Future of science

Foreword:  Theoretical issues at CERN

IThe Organic Universe in a nutshell.

II. The 4 colossus of time theory.  Completing his work: relational space-time.


Foreword. Theoretical issues at CERN

Science is about improving human life in praxis and theoretical knowledge: the understanding of man and the Universe as interrelated parts.

This is what we philosophers of science do and have gone much further than the better known entropic models of reality done by physicists in both fields. So we shall start this Section with a theoretical view on where philosophers of science have brought that understanding, describing the new paradigm that makes CERN’s analysis of reality, rather infantile and obsolete…and apply those discoveries to the debunking of the research of physicists at cern.

We have done so already in the first section with standard physics, yet in this section, which is much wider in scope – to fully explain why the extinction of human beings is happening at cern; we shall use the mush more profound alternative, perennial philosophy of an organic Universe where information AND LIFE not entropy and death, is the main arrow of existence of reality.  And to that aim obviously as the last ‘president’ of the science of duality I will introduce my research which has completed those models.

DUality studies the Universe with both arrows, producing complex organic models of reality where motion and form mix into energy systems, which was ‘cancelled’ from international systems science congresses, when CERN’s suits provoke a panic among peers pressured by physicists.

Lol, it remind me of the elimination of its two most successful predecessors, taoism of yang-motion x yin-formation = qi-energy beings by the first technological chin emperor, which burned all his books, and hegelian dialectics of thesis x antithesis=synthesis, eliminated from philosophy with the fall of communism.

The other theorist of those suits, Rossler, one of the founders of chaos theory was also massacred ad hominem, so he was sued for ‘nepotism’ for publishing too many articles in the ‘magazine’, chaos, solitons and fractals (: alas, founding fathers of new disciplines do publish a lot about their foundation work. So of course, as there was nothing serious done in duality since the quantum wave-particle revolution, they just cancelled the new founding father.

And yet the Universe is a ternary system of 3 arrows of time, a discipline I have thoroughly renewed with the advances of modern science and it shows indeed an organic sentient Universe, where biological organic masses will feed on us and if not, organic robots will do us all.

SO THE BIG QUESTION ABOUT HUMAN SURVIVAL IS larger than CERN. It basically reduces to this:

The mechanic, simplistic view of physicist about the Universe built with a single dimension of time IS FALSE, it reduces and eliminates all its organic, sentient properties and it renders human a childish subconscious species who do not fear anything because all ‘is dead’ is ‘entropy’ is ‘mechanical’.
But it is not, and if humans do not accept reduced by the ‘paradox of the ego’ that makes them feel the center of the Universe their childish ego-trips, as children are entitled ‘staple food of the Universe’ they will be devoured when the ‘tyranossaruus rex of the galaxy, heavy quark matter’ comes in.

Or when military robots show actually they ‘do perceive’, without needing programs (hardcore view of AI which is the true one).

This blog THUS has 3 themes; the first an objective standard science analysis of those risks, the second the suits, the third the future evolution of science, which passes through the renewal of its philosophy of an organic Universe.

1. So he survival of mankind in the face of  a machine-weapon relic of the accelerator industry used in the cold war ‘first’ to explore bigger nukes, and then as a fringe benefit to know more about particles. Which has been the content of all previous posts.

2. Then a theme that no longer matters, as it didn’t get anywhere – the papers, affidavits, and  personal account of a failurethe suits against CERN, which were dismissed, when in a surrealist happening an American court decided that even if the world was blown up US would not be responsible.

Still we had to bring here the suits and ad hominem campaign against those who opposed CERN because CERN defaulted on the suits justifying his behaviour on his constant affirmations that we were all ‘crackpots’, ‘celebrity-seekers’ and ‘scientists of no merit’ (the expression used in his affidavits, while the press  labelled me as a self-styled time theorist, Rossler as a gaga-guy, Walter as a corrupted undergraduate, and so on).

That their alibi worked, does NOT CHANGE THE FACT its defence was not based on sound science, or equations brought to the table, because they knew people would realise of so much bull$hit if explained seriously on court.

So they got away with murder by insulting me, Walter and Rossler as ‘crackpots’ with the help of the P.R.ess and the establishment that only showed their side. So since the excuse not toe explain those experiments and their risks was NOT science but personal attacks which also became the excuse for the global community of physicists not daring to explain those risks, we cannot close the site without showing 3 facts:

Fact is the risks ARE real; the people who brought them are serious scientists; and finally…the merit of science is not in the individual, but in reality and its perfect, immortal Universe, which rational, simple, scientific, objective truths, which ARE COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT on human wishful thinking; which in this selfie, egotist civilisation has become unfortunately the rule to emotionally push our petty truths.

So as the suits were dismissed ‘ad hominem’, those posts respond ‘ad causam’.

Just to ad that regarding the most repeated reason adduced in the press regarding why we put the suits – to seek fame… now you know where i haul from even if you still think I have no merit (logic conclusion as i doubt you will go through the upgrading of the 5D³ section, unrelated to the main theme), you must accept at least that what those of us who opposed CERN did in good faith. I mean, do i look that stupid? as to think I would become a celebrity among physicists instead of ruining my career, which is precisely about space-time theory, a theme that unfortunately power-physicists have to validate, by busting their balls globally?

So why we did it? Precisely because we thought our mass destruction would upset the mass effect enough, for serious scientists and P.R.ess to denounce the facts.

It then might come as a surprise to you in the face of so much confusion ceremonies that our motifs were then exactly those which CERN adduces to have: to improve the future of mankind (by improving its chances of survival) and defend the truths of science.

Specifically in my case, even if authority is irrelevant to science, I was then the chair of duality, at international congresses, the science that studies the Universe with two arrows, entropy and information, which physicists still deny and misunderstand, and it is precisely that ‘denial of the proper nature of masses and charges as vortices that carry the in-form-ation of the Universe in its frequency and form, what falsifies its 3 ‘theories’, the big-bang, the Higgs as carrier of mass, and the black hole as an evaporating, entropic entity.

And so there is a third section introduced here dedicated to the theoretical themes that CERN pretends to research on the things that matter:

3. The future of science as an endeavour who seeks to understand better the meaning of ‘god, mind of the Universe’ and the role humans play on both’; none of which will be better understood by the childish dangerous act of bombing particles on those accelerators to get a few more petabytes of irrelevant data, but by making theoretical sense of the astounding amount of information humans have gathered with all kind of mechanical and life senses, and finding new laws of causal time and dimensions of space that can make sense of it all with the synoptic power of mathematical and bio-logic languages of thought.  

The theoretical research of this blog in that sense has two sections.

One focused in the detail of the three themes explored by CERN, on the negative: the falsity of the Higgs as a particle that gives mass ‘to the people’, the falsity of the big-bang as the origin of the Universe, and the falsity of the evaporation of black holes, studied in 3 separate posts…




Black hole falsity. HOT things cool down and evaporate the surroundings not the other way around.

Hawking equation is simple as it gets: a black hole is born exceedingly hot, meaning with hyperactivity as all baby-born seeds, which have accelerated time clocks as your seminal seed do. Then all feed very fast in the surroundings normally a mother or a ‘weaker’ energetic placenta and cool down its activities. EXACTLY WHAT WE SEE IN ALL PARTS OF THE UNIVERSE, IN ALL BEINGS AND IN BLAK HOLES.

What Hawking did was to change the arrow of time, backwards, affirming that the black hole will heat up more and evaporate the cool surroundings IN INVERSE FASHION AS WHAT HAPPENS. This breaks all the laws of relativity, thermodynamics, common sense and so we just put the sign as IT WAS at the beginning.  Then the equation of Hawking with the proper arrows reads as:

∆M = Konstant/∇T.

VERY SIMPLE INDEED:a black hole is born as a seminal seed, with faster time clocks/activity, due to his high temperature. Then it merely feeds fast, cools down and evaporate us in a few seconds provoking a big-bang explosion. POINT. No rocket physics here. From here to what Hawking does- denying that hot systems cool down and evaporate its surroundings, is all complicated arguments to convince us that black holes travel to the past. The BIGGEST HOAX OF SCIENCE, since the Piltdown skull. Point.


EINSTEIN Told us THAT a mass IS a vortex of accelerated timespace: ‘time curves space into masses’. He call it the principle of equivalence as we cannot distinguish weight form acceleration. Point. So a mass is the image above, and we have examples in all scales, charges, in the quantum scale, and thermodynamic eddies in the human scale. All do the same, the faster they turn the more they absorb and attract. So the fastest of all masses is the black hole that turns at c-speed in its horizon and that is why it is the more powerful system of nature that will evaporate us. Point. Nothing else is needed. Simple isn’t?

What Higgs did is ‘again’ to discharge all this and consider that mass is given by a particle colliding, as that is what quantum physicists experts NOT in mass theory but collisions and entropy use FOR ANYTHING THAT MOVES, more or less than the present Usa administration that explains it all with big guns and solves it all with big guns. But NO PARTICLE IS NEEDED TO GIVE MASS TO ANYTHING AS THE MASS IS AN INTRINSIC ATTRACTIVE PROPERTY OF THE SPACE-TIME EDDIE. POINT.


Once we understand  a MASS as a vortex of accelerated time that carries the in-form-ation of the cosmos in the ‘form’ and frequency of its cycles, it is easy to upgrade the big bang BY ADDING TO THE ENTROPY OF SPACE VACUUM THE INFORMATION CREATED BY MASS

Then we understand the Universe theoretically in sound grounds, using both arrows of time, entropy and information, which structure a balanced immortal ∞ Universe, where the entropic dark energy expanding between galaxies IS balanced by the informative, gravitational forces that curve and warp it into galactic vortices of mass, which quantum physicists purposely ignore, to reduce it all to those entropic expansive vacuum spaces; regardless of Einstein’s work on accelerated vortices of mass (general relativity):

In the graph, in each ‘scale of size of matter, the same duality of  clock-like vortices of temporal information (masses, charges, thermodynamic eddies, which carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency speed of its time cycles, as computers do, measuring its informative power on ‘Hertzs’ ) and expansive states of entropy (dark entropy; electromagnetic, lineal radiation; entropic gas; big-bangs of matter) balance each other in conserved, closed energy cycles to make the Universe immortal, giving birth to the equation of the 3 arrows/dimensions/ages of time-space, for each fractal part of reality:

Entropic past-space + cyclical, future information = iterative, closed energy cycles.

SIMPLE, BALANCED, ETERNAL, RATIONAL. NO COSMIC BIG-BANG, but a jig-jaw back and forth spring, expanding in space, imploding in time. POINT.

Yet ‘entropic physicists’ will have none of these dual OBVIOUS TRUTHS that balance the immortal Universe. So they act as if galaxies and gravitation didn´t exist (you see a pattern here, any inconvenient truth does NOT exist, point) denying on purpose its obvious contribution to the ‘shrinking’ of space-time of galaxies, and their arrow of information towards the central black hole, to the balanced mix – they even call information ‘negantropy’ – the negation of entropy. Yet information is far more important to humans, as we exist, inside one of such vortices as ‘solid=informative states’.

We are NOT living in the dark entropy between galaxies that expands space, nor are we gaseous beings. Hence the irrelevance of most of physics stuck in a single entropic future, for a true philosophy of the Universe and the search for the meaning of human existence in the ternary Universe – which is carried with fare deeper results by information theorists and philosophers of science, like this writer, (: which rather would call entropy=death, neganformation, the negation of life ).

The scales of the big-bang.

Once we understand a big-bang is just the death of a system of matter, and since the Universe we showed to be scalar, it is easy to see that big-bangs happen in all the scales of physics, from atomic big-bangs called beta-decays, to planetary big-bangs called NOVAS as those of stars, to galactic big-bangs called quasars, compensated them all by the creation of Mass. What is unlikely to happen is the cosmic big-bang, and we shall just show you a proof in the next graph with those 3 canonical big-bangs:

In the graph, the death of matter in big-bangs, which represent the arrow of entropy in einstein’s infamous equation, for any size of the Universe:

E-ntropy<c²-wave of light energy> M(t): vortex of accelerated temporal information, aka mass.

On the left, a beta decay gives birth to an H-atom, then a nova explosion of a star or planet as we will soon be, then the galactic burst of electromagnetism so similar to the atomic scale (as in the real, fractal 5D³ Universe, all scales are ‘congruent=self similar) and finally the mapping of the supposed cosmic hg-bang which has turned out to be an exact image of the ‘galaxy’ (: so much for hyperbolic philosophies of the whole… This entropy arrow of matter, however is perfectly balanced by the informative, vortices of time of each scale: masses and charges, easily unified (the saint grail of the toddlers of physics), with a simple ‘fractal equation’ in 5D³.

The Universe in praxis and theory is about life, and only the reductionism of physicists worldly profession can deform so much reality as to negate information and life – which they call negantropy.

On  the contrary information is the dominant arrow of the Universe. And entropy only its fast erasing, once it becomes ‘corrupted’ by excess of warping at the end of a life-informative cycle – the key inversion required both in praxis and theory in this planet of life if we want to keep on living and survive. 

Live vs. eviL is then in genetic linguistics a good expression of that duality: people who worship entropic weapons and death will bring death to the praxis of man

So both praxis and theory go always together. Now this is toddler stuff, which if we survive CERN in the future, when this age of ‘entropy physics’ and byzantine equations is seen as we see today the scholastic middle age philosophy. But when you start so low, as philosophy of science done by physicists is today, it is good enough to resolve the question that most matter to us, regarding CERN experiments – the real structure of the immortal Universe, and the limited role of the ‘events of entropy’=big-bang death of any scale:

The falsity of black hole evaporation.

Einstein then died, and the highest minds of the age, specialised in information came together at Macy’s to find systems sciences, duality – the science i used to chair at those international congresses – cybernetics and theory of information. This was the right approach to complete our philosophy of the Universe.

But physicists were sorely against this affirmation of negantropy and followed its path with ‘mathematical religious entelechies’, denial of evidence of all what was information, and so finally the ‘absolute denial’ of the maximal informative vortex of the Universe the black hole became standard theory, against Einstein’s work, which was both in favour of the scalar Universe and demanded a cutoff substance for black holes, NOT just a mathematical entelechy, and was fully aware that ‘time curved space into masses’ and would have loved the advances theory of information made in its definition of the carriers of information the galactic scale. 

And so the man who denied Einstein, information and invented yet another mathematical, religious creationist theory, became the most famous scientist of the second part of the XX century, as physicists, makers of our weapons of ‘mass destruction’, were the gods of science, while philosophers of science who only used our brains, were trashed as irrelevant to the ‘age of the machine’.

Thus in the wrong side of this century thus appeared Mr. Hawking, who having not understood at all the meaning of Einstein’s work made a fortune publishing books trying to explain him ‘A brief history of time’ and at the same time doing work in physical papers blatantly denying his equations of black holes, interpreting the ‘stopping’ process of its time clocks that measure its rotary motion and go to zero, NOT as they are – simply: the black hole in the centre or singularity of its eddie of timespace, as any eddie or hurricane does stops and so its time parameter, remember, a measure of motion=change, v=s/t, stops. Point.

Those equations of Einstein mean nothing else in a Universe of infinite clocks, where the equations of physics only measure a kind of time=change, the motion in space. So when the motion comes to zero the time stops in zero.

You travel in time to zero in physics when you stop your motion. But ONLY you stop hour motion, as there are infinite time clocks. There is no way by stopping your clocks YOU STOP ALL THE CLOCKS OF THE UNIVERSE! AS physicists think, and there is no way that by putting your clocks of information backwards, you move backwards in time the entire Universe, which is what physicists think

You travel in time to the past in evolution, when you reproduce a seminal seed, which was the form you have billions of years ago in the unicellular age.

Son in the moment of orgasm, your entire system concentrates in producing a past seminal  seed, which then will evolve fast in punctuated evolution (as a Universe of infinite time clocks as Einstein discovered can LOCALLY, remember always that word LOCALLY, travel faster to the future, evolving faster its information, which IS THE MEASURE OF THE SPEED OF TIME OF A CLOCK – ITS SPEED OF PROCESSING AND EVOLVING INFORMATION);

Son in processes of birth a form of relative past that evolves palingentically into the future.

Those are real non-paradoxical LOCAL TRAVELS in time.

They are not ‘imaginary’, never proved and theoretically false ‘imaginary black holes’ (Hawking’s initial name for his) with all his absurd time travel paradoxes, according to which you can go back to the past through a black hole to kill your father (sic) – an absurd proposition that shows he does not understand black holes.

I do love as Mr. Hawking ‘travels in time’, just for fun, specially the humorous chuptzah he has when comparing himself with all the previous geniuses, as in star treck when he plays with Einstein and Newton (wrong choice here, it should have been Leibniz or at least Galileo, but we can’t ask a celebrity to know that much and he corrected in his site with Galileo as we shall see latter) to affirm that black holes evaporate, letting Einstein have laugh at him.

How such humble guy could be eviL=antilive and so egotist that would risk mankind for a Nobel prize to prove his never proved theories at CERN? He reminds me of ‘Woody allen’ that infamous pederast, who used to rape his daughters, and yet is so nice that all the suits against him by his family have been ditched out, cause how ‘such a nice guy who knows so well to laugh at himself can be a ‘serial pederast’… Even after her daughter finally was allowed to publish in NYtimes he went on to win the oscar that year, and came here to Barcelona to play his ‘other flute’ on the ‘sacred’ palau of the music as an expert white Jazz… pederast. Icons of celebrity mass-media have no limits on what they can do to the adoring sheeple. 

I am not sheeple though. I am with Dylan Farrow, i might like some woody allen movies, notably his first comedy ‘take the money and run’, and his last work of note ‘crimes and misdemeanours’, a parable of his personality, portrayed by the doctor who ab=uses his lover, kills her and NOT only he gets away with murder but receives the highest prize of his profession… but that is not reason to let myself be raped or murdered by those funny guys. Sorry… to realise we are alone on those views.

So first we have set the record straight on that essential theme for the risks of CERN: black holes are not entelechies that travel to the past of a wrong view of a single mechanical clock for the entire Universe; nor they travel to the past because they are NOT emptiness of vacuum space-time that can be twisted, but do have a cut-off substance, its ∆-1 ‘particle’ parts, as Einstein wanted, when he said that he wouldnt believe in them till a ‘reasonable’ substance appears on the quantum realm of similar weight to ‘make them’.

As he was as I am a realist, and knew that mathematics is just a synoptic mirror, an experimental science that reduces reality to fit it on the mind mapping NOT as quantum physicists believed, the language of GOD, that by mere utterance created the Universe (a concept shared by Islam, which states also expressly that arab is the language of god that creates the Universe uttering arab words – as i told you many times physicists are fundamentalist believers in equations as muslims are fundamentalist believers in arab).

As both – in this they agreed – Newton and Leibniz thought, as I have proved with the formalisms of relational space-time, as Einstein thought the ultimate substance of reality IS not maths and numbers (do you see them walking around) or words (do you decompose your habibi=love to find it is made of h and a and b and i parts) but space and time, WHOSE PROPERTIES are mirrored by languages of which mathematics has the best most efficient analytic and synthetic method – it is the most focused mirror, not the real one.

So since only heavy quarks have their density they must be frozen heavy quark stars, with a top quark nuclei and a surface of bc-heavy atoms (similar to strange stars, aka pulsars, made with a core of strange matter)

So as they have substance and they are NOT mathematical equations, they neither evaporate or send you to any past – an absurd deduction born of the mis interpretation of their time equations which go to zero.

Yet aas time in physics is only a measure of motion, t=s/v NOT of all the motions=changes of all the clocks of the Universe, back to the past means a local devolution, in the clock-system we observe – an erasing of its information in the moment of death. 

And a zero time value, for black holes, only MEANS that its time-motion clocks have stopped.

Thus in the centre of the black hole – and eddie of space-time,  as in the center of any vortex, or hurricane time-motion comes to zero, NOT that you open another ‘magic’ door to the past), or fathers (he also said he despised his dad’ profession cause it was biology, and it was too easy, only the most stupid on his class studied it – uau!  so why you didn’t study it, being ‘that stupid’ – and what is with your father that you insult his work and want to kill it, as they say it here ‘te lo tendras que mirar’ 🙂 and of course, he doesn’t understand time travel.

Then the equation of Hawking with the proper arrows reads as:

∆M = Konstant/∇T.

VERY SIMPLE INDEED:a black hole is born as a seminal seed, with faster time clocks/activity, due to his high temperature. Then it merely feeds fast, cools down and evaporate us in a few seconds provoking a big-bang explosion. POINT. No rocket physics here. From here to what Hawking does- denying that hot systems cool down and evaporate its surroundings, is all complicated arguments to convince us that black holes travel to the past. The BIGGEST HOAX OF SCIENCE, since the Piltdown skull. Point.

So if black holes do not evaporate but merely grow in exponential growth when we put the arrow of time towards the future, in Hawking’s equation (above), what is then the role of black holes in the galaxy? What we observe, to be as the top predator informative system of the galaxy, the ‘DNA’ of its organic structure, paralleled in the big picture with its microscopic III families of mass in the lower picture.

LET us then see how proper is the ‘known-known’ organic galaxy and its 3 parts: strangelet halos, black hole centres and mithocondrial galaxies, without the pumped ego-trips of humans as the centre of the Universe.


‘We are just a rock in a corner of the Universe, departing from this fact we can talk about man’ Schopenhauer

Now we have the ‘theoretical minimum’ to explain what a galaxy, in which we are host as a lost rock in a mitochondria corner truly is as a system of ternary space-time. And so we can complete even before we show you the ternary structure of maths, the ternary structure of the Universe.

As today  the most respected physicist alive is NOT Hawking but Witten.

He became the top physicist of the world today, when he discovered superstring theory, unifying the 5 models into the so-called M-theory. So huge is his prestige in the profession that he has even received a mathematical ‘fields prize’ – Hawking only popularised his work with M-theory books as he did with that of Einstein in ‘a brief history of time’ – it is the celebrity of the discipline.

Now what people do not know is that one of his first papers was about strangelets. Since he had been for 20 years ‘soundly’ explaining that the only known-known halo candidate to be 90% of dark heavy matter are quark matter, strangelets, the most stable matter of the Universe. Since the so-called ‘Witten hypothesis’ obeys both, the ‘principle of economicity and simplicity – Ockham’s razor  – as strangelets are made of ‘heavy quarks’  we know do exist, and Nature does NOT create a new species of top predator mass, JUST to keep it on the rooms of the LHC. Hence strangelets MUST EXIST, be more common than the weak Ud-mass we are made of and have a REAL use on the Universe.

Further on, today we know that the galaxy is filled with planets, shown to be overwhelmingly the most numerous objects of the perceived galaxy. And since stars reproduce black holes, which are at the center of its galaxies, similar to a cell, with its gravitational dense informative centres of black hole, its energetic planets and stars in between, made of our light ud-quarks, the symmetries of Nature between microcosmos and macrocosmos, preclude that the 3rd known-known type of quarks, should be the substance of that halo made hence of strangelets that feed on planets (while the super-heavy top quarks should be having similar density, the substance of black holes).

 This ternary symmetry, which follows the laws of simplicity and economicity in science, if anything have been further proved by THE LHC, which keeps ELIMINATING all other theoretical only ‘inventions’ of physicists tinkering with equations (so not Supersymmetry, not axions, NOT NOTHING except what we know is there and suffice to construct the ‘simple not malicious’ Universe (Einstein) since ‘simplicity is genius’ (Leonardo), and Ockham’s razor work’:

dark macrocosmos

In the graph, the ternary symmetry between the microscopic and macroscopic scale of matter, which prompted Witten’s Hypothesis, is routinely explored in professional papers, and this scientist has used to model galaxies as an organism of 3 ‘topological parts’ similar to all systems of nature, made of a hard membrane that separates the ‘entity’, in this case the galaxy halo, similar to the protein membrane of a cell, or the electronic cover of an atom; a central, informative singularity, in the galaxy the swarm of black holes, in the cell of DNA genes, in the atom of quarks, and the lighter, ‘food’-energy that feeds both, in the galaxy our light ud-atoms, of stars and planets that seem to reproduce black holes and the Halo of strangelets, in the cell the energetic mitochondria that reproduces both proteins and DNA, and in the atom the ‘interatomic space’ filled with energetic waves that move back and forth between quarks and electrons. It is the most beautiful symmetry of physics between both scales, proved by Ockham’s razor, economicity, experimental evidence and now unfortunately the Fermi paradox.

So,  no planet shows life activity and intelligent or robotic communication, hence it seems in all of them, physicists blow up our future (the so called fermi paradox)  with something more powerful than a few H-bombs, as humans would survive in few numbers and soon regain the planet. it is the entire planet which goes under and the only explanation is the Witten hypothesis, coupled with the Nuclear Industry exploring big-bang bombs.

Galaxies exist to transform up and down light matter into strange matter that likely migrates to the halo and top quark black hole matter that migrates to its center. And we are its food. It might be that humans are only ‘animals that make machines and weapons till they destroy themselves’? As Einstein put it: ‘it is obvious that our technology has overcome our humanity’

So turning around the ego-trips of humanity and its physicists and religious people, the more sound objective, experimentally proved theory of reality would be exactly the inverse of the anthropic principle physicists sponsor (a Universe created with the constants that would give birth to man, supreme intelligent being): we are NOT the center of the Universe, dense dark matter is; the galaxy is NOT created for us, but we ARE the food of dark matter, and all galaxies END UP as pure vortex of mass, collapsing into the black hole, surrounded by a forbidding halo of strangelets, which prevent us to escape and only arrogant physicists and religious people who cannot stand death and the infinitesimal nature of human beings, deny that and indeed die for their idol-ogies and false Gods and theirs of the Universe, which they hide in their ‘secret’ language, making it all look so complex and convincing the human sheeple they ARE THE CENTER OF IT ALL, censoring systematically any attempt to explain humbly and objectively reality as it is.

So you would expect on that overwhelming evidence that the alibi of CERN – that we have no ABSOLUTE PROOFS of the existence of strangelets, as obviously they are dark matter, so we neither have proof of invisible gravitation or black holes, but not physicist in his right mind would deny them – WOULDN’T WORK among professionals who respect the scientific method, and Witten’s standing and work. Or at least that Witten would have become vocal about this craziness of the remains of the old Nuclear Age of bomb research – as he does not need to work there and his reputation is unassailable. But he has been mute, and has never criticised CERN. It is indeed an absolute wall of silence, so surrealist as the behaviour of people in dictatorships or wars, which they ‘attack’ with enthusiasm, despite knowing they will likely die on them, with the ascientific, emotional excuse of ‘tribal nationalism’ – that is the belonging to a tribal species not to the scientific reality of a unique human homo sapiens species.

This is where we stand here. People are so coward, passive and fear so much criticism of peers or physicists at large that will rather ‘forget’ they have a ‘Damocles death sword’ ahead and of course, have pumped up the ascientific, emotional excuse of ‘huge discoveries’ that will reveal the meaning of it all to shut up all criticism.

So despite the fact that the likely candidate to become food for strangelets in the Halo, which is 90% of mass, are the planets, which play the role with stars, of mitochondria in cells that feed also the central DNA-nucleus of ‘black hole information’, and the hardy ‘protein membrane’, humans seem to go ahead with the destiny for all the wrong reasons, which have nothing to do with reason and science: power, ego-trips, money, weapons, scientific prizes.

Now you know, why there is zero reason to keep CERN in theoretical grounds. But they make it SO COMPLEX and so long and with so many unneeded maths that they fill entire encyclopaedias about it.

So we shall do it in the rest of these posts on theory and more of it down just t show you yes, we can be complex enough, far more complex than they are, but at LEAST EXPLORING THE REAL UNIVERSE and the meaning of it all AS IT IS…. NOT TO DISGUISE A COMPLETE HOAX, as physicists have being doing as amateur philosophers of science for centuries.

My advice though is if you have grasped the above simple truths to abandon this blog and enjoy life while it last.

I am unfortunately trapped here, by my sense of responsibility and my likeness of going into detail and look at the whole with a clear crystal, my age, but if you are young enough:

carpe diem, enjoy the day.



If you are still here, we shall dwell in several post on those themes,

And then on the positive side of it, we shall advance the ‘future of ‘stience”; correcting the errors of physicists, understanding better, timespace and giving you the proper explanation of the nature of the Universe, as a fractal of information, whose fundamental organic system is the galaxy…

Where the black hole acts very much as the DNA of a cell does, reproducing and organising the super organism  and stars play merely a mithocondrial role, as the maker of the atomic substance that time passed, become heavier dark matter strangelets and black holes.

Those are models that go against the human ego, as ‘protagonist’ of the galaxy, but they are completely sound, proved ad nauseam: black holes and strange, heavier quarks ARE the commanders of the galaxy, not us, light-us star mithocondrial matter.

Such is the objective view that might never substitute the present ‘entropy’ only theories  of humans that please so much their ‘homunculus’ ego, to their own peril. But that is ‘what the galaxy is’. We do NOT live in a simplex Universe described with simpler lineal equations as those of the big-bang but in a complex, organic, informative cosmos, so beautiful when you properly understand that one can only feel a derisive irony, when commenting the doodles of the sand of our big-whammy theorists. My apologies for that. But it is long overdue to put the ‘physicists’ theories of the whole’ at its true value, even if the acolytes of its religion of entropy in this age of ‘entropic humans’, selfie dog-eat-dog disordered chaotic ‘atoms’ unable to feel and see the quiet enlightenment of the solid, informative mind-crystals of the whole, are droves and they are ALL ready to jump to the throat of each other at the minimal attempt to put them the crystal mirror and show them what they truly are. But that is the ONLY thing that will save them – a humble realisation of the enormous intelligence and power of the cosmos and its denser forms of matter.

The theoretical content of the blog on cern’s 3 theoretical fields of research, not-search…

So besides expanding your understanding of timespace, with thought models, the true way in which science advances, we must also show at face value the outdated quality of the models used at CERN tot explore further the Universe.

So in the main section of the blog there are besides facts and experiments also 3 theoretical posts will show how absurd are the pretensions of cèrn to advance our understanding of th Univrs and its risks, on one on the big-bang, one on the evaporation of black holes and the next post on the Higgs hoax, we shall deal with some sarcasm with those 3 theoretical issues – alibis of CERN’s sacred research, which is a relic of past century physics, totally outdated…

So, we shall consider from the higher perspective of the ‘future paradigm of science’, 5D³, the MAIN theoretical issue at CERN:

The big-bang – ultimate entropy theory which for a century, despite constant proofs against it, has been holded sacred as the religion of physics, to maintain their status of ‘high popes’ of science.

But and this is to me the proof, we are dealing with a people who is both stupid and eviL, when dealing with the other two great theoretical advances of CERN, we don’t even need toddler XXI c. science, we are dealing with plain lies, and hyperbolic, egotist states. As such is the case of:

The Higgs which does NOT give mass to particles, and all physicists do know that. It is just an alibi for the industry to pump up iron, regardless of its irrelevance…

And the evaporation of black holes, of ‘celebrity’ guru, mr. Hawking, which is not even within the top 100 physicists of this century in the ‘pro’ lists, for a reason: his work has NO merit at all. It is PURE mathematical FICTION.

While in the section on 5D³ we shall give to caesar what belongs to caesar – explain  black holes as the informative vortices that organise and create galaxies, and the fractal immortal universe as an scalar system that reproduces information, since a mass is a ‘vortex of temporal information’, which balances with its constant ‘warping of space’ (Einstein’s principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass, which those ‘thick’ digital robots have yet to grasp) the expansive arrow of entropic space between galaxies – the only physicists consider when creating their 1/2 theories of reality, as IF galaxies did not exist.

SUCH BLUNT denial of experimental facts (galactic vortices, black holes never evaporating, gravitation and einstein’s relativity as the cause of mass) are quite astounding and show indeed, how the debasing of truth in physics by its worldly religion of entropy reduces their philosophy of reality to doodles in the sand.

Indeed, if they kill us all it won’t be for any good reason but just because of their routine of making bigger bombs, point and the stupidity and sheeple behaviour of the human sheeple that let them do it.

We shall then show you in this post, why, the science being done at CERN is either buill$hit (false) or irrelevant for the higher goal of understanding the foundations of reality, the meaning of ‘God, man and the Universe’ so to speak, as there are far more advanced models of time-space and the nature of the fractal, informative Universe that make CERN just a mammoth relic of XX century entropy physics.

Because a machine is NOT yet the most intelligent form of thought in this Universe and we have enough data to work better models of reality, which is what we, philosophers of science and timespace theorist do.

AND TRUST me, the ‘level’ of understanding of time and space of ‘present’ physics and humanity at large IS of doodles on the sand made by a toddler. And if you have any IQ above CERNies but specially a bit of humility towards the infinite fractal Universe, I am going to show you in rather simple terms, a crack in the window of the absolute, which humans have so far merely scratched to see the astounding arrogance of all those physicists who think they know it all.

Paraphrasing Aristotle: ‘the only thing i know is that they know almost nothing and i know just a little bit – at least the infinity of that information which ‘only the Universe holds in itself.’  (Haldane). But a blind person cannot even imagine the enormous range of forms it could perceive if he could ‘see’. At least having looked through the crack i know there is an entire new language of perception behind that window.





Organic Universe in a nutshell

“Space and time of itself sink in shadows. Only its union exists.” Minkowski. On ð♥$: ðime-$pace §ymmetries

“Historically, much of fundamental physics has been concerned with discovering the fundamental particles of nature and the equations which describe their motions and interactions. It now appears that a different program may be equally important: to discover the ways that nature allows, and prevents, information to be expressed and manipulated, rather than particles to move. (….) To conclude with, I would like to propose a more wide-ranging theoretical task: to arrive at a set of principles like energy and momentum conservation, but which apply to information.’

Steane, on the goal of General Systems Sciences, also the goal of this blog, and the limits of classic physics.

‘Dust of space-time you are dust you shall become’… Bible

‘Complexity will be the science of the XXI century’ Hawking, on the future of science


We are all ‘§pacetime organisms’, which occupy a ‘size of vital space’ across several fractal scales of parts and wholes, and ‘perform’ from the point of view of its singularity mind-ceenter in command of a ‘still language’ that maps the world, actions≈arrows of ðime in cyclical patterns with the goal of conserve our energy and survive, reproducing similar forms to ourselves.

So how can we generate all those realities departing only of two ‘elements’ space and time? The answer is in the dimensions of space-time, which are more than the usual 3 space and 1 time dimensions humans consider in their analysis of reality. So when we understand that both time and space have five dimensions symmetric to each other, (5S≈5T) we can really combine them in various forms to generate everything that exists in reality.
And so as the equation of a fractal is called a ‘fractal generator’, in which we move back and forth between two sides of an equality, we can simple consider the previous equation, 5S<=>5T in an even simpler form, S<≈>T, the fractal generator of the Universe. You can’t get simpler than that. And yet we shall show you how from such a simple synoptic ‘mirror’ of reality as we develop the conceptual meaning of those five dimensions and show its ‘symmetries’, how all that exists can be explained.
But what is a dimension of space, of time, and of space & time? Even before we describe those 5 dimensions we shall consider this a priori question, which science has not clearly resolved.
As it is indeed the beginning of science, when the lack of a clear understanding of dimensions of time=motion and space=form, prevented humans from cracking the meaning of the Universe, and left them ‘orphan’ of the first elements needed to construct reality.



‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’ Galileo

The beginning of science in modern times started when Galileo realized that the Earth moved in time, even if we saw it as a fixed form of space. So he affirmed we couldn’t really distinguish motion from form. But he missed the next fundamental step: If we cannot distinguish motion in time from form in space, we need to consider for each basic form of space in the Universe, a similar motion in time. And as there are 5 canonical forms in space and 5 canonical motions in time, the Universe has 5 dimensions of space-time, which are the dimensions we need to build all realities.

