makes reality immortal.

*So *I found long ago an equation to define those world cycles (which physicists still call worldlines):

Young-lineal age of maximal spatial motions: Sp < ST (wave-like reproductive age) > Tƒ (Informative old age). And then death, an entropic big-bang explosion of the fractal system of space-time that erases your information.

This worldcycle is truly the ultimate clock of time of the universe, of far more importance to understand the meaning of it all that the mechanical clock that has been hidding it for 400 years with its steady tic.

So paradoxically precisely when humans were able to observe for the first time with some detail thanks to telescopes and microscopes the multiple scales of space and speeds of time of the fractal universe, the straightjacket of mechanical clocks prevented them for 4 centuries to understand them their frequencies, finite rhythms and worldcycles including the worldcycle of life and death of all systems, which are born in at fast time speed (young age) and as they grow in size, diminish the speed of its time clocks, in all scales of the universe, till reaching maturity and finally stopping its clocks in the moment of death.

In the graph the generation of man across the 3 biological scales of human superorganisms. The study of biology, the human being and its upper and lower, social and chemical scales, should focus science as they are the fields which interact with us within the energetic and informative limits of our world-survival, this little understood fact – the ecological view of the Universe and its scales for the surveil of life, should guide the endeavours of astrophysicists, whose range of knowledge is outside the human safety sphere and provides little knowledge due to the uncertainty paradoxes of perception of so far removed scales.

If we observe those 3 motions as ‘still forms in space’, they give birth to the 3 ‘ONLY’ topologies of our Universe:

The toroid, lineal entropic past-forms of limbs/fields; the spherical, informative, ‘future forms’ of heads/particles that DID guide the whole system towards its future; and its combined, hyperbolic, bodies/waves in the middle, that REPRODUCED the system.

Thus a deeper analysis of time cycles shows them to have always 3 ‘ages’, ‘phases’, ‘arrows’, ‘states’ or ‘dimensions’:

- < (symbol of expansion flow), SP: Past, entropic motions, dominant in the youth, with a toroid, lineal expansive form.
- > (implosive flow), TO: Future-form: a cyclical time vortex proper.
- ≈ (symbol of iterative wave): ST: Present-iterative motions that don’t seem to change; or dynamic, body-wave motion

And this gave us the 2 ‘variations of the Generator which described existence in Time and Space, easily written as:

**Time:** Es (young entropic age) > ST(adult, iterative-reproductive age) ≥ Tƒ (informative age) ≤ Es (entropic death)

**Space:** Sp (Limbs/fields) ≤ ST (body-wave) ≤ It (head-particle)

Those symmetries correspond in space to the only 3 topological forms; hence systems can only be constructed with those 3 topologies that define as the graphs show all organisms and physical species.

We associate counter-intuitively ‘cycles with motion’ and ‘lines with Still space’.

It has to do a lot with the limiting errors of classic physics, where only lineal inertial motion matters. Fact is big-bang explosion DECELERATE speed till it becomes Still lineal distances and dimensions, that is pure lineal space with no motion or vacuum space (as in any physical big-bang of entropy). While the equation of cyclical vortex, is Vo x Ro = K (2-manifold, simplest variety), which counter-intuitively accelerates (∆V) when distance becomes smaller, (-∆R) to maintain K constant.

Thus clocks, frequencies and vortices accelerate ,and have more ‘time’ content, that lineal motions that decelerate to a halt.

The Universe in its widest philosophical expression is a game of formal motions, motions with form. Motion never stops. And motion can be equated to time. Form is what motion shows when seeing in a long stretch of time, or inversely in a simultaneous number of traced motions, as a form of space. Motion and form, in physics are akin to the words entropy and information.

So we could write the most general principle of TŒ:

‘All what exists is motion that changes its form back and forth ad eternal’

In the graph, the fundamental ‘development’ of the Metric equation of space and Time of the 5th dimension, which streamlines all the main principles of science, its conservation of energy, lineal and angular momentum, and the principle of relativity between motion and form, from the proper perspective of the multiple space-time cycles of the Universe – that is, THE SPACE-TIME BEINGS OF REALITY INCLUDING YOU, AS WE ARE ALL SPACE-TIME CYCLES AND EXISTENCE IS JUST A TRAVEL ON THE 5TH DIMENSION.

We have written above each graphic image the aforementioned Generator, which now we can complete with the moment of birth and death, as we are born in a lower scale of the 5th dimension as small fast moving beings, ∆-1: seeds of information, and we return in the moment of death back to the ∆-1 scale in the big-bang, closing the cycle;:

∆-1: seminal birth: ∑< ∆: Sp (spatial, relative past, lineal young limb/fields) < ST-reproductive, present bodywave> Tƒ (old particle/head age) << ∆-1: death.

Where the new symbol ∑ means the massive reproduction and reorganisation of the seminal death as it feeds on energy, in the black hole birth, our energy, to emerge in the upper scale.

And as you can see looking at the form of each of those beings, including the 3 artistic styles of civilisations, there is a beautiful symmetry between its 3 organs perceived in simultaneous space:

Sp (Lineal limb/field) <ST (Hyperbolic iterative body-wave)>Tƒ (informative particle/head)

And the 3 ages of existence, as they merely mean that in your young age the limb/field dominates the physical biological system, in the adult age, the body-wave iterates the system ensure the immortality of reality beyond death, and in the old age, the particle/head of information dominates.

**In the graph the main worldcylces of existence of the Universal scales.**

*That equation, decomposed sequentially in 3 phases, a first age of max. energy, a second age of balance and a third age of max. information, explains the existential cycle of any space-time field.*

*In a graph with energy and information coordinates those 3 ages resemble the geometrical form of a cycle that moves upwards, absorbing energy and information till in its 3rd age looses its temporal energy, collapsing back to its origin. On the right side, the same 3 ages show in the Taoist, Korean flag, where a line is the symbol of continuous yang-energy, which yin-time quantizes into ‘in-form-ation’, from youth to death.*

As my ‘no longer professional’ work is not the theme of this blog, it is good enough. School closes. That’s all what we need to understand the world cycle of black holes, which as all systems are born in the smaller scale of the 5th dimension, as you are born as a seminal seed, and then very fast as you grow and finally emerge huge in comparison with your small birth, the black hole born exceedingly active, very small with enormous frequency of feeding (the clock to apply here as temperature is just the translation of the hyperactivity of the black hole), the black hole will grow and eat the Earth.

Simple isn’t? What DID you expect? The black hole of course is born very small. As you a re born very small, because you are born in a lower scale of the 5th dimension as EVERYTHING ELSE IN THE UNIVERSE, including seminal prophets of super organisms of history, seeds of memetic revelation books that expand into the mind of believers VERY FAST and from christ, the seed become christianity the billion plus super organism. ALL THE SYSTEMS OF THE UNIVERSE CAN BE EXPLAINED AS TRAVELS THROUGH SCALES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION.

And the beauty of it is that you can explain it with all languages, with maths, with images as that one, with poetry, with real life experience. Because we are all SPACE-TIME BEINGS.

Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but the ‘entropic’ arrow, Spe, of the dual Einstein’s equation: E (Spe) ≈ c² M (Tiƒ) that describes the trans-form-ation of lineal radiation into cyclical mass vortices, the fundamental, accelerated ‘time clocks’ of the cosmos that store its information in the frequency and form of its cycles.

Any local big bang and big crunch dual process (E<=>M), splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality.

*Even black holes are born at an enormous time speed, in a small scale, growing then very fast, as they cool downwards, slowing down their rhythms, till reaching 0-temperature when they achieve the size of galactic black holes: M= K/T, simple, and NOT malicious.*

*This is thus the ultimate, existential, real concept of time, that humans have completely forgotten looking at the clocks of physicists – the world cycle of life and death of all beings of reality.*

**Cyclical time: the clocks of nature**

*In the graph, the infinite cyclical clocks of time of the Universe and its relative ‘parameters’ that measure its motion, speed, temperature and frequency were ‘forgotten’, when mechanisms substituted Nature as the ‘measure of all things’, with the arrival of mechanic clocks. *

*Then Galileo founded ‘ballistics’, today called physics, in his book ‘On military instruments’, dedicated to the study of locomotions and lineal trajectories of cannonballs, ‘for the delight of philosophers and the practical use of artillery masters’.*

* His goal was to reach the maximal lineal distance possible with those cannonballs. To that aim he established the principles of lineal time, cyclical inertia and a single, steady state mechanical clock time to measure the lineal duration of those canon shots. And soon the single lineal clock became the standard clock and time concept for all time rhythms of the universe. And so the informative properties of those time rhythms and cyclical forms, the multiplicity of time clocks in the Universe, its order and causal laws disappeared.*

In the left graph, all time cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal time – an artifact of measure, and equalizing all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single ‘time clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.

In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

Now we shall return to the proper definition of time and space in simple terms, from where we shall derive much more meaningful truths about reality:

*‘Times are cyclical, closed motions . Spaces are lineal, open extensions’.*

Because physicists do NOT study cyclical time, but define time as a lineal duration according to the simple formula, s=vt (Galileo) or the equivalent s=ct (Einstein), time becomes merely a parameter of space. Indeed, the second equation s=ct is what modern physics calls ‘time as the ‘4th dimension of space’, and it has NOTHING TO DO WITH TIME, IT IS INDEED a dimension of space, NOT of time. And it is lineal. So we conclude that physicists do NOT truly study the clocks of time of nature, which we shall study in this blog. And this is important, because their mirror put on the Universe, becomes distorted, as when we thought the Earth was the centre of reality. In brief, they consider space the centre of reality and constantly convert dimensions of change, of motion, of time, into ‘space dimensions’, and reduce time cycles and its infinite clocks of nature, into lineal distances in a cartesian graph. Thus the biggest advance of 5D physics is to restore the focus on the mind mirror of physics and use to study the Universe its natural cyclical clocks, frequency, temperature and angular speed.

Then the second advance will be the most obvious error of considering the Cartesian graph the only space-time continuum of the Universe. We have already mentioned this blunt error, and so we just will enunciate it here. Newton took the cartesian graph that Descartes invented to show merely the way the human mind sees light as space with 3 dimensions perpendicular to each other, and blew it to cosmic proportions making it the only space-time of reality.

So the obvious fact that the Universe had different scales of space observed with telescopes and microscopes, as well as multiple time clocks for each scale with different speeds, was completely overlooked.

So those errors of a single space continuum and a single mechanical clock reduced enormously the complexity of the Universe its multiple time clocks and space quanta of different size and the crystal clear organisation of all its beings, made of space quanta and time cycles that conform the Universe. Where an absolute space-time is merely the perception of all those beings pegged together on that background cartesian space. In the next graph we see the ‘new outlook of the Universe’ with multiple scales, multiple space quanta and multiple nature time clocks (left side of the graph):

In the graph, we can see the 3 scales of the physical Universe in the right, and its relative different frequencies of time and sizes in space, which however remain co-invariant, so Sp x Tƒ=K. This physics acknowledge with the use of the concept of Energy, which is the product of a space-quanta of each of those scales and its time clocks; E=hƒ in quantum physics, where H is the quanta of space and ƒ is the frequency of time, E=nkT in thermodynamics where temperature is the vibrational measure of the speed of particles and k its entropic quanta of space, and different equations for speed, in which mass is the quanta of space of gravitational worlds and angular speed the main clock of time. Thus in 5D physics we have to ‘put order’ on all those quanta of space and time cycles and the multiple equations of physics that describe them.

In this more general ‘chapter’ we shall try to ‘reorganise physics’ according to those natural clocks and space-quanta across the 2 lower scales of the 5th dimension of physical systems (thermodynamic and quantum, electromagnetic scale). Since the equations of physics merely describe the space-time cyclical actions of the main entities of those scales (particles, atoms and molecules), and all those actions that absorb or emit quanta of space and time, with equations of energy, information lineal spatial momentum, cyclical angular momentum, principles of conservation, storing of those quanta, actions of motion, reproduction of particle-quanta, accelerations and world cycles of those species between its entropic and informative states (E<=>M). And so on.

So we shall first explain the elements of physics, and the structure of those space, time and scalar elements. And then study its actions and equations, through the general scheme of analysing its main isomorphisms and generator equations.

It is thus a full refoundation of physics correcting the reductionist, lineal vision we have of physical systems today, in which cyclical forms are reduced to lines, and most of the fractal organic, vital, mental and logic, causal properties of those systems are ignored.

Yet to fully grasp this reductionism it is needed a historic introduction to realise of the daring consequences of the physical way of ‘constructing’ our world of thought.

We shall state something that should be obvious but it is not, deformed by the lineal measures we make WITH time clocks: time clocks always run in cycles.

All time clocks are closed cycles, paths or knots that return to its origin, closing the cycle. And so they break space into an inner and outer region (fundamental law of knot theory and topology), creating an infinite array of cyclical membranes that close a vital space, forming the infinite beings of the universe we shall call knots of time cycles (mathematical jargons) of space-time beings (physical jargons) or species of energy and information (biological jargons).”

*In the graph, the fractal structure of space, and cyclical nature of its time clocks, which change its ‘space quanta’ and ‘frequency-speed’ as they move upwards in the fractal, network scales of the fifth dimension (ab.∆).*

Physics study 3 ∆ scales, from the ∆-1: quantum, electromagnetic scale, into the human ∆-thermodynamic scale and the larger, cosmic ∆+1 gravitational scale. Thus the ‘quanta of space’ change H (∆-1)-> K (∆) -> cc (∆+1) and so does the clock of time, from frequency, E=hv, into Temperature, E=kT, to speed, E=mcc.

Now, T.Œ has certain basic rules of thought, based in the stringent minimal conditions for truth established by the scientific method, and the geometric structure of the Non-Euclidean space.

To it we can add the principles of conservations of physics, which in fractal space-time, is rather simple, embodying all other principles of conservation:

*‘The Universe conserves the Present’.*

Now what this mean in logic terms is easier than explaining it in mathematical terms, though we will do so.

Basically it says that the present stays. It is all what exists, and what philosophically the Universe conserves. But what is the present? The question here is expressed with a principle, quite proved, the principle of conservation of energy, and other still complex, called the principle of conservation of information. As this second ‘concept’ is ill defined.

A simple case will illustrate this lack of precise definitions, for the concept of information and its inverse, entropy:

“I thought of calling it “information”, but the word was overly used, so Von Neumann told me, “You should call it entropy, nobody knows what entropy really is, so in a debate you will always have the advantage.”

Von Neumann to Shannon.

Now, what is the present, goes well beyond the physical study of a single motion of time, as there are 6 motions, which were understood by philosophers, well before physics of lineal motions, or locomotions, existed. This must be understood, Aristotle declared 6 motions, 5 of which were organic, generation, growth, evolution, diminution, extinction and locomotion, which is the one treated abstractly by physicists.

We shall show though by resolving Zeno’s paradox that motion is reproduction of form, in an adjacent fractal point of space-time, and as such is part of the 5 organic motions, which converts the Universe in a constant orgasm, of present ‘repetition of form’.

Present is iteration, reproduction, repetition, as it is evident for anyone who observes the Universe as a dynamic system, which however seems not to change. And this happens because motions with form reproduce, repeat, exist in present, and this simple equation – fact:

*Space x Time, Entropy x Information, Past x Future = Energetic Present Time*

Which is what the Universe conserves. From this simple realization of the mind-point, we can create a full theory of reality which includes all sciences, as all happen in time and space, in past and future, in present space-time, repeating each of them its cycles of existence.

So what is present? A closed cycle a conservative force, a path allowed because it will return to its origin, in a similar antisymmetric back to the past form, cancelling the arrow of time-life-information, in a single sweeping motion at fast speed, on a quanta of time, called death.

The worldcycle in organic terms thus is a cycle of 6 motions, Generation, growth, locomotion, evolution, diminution, extinction.

In which the origin and the end ‘coincide’ in terms of the ‘zero-sum of information’, ‘zero sum of energy’, of the total cycles and all its partial motions.

We shall therefore departing from this fact, expressed in the Equation of a worldcycle (a closed cycle of space-time), develop the laws of all science.

In this post we shall do the proper with the Physical sciences.

Let us then remember the equations of present explained in T.Œ:

Sp x Tƒ = ST

Sp > < T = ST

Sp > ST < T

In phyiscs, this simple equation of Present, can be written as a Lagrangian, such as the difference between the potential energy, or energy of position and form, Tƒ, the Kinetic Energy, of lineal spatial motions, Sp, tends to zero, that is both equal each other:

Sp-Tƒ=0 -> Sp = Tƒ

In that regard, the fact that the Lagrangian and its similar equation the Hamiltonian are the most widely used equations of physics in all scales, simply validates the fractal structure of cyclical space-time, in which the quantity ‘conserved’ Ei≈∆ is the total content of space and time of each scale of the Universe.

**Foreword. Physical systems.**

In mechanics, the Lagrangian function is just the kinetic energy (energy of motion) minus the potential energy (energy of position).

We translate immediately this equation as Sp (ke) – Tf (Potential Energy) = 0.

Sp = Tƒ, a point of present balance.

As the Lagrangian and its derivative the Hamiltonian are the fundament equation of physics, to which all others can somewhat be translated, we consider, that indeed, Sp=Tƒ, the fundamental equation of T.Œ is obeyed by all physical systems, which therefore can be studied by the Generator of fractal space-time, its Lagrangian:

Spe= Tƒi

In general, it is more useful to measure Space by dynamic parameters such as entropy for the k-constant of space of the thermodynamic scale, or angular Momentum, for the quantum scale or cc for the gravitational scale.

in this case is easy to see that the proper way to write the equation is:

Sp (E) /C = Tƒ (M) x C

Thus we see an inversion from space to time due to the inversion of the constant of gravitational space, c=Sp/Tƒ, into 1/c= Tƒ/Sp.

*c mutates from spatial state as Sp/Tƒ into density of information as 1/c: Tƒ/Sp; and as such it transforms from energy into mass.*

And obviously this is done on the verge of c-speed, which therefore transformations through the Lorentz equations, converts its space parameters into informative parameters and vice versa.

We are simply switching crossing a barrier between the scales of physics of the 5th dimension, between its mass and space clocks.

**The physical jargon. The time clocks of the 3 scales of physical systems**

*In the graph the 3 main time-space clocks of physical systems. As a system grows in scales slows down its time rhythms, according to 5D Metric: Sp xTƒ = Constant.*

*Those constants of space-time are bidimensional sheets of information from the perspective of a human observer, molecule, electron and mass field.*

A key element to T.Œ, a Theory of Everything Organic, is to translate all the abstract jargons to its interdisciplinary language. As the physical sciences are considered ‘wrongly’ on top, we will deal extensively with their concepts (they are merely the sciences who study the limiting scales, further away from man, and only with mathematical languages, hence loosing its organic properties and with the most deformed of all time concepts, as a mere ‘locomotion’ or translation in lineal space – hence loosing all understanding of its form, its information, the dimension of time they ‘deny’ to the point they call it negantropy (the negation of entropy) – so we share the view of Eddington and Einstein that ‘physicists’ invent much of its ‘entelechy’ entities).

Still the species they study are overwhelmingly the majority of reality so we do have to deal extensively with them. And the fundamental concept they use to express all the ‘formal motions’ of those species; that is the combination of all the cyclical motions or ‘angular momentums’ of each scale of the 5^{th} dimension and all its ‘entropic spatial intervals’ or constants of space action or ‘lineal momentums’ is ENERGY.

In normal parlance energy is closer to the concept of expansive lineal motion – our capacity to move. In physics though there is a clear equation that relates Energy and Work. So Energy is the capacity to move with certain ‘directionality’ or form. Or alternately the capacity to move ‘forms’. And it is a very integrative concept both in time and space. So for example, in our human scale, Energy is the sum of the Internal Energy made mostly of cyclical motions (U) that give the form to the being and the External motion or kinetic energy (ke). So it is the closest concept to what we call a ‘plane of the 5^{th} dimension’, which measures all the formal motions of a ‘closed system’, ‘superorganism’, or relative Universe.

And for that reason we DO have a close similarity between the Metrics of a given plane of the 5^{th} dimension:

∆= Sp x Tƒ and the equations of energy of each Plane of the Universe:

∆ : Sp x Tƒ ≈ Energy : Constant of Space-action x Frequency

What is energy then remains the fundamental first question of physical science 5D cosmology must clarify. It is not possible to clearly define energy in physics with a single formula, which becomes the first surprise of a seemingly ‘exact’ science. But we do have 3 equations for it, in the 3 scales of relative size of the Universe, which we shall call, ∆-1: quantum scale, ∆-Thermodynamic scale and ∆+1: gravitational scale:

**∆-1: E= h v; ∆: E= kT; ∆+1: E= c ^{2} M**

They are the Clocks of Time and quanta of space that put together create the 3 ∆±1 planes of physical systems that interact with the human being. Latter we shall study those 3 ‘big planes of space-time’ and its clocks, its space constants and its Energies and formulae in more detail.

Tiƒ stress though that all systems are in a fractal Universe susceptible to study in ternary sub-systems, ternary functions, etc. This we repeat ad nausea because humans tend to understand reality in a single one-dimensional way and the ‘manners of the brain’ are the more difficult to break. You must then always deal with the transformative duality (systems constantly beat between space and time states, entropy and information, motion and form) and so sometimes T.Œ will seem confusing as the rule A is NOT B is often broken (with time A-entropy becomes B information). So the true law of science is:

Energy never dies, it transforms its entropy into information back and forth ad eternal.

And then we must understand that those equations do have 3 elements: energy, which carries on one side a frequency of form, a time clock or frequency or density of information and on the other side a lineal motion an ‘kinetic energy’, expansive entropy (the concept of entropy hence is quite different from the one of science, but it will make sense, for example, in the previous equation, of the thermodynamic scale, E= nKT, K the Boltzmann constant of entropy multiplies by temperature the clock of time that defines the speed of actions in our life scale).

Those are the 3 elements we shall see constantly, ply with it reveal them in its infinite ‘transformations’, because the inversion of both but their coming together into different shapes of motion and form is truly all what is about. In physics all is about E= M c^{2}, where Mass is a cyclical time vortex of gravitation, which attracts the faster it turns; E is the energy it stores and c2 is a plane of expansive light-space, the entropy factor.

And so a third element, which we can call generically ‘Energy’, philosophically ‘formal motions’, geometrically a plane of the 5^{th} dimension and mathematically:

E= SxT or ST, which combines the lineal and cyclical formal motions of Space, Sp, and Time, Tƒ, completes the physical description of a given ∆-scale.

**The transition between scales.**

Now the rules between scales (and sub-scales when analyzed apart) are rather simple. *Each new scale absorbs the energy of the lower scales in a smaller ‘trophic pyramid’, so as we move to the limits of a given scale the next one absorbs its energy and paradoxically the previous scale lowers its ‘time speed-clocks’*

*– So as we move from the ∆-1 quantum scale into the ∆-thermodynamic scale, Frequency clocks slow down as they are ‘transferred’ by infrared spectrum into temperature.*

*– And as we move from the ∆-thermodynamic scale into the ∆+1 gravitational scale, temperature comes closer to zero as the system increases its mass, so entropy, which is merely the space-energy of the ∆-thermodynamic, molecular scale recedes and the gravitational more ordered mass scale kicks in.*

*And at the same time the ‘cyclical activity’ of a previous scale clock diminishes. H-quanta exchanges leaves way to molecular k-entropy exchanges, which become the ‘language of communication, bit and bite for the new Ei exchanges between particles’ And finally, when we enter the gravitational scale, speed and mass, become the momentum, which defines the exchanges of matter and energy between species, provoking their association, or division.*

*Those transitions also happen in each scale between the ternary sub-scales (particles, atoms, electric currents in the quantum sub-scales, etc.) and the ages (in which information accumulates as space-quanta (H, k Mass), so the frequency of the time clocks diminish.*

*So we find always as we ‘scale’ the ladder of the 5 ^{th} dimension a region in which a clock of time (ƒ, T, v), increases in lineal functions, the number of quanta of space per unit of time, and ∆≈Ei, the Energetic information of each system grows.*

*But at certain point, there is a resistance to continue IN A lineal fashion the Metric of the Plane, ∆ [Tf x Sp (T**ò**≈Sp)] = ∆ Ei*

*And so we enter if we are diminishing, a region in which Energy no longer diminishes as we have come to the flat ‘Spatial quanta’ line of minimal ‘existence’, the finitesimal; if we are growing a region where the increase of Energy, does no longer imply a grow on the frequency of the system, as we have reached the limit of ‘frequency growth’. So there is a ‘violet catastrophe’, in the growth of frequency in quantum physics; there is a c-barrier of speed and further energy does not grow the speed of the system in the gravitational scale, and there is a 0 temperature limit which cannot be reached regardless of the energy we use to lower it.*

If the clock of ‘time’ of these scales is speed, equivalent to temperature or frequency, the question is ‘why there is a barrier’ of speed, c, which cannot be crossed.

Now, what clocks of time mean is this. They form loops of Frequency, temperature or speed in the 3 scales of the 5^{th} dimension. Closed paths that form conservative cycles, which are respected.

It is easy to see why when we compare speed with Temperature. The c-barrier is a barrier between two ‘scales’ of reality, the scale of light space-time and electronic mass we live and the creation of denser states of matter, strangelet and top quark mass, of much higher density.

As a system change from a liquid to a solid state, *Temperature no longer varies, as speed no longer varies, and all energy comes into the transition phase of state. *

So happens in the c-speed, which is NOT an absolute barrier of the Universe, but a barrier similar to that found between a lighter gas and a liquid or solid state, as we shall soon consider when studying the process of antisymmetric creation of the Universe.

The advantage of T.Œ indeed is to have this capacity to compare phenomena in different scales even in different sciences, which has always been done in science, but without understanding the underlying game of 5D fractal space and cyclical time and its dualities and ternary symmetries origin of them all. So the fractal Universe is always self-similar (not equal) in tis processes and that difficult to accept qualitative not quantitative, topological not geometrical ‘generalization’ as a form of deep knowledge is what we brought here.

This we have to stress many times: qualitative, homologies is true knowledge, not only detailed mathematical how measure, but deep why understanding, which is what T.Œ. ads.

So we can also among any other similar processes compare the c-speed limit with the transitions that happen in all other scales when a ‘denser’ form is created from a wave, in this case instead of a ‘fluid present wave of light’ converted into mass wen reaching the barrier of change of state, we can put an example of al liquid wave, which moves from a laminar state to a cyclical vortex state:

In the graph, we can see those transitions, which were little understood till quantum theory showed that ‘space’ and ‘energy’ as a consequence of 5D metrics are quantized, but Time clocks have a large continuous increment, ‘bounded’ to the limits of the ∆-plane:

*∆n≈Ei≈ Sp (quanta: h-Planck, k-Boltzmann, mass) x Tƒ (Time clocks: ƒ, Temperature, V:Speed)
*

Now the quantification of ‘time’, is much larger than the quantification of space, as we observe time in an orientation, related to the 5th dimension, arrow of absolute future, as ‘wholes’ require ‘first’ the existence of its parts.

Thus we can talk of an absolute arrow of future, that of growth of scales in the 5th dimension.

And this implies that the ‘latitude’ of the minimal quanta of ‘time’ (the minimal frequency, ‘wavelength’; the minimal temperature, though this and the zero energy is known, the minimal mass, which we take to be the mass of a quark; more precise terms a top quark, and then the minimal unit of the dark world likely the H-planck mass of the smallest possible black hole.

In the left side we see the so called ‘violet catastrophe’, origin of quantum physics, on the emission of ∆-1 radiation by ∆-thermodynamic bodies. The transformation of a larger scale, ∆-molecular systems into the lower scale, ∆-radiation implies the ‘unfolding’ of ‘compacted’ dimensions, which have emerged as fractal points of the larger scale. Thus the Stefan law tell us that: Radiation = sT^{4}, meaning that the ∆-constant, temperature, a ‘3-dimensional’ measure of space-motion, Sp-entropy on the ∆-thermodynamic scale must dissolve into 4 lower sub-dimensions of a ∆-1 quantum wave of radiation. But this would imply maximal ‘energy’ on the higher frequencies, without limit either on temperature or radiation. Both facts are wrong, in a finite Universe, in which each scale ‘exists’ between Tƒ and Sp limiting scales. In the case of temperature, over 10.000 degrees solid become plasma, entering its entropic death, and beyond the ultra-violet frequency, radiation no longer ‘in tune’ with temperature.

Wien’s displacement law gives the wavelength at which the radiation is strongest, and the Stefan–Boltzmann law, gives the overall power emitted per unit area. So, as temperature increases, the glow color changes from red to yellow to white to blue. Even as the peak wavelength moves into the ultra-violet, enough radiation continues to be emitted in the blue wavelengths that the body will continue to appear blue. It will never become invisible—indeed, the radiation of visible light increases monotonically with temperature. So we see on the frequency we see because the mind-point knows this is the selection of frequencies in which the metric of radiation/temperature is monotonically balanced, as radiation is in harmony with the growth of temperature.

Further on, if we write a curve through the maximal points of energy for each temperature, we will see an exponential curve, as those reflected in the other curves (in reversed coordinates). This is the ‘region in which the lineal function Sp≈ Tƒ -> Max. Sp x Tƒ, becomes unbalanced, and the two parameters of the limb-field (body-wave) > Particle-head state of the system breaks its harmony and enters its entropic dissolution.

The same process happen in the other extreme of the Thermodynamic, ‘human scale’, when speed, the gravitational clock reaches the c-speed limit of ‘time frequency’ (sum of steps of a mass along its path of momentum), and no longer can ‘speed up faster’. So the clocks of time of each scale ‘break’ in certain limiting domains which signaled by a hyperbolic curve denote the ‘limits of the domain’ of a given plane of the 5^{th} dimension, and the death by breaking of its internal Sp≈Tƒ symmetry, of the function of existence in time-space, T.œ, of a certain physical being.

In the central graph, we see that when we reach a certain key speed, V, a laminar flow of bidimensional sheets of lineal speed no longer accelerates but for a while maintains its speed and all the energy is absorbed by the laminar flow. Since it is CREATING the equivalent to the mass increase in a c-speed barrier on an accelerator. In this case it is a vortex creation within the liquid. This vortex, are accelerated clocks of time on the liquid, equivalent to the charges on the electromagnetic space or the masses on the galactic space and as such it absorbs more energy than the wave state (it is by definition more dense, as vortices accelerate inwards, Vo x Ro = K).

This comparisons also strongly prove by homology that indeed temperature and speed are the clock-like parameters of both scales, which measure the frequency of the ‘steps’ of the space-time process.

So in this constant dance of parameters that switch between space and time state, entropy and information, speed acts in certain phenomena as the constant, in others as the ‘time frequency’ (as in the motion of a wheel measure in ‘revolutions per minute’) and in a sense as the ‘energy’ element, sum of all the steps of form of a certain wave motion… so we can write also:

V (∆)= l (s) x ƒ (t).

Perhaps the major difficulty for humans to grasp reality is its paradoxical logic, a theme argued in the next posts on the non-Aristotelian structure of mathematics, and when we define the mind as a ‘spatial fixation’ of the fleeting constant, changing motions and values of reality.

In a way all form of knowledge is the attempt by a mind to fix reality but reality always transmutes.

The beauty of physical systems, and the 5^{th} dimension inversion of value, dualities and ternary symmetries is for those with enough flexibility to see how ‘the flow of time, space and planes of energy, constantly transmutes and still keeps its meaning.

Nowhere those transmutations are more obvious that in the borders between waters on the changes of states, of ages of planes of topologies that happen on the maximal and minimal of the ‘calculus’ of variations of any function of existence.

In that regard, perhaps the fundamental law of the 5^{th} dimension is the law of transmutation that we will repeat again:

**| **_{∆-1}: O_{∆}: **| **_{∆+1}

Which ultimately can be understood in terms of the 3 organic functions in space and 3 ages in time of the worldcycle of existence of any system of space-time, which switches in those functions as the overall system evolves and interacts with other space and time parameters of larger and smaller systems, in either its entropic field-gas, wave-liquid, crystal-particle state.

Now, while Energy stays, humans deform its perceptions of time and space parameters, reason why the constants and clocks of space and time are different when we introduce the multiple deformations the human observer introduce in all those scales.

And we will account for them when studying the generator equation of each scale in which ‘the quantifiers, or time frequencies’ vary; the Sp-quanta, or Spatial entropic motion steps of each scale also vary, and ‘thanks God!’ or else we could have difficulties doing any objective assessment of reality, there is a conservation of the whole Plane formal motion, expressed in the conservation of the whole formal motions (energy conservation) its relative cyclical motions (angular momentums and similar variables, such as spin) and the relative lineal motions (lineal momentum and similar variables of each scale).

So generally speaking we can identify in each scale the relevant parameters by finding an equation of Energy for each scale whereas there will be basically 2 or at most 3 terms depending on human detail of analysis whereas, it will be then easy to define what is the space quanta, the time frequency element, in how many dimensions we humans observe them, what we humans extract from them, and how then we mathematize those scales.

And finally study how those scales interact in the ‘regions of emergence and dissolution’ of parameters, from one scale to the other – the most interesting regions of the Universe. To that aim, we can always use the isomorphic method, by comparing phenomena on different scales. So for example, we shall consider the case of a fluid regime that stops its speed growth when it creates vortices, ƑΦt , on its laminar wave flow and compare it with the c-barrier or limit speed that stops growing when a mass starts to form faster mass vortices (heavier quarks). And this will allow to define ‘speed’ as the ‘temperature’ of the gravitational scale.

In physics 5D metric (Sp x Tƒ = ∆) are expressed in the equations of ‘Energy’, which is the ‘aggregated’ sum of all formal motions, conserved for each scale:

E (∆-1) = h (S) x v (Tƒ)

E (∆) = nk (S) x Temperature (Tƒ)

E (∆+1) = c² (S) x m (Tƒ)

Thus v-frequency in the quantum scale, T-emperature in the thermodynamic scale and M-ass density in the gravitational scale are the *3 relative clocks of time* speed of the 3 fundamental scales of size of the Universe.

While H, K and C² are the 3 ‘bidimensional’ constants of spatial motion that define the ‘motion’ or ‘size’ of the minimal space action of each species in each scale.

And its combination give us the ‘conserved’ energy, that is the integral of all the formal motions or ‘lineal and angular, | and O-momentums’ of each scale.

As we grow on scale, hv< kt < c^{2}m, our time clocks emerge in slower motion. Till finally entering the dark world when even gravitation time, t-duration, as used by human mechanics come to a halt in the mass density of the black hole (Proper time tends to infinity). In terms of destruction it means the particle antiparticle moment of death emerges as energy that transcends the next membrane of mass, beyond the c-scale of our Universe.

**The parameters of space and time in physics.**

Before we considering philosophical aspects of physicists clueless but exact mathematical descriptions of the Universe, we should define briefly the fundamental terms physicists studies, with its generator equation:

∆-1: Quantum scale:

To: Time-Clocks: Frequency of waves: v; Constant of action: Ex T= 2π ~~h~~-‘(Planck)ton’; Space-Energy: E

∆: Thermodynamic scale:

To: Time Clocks: Temperature:T; Constant of Action: ExT=2/3 k: ;Bolt'(zmann); Space-Energy: E

∆+1: Gravitational Scale:

To: Time Clocks: Mass (Density): M(ρ). Constant of Action: C; ‘Speed’: Space-Energy: E, Momentum

Those are the elements that emerge and transcend, co-exist and are constantly related by physical laws. The reader would be surprised that our ‘mechanical clocks of lineal duration do not appear in any of those scales. Where is the mechanics pendulum clock, with a second of measure that we humans use to study all those other clocks of time? In your wrists (-;

No kidding. When Landau, the underrated Soviet genius of physics whose 11 volume on physical course taught me when young the discipline, was asked about the uncertainty of time in quantum physics he smiled and said – what uncertainty, there is no uncertainty of time in physics. I make a measure, i look at my watch and i eliminate uncertainty – meaning that obviously human time clocks (our heart-eye-thought synchronic 1 second ratio) were NOT universal constants or methods by which physical systems measure their internal time processes.

How the metrics of the fifth dimension, ∆k= Se x To apply to those scales?

Simple, in all scales of the 5th dimension, there are 3 regions of relative different ‘time-space’ balance, as the geometry of the scales is NOT lineal, except in the central region, we call a Newtonian, balanced region:

In the graph we can see the 3 relative points of a Plane of Space-time, or any ‘function of existence, Œ= se x to that transits through that plane. There will be two limits on those planes in which the clocks of time and parameters of space-energy will vary, and so we can say that the ‘constants of space-time’ or constants of action also break.

The central region of relative ‘present-waves’ in balance is where the lineal, constant relationships of the system work. In a living world cycle, this is equivalent to your life from 20 to 40 where your parameters maintain a balance. After that region, time cycles and energy parameters start to split, energy declines, time clocks and its information which has been accumulating in the ‘tail of memory’ that the system drags (each system has both a ‘quanta of time’ and a tail or ‘block of time’ that drags the quanta of time and decelerates it, unless somehow the system unloads the past)… This is the ‘inertial mass’, that will finally collapse the system.

And viceversa, in the first age, the ‘memory of time, the mass of the system’ is minimal, the potential energy is maximal and the system speeds up in its energy, to the balanced point in which it will reproduce ad maximal speed of action. We are here giving you an overall organic image of what happens to physical systems.

For example in the ∆-1 quantum scale, the fundamental particles-beings, which are ∆-1: photons, ∆- electrons or quarks and ∆+1atoms – the 3 particles that relate to each other through a fractal sub-equation, Se (Photon) >ST (particle) > To (atom), the time clock of the particle, is its frequency. And it changes similarly as energy increases. Photons then change its wavelength. Particles move outwards in its orbits and atoms increase its vibration.

Yet here in the atomic scale is where the clocks of time ‘change its fundamental form’, for being h-dependant to being k-dependant, so the fundamental constant of action changes and we know we have ‘upgraded’ our existence into a new scale, that of the molecular atom, from the photon-particle. We are entering the thermodynamic kingdom, and a simple formula, which shows it is a fundamental one (simple formulae might then be adapted through perturbation theory), tells us that we are indeed changing parameters. It says:

E=hƒ = k(c)T²+²

That is the radiation emitted in terms of the lower scale (hv), by a body is a function of the 4 dimensional potency of its temperature (T up to 4), multiplied by the constant of Boltzmann (and a number c product of other parameters). This also shows that as we move to a new scale of the 5th dimension, that of temperature-molecular atoms, we are gaining 4 dimensions. That is the atom-molecule emerges a a time envelop of temperature motions that encloses a 4 dimensional world of photons and particles, on the realm of h-plancks and v-time frequencies.

The formula is one of entropic creation of energy from a form of the upper scale. It is O∆+1 (Temperature) < O-1 (frequency), and so the 4 dimensions of temperature become radiation as temperature growths, to a limit in which the equation breaks because temperature as all time clocks have a limit in the 3 phases/ages changes from a young to a mature to an informative age (gas, liquid an solid states) following by the entropic death (conversion of the atomic substance into plasma).

Now because of the equivalence between those 2 type of lineal time clocks (frequency and temperature being vibrations in a lineal oscillatory manner), the relationships are evident. We might talk of ‘one dimensional clocks’. or ‘two dimensional plane clocks’.

Masses though as charges are clocks in 3 dimensions and 4 dimensions (depending on how many parameters we use), and so the relationships are more difficult to explain. The easiest manner is through curvature. As we shall see latter. But we can see how the Universe works, with the concept of an envelop and the understanding of the topology of systems:

In the graph the key concept of a clock-To element in any system is the spherical membrane-central point, which work TOGETHER as a single being that surrounds and controls an intermediate vital space. So in a way the Sæ<ST≥To, construct can be explained as an SæxTo< ST, that is the particle and 0-point encloses the wave-body and controls it. The time clock is then measured either as a scalar, which measures the zero-point, or as the membrane that encloses it.

A charge encloses a cloud of dense photons with higher frequencies, with a membrane of ‘charge’ of negative and a central point of positive charge – the wave and a central point, the electron. Both co-exist together. And a mass has an envelope and a zero point which controls a ‘hotter thermodynamic’ intermediate region, with a membrane of ‘gravity’, and a central point of zero gravity.

This is the organic structure: the frequency of the lower scale is ‘dominated’ as energy by the positive central point and negative electron which act as the ± elements that control the micro points of light frequency

The 0-point with no gravity in the centre of the mass and the external membrane of maximal gravity enclose a hotter intermediate region, which provides the motion and energy to the whole (this is not understood but it is a very old prediction of mine now observed for some planes which do have a crystal in the centre, with maximal order and minimal entropy and for galaxies which have a cold membrane and a cold black hole in the centre, which has all the mass that controls the hot stars of the galaxy.

Now all this is inorganic description of the way time-clocks, closed-time paths control lineal frequencies and temperatures. So the motions of reality can be always defined in this manner.

**Particles and anti-particles: death events**

The final event of death of those families is a ‘decay’ or quantum big bang. In our lighter up and down quarks, it is the beta decay, the dual mini-big-bang of a neutron due to the conversion of a balanced, reproductive down quark into an informative up quark (proton, big crunch formation) and an energetic electron (expansive electronic membrane).

As in all processes of death we assist first to the dissociation of the informative’ and energetic elements of the organic system.

Since death is caused by the destruction of the networks of the upper plane of reality, which created a form.

So the Neutron dissociates its informative quarks and electronic, slightly negative, external membrane, provoking a dual big bang and big crunch, breaking into the 2 parts of its balanced state.

Thus we write the reaction as an event of the generator equation:

_{Electron=energetic past}*<Down quark=balanced Present> ^{Up=informative future}*

* _{Electron (E)}* ×

^{Up quark (Information)}= Down quark (balance)The up quark has half of the mass of the down quark, and we know a down quark switches into an up quark in a beta reaction that explodes a neutron into a proton and electron, components of the Hydrogen atom. In other words the balanced neutron splits into an expansive electron and an implosive proton. This is the equivalent of a quantum dual big-bang/big crunch, a far from equilibrium process in which the neutron expands its membrane into an electronic big bang and implodes its quarks into a tighter proton configuration.

*Recap*. Atoms are st-points with 3 topological spaces, the spatial membrane or electron, the hyperbolic center or quark-gluon soup, and the intermediate, ‘bigger’, reproductive space where exchanges of electromagnetic and gravitational forces give birth to virtual particles.

In the previous post, we have studied the galaxy atom, concentrating our efforts in the description of its 3 parts, and the analysis of its birth and death – the so-called big bang of matter, in different scales. It was a limited effort of a huge series of files, which hopefully time and desire dwindling with age and sickness and the long indifference of humans for something more than the absolute praxis of making gadgets without understanding nothing about the Universe will be increased on the 4^{th} line.

WE DID NOT FULLY analysed the deep elements of physics, except some simple concepts of the division of time and space, into scales and dualities. They are the core of physical sciences, ill-understood in concepts but well represented in equations and data, which we shall explore in this post in depth, and whenever we complete the rest of the 3 lines that make up the blog (now hidden as it was obvious i couldn’t complete the task in time – so rather leave only a few basic posts for the reader not to waste his), we will introduce in detail.

**The symmetries of space-time and the absolute dimension of past parts to future wholes.**

It is essential in that sense, to fully grasp the ‘difference’ between time ‘travels’ through the world cycle of life and death of systems, which is a relative process of existence, forwards through the arrow of information and backwards through the arrow of energy, which become a zero sum, and its ‘dualities’ (positive and negative charges, positive and negative masses, positive and negative temperature and positive and negative ‘c-speed, being the essential ones), and the arrow of travel through the 5th dimension of scales, WHERE TRUE TIME TRAVEL HAPPENS TOWARDS THE ABSOLUTE FUTURE AND THE ABSOLUTE PAST, and the way this process

It is though here when I will truly try to express the laws of 5 physics in al the beauty of its symmetries which are on my view the clearest expression of all other symmetries except perhaps those of the human being itself, in its 3 scales. Nothing compares to the detail of the human existence through its levels of genetic, cellular, social and metaphysical space-times, in its richness, and internal beauty, as we cannot peer on the sensations that a material system, a cosmic body or a top quark star (a black hole) might acquire on its perception of reality in its scales.

But we can see eternally the balances of the Universe, the choral symphonies of its time and space sciences, the balances of spatial thermodynamic or gravitational or quantum equilibrium, and the relentless derive towards form and collapse and emergence into the whole, only to find itself, the photon, the atom, the material form, trapped enslaved and annihilate by the higher form to which it gives selflessly its energy. The Lorentzian regions of chaotic destruction, acceleration and transcendence and the spatial balances, of present.

Both things seem antithetic and yet both happen constantly the worldcycles of creation and extinction, the slow eternal presents, in which an equilibrium allow the subtle exchanges between scales of an organism, where the most subtle effects of matter and energy interplay, and we can see through the equations of physics how the constants of balance and action, of space and time of density of energy and information like in a giant puzzle interlock each other to maintain a being in existence, reproducing its actions in perfect tune with the other scales, growing as crystal, liquid and gas, into form, as electron, quark and light into atom,…

Thus we must first introduce the fundamental 3 scales of physical systems (albeit with emphasis in the 2 lower quantum and thermodynamic scales as we have studied the gravitational scale in the previous and following one. And then concentrate in the absolute protagonist of those two scales the To, Œ-structure the atom, which is to those physical scales what the galaxy we just describe is to the cosmological scale.

Let us then in this brief introduction, consider the atomic organism briefly in space and time, and then study the structure of laws that define ins pace-time and through the 3 planes that co-exist in equilibrium, the laws of physical systems

*Now, *space is chiral, meaning when you move forwards or upwards you have two change your orientation into your mirror because SPACE beings are oriented forwards in their motion. This is the proof of vectorial linearity of motion and forces in physics. Forwards you have a head that is on top looking forwards. Thus we should clarify ‘|-Sæ’ motions are chiral and so are |-Sæ lineal motions.

However transformations in the 5^{th} dimension, which are expansions and implosions of a social form by adding to the line back and forth new points, or making the cycle larger or smaller in its dπ perimeter, or shrinking or growing in scale the spherical form has fractal, scalar symmetry. And as it happen with no translation in space does not need to be chiral and conserve parity; meaning the orientation in space does not matter to the process. For that reason what we call the weak ‘force’ is not a force but a transformation across the scales of mass of the 5^{th} dimension, as particles transform into particles of larger or smaller mass, shrinking or expanding in the 5^{th} dimension.

This is the ultimate meaning of the weak force with no range, a coupling constant measured in time, its longer time existence and its transformation of masses into larger ones.

We can thus with this simple concept introduce the 3 families of masses, which are the form in which an mass evolves from the plane of galactic space-time into the plane of black holes and intergalactic space-time.

** **

**The equilibrium of physical systems**** **

In the graph, the general law that explains the ‘3^{rd} informative’ accelerated age of any vortex of time, as the system collapses into the next scale. If we consider a spatial mapping of the process we can observe it as a spiral of accelerated force towards its center – a time vortex.

And it predicts that a small increase in reaction temperature will produce a marked increase in the magnitude of the reaction-rate constant.

For example, Thermodynamics is the science that studies how the energy of the molecular scale can be trapped by the gravitational scale. As such thermodynamics is one of the limits of exchanges of time and space between two planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

It is thought the temporal vision of a spatial structure, which is a thermodynamic series of equilibriums, which maintain a constant temperature, once the energy required for the larger ∆+1 gravitational system is created.

In that regard, for each fundamental discipline of Physics as any other science we have to distinguish as the previous two generic graphs show, the ‘imbalances’ of time antisymmetries and the equilibriums of space organisms.

Both seem to be contradictory and so often physicists discover a time asymmetry and then wonder how a space symmetry can also happen. It is then necessary to have always present that both graphs are essential to all systems.

The consequences of both visions can be easily localized with the type of mathematical equations they use. Exponential functions are temporal functions that happen in the Max. To, 3^{rd} age of a system, as it starts to collapse into the higher system.

**The living Universe**

With all the respect given to mathematical physics and the achievement of quantum theory in the understanding and capacity to manipulate experimentally the world of atoms, in what is perhaps the highest practical achievement of our civilization and the basis of our XXI culture, this blog dedicated to a higher goal – the understanding of the ultimate whys of the Universe, the thoughts of God, not its details, will offer those thoughts, and contradict the ‘interpretations’ in use by quantum physicists and as its conceptualizations have spread to other branches of physics, its philosophy of science.

This is therefore one important key element of T.Œ in physics, without denying the equations of quantum physics to explain properly what they mean in terms of behavior, and the organic, fractal nature of the Universe. We provide the philosophy of science the equations lack.

This is a shame on my view, due to the practical mind of physicists. Simple speaking they do not have the slightest interest on understanding the world they describe, as they are busy-busy making machines, as economists care nothing about the meaning of money as they are busy busy manufacturing it. Ultimately though s how the universe works: it is about space-time actions that combine Sæ x To = Present actions, NOT about To, the thoughts of God, or Sæ its details but its messing in useful facts. As I believe if there were philosophers of physics I would be quite easy to state all what I have to state here, trivial thoughts in certain way, but important to know to see the pantheist universe at work in all its scales.

In that regard I found always ridiculous the selfie importance given to the questions of observer and observable when what truly mates is to see how the Generator equation, of physics, Sæ-1 fields<ExI-waves>To+1 particles interact in such a manner that each can be perceived from the other point of view, each can generate the other, each of those 3 co-existing scales of the 5^{th} dimension is essential to the other.

So we can explain from the perspective of fields (quantum field theory) all other elements, as ‘excitations’ of such fields, as we can explain from the bio-chemical and genetic perspective the generation of organisms and even of recently we try to explain the social activities of humans in the outer external world.

And vice versa we can explain from the perspective of wave-particles, the ExI-To complementary system of body-heads in physics the system. So we do have the external world, the field, the ‘being’ the particle-wave and the 3 together forms the interconnected Universe.

This shows clearly one of the fundamental thesis of 5D physics, that light space (c-speed distance-energy), light space-time (wave and photons) and light time, electronic and electric flows (electrons and currents) are the 3 ‘scales’ of the Universe we exist in. SO each one is a fractal part of the next scale whole.

And then we can do the same with the quark-world and its 3 scales. The world of gluons, quarks and chromo dynamics well beyond the scope of this introduction focused in our ‘light world’.

A second task more important, as the first should be considered trivial and immediate is the understanding in terms of ‘real facts’ the equations, constants and relationships of physics, within the context of the Generator equation of 5d fractal space-time cycles. This is a new, huge field that when future physicists take on – disgracefully this Copernicus didn’t get them interested, so we will have to wait to the next Galileo who takes seriously the understanding of T.Œ and has the prestige among physics, which I don’t have for obvious reasons of having confronted them for a decade on ethic, moral basis, to put aside the ‘ethic priesthood of mankind’ and take the r=evolution for its pure intellectual value.

The Universe is a living organism and T.Œ explains it as all living beings with the different perspectives we have on organic systems:

- The point of view or 0-mind that leads the system, which in physics is called a frame of reference; and gives birth to the paradoxes of motion and perception of form, stop and go processes, relativity postulates that make impossible to distinguish motion from form (Galilean relativity: the earth moves but doesn’t move, Einstein’s relativity, the light is both our space with no motion and our motion with no form, etc.)

- The organic parts of the system, its Sæ-Fields/limbs of energy, its ExI-waves/bodies and its To-heads/particles of information which organize the motion, reproduction and gauging of information of the system, which in physics are call exactly that – Fields, waves and particles. And so there is a complementary principle of particles and fields which we however cannot see together as the entity interacts with us as a particle when we ‘attack it’ with huge electrons, and moves as a wave, as all herds do, in an open field, and further on gauges ahead the field with faster-than-light phase waves, its perceptive system.

- And the physical Universe is made also of Superorganisms, moreover co-exist in 3 different ∆±1 planes of size, from smaller cells/atoms to regular organisms/matter systems to larger social wholes, ecosystems and cosmic forms, which in all physical systems give birth to ∆-1 electromagnetic, ∆-thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational, cosmic level.

- And the Universe of systems interact each other through cyclical actions of space-time exchanging energy and information between its parts with boson waves that carry the energy in its speed and momentum, the information in its wavelength and frequency, giving origin to the forces whose range follows the laws of the 5th dimension: (Sæ x To = K: max. information/force min. space/range). So particles do follow those laws and perform the 4 actions of life beings, absorbing and emitting energy and information, with motions -∆e, feeding on forces, +∆e, information gauging and communication, +∆, and decoupling, iteration, reproduction, -∆œ and reproduction coded by its 4 quantum numbers, 4 field equations, 4 dimensions of space-time (electric, magnetic, c-speed field and color in light).

- And finally the Universe is organic because parts become wholes, force quanta becomes particles that socialize into atoms that become social molecules that become matter that become cosmic bodies that organize galaxies and beyond clusters and local Universes.

Thus to understand the Universe we must use all those languages and point of view, and add according to the isomorphic method and the symmetries of 5D space-time planes of existence, mathematical description, with algebraic equations generated by the Universal Generator of 5D space-time beings: [Sæ≤≥ExI≤≥To]³ across the 3 co-existing planes.

The Universal constants and ¬Æ equations of physics then appear all crystal clear as mere ratios, which is the meaning of most real numbers, of those parameters, equivalent to the vital constant of life beings. We find immediately the meaning of quanta of space-time actions (h in the quantum ∆-1 scale, K in the thermodynamic ∆-scale) and can relate the particle states, which are clock like accelerate vortices (e- charges and masses, attracted by the curvature-speed of its q and g constants easily unified by the metrics of the 5th dimension). And then when all is resolved, all the equations explained in vital terms, we could see ‘unraveling the life’ of all of it.

We can see the particle head, the photon, or electron, guiding the wave -body that reproduces its form along the field of energy, the electromagnetic or matter wave, in tune with its internal clock-frequencies of the group wave of cellular fractal parts, and the head-clock in the same tune, but sending ahead the faster-than-light action at distance phase wave in De Broglie equations, exploring the path; we can see the inverse spins tuning as genders do, mating closing in and reproducing, decoupling into new particles, we can see the electron jumping to feed on the photon, which it will store in its fractal nebulae, we can translate the mathematical entelechies into real actions, we can see that our mind is just a complex iteration of the beats and rhythms of the life of those lower and higher scales of the 5th dimension.

And then we do know what Einstein tried to peer and never fully understood, the thoughts of god, and of course, also its details. Such is the beauty of the mind of man, when it is tuned to the laws of the whole and its parts.

And yet physicists hardly see of that enlightened world but a few numbers they merely count. As Hemingway said to Dietrich, you confuse motion with action, as Wells said to the producers of evilwood, you are just accountants, I am the artist, as Nietzsche said to Einstein, ‘God is an artist on 4 Dimensions’ – he missed one – because it constantly creates, reproduces and combines in symmetries and topological paintings, the 5 dimensions of reality to set its existences travel through them.

**Physical systems and scientific knowledge about them.**

Now 1^{ST} we must clarify a fact that escapes present science: physical systems including those far removed from human beings (cosmic and quantum scales), in which information is scanty (uncertainty and dark energy & matter) ARE isomorphic with all other systems, without ANY difference in its scalar (anti)symmetries of space, time and its co-existing Planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

This is not recognized by physicists because of 3 peculiarities of their science, which prompted the creation of this alternative T.Œ, based in cyclical time and its relationship with information, namely:

– Reductionism: Physics is the science of external motions-translations in space and so it reduces all the types of times=changes of the Universe and its arrows to a single external type of change, that of motion. This is expressed in its equation of time: V=S/T, where Time=S/V becomes merely a parameter to measure the changes in space (S) produced by motions through it (V).

– Linearity: as a consequence, it reduces the nature of reality to lineal equations, having always a huge problem dealing with cyclical, non-lineal equations, cyclical inertial motion, and in-form-ation carried in the frequency and form of cyclical times.

– But and this is the gravest of all problems, it does NOT recognize those limits. Physicists would be OK if they knew their limits, and made them explicit. For example, they define information (Shannon’s formula) as the equation, inverse to entropy, which measures the quantity of bits (without any caring for what those bits mean in terms of form and function), ‘moved’ through a lineal dimension of space (the message carrier, most likely an electronic charge or electromagnetic flow that carries 0s and |). We shall use that equation when studying the ‘motion of information’ along a single plane of existence, but this is NOT the full meaning of in-form-ation, form, which is dimensional form and frequency encoded in time cycles. So goes for their use of time only as lineal duration. Duration is the simplest information about time, and reduces all the time=changes of the Universe, including the infinite number of physical time cycles, charges and masses that encode the information of the Universe to a single number.

So physicists are reduced by their method and their arrogance, which excludes any argument on what they do by philosophers of science, to seek very limited facts.

Unfortunately their worldly power as makers of mechanisms and machines has spread their notions of time and information to ALL other sciences, which abandoned their more sophisticated concepts of information and time in their sciences. So you have the parlance of philosophers on Relativity time equations, of which Feynman rightly laughs. Instead they should be laughing at Feynman for believing that what Einstein or Galileo considers time – ‘what a clock measures’ (Einstein), meaning the single lineal clock duration of a mechanical machine – is ALL what there is to time. Instead they should be talking, as we do, of time as Change=Motion, being physical motion one of the many types of changes of the Universe.

This said, once we are aware of it we can do two things with physics of time:

– To expand its concepts, illuminating them with cyclical time.

– And to limit the use of duration and entropy, to lineal, external motion analysis, NOT to the meaning of it all, with big-bang ‘cosmic statements’ and reductionist entropy-only, explosive theories of time as death.

**Diffferences between quanta of time and space.**

in that regard an important ‘theoretical minimum’ required to understand 5D physics is the basic theory of fractal space and cyclical time, ill-spread on these posts. Let us consider then a general view of the subject, starting from the planes of the 5th dimension:

In terms of Lorentz contractions, those barriers of 0 Time (temperature), 0 length, and c-speed, are crossed over ‘simultaneously’, which means we enter a region back to the past, of negative time, as the system breaks and splits into the Tƒ polar axis of the cyclotron – likely to be a black hole event horizon at c-speed in Nature and an Sp, entropic radiation.

So what happens when time becomes negative is this: M= Mo/√1+v^{2}/c^{2}; L= Lo (√1+v^{2}/c^{2}) and T=To//√1+v^{2}/c^{2}

That is as time moves to the entropic past, reversing its sign, v=s/t, reverses its sign, and the ‘imaginary’ Einstein’s factors become positive.

So beyond the barrier in the dark world, Length that reached 0 in the Length axis, now grows and elongates *in the z-axis or polar axis of the black hole, jetting up at longer speed-distances through its ‘tachyon’ Kerr black hole axis (which indeed appears in relativity as a solution with a central tachyon pole). So repulsive gravitational strings shut up through the jets elongating its z-axis, and we should write for a particle of the gravitational repulsive, tachyon space of the dark world (dark energy, repulsive gravitation, neutrino and or Higgs bosons): *

*L _{x }=0; L _{z}* =Lo (√1+v

^{2}/c

^{2}); M= Mo/√1+v

^{2}/c

^{2}; and T=To/√1+v

^{2}/c

^{2}

If we consider the canonical 10 scale the next scale implies *L _{z}* =Lo (√1+(10c)

^{2}/c

^{2});

*L*=Lo (√1+100) ≈ 10 Lo; and then M=Mo/10 and T=To/10

_{z}So the speed0≈ length of the dark world grows by a factor of 10 (causing the accelerated expansion of gravitational space between galaxies and the elongation of red light to 10 c = z

*Yet mass now as the tachyon accelerates to its decametric natural new scale diminishes by a factor of 10, which being the likely candidate for this ‘process’ a neutrino born at 0 v, accelerating towards c, as it grows in mass and oscillates from electron to muon to tau (anti)neutrino, growing its mass.*

*Yet he neutrino chirality as a tachyon particle will always seem left and all anti-neutrinos right handed without the 2 ‘left-right’ possibilities over served in slower than light particles. As *a spin flip, caused only by a change in point of view, can take place only if inertial frames of reference exist that move faster than the particle: such a particle has a spin of one orientation when seen from a frame which moves slower than the particle, but the opposite spin when observed from a frame that moves faster than the particle.

Thus a tachyon neutrino would have a single chirality. What about the time clocks of the dark world? The clocks as always in each scale after the ‘mirage’ of the ‘acceleration’ during the process of death, as time changes its sign, and speed moves to the past, the faster than light dark world will have a ‘slower time’, as we have grown in size:

∆ L x – ∆ T = K.

Thus in the previous graphs we saw how on the limit of change of time state or scale of the 5^{th} dimension, time clocks come to a halt on the limit, but *then move again at faster rate * (temperature-speed in the laminar flow halting with the change of state; frequency reaching a peak on the energy flow for the quantum world on the left graph, and time slowing down to zero on the c-speed limit).

It is simply that now we are in a different clock system. So after we move from frequency to the limit of the slow down of red radiation, we enter the regime of temperature clocks starting at a faster rate (high temperature) and then when we slow down in the temperature regime, we move into the new clock of rotational c-speed as we accelerate, creating the seemingly contradictory vortices at c-speed of quark-gluon perfect liquids.

And then we enter into the time clocks of the dark world, which slow down, of which we only know the ‘slower reaction times’ of weak forces and coupling constants.

The dark word though as enticing as it might seem for the imagination is quite irrelevant to our life except for the very much ignored fact that we should not do experiments on Earth opening doors to the dark world of energies and temperatures our planet cannot tolerate.

**The splitting of symmetries and universal constants in physics. ****The conservation of ST-presents.**

NOW, we already stated that all the conservation laws of physics resume in the larger conservation law of all the systems of the Universe:

The Universe ExIst as eternal present of bidimensional systems of space-time (energy and information), which is what reality conserves.

so when a constant of relative present space-time (c-constant, h-constant, k-constant, o-temperature etc. splits into 2 relative parts, along the constant, the sum of both is a zero value of past+future which conserves the present.