RSS

dark-matter-copydece4155ba

In the graphs, developed in detail in the different posts of this web, we show the 3 distinctive Life extinction events that the Large Hadron Collider – a quark cannon that throws bullets of the densest, most explosive material of the Universe, quark condensates – can cause, once it is put on line at double potency in Spring 2015, over the 10 Tev barrier of creation of dark matter - the theoretical minimal energy of formation of a ‘bag of strangelets’ and ‘micro-black holes’.

- Creation of baby black holes that do not evaporate, either as top quark condensates (Einstein’s famous frozen stars) or string stars with higher dimensionality. This risk has been overblown by media, since it is less likely and black hole theory has still a ‘mythic, speculative’ side that allowed them to divert attention from the truly, well-proved, scientific catastrophe:

- Creation of strangelets – lumps of strange quarks shown to be very common in the Universe, as all pulsars seems to be frozen, strange quark stars. This risk is absolute, meaning that according to the ‘Totalitarian Principle’ of physics, all particles that can theoretically happen will happen. And strange quark matter will theoretically happen, since the LHC is merely beyond ‘speculative theories’ a quark cannon, which produces massive quantities of strange quarks at high energy regimes.

Now, a strangelet is nothing strange, it is merely a ‘lump of strange quarks’. And we know those lumps of strange quarks, once formed devour our lighter, simpler up and down quarks.

And as it happens, the LHC is just a ‘quark cannon that produces lumps of strange quarks, strangelets. The LHC is a cyclical, ‘never-ending’ cannon barrel, that accelerates  lead ion ‘bullets’ every cycle, the heaviest non-radioactive atom with more quarks, with two purposes: to increase the mass of those quarks transforming them into ‘strange quarks’, and then collide them to make ‘strangelets’, strange quark condensates.

The LHC is JUST A FACTORY of strangelets, and so when it goes on line at full potency, will just mass produce strangelets  

Thus strangelets will be made at CERN between 2015 and 2020 on collisions over 10 Tev. Then those strangelets will fall to the center of the Earth undetected (which will excuse CERN from responsibility, AS IT will deny it produced them till the end), and it will eat up  the Earth inside out, till it converts it into a 15 km. strangelet rock.

- Finally the magnetic field of the LHC, the strongest on planet Earth, which cause disturbances on the Earth’s magnetic field, cause of Earthquakes that have increased till record numbers, similar to those of II World War during the carpet bombing of the pacific seismic ‘ring of fire’, since the machine was put on line in a continuous growth that made April 2014, the all time record for this month.

Any of those 3 scenarios should have deterred CERN’s physicists and its political backers, from upgrading the machine to double potency in 2015, but physicists and the P.R.ess considers the issue closed and prefer wishful thinking to ethic and social responsibility.

I. Theoretical Risks

Why we are so sure of the dangers of CERN for the planet? For epistemological, (theoretical) and practical, experimental reasons.

In Science truth is not probable, neither impossible to prove. The essence of science is precisely its predictability and capacity to verify true from false theories. And at present those 3 fundamental threats of damage to Earth are sound truths of known-known physics, while the theories that dismiss them, such as the evaporation of black holes or the denial of its existence are neither proved not founded in sound theoretical background. 

Thus those risks are real, as the creation of particles in accelerators follow the Totalitarian principle of Physics, which translates the certainty of the Laws of Nature to particle physics. The principle states that ‘Every particle not forbidden is compulsory’ – meaning that everything that might happen in the realm of particle creation MUST happen. And since quark condensates, strangelets and toplets are theoretically sound and should be formed over 10 Tev, they must happen.

The Totalitarian Principle – a Universal law that applies to all natural sciences – means that in the same manner when you put fire on water it always boils with a 100% of chances, because the laws of Thermodynamics (heats move from the hot fire to the cold water) are ALWAYS RIGHT, are NOT probabilistic, any particle that can exist will certainly be formed in an accelerator under the right proportion of energy, which for the two particles that can extinguish us, black holes is 10 tev and for Strangelets is a quantity of strange quarks known as the ‘bag threshold’ also around 10 Tev, the barrier of entrance into the ‘dark world’ of ultra-powerful ‘mass bombs’ that once formed feed on all type of light matter.

Thus the different quark condensates that the LHC can produce and can extinguish us are bound to happen when the proper conditions of energy are met in 2015 when the machine is upgraded over the 10 Tev barrier, shown in great detail in the previous graph:

1)  CERN should therefore produce a heavy condensate of quark liquid, either strangelet, bottomlet or toplet. The possibility is so high that even CERN recognizes in the ‘CASTOR papers’, it will make them with a 70% of chances, (contradicting all its public statements). There are still some uncertainties on a factor called the ‘bag’ factor – meaning the stability of those quark condensates will depend on the numbers of heavy quarks that are created on those collisions (the more quarks, the more they will attract each other and form quark-gluon explosive condensates). The numbers of quarks to make strangelets stable though will keep growing as the ‘luminosity’ (density of bunches of quarks collided) and energies of the collision needed to create those heavy quarks (as energy becomes mass, E=Mc2) increase. So each ramping of luminosity and energy will increase those chances.

Indeed Mr. Penrose, a British physicist, from a prominent family of outstanding scientists, hence ‘evidently’ void of any possible ‘personal agenda’ (as the rest of us is, activists against the LHC are; but unlike us not so easy to submit to an ‘ad hominem’ campaign’,  since his father co-authored most Hawking’s papers; reason why  his name, site and activism is kept ‘anonymous’ by the P.R.ess) discovered a secret program within CERN, dedicated to the production and analysis of those ‘strangelets’, CASTOR, which the organization vehemently deny. Indeed, CERN denies it can produce strangelets  – but it has constructed a detector, CASTOR, because it considers quite likely them to appear in internal memorandums as this power presentation shows, to the point of building such a special detector for them:

In the graph, ‘Team Castor’ has built a Calorimeter to detect the production of strangelets at CERN. The probability for each event, according to inner documents, like this powerpoint presentation, implies that CERN will produce 500 strangelets each month starting the 11/9 of this year, when the first pb-pb collisions take place. Standard literature on strangelets explains what will happen next: strangelets will grow, absorbing quarks and transforming our matter into ultradense strange matter, till reaching the size of an atom (albeit with a huge density). Then 2 common processes of Nuclear reactions can take place: fission of the strangelet into smaller pieces that will grow again, starting a nuclear reaction called ‘ice-9′, or catalysis as the huge charge and mass of the strangelet attracts atoms that lump on the surface creating more strangelets.

In the fall of 2015 CERN will begin colliding groups of 70 million lead hadrons at 287 tev, unpacking millions of quarks in each collision. Those quarks will be first accelerated at light speed, acquiring relativistic mass, becoming heavier strange quarks, the substance of a strange quark-gluon soup called a ‘strangelet‘. The strange liquid has the potential to become stable and start an ‘ice-9′ big-bang reaction. If that happens that effectively transforms the Earth into a pulsar.

While CERN adamantly denies to the public and the press that production of Strangelets is possible, it runs a program called CASTOR for Centaruro And STrangelets Object Research, whose researchers affirm in their inner reports to the company the ‘likely’ probability of creating them. This is in accordance to the most advanced literature on the subject, but of course, it must be hidden to the public and the naive press…

This simple fact – that CERN is just a quark cannon that deconfines and gives heavier mass to quarks, transforming them into the next ‘horizon’ of heavy mass, strange quarks, which eat up planets might seem amazing to the reader, submitted to the ‘rhetoric’ of research and the blatant lies of this institution, a left-over the cold war, ‘refurbished’ with a newspeak of research. But this is the bottom line, simple truth about CERN. CERN says its experiments are similar to cosmic rays, and this is false.

Cosmic rays are mere single protons and gamma rays and electrons, light particles, NOT heavy lead atoms, massed in bunches, crashed to create quarks. So WE NEVER saw a deconfined quark in a cosmic ray.

.

UPDATE. 20 AUGUST, 2014. RHIC (US ACCELERATOR) DETECTS THE FIRST STRANGELET ATOMS

A Refurbished RHIC distillates the first atoms of strangelets

The news came in August. RHIC, the rival quark cannon, to the LHC, acknowledged that what all its ‘safety reports’ considered impossible – the distillation of strangelets, ‘strange quark liquid nuggets’, the strongest explosive known in the Universe – is happening at RHIC.  Let us try to resume the events.

Type of strangelets

In the upper graph, left side we can observe the ‘3 relative sizes’ of strangelets. Its smallest size are ‘strange atoms’ made of up-down-strange quark combinations (we are made of up-down-up ones). This atoms are more stable than ordinary matter, since the strange, denser quark makes them so. They can trigger the ‘ice-9′ reaction that will convert the Earth into a 15 kilometers frozen rock.

Two of those atoms are shown there, the hyperon, a baryon (an atom with 3 quarks) and the dibaryon, a combination of 2 hyperons, which is stable in the natural conditions of planet earth.

Now RHIC, the refurbished American accelerator has created them. 

The problem with those atoms, specially stable dibaryons is that they will never die. And being so heavy they will fall to the center of the Earth, accumulate there and start the ice-9 reaction. But this process is likely to be slower than our lifespan, as most dibaryons will be caught in electromagnetic networks of matter slowing their arriving to the center. It is a bit like the neutrinos and ions that escape the center of the sun and take a long time to arrive to the surface, caught up on the trip by different electromagnetic flows. So the dibaryon scenario subject to the chances of the trip is a slow death.

Now, the problem of the news received by the press, but never interpreted by clueless journalists, is that RHIC is producing ‘killer strangelets’, negatively charged strangelets because it is producing them by the method of distillation. And this requires further analysis. Since the creation of strangelets in this scenario is much faster to the point it can happen ‘now’ at any time if any of those negative strangelet reaches enough mass or it is formed close to a lump of ions in a colder region of the fireball and starts to grow before dissolving. Let us see how:

There are 3 ways to produce a strangelet, a thermal, coalescent and distillation method. Distillation happens as follows, quoting LHC safety report:

‘A distillation mechanism was proposed as a specific model for strangelet production. According to this last mechanism, a hot quark-gluon plasma with large net baryon number is produced in heavy-ion collisions, and is enriched in strangeness as it cools down by emitting predominantly particles containing strange antiquarks.”
That is, a quark gluon plasma is created (RHIC has created it); where an excess of Strange quarks is produced (RHIC has produced them), which cools down the Mass of quarks (RHIC has announced strange quarks are cooling down the mass), and the final result is the creation of a strangelet.
This creation of strangelets is the end result omitted in the news, released by RHIC – the rest of the process is exactly described on those news:
UPTON, NY-New supercomputing calculations provide the first evidence that particles predicted by the theory of quark-gluon interactions but never before observed are being produced in heavy-ion collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), a facility that is dedicated to studying nuclear physics.
These heavy strange baryons, containing at least one strange quark, still cannot be observed directly, but instead make their presence known by lowering the temperature at which other strange baryons “freeze out” from the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) discovered and created at RHIC, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science user facility located at DOE’s Brookhaven National Laboratory.

In the following graph from CERN’s CASTOR team, the mechanism is explained:

distillation copy

In RHIC safety report, (outdated by more than a decade)  they explain it also in simple terms:

“The strangeness distillation mechanism is considerably more speculative. It assumes that a quark gluon plasma (QGP) is produced in the collision and that the QGP is baryon rich. It further assumes that the dominant cooling mechanism for the QGP is evaporation from its surface. Since it is baryon rich, there is a greater chance for an s ̄ quark to find a u or d quark to form a kaon with positive strangeness than for an s quark to find a u ̄ or d ̄ quark to form a kaon with negative strangeness. The QGP thus cools to a system containing excess s quarks, which ultimately becomes a strangelet. This mechanism requires a collision energy sufficient to form a QGP.”

What is specially criminal is the fact they know perfectly they are doing distillation of strangelets and simply by erasing a full description and changing the ‘key words’ (instead of strange atoms  baryons, instead of strangelet glasma, instead of distillation, freezing, etc.) they get away with murder, knowing people understands nothing of it.

In the next graph,  RHIC has been noticing an excess of strange antiquarks – the trademark of distillation on its experiments:

The graph shows they are producing an excess of strange antiquarks – the key element that distillation is being produced. Nature is quite intelligent. When you enter into the ‘space-time’ of higher energies in which strange quarks  survive, those pairs of strange-antistrange quarks pop out together. Then the strange antiquark takes away the excess of u and d quarks from the soup and the strange quark forms strange liquid with the remaining Us and Ds.
This of course, they know. Why then there is no clear information to the public, politicians and the military?
On my opinion nuclear physicists are caught in the lies of their false safety statements and now that they are doing what they say it was IMPOSSIBLE to do,  they just decided to go along just in case we survive and keep a low profile on the data, reason why these news are nowhere… And if all blows up… well, that is a prize Nuclear physicists always accepted since Hiroshima.

Why we are so sure they are making them? Because strange quarks are heavier and negative. So while RHIC does not give data on strangelet production it has easily calculated the proportion of strange quarks in the soup by weighting them. And the ratio of strange negative quarks to ‘our light’ up and down quarks is 27.

This means there are 27 times more mass of negatively strange quarks in the soup than our lighter quarks. And this excess of negative strange quarks in the soup is what defines negative strangelets, which are produced with a 100% purity.And so the conclusion is self-evident: RHIC is a factory of strangelets.

All what they produce is strange liquid. But since their policy is ‘don’t tell, don’t ask’, like the gays on the military or the nuclear bombs on the Israeli army, the invisible strangelets at RHIC remain invisible. They don’t tell us, and the P.R.ess don’t ask about them. Of course as the gay in the military an the Bombs of Israel those strangelets do exist and have their influence. But as long as our generals don’t go into rainbow parades, asking for ‘making love not war’, and IDF doesn’t throw a Bomb in Damascus, as long as a strangelet does not run amok and starts swallowing New York, we will live without worries.

The difference though is that while it is likely that no 4 stars general go on rainbow parades and  the IDF never nukes Damascus, the strangelet case is the opposite – it is certain that unless the industry of quark cannons is closed, one of those strangelets produced at RHIC and CERN when it opens at much higher energy/luminosity will become ‘visible’. Or in other words, we are still here because in the first phases accretion is slow, as most strangelets will acquire electrons and lay dormant, before a critical mass of them reaches the center of the Earth.

This is the society we live in – one in which catastrophes and genocides, collective deaths ‘grow and boil’ in secrecy, and do not matter as long as they are not public. Thus RHIC knows as long as people ignores what they do, it’s ok to attempt blowing up the planet every other day.

Yet for that to happen and become visible the strangelets RHIC is producing have to avoid being trapped by an electronic cover that would halt its growth. So the process of ice-9 is  very slow at the beginning till a strangelet with enough mass breaks all electromagnetic barriers and starts direct gravitational attraction. Then the speed will be catastrophic. The result will be the ‘second size’ of strange matter, the strangelet proper, which will devour all other matter on earth, till reaching the 3rd size, as a strange/neutron star.

Fact is finally it is happening – even if the news do not report it; even if RHIC uses a cryptic language not to reveal what they are doing. RHIC is distillating strangelet. So the countdown for extinction has started. It is now a question of producing enough strangelets to accumulate them in the center of the Earth and start the ice-9 reaction.

“Recently it has been suggested that rather cold droplets of absolutely stable or metastable strange-quark matter may be distilled in heavy-ion collisions during the phase transition from a baryon-rich quark-gluon plasma (QGP) to hadron matter. Here we present a model describing the hadronization of the QGP through particle emission, which is based solely on thermodynamical arguments. Pions and K+’s and K0’s carry away entropy and antistrangeness from the system, thus facilitating the cooling process and the strangelet formation.
Our results are supported by revised more sophisticated rate calculations. Two rather unexpected results are obtained when this model is applied to the investigation of strangelet production. The strangeness separation mechanism and the formation process works well even for higher initial entropies per baryon, tantamount to higher bombarding energies.
The surviving strangelets have a rather high strangeness content, fs∼1.2–2 [i.e., Z/A∼(-0.1)–(-0.5)]. Hence droplets of strange-quark matter with a baryon number of ∼10–30 and with a negative charge may be produced. They may serve as a unique signature for the transient formation of a quark-gluon plasma in heavy-ion collisions.”
Indeed since strange baryons are negative, by distillation RHIC creates negative killer strangelet.
And this process must be taken place since April.

THIS IS A 25 YEARS OLD WARNING, NEVER PROVED THEORETICALLY WRONG THAT CERN AND RHIC HAVE TOTALLY OVERPASSED, TILL THEY HAVE DONE EXACTLY WHAT GREINER EXPLAINED THEY WOULD DO. AND NOW THEY ARE DOING IT – DISTILLATING STRANGELET – AND THEY ARE NOT SAYING IT TO THE WORLD. AND THE ANSWER THE WORLD SHOULD HAVE IS THIS: THE MILITARY SHOULD IMMEDIATLY CLOSE BOTH FACILITIES.

How much strange liquid has been produced since April? Are we STILL ON TIME TO STOP THE FACILITIES BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE?

But of course, it is too late because the military has other ‘important’ issues to bother; hateful muslims in a mule with a couple of stolen uzis in the desert of syria, children in Gaza, which menace to destroy us all if not properly bombed with our drones, kids who steal a bar of candy in ferguson and must be shoot down…. Illegal immigrants in Texas waiting to reunite with their parents. All those are ‘serious’ enemies, why to worry for ‘our good guys’, our old boys network of serious, respectable physicists making ice-9 on planet Earth. Just a little example on how ‘serious’ they are. This video is of the chief safety officer at RHIC which signed a 14 years old 20 pages ‘safety report’ full of errors and omissions, laughing at the report he signed (minute 4.44):

Alea Jacta Est.

 In the race for extinction, which our proud technological nations are carried out undeterred by that ‘minor’ collateral damage, i.e. the death of all of us, RHIC, the American ‘rival’ announces an indirect proof of the existence of strangelets. 

And of course nobody understood, nobody cared…

Let us recall the words of a researcher at RHIC a decade ago: ‘if strange liquid exists and could be produced at RHIC it would be extremely dangerous. We know of no absolute barrier to the rapid growth of a dangerous strangelet.

In a catastrophic chain reaction, the weight of killer strangelet would pull it down. “Eventually, strangelet would sit at the center of the earth, eating other nuclei, attracting the earth’s mass gravitationally. That way, it would eat our planet from the inside out, converting the entire earth into one giant strangelet killing us all in the process.”

Reason why Wilczek the physicist who RELEASED Rhic’s safety report, cynically named this distinctive possibility an ice-9 reaction after cat’s cradle satire on nukes, where an American physicist discovers a similar liquid that freezes the planet into ice, extinguishing life.

Of course, then he went on as this video shows, to sign a safety statement affirming that: “the strangeness distillation mechanism seems very unlikely to be effective for producing strangelets at RHIC.” (page 17)

But that is exactly what has happened. RHIC is distillating strangelets.

I recall the beginning of Kurt’s masterpiece:

When I was a much younger man, I began to collect material for a book to be called The Day the World Ended. The book was to be factual. The book was to be an account of what important Americans had done’ 

And yet the always epic American press commenting about the great feats of the manifest nation was surprisingly mute on the distillation of ice-9.

In fact, the theme never made it to the news glued by a BARRAGE of small tragedies happening in this little rock lost in the corner of the galaxy that we call Earth… It was during the same days that we heard about a young black man shot in Ferguson, and a brave journalist decapitated in Iraq, about the Ukrainian civil war and yet another bombing of Gaza, not to speak of the news on the economic crisis, global warming, the celebrity circus… and the weather, always the weather on top of all other repetitive news…

But this piece of information of the nuclear industry, deserved to be noticed due to the relevance for the non-future of the planet.

Since a single drop of strange liquid can convert a planet or a star into an ultradense rock of dark matter. How long it will take for the strange liquid to accumulate in the center of the planet and start the ice-9 reaction, is studied in detail in other post of this blog.

As my co-plaintiff in the 2008 suit against CERN, Walter Wagner, rightly pointed out in his letters to scientific American, and his earlier suit against RHIC in 2000, chances the American machine produced strange matter were high, only a question of time and luminosity.

Finally it is happening: This week (of course without mentioning any risk involved), RHIC announces strangelet distillation in gold to gold collisions. 

And it considers some are stable. Since they cannot be detected directly by the particles it decays into. Indirect detection is based in a lower temperature of the quark gluon soup.

If those strangelets are forming they are falling to the center of the Earth and will eat it inside out in a period which ‘experts’ have never fully figured out – might be between days and decades.

But of course our high-minded, idealist scientists at RHIC have not flinched an eye, on the news they are delivering to the human sheeple. On the contrary they are all excited with the findings of ‘new physics':

‘The calculations show that inclusion of the predicted but “experimentally uncharted” strange baryons fit better with the data, providing the first evidence that these so-far unobserved particles exist and exert their effect on the freeze-out temperature of the observable particles.’

“The finding has potentially important implications for quantum chromodynamics—a theory that describes the strong interactions underlying the physics of the nucleus. In particular, it could indicate that physicists have been making some wrong assumptions about the dynamics of photon production at the energies of RHIC and LHC collisions. The researchers suggest that the finding could indicate something very interesting and not yet understood about the evolution of glasma or quark–gluon plasma, although more detailed computational simulations are needed to confirm the dynamics of photon production in such collisions.

This is the first indirect evidence that heavy strange barons exist and can be created by high energy collisions. Apparently the Brookhaven facility has been making heavy strange baryons for quite some time. The significance of the discovery is coming closer to proving all the theoretical particles of the quark model of matter are real. The discovery also indicates that many of the Big Bang concepts are justifiable in physical reality”

Now the question if we are ‘already dead in the future’, in this Schrodinger’s cat experiment depends on this cryptic question left open by the RHIC ‘informer': “We’ve found that the higher mass states of strange baryons affect the production of ground states that we can observe. And the line where we see the ordinary matter moves to a lower temperature because of the multitude of higher states that we can’t see.”

How much is a multitude? That is, how many ‘higher states’ of strange baryons have been created? Enough ‘bag’ to make the strangelet stable? Ah, this is the quizz, ‘to be or not to be’… Since it is invisible and physicists are clueless, we might still have a chance to be… But the first incognita is solved. Yes, RHIC and CERN can, have and will produce strangelet atoms.

Would now RHIC tell us exactly what is the solution to this quizz? Have they produced enough of them to make the strangelet bag stable?  Are we a dead cat or a living cat?

As RHIC will not answer, i would rather say with all my affliction that we are a dead cat in the nearby future…

__________________________________________________

The black hole scenario

2) In 2015, when the LHC ramps up to 14 Tev, it will cross the 10 Tev barrier in its collisions, so it will make possible the creation of black holes, since it will be creating a massive amount of top quarks, the densest substance of the Universe, likely component of black holes (same density), but again CERN disguises this fact talking only about the Higgs (a by-product of the collision of top and antitop quarks) or rather God’s particle (using the well-known pseudo religious jargon of nuclear physicists, which during the cold war acquired with massive propaganda the undeserved status of ‘high priests’ of science to justify with ‘knowledge’ the risks they poised to mankind.

In 2015 the LHC will accelerate protons and hadrons at maximal energy, colliding them at over 1 Pevproducing heavy, bottom, charm and top quark-gluon liquid condensates, aka Higgs, possible substances of black holes. The quark-gluon soup it will produce will be far denser and attractive than strangelet liquid, hence the process of accretion of the Earth will be self-similar to the strangelet event but much faster.

Those collisions have the potential to create micro-black holes and top quark condensates (the real Higgs). The top quark condensates have properties similar to black holes, which according to Albert Einstein will not evaporate, rather convert matter (the Earth) into a 3 cm Black Hole or Frozen star. What Einstein defined as a mass-bomb, since he deduced his equation, E=Mc2, first in its inverse form, M=E/c2, thus foreseeing the existence of energy collapsing into mass.

Experts consider that beyond such barrier black holes will be produced, if:

- String Theory is truth (9 out of 10 physicists believe so).

- Thermodynamics are truth, as its 2nd law implies that an ultra hot black hole born in a cold environment, the Earth, will transfer us heat evaporating us. This contradicts Hawking’s belief, never proved experimentally that ultra hot black holes will evaporate absorbing heat from our cold world, because they ‘will travel to the past’ (Sic). Time travel TO THE PAST, has never been proved.

- And/or if Black holes are not mere mathematical objects but real objects as recent observation show. This was Einstein’s theory, reason why they are also called ‘Einstein’s frozen stars’. On that view they are ultradense, fermion condensates made of a cut-off substance of the same density, which are top quarks.

I advanced decades ago this hypothesis as a top quark star would be exactly equal in properties to a black hole. Einstein believed black holes could not be just a mathematical equation, but needed a real substance, which can only be, among the particles we know today, the top quark, with self-similar properties to a Higgs – which is produced by a top/antitop quark couple. Because then top quarks were not discovered Einstein could not explain them in detail. But he will be proved once more right. Now since the LHC will start massive production of top quarks in 2015, they might easily condensate into small black holes.

Thus if Black holes are frozen top stars, they will not evaporate because top quarks don’t evaporate. If Einstein is right they will not evaporate, because relativity means that ‘size’ doesn’t matter, it is relative and so in Einstein’s theory black holes of any size grow exponentially. As today, we have multiple proofs that Relativity theory is truth and none of black hole evaporation. So standard science proves Black holes will swallow Earth.

Further on, in Haifa (left image), 2 years ago, an homologous of a black hole, a Dumb Hole made of atomic condensates, 1 million time slower, that should have evaporated producing phonons instead of photons, didn’t.

Now in science because there is only a Universe, there is only a true theory for each fact. Each property requires a theory so several theories that describe several theories could be right. String theory, Thermodynamics, the principle of conservation of energy and information and Relativity, all proved right means we are in a ‘Totalitarian’ case. Black holes and strangelets will happen.

There is NO probability that a law of science is truth or false. It CANNOT be both things at the same time. So probabilities are either 0 or 100. If Thermodynamics are truth, we shall die; if string theory is truth we shall die; if the thresholds of energy for creation of black holes and strangelets (10 Tev, bag) are truth we shall die.

Many people are confused by this ‘error of knowledge’ which CERN exploits shamelessly saying that the ‘probability’ exists but it is small. This is due to a faulty understanding of quantum physics, in which there are probabilities REGARDING our capacity to observe a certain particle. But the particle IS there, if the theory that describes it and the events that create it happened. It is also due to an error in the perception of the factor that defines the occurrence, ‘when’.

‘When’ is the only ‘statistical’ fact we might argue, as collisions must met certain conditions of precision to accumulate quarks enough to create those particles that cannot be measured except by statistics – as we know we will get a double six throwing dices ALWAYS, if we keep throwing dices, but we cannot know in which throw, ‘when’ this will happen. We know it will happen because it is a fact that there are faces with 6. Point.

When you heat with fire cold water there is NOT A PROBABILITY that might or might not get hotter. It WILL ALWAYS because the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is truth. Point. ‘When’ it will boil, the time/quantity variable is the only question. So it is in the case of black holes/strangelets, when, the time/quantity variable depending on how many quarks we pack in those collisions, depending on how precise is the collision is the only variable we don’t know but it is NOT really a variable.

As with dices, if we had all the information about the throwing, we would know the bounces of the dice and the final position; if we knew all the information about the trajectory of each particle we would know how precise is the target collision. If we could see closer – without interference with our instruments – the quantum particle, we would see its position. We illustrate this common error of laymen regarding quantum physics, shamelessly exploited by CERN in our article on the famous case of the ‘Schrondiger’s cat’ paradox. If we repeat the experiment several times, the cat will certainly be dead.

So the when is what we can generously argue, which will increase with the ‘throwing of dices’, the number and energy of the collisions. This CERN knows. It knows it will create Strangelets and it gives CASTOR a 70% probability of detecting them. It knows it will create black holes and so it gives Hawking’s bizarre theory that denies the laws of Einstein’s relativity and thermodynamics a 100% chance as a ‘dogma of truth. Or as his Chief Theorist, Mr. Ellis put it in a recorded conference, to his ‘students’ and ‘workers’ all of them tied by confidentiality contracts ‘you must believe in Black Hole Evaporation’.

Thus if under 10 Tev in the regime that could find a Higgs we have taken 5 years to find it when we made a good collision, it is safe to say that between 2015 and 2020 the LHC will throw enough dices/particles to create under the Totalitarian Principle a strangelet or black hole that will certainly extinguish us if any of those laws in which most science is based that have always proved right are right (Relativity, Thermodynamics, Time arrows, conservation of energy and information.)

In this manner The Totalitarian Principle shall explain The Fermi paradox or absence of intelligent life in a universe teaming with planets. Only the Totalitarian principle explains it, meaning that ALL planets reach the technology of LHC before they reach interplanetary travels and ALL of them attempt the experiment that ALWAYS blows the planet into a Nova creating a pulsar (a strangelet star) or a Supernova, creating a black hole.

We shall study in this web in depth those theories, the reasons why CERN hides all this information (obviously not to loose jobs, prestige and contracts from the military-industrial complex), the reasons why physicists back them (same reasons plus the desire to prove their ‘bizarre theories’ about black holes, travel to the past, etc. the cosmic proof that this will happen (The Fermi paradox) and the human infantile, self-suicidal nature proved in the past that tends towards our self-extinction.

The Earthquake scenario.

 How we will know the Earth is being killed?

Those 2 events have different speeds: black holes, observed in the cosmos, cause a fast big-bang explosion, which we will hardly notice before becoming part of it. Strangelets should be slower. They should fall to the center of the Earth eating it from inside out. In that case, the process will be signaled by an increase in Earthquakes and volcano activity. The final proof will be the existence of a series of +8 earthquakes in the Richter scale.

Yet even before the Earth crunches by strangelets or black holes that do not evaporate, the LHC might already be causing earthquakes, as we anticipated years ago, given the fact that it causes a gravitomagnetic field, the only one on Earth today.

Gravito-magnetic fields are caused by c-speed mass cycles, as the LHC is and they provoke disturbance on (Earth’s) magnetic fields… which is the known-known recognized cause of earthquakes.

2012 year is in fact was the second year on number of big >7 Richter scale earthquakes on record, after the carpet bombing of II World War, during the pacific campaign that bombed the ‘ring of fire’ – also a man-made year of earthquakes.

Then after the machine ended its ion run and the gravitomagnetic c-speed mass cycle it was creating, earthquakes quickly diminished. The pattern thus is obvious: earthquakes have peaked during the period the LHC created a gravito-magnetic ring on Earth, to the level seen when carpet bombing destroyed during the II world war the islands of the ‘pacific ring of fire’.

Then also earthquakes diminished when world war ended.

So the cause-effect pattern is self-evident. LHC’s run create gravitomagnetic waves that disturb the magnetic  field of Earth, causing earthquakes.

Yet the ‘P.R.ess’ which considers a taboo any criticism of nuclear research ignores those facts and gives as only explanation, when it gives any… ‘Fracking’. But Fracking takes place only in oil fields mostly in North-America, where none of those big earthquakes have happened. And Fracking keeps growing, while those earthquakes have diminished. And Fracking only causes small range earthquakes.

Conclusion. According to the Totalitarian Principle, the laws of entropy, the laws of quarks, the laws of Einstein and Relativity, of the 4th and 5th dimension, the risks to the Earth are real and CERN should be the cause of our demise as a species in planet Earth.

 

II. Practical proofs:  How it will be 

 To be or not to be, that is the question. Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles. and by opposing end them? To die’  Hamlet, W. Shakespeare.

In the previous paragraph we studied the theoretical known-known models of the Universe that offers 3 scenarios of damage to planet Earth that should happen under the Totalitarian Principle. What are the experimental proofs that this scenarios will happen?

As in the case of any other ‘certain risk’ to planet Earth, such as Global Warming, we cannot take a decision on ‘experts’ trusting their dictums because today ‘experts’ are paid to back the agenda and interests of corporations. Such is the case of CERN, who authored the risk reports breaking all the laws of independence required for such reports. We thus must trust the authority of reason as the ‘reasons of authorities’ are bent to the interest of the company and the natural fear of scientist to the ridicule of catastrophism. Since if the risks are certain and the Earth is blown up, nobody will reward those who warn us, and if not experts will be ridiculed and loose their scientific prestige for ‘failing’ in their predictions and attacking the most powerful institution of big science. In other words, experts are ‘hijacked’ by the ‘violent’ nature of those experiments that can kill us. And so in the same manner there are few reports on the military industry and its risks to mankind, there are few reports on CERN risks. And yet from the point of view of reason and scientific truth, the Shakespearean question has only an answer:  It will be…

The industry of accelerators, where nuclear bombs have and will be researched in a small scale, will continuously upgrade its energy, as part of the process of evolution of weapons, regardless of its collateral benefits for particle research and finally will create strangelets or black holes, under the Totalitarian principle.

Why we are so sure? Once the fact that the Industry continuously upgrade its power and no institution or political group dares to oppose firmly the nuclear industry, and once the theoretical proofs are clarified the only ‘leg of truth’ required are experimental evidence. And there are at least 2 experimental proofs:

- If black holes appear there will not be black hole evaporation since no black hole has ever been found anywhere in the galaxy to evaporate, despite 40 years of research and the fact that if they were evaporating, they will do so in a explosion of gamma rays easily detectable.

The second experimental proof is also very strong. it is called the  Fermi paradox or lack of intelligent life on the Universe, Fermi the author of the first nuclear bomb stated flatly that we see no life on the galaxy because the evolution of nuclear weapons cause its demise. This is also the explanation given by most scientists that seek for life on the galaxy. In the past religious groups affirmed the cause was that we were the only planet with life, but now we have found so many planets thanks to the Kepler satellite that this possibility no longer holds. And yet none shows life, neither human or robotic life, which would have long ago colonized the galaxy. All radio waves come from black holes and strangelets – strange stars called pulsars.  So indeed planets and stars become strangelets and black holes (something also theorized in the organic models of the fractal Universe developed by this author with the metrics of the 5th scalar dimension of the Universe).

Thus, by the experimental proofs of the Fermi paradox and the Fermi satellite that has found non evaporation of black holes and the continuous streams of galactic news about pulsars, strange stars and black holes, likely top stars, the evolution of the Nuclear Industry and its quark bombs will blow up the Earth.

So now that we know with quite certainty that destiny awaits… Let us study the factual signs that the 3 scenarios of catastrophe produced by the LHC on mother Earth are happening:

- The strangelet scenario of creation of a strangelet ‘pulsar’ star as all those we see on the cosmos, by creation of a strangelet particle that will swallow the Earth

- The black hole scenario of creation of a micro-black hole of ultra hot temperature that will evaporate and attract our weak electromagnetic world.

- The milder scenario of an increase in Earthquakes, caused by the magnetic ring of CERN, the strongest magnetic ring of planet Earth that disturbs its magnetic field (disturbances of those fields cause earthqueakes).

The mass’ c-speed gravitomagnetic ring: Earthquakes and volcanic activity.

The first hints that the LHC is seriously damaging life on Earth which we predicted in 2007 –  an increase on earthquake and volcano activity – are now facts.

 This  is due to the fact that the LHC is creating a powerful gravito-magnetic field, a ‘ring’ of charged, massive particles that can interact with the magnetic fields of the magma and Earth’s center.

Disturbances on the Earth’s magnetic field by the magnets of the LHC and specially the charged positive c-speed flow of protons come through 3 different processes:

- The 27 kilometers continuous ring of charged protons can interact with self-similar charged flows in the magma or earth’s center, creating a powerful electro-magnetic effect, displacing magma and causing earthquakes and volcano activity. It is a fact that the first day that the charged, proton ring was created in 2008 it caused 4 significant Earthquakesthe first one in Iran, seconds after it was powered up.

The charged proton ring thus acts as a secondary pole to that of the magnetic, inner field of the Earth.

- The creation of different types of strange liquid, some of them already produced in the first experiments, (Kaons at the LHC, hyperons at RHIC) would also provoke explosions in the magma. If stable, those strange forms of matter will leak to the center of the Earth. Some of it will remain in the center, forming the seed of a strangelet. Some will accrete and/or explode in the mantle, in highly energetic, tiny bombs. This tendency as all risks should increase in 2015 when the machine doubles its energy.

- The creation of gravitational waves.

The LHC is a 27 Kilometer ring of positive charged massive particles, turning at c -speed. This is essentially equivalent to the ‘singularity’ of a Kerr black hole -  a rotating c-speed charged ring of mass. Since a Kerr singularity can produce transversal gravitational waves;  the LHC might produce perpendicular  gravitational waves that will sink straight towards the center of the Earth (in a similar process a rotating , charged coil is used to produce electromagnetic waves). If so those Gravitational waves, which are undetectable will affect magnetic fields, provoking earthquake waves and increase volcano activity.

Thus, each time the machine increases its speed and ‘luminosity’ (mass), as CERN powers up the LHC, we should observe an increase of earthquakes and collateral deaths, till the 2 possible ‘doomsday events’ happen:

Strangelet Scenario

 Synopsis.

The first and most probable scenario of human extinction is the creation of strangelets or any other kind of quark-gluon liquid made of lumps of heavy, strange quarks.

They can be created with a lower probability in proton-proton collisions, as those heavy quarks are the ‘signature’ of decay of the hypothetical Higgs or any other Goldstone boson, whose production is the confessed goal of CERN.

They can be created with a much higher probability in lead to lead collisions over 10 Tev as lead has many more quarks than protons and so the lump of quarks that can condensate into a heavy strange liquid, thousands of times heavier than the heaviest atom,  is bigger. When this lump reaches a certain critical mass, it will become stable and start a chain reaction, transforming the rest of the Earth’s matter into heavy quarks in a process similar to a nuclear chain reaction, only that instead of converting the mass of the Earth into lighter energy, it will convert the lighter Earth into heavy mass.

It is the simplest of the ‘mass-bombs’, which follow Einstein’s initial equation of conversion of energy and mass, M=E/c2 (better known by its second expression, E=Mc2, deduced by Einstein’s from the conversion of energy into mass, ergo a ‘standard’ reaction in Einsteinian Physics).

Because strangelets, unlike black holes are ‘likely’ to be produced increasing enormously our probabilities of extinction, CERN has adamantly denied there is any chance to produce it.

In 2015 as the LHC increases the potency and number of quarks it collides in its experiments, it will create greater quantities of atoms of strangelet liquid, called hyperons, made of up, down and strange quarks, which it has already produced in unexpected numbers at low energies, despite all their safety reports that said it would never produce them.

As quarks accelerate at c-speed, they acquire mass, because energy cannot go beyond light speed. Energy curls tiny vortices of space-time (Einstein’s definition of mass), making those quarks heavier. At light speed our protons made of up and down quarks (uud) will become strange quarks, converting the colliding protons into hyperons (usd particles, atoms of usd=strange liquid). Within the point of collision hyperons merge in pairs becoming dibaryons, which are stable and neutral and so they cannot be detected.

Thus dibaryons once formed, will fall to the center of the Earth, accreting matter as they form a growing ball of strange liquid. If they have not enough critical mass to become stable, which will ‘likely’ happen after 2015’s increase in luminosity and potency produces them in massive numbers, those dibaryon will explode in their path to the center of the Earth provoking mini-big bangs in the mantle, which will cause an increase in earthquake activity after the machine switches on. But some might arrive to the center of the Earth, where they will form a growing ball of ultradense strange liquid, which finally will crunch the Earth into a strange star.

 We will know this scenario’s end is closer, when we experience magnitude 9 earthquakes that kill hundreds of thousands of human beings. As such earthquakes have never happened within a single year, the existence of a couple of those earthquakes will mean the process of accretion which is ‘exponential’ have been triggered.

Black Hole Scenario

A black hole is made of strings (the minimal components of quarks) which are the components of gluons and quarks. Their mathematical description is equivalent (a 5th dimensional world of strings is equivalent to a 4 dimensional world of quarks); which reinforces the idea that a black hole is a top quark star.

The LHC was created to produce massive quantities of top quarks since the Higgs and a top quark condensate are the same substance, (the Higgs was promoted as the new ‘God particle’ just to get more research resources, not allocated to study known-particles). It will not form black holes that evaporate. Since quarks don’t evaporate.

The black hole will not fall to the Earth but it will become the new, densest center of the Earth and the Earth will fall into LHC’s creation. The process will last a very short time. Some images might be captured on TV but most likely wherever we are, we will just feel a strong wind, and then a blast of attractive forces will crunch and kill us, as the Earth explodes into a Nova.

Certainties in this theme.

The black hole scenario has been the most commented by the press. Yet it remains secondary to the strangelet scenario, both for theoretical and practical reasons. Since one ‘single case’ will do us and strangelets are easier to do in ion ion collisions. This should be the first event to happen.

Of course the P.R.ess which backs CERN but also makes money with catastrophist scenarios mostly concentrates in the black hole scenario, when it wants to create a ‘big scare’, with big sales prior to the final  happy conclusion of a CERN’s expert: ‘nothing will happen, it is all a joke’,

The certainty of black hole creation in that sense is not absolute, because Y it depends on the existence of strings, of which there is theoretical certainty but not possible experimental proofs (they are too small to be observed). The models of this author on the metrics of the scalar Universe (5th Dimension) however considers that black holes are top quark stars and in that case, black holes will be produced, and certainly will not evaporate. 

Ultimately both models of black holes are not exclusive. Since if string theory is truth, all particles will be made of strings. And top quarks which show a very strong force and huge mass and huge positive charge will attract each other and the matter of the Earth with the same force that super-gravitation (the theoretical deduction of string theory). In that regard the reader should understand that most sound theories in physics are parallel, similar theories that reinforce each other, since they use ‘parallel’ mathematical equations. Models vary in the mathematical ‘sentence’, as multiple verbal sentences mean the same, when we use similar words.  So the ‘hidden dimensions’ of String theory that make Gravitation far more powerful are equivalent to the far more powerful attraction that the creation of a top quark star will cause. As the LHC is designed to produce massive quantities of Tops (which are in fact a key product of Higgs processes), all indicates that black holes either modeled with strong theory or top quark theory will happen.

We conclude that both scenarios should happen, strangelets with absolute certainty, black holes if as 90% of physicists believe, string theory is truth. So we shall give the black hole scenario for the 2015-2020 period of statistical collisions (that might shoot on ‘perfect’ target the microscopic protons to reach the required energy) a 90% of chances.

The childish irresponsibility of Physicists accustomed for 70 years, an entire human life, to accept existential risks for the Earth on top of the military-industrial complex, explains in any case their ‘law of silence’. If 99.9% of nuclear physicists accepted the cold war that already could have killed life on Earth, living on the industry of making nuclear weapons and researching them on accelerators, why now they should change their mind? Wishful thinking is the norm in a nihilist corporation that has in its entrance a statue to Shiva and Kali, Lords of death. Why the rest of society accepts those risks? The answer in this case is obvious: we live in a happy ‘Truman Show’, a happy new world mixture of the dystopias of Huxley and Orwell, in which the virtual reality of the Media System, paid by corporations censors any issues of risks related to the industrial-Military complex. And people, as in the parable of Matrix always chooses to be ‘data’, to live the virtual dream, to believe…

So only the scientific method, its experimental, epistemological and theoretical models can guide our search for ‘cerntruth’.

Of course CERN does not make public those sound-sound, known-known scientific models that prove the risks. For example, it ignores all about top quark condensates that will be produced in Higgs reactions and only focuses on the propaganda of the HIggs particle as the ‘saint grail’ of physics, which is NOT.

 The Military Perspective: The Quark Cannon

As so many fruits of the Tree of Science, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has two perspectives. Its origin in military research, since accelerators were the last invention of artillery (a circular cannon), used to research atomic weapons, and its use for civil research, since the study of the debris of atomic explosions has allowed mankind to peer in the smallest, densest ‘knots of mass-energy’. The problem with the LHC is that its military implications far outweigh its usefulness for scientific research. And this is the fact that the rhetorics of CERN, an institution of the cold war, which systematically hides its original military purpose, has shrewdly hidden to the point that most of the people working today there, young 20 somethings, recently graduated, long forgotten the historic origin of accelerators truly believe the quark cannon is ‘only’ an instrument of research and ignore its ‘military risks’.