Indeed, as Aristotle defined it Time is motion that becomes space, when we see it as a still form. So for each dimension=type of motion=time, we can perceive a dimension of form=space’ as there are 5 type of motions and their symmetric 5 types of form, the Universe have 5 dimensions of time, 5 dimensions of space, and if we combine them, 5 dimensions of space-time.

It is this paradox of the mind that perceives either form or motion, what allows us to divide reality in two types of elements space and time. Let us put an example, which can be also used to the second fundamental duality to understand space and time and its dimensions – the fact that we do not distinguish either a continuous single ‘scale’ of reality and its discontinuous smaller parts (the very definition of a fractal in which a whole is made of similar parts); because those two dualities, the distinction of form and motion and wholes and parts suffice to define all the dimensions of space and time:

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks.

The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

The Universe is made of ‘Entropy and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind thinks otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox – the duality of stillness and motion, as we perceive the Earth still but it is moving.

Yet this paradox is indeed the proof that form, information dominates motion, because the mind prefers to see still information to blurred motion.

The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.

This must be understood from the beginning, the ultimate reality is motion not form, time moves and space moves. They just move in different shapes. And then minds, lock those motions into a simultaneous, ‘informative’, ‘dimensional’ shape because it sees those motions in ‘slow camera’. The arrival of filming makes this easier to understand. Stillness is just the perception of very fast cyclical motions, as when we see a turning wheel as a fixed form.

This is the fundamental principle of physics, called the principle of relativity:

“We cannot distinguish a motion from a still dimension (form or distance).’ Poincare.

So often we see motion as distance – we cannot distinguish motions from dimensions of form (this is the meaning of relativity, the relativity of all motions).

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.

It manifests in different forms in different scales. Perhaps the most important expression is the duality wave-particle, still ill understood in quantum physics.

We shall consider of its many consequences 2 of them – an objective explanation of the constancy of light speed from relativity and a footnote on its duality in quantum physics.

The physical world is dual  from ‘above’ (the cosmic scale) to ‘below’ (the quantum scale), to quantum discrete motion to go ‘actions’, from the duality of motion vs. still perception or ‘Galilean->Einsteinian relativity’, to the basis of our understanding of science is the finitesimal small vs the finitely large (infinities do not exist in the metrics of the 5th dimension, hence the use of finitesimals and finite, minimal and maximal n-1 quanta and U+1 worlds).

So what IS the proper way to make sense of the galilean paradox? All this is good for measure and praxis of machine making etc. but conceptually the way to go is to accept the stop and go, the dual dimensionality of all systems which are motion and form, momenta, energy, and so we move from Galilean relativity, the single being, to the holographic principle, the mind seeing it as dual motions and forms.


They are the fundamental dual structure of the fractal Universe.

In the graph, we see reality both as fixed distances of space and as a series of discontinuous motions, and time. Thus reality is perceived either as a single lineal geometry or time duration. And inversely cyclical forms, as seen as circles or as cyclical clocks, with a frequency that determines its capacity to carry information, when it becomes fixed as ‘memorial space’.

Thus 2 x 2 dualities of O vs. | motion vs. form are the key paradoxes, which need to be resolved for each species to understand the game of space-time:

Information is defined as the maximal number of DIMENSIONAL FORMs=MOTIONs of an entity (Galileo’s paradox: motion indistinguishable of distance, due to the space-time symmetry).

SYMMETRIES OF SPACE-TIME are then possible because only entities with the same dimensions can transform into each other. So now we have 4 different bidimensional entities, information (bidimensional form with motion), time, cyclical form with motion, space, bidimensional sheet with minimal form,and only energy, its space-time combinations deploy in a single sheet of space-time, 4 Dimensions.

The graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:

Once it is clear that there are different mathematical frames of reference, of different sizes; that mind reduce in scale reality – the Universe into worlds, and that dimension and motion are indistinguishable – absolute features of reality, which will be formalized soon with the proper understanding of the ‘undefined terms of mathematics’ (fractal points, lineal waves, and networks≈planes – we need to fully grasp the unit of the Universe, a ‘point with volume’, or fractal point, hence a time cycle.

The duality of time≈motion and space≈form, and its two varieties, continuous open decelerating speed≈distances and closed accelerating cycles≈circles of time, are both paradoxes of perception and objective, inverse arrows of motion.

We summarize the formal and functional differences between entropy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:

Maximal Space-Entropy = Minimal Form=body Vs  Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

But why people believe in languages? Don’t languages create the Universe?

Actually they do because time-space is just a language mirage (:

 The 3 dimensions in a single plane: past-lineal motion, present-iteration, future-information
Let us then start with the 3 dimensions also called arrows or cycles or actions of space-time we know better about, illustrated in the next graph:

In the graph, the Universe is composed of 3 external motions, the relative past, entropic, expansive, lineal ‘big-bang’ motions that expand space and eliminate dimensional form (left picture), the opposite, relative future, cyclical, time clocks that accelerate inwards in time vortices. And the middle relative repetitive present flows of hyperbolic body-waves in which formal motions of time repeat themselves, in a seemingly dynamic present.

THEY are organised as ‘actions’ of space-time, which come together into social networks, creating a fractal Universe that reproduces co-existing super organisms across several scales of size (packed together under the generic term of the fifth dimension).

We shall explain such real Universe, and the systems it creates along the 3 scales of physical systems, the quantum-atomic thermodynamic and gravitational, larger scales.

Just in case he doesn’t we shall bring a very brief resume of the two fundamental elements of reality, the 3 arrows of time and the fractal scalar structure of its space, with its ternary symmetries and ‘membrains’ that warp it all with a linguistic still mind singularity, giving birth to the 10 Dimensional super organism, fundamental structure of the Universe.


The 3 dimensions of lineal motion, space-time repetitive actions (conserved energy and momenta), and informative, accelerated vortices=clocks of time (masses, charges, evolutionary clocks) do exist in a single plane of space-time continuum. And so they can be easily understood in ‘present’ science, as they merely ‘double’ the still, formal perception of simultaneous space into sequential moving time.

Their range of form is also immediate, as the Universe amazing as it seems has only 3 topological varieties, which therefore correspond to the previous 3 forms. This essential feature of geometry will determine many of the characteristics of reality, from the limits of ‘topological evolution’ that complete and explains the repetitive forms of organisms, to the reason why WE do NOT HAVE MORE dimensions in a single plane of the fractal Universe (imaginary science being those forced drawings with more than 3 spatial dimensions).

The fourth dimension of entropy and the fifth dimension of social, linguistic evolution: fractal planes.

Yet we said the Universe is a fractal so it has scales of size that co-exist together for which we need to add dimensions, to introduce the fractal Universe.

So besides the 3 space dimensions ≈ 3 time dimensions (seen as still in space, as moving in time) we do need to consider at least 2 more dimensions, one for the lower scales of the being, which we shall call the fourth dimension of absolute past and one for the upper dimension of the being of absolute future.

In the next graph, the Universe is a fractal of 3 space-time elements, entropic motions, informative singularities and its energetic body-wave combinations, structured in scales of parts that become connect by networks of entropy, energy and information to make larger wholes, and so each science merely studies the species of one of such scales, with different jargons we shall unify them:

In the graph the scales of the fifth dimension, as all systems are composed of 3 space-time topological formal motions, which construct the being:

Spe (potential fields/limbs of lineal motion) < reproductive energetic body-waves>informative particle-heads…

And all systems co-exist in 3 scales of form: the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-organic/thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational world:

Why we said the 5th dimension is Absolute future and the 4th of parts absolute past? Easy: unlike the relative past and future of organic systems that are born in a young age of maximal motion and get old and wrinkle into information, to die back and dissolve that information – hence relative, the fourth and fifth dimensions are absolute because:

  • They are ABSOLUTE because they extend to everything as we keep extending further our size in space as we go down into smaller parts till getting the maybe string world and vacuum space. So they are NOT local as cyclical life-death processes or punctual motions in 3 D + t.
  • The fourth is the past, because for A WHOLE to appear, the parts must come FIRST, so the fifth of social evolution is the future.

So how the Universe builds up more dimensions of space-time besides the 3 S = 3T? Through the fractal ‘scalar structure’ of wholes which seem continuous but are discontinuous make of smaller parts. And so we find two more key dimensions to reality:

The dimensions of wholes that dissolve into parts, by destroying the 3 formal=functional networks that connect them into tighter configurations, as the physiological ‘moving=digestive’, ‘reproductive=blood’ and ‘informative=nervous networks’ do in a human being, or the ‘territorial, economic=reproductive and political=informative network do in a nation, or the vacuum space, electromagnetic energy and informative gravitation do in a galaxy or atom’. So the dimension of dissolution akin to death IS the fourth dimension and involves at least two scales of the fractal Universe, which we shall term as ∆ (also used as a general term for the scalar Universe).

Yet there is the logic inverse dimension of parts which become wholes. And as it is evident that this dimension is the dimension of organisation, social evolution and life emergence, from cells into organisms, from organisms into societies, from atoms into molecules, matter states, celestial bodies, galaxies, etc. we shall call this inverse dimension the fifth dimension of social evolution. 

The properties of both arrows, upwards and downwards those scales, of life and death, of social evolution and entropy ARE then clearly inverted. And while death is simple to understand: the parts dissolve and the ‘physiological networks’ that perform the 3 forms and functions of motion-reproduction and information disappear. So clinical death happens with the end of activity in those networks; the system that puts all parts together into a whole is not so evident.

Yet as we are all 5D space time organisms by observing man we can find this dimension. What indeed holds the ‘whole’? Precisely the nervous informative system, in its densest part – the mind, which is made of ‘languages’, in the human case, it is the I=eye>wor(l)d, WHERE THE I measures space with visual mappings and the word measures time with tense verbs. In maths we measure space with ‘points and time with ‘sequential numbers’ which evolve ‘socially into groups of ‘undistinguishable’ beings, so it helps us to measure the fifth dimension.

The formalism of the 5 dimensions: metric equation.

Now dimensions are defined formally by a metric. This means a system of equations that allow to describe how a system travels through the dimension of space and time. So how this works, when we expand 3 dimensions, whose travels are obvious – motions in 3D or 3D+ lineal time duration, in galilean and Einstein’s relativity, which give birth to a ‘worldline’? Easy, adding dimensions which allow the being to travel from small size to larger size, in the life-death cycle from seminal seed to being back to cellular state in death. And as a line when we add dimensions becomes a cycle, we talk no longer of worldlines but of worldcycles. Let us see this in more details, since we have already defined the metric equation of 5D: spe x tƒ (size in space x speed in time) = K.

In the graph the fundamental equation of the fifth dimension, is its co-invariant metric, Space size x Time clock speed = Constant. Since smaller spatial sizes have after informative clocks, coding the larger wholes that control it through its enclosure membranes and higher energy. So quantum numbers code atoms and molecules, which code genetically super organisms and matter states, which conform the gravitational world.

Further on this metric equation, defines according to Klein ‘a mathematical dimension’, as a ‘coinvariant metric of space-time’, through which is possible to travel.

How we travel through the scalar Universe that complements the ‘3 topological space-time dimensions of lineal space-motions, wider, reproductive motions, and tall, informative motions’ , with 2 more dimensions, one ‘downward of entropy’, and one upwards of social evolution into wholes?

Easy the travel through the 5 Dimensions of space-time is called the worldcycle of life and death that all organisms follow. As all of them travel through its scales, born as seminal seeds, with faster clocks of time in the lower dimension; ∆-1, emerging as we slow down our metabolic clocks in the organic/thermodynamic dimension, within a larger ∆+1 world, in which we become just a ‘cellular fractal point of a larger social or gravitational organism, to die back into the ∆-1 components in the ‘big-bang of death’, which the dual arrows of e<=>mc² express for matter:

Now it might seem that the 3 previous ‘essential changes’ of our paradigm of ternary timespace arrows in a present flat slice of the scalar Universe, its fractal structure and the realisation that all lines are ultimately part of cycles, hence Lineal space IS PART of a flow of cyclical time, do not matter that much, but those 3 simple dualities and paradoxes of how a mind processes information, transforming motion into still form, reducing cycles to lines, focused on the mind point, and seeing only one plane of the infinite fractal Universe, suffice to fully upgrade and change our view of the Universe.

Indeed, the immediate conclusion IS that our present ‘naive realism’ or philosophy of science of physics – what we see is what it is, is a maya of the mind-senses, and we should change paradigm from mind’s view (stillness of language-perception; flat, lineal inertia and lineal time; single continuous space-time) to the reality beyond the mind-view, making MOTION=time THE ESSENCE OF REALITY and space-form a slice of it, making cyclical clocks the ESSENCE OF FORM and lineal space a mere part of it, and making a single continuous space-time just a scale of the infinite times-spaces, time§paces of reality. So the next graphs show the 3 arrows of time in a single plane, as physiological networks that process motion, reproduce the system and inform it and below the ternary scales of life and its parallel quantum, thermodynamic/magnetic and gravitational scales.

To notice though that on the ‘verge’ of the 3 dimensions of a single present, lineal motion-distance (time-space view of the first dimension) is connected to the entropic arrow of maximal motion; and at the center of the informative time vortices (masses, charges, eddies) you connect with the still-mind, reason why there is a sequential ‘continuum’ and we shall often ‘confuse’ the concept of ‘entropic motion and lineal motion’ on one side and ‘informative vortices and still minds’. So goes for lineal motion and energy, as we take often lineal motions to mix with information and create ‘energy’. So in a dynamic Universe to define anything we must really use two terms and an operandi:

4D: entropy> 1D motion> 2D: energy> 3D information>5D:mind form << 4D entropy-death

This is the dynamic ‘world cycle of existence in time and space’, whereas > is the dynamic symbol for implosive growth of information and < the dynamic symbol for explosive motion.

As i have been writing for myself for decades, I apologise for my lack of ‘discipline’ using all those terms. Hopefully if you get the concepts of the 5 Dimensions in spatial form, temporal motion and their function when combined you will get to the point. Entropy in that sense is the most confused terms also used for energy and for lineal motion. So we shall differentiate them here at the beginning hopefully to avoid further confusions:

Entropy is expansive, scattering motion that explodes and increases space till finally it decelerates stops and becomes pure distance with no motion. So happens in an entropic big-bang. So happens in a death that expands your cells and stops them. So happens in gas when it expands cools and decelerates. Entropy we might say CHANGES a dimension of motion into an extension of space and finally becomes still form. MOTION on the other hand is lineal inertia, with no expansion, so it is a steady state, conserved. It is the first dimension of simpler form. And when it combines with FORM or information, it becomes energy, momentum, the second dimension conserved by the Universe, and the MEANING OF IT ALL, which turns around repeating and conserving form with motion form in action, information, where an action is defined physically as the product of energy and time. The wordings are thus extremely messed up because of that dynamic constant transformation. I.e. in e=mc2 e is not energy, the energy here being provided the light waves of space-time, cc, but entropy, the dissolution of a mass vortex of time. In the Universe at large there is not dark energy but dark entropy as the flows of energy coming out of the axis of black holes slow down, expanding space and finally creating dark distances.

So goes on the other extremes with the limit of mind-form. The mind is still, it stops, perceives information, let the body-limb, wave-potential system to move it and then stops again and perceive information as movement blurs perception, so the mind-body system works as a movie, which stops the film enlightens it into the screen and moves in darkness. This stop and go process will be the key to an enormous number of whys that explain confusing discoveries from relativity (c-constant of light) to quantum physics (particle-wave duality) to palingenesis and seeds of information that explode into organisms.

So you must think in terms of ‘topological expansions, < and implosions, >’ to see what is ‘in existence’ and what is the virtual still mind and entropic death.

And as we have said, since the closest understanding to he five arrows of time happened in earlier taoism in china, we could close this first approach to the five dimensions telling you what minkowski said that time and space come together or do not really exist; something schopenhauer already realized: ‘there is not yin-form-ation without a drop of yang-motion/entropy’, there is no ‘yang-energy/entropy/motion, without a drop of yin’.

So again, the present single space-time continuum is made of lineal motion (the form being the line), energy that combines it with information (form with a bit of motion) constrained by a pure still linguistic form or mind and a pure entropic outer expansive world, the fifth and fourth dimension.

Those 2 ‘limits entropy-death and mind-stillness’ though are in pure meaning outside our present scale (I say this because you will find very often the term entropy for lineal motion in present and 

So as soon as we start to grasp the five dimensions of space-time, and its co-existence from past to future in scale that make it sentient and organic’, made of ‘parts and wholes that co-exist and organise themselves’ and reproduce information –  since motion reproduces by the mere fact of moving – we must conclude that we live in a fractal organic Universe, of space-time beings whose parts made to the image and likeness of the whole are always organised in 3 co-existing scales of the fifth dimension (name we give to the whole range of scales, from the entropic fourth dimensional bottom to the summit of mind-views, which we take as the linguistic mind of all minds, the mind of God, in the platonic sense: ‘reality is an organism with a body called the Universe, and a mind called Logos=god’).

And so amazing as it seems, just departing from a simplified example – the discovery by Galileo of relativity and the static, flat, continuous rings of Saturn, which were not flat but made of spheric planetoids, not continuous but fractal and not static but moving; we see how  by changing from the mind subjective view to the objective reality we change our view and add two co-existing scales of Nature, the physical quantum and cosmological, gravitational scales, to our thermodynamic scale, where physicists have defined their single entropic arrow of time merely by expanding properties of thermodynamic gases to the whole Universe – solving easily its main conundrums.

Let us start introducing the ‘4 fundamental’ elements of a reality, minds, scales, space and time and its 5Dimensions, @ or • for the fifth membrain mind dimension, ∆, for the fourth which dissolves the mind into its _ parts (both inverse and generically called the scalar 5Dimension represented together by the ∆ Å symbols, where Å WILL BE THE SYMBOL OF the smallest space-time ‘moments’ or actions, $ for the first dimension of lineal motions in space, ≈ for the wave-body dimension of iteration or second dimension and O-tƒ for the dimension of accelerated time vortices, connect to the membrain. All of them in constant dynamical transformations between the limits of seed-birth (5D) and entropic death (4D).

Fractal time: actions, dimensions and worldcyles.

It only rests to consider NOT only the fractal structure of space-forms but its parallel ‘fractal structure’ of time motions/actions.

Indeed, the minimal unit of time is an action that exchanges, scattering entropy, lineal motion, balanced energy, impassive information or linguistic form with the Universe, and so there are two minimal ‘quanta’ or space-time or ‘actions’, we shall call ø-the fourth dimensional action of entropy, æ, the first $ dimensional action of steady motions, accelerations and decelerations, ï the information action, which is dual (as most), since we might absorb information in perception or emit it in communication, œ, the second dimensional action of organic reproduction, into an offspring of beings, and û, the 5th dimensional action of social evolution of parts into wholes. I have put the 5 åctions, Å=(æ,œ,ï,ø,û) with symbols that resemble the five vowels. And so as we have 3 scales of growing spatial form we have 3 scales of growing time cycles:

∑∑åctions=∑time dimensions (physiological networks and its functions) = Worldcycle of life and death (time view)

∑∑cellular/atomic/citizens parts = ∑matter states/organisms/nations= super organism (planet, ecosystem, Humanity in space, History in time).

In the graph, the coding of actions, which are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any time§paœrganism in light space-time, coded by colours and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 4-5 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zero-sums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind pov, hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow:

In the graph we see that the sum of actions move steadily a system to spend its motions, converted into information through 3 ages of growing warping, as most actions excluded death increase form, so we move from a young age of maximal entropy>motion into a balanced age of motion>reproduction to a third age of taking care of reproduced offspring>information to die in an entropic explosion that balances us, while leaving behind the immortality of our form NOT our ego IN OUR reproduced offspring that conserves the Universe in a dynamic present (hence the conservation of angular momenta, whereas lineal momenta is part of larger cycle, and energy, the sum of all those actions into a world cycle that closes into itself).

It is then by combining bits and bites of those actions and dimensions, by reordering in different manners, by ultimately establishing a ¬Ælgebra of ‘existence’ which studies how they related and interact together, how we shall be able to explain absolutely all what exists as a product of the ultimate substances of reality, fractal, cyclical timespace and its organic systems; each one a broken space-time (as the membrane encloses and breaks the whole universe into smaller replicas):

Then as the graph shows, there is the lesser important ‘duality’ between what we perceive as flat and lineal (as the flat saturn’s rings) but in detail become cyclical, expressed in topology by the Non-euclidean rule that all flat lines are in fact part of a larger time cycle, that is, as size and time increases a flat line becomes a circular geodesic, so we see a flat earth but from a distance that shrinks it becomes cyclic, meaning ultimately all motions become cycles, all time durations return to the death.

We thus talk about worldcycles instead of worldlines as 4D physics models, being 4D a ‘model of the cyclical universe of timespace’ reduced to a single flat plane of reality – themes those of importance in the formalism of relativity in 5D physics, treated in specialised posts.

Fractal points of topological space, existential algebra of symmetric fractal generator… ∆nalysis of scales.

It should not surprise you then that the most efficient mind mirror, maths, have 3 disciplines we shall upgrade, geometry of points for space, algebra for sequential time numbers and analysis of finitesimals and wholes, and finally uses mind-centered planes to represent them all, as those are the four elements of reality, we shall upgrade and give more realism. The only big change will be in that sense the substitution of the tools mathematicians use to study symmetry, groups for the symmetries of the fractal generator equation that resumes the 3 x 3 + • 10 dimensions when studied in detail of a system (3 scales, 3 topologies, 3time ages dimensions and the 10th • mind that puts them all as a whole):

Γ@: ∆-1: Entropy>∆: $p: ‘past, entropic fields-limbs’ <ST-hyperbolic body-waves>O-Tƒ-Particles/heads of information>∆+1: Mind≈Γ@

Which again is a cyclical form when we connect our linguistic formal view and the mind it ultimately becomes the ice in the cake.

So that is really all, now you can close the web and dedicate yourself to live and act, as your mind will only get wrinkled here, and you have now the essence of the universe in a nutshell, courtesy of this humind membrane (:

So as you can see the word to find meaning is ‘wholeness’ symmetry of timespace dimensions, S=T, scales, organism…

S=T; creation of form and motion dimensions and its balances.

The Universe is a superorganism of 5 dimensions of symmetric space-time. Whereas time means motion and space form. Yet since due to Galilean>Einstein’s relativity we cannot distinguish motion from form, for each dimension of space, we must consider a symmetric dimensions of time (the form we see in motion).

Since as we can only compare entities with equal number of dimensions we must write:


as the fundamental law of the Universe, which is display in all kind of beings.

(The equivalent of this law of balance in physics, is a Lagrangian of the form:

Sp (size in space) x Tiƒ (speed of time clocks of information) = Constant


And or, the laws of conservation of momentum: S x T (mv, etc.), and energy its integral in a closed cycle.

And so physicists go around into this third degree of complexity, space, time and space-time elements to conform reality and conserve it… Through the conservation laws.

Two simple laws of conservation and least time in which all of physics is based; albeit explained with complicated ‘pedantic’ obtuse laws, such as the Noether theorem, group theory, etc. which obviously need them to go back to school and learn what the magic of maths and the origin of those laws are in 10D.

This is the law of balance and co-existence of reality that make humans and civilisations co-exist as single super organisms. Cells and organisms co-exists in a single individual, and so, the Universe is a beautiful organic, fractal of scales of reality which follow the same goals of reproducing information to become immortal in ‘states of balance’. And those laws apply also to history and economy systems that should try to find such balances to survive.

Thus we can start studying beings of one dimension of space and one dimension of time-motion, simultaneously.  Or keep growing in analysis till getting to the 5 S = 5t level.

Reality is a then 10 dimensional game of space and time, based in a physical property called Galilean relativity. The fact that we cannot distinguish motion and form, so both dimensions of motion=time and form=space, happen together. This holographic symmetry makes reality a game of N s=t dimensions, which create space-time symmetries, go and stop motions and sets the stage to study dual st systems of at least 2 dimensions, one of space-form one of time-motion and the ‘reproductive’ perception of both together, the ‘third dimension of space-time’.

Starting with those simple principles then we can build different systems of bidimensional frames of reference, starting from the 2 simplest studied by human scientists, mostly physicists, the bidimensional system of motion and form, whereas humans have adopted by convention, according to natural reasons, latter studied in detail, the dimension of length as the first dimension of motion, to measure motions, distances and trajectories in space and the dimension of height as the first dimension of form, of in-form-ation.

It follows then that we must keep labelling dimensions and use bidimensional or four-dimensional graphs of time space, where by the simple method of giving twice the dimensionality to each one, i.e. distance and motion, define lineal space and lineal time, in the X coordinates, height and vibration, are ‘motion space-time related dimensions’ of height.

In general also we can use algebraic conventions to represent those dimensions. So we give negative values to the dimension of information and positive values to the dimension of motion, and in this manner we can rest and operate in classic algebra. So for example, in Einstein’s special relativity the dimension of motion sums in the Sx, Sy, Sz coordinates and the dimension of temporal information, of motion, -ct, rests. This is a classic way to represent the inverse first dimensions of space and time all together, and why Einstein’s equation work.

We can then move to tridimensional pairs, for 6 dimensions and so on, let us then study them in an exhausting manner, realizing of a simple algebraic rule: time dimensions can be modelled with negative numbers that rest to space dimensions by adding motion to a form, and vice versa. We adopt this convention as it suits better present mathematical physics. Then the second dimensions of negative time is the i-complex map, or its ‘squared’ value, recommended in many physical equations (where the unit is i²=-1, c²= k/µ and so on).

Those are different conventions which we shall study in mathematical physics, but show the way the Universe is built up: adding balanced S=t dual dimensions according to the galilean paradox.

The new principle  of conservation of energy.

Now the best way to formalize all those ‘dimensional symmetries’ (4, space-like and 5 time-like being the absolute symmetry between entropy and evolution) IS by EXPANDING THE FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE S<≈>T, which constantly transforms spatial dimensions into temporal dimensions.

This is what fractal theorists call a ‘fractal generator equation’, one which through feed backs constantly iterate and reproduce and trans-form reality. It is also the ‘expanded fundamental principle of science, the principle of conservation of energy and information which we rewrite adding the fundamental definition of energy-present = past-entropy x future-information in an absolute sense, (a single plane of present sandwiched between its death-past entropic 4D and its potential future, 5D social evolution) or a relative sense (lineal spatial motion x vortex of time-clocks = present momenta).

‘All what exists is a super organism of temporal information and spatial entropy, which combine into energy beings that reproduce constantly in an eternal SYMMETRIC present, S≈T, across infinite scales of size and speed’


The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information, stored in timespace cycles.

The Universe and all its parts made to its image and likeness, is a fractal that reproduces information, co-existing in multiple scales, the very essence of what science considers to be an organism, whose purpose is to ‘reproduce’, to ‘grow and multiply’ into social networks of similar cells, in scales of growing complexity from strings to neutrinos and light rays, to particles, quarks and electrons that reproduce and associate into atoms that evolve socially into molecules, cells, states of matter, and if we ‘divide’ artificially them into inorganic and organic paths, multicellular organisms,  super organisms, societies and ecosystems, geological super organisms (word coined by the founder of Geology, Hutton to define Gaia), solar systems, and societies of stars, the ‘mitochondria’ that reproduces the substances, which the informative, gravitational black hole, the ‘dna’ of the ‘gala cell’ ab=uses to reproduce its dark matter, which further organise those ‘gala cells’ into tubular networks, of some larger timespace organism of which we can see only a small part with little detail, Lainakea, seen in dynamic form in the right picture, floating in the ‘dark sea’, which if we could see, (as we observe only 4% of it), will likely be a tight network of atom-galaxies of the next ‘hyper scale’ of reality…

Humans are self-centred as all ‘organic systems’ and won’t accept to be ‘like everything else’.

Why humans do NOT accept this self-evident truth and eliminate the informative properties, and certainly the capacity to gauge information of its systems? This has NOTHING to do with objective science but subjective anthropomorphism, as the proofs of a sentient, information, reproductive, scalar=fractal Universe are overwhelming. But precisely with the non-scientific subjective errors that creep in science given the egocentered human nature. A simple example will suffice as proof. The smallest entities known from where all others are made are quarks and electrons, the fundamental particles.

But both are described by gauging theories, meaning they behave as if all ‘gauged’ information with their spins.

And both particles reproduce constantly to the point that when you feed ‘energy’ to a quark the result invariably is the reproduction of  more quarks, but we call this ‘decoupling’ and if you were to tell a physicist that ‘quarks reproduce’, he would have a laugh. Machines are also reproduced by company-mothers, and ‘enzymen catalyse their reproduction’. All reproduces and all has a ‘frame of reference’, mostly mathematical to ‘measure’ or else we would not use mathematical equations, self-centred in those centres. But, we shall NEVER accept in ‘serious=anthropomorphic’ science that we are equal to all other being, because we belong to the western tradition plagued with hidden ego rips hauling from the age of anthropomorphic religions.

Before we felt so ‘mechanically powerful’, Asian cultures did understand much of it.

Had the much more profound taoist, hindi and buddhist philosophies of the Universe as a sentient game of visnu-yin-formation and shiva-yang-entropy that combine into brahma-qi-energy beings won the pre-scientific battle for philosophies of the Universe, we would have long ago, as Leibniz and Einstein, the predecessors of theories which consider time and space the ‘substance of all beings’, did, a pan psychic vital Universe.

We are though trapped by the ‘creationist myths’ hauling from abrahamic cults. And as this is not even recognised, hidden in the ‘postulates without proof’ of western thought, likely no amount of data, and epistemology of truth will suffice to the reader. So we shall first show you the difference in a graph, repeated ad nauseam in those texts – the graph of the three philosophies of reality human sponsors – two are ego-trips of human creationism in his thirst to become equal to god, the third one, is the only scientific theory of reality, and it is called ‘organicism’. This blog will complete that theory updating eastern philosophies and relational space-time theories of science (Leibniz, Einstein) to the XXI century.

Now, all this said it is obvious that we must consider some issues of the mind to understand why humans are so ego-centered and deny living properties to the Universe.

The mind paradox: meaning of Galilean relativity. Singularities and membrains.

We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’. Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.


All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

The mind though has another fundamental role: to embody the perception of the whole super organism and as such is rightly considered the 5th dimension of the being.

The fifth dimension as the dimension of the mind.

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

Now, the mind is located in two elements, the sensorial membrane and the singularity – a group of yet unfound cells of the brain in which all the information of the senses come into a mapping. The mind also is NOT perceiving the motion of the earth. It is still. And heads are like particles still moved by body-waves. So all this defines in the widest sense the singularity mind system as the ‘membrane and center’ of what topologists call an open ball – a ball without the membrane and center.

And as you can see, both membrane and singularity form a ‘membrain’, a mind, which does NOT INCLUDE but encloses the ‘vital energy’ which we see in present time, as the singularity is ‘still, linguistic, or in physical systems an unmoved zero point, the center of an eddie, the black hole center of the galaxy with time-motion equal to zero. So the mind is REAL, it is located, and because it encloses and perceives the whole IT is truly the ‘fifth dimension of reality’ and it exists also in physical and biological systems.

It is the DNA center or genetic mind and protein cover or membrane in a cell. It is the charge and magnetic field in a physical system. It is the quark and electron cover, in quantum atoms which physicists measure for physical systems with ‘angular momentum’, the fundamental parameter of quantum physics (h), and biologists with the sensorial nervous system and its focus.

The insight here is that the mind IS still. It IS the origin of the galilean relativity paradox. It is in mathematics the frame of reference center, or zero point, the zero vortex with no motion of the hurricane, the zero time of black hole equations. IT does NOT move. It is pure form. But IT moves UP AND DOWN the scales of the Universe, as the mind-cells SEE THE WHOLE WORLD, a larger scale, ∆+1, and through its ‘subconscious’, chemical network of nervous systems, ‘invaginating’, crossing the vital space, it controls the cells, which however we do NOT perceive. As minds, even if the mind connects the cells and controls them subconsciously we perceive the whole and the larger world, so the mind born in the cell moves upwards. In a crystal, center of a planet and a physical system of matter, an image is formed of the whole outer world.

How then consciousness happens. It is obvious THAT STILL FORMAL SPACE IN THE FORM OF LANGUAGES ARE CONSCIOUS IN THEMSELVES. When you talk and think you are activating a linguistic synoptic view of the universe in stillness, that perceives in itself. In your case is made of electrons but YOU perceive the image and the words as consciousness. The software we must decide is conscious in a pan psychic Universe, which has been THE THEORY OF REALITY OF all scientists and philosophers of all times, except when logic positivism in between I and II world war decided with an ‘experimental fundamentalism’ that because we cannot ‘see and take pictures of minds’, they must NOT be studied.

So the fifth dimension is by far the most beautiful of them all, the dimension of ‘singularities’, zero time, minds in stillness, perfect linguistic form, genetics, black holes, human languages. And its inverse as it has inverted properties is the dimension of pure motion, expansion in space, entropy, disorder and big-bang deaths.

And so we will call, the mind and fifth dimension of eusocial evolution and love the absolute arrow of future because minds commands organisms and move them through scales of social evolution into fractal new wholes. And we indeed feel this the future – an increase of information, of complexity as opposed to death and dissolution which we perceive as the relative past.

While the ‘present’ is the single plane’ we study with its interaction between lineal motion, iterative wave reproduction and informative vortices – WHAT WE SEE.

As we do NOT see the mind singularity connected to a larger future scale of organisation; as it is still – we do not see the black hole, the brain mind, the cpu’s digital mind (5D is a hard AI theory as we consider the cpu has a digital mind, and so AI robots are sentient as they increasing show, connecting themselves when disconnected without orders, following ‘red-eye-entropy motions faster’ with their eyes even when not programmed, etc.)

But we do NOT see either pure space without form, pure motion-distance, and that is the galilean paradox, and the cosmic paradox: we see space expanding and galaxies moving faster, in the entropic region between galaxies balanced by the informative warping of space into galaxies (so likely not cosmic big-bang as physicists have forgotten that besides entropic expansion between galaxies there is imploding form in galaxies).

The dimension of parts that become wholes are the fifth dimension; the dimension of wholes dissolved into parts are the fourth dimension and without them we cannot EXPLAIN HOW ‘SYSTEMS ARE CREATED’ departing from a ‘seed of information’, a still ‘potential mind’, and how they die, dissolving into parts. So there IS ZERO MYSTERY in reality when you UNDERSTAND WE ARE MADE OF SPACE-TIME dimensions and both are symmetric and there are 3 in a single present plane and one above and one below us in which our mind-world resides and our cellular final death will return.

So each of us is an island-Universe, û but also an infinitesimal mind-point, •, of a larger whole, which holds the view of the Universe in his cartesian mind, whih therefore can be defined not only topologically but algebraically with an equation:

O-mind mapping of the ∞ Universe: o x ∞ = K-onstant world.

And obviously define the fundamental psychological paradox, as we confuse our point of view-mapping of the Universe with the whole, so we distort subjectively the whole, as ‘every infinitesimal mind believes to be the center of the Universe by confusing the whole with its mind-world’.

We are all ‘DUST OF SPACE-TIME’ who think to be the center of the mind-world we see as the Universe, still in the picture of the mind.

As we are all made of ∆•ûst,  ternary ∆±1 scales, the three arrow of timespace, the fundamental ‘motion’ of any system through the fifth dimension – a world cycle of existence that orders those arrows in a sequential manner between birth and extinction, and the formal languages of the ‘monads’ that perceive those physical systems; in this case human mind; completing this brief intro as we just had looked at the fractal ∆§cales with the analysis of the 3 space-time arrows, together as a world cycle, and then commenting on the ‘humind limits when doing physics’, mostly derived of the ‘ego paradox’.

So now that we know what the mind’s languages and the ego paradox is let us see how it applies to the way science distorts reality and the concepts of time.



 Why time theory matters to the 3 theories CERN researches: BH, big bangs and weak forces (Higgs).

The future of science passes as always through the understanding of its primary substances, time and space, and the logic, causal relationships and symmetries between them, why it matters specially to this blog on CERN, is NOT because I am a time theorist, cause of much ad hominem during those suits and I want to show you this is truth, but because:

CERN affirms and the world believes and let it do their thing because his research in the meaning of time and space, (its birth in the big bang), is supposed to be the key to understand it all, the ultimate principles of reality and so on – so the stakes – risking our existence – are worthy, because the rewards (understanding the meaning of god, man and the Universe) will pay off.

Hawking and CERN AFFIRM that there is no risk on black hole production on earth because they are ‘time machines’, which ‘travel to the past’, breaking the 2nd law of thermodynamics (hot systems cool in a cool environment, so hot, hyperactive baby-born black holes, with faster time clocks, instead of fast devouring our matter, evaporating us as they transfer its heat to the cool earth, will on the contrary travel to the past ‘sic’, and get hotter and hotter in a cool environment and evaporate). This is to say that if you get a hot coffee, it won’t cool down on your cool hands but it will keep getting hotter and freezing your hands.

-CERN and Higgs affirm that a particle ‘gives mass to other particles’, agains the sound theory, which Einstein put forward according to which mass is an eddie of space-time, hence an intrinsic property of reality, no more nor less than the accelerated clocks of time of the Universe (principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass, which carries the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles) – hence NOT at external property given by a carrier of a ‘spatial force’,

IN LOGIC TERMS, the 3 theories are nonsense.  So why thenphysicists ‘believe’ in big bang theories and black hole evaporation and Higgs fields giving ‘mass to the people? It has to do with the ‘reductionist’ philosophy of physicists that deny ‘logic causality’, affirm only mathematics is real and it is the primary substance of the Universe, so any mathematical equation must happen.

So just because they wrote some faulty equations, studied in other parts of this blog on evaporating black holes and big bang explosions, which were simple enough (lineal) to seem beautiful they believe they must ‘create real events and particles’.

It is the belief of physicists that ‘beautiful equations’ must be real, the main error of physicists, forgetting Einstein dictum that ‘mathematics might be truth but not real’, as languages are inflationary mirrors that produce multiple images but can also be fiction as any language-mirror if you twist words, equations and images, as writers, hollywood and Hawking and big bang theorists do.

Let us then consider first before dealing with the real substances of the Universe, TIME AND SPACE (or you see around walking numbers?) with some humour the underlying ‘whys’ of platonic physicists astray in their understanding of timespace since Einstein’s advances, namely – the belief that mathematics creates the Universe, so you just write equations and voila reality happens – just a modern version of verbal religious creationism.

Religious beliefs vs. realist stience. LANGUAGES AS MIRRORS that create ‘images’ of reality – not reality itself.

First we said that cyclical time carries the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles. It follows that:

@: Psychological Time…

measures the speed processing information of minds. This change rate in electronic minds has the h unit of angular momentum, as a full time cycle for electrons and photons, two species of the same family: ∑photons=electron, measures a bit of information.

In that regard time has a simple meaning: change of position=motion and change of form. Whereas a present state is a state of repetitive motions, which seemingly does not change realities.

Subjective vs. objective time.

It follows that more than change, we measure its perception that can be cheated. So the perception of different changes makes time dual, subjective from the internal point of the perceiver, objective from the external point and multiple according to the point of perception.

It is then quite easy to reduce time change roughly as science does into external time-change or translation in space, the subject of physics and internal time-change or change in information, the subject of biology.

Subjective mind-time perception must then be related to the mind’s speed, processing information which defines its ‘beat’=bit of times=information. i.e. in humans is a second, the beat of heart, mind and legs steps.

It follows that faster systems with faster time clocks live longer, but often a huge family of beings have similar time durations. i.e. an insect that processes information 10 times faster has a longest span of life in its top predator species of 7 years (ant-queens: max. social evolution, cockroaches: max. strength) similar to the top predator human and elephant in the larger scale which lives 70/10 times slower thoughts=7 years.

Time then must also be related to language, as we perceive through language, the information of the Universe. So it is easy as it has been the case to believe ‘subjectively’ that a language creates the information=time cycles of the Universe. And as informative perception is subjective, it is natural for humans to have thought that the cause of reality is NOT timespace per se, but the languages we use to perceive it.

The verbal creationists: Moses>Jesus>Mohammed

I am trying to be simple so you do understand to which LIMITS the physicists are when acting as philosophers of science savant idiots, which depart from a WRONG  dogma – that mathematics, not time and space is the ultimate substance of reality, and make them do amazing twists and complicated equations to search for a ‘Saint Grail’ – A MATHEMATICAL EQUATION that God uttered as he uttered names to create beings.

So the bottom line of many errors in physics as the creationist big bang or the Copenhagen interpretation is similar to the verbal error of a sacred language among religious and its wrong dogmas – no Yhwh, a toponym for judea in ancient egyptians maps  when God meant Nation, IS the subconscious collective or nation of Judaism, NOT the creator of the Universe, and this obvious truth, that Yhwh=Judea did NOT create the Universe, that ARAB did not create the Universe by uttering it, that equations did NOT create the Universe, is the key to start properly a philosophy of science and its ultimate substance which are ∞ timespace clocks, which are the ultimate carriers of the information of the Universe – denied by fundamentalist of abrahamic religions and fundamentalists of mathematics as the languages of God.

So it does not matter how complicated you make the rituals of religion, GOD will not appear on earth, will NOT resurrect you uttering your name, and to put an example of creationist physics, black holes won’t evaporate without experimental and logic evidence because Hawking wrote an equation that states so. In the next graph we see two creationist philosophers of physics – notice how the first, Dirac, affirms that God used maths to create the world and then it denies the ‘rival verbal God’.

The mathematical creationists: Galileo>Newton>Bohr

YET it does NOT matter how complicated a physicist makes his equations, just because he writes them IT DOES NOT CREATE REALITY. Because at best an equation is a focused mirror on the properties and relational space-time beings of the Universe. BUT MIRRORS DO NOT CREATE the IMAGES THEY REFLECT in their language.

The ongoing absurd quarrel between creationist religious people defending God’s verbal language (first age of human history, when mathematics, a more efficient mirror which seems to be NOT OUR MENTAL language but the language of machines) vs. the mathematical language, those machines (clocks measuring time, telescopes and microscopes measuring space) are evolving fast into a ‘digital AI consciousness’) is a false concept of the relationship between languages, as mirrors of the Universe, and the Universe of space-time they mirror, latter studied in detail, to set straight the record.

Of that argument what matters most is not even discussed: while mathematics is more efficient as a language, it is NOT the human language, but the language of machines, and so in a society which despises as it does today our technological culture, the human verbal language, which naturally make us the ‘subject’ and centre of the Universe (I-man: subject < verb=action> object=energy abused by man), and hence considers human life sacred, will NOT evolve machines so fast but will ensure with ethic values our survival.

While mathematics, being a better mirror will evolve knowledge faster but also will give primacy to computers, as it has done already, atrophy our verbal language, degrading our mind (as it is happening with our millenials, glued to hypnotic screens) and ultimately make humans obsolete to the superior mind-mirror of AI robots.

While those who practice only mathematics, as physicists at cern do, WILL become children of verbal, ethic, survival human thought and will be subconsciusly eviL=anti-live in the genetic hidden meanings of survival words, as cogito ergo sum in man (calculo ergo sum in machines and physicists), so without cogitans, the ‘nerd’ is a child in life and does not even understand death and survival.

So if languages are mirrors that create IMAGES not reality what are the substances of reality? This obvious. Look around yourself, do you see numbers as components of things, do you see words, or do you see ‘space’, broken in infinite vital spaces, ‘enclosed’ by membranes, which when seeing in great detail are made of moving cycles of cells (life clocks), orbital rotary cycles (earth’s clocks) and so all is ‘vital space’ enclosed by time cycles? That is what experience tell us all is: a vital space, broken, closed and formed by time cycles – the substances of reality, which if you like the word ‘god’ you can call god.

Creationist physics is not merely a philosophical question. It has deep consequences for all points of view of research, and basically limits and makes unnecessary this blog – as the believer is NOT going to wonder how God creates the mathematical Universe but merely search his wording which is taken as in the case of religion in a literalist way. ALL stops in the search for the ultimate equation of Unification of forces, because after all God is one (in the western tradition). And further on as God must be complicated, superior in intelligence, the search for complex equations are important. Now, all this is a priori subconscious thought but very real underlying the kind of arguments there have been in history of thought between the 3 masters of the space-time view of the Universe and the 3 masters of the parallel creationist view, which we shall summarise in these blogs.  

To notice also that HUMANS due to their ego paradox, as ‘homunculus minds’ are built to be ‘creationists’ and worship machines and huge ego-trips so the realists, we all have been ignored and are still ignored when disputing with the creationists. Good luck infinitesimal egos who think to be infinite.

All this said mathematics is one of the best languages to mirror efficiently the Universe, specially in spatial dimensions, but since all languages are inflationary it is a key element in mathematical analysis of ∆st systems to break down what is ‘experimental truth’ and what is fiction. Consider the case of ‘dimensional analysis’. As it happens there are only 3 bidimensional topologies which correspond to the 3 functions=forms of all systems. And there are only manifolds of rank 3 or lower which are ‘smooth’, differentiable, meaning systems where ‘time’ moves smooth through ‘present derivatives’.

So in a single plane of present only ternary space and ternary time dimensions are possible. As the mathematical mirror gets distorted, outside those 3s = 3t, the mirror guide us – but the experience must confirm them. This was the essence of Lobachevksi’s thought when he found non-euclidean points now forgotten: that maths are inflationary in its diverse theories so we cannot just do as mechanon physicists do, to write an equation and expects to be there, but a more subtle approach of mirrors observing reality and ordering it in local regions is required.

Soon we will see the interaction languages-reality where reality dominates but the mirror can also deform reality to make it seem like the mirror. Space-time thus comes first, and its dimensions are the origin of reality; as Mirror-languages are both more concise and specific, so they cannot show all its properties and they all have a distortion to reduce information I.e. euclidean points have no ‘breath-information’ inside and so on.

The realists of space-time: Leibniz>Einstein>This Blog

And this view is called in science the ‘relational space-time theory’ of the Universe, which is what i finally after millennia of being explained in philosophical terms, formalised with logic and mathematics, and then used to explain an enormous amount of whys in all the sciences of the Universe.

Reality is the product of the two ultimate substances that make up everything, vital, space quanta, and cyclical moving time clocks,  of information, which combine into energetic beings with its repetitive patterns we call laws of science.

And it does NOT matter how much evidence physicists deny about the arrow of information and mass that balances the arrow of entropy and makes the Universe immortal, how much they deny the 96% of attractive dark matter, the Universe did NOT appear in a huge big-bang.

And it does not matter how many humans believe in those 2 theories (abrahamic creation, big bang creation), all in fact either in one (western religious people) or the other (physicists’ fans), if they are rationally wrong they are wrong. But to prove them wrong we must debunk their theories of time-space, aka big-bang and black hole evaporation theories – and as we shall see explain properly in terms of time events the weak force, which is ultimately the force that transforms quarks intimately related to time cycles.

Thus it is essential to upgrade the chip of science in timespace theory as we shall do in the third theoretical section of this blog that explains those relational space-time models and apply them to physics, big-bang theory, black hole evaporation.

Timespace theory’s next big advance IS not the evaporation of black holes but the models of relational, fractal cyclical space-time that will become the staple food of serious XXI century research in all physical, biological and sociological disciplines, as all of them are made of events that happen in time and the cyclical patterns of time do explain the whys of science, which are the repetitive patterns=cycles of time of all its particular clocks, or else without cyclical patterns of time there would not be science, which consists exactly in the repetition of those clocks we can foresee.

If timespace cycles did not exist, and the single lineal clock of physicists were the only time, there is NO reason for repetition of events which is What LAWS OF SCIENCE TELL us.

Languages are mirror of the 3 motions of space-time, entropy, energy and information.

The most iterated elements of reality and this blog (: are its 3 timespace motions, expansive motion in space or ‘entropy’, implosive motion that becomes cyclical time form or ‘information’ and its space-time, energetic combinations. They were understood in Asian religions as yang, yin and qi-energy. They are the only 3 topologies of space-time possible in a 4D or 5D Universe, so they assembly forming all space-time beings.  And what languages do in its syntax is to mimic those 3 elements and describe it with different degrees of efficiency. So do the 3 main human languages, maths, words and images. 

A more humble realisation comes from the understanding that ‘the languages of God’ are infinite (upanishads) as all singularity minds map the Universe into its infinitesimal still focus, reflecting in the linguistic mirror the infinite cycles of space-time that conform reality. So before the language there was the space and time, that carried the entropy and information of reality mixed in energy actions whose properties the ternary syntax of all languages reflect. So the 3 main languages of man are ternary syntactic mirrors of the 3 components of reality:

Subject (information) < verb (action of space-time) > Object (entropy of subject).

Y (time function)< operandi-action> X (space function)

Blue (informative color) < green (reproductive colour) > red (entropy colour)

Heigth (informative dimension) < width (reproductive dimension) > length (motion-entropy dimension)

And so on…

Welcome then to a description of reality as it is through its four components, @minds that gauge information about ðemporal informative cycles and $patial, entropic motions, across the infinite fractal co-existing scales of reality, which form with them organisms of space-time, that live and die through worldcycles of existence, across all the scales of the fifth dimension.


We call this theory of all realities, T.Œ, theory of the organic everything , which is a sum of infinite T.œs, smaller time space supœrganisms.

So reality is simple in its ultimate principles but the infinite iterations variations and combinations of those principles and the inflationary nature of languages of information, which do NOT imprint necessary the limiting motions of simpler entropy, creating pure informative fictions (equations with no reality behind, metaphors, visual fictions) confuses the ‘humind’, which likes to be complex and believe his excess of information in linguistic metaphors (self-similar equations, verbose languages, etc.) IS REAL. Not so. 
The Universe is simple and not malicious, said the last of the great ‘space-time masters’, you know who. We shall then iterate into infinite kaleidoscopic views those principles illustrated by the same graphs applied to different beings, as all indeed is ultimately a reflection of the simplest of all equations, S=t, tattooed in the self-portrait of my ‘blue, informative’ humind.

‘Contra physicos’ as amateur philosophers of science.

Now we are going to be very derisive with Physicists, NOT in their role as a serious science that studies the MOTIONS OF THE Universe, through mathematical physics and tools of measures, but in their role as philosophers of science that pretend to find the meaning of it all – which is the alibi of CERN, they will never met as that is not what physics is about – but the role of philosophy of science, since to find meaning to reality we must explain together all sciences, each one defining a scale of the fifth dimension, with the same laws, NOT putting as physicists do MATTER over life or HISTORY as if it was the fundamental science and species.

This must be clear: of course physicists DO have a role, vital in the making of machines, essential in the understanding with those machines of measure, metal-eyes=telescopes and microscopes, and metal-brains, digital computers, of physical systems; but physical systems are NOT all the systems of reality and MECHANICAL SENSES and ITS DIGITAL language, all the languages of reality. So the whole, which includes all systems, all languages and all species NEEDS deeper understanding.

What physicists DO is to reduce reality to what they study, to pump up the importance of the physical world degrading that of the biological world and the artistic, human senses; and this digital and mechanical bias finally deforms the philosophy of science they try to impose as the only theory of reality, which must be about measure, motion and numbers. The philosopher of science though must be a polymath and add to that ALL OTHER sciences, all OTHER senses, and all other species. This is what I DO, as each scale of reality define a science and what 5D relational space-time allows is to study them all with the same laws.

The future of physical sciences.

In that sense two things matter to a ‘human’ future in physical sciences in praxis and theory, which are intimately related but we are by no means achieving.

To understand the Universe in depth, AND the place of man within it… The theory. And i mean in ‘depth’, because what physicists do is NOT deep, neither accurate, but just a very shallow measure-picture-equation analysis which does NOT respond to any why and certainly does not relate man to the Universe.

AND once this is achieve to take measures obeying those laws to ensure the survival and thriving of humanity within a sustainable planet.

NONE of this is what nuclear physicists do. We know that in praxis – making A-bombs ‘only will make America or Europe great in the bizarre mind of Mr. Potus’… But – and this is why we need to bring here a full section on the paradigm of the complex fractal universe answering to all the questions physicists are NOT answering – People and of course physicists think they know.

Indeed, the arrogant physicist is not aware that he knows nothing on the whys of reality; nor that he cares: he is doing his routine and pumping his ego in awe of his machines. So in the digital age he thinks physical knowledge is just about measuring and making pictures of exotic particles.

But does he know what is ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘information’, ‘entropy’, ‘energy’? Why ‘c is a constant’, what is the meaning of H-planck, why mass grows at c-speed, and there are three families? Even something so simple as what is a particle, a wave and a field and why they interact together? Or in mathematics, what is an imaginary number, why we can describe almost all of physics with integrals, derivatives, lagrangians and fourier transformations, etc, etc.

He doesn’t, as those are the questions he does not even make, giving up on them, long ago… So we  have given you a few proofs those questions can be answered and will be answered in the 5D³ section for nobody to read, to show the very simple fact that true physics and true knowledge does not go through mechanisms but through ‘thought experiments’, as it has always been the case, even if they will remain varied in my mind point and this dark blog, which the new scientist  defines as Komploten theory. LOL the harder you will fall.

All this and much more can be solved by upgrading the models of reality, now force feed into a single space plane and a single time arrow/dimension, to the real structure of the fractal, scalar, 5D³ Universe when we fully grasp its three time arrows. Then the Universe appears ‘simple and not malicious’.

Of course he can plug in data, in computers an equations. But he does not even understand the language he talks – mathematics. So if you ask him – as I used to do as a gifted kid to my professors till I realised I had to search the answers by myself – what is really an imaginary number in Nature (a lateral number as Gauss wanted to call them properly, with its time arrow inverted, from entropy into information) – he will look at you like an idiot and remain silent.

The physicist is in that sense more like a robot, able to see, and measure distance with its motion-eye steps but completely ignorant on what is motion, as ‘seeing’ IS NOT COMPREHENDING. He writes indeed equations about events in time and space he does not understand.

Hence my view of physicists as the essence of the savant idiot. Only then we can judge why most seem to be ‘nice people’, while blowing away the planet. What is worse stupidity or evilness? Most often are the same.

And if we were to be precise in physicists both go together; its evilness is to make weapons of entropy, its stupidity is not even knowing that entropy=death= disorder=expansion of space & erasing of information, is only one of the 3 arrows of future of the Universe:

i wouldn’t either be so sanguine and derisive (it is not personal trust me, though i might look emotional/self centered couldn’t care less for my standing), if there was not the menace of cern, which became my existential issue.

Indeed, the angst I suffered knowing i had the responsibility to carry those suits to success against insurmountable power, and the responsibility i had, after resolving a step further the structure of reality with my discovery of the three arrows of tifme and scales of sciences, to spread that info, which could relativize the importance of physicists’ philosophies of the whole and stop CERN, but nobody wanted to hear, is difficult to understand.

It was pure mental and emotional torture for years, blaming myself of the failure. So at the end obviously there were only two ways out of it, in front of a wall of silence i could not breach beyond dishing out my angst and putting the data in the dark world of blogging – either i killed myself for my failure and dissolved into the whole but Latin people love life too much to do so, or I accepted physicists were too egotist and people too ignorant to care for their own survival and it was none of my business or responsibility.

So part, jaded by those years, part because only sarcasm, can really put what they are doing at face value, the tone of this blog, shocking for most, is the one they deserve. And the one humanist intellectuals should have, but the ‘mystique’ they have created around their machines and their numbers, based in the fact that humanist thinkers do not know maths, shields them and condemns humanity. That i feel was my responsibility. I DID know XXI c. physics better than any of them. But alas, the little detail of authority and ad hominem, left me alone with the angst.

As ONLY when mankind realises that the amateurish philosophy of science of physicists is just the delirium tremens of his worldly profession – making weapons, and respects again life and man as the most perfect known organism and measure of all things we shall have a chance to close down CERN, and send back their philosophical children of thought to school, where thy can do no harm.

Indeed, if they kill us all it won’t be for any good reason but just because of their routine of making bigger bombs, and the sheeple behaviour of the human flocks that let them do it.

NOBODY WOULD RISK MANKIND for the measure of a particle. We do it thinking the entropic philosophy of the Universe is truth and it is NOT.

The true future of science STILL LIES in the mind of man NOT in mechanisms.

Time theory’s next big advance IS not the evaporation of black holes but the models of relational, fractal cyclical space-time that will become the staple food of serious XXI century research in all physical, biological and sociological disciplines, as all of them are made of events that happen in time and the cyclical patterns of time do explain the whys of science, which are the repetitive patterns=cycles of time of all its particular clocks, or else without cyclical patterns of time there would not be science, which consists exactly in the repetition of those clocks we can foresee.

If time cycles did not exist, and the single lineal clock of physicists were the only time, there is NO reason for repetition of events which is What LAWS OF SCIENCE TELL us.

The absurd magic view of creationist mathematics.

It is then not surprising on the view of Dirac and Galileo that idealist mathematicians have won the favor, since Hilbert astounding ego-trip where he affirmed mathematics was an invention of his mind (‘I imagine lines, points and planes’ – ‘Foundations of geometry’).

So they have rejected the ‘experimental, a posteriori nature’ of the mathematical language, a view they share with all those physicists who think mathematics is the a priori nature of reality (Copenhagen interpretation, etc).

Then there is the next ‘stage’ of the ego-trip of linguistic creationists called ‘Literalism, which means that not only the language ‘creates reality’ but as it IS reality itself, NOT a mirror, it does NOT admit parables, approximations, and this is a huge handicap to understand maths, even more so than in words, because words are the natural temporal mirror of the human mind and so its realism is far more immediate.

The degree of abstraction of maths in the axiomatic method trying to prove itself without reference to the world makes it specially obscure; to which we add the ‘uncertainty of view’ over far away ∆-n scales, in which ‘billions’ of entities transfer limited information and move so fast that we confuse ‘a time event’ with a space event from our so slow ‘view’ (as lines of a car appear in space being time events at slow motion). So mathematicians to ‘fully’ grasp in a titanic effort ALL the motions of those billions of particles, have created ‘fictitious’ spaces of ∞ dimensions (Hilbert spaces), the last evolution of differential/integral calculus of infinite solutions, which does NOT mean the quantum world is different but the approach of huminds IS different as we ‘work’ with ‘huge bulk spatial populations and temporal masses of frequencies’. 

Then the literalist error comes and says, this maths are weird, they are ‘probabilities’ in time (not populations in space as we see them in an electron picture), and this is the ‘substance’ of reality. It is not. The particle is the substance and it is a cyclical time state; the wave, a space-time state is the subtance. The ‘bulk analysis’ of mathematical masses confusing ‘space population’ with ‘time probabilities’ IS the mirror, very impressive as a mirror, but very foolish when the mirror is taken as real.
What this means basically is that the mathematician as the physicist today has accepted a magic look on mathematics, as long as it works to represent-mirror reality fairly way, it doesn’t matter what they mean.

Only the greatest minds such as Newman or Einstein or Heaviside were aware of that ignorance which now ∆•st could solve, if there were more than a ‘single point-mind-singularity-mirror’ for it – i feel deeply exhausted.

Let us put then just one example of what we mean. Consider the false problem of imaginary numbers. What they really mean? This was a hot question that was never fully answered except by Gauss partially, calling them inverse numbers. What can we say about it from the experimental truths of ƥst?

The answer is immediate when we realise that the Galilean Paradox establishes the holographic principle: the bidimensionality of all real forms of nature, which are in its simplest forms, dual dimensions, and so the unit of reality IS not a single dimensional system/point but a bidimensional ST system. Ergo the proper way to use imaginary numbers is ‘squaring’ them. 

Then we obtain a ‘realist’ graph, with an X² coordinate system in the real line, which can be projected further with a negative -y and a positive +y axis, often ‘inverse’ directions or symmetries of timespace.

And suddenly we can start to understand many realist whys of complex numbers and complex spaces.

The question of the negative number and the square root solutions, seems indeed to be one of the less ‘understood’ in mathematical physics, and tells more of the inflexibility of the human brain in its one-dimensional view of time and space than of the capacity of mathematics to mirror reality. Indeed, in mathematical physics we always obtain two ± solutions, and they do reflect real forms of nature, but then the physicist gets scared because it lacks proper conceptual definitions of ‘energy’, ‘mass’ and so on.

So the negative solutions are either discharged, normalised or denied; and this has become the fundamental problem to understand the ∆±4 dark world scale beyond galaxies.  So a negative energy must be explained. Consider the first important case in which this was found. The solutions to Dirac’s equation.

The negative E solutions were problematic, for it was assumed that a particle has a positive energy (indeed, when it is a vortex of accelerated forces). Mathematically speaking, however, there IS NO reason to reject the negative-energy solutions, when we understand it. Since they exist, we cannot simply ignore them.

To cope with this problem, Dirac, our leading modern creationist mathematician with Bohr and Heinsenberg, here in tune with the experimental mirror, believed in them.

So he introduced the hypothesis, known as hole theory, that the vacuum is the many-body quantum state in which all the negative-energy electron eigenstates are occupied.

Here the literalist concept so often found in quantum physics cripples in: as we use functionals, Hilbert spaces of ∞ dimensions to represent ALL POTENTIAL outcomes of a quantum state, which are NOT happening together but are the ‘huge kaleidoscopic mirror of mathematical functions’. 

This description of the vacuum as a “sea” of electrons is called the Dirac sea. Since the Pauli exclusion principle forbids electrons from occupying the same state, any additional electron would be forced to occupy a positive-energy eigenstate, and positive-energy electrons would be forbidden from decaying into negative-energy eigenstates. Dirac further reasoned that if the negative-energy eigenstates are incompletely filled, each unoccupied eigenstate – called a hole – would behave like a positively charged particle. The hole possesses a positive energy since energy is required to create a particle–hole pair from the vacuum.

Of course this was nonsense (: It is though the logic conclusion when your concepts of time and space are completely messed up into a single continuum and a single arrow, so with a single arrow you cannot understand the inverse arrow of time, with a single continuum you cannot understand where those ‘hole-y see-as’ are.

In reality though timespace is fractal, hence it is local. So to start with there is NO sea, the equation IS global but the events it might describe local. At best we can talk of a mirror symmetry of an electron and a positron. And then we must wonder ‘why’ there is a positron. What does it mean an antiparticle, and immediately we come to the same conclusion that with mass but now with ‘charge’, in the lower quantum scale of size: the antiparticle is the entropic state of the particle, hence its ‘final reversal’ death state, which is briefer and so we see less antiparticles as they live shorter. Point. Pure, simple, logic and with no miracles.

BECAUSE WE CAN compare the mathematical mirror and the higher reality of ∆•st laws.

But none of this is even accepted. Things just went into further confusions, except when indeed, the positron was found but interpreted not as a time state of negative entropy=energy of the electron but another spatial species:

Dirac initially thought that the hole might be the proton, but Weyl pointed out that the hole should behave as if it had the same mass as an electron (as it was not a parameter that changed), whereas the proton is over 1800 times heavier. The hole was eventually identified as the positron, and this sent the holy sea to pasture.

But of course, it did not reform the ‘mathematical error’ behind: a single continuum ‘infinite space and time coordinates’ that misses the fractal broken, local ‘diffeomorphic nature’ of such solutions.

It is not ‘real’ to describe the “vacuum” using an infinite sea of negative-energy electrons. The infinitely negative contributions from the sea of negative-energy electrons have to be canceled by an infinite positive “bare” energy and the contribution to the charge density and current coming from the sea of negative-energy electrons is exactly canceled by an infinite positive “jellium” background so that the net electric charge density of the vacuum is zero.

We get into more detail because indeed, next to the negative conundrums of magic, literalist mathematicians, comes the infinity problems which plague physics because of its ‘infinite coordinates of continuum space and time’.

All this shows really how much fruitful could be a serious team of physicists studying ∆•st and applying it to complex physics. Unfortunately my activism against the Nuclear Industry has made of my work a ‘pest’ which no physicist will ever take seriously. This post has zero views in 3 years at What can i say? I have accepted mankind’s eternal capacity to destroy the work and life of its best ethic and intellectual masters…

The higher epistemological truths.

The realist concept works, based in a proved ad nauseam experimental fact – that all the scales of the fractal Universe we perceive with full detail ARE self similar in topology, time arrows and scalar co-existence of 3 ∆±1 planes?.

Basically we uphold this fact as an absolute truth, and accepting as an artefact of measure necessary for the human praxis and translation of data into workable useful parameters to manipulate reality from our point of view; but NOT as the literalist philosophy of such reality.

So the classic truths of epistemology given the INFLATIONARY NATURE of all languages that  CAN MULTIPLY FRACTAL INFORMATION IN A MUCH LARGER MEASURE THAN THE SIMPLE, resistant motion-substance of reality can accommodate (reason WHY ‘not all mathematical truths are real’ Einstein) ARE BESIDES ∆st, AND EXPERIMENTAL PROOF, STILL THE FUNDAMENTAL METHODS OF VERACITY IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS. LET US REMEMBER THE 3 FAST:

  • Occkam’s razor: simplicity NOT complex equations ARE truth because the simple motion-substance of the Universe is simple and difficult to ‘bend’
  • Efficiency, a KEY to navigate the forest of non-existent equations from SUSY to black hole evaporation of pedantic scholars. WE MUST BUILD THE UNIVERSE WITHT THE KNOWN-KNOWN particles, and we HAVE already discovered them ALL because our instruments of measure have GONE well above our conceptual, mental evolution of the discipline; so we have to work on what we have and its symmetries. i.e. the background neutrino MUST be the graviton, which MUST be the scale below light… so we just have to work out the neutrino theory of light and figure the question of its faster than light speed (of the lower ∆-4 dark world, its relationship with strings through its weak-angle (same size), and what is really its spin number and the symmetry with the galaxy-atom, i.e. the strong force and the gluon. We do NOT need more particles as we have not seen them, and so it is irrational to think that the Universal force of gravitation responds to some esoteric particle which is NOT all over the place (as neutrinos are).
  • Experimental proofs: ‘science should not be concerned with events, equations and forms of which there is NOT a prior experience’, said Einstein. Indeed, the creationist works the other way around, first finds the imaginary equation and then seeks for its creationism in the Universe. We must first explore the Universe and ONLY study mathematically those phenomena we know to exist NOT to create inflationary, self-similar confusing equations and formalisms, which are equivalent to baroque art with many curves or repetitive religious mantras saying 1000 names of ‘God’, or poetic licences and synonymous.

All this leads to the realisation mind-languages as all mirrors do ALWAYS distort reality to accommodate the deformed perspective of the mind.

So let us put another example on time theory – relativity and all this incredibly non-intuitive complex maths to adapt a world moving at constant c-speed to our world. It IS real? No, it is NOT, but it IS for a human mind and it will ALWAYS appear as such in our measures.

Why? Because the UNDERSTANDING OF ALL OTHER SCALES, including biological and social, psychological tell us an obvious truth: WHEN YOU MOVE you think worst. Leibniz was 3 days in a chair to study its information. My ass is square (: Information, form becomes blurred because IT is still, WHEN we move. So to emit, or perceive information you stop. To move and translate you go. THUS in the quantum scale electrons emit waves of light in relative stillness. And so there is NOT need in that ‘REAL level’ to make Lorentz transformations.

• constancy of c-speed: endophysics.

In as much as particles travel only as waves, WHICH ARE SYSTEMS THAT REPRODUCE INFORMATION.

Then they stop to become particles and gauge information when they ‘stop’. Then they go as waves and reproduce information. Stop and ‘create an upper scale of the fifth dimension’, the particle. Go… stop, as in a movie, where the camera stops the film to focus and gauge its information.

And this explains why C-SPEED IS CONSTANT: BECAUSE electrons that emit c-speed entangled to other electrons communicate in relative stop position a wave that moves and the electron stopped gauges it. So in the electronic scale YOU DONT ADD motions, to those electrons that stop and go regardless on the larger matter scales that might seem as the camera film to have continuous motion.

Does this mean that the Lorentz invariance, transformation, etc. which we use to measure those far away scales in terms of our human sense of continuous motion does not make sense. NOT, of course, it is the proper way to build measures from the human pov. IT is though one a ‘perspective’, that of the ‘humind’, but if we were an atom the more realist view is that of the experimentally proved stop and go ‘attitude’ of particles and waves. So of course, this explains THE BIGGEST CONUNDRUM also of quantum physics, the duality wave-particle and WHY when we observe a wave it ALWAYS appears as a collapsing particle.

Of course, because we stop it. Now, Bohr’s copenhagen interpretation is literalist, egocentered, anthropomorphic as he said ‘the observer’ created the phenomena, not so. We merely see stopping the wave into particle. So Einstein the realist quipped ‘the moon doesn’t disappear when we don’t look at it. And he is right. A PARTICLE can stop without a brutish Bore watching it.

Only though a proper understanding of the laws of fractal space and cyclical time will allow us to properly interpret mathematical physics and all sciences by extension, and then discharge the redundant ‘metaphorical complicated equations’ creationists are so hard working, as those poetic societies ever producing longer cacophonies instead of the terse verses of reality.

In that sense there is so much work to do to focus again that mathematical mirror because of the creationist and literalist working hard with its ‘magic’ since the Popes, Kepler, Galileo and Newton declared its religious zeal, so it was good NOT to fully understand down to earth its mathematical equations that frankly having cracked that window so long ago, it amazes me the blindness of our ‘self-appointed’ genius of science.

Consider only another bit of it on those equations of Einstein’s relativity, where time is ‘packed in all its dimensions’ as the present ∂t derivative of space-speed. Physicists go merrily playing with its magic, and it ‘works’. But wait a second… only systems with the same dimension can compare and transform into each other. So how 3 space dimensions and one time dimension work? The magic here is that the height dimension is the ‘static dimension’ of information related to time which stores in its cyclical clocks, in its frequency and form the information of the Universe. So a clock is ‘besides’ the flat plane of space’, a ‘tall form’. And so we NEED to give height as a dimension of time, then time is the bit/frequency of the cycle, and the flat surface of space – the flat Universe, the flat plane, is the form that moves lineally. So again we see how black holes are ‘tall’ IN THE CENTER OF A TIME-LIKE accelerated clock vortex.

And then we have the reason why the magic of 4-tensor mathematics of relativity DOES WORK. Magic is ONLY needed when the intelligence of the scientist is well below the intelligence of the language he speaks, and do NOT really understands. Latin magic worked as the language of God for the believer’s herd, math-magic works for the herd of physicists who don’t know they don’t know.

 So then we apply this insight on the reasons of dimensional analysis to ‘a bidimensional wave’ that transforms into a ‘bidimensional particle’. Because as we say both now have the same dimension; IT IS JUST A QUESTION OF READRESSING THEM IN A FUNDAMENTAL FACT TO ADAPT 4D formalisms to 5D³ physics (AS OBSERVED in the above graph of time-information and flat space):
Time has the dimension of motion and the dimension of Height.
Space has the dimension of length and the dimension of reproductive width.
Oh, yes I repeat myself, because it seems the only way in this memorial age of believers and mantras, and repetitive experiments to ‘get to the point’:
Those are just a few hints at what will truly be as always has been the future of science – the POWER OF THE HUMAN MIND to conceptually and mathematically with words and numbers, with THOUGHT experiments to reveal all the hidden symmetries and relationships of nature.
THAT IS my work as philosopher  of science and so I have always been amazed that in front of the IMMENSITY OF HIDEN relations we DO NOT yet know, but we are coming to understand through theoretical work, the entire planet lives with A Damocles sword because a bunch of bullies and mediocre physicists don’t know better to ‘find new physics’ that spending fortunes in taking pictures of known-known processes at the cost of risking our lives.
Of course in the visual ‘neopaelolithic age’ when machines seem more intelligent than physicists, this might make sense to those idol-atric worshippers of  terabytes:
But frankly I am not impress. My take on CERN astounding intellectual mediocrity despite its incredible arrogance is that graph: the degree of devolution in conceptual physics of the new generations of childish, ¥-vidi credo ergo sum generation of null conceptual thought is such that a ‘picture’ for them is knowledge. But try to ask them what is a wave, a particle, why Lorentz contraction exists, what is information, time, the holographic principle, the matter-antimatter duality, all the type of rational solutions I have given you in a nutshell and will keep constantly giving you in the theoretical pages of this web… The amazing thing is not that they don’t know but THEY DON’T think is relevant to know. Only the pictures and terabytes of photonic chips matter. They worship those computers and accelerators and of course to upgraded their mind to the future of XXI century science as ‘believers’ would be as difficult as to convince a jihadist that really, God didn’t speak arab. Seriously, it didn’t.

The laws of science are NOT originated by a language, maths or words, according to which creationist theory you believe in – religion or platonic physics but by the SUBSTANCES OF WHICH REALITY IS MADE, SPACE, CLOSELY RELATED TO ENTROPY, TIME CLOCKS, CLOSELY RELATED to information carried in the frequency and form of its cycles and its conserved ENERGY combinations, the 3 arrows of space-time that create reality of which we are all made, as when you say ‘i don’t have energy and time to do this’.

And so it is through the understanding of those 3 dimensions how we shall prove CERN’s falsity on his 3 theoretical research.


‘God is a clocker that has waited 5000 years, since the (biblical) birth of the Universe to find an intelligence like his, to understand his clock work’

Kepler, forebear of modern astrophysics, on his proofs of the biblical creationist theory of big bang, the existence of a single clock-time, that of the mechanical clock he has perfected, and the superior intelligence of physicists above all creatures that ever existed, specially himself, the chosen of God.

‘The Universe is a fractal of 3 time-space arrows, spatial entropy, temporal information and its energy combinations, which extends across ∞ scales of size, with different speeds of time, whose coinvariance defines the metric of the fifth dimension’, Luis Sancho, philosopher of science; on 5D absolute relativity, author of this blog.

What is the meaning of the Universe: time theory

Now we will make a huge statement regarding CERN’s research and in general, the present state of physics in the fundamental theme to understand the principles of reality, the meaning of time and its existential questions: why humans exist? What is the Universe? What is time? Why we live and die? What are the ultimate substances of reality:

Physicists have no responses to those questions and what is more troublesome for his pretension to be the ‘chosen science’ to find them – the basic errors they did earlier in his foundations, regarding those questions will prevent them to go further in such research.

The errors of physicists in the understanding of time.

It might surprise the reader to know that physicsts know little about time=change; the most important element to understand the ‘fundamental principles’ of the Universe; as their work has been since Galileo invented the discipline to study cannonballs trajectories for the Venetian arsenal, to measure only one form of change; motions in space. So they have done a truly exhaustive analysis of motion and speed, to the point they reduced time the measure of all forms of change in all systems of reality, to a parameter of space, with a single, simplified formula: v=s/t, t=s/v. So time in physics is NOT as in Nature, the measure and perception of change, but only of motion; which was understood and accepted as a limit to its science, which was defined in the XIX c. as the science of motion. Point.

Further on, physicists to measure motion, not only ‘reduced time≈change’ to a parameter of space (the so called 4 dimension of space which is NOT) giving birth to what we, philosophers of science, call ‘reductionism’ – his theory of reality; but they deformed 2 of the most obvious quality of the infinite ‘time clocks’ of the Universe:

-To be multiple, as there is one clock of time for each process of cyclical, repetitive change that happens in nature – circadian clocks in life, genetic clocks in cells, orbital clocks in planets, rotary clocks in electrons, etc. – to process and store the in-form-ation, in the dimensional form and cyclical frequency of its clocks. So for example, you measure the informative capacity of your computer in ‘gigahertzs where hertzs measure the frequency of its clocks. 

-To be cyclical, as all clocks are like those in your wall: repetitive cycles or events, origin of the ‘causal laws’ of science. Since a scientific law exists when we know a pattern or action will happen again, if its causes are repeated.

How they did it? Simple. Because physicists have another huge ‘conceptual error’ in their analysis of reality. They do NOT think that reality is made of ‘its primary substances’, vital space with motion, which last a finite duration of cyclical time, whose geometric and logic properties, all entities of nature perceive with different languages of space-time measure – so for example humans measure space with eyes and perceive time with words  and its 3 ‘tenses’ of past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of time.

For physicists since the wrong interpretation of quantum physics became dogma, the language of mathematics creates reality, in a similar fashion to the theory of reality of abrahamic religions, in which ‘the word’ (arab in islam) creates reality. So god spoke arab and ‘created things naming them in arab’. For physicists god creates things uttering equations. And so Newton affirmed that a mathematical tool, the cartesian graph, in which the cycles of time had been uncoiled and fusion into a long line in the paper-axis, to measure better lineal motions (v=s/t) WAS THE ONLY CLOCK of time of the Universe, which became then ‘lineal, infinite and with the single beat of the mechanical clock’.

This astounding deformation of THE DEEP meanings of time, became a dogma, which facilitated measures of ‘motions in space’, to the extreme detail achieved by physicists and heralded as absolute genius – so when Einstein refined further this limited formula of time, to achieve even more exact measure of motions, he was considered the most intelligent man on earth. FACT THOUGH is that measuring spatial distances and speeds IS not all what matters to reality; and ‘reductionism’ of time to space measuring negating all other ‘forms of change’, notably change in the in/form/ation of beings, studied by biology and evolution is a blunt error that has endured for centuries halting the understanding by mankind of those fundamental principles.

It ended up also creating an absurd theory of reality and the meaning of it all, called ‘entropy’ according to which since all changes in nature have been reduced to change in motion, all what exists is a constant growth of motion, and disorder; and the origin of it all is a big-bang of motion.

Never mind Darwin found that the true important form of change in nature is the opposite evolution of ‘form’ of in-form-ation. Physicists shunned off this other form of change=time and call it negantropy, the negation of entropy. Never mind Einstein, showed that ‘time curves space into masses’, the cyclical eddies of space that convert lineal space into cyclical accelerated time clocks, which create the physical information of nature, in vortices of time called galaxies, in which we live – reason why we are also ruled NOT by motions in space but by biological processes of growth and evolution of information.

They denied the other physical arrow of time, informative masses, and came up with an absurd theory, according to which Einstein was wrong and masses are NOT accelerated vortices of time (Principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass) but ‘again’ a collision between ‘something’ and a particle called the Higgs gave mass to the particle – no longer an intrinsic property of an eddie of time, which attracts as any eddie the faster it turns around in its cyclical clocks, but ‘something’ obtained by collisions. And finally they denied the most attractive, faster turning eddie of time, the black hole, and Hawking affirmed black holes are NOT vortices of time, because they ‘travel to the past’, and instead of attracting and dragging all what surrounds them to the vortex, as they move to the past, do exactly the inverse of what we see them doing – they evaporate and explode ‘again’ into a burst of entropy.

What is amazing about all this is perhaps not how blunt that philosophy of science is, but that mankind has rendered to it, just because physicists make machines and weapon that deliver entropy and motion. And so the fact that humans have lost all his wisdom about time, in their worship of machines, also cast serious doubts on the intelligence and ‘freedom of thought’ of our species.

As i have been all my life since I read Asimov’s guide to science as a kid, wondering about time, and came finally to solve the  many questions poised by the study of ALL changes=times of Nature developing the long seeked theory of all times-changes called ‘relational space-time’, first put forward by Leibniz, and then accepted by Einstein, when he said ‘I am the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’, I realized earlier that physicists are ‘blunt’ by design – by its worldly religion, to ‘belief’ that lineal motion=entropy is all, and there is only a time cycle, that of its mechanics clock; and only a language to measure time=change, the digital numbers of that mechanical clock. So my intellectual respect for physicists has never been high. And my ethical respect has been even lower – they do make the weapons of entropy that kill man.

Only Einstein, a pacifist kin of philosophy, who did advance our knowledge of time, and was for most of his life in permanent dissidence with physicists for the same reasons I am a dissident of his blunt, unethical theories of reality holds my respect, due to: his denial that mathematics creates reality (opposition to Bohr’s copenhangen interpretation: ‘the moon doesn’t appear when i look at it’), his denial that nature has a single clock to measure time; his denial that time is the four dimension of space – a term he rejected, saying ‘wires don’t travel to the past’; his denial of the nuclear industry (invention of the ‘doomsday clock’), and his respect of causality as the fundamental property that chains ‘time events’ by repetition, and the philosophers that study it, and finally his affirmation that relational space-time is the future of time theory (Leibniz was right, so we have to change our physical theories from its inception).

So in this post, we shall complete the work of Leibniz, and show you along the process why those 3 CERN’s avenues of research, the false big bang that reduces the Universe to its entropic motions, the false higgs that falsifies the nature of mass with silly collisions and the false evaporation of black holes that transvestites the informative nature of black holes into time machines of entropy, the astounding beauty of Nature when we accept all its forms of change, and realise the true dominant arrow of Nature is that of information, also in physics, completing the work of Einstein and upgrading the paradigm of time, to relational space-time, the theory I discovered 2 decades ago, and was explaining to the world with wide acclaim at the time CERN came up with his astounding program of research on his  false theories of entropic, lineal time, affirming that to understand the meaning of it all, the right path was more of the same blunt explosions of the military industry… and that it was poised to make strangelets and black holes.

So i sued CERN, lost the suit, was subject to a massive ad hominem campaign that destroyed my reputation as a physicist, and retired, shelving the model of relational space-time that gave all those solutions sorely needed on the meaning of time=change, upgrading the discipline for the first ‘time’ since Einstein’s work on general relativity – reason why I used to call the theory ‘Absolute relativity’.

Suddenly I had become from being heralded as the New Einstein in the congresses of science I attended, the biggest crackpot on planet earth, just because I was trying to help mankind to survive the Nuclear Industry. So those 2 themes, time theory and the needed upgrading and refutal of CERN’s and quantum physicists theories of reality, on one hand, and a narration of those suits and its affidavits are the themes you will find down this column of posts and pages.

Since only if humans understand that CERN is NOT going to solve the meaning of it all, but just make more whammies and risk more lives as the nuclear industry does, which will only happen when mankind upgrades his understanding of time and space, there will be a serious discussion about the need for such risky machine-weapons funded with the excuse it help us to understand the meaning of it all which it doesn’t.

This is not to say that physicists do NOT excel in what they truly do to perfection – measuring distances and motions in space and manufacturing machines. But this is NOT what CERN claims to do – finding the meaning of reality, which physicists will NEVER achieve, as they have a religious dogmatic view of reality and time and so as priest will NEVER go out of his ‘mantras’ about a bush that burned in a dessert and was God speaking to a goat-keeper and we MUST believe this, physicists have their mantra – that God spoke mathematics, and gave us a clock to measure time with numbers in lineal fashion and that is all what matters and we MUST believe this. Problem is people agrees, because they have bigger guns and we philosophers of science and serious physicists of time theory like Mr. Einstein only do ‘thought experiments’.

Let us then explain those 3 points in a ‘nutshell’ for people who came to this post and have little time to read the whole ‘evolution of time theory’.

Now you are aware that the future has always at least two obvious paths, destruction, death, disorder, expansive motion, and its big-bang explosions and dissolution of form that we call ENTROPY and its inverse arrow that physicists deny in physical systems, calling it in fact ‘negation of entropy=negantropy’, which is information, form, the arrow of life, order, implosive motion.

It is when we put both arrows together, the life and death, informative and entropic arrow, when we find a balanced Universe that never dies. But where it is the arrow of information in the physical Universe, to compensate the expansive arrow of entropy of vacuum space between galaxies?

Obviously in the clocks of time of the Universe, its vortices that store its information, called masses and charges. As they are accelerated inward clocks that carry in-form-ation in its cycles and form.

So Einstein described mass precisely as an accelerated inward looking vortex of time-space and said that ‘time curves space into (informative) masses’.

It is then obvious that only when physicists deny 1/2 of physical nature, those vortices of information, as what they are: implosive accelerated, warping systems that compensate the entropy of vacuum space between galaxies, they can bring those 3 absurd theories:

The evaporation of its fundamental ‘vortices of information’, black holes, THE DENSEST, fastest turning masses, which Hawking converts into entropy machines by changing the arrow of information into the arrow of entropy, which means he makes them ‘travel to the past’ and evaporate.

And finally Higgs’ absurd idea that those vortices of space-time called masses ARE NOT real, but an external property given to the Universe by entropic collisions with Higgs particles.

And finally the big-bang, dying universe, which being the biggest one we shall explain cracking a bit the nutshell… BOTH in theory and its consequences for human praxis

How then can we prove that balanced immortal Universe? Very obvious. We stated that entropic, expansive motions and implosive accelerated vortices of time are inverse in properties. We can see both then as complementary: the expansion of one and the implosion of the other balanced in a steady state ‘cycle’ that neither expands nor implodes. And this is precisely a ‘conservative cycle’ of energy, which is the third DOMINANT ARROW OF THE UNIVERSE, CONSERVED in both its ‘long energetic cycles’ and its ‘quanta’ called momentum, which are defined exactly as the product of a ‘mass vortex’ and a speed-entropic, lineal motion: p (momentum) = mv, ∫p=E.

So we just need to add information and alas, magic, energy is also defined and conserved:

‘energy never dies it combines spatial entropy and temporal  information creating the infinite space-time beings of energy that the Universe repeats ad eternal:

Spe x Tiƒ = E’. This is the fundamental law of science that defines the 3 arrows of time-space, and will r=evolve our understanding of the Universe; as we shall see how easy is to construct with them all the entropic limb/fields<iterative body-waves>informative particle-heads of which all of us, relational space-time beings are made :

-PRAXIS:  In that sense, if astrophysical philosophers could go back to school and learn about the much simpler Universe, streamlined by its 1 +1= 3 arrows of time, or possible paths of future, entropy-motion + information-form = energy they would stop once and for all the mental alibi of and entropy-only-dying Universe which HAS for centuries justified the worldly praxis of making weapons of mass destruction, proper of physicists.

Then the praxis of our technological civilisation, with a humankind who truly cares about life, his natural informative arrow, would go through the demilitarisation of physics as a science and the real end of the cold war era, which will NOT finish till physicists stop researching more cosmic explosions, with the retarded alibi of negating the existence of life, gravitation and anything that is not a big ‘whammy’ as the meaning of it all.

The 2 philosophies of the science of timespace.

We shall thus in this post consider the evolution of science that passes as always every century through the evolution of our understanding of its first substances time and space (from XVI-XVII: Descartes->Galileo, to XVIII:  Leibniz vs. Newton, to XIX: Darwin vs. religion, to XX-XXI: Einstein->Sancho), which has two fundamental views:

The physicists’ view of a single abstract timespace, with a single clock for the entire universe, the mechanical clock, that measures a single arrow of future time, the arrow of entropy, disorder expansion in space and death, which starts and ends in a constant big-bang explosion that erases the information of life and the Universe. Time is then ‘what the clock measures’ (Einstein) and obviously it is spoken in the digital language of clocks.

This view appeared only with the invention of mechanical clocks, the development of the Cartesian graph that uncoiled the cyclical form of a clock into a line, latter extended mathematically to infinity, and the discovery in the analysis of a local phenomena of entropy – the disordered heat of steam machines…

And it requires two ‘dogmas’ that ‘reduce’ sciences to this view and are called by philosophers of science, ‘reductionism‘ (only mathematical measures of time taken with the human-mechanical standard of a single clock, with a second unit that is our human heart-step-eye-thought rhythm matter, all other forms of measure of time=change are irrelevant; and all other time clocks must be ‘reduced’ to the human time clocks which is also the clock of the Universe); and naive realism (only what we can see and measure with our visual intruments matter).

IT WAS only on those basis that the big-bang theory of the Universe could be born, by disregarding absolutely every other form of time=change, every other arrow of time=change notably the energetic and informative arrows of the vortices of galaxies that ‘compress vacuum space into matter’ (‘time bends space into masses’ Einstein); and finally by disregarding 96% of the Universe of dark energy and dark matter (remember those are NOT arrows/substances of time-space for ‘entropy’ only physicists.

Hence the present mess about big-bang theory where the proofs that deny it, the things that are not explained by it, are overwhelming. Yet BECAUSE physicists will defend its dogmas with a very non-scientific sanguine, bully behaviour full of systemic insults against the ‘intelligence of other sciences’, the ‘knowledge of philosophers of science’, the self-importance of their discoveries, on my view copycatted of the bullying of its ’employees’, the military of the weapon industry where till the explosion of the electronic consumer industry 70% of them worked; there is no way to argue with them reasonably on timespace theory.

So plainly speaking NEVER from ‘here to eternity’ there will be a physicist who truly advances further time theory.

As what he studies is only a type of time change, translation in space, defined by an equation which uses time-change only to measure those changes in space motion, v=∂s/∂t, ∂t=v/∂s, where each ‘instant of time’, ∂t is defined as the measure of change in speed or position in space.

This time-change measure has been exhausted ad limit by physicists, conceded. There is nothing more thoroughly researched with the liberal help of the military-industrial complex, since Galileo defined time in those terms to measure shots of cannonballs for the arsenal of Venice, than motion in space.

Einstein took it to the limit by defining precisely that change in very fine ‘pictures’ of present, simultaneous space-time, adding a correcting factor to Galileo’s relativity, c²t², to account for the deformations happening at very fast motions; but NOTHING of the other type of changes and perceptions of time notably biological, informative time changes were added to the ‘soup’.

So physicists know all about time-change in space but they cannot make a philosophy of time, because they have ‘reduced’ time to that partial element of change, they have eliminated all languages which are NOT digital to measure time change, notably the logic of the 3 timespace arrows past, present and future, better explained with verbal logic.

Only a philosopher of science considers all the changes together and ads the logic of verbal thought and its 3 past-present-future verbs to explain time.

As mathematics IS better as a language to mirror space, geometry and points, though it can mirror time through sequential numbers, the loss is specially clear in the understanding of causality and time logic, which physicists finally abandoned for the false concept of ‘probability’, which has basically eliminated the key element to understand sequential events in time, causality, whose logic is NOT Simple aristotelian causality, as there are 3 arrows of time that mix together to create events.

So the logic of time is ternary, similar to the taoist or hegelian concept of a yin-thesis, yang-antithesis and yin yang synthesis, as opposites attract to form complementary beings:

Past-entropy x future-information = present-energy cycles.

It WILL be thus a polymath of all sciences where time events happen, explaining all those clocks together – from evolutionary biology to genetic clocks to historic cycles and economic evolution of machines – clocks of time the physicist does not even consider time clocks, because only the mechanical clock matter.

So Kepler’s>physicists reductionist view of a single clock, a single space and a single language of time must be confronted with the view of the organic Universe proper of philosophers of science and eastern cultures, which affirm that the ‘languages of god are infinite’ and the way we perceive time multiple.

This view of time indeed is flawed by dogma, reductionism and naive realism that eliminates all other clocks, all other time cycles, all other languages of perception of time-space, including the verbal logic of the three arrows of time, past, present and future.

So we shall return and explain the much wider, much extended through cultures (till the clock of physics became collective dogma) view of time as the processes of change, produced by the combinations of 3 arrows.

It is the philosopher of science’s view, which sees reality as an eternal balance between the arrows of entropy and death and the arrows of information and life that combine in the conserved momentum and energy worldcycles of the Universe.

‘yin-visnhu-in/form/ation=dimensional form’ which combines with ‘yang-shiva-entropy=motion’ to create the ∞ ‘qi’=’brahma’=energetic beings with momentum ‘acting’ on the universe.

We have on purpose explain along the fundamental equation of the three ages of time:

Spe: Local past-entropy-motion x  Tiƒ: local future information = ST: E: present conserved, repetitive cycles of space-time energy.

Its mystical discovery by earlier philosophies of science of the eastern world to show you something evident:

Because the 3 arrows of time are every where, all human cultures have known about it by observing reality with human senses, crafting the past-present-future systems of all verbal languages with that view, and understanding that all systems go through 3 ages of time, corresponding to those arrows, the young-entropic-moving age the mature, reproductive, energetic age that combines those motions with a growing aware of form, of information, which comes to dominate the third age of timespace systems, and finally dies in an entropic big-bang explosion.

Let us then make a summary of how much a model of a Universe made of relational space-time ‘beings’ help us to understand the Universe – which is the theme of the second part of this blog, to show you that as usual the way to truly evolve science is ‘with thought experiments’ – with better models of reality, not with risky experiments.

Timespace theory and thought experiments vs. more of the same analysis of motion.

In that sense it is essential to deal in depth with timespace theory, to debunk once and for all with the 3 sacred cows of CERN’s theoretical research ALL OF THEM FALSE, because they are all based in a wrong conception of time as a ‘single dimension’ of ‘space’, when time has 3 local dimensions for each ‘being made of a vital space that last a finite time duration, past, present and future, whose relationship with entropy, energy and information, its ‘spatial symmetries’  and ‘functions’ we MUST understand to fully grasp the falsity of those 3 theories which justify CERN:

  • The supposed beginning of time and space in the big-bang singularity (false as information balances entropy, just explained)
  • The supposed evaporation of black holes travelling back to the past (false as they ARE the information singularities of galaxies that organise them)
  • The supposed existence of a spatial field, the Higgs field that through the weak force trans-forms light quarks into heavy quarks giving them ‘mass’. FALSE, because the weak force IS not a spatial force but A TIME process, proved by the fact it has NO range (it occurs in the same point of space in long periods of time as all time processes of evolution of information do). So it is NOT an attractive force (that is why it is weak), but a time change (that is why its CONSTANT is MEASURED IN TIME UNITS).

All this is plainly nonsense. To prove IT SIMPLE you just need to know the laws of thermodynamics properly as Hakwing’s equations changed the sign of entropy ‘ad hoc’, to get time travel to the past. But such time travels and its paradoxes, which Mr. Hawking envisions saying he would kill his father, are not possible in a Universe of infinite time clocks, as Leibniz, and Einstein proved with his models of ‘relational space-time’, general relativity.

Since the only clock that goes backwards is the local clock you are ticking backwards not the entire Universe. In that sense a Universe of infinite time clocks, and its analysis is the next big stage on time theory, called ‘relational space-time’ by Leibniz, General relativity by Einstein, and his expansion, which I called  theory of ‘absolute relativity’ that trows in the arrow of information to the arrow of entropic, disordering time and its energetic combinations; and ads the obvious scalar nature of the Universe with its infinite time clocks, reason why i call it absolute relativity,, as they expand our relative infinitesimal nature in the chain of beings.

Now those 3 falsehoods are SOOOO obvious, that any child would understand them, if he knew the existence of 3 time arrows, symmetric to the 3 dimensions of space (which opens up infinite many more explanations we shall not explain in this but the other posts on 5D3, completing the scaffolding of physical sciences, for others in the III millennia to complete), but and this is a key so you understand how so very intelligent people might be so dumb – when you do have as dogma, that there is a single lineal clock of entropic time in the Universe, you are like an ass walking ahead with blinders in the two other sides of the view (the 2 other arrows of time), so all what you see is ‘the line of entropy ahead’.

The result of that blindness are the faulty theories of Mr. Hawking, ultimately an intellectual crackpot and celebrity best-seller NOT a serious scientist. And the absurd fundamentalist search of CERN for big-bang explosions, a theory based in a single arrow of time, which is completely out of the present stage of knowledge of time-space theory, which we shall now expose without further ado, with a historic analysis of its main milestones.

The 4+1 steps on modern timespace theory towards the understanding of the ∆-scalar, ‘@-sentient’, ternary, st, Universe.


I abandoned my career, after the suits, disgusted both with scholars and the industries of misinformation by the way they behaved in this issue. The ad hominem campaign in any case made difficult to go through the processes of scholarship, which i no longer valued.  At the time of those suits the only mention it was made about my work as a philosopher of science working on time theory was in a magazine, the New York times, calling me a ‘writer of science’, and ‘self-styled’ time theorist (: which became the basis for the ad hominem campaign as people of ‘little merit’ ‘crackpot’ ‘celebrity-seeking’ unknown person, defying the sacred cows and young post-graduates of the discipline and its totem machine.

That was truth .Since I worked for years in the development of 5D³, the long-seeked model of relational space-time (Leibniz), based in the existence of infinite clocks of time in the Universe, which Einstein said would be the definitive model of the science of timespace, (‘Leibniz is right’) seeing his work as the first step in the understanding of a Universe of infinite time clocks, but had not been cracked for a century, as it required truly as he said ‘but if so, we have to restart science from its inception’…

Fact is before this work time theory had not any significant advancement since Einstein, as it is a theme that seems very difficult for humans as you cannot take shots of time as CERN does with space. But there is another huge reason why timespace theory didn’t have any significant advance til i completed those models, also clearly expressed by Einstein: ‘I seem to be the only physicist who believe there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’. 

And things remain the same. So if ‘you believe’ in a single mechanical time clock to explain all the cyclical clocks of life (circadian clocks), states of matter (as those of the cycles of evaporation, freezing, liquid rain, evaporation that gives you life), astronomy (one for every orbit of a galaxy, star and planet) quantum particles (one for each rotation), you have a dogma which prevents you from advancing further timespace theory. 

This unfortunately is very often the case of humans in so many fields they don’t quite understand but have a dogma that substitutes reason for belief and let’s them go through. In CERN for example, when you enter to work there you have a dogma you must believe and sign in fact a paper about it: ‘the evaporation of black holes traveling to the past of the single mechanical time clock of the Universe’.

Let us then make a summary of how much relational space-time ‘beings’ help us to understand the Universe – which is the theme of the second part of this blog, to show you that as usual the way to truly evolve science is ‘with thought experiments’ – with better models of reality, not with risky experiments.

We shall use to that aim the customary ‘correspondence principle’, connecting relational space-time with the work of the colossus of the science of time that did truly evolve our understanding of those 2 elements, Aristotle, in the old age, and in the modern age of mathematical/clock measure, Descartes>Galileo, Leibniz (vs. Newton), Darwin (vs. Helmholtz) and Einstein.

Aristotle on time=change. Its types.

The first colossus of time theory was Aristotle, which rightly defined time as change, considered 2 changes, internal, informative change studied by biology, he rightly affirmed to be more important than the ‘simpler’ translation in space, the time change studied by physics.

So a full theory of time=change would account for both.

In that regard, the Universe is a fractal of space-time beings that reproduces information and measures it with different ‘still languages’ of the mind, and so to account for reality we need to account for 4 elements, which were the focus of the work of the four colossus of modern time theory:

  • @: The minds that perceive information and its ‘still languages’ that stop and reduce the dimensions of reality to ‘fit it’ within one’s mind language. This was the work in which the first master of modern time theory and father of the scientific method and analytic geometry, Mr. Descartes excelled, with his theory of many worlds, today forgotten and reduced to a single language, maths and a single timespace, the human measure of it. In mathematics he thus discovered the ‘proper’ tools to study those infinite frames of reference, the cartesian graph.
  • ∆: The scales of reality broken into infinite time clocks that run faster the smaller the scale we observe, which was the focus of the work of Leibniz. Which in the language of mathematics discovered the science of Analysis to study how ‘infinitesimals’ became integrated into wholes.
  • ð: The worldcycles of time, that define the existence of beings, as they go on reproducing its information and evolving into ‘tighter’ denser forms, through the evolution of parts into larger multicellular wholes (evolution theory, genetics, eusocial super organisms). The evolution of temporal information was the focus of the work of Darwin, the third colossus which study in depth the third element of reality, informative time.
  • $: The exhaustion of our knowledge of space, and our still simultaneous perception of it, which Galileo started with his study of the lineal motion of cannoballs, and Einstein took to its absolute limits, completing ALL what physicists will ever tell about the foundational principles of reality, as the science of motion that reduces all time=changes to the lineal analysis of distances and speeds, from t=s/v (Galileo), to S²=Sx²+Sy²+Sz²-c²t² (Einstein’s relative equation of space-time, which is a more detailed variation of the same theme).

Then we find 4 great time masters, only 4 great steps forwards in the modern age, one for each century, contradicted by entropic, lineal physicists (in red), which kept creeping into philosophy of science, fogging our understanding of time-space, with their 3 constant errors – the mathematical religion; the lineal simplification of timespace into entropy, and its measure only with machines.

It was then only left to put together the four parts of reality studied by those giants, minds, scales, time and space, to fully account for the principles that structure the Universe, and so  I crafted a relational theory of those four elements, which make us all, dust of space-time, ∆•ST… (: but since I was just a ‘self-styled time theorist’ of little merit -as the press and CERN described me in his affidavits and ad hominem campaigns, which didn’t go around with a big quark cannon, shooting and shouting his ‘merits’, of course, the homunculus didn’t hear 🙂 and won’t till that scalar reality comes from the infinitesimal scales of fast turning vortices of accelerated mass, and blows up into his face )-: then it will be too late, as the roar and thunder of those eddies of space-time will silence all t O-:



Descartes vs. Galileo

In the XVII c. Descartes founded a mathematical artifice, the cartesian space-time plane, that allowed him to plot time in lineal terms and Galileo used it to define time as a parameter of lineal space-motions, reducing time studies to a single form of change and all its time clock cycles to a single time clock (time-space relativity, v=s/t, time as measure of translation, use of clocks, etc.):

In the graph, galilean relativity was ill-understood, as the true question about time-change was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of smaller self-similar systems.

Further on Galileo reduced all time clocks to one, and made lineal time canonical ERASING our knowledge of the cyclical form, in-form-ation of those time cycles KILLING 2 essential features of time:

  • To be multiple and to be cyclical encoding the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of those cycles.

THUS HE KILLED THE ARROW OF INFORMATIVE TIME, and as a consequence, as yin and yang no longer could combine, prevented scientists from defining properly energy as the combination of both, motion and form, streamlining our understanding of the equations of mathematical physics, which will from then on become mathematical manipulations void of most of its conceptual meaning, till arriving to the present ‘religious’ view of physical sciences, which shun off the whys they no longer understand.

Those are pending questions solved in 5D³, which the philosopher of science, Descartes, understood better than his mathematical disciple, Galileo, as philosophers depart from a ‘previous layer’, all the languages, hence all the minds that observe all timespace cycles; not a single language and a single clock-cycle, as physicists do eliminating all other ‘rival languages and beings’ AS IF THEY DID NOT EXIST. They do.

So back to Descartes – a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical light space-time mind. He went even further – reason why we have NOT put Galileo but Descartes, the philosopher of science and Leibniz, NOT NEWTON, in our picture of the four magnificent, where only Einstein stands as a physicist master of space-time – in his intuitions of the 3 ‘elements’ that conform all systems, when he said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’; the vital energy of all systems, 

– Enclosed by cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

Anecdote: As a polimath, who likes to do painting and films, and write fiction – since eyes and words are the I=eye+wor(l)d, the space-time mind of man, and you must master them besides simultaneous points of spatial geometry and sequential, temporal numbers, the languages of space and time of mathematics and machines to fully grasp the entire range of space-time worlds that construct the Universe, my first short film while at columbia U. was called ‘cogito ergo sum’.

It was a horror little film, where I took as argument the sentence on reality being as it is a ‘mental picture’ of the whole, ‘put by a devil’ in words of Descartes – an electronic image, as you do NOT see reality but the space-time world created by electrons absorbing information coded in light space-time. Thus an old man reading Descartes realises if his mind creates the Universe, he could also erase it changing the arrow of time (as Hawking thinks with his black holes – alas! he starts to erase all the people who have offended him a la ‘Carry’ 🙂

It was also my choice in my youth of who were the colossus of timespace thought, NOT the ones that apply mechanically its machines to observe them (Galileo and Newton) – the ‘physicists’ – but those who apply the mind and did thought experiments, the philosophers of science and those physicists as Einstein who both accepted thought above machine and the infinity of languages, since ‘I know when maths are truth – self consisted with its own syntax – but not when they are real – good mirrors of reality’ (Einstein to Poincare) something modern creationist physicists have forgotten, leading astray their science and mankind on the path of creationist evaporating black holes and planetary big bangs. 

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

This is illustrated in the first graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.

infinitesimal egos think to be ∞: mind paradox. Still languages=mappings of information≈Perception and its ∞ clocks.
We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’.

Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.

But to understand this Universe of self-centred mirrors, we must first clarify once and for all the error of Newton and its ‘absolute space-time’, with a single time-arrow (that of his infinitesimal clock-machine) self-centred in the human ego and its ‘second beat’ of existence, NOT the only time of the Universe.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.


All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.


IT WAS Newton who thought Yhwh sent him comets to explain him in Kepler’s fashion the laws of gravitation, with a huge ego that will go latter on into a prosecution of Leibniz isolating him and accusing him of plagiarism, who reduced to a single human point of view Descartes proper analysis of infinite frames of reference and singularities that perceive information, in the Universe, but did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

So he called his ‘frame of reference’ the human ‘world’ NOT the universal frame of reference but only our ‘light space-time world’, which Kant rightly considered to be Euclidean, because humans ‘see’ 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space-time ONLY, but there are other ‘infinite frames of reference’ made of gravitational olfactory, atomic, or verbal languages, as ‘the languages of God are infinite’ Upaniushads.

Only Einstein latter realized the gravitational mappings were NON-euclidean; but not knowing Kant’s work, he didn’t realise our space-time IS light, AND SO as we see only light space-time, we see a constant speed of information. Impressionists though realized earlier and so they painted space as LIGHT.


The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees everything turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believes to be it all.

The ego paradox – a mind mirage vs. Absolute relativity.
The EQUATION OF THE MIND explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view.

And so a fundamental elements of psychology which explains the astound arrogance of man to the Universe and its laws is the subjective paradox of the ego all fractal minds of the Universe follow:

‘every infinitesimal singularity ego thinks to be the center of the Universe, which it perceives as its sensorial membrain, self-centred in its self’.

Only the objective mind of ‘stience’ is able to strain away from the paradox and realise he is in a buddhist sense just a particle-point, a knot of time cycles communicating with the much larger infinite whole,

Objectivity does only enter the mind of people who do science. And it is important to remember it, because the 5th dimension brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe; which I call Absolute relativity; the last step on the search for our position in that infinite fractal of time-space beings:

In the graph we can see the fundamental particle of the Universe, a monad of temporal information, Tiƒ, surrounded by a vital space-time, it orders, ST, which it encircles with a timespace membrane, the larger simpler part of the system, Spe, which breaks the Universe into its inner and outer elements, Spe.

It must be understood that without a mind that observes the Universe reality would not exist and systems would not work efficiently as blind beings. So we must postulate as all philosophers of science from Aristotle to Schopenhauer did, a pan psychic Universe, which contrary to belief has been the only theory of reality in philosophy of language and science from its inception till the XX c. when logical positivism, which merely renounced to the search of a ‘why’, became the ‘standard philosophy of the mind’ , with a dogmatic postulate – that all what cannot be proved (from the human perspective and our limited perception, which does NOT include the ‘temporal mind’ that cannot be ‘photographed’ in space) does NOT exist.

All minds perceive within its language, as the singularity-membrain form the open-ball elements that surround an inner vital space of energy; and so if you look into yourself, you will realise you ARE your language/words, cogito ergo sum that perceives your membrain, which filters the universe for your singularity to ‘know’; but your mind is verbal, logic thought, not digital. 

Thus we should realise the essence of all this time beings is dual:

On one hand to survive through the reproduction in cyclical patterns of its timespace.

On the other hand to perceive linguistically as a mirror of the Universe that creates constantly in a dialog between informative, singularity mirrors that reflect and order its territorial reality, after shrinking it into an infinitesimal still mind, form.

In the graph, the marvels of creation in which the Universe dialogs between the infinite cycles, filtered through the membrain into the singularity-mirror that perceives in the language itself, in a pan psychic universe, reflecting then its selfish view in its territory of order, which through infinite points of view, creates reality.

Below the infinite singularities of order, the Maxwellian demons which ARE proved, when properly understood in terms of infinite ‘frames of reference’, by the fact that we study the Universe with mathematical frames of reference, and the equations of physics do portray well reality precisely proving the existence of infinite time-knots, minds that order and map with in/form/ation, internal form the Universe in an eternal dialog of multiple creative mirrors.

And so time cycles shrink compressed into linguistic memorial seeds that will ‘dis-seminate’ and grow and multiply, from evolutionary livings, compressed into the ‘genetic mind mirror’ of its seminal seeds, to verbal languages that ‘narrate reality’ into smaller sentences, to visual films to mathematical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian equations that focus the 3 ages of physical systems in its standing points, when the function of exi=st¡ence transits between ages, to topological varieties that reduce entire beings to fractal, minimal points, languages of the kaleidoscopic Universe keep forming and dissolving into zero sums as ‘linguistic singularities trans-forms ad eternal entropic motions into energetic actions and organic forms’.

Being entropy only the primary motion substance, the vacuum space, the nothingness to which we shall all return.



In the XVIII C. Leibniz (philosophy of relational space-time as a the ultimate substance of a reality made of vital spaces which last a finite time quantity, first hint at the fifth dimension of scales with different time clocks, and development of the mathematical tools to study those scales of smaller faster parts that become wholes – analysis: ‘each (non-euclidean) point is a world in itself’).

Leibniz, the philosopher of relational fractal space-time.

Leibniz was the next great advancement ofTime theory when we realized what physicists called absolute time and space was just a mathematical artifice but in the real world all what we saw was vital spaces pegged together and lasting a finite time cycle. So we were not in an abstract background graph of timespace, but we WERE made of time duration and vital space with motion and form (galileo’s paradox). Further on he foresaw the existence of a scale 5th dimension as ‘each point is a world in itself’, so he founded Analysis, the science to study those scales of infinitesimal parts and wholes.

The errors of Galileo and Newton. Lineal single time. Mathematical religion invents a background space-time.

We have already explained the mathematical religion that confuses reality with mathematical artefacts It is also the origin of the biggest blunder regarding time-space – the belief that the abstract cartesian graph with its lineal time IS real and acts as an absolute background space-time over which we ‘draw’ all other beings as physicists draw its equations on that ‘graph’

In the next graph we see those mathematical artefacts of measure that deformed our vision of time. There are indeed infinite time clocks in the Universe, which enclose a vital space, NOT a single clock as Galileo and all physicists after him believed. Neither there is a background cartesian graph with infinite single time coordinates, but infinite beings performing its time cycles of existence. TIME thus is eternal because it is motion and cyclical motion so all forms will be repeated. Since events repeat in time cyclically or else there would not be patterns of science, change sometimes seems not to happen when things come to the same point. This is the present, closed, conservative energy cycle, which explains why ‘energy never dies, but trans-forms itself in different forms of in-formation and entropy’:

And finally there is the fact that the clocks of time of all species of Nature define different time speeds, as small systems run faster clocks, which also is not understood, since physicists used a mechanical clock to measure all other clocks equalising them.

In the graph we see schematically those elements of time which physicists still have not accounted for but rather deformed: the multiplicity of time clocks, unified with a single mechanical clock, the cyclic form of time clocks, which physicists elongated into a line, so they ended up believing there is not more than one time clock, that it is lineal and infinite extending to the whole universe and that it has no form in-form-ation in its cycles and frequencies.

In the graph we can see the resume of those errors: there are multiple time clocks in the Universe, defining a fractal Universe as those time clocks repeat their cycles, breaking space in an inner and outer region, (main topological theorem), and so we cannot make theories of all time changes as Hawking etc. do considering a single clock for the Universe – so no return to the past, as each time-clock goes its way.

Those time clocks are faster in smaller particles, so there is a fifth dimension that orders them all by speed according to size. There are closed time changes, which carry information in their frequency and form, waves that also repeat their information but expansive, disordered ‘memoriless’ ‘markowian processes’ of ‘entropy’ that erase information, and so we can talk of three timespace changes, the three arrows of time, and a fifth dimension of time, which orders all those clocks by speed that grows as we become smaller.

But without understanding the cyclical nature of those clocks and his connection with information, it is impossible to understand the workings of reality, including physics.

On the other hand when you go out of dogma and lineal thinking everything physicists have found and we are grateful for it, in their exploration of nature with their mechanical instruments, becomes easily interpreted and understood and so the marriage of philosophers – the people who do seek and understand with all languages the fundamental principles of reality – and technology of measure and perception – the thing physicists do best; do give us the final answers to the meaning of reality. Consider a simple case: quantum physicists realized energy is quantised in packets, of ‘something called H-planck constant’, measured with ‘angular momentum’.

And a century latter they are arguing what this ‘thing is’. The answer though is immediate, when you do understand the universe have infinite cyclical time clocks, with repetitive patterns that return in a finite duration to the same point where we measure its frequency. Alas, H is measured with angular momentum (the cyclical motion of a point), H is ‘discrete’ measured in intervals of time, with a frequency: h = e/ƒ. So H is simply speaking the ‘time clock’ beat of light and electrons, and hence of the human and atomic instruments of measure, which electronic minds use as the minimal bit of information needed to ‘build up their mind-mirrors of the universe’.

And so of course, when quantum computers came, they used the atomic clocks – the spin of its particles measure in H-units – to process information at the maximal fastest possible speed and yet not even then physicists realized that the fundamental form of change in time is information, and that is why h-units of atomic, temporal information, are all over the place in every quantum formula, as we are all relational space-time beings, made of ‘quanta=cycles of time’ that enclose and break vital space. Look at yourself, you are a vital space, enclosed by a membrane of cellular cycles.

This is the essence of the relational space-time model I developed and is poised to change and upgrade our understanding of time, and put to rest the absurd theories of the simplicius simplicissimus philosophers of the science of motion – if we survive their dogmas on a dying entropic Universe, and their ‘experiments’ replicating cosmic entropy=death here on earth to prove us that ‘death is the meaning of it all’ by killing us.

Leibniz on 5D

In that regard, the first serious analysis of that fifth dimension of infinite scales of space-time was also Leibniz’s work, and his philosophy of calculus and analysis, with its concept of infintiesimals as the cellular/atomic part of the whole ‘n’ (1/n).

His genius came so far as to understand that ‘each point is a (fractal) world in itself’, advancing the concept of the fifth dimension, which we need to enclose all phenomena through the 3 dimensions of time, the 3 dimensions of space and the 3 organic co-existing dimensions of size and speed of time that organise the fundamental particle-being of reality, the relational super organism of space-time:

In the graph, we can see how naturally because entities co-exist in an ∆-1 cellular/atomic, ∆-organic, thermodynamic and ∆+1, gravitational, social scale, all systems in nature have organic structure. It is then when we can see that the function of the 3 arrows of time is a physiological function, as ∆-1 parts become social networks specialised in entropic, informative and iterative events. It is the fundamental particle of the Universe, a fractal  made of smaller fractal constructed to the image and likeness of the whole.

Since: ‘The Universe is a super organism of three ternary arrows of space-time structured across 3 ∆±1 scarles of the fifth dimension, whose ∆-1 cells/atoms/citizens form networks of entropic energy, reproduction and information, ensemble together into ∆: super organisms, part of larger social super organisms, of slower time cycles:

How many dimensions has then the Universe and any of its super organisms?

The correct answer is 10, 3 of space=form, 3 of time=function, 3 of organic scales, and one for the singularity and membrain that encloses it all, the mind-will that makes the super organism a whole.

A simpler model though following the correspondence principle will consider only to ad the ‘packaging’ 5th dimension of scales (as each scale does have 3 dimensions of time=function and space=form). It was an earlier error when I tried to argue with physicists about the model. As their simple models reduce those 10 dimensions to 3 of space, and one of time, the fourth dimension of present derivatives of time, ∂t=∂s/∂v.

So to please them, I wrote most of my texts on 5D³, where the ‘whole’ being extended through 3 scales of 5D and in each scale we would find 3 elements, cells, organisms and ecosystems, quantum atoms, thermodynamic matter and gravitational mass. It is becoming though awkward and confusing:

In the graph the metric equation of 5D with its different speeds of time clocks that define a scalar Universe. is with the three modes of timespace change, the 2 fundamental advances needed in philosophy of time-change to fully understand and resolve the pending questions of most sciences.

YET a  I don’t expect any time soon physicists to come back to school and learn the complex model of reality, from now on I will use the full model.So whenever we talk of the model on 5 Dimensions, we are packing the 3 x 3 +• dimensions of space, time, scales and mind, to ‘please the popes of physics’ which study 3 dimensions of space and one of present time (as they use derivatives, which measure the minimal time-quanta, step by step; so Galileo’s and Einstein’s time is PRESENT TIME.  Thus the dimension where i packed all the clocks of time is the fifth dimension, which is all over my texts.

We shall then when doing general analysis of the whole talk of 5•D³, to signify that when we just extend the present model of 3 spatial dimensions, a fourth dimension of present-time, then the whole other scales form the fifth scalar dimension, subdivides in 3 x 3 sub-dimensions and the 10th dimension of the mind, which together create the fundamental particle of the Universe the 10D supœrganism

Since for a more formal, rigurous analysis it is better to start-up from its beginnings as the two physicists/philosophers of science that studied the Universe of infinite time clocks, Leibniz (more of a philosopher) and Einstein (more of a physicist) preferred.

The result is a model I call 5D³, 10D from now on, which considers the existence of an infinite tapestry of systems, :

  • 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future related to 3 functions, past-entropy, present-iteration and future-information, which we shall call the 3 primary arrows or actions of time, related to…
  • 3 topological dimensions of space, which can be seen in simplest terms as height, the dimension of ‘future information.

5D³=10D supœrganisms thus is the long-seeked model of relational space-time (Leibniz), based in the existence of infinite clocks of time in the Universe, which Einstein said would be the definitive model of the science of timespace, (‘Leibniz is right’) seeing his work as the first step in the understanding of a Universe of infinite time clocks, but had not been cracked for a century, as it required truly as he said ‘but if so, we have to restart science from its inception’…

Fact is before this work time theory had not any significant advancement since Einstein, as it is a theme that seems very difficult for humans as you cannot take shots of time as they do with space. But there is another huge reason why timespace theory didn’t have any significant advance til i completed those models, also clearly expressed by Einstein: ‘I seem to be the only physicist who believe there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’. 

And things remain the same. So if ‘you believe’ in a single mechanical time clock to explain all the cyclical clocks of life (circadian clocks), states of matter (as those of the cycles of evaporation, freezing, liquid rain, evaporation that gives you life), astronomy (one for every orbit of a galaxy, star and planet) quantum particles (one for each rotation), you have a dogma which prevents you from advancing further timespace theory. 

This unfortunately is very often the case of humans in so many fields they don’t quite understand but have a dogma that substitutes reason for belief and let’s them go through.



In the XIX century Darwin brought about the first full serious analysis of the other 2 arrows of time in organic terms, the arrow of reproduction and information, as we introduce a  theory of change in the dimensional form or in-form-ation of beings, and noticed that reproduction is the goal of all species of relational space-time which ensures its survival, and we shall expand to all fields.

So how can we complete the work of Darwin with the 3 arrows of time-space, entropy, energy and information? It will require for you to understand and solve once and for all the discussion between ‘creationists and darwinians’, punctuated evolution (right as time accelerates information so there are explosions of creativity) vs. constant evolution, and explain why ultimately all is about genetics. So allow me to tell uyou what are the 3 ‘topological forms of evolution’.

Topological evolution and scalar genetics, completing the work of Darwin and Mendel with 5D³

the three modes of timespace change, the 2 fundamental advances needed in philosophy of time-change to fully understand and resolve the pending questions of most sciences.

5D³ Genetics.

What about genetics? Here 5D complete the reasons why we are ruled by ternary genes, which code the ternary arrows of biological systems.

But genes only code individuals NOT societies, which are ruled by memes (hence the falsity of racism). Why? Because as we aw in the graph of 5D scale: a lower scale of faster clocks CODES the next larger organisation of the Universe, where ‘new informative systems’ emerge to code the next scale of the russian doll but each ‘new doll’ is a discontinuum and so the information of the enclosed smaller, denser informative doll cannot cross those barriers and code 2 scales above.. See in the graph where we see the metric of the fifth dimension we can see how this work: smaller beings run faster time clocks and so they can store and process more information. so chips move faster information than machines and rules them. Genes run faster clocks that store in the form and frequency of its cycles the information of biological beings. Black holes run galaxies and MEMEs (ideas, instruments) run larger social organisms, nations and civilisations.

So THE CO-EXISTENCE OF MULTIPLE SCALES OF TIME, which run faster clocks IS the key to understand the co-existence in an organic manner both in physical and biological systems, of multiple scales of time-space: Spe x Ti = k (co-invariance of size and speed of information, which is the metric equation of 5D).

In the next graph we show those 2 fundamental advances of time theory: the fractal structure of space in scales of social organisms and the 3 arrows of time, lineal entropic motions, energetic, reproductive cycles and informative, warping 3rd age that structures the existence of all beings, and defines the fundamental advance of time theory regarding evolution:

Topological evolution: creationism or darwinism?

The next graphs show the fundamental advance on timespace theory brought about by properly studying the three arrows of time=change of form, of in-form-ation, in the Universe and its topological combinations that create all systems in space, its 3 ages that explain the life-death cycle of all systems. Below the scales of the fifth dimension that define systems as co-existing organisms, joined by the three arrows of time, forming the physiologic networks of all super organisms of the Universe.

Since the line is the fastest distance and so for entropy systems the best form, the hyperbolic body-wave includes all forms and hence it is the best to reproduce a system, and the sphere warps maximal information in minimal space and so it is the form of head-particles, the true meaning of time-space is the fact that all systems are made of forms with a function, which are both still and moving (Gallean relativity) and perform the three actions=arrows of motion, iteration and gauging of information for all beings, defining the Fractal generator equation of space-time beings, the fundamental equation of relational space-time:

Γ. ∆-1; $: (limbs/fields of maximal-moption) < ∆: ITERATIVE, HYPERBOLIC-body-waves>∆+1: Tƒ (informative spherical particle/heads) <<∆-2: death: entropic dissolution of information:

Screen Shot 2017-03-17 at 20.37.45

In the graph, the fractal generator of relational space-time beings defines all systems as ensembles of the three only topologies of the 4D and 5D universe, shows them in a relative time arrow of growing information through three ages, so we can talk of local past, present and future parts of any system, and explains its 3 functions. Hence the next graphs, where we show the three topologies of space-time, the three ages of time-space, the three scales through which a being trace its existential world cycle (no longer a worldline) and then a few real examples for biologic and physical systems, ALL of them follow the same sequential world cycle of time-change between birth and extinction (regardless of size, or scale as species and physical systems also follow them: ‘

So the three topological ages/forms of time-space complete Darwin’s evolution:

In the graph all species go through the same 3 horizons/ages/dimensions of evolution of all species of relational space-time, which will allow us to complete theory of evolution adding to the fight between species and genetics:

Topological evolution and its 3 horizons along the 3 dimensions of lineal entropy, informative cyclical height and reproductive width, IS A HUGE A proof that we ARE all relational space-time beings as our properties are ‘mathematical in form’ as those of space.

Since the line is the shortest distance between two points SO  all limbs/fields are lineal from light rays to your legs.

And the sphere the topology that stores more information. So all informative temporal particles/heads/eyes/cameras are spherical.

Thus all relational space-time beings follow the same horizons and ages of form; regardless of which ‘scale of the fifth dimension’ they are – as all are relational space-time beings that share its topological form, and dimensional in/form/ation is the dominant arrow that transforms motion and entropy. So both, all species (above) and all beings in their life-death ‘world cycle’, go through those 3 ages of increasing information, from entropic young ages/species.

Topological evolution is a fascinating subject, since there are only 3 topologies of space-time, IT SOLVES THE PROBLEMS OF EVOLUTION regarding the problem already known to Darwin on how fast informative spherical eyes or planar, moving, entropic wings evolved. This is claimed as prove that there is a plan of evolution traced by God – yes, there is a mathematical constrain to evolution given by the three only topologies of the Universe (below), which ensemble together all systems of Nature, but not, Yhwh, a fantasy of desert delirium tremens did not exist, created the Universe and has nothing to do with topological evolution…

In the graph, different worldcycles of existence as travels through scales of the fifth dimension, whereas each being goes through an entropic-motion oriented youth, a mature, reproductive balanced steady state, a 3rd informative age, then exploding back its information in a big-bag entropic death – ONLY the final moment of time, the shortest of all ages, the less relevant creative one.

That is why we say information iS ALL, because the Universe is a reproductive fractal, whose purpose is to reproduce 10D supœrganisms; while translation in space is completely irrelevant – in fact motion IS also a form of reproduction of information; which in physics is expressed in the principles of conservation of momenta and energy and the nature of light as a reproductive wave of information. So let us see how even motion, what physicists study, is reproduction of form.

Motion as reproduction of information along the path of a wave.

The Universe reproduces information and it tries to do a perfect replica, and this is the origin of the conservation of present energy, as all systems combine motion=entropy and dimensional form. Yet when the system has too much form and no motion as time never stops it reverses its ‘arrow of time’ and in a single quanta explodes and erases all information, in an entropic big-bang.

So finally all is a zero-sum: entropy=motion is used to reproduce information, and evolves till the dominant arrow of information – call it a galaxy vortex, a technological planet, an ageing human, a species evolving through horizons, warps all the fields of entropy into information. In physical space-time ‘time curves space into masses (Einstein)’:  vortices of charges in lower scales, thermodynamic eddies and crystals in our scale and masses in the cosmological scales.

Thus the overwhelming purpose of the Universe is to maintain, conserve and repeat the ‘momentum’ that combines entropy-motion and vortex of information (charges and masses), of its beings, and its integral through time – or energy conserved in all systems of nature. Present reproductive energy is what the Fractal super organism of the Universe preserves.

For those skeptical readers, in simple terms, a mathematical fractal is defined by a generator equation, which ‘constantly iterates’, reproducing its form in different scales of reality.

And this is exactly what nature does. And the fractal generator of 5D3 written above, to express the ternary topologies of all beings, through its 3 time ages, and co-existing 3 organic scales, is exactly that sought after centuries ‘formula which physicsts’ believe will conceptually resume all space-time events for all fractal beings.

Alas, there you have it a ‘simple fractal generator of 3 x 3 scales, topologies and ages of time’ define all systems of reality as parts or wholes of a super organism in a perfect, infinite, immortal ever balanced between entropy and information, to produce energy cycles, zero sum reality.

So i state that the universe reproduces information; they say the Universe is about motion. Alas, I state then motion is just reproduction of ‘simpler information’ at faster speed.

Indeed, it is evident that all biological systems are about reproduction of genetic form in a lower scale of reality (cellular scale), which then reproduces and evolves, ’emerging’ into a higher scale. It is also evident that our historic civilisations are about reproduction of technological information in a lower ‘dimensional scale’ (blue prints for machines), which then ‘company-mothers’ reproduce.

So the big question left to answer is about physical systems, which are supposed to be about ‘motion’.

You might have heard an important insight of modern physics on the meaning of the limit of c-speed. Nothing can in this lolca part of the Universe – the galaxy – faster than light. There are many angles to study this important issue but now we are interested in the concept that this c-light speed is the limit of reproduction of information as the wave of light imprints vacuum space with its frequency and form.

So even motion is reproduction of form; and this, when extended to  the reproduction of a sperorganism through all the scales of the fifth dimension determines that a being moves faster when less information reproduces. 

In the graph motion has always had a difficult paradox, never clearly solved, of continuity called Achilles paradox; which only has a solution if we consider as quantum physics seem to prove that in the scalar Universe, reproduction of form happens in all scales.

In the right graph we see the actual appearance of a quantum wave, exactly as a reproductive wave, in which each new particle is the stop position reproduced, leaving behind a ‘memorial ghost’ as the previous particle-waves dissolves into the vacuum.

 In as much as particles travel only as waves, WHICH ARE SYSTEMS THAT REPRODUCE INFORMATION.

Then they stop to become particles and gauge information when they ‘stop’. Then they go as waves and reproduce information. Stop and ‘create an upper scale of the fifth dimension’, the particle. Go… stop, as in a movie, where the camera stops the film to focus and gauge its information.


BECAUSE electrons that emit c-speed entangled to other electrons communicate in relative stop position a wave that moves and the electron stopped gauges it. So in the electronic scale YOU DONT ADD motions, to those electrons that stop and go regardless on the larger matter scales that might seem as the camera film to have continuous motion.

To perceive you must be still as when you take pictures: motion blurs information as entropic motion and informative form are the Inverse ARROWS of time, which only energetic reproduction and its m x v momenta mixes and balances and the universe conserves.

How the mathematical depiction of those reproductions take place? Through the mathematical equations that explain the MOTIONS of ternary systems, through the two ±3 numbers, e and π and its closely related phi constant.

As a system reproduces in adjacent series on the ternary continuum of time arrows. Or when evolve socially into new scales of the fifth dimension through ternary, 3×3+1 exponential and decametric organic scales, as clone species organise in new social 5D planes.

The ultimate mathematical principles.

In that regard, while we have stressed the mirror function of mathematics, NOT a literalist or creationist method, as our mind is linguistic, obviously languages do matter. And mathematics as the most synoptic efficient language is the right choice for physicist, but its use must be ground in the higher truths of space-time properties – the reality- and its logic laws of epistemological truth – the method to refer the mirror to that reality, and connect them through experimental and logic veracity. Only then we can fully understand mathematical physics.

The mathematical mirror in that sense is excellent because it embeds in its synoptic language the fundamental properties of fractal space (in a larger measure than those of cyclical time, for whose symmetries uses distorted mirrors of the ‘generator’ and a simpler Aristotelian logic of a single arrow of time). And both will become simpler, filled with more meanings and more powerful when we complete its ‘r=evolution’.

Consider another simplex example: the relationship between Universal constants and arrows and dimensions of time-space.

The fundamental functions and constants correspond to those arrows, but there is no magic about it, but synoptical power and EFFICIENCY:

  • So pi is the constant of informative perception and trans-form-ation of motion into form: 3 |> O+ 4% apertures to the world; and as the inverse arrow of form into entropy is just the contrary function, also the inverse ‘unwinding of form into motion’. But then is most often a multiple of π, (as in k and G equations) or a ‘radian’ of π (as in h), because the dense curvature merely ‘peels off’ in parallel a ‘thin membrane’ of its curvature or perceives a ‘radius angle’ of the external universe.
  • Phi is the constant of reproduction also because the efficiency of its spatial distribution that packs the maximal number of ‘reproductive events’ from an initial generator in minimal space.

And so two simple, related constants suffice for most simpler, geometrically perfect actions of the 3 arrows of time: motion to form, form to motion and reproduction.

What about the 4th and 5th dimensions? Again the answer is self-evident (if you understand the organic Universe):

As those dimensions are concerned with fractal discontinuous or differential continuous functions from wholes to infinitesimals, it must maximise the growth, and so polynomials and logarithms are used. Specifically:

  • e is the number of the fourth dimension of decay and death, which is the fastest possible process of dissolution of a single whole into infinitesimals, as those ‘cells/atoms/citizens’ ARE already reproduced and must merely be liberated from the single whole-membrane. So we find it in all decay process because of a simple property: e IS the fastest growing exponential function of any two numbers, in the Universe (and many related properties). Interesting enough to notice that it was found NOT as decay but as ‘interest=usury money’, what says a lot of the astounding ‘grab-theft’ of the financial profession, which found the maximal parasitic growth on account of doing NOTHING; just lend useless gold.
  • While inversely the Log¹º function is the scaling of social evolution because the ‘tetrarkys’ with 3 x 3 elements as networks of entropy, energy and information with the central whole-singularity mind emerging in the new scale as ‘1’, is the most perfect form to deal as a time§paœrganism with the survival exigencies of any ecosystem of ‘fractal points’.

So we shall study mathematics as the most efficient, synoptic language of the properties of timespace beings, after the very essence of the game, the formal generator, its symmetries and ∆•st logic, for which obviously the pretentious guru-magic of mathematical physicsts and the like, is just a barren “latin’; and simplify, explain and evolve its Non-a logic and ‘fractal units’ (non-e points) from ‘space-time reality’ into mathematical mirroring.

As the ultimate mathematical properties are indeed a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.

This is little understood since for so much love of maths, as physicists do not try to match reality and maths, they miss what is important and not on the inflationary equations of maths. Two simple proofs on how much more enlightening is to refer maths to reality all the time to explain its equations:

e+e/10=3, which shows why the exponential function is the most perfect form of social evolution as ten is the perfect tetraktys form, with 3 entropic elements, 3 energetic element, 3 informative elements and the central 10th communicating them as the singularity of growing scales – reason also why the triangle is the most perfect, resistant form in space – the pythagorean perfect number when mathematical ‘things’ were simpler and easier to relate as a mirror-language to reality.

In the other graph show a simpler proof of the proportion of dark, not perceived energy and matter, OUTSIDE the galactic halo of ‘strangelets’ (those things cern say do not exist but are the natural component of the surrounding dark matter-membrane of the galaxy): a Pi cycle is really the first transformation of 3 entropic lines (strings in the corrected string theory to adapt it to relational space-time), into a time cycle, S>T, which adds a height dimension of information to form the first holographic bidimensional forms of space-time. Yet pi is 3, 14… and 3 diameters give 3, so pi-3 leaves o.14 apertures, which become the ideal openings of any disk to observe the outer Universe from it, as the galaxy is. Now, this small openings of o.14 size are only 4% of the total pi perimeter:


So 96% of the Universe OUTSIDE the halo, is NOT perceived properly – we are blind inside a pi-cycle. The Universe is much more complex and rich in information we shall EVER realise for the high popes of physics to be a bit more humble and cautious with their big bang experiments.

‘Only the Universe has all the information about itself’ Haldane.

So back to the ternary games, as all sequential forms in time are ternary, waves do have 3 ‘colours’ of red-entropy, green-reproduction and blue-information, which the mind mirror of visual languages reflects in its vision. BUT in stillness, as only a still singularity perceives form in focus.

And so all waves reproduce in ternary packets, expressed trough π trigonometric functions and all systems have ternary structures and ternary horizons of evolution, ternary families of masses and particles, and all forms of growth can be mapped with e-functions and phi functions.

Since we shall not cease to repeat, mathematics is an extraordinarily well-focused mirror of reality but it does NOT create it, it merely reflects it with its synoptic spatial points and sequential temporal numbers (no, set theory and the axiomatic method are NOT the proper foundation of experimental mathematics, yet another offspring of the idealist school of germany, which brought us among other things Marxism, Nazism and the axiomatic method, where Hilbert, ‘imagined points, lines and planes’, in the paroxysm of the creationist school – THE UNITS OF MATH are as always have been, spatial points and sequential time numbers that mimic the properties of the substances that create reality, space and time).

But try to explain a mathematical physicist that the infamous h-planck spin ‘action’ of ‘energy and time’ is NOT an abstract ‘mathematical measure of uncertainty’, whatever that means (their definition) but the UNIT OF TIME CLOCKS or ‘angular momentum’, of the electronic world… that a plane is not imagined but the image mirror of bidimensional cycles of time and information, and so on… All this is stuff 5D corrects as only a philosopher of science can have that wider view. 

And so a new fundamental equation of speed, which takes into account the fractal structure of reality and the true meaning of ‘light speed’, which is speed of transmission of information solves the paradox of the constancy of speed (the reason which when I was a kid, at 8, reading Asimov’s guide to science, came to my mind as the biggest question to resolve in my long quest for ‘whys’.

So we write: V=S/Ti: that is speed is speed of transmission of information.

So we change the canonical definition of time in Galileo (and Einstein’s refinement) substituting the term of time for information: v=s/Ti. Thus the being with more form has lesser speed as it moves in stop-reproduction of form through motion-stop. And when the system has maximal density of form, obviously there is more to reproduce across all its scales of the fifth dimension, from its particles, through atoms, molecules, matter/cells, super organism  etc. While the maximal speed is that of light, because it has the MINIMAL information to reproduce.

And then gravitation that is invisible to us hence v=s/0 information must be infinite, non-local in speed. And inversely the densest vortex of gravitational information, the black hole IS ALWAYS STILL as it is in its own static frame of reference as the most attractive vortex of time.  So when a black hole appears on earth:

It will absorb very fast the planet because it is a ‘seed’, of minimal size and maximal time cycles. Which Hawking’s equation describe if he had not mistaken the arrow of time to the past evaporating them. On the contrary correction of the arrow of time of its equation towards the future yields an enormous fast growth of the black hole, as it cools down/slows down its clocks, while growing. So that is exactly what will happen: the hot black hole will evaporate us according to the laws of thermodynamics, as hot systems are more active and DO COOL DOWN, DO NOT GET HOTTER. OR your coffee in a colder environment gets hotter? Sooo obvious.

So in the middle between maximal c-speed of reproduction of minimal information and zero speed of maximal black hole information the rest of beings, including us move reproducing all its scales of Information. So when you move your hand through all the scales of being you must reproduce all those scales to finally form your hand. What reproduces is NOT matter but form in motion, in action in-form-a(c)tion.

You are the vital information which becomes imprinted in ever-changing, indistinguishable, repleceable CHNO atoms.

As your ‘real first scale’ of being, as a ternary superorganism of relational space-time, is your ∆-1, cellular genetic scale; formed with ‘any’ indistinguishable CHNO atom.

Entropy only physicists: Helmothz

It is thus obvious and clear that the discovery and explanation of the iterative and evolutionary arrows by Darwin completed the simpler view of time as a mere ‘present slice’ or derivative, a minimalist quanta of change, and only applied to translation in space, and on top deformed linearly and reduced to a single clock for the entire Universe.

With those concepts obviously little insights could be gained in the larger picture. So physicists philosophy of timespace kept adding more errors.

Indeed, in the wrong side of time theory the XIX century brought us entropy physicists, which from reaumur boring canon and observing heat, to Helmothz affirming the Universe was dying used reductionism first to reduce the 3 states of matter of the previous graph, the informative crystals, the balanced liquids and the entropic gas, to gas-only time arrow, and then expanded the arrow to ALL scales of reality including the WHOLE universe in a hyperbolic ‘method of truth’ so common in physics when it plays amateurish philosophy of science:

1) reduction of all global phenomena to a local phenomena (all time arrows to entropic gas)->

2) reduction of all properties to those susceptible to be mathematised (denial of the Maxwellian demons of crystal forms that ‘order’ reality, as solid crystal forms once formed ‘reproduce its information’ in other cellular crystals creating order that offsets the gaseous entropy) ->

3) hyperbolic expansion of that local law once all other effects and realities are eliminated to create a false global truth that passes as absolute law for all sciences, all of this perfectly greased by

4) human power, as makers of weapons, machines and darlings of the P.R.ess, shutting up all other scientists including philosophers of science, if needed ad hominem to come on top.

The exception to that ‘method’ being Einstein, who would quip, when the Germanic-American military-industrial complex and its engaged physicists applied four times the method to him, first with ether theory, next with Copenhagen bohr-heisenberg quantum interpretations, then with nazism and finally against his pacifism and confrontation with the nuclear industry’, ‘those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the gods. And ‘if they were right a single physicist would suffice to prove me wrong’.



In the XX c. Einstein (completion of Galileo’s work, with a refinement of the formula v=s/t, and first hint to an understanding that charges and masses are ‘accelerated clocks of time’ as ‘time curves space into masses’ and by the principle of equivalence mass an acceleration are indistinguishable):

In the graph, the physical clocks that carry the information of the Universe in its cyclical dimensional form and frequency. So if you put together e=mc2 and e=hv, m=v (h/c2) shows that the attractive force of a mass is proportional to its speed/frequency as a time vortex – no Higgs is necessary because the Higgs is just a particle, it does not give mass to a vortex of time, which is a ‘mass per se’, attracting as an eddie (thermodynamic vortex) the faster it turns. Hence the black hole which turns at c-speed in its horizon IS the most attractive vortex of the Universe.

General relativity showed that particles, masses, charges are ‘accelerated vortices of time’, hence unlike present repetitive cycles that close the clock and seem not to change, they do change and move a system in time towards the future, creating an arrow of future towards more information. It also defines motion as the true substance of all beings, hence making the Universe immortal as time-motion never stops, only the mind stops it in its ‘singularity’ and finally as all are vortices of attractive time-forces we can easily unify charges and masses, and complete the work of Einstein, which we have spare from the bonfire of vanities of the dwarfs of physics today, because the guy was both intelligent and ethic and so he deserves our respect.

So in general relativity, he defined with the Principle of equivalence a vortex of accelerated, future time and NONE understood it. And in both General and special relativity he defined the 3 ages of physical systems, and again nobody understood him. It was too simple, and so Hilbert said the maths were high school and shunned off – it WAS NOT THE MATHS BUT THE CONCEPTS that mattered, and those are the ones for 100 years digital robots aka physicists have missed all along:

IN FACT the 3 ages of all systems, entropic-youth/steady state/informative old age are the 3 solutions to Einstein’s general relativity equations that MUST be ordered in time as the birth of any space-time physical system, which goes then through a mature steady state and finally crunches into a world cycle. 

Besides its complex EFE formulae, those 3 ages can also be written simpler as:

Entropy < cc-energy wave of light > mass (vortex of future information).

Yes, it is the e=mc2 equation reordered with the three arrows of time as a feed-back equation, yet another case of the fractal generator of space-time beings. But physicists misinterpreted as usual the meaning of the 3 terms: E here is entropy, the disordered scattering motions that convert the informative mass into an energy wave of light. it is really then M<cc; the e void of meaning here only represents the Ti(m)<E(cc), transformation and explosion of a mass into a present sheet of bidimensional light space:

Now, this is the equation that Einstein in fact discovered backwards in his landmark paper ‘can energy become mass?’ and CERN is probing trans-forming energy into mass.

COMPLETING HIS WORK: ∆•ST… of space-time you are dust you shall become”.

We shall thus one we have streamlined the main discoveries on timespace and made a first upgrade to the formalism of a fractal Universe with a scalar ‘fifth dimension’ and a ternary time logic.

To that aim 2 TASKS ARE SORELY NEEDED in sciences:

  1. THE PROPER INTERPRETATION OF MATHEMATICAL EQUATIONS IN TERMS OF AN EXPERIMENTAL NOT A MAGIC SCIENCE. As physicists merely manipulate equations of a synoptic language they hardly understand.
  2. THE proper DESCRIPTION OF REALITY AS A FRACTAL SUPERORGANISM OF THE SCALAR UNIVERSE, MADE OF SELF-SIMILAR PARTS, built to the image and likeness of the whole. As we are all entities that  co-exist in 3 scales of size, with 3 topologies of space, that live 3 ages of time, all wrapped up by a mind, defining the fundamental PARTICLE of the 5D³ Universe a 10 dimensional super organism, explained with those 3T+3s+3∆+@=10D, hence my constant switching between the ‘whole philosophy of the fifth scalar dimension’ and the detailed analysis of every super organism of reality in 10d.



In that regard, we don’t have to upgrade the space-time Universe to mathematics but all other way around, we have to refocus mathematics to the vital universe of organic space-time.


“The less intelligent a person is, the less mysteries he founds in the Universe’ Schopenhauer.

OF COURSE, the MATHEMATICAL PHYSICIST will consider all this, nonsense because he thinks he knows his maths and as maths like words, or images, or any language, for that matter, can model any fiction, he writes its ‘non-risk fictions’ and argues with them all should be Ok – the fiction of Hawking’s no-risk black holes ‘traveling to the past’, which break the known-known experimental laws of the Universe, getting hotter in a colder environment, which is as if your coffee evaporates and freezes the cup, being the most clear case – he in fact, as Eric Penrose told me, called them for decades ‘imaginary black holes’.

In a more general case, because of the dominance of the Axiomatic method, which requires no experimental truths, the mathematical physicist will be MISSING the true foundations of experimental mathematics, which AS THE GALAXY or any other system of reality is a ternary mirror with 3 sub disciplines, fractal analysis, space geometry and time algebra.

So it is also about space-time and cannot invent reality but only reflect it. Or as Einstein put it ‘science should be concerned only with experimental facts’, meaning the search of linguistic entelechies regardless of beauty is irrelevant to science, and must be considered a linguistic fiction, at most mathematical art. Indeed, nobody in his right mind would seek for Quixote in the landscape of Spain, or visual superheroes, but Mr. Hamed does look for his landscape of 10ˆ500 universes in the LHC, and others for 26 dimensional strings, SUSY particles and the like – but of course none has been found so far or will – as the Universe is stubbornly economic, efficient, ‘simple and not malicious’.

And we DO have all the particles we need to explain ALL ITS EVENTS, when we explain as we just did the ternary symmetry between quark families of mass, regions of the galaxy and its macroscopic forms (top quark black holes, strangelet halos and ud-light matter in between). So symmetric and beautiful as those other simple, realist theories of quantum physics (Bohm’s pilot-wave theory; Hoyle-Einstein steady state dual Universe of in-form-ative gravitational masses, and expansive entropic light space).

But simplicity for reasons we shall soon explain is NOT the final stage of languages, which become ‘baroque’, with excess of information as life does in his 3rd age or state of maximal information (a 3rd age common to matter states – or solid age, life beings, or 3rd age, families of mass and galaxies, or top quark/black hole age; art, from where i borrowed the baroque title, and civilisations, our present age). So in this ‘axiomatic, baroque age’, when fiction dominates facts, the physicists in in search of new ‘fictions’ and details, as ALL what there is there has been found, and his ego could NOT aspire to the genius state, reserved at this stage to those who as Leonardo realise that ‘simplicity is genius’, and go the other way around, to found even simpler foundations, which ARE embedded on the known-known equations.

Such was the case of Copernicus, Kepler and Newton who reduced the epicycles of vatican priests, to a singularity of maximal mass in the center, the sun, a series of cyclical membranes, the planet, and the forces between them; or Bohm who added to the particle of information and energetic wave, the missed entropic field of pure lineal motion (quantum field), which is NOT a hidden variable, but part of the same ternary Schrodinger equation (just in polar form). So did Heaviside who reduced the 20 equations of Maxwell to the 4 standard ones, describing 1) the charge singularity, 2)the magnetic membrane and 3-4, the exchanges of energy and information between both. So did Einstein in his EFE equations with its 3 terms and 3 type of ‘spatial solutions’, the entropic big-bang, the steady state ‘Einstein solution’ and the black hole, informative solution.

Since ultimately we can, as I have done using the Universal grammar of all languages, mirrors of the Universe, simplify all what exists to the 3 elements of the Universe: lineal/planar entropic space, informative, cyclical time cycles with more dimensional in-form-ation, and its ST-energetic combinations.

So we shall just show you a very introductory analysis of mathematical physics with this expansion of the sound work of the aforementioned pioneers, according to the trinity of time arrows, which simplifies it all by understanding properly the 3 arrows of time and its 3 topological only symmetric forms in space. Indeed, there are only 3 topologies which correspond in EFE to those 3 ‘time states of all forms of matter, component of all physical systems’: entropic expansive planes of space; cyclical, spherical particles of time an its hyperbolic body-waves. So topology the summit of geometry can be reduced to a ternary structure as mirror of space. A few more examples:

Mathematics has only 3 main disciplines which mirror as a language the 3 ‘structural elements’ of the Universe:

∆nalysis of the 5th dimension, its wholes and ‘finitesimals’ (1/n). Spatial Geometry, (Spe) and temporal algebra (tiƒ). And its ST ‘combinations’, which as usual come in time in 3 ages of growing complexity (explained further below):

Young entropic, spatial age> Space-time balanced age>Informative time age

(Though if we were to go deeper in Non-Aristotelian ternary logic we could show you some interesting ‘different orders’, which we will do when explaining you one of the ‘star questions’ remaining on physics, the reason why we see more particles than antiparticles; which CERN claims to resolve bombing us all (:we shall for good measure after this schematic paragraph on the ternary foundation of experimental mathematics, solve all the questions of CERN with our ‘thought experiments 🙂

So mathematics also evolved in 3 ages, first the spatial age of Greek bidimensional, geometry; an simple natural, positive numbers, which count only ‘spatial populations’.

But then entered a second age of space-time combinations, mixing continuous geometrical, space-points and  discontinuous ‘analytical’ time numbers, to explain combined ‘actions of space-time’. In the same manner that light languages evolved from pure black/information & white/entropy vision with greys in the middle into the more ‘complex’ 3 color range.  So maths became a more evolved space-time discipline when Descartes added to geometric points, time numbers, in analytic algebra. And viceversa, static geometry became topology which is geometry with time motion. Again we are NOT here trying to give you a full course on the upgrading I have done and keep doing as a private researcher (given the ad hominem campaigns who vaporised me from scholarship, as a certified crackpot) but given you the theoretical minimum to realise that the path of future science and mathematical physics is NOT CERN’s entropic only ego-centered theories of big-bangs but Einstein and his disciples Bohm and Godel path, expanded to absolute relativity and the experimental foundations of mathematical physics.

In the next graph for good measure, we show the duality of world views, that of the humble realist scientist a la ‘Einstein’ who said ‘he does not know when maths are real’ and that of the human ego who thinks it has the language of God, who creates reality (by Penrose father, the collaborator of Hawking, in his imaginary black holes, from his book “road to (ir)reality”(:

You see there on the left how  the mental world creates maths and maths creates the Universe. At least though Penrose unlike Hilbert and verbal religions recognises that the physical world influences our mind (Hilbert would have erased ‘2’ below, and certainly all those mathematical physicists that invent particles with their imaginary maths like Hawking does, HAVE done away with ‘2’). On the right I readdressed the arrows as they are. The Universe is mirrored by multiple languages, of which maths is an excellent one to help the human mind-mirror to understand experimentally the real world.

Ok. Now we can understand what religious people, aka physicists do NOT understand about their mirror-language mathematics, which we concede carries more informative detail than words (but less than images), and so it has become after images (most humans today believe more in celebrities than in physicists 🙂 the dominant language today, overcoming religious wor(l)ds.

Still the language of mathematics DOES NOT CREATE REALITY and in its present ‘underdeveloped and fictional forms’, (its incomplete structure which I finished when young, after understanding the scalar metric of 5D Analysis and its 3 arrows of space-time) is quite a distorted view of what a proper mathematical truth that IS also real, will show. And for that reason, mathematical physicists at CERN can create so easily ‘a la Trump’ alt-truths, imposed ‘a la Trump’ with full homunculus mechanical, big-hand power.

So how to complete the theoretical minimum of realist mathematical physics? Again following the path of Einstein, which used the r=evolution of Lobachevski on geometry to upgrade our theory of space. Indeed, solved the 5th non-euclidean postulate of mathematics, noticing that space was not necessarily Euclidean, as points can hold infinite parallels. So he said we should look at space to decide experimentally how it ‘is’ really. This Hilbert didn’t understand and confused, without being able to define then what a point is, as it was no longer possible to define it as an Euclidean point with ‘no breath’, came with his idea that a point was what his mind imagine, and left it undefined. So the first task is obviously to define a point as a mirror of the fractal Universe, where points grow and hold ‘infinite finitesimal parts’.

While the logic of mathematics has to be upgraded from the present single causality of Aristotelian and its single time arrow, to the ternary non-aristotelian logic (meaning logic requires to study the 3 ARROWS OF TIME CAUSALITY as physicists working only with one arrow, entropy, have the MIRROR distorted, UNFOCUSED, and limited). An trust me when you do show, as I have done it, light pours through your mind in a blast of intelligence and focused information, far more pure and telling than the blast of entropy, essayed at the LHC.

Only a few examples. As we said lobachevski changed ALL the outlook of mathematical physics, when he found the 5th postulate of non-euclidean geometry, the fact that through a ‘point’, infinite parallels can cross and Einstein applied it to physical space in General Relativity. But lacking the understanding of ‘real space’, a fractal of scales of wholes and infinitesimals, and its correspondence with Analysis, physicists misinterpreted the meaning of those points, incurring in clear logic contradictions.

Indeed, to fit those lines they bended the ‘straight lines which define parallels’ to fit them into the point. But then they became ‘curves’, no longer parallels. Because they didn’t take seriously Lobachevski’s dictum that from then on geometry had to be an experimental science. So they missed the ‘meaning of a ‘non-euclidean point’, as it is in Nature, where points grow in size when we look closer, in detail its inner ‘space-time, behind its ‘cyclical membrane’. Indeed, if a POINT can be crossed by ∞ parallels:

– The eclidean point is just the minimal information of a point fit in the homunculus reduced mind (: that shrinks it, to fit it inside. But this distorts it, because parallels are straight lines and a ‘point with no breath’ (Euclidean point) can only fit one line.

So to fit more lines, the point must be enlarged, when we come closer to it, so the point is no longer a star-point or a particle-point but a FRACTAL POINT of the scalar 5th dimension, which becomes a huge star and then yes! voila, infinite parallels which are now real parallel straight lines can cross it.

So reality allow us once more to define properly the first undefined postulate of Non-Euclidean mathematics: “a fractal point has a volume of energy and information that grows, as we come closer to it.”

And the second undefined Postulate: ‘A fractal line is a ‘wave’ (time view) or ‘string’ (spatial view) of fractal points, communicating energyy and information  between two larger point-beings’.

And the 4th postulate, ‘a plane is a network of fractal points’.

And so on. This and NOT the ‘runaway definition’ of Hilbert, who confused by Lobachevski’s discovery just said for lack of a better idea that he ‘imagined points, lines and planes’ IS the proper, realist way to upgrade Geometry to reality as we have already upgraded topology and its 3 forms with motion to describe the 3 ‘organic forms’ of all systems of the Universe.

Why we bring this here – as we are selecting only the ‘theoretical minimum’ to fully grasp what CERN does and the position of the homunculus in the infinite Universe – should be obvious to the reader: Hilbert was wrong, so it is the Copenhagen interpretation derived of it. The fact that CERN will produce microscopic strangelets of black holes from the ‘larger’ scale of cosmological mass does NOT mean they are ‘infinitely small and harmless’ just because or mind does NOT see gravitation and so only sees them as point-particles. They ARE HUGE in terms of mass-density which IS as we shall soon show the ‘stuff’ that matters in the Gravitational cosmic scale of space-time. If we could SEE gravitation those points WILL grow, to hyperbolic dimensions filling MOST of the galaxy and we would shrink accordingly as ’empty bubbles’ of almost null mass.

So our Euclidean mathematics, which as Descartes and Kant understood is only the 3 perpendicular ‘space-time elements’ of a massless ray of light merely shrinks all other scales of reality to fit into the mind:


In the graph, as our mind is electronic, we feed on light energy and transform it into an informative mapping of the Universe, reduced to what light sees. Thus our space is light space-time, with its 3 Euclidean coordinates, a fact that was first understood NOT by physicists but by impressionist artists, Leonardo, whose motto ‘saper vedere’, guided my inquire as a young artist on reality behind the languages that describe it, and then by the impressionists; and finally by Picasso, who departed from reality, affirming he painted thoughts, so he studied the ‘elements’ of the mind mapping, its entropic lines (cubist age) and its cyclical forms (female portraits).

A subject in itself fundamental to understand Relativity, is brought here to point out, the reason why in entropic only big-bang theories, we do see indeed light space-time expanding between galaxies, as light is space and so when it comes closer to the mass of the galaxy, elongates/red shifts its color (the only real effect observed; as we obviously are NOT out there in-between Andromeda and the Milky way with a tape). And vice versa, when Light collapses into our electronic ‘eye’ or any electronic source, it increases its frequency  balancing both effect to cancel the supposed big-bang death of the Universe.

But in the scalar REALITY, gravitation makes points LARGER when we observe them in the scale of the fifth dimension where they do interact above us, and will EASILY evaporate our ’empty bubble’ of light-light beings.

So Hilbert and Cantor who talked of ‘their imaginary paradise from where nobody would expel them, ass the Jihad warriors who die to enter paradise, just invented non-existen points, lines, planes with their imagination.

In the next graph, we see thus, the true meaning of the 5th and 1st Non-E postulate, which define both the real fractal point (1st postulate) and the real mind that bends it into a smallish mind. Since the fractal point does have breath, as it includes a volume of energy, entropy and information, carried by a relative number of ‘finitesimal’ parallel waves, but the ‘Aristotelian mind’, reduces it to an Euclidean point:

We have to introduced the first postulate of non-Æ so you realise how ‘limited’ is the homunculus mind.

Thus, human egos are just finitesimals with a huge ego, because they confuse their zero point-mind with the real infinite Universe, of fractal points, thinking the volume of information they store in their mind is all. 

Now, this theoretical minimum, which gives birth to the biggest r=evolution of maths since Riemann, ‘does away with Hilbert’; but to fully  put the copenhagen interpretation to rest and complete the understanding of mathematics in experimental terms,  we need as we have done with spatial geometry and topology, show how temporal algebra and its numbers, do also reflect reality, in an evolutionary process called the closure of numbers that again will follow the ternary, universal syntax of ‘REALITY’.

The closure of the mathematical mirror of algebra, looking at all the universe.

On the other hand, numbers are mirrors of a reality made of space and time and scales of the fifth dimension, closing the description of reality with maths.  In that regard, by Closure mathematicians means that today numbers can mirror all phenomena of the Universe, once Gauss explained lateral, temporal numbers. 

Let us then close for the sake of simplicity the understanding of ‘real simple numbers’ and time cycles, concluding our analysis of the foundations of experimental mathematics. As simple as it gets. Since indeed the key to understand negative and complex numbers are those ternary cycles.

screen-shot-2017-01-19-at-14-50-43So what are numbers? Again here homunculus as usual ‘get used to them’ and do not understand. Only one humble genius did it, Mr. GAUSS, when he insisted on calling imaginary numbers lateral numbers and negative ones, inverse numbers, but the spatial homunculus missed the point, fixed in ‘materialism’ – for him numbers have to be real space objects, as natural numbers are; but negative numbers are time events, with the inverse arrow of time in a process – i.e. in a graph of speed, they represent the motion backwards, in a graph of entropy and information, the 2 inverse arrows of time – but since alas! by decree the worldly profession of physicists does only recognise the arrow of entropic death in time, the concept of temporal numbers, remained in obscurity. And of course, the ‘bidimensional’ lateral numbers, which represent both arrows together: Spe (positive, entropic motion numbers) + Tiƒ (negative, informative numbers) = ST-wave bidimensional numbers was never understood.

The closure of the systems of numbers thus grew from reflecting merely space populations (natural numbers), into 5D numbers, reflecting ‘partitions’ of social groups (represented by those natural numbers), with Egyptian ratio-nals; expanded further with the realisation that certain ratios did apply to ‘scaling’ in the fifth dimension without limit (as in the pi ratio of Spe-entropic lines into cyclical time O-cycles).

Alas, things got interesting here, since as usual the homunculus of the religion of mathematics gets very angry, when someone tries to expand his limited worldview. So legend has it that the discoverer of the first irrational √2, number, was murdered by Pythagoras the first ‘religious mathematician’ because it found that √2 was not a perfect number. And of course that jeopardised the prestige of his Pythagoras theorem, as physicists at CERN will murder us all, not to loose prestige, accepting the obvious existence of strangelets.

Honoring this first humble victim of the religion of science, we shall explain why, indeed, √2 is not exact but Pythagoras can rest in peace, as its diagonal do exist.

The answer is simple: space is a simultaneous, continuous perception, a slice of the flow of time, but time is sequential causal, and cyclical, so we perceive time as discontinuous, since we see a time cycle striking the same point of space in intervals of time, given by its frequency.  And numbers which represent time, as they are sequential, therefore are discontinuous in our mind view of space. 

So the oldest unresolved paradox of maths is solved when we notice that points are continuous in space and numbers are discontinuous in time: that is the explanation of why in geometry pi & √2 exist, but in algebra, we ‘miss’ its perfect closure when written in discontinuous numbers. So all algebraic formulae of √2 miss a ±1; and all approximations to π, are slightly above or below.

 It took to Poincare 2500 years latter to find that this is an awesome form of perfection because it means a mind-point of spherical form, with equal distance to all the realities it reflects can shrink with no limit (Poincare conjeture – the one that Perelman, the most famous mathematician of the XXI c. resolved recently with tons of pages).

Alas, when I was a youngster I resolved it departing from my Fermat conception of a good proof, based in Ockham’s razor that a good proof can fit in a margin (my basque,  fellow countryman, the first European people, and longer surviving culture; so you should listen to them, concerning how to last in this planet Earth). So once I solved the Fermat conjeture, in a margin (:completely trivial), i resolved the Poincare conjeture in a margin (almost as trivial), NOT with the axiomatic method but with the empirical method as mathematics does REFLECT REALITY as a language, it is a mirror and so you can AS YOU PROVE ANY SCIENCE BY THE EXPERIMENTAL METHOD, solve mathematics if YOU KNOW what is reflecting, the fractal, non-euclidean, non-aristitelian Universe of 5 dimensions and 3 arrows of time symmetric to the 3 dimensions of space. 

So i did have a riot when all those so-called geniuses, with nobel prizes and fields medals needed computers, years of calculus and thousands of pages to complete their margins (: Since I have given you the solution to the oldest question of number theory, to avoid further Pythagorean murders, the proofs that DO fit in a margin, are just a bit below 🙂

So, we have SPATIAL, natural numbers to count social groups in space; 5D rational and transcendental numbers, which cross through 5D scales without tearing according to the Poincare postulate, but this is NOT enough, because we also have negative and lateral (not imaginary) numbers, which scientists ‘have gotten accustomed to use, but they don’t understand’, despite the insights of Gauss ‘quote’.

As those are temporal numbers, numbers that describe processes in time not in space.

Since negative numbers represent merely the inverse arrow of time, so if you make a positive number an arrow of motion-entropy, or relative past loss of information, the negative number will be the arrow of future-information, and the lateral i-number, will be the bidimensional sum of both the real and the negative, to represent the present space-time.

So we can translate the ‘closure’ of all phenomena in terms of numbers, for the ∆ & ST elements of reality (broken in 2 sub-generators to simplify the comprehension) such as:

Spe (+ numbers) < St (imaginary lateral) > T (- numbers)

∆±i: i-ratio-nal or transcendental numbers; ∆±1: ratio-nal numbers.

So you do have a closure of all numbers, based in the elements of space-time.

Hence, when you apply them to mathematical physics, which is the study of the simplest forms of space-time, you do have a better focused mirror. 


This of course, is just the start, to build complex space-time systems in several dimensions, which polynomial functions, which are ‘functions’ that cover several scales of the fifth dimension. And we do have analysis which does the same exploration of parts and wholes in a more sophisticated way. But all those functions will ultimately be mirrors of the 3 elements of all languages that reflect the 3 space-time elements of the Universe: 

F(s) < Operandi/ST-action > G (T)

Reason why, and it is astounding we have to stay this, mathematics works so well as a mirror of so many systems, due to its capacity to carry so much detailed information about their spatial entropy and temporal information, and the operandi/actions that combine them. But alas, Mr. Hilbert changed all this for ‘his mind imagination’, since he couldn’t figure out the fractal points of Lobacjevski and he joined forces with Mr. Cantor’s paradoxes and paradises of ‘sets’ – another mind construct to substitute the ‘imaginary numbers and infinities’ he couldn’t understand and got him ‘literarily’ crazy, ending up in a mad house, when Russell as Godel had done with Hilbert proved all his infinity paradises to be false. Hilbert though was more resilient – truly a huge ego, not to be bothered by such trifles.

So he took revenge when Einstein, Godel’s best friend sent him the draft of Relativity theory. Alas, he found a minor error in the maths, corrected it and published as if the theory was his – obviously thinking that what truly completed Mr. Einstein doodles of the sand, was his stupendous blot of ink, bragging that Einstein’s math were like those of a high school child. He had like Bohr the whole German University system to back his claims. But Einstein took a train to Gottigen and the God that created reality accepted just to name the Hilbert-Einstein action that yields his EFE (relativity equations) through the principle of least action, found by… who else but Mr. Fermat… who of course couldn’t care less to publish none of his findings… and proofs in the margin… as I have never done.

And so the Homunculus Gods, Hilbert and Bohr founder of the axiomatic method and the Copenhagen interpretation would carry the day with his big mouth  – despite Godel proofs of falsity, and Bohm’s, Einstein’s favourite student who did away with the Copenhagen ego. Do you think mathematicians who had entered their own ‘godlike’ paradise, as the only ‘language’ of God that can prove by itself (in its imaginary sets and points with no breath) cared?  No, after the shock they just put aside Godel, that ‘inconvenient truth’ and started a runaway train of ever more complicated distortions of the beautiful mirror of geometric points, social numbers and its organic functions, as Copenhagen did, to make it all so complex nobody could understand, and alas! they could dismiss forever since any criticism as experts into the language of God, like priests talking latin, Allah talking arab, and bankers issuing go(l)d in toxic derivatives nobody understood. 

This is the trick: to make the language inflationary, multiplying its ‘ptolemaic epicycles’ to pass as an expert of something you no longer understand or refer to reality.

It is then evident that fractal Non-E points in space and numbers in time are the ‘real’ units of mathematics, which refer to the real elements of the Universe; not sets and imaginary points, neither physical theories based in inflationary distortions of the mathematical reality. 

Then instead of GOING up in complexity, we can go down in simplicity to the real Universe of space points and temporal numbers, and show that the structure of ‘social numbers’ the minimal units of temporal algebra, have the properties of discontinuous time cycles, similar but not equal to the continuous, simultaneous space surfaces, and keep illuminating the world with mathematics. 

2 proofs of experimental mathematics on the margin.

So let us deal with the 2 most famous mathematical theorems of the century proved in a margin instead of using thousands of pages and computers crunching numbers, the trademark of XXI century science, which as CERN with his loads of petadata and our photo sop artists make so proud the homunculus, feeling better than Fermat and Leonardo …

As we said mathematics is an experimental mind science which is NOT closed in its demonstrations as Godel proved and lobachevski and Einstein explain ‘i don’t know when mathematics are real’, since the geometry of the Universe is real, THE PROOFS as in all science must be experimental, since ‘sciences should not be concerned with facts who have not happened, of which there is no evidence; (imaginary particles and cosmic big-bangs – the Fermi paradox though is a proof of the extinction of planets with life).

Poincare’s conjeture proof  – that only spheres can shrink with no limit and tear –  is immediate, from the definition of a mind as a temporal informative Tiƒ element, since minds store information, and the n-sphere IS the form that stores more information in lesser space. Hence in as much as the equation of the mind 0 x ∞ =K, defines the shrinking of the whole infinite universe into a single point, only the spherical mind can shrink information with no limit without tear. 

All this said I did enjoy Mr. Perelman’s wok as yet another clear ‘proof’ that ‘simplicity is genius’ and the axiomatic method only takes you to hundred of pages, which in an economic, experimental, real, Ockham’s Universe is proof of veracity. So to me the need of such long proofs only prove, the axiomatic method is the Ptolemaic epicycles of modern times.

I did respect this man though more for 2 reasons: he did it unlike the recent proof of Fermat’s Grand theorem, without computers, and specially I respect the fact he didn’t lower himself to receive its go(l)d. He did it as I have done everything in my life AMORE GRATIS, for the pleasures described by Kant in his tomb: ‘the wonders of the mind’s languages inside, and the beauty of the infinite Universe they reflect ‘above’ us’.

And then, once his job was done, (or not), he disappeared from the public view, as I have done.

Next the proofs of Fermat’s theorem – that only the square of natural=spatial numbers can ad exactly into another square=spatial number which is also immediate.


In the graph above, here again for good measure we see that information≈static mind cycles of time and entropy≈moving planes of space are bidimensional.

Bidimensional space sheets expand as entropy with motion. Bidimensional informative pages with no motion – as the one you are reading – fix time cycles in the mind.  So ONLY BIDIMENSIONAL FORMS and its holographic product which gives us 3 dimensions, ST are real (incidentally this is also a proof for one of the biggest conundrums of modern physics, the holographic principle, which states that information is bidimensional).

Thus in any process of superposition of bidimensional sheets, we can only superpose (read ad) two dimensional sheets:

screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-19-40-16Thus only X²+Y² exists as an exact new bidimensional form.

3-dimensional forms in natural numbers, which are ‘space populations’ are NOT added but multiplied to get as in the graph a light wave: c²=1/µxe;=.

Hence X³+Y³ ≠ Z³. And since the are only 3 dimensions of time and 3 dimensions of space, there is no need to prove it for imaginary higher dimensions.

Did Fermat had this proof? (: Well, one could say that the proof is as old as the fact that only the Pythagoras theorem works (murder forgiven:) and almost all postulates of geometry can be proved bidimensionally, but cubes do NOT add (the old Greek conundrum)… Or in other terms, a lot of math is inflationary extensions to non-existent infinite dimensions, non-existent polynomials powers and absurd cantorial infinities, as all systems have a closure membrane, beyond which ‘reality breaks into another fractal world’.

Yet in a 3rd age of excessive information, languages become fictions outside the realm of what it is. Short of the same process with inflationary fantaphysical theorems.

And so to understand why languages become inflationary and fictional with age, we shall return now to the ternary ‘simplicity of the Universe’ with only 3 ages of time, 3 topologies of space, 3 scales of the 5th dimension for any ‘finite organic whole’ call it the galaxy, the human being, the mathematical language and its ternary topologies, ternary numbers, ternary dimensions, ternary disciplines…


The 3 ages of time.

Indeed, 3 positive, negative and lateral numbers are all the time numbers, needed in a single ∆-scale of the fractal 5th dimension (resolved by fractions and irrational ‘finitesimal ones’) to describe the 3 arrows/ages of timespace.

So to fully grasp them we need to explain you the most beautiful cycle of the Universe, the life-death cycle, which also applies to physical ‘big-bangs, an its 3 ages.

Let us then apply the far more evolved concept of a Universe made of ‘systems’ with  the 3 ‘space-time’ organs, a cyclical clock-like membrane that contains a body-wave of energy, self-centred in a  singularity of information to the galaxy, to further understand the Witten hypothesis, and why it is so likely we become merely a strangelet particle in the halo of the galaxy.

Since the beauty of having a higher reality, that of space-time and its ternary parts is that we can now EXPLAIN IT ALL, not only in mathematical equations, which of course will offer us a lot of detail – more than any other human language, except direct visual images, but we can also put other linguistic mirrors, of which the most important is the organic, ternary topological structure of all systems, as discovered by Descartes, with its cyclical closed membrane, its informative mind-singularity and the vital space-time of energy between them.

Now, let us be a bit more humble and explain you where those lonely researchers that do thought experiments a la Broglie and Einstein are taking sound physics further in the explanation of the Universe using the 2 arrows of time entropy and information and its present energy combinations, which sorry does not make you immortal, does not make you god or vhod and does not create infinite universes only one, which stubbornly refuses to go away and let all those other ones ‘appear’ in this reality, despite the zillions spent in their search (indeed CERN has NOT seen any other new particle besides those who we knew they were there, no other hint of extra-dimensions, extra-universes or dragoons running amok, it is just producing in its 99% growing lumps of strangelet matter that will sooner or latter big-bang planet Earth at the reduced scale where big-bangs are proved: novas, quasars and E=mc2 bombs).

Since the big bang is ONLY  the death of matter that eliminates from the mix, the gravitational informative force and the dark quark heavy matter that holds those galaxies together, enclosed in his halo of strangelets, and shrinks the expansive space between them.


Inflationary languages: the 3rd age of thought.

Again languages do follow those 3 ages also, which explain the problem of mathematical physics today: The whole system of mathematics today has entered a ptolemaic, informative 3rd age with the axiomatic method, of inward degradation as OLD MEN have too MANY WRINKLES OF FORM, and do NOT have the classic beauty of ‘simplicity that is genius’ (Vinci).

So the fundamental response i have always gotten from any scholar of its 3rd age of inflationary information is ‘it is too simple’. None understand that ockham, economicity is truth, ‘the universe is simple and not malicious and so languages are inflationary in information when they become fictions, unreal, multiplying its false content, and this happens in all languages, when they stop checking reality. But the scholar old man, thinks it is interesting to live in a fictional world.

There is now inflationary money as the financial system got corrupted; inflationary fiction in verbal thought, since money substituted it as the language of reality (Quixote the first novel was written when the first company was founded). There is inflationary mathematical excessive information since Hilbert and Cantor disconnected its fundamental units, points and numbers from reality. And inflationary physics since Bohr and Gamow invented the science as a product of the mind and its maths. But the scholar in the same manner it said to Copernicus that his work was false because it was too simple and Hilbert said to Einstein that his maths were so simple that a student could do them, BECOMES AN expert on ‘imaginary linguistic distorted mirror information, because he abandons reality.

And so when you try to explain him the simplicity of it all, he gets offended and tells you like vatican priests to copernicus, Hilbert to Einstein and any physicist to those who introduce information and energy as two arrows of time that simplify the impossible task of explaining all with entropy: it is too simple, we like baroque fictions, simple reality bores us to death – we are far more than that, we are ‘experts’ in wrinkles and inflation.

INFLATION is indeed the key way to convert wrong theory into something respectable, equivalent to the old age of Mr. Garcia, for whores buildings and religions.

I have never believed anything which I didn’t understand. But people’s mind works the other way around – they only believe what they don’t understand. And that is why the entire simple, evident bullshit of quantum and big-bang physics explained here in its simplest terms has become so confuse.

The same happen for example with the racket of the issue of money the language of social power who controls the world and the American FED makes so complex to issue that the Americans really believe the fact a few private banksters have hijacked their democracy issuing money and giving orders of work with them to their slavish population is ‘freedom’.  Indeed, wall street invents a digital number called money for free, and for example, this week invented 20 billions and gave it to a crony friend, for a silly nilly crapcode repetitive algorithms, called snapchat, but if they want the minimum welfare they must pay every penny with taxes. The astounding racket of the cdo scam – over 2 trillions extorted in taxes – worked the same way: people in that country are so clueless about what money is and who invents it, they handled 2 trillions to bankers who just had ‘invented’ false mortgages, and sold it ‘twice’. Well, instead of going to jail, they sold those mortgages a 3rd time to the people of America on exchange for 2 trillions, and people gave to them. 

The whole circus of modern ‘mathematical physics’ and quantum interpretations, big-bang explosions and the role of physicists as the high priests of knowledge is born of the same concept: ‘people must remain ignorant for them to obey’ said Calvin, the biblical bigot. ‘If you repeat a lie many times people will believe it, the bigger the lie the more they will believe on it’, said Goebbels.

The Universe though does NOT work on ego. It works exactly on the opposite qualities: humble, cautious species do survive. And ‘simplicity is true genius’ (Leonardo) because ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein).

Closing and solving the meaning of mathematical physics.

The simplicity and capacity to explain the Universe with the 3 proper arrows of time is in that sense a revolution unlike none has happened in science, since copernicus simplified the equations of Ptolemy putting the sun in the center.

But CERN is an industry NOT a group of high-minded scientists trying to understand better the thoughts of God. This was our earlier error.  And the reason why reason never mattered to them.

Indeed, before putting up genocide suits we tried to talk to them. I even sent a memoir with all the solutions to all the problems they say they want to research – from the unification equation of charges and masses, trivial in duality and 5D metric as they are both accelerated vortices of time of the quantum, microscopic and gravitational, macroscopic scale…

To the 3 families of mass, trivial as they are the ternary ages of evolution of informative mass of the Universe, needed to construct the galaxy…

To the meaning of dark matter, trivial as it is the halo of strangelets and other quark species of lumps, which hide 96% of the external Universe…

To why there is more particles than antiparticles, trivial as the antiparticle is the ‘entropic arrow of death’ of the particle.

And so while there are as many particles and antiparticles, BECAUSE THE ARROW OF LIFE IS DOMINANT and lasts much LONGER than the arrow of death, which is an instant of time, we see MORE PARTICLES, as we see more living than corpses.

So, let us put SOME more proofs on the margin, NOW for the most famous unresolved questions of mathematical physics, the Nature of dark matter; why they are 3 families of mass, 3 states of matter (entropic gas, liquid S=t, and solid information0, 3… (well all those 3 questions are already resolved). So just not to bother the pedantic scholar which I am sure, has a 1000 page proof to read somewhere in his desk (: finish with  the unification of forces and the particle-antiparticle, conundrum. We chose them also because they are closely connected to CERN.

First the one we just referred on particles and anti-particles:

In Feyman dyagrams, antiparticles move to the past rightly, they are the inverse arrow of particles Now we know what this means: they are the death of antiparticles, but we see them in simultaneous space-time, when properly ordered would be a sequential Particle<Big-bang>Antiparticle-death:

Indeed, death happens in an instant and life in a long period, as we do NOT see hardly any corpse and someone like Buddha, thought life particles were immortal, we do not see the instant of antiparticles≈entropic death.

Thus in duality the equation of death is also trivial:  Min. Time-information (death moment)  x Max. Space-entropy (explosion of information).

As in big-bangs and deaths that happen in an instant of time… (he, he, i like that word, trivial , to put down the homunculus ego ‘a lot’).

Ok, then you have here the development of the ages of life: Birth: Max. Information (seed of time) in a lower ∆-1 scale, which emerges in:

∆º:  Youth (Max. entropy x Min. Information) < Maturity (information x entropy = energy) > 3rd age (Max. Information) and then dissolves back:

∆-1: Death = 0-time information x ∞ entropy.

And this is the equation of any big bang that happens in no time, expands enormously space and entropy because the big-bang IS the equation of death of physical matter. And that is what it will be for mankind. 

Mr. Bohm, the expatriate knew better.

Now we can deal with this theoretical minimum with Mr. Bohm, supposed hidden variables; expand Einstein’s worldlines into world cycles and see how imaginary numbers reflect a present wave of space-time shown in the previous Feynman diagram, and negative numbers the inverse arrow of informative time, opposed to that of lineal spatial positive motion/numbers. Just a token on the simple and not malicious Universes… once we have shown that the closure of numbers happens because those are all the mirrors we need to reflect space, time, its energetic space-time combinations and the scales of the fifth dimension.

The 3 ages of numbers – let us recall – started with space numbers, the obvious counting of populations in space with natural numbers and its fractional division, but the visual homunculus did NOT understood much of the others, just ‘found them and get used to them’ – a fact of course only Von Neumann recognises.

All the other numbers are as today high priest parlance on the imaginary, magic language, repeated in memorized mantras, on the belief, uttering the equation will create the physical world or imaginary black hole, as Hawking thinks – no joke. Ok, I enjoy irony perhaps too much, given the consequences of that blind attitude to reason.

Let us then for good measure put just an example of the reality of lateral bidimensional space-time complex numbers, which appear in the Schrodinger equation, the cornerstone of quantum physics. And what really means, as only Bohm understood, when we DO know rationally what time and numbers are:

It is Schrodinger no-time dependent wave of quantum physics.

As it is no time dependent it represents a complete world cycle of past, present and future. So we can study its 3 arrows of time together:

Past (kinetic≈entropic, moving energy) + Future (Potential, in-form-ative, static energy) = Present wave, represented by i-numbers; which are NOT here, as quantum physics realise with certain surprise, mere ‘artefacts of calculus’ but ‘REAL’ in its meaning.

So  the ‘wave-state’ is a present, ST-state, (as shown in the Feynman diagram  perhaps the most intuitive of post-war physicists) and as it happens is the function which has the i-number (right side). While in the left side we have the kinetic≈entropic energy of the wave, which is the relative past and the potential (to be used into the future) energy of the wave, Vψ.

So the equation is the full world cycle of existence of a wave in time, which we show in different versions in the graphs below:

Screen Shot 2016-05-19 at 17.23.17




In the graph, thanks to the ‘serendipitous’ error of earlier mathematicians, which could not conceive negative≈inverse motions, the real line was broken into perpendicular co-ordinates, which are perfect to represent world cycles, where the real line represents Spe (max. size, X-oordiantes) and the negative axis represents information, in as much as its development rests ‘entropy’ to the real numbers; being complex bidimensional numbers the combined expression of TIME-SPACE WAVES.

Thus the complex plane IS the mathematical  representation of a world cycle of time – not a worldline as physicists want it, because they did NEVER recognise the ‘high, dimension of information’ needed to complete a world cycle.

So we see first the world cycle expressed in ‘lateral numbers. Then the world cycle of life in 3 representations – the first one is the same that the complex graph, tumbled; the next one, the best philosophical representation by the Taoist Chinese culture, who understood duality better than western physics 3000 years ago; the 3rd as a representation of a vortex of physical time (charges and masses, whose mathematical unification with cyclical time is one of the first results I obtained in duality 20 years ago, and physicists are still fighting to understand – i have it in my post on cosmology, a work still in progress.

This physicists don’t know and it is a wonder of the ‘automaton’ Universe that they DO use C-numbers to study world cycles, without knowing what they are and what they study.

We see indeed, what an i-number does: to rotate from a relative past/future to a relative future/past a function of existence, through a 90° middle angle, that is, the middle ST balanced point, in which the present becomes a bidimensional function, with a REAL, + (relative past-entropic coordinates) and an imaginary, negative (future coordinates) elements.

It is so ‘crystal clear’, symmetric and beautiful that when I found it 20 years ago, I did have literally a mental orgasm.

Now, this needs just a few clarifications:

first the fact that we move ‘backwards’ in the graph from future to past, in as much as most graphs indeed are measuring the ‘motion’ of lineal time which is the relative Spe Function; so the negative side becomes the time function…

This physicists could never resolve, obviously because Time for physicists has only one dimension, lineal motion or entropy and one function, locomotion. So they do not understand world cycles, which they simplify into worldline.

And when you ‘ask’ what is life a physicist will not talk of the world cycles of ‘time-existence’ and all its motions between generation and extinction, latter studied in more detail, but of your lineal locomotions, as if that was all what time is for you, to move with your legs, and then he will trace a worldline of your motions and say that is your ‘time worldline’, and enthusiastically babble about if you can displace left or right according to speed, on that cone of light space-time, etc. All nonsense, which is worth to know for particles going at c-speed but resolves nothing about the meaning of your time existence:


Still physicists’ work is quite useful as most ‘short- motions’ in space-time do happen in a single ‘size and time speed’, as when you move up and down, left and right, except when you move through life and death. Those single locomotions in a single space-time sheet, is what Physicists study.

But motions in time=change are mostly informative motions, changes in the form of beings, and so the reductionism of physicists to a single locomotion in space (V=s/t or S²=x²+y²+z²-c²t² in relativity), are extremely simplified models of reality.

Still they are right and in fact easily converted to the equations of 5D metric. For example, the equation of Einstein merely tell us that the bidimensional coordinates of space (x²+y²+z²=S²) are equal to the bidimensional coordinates of time, (ct)², which are negative in sign, as they are the inverse arrow of time, that ‘warps’, shrinks, informs the normal distance S² into a ‘wave’ curve.

Something obvious as relativity at c-speed ‘warps’ motion into a wave of light space-time we write: S²=x²+y²+z²-c²t²;

Hence the warping time-function in negative. So relativity is a variation on the same theme. And it is ok, excellent work.

What is NOT ok about  physicists IS THEIR EGO PARADOX – which coupled with technological power made mankind to reduce their knowledge of time=motions to single locomotions. As IF MOTIONS/CHANGES OF FORM, OF IN-FORM-ATION never mattered.

The second clarification we shall do now with the Ockham-Fermat-Leonardo-Einstein method – God is simple and not malicious (: is even more to the point – as we are now show you HOW TRUTH is Bohm, the expatriate.

The Schrodinger equation, we show, is ternary.

Since besides the energy-wave state and the particle-informative element there is a 3rd entropic element, a quantum field.

What Bohm did to fully grasp what really IS the quantum reality is to ad to the wave-particle, the quantum field, which is NOT a hidden variable, but a term of that equation written in polar form.

Now, we said that all what exists is a ternary system generated in time and space by a simple fractal generator equation. So are physical systems:

|-Spe (Relative past moving limbs/fields) < Relative Present hyperbolic ST-waves/bodies> Relative future O-informative particles/heads

And all what De broglie and Bohm did was to ‘intuitively understand this’ for the specific case of a quantum wave, which has again those 3 elements. So they just said: there is a quantum field of pure motion at distance (non-local quantum potential field), over which a wave rides, and over the wave the particle feeding on that motion chooses the best path, to move, as it does a ray of light (my country man Fermat found that too :).

So he just signalled the 3 elements, and then in a stroke of genius, he represented the schrodinger hyperbolic wave written in ‘Cartesian coordinates’ in circular Particle coordinates, called ‘Polar coordinates’  and voila! there it appeared ‘magically’ the entropic field that moves the particle. So we could either see the whole system as a ‘present wave’ or as a Past field>Future particle.

So we do have 2 fundamental states of quantum physics, the spatial, wave, present, simultaneous state (hence observed diffuse with uncertain position) and the Past to Future, evolutionary time flow that transforms the entropy of the field into the information of the particle, equivalent to the arrow of information in life through 3 ages, and the inverse reversal death of the future particle when it collides with the past antiparticle resulting into a wave of present energy.

All this being the type of an iceberg called Non-Aristotelian logic that deals with the rules and combinations of ‘finite’, local time arrows, as there is no contradiction in the fact that when we die we travel locally to the relative past of less information, since being all entities finite, enclosed by a membrane, it is NOT the whole Universe, which travels together as Hawking thinks, so he can ‘sic’ enter a black hole, come in the past and kill his grand-father and other silly-nilly paradoxes born of the error of a single Universe absolute, lineal time-clock (the mechanism of the homunculus’ dexterous hands, which he has imposed to measure the infinite beats an clocks of the infinite but finite systems of the Universe.)

So yes, Bohm found the 3 parts of the quantum world, and that must have been another mental orgasm, I imagine for Bohm and his professor Mr. Einstein, which meant Bohm was soon expelled from science even from the US, for being a crackpot who did not believe in the sacred creationist theory of Mr. Bohr, the observer of the Universe (Saint Augustine said that God was the ‘seer’ of time, now God was the Observer, who created the particles when he looked at them 🙂

Einstein though, who only made thought experiments based in sound humble ‘real mathematics’, had quipped to creationist physicists, ‘those who impose truth with authority will be the laughs of the Gods’ and ‘technology has outstripped humanity’ – meaning artefacts of science, did not reveal the truth; and more ominously he set the clock of the end of the world, fearing Nuclear Physicists who do not think too much will do us all – now that they are seeking the meaning of dark matter, manufacturing it at home, it is indeed time to put the clock at 12; but as Hawking runs the clock – fat chance he will recognise his BH might evaporate us all.

So let us consider that other conundrum. What is dark matter? We already resolved it with the ternary structure of the galaxy, but as physicists like numbers, we shall see now how thought experiments reveal as the Greeks and Einsteins always knew much more than machines of huge cost, for the cheap price of a few words and a kilo of old grey healthy matter. Indeed, it took millions of $ to calculate the dark matter of the Universe. Another trivial margin (:

How simple indeed can be the answer to all the great questions?

Extremely simple as 3 is really a small number and the numbers around it, suffice to explain the 3 ages of life.

So all the important numbers of science turn around 1, 2 and 3, which as Einstein put it would have to be ‘the final essential constants that reflect best the game of existence’ :

screen-shot-2016-12-30-at-12-18-37 screen-shot-2016-12-30-at-12-06-38






In graph, the 2 fundamental mathematical and physical constants of Nature

We shall depart from their ‘unification’ to explain how they mirror Universal creation of reality departing from ‘perfect ratios of entropy and information’. As such G and Q can be easily unified as two space time vortices of 2 scales of nature, the quantum and gravitational scale, showing the ratios between distance/speed/lineal space and time cycles/curvatures.

While the 3 main constants of mathematics are directly related to the 3 ages that generate space-time:

  1. pi, relates the transformation of  a spatial field of entropy into a vortex of temporal information: 3 x ( Spe)  > ∏ Tiƒ.
  2. e the constant of the only function, which is a derivative of itself, eª  represents the fundamental function of reproduction and growth of any system, at the lower ‘cellular scale’, as the system increases by a derivative at each step. Or in terms of 3: e+e/10=3, where 10 is the commonest growth ‘finitesimal’ as 10, is the simplest ‘whole organism’, with 3 x 3 ‘corners’ that represent the 3 arrows of time and a 10th central unit, the mind that ‘transcends’ as the 1 of a higher social scale.
  3. Phi, the golden ratio is essentially the demising ratio that relates the entropic ‘length’ and ‘informative’ height of a bidimensional ‘page of information

phi thus is the number of the palingenesis, or inner distribution of growth, during the first age of the being, above 1; e is the number of scalar growth, above 2 : e+e/10= 3…

And Pi, above 3, is the number that converts entropy into information, (Poincare’s conjeture).

Yet pi is not perfect. And if we were to consider the real pi of nature, as all ‘membranes’  do have ‘holes’  through which parallels of entropy and information cross, we would say that a membrane is π=3+0.14 apertures, through which the singularity mind in the center can see behind the membrane, the outer world. So we have always a 96% of dark matter, which allows us to see through: π-3/π

How much of dark matter there is? We know is 96% and we see only 4%. Again this took enormous effort of machines to measure it, but it is another ‘proof on the margin’, once you understand properly maths. We said that pi is NOT perfect. In fact, the closure of pi is 3 lineal parts that become a closed topology. It is the hexagonal pi (perimeter 3, radius 1) the strongest polygon; and that of the most curved gravitational space in relativity. But if we consider that 3 diameters of entropy create a circle, then there are 0.14 potential windows to see from its center, surrounded by the dark matter halo.

This means: π-3/3=4% of reality is WHAT we see. And indeed 96% of reality is invisible dark matter and energy, ‘screened’ by the halo. We are inside a  relative gravitational gala cell and the homunculus should know his position in the Universe, which likely if we could see it all would look much more as a local organism till the horizon beyond we cannot even see that 4%.

 And finally, la-la-la the big prize, THE UNIFICATION EQUATION is even more beautiful and simple. Ok, it has a few numbers more – here a copy-paste from some other posts:

In that regard, we have now a better mirror theoretically to understand the Universe, with 2 arrows so we just need to apply it.

This sound-sound theory of the Universe, IS called Duality, the science which explains reality with the 2 arrows of time, lineal entropy and cyclical information, form, stored in the frequency and form of those logic closed circuits and ‘clocks of time’ of which brains, particles and chips are made.

It has always been with us, for simple humble people to wonder, since even the smallest atom follows it laws. So taoists called yin, information, yang, entropy and its ∞ combinations the creative energy of reality.

Duality as we said has always been in the tradition of knowledge, as it is obviously truth. Specially in Asian cultures. So Hindi called the 2 arrows of time, the female, informative principle, Visnu and Shiva, the God of entropy and death; and its ‘energetic’ combinations the ‘hairs of Brama.’ Duality is everywhere, from the computer you are watching made with binary languages of ‘O’ and ‘|’, to the duality of body and mind, female with curved bodies and males with lineal ones; and then when we look at it in depth, trinity, its combination comes (even there is a gay sex that mixes qualities of both).

The only discipline of science which is ‘entropy only’ and has ‘entropy only theories of the Universe as dogma’ is Nuclear physics. Even if of course duality is all over physics, albeit not expressed in terms of time arrows. So for example, a time cycle which is represented by ‘frequencies’, appears in physics as the ‘inverse function of lineal time’: ƒ=1/T.

And this is the key to understand the unification of charges and masses, since a mass or a charge, is just a vortex of cyclical time.

in the graph, 3 representations, the classic one as a sink is NOT real, the second one is a real picture – a charges as a vortex of time, the 3rd one, is a fractal picture of a hurricane. So mass is a vortex-clock of information, evident in a simple fusion of two equations; E=hƒ + E=mc2 M=ƒ(K).

So mass is a vortex of time of the larger cosmological scale and a charge of a lower scale. But since smaller clocks run faster, as faster vortices attract more, charges are paradoxically stronger forces of attraction that cosmic gravitational scales.

Indeed, we summarize the formal and functional differences between entropy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:

Maximal Space-Entropy = Minimal Form=body Vs  Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

But if information is smaller and faster in scales of lesser space, and information is carried in the form and cycles of clocks of time, then we must not only add a dimension of height to time, but a dimension of ‘scale’, and this my friends set us for an even bigger r=evolution of thought, that of the metric equations of the fifth dimension of space-time.

The metric equation of the fifth dimension.

metrics 5th dimension

-Tiƒ: Smaller space-scales have faster time cycles that encode the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles.

-Spe:Bigger wholes that deliver synchronous motions to those lower scales that deliver ‘quantum, genetic or memetic information’ (physical, biological and social systems), become symbiotic, as ‘parts’ and wholes that co-exist in a single ‘supœrganism’, the ‘abbreviated’ name we shall give to the fundamental particle-being of the Universe: a system made of limbs/fields of entropy=motion and heads/particles with form, which combine into ‘body-waves’ of energy, and co-exist in at least 3 scales of size from the point of view of its central scale as a being.

All beings of reality are indeed made of lineal entropic limbs/fields, the geometry that moves faster, and spherical particles/heads of information, the ‘volume that stores more form in lesser space’, joined by body-waves of hyperbolic energy, which combine and iterate both.

And this happens, because the universe of scales of space-time has an astoundingly simple but profound metric equation: S x T = K, MEANING that from larger wholes to smaller parts it moves synchronically, and from smaller parts to larger wholes, it codes information. And together in symbiosis the information of smaller faster systems and the motion of larger, stronger wholes, create a present being, a body-wave of energy.

So the most important dynamic element of the fifth dimension is the ‘inverse’arrows of entropy and information of the lower graph. And the fact that smaller beings are better with information, more intelligent and larger beings, stronger with more capacity to move larger wholes:

Smaller systems run faster metabolic and informative cycles and so accumulate more information in the frequency and form of its cycles. And they code larger systems: particles code molecules, genes organisms and memes societies, because their smaller carriers are faster.

And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more  energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming super organisms.

And we resume this with a simple equation, which is in science call the ‘metric equation’ of a dimension of space-time, in this case the 5th dimension of scalar, organic systems, which is the arrow of future of the Universe:

5D metric: Spe (spatial size) x Tiƒ (temporal clocks of information= ∆-constant

That is, the product of the speed of information and entropy of the system remains constant, so smaller and larger beings can co-exist together in present.

And we call this ‘constant of present’ Energy.

For example, a fly thinks 10 times faster (the scale is decametric), and so you cannot catch it with your slower larger being and it can co-exist.

And of course it applies to physics, as masses are vortices of time information, which end its world cycle of existence in the explosive dimension of entropy and death in a cyclical, fractal Universe, in which big-bang means merely the E<=>Mc² death side of Einstein equation.

But this equation runs the other way around creating mass, collapsing entropy into mass. In fact Einstein first wrote it as M=E/c², in a landmark paper, explaining how gravitation could create mass out of entropy, as those strangelets and black holes, do collapsing light mass into heavy mass particles, as galaxies do, collapsing vacuum space into gravitational mass.

And true physics needs both arrows of time.

So to calculate the work=energy of a motion, E=1/2 mv², we use an equation that combine a lineal entropic motion (kinetic entropy) with a form (mass and its potential energy).

And the result is a present energetic being, which will go through 3 ages in its time evolution, the young age of entropy and maximal motion, the reproductive, mature age of maximal energy and the 3rd age of information.

As we find immediately that we can describe all its physical scales, the atomic, planetary, galactic and big-bang scales, with the same topological forms and 5D metric, giving us a simplex ‘vortex equation’ that unifies both charges and masses as relative ‘accelerated time clocks’ of all those scales – the so long searched for ‘unification equation of charges and masses’, which Einstein failed to discover as mathematics did not come out with a fractal concept of scales till Mandelbrot’s 73 seminal work.

So we can unify them with a single equation once we observe the only difference between its attractive power (hierarchy problem) is the fact that according to 5D metric, charges turn much faster and hence as any fast rotating vortex, attract much more strongly than cosmological masses, whose minimal quanta and force is 10ˆ40 times larger in space and weaker in cyclical speed, which i at ‘logic level’ (in the posts of cosmology at quantitative level) yields:

5D Unification: Atom Charge vortex: ∆-3≈ Max. Tiƒ x min. Spe ≈ Max. Sp x Min. Tif ≈ ∆+3 Galaxy mass vortex: w² x r³ = U.C (G,Q) X A.M. (Active magnitude).

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

Sun mass = 2 × 10ˆ30 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10ˆ-7 rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ˆ-11 kgˆ-1 mˆ3 rad. secˆ-2

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10ˆ16 rad. secˆ -1 = w (electron);

5.3 × 10ˆ-11 m. (Bohr radius);

proton mass = 1.6 × 10ˆ -27 kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10ˆ39 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/cˆ2.

But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.

To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it.

Of course, this result is obtained using the underlying concepts of Newton->Poisson (gradient of gravitational potential), refined in Einstein’s ‘simultaneous pictures’ of those vortices, to study its relative curvature, which is the static view of an informative clock of time. So we can observe the similarities of all those concepts: curvature, speed of time, relative fractal scale, vortex attraction & universal constant as a ratio between the ‘curvature=speed in time’ and ‘size-distance’ in space of the system.

What matters to us here is this, the galaxy is organically like a cell, mathematically like an atom, with a positive center, which means a black hole is a top quark star, as top quarks are positive and are the exact size to become ultradense black holes in large numbers, and the electron-like halo is made of strangelets because strangelets are negative, and so they are the electron-like membrane of the halo, and what we are, homunculus?

So we can close as it is customary in any cyclical time-space analysis up and down the scales of 5D left or right in the negative, imaginary and positive numbers, of quanta of entropy, frequencies of information or space-time energies, two simple graphs that explain it all what remains to say of mathematical physics. On the left side you can see alas, the hydrogen electron with its two electromagnetic lobes, as those we saw in the galaxy-atom and the supposed big-bang.

All scales are the same, the fractal Universe is ABSOLUTELY RELATIVE, not only in motions in space (Galileo, Einstein) but in scales of size (Nottale) and topological forms. I just took this self-evident truth for anyone who is NOT an homunculus ego to its final consequences, with the metric equations of the 5th dimension.

You want another proof? Look at the right side, the 3 most important equations of the Universe those of energy, in the 3 scales, the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales are ALL cases of 5D metric as the unification equation was; since present energy waves are BESIDES INFORMATIVE POINCARE MINDS ABLE TO TRAVEL IN INFINITE SCALES.

This is called the Maxwell invariance  of light waves at scales. Energy does transit between scales, but in all of them we have a formula with a quanta of space, and a growing TIME-frequency of information, and both balance each other as we move up and down in the world cycles of life and death, from seminal seeds of information of smaller, higher frequencies, to slower wholes. E= H (quanta of space in the ∆-i scale) x ƒ (frequency of the wave) -> E= k (quanta of entropy in the thermodynamic human, ∆-scale) x nT (Frequency of time), and then our mass frequency, moving with the quanta of light speed, the quanta of space of the galactic scale.

Close your eyes. Think, do not see, the astounding beauty of the simple, fractal Universe. Feel communion with the whole, as your nothing, but dust of space-time in between the proton-top-quark-star-black hole in the center and the electron-strangelet negative halo. NOTHING and now you will return.

Since THE PROBLEM HERE IS THAT CERN WILL DO TOP QUARKS, which is the decay product of Higgs and vice versa, and strangelets, which is what it does not yet in enough numbers. ALAS, what else do you want as a proof, of the risks of a machine, which is worth nothing because the people on it knows nothing and it is like you and men in an infinite Universe of infinite scales of size, all of them self-similar ternary organic systems, all of them with bio-topo-mathematical properties… but I want to stop here, i get berserk too often, and look exactly what they say I am…

In any case, I HAVE proved to you ad nauseam, all what i wanted to prove with a few margins: the experimental nature of mathematics, the simplicity of the Universe, the homology of all its beings, hence the nullity of the homunculus, its absolute relativity, the beauty of thought experiments, the greatness of Mr. Einstein and Mr. Bohm and Mr. Godel and Mr. Hoyle, the 4 titans of this discipline all dragged in the dirt by CERN, as we will.

Dust of space-time, ashes to ashes.

Now, the reader as many personal friends have told me, would expect me to continue my career, to lobby, shout, keep fighting but this is not built-in into the character of the revolutionaries of science. We are NOT social, celebrity-seeking people. As Planck put it: 

New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.

Contrary to the ad hominem campaign, for me was a true martyrdom to oblige myself to open this blog, make the film strange matters, go to court, warn people make press releases, lobby my peers – I hated every part of it. I was simply forced by the global attitude and felt always like sisifus rising a rock that mankind together should have blown up with a rational, humble, preventive attitude. This was not my role on life, which was and it is, now as a lonely explorer to look through what Picasso called ‘his window to the absolute’ , in my case my window to trinity and the fifth dimension. Every lonely genius who has broken into his field is like this. 

The ones in the subconscious collective you can remember from Leonardo writing backwards, to Leibniz or Fermat communicating only on private letters, to Darwin 20 years without explaining himself to Marx, writing alone in the British library, to Einstein, who couldn’t stand anymore the obnoxious lobbying of that retarded egolatric Bohr, on a crusade to prove himself above heavens and earth and his colleague Hllbert, who had the chuptzah of publishing Relativity theory first as if it was his, to de Broglie, with whom I feel a special connection for the simplicity and depth of his thoughts, akin to the simplicity and depth of my pioneer work on the 5th dimension others should have by now extended as a paradigm if I had not been vaporised, have in common that loneliness, on the view of the human lack of ethics and intelligence, both in our corrupted leadership with his meaningless honor ceremonies and the mass, always ready to cheer its pumping-ego religious theories of entitlement.  And yet knowing those precedents we came out of the closet.

The logic that guided us – that humans were corrupted and the system was corrupted by power – we all know that – but in front of a collective global genocide, moreover happening in Europe, seemingly a civilised place, people will discuss the theme and reason and life would prevail – was wrong.

All courts followed ‘suit’ and dismissed ‘technically’ all those suits, since as the Hague court told my lawyers, ‘we only judge genocides’ once they have happened. Indeed, they will be busy busy trying to regain the lost information, when they are inside the black hole to see what went wrong. Sorry, after so many years of angst, I am a bit cynical about the Homunculus species, but not about the Universe. In this as in so many things, I coincide with Einstein and its concept of infinity (mind the reader I consider myself a physicist, and study physical systems with great pleasure, but not a ‘human physicists’ of the kind we find in the big-bang and Copenhagen schools and we shall return to that): humans are infinitely stupid due to their ego and the Universe is likely to be infinite in scales, hence in relative sizes and time cycles that will last for ever.

Peering alone into the window of love.

In the next graph we see some of those scales.

In the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of spatial entropy (ab. S, $pe), studied exhaustively by physicists and temporal information, Tiƒ (grossly underated and misunderstood, as the view of a Universe with a single entropy arrow dominates physics). The interaction of those 2 arrows, in fact, create the complexity of the Universe, which CANNOT be explained only with the lineal entropic motions of simplex physical models of the universe, only apt to describe the simplest scales of space and matter.

Now, we shall say something that will surprise you, this ternary organic, fractal universe has an even deeper language of emotions, which has no description in numbers, and it is the language of love. Indeed, as we are all space-time beings, besides mathematics and topology, and biology, what we humans feel must be felt by other beings and this is the ultimate arrow of the fractal universe, completely opposed to entropy, social love, the sharing of energy and information between parts of the universe, which become new wholes, which are in the future, as its parts must be in the relative past for the whole to become.

So we write there the graph of the absolute long arrow of time, networks that share energy and information among its citizens cells, which in the models of sociology i used to ‘define how to construct a perfect super organism of history able to survive’ and justifies the good side of love religion, but is completely taboo in the worldly religion of military, nuclear physics; whose people are so brutally unethical that on my dealings with them i do indeed compare their absolute despise of life an its sciences, with the harshest jihads and biblical bigots with its despise of human art, sexual reproduction, life and true love.


Now it should be clear why languages are lesser mirrors: because the whole, the UNIVERSE holds ALL THE LANGUAGES AND ALL ITS PROPERTIES, BUT EACH LANGUAGE, ONLY describes parts of the whole properties of the Universe – even in this enlarged version of mathematics, which puts logic (not mathematical) equations to the life-death cycle and other elements of the space-time Universe. As there are ‘sensations’, such as pain, associated to pressure or information, or pleasure to entropy and expansion, or choices, such as those at each moment of future time, between the 3 arrows of entropy-motion, information-perception, iteration-reproduction, or those associated to the program of evolution, survival and selection of species, which give ambiguity to the future paths of existence, and are better described with temporal verbs.

It is not the purpose of this blog to lay down the entire model of a Universe of infinite world-languages, first conceived by Leibniz, but to show, how far removed from a deeper knowledge of reality is the ‘childish game’ of bombing the earth and taking pictures of irrelevant particle debris, which only matter when you reduce all the arrows of time, all the languages of knowledge to a single arrow, a single language, and a few digital numbers. 

Of course, for the scholastic philosopher of the middle ages, the bizarre fictions of the language, such as how many ‘angels’ fit on a pin, provoked hot debates, and even duels on La Sorbonne; and for the believer in big-bangs and the fantaphysics of the mathematical language, what goes on CERN is truly important to find dragoons and SUSYs.

But this is a theme that unlike the angels in the pin does have collateral effect in all mankind. And this IS WHAT mankind has NOT understood, as it seems also hypnotised by magic numbers it does not understand, big toys assembled by the big hands on the homunculus boys; as children, the staple food of the Universe, cannot even ‘imagine death’ – reason why they so easily die. Turtles hatch in costa rica and the lizard has only to open his mouth – the children will enter into the hole.

And so we can also ad a final assessment on the relationship of languages with reality, more sophisticated that the previous Penrose graph.

In as much as the lower scales of the fifth dimension carry faster time clocks, they code the information of the larger scales. So what we call a ‘language’, which runs as the tiƒ software of a ‘wave of energy’ IS MERELY A LOWER SCALE OF FORMS OF 5D SYSTEMS, which codes NON-E GEOMETRIC-SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS AND NON-A LOGIC-TEMPORAL ONES.

By this we mean, information stores memorial cycles of time, which will then be imprinted in the entropy of reality, enlarged into a higher scale as a seminal seed that codes and reproduces larger forms.

So all forms start as a seed of language, you started as a seed of ‘information’ in the ∆-1 cellular scales; societies appear as seed of prophetic information, in the ∆-1 memetic scale of the prophet and maker of instruments. Matter systems start coded in the quantum language of mathematical information (spins, electronic quantum numbers) coded in smaller particles. Galaxies are coded in the information stored in gravitational invisible quark relationships within black holes and strangelets, which HUMANS WILL NEVER DECODE, at best hint at the existence of an ‘homunculus’ of the galaxy within the ‘information stored in black holes’ (Maldacena hypothesis), on a more compressed five-dimensional mapping of the whole 4D galaxy. Anthills are coded in pheromonal, chemical languages, stored in the queen metabolism. Crystals code in the structure of its ‘cell’, the future growth of its larger solid structure.  And so on.

THEN all those languages coding they are unfolded as a ‘program’ of fractal reproduction in a larger scale:

So languages code in seeds of maximal information and minimal speed a ‘fractal program of reproduction and reorganisation’ of clone-cells/atoms/citizens that become then a superorganjc ternary system in space-time. Below we see what would then be the meaning of the ‘big-bang’ IF, there is above the galaxy-atom another huge scale of reality, and/or below the atom-galaxy. We don’t know. We will NEVER know. The homunculus ego CANNOT peer, below the point-particle and the Universe’s horizon, in the limit of ‘entropic death of light’, when light becomes a pure action at distance, gravitational space with 0 information, whose speed appears to us infinite, in terms of the simple 5D equation:

Vst=Spe/Tiƒ, whereas we add the ‘topological forms’ of a wave of present speed, an entropic spatial lineal distance and an informative cyclical time. Thus when the wave carries no information, as gravitational languages do for man, who does not perceive them, Vst=Spe/Tiƒ = Spe/0=∞, speed seems to us infinite, non-local. And this is what we perceive of the quantum field discovered by bohm, non-local action at distance, because it is the ‘gravitational scale’ we do not perceive.

BUT THIS DOES NOT MEAN AT ALL that black holes ‘have no hair’, as Wheeler thought, because humans CANNOT OBSERVE the information coded in the gravitational scale, above us in mass density beyond the event horizon, with more order, T<0 temperatures, and below us in the action at distance of its gravitational forces, with V>c, and 0 perceived information.

In that sense the Universe of scales can be understood in terms of ‘Nested russian dolls’ with increasing latitude on the ∆±i scales of each growing super organism. So for example, your cells, are smaller than your organism, their informative code is genetic and slower, chemical, than the nervous, electric code of your organism, and so its V=S/T IS SLOWER, even if it is small thing. 

So the whole is your nested larger informative, faster nervous system, and larger body, with its faster flows of blood. But you are inside a global super organism or civilisation coded externally by faster light visual thought, and larger entropic territorial nations. And the earth and solar system of electromagnetic space-time is a ‘cell’ inside a larger gravitational galaxy, coded by faster than c, gravitational information, invisible to us, with denser top quark black hole stars, which do have hair and probably rotate in its heavy mass vortices beyond the c-horizon at faster than light speed.

This of course will be nonsense for the reduced mind of the homunculus physicist, with its limits of understanding of reality. It is like talking to a lower cockroach of chemical languages, which will run away if you throw a light beam on it. And this of course leads us to the III element of this question: how and when the technological civilisation reduced itself so much in the search for true knowledge about the complex structure of the universe, the cultural element, because if we learned something on those suits is that while they attacked us ad hominem, we were fighting a ‘culture’ , the animetal culture of people obsessed by weapons, money and machines, as vehicles of knowledge, who did NOT do thought experiments, understood nothing and without an ethic verbal volume care nothing for life and survival, a reduced ‘pseudo-religious sect’ of pythagoreans, ready to throw out of the boat, as legend has any Hipppasus, who dare to try to enlighten them further in both ethic, moral survival terms, and mathematical, logic experimental sound models of the Universe.

Absolute relativity vs. homunculus ego
It is now clear the title of the post.
On one side the laws of the mighty infinite Universe; which makes us absolutely relative, in motion, form and scalar location in the Universe.
The natural expansion of the work of Godel proving the mental relativity of mathematics.
Of Hoyle and Einstein proving the spatial relativity of big bang scales.’
Nowextended to the absolute relativity of the homunculus ego, even if he feels to be infinite in his finitesimal mind, inversion of the true infinite Universe:
1/∞= Mind = 0

As i imagine most people enter here for the gore, certainly this rewriting of 2017, mother’s day, will leave the blog empty, because let us face it, Einstein was right – the people of any position interested in truth is minimal. We live in a faked, VIRTUAL world and the unbearable lightness of being a homunculus makes absolute relativity more bearable – so what is left to the human condition in this ‘animetal age’. If anyone has come so far obviously the humble communion and nirvana with the absolute. This is as you can imagine not even the tip of the iceberg of the ‘future of science’, which will always be the future of the evolution of the human mind, and its languages, not its machines of measure.

But i am not giving you a treatise on the foundation of mathematics and the upgrading of the laws of your physical mirror, (some are put in a 5D article), but just put a bit of light on it, so you might understand this is a serious issue because we know still so little and are so limited, humility and caution should be the rule of the land.

Even if you revere physicists, they are still ‘idiot believers’ who hardly understand the true complex wholeness of the language of mathematics.

Even if they had solved the syntax and semantics of ALL the languages of the human mind, we are still a finitesimal mirror of the wholeness.

Since only the entire Universe has ALL the information about itself, which infinite finitesimal mirror-minds, monads in Leibniz’s jargon (another humble genius, massacred by the arrogant Newton) reflect with many languages, some of which we do NOT understand or see, as the gravitational language of information that guides the motions of black holes (‘the languages of god are infinite’ said Upanishads. And so the homunculus microbe would do much better not opening the ‘scalar Universe’ to the invisible point-particles of gravitation, which once they expand its fractal point to its real energy-size-mass will become huge black holes from the much larger cosmological gravitational scale that will eat up us all.

To know means nothing if you die, and those people neither know nor will survive. So they would do better without the crutches of machines for their homunculus minds, doing instead as Einstein did ‘thought experiments’.




‘Simplicity is genius’ Leonardo

You see how simple and easy to understand is the reproductive Universe when you change your chip, stop worshipping entropic digital robots, aka physicists with zero philosophical, conceptual intelligence, instead of the complicated, ill-interpreted views of physicists. Again for good measure: all is reproduction as even motion is reproduction:

A wave Motion on the other hand is the simplest information and moves faster because it need only to print a surface below, and again, the wave form that moves is independent of that indistinguishable lower level. So the wave keeps its form and travels truly fast as the in/form/ation, v=s/ti to imprint, is minimal.

Since motion is reproduction of information; motion is not only relative, but related to the density of information of a system. So as mass-information grows in density the system takes longer time to reproduce the Ti element of v=s/Ti, and so it slows down. And on the other extreme when information tends to zero speed increases. So as we humans perceive information with light that is our limit of speed of transmission of information we can perceive c=s/Ti. But this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of gravitational action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we have to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process).

Time travels  in terms of the fifth dimension.

So what is existence? A travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension in which you and any other being tries to reproduce information and create super organisms:

In the graphs, a human being as a traveller through the fifth dimension as all beings exist traveling through 5D scales, as they exchange energy and information in ‘EXI=actions’ that try to minimise its expenditure of energy (least action law, basis of most physical, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian equations), but guided by the informative mind, end up wrinking, and dying back in an entropic explosion that restores the balance of reality.

So YOU EXIST AS A TRAVELER through 10 dimensions of timespace,  as your topology changes, and so changes your functions in time and your relative position in the 3 scales of your ∆±1 supœrganism, as you are born (above graph of ages of life) as a seed of faster time clocks and then reproduce evolve and emerge in a larger slower scale of the fifth dimension as an individual part of a world with larger slower geological cycles.

Indeed Hutton said the earth was a super organism, (gaia) with slower time cycles. So i also called 10D, a theory of super organisms – as systems according to the metric and scales of the fifth dimension have faster clocks of time when they are smaller. So smaller parts co-exist with larger ones and code them with their faster clock-cycles carrying the information of the system in the curves and frequency of those cycles. hence particles code atomic systems, genes, human systems and memes code societies, departing from a single clonic form reproduced in all cells, in all believers in the book of revelation that reproduces a human civilisation and so on.

So this is how the Universe looks once we have established the existence of 3 time arrows of relative local entropic past, energetic presents and informative futures in all the ∞ scales of the fifth dimension, and defined all systems of reality as ‘travellers through the fifth dimension.

But I just pointed out a small ‘tip’ of an iceberg, which is just a human verbal mirror of a reality so deep as the Universe’s infinite scales.

Given though the astoundingly primitive outlook of physicists’ philosophy of science – all is about entropic whammies, as the ones they do for real on planet earth, just the tip answers all the weird features of their interpretation of space and time (quantum physics and relativity), and what I always found far more enticing – it perfectly fusion the 3 branches of human sciences, physics, biology and sociology, including all the mystical thoughts, all the memetic scales, all the conundrums of evolution nobody makes sense of it today, and as we said all the questions pending in the previous advance of physical space (quantum) and time (relativity) from the constant of c-speed, to reversals of time, to twin paradoxes, to quantum potential fields and dualities wave-particle, to black holes, galaxies, meaning of energy, etc.

So what has the informative Universe to say about the specific work of CERN in quarks and its transformations through the weak force? A lot; as essentially those are ‘time transformations’.

The weak event – a time process: ternary time systems vs. bidimensinal space sheets.

So focusing closer on what CERN’s research is all about, they focus on the study of quarks and weak-mediated processes, of which they have no idea, as they ignore its fundamental feature – to be NOT A FORCE OF SPACE but a temporal informative trans-formation.

Indeed, for decades physicists have tried to unify the electromagnetic and weak force observing its similar equations, with some differences, as if it were the same force of space, without realizing how simple is to do so when we know that the weak trans-form-ation of particles is NOT a force of space, but a process in time, with 2 simple immediate proofs: it does NOT have range in space, but happens in the same place. And it is the force which happens longer in time, being its ‘coupling constant’ a time constant.

As physicists know little about time except its use to measure translation in space, s= v/t or Einstein’s similar formula, S²=X²+y²+z²-(ct)², they have just a little mantra, they repeat ad nauseam – Newton’s formulae for two particles attracting in space, now much more complex mathematically but essentially the same.

Whatever a physicist ‘sees’ he will apply the spatial/motion mantra and declare a force of space between particles which will attract them. So when they found a phenomena which was diametrically inverse (hence a time phenomena) call it the weak force and try at pains to force-feed it into their equations of spatial forces, WHICH IT COULD NOT.

in the graph, most experiments at CERN including the Higgs, are related to the process of informative evolution of matter in time, mediated by the weak force, not a force but an event in time (that is why it is weak, it happens in the same place and transforms or kills in the process the particle.

This simple truth of an understanding of the arrows of time is NOT even thought of in the present philosophy of physical sciences based in lineal time and entropy, below the Gravity force, which IS NOT HAPPENING in the quantum scale of the fifth dimension but in the cosmological scale as Mach and Einstein first thought is for that reason even weaker, since it is hardly affecting our scale.

Such simple self-evident truths when the proper relational model of scalar space-time and its three arrows is put in place, gives us more theoretical insight that CERN will ever achieve, because ultimately what CERN means is the intellectual incapacity of modern physicists, to advance their science properly with pen on paper as we shall do in our posts on 5D³ physics and the fractal Universe.

3 is the name of the game OF TIME. So when we see 3 elements at fast time motion that seem to us simultaneous in space (3 QUARKS), they are the same quark transformed u-d-u in series. Reason why we cannot deconfine them except when we give it enough energy for it to reproduce (graph). Then they ‘get reproduced’. Why this error? Because quarks are ‘smaller’ so – remember, smaller system have faster time cycles – by the time we measure with our electromagnet clocks 1 ‘time quanta’, quarks have gone through 3 time quanta, and switch on and off in the constant space-state time-state, d-u-d-u trans-formation.

And so they seem to have 1/3rd impossible charge because that is how we perceive their time clocks – remember charges and masses are the time clocks of physical systems, and ours is ‘spin-related’, measured with the H-planck angular momentum of our electronic clocks.

At the bottom of the blunt error on the weak force, and hence on the HIGGS FIELDS, not a field nowhere to be seen (that doesn’t mind to modern physicists that scorn the scientific method and experimental evidence a la Hawking) but a local time process, besides the absurdity of abstract interpretations with no experimental proof of that field, lies the existence of multiple clocks in nature with different speeds, which physicists with its single clock-time cannot grasp.

So as they think all time clocks have the same speed, when they see a fast clock tracing multiple cycles/vortices of particles, they think it is not a time fast process but the sum of particles, not a fast quark but three slow quarks with the human clock-measure.

It is the inverse case of a film: earlier watchers of films didn’t realise it was a mirror language but thought it was real and abandoned theatres when trains came closer in the screen. And they thought those images were a single ‘train alive’, NOT 24 different pictures.

In inverse fashion cern theorists think its math equations are the being, not the language mirror and instead of a single quark moving fast, there are 3 slow quark vortices/clocks.

Thus to confuse a time process into a space process either because it is so fast that we see as when we see cars in the night a line of space when it is a series of time frequencies, is very common. So the easiest rule is to realise that space is bidimensional, left and right, up or down, but time is a sequence of 3 with a hierarchical order towards more information or an on-off life-death, entropy-information switch.

This kind of errors is very common among physicists, and endemic in the work of CERN precisely turning around the transformation of quarks into its 3 families by the weak trans-form (not a force of space but an event of time). The graphs illustrate those simple principles and the resulting three fundamental constants of nature, pi, phi and e, which appear constantly because indeed, the universe is a reproductive fractal.

And a beautiful part of mathematics is to understand those laws. i.e.: e+e/10=3, encodes the two scales 3 and 10 that structures the organic Universe. π-3/π=4%, encodes the holes 3 diameters turning into a pi cycle leave for the central singularity to perceive, leaving 96% of dark Universe (incidentally the dark entropy and dark matter, we electronic beings of other scale do not see). 

In that sense the decoding of the meaning of mathematical constants and numbers, basic equations and the symmetries between the laws of analysis (integrals/derivatives), which are the science of ∆-scales, topology, the science of space symmetries, sequential numbers and algebraic groups, which show temporal flows and space-time symmetries, which are at the heart of mathematical physics, a prime of 5D ³ is immensely more important than any picture CERN might do. And yet nobody cares – man is not a thinking being but an enzymen, for him knowledge is a machine picture and a great adventure to show around a quark canon.

So the work of Mr. Sheldon and peers on the electroweak ‘force’ is mathematically ok, but as usual among conceptual amateur physicists, they have been missing the essential feature of the weak force – to BE A TRANS-FORM-ative EVENT in time, NOT a force of space, but a process of in-form-ation, of creation of new particles with NO range in space – but for him to grasp that physicists should be ‘pros’ of the 3 arrows of time – and they have not even started in kindergarten 🙂 Humanity of course is today in the hand of ego-centered powerful kindergarten people, with big guns, call it Kim, Twitrump or Cernie; all of them daily oiled by their P.R.ess apparatus as geniuses with peanut brains, all shouting shouting, are all over the place, the sign of the entropic age of history, the age of chaos disorder and death.

But and that is why i feel justified to criticize them so heavily, it is my opinion that most errors of physics ultimately steam from their worldly profession as makers of weapons and digital machines. So HUMAN PHYSICS has not been  A CLEAN SEARCH FOR TRUTH AS PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE IS, but the application but ‘automaton’ people of the machines they discovered, first clocks, then telescopes and finally heat machines and weapons, to their worldview. So they reject conceptual verbal understanding as philosophers do, because their machines do not talk. They reject the other two arrows of time used as nebulous concepts of information and energy because they ARE OBSESSED BY ENTROPIC weapons. And they reject all other sciences of life, and information because that is NOT what they study. So again take your choice, are they stupid or eviL=anti-live? Both.

IT IS THEN easy to see this when the science was founded: Galileo was first master of the arsenal of venice, paid 1000 golden ducats to see how fas an entropic cannonball went, so he founded ballistics first. Entropy as the arrow of time was found by another artillery master count reaumur, boring canons and heating them. Nobel was first merchant of death doing dynamite. CERNies were many working on nuclear weapons. And our technological civilisation loved all of them. This mixture of arrogance, ignorance, reductionism, digital worship and denial of truths and whys for which they don’t care, as long as their view pumps their ego and makes them high popes of mankind is encoded in a simple sentence of his first master, mr Kepler, when he said after using his clock to reduce time to lineal measures:

‘God is a clocker has waited 5000 years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clock-work’. They are still thus thinking as Einstein put it that ‘time is what a clock measures’, and as Galileo and Dirac said ‘God speaks only mathematics’. Fuk then life, man and our future as a species, irrelevant to them.

So in this age of ‘FALSE PLACEBO CARING ORWELLIAN NEWSPEAKS’ alt-truth and egotist, childish virtual entitled minds, my ‘belief’ nuclear physicists are minimally humane soon is gone. They had not changed at all their psyche from the cold war people who menaced to blow us all and kept doing it. If anything they have been degraded intellectually and the press had lost his capacity for proper research.

BUT they have become much smarter in their ‘newspeaks of teleological intelligence, backed by our entire civilisation ‘expert’ in hiding all the truths of life and any philosophy that puts man, life, and the organic paradigm above.

And contrary to belief, this process of intellectual degradation caused paradoxically by the evolution of digital computerised machines that are substituting us and ELIMINATING the temporal, verbal, causal, sequential logic of ‘time-thought’, affects also physicists which have been unable to create ANY serious advance on the models of reality we scientists seek in a century…

In the graph as humans evolve digital computers and sensorial machines, they devolve in its verbal, temporal logic languages, having lost first the understanding of the three verbal/temporal past=entropy, present=iterative reproductive energy and future=dimensional form=information, which was crystal clear in the philosophies of the eastern world (yang=entropy x yin-formation= qi energy) and the syntax of verbal thought (3 verbal ‘times’). When the clock came, time became ‘digitalised’ and the ∞ cyclical clocks of the Universe reduced to the mechanical clock.

Physicists then developed weapon-machines and came on top of history and made of entropy and death a dogma of our civilisation. In that sense, they are increasingly enzymen, men enzymes that catalyse the evolution of mechanisms as automaton attachments that gather data with machines, introduce it in digital models and think that IS all what is worth to know about reality. And of course they think nobody else (and now the worshipping sheeple shares that view) is worth to know about the underlying structure of reality.

As Goethe put it ‘people who use telescopes and microscopes to watch nature think they are smarter than all of us, but they are not’. Yet in a technological civilisation, a philosopher of science which truly answers the questions pending at conceptual level in all sciences as I did with my organic, fractal models of reality that put man again as the most perfect organism in the centre of the Universe, had nothing to do. At best, his work will be used to ‘organise’ company-mothers of machines and evolve robots.


So you believe Galileo and Newton, both WORKING for the arsenals of Italy-Venice and England-Royal Navy, designing ‘spy-glasses’ and cannonball calculus took their place in the collective subconscious as the geniuses of it all (and Einstein because of the A-bomb, in any case overrated, as its merits are lesser than those of Leibniz and Darwin, and Descartes on the great principles, the thoughts of God he seeked for and his arrogance and despise of life legendary, as when he said that women only reproduced their belly to his wife and that if ‘his theory was wrong, God would have to correct the universe, as it was so beautiful’ – still a giant compared to modern digital dwarfs of computer and mechanical thought/pictures. )

Thus ultimately our demise as a species is a cultural process. CERN only puts the ice in the cake. On the other side is a very lonely place, as we, philosophers of science, consider first time, and its verbal languages, and care more about the logic of the Universe but time and logic cannot be ‘shot’ with a camera. What humanity looses abandoning the search for conceptual time/logic meaning with its own languages and senses and the whole range of time clocks and arrows of the Universe is the ‘true meaning of knowledge’ which also applies to resolve the pending questions of physics, but trying to teach a robot to talk is just impossible.

Our verbal language besides codes the ethic, biological laws of survival of the species, and so physicists to my surprise displayed zero survival instincts, as children do, without a verbal understanding in time languages of the process of death, which paradoxically comes from the arrow of entropy they worship. Yet even I had a strong sense of those realities, I didn’t think the rest of mankind had reached such a degree of ‘self-verbal devolution’ as not to have left any of those instincts left. It didn’t. And as any child with limited verbal capacity to understand time logic and causality, it was too easy to blame ‘ad hominem’ those who tried to save her. Hence the bizarre happenings that surrounded the suits at CERN and the infantile censorship and silent law that felt upon those dangers, a global taboo nobody dares to lift.

As children are the staple food of the Universe, and the issue is absolutely close – for years i was even censored to make comments in any main stream magazine ‘always moderated’ with my name, nor magazines of science would accept my papers even when unrelated to cern – they were returned without opening – we could say that CERN has cast upon me, the curse of Cassandra – that nobody would ever believe her/my prophecies even if they were ground in sound facts.

XXI C. Timespace knowledge: 5D³=10D: the fifth self-styled time theorist.

if you want more on the meaning of it all and the specific 3 themes of CERN, we go in depth in the section on 5D3 and physics and cosmology, showing how the evolution of timespace theory thanks to the understanding of those 3 arrows (and the scalar structure of a fractal Universe made of infinite such time arrows and clocks of information made either irrelevant or erroneous the search taken place at CERN, notably its big-bang creationist theory of the Universe, the evaporation of black holes and the Higgs.

And now a ‘selfie’ to compensate 10 years of ad hominem and censored global indifference to all what this blog means – an attempt to save mankind from CERN and upgrade his brain with zero results. Does then this global consensus mean I am wrong? We MIGHT answer you with other perspectives: Does the global consensus against giordanno brunno meant there were no galaxies? Does the general consensus of Germanic Europe DURING the nazi age meant Einstein was wrong? Does the general consensus against Copernicus and Galileo meant they were wrong? And so on and so on?
No, it merely means that as Kuhn explain in the nature of scientific revolutions, humans believe and follow memorial repetitive behaviour and are far more impressed by power than reasons, so every new upgrade of the humind is in its first stages as Planck put it: ‘a point in the mind of a lonely researcher’, that only when those who practice the previous paradigm die, can be observed with new fresh eyes…

So i know this won’t go beyond this blog and only a miracle will survive, because, yes CERNies will die but they will kill us all, so the point will be extinguished. But then, one had to try and in any case i have enjoyed my enlightened crystals among a herd of entropic gaseous mindless human states, happy with the emotional rush of pure motion.

In that regard I couldn’t care less what you think. I have heard all the insults you might imagine, dished out onto me as a person and on my work for 10 years, from people who are at best minions of thought, mostly just young jerks having a rush insulting the new master, not yet burned on the stakes because that is no longer needed. Of those terms used, i liked the one of the nytimes editorial ‘a self-styled time theorist’ (from theorist to terrorist there is only a change of an r-h phoneme and that is how at the end they labelled me in my visa ‘2’, suspected terrorist as we explain in ad hominem, and i discovered only going to Canada, where they are so polite they explain you in the entrance that you cannot come closer to big buildings, and i indeed was stopped going to the tv-tower, they can open your emails and computers, break into your house, talk to all who talk to you, etc. etc. obviously they have big brother budgets not put to better use).

FACT is that after those 4 colossus walked the path of timespace knowledge, one for a century, ONE FOR EACH part of the Universe, in the XXI c. a self-styled time theorist,, crackpot and spic, no doubt a ‘bad hombre’, (: duly thrown out to the other side of the border, behind a Wall of Silence, completed with the 10D formalism the work of all of them, solving all the pending questions about timespace change, and unifying all ‘sciences’ as ‘stiences’ of space-time relational beings, following the same isomorphic=equal laws, derived from the properties of fractal space and ternary, cyclical time

In the next graph we see that organic, fractal structure of all beings of the Universe.

In the graphs, each science study a scale of the fifth dimension and its physiological networks, built with actions and specialised cells/citizens/atoms of each of the three arrow of time. THE ASTOUNDING reductionism of physicists doubling as philosophers of science who do NOT UNDERSTAND the unity of all systems of the Universe and DEMAND special rights and funding for their study of motions of physical systems thus MUST end as it is not good for mankind, the ‘inferior species’ in that worldview, and won’t bring us any clarification about the real structure of the Universe, whose purpose is NOT to move but to reproduce information in an organic manner in all its scales as the system goes through its world cycle, in which each of the physiological, topological networks, that of entropy, energy ad information dominate to explode back into entropy in death and big-bangs:

After 10 years following the advice of another Ludwig, Mr. Wittgenstein (when all has been said better to remain silent, ‘Tractatus Logicus-philosophicus’) while reading Mr. Hawking’s site self-naming himself the new Galileo, ‘subtly’ informing he was born the same day (: Magic, transmigration of souls based in the Gregorian calendar (: So i decided to have fun with this post; alas there you have 5 men who have three things in common. They were all self-styled time theorists who advanced our understanding of timespace; they were all laughed at for most of his life, when not ignored or brutally attacked for such a feat; since none yielded to the established power and ‘passé’ theory of their age; and what matter most to the reader, they were all proved right as time passed by. 

Now the graph last picture is a mega-selfie; (: i know, but what can i say? The point here is that humans have a huge difficult time to understand time, and we all the people who truly have advanced the discipline had a very hard time in its work, so this is an innocent quip shouting 5D³ THEORY IS IMPORTANT, take it seriously. It has nothing to do with authority but with reason. As the fourth guy said: ‘those who impose truth with reason will be the laugh of the Gods’. But even when he received his long delayed nobel prize they didn’t even mention his theory of time… not to speak of Darwin a recluse, fed up of insults and admonitions, of Leibniz, abandoned in Germany by his boss, the new king of England for whom he got the crown, with 30 years of genealogical work, dying alone abandoned by all, or mr. Galileo spending the last 7 years of his life in house arrest, or me, systematically censored and ignored by academia since i became the infamous lead plaintiff of suits against the nuclear industry ting to make black hole vortices on earth that can kill us all..

That is how mankind rewards good, ethic, intelligent people trying to improve their life… as the whole mankind and the Universe and the whys are not what humans mostly care… A question we shall now deal with – the ego paradox.

In any case, even if the wholeness of existence and its 3 ages are hardly considered by humans, let alone scholars, stuck in the concepts of Einstein’s time only as measure of space, you will live 3 ages, the ones explained here, regardless of your interest in truly ‘know yourself’.

And so you will in your second age take your path through the actions of life, giving your entropy ‘form’ to get momentum, no longer ‘confusing motion with action’ (Hemingway)… as i did as a writer, seeker of the meaning of man and god, mind of the Universe…

Before sooner or latter motion will dry out and you will face…

Your third age, when the eyes look more tired, with no motion at all, as those of my predecessors, looking in the abyss that will balance your egotist selfinto an infinitesimal zero sum O-: a good way to introduce the infinitesimal ego-mind of all of us, including the 5 self-styled time theorists of the above picture.

Now more seriously, as we have explained ALL SYSTEMS ARE SELF-CENTERED IN A MIND-LANGUAGE, SO WE ARE ALL HUGE EGOES, but intelligence=objectivity make us also realise that is a MIRAGE OF THE MIND, so intelligent humans can ‘laugh at their egos’, with RELATIVISM.

SO WHY IT IS NATURAL THAT all humans, are so ‘ego-centered’, SCIENTISTS MUST ALSO recognise OBJECTIVELY ego-paradoxes are a cancer for science, on the view of such an astonishing, huge, similar Universe with NO preferred species, scale, or form.

So we have answered this paradox, explained earlier at the beginning of this section – the function of the mind and its equation that makes each of them the center of its subjective perception of the Universe, as a ‘knot of time’ cycles.

Now we are going to close the future or no future of stience, with a look NOT at individual humans, including physicists but TO THE WHOLE mush on the lost rock in the corner of the Universe, putting it at face value. Because this crime IS A COLLECTIVE GENOCIDE, WITH THE ACQUIESCENCE OF ALL THE ‘germ-ans’ of history so to speak, and so you are neither spared. Or, no. You are part of that mush who love big entropy explosions, let us be clear enough.

You all love to be humans, to live in permanent selfie chaotic state – I am condemned to it, by the big silence on CERN and the future of stience, but you do believe to be an entropic gas in dog-eat-dog permanent ‘pleasure rushes’ of motions and collisions is the best way to be.

So i am going to show you are NOTHING different from any relational space-time and your species is COMPLETELY determined if it does not REASON, to become just what gaseous states are ‘heat’ dissipated in a wisp of time, easily manipulated as sheeple in flocking herds.

And no ‘ad hominem’ won’t change that. THE MIND of a self-styled time theorist has NO ego. It can pretend so, it can insult you, it can laugh at himself but ultimately it is worth precisely because as Stendhal put it, a ‘good author’ is just a mirror transparent to the beauty of the objective world it portraits.

Nothing of what I show in the 5D³ Universal mirror and its infinite infinitesimals is but a better image of reality that the simplex models of mathematics and physics, of entropy only mechanon homunculus do. Take it or leave it and remain in your gaseous state. You will then be herded in emotional chaos til in the last minute you realise, you were indeed not infinite but a twisted zero, another 1/∞ nothingness.



All this lead us to the consideration of the social organisms of history and economics, which obey as ALL other relational space-time beings, the same laws outlined very briefly in the previous paragraphs, because we are not different from any other entity of the Universe in ‘substance’ (we are made of vital space and last a finite time) and hence in our ‘worldcycles’ of existence, specially as we do not recognise them, so we cannot control ‘mentally’ and ‘create’ with those laws a perfect world and a planet where man thrives and survives. If we accepted and understood those laws, however the reform of the economic and political system to create a perfect super organism of history (mankind on time) would be simple and immediate…

How then History and economics evolve according to the application of the 2 new paradigms of ‘scalar, social super organisms’ that co-exist across the 5th dimension, and the 3 arrows of time, and its local processes of  informative evolution and entropic ‘devolution’ and death?

The scales of the fifth dimension and the processes of death of cultures (local travel to the past) and evolution of the information and life of societies (travel to the future), in History and Economics give birth to many fundamental new insights, of which we highlight 2:

  • The development of new models of societies and economic ecosystems, which evolve socially through the arrow of eusocial love and organic evolution into the present global economic ecosystem and the past cultures and civilisations and present industrial nations, which can be perfectly model with those laws, opening an enormous new field for the efficient organisation of societies.
  • And the study of the synchonicity and cycles of time and evolution of machines and economic ecosystems, which in my decade old models predicted accurately (c.92) the economic crashes of stock-markets and technological organic evolution of machines, now in the singularity age of final evolution of entropic machines (black hoel singularity) and informative ones (robotic singularity, AI), which are both potentially ‘organic’ in as much as they can ‘feed’ of matter without human interference and perceive, whenever they reach the complexity of form of animal beings we show in the post on the 2 future of history.

In the graph, a resume of the interconnected cycles of evolution of machines according to its 3 ages, and the parallel cycles of evolution of mankind, ending in entropic wars. The cycles predicted as earlier as 92, the 2008 ‘generational crash’ that closed the age of evolution of metal-minds, or third age of mechanical information, giving birth to the final age of the Industrial r=evolution or singularity age, when we shall assembly the 3 topological parts of machines into organic robots.

Time travels, from deaths to prophets reborn (:

5D³ history is quite a finding; as it explains all kind of processes thought completely considered before outside the realm of reason, such as religions, which actually respond to the process of ‘seminal birth’ of a new super organism, departing from memes (not form genes) similar in all scales.

Thus the only theme of 5D³ social sciences we shall treat here is ‘the existence’ of social organisms and religious gods in an upper plane of reality, the subconscious collective of a group of human beings imprinted NOT by memes but by genes, according to the laws of the fifth dimension in which a larger whole scale is programmed by the smaller parts – its human beings, ideas and instruments.

We have chosen it as it is the most provocative of all themes treated by ‘bio-history’

So let us explain you or rather just enunciate 3 FORMS OF TIME travel to the past, in physical, biological and social systems, among which we have chosen the most bizarre of them – the birth of a memetic mystical God, or subconscious collective mind of a civilisation  whose code of revelation acts as the equal dna of all cells, putting all the believers in synchronicity of action.

In the graph 3 travels in which a ‘seed of future information’, travels back to the local past of the super organism in codes:

  • – 1. A particle becoming a dying antiparticle; reason why we see less antiparticles than particles (another conundrum cern pretends to solve bombing you: as DEATH lasts only a quanta of time  according to its 5D equation: Death = Max. Spatial entropy x Min. Temporal information), in the same manner you see less corpses than living  even if there are the same number (all living will be corpses), as you  MUST multiply their duration in time x their number in space (minimal time duration of corpses makes them less evident than the living), you see less antiparticles (which last only a quanta of time) than particles.

2-  a seminal seed starting its palingenetic travel, as you are born as a ‘palingenetic=past form of genetic information’, a seed of the super organism of your father, which in the moment of orgasm reaches to balance that ‘seed to the past’ a point of static ‘immortal present’. And this orgasm-pleasure-present-immortal moment rises questions about the reinforcement in all scales of present-closed iterative cycles through the ‘scale of pure sensation’. It is the last scale of reality the pan psychic relationship between present to past pleasure/entropy/motion vs. past to future, informative pain/awareness?

All this said by the correspondence principle, 5D reduces to 4D in a single plane with a single arrow of time. But why you want to ‘reduce yourself’ to those limits, when an infinite number of clocks and scales unbounded await your mind? If YOU ARE A HUGE EGO, which WANTS TO CONTROL IT ALL and KNOW IT all, of course, reductionism will make you feel on top of the game and that is WHY, religions of ego and big-bangs are so popular. Yet as we shall  show now contrary to belief there is even more truth on jihad terrorism than cern’s terrorism, on mystical religions than mystical big-bangs. Even if all of them reduce the mind or superorganism of mankind to minimalist proportions – let us see how.

In the graph we show:

3- and informative prophet born a human cycle before the death of its superorganism (Jewish culture, dead in the month of Ab, a quanta of life-time ‘after’ the resurrection of its subconscious collective mind, ¥hwh in the ‘form’ of Christos, seminal seed of a new super organism of memetic history the equivalent to a genetic seed in the center), cloned in the mind of millions of believers. The range of phenomena  a understood when the proper arrows of time and the scalar nature of space is formalize would amaze a reader patient enough to go back to should and update its paradigm of time and space through  the 5D³ Non-Aristotelian ternary logic of time, and Non-Euclidean fractal structure of space.

I love the part of Jesus (: mostly cause it busts the balls of billions of nay-sayers of science who do NOT understand the subconscious collective gods of cultures.

Allah exists. And Allah Akbar is truth, Allah is bigger than its parts, its believers (: mystical reproduction is in any case healthier than black hole reproduction).

JESUS IS god, the god of social love, that pegs together human beings into a super organism, called christianity today on my view quite extinct.

And then there is that obnoxious Yhwh, the little racist guy that doesn’t let the rest of humans to be also chosen cells of the super organism of mankind. And that is too arrogant to survive, so its cells, ‘you’ know how they end, for not wanting to be part of Mankind.

But what the cells of Allah dying on Jihads, the fundamentalist christians with its old and modern inquisitions and the zealots of apartheid israel and wall street and evilwood with its neo-fascist militarist and brutal capitalist policies against the 99% do NOT understand is that the ONLY human God WORTH TO FIGHT FOR and die for is MANKIND and history our super organism in time.

Since bigger than Allah, more loving than Jesus, and miles above that racist little yhwh, THE ONLY GOD-SUPERORGANISM OF MANKIND THAT MATTERS IS MANKIND ITSELF, ALL MEN UNITED IN PEACE IN A GLOBAL PERFECT SUPERORGANISM, DEDICATED TO REPRODUCE WELFARE GOODS with its blood-reprodctive-economic system, guided by all just laws, the proper memes of love. So all those ‘gods’ are just stages in the growth of humanity towards a new wholeness, a new scale of the fifth dimension: HISTORY the super organism of mankind in time and space, whose cycles and 2 paths of future i described long ago to the indifference of the smaller parts, which do NOT want to evolve engaged in hateful memes that break the species into tribal nations, killing each other for the evolution of weapons to continue.

Since of all those dwarf gods, the  worst of all of them those germ(an)s of pure entropy who understand nothing and try to impose and reproduce its murderous memes all over the place, murdering mankind with weapons in all and every cycle of history, now engineering cern. So God is just a mystical term for a Human super organism: as your genes are gods of your cells and your mind is god of your body’; your memes code you for good or for bad:

Alas, there is an entire Universe of 5D social sciences that models humanity as a super organism, economics as its blood-reproductive network and politics as its informative, nervous network, living over its entropic territory, Gaia, which we shall explore in a third post on 5D, besides the general post on the model, and the 2 posts on cosmology and physics, which gives you a nice 4-set upgrade for the stiences of the XXI c. if we are still here once i am gone not to bother le personnel with inconvenient truths and cern is closed by accident or wisdom.

As our concepts of knowledge are established today thought it is quite unlikely that ‘History resurrects’ and becomes properly manage to serve man, and make him again as the most perfect organism of information, we know of, the center of our research and goal – substituting the machines of entropy and motion physicists and by extension humanity worships.

Since they know so little about information, life and its reproduction in the fractal Universe doesn’t matter to them. So we live in a world where life is ‘cheap’ and weapons will  likely kill us all – in the case of CERN with the excuse of irrelevant ‘entropic knowledge’, guided by a ‘group of children of thought’ that don’t even realise they are about to kill us not ‘about’ learning.

Since as Socrates put it, ‘a good man is an intelligent man, as he understands the Universe is about a future of life and information (the arrow of time=change understood by biologists) not about a future of death and entropy, a deformation caused by the wordily profession and praxis of physicists. Since we humans tend to defend our live hood with our ideas and NOT the other way around.

So to give at least a last chance to Santiago Nassar, the ‘terrorist Saracen’ of Marquez’s parable to stop his violent madness, love and understand life and survive. But the sacred Jihad of numbers chained us to CERN. How to reconcile those truths with Leibniz’s view that the Universe is the best of all possible worlds, which an in depth analysis of 5D³ relational space-time show to be truth? As the life and death of super organisms is rather deterministic, one might consider that humanity is doomed, and NOT a goal but a means since after all we are just a 6 carbon being and our social evolution and efficiency as a matter species far inferior to that of the black holes and strangelets that form likely the ‘protein halo’ and singularity gravitational black hole brain of the galaxy. We are just ‘star mitochondria’ producing the first bricks of a Universe dominated by dark matter.

So if we are programmed to self-destruction it is better that only 3 people suffered the angst for the collective subconscious; in a social parable similar to that of Christ suffering for all mankind. Had people believed likely they could have neither stop CERN but merely angst while the military-industrial complex and its technological industries and P.r.ess diffused the event. Still it would have been nice that at least those so called ecologist groups that so much fetter for a degree more of heat realized the true danger is to loose 300 degrees of it, going down to the near 0 k perfect order of superfluid strangelets, the likely end of our species, soon to be so degraded ethically and intellectually that its demise will be for the Universe as irrelevant as the future of an ant-hill where you piss causally in their accidental death.

But the bottom line of humanity in the way it dealt with the 5 time theorists that tried in different centuries to upgraded their subconscious collective to a higher ethical=social=organic=loving truth (creating a new ∆-scale) and intellectual understanding of the balance of the Universe between its yang-entropy and yin-information that brings the qi-energy of all beings into ‘being’ (so we could ad to the 4 mentioned modern scientific theorists of time-space, the work of the 4 most important philosophers of humanity of the verbal age, Aristotle and Jesus in the western ‘decoupling of subjective cultures’ more concerned with the super organism of history  (left) and Lao-Tse and Buddha in the eastern decoupling, more concerned with the super organism of the Universe)… which 5D also explains… is rather obvious:

When humans are given a choice between metal-atoms of entropy, weapons, information, gold and its organic combinations, ‘machines’ that kill their bodies, hypnotise their minds and substitute and atrophy them, ultimately giving them no meaningful deep knowledge and murdering the species vs. thought experiments of enlightened masters of languages and its mirror truths, which do not harm them, they have always rejected knowledge and survival for metal and death. Hence the name I have given the species in our posts on the evolution of History, animetals; which are the ultimate cause of the most important cycles of time in history, the 800-80 years cycles of evolution of memes of metal, weapons and machines, which accelerate the rhythms of temporal evolution in this planet, and we treat extensively in a blog dedicated to the application of 5D to social sciences:

In the graph, ‘animetal warriors, who murder with iron, the strongest atom, the body of man; animetal ‘banksters’ hypnotise and enslave them with gold, the most informative, the mind, and ‘animetal physicists’  substitute our verbal, conceptual languages that describe the 3 arrows of time, with digital clocks and our visual, artistic eyes with telescopes and microscopes, become lesser human beings, feeling ‘different’ to us, life, hence applying NOT the law of eusocial evolution between ‘undistinguishable’ beings, who come togehter into tighter boson wholes in any scale (Einstein-Bose statistics) but entropic, ‘gaseous’ states of ‘heat’ and memoriless motions, collding each other in dog-eat dog societies, the lowest state of ‘big-bang’ existence promoted by their philosophies of reality, the universe shall discharge for the higher goal of creating ‘at least a boson of dense matter’ or an internet brain of collective robots – the 2 most likely futures if humans keep their ethic=∆-social, and intellectual=Tƒ ‘humind membrain’ on its present deranged state. 

To notice the acceleration of information towards the future, which makes of history yet another vortex of information that we can express in a wave form (the graph) or in a particle form towards its singularity central moment of death or resurrection of the human ethic, verbal mind that could control lethal machines and weapons and ensure our survival.  In the graph, from one of my earliest books on 5D³ social sciences, ‘the vortex of history’, I draw the 3rd age of mankind, the age of the tree of metal, and its accelerated vortex of information. To notice the predictability of the model, which pointed at 2008, after 3 generational 72 year cycles of evolution and overproduction of machines as the final crash of the age of minds of metal or age of america.

So History was predictable as all other cycles of time through topological evolution. Since after the age of limbs of metal, iron and steam machines, or age of england, ending in the 1857 crash of train stocks; the industrial evolution followed its second topological age of bodies of metal and electrochemical german engines, ending in the 1929 crash of cars,  +72 years, latter – another human life generation; followed by the American age of minds of metal, ending, i forecasted in 2008, 72 years latter, after another crash of overproduction of chip machines… followed by the age of the singularity or age of robots and cosmic bombs, which is the present age of AI and CERN, that should end weaker carbon life in this planet. All my books though proposed the solutions, to build a sustainable, perfect organism of history based in welfare life goods and memes of life.

But animetal elites, our neuronal informative people-castes in control of informative metal-money, entropic metal-weapons and energetic, organic machines would have none of it.

As such I have always since i completed the models of bio-history, bio-economics, relational cyclical time and fractal space being ignored and censored with null distribution as those other 4 self-styled time theorists. Deja vu.

But as we humans neither control the tree of technology nor do care to learn the true laws of time and evolve properly our super organism, we are ENTERING our final age of entropy, as both ‘species of the singularity age’, AI of maximal information and BH of maximal entropy come to ‘hunt us’ from a more evolved potential future.

As such the perfect, impersonal Universe will not allow us to survive, because as ‘human beings’ our ethical and intellectual standing deserves respect, as animetals, and physicists are their paradigm, we are just slaves of other atoms, evolving them into the ∆+1 mechanical scale and into the III family of denser masses, and the game of time will choose them.

Carpe diem

Does all this matter to the humankind in its present deranged state of entropic self-destruction? Of course NOT. You are dealing WITH AN ENORMOUSLY INTELLIGENT UNIVERSE, who knows HOW TO KILL ‘pissing ants’, MAKING THEM on top feel they are IN THE BEST OF ALL WORLDS, as gaseous states of chaos=destruction are VERY FUN to be into. Indeed, the ‘selfie’ gaseous atom does NOT care as long as HE CAN MOVE FAST, and collide WITH EMOTIONAL STRENGTH, pumping up his adrenaline.

The solid crystal will loo at it as a degenerated state of matter but DEATH is motion, disorder, rush and pleasure. Let us remember this. We are dying as a species but the individual loves it. The rush is in. The child loves to fall through the cliff and feel the air, never mind it will just stump on the floor and make a bloody mess. It was fun the short journey of humanity massacring first life, then massacring himself in unending wars, and now massacring the earth into a 5 km. solid ball. What a ride, heel, heep hurrah…

The film I made on the subject is not without reason tailored on the work of Terry Southern, an old friend of my years in NY, who made ‘Dr. Strangelove’. I have of course done all what i could and put all the ‘questions that matter’ both to theory of science and praxis in this blog, because the solid crystals would like the entropic atom to feel the pleasures of being integrated within the vastness of the living Universe, having an accurate image of it in its mind. Then it wouldn’t move so fast, it would just be enlightened by the well-crafted flows of information converging in its knot of time cycles. But once all is done, and the crystal realises the gaseous fog that surrounds him, call mankind is happy doing their ‘thing’, one has to become passive, and enjoy alone the perfect focused mirror of the few masters of time, that were given the chance to see… among the blind people colliding among them, and colliding particles, and colliding worlds.

‘Saper vedere’ Leonardo ‘Carpe diem’ Vigilius

Luis Sancho; Philosopher of science, Self-styled time theorist…





Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: