# 5D Cosmology:∞ Big bangs

**SUMMARY.**

**Part I: The Fractal 5D Organic Universe.**

- The fractal Universe, its 5D Metric.
- Generational scalar space. Conservation Principles.

III. Cyclical time. Its 3 ages.

- Vital, Topologic Space. Its 3±¡ Dimotions.
- Absolute Relativity. The equation of existence.
- The worldcycle of existence. The equations of Birth, aging and Death.

VII. The Stientific method. Formal Stiences:¡logic, existential Algebra & Vital Geometry

**Part II. Astrophysics. Galaxies. Its 3±¡ Pentalogic Analysis.**

VIII. The worldcycles of physical systems. 5D Scalar big-bangs.

- The ‘Galatom’: Scalar Unification of the 5 forces as Dimotions of the galaxy.
- The ‘Galacell’: A galactic organism. Its symmetries of scale and topologies in space.

- 5D Black Hole stars. Thermodynamics of Baby-born black holes

XII. Falsifications of the cosmic big-bang. Æntropic man: Science is culture.

XIII. The Hyper Universe.

**Foreword. The new paradigm of the scalar 5D Universe.**

This is the application of the new formalism of scalar space-time (the 5th dimension is the sum of those scales) to cosmology. It will become the new paradigm of space-time studies in the XXI c. hence of cosmology, as 4D, which corresponds to 5D in the limit of a single plane of ‘light space-time’ did in XX c. So the first paragraph shows that correspondence.

When paradigm shift will happen is a human affair irrelevant of its veracity. It’ll depend on the ‘initial opposition’ to a change of paradigm, which happens, as in the case of Einstein’s work, both ‘ad hominem’ (in his case due to his pacifism against military Germany) and scholarly as the previous paradigm has many vested interests of academia, industry and scholar ship (then it was the ‘Ether paradigm’ in which big science machines had invested enough time and money to find the canonical ‘constant of ether’ and proved its veracity 🙂

5D in that sense has less problems on the theoretical arena, as it corresponds to 4D in the limit of light space-time; so it does not contradict it, unlike many modern theories of ‘creationist physics’, based in manipulation of equations beyond its corresponding limits (likely the cosmic big-bang and black hole evaporation falls in this category as we shall prove in those texts), than in the vested interests of the bi-science, industrial world and the routines of academia; as it conflicts with the cosmic big-bang big industry of ultra-expensive machines, such as LHC; and obviously it conflict on the ad hominem side with his author (Einstein smartly just moved to Switzerland not to go to war, didn’t become a key activist against German right-wing militarism or against big-science as I did on CERN’S suits… only in his late life opposed vehemently nuclear weapons research once 4D had become the cosmological paradigm). But this post is not really on my activism or ad hominem campaigns but a pure theoretical delight for those who are intelligent enough to distinguish truth from circumstance – it is the analysis of the basic upgrades and solutions to most questions of cosmology brought about by 5D.

We treat those other traps of ænthropic huminds and their anthropomorphicor entropy-only models of a ‘subjective’ Universe where man always finds excuses to become important in other post (entropic being an ab. for humans anthropic=self centered and entropic: single time dimensional views on reality projected in its ænthropic theories of it all, from cosmic big-bangs to dog-eat-dog darwinism), in other post.

What matters to this one is that once we lay down the basic expansion of 4D to 5D it is easy to realize the Universe is self-similar at the scale of atoms and galaxies, and it has E(t) <=> M(s), big-bangs and Big crunches, that is transformations of spatial, informative states (masses, charges) into entropic, time-motion states (gravitational forces, radiation) in all scales, from beta decays to quasars, and perhaps cosmic big-bangs/big-crunch cycles. And so the objective task of science is to consider at which real scale the real data we have gathered on the big-bang corresponds, and what might be an ænthropic hyperbole in the natural human ‘egocy’ (ego=Idiocy), which becomes a desire to know it all and find the absolute limits of reality, which in the relative Universe with no preferential scale, time age and spatial position does not hold. So we shall in this post introduce 5D, show then application to the scales of the Universe, notice the unification of charges and forces in 5D metric equations as 2 different scalar vortices of time-space and study the different scales of big-bangs, the proper understanding of the 5 forces of the Universe as expressions of the 5 Dimensional motions of time-space, to conclude finally with an extensive analysis of the proofs of the cosmic big-bang to assess if physicists are really studying the birth of the entire cosmos or just the local quasar cycle of our galaxy.

For those who want to expand further its knowledge of 5D to other disciplines and philosophy of stience at large, you might read the other posts.

l§

** **

**PART I. FRACTAL 5D UNIVERSE**

“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.” *Einstein*, on the entangled Universe self-centered men cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and ‘languages of the mind’

** I. ****GENERATIONAL SPACE-TIME.**

**Leibniz v. Newton: ****The underlying question of time§pace physics****.**** Relational or Absolute timespace?**

According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’ * *

*Leibniz; on absurd mechanical absolute time-space models of the fractal Universe & ¡ts ∞ monads & time motions.*

‘Time is what a clock measures’. ‘Leibniz is right. There are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from its foundations’. Einstein, on the infinite relational time cycles of reality.

The fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time unfortunately was resolved as usual in favor of the simpler view: it is space and time an absolute abstract background of the Universe (Mr. Newton’s view) or are we made of ‘vital space’ that lasts a time duration, so we are generated by the bio-topo-logic properties of scalar space and cyclical time? This is the choice of 5D ‘stiences’. And its simpler version was called relational spacetime, sponsored by Mr. Leibniz.

A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which has never shown in any scale of reality such ‘background’ – ultimately a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a cyclic time duration between birth and extinction. So *we are* space and time.

And so we must evolve our concepts of space and time, to extract the properties of ‘existential beings’ from them.

**Absolute space-time.**

In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are the stage of intersecting lines sketched in the illustration. Fact is this ‘mathematical artifact’ made with pen and paper by earlier physicists, called the Cartesian graph, useful to measure ‘translation in space’ is no where to be seen in reality. Unfortunately as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ felt the ‘mathematical language’ created reality.

It meant also the invention of an absolute ‘continuous space’ and a single ‘lineal time’ that extends to infinity contradicting the obvious fact that all ‘spaces’ are broken, divided by membranes, and all beings have a finite time duration. Further on, as we kept exploring smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed time-space cycles; since even particles turned to be also ‘vortices of time-space motions’.

So the true, sound experimental and logic theory was Leibniz’s who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason origin of the ‘Generational space-time’ model of 5D in which are the space we occupy and the time we last – as in the graph where there is no longer abstract background lines.

What Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. So space is the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings: ∑s=S And lineal time, T the sum of all the finite life-death cycles of all beings T=∑t.

*S**ince space and time do exist and so if they are not in the background we ‘are’ vital space and cyclic time.*

The simple idea behind the structure of the fractal Universe is then to consider time=change=motion and Topologic, formal space=extension the 2 elements of which all beings are made.

**WE ARE space and time,** merely of a different kind to that of Newton: Organic scalar spaces, and cyclical, discontinuous times who ‘live’… worldcycles (no longer worldliness as we have a 2^{nd} arrow of information) of exist¡ence (as all species follow the common laws of space and time).

** II. ****SCALAR, ORGANIC SPACETIME**

**Vital, ternary, Organic Topology**

This said the devil is in the details. So the next question is how many *Dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions) of vital space-time we are made of. *

*And the answer provided by topology which studies geometric forms with spatial dimension and time motions is only 3; which perform the 3 organic functions of all systems of vital space-time of which we are all made: *

Indeed a 4 or 5D Universe has only 3 ‘topological varieties’ each one best suited to perform one the 3 organic vital functions of any physic or biologic system –gauging information (1D spheres, the topology that stores more information in lesser space, hence used in all particles and heads in the height dimension), lineal or cylindrical forms that move the system (2D, the shortest distance between two points, hence used as fields or limbs in the length dimension) and hyperbolic body-waves, a mixture of the other two topologies that reproduces the system and stores its energy in the width dimension (3D); which not coincidentally correspond to the 3 ‘conserved quantities’ of physics, angular, lineal momentum and energy.

So we define the main ‘Fractal Generator equation’ of space-time for all systems of Nature:

*Γ: * |-Ts(limbs-fields)<Ø-S=T-Body waves>O-St (particle-heads).

The GST symbols for the 3 topologies=functions=conserved dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions, Ð) of timespace are:

**1D: T>S: angular cyclical motions of information (Ab. O; tS):** the minimal ‘geometry’ of reality, a spherical particle/head or fractal point, the geometry that stores maximal form in minimal space, hence suited for ‘organic functions’ of gauging, storing and perceiving information (particles, heads).

**2D: S<T: Lineal Locomotions***,* **(Ab. |; Ts) *** which will move through its* lineal limbs/fields the system, as the line is the shortest distance between two points… towards a…

**3D: Ø-S≈T:** **Fields of vital Energy (Ab. ST):** with its hyperbolic body-waves that iterate the forms of both the spherical particle/heads and lineal limbs/fields; as the hyperbolic topology combines the other two, so it can generate them, in the same manner Energy adds as the third conserved space-time quantity the lineal and cyclical momentum of 1 and 2D.

**III. 5 ^{TH} DIMENSION METRICS: 4th and 5th Dimotions.**

When we google the 5^{th} dimension one gets surprised by the quantity of speculative answers to a question, which is no longer pseudo-science, but has been for two decades a field of research in systems sciences rather than physics (: No, the answers of google, considering the fifth dimension the upper-self etc. seem to be very popular, but are to the science of the 5th dimension more like a medium in earlier XX c. talking about the 4th dimension as astrological awareness, for lack of understanding of Einstein’s **metric equations** of the 4th dimension).

This is the key word that differentiates pseudo-science from a proper scientific description of a dimension of space-time, *the existence of a metric equation that describes a dimension in terms of its space-time coordinates that allows to travel through it. *Why **the 5th dimension metric** are not well known in modern science has to do with the fact it is not researched in physics but systemics, the mother discipline of all sciences of information, far less popular than physics; since the proprietary feeling physicists acquired on space-time matters after Galileo defined its 3D metric equation, v=s/t completed by Einstein’s 4D formalism, makes difficult to spread the knowledge on space-time acquired on other disciplines. The arguments still raging about evolution, the fundamental theory of time in terms of information, as the ‘arrow that defines’ the future of species but has nothing to do with Relativity and locomotion is a clear case of that difficulty.

Indeed, we know since the XIX c. that the creation of the ‘future time’ of an existential entity is not ONLY mediated by the arrow of **locomotion** and entropy studied by physicists with Relativity Metrics (Galileo’s V=s/t and Einstein’s more complex formalism), but there is a second arrow that defines the ‘future’ of existential species – the evolution of its information. So time – *the changes=motions that defines the existence of any species,* has at least 2 dimensions, locomotion or ordered translation in space and a more disordered version, entropy (scattered motion that ‘dissolves’ the inner form of the system, akin to death)…

And in-form-ation, generation of form, inverse to entropy as it requires the social gathering of parts into wholes; happening without external locomotions, as an internal trans-formation of **form**. This evolution of organic form as opposed to external change is what Systemics calls the fifth dimension of time that applies to all sciences. Specifically in systems sciences we model reality as an organic fractal of relative size scales, that evolve from parts into larger wholes, from particles into atoms, molecules, cells, matter states and so on till reaching the Universe, shaped by social and organic networks coded with information.

In the graph the Universe is a fractal that reproduces ‘forms with motion’, informations and then **organizes** them in networks and systems that evolve into larger organic systems creating the scalar structure of reality.

Thus we call *the sum of all those co-existing scales of parts and wholes the fifth dimension.*

Mathematically then it is necessary to find a metric equation to define this new dimension of space-time. Since a dimension only exists when we can write a mathematical simple metric that leaves the dimension invariant when we change our parameters of space and time – hence we travel through it. (Klein). This equation, as all space-time metric equations, is simple; since metric equations are meant to represent measures of ‘covariant’ motion in a given space-time dimension that leave the other dimensions unchanged. So we write using ð for cyclic time instead of t, for a motion that changes the relative size and speed of clocks of a system (measured with frequency):

**5D Metric: S (Lineal Size/Volume in space) x ð (cyclic speed of its time clocks) = Constant.**

According to those metrics, smaller systems in space have faster time clocks. And as information is stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, smaller systems have more information, coding larger ones: genes code cells, memes societies and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules.

This equation and its use to improve our knowledge of space and time in all sciences, with an emphasis in our models of physical systems will be the theme of this paper. Even if physicists stubbornly refuse to treat information with the same value than entropy. So they call it negentropy, and when you give a conference on the fifth dimension – the dimension of ‘creation of social forms of information, of organic wholes’ – there are no physicists on attendance; and likely no physicists will be reading this post… Let’s then use the metrics of the 5^{th} scalar dimension to explain the fractal, nested Universe and its scales, shown in the graph.

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time (ab.∆) defines 3 known scales of physical systems, with different quantity of information according to 5D metrics, Sxð=k.

Those metrics means information is higher in the smaller ‘quantum plane’ than in the larger gravitational one, and inversely the size of its physical parts is larger ins the Gravitational cosmological ‘plane’ than in the quantum one, with the human thermodynamic scale in-between.

As there is no reason to stop the scales of the fractal in particles and galaxies, there is a ‘potential’ fourth, ∆±4 organic plane defined ‘above’ the galaxy, (∆+4, dark energy world) and below the quantum world (∆-4, Bohm’s quantum potential), which represents the larger cosmos. Further on, according to the fractal, nested principle any larger organic system, encloses smaller nested systems. Thus the ∆±4 cosmos contains ∆±3 galaxies, which contain ∆±2 solar systems and planets, which contain ∆±1 thermodynamic organisms and matter states, described by the human ∆º mind languages, contained on our brains. Thus bigger systems paradoxically are ‘supported’ by the smallest ones, in the same manner than within the nested planet, bigger mammals (whales) eat the smallest animals (Plancktons).

It follows then from the nested structure and the search for creative, organic balances, a symbiotic relationship between the ∆-¡ smaller parts that have more speed of time clocks, which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules. And the larger, ∆+¡ larger envelopes, membranes (static, dimensional view) or angular momentums (dynamic view as time=motions) which have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any system of the Universe.

For example, chips become smaller as they evolve into faster brains. Every 2 years a chip doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension. The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner. And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming super organisms.

Thus 5D metrics describe organic properties because it balances the survival symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe in any of its fractal super organisms, made to the image an likeness of the whole, as the smaller beings ‘code information’ with faster clocks, and the larger wholes enclose and protect the smaller parts with its greater energy- establishing an organic ‘harmony’ in all the scales of the Universe, and explaining its fundamental constants, which are ratios between spatial volumes enclosed by membranes and angular momentums of informative clocks of time:

The galaxy’s 5D metric is immediate: $(c) x ð (h) = Constant, as its largest speed-distance is light and its minimal unit of cyclical information, is the Planck constant of angular momentum, which is used as the unit of the *3 human physical parameters* of *spatial size, cyclical time** frequency and ‘ scale’ (Active magnitude):*

**h= mass (∆) x area (S) x ƒrequency (ð).**

So h, ‘Planckton’, is the minimal fractal organism which feeds or becomes the ‘cellular unit’ of all other species of the Galaxy, as Plankton is the minimal unit of the biologic Universe which starts the trophic pyramid of life or as a cell starts the evolution of multicellular organisms.

In the next graphs we show some classic examples of 5D metric co-invariant Sxð balances within the galaxy in biology and physics, explained by the scalar, organic dimension of the Universe: the metabolic clocks of animals; and the orbital clocks of planets both related to the volume enclosed in its vital space:

Thus organisms have higher heartbeats and consumption of energy the smaller they are; becoming faster and more intelligent than larger beings. So they can co-exist together, as the smallish one reacts faster: I.e. a fly thinks 10 times faster (5D scales are decametric), we cannot catch them and the survive. While Kepler’s laws of planets or any physical vortex in any number of dimensions follows the same co-invariance metric: V(ð) x R($) = K; as particles spin faster the smaller they are.

But the highest upgrading achieved by 5D metrics is to prove the fundamental postulate of systems sciences, organicism – the reasoned belief that all what exists is an organic system, and regardless of scale, all those organic systems follow similar ‘Disomorphic’ laws based in the equality of its forms in space and functions in time derived from the properties of its dimensional motions of space-time (Ab. Dimotions).

Let us now deal with the other huge upgrade of 5D besides fractal space: cyclical time, which explains the informative repetitive patterns or Laws Nature and its multiple space-time clocks.

**III. CYCLIC TIME: ð**

**The causal repetitive laws of ‘stiences’**

A Universe of ∞ time clocks of different size and speed differs from its human description with a single mechanical clock-time to which all time clocks of the universe are equalized, elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks). As Galilean physics, born of ballistics, simplified the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs: Time is cyclical, all clocks of time and laws of science are based in the cyclical patterns of nature. But physicists developed ballistics and denied the obvious truth that we can know the future because it will repeat the causality of the past, and we can change it by changing that causality, in History by repressing the lethal memes of the tree of metal and enhance the welfare memes that make us survive. Of course, lineal and cyclical time render the same equations as one is the inverse of the other, measured by frequency, T=1/ƒ, but the philosophical implications of cyclical time, are ginormous and the in-form-ation provided by those cycles, erased by lineal time, a handicap for humans to truly understand the cycles of history and economics, the ‘deep time’ scales of the fifth dimension, and the whole workings of super organisms and its physiological structures.

It might surprise the reader to know then that ever since Newton and Galileo canonized lineal time physicists and by extension mankind lost its understanding of the modes of time=change of the Universe, reducing them to lineal measures of motion. This didn’t bother them as their work has been – since Galileo invented the discipline to measure motions of cannonballs in space – the exhaustive analysis of motion and speed, to the point they reduced time *the measure of all forms of change in all systems of reality, *to a single parameter of space: v=s/t, t=s/v.

So time in physics is NOT as in Nature, the measure and perception of change, but only of motion; as physics *was defined in the* XIX c. ONLY as the science of locomotion; not of all forms of time-change.

Science is BOTH an instrument of power, and a form of culture, beyond the collection of data and its expression in equations, at the most basic detailed level. All what comes after – the general models of reality of each science *are always biased by the power idol-ogy of the historic culture that develops them. *

The graph shows one of the many examples we shall include in this blog: the obvious fact that time clocks are cyclical and multiple, but *humans have reduced them all to the concept of a single lineal time clock for the entire Universe that progresses towards a future, obviously ‘positive’ for the human kind.*

Physicists reduced our information of the dimensions and modes of time cycles by uncoiling all time cycles, missing its form and frequency, to be able to equalize them all despite all its different speeds through the second standard of a mechanical clock. Then all its different speeds measured as mechanical time-clocks distances are pegged together as number of a line.

In the XVII c. Descartes founded a mathematical artifice, the Cartesian space-time plane, that allowed him to plot time in lineal terms and Galileo used it to define time as a parameter of lineal space-motions, reducing time studies to a single form of change and all its time clock cycles to a single time clock (time-space relativity, v=s/t, time as measure of translation, use of clocks, etc.):

Physicists uncoiled time-frequency, into lineal time, T=1/ƒ by writing the inverse equation: Lineal time writes T and cyclical time measured in frequency its inverse 1/ƒ; so if we were to change all the equations of physics by putting 1/ƒ instead of T, we would change the PARADIGM of time to cyclical time but all the practical results will be the same, just expressed in frequency.

I.e. Speed = Space/Lineal time (V=S/T), becomes Speed = wavelength x Frequency, (V=λ x ƒ) …

Cyclical time just moved to the numerator and that is all. But the consequences are huge when we ‘perceive reality as chaotic, lineal, free and entropic’ guided towards an obvious ‘future of death’ that *justifies war and big-bang theories of a dying explosive universe *vs. the perception of time as cyclical, hence reality as bounded, entangled, multiple, whereas death is just the necessary end of a cycle of renewal of life, which we shall very soon show to be also the case for the fractal, organic eternal Universe, when we model it with the tools of cyclic time. This point – the existence of cyclical patterns in reality, which are called ‘laws of science’, is then the next point to clarify.

We define cyclical time also in logic terms: A fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system – one that exchanges energy and information and grows from parts into larger scales, as the systems of the Universe do. So cyclical time creates a broken Universe naturally as it breaks and encloses vital spaces, with its time cycles.

Despite the obvious cyclical nature of all clocks of nature, and its logic reality, absolute lineal space-time, remains the main physicists’ error, with multiple consequences, for a wrong cosmology of which we shall only consider in detail the error of the big-bang, and the loss of the organic fractal properties of the galaxy.

**Local Past=Entropy, Present=Iteration and Future=Information in zero-sum worldcycles. **

‘The separation between past, present &future is an illusion’ Einstein ‘spacetime ∆@st you’re to Dust you shall return’

*But of all the consequences of cyclical time, the most important is the existence of infinite local time clocks of which we are all made, which therefore imply the existence of infinite local past, present and future states. *Whereas the past is the beginning of a pi cycle, starting as a line of entropy with no form that curves and raises in height in its second state of present, and returns back to its origin in its future 3^{rd} age of information, completing a 0-sum of life and death. Thus instead of a single ∞ lineal absolute time there are ∞ living cycles of time happening in zillions of entities.

**RECAP.** The 2 structural substance of all beings made of cyclical time and fractal, topologic space are:

-Vital, organic space Scales (ab.∆), made of smaller parts that become larger wholes: forces that become particles, atoms, molecules, cells, matter, life organisms, planetary, solar systems, galaxies and Universes, which in each scale will be composed of the only 3 topologic varieties of space with motion: lineal limbs/fields that move the system, hyperbolic iterative body-waves that reproduce it, and spherical particles-heads that gauge its information.

– ð: Cyclic time that returns to its origin as a 0-sum worldcycle and breaks space into an enclosed vital body wave:

Lineal & cyclic time render the same equations as one is the inverse of the other, measured by frequency, T=1/ƒ, but the philosophical implications of cyclical time, are enormous, as we regain the in-form-ation provided by those cycles, *origin of the laws of science, which would not exist if there were not cyclical patterns; including *the cycles of history and economics. The most important of them being, the fact that *a time cycle breaks reality (1 ^{st} knot theorem) in an outer and inner region, creating a membrane that encloses a vital space, of which we are all made’*.

**Paradox of Galileo: S≤≥T: Relativity of Dimensional spatial Form=Motion in time.**

Galileo’s time and space is the fundamental conceptual thought behind the relationship between time=motion and space=form and how one can be converted into another; the Principle of Relativity.

We said all what exists is made of space=form and time=motion. And yet physicists know that we cannot distinguish motion from form. That any being in motion from its point of view seems to be still and all other things moving around it. This is the principle of Relativity of motion.

Physicists then without much thought about that fascinating duality, went on to use mathematics to calculate the relative motion of each entity of reality respect to other system, which seems static from both points of view. This is called Galilean relativity, latter refined by Einstein’s relativity, and essentially is concerned with the mathematical calculus of what we shall call the 2nd Dimotion of time=change, locomotion. Fine, but at this *stage we are far more interested on the astounding duality and reasons why we do NOT see together **MOTION AND FORM, even if all systems have both. Since it is the key to properly define space=form and motion=time and its entangled relationships.* Yet one of the 2 parameters of reality is ‘hidden’ to perception; we either see motion or form, ‘waves or particles’ (quantum complementarity), distances and lines or points in motion (as in the night when fast cars in a picture appear as lines).

This duality, we write S=T, is *at the heart of every law of the Universe; and once more in the same manner we tried with some ‘dark humor’ to walk you away from the entropic principles of Human thought, we are now trying to make you break away from the “Maya of the senses” to realize that the ultimate substance is motion, and form is what a ‘still mind’, makes of that motion to ‘perceive’, information, forms-in-action. *

*Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. So we could say in a spiritual sense that all what exists are disordered entropic motions and ‘minds-monads’ whose languages create the order and forms of reality. ‘Vital motion and perceptive minds’ then make the Universe, ‘vital, perceptive and intelligent’. *

Galileo discovered this paradoxical duality, but his profession was ballistics, the study of cannonballs motion. So he chose motion and lost the chance to start physics with a complex philosophical understanding of its S=T dual Principle of relativity, which Poincare defined more clearly when he said that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’. Hence the quantum/relativity duality. In detail quantum space has energy because it is both an expansive motion that extends into a plane of space, but when seen at larger scales its entropic motion seems static space, a dual area of scattering length and width; and so in the galaxy we see ‘dark energy’ or expanding space.

Dimensions of spatial form are have also areolar motion in time. *But we cannot know from the mental, still point of view, what truly is motion and what is dimensional form. *

*So we must conclude both co-exist together. And so instead of talking of space forms and time motions as something different we must talk of space-time dimensional motions.* Both together become a ‘Ðimotion’, the fundamental element of reality. It is the paradox of relativity of motion that started modern science but was not quite properly understood either by Galileo that chose ‘motion’ and discharged the static form of the Earth or Einstein that chose form and measured the ‘simultaneity of space’: Time Motions & space dimensions however co-exist and merge in every ‘space-time being of the Universe. The 3 essential paradoxes of Galileo: how can we distinguish a closed, cyclical deterministic ordered form from a flat, free one, when can we distinguish motion from stillness, and how can we distinguish discontinuity from continuity are still unresolved, but will show one properly explained by the fractal nature of reality and the different perspectives of the mind, to be essential to the key concepts of our existence such as freedom vs. order, infinity vs. limit, cyclical vs. lineal inertia.

The first truth to understand about the Universe is that a motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space. This was what Galileo found since we see still the Earth and flat but it is round and moving.

History of science took however the wrong path, when he affirmed that the Earth moved, without dealing with the *true question poised by Copernicus discovery: Why if the Earth moves in time, we see it as a still form in space? Reality is a constant game of infinite motions, but the mind focus in stillness those motions, and measures them at distances. So motion is for the mind relative to its systems of measure and perception, which are light-based. *What physicists do was to substitute the still distances for motions, and it took another 300 years for Einstein to realize the relativity of motion and its measure made essentially time and space, motion and form two sides of the same coin. But this realization was not explored philosophically and so it gave birth to a series of ill-understood dualities between ‘states of measure and form’ (particles, head gauging form, in-form-ation) and ‘states of motion’ (wave states). It is then essential to grasp that motion and form co-exist as two different states depending on which scale of the fifth dimension we study.

**The correspondence of 4D and 5 D.**

Even if a few more elements of 5D are needed to fully grasp its correspondence with 4D we shall bring now a synoptic analysis of Einstein’s previous paradigm on 4Dimensional space-time based in 5 postulates/equations:

__–____ The postulate of relativity__, which states that we cannot distinguish motion=time from dimension=position=form =space, which in 5D we reduce to a simple formula, S≈T; we shall call the Paradox of Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove) as he couldn’t explain why the Earth moves but we perceive it in mental space as a still dimension.

– __Denial of Newton’s Absolute space-time__; as he said ‘Leibniz was right, but if so we have to start physics from its foundations’ and ‘I seem to be the only physicist who believe there are infinite time speeds in the Universe’, which we made explicit accepting Leibniz’s relational concept of space-time, the seed of Generational space-time, resumed in a simple sentence: ‘we are the scales of space we occupy and the cycles of time our existence lasts’.

– __The constancy of light speed__, c, which in a 4D single background plane of light space-time corresponding to the galaxy holds naturally, as *light in a relational->Generational theory is the space-time of the galaxy*, which generates through its ‘accelerated’ vortices of space-time in a crescendo of ever more dense scales, photons, electrons, quarks, atoms, molecules, matter states, cosmic bodies and black holes. Yet when we add a 5^{th} Dimension sum of all those scales, c-speed becomes the limit when we reduce all the potential scales of the Universe to light space-time and the particles generated by it. And so we define a second metric equation for all scales: Sp (Space size) x Tƒ (cyclical time frequency) = Constant; meaning smaller scales of space hold faster rotating particles, (black holes beyond the event horizon, where there is no longer ‘light’) or when moving in lineal fashion can go faster than light speed in scales below light or outside galaxies, (Bohm’s quantum potential of action at distance cause of entanglement, neutrinos outside galaxies.) As S=T maximizes SxT, both give: **Max. SxT=C,** 5D metric equation, local to each Time§pace organism struggling to survive Max. its S-form &T-motion.

– __The principle of equivalence__ between Acceleration and mass, which we consider a strong principle, as a rotary accelerated vortex of space-time is a mass in the cosmological scale (ab. ∆+1), a thermodynamic Eddie in the human scale (∆º) or a charge in the quantum scale (ab.∆-1) Thus the principle can be written with parameters of space and time frequency as a case of 5D metrics, SpxTƒ=C, V(t)xR(s)=C, from vortices equations, to the 3D case, (** M, C) = ω^{2} r^{3} /U.C. (G, k) **which defines both charges and masses as quantum and cosmic vortices of 2 different 5D scales, whose G and k, Universal constants of S(curvature – Einstein’s formalism)=T(speed -: Newton’s), in 5D metrics have the measured 10

^{39}difference of strength, solving the hierarchy problem. Since paradoxically, the smaller, faster rotating charge is more attractive than the larger slower galaxy. Further on, in 5D space time vortex metrics a proton shows to have a Schwarzschild Radius, showing the scalar similarity between galaxies, as ‘atoms’ of a hyper-universe and dark expansive energy, as ¥-radiation between them.

–__The dual Energy-mass equation__ – E(T)≤=≥M(S) in Planck Units – which can coil entropic lineal motion into collapsing matter, E->M, as it happens when the accelerated dark entropy between galaxies collapses into galactic mass, warping its one-dimensional motion into 3 Dimensional vortices (hence balancing the expansion of intergalactic space, 75% of dark energy, into 25% of mass vortices, as 3x1D entropy becomes 1x3D masses; leaving the total volume of the fractal immortal Universe unchanged. While its inverse process is a scalar big-bang when a spatial space-time vortex, hold in its attractive position as an accelerated clock of time-space becomes entropic motion, uncoiling its form into lineal motion: M->E, in any 5D scale of spacetime; from a particle’s Beta Decay, through a Nova explosion, a galactic quasar, or perhaps a cosmic big-bang, a ‘hyperbolic’ theory of the whole, which we shall doesn’t hold in 5D as it studies only the entropic expansion of intergalactic space, ignoring the balancing collapse of entropy into galactic masses, doesn’t pass the epistemologic laws of truth – known case, experimental evidence beyond local measures, correspondence principle with the known-known laws of physics (conservation of energy and momentum and baryon numbers), and we shall falsify in this text, more concerned with the building up of an epistemologic sound model of the fractal, organic, immortal 5D cosmos – since if a falsified model of reality upholds against truth like the bigbang does, as per Schopenhauer & Kuhn, it must be taken as a ‘pseudo-religious dogma’, not susceptible of rational criticism, based in short-sighted beliefs proper of the military or religious job of his founding fathers, Lemaitre & Gamow (lineal time, creationism, anthropic principle, entropic, explosive weapons) projected into the ∞ cosmos.

**S=T in modern physics. T-Wave motion and S-particle information. Quantum & General relativity.**

2 limits: the wave erases form into motion, the particle is a still state that gauges information entangled to other particle, fermion and boson, still to each other – despite the perception of relative motion in our scale – hence the information electrons share has always a c-constant speed.

This is the ‘rational’ 5D explanation of both the c-constant of light and entanglement; As electronic beings perceive information in ‘stop position to each other’ and move in ‘wave state’.

Motions are perceived by particles that stop motion into form, into information, as distances.

*Thus Galilean relativity was ill-understood, as the true question about time-change was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of **smaller self-similar systems. **So there is NOT really a Dimension of pure spatial form or a pure time motion but a combination of both, even if **mentally we tend to reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form=space, and this is truly the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into 5 dimotions, the fundamental element of all realities. *If we see slow motion in the night a light it seems a long distance. Distance and motion CANNOT BE distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a Space=time ÐIMOTION (ab. Dimensional Motion):

**S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion:****Dimensions + motions = ðimotions**

*When we perceive the system in space, then we perceive an organism with 3 adjacent topologic elements, and its forma science is ‘vital topology’.* And when we perceive them through its scales the organic system becomes a superorganism. Finally when we perceive the system in time we perceive a cycle that returns to its origin as a zero sum, which *observed through all its scales *will be a life-death cycle, common to all systems where life is the arrow of information and future, death the arrow of death entropy and past, and both together form a worldcycle.

**The fractal generator of physical systems: the 3 conserved quantities in local vital, organic terms. **

Cyclic time has in physics another important consequence, as its cycles break the spacetime continuum, in infinite local timespace beings (1^{st} knot theorem), with angular momentum membranes. So we can define time cycle as the fundamental particle of the Universe of which an h-Planckton and its inner volume would be the simplest one.

From its structure and its 3 relative components, we obtain then a clearer concept of why 3 quantities conserve into the future . They are* there are 3±i Dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions) of Bio-Topo-logic timespace (parts and wholes being the ±i 4 ^{th} and 5^{th}), there are 3±¡ conserved elements in any stientific plane*. Physicists so far have a nebulous definition, based in Noether’s theorem, which no single physicist on Earth really understands. Why there are indeed 3 conserved quantities?

*The conservation laws of physics imply that 3 quantities are conserved into the future; they are the 3 elements of any physical scale’s 5D metric equation: Lineal x Cyclical momentum = Present energy.*

We unify organically those 3 planes of the 5^{th} Dimension of the galaxy, from the h-Planck scale to the astronomical scale, as we do NOT have enough information about the ∆±4 cosmic plane to safely assess its space and time parameters (even if the cosmological constant and the ‘isomorphic’ (equal formal laws) of its forces and scales will help us latter to clarify its structure. How can then we define more specifically those 2 time arrows in physics?

It follows from simple logic thought that any space-time dimensional motion (ab. Dimotion, which from now on will substitute the ascientific concept of an arrow) must be a conserved quantity as they define the existential futures of systems. So they must ‘exist’-be conserved into the future. And this simplifies enormously our inquire as physics has only 3 conserved substances, which not surprisingly correspond quite obviously to locomotion, ‘lineal momentum’, cyclical time clocks which carry information in its frequency and form ‘angular momentum’ and energy, which ‘integrates’ in a longer time span, lineal momentum into kinetic energy and angular momentum, into potential energy, defined by its ‘position’ (as a system turning around a point IS defined by that point-position). So we define those two arrows of topological timespace, as the 2 conserved momentums of lineal motion and cyclical form, from where it derives a third arrow of conserved ‘energy’, its combination.

But when we put together those 3 elements into an ‘organic whole’ as in the right graph above, it is easy to see, they form a structure with a central active magnitude that commands the lineal motion of the system (Center of mass or charge), a clock-like membrane of cyclical motion, and a vital energy enclosed between both, which we can measure by its radius-width. So in many ways angular momentum already ‘hosts’ the 3 elements of the being; reason why h-Planck can be taken as a non-abstract ‘real first particle’.

Thus we can study ‘synchronous’ organic systems in physics made of 3 conserved space-time dimotions: lineal, self-centered singularities, symbiotic to angular momentums that enclose together an energy area.

This is the case for all masses and solar systems, or galaxies, where most of the angular momentum is in the outer region with planets or halos or Oort belts enclosing a ‘vital surface’ of vacuum gravitational energy, self-centered in an active magnitude or mass. So happens in the smallest particle the h-Planck and for the intermediate ensembles of moving electric charges represented by a charge center, a magnetic loop around it, *which acts as the membrane of the charges*, and the vital vacuum energy region enclosed within them.

So the 3 abstract concepts of conserved quantities become 3 organic Dimotions:

**-Lineal momentum is change=motion in space**, the main arrow studied by physics, described with its Galilean metric V=S/t, or in Einstein’s formulation, S^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}-c^{2}t^{2} -a conserved quantity, which in the case of entropy alters the internal form of a being, dissolving and scattering it – synonymous of death.

**-Angular momentum represents a change=motion of the inner form of beings**, with null translation in external space. This is the fifth dimension of time, which applies to the evolution of form, of information, and in its social form, opposite to entropy means the organic evolution of parts into wholes.

Both together ‘enclose=integrate into the vital energy of the system’, its 3^{rd }conserved quantity. It is then immediate its relationship with the main phenomena of physical systems: lineal momentum relates to kinetic energy, its integral in a longer time span; angular momentum, with its curved cyclical geometry, defines time clocks, which store the in-form-ation of the Universe in the curved form and frequency of its cycles.

When they accelerate inwards, shrinking its form, they are akin to charge vortices in the quantum scale or gravitation in the cosmological scale (principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass). From where we define the 2 fundamental forces of nature, as accelerated vortices of informative time, in 2 different scales of the fifth dimension. While its opposite decelerating explosion of information into scattered space is an entropic process.

Yet neither angular momentum, nor its accelerated conserved forces are seen as an arrow of time by physicists, since Newton established only a principle of lineal inertial motion.

While locomotion and entropy are ‘fudged’ together without distinguishing its simplex, individual vs. complex social nature as a single time arrow, which is what physicists call the fourth dimension of time.

It is then obvious that the combinations of locomotion and angular momentum, or entropy and social evolution of form, are balanced ‘stable’ dualities that compensate explosive scattering of entropy expanding in space, with implosive increasing vortex-like speed forming a system, inwards as angular momentum does. This combination of a relative arrow of entropy or death and an arrow of evolution of form or sum of lineal and angular momentum through a time period is what we call energy, the relative present dimension of time, a conserved quantity in physics.

Thus those two varieties of lineal vs. angular momentum and entropy vs. evolution of information, have inverse properties essential to understand in any science the balances of reality:

Simple Lineal inertia has no form, no in-form-ation; while angular momentum has a cyclical motion. While complex, social entropy loose form as it expands in space, and social evolution creates form as it shrinks. Moreover, entropy is a fast, death-like explosive expansion in space that last little time; so it is ‘space-like’; while organic evolution is a life-like, long term process which shrinks in space, hence a ‘time-like’ event.

**The 3 metric equations of physical scales. **

Once we establish the meaning of the 5 Dimotions of reality we can ‘ascribe’ every parameter of science to one of those dimotions either in a ceteris paribus analysis as a partial space or time function or as a complex entangled space-time function in equations that describe a time-space being mutating its 5D metric through the 5 ‘graduations’ of motion and form, from entropy («, scattering motion, which is both motion internal and external to the being), locomotion, < (only external motion), reproduction, ≈, evolution, > (internal mostly with external shrinking) and linguistic seeding, », still perception in crystal and solid or mental states whereas an active magnitude creates from a field of motion a seed of form.

Most human measures called ‘energy’ are not about the 3^{rd} dimotion of energy, which ‘keeps its balance of form and motion’ but about entropic states of scattering form and expansive motion in space. For example in E=mc^{2}, a mass vortex of physical information is trans-formed into an entropic expansion of space, loosing its form. So we do NOT measure its energy but its entropy. Human Energy then works as a parameter of the entropic scattering motions due to the death or big-bang of a physical system, exploding its form. This again becomes the case for Heat, which measures the entropy=motion extracted from a thermodynamic ensemble, useful for man to be transformed into ‘real energy-ordered motion’, in its ∆+1 scale. And so we can consider a general 5D metric for those physical scales such as E is a function of entropy that multiplied by a function of time frequency give us a scalar constant, so we write:

*Entropy (E) x Time Duration (1/ƒ) = Constant of spacetime scale.*

The connection between both concepts is however more subtle. When we express the entropic energy without caring for its ‘informative details’, multiplied by its time duration, we indeed ‘erase’ the constant of space-time into a flow of entropic motion humans can use. But if we keep the system entangled without loss of information as E = C x ƒ (ð); we can talk of the ‘inner energy’ of the system, E, as a ‘population sum’, of ‘space-time C-beings’, as in a wave of light which is a sum of ƒ-Plancktons. So bearing in mind those subtle distinctions, 5D metric equations, E x T = C or E = C x ð, give us the 3 fundamental equations of mathematical physics regarding its 3 ‘scalar planes’ (graph).

Once we understand the 3 conserved quantities of physical systems, as the 3 elements of 5D metrics, all flows easily in the interpretation of the main equations of physics, which will as in the case of the metric equation of the galaxy, and its limits of information (h) and motion-distance (C-speed) related in ‘nested scales’ within a parameter of time (frequency or duration), and one of energetic entropic motions, giving us a constant of scale of space-time, h, m and T in which the actions are taking place.

Entropy=Energy=max. motion x Time frequency/duration become then two limiting barriers, which dissolve the information constant of the being if crossed, disordering and restarting the game with ‘fresh’ entropic motion between scales. So frequency from the quantum wave collapses into an ∆+1 particle of the next dimension, which emerges from the ‘undistinguishable’ use of the energy/entropy of the lower plane.

This implies a finite limit in each plane starting from a first universal constant in space (H-plank uncertainty, first wave frequency mass-particle), and a limiting frequency in time (i.e. beyond 10.000 degrees molecules become plasma and temperature leaves way to frequency; and vice versa, beyond certain frequency waves collapse into particles; again beyond certain mass ’frequency’ quarks collapse into heavy quarks and black holes), so near the limits of each nested dual plane, ∆±1 by an excess of energy or information, the system ‘decays or evolves and emerges into a higher ‘constant’ of an upper or lower plane, crossing a discontinuity that doesn’t conserve 1,2,3 D (momenta and energy) transferred between planes.

In the graph we consider those co-invariant ‘constants’ of the fifth dimension for the 3 main physical planes, as a representation of its conserved energy, which the reader will observe is always equal to the product of a constant of space and a ‘clock of time frequency’ (temperature, frequency mass, where mass is a frequency of an accelerated vortex of space-time, according to Einstein’s principle of equivalence; e=mc^{2}+e=hƒ -> m = ƒ (h/c^{2}). Thus for each fundamental physical scale, there is a constant ratio between its ‘frequency=time parameters’ and entropic, energetic parameters, which give the 3 fundamental constants of Scales in the Galaxy organism, H-Planck (ratio of frequency -energy for quantum systems), K-Boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, 3^{rd} Kepler law (ratio between orbital time of planets and the spatial volume: entropic content of its orbital sphere).

So surprisingly enough from such a simple new metric 5D equation, we can deduce the main equations of all the scales of physics and by the principle of correspondence consider the 4th Dimensional formalism the limit of 5D in a single ‘space-time scale’, special relativity the quantum, ∆-3 scale of a light space-time continuum and General relativity the cosmological ∆+3 scale of the fifth dimension. It is from the interaction of those 3 dimotions, angular and lineal momentum and energy, *happening in a single plane of reality, to which we add 2 ∆±¡ Dimotions of entropy (social, scattering locomotion that dissolves the parts of the being) and its inverse social evolution of parts into wholes*, from where we obtain all the laws of conservation with a much clear-cut conceptual meaning.** **

**RECAP. We are all five dimotional fractal beings.**

It is that simple. Look not further. We are 5 Dimotional beings, dimensions of space with a form which play motions in time with a function 5 functional forms, entangled and ensemble together into a appareance of a variety of being.

The biggest handicap for mankind to advance its comprehension of the Universe is its use of a single motion of time when ‘reality is a fractal of 5 topologic dimensional motions of time-space entangled into ∞ supœrganisms living ¡ts worldcycles of exist¡ence’. That sentence encode the essence of it all.

The first step to expand the motions of time is to realize that the 3 dimensions of abstract still space do have motion, so they are both dimensions of space and motions of time. And as such they can be considered akin to the 3 topologic varieties of bidimensional space which have motion. Next we have to reject Newton’s absolute spacetime background, also a mathematical abstraction born with the Cartesian graph, over which we write our models of reality that acquired ‘life of its own’ but was never found to be ‘drawn’ on Nature. So since we are not placed in a background space-time we are made of space-time. We are made of the 3 topologic dimensional motions of space-time (ab. Dimotions), which happen to have the exact form and function of the 3 parts of all systems of nature: Spherical particles/heads of information, as the sphere holds maximal form in minimal space; cylindrical limbs/fields of locomotion, as the line maximize function, and hyperbolic body-waves composed of both forms that iterate them. Alas, suddenly we realize we are made of 3 dimensional motions of space-time.

But we said we are made of 5 Dimotions, so we must add to those 3 classic dimensions; the classic fourth dimension of time only used in physics and called entropy; which is the process of ‘absolute motion’ that takes place when one of those ensembles of 3 topologic spheres, cylinders and hour-glass body-waves not only has external motion but internal motion; that is breaks into its parts and dies away. Entropy thus is the dimotion that breaks parts into wholes, in a Universe obviously made of scales of parts that become wholes from particles into atoms molecules cells matter organisms planets solar systems and galaxies. Thus if entropy is the dimotion that breaks wholes into parts there must be an inverse dimotion that puts those parts into wholes, of social, organic evolution, of love. And thus we have 3 topologic dimotions of space-time, spherical height that perceives information, cylindrical length that moves the system, hyperbolic body-waves that reproduce them, ensemble into beings that ‘emerge’ through social evolution from parts into wholes to die and dissolve entropically from wholes into parts, and those 3 ±¡ (a parameter of scale) Dimotions of space-time ensemble into infinite beings is what reality is about.

If we call ‘space’ alone a dimension of form and time alone a motion; those 5 Dimotions, its organs and functions, put together through scales of size each one studied by a ‘stience’ of space-time beings, (which we call all together the 5^{th} dimension’ as opposed to the 5 Dimotions which are local for each being) configure the exist¡ence, through 3 St¡ scales of all beings, which are born in a smaller scale, with faster time cycles, emerge to live through 3 ages dominated by its limbs of locomotion, or young age, by its body-waves that reproduce the system in its mature age, and warping, wrinkling into an excess of form in its 3^{rd} age, to die in an explosion of entropy.

So the worldcycle of life and death is a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension, as the 5 Dimotions of space-time that form an organism, in its scales of cellular/atomic, organic/ thermodynamic, gravitational/ecosystem and ternary organs, ‘|-fields/limbs<Ø-body-waves>O-particle-heads’ become sequentially ordered in time from the placental seminal age of ‘social evolution’ of the organism that emerges to live 3 ages in a single plane of the fifth dimension encased into a larger world, to die and explode in an entropic big-bang.

Whereas the topologic symbols, |, Ø, O, express its form. Another way to represent that worldcycle common to all space-time beings is as a sequential progression between the 2 poles of absolute Space-form (the seed: SS) born in a lower scale, (ab.∆±¡) and absolute time motion (Entropic death: TT), when the sytem returns to its parts, with 3 intermediate states of maximal motion, Ts

(young locomotion) > balanced motion and form, or S=T:Age of reproduction > And Informative age – St age taking place in an outer world. So we can aslo write with ilogic symbols the o-sum cycle of life and death: SS¡_{-1}»Ts¡>ST¡>St¡«TT¡_{-1}

Thus 2 new formal disciplines the vital topology in space and pentalogic in time of those 5 Dimotions extract the common isomorphic laws (ab. D¡somorphisms) that all systems of reality obey in its ‘life-death cycle of exist¡ence’ as fractal superorganisms made of 5 Dimotions ensemble in 3 scales of the Universe.

The main of those laws are the metric equations of the scalar Universe, which relate the spatial size and speed of temporal clocks of all scales of Nature. Both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its clocks, its ‘time cycles’, diminish proportionally, both in biological and physical systems. And vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster and information processing carried by the frequency of those cycles accelerates, as it happens in chips, particles or life metabolism. So we write: S x T= C.

**The expansion of 4 Dimensions to 5 Dimotions of spacetime.**

The conclusion is obvious. We are made of 5 Dimotions of spacetime.

And so the biggest handicap for mankind to advance its comprehension of the Universe is its use of a single motion of time when ‘reality is a fractal of 5 topologic dimensional motions of time-space entangled into ∞ supœrganisms living ¡ts worldcycles of exist¡ence’. That sentence encode the essence of it all.

The first step to expand the motions of time is to realize that the 3 dimensions of abstract still space do have motion, so they are both dimensions of space and motions of time. And as such they can be considered akin to the 3 topologic varieties of bidimensional space which have motion. Next we reject Newton’s absolute spacetime background, also a mathematical abstraction born with the Cartesian graph, over which we write our models of reality that acquired ‘life of its own’ but was never found to be ‘drawn’ on Nature.

So since we are not placed in a background space-time we are made of those 3 topologic dimensional motions of space-time (ab. ST-Dimotions), which in fact have the exact space-form and time-function of the 3 parts of all systems of Nature: O-Spherical particles/heads of information, as the sphere holds maximal form in minimal space; |-cylindrical limbs/fields of locomotion, as the line maximize function, and Ø-hyperbolic body-waves composed of both forms that iterate them. Alas, suddenly we realize we are all made of 3 dimotions of space-time. But we must add to those 3 classic dimotions; the fourth dimension of time used in physics, called entropy; which is a process of ‘absolute motion’ (TT) that takes place when one ensemble-being of 3 topologic parts, O-spheres, |-cylinders and hour-glass Ø-body-waves ads to its external motion an internal disruptive motion that breaks its whole, into its scalar (ab. ∆¡) parts and dies away. Entropy thus is the TT-dimotion that breaks parts into wholes, in a Universe made of scales of ∆-¡ parts that become ∆+¡ wholes, from particles into atoms molecules cells matter organisms planets solar systems and galaxies.

Thus if entropy is a dimotion that breaks wholes into parts there must be an inverse formative motion that puts moving parts into wholes of SS-ocial love, organic evolution that form languages, seeds&minds. Thus we add to 3 topologic dimotions of spacetime, spheric height that perceives information, cylindric length that moves the system & hyperbolic body-waves that reproduce both, ensembled into beings; an emergent, scalar dimotion of social evolution from parts to wholes that die, dissolved by entropy back to its parts. Those 3 ±¡ Dimotions of space-time ensembled into ∞ beings and ¡ts laws is what reality=stience is all about:

If we call ‘space’ alone a dimension of form and time alone a motion; those 5 Dimotions, its organs and functions, put together through scales of size each one studied by a ‘stience’ of space-time beings, (which we call all together the 5th dimension’ as opposed to the 5 Dimotions which are local for each being) configure the exist¡ence, through 3 St¡ scales of all beings, which are born in a smaller scale, with faster time cycles, emerge to live through 3 ages dominated by its limbs of locomotion, or young age, by its body-waves that reproduce the system in its mature age, and warping, wrinkling into an excess of form in its 3rd age, to die in an explosion of entropy.

So the worldcycle of life and death is a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension, as the 5 Dimotions of space-time that form an organism, in its scales of cellular/atomic, organic/ thermodynamic, gravitational/ecosystem and ternary organs, ‘|-fields/limbs<Ø-body-waves>O-particle-heads’ become sequentially ordered in time from the placental seminal age of ‘social evolution’ of the organism that emerges to live 3 ages in a single plane of the fifth dimension encased into a larger world, to die and explode in an entropic big-bang.

Whereas the topologic symbols, |, Ø, O, express its form. Another way to represent that worldcycle common to all space-time beings is as a sequential progression between the 2 poles of absolute Space-form (the seed: SS) born in a lower scale, (ab.∆±¡) and absolute time motion (Entropic death: TT), when the sytem returns to its parts, with 3 intermediate states of maximal motion, Ts (young locomotion) > balanced motion and form, or S=T:Age of reproduction > And Informative age – St age taking place in an outer world. So we can aslo write with ilogic symbols the o-sum cycle of life and death: SS¡-1»Ts¡>ST¡>St¡«TT¡-1

Thus 2 new formal disciplines the vital topology in space and pentalogic in time of those 5 Dimotions extract the common isomorphic laws (ab. D¡somorphisms) that all systems of reality obey in its ‘life-death cycle of exist¡ence’ as fractal superorganisms made of 5 Dimotions ensemble in 3 scales of the Universe.

The main of those laws are the metric equations of the scalar Universe, which relate the spatial size and speed of temporal clocks of all scales of Nature. Both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its clocks, its ‘time cycles’, diminish proportionally, both in biological and physical systems. And vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster and information processing carried by the frequency of those cycles accelerates, as it happens in chips, particles or life metabolism. So we write: S x T= C.

** V. ****ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY: MAX S x T =C: FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE**

*Physicists made the Galileo’s paradox, the cornerstone of their theory of measure, but they** failed to study the deep implications it has for every aspect of the structure of the Universe, from the duality between spatial mental, linguistic forms and physical motions; to the balances achieved by the similarity of both space and time, which becomes the fundamental ‘equation of present’ S=T, and hence with the metric equation of scales, $ x ð = K, the two essential equations to formalize single planes S=T, and multiple scales of spacetime. Yet as S=T maximizes SxT=K (5×5>6×4). We unify both in 1 equation: Max. S x T = C, which defines for each fractal vital space-time organism its Function of existence, as all species will try to maximize its motion-entropy-time for its field-limbs, its information-spatial states for its particle-heads, whose product will give us its vital reproductive energy.*

Moreover the equation has an immediate biologic meaning, because as we are made topologically of ‘fields-limbs’ of lineal space with motion provided by the energy we absorb to also reproduce our bodies-waves, and the information we need to linguistically guide our motions with particle-heads, the very essence of survival is to increase our S=position, mental forms of space and T=entropic motions of time (whereas time=motion and space=form are the two limiting Dimotions with ‘energy=reproduction, s=t, locomotion, sT and information, St, are the intermediate 3 dimotions).

The function of existence states that all systems of Nature will try to maximize its absorption of Entropic motion (with no form) and Linguistic form (with no motion), and its 3 intermediate dimotions of energy (s=t, balance of both that reproduces them), information (St: form with a little motion, form-in-action) and locomotion (sT, motion with a little form).

So we talk of a program of survival ‘selected’ by all systems and expressed in its languages and minimal five actions encoded in that simple equation, which we term: ** a, e, ï, œ, û**, as a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence: **a**ccelerations (locomotion), entropic feeding (e), **ï**nformative perception and communication ï, **Œ**:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms **Û**… and social growth into larger wholes called philosophically Universals. This series of actions accumulated in time give birth to an informative word cycle as the monad will first perceive (i), to direct its entropy-motions (a),towards a field of energy (e), where to absorb the energy bites it will imprint with its inner form, e x i = œ, to reproduce another form, and when enough ∑œ exist, it naturally organize into a larger whole û:

In graph we see the action of different Stientific scales of organisms. Above the coding of actions, which are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any time§pace organism in light space-time, coded by colors and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 4-5 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zero-sums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind p.o.v., hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow.

The minimal particle-points, photons, electrons & quarks that construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms.

**RECAP.** All lives, performing 5 Dimotions=actions of ƒ(exist¡ence):Max.SxT(s=t) =C, starting with particles. So all scales are relative NONE matters more than other.

**VI. ALL TOGETHER NOW: WORLDCYCLES OF EXIST¡ENCE**

**Worldcycles of ****5D Time§pace Organisms****: Existence is a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension.**

So, we can redefine absolute spacetime as the sum of an infinite number of Timespace beings, which observed in space become simultaneous super organisms, and when observed in time, trace a **worldcycle** of existence between birth and extinction; as all systems are born in a seminal seed, of faster time clocks, in a lower scale of the fifth dimension, growing socially (4^{th} dimotion) till emerging in the organic scale, where they will live 3 ages dominated by one of its 3 topologic organs and its functions=dimotions, a young age of maximal locomotion, dominated by its limbs/fields, a mature age of reproduction dominated by the body-wave and a third age of information dominated by the informative dimotions, which finally exhausts all energy and as time-space never stops, it reverses its dimotion from information to entropy, exploding in the moment of death.

So we marry the 3 vital functions=motions of time and the 3 dimensions of space, either in 1 or 2D (height=spherical information, length=planar locomotion, width=hyperbolic reproduction) which merge in all Time-space Beings; and dominate one of the 3 ages of its life-death worldcycles, the past, young age of limbic entropic motions, the mature reproductive age dominated by the hyperbolic body/wave and the 3^{rd} age dominated by the informative particle-head, when the illusion of time ends with an entropic big-bang death that dissolves the being into its ‘scalar cellular, atomic parts’, which lead us to the realization that time cycles NOT only return to its origin in a single spacetime continuum but they move up and down the scales of the fifth dimension:

**The 3 ages of existence of space-time organisms. Its 2 worldcycles and Metric equations.**

The *development of the Function of Existence* of a space-time organism, can be developed as a feedback equation, S<=>T, in 3 sequential phases/ages /horizons, Max. TxMin.S Max. SxT(s=t) and Max. S x Min. T, as the equations of the 3 ages of life, between Sx 0 T (seed in the lower plane,¡-1) and Tx 0 S (equation of death):

*∆-1»∆º:* The cycle or organism starts its existence as a seed of pure form (4D) when its space-time field is created.

*$t:* It is the first horizon or ‘energy, youth age’ of the cycle, in which energy dominates the system and so we write this phase as, max. $t x min. T.

Max. SxT: s=t*.* It is the present balanced age of the cycle or classic age of ‘life’, when energy and information are in a constant proportion. It is the most efficient age, when the cycle reproduces.

*ST: Max. T x min. S*: it is the 3rd age of the cycle when information has combed and exhausted the space-time field that warps into itself.

*∆º«∆- 1:0S x T: * It is the end or death of the cycle that reverses its form and becomes energy again.

Existence is an ∞ sum of space/time fields, fluctuating between birth and extinction through those 3 phases or ages. The 3 ages of Timespace supœrganisms happen in all systems, including mental languages:

In State Physics they are, $t-gas, the moving state, S=T liquid, the balanced state and §ð-solid the informative state; into Cosmology, where it describes the Universe as a space-time system that fluctuates between both limits, a form of pure time, the singularity (*min.$t x max.ð§) *and a form of pure space, the big- bang (*max.$t x min. ð§). In *Biology, they are the 3 ages of living beings AND the 3 horizons of evolution of species. In social organisms, through the subconscious collective mind of civilizations which in art styles mimic in a longer 800 year cycle of life and death of civilizations (according to 5D metrics a human social superorganism is larger in space – a nation, culture, religion – and so it lives longer in time). So we find the 3 ages of life *emerging in the 3 ages of cultures and* its 3 artistic styles: Min.S x Max.T-infantile epic, lineal art, as in treccento, Greek kuroi; S=T; balanced beauty, when form and size are in balance, the classic mature age; and Max. S x Min. T: baroque, 3rd age of a civilisation, whose subconscious mind is the art of its ‘neuronal artists’, the age of maximal form and angst for a no future, in *the age of war=death of cultures*).

Finally we talk of 3 ∆±1 scales of worldcycles as the being live in a placenta, then emerges as organism in a world:

þ: 0-1: its palingenetic o-1 social evolution in the accelerated time sphere of existence, till becoming 1 (0-1 bounded unit circle in ¡logic mathematics; quantum probability sphere of particles in physical systems; palingenetic fetal age in biologic systems; 0-9 memetic learning childhood in social systems). It is the highly ordered world cycle as a ‘placental mother-energy world’ is nurturing as memorial cyclic spacetime erases errors of previous generations.

– c: The outer 1-∞ world, in which it will deploy its 2nd world cycle of existence in an environment which is open, entropic (1-∞ hyperbolic unbounded Cartesian plane in ¡logic mathematics; thermodynamic entropic statistical molecular populations in physics; Darwinian struggle between populations in biology; idol-ogic dog-eat-dog capitalist, nationalist competitive eco(nomic)systems in the super organisms of history. In this 1-∞ existence the world cycle is not ensured to continue, as the entropy of the world system can cut it off.

ω: The existential life cycle, though is part of a larger world of hierarchical social scales (§ D¡), where it performs 5 survival actions through ∆±4 Planes self-centered in its mind, beyond which it cannot longer perceive, to become if successful a new superorganism of the infinite planes of God, the game of existence.

**RECAP.** 2 equations of 5D Absolute Relativity, the equation of 5D scales, SxT=C & the equation of equality between form and motion, S=T, develops in 3 ages with 3 standing points, a max. point of existence, S=T or mature age, a young age of Max. T=motion, and an old age of Max.S=information; between birth in ∆-1 Form & T-entropic death.

** **

**VII.**** PHILOSOPHY OF STIENCE: ****THE STIENTIFIC METHOD : PENTALOGIC, DISOMORPHISMS**

**A ****universe made of b¡o-topo-logic time§pace scalar Supœrganisms, tracing worldcycles. **

In the next graph we show the fundamental properties of ‘spacetime beings’ due to the upgrading of its Nature, as all systems will be made of organic scales of vital topologic space, which live NOT a worldline BUT a worldcycle as the arrow of information or ‘height’ define a worldcycle of time, which we can further decomposed in 3=π phases or 3 ages, as there are now 3 ‘conserved quantities’, a first lineal age of maximal motion or youth, a mature age of dominance of vital energy or reproductive present and a third age of maximal in-form-ation, which ends in an scattering big-bang death, completing the worldcycle as a 0-sum that returns to its origin.

The 5^{th} dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of entropy (studied by physicists) and information (its inverse that evolves form) combined into conservative ‘present’ zero-sum cycles of energy. They are the 3 ‘conserved’ arrows of time that create the futures of each fractal supœrganism, between its 4Dimotion of generation in a lower ∆-1 plane that emerges in an ∆+1 social world to die back in a dissolving explosion of scattering entropy, back to ∆-1 in the moment of death. As time is cyclical, made of 3’π’ lineal time motions, we shall distinguish 3 conserved ‘quantities’ of timespace that put together create superorganisms, a relative devolving past or arrow of entropy represented in physics by disordered explosions in space and in vital topology by lineal limbs/fields of lineal momentum, an iterative reproductive present that seems not to change, represented by hyperbolic body/waves of energy, and an implosive in-form-ative local future arrow represented in physic by accelerated, V(t)R(s)=K vortices and angular momentum, and by particle/heads in the ensembles of vital topology. So timespace breaks in ∞ relative local, fractal entropic pasts, iterative energy presents and informative futures, which put together create the illusion of a single timespace continuum.

Thus the Universe has mathematical, spatial continuous & logic, temporal, cyclical & organic, fractal properties derived of the more complex ¡logic geometry of 5D scalar space and cyclic time. Thus even if we describe it with the same logic-mathematical equations a 5D Universe is very different, as scalar space brings organic and sentient properties, and cyclical time, informative deterministic patterns, which the lineal philosophy of mechanist physics ignores. From those scalar, hence organic, cyclical hence informative and moving, energetic, hence vital properties of scalar space and cyclical time, a complete different picture of reality arises; where languages become the ‘extreme’ limit of the still formal ‘spatial state’ of the being with minimal size and maximal information.

Thus 5D defines and upgrades each ‘stience’ of space-time beings that studies entities of each specific dual ∆±¡ scale of the nested Universe, from Physics focused on the largest Galaxy and physical scales, to the smallest ∆^{1} scale of Formal digital and logic sciences of the mind. *S*tiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, each one focused in a scale of the eusocial 5th Dimension, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimotions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales, guided by a still, linguistic mind, which projects its smaller mirror images of form in its territorial body waves, creating its fractal scalar structure, broken though by the entropic limits of its perceptive reach. Above the main scales of the nested supœrganisms of the human island-universe: the galatom, where nested thermodynamic planets exist, where nested human social organisms self-centered in visual, verbal, mathematic and logic minds create its order with social and mechanical memes, carried by individuals where nested cellular systems exist, coded by genes, made of even smaller atoms and particles coded by quantum numbers. Yet all those scales are unified by the invariant ST metric equations of its synchronous timespace cycles.

It is then obvious that a systemic study of reality is so different from a physical one as the underlying philosophies of absolute, lineal vs. relative cyclical time and mechanism vs. organism are. There is no doubt though as which philosophy is the ‘correct’ scientific one; for two obvious reasons:

1.Organisms are self-sustained, mechanisms as Leibniz’s quote shows need an external agent to create them, so they are NOT scientific but deist theories, and indeed Newton and Kepler were pious believers.

- The logic behind both philosophies, which in physics is called naïve reductionism – that is, only what we measure with our mechanisms is real
*and all other properties of reality that don’t fit our methods are not worth to study.*Systemics on the other side struggles to explain all properties observed, so it is a much wider encompassing model, which shows in the fact 5D applies to ALL sciences and modes of change= time space dimensional motions. Let us then apply this ‘different way of searching knowledge’ based in a much stronger ‘logic and conceptual coherence’ – without obviously denying the mathematical equations of physics, even if we change the ‘preferred’ synonymous mathematical model and parameters that better mirrors reality, as with ‘cyclic, frequency time, ƒ(ð), with its multiple fractal forms, instead of lineal T=1/ƒ.

The Universe becomes an organism of ∞ space=form & time=motion; as there are infinite ‘clock-like closed’ time cycles, which carry the in-form-ation of the Universe in the form and frequency of its closed cycles. Humans equalized all those cycles of time space organisms with a single mechanical clock since Galileo and Kepler became in ‘awe’ of its mechanical discovery. But reality displays ∞ clocks with different speeds in the Universe require to study ‘new properties of all of them’. What those clocks of time have in common: to be closed cycles, hence to divide reality into an inner and outer region, to last in time, to conserve certain angular momentum-like quantities in the volume and speed of those cycles, and so on…

It is important to differentiate the philosophy and worldview of systems science validated by that scalar, cyclic nature of space-time vs. lineal time physics, before we apply 5D metric equations to all sciences. Leibniz’s quote goes to the point: classic ‘deist, entropic’ physics projects the human ego into the Universe as a mechanism with a single ‘absolute lineal time-clock’, which ticks for all, built by a personal God who makes human ‘intelligence’ special, as the only other system that makes machines and calculates digitally. In systemics all this ego-centered nonsense disappears: the Universe is an organism with infinite ‘cyclical time clocks’ that carry the information of reality; hence beings are made of ‘relational space-time’, we shall call ‘generational space-time’, that is they occupy a fractal volume of vital space with motion and last a number of time-cycles. And from the cyclical properties of those time clocks and the vital, scalar energy of those spaces emerge the ‘organic, reproductive, vital properties’ we observe in reality.

Since of the 3 possible philosophies of science Deism, mechanism and organicism only organicism is a scientific truth. Indeed, according to *Deism* the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to *Mechanism*, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe. Organicism on the other side is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language, god, as organisms are self-replicating, but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.

What 5 Metrics does is to formalize this philosophical insight, making systemics and its related sciences of complexity, cybernetics, theory of information and organic eusocial evolution, ‘hard sciences’ after 50 years of a wealth of insights that needed to be systematized. The new model of 5D space-time is just wider, as we will apply it not only to physical systems and motions but also as we have already seen to genetic, biological clocks, planets, neutrinos, and even human life and its civilizations and religions – another scale of social humans of larger size and longer timespan.

Physics due to its reduced use of a single time motion & creationist philosophy rejects the organic, scalar properties of matter. So it achieves excellent, mathematical measures of locomotions but fails to understand the Systemic ‘synthetic’ organic Disomorphic whys of its ‘wholes’, galaxies, which are spacetime organisms, and black hole stars, its ‘informative gravitational DNA’ brains – its ‘whys’, which Feynman infamously said is the only question physicists never ask.

The reader should in that sense be prepared to accept many paradoxical laws of the i-logic structure of a Universe with 2 inverse dual arrows, entropy=absolute motion with no form and form=absolute information with no motion, bearing in mind that the key bio-logic concept behind those paradoxes is ‘coincidentia oppositorum’ a ‘thirst’ for balance between both extremes of ‘Black=form and white=motion’ in its infinite shades of grey*.*

So we can state that the Universe is a fractal system of 5 Dimotions of space-time. And construct with those 5 Dimotions all entities in existence from any scientific discipline, which we shall call therefore, ‘space-time super organisms’ (as they are made of smaller parts which are also space-time organisms). A terms we abbreviate as ‘T.œ.’ a ‘Time-space supœrganism’, and consider a ‘Theory of Everything Organic’ as the alternative philosophy of science to any T.O.E. of physical systems.

There is though a deeper understanding of the 2 limits of pure form=space and time=motion=entropy, which also defines more objectively the fundamental paradox of physics – relativity of motion. We have call this view of the limits as pure spatial language and entropy, which becomes merged into the present region of each scale: S ó T.

**Logic time existential ¬ælgebra**

‘The Universe is a sentient, fractal supœrganism of 5 D¡motions of Space-time.’ *l*§

Our language of spatial thought, geometry and time logic must be upgraded to formalize properly the description of ‘superorganisms’ perceived geometrically in simultaneous space and logically in sequential time. At present the dominant geometry of science is Euclidean (save 5^{th} postulate) and static; while Logic is lineal, Aristotelian, A->B. So we shall evolve both into a non-AE-=i-logic topology of space, next letter, i also meaning information and the fractal scales of reality and a ¬Æxistential algebra of time to formalize the ‘stœps’, stops in space and motions in time *that move the relative futures of each system, made of vital scales of space that last a finite time duration, which are generated by the bio-topo-logic properties of its vital space and cyclic time.*

3 scales of pentalogic: ∆-1 Dimotions; ∆º worldcycles of supœrganisms; ¬∆@st of space-time.

¡logic existential algebra deals with the Function of exist¡ence, C=Max. SxT (s=t) in each scale of the Universe. As such it has 3 ‘sub-fields’ according to scale. The ∆-1: study of the minimal ‘quanta’ of actions=dimotions of each species (5D: «tt entropic scattering motions; 2D: <Ts lineal momentum:locomotions; 3D: S≈T iterative reproduction; 3D: >St, informative perception; 4D: § Social evolution, generation.)

Those dimotions together as spatial organis form ∆º superorganisms, which trace a worldcycle as they accumulate more information, provoke 3 ‘ages of life’ of increasing information, $t-youth>ST:maturity>§ð-old age, with a final death reversal, §ð«Tt:death; which is the 2^{nd} level of ‘scalar depth’ of ¡logic studies.

∆+1: So finally we regain ‘Absolute concepts’ to study those 5 elements in its Disomorphic properties common to all beings as ¬∆@st of space-time (entropy: ¬, ∆-scales, @-linguistic minds, Space=information & time=motion)

All dimensions of space have a motion in time. So still Geometry evolved into topology – a geometry with internal motions-times, of which there are only 3 topologic varieties. So the Universe is the sum of ∞ Complementary ternary, topologic systems whose dimensions have organic functions: Systems feed on their relative dimension of energy-length, perceive in their relative dimension of height and reproduce in their relative combined dimension of width, which are assembled into each specific species, *to best satisfy the systems’ in taking of motion, energy and information. I.e*: An animal has its informative height in the high perceptive light dimension, but a plant, which uses light as energy has its up and down dimensions inverted respect to the man and its chemical brain buried on the Earth. So both have opposite energy-time coordinates, with an ‘antero posterior’, lineal’ ‘outward’ energy oriented structure due to the oriented arrow of light. But in a 3D world with no preferred orientation, a sea or vacuum, cyclic forms that maximize information dominate from plankton to galaxies that have a cyclic, informative, inward structure, as the stars’ body absorbs energy from intergalactic space, reproduces matter with it and feeds the internal informative knot of gravitation, with a higher height dimension the black hole.

So as all are dimensions of space with time motion, its science is topology that allows a system to deform= change its inner form. Yet a 4D Universe has only 3 ‘topological varieties’ that restricts ensembles to only 3 topologies, each one best suited to perform the 3 organic vital functions of any physic or biologic system* – gauging information (1D), to move the system (2D) to an energy field in which reproduce (3D):*

**1D: T>S: angular cyclical motions of information (Ab. §ð):** the minimal ‘geometry’ of reality, a spherical particle/head or fractal point, the geometry that stores maximal form in minimal space, hence suited for ‘organic functions’ of gauging, storing and perceiving information (particles, heads).

**2D: S<T: Lineal Locomotions***,* **(Ab. $t) *** which will move through its* lineal limbs/fields the system, as the line is the shortest distance between two points… towards a…

**3D: S≈T:** **Fields of vital Energy (Ab. ∑≈∏):** with its hyperbolic body-waves that iterate the forms of both the spherical particle/heads and lineal limbs/fields; as the hyperbolic topology combines the other two, so it can generate them, in the same manner Energy adds as the third conserved space-time quantity the lineal and cyclical momentum of 1 and 2D. To which we must add the 2 ‘scalar’ Dimotions of:

**5D: entropy («, ∂S)** whereas motion is dual internal dissolving the information of the being and external, scattering its parts, hence we use an « ¬Æ symbol; so the system explodes into its ∆-1 parts: ∆«∆-1 (death). **4D:** **organic evolution (»,∫T)** of parts into still locked simultaneous ‘linguistic seeds or mind forms’∆-1»∆

Thus when we observe those 5 Dimotions simultaneously in space they create an entangled pentalogic supœrganism, in constant communication between its 3 topologic parts, in each of the 3 scales of its relative existence. So we write in ¬Æ logic a Fractal Generator of Space-time beings (GST) that describes all systems of nature as ternary simultaneous topologies of space which trace worldcycles in time. So we write with 5 Dimotions for all supœrganisms as a fractal generator using the symbols of i-logic (ab.G):

4D»∆-1(seed) ∑∆:|-$t (limb-field)<Ø-S≈T (iterative body-wave)>O-§ð (particle-head)«5D∆-1(death)

Where < is a ¬Æ symbol for expansion-translation in space, ≈ for iteration, > for in-formative implosion, ∑ for reproduction, ∆±¡, the 3 scalar planes of the fifth dimension, |, O, Ø, intuitive topologic terms, « the double motion of entropy, » the double stopping of linguistic generation of seeds or minds that *describes all what exists as a spatial superorganism, extending in 3 relative scales of size, from its birth as a seed of pure form, which emerges into a larger plane, ∆ to live its worldcycle and die away into entropic death:*

Thus, to describe the ternary superorganisms of the 5^{th} dimension, a single ∆-plane of space-time with motion (4D formalism) is NOT good enough. We have to describe those 3 topologic forms as ∆-networks with motion, made of smaller fractal points-parts (∆-1), living in a larger ∆+1 world; which leads to the evolution of non-Euclidean geometry to define properly a fractal point, a point with inner volume, through which ∞ parallels can cross that becomes larger as we come closer to it – *solving the contradictions of the present definition of an Euclidean point as having no breath (so it cannot fit no more than a point), focus of ‘curved parallels’ (since parallels are straight lines). Since enlarged points fit and unbend many parallels. *

**All together now: ¬∆@st of space-time. Pentalogic.**

We have so far only analysed reality in the infinitesimal range (motions, dimensions and actions), the organic range (worldcycles and super organisms). So we should consider the final maximal range of the absolute, and here even if the absolute is NOT observable we can bring the ‘paralogic’ Kantian ‘absolute’ views human beings display about reality. Because the system is entangled, and made of 5 obvious components, we need a new logic, ‘pentalogic’ as all the elements communicate and interact together. Those elements common to all systems of nature are identified as:

This level is where we find the absolute concepts of ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scale’, ‘entropic limits’, ‘minds’ that make up for the 5 absolute entities of reality.

As this level is somehow ‘artificial’ to the mind integration of reality into wholes its connection to the more real levels of ‘local organisms’ is not so clear, more philosophical.

But worth to incorporate (without further distinctions of space-like, time-like etc. but rather a pentalogic analysis of each of those elements in its entanglement with all the others). So when we study space we consider it from the perspective of the other 5 elements – that is, how space affects time (the symmetry of relativity s=t), how it affects limits (the entropic spatial membrane that surrounds a system) and so on. This is the essence of pentalogic and the 5 elements, which extracts from absolute wholeness properties of reality, building them down, in the same manner we build up (and as we live in an analytic world we shall do that more often on experimental sciences) from the bottom upwards reality. It is for this pentalogic wholeness that we use the inscribed pentagram where each element connects to all the others.

Essential then to this level of knowledge is the concept of the ‘LAWS common to all systems’ derived from the properties of those 5 elements, whose study discovers** ‘Disomorphic=equal laws’** regardless of what kind of system we study. Because the system is entangled, and made of 5 obvious components, we need a new logic, ‘pentalogic’ as all the elements communicate and interact together. Those elements common to all systems of nature are identified as:

__‘ Space‘,__ ” §paœ that is ‘types of dimensional form’, and we find to have 3 only ‘topological varieties’, which perform 3 clear organic functions in the super organism, lineal limbs/fields that move the system, hyperbolic body-waves that iterate its forms and spherical particle/heads that gauge information.

__Time__**,** that is types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (body-waves) and informative gauging (particle/heads), which dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age).

** Scale**, the 3 aforementioned scales for any super organism

__Mind__**.** And this allow us to identify a ‘center that process’ information from the outer world, and controls the internal networks of the system, with a given language, which we shall call a mind, regardless of its automatic processing or consciousness. As it coordinates and maintains the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. etc. Indeed, there is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, self-centered mind, *which we shall discover all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.*

__Entropic limits__**: **In time called death, in space, called membranes, in scales as systems loose control beyond to scales and in fact death is defined by a simple equation of dissolution of two scales of information, ∆1<<∆-1.

But when we have a larger look to all those ‘analytic elements’, with a larger time span and spatial extension we find easier to make a whole analysis of all those short-time views of motions dimensions and actions as entangled in 5 ‘structural element’ of reality; space=form, time=motion, scales, entropic limits and linguistic minds; which give us a ‘humind’ view of the Universe closer to how our senses and languages put it all together, in what we call the pentalogic structure of reality.

So Entropy becomes the limits in space and time of a T.œ (Time§pace organism),** ¬;** perception, its mental form, **@;** social evolution, its scalar structure, **∆;** motion, its time flow,** T;** and reproduction, its spatial population, **S.**

Thus the key translation ads Dimensions + motions of exist¡ence into 5 structural elements of reality, which allows to move from ceteris paribus dynamic motion analyses or dimensional ones into structural studies of those Dimotions as ‘entangled’ elements of a being made of ‘dust of space-time’: **¬∆@st.**

*It is the fundamental addition to the Scientific method, as to extract the whole truth of a system we must use the Rashomon effect and consider in the entangled Universe the event-form we study from its 3±¡ inner elements and outer roles, as many fractal times we want in detail, with a minimum ternary analysis in a single plane. *

So amazingly enough with this simple scheme of__ 5 pentalogic element__

**s**, tracing 3 relative worldcycles, the first ‘placental worldcycle’ as it evolve in the relative safe ‘womb’ of a maternal system, the life cycle, as it tries to survive in an outer ecosystem, and for the most organized systems, a 3rd worldcycle as it forms part of a larger super organism, we will be able to order everything in the Universe, every event and every phenomena, which the researcher has studied for decades.

So we study further the nested super organism of mankind history in its 3 scales, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind as an ideal global super organism, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legal-nervous system of information and coordination of its citizens-cells.

**RECAP. **The existence of a new dimension of space-time is the most important discovery of science in a century, since Einstein formalized the fourth dimension, but this expansion and formal organization of science is much wider as it *applies to all sciences, not only physics. *

Reality is made of 5 essential elements: topologic space, described best with maths; complex logic time of different ‘dimotions’, which ‘converge’ rather than sequentially cause each other, in the way a ‘convergent multiple flow’ produces a circle, rather than a single pen draws it. So logic but of an entangled more complex type than @ristotelian logic is the best language of time.

**Its mathematical description with ¬Æ ¡-logic geometry: Fractal Points. Its 5 Postulates.**

‘Every point is a world in itself’ Leibniz, on the fractal point, Non-Euclidean unit of ¡logic geometry

The study of the 5 Dimotions of reality is a huge field because all events and forms are generated by their combinations, OPERATED with the <=> «» 5 symbols of transformation of states of a system or transfer of entropy, motion, energy, information and form between them. So we can write with i-logic all events and translate all equations.

For example, E=Mc^{2 }writes E($t)<c^{2}(ST)>M(§ð); which is as all fractal generators a feed back equation that transforms cyclical mass vortices into entropic motion, through the intermediate state of energy radiation..

5Ðimotional beings and its parts are thus constantly performing cyclical 5 Ðimotional changes of its states of space-time, and as a whole, trace a worldcycle of exist¡ence (where each ‘st¡ence describes the existences of the space-time beings of each scale). And a new formal science, ¬Æxistential algebra describes with its Generator of space-time and sub-equations all the processes involved in the creation, existence and destruction of those systems throughout all the stages of its worldcycles, which can be observed from 5 Dimotional perspectives, in an entangled Universe, in which *each being is made of them.*

*Further on* the pentalogic of existential algebra (¬Æ) leads to an i-logic topology of fractal points with parts that complete the upgrading spatial mathematics with 5 ¬Æ postulates to substitute the remaining axioms, postulates and principles of E geometry that the 5 Non-E postulate merely hinted at. Le us review them:

But in sequential time we can observe constantly the being modulating its steps through those 5 Ðimotions, Social Generation, entropic death, locomotion, reproduction and gauging of information, aeiou…

So a huge advance of this blog is to study points with parts, fractal points that as we come into its scale grow in size and display the 3 minimal parts of all of them, its area, frequency of angular momentum, and central Active Magnitude, the true meaning of a ‘singularity’ – the focus of charge, mass, forces and its informative minds. So let us introduce the minimal POINT with parts of the Universe, the time space cycle.

*In the graph, Einstein’s interpretation of the 5th non-Euclidean postulate kept the view from our larger world, bending parallels, but parallels are straight lines, so particle points must be defined more like we see any of them with telescopes or microscopes, peering in its relative scale from its relative point of view, as enlarging worlds with a very complex internal structure when studied in detail. *

So we explain without contradictions Non-Euclidean points, which were not logic in a single scale, as they ‘curved’ parallels which are ‘straight lines’ and fit them in a ‘point with no breath’ that holds only 1 line. But now they enlarge fitting multiple ‘straight lines’. But as humans only see a scale of reality our perception becomes ‘deformed’ curving them. It follows a correction of the axioms and principles of geometry that make Mathematics vital, and we call the ‘5 Postulates of Non-Euclidean geometry’:

1 & 5: Points are fractal points, which harmonize the 1^{st} axiom=postulate with the 5^{th} postulate of non-Euclidean parallels, as a fractal point, a cell, atom or particle of a smaller scale of the fifth dimension can host multiple parallel flows of energy and information crossing it).

2^{nd} postulate defines lines as waves of points with volume (which explains the complementary wave particle).

3^{rd} postulate defines planes as the intersection=messing of 3 ‘lines=networks’ or waves of points in motion, which carry energy and information; to its cells, defining the biotopologic plane, a system with 3 physiological networks. Hence a Non-Euclidean plane is a superorganism. In the graph, the ternary network structure of super organisms in the fractal Universe as ¬Æ topologic planes composed of ‘similar fractal points’ (atoms, cells, individuals) joined by 3 physiological lines=networks, whose 3 functions, feeding for locomotion, and distribution of information and its ‘combined’ energy define the 3 conserved Dimotions) of any system of the Universe.

4^{th} Postulate of congruence: According to internal and external similarity those fractal points will evolve in parallel socially if they are similar and can communicate with information or enter Darwinian perpendicular struggle. So *similar clone beings form topologic ternary networks that become superorganisms, wholes made of ∆-1 parts, themselves wholes of ∆-1 parts through 3 5D scales.*

Scalar space and cyclic time and its 5D metric, Sxð=K implies a revision of many postulates without experimental proof that contradict its bio-topo-logic properties extended to all ‘stiences’* and turn out to be by the correspondence principle, limits of the larger 5D model*. For example, we changed the first axiom without proof of Euclid, affirming that points have no breath, no ‘inner fractal parts’, as that is *our perception of them in a single scale, but when we add all 5D scales, they enlarge opening up a lower ∆-1 plane.*

We will modify also the postulate without proof of Mr. Einstein, regarding the limits of speed of light; which correspond to the limit of speed in the lower ∆-3 light space-time plane over which the galaxy is built (self-evident, if light is the substrata of our galaxy c-light speed is its maximal speed of minimal information, $ x ð = K), but outside the galaxy where there is no light, a lower scale must exist with >c speed according to 5D we must respect mathematics. We complete biology with topological evolution that selects the best forms and explains punctuated evolution, and deny the affirmation that individuals are selfish – a view of the lower plane of a eusocial organism where species survive better collaborating to create an emergent new plane of the 5^{th} dimension. And this applies to social sciences; and explains religions and societies as super organisms built with the same 5D laws of any other super organism. So we deny the ideologies of nationalism that divides the human species into military nations.

The previous examples of all disciplines show how indeed all systems can be modeled with the advanced concept of ∆st, ‘scalar=organic’, ‘vital topologic space’ and ‘cyclical worldcycles of time’. So we shall now consider an upgrading of astrophysics, describing those 3 new properties in its fundamental species. So we shall study its ‘scales’ considering the ‘galaxy-atom’ its organic spatial structure considering the ‘galacell’ and finally put it all together in time, considering the ‘worldcycle’ of life and death of physical systems, that is, the scalar big-bang.

**RECAP.** The Universe is a fractal organism of similar scales, defined by 2 metric equations and its philosophy of science, 5D Absolute Relativity: the equation of 5D scales, SxT=C & the equation of relativity between form and motion, S=T, which started modern science. Since *we cannot know from the mental, still point of view, what truly is motion and what is dimensional form.*

Thus Time Motions & space dimensions co-exist and merge in every space-time being of the Universe &* we must talk of space-time dimensional motions.* When we combine them, as S=T maximizes SxT, we define the Function of existence, Max. S x T = C (s=t), which IS also a biologic equation of survival that embodies the will of life; the biological expression of the ‘Universal mandate’, expressed by all species in all its codes and languages, the Grow and Multiply of the Bible, the intuitive truth that guides all beings. In detail implies all systems try to maximize its 3±¡ ‘Ðimotions’ that in space create organisms and in time its worldcycles of existence; starting as pure Form (4D) in a seminal seed, emerging in an ∆º scale, in a young age of max. Motion (2D), balanced with information in the reproductive age of max. Energy (3D), followed by an age of information (3D), when time reverses into entropic death.

**PART II. ASTROPHYSICS. GALAXIES. **

** **

**VIII. WORLDCYCLES OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: SCALAR BIG-BANGS**

Big bang cosmolgy ignores gravitational informatve galaxies & dark matter & the scalar structure of the Universe reducing space-time to a single scale, and the cyclical nature of tme, we must correct the big-bang, which corresponds to the limit of a 5D complet theory of reality in a single ‘light’ space-time continuum.

The big-bang entropy-only theory of the Universe dismisses galaxies all together, as they are NOT expanding, and if the galaxies are NOT expanding, running backwards its present implosive system would mean a counter-effect to running backwards the expanding Universe. Backwards in a single time, the space between galaxies contracts, but the galaxies between space expand and a balance again is achieved: Since when we ad the gravitational force that warps 1D space into 3D mass in galactic vortices, they balance the expansion of 1D space in entropic vacuum as light dies into dark entropy lines between them. As mass warps 3 1D flat-vacuum into a ‘high volume’ its 3 times more powerful in its warping, hence the 75%-25% balance of mass to dark energy.

Thus the inverse arrow of gravitational information compresses dark energy into matter and balances the arrow of expansive space between galaxies, describing a fractal immortal Universe where a big-bang is merely the entropic arrow of dissolution of matter guided by Einstein’s equation in any scale: E<=>Mc^{2}

In the next graphs, we resume the model of the fractal Universe in which each scale have similar big-bang deaths:

Scalar big-bangs that happen from Beta decays (right picture) that explodes nucleons into atoms, Nova that explode stars and maybe planets doing experimental big-bangs at home, to quasar black holes that give birth to new galaxies. All scales suffer similar e=mc^{2} dual processes of warping through gravitational forces of cyclic momentum that create those galaxies, and expansive big-bangs of lineal momentum balanced in combined cycles of energy – the 3 conserved quantities of each fractal space-time physical organism, which put together give birth to the 3 conserved laws of nature, which present Big Bang theory ignore. Instead a fractal space and cyclical time arrows fully accounts for the immortal Universe and its balanced 3 arrows of space-time, conserved in its infinite reactions; energy, information stored in the cycles and frequency of those systems of angular momentum, whose minimal constant form is h, and lineal speed, conserved in the constancy of light.

In the center we see a map of the Galaxy, which just recently showed to have two lobes similar to those of the first electronic orbital of a Hydrogen atom born in self-similar fashion in the quantum scale. In the left side we see the background radiation that is supposed to come from the Big Bang 13 billion years ago, but HAS in its center the exact 2 lobes recently found above the black hole. This came as a surprise.

Above, the local explanation of the background radiation, which is a LOCAL MEASURE, hence must and can be explained by local causes in the galaxy: any moon MACHO, (Massive Cold Halo Object); that is, a quark nugget of heavy quark matter or a similar black hole that has eaten the mass of a moon will produce the exact same background radiation by gravitational red-shifting. Thus as moons are the commonest objects, we can talk of primordial black holes and/or strangelets as the local, ‘present’ cause of the radiation. Since epistemology ALWAYS favors a local ‘present’ solution far more sound experimentally than a ‘derivation’ from a non-measured experimental past in a non-measured larger region (the cosmic big-bang whose temperature ‘comes from the past’, reduced by a lineal equation and is extended hyperbolically to the non-measured entire Universe), it follows the fractal big-bang, is sounder. So what physicists call the cosmic big-bang likely does not exist, as the limit of scalar big-bangs we soundly measure are quasar big-bang.

Finally French astronomers tabulated for them a 15–20 billion year cycle which explodes central black holes, explaining the hyper-abundance of Helium in the center of galaxies. So a galaxy has a 15 billion years cycle in an older immortal Universe, since the arrow of information that shrink energy into mass in galaxies balances the entropic ‘cosmic electromagnetic’ repulsion of dark energy. Interesting enough if we reduce a quasar big-bang of 15 billion years, with 5D metric, accelerating its time clocks as we reduce size in space: $ x ð = K, it reduces 15 billion years to 15 minutes (: the exact duration of a beta-decay neutron Big Bang.

We will falsify the big bang with experimental & epistemological known proofs ignored by cultural, sociologic reasons that make it a pseudo-religious dogma of the worldly religion of physics – to make entropic weapons in a military society- and the western creationist religion of most founding fathers of physics, with its lineal Abrahamic time views & anthropic beliefs of man at the center of reality reflected in the lineal, created out of nothing cosmos.

**Cosmic vs. Quasar big-bangs. The devil’s advocate: A ‘Univercell’ (nt.1)?**

To play the devil’s advocate we could try to justify in 5D the big-bang since at first sight both big-bangs seem to fit 5D theory, if we accept our limit of light perception as the limit of the Universe. Then the ¬=@=S=T=∆ symmetries between spatial range, time aging and scalar density of populations all fit within the ‘magic number’ of 10^{11} elements for most super organisms of reality. So the symmetry also happens in the ‘limited perception’ of the cosmos:

Most galaxies have 10^{11} stars. The total mass of all the stars in the Milky Way is estimated to be between 4.6×10^{10} and 6.43×10^{10 }*sun masses.* *And the Universe is considered to have around 1.6 10 ^{11}galaxies.*

*So the easiest way to settle the question is to state that the galaxy is just a scale below the big-bang (a huge galactic molecule so to speak), as the neutron star is just a scale above the neutron ( a huge neutron molecule so to speak).*

*And that it exploded in a big bang of the next scale of the universe. But that is just the astounding beauty of pentalogic, where the 5 Dimotions/elements of reality are in balance. So for the limits of our entropic perception (¬=@), we observe similar quantitative and qualitative limits for S-patial population, T-ages within our ∆-scales. *

*A **more profound understanding of those limits though should consider that the local perception of a few galatoms is just a very reduced quantity of the whole number of galatoms of the next hyperscale of the Universe that should be of zillions of them, and all of them living as Protons and black holes without evaporation do an immortal time.*

*The immortality of the Universe indeed becomes evident as Protons are immortal and black holes are also immortal without evaporation, once we put properly in place the arrow of time of Hawking’s awesomely beautiful equation as those of the birth of a black hole into its gargantuan future, NOT of its entropic death=evaporation to the past. *

**IX. GALATOMS. UNIFICATION OF 5 FORCES AS ITS 5 DIMOTIONS.**

*In the graph the translation of the 3±¡ dimotions of spacetime, into topologies of physical systems, with steady state waves and angular momentum as a repetitive present and a relative past of lesser information and more entropy (lineal inertia) that expands space into decelerating big-bangs, vs. an accelerated force, with one more dimension of time=future, as a pole of attractive forces, which change parameter of scale.*

So we define charges and masses as accelerated 4D time-space vortices in the galaxy’s 2 limiting ∆^{±1 }scales.

All what exists is a motion in time. Space forms are still pictures of those motions – a Maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5D metric (S x T=K), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, human-size thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.

Those cyclical time clocks store the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles. And the law explains why smaller computers process more information with faster clock-cycles, genes store more information and reproduce faster, every day, than we do…

So we translate 5D metric into vortex equations in different dimensions, the simplest being:

Vo (speed of time clocks) x Ro (length of radius) = C, which is the equation of any bidimensional vortex.

As the cyclical clocks store the information of the Universe, it also applies to life, reason why an insect thinks 10 times faster than a large organism, and a rat has much faster metabolic rates than an elephant.

And vice versa, larger systems in Nature must have a SPACE-DISTANCE=TIME-SPEED much larger, which we can see as lineal distance in space or faster speeds in time.

* A dimension of angular time-momentum coming out of a loss of a dimension of volume-space.* Attraction laws are then evident and intuitive: In the same manner a vortex of a storm attracts more the faster it turns, sucking in its surroundings, any accelerated space-time vortex, increases the speed of the mass/charge clock according to 5D C=st metric, the smaller it is (S) and hence the smaller it turns, the more it attracts.

**Unification of charges and masses as time-space vortices of 2 scales.**

Thus since a charge is smaller than a mass, it attracts much more and the unification equation follows just when we apply 5D metric, and shrink the galaxy in the same proportion we accelerate them. Then both equations match:

So mass, E=mc^{2} + E=hƒ; hence mass = frequency (h/c^{2}) is a cosmological slow vortex, and charge a quantum faster more attractive vortex.

Further on since curvature is synonymous of cyclical speed, it can be quasi-infinite in the smaller vortex, when measured in time speed as the speed of angular rotation. So if we were to apply 4D curvature’s equations (Einstein) instead of Newton, the results would be the same, just in the far more complicated formalism of EFE.

Those are the essential concepts to define charges and masses as accelerated time vortices of two different scales of the Galaxy. And from that it is only just an easy task of mathematical manipulation to unify them in 5D metric, as both are equal: when we slow down the speed, space enlarges to remain co-invariant. And as it happens a Hydrogen atom enlarged to the size of a galaxy slows down in rotation to the angular momentum of the galaxy. So Kaluza–Klein were *right – the fifth scalar dimension unify *gravity with electromagnetic *forces but in a fractal manner, with 5D metric, unbeknownst to physicists.*

Once we do have a proper understanding of the 5 Dimotions of physics it is very easy to refound the science and its equations in far more straight-forward general laws proper of all space-time systems and solve most of the conundrums of physics, embroiled by the error of lineal time and single space-scales.

Since as long as physicists don’t accept ‘duality’, trinity and pentalogic, the use of entropy and information as equal arrows of time, they will not be able to resolve the conceptual contradictions of its disciplines.

It is just another ‘practical case’ derived from the scalar fifth dimension, which first was rightly (even if the maths were somewhat faulty) introduced in conceptual terms by Kaluza and Klein as a mode to unify ‘two different scales’ of size of the Universe, the gravitational ‘c’ scale and the ‘Planck’ h-scale, which are the two limits of the galaxy’s 5th dimension metric: S(c) x T(h) = Cst.

What mattered of his concept now forgotten is its idea that both scales could be unified if we treated them with a similar jargon, which for obvious reasons could only be the jargon of ‘Relativity’, derived from Poisson’s jargon, derived from Newton’s jargon of ‘vortices of space-time’ – our cyclical clocks and orbits of planets above. So for sake of simplicity we shall use the easy Newtonian jargon, to unify both scales according to 5D metric – the so long seek Unification equation of charges and masses.

The unification of the 5 forces in terms of its 5D metric scalar equations, and its equivalence with the 5 dimotions of the galactic organism requires a deep understanding of the S=T paradox that makes any ‘state of stop-space’ equivalent to a ‘motion in time’. So *we can study mathematically with different ‘spatial, topologic’ vs. algebraic, temporal equations and ceteris paribus perspectives every event of time-space; which accounts for the diversity of formulae for the same forces:*

In the graph, regardless of pedantry in physics, the 4 formalisms of gravitation are equally valid, as they merely reflect the degree of detail in our analysis, either in ‘space=static’ form (Relativity-curvature) or dynamic motion (Newton), from a dual scalar view (Poisson gradient), or based in the conservation principles of the 3 ‘parts’ of a physical system (Lagrange). We shall then use here the earliest, most evident, simpler dynamic view – Newton’s timespace vortex, to unify mathematically the 2 limiting scales of the galaxy: the quantum world of charge vortices & the cosmological scale of mass space-time vortices.

The principles that matter are Einstein’s equivalence between acceleration and mass, which we extend to all scales. So an attractive cyclical force is an accelerated clock of space-time, a ‘vortex’ of any scale:

- Newton Temporal view is a description of a vortex of accelerated space-time
*in dynamic motion*. - A charge is a vortex of accelerated space-time on the quantum scale.
- Poisson’s scalar view is a gradient, which relates two scales of reality the fifth dimension – that of mass and that of the lower scale of its field of gravitational forces.
- Lagrange’s view, differs more because it takes the perspective of the enclosed conserved energy of the whole system between the border of the vortex and its central singularity; so it requires a complete different treatment.
- Einstein’s derived his formalism from Poisson. It is more detailed because it is according to the Galilean paradox (S=T) the spatial still perspective of those vortices as a series of simultaneous derivative measures.

So it reduces the temporal continuous Newtonian view of a spacetime vortex into an ∞ number of infinitesimal detailed pictures, focusing not on the speed but on the curvature of the vortex (which is the spatial definition of a moving cyclical speed – the faster it turns, the more curvature it has in ‘still mathematics’).

Let us do the maths in the simpler Newton’s formalism, whereas by the paradox of Galileo S (Curvature) = T (accelerated motion). So the Universal Constants (G, k), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales (∆ is the symbol for the different ±¡ scales of the fifth dimension within a given organic system). Its formalism of a vortex of time space is then Newton’s Unification Equation: *M,Q= ω ^{2} r^{3} /U.C.(G,k)*

It applies to all vortices of time-space from particles to planets to galaxies. For example if we substitute for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1st ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain k with a 10^{39} higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that solves its hierarchy problem. As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, so it is symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex. It works marvels when we translate electromagnetic jargon to Newtonian jargon. For example it shows the ‘isomorphism’ (systemic jargon for an equal ‘form’ between scales) between atoms and galaxies, which H-atoms of the cosmic scale.

*Since when* we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and its electronic orbitals its star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos.

Let us put some easy numbers by substituting the parameters in that Unification equation for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G, which any high school student can do:

Sun mass = 2 × 10^{30} kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10^{-7} rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ^{-11} kg-1 m^{ˆ3} rad. sec.^{-2}

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal systemic view of the fifth dimension was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10^{16} rad. sec. -1 = w (electron); 5.3 × 10^{-11} m. (Bohr radius); proton mass = 1.6 × 10^{ -27 }kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10^{39} stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: *G(k)M/c ^{ˆ2}*.

Since in that expression

*M*is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant is a gravitational constant, and c, light speed, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is isomorphic to the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.

Those results (more than a decade old), are a *first theoretical deduction* of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three *standard forms of proof in science.*

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal self-similar structure as $t (Space population) x ð§ (Temporal frequency) entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it.

Galaxies, (Galaxies≈Atoms) thus resolve the philosophical question on how many 5D scales exist; as we find enough self-similarity to ‘run again’ another game of fractal scales (not identical but self-similar as in a Mandelbrot fractal) both by quantitative and qualitative methods between the atom and the galaxy. A question that might be extended to the ST dualities of open, ‘entropic strings’ and closed ‘cyclical informative strings’, in a possible larger and smaller scale of microscopic strings and superstrings:

Ouroboros the Universal Snake, bites its tail on the string quantum and cosmological self-similar scales, as perceived from the human ∆o mind. Philosophy of stience would then argue that those scales are real, but part of its self-similarity is mental: that is, the loss of information in the perception of scales make humans extract the same information from the upper and lower 10^{±30} scales.

What about the Hyperuniverse? We do not know what the infinite Universe even in its local region of galatoms looks like, though due to the expansion of space between galatoms, is likely an entropic gas of local atoms on the hyper-Universe. It is not though a big-bang Universe, because even if we run backwards the expansion of space between galatoms, the implosion of information in galaxies, counter that effect, so at best, we could say that running backwards the big-bang equation we shall meet a ‘solid’ crystal of galatoms.

The scalar unification of forces opens up an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, but fractal relativity, the description of the ∆-1 quantum world as a similar scalar plane of space-time to the ∆+1 cosmologic world.

**The Unification of the 5 Forces of Galaxies as its 5 Dimensional Motions, with scalar symmetries.**

So what about the unification of the other forces in scalar couples? It follows immediately when we consider them the scalar symmetry and similarity of the 5 Dimotions of the galaxy:

The Scalar similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atom-galaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is immediate as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). While the weak force is NOT a force but the evolution of the families of particles between scales.

Because physicists only consider one scale and one time arrow they are obliged to model all those forces, with lineal concepts reducing them all forcefully into an exchange of lineal particles, when they are clearly different forces. For example the weak force that happens in a single point transforming a particle into one o a higher scale of larger masses, is represented with a gap that ‘exchanges’ the W-particle, NOT as Fermi shown first, an evolution of a higher particle into a heavier one, that then suffers an entropic process of dissolution in 3 parts.

Such 5D variety of forces makes possible the organic functions and structure of self-similar atoms and galaxies. So we couple forces according to their ∆±1 ‘symmetry of scale’ as 5 forces equivalent to the 5 dimensional motions, ab. Ð¡, of physical systems within galaxies. They must be studied in dualities, belonging to two different scales – the cosmological, ∆+1 scale (gravitation & dark energy) and the ∆-1 quantum scale (strong force and electromagnetism); whereas the dualities relate gravitation and strong forces and electromagnetism and dark energy; while a transformative, ‘weak force’ trans-forms particles between 5D scales.

**RECAP. **Because all systems made of scales of vital space that last a tie cycle, they all have bio-topo-logic properties. So we need *always 3 scalar perspectives that give 3 symbiotic properties. In the galaxy thus we talk of: *1. A scalar view that defines the **galatom**, by similarity of the atomic and galactic scale unified with 5D metric.

- A Human view that defines the
**galaxy**, our present single perspective with a single light spacetime continuum. - A Galactic view that defines a ‘
**galacell’**(nt.1) that is the galaxy as an organism, controlled by ‘DNA-like’ black holes. So we can now study the galaxy as an organic system with its 5 Dimotional, organic networks of forces.

Haldane one said, the universe is more complex and strange than humans can understand or even imagine… Yet its basis are amazingly simple – a property of fractals that by self-repetition and recombination originate from a very simple Generator equation, infinite variations of the same theme: the scalar superorganism.

**X. ORGANIC GALAXIES AS GALACELLS (nt.1).**

The 5D model of the fractal, organic Universe, does not deny Einstein, it merely expands its views, and adds fractal organic properties to the galaxy explaining better the function of those black holes, its atomic substance and working according to the known-known facts of astrophysics, in which black holes have come to dominate most of the creative processes of the galaxy. In that regard, you can compare the galaxy to a cell in a much larger scale, with mitochondria stars, of light ud-matter which end up being devoured and becoming the energy for the creation of black holes, the informative vortices, equivalent to the DNA, that swarm in huge numbers in the central nuclei and control its shape and provoke the reproduction of stars, with its in-formative gravitational waves.

The DNA invaginates with Golgi conducts the vital cytoplasm it exploits, surrounded by the faster membrane of proteins, which act in its formal position as a membrane. The magnetic field surrounds the charge and encloses the vital space of electromagnetic fields the charges controls. So happens with a planet protected by its magnetic field that steams out of the central charge and surrounds it. And the galaxy has in its center a black hole.

And it is surrounded by a halo of dense fast rotating strangelet quarks, so the stars and planets within it will become converted into black holes in Nova explosions or strangelets, when nuclear Physicists, programmed to extinguish the species according to the Fermi paradox, busy-busy recreates big bangs on Earth to ‘prove’ their absurd entropy-only theories of the Universe

Galaxies are super organisms constantly reproducing new stars, in its mitochondria, guided by an informative field, gravitation, dominated by quark-like, strange stars and top quark black holes, forming a symmetry with its lower scales of dark entropy (tachyon, neutrino? beams, that stretch intergalactic space to z>c). We can see many of the homologies of the galaxy atom, which at ∆±3 clearly formed an isomorphism of scale that related them both as mind-singularity (quark top black hole stars) and elements of the ‘strangelet-halo of hard proteins’ and mitochondrial region of ud, light particles, or atoms, which we inhabit, in the ∆º±1 thermodynamic scales.

Kerr rotary black holes would be top quark frozen stars with positive charge and same density at macro-scale than a black hole acting as a relative ‘proton’ acts in an atom in the center of the galaxy. Once we had the ‘solutions’ (Kerr black holes), the study of those holes was limited by the c-speed turning event horizons, which ‘absorbed’ the light of electromagnetic matter after exploding it, and ‘digested’ it via the weak force, creating heavier particles.

While the halo is made of strangelet quarks (negative charged), acting in this symmetry between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy, as a relative negative ‘electron’ cover, with the ud-stars and planets in the middle:

*In the graph, **following Einstein’s search for cut off substances for black holes and Witten hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets, the most likely structure of galaxies, according to 5D scalar symmetries and the efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor): primordial black hole stars are born exceedingly hot and active, as all ‘seminal species’ in a lower scale of size, on the Compton wavelength as heavy positive TCB quark atoms, while similar forms made of lighter strange quarks form negative halos of strangelet matter, which become from the point of view of the hyper-universe ‘galatoms’ with proton-like positive nuclei and electron like strangelet halos.*

Einstein asked for a cut-off substance, or ‘atom of black holes’, which he could not guess at the time as quarks had not been found, but now we hint that black holes are as he thought ‘frozen stars’ of the heaviest quark families (bct quarks), and that should be the ‘realist modeling’ of black holes. As bct quarks appear in growing numbers in accelerators, tiny black stars then should be produced on them, in any of its possible varieties of dark matter that range from strangelets (s-quarks) to toplets (TTT-quarks), through its Higgs decay (H=Top + anti top quark).

The previous graph with its ternary elements, the Halo-membrane of maximal extension in space, which leaves energy and information enter through a cyclical space-time region, the plane of stars, towards a center of information, is the fundamental system of the Universe, already described by Descartes, who said all is made of res extensa (space), cyclical vortices of time space and a central point of reference that measures reality or ‘mind’. So the galaxy centered in a black hole (and the similar atom with its electronic cover, centered nucleus of mass, and intermediate space-time where forces of gravitation and electromagnetism are constantly exchanged) we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but isomorphic to any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe. Let us study the model in detail.

**The symmetry of scale between the 2 families of mass: uds, strange and bct, top decuplets. **

The existence of 2 x 3 mass families responds to:

- the ternary topologic & scalar symmetry between the 3 parts of the organic galaxy – Halo of strangelets, nucleus of Black hole stars and vital space of ud-light atoms and…
- The duality of quantum particles and cosmic galatoms:

Light atoms in the human scale are made of ud quarks and heavy black atoms of the cosmic black hole scale, are made of cb-atoms; whereas the Strange and Top quark, act as the ‘central nucleus’ of the most perfect, heavier stars, pulsars, and largest, galactic black ‘stars’ (black holes), whose 3 varieties we shall study latter in great detail.

**Informative ∆±1 forces. Scalar similarity between protons and black holes, strong and gravitational forces.**

*This symmetry extends to its combined forms, as gluon become symmetric to mesons. So in the atomic scale, the carriers of the internal strong force *are color+anticolors=gluon particles-antiparticles, ‘feeding’ the reproduction of quarks. *While in the cosmic scale* the carriers of the strong gravitational force inside ‘black stars’ (formerly black holes) are the nonets of pairs of particles+antiparticles= mesons, feeding through the weak force (W, Z, H bosons) the heavier BT quarks:

In the graph ∆-1: ud quarks = ∆+1 cb quarks. ∆-1: Gluons = ∆+1 mesons. ∆-1: protons = ∆+1 black holes.

Thus indeed, the force that transforms particles between scales, responsible for the 4th Ðimotion of evolution and generation of heavier particles or its 5D inverse Devolution is the weak force that mediates all those processes. It is not really a force but an evolutionary process that happens in a single point of space (right side), where the intermediate state of higher energy mass (W, z, H boson) gives birth to heavier fermions.

In the next, the strong and gravitational ¡±1 forces are similar in the limiting ±¡ quantum and cosmological scale. They both ‘absorb’ and in-form into denser entities, lighter particles, to collapse them in the central black holes=cosmic nucleon region or quarks=quantum nucleon regions: From left to right, the identity between the nonet of gluons and mesons on both scales, the WRONG procedure of reductionist physics, which models all forces with the lineal concept of electromagnetism through an exchange of particles, as the weak force happens in a single point, hence it is a transformation guided by information; in the right the proper way to understand particle-antiparticles, as the relative arrow of life and death that closes a physical world cycle (Feynman). The hypothesis of work for the model of the fractal Universe is simple: a galaxy is self-similar to an atom, and so are the different forces interacting within and outside them:

1.The* strong force is similar to the gravitational force* in the extremal conditions of the black hole. Reason why both are non-lineal.

2, The *¥ force is similar to the expansive dark energy* between galaxies, which therefore is NOT the same force than gravitation, reason why the expansion between galaxies is a lineal force and it is similar to electromagnetism

3.The* weak interaction is NOT a Locomotion,* force but a process of evolution of particles, guided by the Dimotion of information, reason why it happens in the same spacetime, and so its bosons, W, Z, H are ‘states’ of the same particle, NOT carriers.

4.The proton has in 5D the same metric that a black hole, is self-similar to a black hole, with a Schwarzschild radius. So happens with the electron in its particle state (Carter). We will expand on ‘black hole stars’ latter.

- Antiparticles are the inverse death=entropy moment of particles=lifetime, reason why we see less of them in terms of an ST-dual perspective, as we see less ‘dying corpses’, which is an event that last a quanta of time that living beings, which last longer. So since S-populations of particles-organisms and antiparticles-corpses are the same but its time duration is different, T(p)>> T(anti-p), ST(p)>>ST(anti-p). To that fact we add the fact that if we model, as we shall do black holes as Tbc quark stars of the heavy decuplet, as CERN recently found up Bottom and charm quarks that should form heavier Dark atoms, decay more often into particles of our ‘lighter’ ∆-1 light scale. Because time is cyclical and local, and
*the arrow of future information is inverse to the local arrow of past-entropy that dissolves form, we represent as Feynman did, antiparticles as local travels to the past.*

We model black holes as protons of a larger ‘galactic scale’, strong forces as extremal gravitational forces, gluons as mesons, dark energy as electromagnetism and complete by self-similarity ALL the questions of physics, as we either perceive from within the “galacell”, the internal region of an atom, and outside the atom, the external region of the *galacell*. So the identity between the nonets of gluons in the strong force and mesons in the larger scale of quarks, coupled with the concept of particles-antiparticles forming a local world cycle renders a clear-cut theory of black holes as protons of a larger scales, in which the transformation through the weak force of light matter into heavier quark matter will produce a black hole star of heavy dark matter; whose heavy quarks happen to decay a 20% more often into particles than antiparticles (CERN), resolving the p-¬p problem.

**RECAP**. 2 consequences of the scalar, cyclical nature of space-time are the basis for the whys of astrophysics: cyclical big-bangs in all the scales of reality; and scalar disomorphisms between galaxies and atoms.

Nt. 1 *We call both the galaxy and the Universe a galacell, or Univercell, as opposed to a galatom or Unitom, NOT because this is the ‘real thing’, as all fractal scales of the Universe are ‘similar’ but NONE is identical (though we might argue the identity between galaxies and antiparticles, which would create a ternary identity scale, in ‘metaphysics’, part of philosophy of science, beyond physics). But because according to epistemology, as all scales of reality are similar, obeying the disomorphic laws of the 5 ^{th} dimension, either in its topological geometry or existential algebra, derived of the ‘Function of Exi:st¡ence’, its metric equation [C=Max. SxT (s=t)], the maximal information is obtained in the scales closer to us. So we observe maximal complexity in the cellular scale, which we might consider is similar as all scales have the same volume of information, per unit of form, in the atom and the galaxy. Thus it is more proper to presuppose that if we had all the information about the atom or the galaxy, it would resemble a cell.*

**XII(nt.2). 5D BLACK HOLE STARS: HAWKING’S FORMULA: TOP PREDATOR BABY HOLES.**

As all systems evolve in time towards higher degrees of information, so does our knowledge of any species. On those terms, we can consider black hole theory as an evolving subject, which has clearly 3 ages, of increasing detail departing from its ‘platonic’ mathematical synoptic mirror to finally reach a realist view:

__The age of Einstein,__ when general relativity equations provided the theoretical foundation to study gravitational ‘vortices’, as those described by Newton, and then by Poison with his theory of potentials, of which Einstein made an even more detailed picture as accelerated vortices of spacetime (equivalence principle between mass and acceleration.) He called those gravitational vortices of mass of maximal density, ‘frozen stars’. And he said that since we must respect the scientific method, he would believe on them only if we could find a cut-off particle/substance in the smaller quantum scale of similar density, which in Einstein’s age was still unknown. So he denied them (today we know heavy quarks of the top matter decuplet show all the properties and density needed to be the substance of black holes as quark stars and likely its lesser cousins, strange, neutron stars).

__The age of Wheeler and Hawking.__ As we could not see within those black stars, once Einstein died, his stringent admonitions against any attempt to model black stars as ‘imaginary mathematical objects’, without substance, ‘evaporated’ as they believe in mathematical creationism; and ideology similar to ‘verbal creationism’ (Abrahamic religions), that subverts the relationship between languages which are mirror created by the space-time reality. Creationisms are ego-trips common among human beings, who think instead their specific language – mathematics in physics, Arab in Islam, Hebrew in the bible – creates reality.

So nuclear physicists developed platonic entelechies – mathematical objects with infinities they called singularities, which are *not allowed in 5D*. Since the opposite is truth in the fractal Universe, where the scalar structure of reality and its 2 elements (time motion and spatial forms) are the components of reality, mirror by mind-languages, limited by the entropic barriers that separate the different scales of the cosmos.

All planes have a limit of ST-distance speed, beyond which equations break because we emerge as something else in a different scale. Which for the galaxy is the c-speed of the accelerated black star event horizon, in entropy and the 0 K temperature in informative order; beyond which the light space-time of the galaxy dies, splitting its ‘wave-motion’ into its lineal $t-field component that speeds up and looses information (V=$/ð) and converts within the black hole into axial flow of >c dark energy, perceived in still space as expansion of space and its cyclical §ð-component that becomes a >c vortex of space-time ‘mass’ of faster=heavier attractive power (bct quarks).

But creationism needs no proof whatsoever in the experimental field; only the internal consistence of the language; granted by the ‘isomorphism’ between languages and reality. So when Wheeler came with the catchy name of black holes, which had ‘no hair’ – those mathematical entities suddenly caught the subconscious collective imagination and ‘evaporated’ definitely the need for a rigorous application of the scientific method – meaning the search for its proper substance, as ‘dark matter, made of heavy quark stars’ turning beyond the c-limit of our scale of space-time… This age peaked with the work of Penrose and Hawking, 2 mathematicians without the slightest regard for physical substance (motion or form), who boldly went where nobody had dared to go, with all kind of singularity theorems, ‘cosmic censorships’ and analogies with thermodynamic laws. Since the advantage of a mathematical entelechy beyond our scale of light perception is that anything goes. So black holes’ now would defy every known-known law, including those of classic thermodynamics when Hawking postulated a hot baby-born black star, should get HOTTER and evaporate, against the proved 1^{st} law of thermodynamics that prescribe a hotter object (the baby black hole) will instead evaporate its colder surroundings – our light spacetime – growing in mass, which is what thermodynamic laws said: ‘heat moves from the hotter source that cools down to the colder one’; experimental evidence proofs (a black hole grows exponentially when born), Einstein laws gravitation prescribe, and so do its extension of the principle of equivalence in 5D (as black holes will be both very small and very fast rotating objects, with maximal attractive vortex power). Thus obviously a model that breaks all the laws of science must be false, and indeed 40 years of experimental search have found not a single case of evaporation of black holes. So we can expect now that Mr. Hawking cannot defend his work with his personal charm, the theory will be dropped and we shall enter…

(As gravitation is a cosmological not a quantum-scale theory, so it does NOT work for quantum scales); those of mathematics (as all systems that show infinities are renormalized; that is the infinity region is cut-off for calculations, precisely because both in real nature and mathematical modeling, they do not apply to infinity, so black holes need to be cut-off from infinities, so should happen with the infinities of the big-bang theory). This age *now ends as the age of Einstein ended at his death, with the death of Hawking. So we are going to move into:*

** The age of realist black stars**, where we shall regain the name Einstein would have given to them

__,__as ultra-heavy dark matter, quark stars, which will vindicate Einstein’s work in 4D with this writer’s work in 5D. Such black holes

*as always in 5D are of 3 type:*

** – Primordial black stars **that do NOT evaporate and likely form the bulk of Moon MACHOs responsible for the BG radiation temperature and/or dark matter of the halo.

** -Black Stars **of dark Bottom-Charm-Bottom atoms, similar to our UDU atoms born of single atomic stars.

** -Galactic Black stars, **in swarms that act as the center of the ‘galacell’, regulating its organic functions, similar to strange stars, with a core of ultra heavy top quarks and a cover of BCB atoms.

This hypothesis advanced a decade ago by this writer is based in the logic symmetry of Nature between its families of quarks on the quantum scale, its families of stars on the galactic scale, and its families of galactic active centers in the cosmic scale. As Dark heavy quark star would be exactly equal in properties to a black hole but of course ‘with hair’ even if we cannot see the inner structures of its black atoms.

Let us then in such a huge new field consider only the reasons why those black stars cannot evaporate – as heavy quarks don’t. We shall do it only from the mathematical perspective of Hawking’s black hole equation, studying it when we properly understand the existence of 5 Dimotions of space-time, and its two limiting arrows of entropy and information, which merely change the ‘sign’ of its growth from entropy to information, respecting the true laws of thermodynamics.

## **Hawking formula of black stars… growth.**

As all systems live 3 ages and grow through 3 scales of the fifth dimension, it follows from the laws of 5D that primordial black holes are baby black stars, as they must be born out of the first bcb atoms formed in the ultra dense center of giant stars, which therefore must grow exceedingly fast. And this indeed is the case also mathematically when we merely correct the arrow of time in Hawking’s beautiful formulae, which we shall explain now in the simplest possible terms:

As the formula is filled with Universal Constants, and only two variables we shall write it in a simplified manner as:

±ΔMass = Constant / ±Δ Temperature -> *± Δ Mass x ± Δ Temperature = Constant.*

Simple, isn’t? It is the formula that defines the changes in temperature and mass of black holes. We know both can change but in which direction? If black hole mass increases, temperature must diminish for the product to remain constant. If the black hole mass diminishes, then temperature must increase for the product to remain constant. Two choices solved immediately when we apply the 1^{st} law of thermodynamics, which oblige us to choose:

*+Δ Mass x **∇** Temperature = Constant*

As black holes are born with a temperature of billions of degrees.

Thus since in thermodynamics, any ultra-hot object as a black hole, born in a cold environment as the galaxy is, according to the laws of entropy cools down and transfers heat to the environment, evaporating us. And this is what we see in the Universe happening, always, when a black hole is born. It cools down and evaporates its surroundings into a big explosion, a Nova. So the Universe and his fundamental Laws of entropy always will choose the evaporation of the cold environment in which the black hole is born…

And this will happen extremely fast, in any of the 3 scales we can study the phenomena, in the quantum scale, as particles and forces accelerate around the black hole space-time vortex, increasing its mass, as they do in Earth’s accelerators, becoming BCT heavy quarks; in terms of thermodynamics, given the differential of temperature between the baby black star and its environment or in terms of gravitation, given the c-speed attractive rotational power of the black hole or in S-terms its enormous curvature of spacetime.

So why Hawking said they evaporate? Because he disregarded the correspondence principle that oblige to respect the laws of thermodynamics and relativity and choose the inverse arrow of time, not the growth of mass=information but of entropy, writing: **–****∇**** Mass X +Δ Temperature = Constant…**

Likely he thought it was more ‘interesting’ for a mathematician to calculate such ‘imaginary black holes’ (the first name he gave to them), with its outrageous inverse arrow of time, which if time dimotions were not local but Universal and not multiple but a single arrow of entropy for the whole Universe, will indeed mean the black hole travels to the past and as he said you could enter through the black hole and come out and kill your grand-father.

But all those paradoxes are no longer relevant, as each ‘cyclical time’ clock is local, and so to travel to the past merely means in terms of the duality of entropy=death arrow and information=life arrow, to die.

ALL THIS SAID, we can now vindicate what is important to know about Hawking’s formulae, when *we respect the laws of thermodynamics with its proper arrow, and we introduce for a proper understanding of the formula, the expanded view of the scalar, 5th dimensional Universe.*

*So we translate Hawking’s formula as yet another equation of 5D metric, and write it as: **T($) x M(ð) = Constant*

In 5D mathematical physics it implies a constant growth of the mass of the black hole along the equation that relates the temperature and mass of a black hole: M=k/T, that is as the black hole cools down, it converts via the weak force, lighter matter into heavier quarks that increase its volume and hence its area.

*With the very interesting result that we connect two parameters of two different scales of the 5 ^{th} dimension, the thermodynamic ‘human’ and cosmological ‘gravitational’ scales. *

*How this is possible if scales are separated? Because entropy=death=motion without form does indeed transfer between scales. So the formula reads as T($)/Constant => M(ð), meaning our thermodynamic world in the presence of a primordial black star, if it were to appear at Earth in accelerators will indeed convert thermodynamic matter into pure entropic radiation, which will then evolve emerging as bcb mass.*

So Hawking’s *formula explains the exponential growth of mass of a black hole as it swallows all the ‘universal constants’ of matter of the thermodynamic and quantum scales of the Universe.*

Indeed, if we respect the laws of thermodynamics and Einstein, the weak force shall transform the light matter of our galaxy into heavy quark matter, through its triad of bosons, the W, Z and H particles. So Hawking’s ratio of mass-temperature in black hole stars, describes the birth of a small black hole star, which as all systems of Nature show an enormous activity and rate of growth, in its initial stages, feeding on the energy that surrounds them – i.e. the placenta of our seminal seeds, the nest in which the parental system feeds the birds, the environment in which the new species becomes the dominant predator; in the case of the baby black hole the rich field of electromagnetic energy that surrounds it in stars where they are born by gravitation collapse and/or planets against which they collide or are produced by colliders.

It is then easy to understand the importance of the formula to interpret the genesis of black holes, the mechanisms of Nova explosions, and the way in which the energy and information of the lower scales of nature (the quantum and thermodynamic scales) emerges as mass in the larger cosmological scale.

Those scales are made of hc planckton constants & kT ‘Boltzmann constants of action, hinting to the solution of a fundamental question of physics – what is the relationship and meaning of those constants, and how can we unify mathematically the 3 fundamental scales of physical systems, the smaller quantum scale of electromagnetic charges, the human scale of thermodynamic molecules and the larger scale of cosmological masses.

So the way to properly write that equation in terms of the duality of entropy and information and the 3 fractal scales of the physical Universe is:

Where the event horizon is a discontinuum, which acts as an osmotic membrane, with 2 sides that have the same ‘surface’ area, so to speak – hence its equality: On one side you are inside the black hole (8π GM), and there is NO temperature there because heavy quarks have a superfluid perfect order (no hair theorem indeed, black holes are defined only with 3 parameters, angular momentum, mass and charge). And so we are outside the light space-time scale of electromagnetism. Which proves further on, that the black heavy quark star DOES not evaporate because it is NOT made of temperature. It is impossible to evaporate.

On the other side of the membrane, there is though both, light space-time and its 5D metric constant (hc^{3} in the numerator, whereas one-dimensional c-speed becomes in terms of the S=T symmetry a cubic distance hence a volume of light space-time) and E=kT in the denominator; also the metric 5D equation of the thermodynamic scale, because the black hole swallows and transforms into the ∆+1 gravitational scale both the ∆º Thermodynamic and ∆-1 quantum light space-time scales.

So in 5D the formula is the beautiful expression on how energy emerges into the mass scale.

This duality of a membrane is also perfectly understood in terms of Topological evolution, another key new discipline of 5D. Indeed, the fundamental theorem of classic topology states that a closed circle, any n-dimensional membrane breaks the continuum into an internal world and an external Universe, with 2 different surfaces, an internal elliptic, implosive, in-formative surface and an external hyperbolic, expansive, entropic geometry,

And those are the 2 sides of the black hole: Internally the black hole creates pure information. Externally the black hole increases the entropy and disorder of our world just before it swallows it.

So in a more detailed version of E=Mc², Hawking explains why the Universe is fractal, with discontinuous membranes between the entropic side of the Universe (electromagnetic-thermodynamic membrane) and the in-formative gravitational side that in-forms reality (mass-black hole side). And why there are 2 ‘geometrical description’ of space-time (elliptic curved space-time of Einstein’s gravitation, made of accelerated vortex like informative mass clocks) and the hyperbolic, entropic, expansive description of quantum physics. Which are 2 different discontinuous sides of the fractal universe that balance each other and must not be unified in simple terms because both are needed to balance the Universe.

On the side of mass, the equation is identical to Einstein’s Relativity tensor, that describes a gravitational world: 8 πG Mass. Yet unlike in Einstein’s tensor, there is no energy-entropy, only the other 2 elements of Einstein’s equation: 8 π G, the gravitational space-view or curvature of the black hole and its temporal Mass view, the accelerated vortex of gravitational time – again our familiar 5D metric: SxT.

On the other side, above the equation for quantum space-time where h is the angular momentum of its clocks of information (so quantum systems code with h-Planck quanta its informative spin and form) and c is obviously the speed-distance of space, as we see light space. Space is made of light, as impressionists painters realized and the relativity principle that cannot distinguish motions from distances, or the spatial expansion of intergalactic space homologous to the red-shift elongation of light space, proves:

Our human electronic mind perceives light-space, through its plancktons, hc^{n}, the minimal quanta perceived by an electron:

*We see light space as 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions. That is why our mind is tridimensional: As the product hc³ is the 5D time-space metric for our electronic space-time made of h-angular clocks and a c ^{3} volume. *

*It is then evident that there are different minds’ geometries according to the forces of space and clocks of time each mind has. But still we can measure its ‘relative’ curvature in Non-E Geometry with a simple parameter, ð/$, which is the Gaussian/Lobachevski ratio of curvature that defines each type of mind.*

*So in terms of the specific electronic mind’s spacetime geometry which is NOT the same than the bidimensional photon’s geometry, or the quark geometry inside the black of the quantum world, the ratio ð§/$t =h/c³, is the ‘ratio of curved cyclical information to lineal distance-speed of the human mind. That ratio* h/c^{3} is so small *that we must conclude an electronic mind processes very little information and has according to Lobachevski’s parameter of geometry a maximal flatness. Indeed, we see the Universe as a flat Euclidean World.* *Finally *on the denominator we have the thermodynamic scale that ‘breaks and divides’ the numerator; meaning that the black star absorbs light space-time (hc³), converting it first into entropic temperature (KT) – hence the ratio; and then it moves it to the other side of the membrane, evolving it into 8 π G Mass.

Nt.2.* 13 is the number of ‘bad luck’ as black hole evaporation is a dogma of entropy only physics. So accelerators aim to re=produce them on Earth but if 4D Einstein’s & 5D So:To’s formalism are truth, they will evaporate us. *

**XII. BIG-BANG FALSIFICATION.**

We use epistemology & pentalogic of 3±¡ ¬∆@st Dimotions to falsify the big-bang by the fractal, organic immortal, ∞ cosmos that cannot be falsified. To that aim 3 p.o.v.s must be considered:

– @: Its cultural aspects (as the dominant military, western culture and the wordily profession of physicists -to make entropic weapons – has projected its ‘selective’ worldview over the complex Universe)

– ST: Its theoretic & experimental errors (which once the big-bang became ‘dogma’ no longer are taken into account)

-∆±¡: The development of the complex organic Universe as it is, when we do not eliminate the scalar properties of space, the cyclical properties of time, and its 5 Dimensional motions of space-time.

Let us then consider just 13 ‘bad luck’ +∞ factual proofs that the big-bang is a local quasar big-bang and the proper cosmological theory is that of earlier Einstein->Fred Hoyle->5 D Physics, of an infinite, immortal Universe:

**∆: SCALAR FALSIFICATIONS***.*

**The fractal structure of the cosmos**

Why is the universe so homogeneous and isotropic on a large scale yet with local irregularities like galaxies and stars? Only if it is a fractal structure those properties are natural. In the graph, the Universe has a fractal organic structure as all its systems are organic fractals.

So reality is a fractal that reproduces information, ‘forms in action’ and then self-organizes them in networks and systems that evolve into super organisms in all scales of reality. As such it must be studied with the philosophy of Science, called ‘organicism’. Since only an organism is self-reproductive and hence requires not external ‘agent’ or God or a creationist language, as present philosophies of science (mechanism, pythagorism) or Abrahamic religions do. Further on experimental evidence is overwhelming, on the nested, reproductive structure of nature, as observed in the graph for all systems. So if we respect the scientific method, to which most scientists, and needless to say, religious

people, pay only lip service, its 3 classic tenants,** A)ccurate data,** without ad hoc solutions and selfie biases **B)io-Logic models** that allow new hypothesis and **C)yclical patterns** that allow the existence of laws of sciences based in the predictability of this cycles must be put forward for a NON-creationist, true philosophy that explains the fractal=organic structure of the scalar Universe. Till recently we lacked a formal proper development of such ‘organic philosophy of science’, the *only one that respects the tenants of the scientific method, *a goal we achieve in this paper.

We show some experimental proofs of the fractal Universe. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.It is the basic nature of reality: a fractal that ‘reproduces information’, forms-in-action, a combination of pure time-motion and space-form, in all scales and with the same program of the 5 Dimotions of time space.

A text that explains it taken from Sciam: ‘In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine *New Scientist*^{ }published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” he says. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.” Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.

This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from the birth of the entire Universe.

**The quasar big-bang galactic cycle**

The life-death cycle of the central black hole of Galaxies that explodes into quasars and forms back its bar, follows the same ages of the big-bang. As all of them after the initial ‘Planck epoch – of gravitational superluminal waves’, dark epoch of nucleo-synthesis, are ages ‘within galaxies’, and so they are proved for the inner space of galaxies. They do NOT explain many other features of the Universe as a whole (which is not isomorphic, etc.) but perfectly describe the evolution and formation of the stars of the galaxy.

So the big-bangs ages are properly the ages of the galaxy; without all the ‘ad hoc’ theories and pseudo-scientific models required to explain why the large scale universe has nothing to do with the supposedly smooth result of a cosmic big-bang (this is like Ptolemy constant recurrence to ‘new’ ad hoc epicycles to make fit new observations into its earth-centric theory of the universe). Trust me, any astronomer knows how long this ‘list’ is.

Thus the quasar big-bang follows further the laws of truth (minimalism: Occam’s razor), simplicity and correspondence. We do not need to postulate strange forms of dark energy and dark matter, except the ones known, repulsive gravitation (to account for the entropic expansion of space between galaxies that balances its contraction), which is ‘natural’ to the model of galactic-atoms; and quark matter to account for the dark matter of the halo.

In the graph the ‘big-bang’ properties local to the galaxy can be explained by the quasar cycle of our galaxy.

So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar big-bangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.

All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the big-bang its falsehood. As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the big-bang.

So do those supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic big-bang, which Smolin a famed physicist wanted to use to prove his theory that high frequency light goes faster than red-shifted light, as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago and so a small difference of distance should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy. Yet they occupy supposedly ‘a huge piece of the entire Universe…

We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 arrows of time. So why nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? For all the wrong reasons – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.

Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘big-bang theory’.

In the graph we can see some E/c<=>Mc processes of spatial expansion and big-bang destruction of mass, all of which have an inverse temporal, informative, process of much slower creation of temporal information and mass that balances them, in different scales of physical systems, from the beta decay that explodes atoms into electrons and protons (with an inverse slow collapse of electrons into atoms) to the quasar big-bang of galaxies (with an slow process of creation of mass-information from gaseous space):

If we consider the space-time an absolute continuum in a single scale, this more accurate picture of what we perceive is not possible, hence we come to the conclusion of present cosmology – that the Universe will expand and die. If we consider that galaxies, which follow Einstein’s dictum, compensate this expansion: ‘Time curves space into mass’, Mr. Hogg’s conundrum – how to correct the big-bang is solved.* Experimental facts tell us **we must* accept the fractal informative structure of reality, where the big bang is merely the death-rebirth cycle of a quasar-like galaxy or local Universe, a scale of size above galaxies. *So both together create an immortal Universe. *Since in Philosophy of Science we must never deny experimental evidence, even if at first sight it contradicts an established theory.

* *But Cosmology has a huge metaphysical component in its Greek sense – it is well beyond the limits of human perception, which we find to be the atom and the galaxy, beyond and within uncertainty and dark gravitational matter makes knowledge to say the ‘least’ incomplete.

Thus contrary to belief big-bang theories of the Universe and Cosmology in the widest sense do not belong to astro-physics, but still we can do science if we are minimally serious with the scientific method.

If the cosmic big-bang had sound experimental data, of course, we would accept it. As it does NOT contradict 5D physics. It would just validate a larger scale worldcycle. So we are NOT against cosmic big-bang because 5D physics does not tolerate it but because plain good old’ science disproves it. The scalar big-bang death processes of matter in all planes, from beta decay to galaxies is one of the strongest proofs of the isomorphic nature of all scales. But the cosmic one is not proved. So since all big-bangs are mimetic we reducesthe scale of the big-bang to a quasar scale, making Einstein’s EFE, local field equations for the Light-space time of the galaxy (reason why c is constant).

Fact is as the graph of SCiAM shows the full quasar cycle is longer than the big-bang cycle and we have found *galaxies in all its stages*. Thus by reductio ad absurdum, since we have found galaxies in a ‘second’ quasar cycle, hence over 20 billion years as ‘reborn’ galaxies, forming its central bar, there is no way the time age of the whole is shorter than the time of its parts.

Multiple space-times imply the existence of multiple big-bangs with different explosive size and speeds, all of them deaths of an informative mass or charge that uncoils its accelerated vortex into radiation following Einstein’s equation, E=Mc^{2}, where a bidimensional or tridimensional vortex (M or e) becomes extended into a plane of radiation (hence the square of lineal c-speed).

Yet for each different scale the parameters of speed (c), mass (M) and Entropy will change. And so we obtain a series of self-similar big bangs described in the graph.

The single cosmic big bang based in a single space-time continuum, was devised even before we knew the existence of a faster than light, gravitational membrane of dark Entropy and dark, quark matter. So we first must define it within that scale of big-bangs as the *big-bang of a membrane of electromagnetic radiation; hence a quasar big-bang, not a cosmic big-bang, which will correspond to the much faster explosion of a gravitational membrane, starting at the Planck scale of the gravitational minimal units, the lambda-strings.*

This is in a way the conclusion of astrophysicists, which now study the big bang as a dual process, with an inflationary age (the gravitational membrane) and a slower age (the big-bang of electromagnetic space, created over the gravitational membrane).

**The Black Hole reversed equation of the expansion proves the quasar big-bang.**

Another interesting time-related proof is the understanding both in scale and time of the ‘reversal’ local equations of time, as entropy is the local past arrow of a worldcycle and hence its equations tend to be reversed of those of the arrow of information and life, albeit compressed in time and expanded in space.

So what Hawking found is that the big-bang equations are the reverse of a black hole , because *they are* the reversed quasar explosion of a cosmic black hole.

While there is not clear understanding of what the ‘Singularity that holds the entire mass of the Universe in an infinitely small point’ due to the ‘absurd’ backwards motion of the Hubble equation in lineal terms till are mote past, there is a clear proof the explosion of a black hole into a quasar will give us the same result:

Since the equations of the big-bang inflationary first age are exactly the same than those of a black hole, reversed inside-out, as the black hole explodes creating in its outer rim a ‘ball of fire’, advancing at enormous speed, through repulsive gravitational waves, till the wave smooth an isomorphic sphere of the size of the galactic outer Halo. Thus there is not mystery to the creation of the region, which will be reborn as a spiral galaxy when the entropic death of the black hole reverses its course, in the following eras.

In the parlance of ‘physicists’, the proper description will be this:

ð§ say that space expands exponentially means that two inertial observers are moving farther apart with accelerating velocity. In stationary coordinates for one observer, a patch of an inflating universe has the following polar metric:

ds²=-(1-Λr²)dt² + 1/1-Λr² dr² +r²dW² (where Λ is not the symbol of the 5th dimension but the cosmological constant) We use polar metric because the black hole expands with a positive curvature into a spherical form, following the commonest ‘entropic explosion-death’ of any big-bang material death. In the simplest expression we write: M=e/c² only that we are talking of a tachyon superluminal expansive wave.

This is just like an inside-out black hole metric—it has a zero in the component on a fixed radius sphere called the cosmological horizon. Objects are drawn away from the observer at towards the cosmological horizon, which they cross in a finite proper time. This means that any inhomogeneity are smoothed out, just as any bumps or matter on the surface of a black hole horizon are swallowed and disappear.

Since the space–time metric has no explicit time dependence, once an observer has crossed the cosmological horizon, observers closer in take its place. This process of falling outward and replacement points closer in are always steadily replacing points further out—an exponential expansion of space–time.

This steady-state exponentially expanding space-time is called a de Sitter space, and to sustain it there must be a cosmological constant, a vacuum energy proportional to everywhere. In this case, the equation of state is . The physical conditions from one moment to the next are stable: the rate of expansion, called the Hubble parameter, is nearly constant, and the scale factor of the Universe is proportional to .

Inflation is often called a period of *accelerated expansion* because the distance between two fixed observers is increasing exponentially (i.e. at an accelerating rate as they move apart), while can stay approximately constant (see deceleration parameter).The *∆*-dimensional **de Sitter space**, denoted dS*n*, is the Lorentzian manifold analog of an *∆*-sphere (with its canonical Riemannian metric); it is maximally symmetric, has constant positive curvature, and is simply connected for *∆* at least 3.

**The Helium problem.**

**Related to the previous quasar-black hole falsifications there is the Helium abundance in galaxies.**

Nucleo-synthesis occurs between 3 minutes and 20 minutes after the (quasar) Big Bang.

During the photon epoch the temperature of the universe falls to the point where atomic nuclei can begin to form. Protons (hydrogen ions) and neutrons begin to combine into atomic nuclei in the process of nuclear fusion.

Free neutrons combine with protons to form deuterium. Deuterium rapidly fuses into helium-4. Nucleo-synthesis only lasts for about seventeen minutes, since the temperature and density of the universe has fallen to the point where nuclear fusion cannot continue.

By this time, all neutrons have been incorporated into helium nuclei. This leaves about three times more hydrogen than helium-4 (by mass) and only trace quantities of other light nuclei.

This formation of so much Helium was for very long considered the proof of a cosmic big-bang because stars could not form so much Helium. Then it was found that most of the imbalance was helium accumulated around the central black hole of galaxies; which has not been explained. Obviously because Helium formation happened when the black hole exploded with the big-bang temperature it is found close to the center of galaxies, and it was formed by the quasar explosion. So a galactic big-bang explains both its abundance and its location (the cosmic one does NOT explain its location), a theme we shall dwell on when considering the organic structure of the galacell and the black hole as a black star.

**S=T Balance between 3D accelerated time vortices=masses and one dimensional Dark entropy.**

A big-bang is just in any scale of matter, the entropic death of a system. But all systems have an inverse arrow of informative ‘life’, which it is represented in the cosmological scale by masses, *galaxies which are time vortices that compress the entropy of vacuum into mass through its gravitational forces, are included into the mix. *

Matter folds one-dimensional ‘dark entropy’ which expands mass into space, into 3 dimensional matter. Hence 3 ‘volumes of expansive dark energy’ becomes 1 volume of implosive matter: 75%≈25% and the Universe balances as a spring coil in an eternal game of ∞ fractal SHM motions between galaxies.

Thus the ‘cosmological big-bang’ is a half-truth – the key method humans use to ‘invent reality’ to cater their egos – by eliminating and ‘reducing’ the parameters of reality that don’t fit in their ‘ceteris paribus’ biased theory, in this case an entropy only cultural view of the Universe. So amazing as it sounds to the reader cosmologists have eliminated the gravitational forces that bring together vacuum space into the creation of tighter, denser particles, atoms and matter structures within the vortex of galaxies, and through the warping of one-dimensional ‘lines’ of dark entropy≈energy into 3-dimensional ‘tall’ masses, ‘reduce’ the 75% of entropic expansion between galaxies to the 25% of 3-Dimensional mass, establishing a canonical, mathematical equilibrium between expansion of space-time dimensions (expansion of vacuum space) and implosion, akin to the same process happening on a lower quantum scale between attractive matter and repulsive electromagnetic radiation between atoms, towards a thermal equilibrium.

So why is the universe so close* to the dividing line between collapsing again and expanding indefinitely.* In order to be as close as we are now the rate of expansion early on had to be chosen fantastically accurately. If the rate of expansion one second after the Big Bang had been less by one part in 10^{10}, the universe would have collapsed after a few million years. If it had been greater by one part in 10^{10}, the universe would have been essentially empty after a few million years. In neither case would it have lasted long enough for life to develop. Thus one either has to appeal to the anthropic principle” (religious concept that miraculously in the whole flow of time we are in a balanced point). not so it is more logic to think we are in a balanced eternal Universe as our fractal model describes.

Big Bang cosmologists however ignore the balance between radiation and mass as a steady state, eternal Universe as they *only recognize as a time-future arrow the entropy between galaxies – the expansion of space. *

Thus when physicists discovered ‘another scale of space’, made of dark energy and matter which represents 96% of all matter and doesn’t fit in the lineal continuous big-bang the theory, *because it is attractive*. Never mind – the theory of the 4% is the canon.* So they just ignored dark matter too in a* sanguine ‘honorable discharge’ for the big-bang ‘continuum theory’ to work. And because the entropic explosive big-bang only affects vacuum space expanding between galaxies or atoms, not those galaxies and atoms, which are cyclical, accelerated clocks of cosmological or quantum time… we have eliminated all the Universe that ‘matters’ from big-bang equations.

This is soo surrealist that it amazes me Æntropic men could get away with murder. Indeed, they merely discharged galaxies and dark matter that is not expanding but imploding. Since if they move backwards its equations they do the opposite of the expanding vacuum between them: they would explode.

The proper way to do cosmology would be to account as we do in those posts with both, expansion of space-entropy and implosion of space into cyclical clocks of accelerated information – galaxies, where we exist (indeed in an accelerated planet of evolutionary information). That is, to consider the wobbling expanding+imploding balanced Universe. But that will require to change the big-bang entropic ‘cannonball paradigm’ of Galileo.

We do NOT doubt the cosmic big bang on 5D grounds, but on real data, missed by ceteris paribus analysis, to uphold æntropic views of entropic, military lineal physics and anthropic, lineal creationism proper of religion.

Let us then consider a few of such aspects of the big bang, using the epistemology of the scientific method, with scanty mathematical formulae, as one of the great advantages of the simplified 5D metric model and is its pentalogic analysis based in its 5 Dimotions (or structural elements as ¬∆@st, made of entropic time motions, scales & still mirror-languages of space) is its *logic *capacity to explain any phenomena from 5 points of view as *an alternative to sound mathematical proofs, which show the how and are needed but lack the ‘why-power’ of the 5 pentalogic analysis* – the mental, organic, causal, temporal and spatial, mathematical, in a complementary way.

**Human local experience: we live in a vortex of evolving information NOT in an entropic region.**

*How dumb is that, when we live as human beings inside the vortex of evolutionary information of a planet, turning around a star vortex turning around a galactic vortex?*

Entropy is secondary to our existence as biological and technological beings evolving fast our arrow of information at individual level (process of life and aging, warping, wrinkling into form) and collective level (informative evolution of technological machines, aka meta life) and at planetary level (vortex of evolution of stars and galaxies).

This fact alone should have sufficed added to all the absurdities of singularities which are aberrant infinites obtained merely by extension of mathematical equations with no experimental proof whatsoever to ignore the cosmic bigbang.

But, and this lead us to the 2^{nd} Pentalogic set of falsehoods, *we live in an entropic military world, which despises the reproductive feminine Universe, so entropic, anthropic man projects his limited view of reality in the Universe to affirm the big-bang eliminating galaxies of information, but that is subjective belief not objective science.*

** **

**@-LIMITS OF HUMAN PERCEPTION & EGO PARADOX: ÆNTROPIC MAN**

**Culture in science: æntropic man projects its big-bang limits on the immortal ∞ cosmos**

To fully understand the falsehood of single entropic theories we need to understand the 3 paths of time – that is, the relative paths any system have to choose its future, the reader should be aware that the Big Bang theory merely expands one of the 3 obvious arrows of space-time in matter, that of entropic gas where it was discovered, disregarding completely the arrows of inverse information (solid crystals, informative galactic vortices, perceptive species) and its balanced liquid states (body-waves), in all scales of reality – even IN THEORY of information, they disregard the message content and the emitter analyzing only its lineal transmission and noise; evidently due to the worldly religion of physicists who invented those cosmogonies – to make entropic weapons and transport machines. Then a computer rigged simulation will look make pictures of the supposed Universe with a single time.

Modern Physicists’ interpretation of physical facts and equations is biased by their historic culture, Military Germany of worship of weapons and entropy=death, so they denied the arrow of ‘crystal=solid’ information and Einstein’s/ Gödel’s cyclical, big-crunch solutions happening in thermodynamic matter and cosmological galaxies, where we LIVE dominated by evolution NOT entropy, which balance the gaseous and vacuum space expansion, in reproductive liquid and steady state immortal ‘present’ systems. As time went by since most humans are memorial believers those sided theories of reality became dogma, and today in an age of increasing mental devolution as humans are substituted by thinking machines, mankind just repeats its model errors, spread also into social sciences and biology, always in favor of the arrow of death.

*In the graph a critical assessment of the methods of ‘naïve, digital reductionism’ that physicists have used more or less consciously to establish a ‘way to model science’ only with digital equations and a ‘cosmic censorship’ on the 4 dimotions of time that do not fit earlier Galilean->Newtonian lineal absolutist time views in a single continuum Cartesian space. Space is scalar, fractal, broken in infinite different ‘scalar sizes’ which ‘co-exist’ together and for that reason there are ‘organisms’ and the Universe has an organic fractal structure, as systems change energy and information between those different sizes and scales, that put together form the 5th Dimension of the scalar Universe, ruled by a simple metric equation: the smaller a system is the faster it turns its time cycles, or clocks that carry in the frequency and form of its systems, its information – the missing dimension of time in all lineal theories of the universe.*

It is difficult to understand how Physicists so dexterous building machines=weapons are so dumb interpreting reality, blind to 2/3rds of the states of spacetime, and to all its non-mathematical properties unless we acknowledge that the human being is less of a thinker and more of an ‘enzyman’, ensembling machines, manipulating reality with it and tailoring their models of its world to its worldly profession, which in physics has been traditionally to make entropic weapons and moving mechanisms. Hence its philosophy of reality based in entropy and mechanism. In the graph, the rejection of all other arrows of Time=Dimotions in thermodynamics, cosmology and information theory, which only studies the ‘motion of information’, and its noise without caring for the form of the message, its emitter and receiver. This would be in physics the equivalent of ignoring the Fermions that emit a boson and merely study the space in which the boson moves. And indeed, cosmology is built ignoring the galaxies, space-time vortices of information, which do NOT expand, and just contracting the vacuum space between them to get into the ‘magic singularity’ from where all came from.

This blog leaves aside the ‘worldly’ religion of physicists, as ‘I do only thought experiments’ (Einstein), and so we build an epistemologically correct model with the same data, but *without* the bias of Egos and worldly religions for each ‘stience’.

Now even before we advance further in the model of the Universe as it is, we must explain in detail the previous graph, and add ALL the local arrows of time-space that in the fractal Universe are LOCAL, for each of its species, and define the existence of all of them.

First, it is obvious that we must add the inverse arrow of entropy which is information, dominant in this planet, as it is represented NOT by the vacuum space expanding between galaxies but by the vortex of galactic form, of in-form-ation that evolves entropy into matter, in which we reside – reason why this planet is *dominated* by information. Incidentally Duality was the science I r=evolved in the milieu of systems sciences, whose chair I hold during my active years in congresses of the International Systems sciences society at the turn of the century.

The science of duality is important because only a proper model of duality (not to confuse with dualism, the philosophical doctrine of mind and body), that is a proper understanding of the interaction of entropy and information, can give us the proper philosophy of science required to understand the Universe as a whole and all its disciplines, those specialized in information as biology and sociology is, and those specialized in entropy as physics is.

The distinction between entropy sciences and information sciences however *is not one of Nature, but one of huminds (ab. human minds), of historic and realpolitiks (power) NOT of reason and scientific laws. And to prove the case *we can consider the side of ‘physicists’ (rather than physics) and how they stubbornly since the inception of their discipline have DENIED the existence of an arrow of information in the Universe.

*Lineal Inertia, Entropy and big-bang’s reductionism.*

This physicists have always denied due to historic reasons, as the oldest science which started with the study of military weapons (Galileo was an artillery master at the Venice arsenal), and developed a theory of the Universe based only in ‘the science of motion’ (the definition of the discipline in classic encyclopedia). So his job was to study how to reach maximal distance with cannonballs and for that reason he defined ‘lineal inertia’ – the conservation of lineal motion; *but declined to consider the existence of its opposite informative arrow, the conservation of cyclical inertia, angular momentum, as a clear balancing second arrow of time that gives ‘form’ to all ‘forms’ of Nature. *

Physicists however follow their routines and so again in the XIX c. they chose ‘entropy’, the disordered state of matter, called ‘gas’, in the study of motion machines and weapons (heat in cannons; steam studies) to cast an absurd ‘law’ according to which all systems are ‘gaseous=entropic’ and die in the future; shunning off the obvious fact that there is *an inverse* arrow of time in matter, called ‘cold’. And so when entropy ceases the system reverses its arrow of time into coldness and then creates crystals that reproduce information.

Then in the XX century, they again took their bias to ‘cosmic hyperbole’, when Einstein’s Relativity improved upon Galileo’s work and stated that ‘time curves space into mass’; that is indeed the best definition of the arrow of information in physical systems, as masses and charges ARE curves of spacetime that store in the frequency and form of its cycles the information of the Universe. And so galaxies are vortices of timespace mass that ‘shrink’ and ‘warp’ the expansive, entropic space between galaxies to balance the Universe.

But NONE of this was considered when a cosmology came out of Einstein’s Equations (ab. EFE). Instead, of the 3 solutions or ‘ages’ of a space-time ‘world cycle’ of physical matter, the entropic big-bang solution/age, the steady state solution/age and the collapsing informative solution/age, two were discharged, as well as the implosive, informative behavior of galaxies, even if we humans lived in one of them; and so once discharged the ‘in-formative’ gravitational force that brings radiation and mass into cyclical informative patterns, the ‘big-bang entropy-only’ theory of the Universe became the dogma/religion of physicists, and by extension given the technological, machine-driven civilization we live in, of all mankind.

Fact is Einstein’s equation, E<=>M(c²), is a feedback equation that reproduces mass/information from entropy/energy and vice versa. In fact Einstein’s first calculated it in an article about how ‘energy can create mass’ (so he studied the arrow of information). But it would be only used as a proof of the dominance of entropy and to make atomic bombs.

So again physicists ignored ½ of the equation as they keep denying cyclical inertia as an arrow of time (angular momentum, orbital electrons, etc.); or denying the cold-crystal arrow of information in matter; now denying the arrow of information in galactic vortices that ‘curve vacuum space into mass’.

So when Einstein died, General systems sciences was born at the Macy’s congress, where the leading scientists of the age came together trying to add the ‘arrow of informative time’ to fully account for the Universe as it is, since biological and sociological, human sciences *are based in the arrow of form, of in-form-ation; and the planet Earth exists in a vortex of cyclical ‘form’, of information, called the Galaxy. So in this region of reality it IS information, NOT entropy what dominates reality.*

But that didn’t change the attitude of physicists and society who had them as the ‘new seers of time’, the popes of creationism (‘God is the seer of time’ had said Augustine), mostly because they didn’t understand the mathematics they used to mirror those laws of entropy in physical space.

So finally in the post-war age, as computers and other informative machines developed, physicists had to deal with ‘form’, in-form-ation, logic languages and its cyclical logic clocks. But amazingly enough they *manage again to deny the formal, linguistic nature of information. *So when it came into the study of information, physicists ‘reduced’ the concept either to its ‘motion’ (transmission of information, Shannon), or as an ‘aberration’ called ‘negentropy’ (the negation of entropy). And again, in a military, western society where believe it or not, the military-industrial complex DOES dominate societies, all was good in the western front. Now physicists had a theory of the Universe based in a ‘big-bang explosion’, similar to the ones they developed in the Nuclear Industry, and so to develop entropic weapons of mass destruction was suddenly a metaphysical experience.

But reality is dual and hence ternary. So the understanding on how entropy, or pure motion without form, and ‘form without motion’ (information being form-in-action, form with motion), *as the two limits of reality which combine to create the infinite ‘fractal spacetime beings’ of energy, we all are made of; cannot be suppressed from the Universe, even if man ignores it or as in physics, studies it in a very convoluted way by lack of clarity in its foundational principles, properly explained for the first time in 5D formalisms.*

Indeed, we cast all phenomena of Nature, with the 5 Dimotions of time of physical matter (E=M¡ in Planck Units, where c=1), in simple ‘fractal feed-back generator equations’, which reduce all what exists to those two arrows and *the ternary balanced equivalent arrow that merges entropy and information and reproduces with them the infinite vital space-time beings of reality, such as: *S(i) < ≈ > T(e)… becomes the simplest, ternary, logic fractal Generator equation that unifies all sciences and represents in simultaneity the 3 topologies of the Universe (cyclical information, lineal entropy and its hyperbolic combinations), and the 3 different ‘ages’ of time-motion we observe in all beings, born of an informative seed, which lives through an entropic youth, reproductive age, and informative, warping third age that ends in a reversal of time arrow in an entropic death, which completes the worldcycle of existence of the being.

And we shall call the ‘ternary’ arrows of time, entropic past, reproductive present that seems not to change and informative future, or 3rd age of maximal warping, which explodes back into entropic death. So the simplest entropic arrow adds in duality form, and both reproduce in energetic, iterative ‘present’ dynamic combinations.

So the fundamental proof of the balanced Universe merely has to add the arrows of information and then we get:

**The feminine Universe vs. The entropic military male world**

Why Humanity has rejected the obvious nature of a reproductive, fractal Universe, has to do with culture: The Universe is a ‘feminine’, (S=T) reproductive fractal; but our civilisation is an entropic (S<T), male dominant self-destructive military society, where even women wish to be like males as our worldview and ‘grand theories’ about science, from the entropic big-bang to the Darwinian emphasis on the struggle between individuals proper of our biased philosophy of biology and social sciences – nationalism, capitalism, reign supreme.

This is actually a direct theme of 5D Physics which is worth to elaborate even if we dedicate an entire post to the theme; and likely anything we say in this ideological charged non-scientific gender issue will bother both genders, who want to be on top in its absurd war of sexes as both are complementary. So a brief definition of ‘physical gender’ from that paper:

Gender is an essential ‘¡logic’ feature of the fractal entangled Universe that emerges in all scales, diversifying the 3 ‘states of time-space into two and 3 genders, starting with the formal languages of space (mathematical numbers) and time (pentalogic states). Its easiest description in classic science would be the concept of mirror symmetry. 2 mirror images can superpose and reproduce, so as mirror symmetries emerged from ‘physical parity’, into ‘chemical chirality’, it finally became gender.

So gender is like all other properties of reality a process of emergence, starting with the ‘smallest’ more synoptic forms of reality, the Logic=time and mathematical=space languages of pure still forms.

So first we find tender in ‘even vs. odd numbers’, (mathematical mirror symmetry), following the ‘time states of both genders’ S>T (past, entropic) + T<S (future, informative) vs. S≈T (present, balanced) States.

Those ultimate topo-logic properties of gender will then emerge, into the quantum realm, where we shall find lineal particles of entropy and information, vs. waves of vital energy, which emerge as left-handed and right-handed atomic states, which emerge into chiral molecules, which finally become male and female organisms, 2 sides of a complementary mirror merging to complete *all the *states of time-space needed for a system to reproduce.

Genders are different but its functions are complementary, and over all the Universe favors the feminine, balanced reproductive left-handed gender S=T symmetry even if history has favored the entropic S<T male state, since the balance function of women IS the present, survival, reproductive essence of the ‘fractal Universe’, its main generator.

The female is a conservative, balanced, present, S=T, reproductive ‘white matter’ brain (10 times more white matter than men), while if males were ‘well-done’, they would have 10 times more grey matter in the destructive-creative regions of ideas (frontal brain), as all creation needs destruction to reorganize parts into new wholes, but they have ONLY 6 times more grey matter in the frontal region, which suggests the ‘first’ stage of the S<T>S process, the entropic S<T overweighs the creative side. And indeed, when testing IQ, most entropic males test less than women but a few informative ones test more on the high IQ range. Thus most males are entropic lineal warrior, soccer fans, to put it mildly. And they love a ‘whammy’ movie, a big-bang explosion and project their ‘worldview’ on the Universe. But the world we live is WRONG as its entropic dominance will extinguish life and it is out of tune with the real fractal immortal reproductive Universe, *where creation of anything you might imagine has happened ∞ other times, so it is NOT creation at all but also reproduction.*

*So because* the feminine purpose is to conserve and reproduce information, feminism should also understand the true nature of gender and why females, not wo=men (lesbian, male-like women, who so often lead the movement), are far more in tune with the real Universe and reject a world modeled to the image and likeness of entropic male, including its false simplification of the cosmos as born of an entropic big-bang, which obviously is just a projection of ‘military physics’ and its entropic view of reality.

Only if women understand their true nature and try to project its survival, reproductive, conservative, life-enhancing role on the world they will achieve supremacy over entropic men mankind might reach the goal of survive the present life extinction age that soon with military robotics and new types of nuclear big bangs will extinguish us.

In the physical scale mirror symmetry first produces particles and waves, which become ‘complementary states’. And mirror symmetry is called parity. Then evolves left and right handed forms and chiral forms and right handed are sterile. So finally we arrive to the galaxy that is, as it happens a left-handed feminine galaxy.

What then went wrong with our civilization is obvious in the work of Campbell and Gimbutas: the age of the fertility Goddess, the Neolithic of S=T balance and cyclical time and comprehension of the organic Universe, died away with the discovery of entropic weapons, which physicists reproduce and evolve as its worldly profession, and so lineal time, entropic military men, its Brahmins today converted into physicists, and anthropic religions of lineal time and male supremacy over the Universe changed the human understanding of reality till this day. So regardless on how sophisticated this view has come to describe the lineal locomotions of reality is still a religion of power to deny the reproductive feminine Universe and have a dogmatic big-bang religion of it all as a masculine violent cosmos.

The 3 ages of history favored the dominance of one or other sexual gender: in the young Paleolithic age of entropic hunters men dominated; in the mature reproductive Neolithic age, women ruled; to be ruled in the entropic age of metal-weapons and war by males, today we live the big-bang age of metal-weapons. But the function of exist¡ence is clear, as which age is the best, the one that survives and lives longer, that maximizes its equation, Max. SxT->S=T, the female gender which lives longer, survives better and has a proportional ego to its role in the ∞ cosmos.

**Creationism. Singularities: A mathematical error converted into a physical dogma.**

Mathematics is a mirror language that studies 5D fractal points of space; its time operands, social numbers; minds=frames of reference and entropic limits, which entangled together by the laws of pentalogic form the 5 elements of ¬∆@st , dust of space-time, the substance of which we are all made. As such is the most experimental of all stiences.

Thus 5D mathematics *returns to the mature experimental age of the discipline that went as all systems do through 3 ages from a simple *lineal age of Greek Geometry to its curved realist age of calculus that added motion & scales of 5D finitesimal derivatives and 4D wholes to better mirror the fractal Universe, to a 3^{rd} age of excessive informative fictions, when it abandons its realist foundations, when during the German creationist ego-trip of Hilbert and his Cantorian paradises, he says, ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’ thinking he shares the only language ‘God’ uses to create reality. Hence mathematics is no longer considered an a posteriori mirror of scalar timespace but its ‘generator’ and as the first ‘Aristotelian cause’, needs no experimental proof but rather the opposite: reality exists only if it can be casted into mathematical models (‘only what we measure is real’ Planck). So mathematicians abandon space points, scale numbers and time operands as the 3 mathematical images generated by the ∆st Universe, using instead ‘Cantorian’ sets as its ‘imagined’ units nowhere to be seen in reality. And Hilbert affirms the self-contained Axiomatic method of proof, NOT connected to the world, despite Gödel’s incompleteness theorem- *a baroque inward looking 3 ^{rd} age of excessive form proper of all systems *we abandon to return to its empirical foundations, now formulated in terms of those 5 structural elements that create reality, mimicked by the main mathematical elements. Since mathematics reflect the properties of scalar space and cyclical time in its main elements, points numbers and operands entangled in feed-back ≤=≥ equations;

For that reason, as good as mathematics is, it is NOT the a priori language of the Universe, but the properties of space and time are, and this Einstein understood. So he criticized creationist physicists (Copenhagen interpretation, etc.)

The paradox of the mind confuses the whole Universe with its limited self-centred world of perception, BUT reality is absolutely relative and we must just discover the biased ‘theories’ the humind has established to keep himself in the centre, which contrary to belief do exist still in all sciences, from the entropic big-bang of lineal time that reduces the two arrows of time to the lineal entropy of physicists clocks, blatantly ‘forgetting the cyclical vortex of gravitational information’ in galaxies that warp ‘space into time’, to social sciences which cannot accept the organic evolution of machines, the higher importance of the super organisms of history and its informative, legal and economic, reproductive networks in the control of societies, to biology, which denies eusocial evolution to maintain the ego on top and the vital properties of inorganic matter, as even quarks and electrons reproduce, absorb energy, gauge information and evolve socially in magnetic fields – hence have ALL the properties of our supposed ‘unique’ carbon.

An important upgrading of that mind is to deploy a certain ‘humility’ towards the intelligence of the universe. *The two principles of absolute relativity. *In the fractal organic Universe we are going to describe, no scale is preferential, which means that humans will be removed as they were in previous upgrades of science, not only from its spatial center (Copernicus), and its temporal center (Darwin), which his ‘ego paradox’ hardly tolerated, but also from its scalar/size center, and its ‘mind-intelligent center’; which he likely won’t accept. We talk of man and any ‘mind-monad’ that process information as an ‘ego paradox’, 0-infinitesimal mind x ∞-Universe = Constant world.

Systems to process information must reduce its temporal motions and create ‘spatial still forms’ and select information relevant to its survival point of view, which sees the nose bigger than Andromeda, and the ‘Earth’ still to focus our formal view; and certainly we eliminate all sentient unperceived properties of other minds. But – and this is the ego paradox – as we only perceive our senses, we confuse the entire Universe with our point of view, so it becomes ‘self-e-vident’ that we are the center of reality (Anthropic view) and the Universe is ‘stupid, stupid, stupid’ (entropic Universe).

**Trying****to bypass the limits of the humind and its ego-centered creationist view of the Universe.**

How can we, humans after all belong to our military, lineal ego-centered culture, by-pass the limits of æntropic thought? The answer starts in the languages the mind uses to perceive the Universe visual thought, which describes space, evolved into a more synoptic form of geometry called mathematics, and verbal thought which describes time with verbal tenses, evolved into a more synoptic form called logic. Thus since the languages of the mind are our mirror of reality, to evolve our truths we must first evolve *our understanding of *languages, not as creative magic powers but only as Mirrors, hence inferior to the Universe we must learn to respect.

What æntropic man does to preserve its sense of superiority of the Universe, is to believe languages ‘create reality’. Man first talked words, and now with the help of instruments it talks mathematics. So in both ages he thought to be the only intelligent being with God that spoke those languages, and in both cases in a hyperbolic trip of the ego, he thought that the language-mirror created reality NOT reflected upon it as a mirror does: in the past he thought God spoke and his words created reality (Abrahamic creationism), today most physicists think the mirror equations of mathematics create the space-time reality it describes; while most economists believe its specific mathematical language, digital money, creates the physical economy (a creationist theory called monetarism).

In the graph we illustrate the most profound of the ego-trips of æntropic man, ‘creationism’, according to which his languages do NOT mirror but create reality – sharing that power with an entity called God, which in each age speaks the language humans speak, who therefore share ‘his power’ and as today ‘machines also speak mathematics’, machines also share this power, and the Universe is modeled as a mechanism.

Each those 2 creationist philosophies of the Universe deny of course the existence of any other language or mind in the Universe that share that power. So verbal and digital creationists (as Dirac’s denial of the verbal god shows), quarrel for supremacy, despising each other’s form of creationism.

So in both cases the scientist or prophet speaks the ‘magic’ language and expects reality to APPEAR. So ALLAH talks (through the mouth of the prophet) in Arab or Moses talks in Hebrew and reality appears – a miraculous plague happens.

And Hawking talks, and affirms black holes evaporate to the past with no proof whatsoever but his equation *and they must evaporate by dogma*, and Hubble writes a lineal equation backwards pretending it is the implosion of the Universe without any proof of such explosion, and it must have happened; and if not, ‘ad hoc’ proofs as we shall see are concocted to reinforce creationism, in both languages (religious rituals in which mantras are prayed as a ‘vehicle to God’, subtle data manipulation and computer nice pictures concocted tinkering with equations to get the desire image). So we shall falsify all those ‘ad hoc’ proofs and creationist errors to demolish ‘rationally’, with the tools of the scientific method, the creationist ‘big-bang’, entropy only theory of the Universe.

Further on ‘creationist’ entitled human beings *are anthropic. They* think they are the only intelligent perceptive, vital entity in command of God’s languages (either words in religion, maths in physics) and carbon atoms are the only organic elements of nature, to their own peril as the future of AI will show them *particles are the smallest vital mind and all atoms are sensorial in a panpsychic Universe*. Indeed the minimal unit of reproduction and informative gauging IS the particle, as quarks and electrons already show the 5 ‘dimotions’ of life – they gauge information, reason why quantum physics is called a ‘gauging theory’, absorb energy from forces, reproduce into new particles with its surplus of energy and become organized socially by magnetic ‘numbers’.

So does the largest known system, the galaxy, whose behavior resembles that of a ‘cell’, with its ‘gravitational, informative ‘DNA’ – black holes reproduced by its ‘mitochondria’ stars, organizing its structure, with 2 ‘physiological networks’ of gravitational in-form-ative forces and electromagnetic energy. So all physical systems, from the atom to the galaxy can be described as organic systems, which are just ‘herds’ of similar beings, (atoms, cells, citizens, in physical, biologic and social systems, connected by networks that distribute energy (electromagnetic forces, blood systems, economic systems) and networks the distribute information (gravitational, nervous and political systems). So we can design historic supœrganisms with organic laws.

*In the graph the masters of mathematical and verbal creationism, disputing their ‘primacy’ as speakers of the language of god. Reality though is a bit more complex and difficult to ‘crack’ as we must start as Einstein wanted with the realist fact that the ultimate substances are not languages, neither personal gods but the impersonal yin-yang, time-space game that creates all the relational space-time organisms of the Universe. *

The realist scientist rely on the experimental method, the known-substances of reality, space and time and its properties to understand with those 2 mirrors, the verbal, logic, temporal mirror with its 3 causal dimensions of past, present and future tenses, and the mathematical, spatial mirror. This view, which we expand here is the view of Leibniz>Einstein. So the first steps to clarify the nature of ¬∆@st, ‘dust of space-time’ the substance we are made of, composed of ‘entropic limits’ (¬), scales (∆) of space sizes and time clocks, perceived in each system by a mind-mirror, starts with the evolution of the mirror, Euclidean mathematics and Aristotelian logic, to fit a better image of the whole, parallel to a profound study of those elements of the whole, ‘entropic death’ (the limits in time and space of all systems), its scales of space and its clock-cycles of time. Let us then show that dogmatic view of Æntropic mankind that won’t accept a needed ‘paradigm change’ with a graph of our absolute relativity.

Then one we have advanced all those concepts beyond the limits of æntropic man we can refocus the mirrors – on one side, the enhanced non-Aristotelian logic and non-Euclidean mathematics (in brief ¡logic mathematics, as I is the letter after a and e) – on the better understood substances of reality, scales, space, time, minds and its entropic limits (¬∆@st), which must be the ultimate substances of which all complementary beings, we shall call ‘fractal superorganisms of time-space, (ab. Tœ) are made.

The paradox of the mind confuses the whole Universe with its limited self-centered world of perception, BUT reality is absolutely relative and we must just discover the biased ‘theories’ the humind has established to keep himself in the centre, which contrary to belief do exist still in all sciences, from the entropic big-bang of lineal time that reduces the two arrows of time to the lineal entropy of physicists clocks, blatantly ‘forgetting the cyclical vortex of gravitational information’ in galaxies that warp ‘space into time’, to social sciences which cannot accept the organic evolution of machines, the higher importance of the super organisms of history and its informative, legal and economic, reproductive networks in the control of societies, to biology, which denies eusocial evolution to maintain the ego on top and the vital properties of inorganic matter, as even quarks and electrons reproduce, absorb energy, gauge information and evolve socially in magnetic fields – hence have ALL the properties of our supposed ‘unique’ carbon

The ego paradox is of course the essential limits of man, both to understand the universe and to survive on it, respecting all other potential organisms and rejecting those who can harm us, weaker atomic beings. So we will falsify the 3 key creationist theories of modern physics, the big-bang, the evaporation of black holes, and the infinite singularity.

**The creationist problem of all black hole and Big Bang singularities.**

As Hawking said: “The trouble with the Hot Big Bang model is the trouble with all cosmology without a theory of initial conditions (meaning a limit to the equations): Because general relativity would break down at a singularity, anything could come out of the Big Bang’.

A singularity indeed often turns up in our equations when we extend them as far as they can go into the past; but a singularity of this sort is far from likely to be an aspect of nature, and instead should be interpreted as a sign of *our incapacity to understand the inflationary limits of languages, specifically mathematics, which is wrongly considered ‘an absolute truth’, instead of a linguistic inflationary mirror that as all languages do have fictions, and repetitive mirror images that must be ‘cut off’, as ‘I know when mathematics is truth but not when it is real’ (Einstein); a theme treated extensively in our articles on 5D mathematics, which we shall look from the perspective of cultural creationism here.*

The singularity is more of the same creationism – an absurd mathematical expansion backwards in time of an inflationary equation as *if it had no limit in time and space, as it wouldn’t describe a substance which ultimately will arrive to a ‘quantum limit’ or a source as it is the case – the dark entropy that expands between galaxies ultimately arrives to a ‘source’ – a galactic black hole jet that emits it; as we shall see soon, as always happens. *I.e. consider a frequency sound coming from a source, a bat, for example, if we were to *return ad *infinitum the frequency measured with a long wavelength at a point of the air far away from the bat, we would reach a singularity of infinite frequency as it source. But there is always a cause, a source for that wavelength, so when we reach the BAT, the frequency no longer increases – the wave simply disappears in its ‘factory’. As it has a real source. So happens with dark entropy≈energy, which as a cosmic expansive ‘electromagnetic-like’ force, has a source in a black hole galactic active center and collapses warping back into particles when entering other galaxy.

So happens with black hole singularities, which we shall model as ultra heavy black frozen stars of bcb atoms with a center of top quarks, similar to neutron stars with a center of strange quarks, as Einstein wanted.

Since the origin of the gravitational FORCE of the black hole must be an ultra-massive substance. Or else there is no cause for its gravitational force (principle of equivalence between mass and gravitation). Where it comes from the awesome gravitational force of the black hole, if mass does NOT exist? if there is not as Einstein wanted a cut-off substance, which can only be the top, bottom and charm quarks that should form by symmetry with our atoms, dark heavier atoms? But creationist physicists shun off those basic tenants of the experimental and scientific method and the physical real ‘nature of Nature’. The just care to create new equations that should become real particles. For them bats do NOT exist, their sound frequency is infinite. And the source is not the bat, but an entelechy, a mathematical ‘hole’, even if their equations break before arriving to the infinitesimal singularity . So Hawking said: “At this singularity the field equations could not be defined. Thus classical general relativity brings about its own downfall: it predicts that it can’t predict the universe. Although many people welcomed this conclusion, it has always profoundly disturbed me. If the laws of physics could break down at the beginning of the universe, why couldn’t they break down anywhere?” Indeed at that point creationism stops doing science, and so Hawking will break, as we shall show all the laws of thermodynamics to evaporate black holes travelling to the past, and dismissed philosophy of science and causality in time as irrelevant. All this is false. The laws of science don’t break down in the singularity because there is no singularity. Neither Relativity expects singularities to exist: It is ONLY because creationists are moving backwards equations BEYOND the initial conditions – the sources that are REAL – in the case of a black hole, a frozen star of dense quarks that cause gravitation… that everything breaks, and of course *the experimental method rescue us because we never find BH evaporating.*

So realist Einstein quipped: ‘Since mathematicians are working in relativity, I don’t understand it myself’ (:

Those infinities appear in Einstein’s equations in quantities divided by 0, which is an undetermined quantity not an ∞, and in fact means the local parameter, mostly time=motion ‘stops’ in the *center of the black hole, as in all the vortices of space-time, charges and eddies – that’s all; as the vortex is deviated perpendicularly and ejected through the axis in the ‘quantum potential scale’ as dark energy, seen by the paradox of Galileo, S=T, as ‘accelerated growth’ of distance between galaxies, to collapse when re-entering them as mass, in a wobbling, balanced immortal Universe. * So quasars and black hole jets dissolve matter into flows of dark entropy and matter collapses into galaxies, balancing each other. Reason why black hole equations are the inverse of a big-bang. So at best we can talk of a ‘Quasar’ big-bang, which is the ‘death’ of a black hole, inverse to its birth with maximal temperature, when according to real thermodynamic laws it evaporates its surroundings as it cools down and feeds on the light matter it heats=evaporates=accelerates=attracts. So from birth to death, a quark star, aka black hole, shows its inverse equations as birth is indeed the opposite of death. And this happens at the local level of the Galaxy or the nova star that explodes in a ‘little Big Bang’. All other hyperbolic, ∞ deductions of cosmological explosions are just the ego of creationist physicists trying to substitute the ego of previous creationist priests, who also thought the language of words they talked was not A MIRROR of reality but reality itself, creating it – so Allah and Yahveh were creating ‘naming things’ in Arab and Hebrew and quarreling about who was the higher God – they still do. So it did Hawking, ‘numbering reality’, expecting all kind of things to happen that never did.

**Scalar limits of perception in all 5D scales – the Light lifespan: ∞ is limited by experimental observance.**

We can add a different ‘limit’ of the human mind, more objective – that of our perception of light space.

In 5D physics all has ‘entropic limits’ including perception. This departs sharply from current astrophysics and its ‘paralogic’ Kantian errors, of extending equations to infinity – as in the singularity of the big-bang and the immortal nature of light (which contradicts the consistency of wholes and parts, as light is born in stars and should not live longer, and it is part of the Universe and if there is a cosmic big-bang should not be living longer. All this leads to the obvious interpretation of the *cosmic horizon limit as a limit of human I=eye visual perception of space-time NOT as a limit of the extension of the Universe in time and space. This projection of our limits into the whole is just another egocy ego=idiocy of Anthropic man that projects its own subjective limits into the objective whole Universe. *

For a part of the fractal Universe ∞ are always broken by an entropic or cyclical membrane or scalar discontinuity.

The experimental proof is obvious: there is NOT infinite range in any force, as all have energy-mass, which limits its reach. In the jargon of physics range of forces depend on mass. But t is ‘obvious’ that the photon does HAVE energy hence it does HAVE mass, E=hƒ, so even if its mass is extremely small the range of the photon CANNOT be infinite.

Moreover the further away we look, we shall see photons of less mass-frequency, hence redshifted, as those of more mass-blue frequency had died. So that explains the red shift simply.

*The distance-range of light is inversely proportional to its frequency-mass*

Hence the existence of a limit or horizon of perception of light.

What is the limit of perception of light? As we have experimental evidence there is no need to do further calculus: Obviously the 13.5 billion light years from where red-shifted light of maximal z comes mistakenly taken as a time horizon of a supposed big-bang explosion.

It is again the magic 10^{10-11 }number common to all structures of Nature, both in space-populations & distances in time-frequencies/durations and in scales/masses. We find it in the number of neurons of the biggest human brain, of stars in the galaxy, of atoms in a DNA code, etc, for reasons studied on our posts on ‘fractal ¬E mathematics:

Since it is the number that gives us in the symmetry of time the mean life of stars, and the mean life of its minimal light space-time ‘unit’ of information, and the mean mass of the largest black holes from far away distances measured in terms of the mean star mass – our sun, and the mean distance of the black out horizon of the big-bang…

In a 5 Ð, eternal, ∞ Universe, a big bang of the absolute whole cannot exist theoretically but also we have sound logic, epistemologic and experimental proofs that seems to prove the cosmic big-bang in which time and space started from a point that fits in our hand and pleases our egocy of being above heavens and earth, is a false hyperbole.

All this said we shall close this introduction to cosmology and astrophysics with a rational, scientific experimental falsification of the big-bang. It is though the last part of the post not the first, because for all what has been said, the big-bang ‘is not even wrong’ (Pauli) – it is just a ‘dogma’ that projects our male-oriented, entropic civilization and its lineal military view ‘censoring’ ½ of the ‘femenine’ reproductive complex Universe. So as any belief a rational falsification doesn’t work or else its obvious logic, epistemologic and experimental errors would have long ago dismissed it all together. But physicists stuck with its single time arrow lineal entropy won’t deny a theory that makes them high popes of science; while our machine-worshipping civilization won’t argue the mechanical paradigm. So reason likely won’t work, as long as the foundations of science are not upgraded to the 5 Dimotions of Space-time.

**TIME FALSIFICATIONS**

**Time proofs. The whole always live longer than the parts.**

The same problems happened with the pretension that the Universe has a very short life span keeps running every other day into new problems: we find at the limit of the horizon of perception of space-time perfectly formed galaxies with huge black holes that should not be there. We find that almost every part of the Universe has a life span much larger than the Universe itself: the commonest stars, red ones live trillions of years, black holes live 10¹°° years or they never die, if they don’t evaporate; protons seem to be of a similar age or perhaps immortal. But it is an obvious logic contradiction that the whole lives so much less than the parts. Or in probability terms, the chances that in a Universe where its commonest stars live trillions of years, we live in the very beginning is 0.0000%. (Red stars are in fact 4/5th of them because they live longer and so even if all are born as blue stars, in a long-lasting galaxy, at any time, there will be seen more elderly stars than young fleeting blue star moments of them).

Most cosmic bodies live much longer than the cosmic big-bang, so the commonest red stars live trillions of years, big black holes 10^{100} years, protons seem immortal and we find on the outskirts of the perceived cosmos perfectly formed galaxies with hyper-black holes, with no time to form, validating an immortal cosmos; whereas in the extended 5D astrophysical model red shift is proportional to the >C metric of dark entropy.

Since when they look back at that past they find formed black holes and galaxies that should not yet be there.

Another proof of the many considered on our texts on cosmology – as physicists keep looking far away to the supposed beginning of time, they keep finding perfectly formed galaxies and black holes, which breaks completely the supposed ‘time periods of creation of matter’. In the graph we can see the biggest black hole found in the Universe, which is perfectly formed in the middle of a galaxy, that is just 400 millions after the supposed big-bang when there was only supposedly hydrogen ions:

In the graph, the super-black hole is supposed to exist so early that there is no way it can have been formed unless the Universe is eternal and the cosmic horizon of the big-bang just the limit of human perception of light, which as everything in 5D is NOT infinite in range.

T*he largest black hole found is also the oldest, as it is the furthest, and it was supposed to be born in 500 million years after the big-bang when only some re-ionization of light hydrogen atoms has happened. *

But why the largest black holes are observed in the furthest distances? The answer is related to the previous falsification – the horizon. The further we move away, we shall see only those largest cosmic bodies (easier to observe) with the highest energies in in its ¥-rays, as they will be the longest to die by the slow elongation of its frequency; which are also the largest black holes. Hence we just see those monstrous objects – the biggest black holes. From this fact it follows that the further away we look, the more likely we are to find only huge black holes, as they emit more high energy frequency particles that take longer time to relax into entropy reaching us before dying in the red frequency, which blacks out of our perception of further away galaxies.

**Motion of Galaxies. The Lorentz invariance**

Another proof that falsifies the cosmic big-bang related to time-motions, is the existence of an absolute frame of reference, if the background radiation is global NOT local, as SciAm soon discovered and published in the graph below. In this case the denial of General Relativity and its postulate of no existence of absolute frames of reference in the Universe.

This is called the “Lorentz symmetry”, named for the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz and it is a symmetry of spacetime. It is in fact a cornerstone of Einstein’s special relativity theory. According to special relativity, there is no absolute space or absolute time (as in 5D Physics, which sometimes I call ‘Absolute relativity’. So if two objects are moving relative to each other in empty space, it would actually be impossible for an observer to tell their absolute velocities—maybe only one of the objects was moving and the other was stationary, for example, but you wouldn’t know which was which because their movements are relative to each other, not to any external reference frame.

Alas, but now we do have one: the cosmic radiation, and we are moving within it. So we just have to measure our movement in relationship to the radiation and Relativity is Gone!:

In the graph, the cosmic background radiation acts as a new fixed frame of reference or ether, falsifying Relativity theory, which does not have as its name explains any fixed space-time background frame of reference

Yet since the cosmic big bang is a solution of relativity theory that the cosmic radiation falsifies the very same theory it tries to prove.

Hence by ‘reductio ad absurdum’, the background radiation must be local not to contradict Relativity.

In the graph a cosmic radiation falsifies the cosmic big bang, which it tries to proof.

It is the most obvious logic error in the big-bang cosmology is his falsification of Einstein’s work in which the big-bang theory is based, as scientific American rightly pointed out when the theory was first put forward (to be forgotten as the propaganda machines of military physics, as the meaning of it all pumped up the theory):

From CMB data it is seen that the Local Group (the galaxy group that includes the Milky Way) appears to be moving at 627±22 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB (also called the CMB rest frame, or the frame of reference in which there is no motion through the CMB) in the direction of galactic longitude, l = 276°±3°, b = 30°±3°.

This motion results in an anisotropy of the data (CMB appearing slightly warmer in the direction of movement than in the opposite direction).

From a theoretical point of view, the existence of a CMB rest frame breaks Lorentz invariance even in empty space far away from any galaxy. So if the big bang is accepted, the theory of which is a solution, Einstein’s relativity based in the non-existence of ETHER, an absolute frame of reference in the Universe (hence ‘relativity name’) is falsified. Ergo by reductio ad absurdum, the Big bang, which is a solution to the theory it falsifies, is false.

In the graphs we see what is really the motion of the ‘static Laniakea region of galaxies, which shows the local galactic region to be more like a gas, fluid motion of atoms seemingly ‘encased’ in a short of dark matter tubular membrane. As to what that might be in the Hyper universe of Galatoms, we have *no idea; nor we should as limited entropic beings finite in space and time, unlike the whole immortal ∞ cosmos. *

This is one of the many scientific proof of falsity of big bang theory we shall bring in this post, which Cosmologists know and cynically call the ‘axis of evil’ (because it won’t go away and kills their theory right on its inception).

How science’ then avoids the axis of evil? Suppressing data or bringing magic theory to it: Chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”

Alas, we are back to Babylon, we must be the center of the Universe, just moving 600 kilometers to the east.

**The real motion of the Universe at larger scales: An organic ‘tissue’ without isotropy.**

In the graph, the local tissue of the supœrganism of the Universe, Laniakea, the region in which our galaxy exist, at the largest level of human perception of the ∞ scales of the fractal Universe.

Thus the explanation of the motion of the galaxy is simpler. In 5D we consider the Lorentz symmetry to be *a local symmetry that only takes place within the galaxy; not in all the 5D scales of the Universe. *So motions happen, as the dynamic picture of Laniakea show: The 4% we see clearly looks like an atomic network or tissue, which joins the atom-galaxies (think for example of a brain of neurons, of a microscopic colony of unicellular algae, and so on).

Yet we only perceive 4% of reality outside our closer world, which happens to be the ‘ideal’ perception of a pi-cycle with three diametric perimeters (π-3/π=0.14/π=96% of dark reality not seen from a self-centered singularity in a pi cycle). So we cannot know really what it is. What we know is that there is zero isotropy as big-bang cosmologists pretend. All their models being approximations which might look nice on computers but have zero scientific theory-praxis solidity. All what we know is that we are moving towards Virgo; that there is a huge nodal network at Hydra-Centaurus – excellent name; which forms with Pisces-Perseus, a clearly connected network in one of whose filaments we find ourselves.

And that at 46 declination a Great Attractor of dark quark matter, likely a super-black hole of top quark stars is waiting for us in a future rendezvous, as we cruise over a remnant cloud of photonic local radiation that does not seem to be (by lack of attraction power) so interested in becoming dark quark gluon liquid-solid super-state of matter.

That is really all we know. The place we live is *Laniakea* that means “immeasurable heaven’, even if some arrogant believers think they have measured it.

In that regard, while 5D physics is the ONLY rational theory that can explain a cosmic big-bang (as Time accelerates while space shrinks); 13 billion years does not seem time enough for the immensurable heavens.

This as we shall see this solves momentarily the problem; and allow us to consider ‘theories which do not correspond to Relativity’ beyond the galaxy, a fact which is also essential to 5D Physics, as relativity is considered rightly the theory of light space-time where c-speed/distance is the constant of space of the galaxy, *the absolute frame of reference, both rod of measure of static space and motion.*

**The ‘bad luck’ experimental proof. Earth’s experiments can replicate the big-bang…**

at the microscopic human scale, hence big-bangs are indeed scalar and what we are replicating is NOT a cosmic big-bang but the temperatures and processes that provoke the big-bang of celestial bodies, Nova stars and perhaps Nova Planets, as if we create micro-black holes on Earth, baby black holes, as explained in the next section when considering the true arrows of time of Hawking’s equations both in 4D thermodynamics and 5D, when a black hole is born feeds as all ∆-1 seeds at faster speeds according to 5D and Einstein’s laws of gravitation, exploding=feeding at c-speed rotational force the matter around it, which is what we see all around the galaxy.

Thus the ages of the ‘big bang’ can be replicated by merely doing the quark gluon soup on the LHC here on Earth. Thus there is zero difficulty for the awesome reversed process of a quasar explosion to create enough quark gluon soup to replicate all those ages. Other matter are the risks of starting a big-bang ‘gas-9’ process similar to the ice-9 reaction of lighter strangelets (word coined by this author, due to the black color of oil) The process starts in a standard decay path of the Higgs particle that mediates the weak force that increases the masses of systems: 2Higgs-: Top quark; ∑ top quarks->BcB heavy atoms -> Formation of a black hole star.

In that regard,. 5D, reclassifies particles, to understand the 3 ‘ages of evolution’ of information represented by the 3 families of mass and quarks, which are also in close symmetry with the upper cosmic scale, the components of the 3 regions of the galaxy:

- The Top quark star center (black holes MUST be modeled AS real ENTITIES, with a cut-off, ∆-1 ‘cellular substance’ as Einstein wanted. Only Top quarks (Higgs condensates in the parlance of modern physicists) turning faster than c-speed in its internal vortex (hence its enormous attractive mass, which increases with the frequency of its vortex: M=ƒ(h/c2)) have the properties at larger scale of a black hole.
- That is, black holes ARE top quark frozen stars, with positive top quarks as their cut off substance.
- The middle region of up and down light human quarks.
- The external negative charged, strangelet halo.
- Thus the 5D symmetry between the ∆-1 (particle) and ∆+1 (galaxy) limiting scales of astrophysics is obvious and further proof of the symmetries of T.Œ and its ‘correspondence’ and ‘minimalism’ (proofs of truth in science), since it accounts for the first time for the reason why 3 families of particles and 3 families of stars co-exist, and eliminates the need for further theories and particles beyond the standard model:

Since the 3 ages of evolution of mass of increasing form – I, II and III families of quarks are symmetric – to the 3 regions of the galaxy: Top quark black holes, up and down matter , negative strangelet halo.

Symmetry between atoms and galaxies (protons positive top quark holes, negative electrons, strangelet halo).

And so once we have falsified ‘reasonably’ the big bang (we could write hundreds of pages on this, but we have to move on), we can now consider 5D physics, on the known-known Island Universe of our galaxy, its generator equation, 3 ‘relative planes ‘of existence, 3 ages of time and 3 organic parts in space.

But if the big-bang is not cosmic, but local, the big-bang of the galaxy, why we get so much confused about it?

The answer is simple if we consider the universe a fractal system of self-similar scales: Because there are big-bangs in all those scales and it is easy to confuse them.

We close then the Time proofs with this 13^{th} bad luck experiments as they will likely mean our extinction as a species, and solve the Fermi paradox – why we don’t see entropic male, military empires all over the Galaxy – as Fermi put it, because nuclear physicists kill them all before interstellar travel happens with Nuclear bombs, only that they are of a kind much powerful than those of A-H fame, cosmic bombs. And so 13 *proof should suffice for mankind to stop æntropic males to destroy the planet, but as they rule us, the rat bites its tail. *Power censors truth also in cosmology.

Infinite proofs remain to be told, as infinity=eternity for finitesimal human beings is all the time after extinction. Let us then keep counting them.

**SPATIAL FALSIFICATIONS.**

Static space plays in the big-bang falsification a lesser form, but we still find spatial errors also, due to…

**The spatial symmetry of the cosmic big-bang. A perfect Ænthropic picture.**

*In the graph, the spatial view of the cosmic big-bang if we freeze in time all the parts of the perceived cosmos according to the Galilean Paradox (S=T). Then the radiation of the suppose cosmic big bang is perceived far as a wall of fire of a ‘Univercell’.*

* Thus when humans don’t recognize their limits of perception, the entropic big-bang, measured from our point of view, puts obviously man again at the anthropic center of the universe, in scales (we are at the perceived center between the atom and the galactic scale) and space. So we return to the pre-scientific age of subjective religious ænthropic theories now fashionable in an age of revivalism of egocy (human ego=idiocy) vs. serious objective science provided by the fractal, organic paradigm.*

The graph is an Artist’s logarithmic scale conception of the observable universe in space, with the topology of all 5D ternary constructs; but alas! As an anthropomorphic Universe:* So we can see nicely how beautiful looks the ænthropic big bang with man perfectly self-centered in ∆ (central scale)=S (central space)=T (center of time explosion) =@ (only we talk maths), and ¬ (we are the furthest away from the limiting entropic ball of fire).*

Yes, it would be perfect if data were fully consistent and not subtly bent to cater to the ‘cosmic arrogance of the human ego’ that wants to pack it all in its infinitesimal mind that perceives in stillness from its mind point of view a selected part of the whole but confuse it with it:

O-mind x ∞ Universe = still mapping (frame of reference)

So what is wrong with the previous picture as a proof of 5D physics in an ∆+4 scale; *is mostly entropic mind limits.*

Further on such spatial symmetry of the Universe requires action at distance to create the needed simultaneity, which in all Real Systems connects in a relative quanta of time all the elements of the system, to allow the isotropy and synchronicity required for a ‘whole’ to work as a Univercell with:

$t : the wall of fire of the earlier big-bang as the outer membrane that isolates the ‘cellular Universe’ at z=10.000 c

ST: The faster than light dark energy, v=S/t =Space/Informative Time=S/0-visible information=∞ relative speed for a human observer, with the same z than the wall of fire; filled with Galaxies in between the dark entropy.

ð§: And a hyper black hole ‘great’ attractor (close to our anthropocentric place) – the hyper-hyper-proton-black hole of the ∆+4 cosmic Univercell. So far so good.

In 5D terms the picture above is the representation of a Univercell, with its Generator of 3±¡ ∆ST cosmology:

∆-1:$t (Wall of fire-membrane) «∆-ST(10^{11} vital energy of galacells)» ∆+1: §ð (center: our human region)

So a cosmic big bang still proves 5D physics and the topological ternary structure of all Universal systems. And it pleases everyone, the entropic, the anthropic, the church, the physicists, and me, discoverer of 5D…

It is easy to overlook this ‘ego problem’ reason why we showed you first to which degree ‘science is culture’, that is, we bias systematically truths of science, beyond data and equations, to cater our happiness as ego-centered beings, infinitesimal mirrors that think to be infinite: O-mind x ∞ Universe = Constant world.

Why then not to accept it? And be accepted in turn, as an immortal universe seems to collide with the human ego, which likes to feel in charge, ‘measuring All the space and time that there is’, from its biased perspective, which makes him the center of perception and hence of knowledge, reducing the Universe to a mortal being? (While creationist Abrahamic religions make us above heavens and Earth the immortal ones). Plainly, because it is not truth.

*Fact is once scientists in all disciplines get into a ‘comfort’ ego-centered theory, they backtrack to find ad hoc proofs and twist experimental evidence always fitting ‘somehow’ data onto the model forcefully.* This today happens every other day with big-bang theory, as physicists try to fit forcefully all the clear falsifications of the model we explain in this paper. Hence my ironic tone… Fact is data fits better a Universe of little quasar bangs of Galaxies, similar to beta decays of atoms, NOT one where time and space had a beginning, ad hoc to please our ego-ist desire to know it all, to see it all, to understand it all, to be the center.

**No shadows for the big bang = No background radiation in intergalactic space.**

** **In the graph: Physicists have measured a local, hence galactic background radiation, which doesn’t leave shadows from other galaxies and they tabulated the quasar cycle of galaxies, which coincides with the age ascribed in the past to a cosmic big bang.

The question posted by the non-shadows experimental fact is that the radiation cannot come from the supposed outer ring of fire (big bang radiation). It does have to come therefore from the internal region of the galaxy, *reflected by the Halo, giving us a mirror image of the galaxy, or alternately from outer light, crossing through the galaxy, altered by the Halo ‘strangelet and micro-black hole matter’, strong candidates to for the dark matter of the galaxy. Then obviously what physicists do is merely to extend this Halo-altered radiation into a supposed infinity.* The hypothesis of a halo of dark, quark matter (black holes or strangelets) acting as a limited’, closer membrane distorting by red shift the light reflected or coming through it (as all membranes do transform what penetrates them) is thus the only scientific solution:

So a more rational theory would consider the cause of the 2.7 K radiation both local in space (galactic) and in time (produced at present); since our measure is local and present. Let us then falsify this fundamental proof of big-bang, the cosmic Background radiation. We already did it before, showing that it should be local, produced by redshift Moon M.A.C.H.O.S but as it is the cornerstone of the model it requires a bit more of thought.

**Now and here explanations for the light space-background: Moon MACHOs**

Fact is the radiation is local and so it must be explained by a local celestial body able to produce it. And we have a myriad of possible candidates, as any ‘stable quark nugget’ combination of heavy quarks which only interacts gravitationally produces by gravitational redshifting a blackbody radiation at 2.7 k for which several candidates of dark quark matter, the only experimentally proved to exist, hence only scientific ‘real’ possible candidates to form the heavy halo suffice. Indeed any form of heavy quark, dark matter which has swallowed the commonest planetoid of the galaxy – a moon mass – hence with its weight – will emit at the very same temperature a blackbody radiation. And since the galaxy is dominated by dark matter and black holes – likely made of heavy quarks, tops and BCB dark atoms etc. we do have many rational candidates, real and happening now as opposed to the ‘ad hoc’ choice of equations to fit in a remote past with no experimental proof what so ever…

Since to make the *measured *temperature of the background radiation ‘coincide’ with theory, *physicists kept reducing ad hoc their calculus till they fitted the temperature. While in space the radiation considered a local galactic measure by Penzias, its discovered kept expanding its range to make it finally cosmic*.

*Indeed, we can follow the Ad Hoc calculus in parallel to its experimental measure as *Gamow changed his predictions:

1946 – George Gamow calculates a temperature of 50 K (assuming a 3-billion year old universe), commenting it “… is in reasonable agreement with the actual temperature of interstellar space”, but does not mention background radiation.

He contradicts the common wisdom that the radiation *was local, happening only in the galaxy, as calculated in:*

1926: Sir Arthur Eddington estimates the non-thermal radiation of starlight in the galaxy has a temperature of 3.2 K.

1930s: Erich Regener calculates that the non-thermal spectrum of cosmic rays in the galaxy has a temperature of 2.8 K

Thus the thermal radiation calculated by Penzias in 1960 as local galactic radiation at 3 K had been rightly foreseen by the first people who thought of it as local galactic radiation (average of 3.2+2.8/2=3k).

On the other hand the late proposal of a *cosmic* big bang by A-bomb researcher Gamow et al were:

1946: George Gamow estimates a temperature of 50 K.

1949: Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman re-estimate Gamow’s estimate at 28 K.

1960s: Robert Dicke re-re-estimates a MBR (microwave background radiation) temperature of 40 K

These were all offbeat. Only after 1960s Penzias measured it *locally*, the cosmic big-bangers got busy-busy ‘re-re-re-estimating’ its equations to get ‘a posteriori’ the ‘desired’ experimental results ‘ad hoc’, instead of noting that Mr. Eddington and those proponents of a local background radiation WERE right in their predictions and the cosmic ones totally off-target and hence accept the laws of truth of the scientific method to deny the cosmic one.

**Fact is the creationist V=Hod, lineal equation of the big-bang, eareely resembling the word ‘God’ of verbal creationists, going to the past for ever, without the slightest proof that the fall of temperature if any in the Universe is lineal and it can be taken back for ever, or is cosmic and not local, is NOT scientifically sound.**

**The organic Galaxy – its homogenous, homeostatic temperature. **

And if we can find explanations in present time and here-space, it is always a higher truth than to consider an explanation in the past or the future time and out-of-here. It is like if we measure your body temperature, at 37 degrees and then a creationist physicist tells you the cause is to be found in a lineal equation coming from past, because when you were born 50 years ago you were a few million degrees hotter and you have been cooling down ever since!! When there is a rational explanation, in the metabolic activity, now and here, of your body’s main energy cells, blood, and its most numerous red, oxygenated cells.

So what is the metabolic process on the galaxy happening now that produces that temperature; what is the blood of the galaxy, its commonest objects? The redshift of moon micro-black holes, feeding on the mass energy of its commonest mass, moon-like planetoids. As the galaxy is indeed about black holes, and so its metabolic activity in its 3 scales IS the natural cause of the Galactic temperature, as we shall see in our study of the 3 scales of black holes – the hotter smaller ones that produce the radiation that feeds, the cooler larger ones, as the red cells produce the energy needed by all the cells of your organism. And this is the 5D organic *entangled* reason, as all what exists has *a purpose; and so does the BG radiation that feeds larger black holes – a *far more scientific reason that the forecasted big-bang temperature, which has not true known cause, no true experimental proof now and here, no-nothing.

As we said though the big-bang is the modern religion of Ænthropic man, so we just end with some religious irony.

**The axis of evil and the Shang magicians.**

Finally, there is a huge problem, already mentioned, which shows further that it is a local radiation, the so called *‘axis of evil*‘, (sic) which at the cost of billions of $ in new satellites to ‘dis-measure’ it, astrophysicists try to eliminate with zero success. Namely the radiation aligns with the axis of the galaxy and its equinox, because ‘obviously’ it is produced by the galaxy’s activity. Do you think this obvious answer has any chance? Ha! Quoting the official version, of Wikipedia: “In particular, the quadrupole and octupole (l = 3) modes appear to have an unexplained alignment with both the ecliptic plane and equinoxes, an alignment sometimes referred to as the axis of evil J’

‘A number of groups have suggested that this could be the signature of new physics at the greatest observable scales; other groups suspect systematic errors in the data. Recent observations with the Planck telescope, which is very much more sensitive than WMAP and has a larger angular resolution, confirm the observation of the axis of evil. Since two different instruments recorded the same anomaly, instrumental error (but not foreground contamination – the way they ‘introduce the local cause – ‘contamination’:) appears to be ruled out.

**Coincidence** is a possible explanation, chief scientist from WMAP, L. Bennett suggested coincidence and **human psychology** were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”

Yeah, LOL. So experimental findings is a psychological effect and imaginary equations the real thing – creationism and denial of objective proofs at its best. Yet once the dark horse is on the loose anything goes. Indeed, in recent years a creationist mathematician, Mr. Penrose, companion of Hawking, thought that some of those BG points produced in the galaxy, were a big hotter than the mean temperature. So he thought, they were remains not *even* of the initial singularity 13 billion years ago, but he guessed they were coming from a previous ‘age’ to the infinitesimal infinitely dense singularity!! Somehow they had survived the ∞ infinitesimal stage and were coming from eons beyond the beginning of time, as relics of black holes evaporating in a previous Universe!? (: holy cow! How did he know? I couldn’t help to have a big smile-y. Indeed, it reminded me of the holy cows cracked by fire when the æntropic kings of the ‘celestial empire’ of the Shang dynasty tried to peer on the nearby future and guess the fate of the next battle. Alas, creationist physicists are just a bit more ambitious – they peer trillions of years into the past. But both Shang oracles and big-bangers renounce to the rational, simple explanation – the cracks on the flat bone were produced by the fire, and the points of the black body 2.7 k radiation measured locally and proved to be local by its shape which is mimetic to the galaxy, including its ‘lobes’ above and below the central black hole, are produced locally by any type of quark nugget MACHO (massive, halo object) of dark matter of the mass of a moon – the red cells of the organic galaxy.

**RECAP**. The only alternative object that can produce such radiation in present is a micro-black hole, whose temperature red-shifts light as a gravitational lensing. And since a black hole gravitational lensing is proportional to the mass, we can calculate the mass of those ‘background black holes’, which redshirts light at 2.7 k. Indeed, a simple calculus shows that a black hole of the approximate mass of a moon (the most common galactic object of which each sun has hundreds in its planets and Oort/Kuiper belts, would produce that radiation.

So very likely the halo of dark matter of the galaxy is made of micro-black holes that have eaten moons, as their bigger cousins eat stars. Then they WILL radiate at that exact temperature. Further on, since black holes are fundamental particles of the upper scale, as protons are in the quantum scale, they must be homogeneous in size. So even if they eat less perfect planetoids, primordial black holes should expel the excess of its structural mass as gamma radiation. Those MACHOs of any type of heavy quark matter (strangelets or BH), have then in the organic galaxy the role of blood in the organism, and should also play the role of ‘protein’ membranes in cells, shielding the galaxy with its heavier mass and capacity to ‘reduce’ radiation to a homogeneous temperature.

*Fact is the *radiation was, is and has always been measured/found in the galaxy. In fact physicists trying to measure the supposedly 13 billion years far away hot points of the center, each one a huge galaxy at ‘the beginning of time’, discovered recently that they have the exact shape of the electromagnetic lobes above and below the galaxy.

**Critical density for a flat geometry.**

One of the problems of the big-bang (of many) is the critical density. It must be of 10^{-26} kg per cubic meter for the Universe to be the ‘observed’ flat geometry. But it is not. Only 2 so this is a problem, the big-bang of the cosmos does not match the flat geometry of the Universe and the topic spiral galaxy.

So if the big-bang is a local galactic big bang the critical density of the galaxy should be 10^{-26}; then it would be the quasar big-bang of our galaxy.

Let us do some crunching numbers for a change.

The equation for the critical density is:

ρ crit = 3H_{0}^{2} / 8πG

You can see that the critical density is proportional to the square of the Hubble constant — a faster expansion requires a higher density to overcome the expansion.

How empty is space? Astronomers have learned that the mean density of matter in the universe is within a factor of a few of the critical density. We can calculate ρcrit by inserting the gravitational constant, G = 6.67 × 10^{-11} Nm^{2} / kg^{2}, and adopting H_{0} = 65 km/s/Mpc. We first convert the Hubble constant to metric units, H_{0} = (65 × 1000) / 3.1 × 10^{+22} = 2.1 × 10^{-18}s^{-1}. Now we can solve to get ρcrit = 3 × (2.1 × 10^{-18})^{2} / 8 × 3.14 × 6.7 × 10^{-11} = 7.9 × 10^{-27} kg/m^{3} ≈ 10^{-26} kg/m^{3}. This amazingly low density is equal to about five hydrogen atoms per cubic meter, or a single hydrogen atom in a volume the size of the average TV set. However, in that same cubic meter there will be 5 to 10 billion low energy photons of microwave background radiation, the feeble relic of the big bang.

How well does this density match up to the density of large objects in the universe? The typical distance between large galaxies is about 2 Mpc, so we can see what the average density would be if a galaxy like the Milky Way were the only object in a box 2 Mpc across.

The mass of the Milky Way, including dark matter, is about 10^{+12} M. Sun, or 10^{+12} × 2 × 10^{+30} = 2 × 10^{+42} kg. The volume of a 2 Mpc cube is (2 x 3.1 x 10^{+22})^{3} = 2.4 x 10^{+68} m^{3}. The typical density is therefore mass divided by volume, or 2 × 10+^{42} / 2.4 x 10^{68} ≈ 10^{-26 }kg/m^{3}.

Thus we can see that the galaxy density roughly equal to the critical density.

**∞ MORE FALSIFICATIONS: ONE FOR EACH GALATOM. **

**Epistemological truths vs. Falsification of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis**

** **

In the graph, epistemology is clearly in favor of the immortal fractal cosmos, as its experimental evidence is stronger, when we do not ‘select’ the phenomena to explain, ignoring all other facts (implosive galaxies, dark entropy, irregular distribution of galaxies, objects that live longer than the big-bang, and other proofs we shall consider all of which have a rational explanation in the fractal, organic, immortal Universe).

It leads to falsification (a theory is false when there is a single fact it doesn’t explain or contradicts it – all of the above). Which leads to Economy=Occam’s razor, as the fractal Universe explains more facts with* only one* postulate – that we are made of Time§pace without the need of a background abstract absolute spacetime we don’t see anywhere.

All other facts of the Universe in all its sciences come from this first principle, which is self-evident – time and space exists – and already simplifies reality (there is no need for it to be detached from reality as its abstract background.

We can add other epistemological laws: the big-bang has no logic consistence (the singularity is an infinitesimal of infinite mass, which is absurd, time and space have a beginning which is absurd), uses ad-hoc proofs, forbidden by the experimental method (equations are moved to the past ad hoc in lineal fashion to meet the theoretical temperature, proofs are taken in present time and space as local measures, but considered to be universal global in all parts of the Universe in space, not measured and all the epochs of time, not measured). And finally it has not Known cause for its creation. All those elements are solved by the fractal immortal Universe which is self-reproductive, hence it has its internal cause, it is eternal so it has no contradictions of time and space, and it accepts all facts, no-falsification.

So we gave an alternative physical theory of the Universe, which follows closer the laws of truth of the scientific method (Objectivity, Logic-Linguistic reason, Experimental evidence; Simplicity (Occam’s razor), Correspondence (previous ‘true theories’, parts of the new one), Causal, cyclical predictability and Coherence (logic and mathematical reason), with the added perspective of pentalogic and its 3±¡ Ternary Complex, entangled reinforcing causality. It proved that the cosmic big-bang is:

- It is a
*creationist*theory based in*lineal*time, 2 cultural traits of Germanic, biblical military cultures that invented it. - It is completely illogic and makes no sense at all – for god’s sake indeed, a single point from all was created..
- It has not enough experimental evidence.
- It contradicts Einstein’s dictum, ‘the Universe is simple but not that simpler. Its false simplicity is based in a lineal equation (V=HoD, Hubble’s red shift equation),
*which only applies to the empty space between galaxies, NOT to dark matter and galaxies; so its simplicity is a reductionism that does NOT explain most of the Universe*. Further on at present, not even this lineal equation works for the observed expansion of vacuum space, so as we learned more about the Universe, this ‘Ptolemaic’ theory requires all kind of ‘epicycles added ad hoc’ to fit the new data (accelerated expansion, inflationary first state, which brings the logic absurdity to hyperbolic limits – as the first picosecond the Universe must expand to a speed infinitely faster than light to reach its present size, breaking all the laws of known known science). So the big-bang simplicity is not scientific at all. - It doesn’t correspond to physical & logic consistent theories with those laws of known-known science as it liquidates all of them, from the ‘conservation laws of energy and momentum, and baryon number’ to the logic laws of epistemology, but it is based in religious concepts – lineal Christian time & creationism – which not surprisingly pleased his first researcher – a catholic priest and the ‘religious creationism’ of mathematicians argued in the paper on 5D mathematics and its foundations..

And finally it lacks **C**ausal **c**yclical predictability – it does not explain what was before and after; but the element it truly fails is one we normally consider a given for serious science, ‘logic and internal coherence’. It has none. Because indeed it is creationist ‘religious’, as it requires external creators.

**RECAP.** A single black swan said Popper falsifies a theory of white swans. White is the color of entropy, black of information; *every particle of dark matter and every galaxy, that converts lineal entropy into information falsifies the big-bang, and there are ∞ black swans. Never a theory was so obviously false, so much cherished by Æntropic men.*

**Conclusion. The need for paradigm change.**

Schopenhauer and latter Kuhn wonder why theories of reality, which are false, endure even in science for centuries unchallenged by academia. Their answer is thoughtful and reasoned: model change is difficult, not only in social systems, as corrupted as they might be, but also in science – after all a human endeavor, as ‘all the people who believed the previous paradigm has to die for a new generation to learn the better model’ would say Planck in a sanguine moment. We know the present model of Newtonian Absolute Space-time is false, and the creationist ‘cosmology’ derived of it, the big-bang is also wrong, as it doesn’t account properly for 96% of the Universe (dark matter) and one dare to say the other 4% (light matter, found in galaxies), disregarding the implosion of entropy into information happening in those galaxies that balances the *only element for which the theory accounts for – the ‘vacuum space’ expanding inversely to those galaxies between them. *

Why then cosmologists insist in a theory, which accounts for 0% of the main substance of reality, matter, as the theory of ‘everything’ (T.O.E)? The answer is routine: Newton’s absolute lineal time with a single dimension, which we measure with a simple Galilean v=s/t metric and the slightly more complex –ct time dimension of Einstein’s equations. But they only account for ‘lineal time motions’ one of the 5 Dimensional motions of the Universe. So the remainder cyclical matter, which behaves in inverse fashion to the expanding space between galaxies, remains unexplained. Thus big-bang simplicity is deceptive as NOT all reality could be born of an explosion that expanded space. Only ‘cosmic censorship’, which is how the ego-centered mind works, selecting information and then confusing our selected view with the entire Universe – our mind world of light with infinity – explains why the big-bang has become standard dogma but doesn’t justify scientifically such aberration. Unfortunately because any new model of reality is born with less ‘apparatus’ that an established one, and requires a degree of complexity seldom reached for centuries, those who learned the old model resist with its ‘ad hoc’ solutions for a long time. So don’t expect soon a 5D objective model of the immortal, infinite, complex, organic Universe to become standard.

**XII. THE HYPER-UNIVERSE.**

In the graph the Fractal Generator in a single plane of the Hyper Universe, whose size and form as a macro-ensemble of galatoms is imposible to determine beyond its perception as a dense gaseous/fluid state of atoms or most likely antiatoms (open to argument as most mass is in the halo, as if galaxies were antiparticles) communicated with cosmic electromagnetism (Dark energy). Inside the galatom (below) we can resolve clearly the ∆@st symmetry of the 3 scales of matter, its 3 families of mass and its 3 topologic regions, self-centered into the gravitational black stars minds, which act as the DNA of the ‘galacell’ (max. biological p.o.v.) It is thus metaphysics and speculative stience to try to inquire beyond some details the structure of the ∆±4 plane, which in the nested lower Universe likely flanked by quantum potential fields of neutrino v>c background space

**Faster than light speeds in the lower and larger ∆±4 planes of the nested Universe. **

Since the Universe’s scales are infinite, there must be a lower scale, which according to S x T = K, will have less ‘temporal information’, hence more Spatial speed-distance, allowing the ‘action at distance’ or entanglements of particles through its quantum potential, or ∆-4 plane, likely made of faster-than-light lineal tachyon neutrinos, which carry only trigonometric information on the angle and distance of the other photon., prior to the exchange of more complex information between particles through a light wave.

So particles first localize and entangle each other through the sharing of neutrinos and then ‘keep’ waving its communication through light waves (opening the possibility of a neutrino theory of creation light, put forward by Broglie, which needs two inverse neutrinos travelling in the same direction) and still does NOT break 4D relativity, since *they don’t transmit in-form-ation, form, only ‘still distance’, position.*

*Another way to describe such faster than light speeds, is then considering the parameter of time as a parameter of information; then: V=S/Information, and so a particle that carries less information than light, will be faster than light. So if C=S/I, >C S/<I, which is the case of non-local quantum potentials. *

C-speed constant is the constant of reproduction of information in the 5 D lower scale of light space-time, the background scale of the galaxy: $(c) x ð(h) = C. As such all species within the galaxy have that maximal speed of reproduction of information, spent in the recreation of the mass-energy of the being that reduces the speed from the simplest information reproduced, light itself. But the nested Universe implies that the ¡±4 plane of the Universe must have a constant of speed (of reproduction) higher than its smaller ¡-3 galaxy. Hence we find faster than c-speeds outside the galaxy in dark energy confused with an expansion of distance-space, according to the Galilean paradox: S-distance=T-speed. It follows that the proper *interpretation of quantum physics is Broglie>Bohm’s realism as its main hurdle, to explain entanglement and quantum potentials faster than lights is resolved, as the limits of our ‘Space-time’ scale. Some proofs:*

In physics as time clocks are clear rotational spinning particles, it means that smaller systems turn faster in time; with no limit of speed, reason why for example an electron, when it shrinks from an orbital into a point-particle with 1/2h spin, to have the huge magnetic field we measure it must turn faster than light speed (Pauli). And a black hole, much smaller than a star turns much faster, at c-speed in the event horizon and likely if it is as Einstein wanted a ‘quark star’ it will be made of particles that turn faster than light (top, bottom, charm quarks).

So because 5D is made of layers, S x T = K, with different size from the smallish faster world of rotary particle-points to the much larger slower rotary galaxies; from the short lineal distances of our motions through the c-speed=distances of the galaxy, and beyond in the faster than c-neutrino background of the Universe, by the principle of correspondence when we reduce to the Galactic layer-scale of reality made of a background radiation of c-speed-distances; this background radiation is indeed a fixed c-speed-distance, and it is what we perceive with our electronic eyes. And all what is within that galactic womb, must go slower than c-speed-distance, as you go slower than the river flow that drags you*.*

**Interstellar and inter galactic transversal D-waves = Electromagnetic waves. **

We give the general name of D–waves to Dark cosmic electromagnetism, likely related to faster than light (outside the galaxy) Neutrino waves of dark energy=entropy, to the cosmic >c transversal waves between galaxy-atoms (ab. Galatoms); moving at light speed when constrained by the galaxy’s light space-time background and inner gravitational forces

If made of entangled neutrinos they ‘warp’ reproducing light when entering the galaxy (Broglie’s theory of neutrino light), as particles entangle in the lower > c 5D scale of quantum potential (Bohm’s quantum realism). While they are emitted by galactic black holes in their massive reactions that create heavier quark particles, as jets of dark entropy, unconstrained and escaping back into the dark entropy lower scale of action at distance and null information -for our electronic perceivers of intergalactic scale.

Do D-waves exist within the galaxy? Likely as a quantum potential below and above the range of ¥-interactions between normal matter. As it happens in atoms where ¥-radiation has a very different behavior in dense gamma rays between electrons and protons, D-waves should on the interstellar level be considered rather transversal gravitational waves; which are useful to model interactions and distances between stars turning around the central black hole, hold by the outer strangelet membrane.

So astrophysicists use it as tidal waves to model the shape of those galaxies. On that path a deduction of the 5D model, in the graph, is its use at different frequencies, maybe associated to the 3 type of neutrino waves, to calculate the Titus law of distances between planets with 2 waves of different frequency/energy, shorter for ferromagnetic planets than H-He ones, all of them sitting in their reinforced nodal points.

In any case we are just highlighting with big strokes a field that will engage professional astrophysicists for decades to come if they get to abandon their Æntropic models of a single lineal time for everything that exists and then some – so all forces are modeled as a lineal exchange of particles; all births of cosmic structures from evaporating black holes to cosmic big-bangs with entropic time arrows, etc.

Yet those entropic ‘arrows’ are just the final, last Dimotion of death of any T.œ of the Universe and as such they should be demoted in its importance in astrophysical studies at any scale of reality. As it is absurd to reduce the enormous beauty of the Galaxy and its cosmic bodies to the study of its death; akin to reduce the study of biological organisms to corpses. Forensics IS a very small branch of astrophysics. Let us then apply within the range of the known, hence scientific, experimental scales we perceive with enough detail to make serious science, the Pentalogic method to the galaxy, which we just have done in space, studying its scalar and spatial superorganisms, now in time, studying its life ages, of which the ‘little big-bang death’ is just its quasar collapse.

**Conclusion.** The 5D metric of **t**he fractal Universe puts in relationship the similarity between atoms and galaxies, to expand both within the nucleus of the atom and outside the galaxy as an atom, our modeling of reality.

It doesn’t contradict 4D that corresponds to its limit in a single plane of light space-time, *background space-time* of the galaxy, which our electrons see in stillness to measure reality entangled with other electrons**. **The renewal of astro-physics with the use of the 5D formalism and its 3 main discoveries, the **scalar, organic** Disomorphisms of reality and its 5 Dimotions=forces, the **cyclical** nature of time and its multiple planes of **fractal** space that gift reality with its bio-topo-logic properties is a task which will take generations of researchers to exhaust, as the last big r=evolution of science did (the 4D and quantum paradigm), when finally humans accept the paradigm change.