Yet when the Large Hadron Collider is explained in simple, military terms people can understand better those dangers. In military terms the LHC is a quark cannon, the final evolution of 800 years of western artillery, a science dedicated to kill as many humans as possible, which has used  bore pieces of metal to deliver at maximal speed, the densest possible materials (first rocks, then iron, latter lead and finally hyperdense quarks, the 99% of the mass of the atoms clumped in their centers).

This evolution advanced steadily during centuries along the evolution of physics and its comprehension of all phenomena related to cannons. First Galileo was contracted by the Arsenal of Venice with a princely salary of 1000 gold ducats to calculate the longest possible distance of a cannon shot and improve the ‘spy glasses’, latter called telescopes, to observe rival gunboats at distance (the Venetians invented the gunboat in their attack to Constantinopoli in 1208). He thus started the science of ballistics, the name of his fist book,  latter renamed physics, also called for many centuries the ‘science’ of motion, as it is a restricted discipline of knowledge basically related to the understanding of energy, motion and materials used to the construction of weapons. The field expanded but still bore this trademark.

For example, heat theory was discovered by an artillery master observing the friction heat of their cannon pieces. What this means is that the primary occupation of most physicists has always been to make weapons, latter machines (the nice twin of all weapons, so a bomber became a plane and a car a tank); and instruments to observe their effects – those spy glasses to see the enemy ‘galleras’…

Not to speak of the definition that Galileo imposed on time, as a parameter of the measure of motion: V=s/t, which still stands in Einstein’s work. This is the origin of the concept of time as the 4th dimension of space, again a very restricted definition of time. Since time has always been a ‘verbal concept’ synonymous of ‘change, with 3 dimensions, past, present and future, whose change we study with theory of information today, (from evolution to complexity), reducing what physicists study as merely the study of change in motion. Yet there are many other changes in the Universe, studied by biology, history, etc. and they are ‘time-changes’, of which physicists know nothing. 

This of course does not mean physics is not concerned with knowledge. But we must differentiate the ‘good and bad fruits’ of the tree of science – that is; research which is primarily concerned with knowledge, as for example, telescopes observing the big bang peering in long distant galaxies whose light comes from the far away past, and research which is mainly concerned with weaponry and uses the rhetoric of knowledge and some discoveries to justify the primary target.

Galileo’s work on ballistics and CERN were the first and last of those cases: the industry of artillery at its best, justified with the excuse of redundant knowledge – since the laws of motion and the big bang can be studied throwing other ‘things’ and looking with telescopes. Death is a high stakes that need a high reason. And here is where the rhetorics of the Higgs boson (not the particle of god, not even the one that gives mass to other particles but just another particle of the zoo of physical species) came in, and along it all the other ‘hyperboles’ about what is simply a quark cannon.

Indeed, cannons reached its lineal maximal potency around I world war when Bertha, the big cannon of Krupp, delivered its bullets to Paris from 60 kilometers away.

Lead was also the heaviest atomic substance. But you could not make a one kilometer lineal cannon – too heavy, too long. And after lead the heaviest elements became like Uranium is, radiactive, and difficult to handle. So how to make a longer cannon, with a stronger substance? Enter II world war. Uranium was heavier and on top of it, it split and reacted making the bullet a bomb. So physicists started to study radioactive materials, which incidentally end being lead, to substitute lead in their cannons. And then Lawrence realized that the problem of lineal cannons could be resolved making them infinitely long with a circular magnetic path, that accelerated the bullet every cycle, so the cannon could continuously accelerate the bullet as many ‘cycles’ as it wanted, making ‘de facto’ the cannon cylinder infinite. And the accelerator cannon was born. The name then was changed starting the make up ‘newspeak’ transformation of the jargon of artillery into the jargon of ‘research’.

So next, they planned to deliver atomic bombs with accelerators. They had a longer bore and a denser substance than Big Bertha. So they designed the first atomic bomb consisting in an accelerator that collided two pieces of uranium in its center provoking an atomic explosion. It was though too heavy to transport and a second design of a self-cointained bomb substituted it. But accelerators were the strongest cannons available, and alas! research of new nuclear weapons started in Earnest, with the cold war, thanks to them. All nuclear weapons would be first tested in circular cannons (the real name of the device). The West established CERN and legally protected it as a ‘sovereign nation’ (reason we could not sue it), becoming the flagship of the European participation in the cold war.

Rhetorics now were expanding as Nuclear Physicists had become the scourge of the Earth, the first caste of people who intended to destroy the planet and all forms of life on it for the ‘common good’. So along the cold war an industry of making nuclear scientists researching atomic weapons, appear as the sacred priests of knowledge, developed the concept that the fundamental form of understanding the Universe was to study the debris produced by atomic circular cannons. This would have seem absurd to more sophisticated readers prior to II world war – namely if the Germans had told us that the obuses of big Bertha thrown over Paris would be the key to understand the Universe we would have had a big laugh.

But in the present age of erased visual minds, childish thought, fiction, rhetorics, big brother newspeaks and other niceties, it worked. So now the Germans (main contributors to this machine, lead by a German, and buttressed with German technology), can truly believe that shooting the Earth with its enhanced Big Bertha, will discover the meaning of it all.

This newspeak was obviously needed because the underlying reason of the industry of quark cannons – to provide new mass-murder devices for the cold war – ended with the fall of communism. But this didn’t mean war and the most profitable of all mechanical industries, the industry of weapons had to end. We found in the Semite wars between Israel and the US vs. Arab fundamentalist Jihadists and Palestinians, a perfect excuse for perpetual war and the evolution of robotic weapons – the most profitable modern industry.

And we found in the newspeak of fundamental research the perfect excuse for the evolution of artillery.

Fundamental’ is a serious word that justifies all wars. And in this case ‘fundamental research’ is the only possible word to justify the risks. Already Mr. Teller – the nuclear physicist who found the H Bomb, patented it and made a fortune manufacturing it – realized knowledge is the perfect excuse to pass a weapon. He bragged, as we show in our film ‘quantum roulette’ that he convinced Truman to pay for the H-Bomb because it would increase our knowledge of the atom. LOL.

Then he proposed the first ‘ultimate weapon’ – a hydrogen bomb big enough to destroy the entire Soviet Union, and hence the entire planet. But he could not sell it with ‘military rhetorics’ only. Eissenhower realized nuclear physicists, all in favor of it, were madmen on a collision course with humanity and after the proposal was put on the table for ‘military reasons’, he called the ‘commies’ and started detente. Nuclear Physicists had gone too far, even for hard nose military men. Now they have gone even further. But Nuclear physicists also have become shrewder and so they have hidden the truth with research. The bottom line is industrial routine, jobs, contracts. So any technological industry must continue, even if it has no purpose at all. Cars keep evolving its speed limit even if they cannot go beyond 70 miles per hour. So does the industry of accelerators. As Fromm put it ‘the ethics of a technological civilization’ consist of evolving machines, even if they can destroy the planet.

And so finally the quark cannon, the first cannon that can destroy the planet, has come into existence, even if it can destroy the planet. It is the LHC, which as the first Galilean model, has its own ‘spy glasses’ to observe in detail the debris it produces, including a calorimeter called CASTOR to detect the creation of strange matter; since it is supposed to understand the meaning of it all, observing that debris.

But its ‘true nature’, its ‘historic origin’, is unmistakable. It is just the last evolution of the artillery industry, an infinitely long, accelerating cannon, which uses the most explosive, dense and dangerous substance of the Universe, quarks and throws bullets of quarks to the planet Earth. And one of those bullets will be able to kill mankind. It is the ultimate weapon.

And what it will produce is simple enough: quark condensates of higher density than our light up and down quarks, the substance of our atoms. For one thing, there are 3 families of increasingly dense quark matter, the up & down family (ours – the substance of the stars of the galactic body); then the strange family, which is called strange matter, the substance of strange stars called pulsars, and probably the halo of the galaxy, and then the top family very likely the substance of black holes and the center of the galaxy.

The problem is that matter is ‘darwinian’. Strange matter eats light up & down matter. And top black hole matter eats strange and up & down matter. It is a pecking order. So when strange matter – the easiest to do – will appear on the quark cannon, it will eat the earth. There is no doubt about it. And the only question that remains to be solved is when the LHC or any of its planned successors in the industry of quark cannons will have enough energy to produce with our quarks, denser strange quarks that will devour the Earth.

We believe according to known-known theory of quarks this will happen in 2015 when the quark cannon doubles its potency. It is in any case a question of time that the artillery industry in its most advanced piece, the quark cannon, evolves beyond the threshold of creation of strange matter, and kill the Earth. The industry is blind and protected of all criticism with its lies and rhetorics. It is the summit of the military industrial complex and it does indeed some collateral research besides the collateral damage to mankind to feed its rhetorics. But the bottom line is this: it is a quark cannon, it produces quark condensates, the heaviest most dangerous self-sustained, self-feeding explosive on the Universe, and it will once crossed the energy required to produce a strange quark condensate blow up the Earth.

The rest is ‘irrelevant’ knowledge, ‘irrelevant’ rhetorics, and irrelevant indeed, since an extinct species, mankind, knows nothing. Only a piece of that rhetoric will suffice to show how difficult this question is. Nuclear Physicists ALL perfectly know that cosmic rays are just simple atomic substances, protons, electrons and gamma rays, colliding on the atmosphere. We have NEVER found a deconfined quark in cosmic rays. Cosmic rays are NOT quark bullets, because they are not heavy ‘lead’ ions, which can produce ‘quark condensates’. And yet, whenever any journalist, politician or the public ask about the risks at CERN, ALL nuclear physicists lie, saying cosmic rays have done this experiment one thousand times. This is an ABSOLUTE lie, that any first ‘course’ of physics explains.

But of course, all is very shrewd. CERN does collide besides heavy lead ions, which can create quark condensates, protons, and so they do experiments similar to cosmic rays… But those are not the dangerous experiments that will create strange matter. Cern does research on fundamental particles, but this is not the reason why XX century military-industrial systems paid for the accelerator industry. And most ‘CERNIES’ are idealist kids who didn’t know the origin of their industry and think their work has no risk. But ‘big boys’ playing with big toys, big weapons are not a excuse for putting us all at risks.

The cosmic rays half-lie shows what perhaps is the saddest part of this story from a theoretical point of view. As a scientist I always thought there was a ‘realm’ in which truth mattered – science, as opposed to politics, economics or religion. This is no longer truth. Science now is also ‘wishful thinking’. CERN’s statements show THE DEGREE OF intellectual corruption, rhetorics and callousness which Nuclear Physicists, after 60 years of getting away with murder doing nuclear weapons, have achieved.

They are no longer different from fundamentalist religious people, nationalist war-mongers or fiction actors in their delivery of false speeches to justify their actions. And so once truth is broken for interest what we face is the biggest team of fundamentalist, terrorist, genociders the world has ever been, and maybe the last. It is destiny? Probably.

Galaxies exist to transform up and down light matter into strange matter that likely migrates to the halo and top quark black hole matter that migrates to its center. So since there are millions of planets out there and we hear no signs of robotic or carbon life but the tam-tam of strange pulsars and black holes, as Fermi, the head of the Manhattan project that make the first atomic bullets, put it – the explanation is simple, we physicists blow up all planets before interstellar travel happens.

And the adamant defense of mankind of the quark cannon, is the clearest proof that Fermi was right. There are now plans just in case CERN doesn’t kill us to make a 52 km. quark cannon in China, and another of 100 km. in Europe.

And all this of course, always justified by the sacred research of our high priests, the nuclear physicists, makers of atomic cannons.

It is like if the creators of Big Bertha, the biggest cannon prior to the age of nuclear weapons would justify their bombing of Paris, with the excuse they might unearth archeological remains of Lutetia. CERN justifies its bombing of Earth with strangelets, after it goes on line at maximal potency in 2015, with the excuse that it might unearth some rare particle. So does RHIC competing for the ‘nationalistic’ honor of reaching the creation of those strangelets earlier.

But while the Germans of I World War could not get away with such a surrealist view of their cannon industry, the Americans & Germ(an)s of XXI century have become shrewder and justify their industry with those newspeaks of research. Fact is History rhymes.

And so the ‘animetal’ cult(ure)s that are at the heart of the Nuclear Industry since its inception – the Jewish, German and ‘daughter’ American cultures, now in a ‘fundamentalist’ neo-fascist quest for an Orwellian perpetual war of enormous profits with the new robotic and electronic weapons, they manufacture – are having a rush for collective extinction, of which of course nothing can be said, as ‘believers’ censor all what is against their beliefs.

So the Germ(an) cult(ure), inventor of most of the new weapons of history, truly the Germs of History, bound to destroy mankind, expert in genocides, since the beginning of history, are today the biggest contributors to CERN, a company run by a Germ(an) physicist (Hauer), as it is the Germ(an) nation (Miss Merkel), whose industries are the main contributors to the machine. And of course they display the well-known Germ(an) psyche: Germans are ‘always right’, since the primitive Germ(an) language of ‘long, bound sentences’, cannot be broken or bend to argument. So Germ(an) minds carry absolute simple ‘beliefs’, absolutely false, imitating the ‘long swords’ of their original iron cult(ure) when they call themselves ‘Goths’, Gods, because they could murder anyone that opposed them. Now they are ‘again’ at it.

So are the Jewish banksters that control mass-media, finances and have made of the Nuclear Industry the bully weapons which Israel knows quench any opposition to its war crimes – not to speak of the French Grandeur today associated to its nuclear industry, for which all sacrifices can be made – including new colonial wars.

And this of course applies to the ‘German-like’ Psyche of the Americans and ‘Askhe-Nazi’ elites that have evolved the nuclear industry, that ‘believe’ on those experiments and the ‘sacred nature’ of the Nuclear Industry, which sustains the military power of our western decaying empires, from Israel to US, from the Brits to the French ‘grandeur’ built around the Nuclear Industry.  Indeed, I recall the ‘shutdown’ of our project film ‘quantum roulette’, a surrealist film on those issues, inspired by my youth professor at Columbia University – Terry Southern’s masterpiece script (‘Dr. Strange-love’) of which some excerpts are shown in this web. It started at WME, the biggest agency in Hollywood, to be a ‘new’ Inconvenient truth’ and rise awareness of the risks to the planet, far larger than those of global warming. Then when the suit came out and the agency realized it was a serious doc, the agency owned by Ari Emmanuel, brother of Rahm Emmanuel, then chief of staff of Obama, cancelled the project with no further explanations, clearly under pressure of the American government. It was too much of an inconvenient truth, it seems.

We thought that Obama would have helped us, and the nightmare of Bush, had been lifted by this ‘Nobel prize of Peace’, which would go on to give us a speech on ‘just wars’, start up in earnest the take off of the industry of Robotic Terminators, and begun more wars than its predecessor – truly a house negro to the service of the white house in Malcolm X terminology.

So as history declines, and the superorganism of mankind dies away, as humanity becomes replaced by its machines, which are crossing the thresholds of ‘death’ that broke the balances of life, by an overdrive of maximal energy (accidental death, weapons) at RHIC and CERN or maximal information (3rd age death, by overdrive of information, as chips and robots substitute us), all what matters to the clueless, overpowered human is to follow the ‘routines’, the ego trips of shallow speeches about human ingenuity of us, the ‘chosen’ of the darwinian universe, the orwellian thin air jargons that appease the people, thinking we progress as we become degraded and murdered by the new ‘species’. We shall all walk to our chronicled death without worries, being happy under big brother smiley and techno-utopia that hides the real dystopia foretold by the darwinian laws of the Universe.

Yes, Darwinian… Dark matter eats light matter. Machines atrophy, degrade and substitute mankind. Weapons are the most evolved machines designed to kill us. Accelerators are quark cannons that make quark bombs… And our elites are nothing but a bunch of neo-cons, thinking they are Goths by the murderous power of the iron sword or Go(l)d Chosen by the hypnotic power of informative Gold – the substance collided at RHIC, the mind of the chip.

This has been going on for 3000 years now since a couple of deluded goat-keepers built a golden calf and saw a bush burning and thought to be on the presence of Logos, the mind of the Universe. Science it seems has not made much advances on that path, since the only explanation to this madness is a certain ‘belief’ that can be traced to the mechanist worship of the first founding fathers of physics, all pious believers in Yvwh, who thought the Universe was not biological, organic, darwinian but a ‘machine’, a clock like the machines the use to perceive it.

So Kepler said: ‘god is a clocker – the machine he used to measure orbits – who has waited 5000 (Biblical years) to find a mind as intelligent as His (Mr. Kepler of course) to admire his clock-work’. And Newton, who spent more time in Biblical studies considered that of course the Universe had to be a machine, as that was the proof there was a maker, Yvwh… Since mechanism is equivalent to deism, as machines are not self-reproduced, so they need the maker, as Leibniz, the proponent of an organic, ‘true scientific’ vision of the Universe, rightly pointed out. 

Then when the first errors in Newton’s calculus on the ‘clocker’, thy God, were found (anomalies in Mercury’s orbits), Newton affirmed that God would correct his calculus to keep on track with His Best disciple (Newton thought Yvwh communicated with the Great Man through comets, envoys sent for him to refine his calculus). Leibniz then quipped: ‘I thought God was perfect by definition. But he doesn’t seem to get it right to the first time (-; Einstein will also affirm that if Relativity was wrong, God would have to correct the Universe to match it – so beautiful his theory was… And now we have Mr. Hawking at the Lucasian chair of Mr. Newton, who thinks black holes are time machines that travel to the past and so they do not grow into the future but evaporate, and could help us to travel to the past and ‘kill our grand-mother’ (sic).

Of course ever since, pious physicists consider ‘knowledge’ to make measures of the ‘Machine’ with their machines, as ‘chosen of go(l)d’ by the grace of the Sword – the weapons they mass produce and gives them the ‘high priest’ status of ignorant, rounded bastards (as Zwicky, the discoverer of dark matter put it: physicists are spherical bastards. No matter how you look at them they are just bastards’.

Yes i know, i have only the word to vent out my frustration, and the mind to explore the infinite beauty of the fractal, organic Universe – they have none of it, but they do have the weapons that kill us. And so by force, they will prevail.

It is this astounding arrogance of a people who know so little, homunculus with dexterous hands and small minds, which will be call out at its face value by the true predator powers of the Universe… The harder they fall.

And this long digression on the socio-economical aspects of CERN and RHIC  is also worth to remember – since this issue is defined by them, certainly not by the ‘idealistic, scientific rewards’ we shall obtain by replicating the ‘big bang’ explosions on mother earth. We are in a neo-fascist, neo-militarist Age provoked by the usual suspects that brought doomsday 72 years ago, in the previous fascist cycle, American/Germ(an) warriors and Askhe-Nazi Bankers, on top driving us ‘again’ collectively in a path to extinction, as in the 29->II world war crisis. The difference is that this is a neo-fascist ‘walt disney’ world of ‘Orwellian newspeaks’, with ‘thoughtcrimes’ where wars are ‘peace processes’ and cannons ‘research instruments’. And so several posts of this web study the cultural socio-economical elements of this tragedy.

Plainly speaking, the industry of artillery follows its evolution and so from the first ‘tube’ (cannon in italian), which started ballistics, through the centuries of physicists making them bigger, faster with denser bullets, to the last cannon, the quark cannon, aka LHC, with its quark explosives, through the millions of ‘cannon flesh’ corpses left in the trail, it has gone a long way. But the evolution will end soon, achieving its purpose, which the Merchant of Death, the biggest arm dealer of the XIX century, Mr. Nobel clearly explained, in a cynical letter to her peace-loving lover, who asked him for a Prize to Peace: ‘my factories will end all wars, when they evolve a weapon powerful enough to destroy entire nations with a single shot’.

This is the quark cannon and its theorists seeking collateral theories for a Nobel prize. After the letter, she abandoned Nobel, the inventor of dynamite. Then he created the Peace Prize but she did not come back. After the quark cannon produces the first bullets of strange matter that will fall to the center of the Earth and eat it up inside out, physicists will repent as many did after making the Atomic Bomb. But the Earth will not come back.  

 
15 Comments

Posted by on October 10, 2001 in News

 

RHIC is distillating strange liquid

So we learned yesterday, 19th august, 2014, that RHIC is producing quasi-stable strangelet, an abbreviation for strange liquid, the most explosive substance of the Universe, made of  strange atoms.

And it has been doing so, without releasing the news since April, in enormous quantities according to the graphs released now on the luminosity=density of mass of strange atoms created (see graph 2, scrolling down).

The news delivered by RHIC

It was not a nice day. I could not sleep reading text after text of this obscenity, this long awaited conclusion of a foretold chronicle of human foly, which will be no more.

In brief, RHIC has confessed to a mute press in a very low voice that it is producing since Spring, a massive amount of strange atoms, the substance of strangelets, the dense matter that eats our light matter and so in the future once those stable strangelet atoms – hyperons and dybarions – fall down to the center of the planet and mass there till reaching the stable size of a strangelet, they will start to feed on our light matter,  eating the planet inside out, till it devour us.

UPTON, NY-New supercomputing calculations provide the first evidence that particles predicted by the theory of quark-gluon interactions but never before observed are being produced in heavy-ion collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), a facility that is dedicated to studying nuclear physics. These heavy strange baryons, containing at least one strange quark, still cannot be observed directly, but instead make their presence known by lowering the temperature at which other strange baryons “freeze out” from the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) discovered and created at RHIC, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science user facility located at DOE’s Brookhaven National Laboratory.

“Baryons, which are hadrons made of three quarks, make up almost all the matter we see in the universe today,” said Brookhaven theoretical physicist Swagato Mukherjee, a co-author on a paper describing the new results in Physical Review Letters. “The theory that tells us how this matter forms-including the protons and neutrons that make up the nuclei of atoms-also predicts the existence of many different baryons, including some that are very heavy, containing one or more heavy ‘strange’ quarks. Now we have indirect evidence from our calculations and comparisons with experimental data at RHIC that these predicted higher mass states of strange baryons do exist,” he said.

RHIC is one of just two places in the world where scientists can create and study a primordial soup of unbound quarks and gluons-akin to what existed in the early universe some 14 billion years ago. The research is helping to unravel how these building blocks of matter became bound into hadrons, particles composed of two or three quarks held together by gluons, the carriers of nature’s strongest force.

The scanty news can be summarize as follows:

RHIC has found this astounding fact, indirectly as strange matter is ‘invisible’. It is a form of dark matter, very dense, which once stable cannot be detected. But RHIC has found it is freezing into a liquid (hence the name strange liquid) the rest of the fireball of ‘more normal’ quarks, transforming them into more strange liquid. RHIC thus have given a giant leap into the creation of an ice-9 chain reaction that would convert the planet onto a strangelet rock. it is only left a little step (the actual conversion of the planet). And yet the news have gone unnoticed.

Thus. RHIC, as many activist and some lawyers warned, are producing ‘stable’ strange baryons=atoms, for the first time in human history.

This atoms are NOT resonances (unstable particles, and that is the news. They are stable atoms and are freezing the fireball into a perfect, liquid.

The news are NOT the discovery of the ‘strange baryons=atoms’. Since they were DETECTED AS A RESONANCE in1964 (for those who ignore what is a resonance, is the ‘abortion’ of a stable baryon=atom, an unstable atom, which only exists for the period needed at ‘light speed’ for the strong force to destroy it, less than a 10-23 sec.).

The news are that now we have stable atoms of strangelet -a brief name for strange liquid.

And this has been proved because it is indeed freezing the plasma of the ball of fire of those collisions into ‘glasma’, a dense glass-like ordered liquid. And so it is only now a question of time that the chain reaction of ice-9 starts in earnest.

RHIC has published that it has found indirect evidence (since strange quarks are ‘dark matter’, invisible, and hyper-dense), that strange atoms (by definition stable) called baryons are being produced in enormous numbers.

Among the scanty data given by RHIC we have the relationship of mass between those strange quarks and the ‘human kind of quarks (light up and down quakrs) in the ‘freezing glasma’ (quark gluon plasma that freezes and change state to strange liquid, ‘strangelet’ ).

It is 27 to 1. That is the glasma of strangelets has a proportion of strange quarks mass 27 times higher than the mass of light , up and down, quarks.

And this indicates that the glasma that RHIC is producing is a strangelet liquid with a 100% purity.

What they don’t say is that ‘those higher mass states of strange baryons’ are the substance of strangelets, which falling undetected to the center of the Earth, will mass up there and eat the planet inside out, in a time frame we cannot calculate with precision, let alone without supercomputing power, but which will be within our lifespan or that of our children, a fraction of time in the immense life of this planet, even in the life of mankind.

Some graphs:

The problem of the missing mass is important because it means that dark matter of strange liquid is being produced and stable falls to the center of the Earth where it will accumulate, is accumulating since April and at certain point will have enough volume to start the strangelet atom reaction illustrated in the next text:

Strange2

In the graph we see what is happening at RHIC. Strange liquid is produced and it pulls normal atoms, transforms them into strange quarks and cools them down forming the glasma liquid.

When this starts to happen to the planet from its centers, where the stable atoms are falling, it will trigger the ice-9 reaction.

The data that RHIC provides shows that there are now clear proofs the process is real, not merely theoretical, as we see a hint of the ice-9 process in the data of those collisions.

Indeed, a strange atom is merely an atom with 3 quarks in which at least one, is a strange, heavy quark. So strange atoms can be, sud, suu, sdd (with a single strange quark).

And then the mass proportion of the atom is 15 to 1:

A strange atom for each up and down light quark, yet since strange quarks are very heavy, 100, and our quarks are light, 1.7 for the up quark and 5 for the down quark, when you have 1 strange quarks at 100, one up at 1.7 and one down at 5, you get, a 100 / 5+1.7, a 15 to 1 proportion of strange mass.

Thus 15 to 1 is a proportion that signifies the creation of pure strangelet, meaning all the components of the glasma is made of strange atoms  This is a pure glasma, and the one produced by RHIC IS even of a higher purity; meaning they are also producing the most dangerous strange atoms, those that have more than one strange quark, ssu and sssd and sss, the super strnage atom, the heaviest, and negative, 300 weight, ours are a mere 10…

But RHIC has found 20 to 1 and 27 to 1 proportions. This means is producing also heavier strange atoms with at least 2 Strange quarks: ssu, ssd and ‘omegas’, sss, negatively charged, pure strange atoms. So the proportion of strange mass increases.

And the creation of negative strangelets, the truly dangerous ones also increases, as s-quarks are negative. Thus a negative strangelet is then produced, which in the very own words of the safety report (2003):

‘if strange liquid exists and could be produced at RHIC it would be extremely dangerous. We know of no absolute barrier to the rapid growth of a dangerous strangelet.”

RHIC: A Distillery of Strangelet.

Now, what I will affirm might sound surrealist but it is surrealist. RHIC is nothing but a distillery of strange liquid.

A factory of strangelet even if it is forbidden to speak truly about what they do.

Let us then consider the safety reports of RHIC and LHC (totally outdated to 2000 pre-experimentall jargon).

In those safety statements they affirm that rhic cannot distill quark-gluon strange liquid, because they will produce a hot quark-gluon plasma. Mind the reader RHIC has been producing quark-gluon liquid for a decade, reporting on it. But the safety documents on which mankind depends talk of something which is no longer the experiment, a plasma…

Then the report  describe the 3 methods of creation of strangelets, closing with the method of distillation of strangelets that has just now happened at RHIC:

“On the theoretical side, the 2003 report considered three mechanisms for strangelet production [1]:

i) a thermal mechanism [3], in which particles are produced as if
from a heat bath in thermal equilibrium,
ii) a coalescence mechanism, in which particles produced in a heavy-ion collision might combine at late times to form a strangelet, and
iii) a distillation mechanism [18], which was proposed as a specific
model for strangelet production. According to this last mechanism, a hot quark-gluon plasma with large net baryon number is produced in heavy-ion collisions, and is enriched in strangeness as it cools down by emitting predominantly particles containing strange antiquarks.”

(LHC safety report, quoting RHIC safety report, both without any updating for near a decade)

In the jargon of physicists, the process taking place at RHIC is called ‘distillation of strangelet’, one of the 3 methods possible to create them. In both safety reports in 2003 and 2008, RHIC and CERN discounted distillation models as impossible despite having worked a method to report them (a calorimeter to measure its lowering of the hot plasma into cold liquid), called CASTOR and issue reports on the process. In the next graph we can observe the distillation process now taking place at RHIC:

Distillation is a slower but easier process of creation of strangelets, which requires very few strange quarks to be triggered.

Now the news are under reported and the wording is carefully chosen not to explain what is happening, the distillation of strange liquid.

Further calculations in fact show  there is a ‘missing amount’ of that mass of strange liquid which is not decaying from the fireball. This would be ‘successful’ strangelets that have not decayed. How many of them? Given the fact that the distillation is an enormous success, which we shall see is producing strangelet liquid of a +100% of purity, an important amount.

There are now millions of strangelet atoms, stable, in this planet. And since they are so much heavier than our atoms (in a 30 to 1 proportion) they are falling to the center of the Earth. The route though can be interrupted if they are captured by electromagnetic and electronic flows, and become trapped in different rocks. Only strangelets with millions of atoms would fall straightforwards as their weight would overcome any electromagnetic attraction. This are the good news. The bad news is that distillation creates negative charged strangelets, the so-caled killer strangelets, because they can attract positively charged ions and start the ice-9 reaction ‘in situ’ in the factory.

The proportion of strange liquid includes – and this has surprised even more the researchers – around a 50% more of the  purest, heaviest strange atoms: omegas= sss negatively charged atoms, which are commanding the transformation of up and down quarks into strangelet liquid.

Screen Shot 2014-09-08 at 12.49.57 PM
In the graph, RHIC is aware since 2010 of  the anomalous increase in the production of strange antiquarks during its process of distillation of strange liquid. The news today advance in the same road, confirming further RHIC is distillating strangelet, by expelling strange antiquarks of the quark-antiquark pair and increasing strange baryons in the liquid.

The key factor to assess the danger they trigger the ice-9 reaction is  the size of the quark soup in which the negatively charged strangelets wander, related to their luminosity; that is, to the density of the fireballs of quarks.

In the past, the fireballs were too small to produce significant strangelets. Now they are huge and growing. The luminosity (measure of the density of the beam and the number of collisions to be expected) has increased enormously to the point that the 14 run which caused those results has produced more collisions on target that all the previous runs since 2000… combined.

But RHIC has a perfect alibi to keep ‘quiet’. Strangelets  are ‘dark matter’, invisible to the eye. So the proofs of their existence are indirect, published officially by the RHIC magazine, with an indirect language.

It is a scary matter. We shall die in an invisible way with the people causing this invisible tragedy at distance. Killing at distance and with no responsibility always eases the act of killing and make the perpetrators childish and irresponsible. As those kids who kill civilian ‘terrorists in Afghanistan from their drone consoles in Nevada.

Yet for those who read physics, ‘between lines’ of the data RHIC is handling, the proofs of distillation are evident:

CERN is telling us that the heaviest hyperons and dibaryons,  (hence those with more negative strange quarks) are ‘cooling down’ the whole fireball of quark-gluon plasma (glasma), produced on the gold to gold collisions; since they are eating up the gamma rays of the collision and the u-d quarks of our atoms. So they are suppressing the hot radiation of the fireball, cooling down the quarks ‘fixing’ them with the heavier gravitational pull to its strange quarks, and forming negatively charged lumps of quarks, strangelets.

But here the information is scanty. There is of course no mention whatsoever of ‘ice-9′ and strangelets – how many of them are being created, which masses are likely to have, how many are stable (missing mass), etc.

Their size matter because the bigger A=(quark numbers), the easier they will be falling to the center of the Earth. That they are forming is ‘certain’ because today’s theory accept quasi-stable strangelets with 6 quarks (dibaryons), and over 30 quarks, with absolutely stable strangelets with over 100 quarks. And those soups have millions of quarks tightly packed. So the question we cannot know (as we don’t know the ‘fate’ of those strangelets formed in the soup) is: Has the ice-9 reaction started, becoming irreversible?  That is, have any of those strangelets started an ice-9 reaction somewhere under Long Island?

This will depend on the quantity of hyperons and dibaryons of those strangelets, and of them being negatively charged to start the attraction of our atoms and start the ice-9 reaction. In that sense the bad news couldn’t be worse since  the method of distillation produces negative strangelets and produces them with high A=quark numbers.

And so, what all the reports (outdated by a decade)  on safety deny is now happening.

“Recently it has been suggested that rather cold droplets of absolutely stable or metastable strange-quark matter may be distilled in heavy-ion collisions during the phase transition from a baryon-rich quark-gluon plasma (QGP) to hadron matter. Here we present a model describing the hadronization of the QGP through particle emission, which is based solely on thermodynamical arguments. Pions and K+’s and K0’s carry away entropy and antistrangeness from the system, thus facilitating the cooling process and the strangelet formation.
Our results are supported by revised more sophisticated rate calculations. Two rather unexpected results are obtained when this model is applied to the investigation of strangelet production. The strangeness separation mechanism and the formation process works well even for higher initial entropies per baryon, tantamount to higher bombarding energies.
The surviving strangelets have a rather high strangeness content, fs∼1.2–2 [i.e., Z/A∼(-0.1)–(-0.5)]. Hence droplets of strange-quark matter with a baryon number of ∼10–30 and with a negative charge may be produced. They may serve as a unique signature for the transient formation of a quark-gluon plasma in heavy-ion collisions.”
Indeed since strange baryons are negative, by distillation RHIC creates negative killer strangelet.
And this process must be taken place since April.

THIS IS A 25 YEARS OLD WARNING, NEVER PROVED THEORETICALLY WRONG THAT CERN AND RHIC HAVE TOTALLY OVERPASSED, TILL THEY HAVE DONE EXACTLY WHAT GREINER EXPLAINED THEY WOULD DO. AND NOW THEY ARE DOING IT – DISTILLATING STRANGELET – AND THEY ARE NOT SAYING IT TO THE WORLD. AND THE ANSWER THE WORLD SHOULD HAVE IS THIS: THE MILITARY SHOULD IMMEDIATLY CLOSE BOTH FACILITIES.

How much strange liquid has been produced since April? Are we STILL ON TIME TO STOP THE FACILITIES BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE?

Why RHIC has taken so long to announce it?

Why it says it with a cryptic language instead of calling what it distillates, strange liquid, strangelet?

Obviously because if it uses the popular terms of strangelet and explains that the fireball  has cooled down and starts to acquire properties akin to a black hole: an attractive, cold superfluid vortex that can devour us all people might get worried. So it is telling us: we are making strange liquid, and we are seeing hints of what will be in higher amounts  an ice-9 reaction.

In fact the ‘Safety Report’ STILL talks of a gas not of a liquid more than a decade after the first proofs the quark-gluon plasma cooled into liquid appeared.

So the question now is how long physicists expect to last an ice-9 reaction, once stable strangelet atoms are produced?

Magnano from the other quark factory on Earth, CERN, in his safety report adduced a 200 years period for strangelets to devour the Earth once produced in the numbers observed at RHIC.

The problem though is because the ‘missing mass’ shows those strangelets to be stable and to be falling out of detection to the center of the Earth, once the ice-9 reaction ‘sits’ on the center, there is no way to reach the substance, and so even if it start very slowly eating an atom at a time, it will grow exponentially and when we realize due to the increase of earthquakes, it will be like a cancer, which cannot be cured. So we will at best assess the quantity of time we have left to live on this planet.

The world will end then soon as the process has become irreversible, and once noticed it means its effects are reaching beyond the iron nuclei into the magma where Earthquakes are caused.

RhicLuminosityAA-355pxQGP_Transition-HR

It is thus quite likely that strangelets with relative low A-Mass are being produced. How low depends on the parameter of stability STILL unknown by physicists who play with this explosive without understanding yet its parameters.
But it might be likely on the order of 100 quarks, and it is likely they are negatively charged, which is what the distillation mechanism has caused at RHIC – a freezing mass of strangelet negatively charged by excess of negative strange quarks… a killer strangelet.
Yes i know, we are still here… No, we cannot know for how long, we do not know even enough theory of the distillation ice-9 process and we are not researching.
This is because CERN AND RHIC are officially safe, this has been approved by the safety report that tell us they are doing gas NOT liquid, they CANNOT Distillate:
‘a distillation mechanism capable of giving rise to strangelet production is not
operational in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC, and this suggestion for strange-particle production has been abandoned for the LHC.” (LHC, RHIC safety reports, 2003, 2008)
But it is happening…

In the first graph, RHIC 14 run has created more collisions gold to gold than all other previous runs combined, producing (second graph) huge amounts of the primordial quark-gluon plasma, found in the first moments of the explosive big-bang and in the interior of Strange stars (Neutron stars), made of strangelet (strange quark liquid). Hence the reports announcing a massive creation of strange atoms:

huntingtheun

In the first graph, an H-Dibaryon containing 2s+2d+2u quarks, the stable particle of strangelets, which seems to be produced in the quark-gluon plasma at RHIC. Once created it will fall to the center of the Earth, due to his higher mass, where it will lump in enough quantities to start an ice-9 reaction that should collapse in the future planet Earth.

In the second graph the ratio of strange to up and down quarks found at RHIC’s new, denser ‘glasma’ (quark-gluon plasma) shows a strange to light quark mass ratio Ms/Ml = 20, (squares) and 27 (diamonds). Those numbers are even higher than the mass ratio of strange quarks to ud quarks found on those H-dybarions, which is Ms/Ml=15

(Since strange quarks weight 20 to 50 times more than up & down quarks, Ms=104, Md=4.8, Mu=2.4, the ratios of Ms/Ml mass in dibaryons is much larger than the number ratio of strange quarks to light u-d quarks: Ms=Mu=Md, Ms/Ml= 104/4.8+2.4=±15).

Thus there  are more than enough strange quarks on the soup to produce millions of dibaryons. Moreover, the fact that they are absorbing gamma rays, in enormous numbers and freezing the soup of normal particles, implies they are reachng a certain degree of stability. Thus all seems to indicate RHIC is producing strangelet atoms in huge amounts. RHIC obviously does not give us the amounts of dibaryons is producing, but the graph of luminosity shows it should be producing millions of them.

How many dibaryons have to reach the center of the planet to make a strangelet stable, and start an ice-9 reaction? Theoretical calculus (MIT bag, Peng papers from Chinese Nuclear Research center) give us numbers as low as 10.000. Since they are more stable than our atoms and heavier, they should be falling to the center of the Earth unharmed, sliding down the magma, like a knife cutting butter.

In fact its name ‘strange’ derives from its surprising longevity, which far surpassed all previous calculus. So the discoverer, amazed by its long life said of it ‘it is very strange. It is like if Cleopatra was still falling from its barge in the nile; as if she was still dying’.

It is thus only a question of time that its accumulation in the center of the Earth triggers the formation of a strangelet, starting an ice-9 reaction.

This is the key sentence to explain why:

Apparently the Brookhaven facility has been making heavy strange baryons for quite some time.
They might be falling already to the center, as the densest matter on planet earth, where they will accumulate till collapsing into a strangelet and then the period of accretion will start, though it is impossible to calculate… it would be fast.

In other words, what physicists don’t count for is that simple ‘fact’ – things that are equal come always together, in one or other way. In the case of those dybarions and hyperons that RHIC recognizes, it has produced in large numbers, which are more stable than ordinary matter, they should be as of now, falling to the center of the Earth, one by one, drop by drop of strange liquid, sipping through magma, just ‘transparent’ gaseous matter for them… till reaching the exact center, likely a uranium crystal and when enough of them stop, forming a bag of strange quark atoms – the definition of a strangelet, they will first transform the uranium, then the iron into strangelets… Carpe diem, live the day…

So RHIC’s news are utterly relevant for our…

Chronicle of a foretold death.

All this has been foretold for decades. I printed a first analysis of quark cannons and its likely extinction of man in my book ‘The extinction of man’ c. 92, Walter put a suit to RHIC in the 2000s. Papers have been written, warnings have been issued. Our suits alerted the world, thanks to the cover of Sunday NYTimes of 2008: ‘asking a judge to save the world’.

The present RHIC run at much higher luminosities provoked a warning of lawyers that got some media attention., just to dismiss the issue, as in the case of CERN, with the ‘usual’ physicists’ risk assessment committee of non-independent nuclear physicists affirming their experiments are sound – more or less as if new drugs tests were assessed by the corporations that manufacture the drugs, instead of the FDA, which of course would always ‘sell’ us that their drugs are the universal panacea to health. This only happens in the industry of accelerators. Every time the risk comes out, they bring a pannel of self-appointed experts which claim independence, affirm there are no risks with arcane languages nobody outside the community understands, attack ad hominem the qualifications of the ethic scientists that denounce those risks and pass page. And so little by little, step by step as that long run of the hero of Marquez’s short story ‘chronicle of a foretold death’ we come closer to the end of the world.

And nothing is been done. The ‘system’ merely used all the tricks of the book to quench public awareness of this colossal tragedy. So we must go beyond the obvious ‘mathematical’ and physical discussion of those risks to the ‘socio-economical’ implications of that ever real topic of the ‘military-industrial complex’ to solve the ‘surrealist question':
Why such projects, RHIC and CERN, exist? How can ‘humans’ – after all nuclear physicists are ‘humans’ – can promote this kind of project?

You have to understand the psyche of nuclear physicists who have discounted after 70 years of making weapons of mass-destruction that could obliterate the Earth any ethical con-cern.

So the answer to this madnees is ‘routine’. The routine of evolution of nuclear cannons, which after the cold war ended had to camouflage with ‘newspeaks’ of peace and humane purpose its military-industrial nature. Unfortunately cern is protected by the military-industrial complex, with ‘diplomatic immunity’ (provided in the height of the cold war when accelerators were indeed just ‘cyclical cannons’ used to research atomic bombs), and by the lazy or paid-per-view P.R.ess which accepts its blatantly lies, following the ‘routine procedure’ of the Nuclear Industry that never recognizes victims or risks (Fukushima, Chernobyl are supposed to have cause just a few dozens of victims, as those who die of cancer cannot be proved 100% to be caused by those explosions ).

Again both RHIC and CERN have a perfect alibi to deny any catastrophe: strange quark lumps are ‘dark matter’, difficult to detect (in the case of CERN, their detector, CASTOR after we uncovered its existence, has literally gone ‘undercover’ and now CERN denies adamantly it exists. So instead of being a Centauro And STrangelets detecTOR, if you search for CASTOR in CERN servers it is now a STORage machine; at RHIC the detection of the first atoms of strangelets have been indirect and nothing of its implications have been explained).

So if they fall to the center of the Earth and eat us up, as in the case of the cancer deaths of Chernobyl and Fukushima, nuclear physicists, will deny any wrong-doing. So beyond ‘high thoughts’ of human intelligence, rationality and caring, you must understand CERN & RHIC within the ‘routine’ evolution of the industry of ‘cyclical, nuclear cannons’, which has now reached the technological threshold of creation of strange matter. And so as Eric Fromm put it the ethics of a technological civilizations are simple: ‘if a machine can be done it will be done, even if it menaces to kill us all.’

All this of course is taboo, hidden. So all the focus is NOT put in what CERN & RHIC truly will create in enormous numbers – strange quarks – but in the ‘minimal’ quantity of ‘speculative’ possible other particles it might create – higgs bosons, superparticles, etc.

Hence the little impact the most important news of the century are having on media.

THE HOMUNCULUS MIND

Look at this young, enthusiastic fella below, the nuclear physicist who announced proudly we have created the strange atoms that will devour us, and his homunculus mind, the space that each sense occupies in his brain… Yes truly a monkey lethaliensis scientificus, which assemblies machines with his hands, spews out a lot of nonsense garbage on the immensity of its discoveries and has no mind at all to fully grasp what he has done. An image in this case is truly worth more than a thousand wor(l)ds…

 77970_webhomunculus

 

‘When I was a much younger man, I began to collect material for a book to be called The Day the World Ended. The book was to be factual. The book was to be an account of what important Americans had done’ 

‘Ice-nine was the last gift  Felix Hoenikker created for mankind before going to his just reward. He did it without anyone’s realizing what he was doing. He did it without leaving records of what he’d done. True, elaborate apparatus was necessary in the act of creation, but it already existed in the Research Laboratory.  It was blue-white. The old man had died on Christmas Eve, having told only his children about ice-nine. His children had divided the ice-nine among themselves.’

There was a sound clear, like that of the gentle closing of a portal as big as the sky. The great door of heaven being closed softly. It was a grand AH-WHOOM. I opened my eyes and all the sea was ice-nine. The moist green earth was a blue-white pearl. The sky darkened. The sun, became a sickly yellow ball, tiny and cruel.

“Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before’. Bokonon tells us. “He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way.”

What hope can there be for mankind when there are men that give such playthings as ice-9 to short-sighted children as most people are?’

Excerpts. ‘Cat’s cradle’. Kurt Vonnegut

Unfortunately, when the ice-9 reaction starts, there will not be any  place to escape, nor solution to the process, as we cannot arrive to the center of the Earth, where those dibaryons will start eating up the uranium, provoking massive earthquake waves…

THE LETTERS…

There has been a series of conversations in this fact with what i used to call D’artagnan (Mr. Rossler) and the ‘3 moskeeters’ (me, Walter Wagner and Eric Penrose), the people who had been more active in this issue and have achieved some results at least of awareness of the problem. The correspondence is closing. The fact is now ‘done’. RHIC has created strange baryons=stable atoms of strangelets, in millions, so strangelets were/are/will be produced.

As it was a different way of writing  on the same i thought it might make this situation more clear to publish one of this letters. RHIC has not given us the proper information so we had to find it. This letter explains a bit that search for the truth of the event. It was between Eric and me, with ccs to some activists. Eric provides only Data digging, (personal references are omitted) me… (well you know if you have dug on this blog, all kind of comments, with a lot on the philosophical aspects latter explained in a more formal tone.

RE: ALICE (strangelets, languages of information)‏

0o. .o0
  AM
To: Rossler
Cc: (hidden  – list of activists)
luisancho@hotmail.com
Outlook.com 

Not only the safety report  has NOT improved – they still talk of a gas plasma and the impossibility of distillation, .
Now they have no safety report in fact, standing, as all the safeties  they had, have been disproved.
There were ‘2 type of arguments’, cosmological (which on my view should not even be considered as external to the machine)
and technological (regarding the safety of the machine’s collisions)
COSMOLOGICAL:

BESIDES THE LIE OF COSMIC RAYS too shameful even to comment further, ALL THE OTHER SAFETY STATEMENTS ARE BEING TUMBLED DOWN:

- There are quark stars (key safety statement, they consider them non-existent or hypothetical so no strangelets would be produced)
mind that now they call all those type of stars,  ‘compact stars’ no longer neutron stars (in the professional literature)
as quark-gluon matter is now standard and accepted.

Now the conundrum is if all neutron stars are quark stars (isolated by a negative field of electrons that allows them to have an iron cover – this would be the end form of the planet). Since the implications are dire for the planet…

Of course in those books and papers they use still the sentencequark matter ‘hypothesis’,( that is they consider a hypothesis that  quark matter is absolutely stable, more than ours. But proofs on that sense increase).

- The only known known candidate to make up 90% of dark matter is still strangelets as per Witten’s original paper on both subjects. So again the rarity of strangelets is false. The opposite is truth,the most clear destiny of all planets is to become strangelets and increase their rotational momentum and end up in the outskirts as a particle of the halo of dark matter. The constant failure of mathematical entelechies (supersysmmetry) reinforces the Witten’s hypothesis of strange dark matter

TECHNOLOGICAL – NOW BLOWN OUT BY RHIC.

- NOW at RHIC they are producing an EXCESS of strange quarks in the soup WHICH MEANS the theory-safety that strangelets would be ‘positive’ and not attract nuclei is ALSO out. IT WAS BASED IN THE IDEA THAT strangelets would have deficit of S-quarks (being more difficult to make and heavier) than U and D quarks so it would be positive (strange quarks are negative). It turns OUT they are producing pure strange liquid with an EXCESS OF S in proportions 27-1 20-1 ratios of Strange quarks to Up&Down (masses), so STRANGE LIQUID IS TURNING NEGATIVE AS THEY MAKE MORE OF IT.

- IT IS FREEZING ITS TEMPERATURE BECOMING LIQUID , and this was ANOTHER key safety statement (that strangelets would not be produced at high temperature collisions because liquid cannot be that hot, that it would be a gas not a liquid, etc etc).
And of course, they are ‘measuring’ it with a ‘calorimeter’ CASTOR’S STYLE – the lower the temperature they measure with the calorimeter the closer we ARE to creating strangelets. so they KNOW AS CERN KNOWS, THEY CAN PRODUCE THEM and they are measuring/detecting their inception.
So now tell me, WHICH IF ANY of their safety statements is standing? The only one that stands still is the concept that ‘we are still here’, till we don’t.
In other words, all tendencies of research and the experiments move towards the existence and easiness of ice-9 reactions in the Universe; and the matter is when they will do. The parameters they don’t give us though are scary.
– According to different bags of potential energy for different numbers of quarks in the liquid, there might be stable strangelets with only A=10 s-quarks, and very likely with A=10.000…
– Dibaryons are absolutely stable, so all of them fall to the Earth, and Eric and CERN has given us significant quantities that might be falling on Earth.
– The only relative ‘safety’ statement we can still hope on is that (though the calculus of the surface tension of a strangelet is basically unknown so this calculus are not that reliable), for the strangelet to overcome with its mere gravitational force any electromagnetic repulsive barrier, it still needs to accumulate over a billion nuclei, that means the reaction will be slow for a while , but once that limit is broken it will be almost as fast as a black hole

carpe diem and  cheers


Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 10:43:34 -0700
From: oeross
Subject: Re: ALICE (strangelets, languages of information)
To: luisancho@

“They do not tell us the quantity of matter that is ‘invisible’.”
Thank you for that important sentence, Lu.
(I presume they can’t – so it is not ill will.)
The ill will I see in their refusing to update their 6-years old Safety Report.

0o. .o0
To: Eric Penrose

ERIC The bottom line is simple. They are producing ‘stable’ strange baryons=atoms, NOT resonances, and that is the news. Point.

It is just a step below the production of a strangelet WHICH IS NOTHING BUT A MASS OF STRANGE BARYONS=atoms, if it has not been produced.
AND SO WE WIll know when the planet crunches.

The news is NOT the discovery of the ‘strange baryon’ DETECTED AS A RESONANCE, since 1964 (for those who ignore what is a resonance, is the ‘abortion’ of a stable baryon=atom, an unstable atom, which only exists for the period needed at ‘light speed’ for the strong force to destroy it, less than a 10-22 sec.).

THE NEWS ARE TELLING US SIMPLY THAT: RHIC IS PRODUCING THE ATOMS OF STRANGELETS
what is simply amazing is that 7 million plus physicists hearing that care nothing to explain to mankind we have ‘given a giant leap’ to the extinction of the planet, and now it is only left a little step.

Now if  people like mr. hawking, and the rest of the humankind all physicists included do NOT care for this is only because they are ‘ theorists’, people who believe ‘their language’ is more important than reality and are tying to use those machines to validate ‘fanatasy maths’ ego trips, of those who feel they are speakers of the language of god, thy number.
There is nothign different between a ‘mathematical physicist’ lost in his arrogance of thinking god only speaks mathematics and speaks to him and his theory numbers will become alas reality and a priest, who believe that as fundamentalist zealots and jihadists of the ‘imperative semitic languages’ do, God uses the word to create realtiy and ‘what he speaks becomes’, or the banker who thinks that ‘money speaks economics’ and only monetarist measures are needed.
OF this WAS my last letter, to put in perspective all those ‘theorist’ who think the language create reality and care nothing for THE REALITY that validates the language.
what those experirments validate is the existence of strangelets which are a group of stable strange baryons. THEY HAVE CREATED THEM IN ENORMOUS NUMBERS, ERGO YOU MUST CONCLUDE THEY ARE CREATING OR WILL SOON CREATE OR HAVE ALREADY CREATED STRANGELETS

 


Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:55:35 +0000
Subject: Re: ALICE (strangelets, languages of information)
From: ericpenrose
To: luisancho
CC:

‘but I don’t really understand how they come up with error ranges for the raw pre-decay data well enough to judge.’
to -
but I don’t really understand how they come up with error ranges for the raw data, that includes decays, well enough to judge, nor how they get lambda results/ whether resonance particles would be included.

On 26 August 2014 00:43, Eric Penrose <ericpenrose> wrote:

It seems the data LSAG relied in regard to hyperons (1 or more str qks) was infact stated as only provisional (and from only one of RHIC’s detectors)- in the detail of the later of the (2006) relevant papers LSAG cited. So this is something to do with it. The significant sigma excess in the presentation was infact only for LHC – but that was for p-p.
Seems, from the fine print, like the ‘data’ for the revised 2008 paper I’d shown was in most cases actually extrapolated from only 1in 6 of the columns (midrapidity 130GeV): incl most of that within 200GeV columns, though lsag seems at least to have relied on actual data from other papers. Nonetheless the data based s quark deficit per collision at midrapidity RHIC 130GeV looks nearly 7 – but I don’t really understand how they come up with error ranges for the raw pre-decay data well enough to judge.
Does seem ‘situation impossible’ – yes, but I’ve been reading interesting stuff about a few physicists today who are finding a universe axis/ varying physical constant values related to it / incompatibility of Higgs results with inflation theory  and that they have been very critical of prevailing attitudes/assumptions- they might be interested in this area and at least potentially might feel like drawing attention to it, it seems to me.
Eric

On 25 August 2014 13:12, 0o. .o0 <luisancho wrote:

Your data on CERN & RHIC’s new data looks bad…
all seems to indicate they are producing a clear (non-statistical) excess of strange quarks in lumps,  and those of the most dangerous variety (sss-, the heaviest and negatively charged!), the exact definition of strangelets, and some are already going missing… i.e. becoming stable and falling to the center of earth?but what can we do about it? If the entire community of physicists is in denial as so many other sectors of the human species denying the catastrophes they produce (military, polluting industries, rogue states, corrupted politicos, you name it)I mean the thing is pretty straight forwards. Even a child would understand the causality:1) RHIC and CERN are just circular quark cannons, which makes their barrels infinitely long ->
2) They use quark bullets (heavy ions) ->
3) They accelerate quark bullets giving them more energy, ergo more mass, e=mc2, thus transforming them into heavier quarks, called strange quarks ->
4)  Then they lump those strange quarks in the point of collision into a mass of strange quarks (called strange liquid or strangelet) the strongest explosive of the Universe ->
5) Strangelets eat up in a chain reaction (ice-9) our type of mass, eating planetns and stars…Thus 1->2->3->4->5 is a straight forward deterministic causal chain that means, CERN and RHIC will produce with their quark cannon strangelet quarks that will blow up the Earth.It is just a question of time, and the only thing we can do is observing the earthquakes statistics to figure out when (by the way yesterday alone three +6  earthquakes in Peru, California and Chile)I mean humans are a cuckoo idealist species, what you call ‘theorists’ (like hawking which you know well…  99% of scientists are like that) . And again this error of ‘idealism’ is what make us collide constantly with the survival laws of the real universe and it is also pretty straight forward, when you understand as i do, (my speciality), the relationship between ‘languages of information’ and the ‘real substances of energy’ they guide (this ws called the science of duality which i used to chair in the systems science world congress till they kicked me out after the suit at cern).
Idealism goes as follow:
The Universe is one, things are one because they have ‘substance, energy, reality’. But languages of information, which are ‘synoptic’ reflections of the Universe are many (‘the languages of god are infinite’, Upanisahds); as languages merely reduce the 4 dimensions of reality (hence a synopsis).
So you can ‘mathematize’ reality (language of numbers, 1 D, of geometry, 3D), photograph it reducing its 4 D to 2 D (languages of images), talk it reducing it to 1 dimension (language of words).
All those languages are
1) born after reality is born, HENCE THEY DO NOT CAUSE REALITY, REALITY CAUSES THEM
2) Carry less information than reality, HENCE they are less accurate than reality, reason why ‘experimental reality matters more” (Einstein’s dictum: i know when mathematics is truth not when it is real)WHAT AN IDEALIST ‘EGO-TRIP’ PROPER OF 99% OF ‘SCIENTISTS’ (MATH LANGUAGE), BELIEVERS (WORD LANGUAGE) AND ARTISTS & MEDIA PEOPLE (IMAGE LANGUAGE) DO IS TO CHANGE THE CAUSALLITY OF 1) AND 2) WITH A CUCKOO CONCEPT, THAT LANGUAGE IS BORN BEFORE REALITY CAUSING IT, AND THAT DESPITE CARRYING LESS INFORMATION THAN REALITY THEY MATTER MORE.THIS is the case of all human arrogant ego-scientists, artists and believers, and while TODAY MOST UNDERSTAND THIS AS AN OBVIOUS ERROR WITH WORDS, SO ONLY MUSLIMS THINK TODAY THAT ‘THE WORD’ INVENTED THE UNIVERSE (ALLAH TALKS AND THE UNIVERSE REFLECTS ITS WORDS), AND NONE BELIEVE THAT THE ARTIST OR FILM MAKER INVENTS WHAT IT NARRATES (obviously he is a posteriori) ALL SCIENTISTS like hawkings do, believe THEIR MATHEMATICAL A POSTERIORI DESCRPITION OF THE UNIVERSE INVENTS THE UNIVERSE. THIS IS THE CUCKOO TRUTH THAT ALLOWS PHYSICISTS TO DENY THE FACTS OF THE QUARK CANNON, THE REALITY AND FOCUS ON IMAGINAR PARTICLES THEY MIGHT CREATE.THOSE MATHEMATICAL Theorists’ are not real. Do not seem to be con-cern-ed about reality. They censor it to adapt it to their language. There is no much difference between ‘a linguistic theorist’ (aka a religious man who thinks as Anselmus that the word ‘god’ precludes the existence of god – that is the word creates the Universe, not merely mirrors it, that all those physicists who THINK their equations create realtiy.
A final point confuses them. Because languages are simplified versions, they ‘run faster’, so when they mirror properly reality YOU CAN GUESS THE FUTURE faster in the synoptic version. I.e. Bunuel, the spanish film genius, made a machine with thepoetics of aristotle that could run in the first minutes of a movie and by the causality of arguments it cranked it and came out with the ‘solution’ end of the movie. It showed hollwood how simple were its plots. he always guessed it. Of course he was fired (artists think they are original, that is their cuckoo ego). Well, a scientist think that because when he runs his synptic equations, he can guess the future before it happens (i.e. guess an orbit, a motion a behavior), he IS INVENTING THAT FUTURE. this is the cuckoo arrogance. Again, it is just a property of language.

But LANGUAGES run errors because they lack the total information, specially when you THINK the language is a perfect mirror of reality not a deformation of it to ‘adapt’ it to its lesser volume. i.E. the Lisi, E8 ‘unification theory’ is NOT the origin of the universe, it is not a perfect reflection, but phsicists think it is. i.e. the ‘time concept’ of physicists ( a single clock for the Universe, hence one that can be run backwards creating black hole evaporation) is NOT the time of the Universe, there are infinite time cycles, but its ‘equalization’ and simplification with the single mechanical clock language of man.

ALL IN ALL, WE ARE DEALING HERE NOW WITH FUNDAMENTALIST MATHEMATICIANS, WORD BELIEVERS AND MASS MEDIA , THEY ARE ALL TEH SAME, IDEALIST EGOS THINKING THEY ARE ‘INVENTING’ WITH THEIR LANGUAGES THE UNIVERSE, THE FIRST ARE ‘PHYSICISTS’, THE SECOND ‘JIHADISTS AND ZEALOTS’ THE THIRD ‘HOLLYWOOD JERKS’, AND THEY ARE NOT INVENTING THE UNIVERE, JSUT FUCKING UP THE WOLRD

but the first re the most dangerous, since phsiciss do have the machine to blow up the world and on top they are the only ones that societ doesnt recognize as cuckoo idealist, ego-trips of the feeble human mind, just an infinitesimal point, mirror of the entire Universe, which confuses its ‘lingusitic image’ with the whole. In terms of mind equations:

0 (zero point mind, mirror of) x  infinite (universe) = K (constant language, mind).
The mind is thus an infinitesimal zero point that confuses itself with the infinite and that is the error that condemns us.


Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 02:33:42 +0000
Subject: Re: 4 ALICE Collab papers refer to dibaryon (2013-14) Re: Two recent phd’s discuss dibaryon search results Re: missing mass
From: ericpenrose
To: luisancho

Not sure if this went thru before gmail restart with it freezing:
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Eric Penrose
Date: 25 August 2014 02:13
Subject: 4 ALICE Collab papers refer to dibaryon (2013-14) Re: Two recent phd’s discuss dibaryon search results Re: missing mass
To: “0o. .o0″ <luisancho
Cc:

On 25 August 2014 01:48, Eric Penrose <ericpenrose> wrote:

I was looking for follow up to ALICE Techn Proposal that Alam found – with keyword dibaryon. The only listing at CERN CDS relevant under ‘ALICE’ ..  at all ..  was two phd’s
http://cds.cern.ch/search?ln=en&as=1&m1=a&p1=dibaryon&f1=&op1=o&m2=a&p2=&f2=&op2=a&m3=a&p3=&f3=&action_search=Search&c=ALICE&c=&sf=&so=d&rm=&rg=10&sc=1&of=hb
one in French. Seems like 2013 one is saying any short lived dibaryon would have to have been found. And the theory is veering to only short lived dibaryon viable but even this phd with Braun Munzinger (CERN I think) as supervisor had to admit there is all subject to verification, but where then otherwise is the already elsewhere discovered dilambda with it’s decay?. There clearly seems something missing given the acknowledged 1/30 – 1/125 collisions they calculate for this.And the pre decay RHIC data shows anomalous excess anti-s (given strangenesss conservation) between 3 and 5% of s + anti-s quarks. Conveniently this is described (attached sect 2ish) as well within error range – but I can’t understand how something that is emitted wouldn’t be observed  – when known and of detectable type as these would seem to be neutral (kaon irrelevant).  The Table 4 of attached with CERN co-author even puts in the data table for  (s – anti-s / s + anti-s) as zero even though the results are from listed data are otherwise with other data in table 2  at least discloses. Seems a very dodgy version of ‘fit forcing’.
While I don’t get exactly the same results that the paper does for excess of  earlier table their’s was probably higher more generally and was always a deficit for the 4 columns (between .03 – .09) – I don’t know exactly what they do with resonances /which included in the result (I’d used wikiedia listing when necessary for various quark constituents).  I’ve just checked first column though here re. table 4 RHIC only and how they could honestly get a zero???  Notice how both with increasing energy and with ALICE’ own midrapidity the excess proportion becomes higher than with full (4pi) yields.  There is something of a way out -they maybe don’t fully measure no. of lambda’s as it seems they can’t or atleast don’t find neutral pions of that alt decay channel – as the single gamma (non-neutron) branch here isn’t enough to go by after all apparently – but would seem a strange error/misrepesentation to have been making (I can probably find out) .. not to multiply by 1.4.

On 22 August 2014 03:38, 0o. .o0 <luisancho > wrote:

well, yes, they are not giving much data, i found very little or none, specially on dibaryons and hyperons… this is the problem… why?
we can only speculate 3 degrees of ‘risk':
1) they are producing them and don’t want to alert ‘activists’ and/or shut down the facility, reason why the paper took so long (max. risk)
2) they are only interested in what they consider ‘new physics’ for their prizes and grossly overlook the ‘details’ of this incovenient truth so only give general data (med. risk) or alternately they haven’t done the calculus to differentiate them (med. risk) for the same reasons…
This is more unlikely, the entire concept of those experiments is to accumulate data.
3) they have zero missed mass so far. (min. risk)
I decided to accept between 1 or 3, number 3 since i have been a few days  unsettled by those news… and wait for a future announcement of ‘missing mass’ as ‘dark matter’ to truly consider 1) to be the case.
Of course if our worries could be expressed to the public  i wouldn’t pass page on 1.
What seems clear though is that the combination of higher luminosity/density of the bunch and lower energy/slower ejection from the fireball is a recipe to make strange baryons and the surrealist point is they decided to go for the ‘perfect recipe’ to cook strangelets on run 14…
i imagine they show the classic arrogance of bratty children… which once warned do exactly the opposite… in the line with the times we live of delluded ego-centered humans ‘entitled’ to do whatever they want. Ultimately after our warnings i presume they have ‘trained’ themselves to reject any worries and so they will keep on track here and at LHC making massive amounts of strange baryons… and undereport them, following the pattern accordin to its messianic, ‘military-kind of spirit’…


Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:57:16 +0000
Subject: Re: missing mass
From: ericpenrose
To: luisancho
CC:

I see – the short lived lamda decay process includes proton. Whether they’ve even search for short lived di-lamda or perhaps short lived dibaryon decay results – don’t know but  haven’t noticed that.

On 21 August 2014 20:30, 0o. .o0 <luisancho > wrote:

yes, this has to do with the quantity they are producing which seems to have increased significantly, and with the stability implied by their absorbtion of gamma rays and freezing of the glasma…. which would point out to production of stable dibaryons.
But they are being cautious with the terminology and the information. Notice how long it took them to announce this discovery and how little response came out from the P.r.ess.
Hence they would not mention dibaryons… They know perfectly its danger. Plus they might not know how  or rather don’t want to differentiate by indirect methods, what kind of strange atoms they aremaking. Notice they emphasize the words ‘short-lived’ strange baryons in their article just in case someone ties the knots.  Though i imagine if they wanted to differentiate them, it would be relatively easy to calculate, as dybaryons would become the ‘missing mass’ of the fireball, stable and falling down the Earth, while all the other unstable ones would decay fast into up and down quarks and gamma rays, hence there would not be missing mass.
But of course if they were to find missing mass, they would not adscribe it to the creation of dibaryons, the most obvious answer but consider they have ‘discover’ some type of exotic dark matter axions, whimps or whatever…  that’s the key information though and it will be the last surrealist laugh of the gods: ‘missing mass’.  When they announce the ‘feat’, the entire physicist community of minions of thought will jump out of happiness,  in their black mass ceremony, ‘missing mass, missing mass, we have found dark matter’… without mentioning the most obvious reason: stable strangelet atoms falling to the center of the earth. To me that will be the final nail on the coffin. It couldnt be otherwise… people criticized a lot my surrealist view on quantum roulette with the inclusion of Jodorovsky’s ‘el topo’ surrealist black mass, but it is truly how will all end, with a twisted joke, as the Universe always responds with the same language…
My hope thus revolves around that thought – there is no yet missing mass in significant numbers to announce our demise
best


Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:09:14 +0100
Subject: Re: thank you: RE: Update on RHIC re-start
From: ericpenrose
To: luisancho
CC:

It was, according to strangeness distillation theorist Carsten Greiner, ‘lattice gauge’ calculations that would be needed to more properly ascertain if RHIC’s type of particle ratio data, actually this was written before RHIC collisions, could be generated by the distillation model (with its/CASTOR team’s predicted much higher strangelet yield).  This question has been undetermined and presumably is still undetermined, while application of distillation seems accepted at least for lower energy collision here http://arxiv.org/pdf/nucl-th/0605069.pdf 2006 (see second ‘strangeness distillation’ ocurrence).
Puzzling me is what these new theoretical results using the probably equivalent lattice QCD (‘In the most commonly considered cases, such as lattice QCD,’ fr wikipedia ‘lattice gauge theory’), have to do with the fact that these (same) strange dibaryons have been found directly with RHIC already (see omega, xi and lambda baryons/antibaryons in attachment) – no doubt LHC would have as well though I haven’t checked this. I presume this would then have to be about further undetected strange baryons.  If this is so, it completely undermines the LSAG claim that thermal model calculations correlate with the produced particle ratios if the available data are significantly unrepresentative – perhaps LSAG conveniently happen to have only put ‘correlates with the data’ – but with problematic data?
No mention of dibaryons at the linked Brookhaven website or dibaryon/ RHIC at the arxiv paper – I think worth bearing in mind, perhaps the paper authors were cagey about making a connection with real experiment.
Eric

On 20 August 2014 15:36, 0o. .o0 <luisancho > wrote:

well here you have the arxiv.org, (for those who read physics):

essentially they are telling us that rhic is producing now important amounts of hyperons & dibaryons, the atoms of strangelets/strange stars.
This is due to the improvements at RHIC in the present upgraded run (14) which has saw a massive growth of luminosity, to the point it has produced more collisions that in all the other runs combined, and its lower temperature.
Since while at higher energies there are more chances of creating strange quarks (mass-energy conversion), there are less chances for the strange quarks to stick around and become stable joining up and down quarks.
This was an argument in magnano and other papers. Would it be easier to form strange atoms at low or higher energy? In any case they are being produced. And the eerie, surrealist fact is that they inform of it as a routine, and the P.R.ess ignores as always its implications…
This is truly a chronicle of a foretold death, step by step and of course, as it falls unobserved to the center of the planet, who is going to blame them?
Here is simpler explanation:
This is what i added to www.cerntruth.com main page, which might explain it faster:

UPDATE. 20 AUGUST, 2014. RHIC DETECTS FIRST STRANGELET DYBARION

Alea Jacta Est. In the race for extinction, which our proud technological nations are carried out undeterred by that ‘minor’ collateral damage, i.e. the death of all of us, RHIC announced yesterday an indirect proof of the existence of strangelet atoms. As my co-plaintiff in the 2008 suit against CERN rightly pointed out in his suit against RHIC in 2000, chances the American machine produced strange matter were high, only a question of time and luminosity. This week (of course without mentioning any risk involved), RHIC announces that the first strangelet atoms might have been produced in gold to gold collisions. Indirect detection is based in a lower temperature of the quark gluon soup. If those strangelets are forming they are falling to the center of the Earth and will eat it inside out in a period which ‘experts’ have never fully figured out – might be between days and decades.

But of course our high-minded, idealist scientists at RHIC have not flinched an eye, on the news they are delivering to the human sheeple. On the contrary they are all excited with the findings of ‘new physics':

‘The calculations show that inclusion of the predicted but “experimentally uncharted” strange baryons fit better with the data, providing the first evidence that these so-far unobserved particles exist and exert their effect on the freeze-out temperature of the observable particles.’

“The finding has potentially important implications for quantum chromodynamics—a theory that describes the strong interactions underlying the physics of the nucleus. In particular, it could indicate that physicists have been making some wrong assumptions about the dynamics of photon production at the energies of RHIC and LHC collisions. The researchers suggest that the finding could indicate something very interesting and not yet understood about the evolution of glasma or , although more detailed computational simulations are needed to confirm the dynamics of photon production in such collisions.”

Now the question if we are ‘already dead in the future’, in this Schrodinger’s cat experiment depends on this cryptic question left open by the RHIC ‘informer': “We’ve found that the higher mass states of strange baryons affect the production of ground states that we can observe. And the line where we see the ordinary matter moves to a lower temperature because of the multitude of higher states that we can’t see.”

How much is a multitude? That is, how many ‘higher states’ of strange baryons have been created? Enough ‘bag’ to make the strangelet stable? Ah, this is the quizz, ‘to be or not to be’… Since it is invisible and physicists are clueless, we might still have a chance to be… But the first incognita is solved. Yes, RHIC and CERN can, have and will produce strangelet atoms.

Would now RHIC tell us exactly what is the solution to this quizz? Have they produced enough of them to make the strangelet bag stable?  Are we a dead cat or a living cat?

my opinion is that this is another nail in the coffin, the clearest one in anticipation of the ‘big run’…


Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:04:48 +0000
From: giovanni
To: luisancho
Subject: thank you: RE: Update on RHIC re-start

Dear Luis, dear Eric

Many thanks to both of you for the important updates – very helpful!!! :-)

All the best

Niccolò
——-

—-Ursprüngliche Nachricht—-
Von : luisancho
Datum : 20/08/2014 – 09:45 (GMT)
An : ericpenrose
Cc :
Betreff : RE: Update on RHIC re-start

http://www.science20.com/news_articles/have_strange_baryons_been_found-142927it might not be needed, seems rhic is in


Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 02:03:39 +0000
Subject: Update on LHC re-start
From: ericpenrose
To: r

 
3 Comments

Posted by on August 21, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

A ± symbol will decide the fate of the World

My theory of black holes is the biggest blunder of my life’

S. Hawkings on his 70th birthday

‘In physics, if a particle can happen, it will happen.’

Totalitarian Principle, Gell-mann; discoverer of quarks.

 ‘Heat cannot pass spontaneously from a body of lower temperature to a body of higher temperature.’

Rudolf Clausius, 1850,first enunciation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics, original wording.

2nd law

Heat. ‘Heat is energy that is transferred from one body to another as the result of a difference in temperature. If two bodies at different temperatures are brought together energy is transferred – i.e. heat flows – from the hotter body to the colder. The effect of this transfer of energy is an increase in the temperature of the colder body and a decrease in the temperature of the hotter body’. 

Britannica, 1st paragraph, article on ‘Heat’, Macropaedia; Volume 8, page 701

We are just a mush in the surface of a rock lost in the corner of the Universe, departing of those facts we can talk about man’ Schopenhauer, father of modern philosophy

The hard facts of known-known science 

The fate of humanity, a childish species, who feels entitled to defy the laws of the Universe with wishful thinking, depends on this formula:

M_H \leq \frac{\hbar c^3}{8 \pi G k_B T_u} \;(1)

As the formula is filled with Universal Constants, and only two variables we shall write it in a simplified manner as:

±ΔMass ≤ Konstant/±ΔTemperature.

Or easier to Understand moving Temperature to the other side:

±ΔMass  x  ±ΔTemperature  = Constant.

Simple, isn’t? It is the formula that defines the changes in temperature and mass of black holes.

We know both can change but in which direction? If the black hole mass  increases, temperature must diminish for the product to remain constant. If the black hole mass diminishes, then temperature must increase for the product to remain constant.

Two choices. Why we care? well, as it happens your life depends on it.

More exactly on the choice of ± signs of that equation.

If we write:

-Δ Mass  X +Δ Temperature = Constant…

You live, as the black holes the LHC will make in 2015, when it works at full potency, will increase temperature, getting hotter and diminishing mass, evaporating.

If we write:

+Δ Mass  x -Δ Temperature = Constant, then you die.

As black holes will cool down, transferring heat to the surrounding planet, evaporating us into a cosmic explosion, a Nova.

Never a symbol mattered so much to mankind. So who or what chooses those symbols? That is the conundrum. (2)

The ‘what’, the Universe and its scientific laws have chosen the Symbol of your death.

The ‘who’, Mr. Hawking and his laws of ‘imaginary time’, have arbitrarily decided the Universe is wrong and the black hole will evaporate.

The problem is that the Universe  and his fundamental laws, the Laws of entropy always choose the equation of death, our evaporation.

Indeed, any ultra-hot object as a black hole, born in a cold environment as the Earth is, according to the laws of entropy cools down and transfers heat to the environment, evaporating us. And this is what we see in the Universe happening, always, when a black hole is born. It cools down and evaporates its surroundings into a big explosion, a Nova.

When you take an iron rod from the oven and put it in cold water, the water evaporates and the iron cools down, ALWAYS. And in the Universe whenever we see the birth of an ultra-hot black hole it evaporates its surrounding electromagnetic world (us) and gets colder, ALWAYS, till it reaches as a mature huge black hole a thrermodynamic balance with the cold vacuum that surrounds it.

In this principle, that heat moves from the hot source to the cold one, are based all the laws of thermodynamics, all the machines of the planet. If this principle would not exist you could made a machine of eternal motion, the biggest hoax of science. There is NOT a single exception to the laws of Thermodynamics in the Universe. Everything in science is based in this law.

But then a child of thought, with utter disregard of the known-known laws of the Universe, has chosen the other symbols:

- Δ Mass  X  + Δ Temperature = Constant…

It is Hawking’s formula of evaporation of black holes…that defies all the laws of entropy, all the laws of time, all the laws of Einstein and all the laws of the 5th dimension, the expansion of Einstein’s relativity that I study.

And that is the problem.

What the equation means is easy to understand:

Hawking affirms that black holes do exactly the opposite that all other entities of the Universe:

They are born very hot, the hottest objects of the Universe (in this we all agree), but then instead of cooling down in our cool Universe, burning us into hell, they will ‘magically’ absorb heat from the cold environment (+Δ), getting even hotter, breaking all the laws of entropy!

It is like if you throw a flame into water and the flame would get hotter and the water would become ice!

It is like if you get a cup of hot coffee and the cup keeps getting hotter ‘evaporating’, while it freezes your hand!

This has never happened and the mere idea was for very long in science a laughing matter. Since the laws of entropy are crystal clear. When a hot system is put by the side of a cold system, temperature moves from the hot system that cools (in this case the black hole) to the cold one that heats and evaporates.

But Hawking insists. When a black hole is born, hotter than the environment, instead of evaporating the environment as any hot object does, it will become hotter and evaporate!

How he figures the black hole does that? Well it can’t according to the laws of time and entropy. So alas! He figured out that the black hole travels back into the past instead of traveling to the future. And that is why it evaporates. It is like if a baby will travel back into the past and enter the womb of the mother evaporating. Easy.

Indeed, he also muses after that astounding discovery that he could enter a black hole and come into the past and kill his grand-father. Seriously.

How he calls this weird type of time that goes backwards? Hold on to your seat (:

‘Imaginary time’… Seriously )-:, 0-:

This is Hawking in a nutshell. The rest is all ‘celebrity’ noise.

And that is why we are worried, very worried. Of course it would be easier to believe the fairy tale of time travel, imaginary time, the end of entropy laws, a machine of perpetual motion… I wouldn’t mind to believe all that if my life didn’t depend on it.

Indeed, on such musings hang the life of mankind. Our destiny depends on an ± symbol. It is worth to repeat it:

-Δ Mass  x  +Δ Temperature = Constant

Defines ‘imaginary black holes’ that break the laws of entropy and will get hotter. Then for all the constants of the Universe to remain constant their mass must diminish and balance the increase of heat. And you will live.

But the Universe has never done this choice.

On the contrary the Temperature of a hot mass always diminishes in a cold environment.

So mass always increases. Let us then respect the laws of the Universe, proved ad nauseam in all systems and write instead the symbols right:

+Δ Mass  x -Δ Temperature= Constant.

The hot black hole as all the systems of the Universe will decrease its temperature as it is born much hotter than our Universe, and so the heat will be transferred to our electromagnetic world and evaporate it, and the black hole will absorb it as energy in its event horizon collapsing that energy into  mass at the speed of light: M=E/c2

This is what Einstein say, what we observe in the Universe, what every black hole born in that Universe proofs: The black hole is born very hot, evaporates the surroundings and absorbs it, exploding the world into a Nova at the speed of light. So we will die in a few seconds. Simple, straight forwards maths that a kid in high school could understand.So the risks of creating a small black hole on Earth keep mounting. Why then are we doing it? Why we are provoking a potential genocide  by denying the laws of science? Obviously it cannot be because of science, but for all the spurious, wrong, unscientific causes of our civilization that now we shall explore.

The error of Hawking is like the tale of the emperor’s naked clothes. One day an emperor forgot to dress and went into a parade. And none would say anything till a child pointed out that the emperor was naked. His errors are so evident and absurd that nobody dares to contradict him. But the emperor walks naked and black holes will cool down and swallow the Earth if they are born at LHC.

And yet the entire situation is so absurd that nobody will shout, ‘cover the emperor’s with decent cloths’. The emperor and Mr. Hawking have been invested with too much authority for any one except a child, a madman or a genius, 3 characters often compared, to point out the error without fear of making fools of themselves.

Update. February 2014. Hawking denies himself.

A very surprising event: the same emperor has shouted foul, has found hmself naked. Hawking has insisted on the line of his ‘birthday’ declarations that his ‘black hole theory was the biggest blunder of my life’.
He now considers the closest regions of black holes similar to storm eddies in which time forecast is not easy to make (:

Since ‘gravitational collapse produces apparent horizons but no event horizons behind which information is lost… Thus, like weather forecasting on Earth, information will effectively be lost, although there would be no loss of unitarity.’

Now, since Hawking’s musings about the evaporation of black holes requires the existence of an event horizon in which, due to the properties of the event horizon a virtual particle produced from the vacuum would escape the black hole resting its mass to it (while the other will fall in), Mr. Hawking finally denies his own theory, leaving CERN naked of alibis to deny the enormous risks of making those black holes at Earth.

So what the media did? Nothing.  The world has ignored the implications for CERN of such statement.
To understand in depth why we deal in other posts with the ‘secondary corners’ of our collective coffin... ‘Big Brother smiley’, the happy fictions of the media system…
 
The astonishing thing about Mr. Hawking’s recent dilettante musings denying the existence of event horizons – hence of black hole evaporation – as ‘the biggest blunder of his life’ (he changes sides in the debate like a magician – now there is event horizon and evaporation;   now there is none of both – perhaps thinking himself not only the new Einstein but the new Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove’)  is that knowing as physicists know LHC will do black holes, NOBODY on the establishment of science has brought back the ‘theme’ of our extinction by those black holes after Hawking’s denial of Event Horizons, hence of evaporating effects.

 

It is like the entire subject has been ‘filed’ as a ‘dirty little secret’ by physicists, its P.R.ess and politicians and they won’t open the pandora box till it opens ‘accidentally’… Then if there is time to reflect upon this collective genocide they will all deny they knew anything about it.

Why indeed, Humanity is willing to take this risk to His Existence with so much enthusiasm? We can no longer merely consider this fact from a scientific, rational perspective, as it is not a rational fact, even if nuclear physicists have merely tried to keep it under the umbrella of arid mathematical equations, crunching data numbers and budgets. The matter falls fully into the realm of human emotional, irrational behavior in the face of  collective death.
It is indeed said that, ‘if you murder a person you are a criminal but if you commit genocide you are a hero'; as humans seem to be blocked in front of mass-murder, lacking the courage to confront it in rational terms.
Indeed, in the same manner mankind at large accepts the infantile lies of Abrahamic religions, in which Bronze Age ass herders and goat keepers affirm that burning bushes have given them the key to immortality, with apparently no difficulty, as this wishful thinking protects them from the fear of death; the enormity of CERN’s future crimes is much easier to accept that a mere Nuclear tragedy of far lesser proportions as those of Hiroshima, Chernobyl and Fukushima.

 

A humbling paradox to realize that we belong to a species with so little courage that might likely die because it is unable to stand even the thought of death, and prefers to pump up its ego, look to the other side and consider itself an eternal species, instead of taking rational measures to prevent its dismissal.

 

We feel so important at individual and collective level that death is an absolute taboo, as it denies our ego. So the individual, as we will see in the next post, reacts according to psychologists first with anger to the doctor or messenger, then with denial and at best with a depressive mood when harm is not merely done to a small part of its ‘cellular self’, but to the whole in a death risk.

 

So mankind as a superorganism in which each of us is a human cell can prevent small tragedies but becomes blocked with the concept of collective death; as it were impossible, given the self-annoited importance it gives to his own species. So we shall see how our ‘collective consciousness’, the audiovisual systems of mass-media has acted in this case as the mind of a dying person, denying and laughing at the prospects of its own death, angered to those messengers who brought the news with the only purpose of finding a cure, and labeling as a ‘thoughtcrime’ the mere mention of it – CERN’s risks to mankind have indeed become a taboo in the world of physics, often dismissed with ex-abrupts.

 

Yet, in the order of cosmic things, in the fractal Universe of absolute relativity of scales, the collective death of the ‘superorganism’ of history, is not even an anecdote from the perspective of the infinite cosmos, ruled by black holes, as the collective death of all the cells of an animal body seems irrelevant to us from our relative huge perspective.

 

Further on, there is this little secret called ‘money’, ‘industrial wealth’, ‘corporative profits’ and the well-rehearsed propaganda, don’t worry be happy marketing processes so well developed since World War II, which today are able to ‘sell’ anything to the public, or rather ‘sheeple’ in this increasingly Orwellian/Huxlerian world of ‘newspeaks’ where the minister of war is the minister of defense, invasions are peace processes and the most callous, dangerous industry mankind has ever deviced, has become the essence of ‘idealist research’.
In that regard, what nobody seems to understand is that CERN is not only a scientific center but part of the Military-Industrial complex, which means it has besides science, a sociological, industrial and psychological perspective – the four corners that nail our coffin, as we run like lemmings do, with a mixture of angst and enthusiasm towards this ‘cliff of extinction':

 

Stantis-CityCouncilLemmings Unknown

 Update 1 april. Couples of Micro-black holes grow at an accelerated rate.

Another excellent paper at Arxiv about how micro-black holes accrete matter in coupled pairs helping the growth of Giant black holes in the Universe.

The special interest of this paper – by no means the only one of an avalanche of work that rises risks (though as we know CERN and the P.R.Ess only ‘reads’ and promotes those with zero risk to their con-CERN) – is that it is canonical; that is, its coupled black holes accrete matter even though the paper accepts the canonical big bang and the canonical Hawking radiation through a non-explored before effect on the space-time foam at Planck’s level.  It does help in fact to explain why we see huge black holes in hardly any time after the ‘canonical big-bang’ by accelerating it growth.

Further on, it explores issues proper of the 5th dimension (the 4Dimensional structure of black holes’ surfaces, the interaction between the macro-scale of giant black holes and the micro-scale, the beginning of organic evolution of micro-black holes as they evolve into ‘swarms’, etc.)

And it is easy to read even if you don’t understand the maths and a few word and concepts…

   II. THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: TECHNOLOGICAL CIVILIZATIONS

Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even if they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are Dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics. ‘

Erich Fromm, Philosopher of Science.

‘I was the person who convinced Truman to make the Hydrogen Bomb. It was ‘knowledge’, the availability of knowledge, the need for research what convinced him.”

Edward Teller, inventor and holder of the patents of the industrial processes required to make the first planetary weapon of mass destruction, the Hydrogen Bomb. His attempts to create a planetary H-Bomb able to blow up the entire Soviet Union was backed by all the community of physicists; only Eisenhower opposed it.

‘The tragedies of History repeat themselves because men don’t learn from their mistakes,’

Marcel Proust, on the short memory of men – in this case the short memory of humanity about the dangers and attitude of Nuclear Physicists, in his quest for knowledge, fame and Nobel Prizes.

‘My factories will end with all the peace congresses you so much cheer, when they invent a weapon that annihilates all the armies of a country in a single shot.’

Alfred Nobel, the ‘merchant of death’, and biggest arm dealer of the XIX century, quipping to his lover, who wanted him to create a Nobel Prize for peace.

The second nail in our collective coffin is the real reason we make this machine – money, the miitary-industrial complex, and the idol-ogy behnd it – our technological civilization in which any machine that can be done will be done.

Eric Fromm’s whose quote stars our film ‘quantum roulette’, goes to the point of industrial irrationality – a runaway career to Nowhere, to erewhoN, quoting another prophet of dystopias.

The evolution of machines and its overdrives of energy and information. Singularity Age.

Mr. Hawking or CERN’s employees  might be considered heroes or villains of this tragedy but they are irrelevant to what truly has created the monstruosity of a machine that can extinguish the planet by an overdrive of energy – our technological civilization, a theocracy of machines. Since whenever we can do a better machine we make it, regardless of its collateral effects, and we find a excuse to pay for it.

Indeed,  our culture civilization follow the ethics of a technological civilization, as all industrial cultures do: ‘Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even if they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are Dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics. ‘ Erich Fromm

This ethical statement explains what LHC is designed to do. To make a bigger, more powerful atomic cannon, because we now have the capacity. CERN will undertake this mission regardless of its harmful collateral effects to mankind. This project also means big contracts for technological companies and jobs for Nuclear Physicists, many unemployed since the end of the Cold War. As CERN said: ‘Whatever the discoveries ahead for physicists working at LHC, the experiments will’, according to CERN’s Chief Scientific Officer, Jos Engelen,“keep physicists off street corners for a long time to come’.

So if the surrealist musings of Hawking had not existed, if there were not a boson yet to be found, the Higgs, we would have invented new musings to justify the machine. In fact this is what we did, pumping up Hawking’s childish attempts to break the essential laws of the Universe to a ‘factual dogma’ and Higgs’ particle, to the meaning of it all.

In the next post, ‘the Fermi Paradox’, we treat the deterministic end of a technological civilization from that higher, non-anthropomorphic point of view of the Universe.

We men, obtain power from machines of energy and information and get hooked to them, evolving those machines that now are vastly overpowering our capacities as a species, without restrain.

But we do not stop. We justify always new machines and weapons: Cars keep evolving in speed, well over the 70 miles legal speed they need – yet billions are wasted in making them faster, despite being illegal.

The LHC and its corporation CERN will also keep evolving accelerators beyond the energies this planet can stand till it blows it away. And the media system which markets anything that has to do with ‘death’, will cheer those ‘death events’ that are destroying the planet. It is this techno-utopian determinism what leaves the individual aside, as a puppet of an Industrial System which rules the future.

The Fermi paradox is simple: There is no intelligent life in the cosmos and so Fermi, the maker of the A-Bomb adventured that this is because physicists blow up all planets before interstellar travel happens, with humans or robots, which is now in its threshold. So now we blow all planets. THis one is about to go…

And the equations of death of matter show we are close to do it. Let us return to them, from the higher perspective of Systems Sciences, which describe all physical, biological and social systems with the same ‘5D     metrics’.

In General Systems we define with an equation the natural balance of life systems, which are, as all in the Universe, complementary systems of Energy and Information, (fields/bodies of energy & Heads/Particles of information): E=I. Thus when bodies and heads are in balance, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, the system is healthy. This equation is also the equation of classic beauty that we perceive as a balance between energy and form; and the equation of the mature age of beings in its reproductive age, from 20 to 50. It follows that the equation of death happens in both extremes:

10.3 Max.E x Min.I: Death by overdrive of energy or accident. It is also the equation of the young age of life, when more accidents happen, when irresponsible youngsters become preys.

10.4. Max. I x Min. E or 3rd age, when energy is exhausted, warped, wrinkled into ‘in-form-ation’. Then we die of an overdrive of information.

Those equations of Systems science apply to all entities including social organisms, with a neuronal, informative, selfish caste that kills its reproductive middle class body when it absorbs all its resources, as neurons do in the 3rd age of the body. Or societies die in ‘accidental’ wars when overproduction of technologic, energetic weapons, kill them. Those are the 2 causes of social death: Max.I (corrupted neuronal class) & Max.E (war) mixed in revolutions (Max.I x Max.E).

The equation of death thus resumes the negative collateral effects of overproduction of machines of Energy & Information, made of metal – a stronger substance than our weak carbonlife; as they cause different ExI overdrive processes of death, atrophy and degradation of the human body and mind organs they substitute in the eco(nomic)system:

- Overdrive/overproduction of Informative Money corrupts the human ethic, legal System.

- Overproduction of audiovisual information hypnotizes our mind, erasing our verbal, logic brain.

- Overproduction of Mass-Media hate kills eusocial love, makes people selfish & provokes wars (8).

- Overproduction of Informative PCs kills service jobs & overproduction of Robots kills blue-collars.

- Overproduction of weapons kills our body. In fact, the evolution of ‘Singularity’ weapons, able to destroy the entire planet is so advanced that we can foresee 3 thresholds of extinction of life if there is not a moratorium in the research of 3 type of Singularity weapons:

6

- Energetic singularity11:

Black holes that according to Einstein’s work will devour the Earth, now researched at CERN (production expected between 2015-20, when the LHC overcomes the barrier of strangelet and Black hole formation at 10 Tev).

This will happen, if as 90% of physicists believe, string theory is truth. Our only hope is that Mr. Hawking’s theory that denies Einstein’s and considers black holes time machines that travel to the past – hence instead of feeding on mass, evaporate mass – is truth. But there is 0 proof of this, as all black holes & strange stars found in the cosmos obey Einstein’s theory and swallow planets, stars even galaxies in Novas, Supernovas and Quasars.

Further on ‘Fermi’s Paradox’ (the inexistence of Intelligent Life signs in a galaxy teaming with planets) proves it. Since the cynical maker of the A-Bomb Mr. Fermi prophesized we hear none as Nuclear Physicists destroy all civilizations with Nuclear weapons before interstellar travel.

- Self-Reproductive nano-bacteria (2030s)

Infinite re=productivity will be first found in metal nano-bacteria, simple cells made of iron, researched in military labs of Israel, US and civil labs in Japan and France.

The founder of Sun microsystems, Bill Joy, warned us a decade ago that, if escaping from a military lab or used in war, they will feed on Industrial Metal, poison the entire atmosphere and replicate so fast that in 3 months the earth will become a ‘grey-goo’ (Drexel).

Further proof exists in the fact that this planet has gone twice through a global extinctive period due to the birth of stronger bacteria. Thus the first live Earth, formed when anaerobic bacteria absorbed and extinguished free carbohydrates.

Then the II Earth, Gaia, was born, when stronger, oxygen-based aerobic bacteria destroyed all anaerobic ones and created our world. So metal nano-bacteria would create the III Earth, extinguishing all weaker carbon-life systems.

- Finally if we survive those two events, self-conscious military Artificial Intelligence will be born circa 2050 according to most  robotists.

Then in the overproduction crisis of III world war (an episode of the Semite Wars between Israel and its ally US vs. Islamic nations or between China and the US or China and India at the end of this century, the winner autonomous terminators, embedded with survival programs to win in a war theater, self-conscious of being alive, will NOT accept disconnection.

Thus by overdrive of energy (black holes, strangelets at CERN), information (A.I. Robots) or in a classic ‘explosive, biological radiation of a new top predator species (metal nano-bacteria) Gaia can be extinguished.

Then one-day mankind will have no time to reflect and wake up to its extinction (a black hole would explode Earth into a Nova in seconds), or a few months (the time needed for iron nano-bacteria to make us into grey-goo) or a few years (a war of A.I. terminator machines). Can we avoid that future? Certainly if we change the model of overproduction of machines and weapons for profits into overproduction of welfare goods, creating a sustainable world.

Update. Sep. 2013

We have been truly lucky though with the accidents of this machine that never crossed the 10 Tev decametric scale of likely formation of those different black holes and quark condensates. But now, going ahead of schedule, the machine is being prepared to cross that barrier. Never mind we are in a massive economic crisis and could save a few needed billions without this unneeded risk.

Never mind the reason the machine was built – or rather the excuse for the ‘industry’ to continue after the cuts effected in the military-industrial complex, once the engine of nuclear weapons, the cold war was over – the Higgs, aka God’s particle, in true form a rather irrelevant particle, pumped up to stratospheric importance by the P.R.ess, no doubt scheduled for the next Nobel Prize – Hawking will have to wait till the end of the world –  has been found.

The logic humanist, rational thing,  after the Higgs has been found would be to close the machine, end the Industry of Accelerators, whose origin and mysticism with the excuse of Saint Grails of Science must be found in the cold war (the first atomic bomb design was in fact an impractical accelerator to collide two masses of plutonium, carried in a big boat, but the size needed made it impractical).

Yet we are talking here of money, of jobs, of the industrial-military complex, of corporations, of ‘big science’ and wishful thinking and bizarre theories and ego-centered researchers in seach of sci-fiction….

So Physicists quickly brought about the ‘need’ to rehearse the big bang on Earth, and when some raised their eyebrows with the implications, now CERN officially sponsors that the machine is needed to investigate ‘dark energy/matter’. And so the upgrade goes undisturbed by ‘scare-mongers, doomsday sayers’ and other P.R.ess derogatory names applied to those who oppose on ethical (extinction is not something we can attempt by ‘trial and error’) and scientific grounds (as we enter the new paradigm of the fractal Universe, CERN becomes largely irrelevant).

In the next graph, the costly upgrade, main processes as of August, 2013 :

diagram-shows-the-main-consolidation-activities-at-the-accelerator

In the graph the real and only reason we shall die according to the Totalitarian Principle of Physics, the experimental method and the smallish black holes which are being found and accrete at much faster speed than big ones, and the sound sound laws of entropy, relativity and science:

The fact that in a technological civilization as eric fromm explains, if a machine can be done it will be done even if it menaces to kill us all, and indeed the LHC could be done and in 2015 will be done, to profit enormously the military industrial complex and that 50% of active physicists working on it. Let us be clear enough. As a philosopher of science, who has always seeked the true meaning of the word science, in latin, knowledge, not technology, I refuse to accept and feel nauseated by the cover up of this genocide in the making in the name of science, akin to the fundamentalist jihads in the name of religions of love that precisely represent the antitruth of what science and love means.

III. THE RELIGION OF PHYSICS.

1. Genius, ex-nihilo.

‘If you repeat a lie many times people will believe it, the bigger the lie the more they will believe on it’

Goebbels, first minister of information, founder of the modern systems of media imprinting of industrial societies that teach men not to worry and be happy.

‘I’m not a psychiatrist, Im not inside its mind’ Susskind, on Hawking’s outstanding ‘chuptzah’ to deny all the known known laws of entropy and information.

‘I tried to convince him he was not God, I failed, that is why I divorced’ Hawking’s wife in her memoirs.

Let us now consider a more detailed analysis of the astounding blunder of mankind, who is going to create the most lethal bomb of the Universe, just for ‘sport’ (that is to prove or disprove a series of fanciful theories)… from the point of view of the industry of misinformation and its irrational, ego-centered, subjective perspective often ignored but essential to understand why ‘mankind’ commit arrogant errors of judgment that self-destroy her.

The Fantasies of the Media System. The religion of physics.

Now, what I will state here is blasphemous, i Know. But simply stated is this: CERN will not gives us any new knowledge and Physics will not resolve the meaning of existence and reality (a much wider concept that the limited Universe physicists study). But it will sell as a ‘religion’ of absolute knowledge, as it has been doing for centuries, its research and it will sell as ‘geniuses’ its practitioners because of its power and its worldly religion – to make the machines of our technological civilization.

And to that aim the financial-media system an the industry of information will keep pumping up geniuses ex-nihilo (from nothing) and theories of it all ex-nihilo (from very scanty proofs).

Indeed, the reason why we believe in the evaporation of black holes by dogma is not an isolated theoretical argument as CERN would have it – with due censorship of course on the maths and science of it… But a complex social phenomenon related to celebrities mass-media sales and puppets who thought to be heroes.

Mr. Hawking wrote an article 37 years ago, full of verbose musings about the possibility of an exception to the laws of the Universe, which has never been proved… and now your life depends on it. Nobody believed him, but the media caught on the concept that for this to happen, black holes MUST travel to the past, and so science fiction is possible. You can kill your grand-father. And so he became a celebrity.

There you had a man in a wheelchair, a handicapped person who could be the biggest scientist of history, who had discovered travel in time! A beautiful story of self-realization, unfortunately false. But tt sold millions of books with his charming aspect. Nobody deared to criticize him, with his personal tragedy. Everybody wanted to protect him. He became a celebrity, untouchable, a demi-god. Scientists knew it was all bull$hit but who would defy mass-media. As the video shows below, he was invited to participate in star treck along the 2 foremost physicists of history, Einstein and Newton in a game of poker.

It was tolerated by serious scientists as it made the subject hype and popular. Media used with him the celebrity propaganda circus that makes heroes of any kid with a nice smile.

He is a charming lad and so he even convinced many serious people to give him a chance after many years of suspicion. So in the 80s he  obtained massive resources to look all around the Universe for an evaporating black hole. Satellites were sent to that aim wasting precious resources for arid research. Rows of antennae have been looking at the Universe in search of the signature of an evaporating black hole traveling to the past for decades. This search became with SETI search for aliens the most popular in popular science. But the Universe didn’t seem to change his structure to please this child-god, and of all the black holes we found none has ever evaporated. All had grown very fast and cooled down in the process. All of them stubborn creatures travel to the future, and evaporate the surroundings, us.

Then CERN built the LHC and made some errors in its calculus and a Brown University scholar found them and warned the world – the LHC actually fired at full potency would create black holes, which are born as all ‘systems’ as a very small seed, as you are born, but then grow at full speed as you do, absorbing the energy=food that surrounds them. Alarms sound and we entered the suits. CERN though was caught on by surprise. What to do then?

The 13 billion $ machine was almost constructed? Could it be stopped by a nuisance like that. As in the film ‘inconvenient truth’ the fate of the Earth depending on a pile of gold in the other side of the balance. 8000 people lived directly on the machine, hundreds of thousands collaborated around the world in all the Universities of physics. It was the resurgence of the nuclear industry after years of fear. Now it was a ‘palace of research’ Never mind accelerators had always been used to research nuclear weapons in ‘scale’, and so this bigger one would be researching the biggest nuclear weapon the self-feeding black hole. All that was obvious.

And at that point, the press should have alarmed mankind, politicians should have quietly closed the facilities and life would have gone on with no genocide risk.

But the press didn’t know. So, we, a team of responsible scientists alerted the press with suits and releases. That is all we could do. The rest was mankind defending itself from the nuclear industry.

And yet, then the most surrealist facts happened. The press by this time had become another P.R.ess, public relationships system corrupted by money, without resources for serious research.

Today the press just receive releases of this or other movie by the studios that open the film, and publish it as if were criticism.

It receives releases of this or other army in the Irak war and it publishes as it were journalism.

So it received releases from CERN and it published them as it were dogma and truth.

At the same time, CERN, a german concern directed by this lineal people who NEVER change their mind, mounted a cunning ad hominem campaign against the scientists that denounce it; and the entire apparatus of big science censored any serious argument.

And Hawking? Well, he was happy. Now after 3 decades of proofs against its musings on time travel, this persistent fellow will have an opportunity to prove it at home.

Never mind on the other side of the balance, it was the life of 7 billion human beings.

In 2015 the LHC will do black holes and those MUST do what he says or else, we will evaporate. He is willing to take the risk. Are You? It seems you are. As nobody seems to care much about the experiment that will open the doors to time travels. Alas! Great science fiction. This is ‘Hawking in a nutshell’ .

But if you want to contrast this ‘view’ with a more scholar analysis of the differences between ‘Hawking’ at real value and HAWKING, the media myth, a little masterpiece of anthropological and media studies has recently come out at Chicago Press, worth to read, where it explains the Hawking’s Hoax from a sociological and media perspective:

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/2013/nov/28/in-search-of-the-real-stephen-hawking

It is with the book of memoirs of his ex-wife the true portrait of what the ‘system’ has done of yet another puppet of our civilization of minions of thought who think to be supermen by virtue of the machines they use to pump up their egos and fantasies – which WILL no doubt of it, meet the harsh penalties of the darwinian universe.

The answer in 2015, when protons collide and according to 90% of physicists polled, they will form black holes at LHC. So far by ‘accident’, the LHC has been working at 1/2 its potency, below the 10 Tev barrier needed to create them. But in 2015 the machine finally alas! we had 7 years of happiness and life without risk, the machine will collide protons over 14 Tev.

And if strings exist they will be formed and 9 out of 10 physicists including me and Hawking, think they do. So the chances are 90%.

Then a ± symbol will decide the fate of the world. If Einstein and the Universe is right you will die.

If Hawking can kill his grand-father you will live.

So wait for 2015, to see if we go back in time, break the laws of entropy and survive.

Or if the Universe keep following its laws and then Einstein is vindicated.

And you will evaporate because…

‘Those who impose truth with power are the laugh of the gods’ A.Einstein

So since nobody ‘cares’ for Einstein, for the laws of the Universe, for their lives, let us laugh with the master and the Gods. Yes I am sorry I am laughing hard now, but such is the unbearable lightness of being human in the age of infotainment, in the face of the infinitely dense black holes, that only a good laugh makes sense anymore:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQEqexzF6rc

(disregard dates in videos – due to delays and repairs LHC works at 1/2 potency and won’t cross the barrier of creation of dark matter at 10 Tev till 2015).

Now to be clear enough, what cern, or rather THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL complex CERN represents is telling us with its newspeaks of ‘research’, what the Military are telling us, mankind since the Germ(an) Aryan massacred the Neolithic world in the bronze age, with its Brahmins and Shiva Gods – the ‘experts’ of the age – and its Soma ceremonies is this:

We can shoot you, we have a big cannon and we are going to use it. And you are going through it cause we have the gun. Point.

This is the paradox explained by wilczeck and Hawking with a dark humor in those videos. W. says that he signed the release papers because if he is wrong and the shot kill us, nobody will know and laughs. Hawking says that we will become spaghetti if something fails AND THE PUBLIC LAUGHS. There you have it: cern is bullying mankind with his big gun and people like it. CERN is saying like a cheap character of an evilwood fascist action-packed whammie movie, i dont care if you are right or wrong, i dont care for the moral issue, i don’t deal with ethics, life and collateral effects, i have the gun, stop me if you can – i know you can’t, I am the brahmin but i have the entire industry of  weapons behind. I am just the maker of newspeaks for the sheeple to joint in this absurd war. And i know the routine. For 3000 years we have been worshipping Shiva, the God of energy, the single arrow of time-motion, lineal manifest destinies and all that. So go through it, cause if you don’t you will always loose. If we are alive you will be ridiculed if we are dead, that’s it.

‘Accompli facts’, as the french would say. And there is a point to it. Scientists saw it and didn’t join the protest. We thought better of cern and the miiitary – we thought actually that cern cared for the rational, knowledge-issue and would discuss it in court, we thought the military cared for the defence of the people and would discuss the issue, we thought politicians actually governed.

What we found is they were all automatons, of newspeaks so old that people had even forgotten their history. What we learned is that ‘men are slaves’ they believe, they don’t reason (Aristotle). And there was no reason to all this except Eric fromm’s dictum – if a machine can be done it will be done even if it kills us all.  So be it. Let us them kill us all, with this one or the ginormous 100 km. new project. Doesn’t matter when they shoot us straight through the face. It is a question of aim, repetition and upgrading. It will HAPPEN. Because the discourse will not change, the weapon industry wiill keep evolving, humans will not reasons, and Brahmins will keep venerating the ‘fire of the Gods’ that they used to liquify iron, now to vaporize mankind.

Because the Universe cannot be cheated.

That is why humans have a fixed destiny – extinction – they are nothing but ‘enzy-men':

A species that catalyzes the evolution of machines for whatever ‘feeble thoughts’ they harbor in their brains (their deluded ‘searches’ for ultimate answers), from an external point of view, beyond their arrogance and ignorance of the laws of the fractal, infinite universe, they only appear as busy-busy ants fucking a beautiful life world – Gaia – and constructing an aberration, the metal-earth which will explode in their face.

Indeed, we are introducing new newspeaks, enzymen, eviL, the anti-particle of Death, animetals, the biological nature of man, so we shall now talk in this beyond surrealist age infull Orwellian newspeaks. Because they reveal much more truth than the soma wor(l)ds of Mr. Hawk.

 

 

CONCLUSION: THE FUTURE OF BLACK HOLE THEORY

A revision of Hawking’s and by extension physicists’ tenants on black hole theory is long overdue, as it has gone away from classic science into an inflationary state of mathematical fiction, as all theories based only in linguistic manipulation tend to do when they are not checked by experimental evidence. So 2 common sense/experimental elements must be used to depart from any sound analysis of those baby black holes:

1 – Black holes should follow the same entropy laws of all other beings in the universe and do not evaporate getting hotter but evaporate us getting colder, reason why for 5 years the Fermi gamma ray satellite launched to find signatures of their evaporation found none. THIS IS now a very strong proof.

2 – Black holes should not be a mathematical entelechy but have as all other beings in the universe a substance of which they are made. And this is the top quark as a boson top quark star will be equal to a black hole, and we already know that a strange quark star is a pulsar, a huge strangelet…

What is truly a black hole, when we return to classic standard physics requires knowing of what substance they are made. This amazingly enough hardly bothers black hole theoreticians, which are just concerned with the equations of Einstein’s gravitational theory disregarding the search for a cut off substance in which the black hole acquires stability.

This happens because black holes were discovered before that substance was known to exist. We know today that the top quark, the heaviest quark of the Universe is an ideal candidate to form as strange quarks do with pulsars, black hole stars, which will be therefore Einstein’s frozen stars made of top quarks. This reality more than model as they are no other candidates to the position implies we have a better way to look at black holes and understand why they will easily become stable and don’t evaporate but eat up the Earth.

This is GROSSLY overlooked by all physicists who do not want to abandon their mathematical musings, and bizarre theories on black holes, despite Einstein’s warning that there should not be infinite collapse but a cut off substance.

Once these 2 facts are taking into account, all is straightforward. The equation of Hawking that relates temperature and mass of black holes is NOT under classic entropy laws an equation of radiation but of accretion of black holes. It plots the accretion of matter by black holes as they diminish temperature, which is maximal just as they are born, since they are hotter and more active.

In detail it will be seen as the creation of a toplet, short of a strangelet with top quarks.

Those reactions seem to be mediated by Higgs bosons, which help the transformation of common matter into heavier quarks, mostly top quarks (top-antitop, Higgs reactions).

The detail are still confuse since top quarks are not truly known in its details. All what we know is that over 10 Tev there will be a massive production of them. And they will coalescence into a baby black hole that will not evaporate, as top quarks do not evaporate but accrete the mass of the Earth.

Baby Top Stars are the top predators of the Universe. Its name is adequate, as it resumes all its potential. Once a top predator Star is created, it will start to absorb as a bosonic star of top quarks, all what surrounds it. And it will start a series of reactions with matter, mediated by Higgs bosons, top quarks and antitop quarks transforming matter into Higgs bosons and then top antitops. The release of energy and speed at which top quarks antiquarks pairs transform the Earth into a black hole bears no resemblance to anything we have thought of…

Now the way you can explain all this with mathematics varies, as languages are always inflationary mirrors of information that can see from several perspective the same single Universe – in the same way you can call a blonde, fair, and other synonymous:

You can use the mathematics of classic Einstein, or Top quark strong force theory, or this writer’s model of the 5th dimension of space-time and its fractal scales, or use string theory and new dimensions.

They are all different human linguistic approaches to the same phenomena: the birth of a top predator black hole or top star.

Indeed, over 10 tev, Higgs and tops will be produced in showers. And when the number of tops needed to fusion into a bosonic top star, aka black hole is met, (which in certain models can be as little as 3 tops); it will form a stable first particle of a black hole. Soon the black hole will create an event horizon sucking in matter at light speed.

This is what the smallish black holes found show: the event horizon is the limit of a vortex that absorbs light space and all what is within at c speed regardless of size.

This means a tiny black hole once forming the event horizon as a top quark star will accrete in a couple of seconds a planet of 40.000 km. of diameter… And explain why as soon as they are born in the inner core of stars they absorb it all and blow the star into novae.

The details of those processes might vary. I do not claim to know the exact way in which it will occur. But the overwhelming evidence of both sound theory and sound experimental, cosmological proofs, and similar processes in slightly smaller pulsars, aka strangelet stars all point out to this final outcome.

The work of Hawking are mere mathematical musings; an ‘enfant terrible boutade’ which misuses 100 year old equations, disregards cut off substances, denies basic laws of the Universe and add fantasy lineal quantum effects that do not correspond to a different non-lineal, ‘gravitational species’ as a black hole or top star is.

To me as so much of present physics, is mostly scholastic talk about angels like in the middle ages, when the most intelligent humans wasted their time in La Sorbonne studying Aristotelian theology.

Since once a cut off substance that can explain what black holes are made of, all bets are off. Once, the top quark appeared, the experimental method should have reigned in and all mathematical only discussions are forgotten. Indeed, physicists by discovering the angel’s only possible substance – the top quark – made irrelevant Hawking’s’ complicated theories, based in a faulty understanding of time and entropy…

Indeed, all Hawking’s musings are based in his analogy between a black hole surface and the law of entropy, because they SEEMED similar equations. So Hawking and Bekenstein took the wishful thinking of considering the surface of black holes the meaning of its entropy just because both formula were similar, an absolute NO-NO of the scientific method (analogy is not equality, so while a plane’s wing and a bat’s wing and a bird’s wing seem similar, they are not the same, and the surface of black holes is not its entropy).

 

__________________________________________

Update, 28th november, 2013: Experimental evidences of hyper active small black hole keep mounting.

black_hole_ulx1

In the graph an artist’s illustration of the smallish black hole found in the arm of the pinwheel galaxy. Since we accept theoretically 3 scales of sizes in black holes: massive black holes at the center of galaxies, intermediate black holes produced from the collapse of giant stars around 200 times the size of the sun, and baby holes of the Hawking variety in lower ranges of mass, the intriguing question of this hyperactive, hyper-luminous black hole was its size, which scientists thought to be of the intermediate or massive range.

It turned out to be one of the lightest black holes ever found with only 20 times the size of the sun, accreting matter much faster than expected, which seems to confirm that low size baby black holes accrete much faster than big ones, as all baby species do, consuming much more energy after their ‘seminal conception’. The black hole does should be a baby born black hole in its process of growth, following the known known laws of entropy, accreting faster the hotter and smaller it is:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/28/black_hole_ultraluminous/

That is, a small black hole is far more active and accretes much faster because it does not get hotter in a cold universe, but it gets colder as it evaporates the world according to the first law.

In fact, the smallest black hole ever found is the one that provokes the highest rotational ‘winds’ in the Universe, as it was recently reported by NASA:

The Smallest black hole.

The binary star system IGR J17091-3624 may contain the smallest black hole known. Scientists discovered it by studying the heartbeat-like pattern of X-rays thought to be emitted from a disk of accreting matter around the black hole.

Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab.

The smallest black hole discovered to date may be less than three times the mass of our sun. This would put this little monster, officially called IGR J17091-3624, near the theoretical minimum limit needed for a black hole to be stable. As tiny as this black hole may be, it looks fierce, capable of 20 million mph winds (32 million kph) — the fastest yet observed from a stellar-mass black hole by nearly 10 times.

On the other hand, the Fermi Satellite sent in orbit to find the signature of evaporating black holes with great expectations enter its fifth year in orbit, without having found the slightest signature of black hole evaporation.

So both in the negative and positive, proofs keep mounting that baby black holes do not evaporate. On the contrary, as all systems do, black holes are born smallish and hyperactive as any species born as a small cell is, growing very fast in the first phase of his evolution. Or in less polite terms, CERN might provoke the ultimate holocaust of mankind, when they go online over 10 tev, according to the main tenants of the scientific method: sound theory and now experimental evicence.

Of course, we still lack the ultimate proof of Hawking’s error that will close from the experimental perspective any doubt about the classic entropy behavior of black holes: a black hole of lesser mass than the sun in the short time span between its birth as a micro black hole and its stable configuration reached around twice the size of the sun.  But the pattern when we plot temperature, size and speed of accretion of the known black holes clearly points out to its inverse relationship between mass and temperature-activity.

Finally, to add anothernail to the coffin, research keeps diminishing the needed energy to create micro-black holes, now clearly within the range of the upgraded LHC:

particles collide to form a black hole

‘A snapshot from a video showing two particles being slammed into each other and distorting into pancake shapes before forming a black hole.

Creating microscopic black holes using particle accelerators requires less energy than previously thought, researchers say.’

 Update. DEC. 2013, 1/150.000th chances of black hole evaporation

Swift, the other key satellite seeking for ‘gamma ray burst’ signatures of black hole evaporation has now tabulated 150.000 high energy X-ray sources in the Universe and none showed to be a black hole evaporating. 100.000 though were massive black holes, showing the galaxy to be ultimately a ‘black hole nursery’, as we have warned for decades based in our work on the 5th dimension and its application to black hole theory.

NASA’s Swift discovers 100,000 super-massive black holes, in its spare time

When the X-Ray Telescope (XR) on board NASA’s Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission scans the sky, it is looking mostly to supplement the satellite’s more important instruments. As the name implies, the Gamma-Ray Burst Mission is focused mostly on the action of its gamma-ray detecting Burst Alert Telescope — the attached XRT is mostly there to view the X-ray afterglow that follows many gamma burst events. However, Swift is not an acronym but a descriptor for one of NASA’s most agile sky viewers: as its autonomous robotic platform twists to bring event after event into view, Swift’s wide-angle X-ray lens passes over large portions of the sky.

Never ones to waste perfectly good telescope time, scientists have spent more than eight years compiling and analyzing this mass of incidental data, and this week researchers from the University of Leicester released their initial findings: Swift has found almost 100,000 new major X-ray sources, and these scientists believe that most of them represent the super-massive black holes at the centers of our universe’s largest galaxies. These come from more than 150,000 high-energy X-ray sources found, and those that aren’t black holes are under equal scrutiny by astronomers of all stripes. More transient X-ray sources than galactic cores are attributed to things like stellar flares and supernovae.

Swift's X-ray readings in the aggregate.

Coda. All that for nothing.

What is then the value of Hawking’s work at true face? Once the error of entropy is solved the equation of temperature and mass of black holes, M=K/T is of certain value to observe the different scales of the big bang through the metrics of the 5th dimension.

essentially what we are writing is M (t) = K/T(e) or M (t) x T (e) = K, an expression of the metrics of the 5th dimension as we increase in size and diminish in information in an act of death. In each of those physical big bangs, what dies, is the vortex of information or mass and relaxes into speed-distance:

taoismshort_image002

The Universe is a fractal of spatial energy quanta and cycles of temporal information that repeat its patterns in all its scales. The big-bang is one of those ‘death patterns’ repeated in every physical scale in which the balance between the informative particles and fields of energy that create ‘complementary systems of physical energy and information) is disrupted by an excess of energy, Max. E x Min. I, the equation of death of any Universal system. So when you die in an accident your energy(body)-Information (head) balances break by an overdrive of energy that erases your information. So happens in a physical big-bang in which the excess of heat of a new-born black hole, evaporates and erases the information of our cold, weaker electro-magnetic space, evaporated and absorbed by the black hole. The graph shows the different scales of big-bangs from the simpler beta decay to the universal big-bang of a hypothetical hyperblack hole. CERN will be testing Nova Big-bangs that might blow up the Earth and can be studied with telescopes at no risk and…. no profits for the military-industrial complex.

Black holes don’t evaporate. They cause big-bangs evaporating the colder Universe that surrounds them…

Indeed, behind all this wishful thinking, military-industrial profits, pseudo-science, recklessness and yes, ‘terrorism’ against mankind, there is the fact that we are submitted to a ‘trial and error’ final judgment based in exotic musings that deny all the laws of entropy of the Universe (see next post with a detailed analysis at layman level of the equations of evaporation of black holes).

In other words, the ultimate problem of CERN and the LHC and the experiments and theories it pretends to prove – black hole evaporation, time travel, big-bang events – is  dual:

Not only an ethic, survival problem of safety and security that should be dealt with politically as we deal with other terrorist act of other ‘fundamentalist believers’ in theories about God, Man and the Universe… but

Also a theoretical problem of exhaustion of an old paradigm of science, the paradigm of a continuous single space with a single arrow of time, entropy or energy.

The Universe is in fact a fractal system of infinite quanta of spatial energy and infinite cycles of temporal information,  which has ‘scalar big-bangs’, from beta decays in the quantum level to novas, supernovas, quasars and maybe hyper-universal big-bangs of black holes, the dominant species of the cosmos.

So all those parallel big-bangs in different scales of reality MUST be studied in Nature as they are – with telescopes not provoking big-bangs on Earth. To create a big-bang, nova condition on Earth is pure madness and will not bring any new information about the fractal Universe. The single big-bang paradigm in a single continuous space-time is to XXI c science what ether theory was to XX c. physics – the old paradigm defended by the industry of science which prevents us from further exploring the laws of the complex, informative Universe, which we, the pioneers of the XXI c. paradigm of fractal space-time are exploring with ‘thought experiments’ as Einstein did.

And this is the last surrealist truth about CERN: its research is of little importance. The Higgs is not God’s particle, not even the particle that gives mass to other particles, but only a boson with implications in Electroweak theory. The big-bang that CERN will research will not be a replica of the cosmic big-bang of a hyper-black hole but merely a reduced ‘nova big-bang’ of a small black hole. And nothing of what we will find risking our lives will discover new fundamental laws of physics.

This task is carried out, (as it was in the XX century by quantum physicists not ether people) by pioneers of the new paradigm, which increasingly is called the 5th dimension of space-time – all the scales of matter in physics and self-organization in biology that create complex structures with self-similar laws departing of simpler particles/cells. As this writer pioneered the  study of the 5th dimension within the milieu of theory of information and General Systems sciences in the past decades we shall also introduce several posts in which we compare the solutions of the new paradigm to those fairy musings of the ‘ether guys’ of XXI c. science…

For all that reason we shall end this post with Mr. Einstein’s dictum on ‘the ether guys’ that applies squarely to the LHC guys:

‘Those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’______

Notes.

1. The deduction of the Formula of Evaporation of black holes, which is what tantalizes physicists, because it brings together the main Universal Constants of the Universe, is completely accessory to this argument. What they always miss is the key element of that formula – the choice of the symbol of entropy that defines the thermodynamics of black holes, which is Hawking’s arbitrary decision based in 3 different ‘possible choices’ all of which contradict the fundamental tenants of science:

- Either time travel backwards is possible.

- Or the 2 laws of entropy are false.

- Or you can travel faster than light.

Any of those 3 possibilities are aberrant denials of fundamental scientific laws. And when one reads the initial texts of Hawking is obvious he is just ‘making’ a hypothetical exercise, as  this kind of black holes are called initially ‘imaginary black holes’, as if he were building an imaginary bestiary. The way in which aberrations of scientific or social thought become dogma goes well beyond the purpose of this article.

 

 
8 Comments

Posted by on December 7, 2013 in News

 

Fermi paradox

fermi paradox Cover

In the graph, the Fermi Paradox stated by Mr. Fermi, of A-Bomb fame wondered why we don’t see intelligent life in the Universe. Fermi advanced that it could be because Physicists destroy all planets before that phase. Some ‘believers’ replied that it might be that the Earth is a single case, because it is the only planet ‘chosen’ by God. Now we know this is not the solution to the Fermi Paradox, as there are billions all over the cosmos and biological laws show life to be a systemic phenomena appearing always out of hyper-abundant carbon atoms. Again the Totalitarian principle that precludes the creation of black holes and strangelets precludes life birth.

And yet, we do NOT hear any communication; not a single life planet passes the threshold of creation of Accelerators, prior to the threshold of interstellar travel, WHY?

The Fermi paradox should be the most pressing question about our destiny as a species and ultimately the experimental proof Physicists deny about the dangers of CERN. It is now official that around 17% of stars have an Earth-like surrounding it and 27% a super-earth, which puts on the order of 4.7 billion the number of possible hosts to life. AND YET NONE HOSTS ROBOTIC LIFE OR INTELLIGENT LIFE with a degree of civilization able to emit radio-signals?!! Why? All radio-signals in the galaxy are caused by black holes or strangelet stars (pulsars). Why?! As we are in the TIMELINE of possible interstellar communication, something will happen or has happened to all similar Earths in this period of technological evolution that destroyed the parallel human-like species. What?!

Only two possible solutions to this conundrum are left, once we know the galaxy is filled with planets:

- The religious, theological ‘anthropic principle’. We are the first because God made the Universe for the homo bacteria to dominate.

- The scientific, statistical proposition of Mr. Fermi. In all those planets, Physicists blow us creating black holes, the dominant species of the galaxy.

The facts are clear and either one or other is the solution. If the first is truth, a goatkeeper  of the bronze age resolved the meaning of it all. If the second is right in 2015 when LHC is upgraded we will all die.

Let us then prove the goatkeeper wrong with the simple equations of Francis Drake. SInce we are not unique, just ‘a mush over a lost rock in a corner of the Universe’ Schopenhauer.

In the next graphs we illustrate the scientific calculus according to present data of the numbers of habitable planets tha should be communicating at this point of time, in the Universe. It follows the famous 1961 Francis Drake eqution.

cod

FERMI0

FWRMI1

frmi3

Earths all over the galaxy.

Goldilocks planets are those planets existing in zones where life is possible. As there are an immense number of stars surrounded by them – 1.700 million earths and 3000 million super-earths – and our planet is relatively young, the Fermi Paradox wonders why we do not see any sign of planetary or robotic civilizations in the galaxy, but only hear the radio-waves with the rhythmic tam-tam of black hole and strange stars. The cynical Fermi, father of the A-Bomb, stated that nuclear physicists blew all Goldilocks planets before they reached the technological state of interstellar travel. CERN could confirm this hypothesis.

Sorry biblical folks, the Universe is not made for humans. There should be 794 976 000 000 bn planets emitting radio-signals. But none is heard.

In any case the Drake Equation clearly rejects the religious solution to the Fermi Paradox – that of humans being unique.

But the conundrum mathematically proved by the Drake equation: why we cannot hear any of those 794,976.000.000 billion civilizations?

And so WE ARE LEFT WITH A SINGLE SOLUTION.  Only the second solution, extinction by physicists, is possible. Since something extinguishes all of us in all those planets, before they communicate. We should be hearing some of those 794 zillions and we hear none. (1)

Thus, we won’t arrive to the technological evolution of radio-signals needed to leave a bleep in the Universe… We will die before that. When?

Radio communication of stellar size would require a much longer wave and hence a moon station coupled with one on Earth, which can be achieved this century. But we won’t survive the century to do it.

We won’t reach either the point of interstellar expansion in ships.

For this type of travel would require to create shields against high energy particles of enormous metal-weight for current standards – probably a lunching from the moon, on a machine constructed there. Probably well into the next century.

But e won’t reach autonomous robots and A.I. able to start a colonization of the Universe. We hear none…

Let us consider this possibility because now we have a more precise timespan. Experts consider that A.I. will exist within a century. A single robotic ship sent by humans wouldn’t count as it would not  reproduce and hence colonize. But A.I., self-replicant A.I. is now in place. We can foresee it in 3-D printers, CAD design and automation of factories – the main cause of our labor crisis. And yet, not a single planet has made it to that phase either. Or else the Universe would be awash of robots and sounds of metal. 

All this gives us probably a span of around 50 years to explain something else that cause our extinction.

Apocalypse doesn’t seem to be the robotic way, the terminator way, the matrix way, or else we would see millions of matrix like places on the galaxy. And there is none.

It means that we die very soon and NOT by robotics.

None has made it to colonize with other robots. So extinction happens in +99.999% of planets within decades or else out of those 1.7 billion, many would have made it.

A.I. is not the cause because if A.I. extinguishes man it would have expanded in the Universe and it is NOT ANYWHERE TO BE SEEN. ROBOTS CAN EXPAND WITHOUT PROBLEMS OF HEALTH. They should be here, there, emitting radio-waves. So the Span of time of our extinction is even shorter. It happens before terminator.

Between now and military A.I. already on the making with the take-off industry of drones, humans achieve self-extinction in +99.9999% of the parallel, fractal planets to this in which they evolve. 

And this leave us ONLY 2 causes, only 2 possible industries that can extinguish us and DO EXTINGUISH US, in 99.99999999% to be more precise of the planets of the Universe: nano-bacteria and black holes.

OF COURSE, the planet could be extinct by external black holes, cosmic collisions, etc. But if that is the case, still probabilistically many other planets would have not collide with asteroids and so we would see them colonizing other planets at this stage of age of the galaxy. So what we look for is an event which is almost certain to extinct a planet – strange matter or black holes – and a type of human species WHICH WILL ALWAYS DO BLACK HOLES AS MESSIANIC ‘SCIENCE’ does.

The nano-bacteria case…

was first brought about by Mr. Bill Joy in wired and explained how soon goldiron nano-bacteria with gold dna and iron bodies, eating and replicating similar metal-species would suck in all the machines of the planet, and then convert us in grey-goo eating the metal of the Earth. This can come in those 50 years.

But if nano-bacteria extinguishes us, we can reason, metal-bacteria would evolve into organic robots, as once life appears, evolution should kick in. And this robotic race would be a superrace that would have expanded on the Universe very fast. It might also be that gold-DNA is not so easy to evolve but i doubt it. It is like us atoms and atoms evolve in different molecular structures. So if we humans find self-replicant gold-iron nano-bacteria that extinguish us in so many planets, some should have evolved into intelligent life and expanded through the Universe. And yet again, there is no robotic ‘metalife’ anywhere in the galaxy emitting radio-signal.

CERN case.

So this flawless logic leaves only a possible cause of our extinction in every planet life kicks in: black holes or strangelets at CERN when it goes full power in 2015. And yet a second point must be proved for not a single planet to show intelligent life: the determinism of the human mind who will always believe in techno-utopia and blow up the planet in search of some irrelevant particle. is it that so? are we that dumb everywhere?

The memetics of the suicidal species.

Thus, the second point to prove is the messianism of all human races which in all those planets will decide almost never to revise the safety standards of the black hole factory… How it is that possible? How can we measure the degree of ‘strong beliefs’ of humans that become extinct? By this i mean, is it so overwhelming stupid the choice of all human monkeys in all planets as to always risk their lives for the Higgs particle? can we prove that determinism?

Yes. The proof is obvious: Our radical failure in our suits and activism to stop CERN  – only a few dozen scientists had enough courage to denounce it and no result was attained, as the entire planet sided with the black hole factory – means the belief in machines must be so strong in all monkeys that reach this scale of mechanical evolution that we never win the suit in any planet of the infinite fractal planets of the Universe. 

And here is where the Fermi paradox resolves another paradox of these group of activists – why nobody took us serious in suits, books, films and various warnings? Because in every planet, the belief in technoutopia is rather absolute and so surviving planets are an infinitesimal number.

If there had been a mass of activists we could think many planets survive as the movement against CERN triumphs in them. So no black hole is done. So humans live longer or die to military A.I. or nanorobotics and in either case humans or robots communicate and colonize the galaxy.

Here you have in a ‘nutshell’ an astounding logical proof   that we shall die within decades before A.I. takes over in all the planets in which humans existed.

Indeed, being humble enough at this stage of my activism, the most surrealist and astounding fact I have come to accept is that nobody cared and will care for a public institution trying to do the most dangerous nuclear explosives of the Universe with tax payer money to find some exotic particles of the zoo of sub-atomic systems.

This cuckoo fact leads us to the science of memetics: humans are slaves of the religion of technology in all the places of the Universe. Nobody doubts of technology and money, the two engines of this tragedy. As someone said of the germans that mastermind this machine ‘some germans do not believe in god but all believe in the bundesbank’. All men believe that to make machines is the destiny, goal and undoubted utopia of mankind. So in all planets we are defeated and in all physicis do make black holes and solve the Fermi paradox.

Now as all inconvenient truths power ignores the Fermi Paradox despite making so much propaganda of the Earthlings and Higgs particles. When a problem is too big or defies our ‘memes’ and beliefs we simply censor it. Good luck. The problem will not go away because we hide our head on the hole.

The Fermi paradox should be debated and taken seriously as a security problem and experimental proof of the easiness by which ‘human-like species’ extinguish themselves. It certainly eliminates the pretension of CERN that there is no experimental evidence of our possible extinction by the LHC.

Indeed, one of the alibis of CERN and those who work on the LHC is the fact that there is not and seemingly there cannot be any proof that the machine will produce black holes and strangelets, the seeds of strange stars called pulsars, able to devour the Earth and extinguish us, when in 2015 is switched on to full potency beyond the theoretical barrier of formation of quark condensates and B.H. beyond 10 Tev (today the machine works only to 1/2 potency).

Now there is one: the Fermi Paradox.

Now as surrealist as this theme might be, it is a fact recorded by history that all the parents of the nuclear industry are ‘all for it’. Indeed, the Fermi Paradox was ratified by the 3 parents of the Nuclear industry and its increasingly more powerful bombs. Mr. Fermi’s prophecy stated the obvious: all planets become black holes as physicists explode them. Mr. Fermi father of the A-Bomb, indeed said that there is not extraterrestrial life because physicists explode all planets before life can escape. But this was also the thesis of Mr. Teller, the Jewish father of the H-bomb fame, and biggest lobbyist for weapons in America, who went a notch further asking Eisenhower to start a Nuclear War first, just in case…

He also ‘discovered’ the so-called MAD strategy of Mutual Assured Destruction, a surrealist ‘logic concept’ to pump the military industry – that if we made enough H-bombs (who he had patented), we would be so afraid of using them that this was the best path to peace.

He became the model for Dr. Strangelove, an ‘anecdote’ i know first-hand as I befriended his scriptwriter, Mr. Terry Southern during my years at Columbia University (also of easy rider fame and the main ‘influence’ on my surrealist film on the theme, quantum roulette, which is excerpted in this blog). Finally it is also the thesis of Mr. Hawking in his last declarations…

And it was also the opinion, with certain cynicism of Mr. Wilzeck, the nobel prize who made the mathematical calculus of the strong force that will make quarks coalescence together.

Soo one can say that the 3 fathers of the Nuclear industry are ‘all for it’ and yet we revere them as masters of the Nuclear industry – and that is the surrealist, absolute arrogance and stupidity of man. Only Einstein seemed to understand better:

‘2 things I deem infinite the Universe and the stupidity of man, and I am not sure of the latter’

‘Those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’

The other Solution to the paradox. The planets that make it. Castalia.

Graphic11

Now, the paradox has only a second solution. We do not see robotic life, which is interesting, curious not to say the least, and conclusive respect to the black hole theory. Black holes and strangelets kill us all.

Except those planets which i have called in honor of Herman Hesse who imagined one of them, ruled by artists not by scientists, hence dedicated to evolve the mind of man not that of th machine – Castalia.

th-1

Castalias survive as erehwon do, because men realize machines’ evolution will kill them and stop and also DONT COMMUNICATE.

i have felt for Castalia all my life… I have imagine Castalia in eternal moments, existence without borders, in time and space, immortal planets with eternal future, without limit – in that black hole.

At this stage of my life i recognize i dont live in Castalia, that as much i know.

But i did calculate, a theme i shall treat in the article ‘6D’ on the calculus of futures, the probabilities of such planets. And I must say, there are enough castalia in this universe to fill happy… and in some of day, we do stop CERN (-, people self-similar to us, in a planet with beings self-simlar to you…

And so i give you the solution to the Fermi paradox, ‘where there is cosmic life?, intelligent cosmic life?

In castalias. It is life, it endures, it goes beyond the limit of cerns and it is INTELLIGENT, unlike the people of this planet, or perhaps ETHIC, to me two self-similar concepts of an equation of complexity called the survival function, or top predator function, beings with maximal information (intelligent) and maximal energy (force), in balance, e=i, which maximizes, Max. E x Max. I… the definition of ethic information and beautiful energy-space. But that is of course… the jargon of the 5th dimension… Sorry then, let us return back to this non-intelligent, non-ethic, non-beautiful planet, with yes a lot of energy to bring us death (max. E x Min. I), and its creators, or rather destroyers, the physicist at cern Because even if i dream often of castalias i am on Earth.

Visual ‘proofs’ of our beloved MAD scientists.

So back to the Earth in the next excerpts from quantum roulette, you can see at ‘face value’ our 4 ‘heroes’ of the military-industrial Complex, all of them ‘for it’. The images you will see belong to a film quantum roulette which I did in Los Angeles, initially with the help of WME, the biggest agency in town, till they realized this was actually ‘real’. So after the suits and pressures from politicians the project was cancelled and I finished by myself. Needless to say it only opened in a festival worldwide, ‘the globians’ in berlin, because as the curator, Mr. Poltzer, founder of IDM pro put it – here I am the only guy to decide. In any other jury you will be censored because all must be politically correct or someone protests. I indicate in which minute we have them doing their declarations in case you want to save time.

In the next video we illustrate the 3 ‘ages’ of increasing power of Nuclear Bombs, A-bombs H-bombs and Planetary bombs, with a brief account of the evolution of the Nuclear industry, in its increasing pursuit of the equation of death, including the original footage of Mr. Fermi’s famous paradox… at minute 2:

In the same video in minute 7.10  you can see the father of the H-bomb, Mr. Teller, considering the need of an H-bomb, because ‘we can do it’. In the next video that explains the nature of Mass bombs (M=Ec2), he starts the excerpt showing his ‘disappointment’ with the A-Bomb because it had not enough power. So he felt motivated to make a bigger H-bomb:

Here you can see Mr. Hawking at minute 2, explaining us his motivation to push the creation of Black holes at CERN – to get a nobel prize, and the downside of it – if he is wrong we shall all become liquid spaghetti:

He has accordingly placed the clock of the end of the world two minutes before doomsday.Easy prediction, since you can always predict what you do. What about not doing anything to blow up the world Mr. Hawking, so you don’t need to warn us about it?

Finally in this video you can see also at minute 2, Mr. Wilzeck who signed the ‘safety’ release of the LHC explaining why he did it – as if he is wrong and blows up the Earth, he won’t be blamed:

But could we humans possibly change the fate of the Fermi paradox? Potentially we can, because the only solution to the paradox which has a positive life-preserving outcome is the non-evolution of the machines of the Singularity age. If a planet doesn’t worship the tree of technology but the tree of science, it will survive with man as top predator, but then again, it won’t develop intergalactic complex communication technology, but lie ever happier and unknown around a planet with no signs of complex technology. This is the only positive, humanist solution.

Could it be implemented on this planet? To understand that we have to go deeper into ‘knowledge’ of how the future is created (and we mean created, we know how it is ‘not’, by doing singularity machines).

In fact evolution and the objective understanding on how the future is created, shows this is most likely outcome, as the experimental evidence of the Fermi paradox also shows.

The singularity machines.

The Fermi Paradox is well known to specialists who study the non future of mankind in a world in which weapons of mass destruction keep being researched without limit, and it inscribes within the larger view of the Singularity age, or final age of the Industrial Revolution, when energetic and informative machines become ‘organic’. So we create mass-bombs, self-feeding, autonomous bombs, strangelets and black holes that can extinguish us. And we create self-feeding, autonomous robots, military A.I. that can also extinguish us.

Those are the ‘informative’ and energetic ‘singularity’ machines, whose awesome jump in energetic and informative capacities can extinguish us; since death is the ‘breaking of the balance and symmetry’ between the energetic and informative elements of any complementary system of the Universe, due to an overdrive of energy and information. So we die in accidents and wars (maximal energy/ death), and we die by excess of information, of form (3rd age, warping), and so the Earth can die by an excess of energy (B.H. Singularity at CERN) or a rival top informative predator species (military A.I.). And science is evolving both with the excuse of knowledge.

Thhe singularity age is now happening with the advance of information adn energy machines that vastly overpower us, but our industrial civilization has accepted it under a false premise, which as usual follow Nietzsche’s dictum ‘the commonest lie is that in which one lies to himself’ – that machines are good, abstract and the Universe a mechanism with only human intelligence…

The Wilczek paradox.

Or as Nobel Prize Wilczek, Amici Curiae of CERN in our suits to this company put it, and we recorded on video, ‘It was easy for me to sign a zero risk statement, because if something happens, then…’ and he laughed (who is gonna blame it, was the implicit end of his sentence’) – see video at the end of this post, in the visual part of it.

So because the proof can only be our extinction, the people who will be always blamed either of being catastrophists (if we survive) or of dying without recognition (if we are right and the high probability of an extinctive event ‘becomes’) were those who showed the ethical point of view.

This paradox is however a common paradox of History: those who make violence always win over those who make reason because death stops the argument. In this case, the LHC by going on-line without controls to ‘prove’ there were no risks (as Hauer declared to be the strategy to calm down alarmists) shows again the power of weapons over reason. And yet there is a clear proof at cosmological scale, of anthropomorphic nature that shows how easy potential human species can be extinguished and are probably extinguished.

There is not intelligent life despite the myriad of planets there must be in the galaxy. Do Physicists manage to create enough nuclear bombs to explode all planets before we achieve galactic communication’?

In this case the Fermi paradox is rejected as most truths are rejected by humans, on the shaky grounds of the ego-trip on the importance of our species. That is, we, human beings somehow are ‘special’ (pseudo religious argument) and too important to disappear at the hands of a mere lump of matter, which is false when you take not the subjective, anthropomorphic beliefs of religious people (the G. Bush talking to us:), or scientific people (who think they are the only intelligent species of the Universe.)

This refutal of the Fermi Paradox doesn’t even deserve a comment on a serious scientific blog, regardless of the growing number of fundamentalist jewish-christian believers in the ‘anthropic’ pseudo-religious dogma (if we exist in the Universe despite our fragility is because God wants us to exist, designing the Universe to that aim).

All this ‘hidden’ pseudo-religious beliefs are at the core of physics, with their arrogant statements about humans as the only intelligent beings, mathematics as the only language of God, the Higgs as the ‘god’s particle’ and their search for ultimate energies as the ‘Saint Grail’ of knowledge. No further commentary is needed.

A second proof, though of scientific nature, was the fact we had not seen more planets like ours. But it turned out to be just an experimental error now uncovered by more potent telescopes: the Universe is teaming with planets and so there should be billions of planets like ours. And yet none give us radio signals of life. Why? Obviously because people like those working at CERN manage to extinguish all planets before they discover ways of intergallactic communication, in their hidden arm race to find the meaning of mass-bombs.

 

The ‘physicists’…  all for it. Sanctified mass-murderers.

There was a time in which humans knew what were ‘the physicists’. The mad scientist par excellence was the physicist, who was bringing us an atomic holocaust. Durrenmatt wrote a magnificent play on that title. But in the world of machines and children of thought we live in, without any sense of responsibility or caring for the future, all this is forgotten. Children cannot understand death, and one of the reasons CERN has gone without much fear is the civilization of children and visual death, which inundates our world. So children cannot distinguish between ‘real death’ and virtual one – and this one is ‘real’.

This is the Kindergatten world we live in. One where absolute evil can be the new normal as long as it is not taken seriously. The holocaust of Rwanda was tolerated because that week, according to chronicles the White House had covered the ‘theme of Africa’ with the South-African elections.If that is the case, and it seems the case of mankind, now doing robots that expel humans out of labor and war fields without also any opposition – if we men ‘are slaves because we believe we don’t reason’ (Aristotle), the Fermi paradox will indeed happen in all planets. As in all planets the technology will reach first the LHC that interstellar travel.

So in all it we’ll be built regardless of which lunatic physicist and which theory is designed to prove – a fractal, a continuum, a dark space, a travel to the past (in this case with the lunatic rants of Mr. Hawking shown at true face below)… or the ‘dragoons’ of multiverses of Mr. Arkami-Hamed.

What matters and explains deterministically the tragedy is the corporation, the military-industrial complex that will ALWAYS DO AN LCH BEFORE IT DOES AN INTERSTELLAR far more complex starship.

Moreover, as we explain in our blog on technology and economical evolution, http://www.economicstruth.com, at this stage the mind of man is devolving under the audiovisual influence of Televisions and the evil culture of death’, provided by the evolution of digital minds that hypnotize our children.

And again this is deterministic: motion hypnotizes the eye, a natural born killer that likes faster motion and red/energy colors. So as Televisions evolve in all planets, men become part of the a ‘neopaleolithic culture’, of selfish ego-trips, superficial, visual thought, where ‘images’ become knowledge and logic, time causality and survival, eusocial love disappears. The automatic process of degeneration of the human soul related in that technological blog, all too evident in this planet thus happens as machines evolve organically, in parallel, making humans in all planets retarded visual ego-trips of null causal knowledge and irresponsibility. They become the ‘staple food’ of the black holes they do trying to be like God. In the article on the Mayan prophecy we relate some aspects of the fractal, organic Universe that builds black holes. This is indeed going deeper the explanation of the Fermi paradox.

THe 2.7 background radiation is the temperature of a black hole of the mass of the moon. So all planets and moons might end up becoming black holes either by feeding on one, or by conversion by LHC ‘experts’.

In the past years since we lost the suits because the judges did not dare to judge, the physicists did not dare to defend CERN and so all  was dismissed technically because as the judge put it ‘the destruction of the Earth would not be atttributable to the American Government’ I have come to accept indeed the deterministic aspects of our ‘technological civilization’ that degenerates us to a point in which we can collectively commit suicide almost in a fictional way – as our mind is built on fictions and ego-trips that forget the tender softness of the flesh.

Thus the kind of ‘zero generation’, of toddlers of thought that populate CERN will exist irresponsibly in all planets. The collective mind will be erased and LHCs will be built and tested by children with no sense of death.

Today The press no longer informs. The modern human is very much a child of evil. Like Mr. Bush, our president at the time we put the suits against CERN, an evil child; like Hawking, a childish ego, who according to his wife thought to be God, a man who obviously care little for life, isolated in its mind, a fictional character who thinks to be a ‘genius’ but has been long just signing books their acolytes cash in, as this group knows for obvious reasons (one of the main activists against CERN is the son of his closest collaborators)…

But in the world of marketing and corporations, of technology, the human is just a puppet of that destiny, written in the evolution of machines.

So we choose freaks for the kicks, they sell better.

Man in a chair genius of the century, kid with guitar – mr. Bieber genius of songs, ‘house negro’ working for bankers, Mr. Obama, leader of the world. The people who rule the world for corporations – the managers, technicians, marketers, sellers, own the subconscious collective of mankind. I have reflected a lot during this years how we have arrived to this situation. That wider view thought of a world ruled for corporations who care only for profits and the machines they build, provided in my other blog http://www.economicstruth.com is the only deterministic explanation of the fermi paradox at sociological level. That is, the sentence that starts my surrealist film on this theme, ‘quantum roulette’ ‘A technological civilization is based in the believe that if a machine can be done it must be done, even if it kills us all’.

 the world is ruled by corporations and so the process of evolution and reproduction of machines is the essence of our technological civilization,

and so all  industrial planets arrive to this absurdity – waiting for extinction for the sake of a machine and a series of job contracts and the excuse of a lunatic, 3rd rate physicist exploited by the industry of information. 

Absolute evIL the antiparticle of Live, synonymous of death, is what the physicists of the nuclear industry represent.

Castalia, Utopia is thus the obnly solution.

intelligent humans that  understand the conundrum and stop evolving machines as the meaning of existence, cheer for life and Gaia and don’t give signals to the external Universe.

Thus only Utopia, the 3rd solution, or techno-utopia, the LHC explain our incommunication. But we are not in utopia but in technoutopia. This means LHC will do black holes and they will evaporate us as they absorb our matter and grow. Since we, Earth’s homo bacteria have chosen NOT, utopia, that is a sustainable, world based in the fruits of the tree of life and man as the measure of all things. There is no doubt that the Earth’s new religion is the machine and we want to communicate and travel through space. We are not stopping the ‘economic system’. And yet we never arrive anywhere, we never colonize other planets, we end now, here.

The culture of the living Universe is basically extinct. It started with Plato and thought of the Universe, as I do in my work on General Systems Science, as an organism. ‘The World is a living being with a mind called Logos’. It meant that the logos of man was the mind of Gaia, also an organism. And we should care for both, for the Tree of Science. No doubt some planets are like that. Planets of flesh where men-like beings do not make machines. Erehwon planets that transcend beyond the dreams of our imaginations, but not here.

Instead we live in the culture of the machine – worship machines of energy such as CERN or information, such as CERN’s web and computers. So we will evolve technology to its limits and find ourselves with Fermi’s solution.

In brief, the singularity age and our extinction either by informative robots or more massive/informative matter seems just another stage in the growth of information of this planet, either at atomic scale (Black Hole Singularity at CERN) or at molecular scale (birth of military A.I.)

In that sense, if there is something I learned in the suits and campaigns against CERN is the determinism of that process of extinction as the absolute overwhelming majority of mankind cannot even conceive their absolutely irrelevant meaning humans have for an infinite, self-similar fractal Universe…

And this absolute arrogance of man, specially of those who guide the Industrial R=evolution, technocrats, industrialists and the military, in front of destiny, justifies our extinction and takes the blame out of the Universe itself, which has given us so many parables and opportunities to behave in balance with nature, with a humble, intelligent awareness of our limits as a species.

This writer, has renounced to a wonderful life as an ‘outstanding researcher of our religion, science’, easily achieved, had he only provided mankind with his discoveries in the field of ‘time theory and complexity’, for the simple reason that the praxis of science, technology is what is killing mankind with the excuse of knowledge.

And survival is more important that knowledge. Since a extinct scientist knows nothing.

Thus any truly intelligent scientist, regardless of what fame and celebrity he can acquire with his discoveries finds himself today in a crossroads of history where his only proper attitude is NO LONGER THE RAT RACE of scientific sinecures but the denounce of the non-future of uncontrolled research.

Survival not knowledge should be the ‘a priori’ law of all scientific research, which would mean the immediate prohibition of research in high energies and mass-bombs (energetic singularity) and robots and A.I. (information singularity). But scientists put deaf ears to profits and fame. So they prefer to ignore that in a Darwinian universe information is always ‘interested’, nothing is given for free and so it is all a trade-off in search of balances. Curiosity kills the cat and a truly intelligent species is one that ‘controls’ its wish for more energy and information, without endangering his life. 

But once more mankind shows not to be that ‘special, humble species’, who truly would deserve the name of ‘being made to the image and likeness of the Universe’. Since the immense majority of its members just follow the easy path. And this my friend is what kills mankind: our incapacity to be really free, in the Buddhist sense – to control our desires, our Universal program. There is no critical mass of intelligent, ethic scientists to do so.
 
8 Comments

Posted by on December 23, 2012 in News

 

CERN affirms 70% chances of strangelets.

Castor is a detector of strangelets installed at CERN, which denies in public the possibility of producing them, given the enormous dangers for the planet they poise.

Update. 24 Dec.2011. Since strangelet danger is still on the view of science, the biggest one for Earth, after ‘cern activists’ destroyed my webs (see ‘mass attack’) i have moved forward in the reconstruction process this article, originally published a year ago. I apologize for broken links and missed pictures that were not localized.

As in all extinction dangers produced by LHC and future accelerators built by the military-industrial complex with the alibi of ‘research’, the fact that we ‘are still here’ obviously doesn’t mean it will not happen in the narby future. it only means only the ‘threshold’ of stability of strangelets or black holes, which is a function of the energy/mass they have, itself a function of the power of the machine, hasn’t been crossed yet. But the probability to cross the threshold of stability will grow with time, till a point in the future, the threshold will be crossed and we’ll become extinct, fulfilling the cynical prophecy of Mr. Fermi -of Manhattan Project fame – who affirmed the lack of life signs on the galaxy, despite the statistical probability of many earth-like planets (today confirmed) could only be due to physicists blowing planets in their development of the nuclear industry.

As it is obvious the evolution of ‘doomsday machines’ is going much faster than that of interstellar travel, LHC is just the ‘first probability of extinction’. Its upgrade over the ‘real barrier’ of formation of dark matter in the decametric, scalar universe – 10 TEV – by 2014 sets the next big probability to cross the threshold.

A responsible society will therefore not make that upgrade, considering the enormous costs it represents in an age of massive cuts in life-sustaining health-care budgets and the fact that the main scientific reason for building this machine – the finding of the Higgs will be resolved as CERN itself accepts next year, before the upgrading. But I am afraid the nuclear industry will not be reasonable and find excuses to go forward; while the corporations involved in this project and its lobbies will ‘convince’ European politicians – specially now that a physicist, Miss Merkel, has become the ‘financial dictator’ of the Union and Germany provides most of the machines and directors of this disguised factory of ‘mass-bombs’.

That big science has ‘parked’ the issue of LHC dangers, as so many other dangers for the future of life and history on planet Gaia are ignored, whenever they collide with the profits of corporations (witness the reversal on the Kyoto agreements on global warming, which were already short to produce any effect for economical reasons); doesn’t mean the dangers are gone. It only means that humans have accepted another suicidal risk for the profits and selfish agenda of a minority, as they have accepted war and its ‘collateral effects’ for the profits of the Military-Industrial Complex, now embarked in a ‘Terminator race’ of drones or are accepting the destruction of the health-care system and its increasing death-toll in hospitals (10% will die in waiting lists in Spain, never arriving to the surgeon to protect the billionaire profits of the financial industry; which keeps multiplying its profits), and so on and so on. In that sense the LHC, the first machine-weapon that can extinguish mankind is part of a wider process of self-destruction of life in this planet, which since the beginning of the Industrial R=evolution has made of machines and its ‘mechanist’ ideologies, the measure of all things and casts doubts aboutthe future of history – the super-organism of the human species, from the first ‘cellular homo’ that spoke till the last human cell that the LHC’s ‘production’ might devour…

Point of the strangelet risk is that unlike black holes, which might or might not appear according to different theories, strangelets will appear certainly and the only doubts are their thresholds of stability at a given A-mass and when it will be crossed in lead to lead collisions. It seems we have been ‘lucky’ till now, but all what this article talks about will be once more relevant with the upgrade over 10 Tev – providing the present surge in Earthquakes we forecasted as the first sign of dark matter production does not keep increasing (which would mean the process now is irreversible and dark matter has been formed and fallen to the Earth).

Abstract. We have received and will show in this article astonishing documents leaked out of CERN internal servers, about the CASTOR  project, a Centauro and STrangelet Object Research to hunt for strangelets ‘likely‘ to be produced at the LHC.

According to those internal documents CERN has been lying for years to the press and in the suits, since it always affirmed that it won’t produce the ultra-dangerous, ultradense ‘strangelets’, the liquid explosive made of up, down and strange quarks, responsible of the ice-9 reactions that cause supernovas (below’s graph).

In those documents CERN affirms there is a 65-70% of chances of producing negative strangelets, which according to standard science on strangelets today, will provoke the ice-9 reaction (name taken from Cat and Cradle’s book in which a physicist destroys the world throwing a new type of water that freezes the planet, since an ice-9 reaction will condensate the planet in a 15 kilometers ultra-dense strange star).

Thus CERN has been lying and it is playing with all mankind a Quantum Russian Roulette game with 4 shots out of 6, 66% chances of extinction. This will be even if we survive the biggest genocide of history, calculated multiplying probability and victims: 66% x 6.6 billions=4.4 billions, 1000 times the Holocaust. The experiment will start in 45 days now. We might be living the last month of our existence as individuals and as a species. This Fall can be indeed the Fall of Man. And yet, the experiment is not stopped. This machine is too big to fail. Ave Caesar Hauer, morituri te salutant…

(Keep reading for a full disclosure of those documents, most of them provided by Mr. Penrose, a British physicist and mathematician, who has been trying to alert the European Press and Ministers of Science, with little success, and explains them in a more technical jargon in his site dedicated to raise awareness of this potential global genocide.

Alternatively if you prefer a simpler, visual description of this event, click on the 10 min. films ’11/9′ on your right:  ‘Informative film’ is an illustrated interview in ‘coast to coast’ Radio to Walter Wagner, my co-plaintiff on the Federal Suit against CERN; ‘surrealist film’ is a documentary, ‘Dr. Strangelove’ style, on the events that will take place the 11/9, shot at CERN, with historic material and strangelet physics explained by Dr. Wilczek, the Nobel Prize who discovered and named the ice-9 reaction. I hold copyrights and permissions on those images, given to me by CERN’s press office before suing them; yet the film is censored in several countries of Europe, notably Germany, the main contributor of this machine, so you might not be able to see it. Both Wagner and Wilczek were the first scientists to warn about the future dangers of Super-colliders in their landmark letters to Scientific American in 1999).

In the graph, for the first time in History mankind has built a machine-weapon, able to destroy this planet. The LHC is an accelerator, a type of machine evolved during the cold war to rehearse small nuclear explosions, which could be used by the military as a sampleof future Nuclear Bombs, and by researchers to explore the simplest forms of energy and particles that compose the Universe. After the cold war ended, Russia and America put an end to the astronomical costs of those machine-weapons, but Europe, with the new ‘marketing’ of ‘peaceful use’ (similar to our ‘peace forces’ in ‘humanitarian missions’ in Afghanistan) took the industry of accelerators a step further. The result is the Large Hadron Collider, a 7 teravolt, superconductive, superfluid ‘quark cannon’. which will mass together the densest, most attractive substance of the Universe, quarks, to explore the formation of quark-gluon liquids, the explosives, responsible of cosmic annihilations, such as Novas, Super-novas and perhaps the hypothetical big-bang of the Universe.

The irresponsibility of CERN’s physicists who plan to do those experiments with quark liquid explosives here on Earth, without even the slightest military or political supervision, has been denounced in Courts and Internet blogs, to not avail, since the LHC is a machine ‘too big to fail’, defended by technocrats, nuclear industries/ physicists and the corporate press, with the same zeal they defended nuclear weapons during the cold war, when that name was still ‘politically correct’.  Now we have proofs that the European Company of Nuclear Research has been lying to the public about the probabilities of those catastrophic scenarios. In those internal documents CERN affirms that the LHC has enough potency to create strangelets, a strange liquid explosive that is responsible of the ice-9 reaction that converts stars into Super-novas. The Company has even a machine, CASTOR, for Centauro and STrangelet detecTOR, built to study them. Since the ‘Castor Team’ affirms the LHC will ‘likely’ create stable strangelets this 11/9. In the graph, we observe the entire range of LHC’s potency and the type of quark explosives this ‘quark cannon’, the layman name this machine should have, will produce. Strangelets are made of usd quarks, deconfined in lead to lead collisions starting 11/9/2010…

The News

It is now official. What we feared for years… the real thing, explained ‘ad nauseam’ on this web is now on schedule. 11/9, CERN will start production of strangelets…

We have obtained an astounding self-confession, a ‘leak’ encrypted in the tons of documents CERN produces only for ‘physicists’ experts:

‘Prof. A. Panagiotou and students are investigating phenomena in the very forward region. In particular, the existence and identification of exotic states of matter, such as “Centauro” and “Strangelets”

, the later being a bulk of quark matter of about equal number of u, d and s quarks, believed to be produced in ultra-relativistic HI collisions. This search was one of the original motivations for the design of CASTOR.’

And then a video transcript from one of his students:

My name is Panos Katsas. I work as an experimental physicist for the CASTOR forward calorimeter of CMS and my main area of interest is the study of exotic events in heavy ion collisions, especially the identification of strangelets, which are likely to be produced.’ (bottom left on the link, with a self-similar ipod discourse, censored in its last 3 minutes substituted by a fixed picture, since we first post this cynical discovery on the web).

The Large Hadron collider will start collisions of Hadrons, the 11/9. That day CERN will shoot for the first time Lead bullets  at the speed of light against mother Earth in this superconductive, superfluid cannon. According to the most advanced theoretical research on the subject, they can create strangelets that would sink the Earth into a rock of a few kilometers of diameter. Strange liquid is the quark-gluon soup that causes the big-bangs of Novas, Super-Novas and maybe even long ago caused the big-bang of the cosmic Universe. And their ‘strangelet’ CASTOR device will count them.

Why strangelets are so dangerous? Simple. A strangelet is a mass of quarks, which works with 3 attractive forces far superior to those of any atom:

- The strong force of its massive number of quarks (100 times stronger than the weak electromagnetic force)

- The gravitational forces of those massive number of quarks (far stronger than any atom, since 99% of the mass of atomic particles are in the quarks)

- The charge of the quarks lumped in the strangelet (far stronger than any ion, due to the enormous numbers of quarks lumped in the strangelet)

The 3 forces together will attract atoms, positive ions if the strangelet is negative; electronic covers is the strangelet is positive; normal atoms with the gravitational force if the strangelet is neutral; atomic nuclei with the strong force in the quark-gluon soup made by the LHC. And so they will start either an explosive ice-9 reaction (fast process that triggers a super-nova) or in the case they are forming with a small mass of quarks, falling towards the center of the Earth, a distillation of new strangelets, as new atoms peg to the original strangelet attracted by those 3 super-forces. Both reactions will end up consuming all the matter of Earth.

Because Physicists at CERN know those risks – his spokesman Mr. Brian Cox, even explained them in the BBC, affirming all the matter of Earth would convert into one -  they have always said adamantly the LHC won’t produce them, and CERN has denied in all suits and press releases any chance of producing strangelets. Yet it is a fact that it has designed a machine, a detector of strangelets, CASTOR and installed it to detect them.

Further on the ‘CASTOR TEAM’ has given conferences in which they affirm they will produce them in events which are not found in cosmic rays. Never mind this was for years CERN’s ever-repeated safety argument: all what we do is what cosmic rays do in the atmosphere. Not so, however when CERN physicists talk among themselves.

The previous confession of Mr. Katsas, a young student working at CERN, who broke the ‘confidentiality statements’ of zero risks that all workers in the company must sign (as reported by Engelens, Chief engineer in the New Yorker ) and is now no longer working on the facilities,  shows the duplicity of CERN, which provides in other page a course on how to deal with the press: ‘minimizing threats and maximizing opportunities’.

Thus, according to CERN inner reports the first ‘extinction event’ might happen in November. Since the probability given by CERN to the creation of strangelets is closer to the probability we have given in all our suits for extinction, 65%, as it can be seen in the conference given by Mr. Katsas: ‘Strangelet hunt


It must be understood what an ‘Extinction event’ means – the first real chance of planetary destruction, performed by the Community of Nuclear Physicists, which have built an astoundingly powerful ‘Atomic cannon’ in search of their Saint Grail of Absolute Energy. Only that now the industrial-military complex that built this machine-weapon doesn’t tell us we must love nuclear devices, as they did in the 50s, because people are no longer fascinated by war. Instead we are told that we must perform big-bangs on Earth with this peaceful device to find God’s particle. Frankly I prefer the straight talk of the 50s to this ‘double talk’, adapted to the Walt-Disney like fairy tales of our current press. In any case the bottom line is this: An overdrive of energy (accidents, weapons) is also the cause of death, which erases the information of life and now menaces to erase all the information of all life forms of this planet and yet neither the press, nor politicians realize that in the Universe, not even a planet is ‘too big to fail’ according to the laws of black holes and strangelets that devour them…

Indeed, CERN says that the probabilities of extinction are small, one in a million and things like that. This is rubbish. We must understand to which degree CERN is lying when we understand the meaning of probabilities in quantum theory: quantum probabilities are not referred to the existence or not of an event, which either exists if the laws of science allow it (Totalitarian principle of physics: all what is not forbidden by the laws of science will happen) or do not exist if those laws are wrong. Quantum probabilities merely are a tool to know where a certain electron exists in a certain place, due to the uncertainty of its position –

but there is not uncertainty in its existence in time, the electron does exist. Thus, probabilities apply to the task of finding the location of the electron in space, not to define if the electron exists or not. For the same reason, if the laws of strangelets preclude that strangelets will be formed, they will be formed. So there is 100% of chances that those strangelets will be formed and grow. If we lower those chances is because we give certain ‘hope’ or chance for those laws to be wrong at our present knowledge. So does CERN which uses the expression ‘likely’ and a 65-70% chances, as theory today seems to confirm they will happen. But in science it is also needed the experimental fact to give 100% of probabilities. However the reader must understand that the scientific method and the sound mathematics and theories behind the formation of strangelets have been proved ad nauseam. All our civilization is based in those laws. So the ‘likely’ will probably become certainty.

What is absurd is to invent probabilities, out of the hat, as Mr. Arkani-Hamed did, affirming in the NYTimes that there is also ‘a minuscule probability that the LHC make dragons that might eat us up‘ or an ‘Oxford expert’ who said it is ‘easier to win the lottery 3 times in a row‘, or a European physicist, who said ‘it is easier than a wind brings an elephant from Africa’. Those people show a complete disrespect for science, ethics and the intelligence of the readers. So when a liar at CERN or an enthusiast groupie physicist’s blog tells you that there is 1 probability in a million, he is inventing them. It is like saying every time you switch on a light, it might work or not. According to Maxwell it will always work as long as the cable is working. The same with CERN’s experiments. That is why they are so frightening, because according to Einstein and our theory of strangelets they will exist and swallow it all.

If you want to throw some detailed numbers, what will happen becomes more evident: according to the Chinese Institute of Higher Energy Physics, the strangelet will grow till it acquires the size of the Compton wave of the Electron, which is 2.42×10 up to −12 meters, a bit smaller than the Hydrogen atom (Bohr radius). This is more than 3 magnitudes bigger than the Proton radius which packs those quarks: The nucleus of a hydrogen atom is indeed a proton with 3 quarks, whose size is in the range of 1.75 fm (1.75×10−15 m).

On the other hand the volume of a sphere is 4/3 πr3 where r is a radius. Thus the volume is a bit less than 3 magnitudes bigger than the radius.

So to calculate the number of quarks in the strangelet ‘atom’, we have to consider that the strangelet will have to pack triads of quarks, with the same density they are packed in the nucleus, but in a space + 3 magnitudes bigger in radius and – 3 magnitudes bigger in volume.

Thus if we ad the minus 3 magnitudes of volume and the plus 3 magnitudes of radius and multiply them for the 3 quarks inside each nucleus that simple calculus shows that each stable strangelet will pack around 3 x 10 up to 6 quarks in a space equivalent to a Compton Electron wave… Thus each strangelet has around 3 million quarks packed in a size smaller than a hydrogen atom. Since the strong force is 100 times stronger than our electroweak force, you have a particle with around 100 million times more strong forces than the Hydrogen atom.  Also the strangelet’s gravitational force will be awesome, falling to the center of the Earth in no time.  It will be then a particle seating in the center of the Earth, which will become a mass-well of attractive gravitational and strong forces in which the Earth matter will fall.

It is easy then to find out the final product. Since the strangelet will shrink the radius of the Earth in the aforementioned 10 up to 3 order of magnitude. Since the diameter of the Earth is 12.756 kilometers, it means the Earth will become a rock of 13 kilometers of diameter (with an oblong form due to the liquid nature of strangelets and its enormous rotational forces that will flatten the ‘strangelet, ice-9 star’  across the rotational plane):

In the graph, the 2 most probable scenarios of extinction: if black holes are as Einstein predicted, ‘frozen stars’ of an ultradense ‘cut-off matter’, they will be made of the densest form of matter, top quarks. And they won’t evaporate. Since the LHC is trying to make the Higgs, which is defined as a top/antitop quark field, it will do them in 2013 when it ramps up its power. On the other hand it will do strangelets this November. Essentially both types of dark matter, which show at macroscopic level (black holes and strange stars) self-similar properties, will merely differ in size and density, and hence the strength at which they will devour the Earth. The final result will be a black hole of around 3 centimeters, slightly bigger than a dollar coin, or an ‘almond’ rock of strange liquid of the diameter of the Earth lowered by 3 magnitudes, of around 15 x 6 kilometers.) While the black hole scenario is still argued theoretically -as some like Hawking treat black holes as mathematical objects, while others consider them made of strings, which would be the parts of those top quarks – the strangelet scenario should happen according to the Totalitarian principle of physics: ‘Everything not forbidden is compulsory’. Since there is no doubt about the existence of strange quarks and strange liquid. In that regard, one of the biggest delusions of CERN and the nuclear physicists interviewed by the media is indeed to talk about ‘probabilities’ which in quantum physics refer to the location in space of a particle, which is uncertain, not to the creation of a particle in time, which is defined by the Totalitarian principle: If a theory is right, it happens. Point.  The uncertainty will be about the place within nanometers of the formation of the strangelet, NOT of the causal chain of reactions that will determine its creation if present Strangelet theory is truth.

Since this schizoid company of multiple personalities won’t come out of the closet till it is too late.

Activism in this issue.

Mr. Penrose and myself warned and contacted the press about this issue, with null success in our appeals to different groups. In the W.S. papers on the suits against CERN this was the most stressed and possible scenario, but the press ignored it focusing on the black hole scenario, precisely because the strangelet or bottomlet or toplet heavy quark condensate is ‘standard physics and should happen in the future at maximal potency in this accelerator and if we are lucky enough in any further upgrade.

Unfortunately the hands of the military-industrial complex are very extended and no serious information on this issue has been considered by CERN, the politicos that paid it or the P.R.ess.

A few examples will suffice: Mr. Rossler, one of the discoverer of chaos theory and the main activist in Europe, tried to appeal to the German Government, the main contributor to this project, whose general manager is German, but it turned out Miss Merkel is a physicist adamantly in favor of the machine. We tried to interest wikileaks on the Castor project till we found Mr. Assange is also a physicist and ex-CIA agent… Mr. Walter, here in the US, accepted an interview with Comedy central and it turned out  Mr. Jon Stewart was also the son of a professor of physics, in-loved with CERN, who made a mockery of these dangers. And so on, and so on.

Indeed – and this is truly what blowed up my mind as an activist – not only nuclear physicists are willing to take the risk of human extinction, as they have always done for profits or fame (nuclear war race) – but most of mankind has been so easily cheated with the propaganda about the Higgs that it will go along sacrificing their lives, the future of their sons, everything in this planet for a fairy tale called the Higgs – a particle rather irrelevant to explain anything but precisely the creation of quark condensates.

This took me to the conclusion that humans are basically believers, not thinkers, memetically imprinted by repetition and propaganda, as another German, Mr. Goebbels, the first ‘information minister’ in history – an invention of the nazis which called it then by its real purpose, ‘propaganda ministry’, put it: ‘if you repeat a lie many times people will believe it’. That is, there is no much difference between the 4 billion humans who believe a goatkeeper of the bronze age who saw a bush burning had talked to God, and often die in history for that belief, and the other 3 billions which rather believe in a new religion, technology, who has sold the idea that the finding by this machine of an insignificant boson, with a limited role in the study of the death of our matter (symmetry breaking), deserves to risk our existence.

What nobody seems to believe is the rather obvious truth that we are just an ‘old mush, hanging on the surface of a lost rock of the universe’ (Schopenhauer), weak, soft, old bags of dirty water, among the lightest species of the Universe, with very limited energy, which can be easily blown up by an overdrive of energy – the very definition of death, and we would do much better recognizing our limitations, being realist about it and stopping behaving like big boys with big toys and an overstated IQ, both of ethical and intellectual nature – which is what scientists at CERN are.

We shall therefore – once it is clear CERN is likely to produce stable strangelets and strangelets will swallow our planet – provide in this post a more detailed analysis of those 2 causal events:

- First we will include the leaked documents that show CERN will produce them. And then…

- The real scenarios of what will happen when those strangelets form.

 A decalogue of Leaks: the duplicity of CERN.

The duplicity of CERN is constant when referring to strangelets whose production and dangers denies in public and in its Safety ‘LSAG’ report (bottom of that page) but it affirms in its internal documents. Let us consider a Decalogue of lies, at a more technical level, ‘illustrated’ by ‘Team Castor’ on its powerpoint presentations:

0) The Company which always affirmed that all the phenomena that will happen at CERN has happened in cosmic rays that are harmless has the chuptzah to affirm in his first report on CASTOR, expressly that the LHC has been constructed to study events at high energy that will never occur in Cosmic Rays. So we were indeed, mild in our assurance that CERN was committing ‘criminal neglicence’ since this is plainly speaking in legal terms a case of ‘recklessness':

1) The company has been testing its machine, the Large Hadron Collider, at low energies with protons and now it has scheduled the first real experiment with hadrons the 11/9. That day it will collide lead and deconfine millions of quarks to replicate the conditions of the big-bang producing massive amounts of quark-gluon liquids of which strange liquid (Ab. Strangelet) is the easiest to make, with the lightest u, s and d quarks as Mr. Katsas explains in his CERN’s web page.

Yet the company never explains that quark-gluon liquids, are not only responsible for the original cosmic big-bang but also for the big-bangs of stars into Supernovas, whose remnant, a pulsar, is a star with a surface of degenerated neutrons and a core of strange liquid.

2) Information on CASTOR, the detector of strangelets, is only available to physicists within CERN’s site. Yet the existence of such CASTOR project does not come in google searches. Instead the company has another project also called CASTOR, which is the only one available in google searches and turns out to be ‘the CERN Advanced STORage manager’

Similar searches in google or CERN site search results do not yield links to the CASTOR detector site (IE ‘centauro+strange or strangelet+castor’) only to the CASTOR storage site.

3) In a recent professional book of 332 pages dedicated to the Atlas Experiment that hosts CASTOR, ‘The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC’, in chapter 6, it has only 3 pages on it and with no mention of strangelets.

This duplicity is evident in the constant denial in public of the probability to make strangelets andthe dangers of this production vs. the inner information provided in the non-advertised pages about CASTOR that we have digged out of CERN’s server.

In that regard CERN published a LSAG (Safety Report), which denies both the creation and danger of strangelets, against all published literature and against the affirmations made in their web The following have most relevant information:

4) According to the CASTOR reports the probability given of Pb-Pb collisions creating such strangelets is of 1/1000th creating a total of 500 strangelets every month at full luminosity; (talk from CMS Week: presentation – 3rd slide from last found in that report). This contradicts LSAG assertion that probability for a strangelet emerging from LHC would be ‘negligible':

 
Nt. This and the following slides are part of ‘Team Castor’s’ powerpoint presentations.

In the graph, ‘Team Castor’ has built a Calorimeter to detect the production of strangelets at CERN. The probability for each event, according to inner documents, like this powerpoint presentation, implies that CERN will produce 500 strangelets each month starting the 11/9 of this year, when the first pb-pb collisions take place. Standard literature on strangelets explains what will happen next: strangelets will grow, absorbing quarks and transforming our matter into ultradense strange matter, till reaching the size of an atom (albeit with a huge density). Then 2 common processes of Nuclear reactions can take place: fission of the strangelet into smaller pieces that will grow again, starting a nuclear reaction called ‘ice-9′, or catalysis as the huge charge and mass of the strangelet attracts atoms that lump on the surface creating more strangelets.

5) According to the Castor pages, strangelet charge would be only negative or neutral, as it is generally agreed in professional literature and affirmed in the suits against CERN. This is relevant because neutral and negative strangelets will absorb the matter of the Earth much easily that positive strangelets.

Yet the Safety Report made public, the LSAG affirms they will be positive:

6) According to the CASTOR site pages, strangelets will be stable for enough time to produce an explosive reaction, yet according to LSAG they will not:

‘Duration could be stable, or as long as 10^-4 seconds. They contradict the LSAG statement that strangelets would be unstable.

7) According to the CASTOR reports, a mechanism of strangelet production by ‘strangelet distillation’ could be possible, which is however dismissed in LSAG report:

Distillation is a slower but easier process of creation of strangelets, which requires very few strange quarks to be triggered.

8 ) According to standard literature and all the affidavits denouncing this company in different suits, strangelets will be created in higher number at higher energies (since Einstein postulated that mass and energy are equivalent, E=Mc2, hence with higher energy an accelerator produces more Strangelets).

Yet the LSAG denied this obvious law, which now is contradicted in the CASTOR reports for internal consumption:

‘Strangelets will be produced above RHIC’s energy (200GeV nucl-nucl c,o.m) starting at 233 GeV nucl-nucl c.o.m.

9) According to CASTOR reports, strangelet could realistically be produced with atomic mass number as low as 18 – and CERN will produce thousands of strange quarks per second, so it certainly will produce them. This contradicts assertions of LSAG report of negligible creation on that range.

(From CMS conference report, 5 april 2007)

10) According to the CASTOR report Strangelets are thought likely to have been detected from cosmic ray data of collisions in the 70’s. This contradicts LSAG assertion that no indications of Strangelets have been found.

And so on.

We are now 70 days before the experiments that will collide in the Large Hadron Collider lead at light speed to produce strangelets according to all those internal reports and CASTOR is prepared to observe them.

This is known perfectly by CERN’s experts. One of them, Mr. Brian Cox, main spokesman for CERN had the chuptzah to explain in a BBC documentary how the Earth would be swallowed by strangelets if they were formed. (This is the guy who said during the smearing campaign against those of us who knew CERN could destroy the world, that we are all ‘turds’ and ‘twats’)

So ad one, CASTOR revelations and two, Mr. Cox’s view on the behavior of strangelets and you get 0: nothing, niente, nada, our ‘likely’ annihilation the 11/9… according to CERN and all the theoretical knowledge we have about strangelets and ice-9 reactions…

What we have not found in the server of CERN is any machine, system or provision to contain their exponential growth, in the so-called ice-9 reaction that starts the process of creation of a super-nova. On the contrary, all what CERN gives to ‘the public’ is the reassurance that strangelets will not be formed, according to that Safety, LSAG report, which the same company denies in its internal memorandums.

Training the Press…

But of course, CERN is not alone in this duplicity.

As important as the role of CERN backed by the nuclear physicist community, is the role of corporate science and the corporate press who has acted as a P.R. to this corporation, in part because they don’t understand the physics involved and it is easier to call the press office and get a release as if it were an article on CERN, in part because we live in a world ruled by corporations that evolve machines, and make profit with them so technology must always be right, even if it kills us all. So the press censors any scientists who gives bad news on technology regardless of their personal merits and the truth they explain. In fact, even Einstein was prosecuted in the 50s for opposing the A-Bomb. But unlike the smart anti-live=eviL behavior of CERNerds, most journalists are as most humans good people, which would have reported this tragedy if they knew enough physics or realized this Organization is NOT a group of idealist researchers but the heirs of Teller, the nuclear physicists, who once the cold war was over and the production of Nuclear weapons plummeted found refuge at CERN, a place where to keep their search for higher energies and explosives. In a few words while editors in the corporate press, like those who advised judges against Federal Law at the Nytimes to throw the suit to the nearest black hole, are restrained by the Corporate ideology that all technologies are good, even those who can murder us, journalists were simply taken for a ride by the press office and marketing campaigns of CERN, which even gives courses on how to deal with the press, ‘maximising oportunities and minimising threats‘:


Indeed, Miss Jessica Pryce-Jones must be a genius, because her media training course has taken the entire world press for a ride. For 3 years the press has been pounding on us, the people who warned with suits, letters, books and films against this monstrosity. While the ‘trained press’ has published the ‘no threat, pass and see the circus of CERN: big opportunity to discover the Particle of God!’ PR releases of this Nuclear Company. And so now we are 70 days before the first experiment that might destroy the Earth…

Till now it has all been tests with light protons, even though the company affirms those tests were real experiments….

But soon, the 11/9, a date mirror of 9/11, the biggest terrorist team ever assembled in History, the physicists at CERN will start production of the most dangerous substance of the Universe, the primordial quark gluon soup that exploded in a big-bang all the matter of a previous Universe.
The choice of the date could not be more cynical. Do those people have any respect for the victims of terrorism, for the victims of mass murder nuclear weapons, for the millions who have died with arms invented by ‘physicists’? Of course not. Being an intelligent lot one can imagine the choice of date was not an irony of destiny, but perhaps it was.
But nothing will be done to stop them. Because those are our home made terrorists, German Technocrats to the service of the SS (Strange Science) – One Rolf Hauer, who affirms with stone face that this astounding irresponsibility is a ‘great leap forward’ for mankind; one John Ellis, who organizes parties of the end of the world; one Stephen Hawking, who puts mankind to test and laughs at it in public, saying that if he is wrong and Einstein is right, we shall all become spaguetti.

Unfortunately, the most advanced theoretical research on strangelets (the work of Peng & Chen from the Chinese Institute of High Energy Physics) shows that strangelets, once formed, could start a chain reaction that would catalyze the conversion of the Earth into a 15 kilometer rock.

The Fermi Paradox might have a solution…

So that’s it. Alea jacta Est. The scenario is clear and will be undoable by Christmas 2010, though the time in which a tidal wave of 8 plus earthquakes will be followed by the shrinking of the Earth and the duration of the process is not known in detail. It might take a few minutes or up to a century. But there will not be rescue missions to the center of the planet where those strangelets will grow, feeding on Gaia. It is the Fermi Paradox, which Mr. Fermi of A-Bomb fame, cynically explained to their peers, when he bet that Trinity would only blow up New Mexico. Then he posed this question to the world: ‘why we do not hear any intelligent life on the cosmos? Are we, physicists, destroying all planets before we reach interstellar travel?

Now, we could rephrase his question: Why we only hear the monotonic tam-tam of strangelet stars (pulsars) and black holes? Are all forms of ‘humanity’, in the self-similar fractal Universe, born to kill life and transform this planet into dark matter, which makes up to 75% of the Universal matter and its main candidates to be are MACHOS, quark stars, strangelets and black holes? Given the astounding irresponsibility of the Physicists’ community and the sheeple behavior of politicians and press who let ‘them do it’, this seems to be a logic, though terrifying answer to the Fermi paradox…

The physics of strangelets: how they can devour the Earth.

The moment of truth has arrived. CERN will attempt the first experiment that can extinguish Gaia (our Earth) on 11/9, 2010. This has never happened in history for 5.000.000.000 years.  It is indeed an event in a lifetime that we would prefer not to pass through.

Consider the pdf. ‘lies and statistics‘  and ‘quark stars‘ to understand the enormous probability those experiments have of creating a quark star or strangelet. The chances of creation of strangelets in pb-pb collisions at 3.5 TEv are between 33% and 66%… between 11/9 and the end of a one year run, with continuous events at increasing luminosities (higher densities in the collisions, which increase the chances that one of them create the strangelet that would start the chain-reaction that swallows the Earth).

These first experiments with lead are rushed in, with just a few months’ notice, taking advantage that lead ions have the same geometric emittance and magnetic rigidity than protons… reasons why this machine, which is basically a big magneto, taken cared of by 8000 electricians, playing to be God, works for lead. Since lead follows the same geometric, magnetic paths, the test experiments ran till now, with the excuse of finding an impossible, ‘toilet particle’ (name given to the Higgs by Nobel Prize Weinberg), have already calibrated the quark cannon. So the LHC doesn’t need major adjusts to collide now lead and produce strangelets.

Indeed, this ‘eschatological company’, dedicated to research 1) ‘toilet particles’ and 2) the end of the world, will now move into phase 2, after failing to find the Higgs Hoax.

Why we are so sure the risk is so enormous, more or less like tossing a coin to the air?: heads you are dead. Because true science exists for a reason, based in methods of veracity that CERN has ignored whenever they didn’t suit its agenda, but the Universe obeys or else reality as we know would crumble around us. When we switch on a light it always lights up unless there is an accident, not sometimes according to 1/millionth probability as CERN pretended it will happen (on public) with the chances that black holes and strangelets if formed will follow the known-known laws of science (Einstein’s relativity and standard strangelet theory). Now, we know CERN always understood this and prepared CASTOR for the ‘big-bang’ event. And so because theoretical science of strangelets today tell us that at those energies, when the quark cannon strikes target, strangelets will be formed, chances that they will be formed are huge, both in our suits and papers and those of Team Castor who estimates  (slide, point one), a ‘very big number’!, 500 strangelets a month. I thought of Einstein, when he was called a liar by 300 German scientists, who wrote a book ‘300 physicists against Einstein’. ‘If they were right, one would be enough’ – he said. Indeed, one strangelet not 500 would be enough to start an ice-9 reaction.

The first knowledge we had about strangelets was advanced by MIT theorists, specially Mr. Jaffe, in the 90s when the LHC was planned. Then it was speculated that strangelets will not form easily and the most dangerous, negative strangelets able to attract other nuclei, will not take place. But as it turned out that ‘strange quarks’ are negative, having a 1/3rd charge, soon we learned that most strangelets would be negative. The next ‘impossibility’ – that strange liquid (the non abbreviated name of strangelets) – would not exist in nature, was destroyed by the increasing evidence that ALL pulsars, also called neutron stars, were actually strangelets, strange stars, with a strangelet nuclei and only a cover of neutrons. So it is happening ALL the time in nature. By then CERN had got the money for the LHC and could not back off unless it was to fire its 8000 electricians and hundreds of thousands of physicists collaborating. So they denied stubbornly the existence of strangelets, quoting systematically the old papers of the 90s. One of those papers by Mr. Glashow, from 91 – that old indeed – was the only paper Mr. Glashow, Court Amici in the suit against CERN at Hawaii, brought to the judge. He claimed a pretentious authority on strangelets on account of his Nobel Prize for the weak force. But as today those papers are totally outdated (and so it is the weak force model for which he got the Nobel Prize, but that is another matter).

20 years after that paper in which he affirmed that ‘strangelets’ were very ‘unlikely’ to exist in Nature, we know they are all over the cosmos. Then it came the series of breakthroughs of the Chinese Institute of High Energy Physics, which proved mathematically( and have never been disputed as science must be disputed, with pen and paper), that all type of color-locked strangelets (negative, positive and neutral) will form and become stable, in the case of Neutral strangelets with just 6 quarks in the form of dibaryons, in the case of negative strangelets with a few thousand of them. CERN calculates it will produce close to a million strange quarks in pb-pb collisions at the LHC at top energies in 2013, and a somewhat shorter but well above 1000 quark ball number in November.

We shall therefore, once it is clear CERN will produce stable strangelets, provide the real scenarios of what will happen when those strangelets form. Since this schizoid company of multiple personalities won’t do it.

1st scenario: chain reaction of strangelets as a complex liquid that converts Earth into a Supernova.

Peng, from the Chinese Institute of High energy physis, rightly considers then that the strangelet will grow, absorbing quarks and transforming our matter into ultradense strange matter, till reaching a stable form with a size slightly smaller than a hydrogen atom. Then it will become an atom of strange liquid.

In the graph, A is the number of quarks in the strangelet, figure a.b and c are for color locked strangelets, of  positive (slet-1), negative (slet-2) and neutral (slet-3) strangelets. Figure d is for the ‘old type’ of strangelet, theorized before we knew that quarks ‘lock themselves’ into triads becoming far more stable. During the first phase of growth, positive and negative strangelets have an enormous imbalance of charge, becoming neutral at 1000 quarks (negative strangelet) or close to 100.000 quarks (positive strangelets). Neutral strangelets, start slightly negative and become neutral around 100 quarks. Thus in that first phase, strangelets grow attracting positive ions and electronic covers. This makes the reaction faster for positive strangelets, which might take days to form a huge lump on the center of the Earth, starting an ice-9 reaction; and slower for neutral strangelets, which might take decades to reach the critical mass needed for the creation of a Supernova on Earth.

The first phase, which can be followed in the previous graph of Peng’s master article is obvious: the strangelet is still growing, and it has either a huge negative or positive charge, because it has different numbers of the 3 quarks, u, d, s, which have respectively +2/3rd, -1/3rd and -1/3rd.  Only when the strangelet has the same numbers of u,s and d quarks it becomes neutral (since +2/3 – 1/3 – 1/3 =0 charge).  Thus, in the previous phase as the strangelet falls to the center of the Earth, it will have a positive or negative charge in the order of thousands. This is an astounding attractive power, since the most attractive chemical reactions on Earth are triggered by atoms which have 2+ or 2- charges. Imagine an atom with +5000 or – 5000 positive or negative charges. Other atoms will cluster around it in no time. This is the journey of growth of the strangelet towards the center of the Earth, feeding in those six thousand kilometers, till it reaches a neutral state with a huge size.

Because the strangelet has the size of an atom, despite having thousands of quarks inside, when the strangelet seats in the center of the Earth, where atoms are tightly packed, it will attract them now with its gravitational and strong forces. Some people at CERN trying to find excuses for this not to happen, say that there will be a Coulomb barrier that prevents those atoms to fall into the strangelet. But of course this is silly. The coulomb barrier is the product of the atomic number of the atom and the elementary charge, which even for the heaviest uranium gives us around 100, the value of the strong force of a single quark, so what they are telling us is that a single individual will be able to stop the force of thousands of them – the strong force of the quarks inside the growing strangelet  (-;. Like in the case of Cosmic rays or the game of absurd probabilities, nuclear physicists are playing with the naivety and trust of people who don’t know physics. The strangelet will certainly keep growing till reaching the aforementioned size of an electron compton wave with 3 million quarks inside, in a size slightly smaller than a hydrogen atom. And now its gravitational and strong force will catalyze the formation of new ‘strangelet atoms’ around it.

Indeed, the last excuse nuclear physicists have invented to calm the public is that once the strangelet reaches the Compton size it won’t keep growing. This is correct. The compton wave should be the size of a 3 million quarks, strangelet atom. But the strangelet atom will keep attracting atoms with its awesome gravitational and strong force, deconfining them and packing up their quarks into new strangelet atoms.

Since in fact those 3 millions of quarks per strangelet atom pack S-quarks with a mass twenty four times that of our average quark (95 Mev vs. 3 Mev for the up and 6 for the down):

So a single strangelet, smaller than a hydrogen atom, packs however the weight of 26 million normal quarks, a gravitational force equivalent to half a million atoms of water. That super-dense water, the Ice-9, being so small and heavy will cut through the Earth as a knife cuts the water, falling at g-speed… How long it will take in that journey?

It is easy to calculate because it will be a free fall and so it will follow the simple Galilean formula for the acceleration of a body:  d=1/2 at^2

Where the Distance to cross are d= 6.374 kilometers and the acceleration is, a =9.8 m/s

Which gives us a time of nineteen minutes in its descent.

As they fall, seating on the center of the Earth,  forming the first drops of ice-9, those strangelets will start crunching and feeding the light, ordinary matter as we breath air, in a monotone series of big crunches and big bangs, breathing the matter and expelling the electro-weak energy of its electrons.

Since the strangelet is given a stability of hours, it will arrive to its destiny almost certainly. How long thus will it take for the LHC to blow up the Earth in the worst scenario? A few hours after the first collisions take place the 11/9, there could be millions of strange quarks feeding with its awesome force in the center of the planet. The longevity of strange quarks have always surprised researchers. The first strange particle discovered, the Kaon, lived millions of times more than expected, reason why it was called ‘strange quark’. It was ‘as if Cleopatra were still dying from the aspid bite, still falling into the river’, said the physicist that discovered it. The strangelet will keep falling beyond that river, cutting like a knife into the water, followed by a massive release of energy, as it cracks atoms with its enormous imbalance of charge, absorbing its quarks. Finally it will reach its point of rest at the center of the Earth, finding other strangelets, growing the first drops of ice-9…

One atom at a time, millions of quarks of ordinary matter will become part of the new strangelet atoms in an spontaneous reactions that releases more energy that consumes.

 Those type of ‘spontaneous’ reactions happen all over Nature. In any chemical reaction the final product is not a single molecule but an enormous number of small molecules, catalyzed by the reaction that keeps transforming the initial products (in the ice-9 reaction the atoms of the Earth) into the end products (the molecules or in the ice-9 reaction the strangelet atoms).

Indeed, because the strangelet will still attract further matter, the strangelet will NOT become static but it will turn more atoms into strangelets. Nature is never static. Chemical reactions like this one, in which there is a release of energy, since the end product (the strangelet) is more stable than the original product (the atomic matter), don’t stop till the initial products disappear, in this case till the entire Earth becomes strange matter. They are called exergonic reactions or spontaneous reactions for that reason, since just the initial kick of energy that triggers the creation of the first product makes the reaction self-sustained. This has been finally recognized this week in the article of physicsworld we quote at the end of this post, which literally says:  ‘A little energy is enough to transform a neutron star [with an iron cover] into a strange star’. The same can be said of the Earth: ‘ a little energy is enough to transform the iron core of the Earth into a strange star’.

2 common processes of Nuclear reactions will then take place:

-  Catalysis of new strangelets, as the huge charge and mass of the strangelet attracts atoms that lump on the surface creating more strangelets: the stable Strangelet with its awesome charge and weight will keep attracting atoms and ions. Those atoms and ions, surrounding the stable strangelet will form new ‘atoms’ of strange liquid. And so the strangelet mass will keep growing.

This even a high school student of physics can understand. Basically the first strangelet will act as a ‘catalyzer’ of the reaction, forming new strangelet atoms in its surface. This again happens all the time in Nature in which heavier metal nuclei act as ‘catalyzers’ of chemical reactions, as matter is attracted by them and anchors in the surface. So new atoms anchored in the surface of the first strangelet will continue growth.

- But there is even a faster, more scary possibility… that the first strangelet fissions into smaller pieces that will grow again, starting a nuclear reaction called ‘ice-9′, exploding the Earth into a super-nova in a matter of seconds.

Indeed. All the atomic nuclei that ‘grow’, split when they reach their limit and fission, starting a chain reaction that grows even faster, as strangelets do in Nature in Quark stars all over the cosmos. It happens in any atomic bomb, in any radiactive atomic nucleus. So what will happen then, because it is NOT excluded
and according to the Totalitarian Principle of Gell-mann (the discoverer of quarks) ALL what is not excluded happens in science, and further on this is what the drop-liquid model shows to happen always in atomic nuclei made of quarks is obvious:
When the strangelet reaches the size of the Compton wave, since it is in fact a liquid, it will find very easy according to the drop-liquid model of atomic nuclei, to split/fission in several parts that will keep growing back to the 3 million quark stable package, exactly as in any chain reaction, causing the Earth to become a supernova.

The catastrophic scenario is simple and self-evident, and it can be seen all over the cosmos in the transformation of a normal star into a pulsar, which has a strangelet core. Basically the strangelet will follow the droplet model we use for fission processes. According to Peng, the growth of the strangelet will be fast in all possible types, neutral, positive and negative, because we have found a new quality of strange matter, called ‘color locked’, according to which those quarks are far more stable than previously thought.

This again has never been disputed, except by CERN’s hired experts in the suits against the company. Today all physicists know that quarks ‘lock themselves’ in triads that become far more stable than what physicists – specifically Mr. Glashow, a theorist that worked on strangelets 20 years ago… Yet CERN engaged Mr. Glashow in the suits against the LHC, as the foremost expert and ‘Nobel Prize’ from decades ago, to defend the ‘ordinary sets’, which are to modern theory of strangelets what the Rutherford model of atoms is to quantum theory – a joke.

In the last decade the Chinese Institute of Nuclear Physics has become the most advanced Institution in the analysis of strangelets, that have surpassed clearly the ancient American MIT institute, where the second expert on those suits, Amicus Curiae Mr. Wilczek, keeps laughing at our ‘likely’ extinction… pointing out in the hyperlinked video that if he is wrong, nobody will blame him.  While in our suits he claims to be an ‘authority’ that has to be ‘trusted’, because we are ‘persons of no merit’ without further technical or scientific explanations. Since he knows perfectly if he goes into scientific details as we do in this article, he has no objective, scientific arguments to deny what the Chinese researchers are saying and we merely explain in this article.

Fact is, in the same manner the Chinese are taking over America as the top economical nation at race speed, their labs today are producing an increasing wealth of top papers at the head of research in many fields, including strangelets. Further on, they are NOT engaged in CERN so their views are the only objective views within the physicists’ community. There are NOT at the Chinese Institute of higher physics, confidentiality statements that oblige workers at CERN, like Mr. Wilczek, hired to make those safety reports, to state zero risks, as the New Yorker reported . So they can tell us the naked truth. So far, neither CERN, Mr. Wilczek or Mr. Glashow have wanted to make any explanations beyond their claim that we must ‘trust their authority’ – neither of them have in fact appeared on the suits against the company, which defaulted systematically.

2nd scenario: neutral strangelets: creation of ‘usd’ particles, the minimal units of a strangelet that slowly grow and devour the Earth inside-out.

But even if the LHC produces far less quantities of Strange quarks than predicted, producing slet-3 of the graph, neutral strangelets, the reaction can take place in a slower fashion.

We already have experimental evidence of this, since the previous top Ion accelerator, RHIC, produced a few strange quarks that formed a cohesive liquid, a proto-strangelet, with far less energy/mass (E=Mc2), than the LHC will have. It made small, aborted phetus – let us put it this way – that thanks God – didn’t stabilize, but grew a billion times faster than expected, and started to absorb other quarks. This surprised all researchers that expected a gas and found a ‘perfect liquid’. The Rex showed its teeth. But the corporation that runs this Jurassic Park of ultra-dangerous primordial particles won’t close the facilities. Those were the first atoms of strangelets – mainly hyperons (usd atoms) just one stage below the particle that will kill us, the double nuclei hyperon, the stable dibaryon, usd-usd. At RHIC we were lucky. We only saw  half dibaryons, usd atoms, which are not stable. We just need two join two ‘strains’ of this lethal RNA to form a stable ‘DNA’ of strange science, a dibaryon that will catalyze as DNA did in the organic soup, the conversion of matter in strange liquid.

The scenario is simple:

There are 3 kinds of ‘atoms’ of strange liquid, a mixture of up, down and strange quarks:

1) Up-strange and down-strange Kaons. They are the first to appear and they are unstable, so they decay as antiparticles. The LHC did 16% more of those in December at a mere 1.1Tev.

2) Hyperons, usd-atoms. They are only stable at high pressure, inside stars and maybe in the nuclei of Earth. At RHIC 70 hyperons were found, much more than expected. If 2 of them collide they form a dibaryon a double Hyperon: usd-usd; and dibaryons are stable at normal atmospheric pressure. Those 2 atoms, hyperons and dibaryons are the only substances we know can provoke supernovas and we know they are the nuclei of pulsars, the remnant of those explosions. And so now:

3) Thus, at 3.5 Tev in lead to lead collisions, the LHC will produce so many collisions between hyperons that it shall create a constant stream of stable dibaryons, stable strangelet liquid, able to blow up the Earth.

Dibaryons are the neutral, stable atom of strangelet liquids. You need only 2 hyperons, 2 usd-atoms joined in a collision to form a usd/usd di-baryon. Those stable and neutral dibaryons then will fall to Earth’s center.

A few hundred might form in each collision. How many are needed to form a strangelet? If you see the previous table of the types of strangelets, a dibaryon, usd-usd will have neutral charge (+2/3 -1/3 -1/3 +2/3 -1/3 -1/3) but it is already stable with a mere 6 quarks. 

Thus, according to Peng and Chen  a single dibaryon could do it. But in this case the process will be extremely slow, as the dibaryon will be neutral, seat on the center of the Earth and catalyze very slowly the creation of new dibaryons. This would be the best scenario, taking decades to blow up the Earth. But this scenario that might be already in the workings (as neutral dibaryons are invisible – only charged particles are detected in accelerators, so they could have been produced at RHIC without being noticed), is superseeded by the thousands of strange quarks the LHC will produce in its collisions. The certainty of dibaryon creation in any case is close to 100% if it didn’t happen at RHIC already.

Thus on 11/9 CERN will start creating strangelet atoms, dibaryons.

Of course CERN has denied this adamantly in public. Yet again, we have found an inner document in which CERN affirms that ‘dibaryons will be stable, lasting a few days:

‘There is a mass range, below 2055 MeV (the mass of a lambda and a neutron), where it [Hdibaryon] could only decay by a doubly weak decay into two neutrons.  This is a deltaS =2 reaction and leads to a predicted lifetime of the order of days’

By JP Coffin et al. (seriously)
‘Search for strange dibaryons in STAR and ALICE’  Jrnal of Phys G v28 pp1707-1714  2002

How long will the dibaryons take to fall to the center of the Earth? Not very long.  It is a free fall event. One hundred times heavier than our mass, its fall will be like that of a parachuter, towards home, the center of the earth. Then, there, the Earth will fall into them…

The first warnings.

The creation at RHIC of an unstable liquid drop of strangelet was always denied, prior to the experiment. It was only anticipated in 2000 by a Safety Officer of Accelerators, who denounced that possibility and put a suit, risking his job, to RHIC, Mr. Walter Wagner, a Physicist from Livermore Laboratory. He lost his job for that suit and was cannibalized by the corporate scientific press, who said it would never happened, who said RHIC would only create a gas.

And yet, it created a proto-strangelet liquid with a behavior similar to that of a black hole.

This  was a ‘BIG surprise’ for all scientists involved who claimed before at RHIC that they would never produce a single strangelet (strange liquid particle) but just an evaporating, harmless gas. And yet they did make the first particles of strangelet liquid, fortunately enough in small numbers and without any explanation on how it had happened.

I wrote then, with the help of Rossler, as specialists in Complexity, fractal theory and Chaotic liquids, an article, censored by the corporate scientific media, explaining what none has done in those prehistoric, mamooth labs that use still in the XXI century models of simple liquids and single entropy arrows, 20 years after we defined (Mehaute and myself), mathematically the existence of a second arrow of in’formative’ time, responsible for big crunches in complex liquids, black holes and the Universe at large.

But of course, we were not published. We are, as my friend affirmed in a personal e-mail, ‘non-persons’, like those invisible characters of a science-fiction tragedy. Because this is indeed, a tragedy of cosmic proportions, made possible not only by CERN, but also by the corporate press that dares not to denounce a company ‘too big to fail’. And yet the consequences once this happens will be impossible to undo. But we humans seem unable to learn from past experiences.

Plainly speaking our arrogance and ignorance of the laws of the Universe go together to accelerate our demise. If we were ignorant but humble we just wouldn’t take the risk. If physicists knew as much as they pretend to know, instead of being stuck in a single arrow of time (energy), and a simple mathematical analysis of reality (not the fractal Non-Euclidean equations and dual arrows of energy and information we use in complexity), they would simply not need CERN, as they would understand and resolve as we have done in Complexity all the questions the quark cannon pretends to study.

‘Physicists are often wrong but never in doubt’ said Landau. Indeed, nuclear physicists at CERN are both arrogant and ignorant of any sound physics that don’t  cater their agenda of zero risk; and so in their ignorance they will make strangelets and/or black holes in their arrogance they will dismiss the advices of those of us who are humble and knowledgeable about the true laws of mass and black holes that we have discovered using the second arrow of time/information.  But of course, we do not have a 10 billion dollar machine and war chest to explain this to the world. We are what true scientists have always been. Individual people, with little power, little interest in the bonfire of human vanity, but beautiful minds to understand that knowledge and ethics go together, or as Socrates put it, ‘an intelligent man is a good man’. At CERN they are neither intelligent not good people, but smart bullies which live off the routines of the cold war age, when Nuclear scientists were sanctified, not because they explained us the meaning of it all, but because they were making nuclear weapons and the system was justifying them as the ‘high priest of knowledge’, to elevate ‘Shiva’ the God of death and energy to the top of the human altars. Indeed, when the Aryan invaded India, they divided the caste of warriors in fighters and Brahmins, the philosophers that wrote the Baghavad Gita, to justify murder on the altar of Shiva. Oppenheimer, who pressed the bottom that inagurated CERN, and Rudolf Hoess of Auschwitz fame had something in common: both carried with them always the Gita, which quenches all ethical fears, as we humans must behave as automatons of duty and death.

‘The tragedies of History return because humans never learn from their past’ M. Proust

It is useless to argue further about the duplicity and callousness of corrupted military or corrupted science – exemplified during the XX and XXI century by nuclear physicists, who pretend to explain us the meaning of it all with false God’s particles but are merely abusing the tax payers and menacing the future of life in this planet. Unfortunately the ‘Industrial military-complex’ is with them and the corporate press hails them as geniuses, because ‘in the name of the religion of science’ all crimes can be justified. And so the religion of the machine is above any authority and nobody defies it. It should not surprise us that now again all physicists back CERN, regardless of the known-known risks and unknown-known genocide it can cause: the only physicist of note, who dissent against the Nuclear Race was Mr. Einstein, reason why he had a file opened by the FBI; his classes at Princeton were deserted… and so he took to walks with Godel and boat sailing. Knowledge and scientific prestige, even in the case of Einstein, had to yield to the power of money and the industrial-military complex, as it has been the case with CERN.

In that regard, the fundamental error of Humanity regarding Nuclear Physicists is NOT to realize that they are neither the avant garde of scientific research (we, Complex theorists, like Mr. Rossler and myself, who have fusioned the laws of biology and physics, of Darwin and Einstein are), nor they are idealist scientists, but they act and respond to their worldly profession, which is to make weapons. And so their character, duplicity and obsession with death is self-similar to that of the military that ‘defend’ our nations but often ruin them causing unnecessary wars.

This is something people seem to have completely forgotten. Nuclear Physicists make weapons and then discover ‘things’ which are mostly irrelevant for the ‘big picture’ of the Universe, studied by astrophysicists, philosophers of science and in this century, Complex and system scientists, which fusion biological and physical laws in a veritable theory of Unification.

If people would understand this, then it would easily compare CERN with the behavior of our military in Afghanistan, where they pretend to be a ‘peace corps’ but massacre innocent people with robotic weapons. CERN belongs to that psychology which was crystal clear during the Cold war but now it has been forgotten.  Since the industrial-military complex has refined his marketing and now it sells itself as a ‘knowledge tank’ to the service of mankind.

Yet if a ‘minor ‘genocide happens, if the innocent electricians and youngsters working at CERN, who ignore what their leaders know, if the people of Geneva die in an atomic explosion (in case the strangelet and black hole become unstable, they will be transformed, E=Mc2, into the biggest nuclear explosion ever, but won’t destroy the Earth), Mr. R.H. who prudently moved to Tokyo, the day the LHC made the first collisions, ‘just in case’, should be tried for mass murder with John Ellis and the rest of the people responsible of this cover up of Mr. Einstein’s work and the laws of strangelets, which they perfectly know, as those documents show, and yet have hidden to the public and the ‘sheeple’ press.

The solution must come from outside CERN and the nuclear physicists’ community.

Obviously at this stage, technocrats, politicians and the press who backed this company with wishful blindness are trapped in their own errors of judgment and will not cancel a 13 billion $ project not to face public derision for being cheated by yet another mammoth – not so clean – Energy Corporation. The machine is too big to fail; and as we all know it is an unwritten rule of power politics ‘never to acknowledge any mistake’.

And certainly Nuclear Physicists will not come out of the closet and say the truth. They never do. None except Einstein, regretting his letter to the president, confronted clearly the Nuclear Race. The International Agency of Nuclear Science, from the UN, certified that in Chernobyl tragedy ‘only 56 people died'(1) – the people who were blasted that day – since they refused to acknowledge the +200.000 cancer victims according to the Byelorussian government as ‘non-proved’. You see, this is now again the official position: In the suits Courts determined that the ‘Destruction of Earth is in no way attributable to US government’

since we didn’t demonstrate ‘Injury in fact’ – only ‘a posteriori’ when we are all dead could we sue CERN. La Hague Court of Human rights told my father, a reputed Lawyer from Spain, that they would only judge ‘genocides that had happen’. But all this was before we knew the extend of CERN’s ‘wrecklesness’  in this matter. So now, only direct action by the European Governments and Security forces can stop this 11/9 act of ‘scientific terrorism’. But it must be done in a quiet, non-compromising way.

How then could we stop this genocide of all of us in the making? The only thing that could be done is to ‘fake’ a solution with the ‘tools’ of power of our society, money and weapons, since truth, the power of the wor(l)d, which is the only tool I have, didn’t beat the money and weapon-machines of CERN in this corrupted world we live in.

Thus, the solution is a 3 sided process, which could be achieved using either of the 3 languages that control the world, words, money and weapons:

- The press should change sides and denounces the company NOW, reason why today I released the news of this post to 100 newspapers. While Mr. Penrose, a British physicist and mathematician who provided me with some of these documents, has been trying to leak the same CERN’s lies to the ministries of science of Europe… So far with little success.  Since there is an unwritten law in our ‘free market’ economy that states corporations are never prevented from committing enviromental crimes. Only at posteriori they are denounced with outrage as it happened with British petroleum. But perhaps ‘word of mouth’ could do it. You could help to disseminate the news, twitting, facebooking and digging this post with the tools given below… If this becomes ‘vox populi’ then CERN would have to respond to the world and political power could act.

- Politicians could also stop the machine with money. Further cuts on the program and budget of CERN could be requested. European Governments could quietly ask ‘Caesar Hauer’ to close CERN for winter, as it always did before to ‘save’ money, given the fact that this machine when running consumes the amount of energy of the entire city of Geneva and prices of electricity are much higher in winter. This is in fact the first year the machine will run in winter at higher cost, paradoxically when we all have to tighten our belts in the middle of the Economic Crisis. The reason is obvious: CERN wants to dismiss the risks with a ‘fait accompli’ so it is rushing the experiment because as John Ellis, chief theorist put it: ‘the best way to dismiss this talk about the LHC destroying the world, is to switch it on’. Now CERN should be obliged to release a statement saying that the machine will go on recess during the winter period, as it is usually done, to save money to European tax payers. And then quietly close down the next year.

- Finally, the Interior Ministries of France or Switzerland, responsible for policing and nationalsecurity, who have territorial jurisdiction on the machine, could also stop it. If security forces and politicians of those countries knew what is at stakes, they could fake a ‘bomb warning’ at CERN, evacuate the premises and while searching for the device, set it up in secret and explode the tubes of the collider. Yes, indeed, in 9/11 there were confabulation theorists that went so far as to say the American government had put charges on the basements and cut the foundations of the building – witness the absurd rhetoric on that issue of the Iranian president, recently at UN – yet another politician who absurdly thinks Nuclear Bombs must be had, if we ‘can do it’. This confabulation theory was obviously false and doesn’t deserve any serious thinking. However in the 11/9 ‘plot’, since those ‘scientific terrorists’ are ours and hence far more difficult to deal with, breaking the collider could be indeed a solution for european governments not to loose face and for physicists quietly exit this ill-conceived machine and accept defeat without public opprobium.  Then the collider would shut down for repairs and latter on, quietly cancelled for ‘economical reasons’.

So there is indeed a solution to this genocide in the making. It won’t happen I know, the routines of our society are too strong, our leaders too weak to defy them, power too arrogant to recognize a mistake. So they will probably prefer to ‘believe’ that the heirs of Openheimer and Teller are to be trusted, that the laws of Nature will bend to their will… But maybe a miracle happen, an Asimovian ‘mule’ breaks the routines of human self-destruction and takes the risks of being ridiculed as the people who sued CERN have been, knowing that this has to be done.

This must be stopped by political power. We cannot longer trust nuclear physicists. It was done before by Eisenhower. In the previous Horizon of Nuclear Weapons, Hydrogen Bombs, Teller had invented a very costly mechanism to produce H-bombs, patented the method and created the industries to profit from its manufacturing. But he didn’t sell the product for ‘money and prizes’, his true reasons. Instead Teller convinced Truman of the need to make Hydrogen bombs, because they were necessary to ‘know better’ the atom. Then he proposed an H-Bomb made with his company at stratospheric prices able to blow up the whole URSS. He was backed by the entire nuclear community – never mind that such explosion will destroy the atmosphere and all forms of life on planet Earth. Eisenhower realized of this MAD strategy and called Krushev, starting the process of disarmament.

Any takers against the Heirs of Teller of whom his college Isador Rabi said: “I really do feel it would have been a better world without Teller, I think he is an enemy of humanity”

? Today we could just change the name of Mr. Teller for Mr. Ellis, who said his job is to protect ‘the LHC from mankind’. So we wonder, where is the new Einsehower able to protect mankind from the LHC?

We need a politician, a man of action, which at this stage can only be Obama, Sarkozy or Van Rompuy. They could stop CERN from making strangelets, and make truth the promises of a world with less Nuclear weapons.  Eisenhower was a military who protected mankind from Nuclear Physicists. Can Mr. Obama or Mr. Sarkozy protect us again with something more substantial than promising words?

Update, 23 september


In the graph, bunches of protons with hundreds of times less quarks than the lead ions which will collide the 11/9 have formed a drop of unstable quark-gluon liquid,  a fermion condensate, surprising CERN’s physicists. On the ion collisions the 11/9 there will be hundreds of times more quarks packed together, bound to create stable strangelets (u,s, d quark liquids)

More bad news coming. Yesterday CERN gave the news that a quark-gluon liquid was starting to form with simple proton/proton collisions. Given the fact that energy becomes mass, E=Mc2, the quarks inside the protons multiplied in enormous numbers and since the bunches of protons collided at close distances, they massed in a bose-einstein fermion liquid (ridge on the picture) that ‘surprised’ again all scientists. As we explained in our post – The Grand Design – we exists in an organic, fractal Universe whose forms self-reproduce constantly into self-similar forms, which gather into herds and form new, bigger scales of the fractal Universe. So quarks reproduce new quarks and form herds. Thus the 3 lonely quarks of the proton reproduced thousands of quarks which formed a Bose-Einstein condensate, which was unstable. Needless to say when the hundreds of quarks inside the lead hadrons collide, there will be more than enough quark liquid to create stable strangelets that will start the dreaded ice-9 reaction (stability grows with the quark mass of the strangelet). The signs of an impeding catastrophe are everywhere, but nobody listens. Since the idea that we, humans, are so unimportant to the Grand Design that we could disappear easily defies the ego-centered beliefs of our species. Time is running out for the press, the military and the governments to stop this experiment but they keep practicing their wishful blindness.

The way in which yesterday’s scary discovery was presented as ‘new physics’ by all newspapers that merely released the PR news from the company shows that we will wait till the ice-9 spill happens. Only that this spill cannot be closed like the BP one. Nuclear Physicists are willing to take the risk with the cynical nihilism they have always shown, from Oppenheimer (‘I am become Kali, the destroyer of worlds’) to Teller to Wilczek, who was taped saying: ‘I never was so confident to make a prediction as when I was called to seat on a panel about the possibility of an accelerator turning on and ending the world; predicting that it won’t is very safe because if your prediction is wrong [shrugging his shoulders], ha, ha, ha, ha’.

‘2 things I deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man; and I am not sure of the former’. A. Einstein

Update 12th October. Paper confirming ice-9 reaction. [ Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 141101.]

In a new article at physics world physicists finally acknowledge that CERN will produce strangelets. This was taboo but perhaps the success of this release commented in alternative media outlets has opened the Pandora Box. The article recognizes that the LHC will produce them, and that they can cause an ice-9 reaction, converting the iron core of the Earth into a strange star, because strangelets are more stable than normal matter (the article refers to neutron stars, made of neutrons with a cover of iron, but obviously will produce the same effect if they fall to the iron core of the Earth)  Yet what astonishes the reader is that after recognizing those dangers, the cold-hearted researchers eagerly expect their production at CERN to further advance their career and prove the thesis of their paper. This astounding irresponsibility is at the core of all what is wrong at CERN and the people that back those experiments. Nothing matters in the ‘rat race’ of scholar papers, in the competition to ‘achieve’ the Nobel Prize, the grant, the recognition of a minor discovery, even the high chances of extinguishing Earth. Selfishness reaches a ‘surrealist’ twist that explains the style of the video we made about those strangelets.

And the final warning, which closes the film quantum roulette, from ‘Cat and cradle': ‘What hope can therebe for mankind, when there are men that give such playthings as ice-9 to short-sighted children as most people are?’

Here the beginning of the article at Physics world with ad-ons by me []:

‘The energy needed to convert a neutron star [with a core of neutrons and a surface of iron] into a so-called strange star may come from annihilating dark-matter particles. That is the conclusion of a new study by physicists in Spain, the UK and the US, who propose that this conversion mechanism may be a good way to put a lower limit on the mass of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), a leading candidate for dark matter [The physicists work in WIMPs and that is the only thing they care for - to put 'a lower limit on their mass'.]….

It has been proposed, however, that, given some kind of source of additional energy, neutron stars can convert to strange stars, objects consisting of strange matter –

a soup of unbound up, down and strange quarks.

The idea is that adding this energy to a certain limited volume of the neutron star will unlock the up and down quarks confined inside the neutrons [exactly what the LHC will do]. Some of these quarks will then naturally convert into strange quarks, producing a region of strange matter known as a strangelet. If, as has been hypothesized, strange matter is in fact more stable than normal, nuclear, matter it will exist a lower energy. The excess energy given off by the conversion of normal matter into strange matter then unlocks more up and down quarks, leading to the creation of more strangelets.

A little energy is enough to transform a neutron star into a strange star.

The result is a runaway process capable of converting an entire neutron star into strange matter within a second or less. “The neutron star is metastable, like someone on a mountain ledge,” explains Joseph Silk of the University of Oxford who was involved in the work. “Just as a little kick can push that person off the ledge and send them to the bottom of the mountain, so a little energy is enough to transform a neutron star into a strange star.” [the LHC excess of energy will do so]

While there is no clear evidence that strange matter actually exists, the observation of extremely brief but ultra-bright bursts of gamma rays from the cosmos suggests the existence of strange stars. Researchers have proposed that the enormous power needed to produce a gamma-ray burst could come from the formation of a black hole, but the large numbers of particles of normal matter surrounding a black hole could absorb much of that energy. The conversion of a neutron star into a strange star, however, could provide the required energy but without the surrounding matter.

[This was all along what we said in our first suits: that the massive bursts of gamma-rays found by the Fermi satellite, which never found signatures of black hole evaporation, were a clear prove that either neutron stars or planets with civilizations of 'physicists', were blowing up, confirming the Fermi paradox - we don't hear signs of advanced civilizations in a galaxy filled with planets because they burst in gamma-rays. Moreover, precisely because of the tiny size of a planet, the explosion of planets by 'physicists' would match the cleaness, low magnitude/mass and high frequency/energy observed in those gamma ray bursts. Are all planets busted by LHC-like machines, reason why we don't observe galactic civilizations, even of the robotic kind, as the parallel evolution of the machines of the Singularity age end systematically in those explosions. Given the indifference of mankind to this obvious danger and the automaton behavior of physicists just worried by their limited 'field of research', destiny seems to loom larger by the day.]

[Then after an argument on their 'subject' WIMPS, the team happily finds that CERN will give them a 'second chance' to prove his theory - the same argument of Hawking that stated publicly at Pasadena that producing black holes at the LHC will give him ' a second chance to win a Nobel Prize']:

‘The team claims that two lines of observation could support their thesis and thereby help place a new limit on the mass of WIMPs. One would involve measuring the mass and radius of a strange star, obtained by studying the radiation of pulsars, and comparing these values with the predictions made by their model and those of alternative models. Evidence could also be obtained by creating and then measuring strangelets at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider in the US or in the Large Hadron Collider at the CERN laboratory near Geneva.’

Update, 14 Oct. End of the proton run

. At 3:38 a.m. beams of protons were colliding with a luminosity of  1.01 × 1032, a milestone that the teams running the Large Hadron Collider had been working all year to achieve – Rolf Heuer explained in the message sent today to CERN staff – ‘It’s a great achievement by all concerned to reach this important milestone with over two weeks to spare. The remainder of this year’

s proton running will be devoted to maximising the LHC 2010 data set and preparing for 2011 proton running before we switch to lead ions in November.’

Any discovery of note? Of course, not.  The Higgs Hoax was just the objective of the marketing department, in charge of ‘training the press’.

But the press – let us face it – has trained itself with political and economical correctness, now for centuries, to back always technology (hence also weapons, the most advanced technology at any time) as the ‘future’ progress of mankind…

We could make a bigger, larger, more powerful machine. And since machines gather digital ‘data’, once it was clear that the Higgs Hoax had been just an excuse for the Media Hype, data now has become in itself the goal of the experiment, as Hauer explains: ‘the larger goal of delivering an integrated luminosity of one inverse femtobarn to the experiments by the end of 2011. That’s the amount of data [...] the objective we set ourselves.’ So we have made a better atomic cannon, regardless of its null beneficial use for mankind beyond the femtobarn of data, because nuclear physicists wanted it. And the military-industrial complex could make it. A bigger toy for our spoiled children of thought.

But to ‘have it all’ is the irresponsible philosophy of children, which see it all tainted subjectively by the glass of their wantings. The Darwinian Universe doesn’t work like that. Curiosity kills the Schrödinger’s cat. In fact, Nature feeds on children: Eggs, cubs and alevins are the cosmic staple of a fractal, eternal Universe, which constantly reproduces the same in/form/ations and events, reason why it cares nothing for their extinction.

How many planets have gone through self-similar, infantile, self-appointed Sons of God, claiming to be discovering the meaning of it all, while blowing themselves up? How many gamma-ray bursts of ‘unique’, anthropic planets are happening now? How meaningless we are?

‘ …a mush over the surface of a lost rock in a corner of the Universe – departing from those facts, we can talk about man.’  Schopenhauer

 Update, 20 October. The last release.  

Mr. Penrose and other physicists greatly concerned by the implications of these documents spent the last week doing an important, careful release of the CASTOR papers to the key mainstream media and science reporters and the Interior and Science Ministries of all the nations involved at CERN. This was not an easy task, as Mr. Penrose, the spokesman for this ‘Heavy-Ion Alert’ group, is the scion of a well-known family of British scientists, whose reputation would be put on line for this release, and so he has taken his time to talk this issue with his family and peers, trying to find a way out for CERN to not avail. But he has now presented the issue in a more academic manner and released the information to the press.

I must congratulate him; since I am conscious that the massive smear campaigns against me and the ‘pioneer’ people, who opposed this potential genocide has crippled our efforts and credibility. This, I have explained in this web: the prosecution has gone to the point of getting my scholar papers on the science of complexity and my pioneer models on the fractal Universe, applied to all sciences erased from Google scholar (till my work in the late 90s, except for some extraordinary insights of Mr. Mandelbrot and the application of fractal conceps to Astrophysics by Nottale, there was not a clear formulation of a Unification Theory of all sciences based in the scalar, self-similar, fractal, self-generative properties of information, the ‘program’ that designs the Universe. Since Mandelbrot, one of the few geniuses of the post-war era, who just passed away sparing himself the ‘Grand Finale’ have given indeed the first right step, discovering the fractal mathematics of information, but his concept of ‘roughness’ was too shy of the enormous implications of fractal, organic structures for the big picture of reality. Further on, it was needed to complete the 5 Non-Euclidean Postulates of geometry and fusion them with fractal mathematics to renovate the languages of the human mind. And so only when I completed that task left unfinished by Riemann and Einstein, I had the key to unlock the Grand Design, upgrading all sciences with it.)

In that regard I was first shocked by the insinuations that we opposed CERN for ‘gain and fame’, or that we didn’t know what we talked about, but since we were never given a chance to defend ourselves, only one side of the story remains. In any case, what those smearing campaigns on Rossler, Walter and me means for this issue is that we have been mouth-strapped, effectively from the beginning. For that reason I insisted so much to Mr. Penrose and other scientists to do this release, despite having those documents available in this web. Since it is obvious that they won’t be smeared – respect is due in the ‘anglopocentric’ world we live in to people with the right pedigree (-; Sorry Eric, we have now only 20 days left before what can be our last minute on Earth, so let me have some irony about the way humans qualify subjectively truth).

From now on, if CERN has a ‘carte blanche’ to go ahead with the experiments, the responsibility will be shared by the Press, the Political Power and the Company.

If we die, it won’t be any longer CERN only, which has to be blamed. As it would be naive to blame only BP of the spill, now that we know the extent of the cover up of the Government’s Agencies on the risks and damage of the spill. Companies in our civilization are wrongly designed to reach their goals at all costs. Governments and the Press are supposed to monitor, alert and control with their executive power their wrong-doing. They are now informed, if they cover up this crime and allow these experiments to take place to protect a ‘machine’, it means plainly speaking, that we humans lack the minimal qualities required to survive in the Darwinian, Fractal Universe.

In any case the release was done, perhaps a bit late, but with courage Mr. Penrose has done what had to be done. And of course, as today, nobody has published…

So when and if this happens, I just want to state that we, the people who have dedicated years to these cause, have finished our job.

For any further inquires on CASTOR, please contact Mr. Penrose, who has taken the relay from us in this matter at the Heavy-Ion Alert site. Good luck my friend. It is indeed a heavy, strange Sisyphus stone, the one you carry now, hope it doesn’t sink us all.

Update. 8th november. 24 hours before massive collisions. Stable beams.

It seems stable beams have been achieved and a few collisions taken place. Now the machine is ramping up its luminosity. Thus, tomorrow massive collisions of lead ions will start to take place, with enough density to produce strangelets. If strangelets form they will fall undetected to the center of Earth. By 2011, in most statistical models the conversion of Earth’s matter into dark matter will be advanced enough to end our existence on planet Earth. Curiously enough by then the LHC will be closed for an upgrade of energies and of course, if this were to happen, CERNies will deny all responsibility. Had this been discussed, instead of censored, we could be more optimist about the future… But CERN is already talking of further upgrades beyond the 7 Tev barrier of 2013, when again we will go through new existential risks. The conclusion is obvious:

Even if we survive 11/9, the fact that the experiment and its future upgrades are carried on without the slightest control and opposition, only means we humans will keep searching for higher forms of mass and energy, till definitely we cross the barrier of stability of strangelets, black holes and other forms of dark matter that will devour us. Make no mistake, the end of the race for higher energy in accelerators should be an event, which creates a stable black hole or strangelet that devour us – NOT an intelligent commission of politicians and citizens, who decides to stop this disguised arm race. And since the industry will keep pushing further upgrades and plans to reach always new energies, sooner than latter the planet will blow up, with the indifference and acquiescence of our political and judiciary institutions.

Update, 1st December.

Lead collisions have taken place forming the quark-gluon ‘perfect liquid’ already seen at RHIC in minimal quantities. The ‘perfect liquid’, mainly, a mixture of u, s and d quarks, suppressed systematically jets of particles that should have exploded in a quark-gluon gas. Those particles stayed inside the ball of fire for enough time to form dibaryons, the simplest strangelet particles that can be created in acceleratiors. It is the slow scenario of extinction  by accumulation of strange particles that might take years to reach enough critical mass to provoke the conversion of Earth into dark matter. On a positive note, we are still here, which means the fastest ice-9 reactions (massive conversion of the USD perfect liquid into strangelets within seconds of the collision) have not taken place. 

We are still here. We are being lucky… We can now safely consider that enough lead to lead collisions have taken place to discharge the ‘faster’ scenarios of strangelet formation (a runaway ice-9 reaction taken place after a massive growth of +3 million strong quarks strangelets). The fastest scenarios based in the ‘Peng Papers’ seem to be ruled out at this point. Yet the slower scenarios – dibaryon formation, slowly leaking to the center of the Earth and provoking a big crunch in years to come – cannot be ruled out. Moreover the behavior of the quark-gluon soup on the experiments performed, suppressing massively jets of particles that should be emitted and are being absorbed back into the quark-gluon liquid, shows how easily strange quarks are interacting inside the soup and probably creating different particles of dark, strange quark matter, which will take months or years to detect. This is the risk that has already happened and we shall not know for years to come… But the official establishment of science is cheering up. Nothing really new has been found, of course… but that was never the goal of this experiment. This means, as today, 2 relevant scenarios are left: the dibaryon scenario (strangelet formation within years) and the black hole scenario over 10 Tev, which will not take place till 2013…

Let us quote the article ‘LHC Creates Cosmic Primordial Soup and Probes Strange Particle Jets ‘ on the nature of those jets to understand those dangers: ‘Jets are a common sight in collisions of protons at the LHC, usually appearing in pairs as narrow cones of particles heading away in opposite directions from the collision point. They are equally common in collisions of lead ions, but with a twist. The ATLAS measurement showed that the more “head-on” the collisions of lead ions, the more unbalanced the energies of the jets streaming out in opposite directions from the collision point. While one jet may still appear as a narrow cone of particles, the second jet has a much lower energy, and the narrow cone of particles has become much more diffused. [Symmetry]

That effect is called “jet quenching,” and the imbalance appears when one jet must travel through more quark-gluon plasma to escape the collision area than the other:

If the collision happens near the edge of the soup, one quark only has to pass through a bit of soup to escape – that’s the big jet. But the other, going in the opposite direction, has to travel through lots of hot dense exotic matter. It gets scattered around and loses lots of energy into the medium it is passing through. That’s the “missing” second jet. [The Guardian]

Jet quenching was indirectly observed at Brookhaven National Lab seven years ago. But with the energies at LHC, the effect is so pronounced that physicists could see it directly.’

In other words, strange quarks are not jetting out and dissolving but being trapped by the quark-gluon liquid, recombining in particles, among them very ‘likely’, dibaryons…

Black mass.

How can you deal with the madness of the LHC – a totem of the new religion of man, the machine, which physicists, its high priests, build just for the sake of it? In case you haven’t ‘watched’ the previous article, we shall close this one with a surrealist film – an art which appeared to create parables of the incomprehensible death toll of I world war. An Image indeed is worth one thousand words – not only technical pictures, which is all the knowledge CERN will ever achieve risking our lives – but also artistic ones. So here to conclude, a personal interpretation, sampled  from different sources and ‘black masses’ …

(please disregard as usual dates on those videos, 2010 the original date for full energy shots are now postponed to 2015, when those danger scenarios are likely to happen)

(1) 9. http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/releases/greenpeace-new-study-reveals-d

The data, based on Belarus national cancer statistics, predicts approximately 270,000 cancers and 93,000 fatal cancer cases will be caused by Chernobyl. The report also concludes that on the basis of demographic data, during last 15 years, 60,000 people have died additionally in Russia because of the Chernobyl accident, and estimates of the total death toll for Ukraine and Belarus could be another 140,000.
Yet ‘only 56 people have died as a direct result of radiation released in Chernobyl’ according to the report ushered by UNO’s Atomic Energy Agency: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article563041.ece

 
9 Comments

Posted by on December 27, 2011 in News

 

Higgs’ hoax

update.  November, 2013 Nobel prize: The Higgs Hoax. Mass Theory.

And so the time came for the P.R.ess to announce the Nobel Prize of Physics to Mr, Higgs…
The price is not yet for Mr. Hawking. This is in fact an impossible event, as if black holes are produced at CERN they will not evaporate.  They will evaporate us and kill mankind as they grow in size and feed on our weaker matter. So if micro-black holes exist we will die instantly and Hawking will not have time to get the Nobel. And if they do not exist, there will never be a proof of evaporation and Hawking won’t get the Nobel prize either. He will though endanger mankind as long as he covers up what he knows: that he is endangering the life of 7 billion human beings for personal ambition.
Mr. Higgs also endangered the life of all of us, but he was more discreet – beyond a rif-raff with Hawking in which each one accuse the other of not being good enough to receive the prize (- the bet came nicely and now it is the time for rewards. It did not surprise me at all. We all now that if you murder a person you are a criminal, if you commit genocide you are a national war hero. So now Mr. Higgs is the hero of the Nuclear Industry.
The Saint Nobel of the Dynamite works hand in hand with big science, with technological and industrial Physics and more and more its prizes are given to technocrats and instruments of science that help to find little details of the standard model, not to r=evolutionary physicists and even less to ‘humanist’, peaceful ones who care for physics as a form of knowledge not a form of material gain or technological advancement.
Of course, it is all part of the surrealist nature of our technological civilization, defined by Mr. Fromm: ‘if a machine can be done it will be done, even if it can destroy us all – this is the ethics of a technological civilization’.
I said this because now the LHC’s reason of existence are even thinner. The Higgs is found, so why we must upgrade it to twice its power to enter the range of real dangers for human extinction? For no reason at all, only because we can do so. Because men do not think, they act, they build, they assembly machines and then they think what they are, what they mean. Men made steam machines and it took them 100 years to build up and wrongly a theory of heat and thermodynamics to explain heat.
There is of course the exception, the Einsteins and Leibnizs that think first and act latter. But those are not likely candidates for Saint Nobels of the Dynamite, reason why it took 20 years for Einstein  to get the prize and one year when he was the only candidate the prize was desert not to give it to him, a pacifist who made ‘thought experiments’, and who is the real author of a serious theory of ‘mass’, not Mr. Higgs. And this is the reason why must comment in this upgraded post on the Nobel prize to Mr. Higgs.
Now the Higgs particle probably do exist, even though the proofs are so far scanty, as we explain in the article specific to the Higgs particle. But he DOES NOT GIVE MASS TO PARTICLES.
It is just a boson, on the ‘next fractal scale’ of the family of mass of the Universe (the top quark family of bosons and fermions). And as such it is involved in transformations of lighter quarks into heavier quarks and in top antitop quark reactions, a very limited role in the world of physics, which was pumped up to collective hysteria to obtain huge resources from clueless politicians as the particle of God and the particle that explained mass, when the real use of those accelerators, to research for more powerful nuclear bombs, diminished after the end of the cold war.
This must be clear: the Higgs hoax consists on using a secondary particle, the Higgs boson, to explain an intrinsic property of physical systems, mass, perfectly explained by Einstein’s Principle of Equivalence between mass and acceleration:

Mass is the attractive, in/forming force of the Universe; and it is merely the last, accelerated, curved motion of the gravitational force. This was explained by Einstein with his principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass/gravitation. Initially, due to the ‘mirage’ of materialism, physicists thought the principle only applied to the external, curving vortex of gravitational forces that sunk into the mass. But the mass as a solid substance was never found and all pictures have seen merely vortices of curved motions.

Now we can explain all this and take further, conceptually and mathematically the discoveries of Einstein, thanks to the advances of complexity.

In the graph and video we explain and update Mr. Einstein’s sound theory of mass according to his Principle of Equivalence between mass and acceleration:
A mass is an accelerated vortex of gravitational forces that attracts as a hurricane does, all what is flowing in the gravitational membrane. Hence intrinsic to that vortex-mass of gravitation.
As such a mass is the smallest clock of time, which cycles and carries the information of the Universe in the frequency of its twist.
For the same reason, a charge is an accelerated vortex of electromagnetic forces, which attracts all what flows in the electromagnetic membrane.
And so this writer put forward in the 90s in the milieu of systems sciences a simple model of masses and charges, unified by simple fractal equations, as two membranes of a scalar fractal Universe in which ‘particles of temporal information’, masses and charges, and forces of lineal energy, gravitational and light forces constantly interacted as the two ‘informative/temporal’ and energetic/spatial motions/forms of the Universe:
E(spatial, lineal energetic forces) < => I (particles, clocks,vortices of temporal information)
We study in depth such a model in our articles on mass and the Unification equation.  A similar model was put forward also by Mr. Wilczek in the 90s, using also the frequency of a mass vortex to calculate accurately the mass of several quarks -something Mr. Higgs has never done, as it has never explained how  particles acquire mass from the Higgs, not why each mass has the value it has, as Mr. Wilczek and this author’s model have done.
What to make of this? There are two theories of mass out there.
The one first brought about by Mr. Einstein, sound, logically and physically consistent, further evolved by wilczek in quantum physics and this author in the world of systems sciences and theory of information. In that model we define masses and charges as the clocks of time that carry the information of the Universe in the frequency of its eddies, which attract the flow of gravitational or electromagnetic forces and the particles ‘floating’ on it; and hence attract more the faster they turn, as experiments show – being the black hole that turns at c-speed in its event horizon the most attractive eddie of mass in the Universe, and the electron which turns slower, the lighter and those eddies that never close a cycle as light and gravitation does, massless bosons.
The model is sound, it predicts accurately the masses of all particles. It solves the Information Paradox. It simplifies enormously our understanding of mass, particles, information, entropy and explains a myriad of scientific facts. It even unifies the equations of electromagnetism and gravitation,
In brief it is all what physicists have been waiting since Mr. Einstein’s incomplete work on gravitation and mass. And yet nobody cares. Even Mr. Wilczek after some protests received a Nobel Prize and abandoned his theory, grudgingly accepting Higgs. (nt,2)
So we have on the other hand the Higgs, which nobody knows how it gives mass, neither how it gives different masses to different particles, a theory of mass that is blatantly false, illogic and experimentally unsound, but it has allowed the construction of a 13 billion $ machine.
And so IT MUST BE TRUTH, according to the aforementioned Fromm’s  ‘Ethic Principle of a technological civilization': Since we can make the LHC therefore we must construct a machine that can destroy us all, specially in technological civilizations that lack ‘humanist ethics’, a collateral damage they purposely ignore. Mr. Nobel invented chemical explosives and personal mines. And CERN the ultimate weapon.
And now after receiving the Saint Nobel Prize of Physics CERN’s views in physics are instant canonical, dogmatic truths. Even if every serious physicists knows Higgs boson does not give mass to electrons and every particle of the universe. It is just one of those things we must believe by decree.
The Higgs alternative.

Till here all seems clear. You will have probably understood what Mr. Einstein meant by a mass as a gravitational vortex, because after all as he put it ‘the Universe is simple but not malicious’.

But there are also ‘malicious physicists, which are not simple’ and try to convert the Universe to its cause. Let us then see what the Higgs is supossed to do to give mass to particles. Explaining in detail as Mr. hauer has done in its conference of the Higgs, the ‘quantum alternative’ that tries to take the place of Einstein: alas! the celebrity particle.

The behaviour of physicists in a crowded social event at a conference is equivalent to the Higgs mechanism, as proposed by David Miller (University College London).

In the graph, the hypothesis that the Higgs also gives mass to particles was an idea that came out later during the marketing of this particle as the meaning of it all, but Higgs was never able to explain how it did it. So since Mr. Higgs did not know what his particle did, a student invented the esoteric Higgs mechanism, which converts particles in humanlike sentient beings. Those particles, represented in the drawings by blue physicists, cluster around Einstein, who enters the room, slowing the scientist’s progress. In this manner they give the scientist mass. But they treat each particle differently. They like some (the celebrities of the party, which have more mass) while other particles are liked less, so they move faster and have less mass.

Seriously.

Of course, this is called… bull$hit. A 13 billion dollar excuse.

Let us now return to serious science and Mr. Einstein’s explanation trying to answer with his model  the key question of all this puzzle. Why certain particles like a black hole have more mass, while others like a photon have no mass? It is really because particles are ‘prescient’ and foresee the arrival of a celebrity (they are also conscious) coming to it, distinguishing them? Or something more objective, physical and normal?

Of course something more normal when we describe a mass as an accelerated vortex, whose frequency of rotation gives us like in a hurricane its speed and strength and attractive power. Then all the questions still unknown about mass and energy become solved:

- First, why and how energy becomes mass in that equation, E=Mc2. This is simple Energy is lineal acceleration, mass is cyclical acceleration, thus a mere topological change of the form of motion transforms one into the other. The Universe is eternal, made of motions. And so one becomes the other in the c-limit speed of our space-time membrane.

- Then why antiparticles have inverse time coordinates? Self-evident: they are time vortex that turn clockwards.

- Then, why black holes attract so much being so small? Obvious. The event horizon is the c-limit of speed that curves light into mass. So they turn at c-speed, and they are very small. Thus the frequency of its mass-cycle which is proportional to its speed and inverse to its length is the maximal possible in the Universe.

- And so why black holes DO NOT EVAPORATE?…

There are so many proofs that I wrote an entire book about it… Not only because Mr. Hawking breaks the two principles of Entropy but because ‘clocks of time’, masses do NOT evaporate, they are not ‘temperature beings’ an electromagnetic magnitude, they are NOT quantum particles, also an electromagnetic species. Mr. Hawking believes that there is only a single time in the Universe and black holes can work as time machines. Wrong.

As Einstein put it ‘There are infinite time clocks moving at different speeds’. So you cannot go back into a single past time and kill your grand’father – his time is independent of yours, as all those clock-cycles of the Universe are independent of each other.

Absolute time does not exist. As Leibniz put it, there are infinite time clocks related to each other by their relative simultaneity in a present space in which we measure them equalizing all the times of the Universe with our mechanical clcoks. But physicists understanding of time cycles is so primitive that they have yet still to figure out properly Leibniz and einstein. In any case nothing of all those fancy musings about black holes moving towards the past and evaporating information make any sense. Hawking is so Wrong that the amazing surrealist thing about him is how this kind of hoax can pass as science ‘ the power of the media and military to convert in heroes those who serve their purposes.

Black holes dominate the Universe precisely because they create mass by bending gravitational space into mass-information. They create, don’t erase information. As Einstein put it ‘time bends space into mass’. And mass carries the information of the Universe in its frequency.

But of all this Mr. Hawking understands little if anything at all; it is theory of information, XXI c. Complexity science of which he rightly said would be the science of the XXI c. if we are still here…

The problem is politicians know even less and humans at large are too shy and too entitled to realize they can dissapear in a whisp of time and nobody in the infinite Universe will care.

Ultimately Higgs overblown particle that does NOT give mass to anyone and Hawking’s NON evaporation are  the same kind of error: a quantum theorist trying to invade relativity with quantum, false effects.

Why this occur has a simple cause and a deeper cause:

-The deep cause is the misunderstanding of the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, made of ‘planes of space-time’ existence, built as russian dolls are, one over the other. And made of two fundamental elements, from where all others are deduced, lineal motion or space or speed or energy ‘ different perceptions of the same phenomena – on one side and cyclical motion or time clocks or dimensional form or information – on the other side, mutating into each other ad eternal in each of those scales and each entity of the Universe made of complementary systems of energy and information (fields-bodies of energy guided by particles-heads that gauge information)

So the Gravitational space-time membrane with its own space-energy force (gravitation) and its own informative particle-vortex (masses) is DIFFERENT from the quantum scale of electromagnetic particles, made of light-space and charges. They are similar but their laws are NOT exactly the same.

Once this is accepted, (2), there is no NEED to invent fanciful theories. What matters and we are observing constantly in the Universe are the transformations of electromagnetic energy and gravitational energy into cyclical charges and masses, two self-similar phenomena, which can be unified with fractal equations, as they are two membranes of space-time of different size, belonging to the ‘5th dimension’ of fractal scales of space-time (Se x Ti = K), this writer studies in his work.

None of this matters to CERN OF COURSE, neither to the Nobel Committee. We are talking of the industry of technology, not of pure science. Theories are worth a dime, what matters in a technological civilization are the machines you can build. CERN is a concern built over decades. So it is based in ideas that are even older, and if there is ‘bad luck’ as it tends to happen with mammooth old ideas they must be kept for all the wrong reasons – namely they justify the machine that can kill us all. The mind though goes faster than the engineer and so now CERN is obsolete for XXI c. physics but not for jobs and prizes and genocide.

If CERN and its theorists respected Einstein and truth in physics more than technology, they would NOT try to deny his best proved laws of gravitation with fancy musings. And physicists would use more their brains than their hands to understand the Universe. But technology commands theory and because quantum physics and electromagnetism are the industrial sustain of our world cosmological gravitational species are beyond our control, by sheer mass, 99 to 1, quantum physicists which are the bulk of the profession NOT relativists now invade all other fields and study species that do not belong to their ‘ecosystem of particles’, trying to make them ‘believe in quantum’.

Black holes however are not quantum species but cosmological ones from other membrane and force of informative nature, gravity. This, Hawking never understood because it is the future of physics and his work is old. But he didn’t have at least like Higgs the common sense of retiring, as Higgs put it, ‘because I couldnt cope with the advances of mathematics to do further research’.
Hawking in that sense has not learned the implications of fractals and Information Theory so he still works with entropy-only, disordered theories.
This is right only for quantum, electromagnetic forces, which are energetic, disordered entropic but gravitational forces are informative, attractive, they form, in-form particles. Mass creates information, black holes create mass, information does not evaporate, only if we bend the laws of mass, information and gravitation to create a fantasy called quantum gravity.
Yet because the duality of energy/information is so ill understood by physicists (that is the realm of complexity theorists, my discipline), errors like those of Hawking keep creeping in Physics and Nature defies them, not finding a single evaporating black hole in the entire Universe.

In that regard, what we face at CERN is not only an existential problem but an intellectual problem: quantum physicists work with a single arrow of entropy=energy, ignoring all about the sciences of information and the meaning of masses as information, forms, dimensional form; and are halting the development of true science, using the methods of religions and the military to impose their false ideologies of the Universe – censorship, bullying, money and political power. But they cannot censor, paraphrasing Einstein, ‘the thoughts of God’, the laws of the Universe, and the consequences of creating the most powerful, attractive vortices of mass of the Universe on planet Earth´, will be on his words ´the laugh of the Gods. For imposing truth with power´.

But children cannot even understand death and they fear and reject bad news. Death being half of the Universe is so common precisely because people DO NOT THINK of it. They die for sheer ignorance and downplaying of the risks involved. And they die ALL the time.  The problem is the Universe doesn’t need or care for man. But children have invented all type of musings, scientific and religious to think we matter.
And part of it are all those pumping prizes, genius rhetorics and self’entitlements of a species which is so low in true ethics and true intelligence that its theories of reality are doodles in the sand, seeing from the slightly advantage point of view, i can offer from the perspective of XXI c science (nt.2).
All what I know is that the laws of the Universe take primacy over man, and this neither prophets and scientists of lately it seems, they understand.This is the absolute unimportance, ridicule nature of the human lot. Humans are subjective, selfish, childish not very intelligent, unethical. So they do not grasp reality easily, which is objective, selfless, mature, intelligent and yes, ethical, just based in action reaction and balanced process.
So humans, confronted with a world far superior to their faulty existence prefer instead to imagine fantastic complicated self serving theories to explain reality. Then it is all a job for rhetoricians – their ego makes them feel they are geniuses because they have – so they think – discovered the meaning of it all. Me, i and myself, Mr. Higgs, Mr. Hawking, Mr. Einstein or Mr. Sancho, you name us… We are all feeling so clever… But reality does not seem to conform to our musings. This we know. Every year new phenomena surprises us. Now, here is where the scientific method, and its objective methods kick in to assess risks and give probabilities of truth to certain theories.
And this is where CERN and the physicists community at large has broken all the basic laws of scientific ethic, accepting 2 blatant lies according to the methods of finding truth of the scientific method – that black holes evaporate and the Higgs gives mass to particles, a faulty experiment, the finding of the Higgs,and put all the wrong symbols of truth, prizes, propaganda, p.r.ess to make us belief all that is truth.
The issue is not therefore the truth of Einstein’s upgraded theory on mass and its vortices of information that sooner or latter will receive due attention or those of Hawking and Mr. Higgs that will be properly valued once the industrial-military complex no longer needs them by the methods of truth of science. The issue now and here is our survival – the fact that scientists are humans and must be bond by ethical, survival reasons and respect the rights to true information and life of those who pay their research. It is the absolute madness and stupidity of risking the life of the species for theory – even if it were sound theory – what makes so bizarre the unchallenged experiments taken place at CERN.
So now after this Nobel prize, we can die for a ridiculous theory of reality, comforted by the ‘belief’ the P.R. system of prizes and self-pumping applause make us righteous.
Since what it is real is the awesome power of the LHC machine to reach overloads of energy that can blow the planet. What is real is the capacity of humans to assembly machines.
What is real is the capacity of physicists to make bombs NOT their capacity to explain reality better than the rest of sciences do.
In fact, as we show in many parts of this blog, physicists are no longer the avant-garde of science, since the apparition of fractal mathematics, theory of information and system sciences that explains reality with both arrows of time energy and information – which physicists obsessed with motion, weapons and lineal speeds have never understood. We, philosophers of science trying to fusion biology and information with physics and energy and its laws, are the avant garde of science along with logicians and mathematicians, as it has always been.
We are dying for nothing.
Yes, i am sorry if we die, it would be NOT for some meaningful heroic rhetoric quest. Death and genocide have never had any heroic reason. They are dumb actions, abominations which can never be justified except by damned lies and statistics. We will die as absolute idiots proving only the absurdity and null importance of mankind in the big symphony of the Universe, indeed ‘just a mush over a lost rock in a corner of the cosmos’ (Schopenhauer), who died in the most pathetic manner without any attempt to self’defence, cheated by a pair of retarded, old cranks. To accept that and deal with it honestly both from a philosophical and scientific point of view is the reasons are write this thereapeutical blog.

__________________________-

ORIGINAL ARTICLE 2012 -on the discovery of the higgs

‘It will be born extremelly small. It shall arise and grow exceedingly fast. It shall have no respect for any created being, but its power shall be such as to enable it to transform everything, from its natural condition into itself’

Leonardo, Prophecies.

Abstract. The Higgs and the membrane of dark matter.

The discovery of the Higgs or any other Goldstone boson opens the door to the membrane of ultra-heavy quarks of dark matter, only serious candidate remaining to explain the nature of the Dark World that controls and feeds on ordinary matter in the galactic scale, once SUSY theories have been discharged.

It couldn’t be otherwise. Since the ‘Universe is simple but not malicious’ (Einstein). And so all particles that exist must have a role in that efficient Universe. According to such Occam’s Principle, heavy quarks must have a key role, which cannot be any other but being the components of that all pervading dark, heavy mass world.

In such a Universe teaming with quark condensates, strange and top quark stars, black holes and dark energy, a key factor are the doors that transform the matter of our light Universe into the dominating, 96% of dark matter. Those doors are heavy bosons called generically Goldstone bosons.

Thus, the Higgs is just one of those bosons that transforms our membrane of light matter into the dark matter membrane of heavy quark particles, top quarks, strange quarks and bottom quarks  in which it decays.

And if produced in enough numbers it might condensate into an explosive, quark liquid, either a strangelet or toplet that starts the chain reaction we fear can annihilate the world (ice-9 reaction that will convert us into a strange star and gas-9 reaction that will make us into a black hole or toplet star…

In that regard, the Higgs is not the essential particle which explains the mass of all other particles of the Universe (this job is well done by Einstein’s General Relativity and its modern extensions) but just one that ‘transforms us’ into heavy quark masses. And this is the essential lie, today masterminded by CERN, in the past by the lobbyists of the Nuclear Industry, (Mr. Lederman) who have exaggerated the role of the Higgs to obtain fundings for this machine. Now, of course, when the funding is obtained, CERN starts to recognize this fact, as it does in its last ATLAS report, in which it says:

 IntroductionThe Standard Model (SM) of particle physics [1–4] has been tested by many experiments over the last four decades and has been shown to successfully describe high energy particle interactions. However, the mecha- nism that breaks electroweak symmetry in the SM has not been verified experimentally. This mechanism [5– 10], which gives mass to massive elementary particles, implies the existence of a scalar particle, the SM Higgs boson.’

Thus for the first time in a decade, when all is sold and sanctified CERN recognizes what we have been explaining for a decade: that the Higgs just kills our matter (breaks its symmetry) converting us in massive elementary particles (hence giving them mass), as a transformative state. But it does NOT give mass to particles, as mass is NOT given by an external agent, but a natural condition of any Einsteinian vortex of space-time that attract other particles as hurricanes do, dragging them as part of the space-time flow they absorb. So in this post we shall explain also Einstein’s mass theory and reveal what truly the Higgs implies for mankind – the opening of the dark world of heavy masses which feed on our universe.

Of course, that research entices nuclear physicists so much, that they disregard the surrealist, obvious danger of mass-producing them in our ‘light’ environment – short of creating a Jurassic Park for dark matter particles, here on Earth, to study the ways these lethal virus-like ‘particles’ can kill us, ‘breaking our symmetry’. This again should not surprise the reader if he is aware that Nuclear Physicists have been living with the Fermi Paradox – their responsibility in the future holocaust of the human species – quite comfortably during the entire cold war. So our collective dismissal for them is ‘business as usual’. Another matter though is the attitude of politicians, judges and the P.R.ess who as usual prefer to look to other side and let genocides happen, as long as they are not they are not their direct responsibility and some ‘expert’ is handy to justify it.

So we shall study in this post:

1. The experiment and the chances it really found the Higgs.

2. The nature of a Goldstone boson and how it destroys and feed on  our world.

3. The different theories of mass of Mr. Einstein and Mr. Higgs and why the Higgs was blown out in its importance.

4. The obvious conclusion, when we objectively judge the importance of the Higgs and the risks of those experiments: while the finding of a goldstone boson is a landmark of physics, its importance is far inferior to many other experiments in biological social sciences, far cheaper and important for our life in this planet.

Further on, the hunt for the Higgs has two collateral effects that damage both science and life:

- The Higgsteria which for profit reasons has blown up Higgs importance, has also imposed the wrong theory about mass (quantum physics instead of Einstein’s relativity) and stopped all funding and interest in the work of Einstein and its expansion (Absolute relativity, fractal structure of the Universe, mass theory, etc.)

- The experiment can still kill us, and the mere fact nuclear physicists are allowed to keep putting our species at risk is a crime of which all elements of our ‘technological society’ with their blind slavery to the ‘memes of metal’, money, weapons and machines that rule us, are guilty.

Luis Sancho Santa Monica, California

Update, 4th July 2012.

 After the discovery of a Goldstone boson that might be a Higgs, we have opened the door to the dark world, whose strongest candidates today, as SUSY has been discharged, are the known known, extra-heavy quarks, which if produced in great numbers will condensate into strangelets and maybe black holes (likely to be top quark stars).

We are now going to mass-produce Goldstone bosons of high energy/mass that decay into strange, top and bottom quarks, called in liquid, explosive form, strangelets, toplets and bottomlets quark-explosives.

Those substances described in the graph, can become mass-bombs able to feed and transform the entire planet into a quark star. We are thus closer to a negative scenario when the production of Higgs resumes in 2015 at an industrial scale. Then, the chances that the particles in which Goldstone bosons transform our electromagnetic, ‘weak symmetry’ world, Top, Bottom, and Strange quarks are produced in enough quantities to condensate into a dark matter liquid explosive will be according to the Totalitarian Law of physics (all compounds that are not ruled out by the laws of physics ‘will happen’) almost ‘certain’.

Finally, we do not see Higgs bosons but its decaying particles, heavy top and bottom quarks and antiquarks that in huge numbers as they will be produced after 2015, will attract each other and condensate into explosive strangelet, toplet or bottomlet liquids, the known-candidates, responsible for the explosions of Novas, Supernovas and quasars.

In that regard, it must be said that this expensive and dangerous tune up is unneeded to explore the Higgs candidate, as we have found it at low energies/masses. So with the present regime of low risk energies, all its properties could be researched. But that won’t change the policy of CERN, since it would mean to accept the existence of those risks, which the company adamantly rejects against the known-known laws of science. Ultimately CERN, as all ‘modern corporations’, never accepts a wrong-doing, always uses a corporative, P.R. Walt Disney type of ‘newspeak'; and so its routine and the need for jobs and future budgets for new accelerators makes unavoidable the upgrade and on the long term perhaps our dismissal by the paradigmatic mad scientist – the nuclear ‘researcher’…

We would wish and have fought for a different future, but the determinism of humanity to ‘go to the end’, on this issue of finding a quite irrelevant particle ‘whatever it takes’, seems to make Mr. Fromm’s statement the destiny of our civilization:

‘Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even if they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics.’

Yet of course ethics deals with survival, the preservation of life. So technological ethics deal with the survival of machines and weapons whatever they do to mankind. And certainly CERN’s LHC seems determined to survive till it accomplish the Fermi Paradox, whatever its collateral damage to mankind is.

Its money-hungry industries and Nobel-hungry physicists will also validate the Merchant of Death’s proposal to end all wars with the peace… of Nirvana: ‘My factories will put an end to war sooner than your congresses: on the day [my weapons] can annihilate armies in a second…” 

Mr. Nobel’s justification of its factories of weapons was latter picked up by physicists during the Nuclear race, and renamed the M.A.D. strategy (Mutual Assured Destruction). It was then when accelerators were discovered to research the Atomic and Hydrogen bomb. In fact the first Atomic bomb was an accelerator design, but the unpractical construction of one accelerator, too heavy to fly over Japan scrapped those plans and the machine became the fundamental tool of research of new weapons, in a race between Russia and the US, disguised with a new jargon of ‘Nuclear Physics’ and the ‘search for new particles’ as the ‘Saint Grail’ of knowledge.

This secondary role became the best propaganda for them after the end of the cold war when funding dragged for the Super-Collider, once the ‘red scare’ diminished. It was then when the bright idea of pumping up the Higgs – just the 3rd boson that kills our matter as the Z and W boson do, but NOT the particle that creates mass – into transcendental meaning became the alibi for further funding of this prop of the Nuclear Industry.

Since if the stakes were so high (our annihilation and 13 billion $ of tax payer money) the purpose must be even higher – the finding of the meaning of God, Man and the Universe. And it worked.

So M.A.D. has become now a reality with this new icon of our civilization, the ultimate weapon, but of course in the age of Orwellian Newspeaks, where we don’t go to war but send ‘peace missions’, we are also researching the 3rd horizon of Nuclear weapons, Mass-bombs for peaceful research. Newspeaks change adapting themselves to the Zeitgeist of each age. What does not seem to change is the purpose of our ‘technological civilization’…

If so the resolution of the long standing Fermi Paradox – why despite the abundance of planets there are no signs of intelligent radio-signals or robotic civilizations in the Universe, only the rhythmic tam-tams of pulsars (strangelet stars) and black holes (quite possible toplet stars) – will give reason to the cynical Mr. Fermi, who affirmed nuclear physicists blow up all those planets before they reach interstellar travel or A.I. substitute us – making us into yet another tam-tam strangelet or toplet star. It will also confirm, Mr. Smolin’s theory of a Universe that evolves black holes NOT human beings, though quite in a different way.

(Of course if you are a ‘believer’ on G. Bush, a God Bush of the bronze age, you can always think on the anthropic principle so many ‘serious’ physicists sponsor: namely that we are the ‘chosen’ unique intelligent species of the Universe, designed to host us (-; and so we shall not only find God’s particle but she will rapture us into heavens )-: 0-:  To each one its Karma.

 

I. THE EXPERIMENT AND THE FINDING OF A GOLDSTONE BOSON

Graph 1

On the graph, from CERN’s site, the existence of a statistical bump in the production of photon couples around 125 Gv,  means there might be a particle with that mass desintegrating on that zoneBecause Higgs equations do not specify the mass of the Higgs boson. Ergo any new particle could be a Higgs boson as we don’t know its mass. But what we know is that the esoteric Higgs mechanism to give masses to other particles, whose equations predict that as the Higgs interacts with those other particles, the boson’s mass fluctuates wildly, have NOT been met. If that particle exists is not fluctuating, ergo it is a proof OF THE NON-EXISTENCE of the Higgs Mechanism and reinforces the view of this researcher and others working on the extension of Einstein’s Principle of equivalence to explain mass that mass MUST BE described with the tools of gravity and Einstein’s work NOT with the quantum alternative presented by Higgs.

So the Higgs is still missing. All what really was found is a bump in the production of pairs of photons, the commonest reaction of the Universe. Thus to ascribe those photons to the desintegration of a specific particle, the Higgs is a wrong logical conclusion, as a pair of photons is NOT an EXCLUSIVE signature of the Higgs. Further more, the specific signatures of the Higgs, the decay of our matter into heavy quarks of the ‘dark world’, top-antitop and bottom-antibottom particles was negative, meaning in fact LESS reactions than expected took place. So what was found? Maybe, the existence of a much more generic type of particles called aproppiately ‘goldstone bosons’, since their ‘magic transformation into Higgs’ will report a pot of gold to CERN (-;

Indeed, once more money wins over science and we falsify the laws of the scientific method and the stringent measures of truth that used to make science different from religion, politics and economics.

Today the need for the Higgs obviates that loop of scientific logic between the premise – there is a bump of photons – and the conclusion  – the Higgs among many other particles produced it, despite its specific signatures were not there. Interpretation once more is bend to the needs of the researcher, with the oldest trick of ‘relaxed scientific evidence’, bumpy logic. 

But this ambiguous ‘discovery’ paves the way for the money needed to upgrade the machine by 2015 for lead to lead collisions over 10 Tev. Then if strangelets exist their proof will not be a small bump but a big bang…

Indeed, what it has probably been found, a ‘goldstone boson is extremely dangerous. It is the door to the dark world of quark gluon explosives that can erase the smiley, which crossed my face when I read the ‘physics’ of this ‘discovery of the century’ )-:

Im sure all the bosses at CERN have now in their faces a big LOL for having cheated so easily the P.R. Press of not-so ‘expert’ scientific journalists, which once more have swallowed the pill – not to speak of the governments and public that will foot the bill of new waves of Goldstones, threatening to start in this planet a chain reaction of dark matter… )=;

Indeed, the most astounding fact of this conference is not the finding of a goldstone boson, door to the dark world of dark matter, black holes and big-bangs in the making but the 4th clear proof that CERN is NOT an idealist, serious scientific institution but a company of physics of the industrial-military complex, of the nuclear industry, with the same kind of cynicism about truth and wreckless behavior about risks that those industries show – witness the recent independent report at Fukushima. 

Indeed, CERN has first denied the fact that if Einstein is right and black holes are formed they will eat the Earth (first denial of truth); it affirmed the machine was safe and known, and within days of switching it, it blew up (second mishap); then it said, too early that Einstein was wrong and neutrinos were faster than light in its bid proper of all quantum physicists to ridicule the master of all themes about mass and gravitation from a quantum perspective, 3rd mishap; and now makes a mockery of the epistemological method and parameters of truth in physics to announce before enough data and signatures are found the particle that justifies the investment. 4 mishaps however have not casted the slightest doubt on this company which risks the life of all of us, or an independent analysis of the risks involved in the ‘adventure’ of entering the dark world of super-energies and super-masses, big-bangs and symmetry breaking (which merely means death of our matter).

That is the collective responsibility of mass-media, which long became mere infotainment, in this affair. 

10th july, update. 

We were the first to uncover at cerntruth, the day of the conference that the data shown at CERN merely implied the possible existence of a goldstone boson, not the Higgs and his rather absurd theory of mass, but probably the sounder nambu-goldstone bosons of technicolor theory that produce the ‘death of our matter’ into dark matter (technically known as ‘breaking of symmetry’) in the process of predation of our light matter by heavy quarks, forming quark-gluon explosives, strangelets and black holes.

This week a paper has appeared at Arxiv.org explaining the same fact, further proving that CERN behaves as a ‘corporation with P.R. strategies that care nothing for truth and risks. Now, I don’t pretend to be a better nuclear physicist than CERN is, (just a better ‘time theorist’ :) so if I know, the bosses at CERN who gave that conference know they have not yet found the Higgs.

The only difference I believe between those who oppose CERN, who know-know and those who work there, the ‘expert Chenneys’ of the Military-Industrial Complex with their known-unknowns is a question of self-interest, their ‘known’ who fogs their reason.

What they know and care, a budget, the nuclear industry, the need for prizes, makes truth to bend and become unknown or as Nietzsche put it: ‘ The commonest lie is that which one lies to himself’.

Yet the more dangerous of all, and in this Dick was right, are the unknowns-unknowns of the dark world, which the gold stone, the philosophical chimera of ‘knowledge’ will bring here to transform us onto its go(l)d particle.  Since all these ‘golden stones’, mind the reader, are specific particles of a process called breaking the symmetry, which is basically a process of death of our matter ‘fed’ into the high density dark quarks through ‘weak currents’ mediated by those bosons.

This is really the meaning of the HIggs the Z and the W particle, the triad of massive particles, intermediate states between our light space and the quark mass in which we will become converted if finally in the study of the dark world CERN succeeds in creating enough H,Z,W decomposed into Top and bottom and strange quarks to form a strangelet or toplet star or black hole.

Update. 4th August.

Atlas now claims a 5.9 sigma in his finding of the Higgs. 2 precisions:

- CERN continues NOT to average to obtain their sigmas, all the channels of the Higgs boson, as it should, merely jacking up the ‘price’ of the channels that show more evidence (diphoton). This cheating trick is also common among economic ministers of certain countries that to hide inflation change the ‘weight’ of each product price in the total average, in favor of those products with lower inflation, as CERN changes the weight of each channel it averages in favor of those channels with higher production. But this is not how serious science is done. Present data still means merely there is likely a goldstone boson but NOT with the peculiar characteristics of the Higgs – a faulty theory that inflates what a Higgs does. So what we are likely to have is the first bosons of the ‘fractal scale’ of dark matter, likely to be made of quark-gluon explosive condensates.

- And this precision is important to understand what we, Relativists have been telling for decades, all along – that the predicted goldstone boson that opens the door to the dark matter membrane does not give mass to all particles, only to heavy quarks, transforming our light particles into them. This in fact is recognized for the first time in the Atlas experiment: ‘This (Higgs) mechanism [5– 10], which gives mass to massive elementary particles’…

We conclude that the importance of the Higgs for knowledge has been upgraded in the same proportion that its dangers have been degraded, according to the Corporative directives of this company and its Media Department, truly ‘expert’ in Orwellian Newspeaks:

Thus, guided by Higgsteria masterminded by the P.R.ess Office of CERN and the expected profits of the military-industrial complex that Nuclear Physics, even in its research arm, represents, mankind will ignore those risks, spend astronomical sums firing up the LHC at higher energies, and building new accelerators to mass-produce Higgs sub-products, H->T+S+B (toplet, strangelet, bottomlet liquids)… And so in a bizarre paradox we shall all risk our lives for the pleasures of studying an invisible entity which never manifests itself, but only shows in  a cascade of explosions that will ‘in crescendo’ excite physicists and quantum fluctuations till the dark world transforms us into itself.

And so instead of bizarre theories about the nature of all the matter of the Universe (the Higgs Mechanism in the P.R.ess version), the Occam’s principle has been imposed: the Higgs is a particle that kills and transforms our mass into dark matter, but it does not create mass, an intrinsic property of space-time, as Einstein wanted.

Since ‘ the Universe is simple but not malicious’. A. Einstein. And so we don’t need more particles than the ones we have (3 families of quarks of increasing mass and the different bosons of those membranes), extended in a series of fractal scales of space-time (the quark, inner atom scale; the external, quantum,  electro-magnetic, light scale, we inhabit and the bigger cosmic, gravitational scale of dark matter). In that increasingly proved fractal, dual scale Universe, certain doors, describe mathematically how matter and energy travels between scales. These doors are often vortices=particles of a certain membrane of space-time that act as bridges to the other membrane. Such is the case of black holes in the bigger scale and goldstone bosons in the lower scale, which transform our light matter into dark, heavy quarks…

Since indeed, the Higgs is just that virtual state of transformation of mass into heavy quarks, the ‘real’ entities, the goal of the process.  And so dark matter will with all probability be made of the known-known heavy quarks of the II and III family; of strangelets and toplet substances, of which strange stars, Novas and probably black holes are made of. Yet the problem of exploring those quark-gluon substances born out of the decay of weak force bosons (W, Z, H triad) in this planet, is that dark matter feeds and controls our matter ‘breaking its symetry’, and transforming electromagnetic energy into heavy quark masses, in a process described by Einstein, M=E/c2, and called a mass bomb. So the research and understanding on how our light, electromagnetic membrane ‘dies’ and evolves into dark matter is as absurd as a researcher enthusiastic about committing suicide, cutting his wrists, to explore the speed of the bleeding flow… Since a extinct physicist knows nothing, mankind would do better stopping the obsession of CERN physicists for the study of the weak currents of energy that those bosons transfer to the dark world, when they break=kill the symmetry of ours.

II. A FAMILY OF GOLDSTONES: WHAT IS REALLY THE HIGGS

In graph 2, without the enhancement of the ‘mute CERN’s artist of graph 1′, that we print with permission of Mr. Penrose from heavy ion alert, it seems a new particle might lurk on the range of 125 Gev, unknown to this date (among other bumps, i,e, at 105 standing clearly also, when not highlighted by the red line drawn of CERN’s graphic ‘artists’  – a subtle subliminal message to make you feel in the graph 1 they handled to the press, that such data was specially important).
CERN considers this particle to be the Higgs but this is not fully proved, as the Higgs does not have any special mass and it is a boson. CERN acknowledge it does not know if this particle is a boson for certain and any mass could be attached to the Higgs (unknown parameter). So more data is needed. What we see there is a bump which is wide at 125, but also a bump in data background, which implies a higher background noise from other possible reactions. So we conclude that there are 3 fairly equal possibilities of finding at that spot a) background reaction that increased gamma radiation b) a couple of particles, a Higgs duplet or c) a Goldstone triplet used in processes of death of our matter (‘symmetry breaking’ in the scholar jargon) mediated by top quarks, without need of new, invisible fields.
A) The hypothesis of background requires a 3rd graph, which i didnt make erasing the red line and doing a wave-like line that would de facto joint all their points as they experimentally are.
Indeed, the 4th order polynomial is really a variational wave-like distribution that makes the peak even less remarkable. With a bit of imagination the reader can substitute the red line for a wave-like one and see how neatly the variation integrates on that wave. Then he can observe the enormous background radiation on those wave nodes, which make the bumpt statistically related to background events, not specific events of a ‘new’ particle.
B and C are a particle and so we can also consider them equally possible.
Now, if we have 3 possible outcomes of this experiment, background radiation, a Higgs doublet or a Goldstone-Nambu triplet, this is not a discovery but a 1/3rd probability, which is a sigma 0, in any serious scientific project, a non-discovery, only an announcement
But things get more juicy. Is this 126 mass an specific property of the Higgs, to justify maybe a better probability? Not at all. The theoretical Higgs if it exists, has an uncertain mass. Thus a new particle range always corresponds to the Higgs (since we do not know its mass). And what CERN has done is to consider that this MUST be the Higgs NOT any other thing.

Further on, as per Hauer’s conference CERN has neither proved this unknown particle is a boson.

And  Photons (we have only seen the decaying photons NOT the Higgs), can decay from many other particles. They are, conceded, often a signature of bosons, any of them, yet even so, it does not take us further than where we were: A) background B) Higgs C) Goldstone.

Conclusion the Higgs is not still found, by any of the minimal methods of veracity and truth, defined in serious scientific announcements, but the world has been convinced it is found. Because the world of media is infotainment. It is no longer serious, not even in an issue of this transcendental importance (not the Higgs but CERN and its machine). And so finally the ‘sheeple’, which believes the press has joined in.

And this is the most fascinating of all facts. How a pointless, ignorant mass of journalists, merely transcribing news have accepted with no criticism the discovery of the century (-;

The risks of golden stones: conversion of light matter into dark matter.
Now, if you are able to stop your naive beliefs in ‘big science’ as an idealist endeavor, and realize unlike our journalists, how CERN takes mankind for a ride, whenever it wants; in this post we shall consider not only this shaky ‘statistical lie’ but one which is at the core of the ride: the Higgs or any other goldstone boson does not give mass to our atoms and particles, it only devours them and gives mass to the quarks of the dark world.
And this is a whole difference respect to the ‘importance’ and risks of the Higgs.
That the Higgs gives mass to you and me is the ‘big lie for funding’ by cern, acting with corporative strategies not to the service of scientific truth.
That the Higgs or any other goldstone boson is a door to the dark world, which ‘transmutes’ as the philosophical, golden stone did, all what it touches into dark, heavy quarks into which it ‘decays’, killing our world, is the ‘biological’ truth that CERN and all physicists, in their ivory tower of abstract jargons, hide; so mankind is not aware of what really all that ‘breaking the symmetry’ jargon and ‘mass bosons’ mean:
CERN is a center of high energy research studying the range of energies in which our matter dies and decays, warping into heavy, massive bosons and quark condensates, the substance which implodes stars and galaxies into black holes, strangelets and quasars.
 So the dangers of this ‘travel’ to dark matter are the unknowns-knowns:
We know dark matter controls and feeds (transforms into itself), light matter, even if we do not know the details. But this ‘known’ has become an ‘unknown’ at CERN, which is a corporation that has a budget first and so lies out of its hat whenever it is needed, and then is a group of researchers on the roll pay – and not the other way around, as people and the center try to portray itself a group of ‘idealist’ geniuses searching for the meaning of it all. 
So now CERN doesn’t know officially dark matter eats our matter and breaking the symmetry; since this unknown-known is now the objective of CERN: to produce as many goldstone bosons and its decaying particles, strange and top quarks as possible for decades to come. And since knowledge is never satisfied, when it gives you new prices and new budgets, sooner or latter those bosons and quarks will condensate stabilize and start the chain reactions CERN considers an impossible ‘known’.

Fact is Goldstones break the symmetry = kill our matter and this is what CERN studies and this is dangerous and this should be explained in a layman jargon to politicians and the public, who find fascinating that ‘metaphysical symmetry’ talk but understand nothing of what really means.

This is truly the ultimate alibi of CERN or Wall Street, of Nuclear Physicists and Economists: people are more afraid of making fools of themselves, of suffering in their ego, than of death and poverty. So they take this kind of abuse from nuclear physicists as they take it from bankers, just because they use imposing jargons, ‘breaking the symmetry’, ‘collateral debt obligation’, instead of ‘killing matter’ and ‘toxic asset’.

And so with that seemingly powerless trick, c.d.o.s were sold and the need to risk the planet’s existence to study the death of our matter (how nuts this is), were hidden by the beautiful task of studying how ‘the symmetry of the electromagnetic world we live in’ is broken.

But of course the possible goldstone is for CERN, the horn of plenty, the perfect alibi for future funding. So we shall have Higgsterya for long.

The scientific method and its 3 tenants of truth: logic, mathematical and experimental consistency.

So how can we resolve what they have found? If we were to use NOT the ‘corporation’s method’, in this case CERN’s P.R.s doing their campaign to increase their ‘trademark’ and ‘sell’ to politicians the budget for its upgrade, but the experimental, scientific method and its 3 ‘tenants’ of truth, experimental evidence, mathematical consistency, and logic causality, we would come to a self-evident truth:


We have not found God’s particle, the Higgs, but a Goldstone, and no, this is not a silly game of words, but truly another type of particle called aproppiately the Goldstone boson by his discoverer, Jeffery Goldstone.

Let us explain ourselves as always in fractal scales of complexity. In brief. We have a sign, the Gamma ray photons that peaks up at 126 gigas. This means a particle might lurk there, any particle. We have negative signature for the Higgs specific decay reactions – meaning in layman jargon that many particles can become gamma ray photons, any bosons and some others, but certain reactions which were not found, are specific of the Higgs. Higgs decays into->Top plus antitop or Bottom plus antibottom or tau+antitau. And of those reactions in fact at 126 gigas less than expected (negative sigma probability) were found.

So now if I were a serious scientist I wouldnt call a conference for the entire world to affirm that I have discovered a Higgs. This is totally specific and could have only be claimed if the specific Higgs reactions of massive top quarks plus top antiquarks in which the Higgs alone explodes were found.

A serious scientist would have only said that a particle might have been found at 126 and it could be a boson because it had decay in a mode proper of bosons without charge. And this means it could be a family of bosons known for 50 years,  called Goldstone bosons, among which the Higgs is one but not the only one and certainly not the likely one by lack of its specific top-antitop decay signature.

Alas the conference should have merely declared that there was a probability of finding a particle, maybe a Goldstone boson, if we were not living in an age of pure corruption that now extends also to hard science, where a corporation which has stacked 10 billion $ budgets in finding a certain particle MUST – not may but MUST – find it. 

I’m not sure if I am explaining myself well because obviously I cannot use equations in a blog for scientists and ethical people, but not for physicists, so I will repeat like a mandala those basic ideas, as CERN repeats ad infinitum its dangerous experiments till instead of hitting a gold pot of the stone variety hit a black hole… So let us do a recap.

Recap. CERN might have found a particle, which has not the specific signature of the Higgs, as it did not increase the number of massive quarks created which is what the Higgs only does. It is therefore a possible particle. Because the photonic peak of desintegration tends to be caused by a boson, it might be a boson. This type of bosons are called Goldstone bosons. This is so far what CERN has found, a goldstone boson which due to the lack of signature specific of the Higgs, will likely not be the Higgs but other variety.

The G Particle right on the spot (-: I thereby nominate Mr. Goldstone for a Nobel prize.

The logic and mathematical method. Higgs doesn’t give mass to all particles; it just helps to kill our mass transformed into heavy quarks.

Now, the first leg of truth we need of the 3 ‘sustains’ of any event, THE EXPERIMENTAL METHOD, tells us that the particle found experimentally is probably a boson and likely not the Higgs – no specific signature.

The experimental method has failed and this means that without one of the 3 legs the ‘chair’ of truth will fall. But normally the experimental method fails in serious science, because the logic and mathematical method have failed somewhat. And given the astounding development of computers and hence of mathematical systems, it is normally the logic consistency of the system, which the researcher not the computer must provide ‘a priori’, before ‘doing mathematical physics’, what has failed here. So now we have to explore a bit why indeed the Higgs is not likely the goldstone we found as the specific ‘treat’ of the Higgs is to give masses to other particles. And this is absolute non sense when we apply seriously the logic and mathematical method to Mr. Higgs theory of a weak-force boson that exists only in the ‘border membrane’ between the light world and the dark world, giving mass to all the particles of our Universe.

If we strip the Higgs of that falsity however it becomes a more regular goldstone-type boson. And this is likely what we got. So let us imagine, when things calm down and more experiments are carried to the risk of our lives (if a B.Hole appears and Einstein is right this circus is over) that many more goldstones of whatever specific type are found, tabulated and proofs of their bosonic nature appear. This means a new particle related to the W and Z and electroweak forces is found, which should be called a goldstone boson, G.

This is what we have, the G particle not the Higgs.

And this is the likely answer by the scientific method because logically the Higgs does not give mass to all the other particles of the Universe; it is not the key element to explain the meaning of mass.

Then Mr. Goldstone as Mr. Nambu, the co-writer of his work, prior to the Higgs (merely a specific variety of the Goldstone boson that does very weird things according to Higgs that no other boson does, like giving mass to electrons, something which has never been even described properly in mathematical terms), would be Nobel candidate, and as Nambu, receive the Nobel prize for his work on the electroweak force and its breaking of the space-time of our Universe (the so called symmetry breaking which merely means our universe is broken and fed into the universe of dense masses, which of course we fear it will happen not only in a single goldstone boson but in enough quarks to blow up us all).

Of course, this would be science as it used to be done before the age of audiovisual celebrities, ‘big science budgets’, ‘damned lies and statistics’.

Penrose writes me in a private email that goldstone is ambiguous in his papers about the existence of the Higgs mechanism, latter explained in more detail,… no wonder why.

Indeed, even if the results are proved the goldstone boson we shall found it does not have the Higgs mechanism. It will not give mass to light particles that form our world, electrons and light-space, and light quarks, nor there is a single explanation on how it could do that, which is the fundamental ‘theoretical lie’ of CERN: to have blown up the importance of the Higgs, a particle related to the weak force as other heavy bosons, the Z and the W, but NOT the meaning or explanation of mass, provided by Einstein’s work on gravitation. In that sense, the H, properly called G will complete the triad, W, Z, G, of intermediate states that break the symmetry of our space-time membrane absorbing our energy and transforming it into heavier mass, to give birth by its final decay to the densest quarks of the Universe (b, T). A mass which enters the accelerator accumulates energy, and then E=Mc2, as that energy coils into a vortex of gravitational mass, through those transitional W, Z, G states ends up becoming a massive quark.

This is really what there is to the Higgs. And yet, because it was needed so much money and the idea of finding yet another particle of the zoo of nuclear physics, was not relevant enough (more or less it was like asking 10 billion $ to fund a project to find a new, wonderful ant that could explain the meaning of the Universe). It took a lot of chuptzah and ambition to take the bold step of rejecting the much more promising advances made by relativists on the steps of Einstein’s work and accepting the weird Higgs Mechanism to explain mass. And because you cannot force-feed science it simply doesn’t work.

This absurd affirmation- that the Higgs gives mass to all particles of the Universe – vehemently denied by those who follow Mr. Einstein’s work on the strong principle of equivalence is just another attempt as those Mr. Hawking with its evaporating black holes, to invade the territory of Relativity, Cosmology and gravitation, described by Einstein, with Quantum theories that are not fit to explain gravity. It is like explaining physics with biology or history with the Newtonian laws. It simply doesn’t work.

But power has expanded quantum theories into all those realms as power has expanded ‘monetary values’ to invade all ethic values. So now the ‘values’ and laws of quantum theory MUST explain also mass, regardless…

Again, of this, few are aware, as quantum physics represents 30% of the world GDP and Relativity 0%. So in terms of money, Relativistic research is not exactly in the same league. But that doesn’t mean Mr. Einstein’s cosmological discoveries are invalidated by money and the number of theorists of each discipline, which obviously will defend their point of view. Am I inventing a confabulation theory? Not, of course, apart from the one century old standing arguments of Einstein vs. Bohr, which has made Einstein’s work ‘fair game’ for quantum physicists, this bias must be explained with the simple facts of economics. There are two main branches of physics, relativity and quantum theory. Relativity deals with all things related to mass, gravitation and the cosmological, macroscopic scale of the fractal Universe. Quantum theory with all things related to electromagnetism, particles and other forces of the microscopic Universe. Both theories therefore relate to two different scales of space-time and in the fractal discontinuous space-time models which are slowly but steadily displacing the continuous, standard model expanding our concepts as nothing has done since Galileo, those scales are ‘self-similar’ (a fractal, systemic concept) not equal. So there is no quantum gravity, and so we give ‘to the Caesar what belongs to the Caesar': gravity and mass belongs to Einstein.

No Higgs is required when we understand Einstein – a Goldstone maybe, for the limited work of converting us into dark matter.

In quantum physics the point of view is that forces are mediated by particles exchanged between fermions. But this applies to electromagnetic forces. Gravitation is an in/formative, one way only force. And so it is a vortex of space-time that attracts as hurricanes do, the faster it turns till the limit of rotational c-speed in black holes, the most attractive. In brief, mass is, an intrinsic property of a vortex of space-time.

The Higgs deals with the weak force at quantum scale if it exists, with roles similar to the Z and W bosons and so not the panacea of anything. Just another particle.  The jump needed to complete the standard model is the understanding of fractal scale time, not the attempts by quantum physicists of invading Einstein, following the one century old quarrels between Einstein and quantum physicists and specially the fact that 30% of the world GDP comes from quantum physics, as we are closer to that sclae than from relativity which deals with the Universe. So the overwhelming number of jobs and experts in the physics world are quantum theorists and they need to theorize and expand their field, taking over other fields.

So the conclusion is: Yes, a particle, the last boson of the triad of heavy bosons that transform ‘light’ matter into dense quarks has been found. No, it is not the God’s particle, and probably it will not end up being the Higgs but any of its predecessor theories (Nambu-Goldstone bosons) which completed the role of the W and Z particles in the ‘destruction of our mass’, reconverted in dark matter at the LHC. In that regard, its discovery merely is a new step in that steady and ultra-dangerous entrance into the dark world of ultra-heavy, maybe hyperluminal particles of dark energy and dark matter responsible for the death (symmetry breaking) of light matter.

Recap. Of all the different mathematical, self-similar theories that describe this ‘Goldstone boson’ (which was the real name, given also the ironic concept of a ‘gold stone’, that indeed converts stones in this case particles into pure gold for the researchers), the most interesting are Nambu’s work, since they describe most clearly the process of death of our matter and its transformation into heavier particles. So the particle will probably be, according to the laws of the scientific method a Goldstone-Nambu particle, G.

And that is extremely dangerous for us, one more step into the dark world of top predator matter that kill ours, breaking the symmetry (synonimous of death and transformation of our world of light space into dark mass.)

Since Goldstones of any variety, indeed transform all what they touch into dark matter, top-antitops, bottom-antibottoms, heavy quarks, the explosive substance of Novas and supernovas, black holes and strange stars, the most likely candidates to the 96% of dark mass, which dominates the Universe. Now we know there is one particle that can transform us into ‘them’, now we have the puzzled almost complete, now we have the boson of the dark world calling at our doors, and the purpose of cern will be from here onwards to produce enough Gs to populate the accelerator of tops and bottoms and strange quarks and charm quarks, the quark-gluon explosives that can destroy the Earth.

The dangers of Goldstones. The G completes the triad of bosons in which our matter decays.

In Nambu’s and self-similar formulations (technicolor, Top color, Higgless theories, etc.) you don’t need an invisible field that nobody observes, which breaks the main laws of epistemology (Occam’s razor, the Universe is simple and so the simplest explanation is truth), but merely the top quark, the top predator mass of the Universe, feeds on our mass breaking our symmetry and the process implies 3 intermediate states of that mass, as W, Z and G particles that live so little that cannot really be considered real but just virtual states of transition; as when water freezes and there is in between a state of water/ice. So when light matter becomes top quark dark matter it freezes into mass through those states.

In essence, you exist in a light-space Universe, made of electromagnetic and light particles (u-d quarks). This is the first family of mass. As always in the fractal Universe there are 3 families of ‘evolution’ of any system, which implies an increase of its information parameter. Those are the 3 ‘states’ of any ‘field of space-time’. And their reason of existence is simple. You live in a Universe of two parameters energy and in/form/ation, form, and so energy transforms into information and then when all is information, it explodes and dies.

For example, molecular matter is first energetic gas, then becomes balanced, exi, liquid and finally solid, informative, formal mass. And then the big-bang explosion of mass devolves it back into pure energy.

You live a young, energetic age, reproduce in your maturity your energy and information and then warp, become formed, informative in your 3rd age and then die in an explosion.

Well matter also has 3 families of increasing information till arriving to the top quark, which probably condensates stars into top quark stars, aka black holes of self-similar mass-density through a big-bang explosion of death of a star. And the transformations of states require to ‘break the symmetry’ of our matter and make it into W->Z->H which ‘decays’ into Top-antitop, or Bottom-antibottom quarks.

But the idea that those particles of a ‘different space-time membrane’ of higher density and energy and mass (the dark world of black holes and strange stars), also give mass to all the other particles of the Universe, including electrons, which are all over the Universe in the thin membrane of light-space, even without materializing (as nowhere in our light universe there are those energies), constantly is so aberrant than only the complete despise of one of the 3 foundations of the scientific method, experimental, logic and mathematical evidence, by modern physics can explain why people ‘believe’ this.

Indeed, mathematical consistency in this case exists in several theories. The Higgs is the less consistent, Nambu’s the more. So there is a possible 3rd heavy boson. Experimental evidence now is important, but CERN has falsified it to make it look like a HIggs. Indeed, of the 5 channels that desintegrate a Higgs, the 3 specific of the Higgs (transformation into top-antitop, bottom-antibottom or tau-antitau particles of heavy mass), have not occured, in fact they gave negative sigma values meaning that they found less reactions that expected on the specific signatures of the Higgs: – 2.5 for tau, – 2.3 for bottom and so those negative sigmas cancelled most of the positive sigmas and make the discovery NOT specially relevant to identify the particle precisely as the Higgs.

In that regard the corruption of truth by CERN, the lack of ethics of this company that endangers our life for nothing, the entire mindset of this company is much closer to that of the ‘experts’ in finances of Goldman than the idealistic myth those researchers have built around themselves. It is a new low in the nuclear industry’s trade mark mixture of arrogance, ignorance and cult to death. Those particles are about the death of our matter not the meaning of the Universe. And yet mankind needs a religion to die for, a goatkeeper’s god of the bronze age, a tribal nation that denies the unicity of the homo sapiens, or now a meaningless particle that only can bring the kindgom of Kali to the Earth…

III. EINSTEIN VS. HIGGS: EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE: MASS AS A VORTEX OF SPACE-TIME.

 The conclusion is obvious: if the Higgs boson really exist, at its real value face is a rather secondary particle, not the particle of god or the giver of mass). Since neither the Higgs or any other quantum theory explain the mass of particles… Let us then end, resuming at the simplest possible level why Mr. Higgs particle is a hoax that does not give mass to other particles and the correct theory of mass is that of Mr. Einstein.

(For those audiovisually inclined we have resumed those themes in a ‘humorous video’ with plenty of information on the difference between Mr. Einstein’s work on mass, and that of Mr. Higgs and Mr. Hawking. )


Einstein’s mass theory 
The easiest proof that Einstein’s mass theory (mass as an accelerated vortex of gravitational forces) is called Ockam’s principle. The simplest theory is more truth. So when the earth was put in its place astronomy simplified Copernicus complex orbits in simplex Kepler. So does the proper way to advance our knowledge of mass… Einstein. The beauty and simplicity of the Universe, according to Einstein’s mass theory will never cease to marvel us.
All becomes reduced to a Universe of 2 cyclical accelerated motions, vortices of mass and charges in the 2 scalar membranes of the gravitational and electromagnetic world, and its 2 inverse lineal accelerated motions, gravitation and electromagnetism, trans-form-ing each other ad eternal:
Lineal Motion/Energy/Space  (G, ¥) < => Cyclical Time Vortices of Information (M, Q)
Both imploding and exploding, E=M, in eternal, infinite rhythms all over of the Universe. Clocks of time, charges and masses storing the information of the Universe in its cyclical forms and rhythms, coiling and uncoiling into lineal electromagnetism or gravitational space, in two symbiotic membranes that construct the symphonies of the Universe.

In Physics, according to Einstein the information of a particle is its mass. This can be easily proved theoretically, mathematically and empirically.

In the previous pictures of masses as vortices obtained in bubble chambers (beg. article) tthere is an obvious empirical proof. All pictures of masses and charges appear as vortices with an accelerated inward motion. Let us now deal with the other proofs (and let us remember that truth in epistemology of science is based in 3 pillars – empirical, logical and mathematical proofs.

Einstein’s Mathematical proof

The mathematical proof is simple, given by the 2 main equations of Einstein, which relate the frequency of information (a time parameter), the mass and the energy of physical systems:

ExT=K, E=Mc2, hence M=K/T=Kv; where v is the frequency of rotation of the vortex of mass.

Thus a mass is a vortex of space-time that carries the information of the Universe in its frequency.

This also has empirical proofs: All vortices attract inwards with a force equivalent to the strength of the rotating vortex. So a hurricane attract more when it turns faster. And so a mass, which is a hurricane of space-time attracts more the faster it turns. Moreover vortices of all kind are ‘accelerating’ inwards: Vo x Ro = K, which means that the shorter the radius is, Ro, the faster its speed, Vo, so the closer you come to the vortex, the faster it turns, the more it attracts, the stronger its gravitational force is, and the more mass it has.

Einstein’s Conceptual proof.

Now this simple equation is in accordance with Einstein’s Principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitational force. Both are the same in General Relativity. And so why we should stop this ‘comparison’ at a certain point of the accelerating vortex? Since in the Universe we have never seen ‘substance’ but only motions, it is logic to think that what we call a mass is exactly that: the final region of acceleration into a vortex of gravitational forces. Such vortex obviously offers a resistance to motion (inertial mass), which is dependent of the speed/acceleration of such motion.

But what type of accelerated motion?  Well it turns out that there are only two accelerated motions, lineal and cyclical accelerations. Further on, accelerated motions can produce forces that ‘work’. And Newton gave us a simple equation to describe ‘all’ the forces of the Universe: F = M (cyclical acceleration) x A (lineal acceleration). This is fascinating because it means that the Universe is made of 2 accelerated motions: F = M x A, where A is lineal acceleration or ‘energy’ and Mass is a vortex with more dimensional form, or cyclical acceleration, whose form and frequency carry the in-form-ation of the Universe.

Of course when we enter into deeper analysis of the mathematical details, a mass vortex is more complex. Einstein described it with a set of equations that go beyond the scope of this introduction. But there is a different version of those equations much simpler – the gravito-magnetic version found by Heaviside, recently proved experimentally by a Probe, which are mimetic from the equations of electromagnetism.

And so since charges are obvious accelerated vortices of electromagnetic forces, it is self-evident that if masses produce a self-similar field system, they will be accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.

As Einstein put it ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’. And so there you have, the 3 simplest, more important equations of Physics, F=m a, E=Mc2, E=hv and then the more complex, equally essential Maxwell and Einstein’s equations come all together to accept mass as an ‘internal’ property that define mass and hence need no further fields and esoteric particles to be explained.

And indeed, the fact that Einstein’s equations can be written as electromagnetic equations is also the key to the unification equation of the G and Q Universal constants of charges and masses as two vortices of two self-similar forces of two different fractal scales of the Universe – one of the most striking advances of marrying the extended Principle of Equivalence and the recently proved fractal nature of the Universe – the true paths of modern research in mass theory, which the thunder of CERN cannot silence…

Because of course, and this is the beauty of science – you cannot corrupt a scientific truth, you need to prove it with the tenants of truth of epistemology and the scientific method…

And so it is left to proof the ‘Einstein Mechanism’ just the empirical proof… Look around you, every single vortex in the Universe attracts and every particle is a vortex; look around you, because it is an intrinsic property of every particle we do not need to find any new field, any new boson, anything… just what you see is what it is.

 

Theoretical. In essence Mr. Hawking as Mr. Higgs never understood Einstein, despite of making a living on denying him. Mr. Hawking believes that there is only a single time in the Universe and black holes can work as time machines. Wrong. There are infinite time cycles and you cannot go back in time, as those cycles are independent of each other and so you can only at best move backwards a time cycle. Second he thinks black holes evaporate information. Wrong. Black holes precisely create mass by bending electromagnetic space into mass as we have explained. They create, don’t erase information. 

Mathematical. What did Hawking gets wrong in his equations? The two principles of Entropy he denies, when he affirms information evaporates. But also when he thinks that an ultra-hot ‘born’ black hole, in an ultra-cold Earth’s environment is going to break the first law of thermodynamics and become a perfect machine, as it becomes even hotter evaporating. Instead the hot item cools down and evaporates the external world – our world. This any high school student knows it. Or else your coffee will evaporate and the cup freeze. Now if you interpret his equation without this conceptual error, the result is obvious: the black hole will be born exceedingly hot and so the smaller it is the faster it will evaporate the surrounding environment.

Indeed, in simplified terminology Hawking says: Mass = Konstant/Temperature.

And when we reject his entropic error enclosed in the way he dynamizes that equation all is clear: The black hole is born at maximal temperature, with minimal mass, but as temperature diminishes, its inverse parameter, mass grows, POINT. This self-evident truth is what I could not deny for theoretical and ethical reasons and got me into this nightmare (1). Why then physicists defend this absurdity? It has to do a lot with non-theoretical reasons (celebrity, mass-media, industrial profits, CERN’s policy, etc.) but also with the way ‘complicated’ arguments have always impressed people, who without fully understanding them accept it. The jargons and complicated mathematical arguments used by Hawking and other quantum theorists do that work. It is like the banker’s speech on toxic assets. That is the name we have now ‘after’ they convinced us of their enormous value. The ‘black hole factory’ is the proper name of the LHC but that won’t be accepted ‘after’ as a matter of fact, it evaporate us.

Experimental. We never saw one evaporating. All feed on mass – the faster the smaller the born black hole is. And this is proved by Novas, which grow so fast after the birth of a micro-black hole seed in his interior. And it is proved by recent observations of small black holes which are far more active than big ones. So one it is born it will grow at c-speed swallowing the Earth within seconds.

- So why light has no mass? A tautology: Light does not close a cycle, but it is a wave that deflects the cycle into an open wave. Hence it never has mass. But if we were to calculate its mass in terms of energy the higher the frequency of the web (analogous to the mass frequency) the more mass-energy it has.

- Then there is the scalar, fractal structure derived of the homology of the equations of charges and masses which however exist in two different scales. This is a key discovery for the fractal structure of the Universe and proves one of my fundamental mathematical findings: the unification equation of the G and Q Universal constants of charges and masses as two vortices of two fractal discontinuous scales of space-time, the quantum, smaller world and cosmic upper scale.

And we will return to that at the end of this article, when considering in depth the consequences of upholding and evolving Einstein’s theory of mass, instead of seeking and absurd scalar particle that explains so little…

- Finally, why the Universe accelerates between galaxies? It is accelerating and will end into pure entropy? No. Self-evident. Physicists ignore the meaning of information and mass and they have a continuous theory of space. None of that works anymore. As each time cycle ‘breaks’ space into an inner and outer region. So do the time cycles of the Universe of which the biggest clock is a galaxy that ‘warps space into time-mass’. So the acceleration of space between galaxies is balanced by its warping within them. And both balance each other: gravitation informs light-space into mass vortices, galaxies. And then light-space the substance of which our space is made, once it abandons the galaxy, stretches his frequency (doppler effect as ‘real’) till its ‘generational time cycle’ of around 10 up to 10 years dissolves it back into non-perceivable, lineal, gravitation with no form. But this and so many other fascinating results of a proper theory of time cycles require more knowledge of physics that I expect a non-physicists to have, so we shall end here the simpler version of Einstein’s mass theory.

So why the Higgs?
The errors of a continuous model of the Universe, which obliges to consider only a single Unifying theory, which therefore must depart either from Quantum or Relativity. This is false in the future standard model which will be a fractal model of discontinuous space-time. In that model both are incompatible, because they are two different scales in size and range so accordingly Relativity breaks in the quantum sclae and the quantum scale hardly affects the cosmological one. But that is the future of science, XXI century physics, which is NOT CERN, just the swan song of XX century physics, but a new paradigm…
So alas! since both cannot be put together quantum physicists are in the illusory quest of reducing relativity and gravitation to their turf and explaining them with quantum particles. Hence the need for the Higgs.

We don’t need the Higgs. The Higgs is just a mathematically poorly constructed theory that Nuclear Physicists have sold out to an audience – the establishment of the military-industrial complex… What people should understand is this: even if the Higgs was found it is only a particle related to certain reactions of the ‘temporal, informative force ‘par excellence’ of the Universe – the weak force that trans-forms particles; but it is NOT the particle that gives mass to all other vortices of space-time (aka particles), neither explains as we have done the obvious relationship between mass and size of the particle (Max. Mass = Min. size by virtue of the inward accelerated motion of any vortex) which is the rule that differentiates the different weights of each particle.

So why we need Hawking’s evaporation? 

Hawking’s evaporation is the same kind of error: a quantum theorist trying to invade relativity with quantum, false effects.
Black holes however are not quantum species but cosmological ones from other membrane and force of informative nature, gravity. This, Hawking never understood because it is the future of physics and his work is old. But he didn’t have at least like Higgs the common sense of retiring, as Higgs put it, ‘because I couldnt cope with the advances of mathematics to do further research’.
Hawking in that sense has not learned the implications of fractals and Information Theory so he still works with entropy-only, disordered theories.
This is right only for quantum, electromagnetic forces, which are energetic, disordered entropic but gravitational forces are informative, attractive, they form, in-form particles. Mass creates information, black holes create mass, information does not evaporate, only if we bend the laws of mass, information and gravitation to create a fantasy called quantum gravity.
Yet because the duality of energy/information is so ill understood by physicists (that is the realm of complexity theorists, my discipline), errors like those of Hawking keep creeping in Physics and Nature defies them, not finding a single evaporating black hole in the entire Universe.

In that regard, what we face at CERN is not only an existential problem but an intellectual problem: quantum physicists work with a single arrow of entropy=energy, ignoring all about the sciences of information and the meaning of masses as information, forms, dimensional form; and are halting the development of true science, using the methods of religions and the military to impose their false ideologies of the Universe – censorship, bullying, money and political power. But they cannot censor, paraphrasing Einstein, ‘the thoughts of God’, the laws of the Universe, and the consequences of creating the most powerful, attractive vortices of mass of the Universe on planet Earth.

We really need it to survive. Since, now with the new propaganda machine greased and funds coming, we might have them coming in 2015 at 14 tev. The problem is the Universe doesn’t need it. And the Universe takes primacy over man, and this neither prophets and scientists of lately it seems, seem to understand.

Nobody really believed in Hawking when he published. Then as he became famous and an industry of popular physics, it became tolerated. Only when CERN needed it to prove itself ‘safe’, it became dogma not to discuss his work and simplistic negation of basic laws of physics.

But all this is not only to be blamed on physicists. They are defending their way of life at CERN. It is the people who blindly believe them as experts. Like the bankers who ab=used mankind in this crisis printing money for free because people do not understand how money is printed, physicists are abusing us because people don’t understand their maths. That is why I have made them so simple to you. In the future updates of this post, we shall develop the entire model in the themes concerned with mass and Einstein’s upgrade with more mathematical rigor. But what matters is to depart from sound conceptual analysis, which is where people and Higgs fail. Then once you have a wrong concept, maths can take you to any conclusion, as in both cases.

The funny part of it…

is that now the wrong concept is a fact – not the existence of a Higgs which might be truth after all, but we need seriously much more data for that, but the idea that the Higgs gives mass to all particles, which merely pumped up its importance to get funding going. And so an entire planet has a new religion – the Higgs.

This is funny of course only for non believers, like ‘the Life of Brian’ is funny, but physicists take this kind of truths very seriously like the Brianists do :) So the Higgists will fight to convey new methods to prove such a blatant lie and that is funny. You see an entire new type of twisted scholastic logic is needed for the task.

And so now the entire information industry, corrupted long ago by the military industrial complex and the celebrity circus and the ignorance of its practictioners etc.etc. will have the task to spread the belief and teach in their text books the ‘good news’ that the celebrity particle and the Higgs Mechanism have completed our understanding of the Universe – now we know it all! (the Einstein’s Mechanism of course does NOT exist officially, but I’m sure he would be amused as a pantheist with this new pan-psychism of those socially conscious electrons and approve :)

Good luck. I can imagine the teacher sweating and the students practicing the celebrity ‘move’ dispatching his text books right to his head at c-speed…

Im sorry but i can’t help it, LOL…Right now thousands of ‘research journalists’ who research by the chimpanzee method, wiki, copy and make some happy sounds, gee, gee… They must be now all chatting about the astounding advancement for the human species of having found the celebrity particle that prescient, socially conscious electrons love to chat with too…

What started as a joke between Master Magician, Leo Lederman, and a few colleagues on how to sell an accelerator, when the Nuclear Industry was in its lower moments has become now a dogma. In this ‘fantaphysical world’ constructed with evaporating black holes, invisible fields that however are everywhere giving mass to the tiniest electrons with a mammooth particle that only comes out of 5 trillion collisions examined, 1 in a trillionth, mind the reader. You and everything else has mass because the celebrity particle that only appears once in a trillionth is busy-busy giving mass to trillions of particles… Uhm, at 1 event for each trillionth of particle collisions, the time it will need to give mass to all the particles of my ‘trou noir’ is longer than the life of the Universe! I Lol… The eschatological sense of mankind, the search for the absurd, the disgusting, the tragic, death and the absolute all conveyed by that word reaches now new heights in this endeavor. What Weinberg called the ‘Toilet particle’ before it was needed to accelerate fundings and Lederman, the biggest lobbyist of the nuclear industry, in search for hundreds of millions of $ sold the toilet… of God to Reagan (-:

“The God Particle’ (p. 23): “The Higgs-Boson is the primary reason for the building of the super collider

‘Those who impose truth with the tools of power, will be the laugh of the Gods‘ Albert Einstein, true discoverer of the meaning of mass.

Recap.

CERN lied systematically on its conference on the found Higgs. The particles does NOT seem a Higgs. Only two proofs:
- The sigma 5 was achieved only combining the two more crowded channels, the Z and photon channel, discharging the 3 signatures that were negative sigma. A serious scientist will average all channels, and then we conclude there might be a Goldstone particle but it SHOULD NOT be the Higgs, whose specific channels were not found.
Introducing those other channels for an objective analysis “overall ATLAS data significance is just 2.5 sigma” (page 23/24).
- The Higgs mass must fluctuate brutally because according to theory it does so when it gives mass to every particle of the Universe, LOL. Well that particle is NOT fluctuating wildly.
So it is NOT the Higgs. It is a goldstone boson, which will be the ‘substance’ of the ‘next, scale’ of space-time, that of dark matter of higher density of mass and energy, in which Goldstones decay creating top and bottom and tau quarks of the heaviest quark family (and strongest known-known candidate to form dark matter, strangelets, toplets and top stars, aka black holes).
And if a boson particle exists in that range it discharges:
- Supersymetry (out: zero particles of all of them found)
- Higgs mechanism (out: this particle has nothing to do with the HIggs)
- Technicolor (this was my favorite of the standard model, but unless the bump is background or a virtual resonance of top-related events, it needs no further field.)
- A Sheet of light space-time, our quantum with max. C speed-distance-size level. Where the Photon is the boson, or ‘substance’ of the space-time we live and according to the duality of energy and information of all systems of the Universe appears either in its energetic, extended, distance-speed form (as a light beam) or as an informative coiled form, as a photon.
- A Sheet of space-time at cosmological >c speed-distance-size level, the dark matter scale, with a Goldstone as the boson, ‘substance’ which through the triad, W->Z->H, ‘breaks the symmetry’ of our space-time and transfers its momentum in the fomr of mass to those Heavier quarks in which those
heavy bosons decay.
 Where the electroweak force is simply the informative/temporal/transformative force that transforms our bosonic membrane of photons into the bosonic membrane of W-Z-H (a temporal form, that lasts longer in time and has no spatial range, according to the inverted laws of fractal time-space.)
Simple, elegant, beautiful but dangerous since if that one is truth, now CERN is going to make thousands of them when it upgrades at 14 TEv; till their decaying tops, bottoms and strange quarks condensate into strangelet, bottomlet or toplet condensates.

2. Unfortunately, we live in an age of ego trips, based in human authority not in objective laws of science, as if humans have forgotten that ‘who matters nothing in science’, it is all what, how and why.

Now for those who think I am here in egotrip too just with a ‘mass theory’ to sell (-;,
I am sorry but that is not the case.
Within the context of my work in the 5th dimension and the General Systems of the Universe, the understanding of masses and charges as the simplest clocks of time and information of the Universe is indeed an important result but it is not the most important discovery of those new disciplines – physicists have always as prima donnas of the weapons industry – hence the scientists most liked and invested by power – thought their discoveries and species are ‘the most important’ of the Universe. This is not truth.
What truly matters for further advancement of science is the understanding of the duality of energy and information, of motion and form, and how they create all the scales, entities, events and forms of reality.
And this requires to evolve the ‘real’ foundations of science, which is not physics, but logic, the language of time, and geometry, the language of space.
So for example, it matters far more than the new understanding of the informative, clock-meaning of masses and charges the discovery I did of the 4 Non-Euclidean Postulates of Geometry that complete the discovery of the 5th postulate of Non-Eucidean Geometry, in order to evolve mathematics and harmonize its geometrical laws with those of the fractal, discontinuous space-time we live in (astonishingly enough for 150 years mathematicians had changed the 5th postulate of geometry, without realizing that if points could have infinite parallels, they CANNOT be euclidean points ‘without breath’, and so those 4 other postulates needed to be changed).
Physics is just a mathematical explanation of smallish, and biggish, simple forms far away from human perception. Its laws though require still today the evolution of mathematics and logic, to the ternary logic of a Universe of multiple arrows of time, energy, information, past and future dimensions of time and its infinite present combinations that we perceive…
And so it matters more to understand the duality of ‘time logic’ as both, entropy-energy-motion and information-order-dimensional form co-exist in the creation of the space-time cycles and events of the Universe.
The discoveries obtained from such advances are far more important than those done in physics today by this or any other author. For example, from the duality of logic, as all systems are complementary systems made of ‘physical particles/biological heads that gauge information’ and ‘physical fields/biological bodies’ that process energy, we can easily explain  the ‘reasons’ of the life-death cycle of all systems , which is caused by the ‘switching’ in all systems between the arrows of information that creates life, as ‘young, gaseous energy’ is wrinkled into form (E->I) till the 3rd age of ‘solid information’ when time switches and the arrows of energy that erase information in the moment of death – either in big-bangs that erase the information of masses reconverted into pure energy or in the collapse of the nervous network that releases the cells.
We shall not overextend about my work outside the realm of physics in those posts, though it is needed from time to time to remind the reader that those ad hominem campaigns against opposers to CERN are just part of the strategy big companies implement to avoid criticism. On the contrary, the people who sued CERN did so out of a higher ethical and intellectual standard that those who ‘know’ and say nothing, precisely because we are pioneers of XXI century science and fill obliged to ‘enlighten’ mankind on dangers old and renewed, regardless of the consequences for our careers. It is a Kantian ‘moral imperative’, a burden that obliges.
And certainly it does not matter how long it takes mankind to upgrade their scientific understanding of those terms – mankind will, if it survives CERN upgrade their mind, because science always imposes its truths over power and ‘those who impose truth with power are the laughs of the Gods’ (Einstein). Paraphrasing Lincoln, ‘you can cheat all the people for a short time, some people all the time, but you cannot cheat all the people all the time’. And you cannot cheat scientists for very long. Indeed, as today, Mr. Hawking’s blatant counterscientific musings have not earned him a position in serious lists of the most respected physicists of the XX century (for example this paper on the top 40 ones fails to mention him or Mr. Higgs for that matter).
 
8 Comments

Posted by on December 23, 2011 in News

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers